BETA


2008/2242(INI) Protection of the Communities' financial interests - Fight against fraud - Annual report 2007

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT DE BLASIO Antonio (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AGRI PEILLON Vincent (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion REGI STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4

Events

2009/10/27
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/04/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/04/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 382 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007.

The resolution notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006). The amounts notified by the Member States to the Commission in 2007 can be broken down as follows:

own resources: EUR 377 million (EUR 353 million in 2006); agricultural expenditure: EUR 155 million (EUR 87 million in 2006); structural actions: EUR 828 million (EUR 703 million in 2006); pre-accession funds: EUR 32 million (EUR 14 million in 2006); direct expenditure: EUR 33 million.

The Parliament welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy.

Own resources : the resolution notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. The Parliament deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. It therefore invites the Council promptly to adopt the regulation.

It follows with special attention both the Commission proposal for a Council directive concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures and the Commission proposal for a Council directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.

MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud.

Agricultural expenditure : the resolution noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. It notes that the milk, fruit and vegetable, sugar and rural development sectors taken together account for about 77% of the total amount of irregularities and that rural development represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported. MEPs ask OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development.

The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report. It is also called upon to take a firm political decision should the Greek authorities fail to comply with the deadlines set by the action plan for setting up a new operational Land Parcel Identification System-Geographical Information System.

Structural actions : the resolution acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments.

While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work.

The resolution calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes.

Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically.

Furthermore, MEPs advocate that more efforts need to be undertaken in view of an improved harmonisation of reporting of irregularities, especially as regards the Cohesion Fund.

Pre-accession funds : the resolution notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures.

MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation.

Recoveries : the Parliament regrets that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts.

OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified.

OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information.

The resolution stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks.

The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The resolution notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries.

Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive resolution on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007.

Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered.

The resolution stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. The Parliament reiterates its call on the Commission to provide it with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.

Documents
2009/04/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/03/16
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Antonio DE BLASIO (EPP-ED, HU) on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007.

The report notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006).

The committee welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy.

Own resources : the report notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. MEPs deplore the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. They therefore invite the Council promptly to adopt the regulation.

MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud.

Agricultural expenditure : the report noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. MEPs call on OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development, which represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported.

The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report.

Structural actions : the report acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments.

While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work.

The report calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes.

Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically.

Pre-accession funds : the report notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures.

MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation.

Recoveries : MEPs regret that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts.

OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified.

OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information.

The report stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks.

The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The report notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries.

Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive report on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007.

Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered.

The report stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. It reiterates its call on the Commission to provide Parliament with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.

2009/02/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/12/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/12/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/02
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/11/05
   EP - STAES Bart (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2008/10/07
   EP - PEILLON Vincent (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2008/09/23
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2008/06/02
   EP - DE BLASIO Antonio (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
49 2008/2242(INI)
2008/11/12 AGRI 3 amendments...
source: PE-415.275
2008/11/14 REGI 24 amendments...
source: PE-415.250
2009/02/24 CONT 22 amendments...
source: PE-421.103

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-414304_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-414934_EN.html
events/2/date
Old
2009-03-25T00:00:00
New
2009-03-24T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.304&secondRef=02
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.934&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.996
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.996
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.103
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE421.103
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html title: A6-0180/2009
events/2
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html title: A6-0180/2009
events/4
date
2009-04-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0315_EN.html title: T6-0315/2009
summary
events/4
date
2009-04-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0315_EN.html title: T6-0315/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: DE BLASIO Antonio date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE BLASIO Antonio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: STAES Bart date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2008-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STAES Bart group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2008-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0180_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-315
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0315_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0180/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16992&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-315 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0315/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: KALLAS Siim
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DE BLASIO Antonio group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2008-10-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2008-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STAES Bart group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2008-06-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2008-10-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PEILLON Vincent group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2008-11-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
docs
  • date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.304&secondRef=02 title: PE414.304 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.934&secondRef=02 title: PE414.934 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.996 title: PE414.996 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE421.103 title: PE421.103 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN title: A6-0180/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16992&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3615 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Antonio DE BLASIO (EPP-ED, HU) on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007. The report notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006). The committee welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy. Own resources : the report notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. MEPs deplore the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. They therefore invite the Council promptly to adopt the regulation. MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud. Agricultural expenditure : the report noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. MEPs call on OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development, which represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported. The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report. Structural actions : the report acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments. While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work. The report calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes. Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically. Pre-accession funds : the report notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures. MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation. Recoveries : MEPs regret that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts. OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified. OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information. The report stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks. The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The report notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries. Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive report on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007. Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered. The report stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. It reiterates its call on the Commission to provide Parliament with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN title: A6-0180/2009
  • date: 2009-04-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16992&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-315 title: T6-0315/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 382 votes to 7, with 6 abstentions, a resolution on the protection of the Communities’ financial interests and the fight against fraud - Annual report 2007. The resolution notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1.425 billion (compared to EUR 1.143 billion in 2006). The amounts notified by the Member States to the Commission in 2007 can be broken down as follows: own resources: EUR 377 million (EUR 353 million in 2006); agricultural expenditure: EUR 155 million (EUR 87 million in 2006); structural actions: EUR 828 million (EUR 703 million in 2006); pre-accession funds: EUR 32 million (EUR 14 million in 2006); direct expenditure: EUR 33 million. The Parliament welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries. MEPs emphasise the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy. Own resources : the resolution notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6% and that the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes. The Parliament deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, as well as the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions. It therefore invites the Council promptly to adopt the regulation. It follows with special attention both the Commission proposal for a Council directive concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures and the Commission proposal for a Council directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation. MEPs stress that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud. The Commission is called upon to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud. Agricultural expenditure : the resolution noted that the estimated amount affected rose by 44% and that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal. It notes that the milk, fruit and vegetable, sugar and rural development sectors taken together account for about 77% of the total amount of irregularities and that rural development represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported. MEPs ask OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development. The Commission is called upon to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report. It is also called upon to take a firm political decision should the Greek authorities fail to comply with the deadlines set by the action plan for setting up a new operational Land Parcel Identification System-Geographical Information System. Structural actions : the resolution acknowledges that irregularities in the use of EU funds relating to mismanagement and sometimes even fraud occur in a large number of Member States. In this context, MEPs endorse the Commission's position in taking corrective action in the event of the detection of irregularities of a serious nature, including the suspension of payments and the recovery of undue or erroneous payments. While acknowledging that effective absorption of the Structural Funds has posed significant challenges, especially for the new Member States, MEPs welcome the efforts made by these Member States to improve their implementation capacity and invites them to step up that work. The resolution calls on the Commission and the Member States to work methodically to provide advice on ways of avoiding irregularities and administrative errors and failings. The Commission is called upon to simplify further the management and monitoring procedures of the Structural Funds programmes. Moreover, MEPs are shocked by the lack of reporting discipline of the Member States after a number of years. They find it unacceptable that six Member States still do not use electronic reporting, 14 failed to comply with the reporting deadlines and some did not classify any of their reported cases of irregularities. They urge the Commission to find effective solutions, besides infringement proceedings, to address the situation, and invite the Commission to seriously consider establishing an effective financial sanctions system to be integrated in the future regulations, and to implement it systematically. Furthermore, MEPs advocate that more efforts need to be undertaken in view of an improved harmonisation of reporting of irregularities, especially as regards the Cohesion Fund. Pre-accession funds : the resolution notes that although the number of irregularities decreased, their financial impact increased by 2.2 times, and the financial impact of suspected fraud increased by 3 times, largely due to "non-eligible" expenditures. MEPs stress that the insufficient quality of reported information remains an outstanding problem, as well as timely reporting. They therefore call on the Member States concerned to cooperate with the Commission to find ways to remedy this situation. Recoveries : the Parliament regrets that recovery rates are still low, especially in sectors where Member States manage recoveries (according to the OLAF report, currently about EUR 3.75 billion in recoveries are still pending). The Commission is called upon to explore the possibility of introducing a system of surety, such as by putting a certain amount into a reserve or earmarking it, to speed up the recovery of outstanding amounts. OLAF's relationship with Europol and Eurojust : MEPs feel that it is crucial to create a solid basis for operational and intelligence synergies with Eurojust and Europol, for example by means of a common operational and intelligence team, as this would certainly bring added value to the fight against fraud. The currently overlapping competencies of these bodies should be clarified. OLAF's cooperation with Member States : MEPs support the major aim of the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) of strengthening OLAF’s independence. They recall, however, the importance of interlinking the work and results of OLAF, the Commission’s services and the Member States’ authorities by effective communication channels avoiding duplication of work and lack of information. The resolution stresses the need for clearer provisions on procedures and binding time limits for competent authorities in providing the assistance required and generally more binding provisions for cooperation identifying the national authority competent to provide assistance. The Commission is called upon to take appropriate measures, including infringement proceedings, against those Members States which do not assist its services in carrying out on-the-spot checks. The anti-Fraud coordination service for OLAF in the Member States which acceded to the EU after 2004 are very important information/contact points for OLAF. The resolution notes, however, that so long as these offices are not independent from the national administration, their functional added value is minimal. It therefore invites the Commission to make a proposal to the relevant committee of Parliament about making the work of these offices more valuable and also considers it necessary to improve collaboration with the candidate countries. Tobacco - Agreement with Philip Morris : MEPs regret that the Commission was unable to provide a comprehensive resolution on the follow-up to Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System, and in particular paragraph 49 thereof, which explicitly asked the Commission to publish such a report by the end of 2008. MEPs expect that the Commission will come forward with this report before the end of the discharge procedure for the financial year 2007. Organised crime : MEPs welcome the publication of the Communication from the Commission of 20 November 2008 on proceeds of organised crime, which deals with the confiscation and recovery of crime. They agree with the Commission that confiscation is one of the most effective ways to fight organised crime and that measures should be put in place in order to increase the limited number of confiscation cases and the modest amounts recovered. The resolution stresses that it is essential to have in place expedient and effective mechanisms to freeze and confiscate assets abroad and therefore a recasting of the existing EU legal framework should be considered. The Parliament reiterates its call on the Commission to provide it with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime to undermine the Communities' financial interest.
  • date: 2009-04-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/66813
New
  • CONT/6/66813
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03 Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
  • 8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
New
8.70.03
Budgetary control and discharge, implementation of the budget
8.70.04
Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
activities
  • date: 2008-09-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • date: 2009-03-16T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-180&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0180/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16992&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-315 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0315/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-10-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: PEILLON Vincent
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2008-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: DE BLASIO Antonio
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2008-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/66813
reference
2008/2242(INI)
title
Protection of the Communities' financial interests - Fight against fraud - Annual report 2007
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject