BETA


2008/2212(INI) Facing oil challenges

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE REUL Herbert (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AFET PALECKIS Justas Vincas (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion IMCO BURKE Colm (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ECON BERÈS Pervenche (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/06/04
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 471 votes to 190, with 16 abstentions, a resolution on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply, in response to the Commission Communication entitled “Facing the challenge of higher oil prices”.

The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED and PES groups, in accordance with Rule 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.

The resolution notes that many oil resources, some of them easily extractable, are at present not fully accessible in many countries of the world. Yet, according to calculations, worldwide demand for oil will be more than a third higher in 2030 than it was in 2006. The European Union's dependence on oil imports will rise to 95% by 2030, whilst, at the same time, conventional oil reserves will be increasingly concentrated in the countries in the strategic ellipse, and growing competition in demand could create uncertainties in supply.

(1) Exploitation of existing resources : the resolution stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this context, the Commission's proposal for short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Parliament also calls for intensification of efforts to make unconventional oil resources commercially viable , and in this way to contribute to diversification, provided that environmentally friendly extraction processes are developed and then used.

Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services. MEPs consider that the use of oil and other carbon-intensive energy sources should be reduced, both through increased energy efficiency and by a shift to more carbon-neutral solutions , such as nuclear energy and energy derived from renewable sources.

The resolution calls for a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries aiming towards a more stable and steady supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large.

(2) Market transparency and pricing : the Parliament considers it vital to improve market transparency in order to stabilise oil prices. The Commission is called upon to submit corresponding proposals to Parliament and the Council.

The resolution stresses the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks.

MEPs emphasise that differing technical specifications for oil products in the main importing countries lead to market fragmentation that may play a key part in pushing up prices in the event of supply shortages. The Commission is called upon to submit proposals outlining ways in which such constraints on market access can be removed.

According to the Parliament, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason, it rejects all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves.

The resolution stresses the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. Lastly, it stresses that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products.

(3) Investments in oil extraction and processing : the resolution notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to USD 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment in their corresponding policies, also and in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital.

(4) Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy.

Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the trans-European energy networks (TEN-E). In this regard, new oil infrastructure projects such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constan ț a-Trieste pipelines should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest.

Lastly, the Parliament is concerned at the growing piracy that threatens international shipping and at the threat to transport routes and strategic infrastructure posed by terrorism . It calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up the dialogue with key players.

(5) Transport and buildings : MEPs point to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium-and-long-term suitability of first-generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels.

MEPs call for additional measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing, etc.).

(6) Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the Parliament considers that increased account must be taken of energy policy matters in the European Union's common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products. The Commission is called upon to include in its common foreign, trade and neighbourhood policy measures that can contribute towards progress being made worldwide in removing the link between economic growth and oil consumption.

According to MEPs, a continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the European Union, the United States, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.

Documents
2009/03/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/01/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/01/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/01/21
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Herbert REUL (EPP-ED, DE) on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply.

MEPs stress that increasing attention will have to be paid at European level to the diversification of energy supply routes and sources, energy savings and energy efficiency, in order to guarantee the security of energy supply in the coming decades. Oil is a finite resource so it is becoming ever more urgent to develop a coherent and comprehensive Community energy policy in order to ensure security of supply at a time when the European Union is becoming increasingly dependent on imports.

Exploitation of existing resources : the report stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal for the short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Commission is called upon, in dialogue with the oil companies and producer countries, to seek ways in which steady investment can be secured despite fluctuating prices and profits.

The Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services in order to minimise long-term expense as well as to mitigate a future decrease in oil supply.

The report urges a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries involving a willingness to give as well as take on both sides and aiming towards a more stable and smoothed supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large.

Market transparency and pricing : MEPs are concerned about the volatility of oil prices and its impact on economic and financial stability, and therefore urge the Commission and the Member States to ensure the highest practicable level of transparency in energy markets, and to work towards greater transparency within the framework of their dialogues with producer countries.

The report highlights the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks.

According to MEPs, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason and for reasons of sustainable budgetary policy, they reject all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves.

MEPs stress the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. They also stress that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products.

Investments in oil extraction and processing : the report notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to US$ 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment, in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital.

Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs urge the Member States and the Commission to step up their efforts in this connection and to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy.

Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the Trans-European Energy Network (TEN-E). In this context, the new oil infrastructure projects, such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constanta-Trieste pipelines, should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest.

Transport and buildings : MEPs draw attention to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium and long-term suitability of first‑generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels.

MEPs call for measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing).

Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the report stresses the vital importance of a coherent strategy as regards the EU’s main external suppliers. MEPs consider that increased account must be taken of energy-policy matters in the Union’s common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products.

According to MEPs, the continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the EU, the US, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.

2009/01/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/12/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/11/25
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/10/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2008/10/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/09/25
   EP - REUL Herbert (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2008/09/24
   EP - BERÈS Pervenche (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2008/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/07/15
   EP - PALECKIS Justas Vincas (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2008/07/07
   EP - BURKE Colm (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2008/06/13
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to face the challenge of higher oil prices.

BACKGROUND: in recent months, oil prices have experienced a sharp and abrupt increase, reaching their highest level, in real terms, since the end of the seventies. Consumer fuel prices have been increasing sharply in the EU following the crude oil price trend. The current surge in oil prices is largely the result of a major structural shift of oil supply and demand in the global economy: oil consumption in OECD countries is declining; demand growth in the rest of the world is led by emerging economies, in particular China and India; demand in many countries is underpinned by existing subsidies for fuels; oil production in the short term is unlikely to keep pace with sustained strong demand; the number and size of new oilfields is shrinking; the largest potential for further oil production expansion is concentrated in the Middle East and OPEC countries, where state-run companies dominate extraction and production; refinery bottlenecks and capacity constraints have also negatively influenced level of supply. The weakening of the dollar has also contributed to pressure on oil prices.

Estimates indicate that the current high oil prices will have long-term impacts, reducing growth and increasing inflation in the EU economy . Through higher input and transport costs, high fuel prices increase food prices. These high price levels are squeezing the purchasing power of all EU citizens, with the most severe impact on the lowest income families, and putting a strain on business. Energy intensive sectors, as well as transport and agriculture, and in particular fisheries, are most affected and face a difficult adjustment process. Globally, higher oil prices imply a sizeable income transfer from oil-consuming to oil-producing countries, and this from the EU to a small number of third countries.

CONTENT: according to the Commission, the response of the EU to recent increases in oil prices should be based on the assumption that prices are likely to remain high in the medium to long term . This implies the need for structural adjustment, which needs to be accelerated to produce its positive effects as soon as possible. At the same time, the short term effects on some vulnerable groups should be mitigated , helping them to adjust to the new market situation. Great care should be exercised over proposals to offset oil price increases by tax cuts. The most likely effect would be to transfer revenue from consumers to the oil supplying countries, aggravating global imbalances. This could be followed by further price increases and would distort the functioning of the single market, undermining EU efforts to improve energy efficiency.

The major policy response must be to make the EU more efficient in the use of energy, and less dependent on fossil fuels . Increased oil prices should spur the EU to implement its integrated energy and climate change policies . Despite near term difficulties being experienced by certain sectors of the EU population in meeting rising energy bills, solutions can only come from completing shifts in energy demand and encouraging energy efficiency throughout the economy. Short-term palliative measures that Member States may take should be well targeted and should not lead to distorting effects on the internal market.

Against this background, the Commission recommends to the European Council to:

confirm its determination to adopt legally binding measures to give effect to its 2020 targets for renewables, biofuels and greenhouse gas reductions by the end of 2008, which are essential to improve substantially energy efficiency and the diversification to the EU energy supply; step up the drive for energy efficiency in business and in private households so that quicker and greater savings can be achieved in line with agreed objectives; note that the forthcoming strategic energy review on security of supply and external energy policy, will also report on the functioning of the oil and petroleum markets. In addition to a proposal to improve the transparency of emergency oil stocks the Commission will also report on the feasibility of requiring greater transparency on commercial oil stocks; note that the Commission is examining options for revising the energy taxation directive and will shortly propose to amend the Eurovignette Directive as part of the wider drive to support greater energy efficiency; note the Commission's intention to report on the possible use of tax incentives, including reduced VAT rates to encourage energy savings; support the organisation of a high level meeting on oil markets between main oil producing and consuming countries and strengthen existing regional and bilateral dialogues in order to achieve better market access and transparency; agree that Member States could provide targeted support when justified to vulnerable households ; agree that Member States could make available targeted f inancial support for the most affected entities provided this aid is used to support industrial redeployment, retraining or restructuring measures.. Furthermore, any measures taken to alleviate the immediate impact of high oil prices must be proportionate and accelerate longer term adjustment to a low carbon economy; agree on the need to restructure the fisheries sector while taking care of the economic and social repercussions. The Commission will shortly make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of those segments of the European fleet that are most vulnerable; agree to assist net oil importing developing countries to mitigate the short term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the EU's and Member States' overall development policy and assistance programmes.

2008/06/12
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to face the challenge of higher oil prices.

BACKGROUND: in recent months, oil prices have experienced a sharp and abrupt increase, reaching their highest level, in real terms, since the end of the seventies. Consumer fuel prices have been increasing sharply in the EU following the crude oil price trend. The current surge in oil prices is largely the result of a major structural shift of oil supply and demand in the global economy: oil consumption in OECD countries is declining; demand growth in the rest of the world is led by emerging economies, in particular China and India; demand in many countries is underpinned by existing subsidies for fuels; oil production in the short term is unlikely to keep pace with sustained strong demand; the number and size of new oilfields is shrinking; the largest potential for further oil production expansion is concentrated in the Middle East and OPEC countries, where state-run companies dominate extraction and production; refinery bottlenecks and capacity constraints have also negatively influenced level of supply. The weakening of the dollar has also contributed to pressure on oil prices.

Estimates indicate that the current high oil prices will have long-term impacts, reducing growth and increasing inflation in the EU economy . Through higher input and transport costs, high fuel prices increase food prices. These high price levels are squeezing the purchasing power of all EU citizens, with the most severe impact on the lowest income families, and putting a strain on business. Energy intensive sectors, as well as transport and agriculture, and in particular fisheries, are most affected and face a difficult adjustment process. Globally, higher oil prices imply a sizeable income transfer from oil-consuming to oil-producing countries, and this from the EU to a small number of third countries.

CONTENT: according to the Commission, the response of the EU to recent increases in oil prices should be based on the assumption that prices are likely to remain high in the medium to long term . This implies the need for structural adjustment, which needs to be accelerated to produce its positive effects as soon as possible. At the same time, the short term effects on some vulnerable groups should be mitigated , helping them to adjust to the new market situation. Great care should be exercised over proposals to offset oil price increases by tax cuts. The most likely effect would be to transfer revenue from consumers to the oil supplying countries, aggravating global imbalances. This could be followed by further price increases and would distort the functioning of the single market, undermining EU efforts to improve energy efficiency.

The major policy response must be to make the EU more efficient in the use of energy, and less dependent on fossil fuels . Increased oil prices should spur the EU to implement its integrated energy and climate change policies . Despite near term difficulties being experienced by certain sectors of the EU population in meeting rising energy bills, solutions can only come from completing shifts in energy demand and encouraging energy efficiency throughout the economy. Short-term palliative measures that Member States may take should be well targeted and should not lead to distorting effects on the internal market.

Against this background, the Commission recommends to the European Council to:

confirm its determination to adopt legally binding measures to give effect to its 2020 targets for renewables, biofuels and greenhouse gas reductions by the end of 2008, which are essential to improve substantially energy efficiency and the diversification to the EU energy supply; step up the drive for energy efficiency in business and in private households so that quicker and greater savings can be achieved in line with agreed objectives; note that the forthcoming strategic energy review on security of supply and external energy policy, will also report on the functioning of the oil and petroleum markets. In addition to a proposal to improve the transparency of emergency oil stocks the Commission will also report on the feasibility of requiring greater transparency on commercial oil stocks; note that the Commission is examining options for revising the energy taxation directive and will shortly propose to amend the Eurovignette Directive as part of the wider drive to support greater energy efficiency; note the Commission's intention to report on the possible use of tax incentives, including reduced VAT rates to encourage energy savings; support the organisation of a high level meeting on oil markets between main oil producing and consuming countries and strengthen existing regional and bilateral dialogues in order to achieve better market access and transparency; agree that Member States could provide targeted support when justified to vulnerable households ; agree that Member States could make available targeted f inancial support for the most affected entities provided this aid is used to support industrial redeployment, retraining or restructuring measures.. Furthermore, any measures taken to alleviate the immediate impact of high oil prices must be proportionate and accelerate longer term adjustment to a low carbon economy; agree on the need to restructure the fisheries sector while taking care of the economic and social repercussions. The Commission will shortly make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of those segments of the European fleet that are most vulnerable; agree to assist net oil importing developing countries to mitigate the short term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the EU's and Member States' overall development policy and assistance programmes.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport REUL A6-0035/2009 - am. 2 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: -: 443, +: 215, 0: 24
SE NL DK LT EE FI CY MT LV LU IE BE SI BG PT SK AT PL RO IT GB HU CZ EL ES FR DE
Total
17
26
14
12
6
13
6
4
7
6
11
24
7
17
21
13
17
45
31
62
63
22
21
22
44
63
88
icon: ALDE ALDE
87

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1
2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
37

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
38

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

4
icon: NI NI
26

Belgium NI

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

2

Austria NI

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
198

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

3

Finland PSE

For (1)

3

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
249

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

For (1)

5

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Rapport REUL A6-0035/2009 - am. 3 #

2009/03/11 Outcome: +: 471, -: 190, 0: 16
DE ES IT PL FR GB RO CZ HU EL PT BG SK IE BE AT MT SI LV LT LU CY EE FI NL DK SE
Total
87
43
62
43
66
62
29
21
21
22
21
17
13
10
24
17
5
7
7
12
6
6
6
13
25
14
18
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
245

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
196

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

3

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
26

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

6

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

2

Austria NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
87
2

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2
AmendmentsDossier
94 2008/2212(INI)
2008/11/12 IMCO 15 amendments...
source: PE-415.274
2008/11/20 ECON 29 amendments...
source: PE-416.277
2008/12/12 AFET 16 amendments...
source: PE-416.319
2008/12/17 ITRE 34 amendments...
source: PE-416.609

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2008-06-13T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-12-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.937
committee
ECON
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2008-12-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.937
committee
ECON
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2008-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.941
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-414937_EN.html
docs/3
date
2008-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.941
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-414941_EN.html
docs/4
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.203
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.203
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-414203_EN.html
docs/6
date
2009-06-04T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2009)3060
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7
date
2009-06-04T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2009)3060
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16680&j=0&l=en
events/0/date
Old
2008-06-13T00:00:00
New
2008-06-12T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.294
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.294
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.937&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.941&secondRef=02
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.609
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.609
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.203&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16680&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2009-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html title: A6-0035/2009
events/4
date
2009-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html title: A6-0035/2009
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE
events/7
date
2009-03-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0118_EN.html title: T6-0118/2009
summary
events/7
date
2009-03-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0118_EN.html title: T6-0118/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: REUL Herbert date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REUL Herbert group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: BERÈS Pervenche date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-09-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BERÈS Pervenche group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: BURKE Colm date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BURKE Colm group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0035_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-118
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0118_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0384/COM_COM(2008)0384_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0384 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52008DC0384:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General Commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2894 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2894*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2894 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0035/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16680&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-118 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0118/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REUL Herbert group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2008-09-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-09-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BERÈS Pervenche group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BURKE Colm group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2894 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2894*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2008 date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.294 title: PE416.294 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.937&secondRef=02 title: PE414.937 committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.941&secondRef=02 title: PE414.941 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.609 title: PE416.609 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.203&secondRef=02 title: PE414.203 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN title: A6-0035/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16680&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3060 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0384/COM_COM(2008)0384_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0384 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=384 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to face the challenge of higher oil prices. BACKGROUND: in recent months, oil prices have experienced a sharp and abrupt increase, reaching their highest level, in real terms, since the end of the seventies. Consumer fuel prices have been increasing sharply in the EU following the crude oil price trend. The current surge in oil prices is largely the result of a major structural shift of oil supply and demand in the global economy: oil consumption in OECD countries is declining; demand growth in the rest of the world is led by emerging economies, in particular China and India; demand in many countries is underpinned by existing subsidies for fuels; oil production in the short term is unlikely to keep pace with sustained strong demand; the number and size of new oilfields is shrinking; the largest potential for further oil production expansion is concentrated in the Middle East and OPEC countries, where state-run companies dominate extraction and production; refinery bottlenecks and capacity constraints have also negatively influenced level of supply. The weakening of the dollar has also contributed to pressure on oil prices. Estimates indicate that the current high oil prices will have long-term impacts, reducing growth and increasing inflation in the EU economy . Through higher input and transport costs, high fuel prices increase food prices. These high price levels are squeezing the purchasing power of all EU citizens, with the most severe impact on the lowest income families, and putting a strain on business. Energy intensive sectors, as well as transport and agriculture, and in particular fisheries, are most affected and face a difficult adjustment process. Globally, higher oil prices imply a sizeable income transfer from oil-consuming to oil-producing countries, and this from the EU to a small number of third countries. CONTENT: according to the Commission, the response of the EU to recent increases in oil prices should be based on the assumption that prices are likely to remain high in the medium to long term . This implies the need for structural adjustment, which needs to be accelerated to produce its positive effects as soon as possible. At the same time, the short term effects on some vulnerable groups should be mitigated , helping them to adjust to the new market situation. Great care should be exercised over proposals to offset oil price increases by tax cuts. The most likely effect would be to transfer revenue from consumers to the oil supplying countries, aggravating global imbalances. This could be followed by further price increases and would distort the functioning of the single market, undermining EU efforts to improve energy efficiency. The major policy response must be to make the EU more efficient in the use of energy, and less dependent on fossil fuels . Increased oil prices should spur the EU to implement its integrated energy and climate change policies . Despite near term difficulties being experienced by certain sectors of the EU population in meeting rising energy bills, solutions can only come from completing shifts in energy demand and encouraging energy efficiency throughout the economy. Short-term palliative measures that Member States may take should be well targeted and should not lead to distorting effects on the internal market. Against this background, the Commission recommends to the European Council to: confirm its determination to adopt legally binding measures to give effect to its 2020 targets for renewables, biofuels and greenhouse gas reductions by the end of 2008, which are essential to improve substantially energy efficiency and the diversification to the EU energy supply; step up the drive for energy efficiency in business and in private households so that quicker and greater savings can be achieved in line with agreed objectives; note that the forthcoming strategic energy review on security of supply and external energy policy, will also report on the functioning of the oil and petroleum markets. In addition to a proposal to improve the transparency of emergency oil stocks the Commission will also report on the feasibility of requiring greater transparency on commercial oil stocks; note that the Commission is examining options for revising the energy taxation directive and will shortly propose to amend the Eurovignette Directive as part of the wider drive to support greater energy efficiency; note the Commission's intention to report on the possible use of tax incentives, including reduced VAT rates to encourage energy savings; support the organisation of a high level meeting on oil markets between main oil producing and consuming countries and strengthen existing regional and bilateral dialogues in order to achieve better market access and transparency; agree that Member States could provide targeted support when justified to vulnerable households ; agree that Member States could make available targeted f inancial support for the most affected entities provided this aid is used to support industrial redeployment, retraining or restructuring measures.. Furthermore, any measures taken to alleviate the immediate impact of high oil prices must be proportionate and accelerate longer term adjustment to a low carbon economy; agree on the need to restructure the fisheries sector while taking care of the economic and social repercussions. The Commission will shortly make proposals for urgent measures to help ensure the survival of those segments of the European fleet that are most vulnerable; agree to assist net oil importing developing countries to mitigate the short term impact of high oil prices, to improve their energy efficiency and to develop alternatives to fossil fuels, as part of the EU's and Member States' overall development policy and assistance programmes.
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2894*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2008 title: 2894
  • date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Herbert REUL (EPP-ED, DE) on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply. MEPs stress that increasing attention will have to be paid at European level to the diversification of energy supply routes and sources, energy savings and energy efficiency, in order to guarantee the security of energy supply in the coming decades. Oil is a finite resource so it is becoming ever more urgent to develop a coherent and comprehensive Community energy policy in order to ensure security of supply at a time when the European Union is becoming increasingly dependent on imports. Exploitation of existing resources : the report stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal for the short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Commission is called upon, in dialogue with the oil companies and producer countries, to seek ways in which steady investment can be secured despite fluctuating prices and profits. The Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services in order to minimise long-term expense as well as to mitigate a future decrease in oil supply. The report urges a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries involving a willingness to give as well as take on both sides and aiming towards a more stable and smoothed supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large. Market transparency and pricing : MEPs are concerned about the volatility of oil prices and its impact on economic and financial stability, and therefore urge the Commission and the Member States to ensure the highest practicable level of transparency in energy markets, and to work towards greater transparency within the framework of their dialogues with producer countries. The report highlights the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks. According to MEPs, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason and for reasons of sustainable budgetary policy, they reject all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves. MEPs stress the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. They also stress that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products. Investments in oil extraction and processing : the report notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to US$ 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment, in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital. Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs urge the Member States and the Commission to step up their efforts in this connection and to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy. Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the Trans-European Energy Network (TEN-E). In this context, the new oil infrastructure projects, such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constanta-Trieste pipelines, should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest. Transport and buildings : MEPs draw attention to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium and long-term suitability of first‑generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels. MEPs call for measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing). Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the report stresses the vital importance of a coherent strategy as regards the EU’s main external suppliers. MEPs consider that increased account must be taken of energy-policy matters in the Union’s common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products. According to MEPs, the continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the EU, the US, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN title: A6-0035/2009
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16680&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-118 title: T6-0118/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 471 votes to 190, with 16 abstentions, a resolution on possible solutions to the challenges in relation to oil supply, in response to the Commission Communication entitled “Facing the challenge of higher oil prices”. The text adopted in plenary had been tabled by the EPP-ED and PES groups, in accordance with Rule 45(2) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, in the form of a proposal for a resolution to replace the proposal for a resolution tabled by the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. The resolution notes that many oil resources, some of them easily extractable, are at present not fully accessible in many countries of the world. Yet, according to calculations, worldwide demand for oil will be more than a third higher in 2030 than it was in 2006. The European Union's dependence on oil imports will rise to 95% by 2030, whilst, at the same time, conventional oil reserves will be increasingly concentrated in the countries in the strategic ellipse, and growing competition in demand could create uncertainties in supply. (1) Exploitation of existing resources : the resolution stresses that all measures that could reduce demand for fossil energy sources should be vigorously pursued and supports, in this context, the Commission's proposal for short-term measures to be taken if necessary to mitigate future oil price spikes. The Parliament also calls for intensification of efforts to make unconventional oil resources commercially viable , and in this way to contribute to diversification, provided that environmentally friendly extraction processes are developed and then used. Member States are called upon to provide financial support for investments in alternative energy sources such as renewable energy, and to prioritise consumer awareness measures promoting the purchase of energy-efficient goods and services. MEPs consider that the use of oil and other carbon-intensive energy sources should be reduced, both through increased energy efficiency and by a shift to more carbon-neutral solutions , such as nuclear energy and energy derived from renewable sources. The resolution calls for a more dynamic relationship between the European Union and the oil-producing countries aiming towards a more stable and steady supply and pricing environment for oil, which would be in the interests of all parties concerned and the world economy at large. (2) Market transparency and pricing : the Parliament considers it vital to improve market transparency in order to stabilise oil prices. The Commission is called upon to submit corresponding proposals to Parliament and the Council. The resolution stresses the need to prioritise the monitoring of competition in the processing and sale of oil and petroleum products and to increase the transparency of data on commercial oil stocks. MEPs emphasise that differing technical specifications for oil products in the main importing countries lead to market fragmentation that may play a key part in pushing up prices in the event of supply shortages. The Commission is called upon to submit proposals outlining ways in which such constraints on market access can be removed. According to the Parliament, the function of strategic reserves is to respond to physical bottlenecks arising from supply shortages. For this reason, it rejects all attempts to counter oil price volatility by using these reserves. The resolution stresses the importance of actively working to make new alternative energy accessible to small businesses in order to make them less dependent on oil price fluctuations. Lastly, it stresses that an effective emissions trading system and the adoption of a wide range of other energy saving measures should be important tools for stimulating the development of a wide-ranging, cutting-edge market for energy-efficient technologies and products. (3) Investments in oil extraction and processing : the resolution notes that, according to the IEA, annual investments amounting to USD 350 billion are necessary in the oil industry by 2020 in order to guarantee security of supply. In this context, MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to provide incentives for investment in their corresponding policies, also and in particular within the European Union. They highlight the role of long-term investment security in this connection but reject the notion of public money being substituted for private investments and capital. (4) Transport routes : stressing the crucial importance of good neighbourly relations among transit states and between them and their neighbouring countries, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to work towards stabilisation, in particular in producer countries threatened by political instability, within the framework of the common foreign, trade and security policy. Moreover, MEPs call on the Member States and the Commission to consider including oil infrastructure in the trans-European energy networks (TEN-E). In this regard, new oil infrastructure projects such as the Odessa-Gdansk and Constan ț a-Trieste pipelines should continue to be high-priority projects of European interest. Lastly, the Parliament is concerned at the growing piracy that threatens international shipping and at the threat to transport routes and strategic infrastructure posed by terrorism . It calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up the dialogue with key players. (5) Transport and buildings : MEPs point to the potential for energy savings in the buildings sector, which could reduce demand for fossil energy sources such as oil and gas. However, they express doubts regarding the medium-and-long-term suitability of first-generation biofuels as a substitute for oil and call for increased efforts in researching synthetic fuels. MEPs call for additional measures to shift transport and mobility towards more sustainable modes that consume little or no oil, such as rail, waterborne transport and intermodal mobility chains in urban areas (walking, cycling, public transport, vehicle sharing, etc.). (6) Relations with countries with rising oil consumption : the Parliament considers that increased account must be taken of energy policy matters in the European Union's common external relations with countries whose energy consumption is rising sharply, and that the European Union must work towards cutting state subsidies for oil products. The Commission is called upon to include in its common foreign, trade and neighbourhood policy measures that can contribute towards progress being made worldwide in removing the link between economic growth and oil consumption. According to MEPs, a continued reliance on national solutions must give way to new and close forms of political and economic cooperation between the European Union, the United States, Russia and China, which must also be given institutional form in the medium term.
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/6/64698
New
  • ITRE/6/64698
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 52-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels
New
3.60.02
Oil industry, motor fuels
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Secretariat General
New
Secretariat-General
other/0/dg/title
Old
Secretariat General
New
Secretariat-General
activities
  • date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0384/COM_COM(2008)0384_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008DC0384:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2008)0384 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General Commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2894 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2894*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2894 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-35&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0035/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16680&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-118 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0118/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: PALECKIS Justas Vincas
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERÈS Pervenche
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BURKE Colm
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: REUL Herbert
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat General commissioner: BARROSO José Manuel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/6/64698
reference
2008/2212(INI)
title
Facing oil challenges
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels