Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | OBIOLS Raimon ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 429 votes to 36, with 55 abstentions, a resolution on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2008.
Parliament considers that the EU needs to move towards a coherent and consistent policy of upholding and promoting human rights around the world. It stresses the need to conduct such a policy more effectively . It reiterates its conviction that, in order to effect an improvement in the promotion of human rights, the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP) needs to be strengthened .
Parliament also stresses the increased expectations in relation to the EU’s role in the world. It therefore calls for a common EU human rights line both in its external policy and within its own borders. Moreover, it calls for continued maximum vigilance as regards respect for the human rights clauses in the agreements signed by the EU and its third-country partners.
The EU Annual Report on Human Rights 2008 : Parliament reiterates its request that more and better information should be provided for the assessment of policies and call for a better targeting of information on certain countries, for example by focusing on “countries of particular concern” (and where it is particularly difficult to promote human rights). Moreover, it calls for greater efforts to disseminate the annual report and for public information campaigns aimed at raising the EU’s profile in this field. The information called for by MEPs includes an evaluation of Member States’ practices in relation to the anti-terrorism policies followed by the US Administration under the Bush presidency. In accordance with an amendment adopted in plenary, the Parliament calls on the Council to envisage inclusion of the Movimiento Revolucionario Túpac Amaru (MRTA) on the European list of terrorist organisations.
Council and Commission activities in international forums : Parliament reiterates its request to the Commission to encourage Member States, and third countries with which there are ongoing negotiations for future accession or for strengthening relations, to sign up to and ratify all core United Nations and Council of Europe human rights conventions. It calls specifically for a framework agreement to be concluded between the EU and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) with a view to promoting the ratification and implementation of United Nations conventions by all Member States.
Towards the universal ratification of the Rome Statute on the ICC : Parliament calls for vigorous efforts to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Czech Republic, as the only remaining EU Member State not to have ratified the Rome Statute, is called upon to finally do so.
Furthermore, whilst Parliament welcomes the arrest and transfer of Radovan Karadžić to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), it notes with concern that Ratko Mladić and Goran Hadžić remain at large. Further noting the persistent failure of Sudan to arrest and transfer to the ICC Ahmad Harun and Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (‘Ali Kushayb’), Parliament calls for additional measures to counter the measures taken by President al-Bashir following his conviction. It also calls on the EU and Member States to make efforts to enforce the Council’s conclusions on Sudan. Other black spots in terms of non respect of human rights are highlighted, for example in the DRC and Uganda. Noting with satisfaction the first promising statements on the ICC by the new US administration, acknowledging that the ICC “looks to become an important and credible instrument for trying to hold accountable the senior leadership responsible for atrocities committed”, Parliament calls on the USA to further engage with the ICC.
Durban II Conference on Racism : several amendments adopted in plenary state that Parliament is disappointed at the lack of leadership on the part of the Council and the inability of Member States to agree on a common strategy at the Durban Review Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance held in Geneva from 20 to 24 April 2009 (Durban II). It deeply deplores the lack of unity and cooperation, in particular against the backdrop of the expected intensification of EU foreign policies under the new EU Treaty. Plenary calls on the Commission and, notably, the Council to explain to Parliament whether an EU strategy was planned and what efforts were made to find a common line. Parliament condemns the speech of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (Iran), which contradicted the spirit and purpose of the conference.
The United Nations Human Rights Council : whilst welcoming the work of the UNHRC and its crucial role within the overall UN architecture, Parliament considers that the EU should closely follow and monitor the undertakings of the Universal Periodic Review (a new mechanism for reviewing the human rights situation in every country in the world, based on reliable and objective data). Parliament also notes that EU Member States are in a minority in the UNHRC and call for concerted action to remedy this. In this context, they propose that Member States should strengthen their engagement with democratic governments from other regional groups (particularly to counteract the policy of voting in regional blocs within the UNHRC). In general, Parliament calls for enhanced cooperation between the Council of Europe and the European Union in the field of promoting minority rights and protecting regional and minority languages.
Intercultural dialogue : plenary welcomes the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue 2008, which was initiated by the Commission and established by decisions of the European Parliament and the Council. It reiterates that intercultural dialogue has an increasingly important role to play in fostering European identity and citizenship. It urges the Member States and the Commission to bring forward strategies to foster intercultural dialogue, to promote, within their spheres of competence, the objectives of the Alliance of Civilisations, and to maintain their political support for that Alliance.
Performance as regards the European Union human rights guidelines : Parliament considers that, despite the delay in final ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the preparations for the creation of the new European External Action Service should continue. It takes note of the Slovenian and French Presidencies’ drive to finalise European Union human rights guidelines on the rights of the child. Now it considers that necessary measures should be taken to ensure that human rights issues are followed in a more systematic way by the EU missions, for instance by appointing human rights focal points and including guidelines on human rights.
Situation of women and violence against women : Parliament welcomes the new priority status given by the French Presidency to women’s issues. In this context, it calls for a more serious examination of the case of Zimbabwe and for greater attention to be paid to the situation of women in conflict-affected countries.
The death penalty : whilst Parliament welcomes the Joint Declaration against the death penalty, signed on 10 October 2008 by the Presidents of the European Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission, it calls on the Presidency to encourage Italy, Latvia, Poland and Spain, which have signed but not yet ratified Protocol No 13 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances, to do so. It reiterates that the EU is opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances , and emphasises once again that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity. Noting the fact that the death penalty is in retreat, Parliament condemns the fact that the Iranian regime still sentences to death and executes defendants under the age of 18 (particularly homosexuals). It recalls that Iran is the only country to have executed juvenile offenders in 2008. Parliament is also concerned about the possibility that the death penalty might once again start to be enforced in Guatemala. It also remains concerned that China still carries out the greatest number of executions worldwide. Moreover, Parliament condemns the practice of the death penalty in Belarus, which is the only country in Europe that continues to use the death penalty.
Torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment : Parliament urges all EU Member States that have not hitherto signed and/or ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT) to do so as swiftly as possible. It expects the Council and the Commission to enhance the cooperation with the Council of Europe for the purposes of creating a Europe-wide zone free from torture and other forms of ill-treatment, thereby setting an example for other countries of the world. Members welcome the assessment of the EU Guidelines on Torture, which are designed to provide guidance for EU missions in third countries. They urge the Council and the Commission to continue the practice of demarches in respect of all of the European Union’s international partners as regards the ratification and implementation of international conventions banning the use of torture and ill-treatment. In particular, they call for the fight against torture and ill-treatment to be regarded as a top priority of the EU’s human rights policy.
Children’s rights : Parliament stresses once again the crucial need to implement the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict. It notes with satisfaction that the EU has instructed ambassadors to devise individual strategies regarding the 13 priority countries and welcome the adoption by the EU in June 2008 of the revised checklist, which aims to integrate the protection of children affected by armed conflict into the European Security and Defence Policy. Parliament also strongly condemns the recruitment and use of children in armed conflicts in Chad and Iraq as well as the continued use of children in the armed conflicts in Sri Lanka, Burma, the Philippines, Somalia, Congo and Burundi.
Human rights defenders : Parliament reiterates the EU’s commitment to improving protection for human rights defenders in their struggle to realise the vision set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It draws attention to the abuse and sexual exploitation of millions of children worldwide and asks the Council and Member States to do everything possible to prevent and combat the sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children.
Parliament urges the EU institutions to strengthen their support for human rights defenders by creating a focal point in the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission with a view to improving the follow-up of individual cases and coordination with other international and European organisations. It calls on the Union to consider the matter of emergency visas for human rights defenders by including a clear reference to the specific situation of human rights defenders.
In general, MEPs strongly reject the systematic violence and the recurrent acts of harassment suffered by the Sakharov Prize laureates. Plenary r eiterates its position with regard to the Cuban Sakharov Prize winners Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas and the group known as "Damas de Blanco" ("Ladies in White"). It regards it as intolerable that a country with which the EU has reassumed a political dialogue on all kind of matters, including human rights, should refuse to allow both Oswaldo Payá and the Damas de Blanco to participate in the ceremony marking the 20th anniversary of the Prize. In this respect, Parliament calls on the Cuban government to release immediately all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience and to recognise the right of all Cubans freely to enter and leave the country.
Guidelines on human rights dialogues and recognised consultations with third countries : Parliament notes the revised version of the guidelines, adopted under the French Presidency, on human rights dialogues with third countries and calls on the Council and the Commission to initiate a comprehensive evaluation of those guidelines, based on an in-depth evaluation of each dialogue.
Parliament makes a number of points concerning areas of the world where the Council and the EU have been forced to act or express their view:
China : Parliament stresses the need for a radical intensification and re-thinking of the European Union-China human rights dialogue. It is particularly concerned about the serious human rights violations in China, despite promises made by the regime before the Olympic Games in 2008. It strongly condemns the crackdown against Tibetans and calls for the restart of a sincere and results-oriented dialogue between both parties based on the “Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People”. It calls on the Chinese government to release the Chinese dissident Hu Jia (who was awarded the 2008 Sakharov Prize) immediately and calls for free and full access to the Internet; Iran : Parliament remains concerned that the human rights dialogue with Iran has been interrupted since 2004. It calls on the Iranian authorities to resume this dialogue with a view to supporting all civil society stakeholders who are committed to democracy, and to strengthen existing processes that can foster democratic reforms. Members are deeply concerned that, in 2008, the human rights situation in Iran worsened and the restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly persisted (in particular, the suppression of journalists, writers, scholars and women’s rights and human rights activists). They remain concerned about the repression of ethnic and religious minorities in Iran and the increasing use of the death penalty, including in respect of juveniles; Russia : Parliament regrets that the Russian authorities declined to participate in any of the round-table meetings held to prepare for the consultations which involved domestic and international NGOs. During the consultations the EU raised human rights concerns with a particular focus on freedom of expression and assembly, the functioning of civil society, minority rights, combating racism and xenophobia and the rights of children and women, as well as the international human rights obligations of both the EU and Russia. It also regrets that the EU has not succeeded in bringing about any change of policy in Russia, particularly following the Khodorkovsky affair. Parliament calls for the independence of the media and freedom of expression, as well as the liberalisation of the activities of NGOs in Russia. Moreover, it expresses its concern about the ongoing failure of the Office of the Prosecutor to respect the right of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his associate Platon Lebedev to a fair trial; Israel and North Africa : Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to set up human rights subcommittees with all neighbourhood countries, and in particular with Israel. Parliament believes that these subcommittees should allow the human rights issues included in the action plan to be specifically followed up but stresses that discussions on human rights should certainly not be confined to these subcommittees. It emphasises the importance of coordination with other subcommittees dealing with human rights-related issues, such as migration and highlights the need to include these issues in the political dialogue up to the highest level so as to increase the coherence of the EU's policy in this field. Parliament is convinced that the European Neighbourhood Policy could give real leverage for the promotion of human rights were the European Union to demonstrate a genuine political will to ensure respect for the primacy of human rights in a coherent, systematic and wide-ranging manner. It believes, therefore, that respect for human rights and democratic principles must be a precondition for strengthening relations between the Union and a third country. In the context of concluding a framework agreement with Libya, MEPs call on the Council and the Commission to give due attention to dialogue and cooperation on human rights; Gaza : Parliament strongly deplores the recent military escalation and the further deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Gaza, expressing at the same time its unconditional sympathy for the civilian population in southern Israel. Members urge all parties to fully implement UN Security Council resolution 1860 (2009) with a view to securing a permanent ceasefire. They underline the urgent need for effective accountability in cases of violations of international humanitarian law. Parliament welcomes in this regard the decision of the UNHRC to appoint an independent fact-finding mission to investigate war crimes and serious human rights violations by all sides during the recent conflict in Gaza. The Commission is asked to decide, in close consultation with the Member States, on the further action to be taken once the findings are known; Uzbekistan : Parliament notes the continuing absence of an independent international inquiry into the Andijan massacre and the lack of any improvement in the human rights situation in Uzbekistan. It welcomes the release of two human rights defenders, Dilmurod Mukhiddinov and Mamarajab Nazarov, but condemns the holding of independent journalists in prison on politically motivated charges. It urges the Uzbek authorities to release all human rights defenders and other political prisoners and to accept the accreditation of the new Country Director of Human Rights Watch. Parliament also calls on Uzbekistan to cooperate fully and effectively with the UN Special Rapporteurs on torture and on freedom of expression. It welcomes the fact that the Council has decided to renew, for a period of 12 months, the arms embargo; Turkmenistan : Parliament welcomes the fact that the European Union and Turkmenistan held the first round of the human rights dialogue in July 2008. It stresses that that Turkmenistan must make progress in key areas in order for the EU to conclude the Interim Agreement, inter alia by allowing the International Committee of the Red Cross free and unfettered access, by unconditionally releasing all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience, by abolishing all government impediments to travel, and by allowing all NGOs and human rights bodies to operate freely in the country. Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to clearly articulate, prior to the signing of the Interim Agreement, specific human rights improvements and to that end, to adopt a roadmap with clear timelines for compliance; Turkey : Parliament recalls the importance of both Turkey’s and the EU’s commitment to Turkey’s accession process for the ongoing human rights reforms in Turkey. It considers as a positive step towards freedom of speech in Turkey the decision of the government to permit the broadcasting of Kurdish television but regret the fact that the use of the Kurdish language is still banned in parliament and in political campaigning. It reiterates that further legislative reforms are needed in order to ensure respect for and protection of minorities and full freedom of expression, in law and in practice, in Turkey; Pakistan : Parliament calls on the new Pakistani Government to take adequate steps towards the improvement of the human rights situation in Pakistan. It welcomes the fact that the EU deployed an independent election observation mission for the general parliamentary elections in February 2008 and stresses the need for human rights to be one of the EU’s main priorities within the framework of continuing dialogue with Pakistan; Latin America : Parliament welcomes the Council’s proposals for launching human rights dialogues with a number of Latin American countries. It stresses the desirability of including the countries of Central America. Moreover, MEPs call on the Cuban government to release all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience and to recognise the right of all Cubans freely to enter and leave the country. Parliament notes that the Council will decide in 2009 whether to pursue the political dialogue with Cuba, depending on whether or not there have been significant improvements as regards human rights; Georgia : Parliament calls on Russia as an occupying power in Georgia to uphold human rights in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, including the right of citizens to return to their homes. It asks all governments concerned to continue to provide detailed maps and information concerning all areas affected by the conflict, so as to facilitate the clearance of cluster weapon munitions and make those areas safe for civilians. Both governments should also ensure that the public is made aware of the dangers of unexploded material; Burma : Parliament expresses its concern about the lack of progress in the human rights situation in Burma, especially in view of the upcoming elections scheduled for 2010. It condemns the arrests of members of the Burmese opposition and the draconian sentences they received.
General scrutiny of Council and Commission activities (including the performances of the two Presidencies) : Parliament calls for greater efforts and more determined action by the EU with a view to achieving a political settlement to the Darfur conflict. It stresses the need to find a solution to the conflict arising in the Central African Republic and Chad, and express their intention to authorise the deployment of a UN military component to follow up EUFOR Chad/CAR.
Parliament welcomes the fact that the Council establishes and regularly updates lists of focus countries in respect of which additional concerted efforts are made with a view to implementation of the European Union Guidelines on children and armed conflicts, on the death penalty (so-called ‘countries on the cusp’) and on human rights defenders. It reiterates its request that all human rights and democracy discussions with third countries, instruments, documents and reports, including the Annual Reports on human rights, explicitly address discrimination issues including the issues of ethnic, national and linguistic minorities, religious freedoms and caste-based discrimination, the protection and promotion of the rights of indigenous peoples, the human rights of women, and the rights of children, disabled people including people with intellectual disabilities, and people of all sexual orientations.
The Commission’s external assistance programmes and the EIDHR : Parliament welcomes the fact that Parliament’s priorities have been taken into consideration in the 2007 and 2008 programming documents of the EIDHR. It calls for the updating of the electronic compendiums, which are intended to cover all EDIHR projects organised geographically and thematically and once again calls on the Commission to adjust the level of staffing allocated for the implementation of the EIDHR, both at headquarters and in the delegations, so as to take account of the peculiarities and problems of this new instrument.
Electoral assistance and election observation : Parliament notes with satisfaction that the EU makes increasing use of electoral assistance and election observation to promote democracy in third countries. It stresses that the comprehensive EU methodology has been very successful for the EU and welcomes the publication of the first Handbook for EU election observation. However, it calls for increased vigilance with regard to the criteria for selection of the countries in which electoral assistance/election observation is to take place. According to MEPs, the electoral process, including both the pre- and post-electoral stages, should be incorporated into the different levels of political dialogue with the third countries concerned.
Economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights : Parliament stresses that economic, social and cultural rights are just as important as civil and political rights. It therefore calls on the EU to mainstream protection of ESC rights into its external relations with third countries. Those rights include rights to food, to adequate housing, to education, to water, to land, to decent work, to social security and to form a trade union. Members also stress the need to promote corporate social responsibility. Once again, they call on the Council and the Commission to take EU initiatives at international level with a view to fighting persecution and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Effectiveness of the European Parliament’s interventions in human rights cases : Parliament calls on the Council to respond in a substantive manner to the wishes and concerns expressed in formal communications from Parliament, particularly with respect to urgency resolutions. It welcomes the ground-breaking statement, supported by 66 nations including all EU Member States, presented in the UN General Assembly on 18 December 2008, confirming that international human rights protections include sexual orientation and gender identity and reaffirming the principle of non-discrimination, which requires that human rights apply equally to every human being regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. It reminds Parliament’s delegations visiting third countries that they should systematically include in the agenda an interparliamentary debate on the human rights situation, as well as meetings with human rights defenders.
Plenary is convinced that only a strengthened human rights body in Parliament would be able to promote a coherent, effective, systematic and cross-cutting human rights policy within Parliament and vis-à-vis the Council and Commission, in particular in the light of the foreign policy provisions of the Lisbon Treaty. Members believe that the Parliament should quickly decide on its operating arrangements and put in place the resources necessary to achieve its objectives.
Lastly, Parliament reiterates its demand that all winners of the Sakharov Prize and, in particular, Aung San Suu Kyi, Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas, the Cuban collective Damas de Blanco and Hu Jia be given access to the European institutions. It deplores the absence of any significant response to the EU's calls made to the Chinese, Burmese and Cuban authorities to respect fundamental freedoms, especially freedom of expression and political association.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Raimon OBIOLS I GERMÁ (PES, ES) on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2008, noting that the EU needs to move towards a coherent and consistent policy of upholding and promoting human rights around the world. However, MEPs stress the need to conduct such a policy more effectively .
MEPs reiterate that, in order to effect an improvement in the promotion of human rights, the EU’s common foreign and security policy (CFSP) needs to be strengthened. It is therefore necessary to ensure that the promotion of human rights, as a main objective of the CFSP, is strictly implemented at all levels. The EU must also make greater efforts to improve its ability to respond rapidly to breaches of human rights by third countries. MEPs also stress the increased expectations in relation to the EU’s role in the world. They therefore call for a common EU human rights line both in its external policy and within its own borders. Moreover, MEPs call for continued maximum vigilance as regards respect for the human rights clauses in the agreements signed by the EU and its third-country partners.
The EU Annual Report on Human Rights 2008 : MEPs reiterate their request that more and better information should be provided for the assessment of policies and call for a better targeting of information on certain countries, for example by focusing on “countries of particular concern” (and where it is particularly difficult to promote human rights). Moreover, MEPs call for greater efforts to disseminate the annual report and for public information campaigns aimed at raising the EU’s profile in this field. The information called for my MEPs includes an evaluation of Member States’ practices in relation to the anti-terrorism policies followed by the US Administration under the Bush presidency.
Council and Commission activities in international forums : MEPs reiterate their request to the Commission to encourage Member States, and third countries with which there are ongoing negotiations for future accession or for strengthening relations, to sign up to and ratify all core United Nations and Council of Europe human rights conventions. They call specifically for a framework agreement to be concluded between the EU and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) with a view to promoting the ratification and implementation of United Nations conventions by all Member States. They also call for vigorous efforts to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Czech Republic, as the only remaining EU Member State not to have ratified the Rome Statute, is called upon to finally do so. MEPs make a number of other requests, including: (i) all EU Member States should step up cooperation with the Court and conclude bilateral agreements on the enforcement of sentences; (ii) ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; (iii) further promoting cooperation between the EU and the Council of Europe in the field of human rights, the rule of law and pluralist democracy.
Furthermore, whilst MEPs welcome the arrest and transfer of Radovan Karadžić to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), they note with concern that Ratko Mladić and Goran Hadžić remain at large. Further noting the persistent failure of Sudan to arrest and transfer to the ICC Ahmad Harun and Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (‘Ali Kushayb’), MEPs call for additional measures to counter the measures taken by President al-Bashir following his conviction. They also call on the EU and Member States to make efforts to enforce the Council’s conclusions on Sudan. Other black spots in terms of non respect of human rights are highlighted, for example in the DRC and Uganda.
Noting with satisfaction the first promising statements on the ICC by the new US administration, acknowledging that the ICC “looks to become an important and credible instrument for trying to hold accountable the senior leadership responsible for atrocities committed”, MEPs call on the USA to further engage with the ICC.
The United Nations Human Rights Council : whilst welcoming the work of the UNHRC and its crucial role within the overall UN architecture, MEPs consider that the EU should closely follow and monitor the undertakings of the Universal Periodic Review (a new mechanism for reviewing the human rights situation in every country in the world, based on reliable and objective data). MEPs also note that EU Member States are in a minority in the UNHRC and call for concerted action to remedy this. In this context, they propose that Member States should strengthen their engagement with democratic governments from other regional groups (particularly to counteract the policy of voting in regional blocs within the UNHRC).
In general, MEPs call for enhanced cooperation between the Council of Europe and the European Union in the field of promoting minority rights and protecting regional and minority languages.
Performance as regards the European Union human rights guidelines : MEPs consider that, despite the delay in final ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the preparations for the creation of the new European External Action Service should continue. They take note of the Slovenian and French Presidencies’ drive to finalise European Union human rights guidelines on the rights of the child. Now they consider that necessary measures should be taken to ensure that human rights issues are followed in a more systematic way by the EU missions, for instance by appointing human rights focal points and including guidelines on human rights.
Situation of women and violence against women : MEPs welcome the new priority status given by the French Presidency to women’s issues. In this context, they call for a more serious examination of the case of Zimbabwe and for greater attention to be paid to the situation of women in conflict-affected countries.
The death penalty : whilst MEPs welcome the Joint Declaration against the death penalty, signed on 10 October 2008 by the Presidents of the European Parliament, of the Council and of the Commission, they call on the Presidency to encourage Italy, Latvia, Poland and Spain, which have signed but not yet ratified Protocol No 13 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances, to do so. They reiterate that the EU is opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances , and emphasise once again that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity.
Noting the fact that the death penalty is in retreat, MEPs condemn the fact that the Iranian regime still sentences to death and executes defendants under the age of 18 (particularly homosexuals). They recall that Iran is the only country to have executed juvenile offenders in 2008. MEPs are also concerned about the possibility that the death penalty might once again start to be enforced in Guatemala. They also remain concerned that China still carries out the greatest number of executions worldwide. Moreover, MEPs condemn the practice of the death penalty in Belarus, which is the only country in Europe that continues to use the death penalty.
Torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment : MEPs urge all EU Member States that have not hitherto signed and/or ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT) to do so as swiftly as possible. They expect the Council and the Commission to enhance the cooperation with the Council of Europe for the purposes of creating a Europe-wide zone free from torture and other forms of ill-treatment, thereby setting an example for other countries of the world. They welcome the assessment of the EU Guidelines on Torture, which are designed to provide guidance for EU missions in third countries. They urge the Council and the Commission to continue the practice of demarches in respect of all of the European Union’s international partners as regards the ratification and implementation of international conventions banning the use of torture and ill-treatment. In particular, they call for the fight against torture and ill-treatment to be regarded as a top priority of the EU’s human rights policy.
Children’s rights : MEPs stress once again the crucial need to implement the EU Guidelines on Children and Armed Conflict. They note with satisfaction that the EU has instructed ambassadors to devise individual strategies regarding the 13 priority countries and welcome the adoption by the EU in June 2008 of the revised checklist, which aims to integrate the protection of children affected by armed conflict into the European Security and Defence Policy. MEPs also strongly condemn the recruitment and use of children in armed conflicts in Chad and Iraq as well as the continued use of children in the armed conflicts in Sri Lanka, Burma, the Philippines, Somalia, Congo and Burundi.
Human rights defenders : MEPs reiterate the EU’s commitment to improving protection for human rights defenders in their struggle to realise the vision set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They draw attention to the abuse and sexual exploitation of millions of children worldwide and ask the Council and Member States to do everything possible to prevent and combat the sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children.
Moreover, MEPs encourage the EU institutions to strengthen their support for human rights defenders by creating a focal point in the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission with a view to improving the follow-up of individual cases and coordination with other international and European organisations.
MEPs welcome the revised version of the EU Guidelines on human rights defenders and once again call on the Council and the Member States to consider in concrete terms the matter of emergency visas for human rights defenders by creating a specific and accelerated visa procedure. Furthermore, MEPs note the discussion concerning the issuing of visas for the temporary relocation of human rights defenders who are at immediate risk or in need of respite.
In terms of concrete cases highlighted by MEPs in relation to non respect of human rights, MEPs cite Belarus and, in particular, the pressure exerted on Alyaksandr Kazulin - an opponent - before the elections. They also condemn the strengthening of restrictions imposed by the Chinese government on human rights defenders before the Olympic Games, and the restrictions imposed on cyber-dissidents (whether Chinese or not). MEPs express concern about other issues in Iran (arbitrary arrest, torture and imprisonment), Nicaragua and Venezuela. In general, MEPs strongly reject the systematic violence and the recurrent acts of harassment suffered by the Sakharov Prize laureates.
Guidelines on human rights dialogues and recognised consultations with third countries : MEPs note the revised version of the guidelines, adopted under the French Presidency, on human rights dialogues with third countries and call on the Council and the Commission to initiate a comprehensive evaluation of those guidelines, based on an in-depth evaluation of each dialogue.
MEPs make a number of points concerning areas of the world where the Council and the EU have been forced to act or express their view:
China : MEPs stress the need for a radical intensification and re-thinking of the European Union-China human rights dialogue. They are particularly concerned about the serious human rights violations in China, despite promises made by the regime before the Olympic Games in 2008. MEPs strongly condemn the crackdown against Tibetans and call for the restart of a sincere and results-oriented dialogue between both parties based on the “Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People”. They call on the Chinese government to release the Chinese dissident Hu Jia (who was awarded the 2008 Sakharov Prize) immediately and call for free and full access to the Internet; Iran : MEPs remain concerned that the human rights dialogue with Iran has been interrupted since 2004. They call on the Iranian authorities to resume this dialogue with a view to supporting all civil society stakeholders who are committed to democracy, and to strengthen existing processes that can foster democratic reforms. MEPs are deeply concerned that, in 2008, the human rights situation in Iran worsened and the restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly persisted (in particular, the suppression of journalists, writers, scholars and women’s rights and human rights activists). They remain concerned about the repression of ethnic and religious minorities in Iran and the increasing use of the death penalty, including in respect of juveniles; Russia : MEPs regret that the Russian authorities declined to participate in any of the round-table meetings held to prepare for the consultations which involved domestic and international NGOs. During the consultations the EU raised human rights concerns with a particular focus on freedom of expression and assembly, the functioning of civil society, minority rights, combating racism and xenophobia and the rights of children and women, as well as the international human rights obligations of both the EU and Russia. They also regret that the EU has not succeeded in bringing about any change of policy in Russia, particularly following the Khodorkovsky affair. They call for the independence of the media and freedom of expression, as well as the liberalisation of the activities of NGOs in Russia. Moreover, they express their concern about the ongoing failure of the Office of the Prosecutor to respect the right of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his associate Platon Lebedev to a fair trial; Israel and North Africa : MEPs call on the Council and the Commission to set up human rights subcommittees with all neighbourhood countries, and in particular with Israel, as part of the negotiations on an upgrading of the bilateral relations. They stress the need for political dialogue up to the highest level on issues related to human rights so as to enhance the coherence of the EU’s policy in this field and reduce discrepancies in statements on the human rights situation given by both sides to the press. In the context of concluding a framework agreement with Libya, MEPs call on the Council and the Commission to give due attention to dialogue and cooperation on human rights; Uzbekistan : MEPs note the continuing absence of an independent international inquiry into the Andijan massacre and the lack of any improvement in the human rights situation in Uzbekistan. They welcome the release of two human rights defenders, Dilmurod Mukhiddinov and Mamarajab Nazarov, but condemn the holding of independent journalists in prison on politically motivated charges. They urge the Uzbek authorities to release all human rights defenders and other political prisoners and to accept the accreditation of the new Country Director of Human Rights Watch. MEPs also call on Uzbekistan to cooperate fully and effectively with the UN Special Rapporteurs on torture and on freedom of expression. They welcome the fact that the Council has decided to renew, for a period of 12 months, the arms embargo; Turkmenistan : MEPs stress that that Turkmenistan must make progress in key areas in order for the EU to conclude the Interim Agreement, inter alia by allowing the International Committee of the Red Cross free and unfettered access, by unconditionally releasing all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience, by abolishing all government impediments to travel, and by allowing all NGOs and human rights bodies to operate freely in the country; Turkey : MEPs recall the importance of both Turkey’s and the EU’s commitment to Turkey’s accession process for the ongoing human rights reforms in Turkey. They consider as a positive step towards freedom of speech in Turkey the decision of the government to permit the broadcasting of Kurdish television but regret the fact that the use of the Kurdish language is still banned in parliament and in political campaigning. They reiterate that further legislative reforms are needed in order to ensure respect for and protection of minorities and full freedom of expression, in law and in practice, in Turkey; Pakistan : MEPs call on the new Pakistani Government to take adequate steps towards the improvement of the human rights situation in Pakistan. MEPs welcome the fact that the EU deployed an independent election observation mission for the general parliamentary elections in February 2008 and stress the need for human rights to be one of the EU’s main priorities within the framework of continuing dialogue with Pakistan; Latin America : MEPs welcome the Council’s proposals for launching human rights dialogues with a number of Latin American countries. They stress the desirability of including the countries of Central America. Moreover, MEPs call on the Cuban government to release all political prisoners; Georgia : MEPs call on Russia as an occupying power in Georgia to uphold human rights in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, including the right of citizens to return to their homes. They ask all governments concerned to continue to provide detailed maps and information concerning all areas affected by the conflict, so as to facilitate the clearance of cluster weapon munitions and make those areas safe for civilians. Both governments should also ensure that the public is made aware of the dangers of unexploded material; Burma : MEPs express their concern about the lack of progress in the human rights situation in Burma, especially in view of the upcoming elections scheduled for 2010. They condemn the arrests of members of the Burmese opposition and the draconian sentences they received.
General scrutiny of Council and Commission activities (including the performances of the two Presidencies) : MEPs call for greater efforts and more determined action by the EU with a view to achieving a political settlement to the Darfur conflict. They stress the need to find a solution to the conflict arising in the Central African Republic and Chad, and express their intention to authorise the deployment of a UN military component to follow up EUFOR Chad/CAR.
MEPs welcome the fact that the Council establishes and regularly updates lists of focus countries in respect of which additional concerted efforts are made with a view to implementation of the European Union Guidelines on children and armed conflicts, on the death penalty (so-called ‘countries on the cusp’) and on human rights defenders. They reiterate their request that all human rights and democracy discussions with third countries, instruments, documents and reports, including the Annual Reports on human rights, explicitly address discrimination issues including the issues of ethnic, national and linguistic minorities, religious freedoms and caste-based discrimination. They note the initiative of the Union for the Mediterranean launched by the French Presidency as a new challenge aimed at promoting democracy and respect for human rights in the Mediterranean zone. However, this new initiative must not lead to less attention and priority being given to the promotion of the necessary reforms in respect of democracy and human rights in the region.
The Commission’s external assistance programmes and the EIDHR : MEPs welcome the fact that Parliament’s priorities have been taken into consideration in the 2007 and 2008 programming documents of the EIDHR. They call for the updating of the electronic compendiums, which are intended to cover all EDIHR projects organised geographically and thematically and once again call on the Commission to adjust the level of staffing allocated for the implementation of the EIDHR, both at headquarters and in the delegations, so as to take account of the peculiarities and problems of this new instrument.
Electoral assistance and election observation : MEPs note with satisfaction that the EU makes increasing use of electoral assistance and election observation to promote democracy in third countries. They stress that the comprehensive EU methodology has been very successful for the EU and welcome the publication of the first Handbook for EU election observation. However, they call for increased vigilance with regard to the criteria for selection of the countries in which electoral assistance/election observation is to take place. According to MEPs, the electoral process, including both the pre- and post-electoral stages, should be incorporated into the different levels of political dialogue with the third countries concerned.
Mainstreaming of human rights : MEPs call on the Commission to continue to monitor closely the granting of ‘Generalised System of Preferences plus’ (GSP+) benefits to countries which have shown serious flaws in the implementation of the eight ILO conventions relating to core labour standards and ask the Commission to develop criteria determining when the GSP should be withdrawn on human rights grounds.
Economic, social and cultural (ESC) rights : MEPs stress that economic, social and cultural rights are just as important as civil and political rights. They therefore call on the EU to mainstream protection of ESC rights into its external relations with third countries. Those rights include rights to food, to adequate housing, to education, to water, to land, to decent work, to social security and to form a trade union. MEPs also stress the need to promote corporate social responsibility. Once again, they call on the Council and the Commission to take EU initiatives at international level with a view to fighting persecution and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Effectiveness of the European Parliament’s interventions in human rights cases : MEPs call on the Council to respond in a substantive manner to the wishes and concerns expressed in formal communications from Parliament, particularly with respect to urgency resolutions. They remind Parliament’s delegations visiting third countries that they should systematically include in the agenda an interparliamentary debate on the human rights situation, as well as meetings with human rights defenders. Lastly, they welcome the setting-up of the Sakharov Network, as announced on the 20th anniversary of the Sakharov Prize.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0385/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0264/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0264/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE419.926
- Committee draft report: PE416.698
- Committee draft report: PE416.698
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE419.926
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0264/2009
Activities
- Raimon OBIOLS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Human rights in the world 2008 and the EU's policy on the matter (A6-0264/2009, Raimon Obiols i Germà)
- 2016/11/22 Human rights in the world 2008 and the EU's policy on the matter (A6-0264/2009, Raimon Obiols i Germà)
- 2016/11/22 Human rights in the world 2008 and the EU's policy on the matter (A6-0264/2009, Raimon Obiols i Germà)
- Hartmut NASSAUER
- Martine ROURE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christopher BEAZLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Daniel COHN-BENDIT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Árpád DUKA-ZÓLYOMI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert EVANS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hélène FLAUTRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Milan HORÁČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georg JARZEMBOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Eleni KOPPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alexander Graf LAMBSDORFF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jules MAATEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marios MATSAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik MEIJER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrzej WIELOWIEYSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
112 |
2008/2336(INI)
2009/02/10
AFET
112 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the EU needs to move towards a coherent and consistent policy to uphold and promote human rights around the world, and stresses the need to conduct such a policy more effectively;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 109 109. Stresses that human rights also include rights to food, to adequate housing, to education, to water
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 114 114.
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 114 a (new) 114a. Calls on the Council to respond in a substantive manner to the wishes and concerns expressed in formal communications from Parliament, particularly with respect to urgency resolutions;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 115 115. Reminds Parliament's delegations visiting third countries that they should systematically include in the agenda
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 115 a (new) Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 115 b (new) 115b. Believes that a single, strengthened ‘human rights’ body in Parliament would be able to promote a coherent, effective, systematic and cross-cutting human rights policy within Parliament and vis-à-vis the Council and the Commission, particularly with regard to the foreign policy aspects of the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas human rights and the protection of those rights rely on recognition of the dignity of the human person; recalls in this connection the opening words of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, namely: “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world",
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A a (new) -Aa. whereas justice, freedom, democracy and the rule of law arise out of an authentic recognition of the dignity of the human person, and whereas such recognition is the foundation of all human rights,
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas efforts must be made to focus greater attention on respect for basic human rights
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2009 on the situation in the Gaza Strip1 and the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 27 January 2009 on the Middle East Peace Process,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 28 a (new) – having regard to the second report of the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights entitled “Human Rights Defenders in the OSCE Region: Challenges and Good Practices” of 15 December 2008,
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 30 – having regard to the European Union
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 31 a (new) Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the report shows that the EU, despite the inquiries undertaken in some Member States, has not carried out an evaluation of Member States' practices in relation to the anti-terrorism policies followed by the US Administration under the Bush presidency; considers it essential to clarify the role of Member States implicated in cases of extraordinary rendition and urges, once again, full and complete compliance with international standards in the fight against terrorism;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses that immigration policy
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers that the EU considerably weakens its capacity to promote respect for human rights every time it puts security or trade priorities ahead of respect for human rights;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers it essential that, given the
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Reiterates its request to the Commission to encourage European Union Member States, and third countries with which there are ongoing negotiations for future accession, to sign up to, and ratify, all core United Nations and Council of Europe human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its conviction that, in order to effect an improvement in the promotion of human rights
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Reiterates its request to the Commission to encourage European Union Member States, and third countries with which there are ongoing negotiations for future accession, to sign up to, and ratify, all core United Nations and Council of Europe human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Reiterates its request to the Commission to encourage European Union Member States, and third countries with which there are ongoing negotiations for future accession or for strengthening relations, to sign up to, and ratify, all core United Nations and Council of Europe human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto and to cooperate with international human rights procedures and mechanisms; draws the attention of European Union Member States to, in particular, the need to ratify the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and As of November 2008. Members of their Families, which none of the Member States has ratified to date1;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the cooperation between the European Union and the Council of Europe taking place within the framework of a Memorandum of Understanding signed in May 2007; welcomes the fact that quadripartite meetings were held on 23 October 2007 and 10 March 2008 between the EU Presidency, the Commission, the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe and the Chair of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe; reaffirms the importance of further promoting cooperation in the field of human rights, the rule of law and pluralist democracy, which are the shared values of both those organisations
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Supports the continuation of the vigorous efforts on the part of the Council and the Commission to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute and the adoption of the requisite national implementing legislation, in conformity with Council Common Position
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Welcomes the fact that the ratifications of the Rome Statute by Madagascar, Cook Islands and Suriname in 2008 brought the
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates its conviction that, in order to effect an improvement in the promotion of human rights, the EU's common foreign and security policy (CFSP) needs to be strengthened, and that it is necessary to ensure that the promotion of human rights as a main objective of the CFSP, as outlined in Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union, is strictly implemented in the EU’s dialogues and institutional relations with all the countries of the world;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Welcomes the opening of the first ever trial at the ICC and notes that it represents the first trial in the history of international criminal law to see the active participation of victims in the proceedings; in that context, urges the ICC to intensify its outreach efforts with a view to engaging communities in countries in crisis situations in a process of constructive interaction with the ICC, designed to promote understanding and support for its mandate, to manage expectations and to enable those communities to follow and understand the international criminal justice process; welcomes the cooperation of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in the transfer of Thomas Lubanga, Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo to the ICC; however, deplores the fact that the ICC warrant for the arrest of Bosco Ntaganda has not yet been executed, and calls on the upcoming meetings of the General Affairs and External Relations Council to demand the immediate arrest and surrender of Bosco Ntaganda to the ICC; notes with concern that the already volatile situation in the DRC has recently been further destabilised by new attacks by the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), which brutally massacred at least 620 civilians and abducted more than 160 children between 24 December 2008 and 13 January 2009 in northern DRC; therefore emphasises the need to arrest LRA commanders as a matter of urgency, as demanded in Parliament's resolution of 21 October 2008 on the indictment and bringing to trial of Joseph Kony at the International criminal Court1;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new) 24c. Notes with satisfaction the first promising statements on the ICC by the new US administration, acknowledging that the ICC “looks to become an important and credible instrument for trying to hold accountable the senior leadership responsible for atrocities committed in the Congo, Uganda, and Darfur”2, and calls on the USA to reinstate its signature and further engage with the ICC, especially by cooperating in situations which are the subject of an ICC investigation or preliminary analysis;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes once again with satisfaction the adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of the Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, which creates a framework in which States can protect and promote the rights of indigenous people without exclusion or discrimination; urges the Commission, therefore, to follow up on the implementation of the declaration, in particular through the EIDHR, while in particular enjoining all the Member States to ratify as a matter of urgency International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, which backs up the principles set out in the declaration in question with a legally binding instrument; however, welcomes the Commission's activities targeting indigenous peoples and welcomes the project entitled "Promotion of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Rights through Legal Advice, Capacity-Building and Dialogue", initiated as a joint management project between the European Commission and the ILO; notes that, almost twenty years after its entry into force, only three Member States have ratified the ILO Convention; consequently, encourages initiatives to increase awareness of this important legislative instrument and to enhance its effectiveness worldwide by ensuring that it is ratified by all the Member States;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Reiterates its call for the development of a European framework strategy on Roma, given the special social situation of Roma communities in the European Union, in the candidate countries and in the countries involved in the Stabilisation and Association process;; notes with satisfaction the Commission's first "EU- Roma Summit", which took place in September 2008 under the joint patronage of the Commission President and the French Presidency, aiming to promote a firm commitment to tackling concrete problems and to creating mechanisms through which to ensure a better understanding of the situation of Roma across Europe;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls for closer monitoring of the right to freedom of religion in the world, as enshrined in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Welcomes the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue 2008, which was initiated by the Commission and established by decisions of the European Parliament and the Council; reiterates that intercultural dialogue has an increasingly important role to play in fostering European identity and citizenship; urges the Member States and the Commission to bring forward strategies to foster intercultural dialogue, to promote, within their spheres of competence, the objectives of the Alliance of Civilisations, and to continue their political support for that Alliance;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and the Commission to make greater efforts to improve the ability of the European Union to respond rapidly to breaches of human rights by third countries; stresses the key role played by the EU in the sphere of human rights in today's world and the corresponding increased expectations; calls for
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes with regret that, despite the fact that the Commission has recommended ratification of ILO Convention 169 on several occasions, at the present time, almost twenty years after its entry into force, only three Member States – Denmark, the Netherlands and Spain – have ratified it;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34.
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Is concerned that
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. In this regard, calls on the Council and the Commission to strengthen their engagement with democratic governments from other regional groups within the UNHRC, with a view to improving the chance of success of initiatives aimed at respect for the principles contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; asks the Commission to provide an annual report on voting patterns at the UN in matter concerning human rights, analysing how these have been affected by the policies of the EU and of its Member States and those of other blocs;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 36 36. Calls for
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 38 38. Welcomes the fact that the EU initiated the holding of a special UNHRC session on Burma in October 2007, which culminated in the adoption of a resolution in June 2008 condemning the ongoing systematic violations of human rights and the recruitment of child soldiers in Burma and urging the Burmese Government unconditionally to release all political prisoners
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 39 Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 40 a (new) 40a. Considers that necessary measures should be taken to ensure that human rights issues are followed in a more systematic way by the EU missions, for instance by appointing human rights focal points and including guidelines on human rights and their implementation in EU mission staff training programmes;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 41. Welcomes the new priority status given by the French presidency in the second half of 2008 to women's issues in the context of the EU's action in the field of human rights; stresses, in particular, the need to tackle the tragic phenomena of violence against women
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls for continued maximum vigilance as regards respect for the human rights clauses in the agreements signed by the EU and its third-country partners, and for such clauses to be included systematically in future agreements; points out that the human rights clause, by virtue of being an essential element, should apply to all the provisions of the agreement; reiterates its call for this clause to be systematically accompanied by a genuine enforcement mechanism;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 41 a (new) 41a. Given the failure of the international community to bring about change for the better in Zimbabwe – a human rights catastrophe – calls on the Council and Member States to examine the reasons behind this, to determine more effective policies, and to inform Parliament what action it intends to take, given the extent of the relationship between the EU and its Member States and many African countries, in particular in southern Africa;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Welcomes the
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Welcomes the ongoing elaboration of new guidelines aimed at the establishment of a comprehensive strategy for strengthening EU action to enhance women's security, especially in conflict- affected countries;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 42 42. Welcomes the ongoing elaboration of new guidelines aimed at the establishment of a comprehensive strategy for strengthening EU action to enhance women
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Draws attention, nonetheless, to the existing gaps in the development of the Union's policies and actions for the human rights of women; finds these gaps reflected in the Council's report insofar as when assessing various specific areas it fails to go into detail; suggests that the Council should appoint an EU special envoy for women’s rights to strengthen its action in this area;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 44 Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 48 48. Calls on the Presidency to encourage
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the relevance of the European Union Annual Report on Human Rights in analysing and evaluating the European Union's human rights policy, and recognises the positive role played by
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Welcomes the fact that death penalty is in retreat, having been abolished for all crimes in 2008 by Rwanda and Uzbekistan; welcomes the draft penal code in Iran, which prohibits stoning sentences, and urges the Iranian parliament to conclude the penal code so as to provide for the absolute prohibition of stoning; condemns the fact that the Iranian regime still sentences to death, and executes
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Welcomes the fact that death penalty is in retreat, having been abolished for all crimes in 2008 by Rwanda and Uzbekistan; welcomes the draft penal code in Iran, which prohibits stoning sentences, and urges the Iranian parliament to conclude the penal code so as to provide for the absolute prohibition of stoning; condemns the fact that the Iranian regime still sentences to death, and executes, defendants under the age of 18 (particularly those whose only ‘crime’ under sharia law is having committed acts of homosexuality); once again condemns the Iranian regime's increasing use of death penalty, which places Iran in second position, just after China, in the league table of countries having highest number of executions; notes that there has not been any death sentence passed in Guatemala; however, expresses its disquiet at the possibility that the death penalty might once again start to be enforced; urges the Guatemalan Government, on the contrary, to genuinely commit itself to the universal moratorium on the death penalty; however, welcomes the decisions taken by President Colom in March 2008 which may lead to the abolition of the death penalty in Guatemala; expresses its concern at the retention of the death penalty in domestic legislation in Peru; notes that since 2007 all death penalty cases in China have been reviewed by the Supreme Court; however, remains concerned that China still carries out the greatest number of executions worldwide; condemns the practice of the death penalty in Belarus, which runs counter to European values;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50.
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 50 50. Notes with concern that Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia have so far neither signed nor ratified the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT); notes that Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Romania have so far signed but not ratified it; urges all
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53. Expects the Council and the Commission to enhance the cooperation with the Council of Europe for the purposes of creating a Europe-wide zone free from torture and other forms of ill-
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 a (new) (to be situated within the section headed "Torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment") 57a. Deplores the fact that there are 1.35 million displaced persons in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), including 850,000 displaced in North Kivu; emphasises once again the need for urgent action in the form of a full investigation aimed at bringing to justice the perpetrators responsible for the killing of an estimated 150 people by CNDP (National Congress for the Defence of the People) and Mai Mai combatants in Kiwanja in November 2008; calls on the governments of the DRC and Rwanda to pledge their full support for MONUC (the UN Mission in the DRC) in the region, in the fulfilment of its peacekeeping mandate, and to work towards protecting civilians in the region from the violence and severe atrocities seen to date; further requests the Council and the Commission to support an investigation into the serious violations of international humanitarian law which are occurring on a daily basis, including rape, extrajudicial killings and torture, as well as the need to implement a strong EU strategy which would help to facilitate change in the region;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 57 b (new) (to be situated within the section headed "Torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment") 57b. Remains deeply concerned about the devastating humanitarian crisis in Zimbabwe, the cholera epidemic, and the continued refusal of the Mugabe regime to respond effectively to the crisis; further calls on the Council and the Commission to roundly condemn the actions of the Mugabe regime, and to reaffirm their commitment to the Zimbabwean people in the form of a long-term programme of humanitarian aid; further denounces the intimidation and detention of human rights defenders and members of civil society, such as Jestina Mukoko, by the Mugabe regime, and calls for the perpetrators of these acts to be brought to justice;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Heading before paragraph 58 Children
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 65 65. Welcomes the fact that 16 European Union Member States
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 68 a (new) 68a. Draws attention to the abuse and sexual exploitation of millions of children worldwide; asks the Council, the Commission and Member States to do everything possible to prevent and combat sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children, protect the rights of child victims of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse, and promote national and international cooperation in the fight against sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls once again on the Council and the Commission to identify the
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 a (new) 69a. Welcomes the establishment in 2006 by the ODIHR of a focal point for human rights defenders for the purpose of monitoring the human rights situation in all OSCE countries; urges the European Union institutions to strengthen their support for human rights defenders by creating a focal point in the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission with a view to improving the follow-up of individual cases and coordination with other international and European organisations;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 69 b (new) 69b. Welcomes the 2008 revised version of the EU Guidelines on human rights defenders; highlights the inclusion of provisions aimed at improving the support given to, and the protection of, human rights defenders by EU missions, such as local strategies for the implementation of the guidelines, local working groups on human rights and the organisation of meetings at least once a year between human rights defenders and diplomats; welcomes at the same time the inclusion of the possibility of issuing emergency visas and facilitating temporary shelter in the EU Member States as measures to provide swift assistance and protection to human rights defenders in danger in third countries;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 70 70. Once again calls on the Council and the Member States to consider in concrete terms the matter of emergency visas for human rights defenders by including a clear reference to the specific situation of human rights defenders in the new
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 71. Refers to the Council Conclusions on Belarus of 13 October 2008 and the statement issued by the Presidency on 30 September 2008 concerning the parliamentary elections held that month in Belarus; regrets that the elections fell short of the international standards and failed to meet the democratic criteria of the OSCE; welcomes the release of the last internationally recognised political prisoner, Alyaksandr Kazulin, before the elections
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 a (new) 71a. Condemns the strengthening of restrictions imposed by the Chinese government on human rights defenders before the Olympic Games which prohibited them from engaging in telephone and internet communications, tracked their movements and subjected them to varying degrees of house arrest and unprecedented surveillance and monitoring, as a result of which many activists chose to postpone or suspend their work until the Games were over;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 71 a (new) 71a. Draws specific attention to the significant impact that the right of free expression on the internet can have on closed communities, and calls on the EU to support cyber-dissidents worldwide; accordingly, asks the Commission and the Council to deal with all restrictions on the provision of internet and information society services by European companies in third countries as part of the EU external trade policy and to regard as barriers to trade all unnecessary limitations on the provision of those services;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 72. Is greatly concerned that Iran has continued in 2008 to suppress independent human rights defenders and members of civil society, and that serious violations of human rights have persisted; condemns the arbitrary arrest, torture and imprisonment of human rights defenders for their work, on the charge of "activities contrary to national security"; regrets the current government policy directed against teachers and academics, barring students from access to higher education, and condemns the persecution and imprisonment of student activists;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 73. Expresses its concern at the human rights situation in Nicaragua and Venezuela and at the attacks against and harassment of a number
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 a (new) 73a. Reiterates its position with regard to the Cuban Sakharov Prize winners Oswaldo Payá Sardiñas and the group known as "Damas de Blanco" ("Ladies in White"); strongly rejects the systematic violence and the recurrent acts of harassment suffered by the Sakharov Prize laureates;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 74 74.
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Council and Commission to make greater efforts to disseminate their annual report on human rights and ensure it reaches as large a public as possible;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76. Regrets China's postponement of the
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76. Regrets China's postponement of the ninth China-EU summit on the grounds of the Dalai Lama's visit to Europe; emphasises the need for a radical intensification of the European Union-
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 76 76. Regrets China's postponement of the ninth China-EU summit on the grounds of the Dalai Lama's visit to Europe; emphasises the need for a radical intensification of the European Union- China human rights dialogue; expresses its disquiet at the serious human rights violations in China and stresses that, despite promises made by the regime before the Olympic Games in August 2008, the situation on the ground regarding human rights has not improved; notes that, despite repeated assurances by the Chinese government of its intention to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratification is still pending; refers to its resolution of 17 January 2008 on the arrest of the Chinese dissident Hu Jia, who has been awarded the 2008 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought; calls on the Chinese government to release Hu Jia immediately and to lift the house arrest on his wife Zeng Jinyan and his daughter; condemns the wave of repression against signatories of the ‘Charter 08’, a document calling for democratic reforms in China and demanding the release of Liu Xiaobo, a dissident who has been detained since 9 December 2008; remains concerned about many aspects of Chinese legislation, including the State Secrets system, preventing the transparency necessary for the development of good governance and a system in which the rule of law prevails; in this context, deplores the systematic punishment of lawyers who try to make the Chinese legal system function in accordance with China's own laws and the rights of its citizens;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78. Regrets the lack of results from the European Union-Russia consultations on human rights; regrets that the Russian authorities declined to participate in any of the round-table meetings held to prepare for the consultations which involved domestic and international NGOs; notes that during the consultations the European Union raised human rights concerns with a particular focus on freedom of expression and assembly, the functioning of civil society, minority rights, combating racism and xenophobia and the rights of children and women, as well as the international human rights obligations of both the EU and Russia; however, regrets that the European Union has not succeeded in bringing about any change of policy in Russia, particularly with regard to impunity and the independence of the judiciary, the treatment of human rights defenders and political prisoners including Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the independence of the media and freedom of expression, the treatment of ethnic and religious minorities, respect for the rule of law and human rights protection in the armed forces, discrimination based on sexual orientation as well as other issues; refers to its resolution of 19 June 2008 on the EU- Russia Summit of 26-27 June 2008 in Khanty-Mansiysk ; expresses once again its concerns at the deteriorating situation of human rights defenders and the difficulties faced by NGOs with regard to their registration and in carrying out their
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78. Regrets the lack of results from the European Union-Russia consultations on human rights; regrets that the Russian authorities declined to participate in any of
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 a (new) 78a. Strongly deplores the recent military escalation in Gaza and, in particular, the heavy bombardment of that densely populated land and the fact that civilian and UN targets have been hit during the attacks; regrets the further deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Gaza, expressing at the same time its unconditional sympathy for the civilian population in southern Israel; urges all parties to fully implement the UN Security Council resolution 1860 with a view to securing a permanent ceasefire; takes note of the statement made by UNSG Ban Ki-moon to the Security Council on 21 January 2009, underlining the urgent need for international humanitarian law to be fully respected and for civilians to be protected, making it clear at the same time that "there should be thorough investigations, full explanations, and, where it is required, accountability"; welcomes in this regard the commitment of the External Relations Council of 27 January 2009 to follow those investigations closely;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Urges the Council and the Commission to set up human rights subcommittees with all neighbourhood countries, and in particular with Israel,
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 79. Urges the Council and the Commission to set up human rights subcommittees with all neighbourhood countries, and in particular with Israel,
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Recognises the second round of the EU-Uzbekistan human rights dialogue, which took place on 5 June 2008; notes the seminar on media freedom, held in Tashkent on 2 and 3 October 2008; however, considers that the seminar failed to achieve its aim of providing an open discussion on the human rights violations and freedom of the media in Uzbekistan, as was originally intended; notes the continuing absence of an independent international inquiry into the Andijan massacre and the lack of any improvement in the human rights situation in Uzbekistan; welcomes the release of two human rights defenders, Dilmurod Mukhiddinov and Mamarajab Nazarov; condemns the holding of at least 11 human rights defenders and independent journalists in prison on politically motivated charges and urges the Uzbek authorities to release all human rights defenders and other political prisoners; reiterates its deep concern at the imprisonment of Salijon Abdurakhmanov, an independent journalist, and Agzam Turgunov, a human rights activist; welcomes the Council's Conclusions of 13 October 2008 on Uzbekistan; urges the Uzbek authorities to accept the accreditation of the new Country Director of Human Rights Watch and to allow that organisation and other international organisations and NGOs to operate without hindrance; asks Uzbekistan to cooperate fully and effectively with the UN Special Rapporteurs on torture and on freedom of
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Council and Commission to make greater efforts to disseminate their annual report on human rights and ensure it reaches as large a public as possible; also calls for public information campaigns aimed at raising the EU's profile in this field;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 80. Recognises the second round of the EU-Uzbekistan human rights dialogue, which took place on 5 June 2008; notes the seminar on media freedom, held in Tashkent on 2 and 3 October 2008; however, considers that the seminar failed to achieve its aim of providing an open discussion on the human rights violations and freedom of the media in Uzbekistan, as was originally intended; notes the continuing absence of an independent
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 81 81. Welcomes the fact that the European Union and Turkmenistan held the first round of the human rights dialogue in July 2008; welcomes the raising of concerns about the human rights situation in Turkmenistan, particularly regarding freedom of opinion and assembly, the independence of the judiciary and the functioning of civil society; refers to its resolution of 20 February 2008 on an EU Strategy for Central Asia
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 83 83. Notes the importance of both Turkey's and the EU's commitment to Turkey's accession process for the ongoing human rights reforms in Turkey; considers as a positive step towards freedom of speech in Turkey the decision of the government to permit the broadcasting of Kurdish television; regrets, however, the fact that the use of the Kurdish language is still banned in parliament and in political campaigning; reiterates that further legislative reforms are needed in order to ensure respect for and protection of minorities and full freedom of expression, in law and in practice, in line with the European Convention on Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights; notes with concern that no progress has been made as regards ratification of human rights instruments, in particular the OPCAT, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Additional Protocol Nos 4, 7 and 12 to the European Convention on Human Rights;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 85. Welcomes the Council's proposals for launching human rights dialogues with a number of Latin American countries; stresses the desirability of including the countries of Central America; notes the signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) by the Cuban government in February 2008; calls for those Covenants to be ratified without any reservations; asks the Cuban government to release all political prisoners and to honour the rights protected in the signed treaties; notes the Council's decision of 20 June 2008 to lift the informal sanctions with regard to Cuba; notes that the Council will decide in 2009 whether to pursue the political dialogue with Cuba depending on whether or not there have been significant improvements as regards human rights;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 86 86.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 86 a (new) 86a. Expresses its concern about the lack of progress in the human rights situation in Burma, especially in view of the upcoming elections scheduled for 2010; condemns the recent arrests and convictions after show trials of more than one hundred members of the Burmese opposition, and the draconian sentences they received; urges the Burmese government to release all political prisoners immediately; considers that Parliament should send a heavyweight mission to Burma, seeing that the current human rights situation is still not improving despite all sanctions and international pressure on the Burmese regime has to be reinforced;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 106 106. Underlines
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 107 Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 108 108. Calls on the Co
source: PE-419.926
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE416.698New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE416.698 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.926New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE419.926 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0264_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0264_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090506&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090506&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-264&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0264_EN.html |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-264&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0264_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-385New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0385_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/6/71257New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2008 and the European Union's policy on the matterNew
Annual report on human rights in the world 2008 and the European Union's policy on the matter |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|