Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | MILLÁN MON Francisco José ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | INTA | QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL José Manuel ( PPE-DE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 503 votes to 51 with 10 abstentions, a resolution on the state of transatlantic relations in the aftermath of the US elections.
Parliament recalls that the inauguration of President Obama opens up a new era in the history of the United States. Moreover, it recalls that many Europeans expect a cooperative attitude in the international field from the new US administration, in particular in the framework of a transatlantic partnership which must remain a cornerstone of the external action of the Union.
Plenary welcomes the upcoming summit to be held in Prague on 5 April 2009 between President Obama and the 27 EU Heads of State and Government, and hopes that that meeting will provide a strong impetus for the strengthening of the transatlantic relationship and the establishment of a common agenda.
Bilateral institutional issues : congratulating, once again, Barack Obama on his election, Parliament recalls his emphatic commitment to the transatlantic partnership made in his Berlin speech in July 2008. It reiterates its invitation to the new President to address the European Parliament in plenary during his first official visit to Europe. It also calls on the Council, the EU Member States and the Commission to enhance the coordination and coherence of the EU´s policy vis-à-vis the new US administration. The Czech Presidency of the Council and the Commission is urged to establish with the new US administration a common agenda of short and long-term goals with regard to both bilateral matters and global and regional issues and conflicts.
Institutional level : Parliament considers that the transatlantic partnership agreement should be replaced by a new transatlantic partnership agreement based on a new institutional architecture. However, it deems it appropriate for the negotiation of the new agreement to commence once the Lisbon Treaty comes into force. In this context, they recommend that the EU-US summits should take place twice a year , in order to provide the partnership with strategic direction and impetus. The new agreement should establish a body for systematic high-level consultation and coordination in respect of foreign and security policy (this body should be chaired by the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission on the EU side and by the Secretary of State on the US side). It should also upgrade the current Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) into a parliamentary transatlantic assembly which should meet in plenary twice a year and be comprised on an equal basis of both MEPs and Members of both Houses of the US Congress. MEPs reiterate that a reciprocal legislative early-warning system should be created within this assembly with the aim of improving bilateral cooperation. MEPs invite the European Parliament and the US Congress to reflect on the possibility of setting up a US Congress liaison office in Brussels .
Support from civil society : the transatlantic partnership must be backed up by a deep understanding and closer ties between the parties' civil societies. Parliament insists on the need to increase exchanges among students, academics and other civil society. Back-up support for this initiative should be provided from the 2010 EU budget and from the relevant US institutions' budgets so as to ensure its effective development. Other initiatives include promoting the mutual benefits resulting from cultural exchanges and creating a closer cooperation in space programmes.
Global challenges : Parliament urges both partners to engage in effective multilateralism , within the United Nations and promote respect for human rights in the world as a key element of their policy. It calls on the new US administration to ratify and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to abolish the death penalty .
As regards the current financial and economic crisis , Parliament calls on the new President to reform the international financial system, with the help of the World Bank and the IMF, involving the emerging powers. It welcomes the strong commitment of the new US President to tackling climate change and urges the EU and the US to take the lead and to reach an ambitious post-2012 agreement at the Copenhagen Conference to be held in 2009. Parliament calls for closer cooperation between the EU and the US in the field of energy and urge that efficient coordination of their approaches towards the producing countries and strengthening diversity in supply, resources and transportation be regarded as a priority.
Parliament has expressed the approach to be adopted as regards specific regions in world :
Middle East : Parliament underlines that a peaceful and just settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital. It asks the US administration to coordinate closely with the EU and engage in the Quartet. It also calls on the transatlantic partners to support efforts for inter-Palestinian reconciliation and urge both partners to work closely together in order to help make the current fragile ceasefire in Gaza solid and durable.
Afghanistan , Pakistan, Iran, Iraq : Parliament calls on the EU and the US to develop a joint strategy towards Pakistan , aimed at strengthening its democratic institutions, the rule of law and its ability to fight terrorism. It welcomes the nomination of Richard Holbrooke as a single special envoy for the Pakistan-Afghan region. Underlining that the Iranian nuclear programme endangers the non-proliferation system and stability in the region and the world, Parliament supports the objective, pursued jointly by both partners, of finding a negotiated solution with Iran . It considers that any initiatives that one of the partners may launch concerning Iran must be closely coordinated between them in a spirit of trust and transparency; calls on the transatlantic partners to define as soon as possible a common approach towards Iran, without waiting until the issue needs to be confronted as a matter of urgency. Parliament calls on the transatlantic partners to define as soon as possible a common approach towards Iran, without waiting until the issue needs to be confronted as a matter of urgency. As regards Iraq , Parliament calls on the partners to continue, by means of coordinated efforts, to work with the Iraqi government and the UN in order to improve stability and national reconciliation and to contribute to the unity and independence of Iraq.
Russia : Parliament urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia. It emphasises the importance of building up with Russia constructive cooperation on challenges, threats and opportunities of mutual concern, including security matters, disarmament and non-proliferation, while respecting democratic principles, human rights standards and international law. Parliament underlines the need to enhance mutual trust between the transatlantic partners and Russia and to intensify the cooperation within the NATO-Russia Council. In addition, it calls on the EU and US to develop a common strategy concerning the six eastern European countries (Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus).
Other regions in the world : Parliament urges both partners to pay special attention to Latin America and to promote a common approach to other major geopolitical players such as China, India or Japan .
Defence, arms control and security matters : Parliament calls on both partners to adopt a common strategy in all international fora , in particular the UN, on disarmament of weapons of mass destruction and conventional weaponry. It urges the new US administration to re-engage with Russia in the area of arms control and disarmament, extending the two countries' current bilateral agreements. They also welcome the new US President’s commitment to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty as well as his decision to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay. Parliament calls on the Member States, should the US administration so request, to cooperate in finding, on a case-by case basis, solutions to the issue of accepting some of the Guantánamo inmates in the EU while respecting the duty of loyal cooperation to consult each other regarding possible effects on public security throughout the EU.
As regards the combat against terrorism : the importance of strengthening transatlantic cooperation in the fight against terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights is underlined. According to the Parliament, the sharing of data and information is a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and transnational crime, but it stresses that this must take place within a proper legal framework, ensuring adequate protection of civil liberties, including the right to privacy. It also considers that close EU-US cooperation in the area of justice and home affairs is also necessary in order to gradually build a transatlantic area of freedom, security and justice.
Parliament stresses the importance of the prompt entry into force of the EU-US Extradition and Legal Assistance Agreements . It emphasises that the effective implementation of those agreements requires a high degree of mutual trust built on full respect by all parties of human rights obligations, defence and fair trial rights and the rule of domestic and international law.
Economic and commercial issues : recalling that the gross domestic product (GDP) of the EU and the US represents more than half of the global GDP, Parliament urges the partners to use the full potential of the TEC in order to overcome the existing obstacles to economic integration and to achieve a unified transatlantic market by 2015 . It requests that the European Commission, on the basis of the study authorised and financed by the European Parliament, to draw up a detailed road map of existing obstacles which need to be removed with the aim of meeting that target date.
Concerned about the new trade-inhibiting US stimulus Bill, Parliament insists on the absolute need for a mutual response to the current crisis rather than the adoption of measures to seal ourselves off from one another. It advocates gradually integrating the financial markets through mutual recognition combined with a degree of convergence of the current regulatory frameworks and through the establishment of occasional exemptions whenever possible. It calls on the EU and the US authorities to avoid setting up barriers to inward investment and enacting legislation having an extraterritorial impact without prior consultation and agreement.
Parliament favours improving the integration of EU and US markets (in particular the financial services market ) and advocate the adoption of regulations that guarantee competition, ensure increased transparency and effective supervision of products, financial institutions and markets, and create common risk management models, in line with agreements reached at the G20 Summit in November 2008. It calls for greater cooperation between the supervisory bodies in supervising the activities of cross-border financial institutions and preventing action by financial institutions domiciled in jurisdictions that are uncooperative and less than transparent. It also calls for the abolition of tax havens .
Cap and trade emissions system : lastly, Parliament recommends that the next TEC meeting should discuss whether it would be helpful to integrate more technical topics into the scope of the TEC and whether greater cooperation between the EU and the US is essential in order to achieve a workable cap-and-trade emission system. It recommends that existing common international benchmarks for energy-intensive industries should be developed or integrated into the TEC process.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Francisco José MILLÁN MON (EPP-ED, ES) on the state of transatlantic relations in the aftermath of the US elections. The committee states that the inauguration of President Obama opens up a new era in the history of the United States.
Moreover, MEPs recall that many Europeans expect a cooperative attitude in the international field from the new US administration, in particular in the framework of a transatlantic partnership which must remain a cornerstone of the external action of the Union.
Bilateral institutional issues : congratulating Barack Obama on his election, MEPs recall his emphatic commitment to the transatlantic partnership made in his Berlin speech in July 2008. They reiterate their invitation to the new President to address the European Parliament in plenary during his first official visit to Europe. They also call on the Council, the EU Member States and the Commission to enhance the coordination and coherence of the EU´s policy vis-à-vis the new US administration. The Czech Presidency of the Council and the Commission is urged to establish with the new US administration a common agenda of short and long-term goals with regard to both bilateral matters and global and regional issues and conflicts.
Institutional level : MEPs consider that the transatlantic partnership agreement should be replaced by a new transatlantic partnership agreement based on a new institutional architecture. However, MEPs deem it appropriate for the negotiation of the new agreement to commence once the Lisbon Treaty comes into force. In this context, they recommend that the EU-US summits should take place twice a year , in order to provide the partnership with strategic direction and impetus. The new agreement should establish a body for systematic high-level consultation and coordination in respect of foreign and security policy (this body should be chaired by the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission on the EU side and by the Secretary of State on the US side). It should also upgrade the current Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) into a parliamentary transatlantic assembly which should meet in plenary twice a year and be comprised on an equal basis of both MEPs and Members of both Houses of the US Congress. MEPs reiterate that a reciprocal legislative early-warning system should be created within this assembly with the aim of improving bilateral cooperation. MEPs invite the European Parliament and the US Congress to reflect on the possibility of setting up a US Congress liaison office in Brussels .
Support from civil society : the transatlantic partnership must be backed up by a deep understanding and closer ties between the parties' civil societies. MEPs insist on the need to increase exchanges among students, academics and other civil society. Back-up support for this initiative should be provided from the 2010 EU budget and from the relevant US institutions' budgets so as to ensure its effective development. Other initiatives include promoting the mutual benefits resulting from cultural exchanges and creating a closer cooperation in space programmes.
Global challenges : MEPs urge both partners to engage in effective multilateralism , within the United Nations and promote respect for human rights in the world as a key element of their policy. They call on the new US administration to ratify and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to abolition the death penalty.
As regards the current financial and economic crisis , MEPs call on the new President to reform the international financial system, with the help of the World Bank and the IMF, involving the emerging powers. They welcome the strong commitment of the new US President to tackling climate change and urge the EU and the US to take the lead and to reach an ambitious post-2012 agreement at the Copenhagen Conference to be held in 2009. MEPs call for closer cooperation between the EU and the US in the field of energy and urge that efficient coordination of their approaches towards the producing countries and strengthening diversity in supply, resources and transportation be regarded as a priority.
MEPs have expressed the approach to be adopted as regards specific regions in world :
Middle East : MEPs underline that a peaceful and just settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital. They ask the US administration to coordinate closely with the EU and engage in the Quartet. They also call on the transatlantic partners to support efforts for inter-Palestinian reconciliation and urge both partners to work closely together in order to help make the current fragile ceasefire in Gaza solid and durable. Afghanistan , Pakistan, Iran, Iraq : MEPs call on the EU and the US to develop a joint strategy towards Pakistan , aimed at strengthening its democratic institutions, the rule of law and its ability to fight terrorism. They welcome the nomination of Richard Holbrooke as a single special envoy for the Pakistan-Afghan region. Underlining that the Iranian nuclear programme endangers the non-proliferation system and stability in the region and the world, MEPs support the objective, pursued jointly by both partners, of finding a negotiated solution with Iran . They call on the transatlantic partners to define as soon as possible a common approach towards Iran, without waiting until the issue needs to be confronted as a matter of urgency. As regards Iraq , MEPs call on the partners to continue, by means of coordinated efforts, to work with the Iraqi government and the UN in order to improve stability and national reconciliation and to contribute to the unity and independence of Iraq. Russia : MEPs urge both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia. They emphasise the importance of building up with Russia constructive cooperation on challenges, threats and opportunities of mutual concern, including security matters, disarmament and non-proliferation, while respecting democratic principles, human rights standards and international law. MEPs underline the need to enhance mutual trust between the transatlantic partners and Russia and to intensify the cooperation within the NATO-Russia Council. In addition, they call on the EU and US to develop a common strategy concerning the six eastern European countries (Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus). Other regions in the world : MEPs urge both partners to pay special attention to Latin America and to promote a common approach to other major geopolitical players such as China, India or Japan , as well as to the various crises and problems in sub-Saharan Africa.
Defence, arms control and security matters : MEPs call on both partners to adopt a common strategy in all international fora , in particular the UN, on disarmament of weapons of mass destruction and conventional weaponry. They urge the new US administration to re-engage with Russia in the area of arms control and disarmament, extending the two countries' current bilateral agreements. They also welcome the new US President’s commitment to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty as well as his decision to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay.
As regards the combat against terrorism : the importance of strengthening transatlantic cooperation in the fight against terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights is underlined. MEPs underline that the sharing of data and information is a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and transnational crime, but stresses that this must take place within a proper legal framework. They also consider that close EU-US cooperation in the area of justice and home affairs is also necessary in order to gradually build a transatlantic area of freedom, security and justice.
Economic and commercial issues : recalling that the gross domestic product (GDP) of the EU and the US represents more than half of the global GDP, MEPs urge the partners to use the full potential of the TEC in order to overcome the existing obstacles to economic integration and to achieve a unified transatlantic market by 2015 . The request the European Commission, on the basis of the study authorised and financed by the European Parliament, to draw up a detailed road map of existing obstacles which need to be removed with the aim of meeting that target date.
Concerned about the new trade-inhibiting US stimulus Bill, MEPs insist on the absolute need for a mutual response to the current crisis rather than the adoption of measures to seal ourselves off from one another. They advocate gradually integrating the financial markets through mutual recognition combined with a degree of convergence of the current regulatory frameworks and through the establishment of occasional exemptions whenever possible. MEPs call on the EU and the US authorities to avoid setting up barriers to inward investment and enacting legislation having an extraterritorial impact without prior consultation and agreement.
MEPs favour improving the integration of EU and US markets (in particular the financial services market ) and advocate the adoption of regulations that guarantee competition, ensure increased transparency and effective supervision of products, financial institutions and markets, and create common risk management models, in line with agreements reached at the G20 Summit in November 2008. They call for greater cooperation between the supervisory bodies in supervising the activities of cross-border financial institutions and preventing action by financial institutions domiciled in jurisdictions that are uncooperative and less than transparent. They also call for the abolition of tax havens .
Monitoring of cargo : MEPs call on the new Congress to modify the US regulation so as to provide for the scanning of 100% of inbound cargo. They note that secure trade is particularly important in an ever more integrated global economy, but consider that this blunt measure represents a potential new trade barrier, imposing significant costs on economic operators, which will not bring any benefit in terms of supply chain security.
On the other hand, MEPs believe that the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) could usefully organise seminars on the 100% scanning issue in order to foster a deeper understanding between EU and US legislators.
Cap and trade emissions system : lastly, MEPs recommend that the next TEC meeting should discuss whether it would be helpful to integrate more technical topics into the scope of the TEC and whether greater cooperation between the EU and the US is essential in order to achieve a workable cap-and-trade emission system. They recommend that existing common international benchmarks for energy-intensive industries should be developed or integrated into the TEC process.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3060
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0193/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0114/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0114/2009
- Committee opinion: PE416.292
- Committee opinion: PE418.105
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.557
- Committee draft report: PE416.553
- Committee draft report: PE416.553
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.557
- Committee opinion: PE418.105
- Committee opinion: PE416.292
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0114/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3060
Activities
- Erika MANN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 The state of transatlantic relations in the aftermath of the US elections (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- Ignasi GUARDANS CAMBÓ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The state of transatlantic relations in the aftermath of the US elections (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- Glenys KINNOCK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Cariforum – Stepping-stone Agreement towards an Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and Côte d'Ivoire – EC-Cariforum States Partnership Agreement – EC-Côte d'Ivoire Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Ghana, of the other part – Interim Partnership Agreement between the Pacific States, on the one part, and the European Community, on the other part – EC-SADC EPA States Interim Economic Partnership Agreement – Economic Partnership Agreement between EC and Eastern and Southern African States – Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the East African Community Partner States – Stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and Central Africa, of the other part (debate)
- Kader ARIF
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
- Liam AYLWARD
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jana BOBOŠÍKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elmar BROK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Călin Cătălin CHIRIȚĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Albert DESS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James ELLES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christofer FJELLNER
- Glyn FORD
- Daniel Petru FUNERIU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Urszula GACEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Martí GRAU i SEGÚ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fiona HALL
- Alain HUTCHINSON
- Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Madeleine JOUYE DE GRANDMAISON
- Syed KAMALL
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Helmut KUHNE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joost LAGENDIJK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Baroness Sarah LUDFORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mary Lou McDONALD
- Helmuth MARKOV
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mario MAURO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alexandru NAZARE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ONYSZKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard ONESTA
- Georgios PAPASTAMKOS
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Józef PINIOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogusław ROGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Manuel dos SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Toomas SAVI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jürgen SCHRÖDER
- Adrian SEVERIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek SIWIEC
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert STURDY
- István SZENT-IVÁNYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Johan VAN HECKE
- Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zbigniew ZALESKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dushana ZDRAVKOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
198 |
2008/2199(INI)
2009/01/06
ECON
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Notes that the transatlantic market is the largest and most integrated economic area in the world but is no longer the most dynamic, and therefore calls for the strategic partnership between the EU and the USA to be strengthened in order to improve competitiveness and remove obstacles to trade and investment, in line with agreements in the Framework for Advancing Transatlantic Economic Integration;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls, consequently, for a greater convergence between the regulatory frameworks in order to strengthen the transparency and control of products, financial institutions and markets
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Would encourage the US Congress to consider a more coherent supervisory structure in the banking and insurance sectors so as to provide an easier means of EU/US coordination;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Urges the US and EU authorities to regulate credit rating agencies in accordance with jointly held principles and methods so as to restore confidence in ratings and place them on a sound footing; points out however that the EU needs to develop its own regulatory framework as the extra-territorial application of US Securities and Exchange Commission standards to American agencies operating in the European market would not be acceptable;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that a Code of Conduct should be agreed upon for sovereign wealth funds
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Agrees with the Commission that credit originator institutions should be obliged to retain a fraction of the credit issued in order to force them to accept their share of the risks transferred; calls for this issue to be raised in the transatlantic dialogue in order to preserve equal conditions at international level and limit systemic risks on the world financial markets;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the need, as regards the suggestions for transatlantic convergence in the issues raised in paragraphs 2 to 8, for a framework for negotiations to be established under which the reoccurrence of situations similar to those that have led to the present situation, where an American crisis is dragging down Europe's economy, would be avoided;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls for joint discussions on reforms at the IMF and World Bank in order to present joint proposals in the various forums where these reforms are being discussed, so as to provide an effective mechanism for global financial surveillance and solidarity in time of crisis.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Acknowledges that the US supervisory authorities have made progress in implementing the Basel II agreements in regard to large banks, but criticises the discrepancies that remain to be corrected as they impose additional burdens on American subsidiaries of European banks, thereby reducing their competitiveness, and notes that there are still some points (financial holdings and small banks) that need to be cleared up as soon as possible.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for defining a joint EU-US framework for action in the field of investments in new, clean technologies since such a strategy would not only tackle the problem of climate change, but would also create new jobs.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on both the US and the EU authorities to avoid barriers to inward investment and legislation of extra- territorial impact without prior consultation and agreement.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the financial crisis has demonstrated the close relationship between the US and EU financial markets,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports removing barriers that hinder investment and transatlantic financial services, and is in favour of gradually integrating the two markets
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Supports removing barriers that hinder investment and transatlantic financial services, and is in favour of
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that liberalising financial
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 source: PE-418.150
2009/01/21
INTA
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Is convinced that the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) could become the most appropriate mechanism for managing the transatlantic economic relationship and stresses the need for it to continue, develop and be strengthened following the change of administration in the United States in January 2009 and the appointment of a new European Commission later in the year so as to achieve the goal of a transatlantic market without non-tariff barriers;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Believes, at the same time, that transatlantic economic cooperation must be made more accountable, transparent and predictable; schedules of meetings, agendas, road-maps and progress reports must be agreed upon between the core stakeholders as early as possible and then should be published on a website;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Takes the view that there is very great potential for the USA and the European Union to take joint positions and initiatives in international fora, in view of the many common trade interests, for example non-discriminatory access to raw materials on the global market, the implementation of intellectual property rights and global patent harmonisation; suggests that it is in both parties' interests to exploit this potential better;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that any standards harmonisation should not lead to the EU and USA creating intentional or unintentional barriers to third country trading partners wishing to access their markets;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes the positive effects of the free trade agreement between the European Union and Mexico. Trade has increased by 25 percent since the agreement came into force and extensive liberalisation has been undertaken by both parties. Also notes the mutual interest of Canada and the EU in a free trade agreement and therefore encourages the Commission and the new US Administration to begin negotiations in earnest to enable a free trade agreement between the European Union and NAFTA.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recommends that the next TEC meeting should discuss whether it would be helpful to integrate more technical topics into the TEC environment and whether greater cooperation between the EU and the US is essential in order to achieve a workable cap-and-trade- emission system ; recommends that existing common international benchmarks for energy-intensive industries should be developed or integrated into the TEC process;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Considers that the Transatlantic Legislative Dialogue (TLD), at its next meeting in April 2009 in Prague, should evaluate the work of the TEC and work out a method of strengthening the involvement of the TLD in the TEC process;
source: PE-418.314
2009/01/30
AFET
169 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to its resolutions of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners1, of 16 February 2006 on Guantánamo2 and of 12 December 2007 on the fight against terrorism3;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas many Europeans expect from the new US administration a
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls for a new joint EU-US strategy on prevention of further proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, to include measures which could be taken in the event of infringement or renunciation of the NPT Treaty;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and hopes that it will represent one of the most urgent priorities of the new US administration, coordinating closely with the EU and engaging in the Quartet; welcomes the early appointment of a US special envoy for the Middle East in the person of the former Senator George Mitchell; emphasises that both partners should strive for intensification of the negotiations based on the road map and the Annapolis
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a just and peaceful settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and hopes that it will represent one of the most urgent priorities of the new US administration, coordinating closely with the EU and engaging in the Quartet; emphasises that both partners should strive for intensification of the negotiations based on the road map and the Annapolis Conference achievements, aimed at
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Underlines that a peaceful, just and lasting settlement of the Middle East conflict is vital, and hopes that it will represent one of the most urgent priorities of the new US administration, coordinating closely with the EU and engaging in the Quartet; emphasises that both partners should strive for intensification of the negotiations based on the road map and the results of the Annapolis Conference
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas many Europeans expect from the new US administration a
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Urges the EU and the US to work together in renewing strategies to promote efforts to strengthen democracy in the Middle East, based on their economic and soft power in the region;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines that the values, security and credibility of the transatlantic community are at stake in Afghanistan
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines that the values, security and credibility of the transatlantic community are at stake in Afghanistan; urges the EU, the US, the UN and NATO to come up with a new joint strategic concept which comprehensively integrates the components of the international engagement, in order to increase security in all regions, strengthen the Afghan governmental and local institutions and aid nation-building and prosperity in close cooperation with neighbouring states; considers that the final goal must be a gradual handover of responsibility for security and stability into the hands of the Afghan authorities; recalls UN Security Council resolution 1833 (2008), which encourages all Afghan parties and groups to engage constructively in political dialogue and to avoid resorting to violence, and welcomes in this context President Obama's announcement of his intention to foster dialogue with the diverse political forces in Afghanistan;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines that the
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the EU and the US to develop a joint strategy towards Pakistan, aimed at strengthening its democratic institutions, the rule of law and its ability to fight terrorism, while encouraging Pakistan's involvement in responsibility for stability in the region, including the security of the Afghan border; welcomes the recently expressed intention of the new US President Barack Obama to resolve the Kashmir conflict; urges the EU and US to work towards this goal;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the EU and the US to develop
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the EU and the US to develop a joint strategy towards Pakistan, aimed at strengthening its democratic institutions, the rule of law and its ability to fight terrorism, while encouraging Pakistan's involvement in responsibility for stability in the region, including the security of the Afghan border and full governmental control of Pakistan's border provinces and tribal areas;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Member States of the EU and the US to develop a joint strategy towards Pakistan, aimed at
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Obama administration to put an end, as a matter of urgency, to the extra-judicial detention of over 600 detainees in Bagram military base and other secret prisons in Afghanistan and to re-establish the rule of law in the American detention system;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that the Iranian nuclear programme endangers the non-proliferation system and stability in the region; supports the objective, pursued jointly by both partners, of finding a negotiated solution with Iran, following the dual strategy of dialogue and sanctions, in coordination with other members of the Security Council; considers that any initiatives that
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the United States and the European Union can successfully face any challenges to the regional and global order when acting on the basis of a strong, comprehensive and substantial transatlantic partnership, in the spirit of their common values and pursuing their legitimate interests,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that the
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Underlines that the Iranian nuclear programme endangers the non-proliferation system and stability in the region and the world; supports the objective, pursued jointly by both partners, of finding a negotiated solution with Iran, following the dual strategy of dialogue and sanctions, in coordination with other members of the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency; considers that any initiatives that one of the partners may launch concerning Iran must be closely coordinated between them in a spirit of trust and transparency; calls on the transatlantic partners to define as soon as possible a common approach towards Iran, without waiting until the issue needs to be confronted as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Welcomes the ratification of the US- Iraqi agreement on the presence in Iraq of US military forces; underlines the readiness of the EU to continue helping with the reconstruction of Iraq, in particular focusing on the rule of law, respect for human rights and consolidation of the state institutions; calls on the partners to continue, by means of coordinated efforts, to work with the Iraqi government and the UN in order to improve stability and national reconciliation and to contribute to the unity and independence of Iraq; urges the EU and the US governments to support the Iraqi authorities in their efforts to close down Camp Ashraf, in which members of the People's Mujahedin of Iran (MKO) have been held hostage for years by their own leadership; calls, as a first step, for the immediate opening-up of the camp to family members, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Committee of the Red Cross/Red Crescent, and for refuge to be given to those who do not want to return to Iran;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Welcomes the ratification of the US- Iraqi agreement on the presence in Iraq of US military forces; underlines the readiness of the EU to continue helping with the reconstruction of Iraq, in particular focusing on the rule of law, respect for human rights and consolidation of the state institutions and support for the economic development of Iraq and its reintegration into the world economy; calls on the partners to continue, by means of coordinated efforts, to work with the Iraqi government and the UN in order to improve stability and national reconciliation and to contribute to the unity and independence of Iraq;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards and with Russia; conscious of Russia's r
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia; conscious of Russia's relevance as a neighbouring country
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia; conscious of Russia's relevance as a neighbouring country, of its interdependence with the EU and of its role as a global player, emphasises the importance of building up constructive cooperation with Russia
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia; conscious of Russia's relevance as a neighbouring country, of its interdependence with the EU and of its role as a global player, emphasises the importance of building up constructive cooperation with Russia, without compromising democratic principles or international law; calls on both transatlantic partners to closely coordinate their approach towards any
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges both parties to closely coordinate their policies towards Russia; conscious of Russia's relevance as a neighbouring country and a global player, of its interdependence with the EU and of its role as a global player, emphasises the importance of building up constructive cooperation with Russia, without compromising democratic principles or international law; calls on both transatlantic partners to closely coordinate their approach towards any reform of the European security architecture, while insisting on the OSCE principles as its inalienable base and maintaining the coherence of NATO;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Stresses that the security dimension of the EU's relations with Russia and the US and the role of the CFSP and ESDP cannot be seen in isolation from the wider European security architecture, which includes NATO, the OSCE and international arrangements such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe; considers that relevant developments in this wider security structure should be addressed in dialogue with Russia, the United States and the non-EU OSCE member countries in order to renew the transatlantic consensus on security, taking as a basis the Helsinki agreements or an updated version of them to be negotiated within a new Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe; believes that a moratorium on the deployment of any new weapons systems in Europe would be helpful in this respect;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Is of the view that the US plan to establish an anti-missile system in Europe at this time may hamper international disarmament efforts; is equally concerned over the announcement by the Russian President to deploy missiles in Kaliningrad to counter the US plan; calls on the new US administration to defer the US missile defence system planned for Poland and the Czech Republic until comprehensive talks on future global security have taken place;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Considers that the construction of the US missile defence system in Poland and the Czech Republic can only be negative in its impact on Europe, risks leading to a new arms spiral and ignores the majority view among the people of Poland and the Czech Republic which opposes the US missile shield; calls on the newly elected US President and the US Senate to abandon this project altogether;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the EU and US to develop a common strategy concerning the six eastern European countries (Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus), encompassed by the European Neighbourhood Policy, in order to achieve substantial and lasting results in the implementation of the new Eastern Partnership and Black Sea Synergy;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges both partners to pay special attention to Latin America and its regional organisations in particular, coordinating efforts to promote the consolidation of democracy, respect for human rights, good governance, the fight against poverty, the strengthening of social cohesion, market economies, the rule of law including the fight against organised crime and drug trafficking, and supporting regional integration as well as cooperation in respect of climate change;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges both partners to pay special attention to Latin America, coordinating efforts to promote the consolidation of democracy, respect for human rights, the fight against poverty, the strengthening of social cohesion, market economies, the rule of law including the fight against organised crime and drug trafficking (acknowledging the progress made in this regard by certain emergent countries such as Chile and Brazil), and supporting regional integration;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on both partners to work towards resolving armed conflicts in Africa, to prevent further outbursts of violence, to put an end to mass killings in certain African countries, in particular Darfur and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and to work towards achieving peace, democracy, freedom, human rights and sustainable development throughout the continent;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law and international institutions as well as
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Recommends also the
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Recommends also the promotion of a common approach to other major geopolitical players such as China, India or Japan, as well as to the various crises and problems, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, in order to eradicate poverty and health problems;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Underlines the importance of NATO as the cornerstone of transatlantic security; welcomes the decision by the European Council in December 2008 to strengthen the strategic partnership between the EU and NATO, and calls on both partners to accelerate the creation of an EU-NATO high-level group in order to improve cooperation between the two organisations; suggests that discussions be held on the value of a Euro-Atlantic Security Strategy that could define common security concerns and interests;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on both the US and European allies to revitalise NATO as it approaches its 60th anniversary;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Emphasises the growing importance of the E
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Invites the EU and the US to adopt a common strategy in all international fora, in particular the UN, on disarmament of weapons of mass destruction and conventional weaponry; urges the new US administration to re-engage with Russia in the area of arms control and disarmament, extending the two countries' current bilateral agreements; stresses the need for closer cooperation in order to ensure progress in the run-up to the NPT Review Conference in 2010, welcomes the commitment of the new US President to ratification of the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty; calls on the USA to abandon its long-standing boycott (since 1997) of the Geneva Conference on Disarmament, which is the only permanent multilateral negotiating forum on armaments issues, and, as a first step, to begin negotiations on halting the production of fissile material;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Invites the EU and the US to adopt a common strategy in all international fora, in particular the UN, on disarmament of weapons of mass destruction and conventional weaponry;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law and international institutions as well as o
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Reiterates its call, in its resolution of 20 November 2008, on all Member States of the European Union to sign and ratify the Convention on cluster munitions (CCM), and also calls on the USA to sign and ratify this international convention; further calls on the USA to accede to the Convention on the Prohibition of Anti- Personnel Mines (Ottawa Convention);
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Underlines the importance of fighting terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights, and of supporting the role of the UN in combating this threat; welcomes the commitment of the new US
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Underlines the importance of fighting terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights, and of supporting the role of the UN in combating this threat; welcomes the
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Underlines the
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Underlines the importance of fighting terrorism on the basis of full respect for international law and human rights, and of supporting the role of the UN in combating this threat; welcomes the commitment of the new US-President to the closure of Camp Delta in Guantánamo Bay; calls on the Member States to assist with the closure by offering help in finding a suitable new residence for the remaining inmates;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Stresses the importance of the prompt entry into force of the EU-US Extradition and Legal Assistance Agreement, and urges those Member States that have not yet ratified it to do so as soon as possible; stresses at the same time that the US needs to explicitly halt its policy of extraordinary rendition, and calls on the US to exercise restraint in issuing requests for the extradition of EU citizens;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Underlines that the sharing of data and information is a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and transnational crime, but stresses that this must take place within a proper legal framework, ensuring adequate protection of civil liberties and respect for human rights, including the right to privacy, and that it should be based on a binding international agreement, as agreed at the 2008 EU-US Summit;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the recent extension of the visa waiver programme to another six EU Member States; however calls once again on the US to lift the visa regime for the remaining six Member States and to treat all EU-citizens equally and on the basis of full reciprocity
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the recent extension of the visa waiver programme to another six EU Member States; however calls once again on the US to lift the visa regime for the remaining six Member States and to treat all EU-citizens equally and on the basis of full reciprocity; asks the Commission to treat this as a priority matter with the new US administration; stresses the major progress made towards this objective in real terms, for example the introduction in Romania from January 2009 of the new ‘biometric’ passports (containing chips storing the personal data of holders with 50 safety features, 18 more than current passports); considers however that biometric passports should not be an eliminatory conditions for inclusion in the visa waiver programme.
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the recent extension of the visa waiver programme to another six EU Member States; however, deems it inappropriate for the US to obtain access to the internal security databases of those Member States that are parties to the Schengen Agreement and calls once again on the US to lift the visa regime for the remaining six Member States and to treat all EU-citizens equally and on the basis of full reciprocity; asks the Commission to treat this as a priority matter with the new US administration;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law and cooperation in the framework of international institutions as well as
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the recent extension of the visa waiver programme to another six EU Member States; however
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Welcomes the recent extension of the visa waiver programme to another s
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Is of the view that EU-US close cooperation in the area of justice and home affairs is also necessary in order to gradually build a transatlantic
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Urges the partners to use the full potential of the TEC in order to overcome the existing obstacles to economic integration and to achieve a unified transatlantic market by 2015; requests the European Commission, on the basis of the study authorised and financed by the European Parliament in its 2007 Budget, to draw up a detailed road map of existing obstacles which need to be removed with the aim of achieving that target date;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Urges the partners to use the full potential of the TEC in order to overcome the existing obstacles to economic integration and to achieve a
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Warmly welcomes the growing presence of organisations of American parentage in Brussels and in particular their commitment to the European Union, its institutions and a strengthened EU-US partnership; stresses that European organisations need to give a similar commitment to operate in Washington DC in order to raise the profile of the EU and that of European perspectives on transatlantic and global issues in the US political community; is aware that European institutions are often unable to match the resources available to their American counterparts; therefore suggests that funding be made available and prioritised for projects organised by European organisations which are aimed at enhancing the awareness and understanding of European issues and perspectives in the United States;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Invites the Parliament's Secretary- General to proceed as a matter of the utmost urgency with the implementation of the Bureau's decision of 11 December 2006 on the deployment of an official to Washington as Liaison Officer;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 b (new) 36b. Insists on the advantages of a joint programme of staff exchanges and invites Parliament's Secretary-General to examine with the clerks of the US House of Representatives and the Senate the feasibility of a joint memorandum on staff exchanges similar to that agreed between Parliament and the UN Secretariat;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Stresses the importance of closer cooperation in space programmes, in particular between the ESA (European Space Agency) and NASA;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 a (new) 36a. Calls on the EU and the US to strengthen their cooperation in the field of culture, and to continue to foster and promote the mutual benefits resulting from cultural exchanges;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transatlantic partnership is founded on shared core values such as democracy, human rights, the rule of law and
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas in several instances during recent years the EU and the USA have had differences on the role and implementation of these values;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EU and the US play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and share responsibility for promoting peace, stability, good governance and international justice, respect for human rights and
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EU and the US play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EU and the US, as well as other emergent countries, play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and share responsibility for promoting peace, respect for human rights and stability and for tackling various global dangers and challenges, such as the deep financial crisis, the eradication of poverty and fulfilment of other MDGs, climate change, energy security, terrorism and nuclear proliferation,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EU and the US play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and share responsibility for promoting peace, respect for human rights and stability and for tackling various global dangers and challenges, such as the deep financial crisis, the eradication of poverty and fulfilment of other MDGs, climate change, energy security, global migration challenges, terrorism and nuclear proliferation,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the EU and the US play key roles in the world's politics and economy, and share responsibility for promoting peace, respect for human rights and stability and for tackling various global dangers and challenges, such as the deep, self-inflicted financial crisis, the eradication of poverty and fulfilment of other MDGs, climate change, energy security, terrorism and nuclear proliferation,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the European Union and the United States of America recognise the need for further cooperation to tackle international terrorism; whereas the fight against terrorism must comply with international law and democratic values, fully respecting civil liberties and fundamental human rights;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is in the interests of both partners, the EU and the US, to shape the international environment together and to confront in unison common threats and challenges in the new scenario of a global, complex and changing world, on the basis of international law and multilateral institutions, in particular the UN system, and to invite other partners to cooperate in this effort,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas in an increasingly global, complex and changing world, it is in the interest
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the inauguration of the new US President
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas it is in the interests of both partners, the EU and the US, to shape the international environment together and to confront in
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. noting the conclusions of the informal meeting of the EU General Affairs Council held on 8 January 2009 concerning the priority areas for transatlantic cooperation during the Czech Presidency (economic and financial cooperation, energy security, preparation of the UN Conference on climate change and reinforced dialogue on the Middle East, Afghanistan and Iran),
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas it is necessary to involve emerging players in responsibility for the world order, because, as the then presidential candidate Barack Obama said in Berlin in July 2008, "no one nation, no matter how large or powerful", can defeat global challenges alone,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the transatlantic partnership
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the transatlantic partnership, EU military forces such as those deployed on peacekeeping missions, and NATO are indispensable for collective security,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas it has not been possible since 1990 to establish a pan-European security system including Russia and based on the principles of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); whereas since 1989 in general, and with the last round of enlargement in particular, the traditional security threats in and to Europe have changed; whereas, by contrast, the enlargement of NATO does not seek to generate all-round security but has gradually shifted away from collective defence towards worldwide intervention,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas a strategic trilateral partnership between the EU, the US and Russia is necessary in order to address the various global challenges, opportunities and threats,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the transatlantic economy remains at the forefront of globalisation and whereas the progressive integration of the transatlantic market can help to regulate this process; whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC)
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) needs to continue
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the inauguration of the new US President
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) needs to continue so as to integrate the transatlantic market; whereas joint leadership is needed to conduct a decisive reform of the international economic institutions in the current crisis,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) needs to continue so as to integrate the transatlantic market in the medium to long term; whereas joint leadership is needed to reform the international economic institutions in the current crisis,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Congratulates
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the EU Member States to coordinate their positions vis-à-vis the US, thus delivering a common EU political message to the EU's American partner while avoiding competition and rivalry between them within the framework of the transatlantic relationship;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that more and closer EU- US coordinat
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that EU-US coordinated action
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that EU-US coordinated action is
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that EU-US coordinated action is very beneficial for the international community; urges the
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that, in order to attain its objectives, the EU-US partnership must put in place a mechanism aimed at communication, consultation, coordination and cooperation;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas a successful and viable partnership between the United States and the European Union involves a duty on the part of the EU itself to consolidate its internal reforms at the institutional, decision-making and political level, with a special focus on strengthening the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) and the European security and defence policy (ESDP),
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on EU Member States to coordinate their foreign and security policies ever more closely, so as to represent a coherent bloc in relations with the USA;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the current momentum should also be used in order to improve and renew the framework of the transatlantic relationship; insists on the need to replace the existing NTA of 1995 with a new Transatlantic Partnership Agreement, providing a more stable and a more up-to-date basis for the relationship; recommends that negotiations be commenced as soon as possible so that the agreement can come into force independently of further progress in the process of ratification of the Lisbon Treaty but be ready to function whether or not the Lisbon Treaty enters into force; calls on all EU Member States to better coordinate their common positions vis-à- vis the US institutions with which they work;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the current momentum should also be used in order to improve and renew the framework of the transatlantic relationship; insists on the need to replace the existing NTA of 1995 with a new Transatlantic Partnership Agreement, having as its main characteristic the four -component mechanism of cooperation, communication, consultation and coordination, thus providing a more stable and a more up-to-date basis for the relationship;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the current momentum should also be used in order to improve and renew the framework of the transatlantic relationship;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that the current momentum should also be used in order to improve and renew the framework of the transatlantic relationship; insists on the urgent need to replace the existing NTA of 1995 with a new Transatlantic Partnership Agreement, providing a more stable and a more up-to-date basis for the relationship;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Deems it appropriate for the negotiation of the new agreement to commence
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Deems it appropriate for the negotiation of the new agreement to commence once the Lisbon Treaty comes into force
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Deems it appropriate for the negotiation of the new agreement to commence
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 5. Is convinced that the TEC, as the body responsible for enhancing economic integration and regulatory cooperation, should be included in the new agreement; welcomes the fact that the TEC is advised by a range of stakeholders, including representatives of business, and asks that a comparable role be given to representatives of the trade union movement on each side of the Atlantic;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the view that the new agreement should establish a body for systematic high-level consultation and coordination in respect of foreign and security policy; recommends that this body be chaired by the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission on the EU side and by the Secretary of State on the US side, and that it meet
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reaffirms that the
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the European Union is an increasingly important player on the world stage and whereas,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reaffirms that the new agreement should
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reaffirms that the new agreement should transform the current Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) into a
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reaffirms that the new agreement should transform the current Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) into a Joint Parliamentary Committee, serving as a forum for parliamentary dialogue and scrutiny of the implementation of the agreement; considers that this Committee should meet in plenary twice a year and
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Invites the European Parliament and the US Congress to reflect on the possibility of setting up a US Congress liaison office in Brussels or a Congress/European Parliament Task Force to tackle key issues of common interest such as climate change, the fight against terrorism, non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and regional conflicts;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) should be kept informed by the TEC and the TPC about the
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the Joint Parliamentary Committee should be
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the Joint Parliamentary Committee should be regularly consulted and kept informed by the TEC and the TPC about the work done by them, and that it should be able to submit proposals to those Councils and to the EU-
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that this transatlantic partnership must be backed up by a deep understanding of the parties' civil societies; insists on the need to increase exchanges among students from both sides so as to ensure that present and future generations remain committed to this partnership;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that th
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that this transatlantic partnership must be backed up by a deep understanding of the parties' civil societies; insists on the need to increase exchanges among students, young people in general and other civil society actors from both sides so as to ensure that present and future generations remain committed to this partnership;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that this transatlantic partnership must be backed up by a deep understanding of the parties' civil societies; insists on the need to increase exchanges among students and teachers from both sides so as to ensure that present and future generations remain committed to this partnership;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges both partners to promote effective multilateralism, involving emerging players in a spirit of shared responsibility for the global order, respect for international law and common problems; insists that the EU and the US pursue their efforts to accomplish the UN Reform Agenda, including the reform of the UN Security Council
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls for enhanced cooperation between the EU and the US and recommends a comprehensive approach to crisis management; supports closer EU-NATO relations, with a view to better addressing a wide range of issues of common interest relating to crisis management, in conformity with the UN Charter, whilst remaining open to cooperation with other nations and other multilateral organisations as appropriate,
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on both partners to promote respect for human rights in the world; underlines the need for intensive coordination in preventive and crisis diplomacy, as well as in responding to pandemics and humanitarian emergencies; encourages the new US administration to repeal the American Service-Members' Protection Act and the so-called Article 98 Agreements, and to ratify and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; repeats its appeal for the abolition of the death penalty;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on both partners to promote respect for human rights in the world as a key element of their politics; underlines the need for intensive coordination in preventive and crisis diplomacy, as well as in responding in a coordinated and efficient way to pandemics and humanitarian emergencies; encourages the new US administration to ratify and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; repeats its appeal for the abolition of the death penalty;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on both partners to promote respect for human rights in the world; underlines the need for intensive coordination in preventive and crisis diplomacy, as well as in responding to pandemics and humanitarian emergencies;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on both partners to contribute decisively to the achievement of the MDGs, particularly in Africa, which must not be placed in jeopardy by the economic crisis, and to study possibilities for coordinated action in those areas; calls on both partners to honour their commitment(s) to spend 0.7% of their GDP on development cooperation;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on both partners to jointly lead the multilateral efforts, launched at the Washington Conference on 15 November 2008, to resolve the current financial crisis and to reform the international financial system, the World Bank, the regional banks and the IMF, while resisting protectionism and promoting fair trade, inter alia through a successful conclusion of the WTO Doha round, which should contribute to the achievement of the UN Millennium Development Goals;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on both partners to jointly lead the multilateral efforts, launched at the Washington Conference on 15 November 2008, to resolve the current financial and economic crisis and to reform the international financial system, the World Bank and the IMF, involving the emerging powers, while resisting protectionism and promoting a successful conclusion of the WTO Doha round;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on both partners to jointly lead and sustain the multilateral efforts, launched at the Washington Conference on 15 November 2008, to resolve the current financial crisis and to reform the international financial system, the World Bank and the IMF, while
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Urges both partners to champion the efforts to achieve fairer rules for globalisation, including a firm commitment to the protection of workers' rights worldwide and to social inclusion, along with economic progress;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Welcomes the strong commitment of the new US President to tackling climate change; calls on the USA to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and urges the EU and the US to take the lead and to reach an ambitious post-
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for closer cooperation between the EU and the US in the field of energy
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for closer cooperation between the EU and the US in the field of energy, coordinating their approaches towards the producing countries and strengthening diversity in supply, resources and transportation; advocates closer scientific and technological cooperation on renewable energy and energy efficiency;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Draws attention to the National Intelligence Council (NIC) report entitled "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World", and, given the need for long-term strategic thinking on policy issues within the EU institutions, urges the Czech and Swedish Presidencies to strive to establish a system of analysis similar to that used by the NIC, in order to identify long-term trends from an EU perspective, working in close cooperation with the EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS); believes that this step will facilitate dialogue on the main strategic issues facing the transatlantic partnership in the long term;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Draws attention to the National Intelligence Council (NIC) report entitled "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World", and, given the need for long-term strategic thinking on policy issues within the EU institutions, urges the
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Draws attention to the National Intelligence Council (NIC) report entitled "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World", and, given the need for long-term strategic thinking on policy issues within the EU institutions, urges the
source: PE-416.557
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-418105_EN.html
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-416292_EN.html
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16835&j=0&l=en
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.553New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.553 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.557New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.557 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.105&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.292&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0114_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0114_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16835&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090325&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090325&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-114&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0114_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-114&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0114_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-193New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0193_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/6/66639New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|