BETA


2008/2237(INI) Small Business Act

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE HERCZOG Edit (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion FEMM PODIMATA Anni (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion CULT TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion IMCO GRAU I SEGÚ Martí (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion JURI KARAS Othmar (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ECON HÖKMARK Gunnar (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion EMPL WEISGERBER Anja (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2009/12/16
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBA). It summarises the progress achieved in 2009, which has been the first full year of implementation of the SBA, focussing mainly on the measures contained in the SBA Action Plan and in the European Economic Recovery Plan . The report notes that both the Commission and Member States have taken substantial action to improve SMEs’ access to finance, to facilitate their access to EU and third country markets and to improve framework conditions for SMEs in particular by removing unnecessary administrative burdens.

The Commission has delivered on major actions announced in the SBA. It has adopted all five legislative proposals linked to the SBA:

· a general ‘block exemption’ regulation (GBER) adopted in July 2008 made it easier for governments to support SMEs through aid measures exempted from the notification obligation;

· the proposal on reduced VAT rates entered into force on 1 June 2009 and offers the Member States ample possibilities to boost economic activity notably in labour-intensive services.

The three other legislative proposals are still pending. The proposed recast of the late payments Directive and the proposal on a European Private Company Statute are both vitally important for the competitiveness of SMEs. The proposal on VAT invoicing aims at ensuring equal treatment of paper and electronic invoices and is estimated to have a maximum midterm reduction potential of EUR 18.4 billion if all businesses send all their invoices electronically.

Member States have also shown strong political commitment to implement the SBA, but vary as regards both the approach taken and the results achieved. Several Member States have 'transposed' the SBA as a whole into their national policy programmes.

Implementing the “Think Small First” principle : from January 2009, the Commission has systematically applied an “SME Test” to assess the impact on SMEs of all its major legislative and policy proposals. It proposed giving Member States the option of exempting micro-enterprises from accounting rules. It has also taken major steps to reach the EU target of a 25% reduction in administrative burdens set in March 2007, which particularly benefits SMEs. Reduction measures already adopted by the legislator are expected to lead to reduced costs of EUR 7.6 billion. Measures pending adoption by the Council and Parliament could add EUR 30.7 billion to that amount. All in all, the administrative burdens reduction proposed or currently under preparation by the Commission could exceed the initial target and reach 33% of the total of EUR 123.8 billion estimated burdens of EU origin.

The Commission welcomes the fact that all Member States have by now adopted national targets for reducing administrative burdens and that they are continuing to simplify the administrative environment for SMEs. For example, the average time and cost to start-up a private limited company is now 8 days (compared to 9 days in 2008) and the cost is EUR 417 (compared to EUR 463 in 2008).

Access to finance : the Commission has simplified state aid rules and has pointed clearly to the need to take better account of SMEs’ needs at Member State level. The new General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER) adopted as part of the SBA enlarges the categories of state aid covered by the exemption. Block exempted aid for SMEs amounted to EUR 2.8 billion in 2008, an increase of EUR 0.3 billion compared to 2007. The European Investment Bank (EIB) group has played a crucial role in easing SMEs’ access to finance in 2009. It has substantially increased its lending activity dedicated to SMEs from EUR 8.1 billion in 2008 to around EUR 11.5 billion in 2009. EUR 200 million has been allocated by the EIB for mezzanine finance for 2009.

The report notes the activities and contribution of the JASMINE and JEREMIE initiatives.

As a response to the financial and economic crisis, and often using the temporary framework on state aid, most Member States have also adopted policy measures to enhance SMEs’ access to liquidity, especially to bank lending, through the creation and extension of loan and guarantee schemes for SMEs. The EIB package of EUR 30 billion for loans to SMEs also allows some member countries to use a second level guarantee scheme.

Access to markets : to stimulate cross-border operations with the Single Market, the Commission and Member States jointly decided to lower the fees for EU-wide trade mark rights by 40% and to simplify the registration procedure from 1 May 2009. The Commission also increased EU financial support to EUR 2.1 million in 2009 to promote SMEs defence of their interests in the standardisation process and to improve SMEs use of European standards. As regards the external dimension, Market Access Teams have been established in 30 key export markets. The Commission is setting-up business centres in a selected number of these markets. These Centres will help EU SMEs wishing to set up and trade in these countries by providing business support services including market access assistance, finding commercial partners, logistical support and advice on issues such as protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and standardisation.

Promoting Entrepreneurship : two major events in 2009, the First European SME Week which took place in 36 European countries and the Conference on the SBA/European Charter for small enterprises have contributed to promoting entrepreneurship among the general public, giving voice to entrepreneurs to present their career paths and providing opportunities for networking. A number of countries have anchored entrepreneurship education in their curricula

The report concludes that it remains of utmost importance to continue to implement the SBA Action Plan at all levels.

2009/10/06
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/10
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/10
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 536 votes to 47, with 47 abstentions, a resolution on a “Small Business Act”.

Parliament regrets that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument. considers that its truly innovative aspect is its intention to place the "Think Small First" principle at the heart of Community policies; calls on the Council and the Commission to join Parliament in the effort to establish the “Think First Principle” principle as a binding rule , in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation.

The resolution stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles.

MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs.

The resolution emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, it sees a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union.

The Parliament makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas:

(1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the resolution makes the following recommendations:

improve access to the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013); the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened , so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes.

(2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. Parliament considers that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the resolution:

calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments , possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit.

MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs.

(3) Improving market access : the resolution stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need:

to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by: (i) making more use of e-procurement; (ii) adapting the size of contracts; (iii) alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; (iv) providing relevant and proportionate qualification criteria in specific tenders; (v) enhancing access to information on public tenders for SMEs and (vi) harmonising required documents; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices , such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border.

Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive.

MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation , as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin. Parliament encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, and in all emerging markets.

(4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : Parliament believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. It therefore encourages the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices.

MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation.

In particular, the resolution:

stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making : the Commission’s consultation period should be extended to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; encourages the setting up of a " statistics holiday " for micro enterprises; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation.

(5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient.

The resolution welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.

Documents
2009/03/10
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/02/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/02/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/02/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own initiative report by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on a ‘Small Business Act’, supporting the Commission's Communication which aims to drive an ambitious policy agenda to promote SMEs’ growth and to anchor the “Think Small First” approach in policy-making at all levels. It regrets, however, that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument and calls on the Council and the Commission to establish this principle as a binding rule, in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation.

The report stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles.

MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs.

The committee emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, MEPs see a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union.

The committee makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas:

(1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the report makes the following recommendations:

the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; the Small Business Act should take account of cooperative arrangements among SMEs (clusters); a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; Member States should increase their share of innovative public procurement and the participation of innovative SMEs in public procurement procedures; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened, so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs should be supported through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes; the Commission should assess SME participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and bring forward any necessary proposals.

(2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. They consider that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the report:

calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; calls for further investigation into how current banking rules and other financial regulations, including the transparency of credit ratings, could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments, possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit.

MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs.

(3) Improving market access : the report stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need:

to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by making more use of e-procurement, adapting the size of contracts and alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices, such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border.

Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive.

MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation, as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin.

(4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : MEPs believe that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. They therefore encourage the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices.

MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation. In particular, the report:

stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making: the Commission’s consultation period should be extended from 8 to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation.

(5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient.

The report welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.

2009/01/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/01
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2008/12/01
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/11/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/11/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/10/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/10/15
   EP - PODIMATA Anni (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2008/09/25
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council held an exchange of views on the Communication entitled "Priority for small and medium-sized undertakings (SMUs) first - A "Small Business Act" for Europe. The exchange of views made it possible to work out political guidelines to aid the Council's preparatory fora in discussion of draft conclusions with a view to the adoption of these at the next Competitiveness Council on 1 and 2 December 2008.

Delegations voiced their opinions, in particular, on identifying the priority measures laid down in the "Small Business Act" (SBA), which could have a rapid impact on growth against a background of economic slowdown.

A broad consensus emerged regarding the beneficial effects which implementation of the measures contained in the package could have on SMUs, in particular by facilitating access for SMUs to funding, by tending to reduction and simplification of administrative burdens and by favouring undertakings' access to the market.

The proposal to create an SBA for Europe put forward by the Commission in June 2007 had been the subject of an initial discussion at the informal meeting of ministers at Versailles (France) on 17 and 18 July 2008.

Documents
2008/09/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/09/23
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2008/09/22
   EP - KARAS Othmar (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2008/09/17
   EP - HERCZOG Edit (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2008/09/09
   EP - WEISGERBER Anja (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2008/09/08
   EP - TRÜPEL Helga (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2008/07/08
   EP - HÖKMARK Gunnar (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2008/07/07
   EP - GRAU I SEGÚ Martí (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2008/06/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to present an initiative entitled a “Small Business Act” for Europe (SBA) to fully unlock the growth and jobs potential of European SMEs.

CONTENT: in a globally changing landscape characterised by continuous structural changes and enhanced competitive pressures, the role of SMEs has become even more important as providers of employment opportunities but they very often face enormous bureaucratic hurdles and obstacles. European SMEs deserve to be better assisted to fully unlock their potential of long term sustainable growth and of more job creation.

At the heart of the SBA is the conviction that achieving the best possible framework conditions for SMEs depends first and foremost on society’s recognition of entrepreneurs. This is why the “Small Business Act” aims to improve the overall policy approach to entrepreneurship , to irreversibly anchor the “Think Small First” principle in policymaking from regulation to public service, and to promote SMEs’ growth by helping them tackle the remaining problems which hamper their development.

The SBA builds on the Commission’s and Member States’ policy achievements, creates a new policy framework which integrates the existing enterprise policy instruments, and builds in particular on the European Charter for Small Enterprises and the Modern SME policy. To implement this ambitious policy agenda, the Commission is proposing a genuine political partnership between the EU and Member States through:

A set of 10 principles to guide the conception and implementation of policies both at EU and Member State level :

create an environment in which entrepreneurs and family businesses can thrive and entrepreneurship is rewarded; ensure that honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy quickly get a second chance; design rules according to the “Think Small First” principle; make public administrations responsive to SMEs’ needs; adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs; facilitate SMEs’ access to finance and develop a legal and business environment supportive to timely payments in commercial transactions; help SMEs to benefit more from the opportunities offered by the Single Market; promote the upgrading of skills in SMEs and all forms of innovation; enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities; encourage and support SMEs to benefit from the growth of markets.

A set of new legislative proposals which are guided by the “Think Small First” principle in four areas that particularly affect SMEs :

1) General Block Exemption Regulation on State Aids (GBER) : this Regulation, to be adopted shortly, will exempt from prior notification categories of State Aid already covered by existing regulations in the field of aid to SMEs, for training, employment, R&D and regional aid and possibly also for new categories of aid. The new Regulation will simplify and harmonise existing rules for SMEs and increase investment aid intensities for SMEs.

2) Regulation providing for a Statute for a European Private Company (SPE) : this Regulation provides for a Statute for an SPE that could be created and operate according to the same uniform principles in all Member States. The Commission will also come forward with the necessary amending proposals to ensure that this new company form can benefit from the existing corporate tax directives.

3) Directive on reduced VAT rates : this Directive, which will be proposed shortly, will offer Member States the option of applying reduced VAT rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs.

4) As part of the SBA the following proposals will be prepared : i) a legislative proposal to further modernise, simplify and harmonise the existing rules on VAT invoicing to alleviate the burden on businesses; ii) an amendment to the Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments with a view to ensuring that SMEs are paid on time for any commercial transaction.

A set of new policy measures which implement these 10 principles according to the needs of SMEs both at Community and at Member State level.

The SBA includes an ambitious set of measures to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the Single Market and expand into international markets by orienting more resources to small companies' access to finance, Research & Development and innovation. They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process , win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities.

In addition to the standing commitment to cut administrative burden by 25% by 2012 , the time needed to start a new company should be no more than one week, the maximum time to obtain business licenses and permits should not surpass one month and one-stop-shops should assist to facilitate start-ups and recruitment procedures.

Where practical, the Commission plans to use concrete dates in a year for the entry into force of regulations/decisions affecting business. Member States are invited to consider similar measures.

Lastly, the SBA seeks new ways to stimulate interest in entrepreneurship and cultivate a more entrepreneurial mindset, especially among young people. Young people, who want to start up a business, can now gain experience by spending time in an SME abroad via the just launched “ Erasmus for young entrepreneurs ” programme. This will help upgrade their skills and contribute to the networking among SMEs in Europe. Similar mobility programmes are also underway for apprentices.

The SBA should be fully embedded in the Growth and Jobs strategy. Member States are invited to take advantage of the update of the Lisbon cycle 2008 to reflect the SBA in their National Reform Programmes.

2008/06/25
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/06/25
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/06/24
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present an initiative entitled a “Small Business Act” for Europe (SBA) to fully unlock the growth and jobs potential of European SMEs.

CONTENT: in a globally changing landscape characterised by continuous structural changes and enhanced competitive pressures, the role of SMEs has become even more important as providers of employment opportunities but they very often face enormous bureaucratic hurdles and obstacles. European SMEs deserve to be better assisted to fully unlock their potential of long term sustainable growth and of more job creation.

At the heart of the SBA is the conviction that achieving the best possible framework conditions for SMEs depends first and foremost on society’s recognition of entrepreneurs. This is why the “Small Business Act” aims to improve the overall policy approach to entrepreneurship , to irreversibly anchor the “Think Small First” principle in policymaking from regulation to public service, and to promote SMEs’ growth by helping them tackle the remaining problems which hamper their development.

The SBA builds on the Commission’s and Member States’ policy achievements, creates a new policy framework which integrates the existing enterprise policy instruments, and builds in particular on the European Charter for Small Enterprises and the Modern SME policy. To implement this ambitious policy agenda, the Commission is proposing a genuine political partnership between the EU and Member States through:

A set of 10 principles to guide the conception and implementation of policies both at EU and Member State level :

create an environment in which entrepreneurs and family businesses can thrive and entrepreneurship is rewarded; ensure that honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy quickly get a second chance; design rules according to the “Think Small First” principle; make public administrations responsive to SMEs’ needs; adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs; facilitate SMEs’ access to finance and develop a legal and business environment supportive to timely payments in commercial transactions; help SMEs to benefit more from the opportunities offered by the Single Market; promote the upgrading of skills in SMEs and all forms of innovation; enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities; encourage and support SMEs to benefit from the growth of markets.

A set of new legislative proposals which are guided by the “Think Small First” principle in four areas that particularly affect SMEs :

1) General Block Exemption Regulation on State Aids (GBER) : this Regulation, to be adopted shortly, will exempt from prior notification categories of State Aid already covered by existing regulations in the field of aid to SMEs, for training, employment, R&D and regional aid and possibly also for new categories of aid. The new Regulation will simplify and harmonise existing rules for SMEs and increase investment aid intensities for SMEs.

2) Regulation providing for a Statute for a European Private Company (SPE) : this Regulation provides for a Statute for an SPE that could be created and operate according to the same uniform principles in all Member States. The Commission will also come forward with the necessary amending proposals to ensure that this new company form can benefit from the existing corporate tax directives.

3) Directive on reduced VAT rates : this Directive, which will be proposed shortly, will offer Member States the option of applying reduced VAT rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs.

4) As part of the SBA the following proposals will be prepared : i) a legislative proposal to further modernise, simplify and harmonise the existing rules on VAT invoicing to alleviate the burden on businesses; ii) an amendment to the Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments with a view to ensuring that SMEs are paid on time for any commercial transaction.

A set of new policy measures which implement these 10 principles according to the needs of SMEs both at Community and at Member State level.

The SBA includes an ambitious set of measures to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the Single Market and expand into international markets by orienting more resources to small companies' access to finance, Research & Development and innovation. They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process , win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities.

In addition to the standing commitment to cut administrative burden by 25% by 2012 , the time needed to start a new company should be no more than one week, the maximum time to obtain business licenses and permits should not surpass one month and one-stop-shops should assist to facilitate start-ups and recruitment procedures.

Where practical, the Commission plans to use concrete dates in a year for the entry into force of regulations/decisions affecting business. Member States are invited to consider similar measures.

Lastly, the SBA seeks new ways to stimulate interest in entrepreneurship and cultivate a more entrepreneurial mindset, especially among young people. Young people, who want to start up a business, can now gain experience by spending time in an SME abroad via the just launched “ Erasmus for young entrepreneurs ” programme. This will help upgrade their skills and contribute to the networking among SMEs in Europe. Similar mobility programmes are also underway for apprentices.

The SBA should be fully embedded in the Growth and Jobs strategy. Member States are invited to take advantage of the update of the Lisbon cycle 2008 to reflect the SBA in their National Reform Programmes.

Documents

Votes

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 8/1 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 619, 0: 18, -: 12
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO HU BE NL PT CZ EL AT BG FI SK SE DK IE LT SI CY EE LU LV MT
Total
87
65
61
62
43
43
32
20
21
23
18
19
21
16
14
13
13
18
13
9
8
7
6
6
5
3
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
248

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
32

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
22

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

5

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 8/2 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 354, -: 250, 0: 30
FR PL DK LT BG DE AT IT BE NL FI EE SE ES PT MT GB HU LV RO IE LU SI SK CY CZ EL
Total
61
40
14
10
14
83
17
61
21
23
12
6
18
41
17
3
62
19
4
30
10
4
7
13
4
21
19
icon: PSE PSE
176

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Austria ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Spain ALDE

1
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25
2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Germany GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Poland NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

5

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Poland IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
242

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 29 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 588, 0: 29, -: 6
DE FR IT ES PL RO GB EL NL PT CZ HU AT BE BG FI SK DK SE LT IE SI EE LV CY LU MT
Total
87
62
57
42
39
32
59
21
21
19
20
18
17
16
13
12
12
13
17
10
9
6
6
4
4
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
240

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
181

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1

Netherlands ALDE

3
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
31

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
23

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (2)

4

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

France IND/DEM

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 31 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 563, 0: 51, -: 25
DE IT FR GB PL ES RO HU NL BE EL CZ BG SK PT FI AT DK IE LT SE SI EE LU LV MT CY
Total
88
63
61
62
41
41
31
19
23
19
20
20
14
13
17
13
16
14
9
8
17
7
6
4
4
3
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
249

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
176

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2
3

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

5

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 36 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 565, -: 81, 0: 14
DE IT GB PL FR ES RO NL HU EL PT BG BE SE SK FI LT DK IE AT SI EE MT LU LV CY CZ
Total
86
66
64
43
66
40
32
24
19
21
19
14
23
18
12
13
9
13
9
17
7
6
3
5
4
6
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
250

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
186

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
23

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

5

Poland NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 37 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 558, -: 15, 0: 11
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO NL HU BE PT EL AT BG SE FI IE SK LT DK SI EE LV CY LU CZ MT
Total
82
61
49
56
40
35
29
21
19
18
17
19
16
14
17
11
9
9
8
10
6
5
4
4
4
18
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
222

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
164

Slovakia PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
32

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
17

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 39 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 614, -: 13, 0: 11
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO BE HU CZ NL EL PT AT FI SK BG DK SE LT IE SI EE LU LV MT CY
Total
85
65
62
58
44
39
32
23
20
19
23
21
16
16
13
13
12
13
17
9
8
7
6
5
3
3
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
248

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
181

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
23

Germany GUE/NGL

2
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
21

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

5

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 44 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 635, 0: 11, -: 5
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO BE NL HU CZ PT EL AT BG SE DK FI SK IE LT SI CY EE LV LU MT
Total
83
66
63
62
43
43
32
22
23
20
20
19
21
16
14
17
14
12
12
10
9
7
6
6
4
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
249

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

2
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 47 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 604, -: 16, 0: 11
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO NL BE HU EL PT AT BG SK FI DK SE IE LT SI EE LU LV CZ MT CY
Total
84
63
58
60
41
39
32
23
21
20
19
17
16
14
12
11
14
17
10
9
7
5
5
4
21
3
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
245

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
80
3
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

4

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 51 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 634, 0: 11, -: 6
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO BE NL HU EL PT CZ AT BG DK SE FI SK IE LT SI CY EE LU LV MT
Total
88
65
64
63
43
42
31
22
22
20
21
18
18
16
14
14
18
12
11
10
9
6
6
6
5
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
245

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
91

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 53 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 608, -: 22, 0: 14
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO BE NL HU PT AT EL DK SK BG FI SE LT IE SI EE LU CZ LV MT CY
Total
87
64
62
61
45
42
30
22
24
19
18
17
20
14
12
12
11
16
9
9
7
6
5
21
3
3
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
242

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 54/1 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 646, 0: 11, -: 6
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO BE NL CZ HU PT EL AT SE BG FI SK DK IE LT SI EE LV LU MT CY
Total
90
65
65
63
45
41
30
23
24
21
19
19
21
17
18
13
13
13
14
10
9
7
6
4
4
3
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
185

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
22

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 54/2 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 581, -: 44, 0: 14
DE FR IT PL ES RO NL HU CZ EL BE AT PT FI BG SK DK IE SE LT SI CY EE LV LU MT GB
Total
86
65
62
41
37
32
22
20
20
21
21
17
19
13
12
11
14
10
16
8
7
6
6
4
4
3
62
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
242

Bulgaria PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
181

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2
3

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
21

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

3

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 59 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 629, -: 9, 0: 8
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO BE NL HU PT CZ EL AT BG DK SK FI SE LT IE SI EE CY LU LV MT
Total
83
63
63
61
45
42
32
22
22
19
18
20
21
16
14
14
13
12
17
10
9
7
6
5
5
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
249

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
19

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 67 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 552, -: 80, 0: 19
DE GB IT FR PL ES RO HU NL BE EL BG PT SK FI IE LT AT DK SI EE LU LV MT CY SE CZ
Total
87
62
64
65
42
43
32
20
23
21
19
14
18
12
13
10
9
16
13
7
6
5
4
3
6
16
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
250

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
182

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
86
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4

Italy NI

For (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Germany GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 68/1 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 545, -: 84, 0: 17
DE IT FR ES RO NL HU BE EL PT AT BG FI SK DK SI LT SE CY EE PL LU LV CZ MT IE GB
Total
83
65
65
41
31
23
20
23
21
19
15
14
13
13
13
7
8
18
6
6
41
4
4
19
3
10
61
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
246

Bulgaria PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Abstain (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
33

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 68/2 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 590, -: 35, 0: 11
DE IT FR PL ES GB RO HU NL EL PT BE AT BG FI SK DK IE LT SI SE CY EE LV LU MT CZ
Total
87
62
63
41
39
62
30
20
19
21
19
22
15
14
13
12
13
10
9
7
16
6
6
4
4
3
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
241

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
182

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
31

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

For (1)

3

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 69 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 613, 0: 19, -: 17
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO NL HU BE PT EL AT BG FI SK DK IE LT SE SI EE LU LV CY CZ MT
Total
89
62
64
60
44
41
32
23
20
22
18
21
16
14
13
13
14
10
9
16
7
6
5
4
6
18
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
246

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
183

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 78 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 623, 0: 13, -: 9
DE IT FR GB PL ES RO BE CZ NL HU PT EL AT BG FI SK DK LT SE IE SI EE LU LV CY MT
Total
86
65
63
61
42
40
32
23
21
20
19
18
21
17
13
13
13
14
10
14
10
7
6
5
4
6
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
243

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
87
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Germany GUE/NGL

3
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 80 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 566, 0: 19, -: 8
DE IT FR GB ES RO PL BE NL HU CZ PT AT EL SK BG DK FI IE LT SE SI EE CY LV LU MT
Total
73
57
56
55
42
30
38
20
21
19
20
18
17
19
13
12
12
11
9
8
14
7
6
6
4
4
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
4

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
165

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1
3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
29

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

2
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - par. 82 #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 604, 0: 20, -: 16
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO BE NL HU PT EL AT BG SK SE DK FI IE LT SI EE LU LV CY CZ MT
Total
84
65
63
61
41
39
31
22
22
20
18
21
16
13
13
18
14
11
10
8
7
6
5
4
5
20
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
177

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
84
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Germany GUE/NGL

2
2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport HERCZOG A6-0074/2009 - résolution #

2009/03/10 Outcome: +: 536, 0: 47, -: 47
DE IT FR GB ES RO PL NL BE HU EL PT BG FI AT SK LT SI DK EE SE LU MT LV CY IE CZ
Total
82
64
62
58
43
30
41
24
22
18
20
19
12
13
17
12
7
7
11
6
17
5
3
3
6
9
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
243

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
175

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
31

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
24

Germany GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
330 2008/2237(INI)
2008/10/29 JURI 1 amendments...
source: PE-415.125
2008/11/11 ECON 72 amendments...
source: PE-415.225
2008/11/14 IMCO 30 amendments...
source: PE-415.325
2008/11/20 EMPL 39 amendments...
source: PE-415.216
2008/11/26 ITRE 183 amendments...
source: PE-416.309
2008/12/10 CULT 5 amendments...
source: PE-416.590

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: HÖKMARK Gunnar date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: PODIMATA Anni date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: WEISGERBER Anja date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/5
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/6
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: HÖKMARK Gunnar date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/7
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: PODIMATA Anni date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: WEISGERBER Anja date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/0
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2008-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.319
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2008-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.319
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-414319_EN.html
docs/5
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.290
committee
EMPL
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.290
committee
EMPL
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.346
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-414290_EN.html
docs/7
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.346
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2008-12-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.342
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-414346_EN.html
docs/8
date
2008-12-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.342
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8
date
2008-12-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.940
committee
ECON
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/8/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-414342_EN.html
docs/9
date
2008-12-15T00:00:00
docs
title: PE414.940
committee
ECON
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/9
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE415.266
committee
CULT
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/9/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-414940_EN.html
docs/10
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE415.266
committee
CULT
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/10/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-415266_EN.html
events/0/date
Old
2008-06-25T00:00:00
New
2008-06-24T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.994
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE413.994
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.319&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.309
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.309
docs/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.290&secondRef=02
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.346&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.342&secondRef=02
docs/8/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.940&secondRef=02
docs/9/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.266&secondRef=03
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/5/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/6
date
2009-02-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html title: A6-0074/2009
events/6
date
2009-02-18T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html title: A6-0074/2009
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE
events/9
date
2009-03-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0100_EN.html title: T6-0100/2009
summary
events/9
date
2009-03-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0100_EN.html title: T6-0100/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: HÖKMARK Gunnar date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-07-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÖKMARK Gunnar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: WEISGERBER Anja date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2008-09-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WEISGERBER Anja group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2008-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: PODIMATA Anni date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2008-10-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PODIMATA Anni group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html
docs/11/body
EC
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0074_EN.html
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-100
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0100_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0394/COM_COM(2008)0394_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0394 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52008DC0394:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry Commissioner: VERHEUGEN Günter type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2891 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2891*&MEET_DATE=25/09/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2891 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-12-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2910
  • date: 2009-02-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0074/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16781&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-100 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0100/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs commissioner: VERHEUGEN Günter
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2008-09-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2008-07-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÖKMARK Gunnar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2008-07-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2008-09-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WEISGERBER Anja group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2008-09-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2008-10-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2008-09-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2008-07-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2008-09-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2008-10-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PODIMATA Anni group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2008-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2910 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2910*&MEET_DATE=01/12/2008 date: 2008-12-01T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2891 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2891*&MEET_DATE=25/09/2008 date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2101/COM_SEC(2008)2101_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)2101 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=2101 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2102/COM_SEC(2008)2102_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)2102 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=2102 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.994 title: PE413.994 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.319&secondRef=02 title: PE414.319 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.309 title: PE416.309 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.290&secondRef=02 title: PE414.290 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.346&secondRef=02 title: PE414.346 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.342&secondRef=02 title: PE414.342 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.940&secondRef=02 title: PE414.940 committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.266&secondRef=03 title: PE415.266 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN title: A6-0074/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16781&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3244 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=680 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2009)0680 summary: The Commission presents a report on the implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBA). It summarises the progress achieved in 2009, which has been the first full year of implementation of the SBA, focussing mainly on the measures contained in the SBA Action Plan and in the European Economic Recovery Plan . The report notes that both the Commission and Member States have taken substantial action to improve SMEs’ access to finance, to facilitate their access to EU and third country markets and to improve framework conditions for SMEs in particular by removing unnecessary administrative burdens. The Commission has delivered on major actions announced in the SBA. It has adopted all five legislative proposals linked to the SBA: · a general ‘block exemption’ regulation (GBER) adopted in July 2008 made it easier for governments to support SMEs through aid measures exempted from the notification obligation; · the proposal on reduced VAT rates entered into force on 1 June 2009 and offers the Member States ample possibilities to boost economic activity notably in labour-intensive services. The three other legislative proposals are still pending. The proposed recast of the late payments Directive and the proposal on a European Private Company Statute are both vitally important for the competitiveness of SMEs. The proposal on VAT invoicing aims at ensuring equal treatment of paper and electronic invoices and is estimated to have a maximum midterm reduction potential of EUR 18.4 billion if all businesses send all their invoices electronically. Member States have also shown strong political commitment to implement the SBA, but vary as regards both the approach taken and the results achieved. Several Member States have 'transposed' the SBA as a whole into their national policy programmes. Implementing the “Think Small First” principle : from January 2009, the Commission has systematically applied an “SME Test” to assess the impact on SMEs of all its major legislative and policy proposals. It proposed giving Member States the option of exempting micro-enterprises from accounting rules. It has also taken major steps to reach the EU target of a 25% reduction in administrative burdens set in March 2007, which particularly benefits SMEs. Reduction measures already adopted by the legislator are expected to lead to reduced costs of EUR 7.6 billion. Measures pending adoption by the Council and Parliament could add EUR 30.7 billion to that amount. All in all, the administrative burdens reduction proposed or currently under preparation by the Commission could exceed the initial target and reach 33% of the total of EUR 123.8 billion estimated burdens of EU origin. The Commission welcomes the fact that all Member States have by now adopted national targets for reducing administrative burdens and that they are continuing to simplify the administrative environment for SMEs. For example, the average time and cost to start-up a private limited company is now 8 days (compared to 9 days in 2008) and the cost is EUR 417 (compared to EUR 463 in 2008). Access to finance : the Commission has simplified state aid rules and has pointed clearly to the need to take better account of SMEs’ needs at Member State level. The new General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER) adopted as part of the SBA enlarges the categories of state aid covered by the exemption. Block exempted aid for SMEs amounted to EUR 2.8 billion in 2008, an increase of EUR 0.3 billion compared to 2007. The European Investment Bank (EIB) group has played a crucial role in easing SMEs’ access to finance in 2009. It has substantially increased its lending activity dedicated to SMEs from EUR 8.1 billion in 2008 to around EUR 11.5 billion in 2009. EUR 200 million has been allocated by the EIB for mezzanine finance for 2009. The report notes the activities and contribution of the JASMINE and JEREMIE initiatives. As a response to the financial and economic crisis, and often using the temporary framework on state aid, most Member States have also adopted policy measures to enhance SMEs’ access to liquidity, especially to bank lending, through the creation and extension of loan and guarantee schemes for SMEs. The EIB package of EUR 30 billion for loans to SMEs also allows some member countries to use a second level guarantee scheme. Access to markets : to stimulate cross-border operations with the Single Market, the Commission and Member States jointly decided to lower the fees for EU-wide trade mark rights by 40% and to simplify the registration procedure from 1 May 2009. The Commission also increased EU financial support to EUR 2.1 million in 2009 to promote SMEs defence of their interests in the standardisation process and to improve SMEs use of European standards. As regards the external dimension, Market Access Teams have been established in 30 key export markets. The Commission is setting-up business centres in a selected number of these markets. These Centres will help EU SMEs wishing to set up and trade in these countries by providing business support services including market access assistance, finding commercial partners, logistical support and advice on issues such as protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and standardisation. Promoting Entrepreneurship : two major events in 2009, the First European SME Week which took place in 36 European countries and the Conference on the SBA/European Charter for small enterprises have contributed to promoting entrepreneurship among the general public, giving voice to entrepreneurs to present their career paths and providing opportunities for networking. A number of countries have anchored entrepreneurship education in their curricula The report concludes that it remains of utmost importance to continue to implement the SBA Action Plan at all levels. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0394/COM_COM(2008)0394_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0394 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=394 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present an initiative entitled a “Small Business Act” for Europe (SBA) to fully unlock the growth and jobs potential of European SMEs. CONTENT: in a globally changing landscape characterised by continuous structural changes and enhanced competitive pressures, the role of SMEs has become even more important as providers of employment opportunities but they very often face enormous bureaucratic hurdles and obstacles. European SMEs deserve to be better assisted to fully unlock their potential of long term sustainable growth and of more job creation. At the heart of the SBA is the conviction that achieving the best possible framework conditions for SMEs depends first and foremost on society’s recognition of entrepreneurs. This is why the “Small Business Act” aims to improve the overall policy approach to entrepreneurship , to irreversibly anchor the “Think Small First” principle in policymaking from regulation to public service, and to promote SMEs’ growth by helping them tackle the remaining problems which hamper their development. The SBA builds on the Commission’s and Member States’ policy achievements, creates a new policy framework which integrates the existing enterprise policy instruments, and builds in particular on the European Charter for Small Enterprises and the Modern SME policy. To implement this ambitious policy agenda, the Commission is proposing a genuine political partnership between the EU and Member States through: A set of 10 principles to guide the conception and implementation of policies both at EU and Member State level : create an environment in which entrepreneurs and family businesses can thrive and entrepreneurship is rewarded; ensure that honest entrepreneurs who have faced bankruptcy quickly get a second chance; design rules according to the “Think Small First” principle; make public administrations responsive to SMEs’ needs; adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs; facilitate SMEs’ access to finance and develop a legal and business environment supportive to timely payments in commercial transactions; help SMEs to benefit more from the opportunities offered by the Single Market; promote the upgrading of skills in SMEs and all forms of innovation; enable SMEs to turn environmental challenges into opportunities; encourage and support SMEs to benefit from the growth of markets. A set of new legislative proposals which are guided by the “Think Small First” principle in four areas that particularly affect SMEs : 1) General Block Exemption Regulation on State Aids (GBER) : this Regulation, to be adopted shortly, will exempt from prior notification categories of State Aid already covered by existing regulations in the field of aid to SMEs, for training, employment, R&D and regional aid and possibly also for new categories of aid. The new Regulation will simplify and harmonise existing rules for SMEs and increase investment aid intensities for SMEs. 2) Regulation providing for a Statute for a European Private Company (SPE) : this Regulation provides for a Statute for an SPE that could be created and operate according to the same uniform principles in all Member States. The Commission will also come forward with the necessary amending proposals to ensure that this new company form can benefit from the existing corporate tax directives. 3) Directive on reduced VAT rates : this Directive, which will be proposed shortly, will offer Member States the option of applying reduced VAT rates principally for locally supplied services, which are mainly provided by SMEs. 4) As part of the SBA the following proposals will be prepared : i) a legislative proposal to further modernise, simplify and harmonise the existing rules on VAT invoicing to alleviate the burden on businesses; ii) an amendment to the Directive 2000/35/EC on late payments with a view to ensuring that SMEs are paid on time for any commercial transaction. A set of new policy measures which implement these 10 principles according to the needs of SMEs both at Community and at Member State level. The SBA includes an ambitious set of measures to allow SMEs to fully benefit from the Single Market and expand into international markets by orienting more resources to small companies' access to finance, Research & Development and innovation. They will also make it easier for them to participate in the standard-setting process , win public procurement contracts and turn environmental challenges into business opportunities. In addition to the standing commitment to cut administrative burden by 25% by 2012 , the time needed to start a new company should be no more than one week, the maximum time to obtain business licenses and permits should not surpass one month and one-stop-shops should assist to facilitate start-ups and recruitment procedures. Where practical, the Commission plans to use concrete dates in a year for the entry into force of regulations/decisions affecting business. Member States are invited to consider similar measures. Lastly, the SBA seeks new ways to stimulate interest in entrepreneurship and cultivate a more entrepreneurial mindset, especially among young people. Young people, who want to start up a business, can now gain experience by spending time in an SME abroad via the just launched “ Erasmus for young entrepreneurs ” programme. This will help upgrade their skills and contribute to the networking among SMEs in Europe. Similar mobility programmes are also underway for apprentices. The SBA should be fully embedded in the Growth and Jobs strategy. Member States are invited to take advantage of the update of the Lisbon cycle 2008 to reflect the SBA in their National Reform Programmes.
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2891*&MEET_DATE=25/09/2008 title: 2891 summary: The Council held an exchange of views on the Communication entitled "Priority for small and medium-sized undertakings (SMUs) first - A "Small Business Act" for Europe. The exchange of views made it possible to work out political guidelines to aid the Council's preparatory fora in discussion of draft conclusions with a view to the adoption of these at the next Competitiveness Council on 1 and 2 December 2008. Delegations voiced their opinions, in particular, on identifying the priority measures laid down in the "Small Business Act" (SBA), which could have a rapid impact on growth against a background of economic slowdown. A broad consensus emerged regarding the beneficial effects which implementation of the measures contained in the package could have on SMUs, in particular by facilitating access for SMUs to funding, by tending to reduction and simplification of administrative burdens and by favouring undertakings' access to the market. The proposal to create an SBA for Europe put forward by the Commission in June 2007 had been the subject of an initial discussion at the informal meeting of ministers at Versailles (France) on 17 and 18 July 2008.
  • date: 2008-12-01T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2009-02-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own initiative report by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on a ‘Small Business Act’, supporting the Commission's Communication which aims to drive an ambitious policy agenda to promote SMEs’ growth and to anchor the “Think Small First” approach in policy-making at all levels. It regrets, however, that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument and calls on the Council and the Commission to establish this principle as a binding rule, in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation. The report stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles. MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs. The committee emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, MEPs see a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union. The committee makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas: (1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the report makes the following recommendations: the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; the Small Business Act should take account of cooperative arrangements among SMEs (clusters); a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; Member States should increase their share of innovative public procurement and the participation of innovative SMEs in public procurement procedures; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened, so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs should be supported through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes; the Commission should assess SME participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme and bring forward any necessary proposals. (2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. They consider that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the report: calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; calls for further investigation into how current banking rules and other financial regulations, including the transparency of credit ratings, could be improved to ease access to finance for SMEs; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments, possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit. MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs. (3) Improving market access : the report stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need: to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by making more use of e-procurement, adapting the size of contracts and alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices, such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border. Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive. MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation, as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin. (4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : MEPs believe that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. They therefore encourage the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices. MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation. In particular, the report: stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making: the Commission’s consultation period should be extended from 8 to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation. (5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient. The report welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.
  • date: 2009-02-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN title: A6-0074/2009
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16781&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-100 title: T6-0100/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 536 votes to 47, with 47 abstentions, a resolution on a “Small Business Act”. Parliament regrets that the Small Business Act (SBA) is not a legally binding instrument. considers that its truly innovative aspect is its intention to place the "Think Small First" principle at the heart of Community policies; calls on the Council and the Commission to join Parliament in the effort to establish the “Think First Principle” principle as a binding rule , in a form to be determined, in order to ensure that it is properly applied in all future Community legislation. The resolution stresses the absolute necessity of implementing the 10 guiding principles at European, national and regional level. The Commission is called upon to further enhance the visibility and awareness of SME-related policy actions (through the bundling of existing Community instruments and funds for SMEs under a separate heading in the EU budget) and to set up a screening system for the monitoring of the progress achieved following implementation of the guiding principles. MEPs stress the need to place particular emphasis on craft, family, micro- and individual enterprises at EU, national and regional level. They call for the acknowledgement of the specific characteristics of members of the liberal professions and note that the Commission's proposals lack a clear strategy for self-employed persons to improve their legal status and rights. They also stress that even more money should be invested in projects to endorse female entrepreneurs. The resolution emphasises the need to develop a social and economic model that creates an appropriate security network for small and medium-sized entrepreneurs in the creative sector, where unstable working conditions are often encountered. In this context, it sees a need, in the framework of the SBA, for greater emphasis to be given to the area of labour law, especially in view of the concept of flexicurity, while taking into account the necessary social protection. MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to take into account the creative and cultural sector as a driver of economic and social development in the European Union. The Parliament makes a number of recommendations that focus on 5 areas: (1) Boosting R&D and innovation : stressing the importance of innovation for SMEs and the difficulties in taking advantage of research opportunities, MEPs consider that all Community research and technological programmes should be designed in a way that facilitates the cross-border participation of SMEs. They call on the Member States to multiply initiatives that lower the threshold for SMEs to have access to research. In particular, the resolution makes the following recommendations: improve access to the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013); the Commission and the Member States should put in place better framework conditions aimed at creating an environment favourable to innovation by SMEs, in particular by introducing ways to improve the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and to fight against counterfeiting more effectively throughout the European Union; a swift agreement should be reached on a Community Patent ensuring low-cost, efficient, flexible and high-quality legal protection, adapted to the needs of SMEs, as well as on a harmonised European patent litigation system; the links between educational institutions and SMEs should be strengthened , so that the promotion of self-employment, entrepreneurship culture and business awareness is included in the national education curricula. MEPs call for an ‘Erasmus for young entrepreneurs’ and an ‘Erasmus for apprentices’; the importance of encouraging young entrepreneurs and female entrepreneurs through, amongst other things, the introduction of tutoring and mentoring programmes. (2) Ensure funding and access to finance : recalling that SMEs’ limited ability to access finance is a major impediment to their creation and growth, MEPs call for a combined effort on the part of financial institutions, the Commission and the Member States to ensure SMEs’ access to finance and to offer them the possibility of consolidating their capital by reinvesting their profit in the company. Parliament considers that payment of charges prior to SMEs’ commencing activities should not be required in order to ensure that they are able to build up their own funds and resources. In particular, the resolution: calls for greater efforts to promote and provide information on the existence of European funds and state aids intended for SMEs, and for these two instruments to be more accessible and more easily understandable; calls for the creation of better conditions allowing SMEs to invest in skills training, not least through direct tax cuts; underlines the need to open up European risk capital markets by improving the availability of and access to venture capital, mezzanine finance and micro-credit; urges the creation at Community level of a harmonised time limit for payments , possibly shortened for payments to SMEs, and penalties for exceeding this limit. MEPs welcome the recent initiative for a Joint Action to Support Micro-finance Institutions in Europe (JASMINE). They call on the Member States to take a proactive role in providing information on access to and application for microcredits and alternative forms of finance. They also emphasise the important role of the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) in improving financing available to SMEs. (3) Improving market access : the resolution stresses that standardisation can lead to innovation and competitiveness by facilitating access to markets and by enabling operability. The Commission is called upon to improve access to standards for SMEs and their participation in the standardisation process, as well as to further promote Community standards internationally. In this context, MEPs stress the need: to strengthen SME access to and participation in public procurement by: (i) making more use of e-procurement; (ii) adapting the size of contracts; (iii) alleviating the administrative and financial burden in tendering; (iv) providing relevant and proportionate qualification criteria in specific tenders; (v) enhancing access to information on public tenders for SMEs and (vi) harmonising required documents; for a system consultancy service that would assist the everyday operation of SMEs during their whole lifecycle with the aim of optimising their investments; to improve information on market access and export opportunities within the Single Market and to strengthen information and advisory services, in particular the SOLVIT problem-solving network; to promote the implementation of interoperable electronic signatures and authentication certificates; to help SMEs defend themselves against unfair commercial practices , such as those of misleading directory companies, which should strengthen SMEs' confidence to operate cross-border. Stressing that only 8% of all SMEs are involved in cross-border activities, MEPs call on the Member States to cooperate in harmonising administrative requirements that affect intra-Community activities and to swiftly transpose and implement the Services Directive. MEPs also encourage the swift adoption of the statute for a European Private Company, the establishment of a common consolidated basis for company taxation , as well as the establishment of a 'one-stop-shop' for VAT in order to make it possible for entrepreneurs to fulfil their responsibilities in the business country of origin. Parliament encourages the setting up of European business support centres in China and India, and in all emerging markets. (4) Fighting bureaucracy and red-tape : Parliament believes that there is an imperative need to cut red tape and to put in place a modern administration adapted to the needs of SMEs. It therefore encourages the promotion of ICT knowledge among SMEs. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to take initiatives in order to exchange and promote best practices, set benchmarks, and elaborate and promote guidelines and standards for SME-friendly administrative practices. MEPs believe that SMEs, and in particular micro-enterprises, should be taxed in a way that reduces administrative efforts as far as possible. In this context, the Commission is called upon to apply the SME test to all new proposals for EU legislation affecting business including simplification of existing legislation. In particular, the resolution: stresses the need for proper and timely involvement of SMEs in policy making : the Commission’s consultation period should be extended to at least 12 weeks from the date on which the consultation is available in all Community languages; calls on the Commission to stimulate simplification and harmonisation of company law and, in particular, accounting rules within the internal market; encourages the setting up of a " statistics holiday " for micro enterprises; stresses the need for the introduction of common commencement dates for new Community legislation affecting SMEs and for SMEs to be informed concisely and comprehensibly of changes to legislation affecting them; considers it necessary to establish a unified system for setting up businesses in which the process is carried out step-by-step and it is possible for a business to be created in 48 hours; calls for a special EU website for SMEs which shall contain information and application forms for EU projects, national telephone numbers, links to partners, trade information, information on research projects as well as internet consultation, briefings and information about new regulation. (5) Turning sustainability into business : recognising that efforts to improve sustainability could become an important source of (eco-) innovation and a key asset for industry's competitiveness, MEPs call on the Commission to investigate how the Community could help SMEs to become more resource and energy efficient. The resolution welcomes recent initiatives to assist SMEs in coping with environmental legislation by, inter alia, granting them reduced agency fees, ensuring their access to information on environmental standards or introducing specific exemptions from Community legislation.
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry commissioner: VERHEUGEN Günter
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/6/64697
New
  • ITRE/6/64697
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
New
3.45.02
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
procedure/subject/0
Old
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industries
New
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), craft industries
activities
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0394/COM_COM(2008)0394_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008DC0394:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2008)0394 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry Commissioner: VERHEUGEN Günter
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2891 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2891*&MEET_DATE=25/09/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2891 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-12-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2910
  • date: 2009-02-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-02-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-74&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0074/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090309&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16781&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-100 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0100/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2008-09-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: HÖKMARK Gunnar
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2008-09-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WEISGERBER Anja
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PSE name: PODIMATA Anni
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2008-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: GRAU I SEGÚ Martí
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2008-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ title: Enterprise and Industry commissioner: VERHEUGEN Günter
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/6/64697
reference
2008/2237(INI)
title
Small Business Act
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.45.02 Small and medium-sized enterprises SMEs, craft industries