BETA


2008/2206(INI) Control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AFET SZENT-IVÁNYI István (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion REGI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/10/27
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/04/22
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/04/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 640 votes to 28, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) in 2007.

The Parliament welcomes the structured dialogue established with the Commission on the implementation of the IPA and reiterates its position in this respect, notably the need to:

grant all beneficiary countries equal access to the full range of policy tools available under the instrument; give adequate priority to the fight against corruption and organised crime; pay increased attention to institutional capacity-building, particularly at parliamentary level, development of civil society organisations, measures to promote the principle of tolerance and non-discrimination, human development and regional cooperation in key policy areas.

Late implementation : the Parliament is pleased by the high implementation rate of IPA commitments in 2007 but regrets that the first IPA programmes were only adopted at the end of 2007 and the actual implementation started only in 2008. It also believes that it is important to strengthen the coherence between the 2007 IPA national programmes and the EU pre-accession policy.

Do not undermine the political criteria : the Parliament notes that the main focus for the candidate countries lies in the implementation of European standards, namely statistical, environmental and fiscal standards. It stresses, however, that the importance of the political criteria, notably democratic governance, respect for human rights, freedom of religion, women’s rights, minorities’ rights and the rule of law, should not be undermined.

Assistance should benefit citizens : the Parliament reminds the Commission that the Union's legitimacy and capacity to promote reforms can be greatly enhanced if the IPA targets its assistance to areas of direct benefit for the citizens of the candidate and potential candidate countries, particularly in view of the needs and challenges generated by the global financial crisis. It is consequently of the opinion that the IPA should support the efforts by the beneficiary countries to meet the requirements laid down in the roadmap for visa liberalisation, so that the citizens of the Western Balkans can finally enjoy freedom of movement and participate fully in EU programmes and schemes.

Increasing transparency : stressing the need for transparent and effective IPA management and control, the Parliament expects the Commission to report every year to Parliament and its responsible Committee on Budgetary Control on payments and implementation of IPA funds.

Horizontal issues : the Parliament notes that horizontal issues, such as environmental impact assessment, good governance, civil society involvement, equal opportunities and non-discrimination, are not sufficiently present and visible in the 2007 IPA projects. The Commission is called upon to develop, in particular, multi-beneficiary regional or horizontal programmes, notably on the fight against corruption and organised crime, intercultural dialogue and gender equality.

Unequal regional funds : the Parliament notes that limited funds are allocated for large geographic areas or comprehensive policy areas and that these funds are fragmented into many small projects rather than concentrated in fewer, more visible projects. It points out that the annual national programmes should strike a balance between providing an adequate response to the key priorities identified in the progress reports and avoiding over-fragmentation of the funds.

Combating corruption : the Parliament stresses the need to use the IPA to strengthen in all beneficiary countries the fight against corruption and organised crime with a special focus on money laundering, illegal migration and human trafficking, and suggests that EU funds should be earmarked for this purpose.

Involvement of civil society organisations : the Parliament considers that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in the beneficiary countries should be more actively involved in the development and initiation of projects. It points out that future IPA programmes should tackle the systematic donor dependency of the CSOs, and should address the development of some of the CSOs along ethno-political conflict lines (especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Kosovo). It expects the new Civil Society Facility to tackle many of the problems with regard to the diversity, complexity, and fragmentation of EU programmes.

Improving the visibility of the EU : noting that IPA-funded projects and activities score low in terms of EU visibility "on the ground" and have not generated "bottom-up" legitimacy for further EU rapprochement, the Parliament insists on this aspect.

Education, youth employment and women’s rights : stressing that education and youth employment have not been adequately addressed, the Parliament suggests that the Commission examine the possibility of making greater use of the flexibility provided for in IPA so as to allow funding of measures in these areas. The Parliament also calls for pre-accession funds for strengthening women's rights in the Balkans, in particular through women's NGOs and women's organisations.

Cross-border cooperation : the Parliament is concerned that the total 2007 IPA allocations for Component II was only EUR 38.8 million out of a total IPA of EUR 497.2 million (i.e. less than 8%). Regretting that effective cooperation has been difficult to establish, in practice, the Parliament calls on the beneficiary countries and the Commission, under this component, to pursue further existing cooperation and to develop new cooperation, in line with the objective of fostering good neighbourly relations and promoting economic integration, especially in the fields of environment, natural and cultural heritage and the fight against corruption and organised crime.

Documents
2009/04/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/04/21
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU (EPP-ED, EL) on control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) in 2007, welcoming the structured dialogue established with the Commission on the implementation of the IPA, and recalling its position in this respect, notably the need to:

grant all beneficiary countries equal access to the full range of policy tools available under the instrument; give adequate priority to the fight against corruption and organised crime; pay increased attention to institutional capacity-building, particularly at parliamentary level, development of civil society organisations, measures to promote the principle of tolerance and non-discrimination, human development and regional cooperation in key policy areas.

The committee is pleased by the high implementation rate of IPA commitments in 2007 but regrets that the first IPA programmes were only adopted at the end of 2007 and the actual implementation started only in 2008. It considers that there was satisfactory coherence between the 2007 IPA national Programmes and the EU pre-accession policy, as most of the objectives set out in the Programmes were in line with the priorities identified in the respective Commission Progress Reports.

Do not undermine the political criteria : the report notes that the main focus for the candidate countries lies in the implementation of European standards, namely statistical, environmental and fiscal standards. It stresses, however, that the importance of the political criteria, notably democratic governance, respect for human rights, freedom of religion, women’s rights, minorities’ rights and the rule of law, should not be undermined, since their non-fulfilment can lead to complications and delay in negotiations.

Assistance should benefit citizens : MEPs remind the Commission that the Union's legitimacy and capacity to promote reforms can be greatly enhanced if the IPA targets its assistance to areas of direct benefit for the citizens of the candidate and potential candidate countries, particularly in view of the needs and challenges generated by the global financial crisis. They are consequently of the opinion that the IPA should support the efforts by the beneficiary countries to meet the requirements laid down in the roadmap for visa liberalisation, so that the citizens of the Western Balkans can finally enjoy freedom of movement and participate fully in EU programmes and schemes.

Increasing transparency : stressing the need for transparent and effective IPA management and control, MEPs expect the Commission to report every year to Parliament and its responsible Committee on Budgetary Control on payments and implementation of IPA funds.

Horizontal issues : the report notes that horizontal issues, such as environmental impact assessment, good governance, civil society involvement, equal opportunities and non-discrimination, are not sufficiently present and visible in the 2007 IPA projects. The Commission is called upon to develop, in particular, multi-beneficiary regional or horizontal programmes, notably on the fight against corruption and organised crime, intercultural dialogue and gender equality.

Combating corruption : the committee stresses the need to use the IPA to strengthen in all beneficiary countries the fight against corruption and organised crime with a special focus on money laundering, illegal migration and human trafficking. Not all 2007 IPA programmes take corruption sufficiently into account. Therefore, MEPs suggest that funds should be earmarked for this purpose, and call on the Commission to develop a more coherent strategy in this context.

Involvement of civil society organisations : MEPs consider that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in the beneficiary countries should be more actively involved in the development and initiation of projects. They point out that future IPA programmes should tackle the systematic donor dependency of the CSOs, and should address the development of some of the CSOs along ethno-political conflict lines (especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Kosovo). MEPs expect the new Civil Society Facility to tackle many of the problems with regard to the diversity, complexity, and fragmentation of EU programmes.

Education and youth employment : stressing that education and youth have not been adequately addressed, MEPs suggest that the Commission examines the possibility of making greater use of the flexibility provided for in IPA so as to allow funding, where appropriate, of measures related to components III-V through the first two components.

Cross-border cooperation : MEPs are concerned that the total 2007 IPA allocations for Component II was only EUR 38.8 million out of a total IPA of EUR 497.2 million (i.e. less than 8 %). Regretting that effective cooperation has been difficult to establish, in practice, MEPs call on the beneficiary countries and the Commission, under this component, to pursue further existing cooperation and to develop new cooperation, in line with the objective of fostering good neighbourly relations and promoting economic integration, especially in the fields of environment, natural and cultural heritage and the fight against corruption and organised crime.

Women’s rights : the Commission is also called upon to provide pre-accession funds for strengthening women's rights in the Balkans, in particular through women's NGOs and women's organisations.

Lastly, the European Court of Auditors is called upon to submit by the end of 2010 a mid-term special evaluation report on the implementation of the IPA.

2009/02/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2009/02/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2009/01/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/09/23
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2008/07/15
   EP - SZENT-IVÁNYI István (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2008/06/02
   EP - KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Votes

Rapport KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU A6-0181/2009 - résolution #

2009/04/22 Outcome: +: 640, -: 28, 0: 9
DE GB FR IT PL ES RO NL HU CZ PT BE SE EL AT BG FI LT DK SK LV IE SI EE LU CY MT ??
Total
92
70
68
51
46
43
32
25
22
22
20
21
17
19
17
16
14
12
13
11
9
9
7
6
6
4
4
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
257
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
192

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
20 2008/2206(INI)
2009/01/27 AFET 2 amendments...
source: PE-418.243
2009/02/19 CONT 18 amendments...
source: PE-420.207

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.628
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.628
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.554&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.207
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE420.207
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2009-03-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html title: A6-0181/2009
events/3
date
2009-03-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html title: A6-0181/2009
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE
events/6
date
2009-04-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0237_EN.html title: T6-0237/2009
summary
events/6
date
2009-04-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0237_EN.html title: T6-0237/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0181_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-237
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0237_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0181/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16993&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0237/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
docs
  • date: 2009-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.628 title: PE416.628 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.554&secondRef=02 title: PE416.554 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.207 title: PE420.207 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN title: A6-0181/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16993&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3615 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU (EPP-ED, EL) on control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) in 2007, welcoming the structured dialogue established with the Commission on the implementation of the IPA, and recalling its position in this respect, notably the need to: grant all beneficiary countries equal access to the full range of policy tools available under the instrument; give adequate priority to the fight against corruption and organised crime; pay increased attention to institutional capacity-building, particularly at parliamentary level, development of civil society organisations, measures to promote the principle of tolerance and non-discrimination, human development and regional cooperation in key policy areas. The committee is pleased by the high implementation rate of IPA commitments in 2007 but regrets that the first IPA programmes were only adopted at the end of 2007 and the actual implementation started only in 2008. It considers that there was satisfactory coherence between the 2007 IPA national Programmes and the EU pre-accession policy, as most of the objectives set out in the Programmes were in line with the priorities identified in the respective Commission Progress Reports. Do not undermine the political criteria : the report notes that the main focus for the candidate countries lies in the implementation of European standards, namely statistical, environmental and fiscal standards. It stresses, however, that the importance of the political criteria, notably democratic governance, respect for human rights, freedom of religion, women’s rights, minorities’ rights and the rule of law, should not be undermined, since their non-fulfilment can lead to complications and delay in negotiations. Assistance should benefit citizens : MEPs remind the Commission that the Union's legitimacy and capacity to promote reforms can be greatly enhanced if the IPA targets its assistance to areas of direct benefit for the citizens of the candidate and potential candidate countries, particularly in view of the needs and challenges generated by the global financial crisis. They are consequently of the opinion that the IPA should support the efforts by the beneficiary countries to meet the requirements laid down in the roadmap for visa liberalisation, so that the citizens of the Western Balkans can finally enjoy freedom of movement and participate fully in EU programmes and schemes. Increasing transparency : stressing the need for transparent and effective IPA management and control, MEPs expect the Commission to report every year to Parliament and its responsible Committee on Budgetary Control on payments and implementation of IPA funds. Horizontal issues : the report notes that horizontal issues, such as environmental impact assessment, good governance, civil society involvement, equal opportunities and non-discrimination, are not sufficiently present and visible in the 2007 IPA projects. The Commission is called upon to develop, in particular, multi-beneficiary regional or horizontal programmes, notably on the fight against corruption and organised crime, intercultural dialogue and gender equality. Combating corruption : the committee stresses the need to use the IPA to strengthen in all beneficiary countries the fight against corruption and organised crime with a special focus on money laundering, illegal migration and human trafficking. Not all 2007 IPA programmes take corruption sufficiently into account. Therefore, MEPs suggest that funds should be earmarked for this purpose, and call on the Commission to develop a more coherent strategy in this context. Involvement of civil society organisations : MEPs consider that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in the beneficiary countries should be more actively involved in the development and initiation of projects. They point out that future IPA programmes should tackle the systematic donor dependency of the CSOs, and should address the development of some of the CSOs along ethno-political conflict lines (especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Kosovo). MEPs expect the new Civil Society Facility to tackle many of the problems with regard to the diversity, complexity, and fragmentation of EU programmes. Education and youth employment : stressing that education and youth have not been adequately addressed, MEPs suggest that the Commission examines the possibility of making greater use of the flexibility provided for in IPA so as to allow funding, where appropriate, of measures related to components III-V through the first two components. Cross-border cooperation : MEPs are concerned that the total 2007 IPA allocations for Component II was only EUR 38.8 million out of a total IPA of EUR 497.2 million (i.e. less than 8 %). Regretting that effective cooperation has been difficult to establish, in practice, MEPs call on the beneficiary countries and the Commission, under this component, to pursue further existing cooperation and to develop new cooperation, in line with the objective of fostering good neighbourly relations and promoting economic integration, especially in the fields of environment, natural and cultural heritage and the fight against corruption and organised crime. Women’s rights : the Commission is also called upon to provide pre-accession funds for strengthening women's rights in the Balkans, in particular through women's NGOs and women's organisations. Lastly, the European Court of Auditors is called upon to submit by the end of 2010 a mid-term special evaluation report on the implementation of the IPA.
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN title: A6-0181/2009
  • date: 2009-04-21T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16993&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-237 title: T6-0237/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 640 votes to 28, with 9 abstentions, a resolution on control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) in 2007. The Parliament welcomes the structured dialogue established with the Commission on the implementation of the IPA and reiterates its position in this respect, notably the need to: grant all beneficiary countries equal access to the full range of policy tools available under the instrument; give adequate priority to the fight against corruption and organised crime; pay increased attention to institutional capacity-building, particularly at parliamentary level, development of civil society organisations, measures to promote the principle of tolerance and non-discrimination, human development and regional cooperation in key policy areas. Late implementation : the Parliament is pleased by the high implementation rate of IPA commitments in 2007 but regrets that the first IPA programmes were only adopted at the end of 2007 and the actual implementation started only in 2008. It also believes that it is important to strengthen the coherence between the 2007 IPA national programmes and the EU pre-accession policy. Do not undermine the political criteria : the Parliament notes that the main focus for the candidate countries lies in the implementation of European standards, namely statistical, environmental and fiscal standards. It stresses, however, that the importance of the political criteria, notably democratic governance, respect for human rights, freedom of religion, women’s rights, minorities’ rights and the rule of law, should not be undermined. Assistance should benefit citizens : the Parliament reminds the Commission that the Union's legitimacy and capacity to promote reforms can be greatly enhanced if the IPA targets its assistance to areas of direct benefit for the citizens of the candidate and potential candidate countries, particularly in view of the needs and challenges generated by the global financial crisis. It is consequently of the opinion that the IPA should support the efforts by the beneficiary countries to meet the requirements laid down in the roadmap for visa liberalisation, so that the citizens of the Western Balkans can finally enjoy freedom of movement and participate fully in EU programmes and schemes. Increasing transparency : stressing the need for transparent and effective IPA management and control, the Parliament expects the Commission to report every year to Parliament and its responsible Committee on Budgetary Control on payments and implementation of IPA funds. Horizontal issues : the Parliament notes that horizontal issues, such as environmental impact assessment, good governance, civil society involvement, equal opportunities and non-discrimination, are not sufficiently present and visible in the 2007 IPA projects. The Commission is called upon to develop, in particular, multi-beneficiary regional or horizontal programmes, notably on the fight against corruption and organised crime, intercultural dialogue and gender equality. Unequal regional funds : the Parliament notes that limited funds are allocated for large geographic areas or comprehensive policy areas and that these funds are fragmented into many small projects rather than concentrated in fewer, more visible projects. It points out that the annual national programmes should strike a balance between providing an adequate response to the key priorities identified in the progress reports and avoiding over-fragmentation of the funds. Combating corruption : the Parliament stresses the need to use the IPA to strengthen in all beneficiary countries the fight against corruption and organised crime with a special focus on money laundering, illegal migration and human trafficking, and suggests that EU funds should be earmarked for this purpose. Involvement of civil society organisations : the Parliament considers that Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in the beneficiary countries should be more actively involved in the development and initiation of projects. It points out that future IPA programmes should tackle the systematic donor dependency of the CSOs, and should address the development of some of the CSOs along ethno-political conflict lines (especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Kosovo). It expects the new Civil Society Facility to tackle many of the problems with regard to the diversity, complexity, and fragmentation of EU programmes. Improving the visibility of the EU : noting that IPA-funded projects and activities score low in terms of EU visibility "on the ground" and have not generated "bottom-up" legitimacy for further EU rapprochement, the Parliament insists on this aspect. Education, youth employment and women’s rights : stressing that education and youth employment have not been adequately addressed, the Parliament suggests that the Commission examine the possibility of making greater use of the flexibility provided for in IPA so as to allow funding of measures in these areas. The Parliament also calls for pre-accession funds for strengthening women's rights in the Balkans, in particular through women's NGOs and women's organisations. Cross-border cooperation : the Parliament is concerned that the total 2007 IPA allocations for Component II was only EUR 38.8 million out of a total IPA of EUR 497.2 million (i.e. less than 8%). Regretting that effective cooperation has been difficult to establish, in practice, the Parliament calls on the beneficiary countries and the Commission, under this component, to pursue further existing cooperation and to develop new cooperation, in line with the objective of fostering good neighbourly relations and promoting economic integration, especially in the fields of environment, natural and cultural heritage and the fight against corruption and organised crime.
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/66667
New
  • CONT/6/66667
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20.04 Pre-accession and partnership
  • 8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
New
8.20.04
Pre-accession and partnership
8.70.03
Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-181&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0181/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16993&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-237 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0237/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/66667
reference
2008/2206(INI)
title
Control of the budgetary implementation of the Instrument for Pre-Accession
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject