Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | SEEBER Richard ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | HERRANZ GARCÍA Esther ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Commission presents a report reviewing the European Water Scarcity and Droughts Policy. It recalls that, following one of the most widespread droughts in 2003 affecting over 100 million people, with a cost of at least EUR 8.7 billion, the Commission adopted the Communication on water scarcity and droughts in the EU . This laid down a water hierarchy under which water demand management should come first, with alternative supply options only when the potential for water efficiency has been exhausted. This report assesses the 7 main policy options identified in that Communication and also reviews whether the policy on water scarcity and droughts has achieved its objectives of reducing water scarcity and vulnerability to droughts. It also looks into whether action taken in the implementation of the Directive 2006/60/EC (Water Framework Directive - WFD) has contributed to addressing water scarcity and droughts. This assessment is based on a number of studies launched by the Commission and on the assessment of the Member States river basin management plans (RBMPs).
Generally, the Commission considers that overall objective of the water scarcity and droughts policy - to reverse the water scarcity and droughts trends - has not been achieved, although there has been progress in implementing the 7 policy instruments identified in the Commission’s 2007 Communication. The report highlights certain points.
1. Integration of Water Scarcity and Droughts measures in the RBMPs : water scarcity and droughts are recognized as relevant issues by RBMPs across the EU. Water scarcity is reported for the whole Mediterranean area, and for some areas in Central, Eastern and Northern Europe but 41% of the RBMPs do not consider water scarcity as a relevant concern . Drought is reported for a wide range of River Basin Districts across Europe but 40% of the RBMPs do not consider drought relevant.
The analysis of water quantity aspects lacks adequate foundation in many RBMPs: quantity data are insufficient and water scarcity is often not clearly distinguished from droughts and vice-versa. Water demand scenarios are presented for only 35% and water availability scenarios for less than 25% of the RBMPs. 80% of the plans do not asses the uncertainty of data and 90% do not specify the sources of funds to implement the relevant measures.
Measures to ensure the achievement of the WFD objectives by enhancing the resilience of the ecosystems are included in 45% of the RBMPs. Only in a few basins that face water scarcity, restrictions to new water-consuming developments are envisaged as a high priority in the RBMPs.
The influence of other sectoral policies on the reduction of water scarcity and the mitigation of drought effects is not sufficiently covered: for only 12% of the RBMPs, the pressures on water resources by the different sectors are identified.
2. Gaps in the current Water Scarcity and Droughts policy : the Commission’s assessment shows a diversity of inter-linked policy gaps in addressing water scarcity and droughts in Europe. These include:
· conceptual gaps : the understanding of the causal relationships between drivers, pressures, states and impacts that would help identifying the most cost-effective measures for addressing water scarcity and droughts is still not sufficient. Water scarcity and droughts are often not distinguished and indicators to illustrate the two phenomena have so far been insufficient. Newly agreed indicators need to be calculated for the entire EU at appropriate geographical and time scale. This requires a coherent dataset at EU level;
· information gaps : the RBMPs include only limited data on current and future water demand and availability as well as on measures that target water scarcity and drought, availability of funding and their expected impact on WS&D. The absence of robust information hampers a proper assessment of the effectiveness and socio-economic impacts of measures;
· policy, governance and implementation gaps : overall, most support actions and measures proposed by Member States target pressures, state and impacts, giving priority to measures to increase water supply. Measures that target key drivers at the origin of water scarcity and drought, or the implementation of accompanying measures such as metering, pricing/subsidies and restriction of water consumption are proposed in a few RBMPs only. Responsibilities for and financing of the proposed measures is unclear. Adequate coordination with other planning processes and availability of financial resources is not satisfactory . Lastly, the links between water scarcity and ecological flows are not well established.
3. Tools for improving water quantity management: in addition to the European Innovation Partnership on Water and the European Innovation Partnership ‘Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability’ , the review highlights a number of tools to improve water quantity management in the next RBMPs. These include the following:
· Defining and implementing ecological flows : this requires the adaptation of current water allocation to consider the ecological needs of water-dependent ecosystems. If water allocations reflect ecological flow requirements, it will be possible to prevent or mitigate the effects of water scarcity and droughts.
· Defining and implementing targets for water efficiency : targets are best set at local level by stakeholders who have full knowledge of the different water use sectors and components of the hydrological cycle and who can ensure that targets are coherent and that efficiency measures are implemented where the socio-economic costs are the lowest.
· Promoting economic incentives for efficient water use : widening the scope of current economic instruments will provide incentives for sustainable water abstraction and use.
· Guiding land use to respond to water scarcity : ensuring that new economic development is coherent with the water availability is the basis for long-term sustainability, and specific attention on land use is required. This re-emphasises the need for proper integration between RBMPs and other economic and physical planning processes.
· Enhancing drought management in Europe : further development of the European Drought Observatory to operate as an early-warning system should be combined with an effective adaptation of the EU Solidarity Fund to cope with damages that could not be avoided.
· Promoting resilience to climate change : climate change is expected to worsen the impacts of already existing stresses on water, as changes in precipitation, combined with rising temperatures, will cause significant changes in the quality and availability of water resources. A combination of adaptation measures must be included in the policy answers to water scarcity and drought.
The report considers that the water scarcity and droughts policy has to some extent been considered as self-standing by Member States and a stronger focus on quantity issues in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive is critical. In the next implementation cycles of the Directive, this needs to be ensured along with further integration of water quantity issues into sectoral policies.
The policy gaps and concrete options to address them are considered in the Commission Communication 'Blueprint to Safeguard Europe's Water Resources with a view to integrating water quantity issues more fully into the overall policy framework. Where relevant, further policy measures may be addressed in the Adaptation to climate change Strategy foreseen for spring 2013.
The Commission presents the third follow up report to the Communication on water scarcity and droughts (WS&D) in the EU which identified seven policy areas that had to be addressed if Europe was to move towards a water-efficient economy. In June 2010, the Council recognised that WS&D are already serious problems in many European regions and invited the Member States to promote more efficient and sustainable water use and recalled that trustworthy data would be needed on WS&D events to support further policy development.
This report covers the period May 2009 to May 2010 and is based upon the responses of 21 countries to the Commission's annual questionnaire. It is focused on the building blocks of the future WS&D policy - water efficiency, better planning and adequate implementation instruments – which are key elements of the establishment of a water efficient economy that meets the challenge of the EU 2020 strategy .
The situation concerning water scarcity was as follows:
three Member States reported that they faced continuous water scarcity (CZ, CY, MT); five Member States reported that they faced droughts or rainfall levels lower than the long term average (FR, PT, HU, ES, UK); and four Member States experienced local limited water scarcity occurrences (FR, NL, RO and SE).
Consequently, mitigation actions were developed and restrictions were applied in order to restrict water use (FR), irrigation (RO, SE, CY) and shipping (NL) in some of the affected Member States. Six Member States reported that they did not experience drought or water scarcity situations (AT, BE, EE, IE, LU, SK), and the same applied to Switzerland (CH). The report gives further details on the extent of WS&D in the EU and the measures which are being put in place to address both situations. It also sets out the activities to be implemented by the Commission in preparation for the 2012 review of WS&D policy.
Blueprint : the Commission intends to adopt a "Blueprint" to safeguard Europe's waters by the end of 2012 based on assessments of the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC (the Water Framework Directive or WFD), WS&D policy and the vulnerability of water resources to climate change and other man-made pressures. This evaluation has a twofold purpose:
it will look back and assess the implementation and achievements of policies and measures in place to ensure the protection and availability of EU water resources, while identifying gaps and shortcomings; it will look forward at the evolving vulnerability of the water environment to identify measures and tools that will be needed in several EU policy areas in order to ensure a sustainable use of water in the EU in the long term;
The Blueprint will synthesise policy recommendations and will be accompanied by a number of new initiatives, including of a legislative nature if appropriate. It will also examine the needs for additional funding, incentives, measures and the establishment of the necessary support for data collection, scientific and technological development. It will consider the links between the various aspects of water policy, including those relating to quality and availability. The Blueprint will be developed in close consultation with stakeholders.
Financing : with regard to financing at EU level, the report notes that Member States plan to spend 26.9% of CAP Health-Check and European Economic Recovery
Plan (EERP) funds on water management. Of these funds, for the remainder of the current period, the various rural development programmes set out planned spending of EUR 184 million for water storage, EUR 568 million Euros on water savings technologies and EUR 119 million for wetland restoration. In the coming years rural development policy will remain an indispensable tool for improving care for the EU's precious water resources.
The next milestone of the WS&D policy is its review which will be published in 2012, in the Year of Water, as part of the Blueprint for Europe's waters.
In the next months, the Commission will focus on filling knowledge and data gaps and conducting an impact assessment for the review. The report notes that important knowledge gaps still exist as regards WS&D in the EU and trustworthy and comparable data are needed about the temporal and spatial distribution of water scarcity and droughts events, the expected impacts of climate change on water resources and the vulnerability of ecosystems, as well as the associated socio-economic aspects. As a part of the Common Implementation Strategy for the WFD period 2010-2012, an Expert Group is working on defining water scarcity and drought indicators. The Commission is also developing a set of vulnerability indicators for water related impacts under a set of climate change and socio-economic scenarios, and performing an inventory of potential adaptation measures and assessment of their impact, which gives a strong emphasis to WS&D issues.
The Commission has started an assessment of natural water retention measures and their potential impact i.e. on WS&D prevention. An upcoming Commission Communication will address the multiple benefits of green infrastructure including its role in water retention and mitigating the effects of extreme events.
The Commission’s work on the review will be supported by the outcomes of the assessment of the River Basin Management Plans, the modelling of water vulnerability to man-made pressures, the cost-benefit analysis of natural water retention measures, the inputs from the Environmental Agency, the JRC and Eurostat and the forthcoming Communication on a road map towards a resource efficient economy.
The Commission presented the second follow-up Report to the Communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union.
The aim of the report is to present the progress that has been achieved across Europe over the last year.
In April 2009 the European Commission presented a White Paper which sets out a framework for climate adaptation measures and policies to reduce the EU's vulnerability to the impacts of climate change . It stressed the need for further measures to enhance water efficiency and to increase resilience to climate change . 22 December 2009 was a milestone in European water policy. This is the date by which the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) required River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) to be adopted for all river basins across the EU. This will give a clearer overview of what Member States are planning in the respective river basins for tackling water scarcity and drought problems.
However, b y December 2009, several of the Member States where water scarcity and drought is expected to be most severe had not adopted their plans.
The document specifies the progress made in the seven key areas which must be tackled if Europe is to move towards a water efficient and water saving economy. These areas may be summarised as follows:
1. Full implementation of the Water Framework Directive : in this context, setting water pricing policies in a manner consistent with water availability remains a challenge at all levels of governance;
moving towards sustainable land use planning and the need to improve the financing of water efficiency within the framework of existing sectoral policies.
2. Allocating water and water-related funding more efficiently : large-scale development of economic activities such as tourism or farming could lead to over-abstraction of waters which can cause significant problems, particularly in water-scarce areas. Several activities linked to land-use planning are ongoing across the EU both at European and at national level. In particular, as regards agriculture , to respond to new challenges, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Health Check agreed in 2008 resulted in the inclusion of better water management objectives relating to cross-compliance. From 2010 Member States will have to define standards applying at farm level for compliance with existing national authorisation procedures when using water for irrigation. The Commission will carefully monitor the application of the cross-compliance rules resulting from the Health Check during the implementation phase. The tourism sector needs attention. A key challenge identified is to reduce water demand in the peak season and minimise resource use to reduce the ecological footprint and stress on water.
3. Improving drought risk management : as regards the development of drought risk management plans, the document considers that moving from 'crisis response' to 'risk management' in the context of water management is the way to improve society's resilience to water scarcity and droughts. The document states that the prototype of the European Drought Observatory (EDO) for drought forecasting, detection and monitoring in Europe is currently engaged in pre-operational production of drought indices using meteorological information.
It is also considered to further optimise the use of the EU Solidarity Fund and the European Mechanism for Civil Protection .
4. Considering additional water supply infrastructures : in those regions where water demand still exceeds the availability of resources, despite having exhausted all possible options to reduce water demand in line with the water hierarchy, new water supply infrastructures for the mitigation of drought effects could be considered. A study carried out for the Commission in December 2008 assessing the risks and impacts of four alternative water supply options (desalination, wastewater re-use, ground-water recharge, and rainwater harvesting) revealed that it is not possible to provide an EU-wide set of best available mitigation options . The documents highlights that the role of alternative water supply options will grow in the future due to climate change and the reduction of water availability, so particular attention should be paid to their implementation and the continuous improvement of knowledge in the field.
5. Fostering water-efficient technologies and practices : in July 2009 an assessment was finalised for the Commission showing that the introduction of mandatory requirements on water using devices under the extended Eco-design Directive could induce significant savings.
6. Fostering the emergence of a water-saving culture in Europe : following the adoption of the revised EU Ecolabel Regulation in November 2009, it is expected that the Ecolabel will play an increasingly important role in helping consumers buy environmentally friendly products, including those produced with lower water consumption and those that use less water. The Greening of Public Procurements is a major opportunity to stimulate the market for environmentally friendly products and technologies and to give priority to water-efficient products and technologies. The Commission strongly urges Member States to increase their level of green public procurement. The water footprint is increasingly used to raise consumers' awareness of water consumption. The Commission will consider whether it has a role to play in the future policy on water scarcity and droughts.
7. Improving knowledge and data collection : indicators are being produced under the Common Implementation of the WFD in co-ordination with the European Environmental Agency (EEA) and the Joint Research Centre (JRC). Research and development projects at both national and international level are playing a key role in seeking synergies between water scarcity and drought management policies. Following the request of the European Parliament the Commission will initiate pilot projects that could contribute to the work on tackling water scarcity and droughts.
Conclusion : the priorities of the 2007 Communication on water scarcity and droughts remain valid. M any measures have been implemented and actions carried out in response to the policy options identified in the Communication of 2007 but much m ore effort is needed to stop and reverse the process of over-exploitation of Europe's precious but limited water resources.
In 2010 the focus will be on water efficiency and in particular the potential for savings in domestic water use. The Commission will consider the options for EU measures on water savings that could be achieved by buildings (and will present them to stakeholders in 2011) and leakage reduction. The Commission's policy review on water scarcity and droughts in 2012 will focus on assessing what is being achieved and whether more action is needed.
The Commission is concerned that implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Member States which are most affected by water scarcity is delayed . The Water Framework Directive requires the Commission to publish, by 2012, a report on its implementation which will review how Member States have tackled their river basin management planning. This policy review will contribute, together with a review of the vulnerability of environmental resources, to the Commission Blueprint for safeguarding Europe's water resources planned for 2012. The Blueprint will examine the effectiveness of current policies and the need for further policies or measures necessary to strengthen the resilience of EU water policy to the impacts of climate change. In particular, the Blueprint will look into the need for improved implementation and additional legislation, funding, incentive measures and the establishment of the necessary support for data collection, and scientific and technological development.
This Commission Staff Working Document which accompanies the second follow-up report to the Communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union presents additional information to the report.
In particular, it sets out, in tabular form, a timetable as regards the timing and the state of play of each of the seven key areas which must be tackled if Europe is to move towards a water efficient and water saving economy. These areas are summarised in the follow-up document dated 18/05/2010 under the same procedure reference.
The Commission presented a follow-up Report to the Communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union. In October 2007, the Council supported the options identified at European and national levels in the Communication and invited the Commission to review and further develop the evolving strategy for water scarcity and droughts by 2012.
This report is the first follow-up report based on the progress made in putting into effect the options of the Communication. It specifies the progress needed in relation to the different strategic options and presents a work programme for the medium and long term. It identifies some encouraging policy initiatives at both EU and national levels that have contributed to these results, although there is a great deal still to be done.
The document specifies the progress needed on the seven key challenges which must be tackled if Europe is to move towards a water efficient and water saving economy. These challenges are as follows:
the need to fully implement the Water Framework Directive : in this context, setting water pricing policies in a manner consistent with water availability remains a challenge at all levels of governance; moving towards sustainable land use planning and the need to improve the financing of water efficiency within the framework of existing sectoral policies; the need to develop operational drought management plans in order to efficiently prevent and mitigate drought impacts on environment, society and economy; assessment of water supply infrastructures : additional water supply infrastructures (such as storage of water, water transfers or use of alternative sources) should be considered as an option when other options, including effective water pricing policy and cost-effective alternatives, have been exhausted; the promotion of water efficient technologies and practices (specific standards for water-using devices; sustainable consumption and production; implementing the current Ecodesign Directive; steps to reduce leakages in water networks, etc.); the development of a water-saving culture in Europe, including by developing actions for communication and education in order to increase public awareness on water quantity issues; the improvement of knowledge and data collection .
Adaptation to climate change has likewise become a top priority for the EU agenda, and the challenge of water scarcity should be considered in this broader context.
In conclusion, the follow-up report shows that, while progress has been made, a great deal still needs to be done in order to improve water demand management more widely across Europe and to avoid mismanagement of water resources, especially in water-scarce areas. The priorities set by the Commission remain valid and continued attention needs to be paid to implementation in all priority areas.
As announced in the 2007 Communication, the Commission will provide from 2009 onwards an annual European assessment on water scarcity and droughts that will make it possible to monitor the evolution of the issue across Europe on a regular basis.
The implementation of the work programme will be monitored and will be part of the review of the strategy for water scarcity and droughts mentioned in the Council Conclusions of 30 October 2007 and planned for 2012.
The European Parliament adopted by 594 votes to 45, with 12 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission’s communication entitled “Addressing the Challenges of Water Scarcity and Droughts in the European Union”.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration by Richard SEEBER (EPP- ED, AT) on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.
MEPs welcome the Communication and support the proposed first set of policy options for action, but regret that its scope is limited to the EU and Member State level only. They recall that water scarcity and drought is a problem with an international dimension and that action needs to be taken accordingly.
Integrated approach : MEPs regret that the Communication limits itself to promoting general objectives, proposing only a limited number of precise measures and no concrete timetable for their implementation. The Commission is called upon to present an ongoing programme, in particular a progress report in 2009 and the review and development of the European Union's strategy. MEPs stress the need to mainstream the issue of water into all policy areas and to create a truly integrated approach when addressing it, including all of the financial and legal instruments of the EU. They underline that all political levels (national, regional and local) should be involved in the process.
Coordinated action : the resolution stresses that the cross-regional and trans-border nature of river basins can have a serious cross-border impact on upstream and downstream regions, and that it is thus indispensable for the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to cooperate on the issue of water scarcity and drought, ensuring sustainable and fair use of water resources. MEPs consider that the specificity of the water scarcity and droughts issue requires coordinated action at EU and Member State level as well as at regional and local government level.
The role of regions : the resolution highlights the importance of the regions as a driving force behind technological innovation in the field of water, the report calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds and invest in the improvement or renewal of existing infrastructure and technology including, notably, clean technologies that facilitate the efficient use of water. MEPs maintain, in this context, that infrastructure funding should be allocated with a view to implementing measures to improve the management and supply of high-quality water, in keeping with existing needs.
Coordinated action : the resolution stresses that the cross-regional and trans-border nature of river basins can have a serious cross-border impact on upstream and downstream regions, and that it is thus indispensable for the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to cooperate on the issue of water scarcity and drought, ensuring sustainable and fair use of water resources. MEPs call on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds and invest in the improvement or renewal of existing infrastructure and technology including, notably, clean technologies that facilitate the efficient use of water and can be linked to integrated water resource management (IRM), in particular to address the challenge of water efficiency. They maintain in this context that infrastructure funding should be allocated with a view to implementing measures to improve the management and supply of high-quality water, in keeping with existing needs.
The role of regions : the report highlights the importance of the regions as a driving force behind technological innovation in the field of water, the report calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds and invest in the improvement or renewal of existing infrastructure and technology including, notably, clean technologies that facilitate the efficient use of water. MEPs maintain, in this context, that infrastructure funding should be allocated with a view to implementing measures to improve the management and supply of high-quality water, in keeping with existing needs.
Demand-side measures : MEPs recall that a demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources. Supply-side measures should also be considered, with a view to achieving the most economically and environmentally efficient solution, optimising the balance between supply and demand, and ensuring an uninterrupted public water supply including during drought conditions. MEPs stress, however, the construction of diversions to transport water over large distances should not be the solution to the problem of water scarcity.
Climate change : recalling the link between climate change, water scarcity and drought, MEPs call for account to be taken of the impact on water resources when policies to combat climate change are drawn up. They stress that the revision of Community budget priorities should accord a higher ranking to environmental measures and, in particular, to policies designed to combat the effects of climate change, which include drought and water scarcity, ensuring that the necessary additional resources are available. The Commission and Member States are urged to acknowledge that deforestation and unrestrained urban development are contributing to growing water scarcity. MEPs call on the Member States and the authorities concerned to pay heed to water-related considerations in their land-use planning, especially in connection with the development of economic activities in sensitive river basins.
Water quality : the resolution acknowledges the importance of the WFD as a framework for achieving "good status" for all European waters, promoting inter-regional cooperation, sustainable water use and protection of available water resources while contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts. MEPs call upon the Commission and all the Member States to implement fully its provisions and to ensure that water scarcity and drought measures have no negative effects on water quality objectives.
Water saving potential : recalling that almost 20% of water in the EU is lost due to water inefficiency, the resolution underlines the need for major investments in order to improve technical progress in all economic sectors. MEPs stress that any supply of water regardless of the purpose of its consumption must comply with the principle of fair water tarification, thereby encouraging companies especially to use water more efficiently. Welcoming the fact that water saving is the Commission's first priority in response to water scarcity and droughts, MEPs urge the Commission in this connection to ensure that use of Structural Funds does not run counter to this priority, to incorporate sustainable water management as a criterion that projects must satisfy, and to obtain evidence of the utilisation by local and regional authorities of water savings and of their compliance with the requirements of the WFD, before granting them funding from the Structural Funds.
Combating waste : stressing that 40% of the water used in the EU could be saved, MEPs call for concrete measures and financial incentives to promote a more efficient and sustainable use of water. They call, likewise, for the widespread installation of metering devices to measure water consumption in order to encourage saving, re-use and the efficient and rational use of water. They call for the widespread installation of metering devices to measure water consumption in order to encourage saving, re-use and the efficient and rational use of water. Bearing in mind that losses owing to leakages in the public water supply network in urban centres may exceed 50%, MEPs ask the Commission to look into the possibility of promoting a network of cities to encourage sustainable water use with the aim of exchanging good practices such as re-use, saving and improved water efficiency and jointly carrying out pilot demonstration projects. The European Union is called on to support measures to improve water management in agriculture and to promote a modernisation of irrigation systems.
Consumer awareness : consumers have a major role to play if a sustainable use of water resources is to be achieved in the EU. MEPs call on the EU to launch a public information and education campaign to make people aware of the water issue and encouraging them to take concrete actions. The Commission is invited to encourage the exchange of good practice among regions, cities and civil society organisations, focusing on measures to save water (including the purification of rain and waste water), improve water efficiency and manage the risk of droughts. MEPs take the view that a labelling system for the water consumption of products, which already exists for energy efficiency, would be an appropriate tool for achieving a more sustainable water consumption. They point out that devising an efficient water pricing policy which reflects the true value of water may encourage consumers to be more sparing in their use of water.
The Parliament calls on the Commission to consider financing in 2009 a pilot project intended to cover research, surveying and monitoring for the development of prevention activities to halt desertification and steppe formation in Europe. It is also called upon to promote the entry into operation of the European Drought Observatory within the framework of the European Environment Agency to enhance sound, strategic decision-making.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own initiative report by Richard SEEBER (EPP- ED, AT) in response to the Commission’s communication entitled “Addressing the Challenges of Water Scarcity and Droughts in the European Union”.
MEPs welcome the Communication and support the proposed first set of policy options for action, but regret that its scope is limited to the EU and Member State level only. They recall that water scarcity and drought is a problem with an international dimension and that action needs to be taken accordingly.
Integrated approach : MEPs regret that the Communication limits itself to promoting general objectives, proposing only a limited number of precise measures and no concrete timetable for their implementation. The Commission is called upon to present an ongoing programme, in particular a progress report in 2009 and the review and development of the European Union's strategy. MEPs stress the need to mainstream the issue of water into all policy areas and to create a truly integrated approach when addressing it, including all of the financial and legal instruments of the EU. They underline that all political levels (national, regional and local) should be involved in the process.
Coordinated action : the report stresses that the cross-regional and trans-border nature of river basins can have a serious cross-border impact on upstream and downstream regions, and that it is thus indispensable for the Member States, as well as regional and local authorities, to cooperate on the issue of water scarcity and drought, ensuring sustainable and fair use of water resources. MEPs consider that the specificity of the water scarcity and droughts issue requires coordinated action at EU and Member State level as well as at regional and local government level.
The role of regions : the report highlights the importance of the regions as a driving force behind technological innovation in the field of water, the report calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds and invest in the improvement or renewal of existing infrastructure and technology including, notably, clean technologies that facilitate the efficient use of water. MEPs maintain, in this context, that infrastructure funding should be allocated with a view to implementing measures to improve the management and supply of high-quality water, in keeping with existing needs.
Demand-side measures : the report recalls that a demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources. Supply-side measures should also be considered, with a view to achieving the most economically and environmentally efficient solution, optimising the balance between supply and demand, and ensuring an uninterrupted public water supply including during drought conditions. MEPs stress, however, the construction of diversions to transport water over large distances should not be the solution to the problem of water scarcity.
Climate change : recalling the link between climate change, water scarcity and drought, MEPs call for account to be taken of the impact on water resources when policies to combat climate change are drawn up. They stress that the revision of Community budget priorities should accord a higher ranking to environmental measures and, in particular, to policies designed to combat the effects of climate change, which include drought and water scarcity, ensuring that the necessary additional resources are available. The Commission and Member States are urged to acknowledge that deforestation and unrestrained urban development are contributing to growing water scarcity. MEPs call on the Member States and the authorities concerned to pay heed to water-related considerations in their land-use planning, especially in connection with the development of economic activities in sensitive river basins.
Water quality : the report acknowledges the importance of the WFD as a framework for achieving "good status" for all European waters, promoting inter-regional cooperation, sustainable water use and protection of available water resources while contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts. MEPs call upon the Commission and all the Member States to implement fully its provisions and to ensure that water scarcity and drought measures have no negative effects on water quality objectives.
Water saving potential : recalling that almost 20% of water in the EU is lost due to water inefficiency, the report underlines the need for major investments in order to improve technical progress in all economic sectors. MEPs stress that any supply of water regardless of the purpose of its consumption must comply with the principle of fair water tarification, thereby encouraging companies especially to use water more efficiently. Welcoming the fact that water saving is the Commission's first priority in response to water scarcity and droughts, MEPs urge the Commission in this connection to ensure that use of Structural Funds does not run counter to this priority, to incorporate sustainable water management as a criterion that projects must satisfy, and to obtain evidence of the utilisation by local and regional authorities of water savings and of their compliance with the requirements of the WFD, before granting them funding from the Structural Funds.
C ombating waste : stressing that 40% of the water used in the EU could be saved, MEPs call for concrete measures and financial incentives to promote a more efficient and sustainable use of water. They call, likewise, for the widespread installation of metering devices to measure water consumption in order to encourage saving, re-use and the efficient and rational use of water. They call for the widespread installation of metering devices to measure water consumption in order to encourage saving, re-use and the efficient and rational use of water. Bearing in mind that losses owing to leakages in the public water supply network in urban centres may exceed 50%, MEPs ask the Commission to look into the possibility of promoting a network of cities to encourage sustainable water use with the aim of exchanging good practices such as re-use, saving and improved water efficiency and jointly carrying out pilot demonstration projects. The European Union is called on to support measures to improve water management in agriculture, promoting a modernisation of irrigation systems to reduce water consumption and boosting research in this field.
Consumer awareness : the report recalls that consumers have a major role to play if a sustainable use of water resources is to be achieved in the EU. MEPs call on the EU to launch a public information and education campaign to make people aware of the water issue and encouraging them to take concrete actions. The Commission is invited to encourage the exchange of good practice among regions, cities and civil society organisations, focusing on measures to save water (including the purification of rain and waste water), improve water efficiency and manage the risk of droughts. MEPs take the view that a labelling system for the water consumption of products, which already exists for energy efficiency, would be an appropriate tool for achieving a more sustainable water consumption. They point out that devising an efficient water pricing policy which reflects the true value of water may encourage consumers to be more sparing in their use of water.
PURPOSE: to address the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union.
CONTENT: over the past thirty years, droughts have dramatically increased in number and intensity in the EU. The number of areas and people affected by droughts went up by almost 20% between 1976 and 2006. One of the most widespread droughts occurred in 2003 when over 100 million people and a third of the EU territory was affected. The cost of damage to the European economy was at least EUR 8.7 billion. The total cost of droughts over the past thirty years amounts to EUR 100 billion. The yearly average cost quadrupled over the same period.
While “drought” means a temporary decrease in water availability, “water scarcity” means that water demand exceeds the water resources exploitable under sustainable conditions. At least 11% of the European population and 17% of its territory have been affected by water scarcity. In a context where changes in climate are foreseen in spite of significant EU mitigation efforts, this trend is expected to continue and even worsen. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, climate change would bring water scarcity to between 1.1 and 3.2 billion people if temperatures rose by 2 to 3° C. Drought affected areas are likely to increase in extent. In these circumstances, it has become an EU priority to devise effective drought risk management strategies.
CONTENT: Against this background, this Communication presents an initial set of policy option at a European, national and regional level to address and mitigate the challenge posed by water scarcity and drought within the Union. It is also a response to a request for action on water scarcity and droughts from the Environment Council meeting in June 2006.
In this Communication the Commission sets out a list of challenges that need to be addressed. For each challenge a way forward is proposed and an example of “good practice” given. In summary, the main challenges, faced by the EU include:
Progressing towards the full implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD): Implementation of this Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC) is given high priority in order to address the mismanagement of water resources.
Ineffective water pricing policies: The “user pays” principle is hardly implemented beyond the sectors of drinking water supply and waste water treatment. Introducing this principle at an EU level would put an end to needless losses or waste, thereby ensuring that water remains available for essential use across Europe, including all parts of trans-boundary river basins. A more effective water pricing policy would encourage efficient water use.
Land use planning: This is also one of the main drivers of water use. Inadequate water allocation between economic sectors results in imbalances between water needs and existing water resources. A pragmatic shift is required in order to change policy-making patterns and to move forward effective land-use planning at the appropriate levels.
Water savings: There is a huge potential for water savings across Europe. Europe continues to waste at least 20% of its water due to inefficiency. Water saving must become the priority and all possibilities to improve water efficiency must therefore be explored. Policy making should be based on a clear water hierarchy. Additional water supply infrastructures should be considered as an option when other options have been exhausted, including effective water pricing policy and cost-effective alternatives. Water uses should also be prioritised: it is clear that public water supply should always be the overriding priority to ensure access to adequate water provision.
Improving drought risk management: at European level, the Commission proposes fostering exchanges of information and best practices on drought risk management; identifying methodologies for drought thresholds and drought mapping and developing recommendations by the end of 2008. At national level, by 2009, it proposes the drawing up of specific drought management plans to supplement WFD river basin management plans, where needed, in accordance with WFD provisions. It also recommends the creation of a drought observatory and a rapid alert system and to make use of the EU’s Solidarity Fund and the Civil Protection Mechanism for these purposes.
Considering additional water supply infrastructures: there are several possible ways of developing additional water infrastructures, (e.g. the storage of surface or ground waters, water transfers, or use of alternative sources). The construction of new water supply dams and water transfers are subject to EU legislation. Alternative options like desalination or waste water re-use are increasingly considered as potential solutions across Europe.
Fostering water efficient technologies and practices: in addition to improving technologies, the upgrading of water management practices is a necessary instrument in all sectors where huge quantities of water are used (e.g. agriculture, manufacturing or tourism). The Commission suggests, among other things, the development of standards for water-using devices, such as irrigation systems and other energy-using farm equipment, as well as developing a new directive similar to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive for the water performance of buildings.
Fostering the emergence of a water-saving culture in Europe: developing a responsible water-saving and efficiency culture requires an active awareness-raising policy in which all actors in the water sector need to be involved. Information, education and training are priority areas for action.
High quality knowledge and information: existing European and national assessment and monitoring programmes are neither integrated nor complete. Filling knowledge gaps and ensuring data comparability across the EU is therefore a precondition. In this context, research has a significant role to play for policy makers.
To conclude, the challenge of water scarcity and droughts needs to be addressed both as an essential environmental issue and also as a precondition for sustainable economic growth in Europe. As the EU seeks to revitalise and reinvigorate its economy and continue to take a lead on tackling climate change, devising an effective strategy towards water efficiency can make a substantial contribution.
The Commission has identified a first set of policy options with a view to opening up a wide-ranging debate on how to adapt to water scarcity and droughts – two phenomena that could potentially increase. The Commission is of the view that more has to be done in order to introduce these measures swiftly at an EU level. In future, it will review progress towards the set of orientations and will report on them to both the Council and Parliament. Any follow-up initiatives may be considered within the coming few years.
PURPOSE: to address the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union.
CONTENT: over the past thirty years, droughts have dramatically increased in number and intensity in the EU. The number of areas and people affected by droughts went up by almost 20% between 1976 and 2006. One of the most widespread droughts occurred in 2003 when over 100 million people and a third of the EU territory was affected. The cost of damage to the European economy was at least EUR 8.7 billion. The total cost of droughts over the past thirty years amounts to EUR 100 billion. The yearly average cost quadrupled over the same period.
While “drought” means a temporary decrease in water availability, “water scarcity” means that water demand exceeds the water resources exploitable under sustainable conditions. At least 11% of the European population and 17% of its territory have been affected by water scarcity. In a context where changes in climate are foreseen in spite of significant EU mitigation efforts, this trend is expected to continue and even worsen. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, climate change would bring water scarcity to between 1.1 and 3.2 billion people if temperatures rose by 2 to 3° C. Drought affected areas are likely to increase in extent. In these circumstances, it has become an EU priority to devise effective drought risk management strategies.
CONTENT: Against this background, this Communication presents an initial set of policy option at a European, national and regional level to address and mitigate the challenge posed by water scarcity and drought within the Union. It is also a response to a request for action on water scarcity and droughts from the Environment Council meeting in June 2006.
In this Communication the Commission sets out a list of challenges that need to be addressed. For each challenge a way forward is proposed and an example of “good practice” given. In summary, the main challenges, faced by the EU include:
Progressing towards the full implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD): Implementation of this Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC) is given high priority in order to address the mismanagement of water resources.
Ineffective water pricing policies: The “user pays” principle is hardly implemented beyond the sectors of drinking water supply and waste water treatment. Introducing this principle at an EU level would put an end to needless losses or waste, thereby ensuring that water remains available for essential use across Europe, including all parts of trans-boundary river basins. A more effective water pricing policy would encourage efficient water use.
Land use planning: This is also one of the main drivers of water use. Inadequate water allocation between economic sectors results in imbalances between water needs and existing water resources. A pragmatic shift is required in order to change policy-making patterns and to move forward effective land-use planning at the appropriate levels.
Water savings: There is a huge potential for water savings across Europe. Europe continues to waste at least 20% of its water due to inefficiency. Water saving must become the priority and all possibilities to improve water efficiency must therefore be explored. Policy making should be based on a clear water hierarchy. Additional water supply infrastructures should be considered as an option when other options have been exhausted, including effective water pricing policy and cost-effective alternatives. Water uses should also be prioritised: it is clear that public water supply should always be the overriding priority to ensure access to adequate water provision.
Improving drought risk management: at European level, the Commission proposes fostering exchanges of information and best practices on drought risk management; identifying methodologies for drought thresholds and drought mapping and developing recommendations by the end of 2008. At national level, by 2009, it proposes the drawing up of specific drought management plans to supplement WFD river basin management plans, where needed, in accordance with WFD provisions. It also recommends the creation of a drought observatory and a rapid alert system and to make use of the EU’s Solidarity Fund and the Civil Protection Mechanism for these purposes.
Considering additional water supply infrastructures: there are several possible ways of developing additional water infrastructures, (e.g. the storage of surface or ground waters, water transfers, or use of alternative sources). The construction of new water supply dams and water transfers are subject to EU legislation. Alternative options like desalination or waste water re-use are increasingly considered as potential solutions across Europe.
Fostering water efficient technologies and practices: in addition to improving technologies, the upgrading of water management practices is a necessary instrument in all sectors where huge quantities of water are used (e.g. agriculture, manufacturing or tourism). The Commission suggests, among other things, the development of standards for water-using devices, such as irrigation systems and other energy-using farm equipment, as well as developing a new directive similar to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive for the water performance of buildings.
Fostering the emergence of a water-saving culture in Europe: developing a responsible water-saving and efficiency culture requires an active awareness-raising policy in which all actors in the water sector need to be involved. Information, education and training are priority areas for action.
High quality knowledge and information: existing European and national assessment and monitoring programmes are neither integrated nor complete. Filling knowledge gaps and ensuring data comparability across the EU is therefore a precondition. In this context, research has a significant role to play for policy makers.
To conclude, the challenge of water scarcity and droughts needs to be addressed both as an essential environmental issue and also as a precondition for sustainable economic growth in Europe. As the EU seeks to revitalise and reinvigorate its economy and continue to take a lead on tackling climate change, devising an effective strategy towards water efficiency can make a substantial contribution.
The Commission has identified a first set of policy options with a view to opening up a wide-ranging debate on how to adapt to water scarcity and droughts – two phenomena that could potentially increase. The Commission is of the view that more has to be done in order to introduce these measures swiftly at an EU level. In future, it will review progress towards the set of orientations and will report on them to both the Council and Parliament. Any follow-up initiatives may be considered within the coming few years.
Documents
- Contribution: COM(2012)0672
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0672
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2012)0380
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0133
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)0338
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2010)0228
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2010)0573
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2008)0875
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2008)3069
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6664
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0473/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0362/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0362/2008
- Committee opinion: PE404.756
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.761
- Committee opinion: PE404.481
- Committee draft report: PE405.955
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0414
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0993
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0996
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0414
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0414 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0993 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)0996 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE405.955
- Committee opinion: PE404.481
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.761
- Committee opinion: PE404.756
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0362/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6664
- Follow-up document: COM(2008)0875 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2008)3069 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2010)0228 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2010)0573 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0133 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)0338 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2012)0672 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2012)0380
- Contribution: COM(2012)0672
Activities
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolf BEREND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Johannes BLOKLAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antonio DE BLASIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis GRECH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne LAPERROUZE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Péter OLAJOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria PETRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zita PLEŠTINSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daciana Octavia SÂRBU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrzej Jan SZEJNA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Seeber A6-0362/2008 - par. 8/2 #
Rapport Seeber A6-0362/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
207 |
2008/2074(INI)
2008/04/18
REGI
58 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the fourth cohesion report identifies climate change, in particular drought and water scarcity, as one of the new challenges
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Acknowledges that water scarcity and droughts have direct effects on economic, social and territorial cohesion; maintains that this aspect should be adequately considered in future cohesion policy development with all necessary budgetary and instrumental measures made available to this end;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1b (new) 1b. Stresses that the cross-regional and trans-border nature of river basins harbours potential risks of tension between upstream and downstream regions, and that a European approach ensuring sustainable and fair use of water resources is needed; considers that the specificity of the water scarcity and droughts issue requires coordinated action at EU and Member State level as well as regional and local government level;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds by opting for investment in improvement or renewal of existing infrastructure
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds by opting for infrastructure investment linked to water management, in particular to address the challenge of water efficiency in the consumer, industrial and agricultural sectors;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to take advantage of the great opportunities offered by the Structural Funds by opting for infrastructure investment linked to water management, in particular to address the challenge of water efficiency, in terms of saving and reutilisation;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Maintains in this context and on the basis of the new legislative framework, that infrastructur
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Calls upon the Member States and on local and regional bodies to develop and introduce technologies for the collection, absorption, use and recycling of rainwater, which at the moment is mostly drained away to no advantage from the towns and cities of Europe;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Stresses that worldwide experience has shown that river diversion leads to irreparable damage of the ecological and hydromorphological conditions and may entail population removal and business relocation which disturb social and economic cohesion; calls on the Member States to prevent any deterioration of their river basins and observe scrupulously the requirements set out in Articles 1 and 4 of the Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC), and calls on the Commission to refuse any EU funding for projects that do not comply with these requirements;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Stresses that water remains above all a resource which has been inherited and must be shared by all humanity and that an increase in its cost in monetary terms, even where based on economic analyses, can be neither taken as the cornerstone of the ‘user pays’ principle nor seen as a lasting solution to the problem of increasing water scarcity and drought; considers that, furthermore, proposals to increase the cost of water fail to take account of the millennium objectives: access to drinkable water for all and poverty reduction;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3b (new) 3b. Stresses that all sources of pollution are contributing to water scarcity, which means that it is urgently necessary to implement throughout the territory of Europe a strict and efficient system of monitoring the use of pollutants, in particular pesticides and other industrial pollutants;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital Aa (new) Aa. whereas issues relating to water scarcity and droughts in the European Union are more pronounced in certain regions and the regional dimension is central in all policy considerations; whereas only measures which are based on regional conditions and regional socio- economic contexts can deal effectively with the challenges posed by water scarcity and droughts,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3c (new) 3c. Urges the Commission and Member States to acknowledge that deforestation and unrestrained urban development are greatly contributing to growing water scarcity;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3d (new) 3d. Notes that the communication fails to address the problem arising in numerous regions from the non-purification of waste water;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3e (new) 3e. Stresses the need to introduce throughout European territory a system of integrated resource management (IRM) for water by catchment area, so as to ensure the balanced distribution of this resource for various uses;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3f (new) 3f. Stresses that the need to protect groundwater resources should not be forgotten if they are to be included in overall water resource management;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3g (new) 3g. Urges that support be given to all rational rainwater collection systems (meeting good public health standards).
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Calls upon the Commission to examine the impact caused by the anthropogenic reshaping of the countryside, which alters the drainage conditions and influences the natural circulation of water in country areas - a phenomenon which affects drainage in those areas;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the authorities concerned to
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the authorities concerned to pay heed to water- related considerations in their land-use planning, especially in connection with the development of economic activities in sensitive river basins; stresses that any consumption of water regardless of its purpose must be subject to the water tariff regime in force and that no exemption from payment is acceptable;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the authorities concerned to pay heed to water- related considerations in their land-use planning, especially in connection with the development of economic activities in island areas and generally in sensitive river basins;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Emphasises that national data should be complemented by standard regional and local seasonal information on precipitation and cross-sector consumption to enhance sound and strategic decision-making;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital Ab (new) Ab. whereas the impact of water scarcity and droughts is most strongly felt in the poorest regions and the rural areas within these regions, hindering significantly their social and economic development; whereas droughts in the poorest regions are more likely to lead to land abandonment, forest fires and soil degradation; whereas the economic effects of water scarcity and droughts, due to their regional nature, constitute a challenge in view of the Lisbon targets as set within EU Cohesion Policy,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Highlights the importance of the regions as a driving force behind technological innovation in the field of water, given that water efficiency will be an increasingly important factor for competitiveness; therefore urges regional authorities to consider national and international inter-regional cooperation, information exchange and strategic partnerships with a view to organising efficient regional water management;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Condemns the authorisation of urban developments and tourist resorts being built on territories that cannot meet the water demand for maintenance of these projects; points out that such projects lead to an increasing demand for desalination plants which contribute substantially to climate change; calls on the Commission to approve EU funding only for desalination plants that provide water for urban developments or tourist resorts built before 2006;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5b (new) 5b. Emphasises that water is a public asset and an essential part of services of general interest; refuses any attempt to interpret water as an economic asset;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on regions and cities to launch campaigns to raise public awareness of water saving, and calls on the Commission to promote the entry into operation of the European Drought Observatory and encourage the exchange of good practice among regions and cities, focusing on measures to save water, enhance water efficiency, and manage the risk of droughts.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on regions and cities to launch
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to analyse in more detail the man-made causes of water scarcity in order to better tackle their impacts and devise the necessary measures;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6a (new) 6a. Notes that the issue of water treatment is a strategic problem of great importance both at European and at Member State level; therefore considers it indispensable for this matter to be regulated at EU level in accordance with the following recommendations;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6a (new) 6a. Urges the prompt implementation of the framework directive on water so as to facilitate the proper management of water resources;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6b (new) 6b. Calls for particular attention to be given to catchment areas affected by water shortages or water scarcity, where this is having a major impact on the development of the regions concerned;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital Ac (new) Ac. whereas EU Structural Funds can play an important role as regards water resources and priority should be given to increasing water efficiency rather than supply; whereas EU Structural Funds can contribute to increased water efficiency and better water management by means of research, technology development, awareness raising, agriculture and industry education and training as well as better infrastructure including water treatment and reserve plants,
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6c (new) 6c. Points out that in-depth consideration is necessary concerning the introduction of restrictions on the use of water;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6d (new) 6d. Points to the particular situation of remote and outlying areas regarding access to fresh water;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6b (new) 6b. Points out that many regions within the EU are confronted with a very serious water scarcity and drought problem;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6c (new) Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6d (new) 6d. Points out to the Commission that a region's economic situation, competitiveness and development opportunities are determined by these complex environmental issues;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6e (new) 6e. Calls on the Commission – given that several regions in the EU are seriously threatened with desertification, which may have a grave impact on economic life and consequently on further development in the regions concerned – to support all projects aimed at soil-binding;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6f (new) 6f. Highlights the importance of agricultural watering, which not only benefits the growth of crops but also replenishes the soil’s water supply, thus boosting the long-term competitiveness and development of agricultural regions;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6g (new) 6g. Calls on the Commission, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, to grant the Member States the necessary flexibility on problems relating to agricultural watering, so that each Member State can regulate this matter in the light of its own specific conditions;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6h (new) 6h. Calls on the Commission, given that the problem of water scarcity is closely linked to forest protection, to do all in its power to prevent unnecessary logging and felling of forests which exacerbates devastating floods and results in the washing away of arable soil;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6i (new) 6i. Points out that these complex environmental problems can produce serious cross-border impacts, and that it is thus indispensable for the European Union’s Member States, as well as regional and local organisations, to cooperate on the issue of water scarcity and drought and in working out solutions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph - 1 (new) -1. Notes that the Commission communication fails to identify the causes of this scarcity and that, while it proposes a number of excellent measures to alleviate water shortages and drought in the European Union, they do not provide a lasting solution to the problem of dwindling water resources;;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6j (new) 6j. Points out that water scarcity may be reduced by storing inflowing water or rainwater, and that to that end it is absolutely essential to step up water storage capacities in the European Union;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6k (new) 6k. Calls on the Commission, with that in mind, to support the creation of water storage facilities to deal with flooding or torrential rain, thus reducing the affected areas’ exposure to problems of water scarcity and drought;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6l (new) 6l. Considers it essential – since water storage facilities are of strategic importance and may where necessary permit one Member State to retain water flowing into another Member State – for the criteria for the creation of water storage facilities to be regulated at European level while respecting the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6m (new) 6m. Calls on the Commission to support any project which provides for the collection of rainwater and its use for watering or other purposes, thus promoting water saving;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6n (new) 6n. Calls on the Commission – since it is necessary to trap precipitation and inflowing water, taking into account the seepage conditions and improving them – to support such projects rather than water drainage, and to propose legislation promoting efforts towards a closed water balance;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6o (new) Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6p (new) 6p. Notes that the Member States must encourage firms, factories and other entities using water on an industrial scale to use water more efficiently and economically by means of tax incentives and/or other economic advantages;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6q (new) 6q. Points out to the Commission that by devising an efficient water pricing policy which reflects the true value of water, it may encourage consumers to be more sparing in their use of water;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6r (new) 6r. Stresses the pre-eminent role of regional and local authorities and civil society organisations in awareness-raising campaigns and in organising educational activities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Council, without further delay, to adopt the proposed EU Solidarity Fund regulation in order to provide a better definition of the criteria and eligible operations, including droughts, and hence enable damage caused by natural disasters to be countered more effectively, flexibly, and swiftly, bearing in mind also that Parliament adopted its position as long ago as May 2006;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Urges the Council, without further delay, to adopt the proposed EU Solidarity Fund regulation in order to provide a better definition of the criteria and eligible operations, including droughts, and hence enable damage caused by natural disasters to be countered more effectively, flexibly, and swiftly, bearing in mind also that Parliament adopted its position as long ago as May 2006. In order to improve drought risk management, it is necessary to optimise the use of the EU Solidarity Fund and the European Civil Protection Mechanism;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Welcomes the fact that water saving is the Commission's first priority in reply to water scarcity and droughts and that additional water supply infrastructures shall only be considered as an option when other options have been exhausted; calls on the Commission and the Member States to verify and ensure that the use of Structural Funds does not contradict this strategy and to make evidence of full utilisation of water savings and other options as well as full compliance with the requirements of the Water Framework Directive a condition for receiving funds;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Points out that the Member States and regional and local authorities should focus on the objectives of the existing Water Framework Directive and develop interregional benchmarking systems and introduce cross-border water solidarity mechanisms;
source: PE-405.761
2008/05/29
AGRI
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital -A (new) -A. whereas agriculture, as a productive sector, suffers acutely from the effects of water scarcity and drought, while at the same time playing an important role in the sustainable management of available water resources,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Advocates more support from the European Union to improve water management on farmland by providing incentives for the introduction of more water-efficient irrigation systems tailored to different crops, promoting research in this field, with particular regard to areas affected to a greater extent by water scarcity and drought, and encouraging the use of biotechnological developments;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the contribution made by European farmers to combating desertification and seeks recognition of the pivotal role played by European producers in preserving plant cover in regions affected by persistent drought or threatened by wind-blown sand; emphasises the specific benefits of permanent crops, orchards and vineyards, pasture and forestry for water collection;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the contribution made by European farmers to combating soil erosion and desertification and seeks recognition of the pivotal role played by European producers in preserving plant cover in regions affected by persistent drought; emphasises the specific benefits of permanent crops, pasture and forestry for water collection;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Highlights the contribution made by European farmers to combating desertification and seeks recognition of the pivotal role played by European producers in preserving plant cover in regions affected by persistent drought; emphasises the specific benefits of
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the importance of the issue of water management in mountain areas and calls on the Commission to encourage local and regional authorities to develop a sense of solidarity between downstream and upstream users;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Takes the view that the environmental value of forests and agricultural production must be reassessed in a context of climate changes where it is absolutely vital to balance the increase in greenhouse gas emissions with an increase in forest cover, whose contribution as a carbon sink must be taken into account in all policies on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. States that water management policies
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. States that water management policies
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital -A a (new) -Aa. whereas water scarcity and drought are not equally acute in all regions of the EU, their being most acute in the more southerly Member States,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. States that, for several crops that require large amounts of water in regions threatened by droughts, alternative crops and sustainable crop rotation should be promoted; underlines the fact that even plants for non-food use are today irrigated in some regions with scarce water sources and urges the Commission to propose measures for improving water- saving and proportionality of irrigation in different agricultural crops;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers it necessary, where a watercourse passes through more than one Member State, to introduce inter- regional and trans-national cooperation for the integrated management of watercourses, particularly in relation to farming;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Considers it necessary to promote information, awareness and training campaigns for producers in order to make an active contribution towards the sustainable management of water resources;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that, in view of climate change and the prospect of worsening drought, there is a need to set up a European observatory that, amongst other things, will allow for the better planning of agricultural activity
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines the importance of soil rich in humus, an adapted crop rotation system and a balanced mix of forest, grassland and crop land for sustainable water management; warns that the increasing consumption of land constitutes a threat to agriculture, security of food supply and sustainable water management;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission and Council to take account of the need to create aid mechanisms for farmers affected by cyclical droughts, fires and water scarcity aimed at preventing fresh large-scale disasters resulting from climate changes and minimising their consequences;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for incentives for sustainable water management to be incorporated in the first pillar of the CAP, for example through clear cross-compliance rules;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to support the Member States in reforesting areas which have been affected by cyclical drought and fires on the basis of respect for their bio-climate and ecological characteristics, and hopes that rehabilitation of the rural and urban landscape will be treated as a matter of particular importance, having due regard to specific local features;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Underlines the role that environmental programmes in the framework of the second pillar of the CAP play in the setting of incentives for agricultural practices for protecting the sustainability and purity of water resources;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas large amounts of water are required in agriculture and, as it therefore depends on water supply, agriculture must be included as a responsible actor in integrated regional water management systems as regards balanced use of water, stopping water wastage, adapted landscape and crop-planning as well as protection of water from pollution,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Urges the Commission and Council to create a public system of agricultural insurance, financed by the EU, with a view to guaranteeing a minimum income for farmers in the event of natural disasters such as drought, fire and floods, and to protect them from risks and crises such as those that recently occurred in the countries of southern Europe;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Stresses the need to develop policies for the effective prevention of forest fires, reaffirming that the Commission must support the Member States in monitoring and preventing fires, funding, in particular, appropriate forest fire prevention measures such as fire breaks, forest tracks, access points, water points and forest management programmes;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Takes the view that water scarcity and cyclical droughts have accentuated the scourge of fires and their gravity, increasing the fragility and risk of destruction of many species that are characteristic of forests in southern European countries, for which forests often represent the main natural resource;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Stresses that the revision of Community budget priorities should accord a higher ranking to environmental measures and, in particular, to policies designed to combat the effects of climate change, which include drought and water scarcity, ensuring that the necessary additional resources are available;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses that planning for the European agricultural model should take account of the most frequent and acute environmental hazards as well as water scarcity and drought and that, in that context, an effective crisis management mechanism should constitute a fundamental element of the European common agricultural policy.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas multifunctional agriculture in the EU plays an important role in the preservation of landscapes, biodiversity and clean water and therefore needs financial support for certain measures as well as scientific advice on water management,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Considers it extremely negative that, as part of the current review of the CAP, no account is being taken of the need to reverse the trend of successive previous reforms, which encouraged absenteeism and led many small and medium-sized farmers to give up farming, thus favouring large landowners and the concentration of intensive production only in certain regions and in the hands of agro-industry, on which many farmers who are still in business now depend; takes the view that these factors are responsible for the abandonment of many rural areas, leading to the depopulation of vast areas of territory with the result that no work is carried out to maintain and clear forests or implement agricultural hydraulic projects, and having a clear adverse effect on water quality, supply and access for both farmers and public supply systems;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Takes the view that the production of one litre of agro-fuel consumes around 4 560 litres of water on average and that its contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions is zero or virtually zero; supports the ending of Community incentives for agro-fuels and considers that internal agricultural production for this purpose must not be replaced by imports after processing or of raw materials;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Advocates more support from the European Union for integrated regional water-management concepts, including agriculture as a main partner, to improve water management o
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Advocates more support from the European Union to improve water management on farmland by providing incentives for the introduction of more water-saving, efficient irrigation systems tailored to different crops, promoting research in this field and
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Advocates more support from the European Union to improve water management on farmland and on livestock farms by providing incentives for
source: PE-407.670
2008/06/10
ENVI
115 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Indent 4 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 18 May 2006 on natural disasters (forest fires, droughts and floods) – agricultural aspects,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas intense drought, accompanied by lower rainfall, is increasing the danger of forest fires, as evidenced by the devastating fires which recently swept through southern Europe,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Points out that major water users (such as power plants) do not consume water but release water to the water cycle after having used it in their processes; stresses that by doing this they have a strong effect on surface water availability, ecological systems and public health by increasing the water temperature; underlines the need to take these effects into consideration;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that consumers have a major role to play if we want to achieve a significant reduction of water consumption in the EU, calls therefore on the EU to launch a public information and education campaign to make people aware of the water issue and encouraging them to take concrete actions e.g. using rain water for economic and sanitary purposes in the home;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that consumers have a major role to play if we want to achieve a significant reduction of water consumption in the EU; calls therefore on the EU to launch a public campaign to make people aware of the water issue and encouraging them to undertake concrete actions; highlights in particular the unsustainable practices in the tourist sector, especially in regions affected by persistent drought such as the Mediterranean;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that consumers have a major role to play if we want to achieve a s
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Points out to the Commission that by devising an efficient water pricing policy which reflects the true value of water, it may encourage consumers to be more sparing in their use of water;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the pre-eminent role of regional and local authorities and civil society organisations in awareness-raising campaigns and in organising educational activities;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Observes that in order to guarantee the fair distribution of water, water management must be the responsibility of a public utility;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Takes the view that
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Urges that water performance criteria should, where possible, become part of construction standards for buildings;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages all stakeholders to develop a voluntary scheme for labelling sustainable water management and to draw up voluntary water savings programmes in the various economic sectors (for example agriculture, tourism, manufacturing);
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. Whereas no comprehensive, technically and scientifically sound assessment of the water quantity
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Welcomes the establishment of a European Drought Observatory and stresses the important contribution made by drought early warning systems;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to consider financing in 2009 a pilot project intended to cover research, surveying and monitoring for the development of prevention activities to halt desertification and steppe formation in Europe thus preventing erosion, deflation, agriculture and biodiversity losses, increasing soil fertility and the soil's capacity to retain water as well as its abilities in c
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to consider financing in 2009 a pilot project intended to cover research, surveying and monitoring for the development of prevention activities to halt desertification in Europe thus preventing erosion, agriculture and biodiversity losses, increasing soil protection and fertility and the soil's capacity to retain water as well as its abilities in carbon capture;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to consider financing in 2009 a pilot project intended to cover research, surveying and monitoring for the development of prevention activities to halt desertification in Europe thus preventing erosion, agriculture and biodiversity losses, increasing soil fertility and the soil's capacity to retain water as well as its abilities in carbon capture; reiterates the importance of establishing reliable and transparent data so that policy can be truly effective;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Welcomes the establishment of the European Drought Observatory and the early warning system, which are to come into operation by 2012; stresses the importance of an extended discussion on its basic objectives, budget and organisation.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Supports the Commission's commitment to continue to highlight the challenge of water scarcity and drought at international level, in particular through the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas no comprehensive, technically and scientifically sound assessment of the water quantity situation in the EU exists; whereas the available data at regional level and on seasonal variations are very limited, while the unequal distribution of water resources within the EU means that they are not being used as effectively as possible,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas water scarcity may be the result of natural causes, human activities or an interaction of both, either through over-use of the natural supply or through degradation of water quality; whereas the misuse of water is one of the causes of desertification;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas strong economic, social and human competition for water uses, more recently those of a recreational and leisure nature, requires the adoption of water allocation policies favouring reduced demand, conservation and efficient use;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas tourism further increases demand for water, particularly during the summer period and in the coastal areas of southern Europe,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. Whereas awareness raising and pro
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. Whereas awareness raising and providing good information to citizens in different forms, e.g. via information and education campaigns, is of key importance to facilitate a change in behaviour and practices and the emergence of a water saving and efficient water use culture,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. Whereas public supply of water is a fundamental public service linked to public health which should not be disrupted,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. Whereas water scarcity and drought are a complex environmental issue, and should as such be regulated in close connection with and taking account of other environmental issues;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. Whereas the issue of water scarcity and droughts is not limited geographically to the European Union
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. Whereas a region's economic situation, competitiveness and development opportunities are determined by these complex environmental issues;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the Commission does not indicate the reasons for water scarcity and that, while it makes a number of excellent water saving recommendations, the proposed measures do not offer a lasting solution to the problem of diminished water reserves;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that the Communication limits itself to promoting general objectives, proposing only a limited number of precise measures and no concrete timetable for their implementation in regions threatened by water scarcity and droughts; regrets the absence of realistic goals and time constraints for reaching them, in close co- operation with national, regional and local authorities;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Regrets that the Communication limits itself to promoting general objectives, proposing only a limited number of precise measures and no concrete timetable for their implementation in regions threatened by water scarcity and droughts; regrets the absence of realistic goals and time constraints for reaching them, in close co- operation with regional and local authorities; calls on the Commission to present an ongoing programme, in particular a progress report in 2008 and the review and development of the European Union's strategy by 2012, including legislative action;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that it is not in the competencies of the European Union to establish a hierarchy of water uses; points out that these competencies lie with the Member States who each have unique challenges, economies, climates, geographical conditions and infrastructures, and that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach to the evaluation of water efficiency;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that de
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources; notes that supply-side measures should be considered after the options of enhancement of water efficiency, improvement of demand management and educational measures have been exhausted; takes the view that action should be encouraged to establish an effective hierarchy of water uses, and that the construction of diversions to transport water over large distances should not be the solution to the problem of water scarcity;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources, together with the possibility of using water from the environment; notes that supply-side measures should be considered after the options of enhancement of water efficiency, improvement of demand management and educational measures have been exhausted, in accordance with the principles of sustainable development;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that a demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources; notes that supply-side measures should also be considered
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Aa (new) Aa. Whereas water is essential to life and a common good which should not be reduced to a mere commodity; whereas ensuring fair access to water for all, including future generations, should guide all water policy,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that demand-side approach should be preferred when managing water resources; notes that supply-side measures should be considered after the options of enhancement of water efficiency, improvement of demand management and educational measures have been exhausted;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Acknowledges the importance of the demand-side approach but takes the view that the EU should adopt a holistic approach when managing water resources, combining measures of demand management, measures to optimise existing resources within the water cycle, and measures to create new resources, and that the approach needs to integrate environmental, social and economic considerations;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses above all that water is a natural heritage to be shared by all and that increased water costs in monetary terms can neither be the cornerstone of the 'user pays' principle nor provide a lasting solution to the problem of increasing water scarcity and drought, even where increased costs are based on economic analysis; takes the view furthermore that proposed increases in the cost of water fail to meet the millennium goals, including access for all to drinkable water and less poverty;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that all sources of pollution contribute to water scarcity, which means that it is urgently necessary to create throughout the European Union an accurate and efficient system for monitoring the use of pollutants, in particular pesticides and other industrially produced pollutant substances; in this connection it is necessary to adopt the principle that it is the polluter and not the consumer who pays;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the link between climate change, water scarcity and drought and integrated territorial care aimed at maintaining and preserving local water resources and is deeply concerned about the possible impact on public health; stresses the need to mainstream the issue of water into all policy areas and to create a truly integrated
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the link between climate change, water scarcity and drought and is deeply concerned about the possible impact on public health; calls for account to be taken of their impact on water resources when policies to combat climate change are drawn up: asks that an in-depth study be made of the inter-relationship between the development of biofuels and the availability of water resources; calls, likewise, for a specific assessment to be made of installations with a high consumption of water resources; stresses the need to mainstream the issue of water into all policy areas and to create a truly integrated approach when addressing it, including all of the financial instruments of the EU; underlines that all political levels (national, regional and local) should be involved in the process;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls th
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recalls the link between climate change, water scarcity and drought and is deeply concerned about the possible impact on public health; stresses the need to mainstream the issue of water into all policy areas and to create a truly integrated approach when addressing it, including all of the financial and legal instruments of the EU; underlines that all political levels (national, regional and local) should be involved in the process;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the current context of climate change and water scarcity and drought, expresses concern over the impact on rivers and consequently on nuclear facilities relying on them for cooling the reactors;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that a link should be established between water scarcity and drought and climate changes and their specific strategies, bearing in mind that concerns as regards adapting to climate changes must be integrated as priorities in the implementation of the WFD;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the desertification which is affecting Community countries to differing degrees is impoverishing the natural environment and leading to degradation of soils and consequent loss of their agricultural value,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Asks the Commission to take into account the inter-sectoral link between the social and economic impact of climate change on land usage and the energy costs associated with climate change; encourages the EU to conduct all water efficiency evaluations using objective and economic indicators;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the importance of the WFD as a framework for achieving "good status" for all European waters, promoting inter-regional cooperation, sustainable water use and protection of available water resources while contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts, and calls upon the Commission and all the Member States to implement fully its provisions;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the importance of the WFD as a framework for achieving "good status" for all European waters, promoting sustainable water use and protection of available water resources while contributing to mitigating the effects of floods and droughts, and calls upon the Commission and all the Member States to implement fully its provisions and to ensure that water scarcity and drought measures have no negative effects on water quality objectives;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to clarify the definition of 'prolonged drought' (in the context of the WFD) and its implications for achieving the environmental objectives of the WFD in periods of drought and after such periods; points out that water scarcity and drought are related but different, and differentiated strategies should be adopted for them;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses that there is a close link between drought, soil erosion, desertification and forest fires;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that river basin management plan required under the WFD should also integrate drought and other hydro-meteorological disaster management and set up crisis management tailored to the concrete needs of river basins threatened by water scarcity and droughts;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that river basin management plan required under the WFD should also integrate drought management and set up crisis management tailored to
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that river basin management plans required under the WFD
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Takes the view that river basin management plans under the WFD should also integrate drought management and set up crisis management tailored to the concrete needs of river basins threatened by water scarcity and droughts; highlights the need to avoid creating barriers to the natural course of rivers in an effort to minimise flooding, and encourages more extensive impact assessment as regards sealing off the natural courses of the water flow;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. Whereas there are significant regional differences in the way in which problems resulting from water scarcity and drought manifest themselves; whereas measures to deal with these problems would be best based on a regional approach,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines the role of forests in the water cycle and the importance of a balanced mix of forests, grassland and crop land for sustainable water management; in particular highlights the role of soils with high organic content and adapted crop rotation; warns that the increasing consumption of land is a threat to agriculture, food security and sustainable water management;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that desertification is closely connected to the forest economy; urges that greater use be made of afforestation to restrain and alleviate extreme surface and groundwater flow and to combat soil degradation and erosion;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that water scarcity may be reduced by storing inflowing water or rainwater, and that to that end it is absolutely essential to step up water storage capacities in the European Union;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers it essential – since water storage facilities are of strategic importance and may where necessary permit one Member State to retain water flowing into another Member State – for the criteria for the creation of water storage facilities to be regulated at European level while respecting the subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to support the creation of water storage facilities to deal with flooding or torrential rain, thus reducing the affected areas’ exposure to problems of water scarcity and drought;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission – since it is necessary to trap precipitation and inflowing water, taking into account the seepage conditions and the need to improve them – to support such projects rather than water drainage, and to propose legislation promoting efforts towards a closed water balance;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to support any project which provides for the collection of rainwater and its use for watering or other purposes, thus promoting water saving;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the need for support mechanisms under the European Union Solidarity Fund to be made more flexible, since severe drought is an anomalous natural phenomenon, which develops slowly and is of variable duration, with serious lasting repercussions on living conditions and socio-economic stability in the regions affected; recommends that the Fund maintain the possibility of supporting localised crisis situations (regional character) and make public and private damage eligible;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Recommends that the Community civil protection mechanism make provision for intervention in crisis situations resulting from extreme drought;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of reassessing the available quantities of groundwater throughout the EU and the rules governing the use thereof, the principal objective being to ensure rational use of groundwater resources according to the needs of the individual country concerned;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. Whereas water scarcity and drought have occurred with increasing frequency and severity over the past 30 years and climate change is likely to aggravate the situation, contributing to an increase in extreme hydrological events inside and outside the EU,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls that almost 20% of water in the EU is wasted and stresses the need for major investments in order to improve technical progress and the distribution network; notes that poor water management is a problem that influences water scarcity, and that may have more negative impacts in times of drought but that does not cause it, since drought is a natural phenomenon;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls that almost 20% of water in the EU is wasted and stresses the need for major investments in order to improve technical progress and the distribution network, as well as the waste water economy;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Recalls that almost 20% of water in the EU is lost due to wa
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Proposes to the Commission – given that the water scarcity and drought problem is closely linked to the complex of issues surrounding the wasteful use of water – that the criterion of economical water use should be incorporated into the system of conditions for the award of subsidies from EU funds;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Encourages the EU to support technology and innovation aimed at improving efficiency in the use of water; calls on the Commission to promote research, within the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities, into desalination technologies which reduce the impact on the environment and their cost;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Encourages the EU to support technology and innovation that are less water- and energy-intensive and aimed at improving efficiency in the use of water;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Encourages the EU to support technology, exchanges of good practices and innovation aimed at improving efficiency in the use of water;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Encourages the EU to
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the need for better information and the pooling of data through the creation of an information system concerning water shortages and drought throughout Europe;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the disastrous droughts which have struck areas of the Community in the last few years are one of the major factors affecting the increase in food prices,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission, bearing in mind that losses owing to leakages in the public water supply network in urban centres may exceed 50%, to look into the possibility of promoting a network of cities to encourage sustainable water use with the aim of exchanging good practices such as re-use, saving and improved water efficiency and jointly carrying out pilot demonstration projects; calls, likewise, on local authorities to improve supply networks for water distribution that have become obsolete;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that 40% of the water used in the EU could be saved; calls for concrete measures and financial incentives to promote a more efficient and sustainable use of water; calls, likewise, for the widespread installation of metering devices to measure water consumption in order to encourage saving, re-use and the efficient and rational use of water;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that 40% of the water used in the EU could be saved; calls for concrete measures and financial incentives to promote a more efficient and sustainable use of water; encourages the Member States most affected to use part of their structural funds for projects to improve water use and water saving;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that 40% of the water used in the EU could be saved; calls for concrete measures and financial incentives to promote a more efficient and sustainable use of water; encourages river basin authorities to pursue a cost-benefit analysis for alternative water management measures in all sectors;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Emphasises the need to evaluate the production of drinking water using a methodology that includes the various aspects of the life cycle: energy, emissions, waste, noise and the degradation of soil;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls for the creation of an integral policy to retain rainwater and maximise the ability to stock this water resource within the territory concerned through the use of small dams and other traditional measures, and calls on authorities to promote the retention of excess water in moments of flooding or heavy rainfall by collecting the water in existing or new reservoirs or by using the water to fill underground aquifers;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the need to combat waste and balance water uses, in particular through re-use, bearing in mind its manifold values: biological, social, environmental, symbolic, cultural and in terms of landscape and tourism;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a . Considers that, while water management policies must be based on the polluter pays principle, they should also be accompanied by measures to put an end to the significant losses that occur as a result of defective equipment and unsuitable crops and agrarian systems;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. Whereas trends in water use are increasingly unsustainable with the EU continuing to
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Urges the EU to support the introduction of a pricing policy in each Member State reflecting the actual cost of using water resources, taking account of social priorities and needs;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out that nuclear energy generation requires large quantities of water and is, for this and other reasons, undesirable;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Indicates that the production of biofuels requires large quantities of water and is, for this and other reasons, undesirable;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Observes that there is a direct connection between intensive agriculture and excessive use of water; recommends that the European Union promote alternative and sustainable forms of agriculture and proposes specific measures to this end;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in the agricultural sector; hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available technologies; in particular calls for incentives for sustainable water management in the first pillar of the CAP, for example through clear cross- compliance rules;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in the agricultural sector, hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in some countries in the agricultural sector, hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available technologies;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas water scarcity and drought have occurred with increasing frequency over the past 30 years and climate change is likely to aggravate the situation, contributing to an increase in extreme hydrological events inside and outside the EU, probably affecting both the quality and quantity of water resources,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in the agricultural sector; hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available technologies; considers that the European Union should support measures to improve water management in agriculture, promoting a modernisation of irrigation systems to reduce water consumption and boosting research in this field;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in the agricultural sector; hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available technologies, through cross- compliance, the application of the polluter pays principle and the user pays principle, and Rural Development Programmes;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses that a lot of progress towards more efficient use of water can be achieved in the agricultural sector; hopes that the Common Agricultural Policy health check will take this problem into consideration and will propose concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water through incentives to mobilise the best available technologies; suggests that any concrete actions promoting a more sustainable use of water should also seek to provide support for the farming and fishing industry, given the importance of their work to the EU;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Underlines the fact that biofuel production will increase demand for large quantities of water and stresses the need to closely monitor the impact of the use of biofuels and to regularly review European Union and national biofuel policies;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that for crops with a high demand for water in regions threatened by droughts alternative crops and sustainable agrarian systems should be required; notes with concern the fact that even plants for non-food use are irrigated in some regions with scarce water resources;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls for the CAP to play a central role in reversing soil erosion processes and in preserving plant cover in regions affected by persistent drought;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission – given that several regions in the EU are seriously threatened with desertification, which may have a grave impact on economic life and consequently on further development in the regions concerned – to support all projects aimed at soil-binding;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Highlights the importance of agricultural watering, which not only benefits the growth of crops but also replenishes the soil’s water supply, thus boosting the long-term competitiveness and development of agricultural regions;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, to grant the Member States the necessary flexibility on problems relating to agricultural watering, so that each Member State can regulate this matter in the light of its own specific conditions;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission, given that the problem of water scarcity is closely linked to forest protection, to do all in its power to prevent unnecessary logging and felling of forests, which exacerbates devastating floods and results in the washing away of arable soil;
source: PE-407.761
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.481&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-404481_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.756&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-404756_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16073&j=0&l=en
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0875/COM_COM(2008)0875_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0875/COM_COM(2008)0875_EN.pdf |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdf |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/0573/COM_SEC(2010)0573_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/0573/COM_SEC(2010)0573_EN.pdf |
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0338/COM_SEC(2011)0338_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0338/COM_SEC(2011)0338_EN.pdf |
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0996/COM_SEC(2007)0996_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0996/COM_SEC(2007)0996_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.955New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE405.955 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.481&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.481&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.761New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.761 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.756&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.756&secondRef=02 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0362_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0362_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16073&j=0&l=en
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081008&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081008&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0996/COM_SEC(2007)0996_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0996/COM_SEC(2007)0996_EN.pdf |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-362&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0362_EN.html |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3069/COM_SEC(2008)3069_EN.pdf |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0228/COM_COM(2010)0228_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0228/COM_COM(2010)0228_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0414/COM_COM(2007)0414_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0414/COM_COM(2007)0414_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-362&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0362_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-473New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0473_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/6/52596New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|