Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | REUL Herbert ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET | PALECKIS Justas Vincas ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | BURKE Colm ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | BERÈS Pervenche ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 471 votes to 190, with 16 abstentions, a resolution on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply, in response to the Commission Communication entitled “Facing the challenge of higher oil prices”.
The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED and PES groups, in accordance with Rule 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.
The resolution notes that many oil resources, some of them easily extractable, are at present not fully accessible in many countries of the world. Yet, according to calculations, worldwide demand for oil will be more than a third higher in 2030 than it was in 2006. The European Union's dependence on oil imports will rise to 95% by 2030, whilst, at the same time, conventional oil reserves will be increasingly concentrated in the countries in the strategic ellipse, and growing competition in demand could create uncertainties in supply.
(1) Exploitation of existing resources : the resolution stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this context, the Commission's proposal for short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Parliament also calls for intensification of efforts to make unconventional oil resources commercially viable , and in this way to contribute to diversification, provided that environmentally friendly extraction processes are developed and then used.
Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services. MEPs consider that the use of oil and other carbon-intensive energy sources should be reduced, both through increased energy efficiency and by a shift to more carbon-neutral solutions , such as nuclear energy and energy derived from renewable sources.
The resolution calls for a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries aiming towards a more stable and steady supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large.
(2) Market transparency and pricing : the Parliament considers it vital to improve market transparency in order to stabilise oil prices. The Commission is called upon to submit corresponding proposals to Parliament and the Council.
The resolution stresses the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks.
MEPs emphasise that differing technical specifications for oil products in the main importing countries lead to market fragmentation that may play a key part in pushing up prices in the event of supply shortages. The Commission is called upon to submit proposals outlining ways in which such constraints on market access can be removed.
According to the Parliament, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason, it rejects all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves.
The resolution stresses the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. Lastly, it stresses that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products.
(3) Investments in oil extraction and processing : the resolution notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to USD 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment in their corresponding policies, also and in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital.
(4) Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy.
Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the trans-European energy networks (TEN-E). In this regard, new oil infrastructure projects such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constan ț a-Trieste pipelines should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest.
Lastly, the Parliament is concerned at the growing piracy that threatens international shipping and at the threat to transport routes and strategic infrastructure posed by terrorism . It calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up the dialogue with key players.
(5) Transport and buildings : MEPs point to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium-and-long-term suitability of first-generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels.
MEPs call for additional measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing, etc.).
(6) Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the Parliament considers that increased account must be taken of energy policy matters in the European Union's common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products. The Commission is called upon to include in its common foreign, trade and neighbourhood policy measures that can contribute towards progress being made worldwide in removing the link between economic growth and oil consumption.
According to MEPs, a continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the European Union, the United States, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Herbert REUL (EPP-ED, DE) on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply.
MEPs stress that increasing attention will have to be paid at European level to the diversification of energy supply routes and sources, energy savings and energy efficiency, in order to guarantee the security of energy supply in the coming decades. Oil is a finite resource so it is becoming ever more urgent to develop a coherent and comprehensive Community energy policy in order to ensure security of supply at a time when the European Union is becoming increasingly dependent on imports.
Exploitation of existing resources : the report stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal for the short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Commission is called upon, in dialogue with the oil companies and producer countries, to seek ways in which steady investment can be secured despite fluctuating prices and profits.
The Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services in order to minimise long-term expense as well as to mitigate a future decrease in oil supply.
The report urges a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries involving a willingness to give as well as take on both sides and aiming towards a more stable and smoothed supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large.
Market transparency and pricing : MEPs are concerned about the volatility of oil prices and its impact on economic and financial stability, and therefore urge the Commission and the Member States to ensure the highest practicable level of transparency in energy markets, and to work towards greater transparency within the framework of their dialogues with producer countries.
The report highlights the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks.
According to MEPs, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason and for reasons of sustainable budgetary policy, they reject all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves.
MEPs stress the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. They also stress that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products.
Investments in oil extraction and processing : the report notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to US$ 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment, in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital.
Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs urge the Member States and the Commission to step up their efforts in this connection and to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy.
Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the Trans-European Energy Network (TEN-E). In this context, the new oil infrastructure projects, such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constanta-Trieste pipelines, should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest.
Transport and buildings : MEPs draw attention to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium and long-term suitability of first‑generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels.
MEPs call for measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing).
Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the report stresses the vital importance of a coherent strategy as regards the EU’s main external suppliers. MEPs consider that increased account must be taken of energy-policy matters in the Union’s common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products.
According to MEPs, the continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the EU, the US, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.
PURPOSE: to face the challenge of higher oil prices.
BACKGROUND: in recent months, oil prices have experienced a sharp and abrupt increase, reaching their highest level, in real terms, since the end of the seventies. Consumer fuel prices have been increasing sharply in the EU following the crude oil price trend. The current surge in oil prices is largely the result of a major structural shift of oil supply and demand in the global economy: oil consumption in OECD countries is declining; demand growth in the rest of the world is led by emerging economies, in particular China and India; demand in many countries is underpinned by existing subsidies for fuels; oil production in the short term is unlikely to keep pace with sustained strong demand; the number and size of new oilfields is shrinking; the largest potential for further oil production expansion is concentrated in the Middle East and OPEC countries, where state-run companies dominate extraction and production; refinery bottlenecks and capacity constraints have also negatively influenced level of supply. The weakening of the dollar has also contributed to pressure on oil prices.
Estimates indicate that the current high oil prices will have long-term impacts, reducing growth and increasing inflation in the EU economy . Through higher input and transport costs, high fuel prices increase food prices. These high price levels are squeezing the purchasing power of all EU citizens, with the most severe impact on the lowest income families, and putting a strain on business. Energy intensive sectors, as well as transport and agriculture, and in particular fisheries, are most affected and face a difficult adjustment process. Globally, higher oil prices imply a sizeable income transfer from oil-consuming to oil-producing countries, and this from the EU to a small number of third countries.
CONTENT: according to the Commission, the response of the EU to recent increases in oil prices should be based on the assumption that prices are likely to remain high in the medium to long term . This implies the need for structural adjustment, which needs to be accelerated to produce its positive effects as soon as possible. At the same time, the short term effects on some vulnerable groups should be mitigated , helping them to adjust to the new market situation. Great care should be exercised over proposals to offset oil price increases by tax cuts. The most likely effect would be to transfer revenue from consumers to the oil supplying countries, aggravating global imbalances. This could be followed by further price increases and would distort the functioning of the single market, undermining EU efforts to improve energy efficiency.
The major policy response must be to make the EU more efficient in the use of energy, and less dependent on fossil fuels . Increased oil prices should spur the EU to implement its integrated energy and climate change policies . Despite near term difficulties being experienced by certain sectors of the EU population in meeting rising energy bills, solutions can only come from completing shifts in energy demand and encouraging energy efficiency throughout the economy. Short-term palliative measures that Member States may take should be well targeted and should not lead to distorting effects on the internal market.
Against this background, the Commission recommends to the European Council to:
confirm its determination to adopt legally binding measures to give effect to its 2020 targets for renewables, biofuels and greenhouse gas reductions by the end of 2008, which are essential to improve substantially energy efficiency and the diversification to the EU energy supply; step up the drive for energy efficiency in business and in private households so that quicker and greater savings can be achieved in line with agreed objectives; note that the forthcoming strategic energy review on security of supply and external energy policy, will also report on the functioning of the oil and petroleum markets. In addition to a proposal to improve the transparency of emergency oil stocks the Commission will also report on the feasibility of requiring greater transparency on commercial oil stocks; note that the Commission is examining options for revising the energy taxation directive and will shortly propose to amend the Eurovignette Directive as part of the wider drive to support greater energy efficiency; note the Commission's intention to report on the possible use of tax incentives, including reduced VAT rates to encourage energy savings; support the organisation of a high level meeting on oil markets between main oil producing and consuming countries and strengthen existing regional and bilateral dialogues in order to achieve better market access and transparency; agree that Member States could provide targeted support when justified to vulnerable households ; agree that Member States could make available targeted f inancial support for the most affected entities provided this aid is used to support industrial redeployment, retraining or restructuring measures.. Furthermore, any measures taken to alleviate the immediate impact of high oil prices must be proportionate and accelerate longer term adjustment to a low carbon economy; agree on the need to restructure the fisheries sector while taking care of the economic and social repercussions. The Commission will shortly make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of those segments of the European fleet that are most vulnerable; agree to assist net oil importing developing countries to mitigate the short term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the EU's and Member States' overall development policy and assistance programmes.
PURPOSE: to face the challenge of higher oil prices.
BACKGROUND: in recent months, oil prices have experienced a sharp and abrupt increase, reaching their highest level, in real terms, since the end of the seventies. Consumer fuel prices have been increasing sharply in the EU following the crude oil price trend. The current surge in oil prices is largely the result of a major structural shift of oil supply and demand in the global economy: oil consumption in OECD countries is declining; demand growth in the rest of the world is led by emerging economies, in particular China and India; demand in many countries is underpinned by existing subsidies for fuels; oil production in the short term is unlikely to keep pace with sustained strong demand; the number and size of new oilfields is shrinking; the largest potential for further oil production expansion is concentrated in the Middle East and OPEC countries, where state-run companies dominate extraction and production; refinery bottlenecks and capacity constraints have also negatively influenced level of supply. The weakening of the dollar has also contributed to pressure on oil prices.
Estimates indicate that the current high oil prices will have long-term impacts, reducing growth and increasing inflation in the EU economy . Through higher input and transport costs, high fuel prices increase food prices. These high price levels are squeezing the purchasing power of all EU citizens, with the most severe impact on the lowest income families, and putting a strain on business. Energy intensive sectors, as well as transport and agriculture, and in particular fisheries, are most affected and face a difficult adjustment process. Globally, higher oil prices imply a sizeable income transfer from oil-consuming to oil-producing countries, and this from the EU to a small number of third countries.
CONTENT: according to the Commission, the response of the EU to recent increases in oil prices should be based on the assumption that prices are likely to remain high in the medium to long term . This implies the need for structural adjustment, which needs to be accelerated to produce its positive effects as soon as possible. At the same time, the short term effects on some vulnerable groups should be mitigated , helping them to adjust to the new market situation. Great care should be exercised over proposals to offset oil price increases by tax cuts. The most likely effect would be to transfer revenue from consumers to the oil supplying countries, aggravating global imbalances. This could be followed by further price increases and would distort the functioning of the single market, undermining EU efforts to improve energy efficiency.
The major policy response must be to make the EU more efficient in the use of energy, and less dependent on fossil fuels . Increased oil prices should spur the EU to implement its integrated energy and climate change policies . Despite near term difficulties being experienced by certain sectors of the EU population in meeting rising energy bills, solutions can only come from completing shifts in energy demand and encouraging energy efficiency throughout the economy. Short-term palliative measures that Member States may take should be well targeted and should not lead to distorting effects on the internal market.
Against this background, the Commission recommends to the European Council to:
confirm its determination to adopt legally binding measures to give effect to its 2020 targets for renewables, biofuels and greenhouse gas reductions by the end of 2008, which are essential to improve substantially energy efficiency and the diversification to the EU energy supply; step up the drive for energy efficiency in business and in private households so that quicker and greater savings can be achieved in line with agreed objectives; note that the forthcoming strategic energy review on security of supply and external energy policy, will also report on the functioning of the oil and petroleum markets. In addition to a proposal to improve the transparency of emergency oil stocks the Commission will also report on the feasibility of requiring greater transparency on commercial oil stocks; note that the Commission is examining options for revising the energy taxation directive and will shortly propose to amend the Eurovignette Directive as part of the wider drive to support greater energy efficiency; note the Commission's intention to report on the possible use of tax incentives, including reduced VAT rates to encourage energy savings; support the organisation of a high level meeting on oil markets between main oil producing and consuming countries and strengthen existing regional and bilateral dialogues in order to achieve better market access and transparency; agree that Member States could provide targeted support when justified to vulnerable households ; agree that Member States could make available targeted f inancial support for the most affected entities provided this aid is used to support industrial redeployment, retraining or restructuring measures.. Furthermore, any measures taken to alleviate the immediate impact of high oil prices must be proportionate and accelerate longer term adjustment to a low carbon economy; agree on the need to restructure the fisheries sector while taking care of the economic and social repercussions. The Commission will shortly make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of those segments of the European fleet that are most vulnerable; agree to assist net oil importing developing countries to mitigate the short term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the EU's and Member States' overall development policy and assistance programmes.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3060
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0118/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0035/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0035/2009
- Committee opinion: PE414.203
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.609
- Committee opinion: PE414.941
- Committee opinion: PE414.937
- Committee draft report: PE416.294
- Debate in Council: 2894
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0384
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2008)0384
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2008)0384 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE416.294
- Committee opinion: PE414.937
- Committee opinion: PE414.941
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE416.609
- Committee opinion: PE414.203
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0035/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3060
Activities
- Luca ROMAGNOLI
Plenary Speeches (23)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alessandro BATTILOCCHIO
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Martin CALLANAN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Glyn FORD
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christopher HEATON-HARRIS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philip CLAEYS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carlo FATUZZO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hélène GOUDIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl LANG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Flaviu Călin RUS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- José Albino SILVA PENEDA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Peter SKINNER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Frank VANHECKE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jim ALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean Marie BEAUPUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Šarūnas BIRUTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Guy BONO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Simon BUSUTTIL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Charlotte CEDERSCHIÖLD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Călin Cătălin CHIRIȚĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Brian CROWLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bairbre de BRÚN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Genowefa GRABOWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jim HIGGINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna IBRISAGIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Stanisław JAŁOWIECKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Fernand LE RACHINEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mary Lou McDONALD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Adrian MANOLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Claude MARTINEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexandru NAZARE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria PETRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicolae Vlad POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John PURVIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Leopold Józef RUTOWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eoin RYAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marianne THYSSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Votes
Rapport REUL A6-0035/2009 - am. 2 #
SE | NL | DK | LT | EE | FI | CY | MT | LV | LU | IE | BE | SI | BG | PT | SK | AT | PL | RO | IT | GB | HU | CZ | EL | ES | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
17
|
26
|
14
|
12
|
6
|
13
|
6
|
4
|
7
|
6
|
11
|
24
|
7
|
17
|
21
|
13
|
17
|
45
|
31
|
62
|
63
|
22
|
21
|
22
|
44
|
63
|
88
|
|
ALDE |
87
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEFor (4)Against (1) |
4
|
Lithuania ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
Finland ALDE |
1
|
1
|
1
|
Belgium ALDE |
2
|
Bulgaria ALDEFor (5) |
1
|
Poland ALDEFor (5) |
Romania ALDE |
Italy ALDEFor (8)Against (1) |
United Kingdom ALDEFor (9)Against (2) |
2
|
2
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
Germany ALDEAgainst (1)Abstain (4) |
||||||
Verts/ALE |
34
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
France Verts/ALE |
Germany Verts/ALEFor (10)Against (1) |
||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
37
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Italy GUE/NGLFor (6) |
1
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (7) |
||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
13
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
38
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
Poland UENFor (7)Against (8)Abstain (1) |
Italy UENFor (3)Against (7)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
26
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom NIFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
France NIAgainst (7) |
||||||||||||||||||
PSE |
198
|
5
|
Netherlands PSEAgainst (2) |
Denmark PSEAgainst (1)Abstain (4) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Belgium PSEFor (1)Against (5)Abstain (3) |
1
|
Bulgaria PSEFor (1)Against (4) |
Portugal PSEFor (2)Against (7) |
3
|
Austria PSEAgainst (7) |
Poland PSEFor (1)Against (7) |
Romania PSEFor (2)Against (8) |
14
|
United Kingdom PSEFor (4)Against (12) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (8) |
2
|
Greece PSEAgainst (8) |
Spain PSEFor (2)Against (20)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Antonio MASIP HIDALGO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Francisca PLEGUEZUELOS AGUILAR,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Juan FRAILE CANTÓN,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
Martí GRAU i SEGÚ,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Vicente Miguel GARCÉS RAMÓN
|
France PSEFor (1)Against (25)
André LAIGNEL,
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Béatrice PATRIE,
Catherine BOURSIER,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine NERIS,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Gilles SAVARY,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre PRIBETICH,
Roselyne LEFRANÇOIS,
Stéphane LE FOLL,
Vincent PEILLON,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Germany PSEFor (1)Against (21)
Barbara WEILER,
Bernhard RAPKAY,
Constanze KREHL,
Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT,
Erika MANN,
Evelyne GEBHARDT,
Heinz KINDERMANN,
Helmut KUHNE,
Jo LEINEN,
Jutta HAUG,
Karin JÖNS,
Klaus HÄNSCH,
Martin SCHULZ,
Matthias GROOTE,
Mechtild ROTHE,
Norbert GLANTE,
Ralf WALTER,
Udo BULLMANN,
Ulrich STOCKMANN,
Ulrike RODUST,
Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER
|
|||
PPE-DE |
249
|
Sweden PPE-DEFor (2)Against (3) |
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (7) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Ireland PPE-DEFor (1)Against (4) |
Belgium PPE-DEFor (1)Against (4) |
4
|
Bulgaria PPE-DEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Austria PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
Poland PPE-DEFor (2)Against (10) |
Romania PPE-DEFor (2)Against (14) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (3)Against (15) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (7)Against (15)Abstain (1) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (2)Against (10) |
Czechia PPE-DEFor (3)Against (9) |
11
|
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (16)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN,
Florencio LUQUE AGUILAR,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Jaime MAYOR OREJA,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
José Javier POMÉS RUIZ,
José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL,
Juan Andrés NARANJO ESCOBAR,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Salvador Domingo SANZ PALACIO,
Salvador GARRIGA POLLEDO,
Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
France PPE-DEAgainst (16) |
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (43)
Albert DESS,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Ewa KLAMT,
Gabriele STAUNER,
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst POSDORF,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt Joachim LAUK,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Martin KASTLER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
|
Rapport REUL A6-0035/2009 - am. 3 #
Amendments | Dossier |
94 |
2008/2212(INI)
2008/11/12
IMCO
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication and echoes its concern over the recent oil price
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is of the opinion that political dialogue with oil producers is not a priority, as market forces should form the basis of the balance between supply and demand, providing national control mechanisms intervene effectively in cases of tax exemption and profiteering;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the Commission should assist net importing developing countries to mitigate the short-term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the overall development policy and assistance programmes of the EU and the Member States;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that limited capacity for the expansion of new supplies and extraneous factors such as conflicts and the weak dollar
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that limited capacity for the expansion of new supplies, the increase in demand and extraneous factors such as the weak dollar and the turmoil in financial markets have also contributed to oil price volatility;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Supports the Commission’s
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
source: PE-415.274
2008/11/20
ECON
29 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes the view that the peak in higher oil prices reflects a
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes the view that fluctuations in the price of oil, and in particular recent higher oil prices reflect a structural imbalance between supply and demand caused, in the main, by two factors: progressive depletion of the oil reserves and a change in demographic and urbanisation trends, especially in emerging countries, where the rise in average income is causing an increase in demand;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Expresses its concerns about the volatility
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Expresses its concern
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Expresses its concerns about the volatility of oil and commodity prices and its impact on inflation, purchasing power and financial stability; stresses that soaring
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that oil and other basic commodities should be insulated from speculators and hedge funds, since speculation on basic needs is at the expense of people all over the world; is of the view that speculation in oil and commodities creates a strong case for exploring the introduction of a special tax on financial transactions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to seek to reach an international agreement committing all signatories to impose such a tax on financial transactions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that use of oil and other c
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that sustained demand for oil has increasingly pushed supply up against capacity limits; urges for an improvement of data transparency in regard to energy statistics, especially in respect with oil stock levels;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that the European Union will have to face even more the challenge of lasting high and volatile oil prices and the economic impacts connected to them, considering that newly-discovered resources have tended to be smaller and more expensive to develop, being increasingly offshore, and the costs of exploration, development and production will become higher, making it more urgent to switch to alternative and renewable energy sources and to develop energy-saving technologies;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B (new) B. whereas higher oil prices and other basically needed commodities have raised the costs of production and put upward pressure on overall prices, because of the strong links across commodities,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses its concern that
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses its concern that with structurally higher energy prices, there is more of a burden on labour to absorb increased costs through lower wages; considers that the inflation triggered by the increase in oil price should be addressed, in particular, by distributing purchasing power more evenly, particularly through targeted measures to help the poorest people;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to review seriously not only the environmental aspects but also the economic and security aspects of an increased dependency on energy from non-renewable sources;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that green taxation or an effective cap on emissions and the adoption of a wide range of energy and transport-related measures are important tools for smoothing out oil price volatility and for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products; also underlines the importance of the application of the ‘polluter-pays’ principle; considers that there is scope for expanding the use of environmentally related taxes if the European Union and the Member States are serious about achieving their climate change objectives; recalls that the greater the number of countries that put similar policies in place, the more limited the impact on sectoral competitiveness of those policies, in particular where ecotaxes substitute taxes on activity;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines that
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5b. Notes the extreme volatility of the price of oil, which went from USD 100 a barrel on 2 January 2008 to USD 148 on 4 July, before falling to the current price of around USD 60 a barrel; asks the Commission to analyse whether this volatility, which is harmful to the economy and consumers, is a consequence of speculative practices on the markets, in particular the NYMEX, where 60% of trading is in virtual oil; considers that, with a view to a better regulatory framework for financial markets, specialised market practices for trading in raw materials must also be reviewed in order to avoid excessive speculation;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Urges a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil producing countries involving a willingness to give as well as take on both sides and aiming towards a more stable and smoothed supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Expects the petroleum companies to reinvest their substantial recent profits in exploration and development of new oil reserves and in promoting energy saving technology and research into oil substitutes (notably for transport applications).
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C (new) C. whereas the rise of inflation, triggered by basic commodities and hikes in the price of oil has provoked an erosion of purchasing power, which has not been properly addressed,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital D (new) D. whereas the fluctuation in the oil price over the last months reflects cyclical and structural factors,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital E (new) E. whereas the oil prices fluctuation has highlighted the dual nature of commodities; whereas oil or other commodities are not only used as inputs of production or consumption, but also as a financial asset subject to speculation,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital F (new) F. whereas the development of new investment vehicles on the market for oil and other fundamental commodities, as well as the investment of hedge funds into commodities, has amplified the price volatility of those commodities; and whereas there is a need to ensure greater transparency on the energy markets,
Amendment 7 #
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes the view that higher oil prices reflect a structural imbalance between supply and demand caused, in the main, by two factors: progressive depletion of the oil reserves and a change in demographic and
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Takes the view that
Amendment Amendment1 #
Draft opinion Recital A (new) A. whereas the price of oil increased from less than USD 50 per barrel in early 2000, to more than USD 140 in August 2008, and then sharply fell to less than USD 60 dollars per barrel,
source: PE-416.277
2008/12/12
AFET
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's communications entitled “Facing the challenge of higher oil prices” and “Second Strategic Energy Review – an EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan”; points out that, despite the drop in oil prices in the second half of 2008 as a result of the global financial crisis, the slow progress in switching to more sustainable fuels, declining output from the world's oilfields and the continuing growth in demand, primarily driven by the emerging economies, inevitably mean a
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates the importance of greater diversification of the EU's energy sources and supply routes, in order to mitigate the effects of a possible future oil crunch, while recognising the diversity of situations in which various Member States find themselves when it comes to energy mix, import dependency and infrastructure availability, particularly for 'energy islands' in the EU; supports a greater use of
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates the importance of greater diversification of the EU's energy sources and supply routes, in order to mitigate the effects of a possible future oil crunch, while recognising the diversity of situations in which various Member States find themselves when it comes to energy mix, import dependency and infrastructure availability, particularly for 'energy islands' in the EU; supports a greater use of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reiterates the importance of greater diversification of the EU's energy sources and supply routes, in order to mitigate the effects of a possible future oil crunch, while recognising the diversity of situations in which various Member States find themselves when it comes to energy mix, import dependency and infrastructure availability, particularly for 'energy islands' in the EU; supports a greater use of sustainable biofuels and acknowledges the importance of nuclear energy in order to improve energy security; notes that non- conventional oil is expected to play an important role in counterbalancing the decline in production from existing fields; underlines that new oil infrastructure projects
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the role of the Arctic in the formulation of the Energy Policy for Europe and in relation to climate change and sustainable development, as proposed by the March 2007 European Council; notes with particular concern the ongoing race for hydrocarbon resources in the Arctic, which may lead to security threats for the EU as well as overall international instability; calls on the Commission to pay specific attention to hydrocarbons in its Communication on strategic issues related to the Arctic;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the role of the Arctic in the formulation of the Energy Policy for Europe, as proposed by the March 2007 European Council; notes
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the EU's nascent energy policy will remain weak as long as there is no
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the EU's nascent energy policy will remain weak as long as there is no
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the EU's nascent energy policy will remain weak as long as there is no suitable Treaty basis for energy and energy security and it lacks a coherent strategy vis-à-vis its main external suppliers; supports Europe-wide referenda on the Lisbon Treaty, which contains an energy solidarity clause and makes energy policy a shared responsibility between the EU and the Member States, as a step in the right direction;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the EU's nascent energy policy will remain weak as long as there is no suitable Treaty basis for energy and energy security and it lacks a coherent strategy vis-à-vis its main external suppliers; supports the Lisbon Treaty,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that, in particular, the geopolitical impact of the changes in global conditions for international energy security and the consequences for future international governance policy have not yet been adequately considered and debated by the EU; considers that a continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the EU, the US, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern energy nationalism among the key energy players and increasingly politicised energy relations between the oil exporting and importing countries, including a higher risk of tensions and conflicts; strongly supports the Commission's proposal that the EU should engage in close dialogue with key oil suppliers such as Norway, OPEC and Russia, with a view to reinforcing energy interdependence and energy security for the whole of the EU, with a particular focus on greater efficiency, equal market access, non-discrimination and transparency; commends the Commission on its work on intensifying energy dialogues, resulting in particular in a number of memoranda of understanding with the eastern neighbours and Central Asian countries, and looks forward to more progress with southern partners;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern energy nationalism
source: PE-416.319
2008/12/17
ITRE
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas it is becoming ever more urgent to develop a coherent and comprehensive Community energy policy in order to ensure security of supply at a time when the European Union is becoming increasingly dependent on imports,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that, according to various estimates, it will still be possible to extract sufficient oil to meet mounting demand in the coming decades, even though the costs of extraction will certainly rise;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points to the uncertainty surrounding the question of when and to what extent a gap will develop between mounting demand and falling supply; is however convinced that all mea
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Takes the view that the extraction of existing resources is increasingly being hampered by political factors, including political instability, insufficient legal protection, but also environmental measures and resource management; calls, therefore, on the Commission to step up the dialogue with producing countries at all levels and to seek pragmatic solutions to disputes in the interests of both parties;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points to the importance of the Artic region as an oil-producing area, which is thought to contain up to a quarter of undiscovered reserves worldwide;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to do everything possible to persuade oil companies and producer countries to ensure more consistent investment in spite of fluctuating prices and profits;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Is alarmed at growing trends towards nationalisation and sweeping state intervention in recent years; is convinced that such intervention sends a disastrous signal for investment decisions and increases the risk of market distortions;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned at the increasing oil price volatility, which was a striking feature in 2008 and has a negative effect on
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the main reason for the oil price rise in the past eight years lies with a strong growth in demand
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it vital to improve market transparency in order to stabilise oil prices; calls on the Commission to submit corresponding proposals to Parliament and the Council; points out that transparency must urgently be increased in the producer countries as well, and volumes of production and the level of reserves in particular must also be published in a transparent way; calls on the Commission and Member States to work towards greater transparency within the framework of their dialogues with producer countries;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Stresses the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Welcomes the fact that many small businesses are now endeavouring to create and produce alternative energy but is concerned that numerous technical rules and standards make it difficult for them to sell the energy they produce or their surplus energy; considers, therefore, that the Commission should be instructed to draw up a report on the possibilities open to small businesses to produce energy and distribute it via networks owned by other companies and on any other form of technical regulation which may prevent or impede such a development;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to US$ 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry in order to guarantee security of supply;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Member States, the Commission and oil companies to ensure adequate training for the specialists who are required for research into oil reserves and for oil production;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Notes that oil pipelines have been excluded from the trans-European energy networks and calls on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the TEN-E in view of current developments, in particular falling domestic production and the simultaneous rise in dependence on imports and the need for new transport capacities;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy, since stability provides the basis for investment and prosperity;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, as things stand, the life of reserves is longer than had been assumed in 1980 and no-one can accurately predict when a cut in production caused by the natural depletion of resources will occur and whether this will happen gradually, abruptly or with intermediate peaks; whereas oil is nevertheless to be regarded as a finite resource,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Is concerned at the growing piracy that threatens international shipping and hence oil transport
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Welcomes the European Union's efforts to diversify energy sources in the transport sector;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on Member States to improve energy efficiency in transport by at least 20% by 2020 against a 2005 baseline; urges the Commission to stop unfair competition in favour of more oil consuming transport modes, such as air and road transport, by internalising external costs, caused by oil dependency and climate change; underlines the importance of intensifying efforts to promote green logistics and mobility management and thus save energy by reducing transport volumes;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Is convinced that in the medium and long term the growth in oil consumption in the transport sector can be reduced only if the EU and Member States also take
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Commission to study how energy savings can be achieved in road and air transport and shipping, in particular through the more efficient use of modern traffic management systems to reduce delays and diversions;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas oil production by the European Union and Norway still made a contribution towards meeting domestic demand of more than 30% in 2007,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the European Union's dependence on oil imports will rise to 95% by 2030, whilst at the same time conventional oil reserves will be increasingly concentrated in the countries in the strategic ellipse and growing competition in demand could create uncertainties in supply,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to focus more on analysing the indirect as well as the direct impact of proposed measures on security of supply and costs when preparing legislative proposals;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that it will still be possible to extract sufficient oil to meet demand in the
source: PE-416.609
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-414937_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-414941_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-414203_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16680&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/date |
Old
2008-06-13T00:00:00New
2008-06-12T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.294New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.294 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.937&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.941&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.609New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.609 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.203&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16680&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-118New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0118_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/6/64698New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|