BETA


2008/2135(INI) EU-India Free Trade Agreement

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA KARIM Sajjad (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion DEVE KACZMAREK Filip (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AFET TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/10/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/26
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/26
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 326 votes to 226, with 3 abstentions, a resolution on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED, ALDE and UEN groups, pursuant to Article 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution contained in the own-initiative report tabled by the Committee on International Trade.

The resolution recalls that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour. In light of these observations, the Parliament believes that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations, pointing to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities. However, the FTA should also ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India's achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), including preventing environmental degradation. The agreement must also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism.

The Parliament considers the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario. However, the plenary recommends that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities. It also encourages the parties to address the potential disadvantages of the FTA and the ways in which human development and gender equality may be adversely affected by the rapid opening of markets.

Reiterating its view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, the Parliament makes a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement:

Trade in goods : the Parliament notes that, at the existing average growth rate, bilateral trade is expected to exceed EUR 70.7 billion by 2010 and EUR 160.6 billion by 2015. Therefore, all efforts must be made to promote trade. That is why the Parliament calls for the FTA to include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade . It calls, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production.

The Parliament stresses that the FTA includes a binding state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism, provisions on mediation on non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs), on anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures.

Trade in services, establishment : the Parliament stresses that service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , including public services. It notes that trade in services between the European Union and India is relatively unbalanced; the EU exports 1.5% of its services to India, while India exports 9.2% of its total exports to the European Union.

The Parliament also notes that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world (and the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years) and therefore calls for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. Moreover, the plenary considers that the telecom and IT sectors are major drivers of the Indian economy and that these sectors offer enormous opportunities. The Parliament also calls for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration.

Other liberalisation measures are called for, including the accreditation of qualifications (the Parliament stresses that EU-wide accreditation of professional qualifications and agreements on mutual recognition and licensing requirements could be easily covered by the FTA) and also in terms of legal services. Moreover, the Parliament encourages India to gradually liberalise the banking and insurance sectors.

Investment : the Parliament calls on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. It calls on the Commission to incorporate in the FTA a chapter on investment, being a significant part thereof, thereby promoting and protecting investment deals while exploring immediate opportunities. It also calls on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants.

Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, the Parliament calls on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis.

Public procurement and competition : the Parliament regrets that India is not willing to include public procurement in the FTA and calls on the Commission to negotiate effective and transparent procurement systems. It also calls on India to apply transparent and fair procedures when awarding public contracts and to grant access to public procurement systems for European businesses. Moreover, the plenary believes that the European Union should incorporate Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty in the FTA so as to secure commitments on competition policy.

Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : stressing that India is one of the major sources of counterfeit medicines seized by the customs services of the Member States (accounting for 30% of the total), the Parliament calls on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines . It calls on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases.

Trade and sustainable development : the Parliament calls for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, the Parliament calls for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. It welcomes, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community (indigenous tribes and peoples) - in India. The plenary also recalls that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA .

Other considerations : the Parliament welcomes the commitments made by the European Union and India to cooperate in civil nuclear research. It notes, however, that India is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and therefore calls on India to sign the NPT. Moreover, the Parliament calls for:

a comprehensive strategy to tackle rising global commodity prices; the strengthening of initiatives taken as part of the health-related MDGs concerning such matters as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS; new measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit.

Documents
2009/03/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/03/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/03/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/03/05
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the report drawn up by Sajjad KARIM (EPP-ED, UK) on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

MEPs recall that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour.

In light of these observations, MEPs believe that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations. They recall that the EU-India Strategic Partnership is based on common principles and shared values, as reflected in the 1994 EC-India Cooperation Agreement and consider that the new competitiveness-driven FTA should complement the 1994 Cooperation Agreement.

Based on the complementarities of both economies, MEPs point to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities arising from the FTA. They consider the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario but recommend that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities.

According to MEPs, the FTA should ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The agreement should also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism.

Reiterating their view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, MEPs make a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement:

Trade in goods : according to MEPs, the FTA should include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade. They call, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production. Moreover, MEPs call for priority to be given to tariff reductions on Fairtrade and sustainable products .

Trade in services, establishment : according to MEPs, service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , and especially to maintain and develop strong public services, an essential element for development, social justice and democracy. MEPs encourage India to develop appropriate data protection legislation. They also note that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world and that the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years. They therefore call for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. They also call for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration.

Investment : MEPs call on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. They also call on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants. Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, MEPs call on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis.

Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : MEPs call on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines. They call on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases.

Trade and sustainable development : MEPs call for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, MEPs call for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. They welcome, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community - in India.

Other considerations : MEPs express concern about rising global commodity prices and their effect on the poorest populations, including in India. They therefore call on the EU and India to coordinate a comprehensive strategy to tackle this issue in an integrated manner. Moreover, MEPs welcome the fact that India has made considerable progress towards universal primary education, improving poverty eradication and increasing access to safe drinking water. They note, however, that India is still off track on most of the health-related MDGs, such as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. MEPs also call for measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit, which has already been introduced in the country.

2009/02/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/12/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/06/25
   EP - KACZMAREK Filip (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2008/06/03
   EP - TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2008/05/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/03/26
   EP - KARIM Sajjad (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
173 2008/2135(INI)
2008/11/11 DEVE 16 amendments...
source: PE-415.223
2008/11/13 AFET 17 amendments...
source: PE-415.160
2009/02/03 INTA 140 amendments...
source: PE-419.842

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-406165_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-414227_EN.html
docs/3
date
2009-01-28T00:00:00
docs
title: PE419.841
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
TANNOCK Charles
New
TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.788
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.788
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.842
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE419.842
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2009-03-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html title: A6-0131/2009
events/2
date
2009-03-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html title: A6-0131/2009
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
events/5
date
2009-03-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0189_EN.html title: T6-0189/2009
summary
events/5
date
2009-03-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0189_EN.html title: T6-0189/2009
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: KARIM Sajjad date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2008-03-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARIM Sajjad group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: TANNOCK Charles date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TANNOCK Charles group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: KACZMAREK Filip date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KACZMAREK Filip group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0131_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-189
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0189_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad
  • date: 2009-03-05T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0131/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16878&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-189 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0189/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2008-03-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARIM Sajjad group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TANNOCK Charles group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KACZMAREK Filip group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2008-03-26T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad
docs
  • date: 2008-12-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.165&secondRef=02 title: PE406.165 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.227&secondRef=02 title: PE414.227 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.788 title: PE409.788 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 docs: title: PE419.841 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.842 title: PE419.842 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN title: A6-0131/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16878&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3245 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-05T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the report drawn up by Sajjad KARIM (EPP-ED, UK) on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA). MEPs recall that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour. In light of these observations, MEPs believe that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations. They recall that the EU-India Strategic Partnership is based on common principles and shared values, as reflected in the 1994 EC-India Cooperation Agreement and consider that the new competitiveness-driven FTA should complement the 1994 Cooperation Agreement. Based on the complementarities of both economies, MEPs point to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities arising from the FTA. They consider the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario but recommend that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities. According to MEPs, the FTA should ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The agreement should also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism. Reiterating their view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, MEPs make a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement: Trade in goods : according to MEPs, the FTA should include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade. They call, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production. Moreover, MEPs call for priority to be given to tariff reductions on Fairtrade and sustainable products . Trade in services, establishment : according to MEPs, service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , and especially to maintain and develop strong public services, an essential element for development, social justice and democracy. MEPs encourage India to develop appropriate data protection legislation. They also note that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world and that the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years. They therefore call for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. They also call for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration. Investment : MEPs call on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. They also call on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants. Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, MEPs call on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis. Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : MEPs call on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines. They call on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases. Trade and sustainable development : MEPs call for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, MEPs call for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. They welcome, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community - in India. Other considerations : MEPs express concern about rising global commodity prices and their effect on the poorest populations, including in India. They therefore call on the EU and India to coordinate a comprehensive strategy to tackle this issue in an integrated manner. Moreover, MEPs welcome the fact that India has made considerable progress towards universal primary education, improving poverty eradication and increasing access to safe drinking water. They note, however, that India is still off track on most of the health-related MDGs, such as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. MEPs also call for measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit, which has already been introduced in the country.
  • date: 2009-03-12T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN title: A6-0131/2009
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-26T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16878&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-26T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-189 title: T6-0189/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 326 votes to 226, with 3 abstentions, a resolution on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED, ALDE and UEN groups, pursuant to Article 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution contained in the own-initiative report tabled by the Committee on International Trade. The resolution recalls that, as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries), 35% of the Indian population lives on less than USD 1 a day and 80% on less than USD 2 a day. India also has one of the highest incidences of child labour. In light of these observations, the Parliament believes that the FTA should be balanced and compatible with WTO rules and obligations, pointing to the future potential for an increase in EU-India trade and investment and business opportunities. However, the FTA should also ensure that increasing bilateral trade brings benefits to the widest number of people and contributes to India's achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), including preventing environmental degradation. The agreement must also include an ambitious sustainable development chapter and be subject to the standard dispute settlement mechanism. The Parliament considers the EU-India FTA overall as a win-win scenario. However, the plenary recommends that an evaluation be carried out of the existing sector-specificities. It also encourages the parties to address the potential disadvantages of the FTA and the ways in which human development and gender equality may be adversely affected by the rapid opening of markets. Reiterating its view that the FTA should be presented to Parliament for its assent, the Parliament makes a number of observations on the other main points of the agreement: Trade in goods : the Parliament notes that, at the existing average growth rate, bilateral trade is expected to exceed EUR 70.7 billion by 2010 and EUR 160.6 billion by 2015. Therefore, all efforts must be made to promote trade. That is why the Parliament calls for the FTA to include provisions aimed at reducing technical barriers to trade . It calls, in particular, for measures in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary domain (including animal welfare). The Commission is also called upon to provide technical assistance to support Indian producers in their efforts to reach EU standards, in particular concerning the health, environmental and social dimensions of production. The Parliament stresses that the FTA includes a binding state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism, provisions on mediation on non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs), on anti-dumping and countervailing duty measures. Trade in services, establishment : the Parliament stresses that service liberalisation must in no way hinder the right to regulate services , including public services. It notes that trade in services between the European Union and India is relatively unbalanced; the EU exports 1.5% of its services to India, while India exports 9.2% of its total exports to the European Union. The Parliament also notes that India is the fifth largest telecom services market in the world (and the telecom market has grown at about 25% per year over the last 5 years) and therefore calls for a relaxation of the licensing restrictions on service providers for the removal of policy uncertainty on tariff and interconnect regimes. Moreover, the plenary considers that the telecom and IT sectors are major drivers of the Indian economy and that these sectors offer enormous opportunities. The Parliament also calls for measures in the satellite sector. Moreover, in order to promote trade, MEPs request from India a more open approach in granting visas to citizens and business professionals and politicians from the EU Member States with multiple entries and minimum one year duration. Other liberalisation measures are called for, including the accreditation of qualifications (the Parliament stresses that EU-wide accreditation of professional qualifications and agreements on mutual recognition and licensing requirements could be easily covered by the FTA) and also in terms of legal services. Moreover, the Parliament encourages India to gradually liberalise the banking and insurance sectors. Investment : the Parliament calls on the Commission to incorporate a chapter on investment in the FTA, which could make provision for a system of a single point of information for investors. It calls on the Commission to incorporate in the FTA a chapter on investment, being a significant part thereof, thereby promoting and protecting investment deals while exploring immediate opportunities. It also calls on EU-based transnational companies with production facilities in India to abide by core ILO standards , as well as social and environmental covenants. Recognising that FTA investment chapters have often come accompanied by commitments to liberalise capital movements and renounce capital controls, the Parliament calls on the Commission to refrain from including such clauses, given the importance of capital controls – especially for developing countries - to mitigate against the impact of the financial crisis. Public procurement and competition : the Parliament regrets that India is not willing to include public procurement in the FTA and calls on the Commission to negotiate effective and transparent procurement systems. It also calls on India to apply transparent and fair procedures when awarding public contracts and to grant access to public procurement systems for European businesses. Moreover, the plenary believes that the European Union should incorporate Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty in the FTA so as to secure commitments on competition policy. Intellectual property rights and industrial and commercial policy : stressing that India is one of the major sources of counterfeit medicines seized by the customs services of the Member States (accounting for 30% of the total), the Parliament calls on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to coordinate actions to address effectively the fight against counterfeiting and, in particular, against counterfeit medicines . It calls on the European Union and India to ensure that commitments under the FTA do not preclude access to essential medicines whilst India is developing its capacity from a generic to a research based industry. Other initiatives have been proposed, such as prize funds and patent pools in order to support access to and innovation in medicines, particularly for neglected diseases. Trade and sustainable development : the Parliament calls for the inclusion of a substantial development chapter. The EU and India should ensure, in particular, that trade and FDI are not encouraged at the cost of lowering either environmental standards or core labour, occupational health and safety legislation and standards. Once again, the Parliament calls for the ratification and effective application of the basic conventions of the ILO. It welcomes, in particular, the introduction of a new Indian child labour law which bans children under the age of 14 from working as domestic servants or on food stalls. The EU should also press the Indian government to tackle the issue of bonded labour, which affects millions of people - largely from the Dalit and Adivasi community (indigenous tribes and peoples) - in India. The plenary also recalls that human rights and democracy clauses constitute an essential element of the FTA . Other considerations : the Parliament welcomes the commitments made by the European Union and India to cooperate in civil nuclear research. It notes, however, that India is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and therefore calls on India to sign the NPT. Moreover, the Parliament calls for: a comprehensive strategy to tackle rising global commodity prices; the strengthening of initiatives taken as part of the health-related MDGs concerning such matters as infant mortality, maternal health, child malnutrition and reducing malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS; new measures in relation to the strengthening of SMEs and in terms of microcredit.
  • date: 2009-03-26T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/6/62893
New
  • INTA/6/62893
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
New
6.20.03
Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
activities
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad
  • date: 2009-03-05T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-131&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0131/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16878&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-189 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0189/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TANNOCK Charles
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KACZMAREK Filip
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARIM Sajjad
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/6/62893
geographical_area
India
reference
2008/2135(INI)
title
EU-India Free Trade Agreement
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations