Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | DE BLASIO Antonio ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | PEILLON Vincent ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 382 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007.
The resolution notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006). The amounts notified by the Member States to the Commission in 2007 can be broken down as follows:
own resources: EUR 377 million (EUR 353 million in 2006); agricultural expenditure: EUR 155 million (EUR 87 million in 2006); structural actions: EUR 828 million (EUR 703 million in 2006); pre-accession funds: EUR 32 million (EUR 14 million in 2006); direct expenditure: EUR 33 million.
The Parliament welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy.
Own resources : the resolution notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. The Parliament deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. It therefore invites the Council promptly to adopt the regulation.
It follows with special attention both the Commission proposal for a Council directive concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures and the Commission proposal for a Council directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.
MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud.
Agricultural expenditure : the resolution noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. It notes that the milk, fruit and vegetable, sugar and rural development sectors taken together account for about 77% of the total amount of irregularities and that rural development represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported. MEPs ask OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development.
The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report. It is also called upon to take a firm political decision should the Greek authorities fail to comply with the deadlines set by the action plan for setting up a new operational Land Parcel Identification System-Geographical Information System.
Structural actions : the resolution acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments.
While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work.
The resolution calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes.
Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically.
Furthermore, MEPs advocate that more efforts need to be undertaken in view of an improved harmonisation of reporting of irregularities, especially as regards the Cohesion Fund.
Pre-accession funds : the resolution notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures.
MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation.
Recoveries : the Parliament regrets that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts.
OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified.
OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information.
The resolution stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks.
The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The resolution notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries.
Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive resolution on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007.
Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered.
The resolution stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. The Parliament reiterates its call on the Commission to provide it with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Antonio DE BLASIO (EPP-ED, HU) on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007.
The report notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006).
The committee welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy.
Own resources : the report notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. MEPs deplore the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. They therefore invite the Council promptly to adopt the regulation.
MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud.
Agricultural expenditure : the report noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. MEPs call on OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development, which represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported.
The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report.
Structural actions : the report acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments.
While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work.
The report calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes.
Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically.
Pre-accession funds : the report notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures.
MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation.
Recoveries : MEPs regret that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts.
OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified.
OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information.
The report stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks.
The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The report notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries.
Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive report on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007.
Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered.
The report stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. It reiterates its call on the Commission to provide Parliament with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3615
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0315/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0180/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0180/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.103
- Committee draft report: PE414.996
- Committee opinion: PE414.934
- Committee opinion: PE414.304
- Committee opinion: PE414.304
- Committee opinion: PE414.934
- Committee draft report: PE414.996
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE421.103
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0180/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3615
Activities
- Antonio DE BLASIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
49 |
2008/2242(INI)
2008/11/12
AGRI
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Welcomes the fact that the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) is working well in most Member States, noting however that the quantity and quality of the checks made under it should be stepped up in order to reinforce fraud deterrence;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a Considers, however, that the financial sanctions against Member States should increase in the event of a structural failure, over several years, by Member States to fulfil their obligations with regard to expenditure control;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b Welcomes the national management declarations issued by some Member States regarding European funds managed at national level; calls on the other Member States to carry out similar initiatives, and on the Commission to do all in its power to ensure that such national management declarations are introduced throughout the European Union;
source: PE-415.275
2008/11/14
REGI
24 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. Notes that the Member States reported 3 832 irregularities in 2007 (which is an increase by 19,2% in relation to 2006), that the total financial amount affected in 2007 was about EUR 828 million, that suspected frauds as a percentage of the total number of reported irregularities represent around 12-15% in 2007 and that the total irregular amount for the European Regional Development Fund has risen by 48% in comparison to 2006; stresses once again that Member States should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. Underlines the fact that fighting fraud and corruption is an ongoing responsibility of all Member States and also that a concerted effort is needed in order to achieve real improvements.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of reports assessing the progress in Bulgaria and Romania of judicial reform and the fight against corruption under the Co-operation and Verification mechanisms and a separate report on the management of EU funds in Bulgaria, which highlight the need for sustained political commitment and implementation on the ground if the benchmarks set at the time of accession are to be met in full; notes also that specifically in the case of Bulgaria the Commission has provisionally suspended EU funding because of irregularities found through its control and auditing system; therefore calls upon these Member States to take urgent action to implement the concrete follow up measures put forward in these reports; finally, encourages the efforts made by these Member States and calls on them to take all the necessary measures to that end.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of reports assessing the progress in Bulgaria and Romania of judicial reform and the fight against corruption under the Cooperation and Verification mechanisms and a separate report on the management of EU funds in Bulgaria, which highlight the need for sustained political commitment and implementation on the ground if the benchmarks set at the time of accession are to be met in full; notes also that specifically in the case of Bulgaria the Commission has provisionally suspended EU funding because of irregularities found through its control and auditing system; therefore calls upon these Member States, which have not yet done so, to take urgent action to implement the concrete follow up measures put forward in these reports.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Acknowledges that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, as they are called upon to comply with strict and often complex requirements for their utilisation; welcomes, therefore, the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work so as to be able to show tangible results within an acceptable timeframe;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that the complexity of the legislative framework governing Structural Funds programmes, especially as regards management and monitoring procedures, is responsible to some extent for irregularities on the part of Member States; urges, therefore, the Commission to intensify its efforts to further simplify the system;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Urges the
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Urges the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the classification of the irregularity (indicating whether or not it is a case of suspected fraud) is an element of the reporting by the Member States that needs to be strengthened, given the fact that
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that notwithstanding all direct beneficiaries of EU cohesion policy have to be published by the Managing Authorities under the rules governing the implementation of the Funds 2007-2013 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006), the database on the Commission website is incomplete; urges therefore the Member States
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Regrets that notwithstanding all direct beneficiaries of EU cohesion policy have to be published by the Managing Authorities under the rules governing the implementation of the Funds 2007-2013 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006), the database on the Commission website is incomplete;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Endorses the Commission's position that, where irregularities are detected, corrective action, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments, will be taken
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Member States reported 3 832 irregularities in 2007 (which is an increase by 19,2% in relation to 2006), that the total financial amount affected in 2007 was about EUR 828 million, that suspected frauds as a percentage of the total number of reported irregularities represent around 12-15% in 2007 and that the total irregular amount for the European Regional Development Fund has risen by 48% in comparison to 2006; welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Endorses the Commission's position that, where irregularities of a serious nature are detected, corrective action, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments, will be taken, and that it will report to Parliament at least twice a year on the measures it takes in this respect; nevertheless, calls on the Commission to step up its efforts to support the Member States in preventing irregularities and transferring the necessary expertise to the competent national and regional authorities.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to take account of the administrative cost which Member States' national, regional and local administrations have to bear in applying the often complex and expensive requirements involved in monitoring and checking cofinanced projects;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Stresses that the necessary improvement in the situation regarding sound financial management must be based on more extensive simplification of the rules and procedures governing the use of Community resources.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. To this end, calls on both the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Member States reported 3 832 irregularities in 2007 (which is an increase by 19,2% in relation to 2006), that the total financial amount affected in 2007 was about EUR 828 million (equivalent to slightly less than 1.83% of commitment appropriations), that suspected frauds as a percentage of the total number of reported irregularities represented around
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a . Stresses the importance of the Action Plan to strengthen supervision under shared management for structural actions adopted by the Commission on 19 February 2008, which is aimed at reducing errors in payment claims from Member States; is confident that this new Action Plan can significantly improve the situation, not least by assisting Member States to develop their ability to check the eligibility of project expenditure; notes that the first progress report relating to this Action Plan presents some positive initial results;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that a distinction needs to be drawn between the concept of fraud and that of mismanagement, since the former entails an element of premeditation whilst the latter designates unintentional errors;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of reports assessing the progress in Bulgaria and Romania of judicial reform and the fight against corruption under the Cooperation and Verification mechanisms
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of reports assessing
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the Commission has published a series of reports assessing the progress in Bulgaria and Romania of judicial reform and the fight against corruption under the Co-operation and Verification mechanisms and a separate report on the management of EU funds in Bulgaria, which highlight the need for sustained political commitment and implementation on the ground if the benchmarks set at the time of accession are to be met in full; notes also that specifically in the case of Bulgaria the Commission has provisionally suspended EU funding for one operational programme because of irregularities found through its control and auditing system; therefore calls upon these Member States to take urgent action to implement the concrete follow up measures put forward in these reports.
source: PE-415.250
2009/02/24
CONT
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities (COM(2006)0473)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Stresses the need for streamlining legal instruments, since the definitions of fraud, susp
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 44. Welcomes the publication of the above- mentioned second report of OLAF on on- the-spot checks and inspections outlining good practices for each stage of checks, as well as the new version of the OLAF Vademecum (guidelines); requests the Commission to send Parliament's competent committee the updated and comprehensive version of OLAF's manual by September 2009;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Advocates the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance; insists, with a view to solving this problem, on the usefulness of its legislative resolution of 20 November 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)1;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Notes that since extensive judicial follow-up of cases has been observed but admissibility of evidence collected by OLAF by the national courts is very limited, the aim is to improve the judicial support for the investigative function of OLAF; considers moreover that Eurojust should be informed when
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 a (new) 47a. Reminds the Commission of Parliament's request to include in the 2008 PIF Report an analysis of the Member States' structures involved in combating irregularities;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Deplores the inadequate notification by Member States of action taken on
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 a (new) 48a. Notes that the national audit authorities have considerable competencies in audits regarding EU- funds and they provide the first source of information for both national prosecution authorities and EU institutions; believes therefore that maximising the cooperation and information flow between audit authorities, national prosecution authorities and OLAF is in our common interest;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 b (new) Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49a. Points out that the Anti-Fraud Coordination Service (AFCOS) for OLAF (European Anti-Fraud Office) in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF; however points out that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal (especially concerning reporting of irregularities to the Commission); therefore asks the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee about making the work of these offices more valuable;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Regrets that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive report on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System2, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities (COM(2006)0473) and the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions (COM(2008)0147)2, which causes serious damage to the efficiency of
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Cannot accept that, whereas under the Philip Morris and Japan Tobacco agreements the Community received
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 a (new) 52a. Underlines that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered; stresses that Council Decision 2007/845/JHA should be implemented, as a matter of urgency, in order to ensure that all Member States set up or designate Asset Recovery Offices (AROs);
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 52 b (new) 52b. Reiterates its call on the Commission to provide Parliament with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest; finds the yearly Europol Organized Crime Threat Assessment (OCTA) useful, but not sufficient in this respect;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the fact that, following its Communication concerning the need to develop a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud (COM(2006)0254), the Commission adopted a Communication on a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against VAT fraud (COM(2007)0758), and
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out that the milk, fruit and vegetable, sugar and rural development sectors taken together account for about 77% of the total amount of irregularities and that rural development represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported; further notes that the highest amount in irregularities within rural development is reported for the support measure "forestry" and the highest number of irregularities is reported for the support measure "agri-environment"; therefore asks OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Points out that the reporting compliance rates, in particular timely reporting, vary greatly between Member States; deplores that for Austria and Sweden the time gap between the detection and the reporting of the irregularities is far beyond the average time gap (1,2 years): 3,4 and 2,3 years respectively;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Is shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years; finds it unacceptable that six Member States1 still do not use electronic reporting, 142 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some3 did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities; urges the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invites the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Has reservation about the fact that according to OLAF there were no suspected fraud cases for ISPA in 2007;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Requests the Commission to pay attention to the problem of double financing of projects; in particular, requests the Commission, when concluding or amending agreements on the management and implementation of projects by international organisations, to send systematically all their internal and external audits on the use of Community funds to the ECA and to the Internal Auditor of the Commission;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 39. Points out that OLAF is the only authority to exercise all the powers of investigation to fight against and to prevent fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity detrimental to the general budget of the EU; therefore stresses that especially in relation to Structural Funds and External Aid with the highest irregularities reported, OLAF’s investigative function should be further strengthened;
source: PE-421.103
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-414304_EN.html
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-414934_EN.html
|
events/2/date |
Old
2009-03-25T00:00:00New
2009-03-24T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.304&secondRef=02
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.934&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.996New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.996 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.103New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE421.103 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-315New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0315_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/6/66813New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|