BETA


2008/2123(INL) Legal protection of adults: cross-border implications

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion LIBE GACEK Urszula (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47

Events

2009/04/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/12/18
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/12/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted, by 493 votes to 6 with 23 abstentions, a resolution on the legal protection of adults.

The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE (EPP-ED, ES) on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs.

Concerned about the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions, Parliament made a series of recommendations to the Commission on the cross-border implications of the legal protection of adults.

Parliament stresses that work and consultations have been conducted in that context on decisions concerning family property issues, successions and wills, with a view to drawing up new legislative proposals. It requests the Commission, as soon as sufficient experience of the operation of the Hague Convention has been acquired, to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on strengthening cooperation between Member States and improving the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the protection of adults and incapacity mandates and lasting powers of attorney .

This proposal should be based on the following principles and aims :

promote the recognition and enforcement of legal or administrative decisions regarding persons who are the subject of protection measures; provisions to help achieve the goal of establishing an area of justice, freedom and security by facilitating the recognition and enforcement of decisions granting a protection measure, determination of the law to be applied and cooperation between the central authorities; specific and appropriate measures for cooperation between the Member States should be implemented, drawing on the instruments available under the Hague Convention; single Community forms to promote information on protection decisions and the circulation, recognition and enforcement of those decisions; single Community form created at European Union level in the case of incapacity mandates, in order to ensure their effectiveness in all the Member States.

Other measures : the Commission is asked to:

monitor experience with the application of the Hague Convention and its implementation in the Member States, and to submit to Parliament and the Council in due course a report summarising the problems and best practices in its practical application and containing, if necessary, proposals for Community provisions supplementing or specifying the manner in which the Convention is to be applied; assess the option of the accession of the Community to the Hague Convention; finance a study to compare Member States' legislation on vulnerable adults and protection measures with a view to ascertaining where legal issues could arise and what measures would be needed at EU or Member State level to resolve any such issues; considers that the study should also address the issue of institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities as regards their guardianship and their ability to exercise their legal rights.

Member States are called upon to ensure that protective measures are proportionate to the state of the vulnerable adults in question, so that individual EU citizens are not denied a legal right when they still have the ability to exercise that right; take measures to protect vulnerable adults from becoming victims of identity theft or fraud or other telephone or cyber-crimes, including legal measures to enhance the protection of and/or limit access to a vulnerable adult's personal data.

Lastly, Parliament supports the creation of secure mechanisms , subject to robust rules for the protection of personal data and rules on the limitation of access, for the sharing of best practices and other information regarding protective measures currently in force between Member States, including the possibility of Member States' judicial systems sharing information as to the protection status of a vulnerable adult.

Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/11/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/11/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/11/17
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report drafted by LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE (EPP-ED, ES) containing a series of recommendations to the Commission on cross-border implications of the legal protection of adults.

Concerned about the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions, MEPs stress that work and consultations have been conducted in that context on decisions concerning family property issues, successions and wills, with a view to drawing up new legislative proposals. They welcome the commitment of the French Presidency regarding the situation of vulnerable adults and their cross-border legal protection and congratulate those Member States which have signed and ratified the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the international protection of adults.

MEPs request the Commission, as soon as sufficient experience of the operation of the Hague Convention has been acquired, to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on strengthening cooperation between Member States and improving the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the protection of adults and incapacity mandates and lasting powers of attorney .

This proposal should based on the following the principles and aims:

to promote the recognition and enforcement of legal or administrative decisions regarding persons who are the subject of protection measures; provisions to help achieve the goal of establishing an area of justice, freedom and security by facilitating the recognition and enforcement of decisions granting a protection measure, determination of the law to be applied and cooperation between the central authorities; specific and appropriate measures for cooperation between the Member States should be implemented, drawing on the instruments available under the Hague Convention; single Community forms to promote information on protection decisions and the circulation, recognition and enforcement of those decisions; single Community form created at European Union level in the case of incapacity mandates, in order to ensure their effectiveness in all the Member States.

Other measures : the Commission is asked to:

monitor experience with the application of the Hague Convention and its implementation in the Member States, and to submit to Parliament and the Council in due course a report summarising the problems and best practices in its practical application and containing, if necessary, proposals for Community provisions supplementing or specifying the manner in which the Convention is to be applied; assess the option of the accession of the Community to the Hague Convention; finance a study to compare Member States' legislation on vulnerable adults and protection measures with a view to ascertaining where legal issues could arise and what measures would be needed at EU or Member State level to resolve any such issues; considers that the study should also address the issue of institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities as regards their guardianship and their ability to exercise their legal rights.

Member States are called upon to:

ensure that protective measures are proportionate to the state of the vulnerable adults in question, so that individual EU citizens are not denied a legal right when they still have the ability to exercise that right; take measures to protect vulnerable adults from becoming victims of identity theft or fraud or other telephone or cyber-crimes, including legal measures to enhance the protection of and/or limit access to a vulnerable adult's personal data;

Lastly, MEPs support the creation of secure mechanisms , subject to robust rules for the protection of personal data and rules on the limitation of access, for the sharing of best practices and other information regarding protective measures currently in force between Member States, including the possibility of Member States' judicial systems sharing information as to the protection status of a vulnerable adult.

2008/11/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/10/24
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2008/10/24
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/10/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/09/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/06/25
   EP - LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2008/05/28
   EP - GACEK Urszula (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2008/05/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Votes

Rapport López-Istúriz White A6-0460/2008 - résolution #

2008/12/18 Outcome: +: 493, 0: 23, -: 6
DE FR IT ES PL GB NL RO BE CZ PT HU EL BG IE DK AT SK FI LT SI LV SE LU MT CY EE
Total
69
59
39
36
36
45
22
20
20
17
16
13
16
12
11
13
10
10
8
7
7
6
14
4
4
5
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
189

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
151

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
26

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
15

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
10

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.145&secondRef=04
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-414145_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 47
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 46
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.250
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.250
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.353
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.353
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.145&secondRef=04
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.145&secondRef=04
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2008-11-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html title: A6-0460/2008
events/3
date
2008-11-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html title: A6-0460/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081218&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081218&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-12-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0638_EN.html title: T6-0638/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-12-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0638_EN.html title: T6-0638/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: GACEK Urszula date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GACEK Urszula group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0460_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-638
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0638_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula
  • date: 2008-10-24T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2899
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0460/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16380&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081218&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-638 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0638/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GACEK Urszula group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2899 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2899*&MEET_DATE=24/10/2008 date: 2008-10-24T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-09-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.250 title: PE412.250 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.353 title: PE414.353 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.145&secondRef=04 title: PE414.145 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN title: A6-0460/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16380&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)988 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-24T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report drafted by LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE (EPP-ED, ES) containing a series of recommendations to the Commission on cross-border implications of the legal protection of adults. Concerned about the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions, MEPs stress that work and consultations have been conducted in that context on decisions concerning family property issues, successions and wills, with a view to drawing up new legislative proposals. They welcome the commitment of the French Presidency regarding the situation of vulnerable adults and their cross-border legal protection and congratulate those Member States which have signed and ratified the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the international protection of adults. MEPs request the Commission, as soon as sufficient experience of the operation of the Hague Convention has been acquired, to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on strengthening cooperation between Member States and improving the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the protection of adults and incapacity mandates and lasting powers of attorney . This proposal should based on the following the principles and aims: to promote the recognition and enforcement of legal or administrative decisions regarding persons who are the subject of protection measures; provisions to help achieve the goal of establishing an area of justice, freedom and security by facilitating the recognition and enforcement of decisions granting a protection measure, determination of the law to be applied and cooperation between the central authorities; specific and appropriate measures for cooperation between the Member States should be implemented, drawing on the instruments available under the Hague Convention; single Community forms to promote information on protection decisions and the circulation, recognition and enforcement of those decisions; single Community form created at European Union level in the case of incapacity mandates, in order to ensure their effectiveness in all the Member States. Other measures : the Commission is asked to: monitor experience with the application of the Hague Convention and its implementation in the Member States, and to submit to Parliament and the Council in due course a report summarising the problems and best practices in its practical application and containing, if necessary, proposals for Community provisions supplementing or specifying the manner in which the Convention is to be applied; assess the option of the accession of the Community to the Hague Convention; finance a study to compare Member States' legislation on vulnerable adults and protection measures with a view to ascertaining where legal issues could arise and what measures would be needed at EU or Member State level to resolve any such issues; considers that the study should also address the issue of institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities as regards their guardianship and their ability to exercise their legal rights. Member States are called upon to: ensure that protective measures are proportionate to the state of the vulnerable adults in question, so that individual EU citizens are not denied a legal right when they still have the ability to exercise that right; take measures to protect vulnerable adults from becoming victims of identity theft or fraud or other telephone or cyber-crimes, including legal measures to enhance the protection of and/or limit access to a vulnerable adult's personal data; Lastly, MEPs support the creation of secure mechanisms , subject to robust rules for the protection of personal data and rules on the limitation of access, for the sharing of best practices and other information regarding protective measures currently in force between Member States, including the possibility of Member States' judicial systems sharing information as to the protection status of a vulnerable adult.
  • date: 2008-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN title: A6-0460/2008
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16380&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081218&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-638 title: T6-0638/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, by 493 votes to 6 with 23 abstentions, a resolution on the legal protection of adults. The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE (EPP-ED, ES) on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs. Concerned about the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions, Parliament made a series of recommendations to the Commission on the cross-border implications of the legal protection of adults. Parliament stresses that work and consultations have been conducted in that context on decisions concerning family property issues, successions and wills, with a view to drawing up new legislative proposals. It requests the Commission, as soon as sufficient experience of the operation of the Hague Convention has been acquired, to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on strengthening cooperation between Member States and improving the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the protection of adults and incapacity mandates and lasting powers of attorney . This proposal should be based on the following principles and aims : promote the recognition and enforcement of legal or administrative decisions regarding persons who are the subject of protection measures; provisions to help achieve the goal of establishing an area of justice, freedom and security by facilitating the recognition and enforcement of decisions granting a protection measure, determination of the law to be applied and cooperation between the central authorities; specific and appropriate measures for cooperation between the Member States should be implemented, drawing on the instruments available under the Hague Convention; single Community forms to promote information on protection decisions and the circulation, recognition and enforcement of those decisions; single Community form created at European Union level in the case of incapacity mandates, in order to ensure their effectiveness in all the Member States. Other measures : the Commission is asked to: monitor experience with the application of the Hague Convention and its implementation in the Member States, and to submit to Parliament and the Council in due course a report summarising the problems and best practices in its practical application and containing, if necessary, proposals for Community provisions supplementing or specifying the manner in which the Convention is to be applied; assess the option of the accession of the Community to the Hague Convention; finance a study to compare Member States' legislation on vulnerable adults and protection measures with a view to ascertaining where legal issues could arise and what measures would be needed at EU or Member State level to resolve any such issues; considers that the study should also address the issue of institutionalised adults with intellectual disabilities as regards their guardianship and their ability to exercise their legal rights. Member States are called upon to ensure that protective measures are proportionate to the state of the vulnerable adults in question, so that individual EU citizens are not denied a legal right when they still have the ability to exercise that right; take measures to protect vulnerable adults from becoming victims of identity theft or fraud or other telephone or cyber-crimes, including legal measures to enhance the protection of and/or limit access to a vulnerable adult's personal data. Lastly, Parliament supports the creation of secure mechanisms , subject to robust rules for the protection of personal data and rules on the limitation of access, for the sharing of best practices and other information regarding protective measures currently in force between Member States, including the possibility of Member States' judicial systems sharing information as to the protection status of a vulnerable adult.
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/6/62870
New
  • JURI/6/62870
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 46
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
procedure/subject
Old
  • 1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
  • 7.40 Judicial cooperation
  • 8.50.01 Implementation of EU law
New
1.10
Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
7.40
Judicial cooperation
8.50.01
Implementation of EU law
procedure/subject/0
Old
1.10 Fundamental rights in the Union, Charter
New
1.10 Fundamental rights in the EU, Charter
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula
  • date: 2008-10-24T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2899
  • date: 2008-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-460&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0460/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16380&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081218&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-638 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0638/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GACEK Urszula
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/6/62870
reference
2008/2123(INL)
title
Legal protection of adults: cross-border implications
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Request for legislative proposal
type
INL - Legislative initiative procedure
subject