Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL José Manuel (PPE) | |
Opinion | JURI | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna (S&D) |
Legal Basis TFEU 113
Activites
-
2010/10/12
Final act published in Official Journal
- #3034
-
2010/10/07
Council Meeting
-
2010/10/07
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2010/10/07
Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
- #3020
-
2010/06/08
Council Meeting
-
2010/05/05
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T7-0091/2010
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 539 votes to 11, with 75 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the consultation procedure, the proposal for a Council regulation on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (Recast).The main amendments were as follows:Processing of personal data: in light of the European Data Protection Supervisor’s opinion of 30 October 2009, Members consider that the processing of personal data is only acceptable if it is necessary for achieving the objectives of the regulation. Within the framework of application of this Regulation, the Member States and the Commission shall ensure respect for the rights and obligations laid down in Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data. Parliament stipulates that the processing of personal data shall only be allowed with the sole aim of ensuring that there is no breach of the VAT legislation and where it is deemed necessary in order to monitor intra-Union purchases of goods or provisions of services which are subject to taxation in the Member State concerned. In addition, it proposes limiting the risks associated with automatic access to databases which could include personal data.A new recital stresses that in obtaining such automatic access to non-sensitive data, an appropriate level of protection, a limited storage period of the data exchanged and due accountability of the data keeper institution or body, in order to prevent mismanagement or leakage of data, should be ensured.The guarantees contained in the EU legislation on data protection also apply to relations with third countries.Feedback: Members consider that a more explicit procedure for the reporting on the quality of information exchanged in feedback is required. The aim is to improve quality of feedback provided by an authority, rather than increasing the administrative burden.Eurofisc: the amendments aim to clarify the fact that Eurofisc will operate on the basis of an EU-wide approach and to specify the Commission's role in its operations. It shall be made up of officials appointed by the competent authorities of the Member States. According to Members, Eurofisc should have an open and transparent structure and it should therefore be made clear that not only the administrative committee set up by the Commission is to have the right to examine its reports but also the Member States and the European Parliament.The European Parliament recalls that in its resolution of 4 December 2008 it called for the introduction of Eurofisc and recalled the paramount necessity for sharing existing national best practices in the fight against cross-border VAT fraud with a view to introducing both appropriate incentives for due diligence by Member States in relation to VAT, and rewards for honest taxpayers.Inventive mechanism: in order to investigate VAT fraud with more efficiency in the Union, Members propose an incentive mechanism which shall be designed for the recovery of cross-border tax claims by distributing a fair proportion of the collected unpaid VAT between the Member State recovering the tax claims and the requesting Member State.Administrative cooperation: the Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission shall examine and evaluate how the arrangements for administrative cooperation provided for in this Regulation are working. In particular, the Member States shall conduct audits of the operation of those arrangements. The Commission shall pool the Member States' experience with the aim of improving the operation of those arrangements and shall regularly report to the Member States and the European Parliament on the results. It is important that the Commission should be responsible for providing assistance and expert opinions to help the Member States to attain the objectives.Exchange of information: it is desirable for Member States to exchange and receive data reports of the highest possible quality, and these should meet with standards for transparency. With a view to improving the exchange of information between the various national authorities, it is proposed to monitor cases where a Member State has refused to transmit information or has failed to authorise an administrative inquiry.European Data Protection Supervisor: where the implementing provisions of this regulation are liable to affect the processing of personal data, it will be desirable to obtain the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
- 2010/03/25 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
2010/03/17
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2009/10/07
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2009/08/18
Legislative proposal published
-
COM(2009)0427
summary
PURPOSE: to recast Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax, with a view to giving Member States the means to combat cross‑border VAT fraud more effectively.PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.BACKGROUND: the Council has repeatedly stressed the need for a common approach to combating tax fraud, and in particular VAT fraud, to supplement and support national efforts. At present, administrative cooperation in the field of VAT is governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003.In May 2006, the Commission adopted a Communication concerning the need to develop a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud. On 1 December 2008, it adopted a Communication (COM(2008)0807) establishing a short-term action programme for the introduction of legislative measures which would strengthen the tax authorities’ capacity to prevent and detect VAT fraud (in particular, “carousel” fraud) as well as to recover taxes in the event of fraud. Several of the measures set out in that action programme are included in this proposal.In its resolution of 2 September 2008 on a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud, the European Parliament stressed that the Member States cannot combat cross‑border fraud in isolation and called on the Commission to propose mechanisms to promote cooperation between Member States. In particular, it invited the Commission to submit proposals on the automated access by all other Member States to certain non-sensitive data held by Member States concerning their own taxable persons (business sector, certain data concerning turnover), and on the harmonisation of the procedures for the registration and de‑registration of persons liable for VAT to ensure the swift detection and de-registration of fake taxable persons. It stressed that Member States must take responsibility for keeping their data up to date, in particular as regards de‑registration and the detection of fraudulent registrations. This proposal covers these points.IMPACT ASSESSMENT: this proposal concerns exchanges between tax authorities and will have no impact on economic operators. Thus, it has not been the subject of a formal impact assessment. The consequences of this proposal will affect Member States' tax authorities. The Member States are in a better position than the Commission to evaluate its precise impact.CONTENT: as part of the coordinated strategy to improve the fight against VAT fraud, the purpose of this proposal is to recast Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax. The most important changes are as follows:Eurofisc: the proposal provides for the establishment of a common structure (Eurofisc) which will provide a faster cooperation mechanism for dealing with very large-scale or new fraud patterns. This structure will make possible multilateral, swift and targeted exchange of information so that Member States can respond adequately and in a coordinated fashion to combat any new kinds of fraud that emerge. It will be able to draw on jointly organised risk analysis.Joint responsibility for the protection of tax receipts: the proposal provides that Member States' responsibility in the field of administrative cooperation is extended to protect the VAT revenue of all Member States.Direct access to databases: tax authorities store a large amount of information regarding their own taxpayers in their databases. Rapid access to this information can be very useful to other Member States in order to detect cross-border fraud schemes. The proposal grants tax authorities of other Member States a direct access to a defined set of information contained in these databases.Quality of data: the proposal establishes a framework to guarantee the quality of the information in the databases by laying down common rules on the information to be collected and the checks to be carried out when a VAT identification number is registered in the database. The Regulation specifies the cases in which certain information must be deleted from the databases. It also includes provisions under which Member States are mutually responsible for any erroneous information in their databases or failures to update such information in good time.Information to taxpayers: in order to prevent them from being caught involuntarily in fraud schemes, taxpayers will benefit from an enhanced and secure system of validation of their counterparts' VAT number and identity. Users are also given guarantees concerning the reliability and use of such information.Note that the proposal leaves the following elements of Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 unchanged:the organisation of the departments responsible for administrative cooperation in the Member States; the mechanism for requesting information and specific enquiries; the request for administrative notification; the principle of officials being present in the administrative departments of another Member State and at simultaneous controls; the provisions on services supplied by electronic means and telecommunications and radio broadcasting services; the provisions on the refund of VAT to taxable persons established in another Member State; the principle of the provisions on relations with third countries;the limitations on some of the rights and obligations provided for in Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the Community budget.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Taxation and Customs Union'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas
-
COM(2009)0427
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0427
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0061/2010
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0091/2010
Amendments | Dossier |
17 |
2009/0118(CNS)
2010/01/29
ECON
17 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Tax evasion and tax avoidance extending across the frontiers of Member States lead to budget losses and violations of the principle of fair taxation and are liable to bring about distortions of capital movements and of the conditions of competition. They therefore negatively affect the operation of the internal market.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The European Parliament, in its resolution of 2 September 2008 on a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud, stressed once again that the existing system for managing VAT needs a radical overhaul and urged the Commission to submit proposals to harmonise the registration and de- registration procedures for taxable persons and to allow Member States automatic access to non-sensitive data on their taxpayers, which is held by another Member State. In obtaining such access, an appropriate level of protection and limited storage period of the data exchanged and due accountability of the data keeper institution or body, in order to prevent the mismanagement or leakage of the data, should be ensured.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of 4 December 2008 on the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 8/2007 concerning administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax, called for the introduction of Eurofisc and recalled the paramount necessity for sharing existing national best practices in the fight against cross-border VAT fraud with a view to introducing both appropriate incentives for VAT due diligence by Member States, and rewards for honest taxpayers.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In view of the repetitive nature of certain requests and the linguistic diversity within the Community, it is important to spread and promote the use of standard forms in the exchange of information so that information requests can be processed more quickly.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The conditions for the exchange of, and automated access of Member States to electronically stored data in each Member State and the means of storage of such data should be clearly defined.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The persons referred to in point (b) shall be invited to give their opinion on the quality of the information held.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 3 3. The list and details of the data referred to in paragraph 1(b), (c), (d) and (
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 2 2. The competent authorities of the Member States shall determine the fields of investigation to be covered by
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 3 a (new) In order to investigate the VAT frauds with more efficiency in the Union, an incentive mechanism shall be designed for the recovery of cross-border tax claims by distributing a fair proportion of the collected unpaid VAT between the Member State recovering the tax claims and the requesting Member State.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 The
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 The structure established under Article 34 shall be made up of competent officials designated by the competent authorities of the Member States. It shall be provided with technical, administrative and operational support by the Commission, with the aim of enhancing the exchange of best practices in the fight against VAT fraud and the implementation of an incentive system to promote tax compliance.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 The structure established under Article 34 shall submit an annual account of its activities to the Member States, the European Parliament and the Committee referred to in Article 60.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. The Member States
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 2. The Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the European Parliament any available information relevant to their application of this Regulation.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 9 9. The Commission
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) ensure the highest standard of quality of the data exchanged, with the highest degree of transparency, where appropriate.
source: PE-438.380
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/9/docs |
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|