BETA


2008/2128(INI) MDG contracts

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE HUTCHINSON Alain (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/10/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 582 votes to 24, with 39 abstentions, a resolution on millennium development goal (MDG) contracts.

Parliament reasserts that development aid should be based on need and performance and development aid policy should be designed in partnership with the recipient countries. It also reasserts that, to achieve the MDG, donor countries must honour all their commitments and improve the quality of the aid they provide. It stresses the need to develop new instruments to ensure aid is more predictable and less volatile.

Priority sectors : the Commission is invited to continue to link its aid in the health and education sectors, in particular basic health care and primary education, to the results achieved in those sectors.

Aid effectiveness : Parliament calls on the Commission to improve the predictability of budget support by introducing MDG contracts and extending the principles underlying these contracts to a larger number of countries and to sector budget support. The Commission is also invited to maintain high levels of budget support spending, while aiming in particular to increase the provision of budget support for ACP countries' social services sectors and strengthen sector budget support in other regions.

Governments of the developing countries are called upon to increase their health spending to 15% of their national budgets, in accordance with the recommendations set out in the Abuja Declaration, and their education spending to 20% of national budgets, as recommended by the Global Campaign for Education.

MDG contracts : noting with interest that the Commission's proposal concerning MDG contracts provides eligible countries with a minimum guaranteed aid level (70% of total commitment), Parliament calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide a detailed timetable for the introduction of the contracts. It also calls for the adoption of a communication formalising the MDG contract approach and extending it to non-ACP countries which meet the eligibility criteria.

According to the Parliament, every MDG contract should be matched with a series of performance indicators in order to evaluate progress achieved in the implementation of the contract. The inclusion of persons and children with disabilities should also be measured by these indicators.

Parliaments and civil society : Parliament asks the Commission and beneficiary countries to ensure the involvement of their parliaments and civil society, including disabled people's organisations, in every stage of the budget support dialogue. The ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA) is called upon to play a more active role in defining priorities, negotiating MDG contracts and all other stages of the process.

In addition, Parliament stresses that donors, rather than imposing unilateral conditions on recipients, should seek to promote good governance, democracy and stability in recipient countries through transparent criteria established in partnership with these countries. It is recommended that the Commission work towards strengthening the dialogue between donors and recipients , particularly with a view to identifying real needs and sectors in which aid is necessary.

Selection criteria – creativity and flexibility : Parliament calls on the Commission to make its budget support conditional on results achieved with regard not only to the field of good governance and transparency, but also in terms of defending and upholding human rights, in particular those of the poorest and the excluded, including disabled people, minorities, women and children, and to ensure that budget support is not provided for sectors other than those specified in the MDG contract.

Parliament deplores the fact that the Union's budget support policy for developing countries is increasingly subject to conditions imposed by the IMF being attached to Union development aid considering that such conditionality runs counter to the policies of recipient countries with regard to the ownership principle. It emphasises the need to develop other budget support approaches for countries which are ineligible for MDG contracts, and particularly for countries whose situation is fragile.

Gender dimension : the resolution draws the Commission's attention to the fact that it should imperatively continue to link its budget support to results in beneficiary countries related to gender equality and the promotion of women’s rights. It asks that the performance indicators be strengthened in this area in the MDG contracts.

Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/02/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/02/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/02/17
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Alain HUTCHISON (PES, BE) on millennium development goal (MDG) contracts. It reasserts that development aid should be based on need and performance and development aid policy should be designed in partnership with the recipient countries. It also reasserts that, to achieve the MDG, donor countries must honour all their commitments and improve the quality of the aid they provide.

Priority sectors : the Commission is invited to continue to link its aid in the health and education sectors, in particular basic health care and primary education, to the results achieved in those sectors.

Aid effectiveness: MEPs call on the Commission to improve the predictability of budget support by introducing MDG contracts and extending the principles underlying these contracts to a larger number of countries and to sector budget support. The Commission is also invited to maintain high levels of budget support spending, while aiming in particular to increase the provision of budget support for ACP countries' social services sectors and strengthen sector budget support in other regions.

Governments of the developing countries are called upon to increase their health spending to 15% of their national budgets, in accordance with the recommendations set out in the Abuja Declaration, and their education spending to 20% of national budgets, as recommended by the Global Campaign for Education.

MDG contracts : noting with interest that the Commission's proposal concerning MDG contracts provides eligible countries with a minimum guaranteed aid level (70% of total commitment), MEPs call on the Commission, therefore, to provide a detailed timetable for the introduction of the contracts. They also call for the adoption of a communication formalising the MDG contract approach and extending it to non-ACP countries which meet the eligibility criteria.

MEPs call on the Commission, in collaboration with partner countries, to match every MDG contract with a series of performance indicators in order to evaluate progress achieved in the implementation of the contract; the inclusion of persons and children with disabilities should also be measured by these indicators.

Parliaments and civil society – Aid ownership – Transparency : MEPs asks the Commission and beneficiary countries to ensure the involvement of their parliaments and civil society, including disabled people's organisations, in every stage of the budget support dialogue. The ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA) is called upon to play a more active role in defining priorities, negotiating MDG contracts and all other stages of the process.

In addition, MEPs stress that donors, rather than imposing unilateral conditions on recipients, should seek to promote good governance, democracy and stability in recipient countries through transparent criteria established in partnership with these countries. It is recommended that the Commission work towards strengthening the dialogue between donors and recipients, particularly with a view to identifying real needs and sectors in which aid is necessary.

Selection criteria – creativity and flexibility : MEPs call on the Commission to make its budget support conditional on results achieved with regard not only to the field of good governance and transparency, but also in terms of defending and upholding human rights, in particular those of the poorest and the excluded, including disabled people, minorities, women and children, and to ensure that budget support is not provided for sectors other than those specified in the MDG contract.

MEPs deplore the fact that the Union's budget support policy for developing countries is increasingly subject to conditions imposed by the IMF being attached to Union development aid considering that such conditionality runs counter to the policies of recipient countries with regard to the ownership principle. They emphasises the need to develop other budget support approaches for countries which are ineligible for MDG contracts, and particularly for countries whose situation is fragile.

Gender dimension : the report draws the Commission's attention to the fact that it should imperatively continue to link its budget support to results in beneficiary countries related to gender equality and the promotion of women’s rights. It asks that the performance indicators be strengthened in this area in the MDG contracts.

2009/01/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/05/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/01/29
   EP - HUTCHINSON Alain (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
47 2008/2128(INI)
2009/01/26 DEVE 47 amendments...
source: PE-418.409

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.116
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.116
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.409
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.409
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2009-02-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html title: A6-0085/2009
events/2
date
2009-02-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html title: A6-0085/2009
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
events/5
date
2009-03-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0152_EN.html title: T6-0152/2009
summary
events/5
date
2009-03-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0152_EN.html title: T6-0152/2009
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: HUTCHINSON Alain date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2008-01-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HUTCHINSON Alain group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0085_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-152
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0152_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0085/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16795&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-152 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0152/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2008-01-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HUTCHINSON Alain group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2008-01-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain
docs
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.116 title: PE418.116 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.409 title: PE418.409 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN title: A6-0085/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16795&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3245 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Alain HUTCHISON (PES, BE) on millennium development goal (MDG) contracts. It reasserts that development aid should be based on need and performance and development aid policy should be designed in partnership with the recipient countries. It also reasserts that, to achieve the MDG, donor countries must honour all their commitments and improve the quality of the aid they provide. Priority sectors : the Commission is invited to continue to link its aid in the health and education sectors, in particular basic health care and primary education, to the results achieved in those sectors. Aid effectiveness: MEPs call on the Commission to improve the predictability of budget support by introducing MDG contracts and extending the principles underlying these contracts to a larger number of countries and to sector budget support. The Commission is also invited to maintain high levels of budget support spending, while aiming in particular to increase the provision of budget support for ACP countries' social services sectors and strengthen sector budget support in other regions. Governments of the developing countries are called upon to increase their health spending to 15% of their national budgets, in accordance with the recommendations set out in the Abuja Declaration, and their education spending to 20% of national budgets, as recommended by the Global Campaign for Education. MDG contracts : noting with interest that the Commission's proposal concerning MDG contracts provides eligible countries with a minimum guaranteed aid level (70% of total commitment), MEPs call on the Commission, therefore, to provide a detailed timetable for the introduction of the contracts. They also call for the adoption of a communication formalising the MDG contract approach and extending it to non-ACP countries which meet the eligibility criteria. MEPs call on the Commission, in collaboration with partner countries, to match every MDG contract with a series of performance indicators in order to evaluate progress achieved in the implementation of the contract; the inclusion of persons and children with disabilities should also be measured by these indicators. Parliaments and civil society – Aid ownership – Transparency : MEPs asks the Commission and beneficiary countries to ensure the involvement of their parliaments and civil society, including disabled people's organisations, in every stage of the budget support dialogue. The ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA) is called upon to play a more active role in defining priorities, negotiating MDG contracts and all other stages of the process. In addition, MEPs stress that donors, rather than imposing unilateral conditions on recipients, should seek to promote good governance, democracy and stability in recipient countries through transparent criteria established in partnership with these countries. It is recommended that the Commission work towards strengthening the dialogue between donors and recipients, particularly with a view to identifying real needs and sectors in which aid is necessary. Selection criteria – creativity and flexibility : MEPs call on the Commission to make its budget support conditional on results achieved with regard not only to the field of good governance and transparency, but also in terms of defending and upholding human rights, in particular those of the poorest and the excluded, including disabled people, minorities, women and children, and to ensure that budget support is not provided for sectors other than those specified in the MDG contract. MEPs deplore the fact that the Union's budget support policy for developing countries is increasingly subject to conditions imposed by the IMF being attached to Union development aid considering that such conditionality runs counter to the policies of recipient countries with regard to the ownership principle. They emphasises the need to develop other budget support approaches for countries which are ineligible for MDG contracts, and particularly for countries whose situation is fragile. Gender dimension : the report draws the Commission's attention to the fact that it should imperatively continue to link its budget support to results in beneficiary countries related to gender equality and the promotion of women’s rights. It asks that the performance indicators be strengthened in this area in the MDG contracts.
  • date: 2009-02-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN title: A6-0085/2009
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16795&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-152 title: T6-0152/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 582 votes to 24, with 39 abstentions, a resolution on millennium development goal (MDG) contracts. Parliament reasserts that development aid should be based on need and performance and development aid policy should be designed in partnership with the recipient countries. It also reasserts that, to achieve the MDG, donor countries must honour all their commitments and improve the quality of the aid they provide. It stresses the need to develop new instruments to ensure aid is more predictable and less volatile. Priority sectors : the Commission is invited to continue to link its aid in the health and education sectors, in particular basic health care and primary education, to the results achieved in those sectors. Aid effectiveness : Parliament calls on the Commission to improve the predictability of budget support by introducing MDG contracts and extending the principles underlying these contracts to a larger number of countries and to sector budget support. The Commission is also invited to maintain high levels of budget support spending, while aiming in particular to increase the provision of budget support for ACP countries' social services sectors and strengthen sector budget support in other regions. Governments of the developing countries are called upon to increase their health spending to 15% of their national budgets, in accordance with the recommendations set out in the Abuja Declaration, and their education spending to 20% of national budgets, as recommended by the Global Campaign for Education. MDG contracts : noting with interest that the Commission's proposal concerning MDG contracts provides eligible countries with a minimum guaranteed aid level (70% of total commitment), Parliament calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide a detailed timetable for the introduction of the contracts. It also calls for the adoption of a communication formalising the MDG contract approach and extending it to non-ACP countries which meet the eligibility criteria. According to the Parliament, every MDG contract should be matched with a series of performance indicators in order to evaluate progress achieved in the implementation of the contract. The inclusion of persons and children with disabilities should also be measured by these indicators. Parliaments and civil society : Parliament asks the Commission and beneficiary countries to ensure the involvement of their parliaments and civil society, including disabled people's organisations, in every stage of the budget support dialogue. The ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA) is called upon to play a more active role in defining priorities, negotiating MDG contracts and all other stages of the process. In addition, Parliament stresses that donors, rather than imposing unilateral conditions on recipients, should seek to promote good governance, democracy and stability in recipient countries through transparent criteria established in partnership with these countries. It is recommended that the Commission work towards strengthening the dialogue between donors and recipients , particularly with a view to identifying real needs and sectors in which aid is necessary. Selection criteria – creativity and flexibility : Parliament calls on the Commission to make its budget support conditional on results achieved with regard not only to the field of good governance and transparency, but also in terms of defending and upholding human rights, in particular those of the poorest and the excluded, including disabled people, minorities, women and children, and to ensure that budget support is not provided for sectors other than those specified in the MDG contract. Parliament deplores the fact that the Union's budget support policy for developing countries is increasingly subject to conditions imposed by the IMF being attached to Union development aid considering that such conditionality runs counter to the policies of recipient countries with regard to the ownership principle. It emphasises the need to develop other budget support approaches for countries which are ineligible for MDG contracts, and particularly for countries whose situation is fragile. Gender dimension : the resolution draws the Commission's attention to the fact that it should imperatively continue to link its budget support to results in beneficiary countries related to gender equality and the promotion of women’s rights. It asks that the performance indicators be strengthened in this area in the MDG contracts.
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/6/62877
New
  • DEVE/6/62877
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
  • 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
  • 6.30.04 Loans to third-countries, Guarantee Fund
  • 8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
New
6.30
Development cooperation
6.30.02
Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
6.30.04
Loans to third-countries, Guarantee Fund
8.70.03
Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-85&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0085/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16795&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-152 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0152/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: HUTCHINSON Alain
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/6/62877
reference
2008/2128(INI)
title
MDG contracts
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject