2009/0139(CNS) | [ParlTrack]

Changes: 2023/08/03links.National_parliaments.url, docs.docs.url, 2021/12/18procedure.Modified_legal_basis, events, docs.docs.url, events.docs.url, events.type, procedure.Other_legal_basis, 2020/01/19docs.body, committees, events.docs.url, docs.docs.url, 2019/07/06council, procedure.instrument, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, events, procedure.final.url, procedure.subject, activities, docs, committees, other, commission, procedure.title, procedure.summary, 2015/11/04links.European_Commission.title

View current state | View Changes for this date

Procedure completed

2009/0139(CNS) Value added tax (VAT): application of the reverse charge mechanism to supplies of certain services suspectible to fraud

Role	Committee	Rapporteur	Shadows
Lead	ECON	CASA David (PPE)

Lead committee dossier: ECON/7/01137
Legal Basis TFEU 113

Subjects

Links

Activites

2010/03/20 Final act published in Official Journal
- Directive 2010/23
- OJ L 072 20.03.2010, p. 0001
#3003
2010/03/16 Council Meeting
2010/03/16 End of procedure in Parliament
2010/03/16 Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2010/02/10 Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
- T7-0011/2010 summary
  
  The European Parliament adopted by 506 votes to 26, with 9 abstentions a legislative resolution amending, under the consultation procedure, the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards an optional and temporary application of the reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud. The main amendments were as follows: Taxable persons: according to MEPs, it should be made clearer that the application of the optional reverse-charge mechanism shall only target business to business relationship involving taxable persons. The person to pay the tax shall never be the final consumer but rather the last business trader within the chain of commerce. Greenhouse gas emission trading allowances: when choosing which goods and services shall be subject to that mechanism, Member States shall select trading greenhouse emission trading allowances and a maximum of two of the categories of goods listed in Part A of Annex VI A. Communication of information and reporting obligations: to reduce the possibility of fraud being committed, the reporting has to take place on a periodical basis so that the authorities are enabled to supervise the movement of goods and services. Reporting obligation for suppliers on a global transaction basis should be permitted in order to minimise the burden for business. Inspections: control measures to monitor and mitigate current forms of fraud should be accompanied by already existing unannounced inspections. Effect of the application of the reverse-charge mechanism on fraudulent activities: with a view to ensuring uniform application, the Commission should be empowered to adopt measures designed to specify, on the basis of input by the Member States and taking into account the advice of the VAT Committee, the evaluation criteria that will be used by Member States when assessing the effect of the application of the reverse-charge mechanism on fraudulent activities. Such criteria should be established by the Commission by 30 June 2010. Report: by 1 July 2014, the Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals, on the basis of the Member States' evaluation reports, assessing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the measure applying the mechanism and the cost-benefit ratio of the measure in order to re-evaluate whether an extension or a widening of its scope would be appropriate.
2010/02/08 Debate in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament
2010/02/02 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- A7-0008/2010
2010/01/27 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
#2981
2009/12/02 Council Meeting
- 2981 summary
  
  The Council agreed on a general approach, pending the opinion of the European Parliament, on a draft directive that would allow Member States to implement, on an optional and temporary basis, a reversal of liability for the payment of VAT (value-added tax) on greenhouse gas emission allowances.The aim is to close off certain forms of tax fraud, in particular so-called carousel schemes whereby supplies are traded several times by different suppliers without VAT being paid to the tax authorities. Applying a "reverse charge" principle, the draft directive would allow, until 30 June 2015, liability for the payment of VAT on emission allowances and services to be shifted from the supplier (as normally required by EU rules) to the customer.The Council will continue to work on other elements of the proposal as regards the application of the reverse charge mechanism to mobile phones and electronic circuit devices with a view to reaching an agreement as soon as possible. Pending agreement on the proposal, in the event of a justified request by a member state according to article 395 of the VAT directive (2006/112/EC) for the application of the reverse charge mechanism to mobile phones and electronic circuit devices, the Commission declared that it would present a proposal for a derogation before June 2010.Member states that are at present authorised to apply the reverse charge mechanism to mobile phones and electronic circuit devices will be allowed to continue to apply that arrangement until agreement is reached on a new decision or directive.
2009/10/07 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2009/09/29 Legislative proposal published
- COM(2009)0511 summary
  
  PURPOSE: to allow the temporary application of the reverse charge mechanism to combat VAT fraud in relation to trade with emission certificates and to transactions involving certain fraud-sensitive goods, and amending Council Directive 2006/112/EC.PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.BACKGROUND: fraud is a major concern for the correct functioning of the Internal Market and poses a threat to Member States' tax revenues. Certain Member States have requested, by means of a derogation granted on the basis of Article 395 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (“the VAT Directive”) a targeted reverse charge system in relation to a particular fraud sensitive sector or to certain goods in order to combat fraud. The most common form of evasion consists in invoicing supplies by a VAT registered supplier who disappears without accounting for this VAT but leaving the customer (also a taxable person) with a valid invoice for deduction. This means that the treasury does not receive VAT on the supply, but must give the next trader in the chain credit for input VAT. This has, in certain cases, developed into Missing Trader Intra-Community Fraud (MTIC) which is an organised attack on the VAT system. The supplier receives credit for the input VAT through a refund of VAT when his onward supply to a taxable person in another Member State is exempt. In addition, such frauds are often organised in a series of supplies in which the same goods may circulate several times between Member States (“carousel fraud”) and the treasury may loose several times the amount of tax on single goods. It is to be noted that this type of fraud is extending to services as well. The reverse charge mechanism results in no VAT being charged by the supplier to taxable customers who, in turn, become liable for the payment of the VAT. In practice, customers (insofar as they are normal taxable persons with a full right of deduction) would declare and deduct at the same time without effective payment to the treasury. In this sense, the theoretical possibility of committing fraud is removed.CONTENT: the purpose of this proposal is to allow the temporary application of the reverse charge mechanism to combat existing fraud in relation to trade with emission certificates and to transactions involving certain fraud-sensitive goods. The application of a targeted reverse charge mechanism should, however, not alter the fundamental principles of the VAT system, such as the fractionated payment, and should therefore be restricted to a pre-defined list of goods and services.Member States will have the option of applying this targeted reverse charge mechanism to a prescribed list of goods and services which have been identified by Member States themselves as sensitive to fraud. The proposal concentrates on the following areas:1) the Commission has some information on alleged cases of fraud in the area of trading greenhouse emission allowances. The differences in individual Member States responses have prompted the Commission to prepare this proposal. Although further analysis is still required as regards the precise circumstances and the actual dimension of the fraud problem, the information already provided by several Member States is such that it is appropriate to take swift action and include it in this proposal. Accordingly, included in the scope of the proposal are allowances to emit greenhouse gases as defined in Article 3 of Directive 2003/87/EC, transferable in accordance with Article 12 of that Directive, and other allowance units that may be used by operators for compliance with the same Directive;2) mobile telephones and integrated circuit devices have also been included in the scope of the proposal. Member States should produce an evaluation report on the application of the mechanism before the end of the application period so as to enable a timely assessment of its efficiency;3) perfume, and precious metals where they are not covered by the special arrangements for second-hand goods, works of art, collector's items and antiques pursuant to Articles 311 to 343 or the special scheme for investment gold pursuant to Articles 344 to 356 are included in the scope of the draft Directive. In procedural terms, Member States should first inform the Commission about their intention to introduce the mechanism. The experimental application of a targeted reverse charge must be subject to detailed conditions so as to guarantee the functioning of the scheme, avoid potential negative impacts as far as possible and allow for a proper evaluation of the results. Before applying this reverse charge scheme, the taxable persons who will be affected by the application of this scheme, as a supplier or as a customer, must be identified for VAT purposes under an individual number. It is furthermore stipulated that the Member States concerned have to introduce reporting obligations in order to guarantee a sufficient follow-up of the measure in order to ensure that the measure is operating effectively. Moreover, to ensure that the application of reverse charge remains targeted and exceptional to the normal VAT rules, the goods and services have been listed and each Member State may choose to apply a reverse charge mechanism to a maximum of three categories of which two can be goods.The interested Member States should implement effective control measures to monitor and to avoid, as much as possible, all forms of fraud and in particular new forms of fraud which would consist in the spilling over of fraud patterns to other products, to the retail level or to other Member States. For the implementation of these measures, it would be recommendable that the findings on the reverse charge mechanism, as described in the Commission document on measures to change the VAT system to fight fraud (see SEC(2008)0249, would be taken into consideration.The experiences stemming from this temporary application of the scheme to fraud sensitive goods or services should allow, on the basis of an information and evaluation procedure as set out in the proposal, a better overall assessment of the usefulness and the proportionality of the targeted application of reverse charge.Lastly, the Directive will apply until 31 December 2014.BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no negative impact on the Community budget.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Taxation and Customs Union'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0511
Debate in Council: 2981
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0008/2010
Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0011/2010
: Directive 2010/23
: OJ L 072 20.03.2010, p. 0001

Amendments	Dossier
15	2009/0139(CNS) 2009/12/10 ECON 15 amendments... Amendment 11 # Olle LUDVIGSSON Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 7 (7) In order to assess the effect of the application of the mechanism on fraudulent activities in a transparent manner, evaluation reports by Member States should be based on pre-defined criteria ~~established by Member States~~. With a view to ensuring uniform application, the Commission should be empowered to adopt measures designed to specify, taking into account the advice of the VAT Committee, the evaluation criteria that will be used by Member States when assessing the effect of the application of the reverse-charge mechanism on fraudulent activities. Such criteria should be established by the Commission by June 2010. Any such evaluation should clearly assess the level of fraud before and after the application of the mechanism and any shifts in trends of fraudulent activities, including supplies of other goods and services, supplies at the retail level and supplies in other Member States. Amendment 12 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 8 (8) The report should also evaluate compliance costs for taxable persons and implementation costs incurred by Member States, including those entailed by control and audit measures as well as possible changes in VAT revenues arising from the mechanism with regard to the goods and services listed in Annex VIA, selected and applied by the respective Member States. Amendment 13 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 8 a (new) (8a) By June 2014, the Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals on the basis of the Member States' evaluation reports, assessing the cost-benefit ratio of the measure in order to re-evaluate whether an extension or widening of its scope would be reasonable. Amendment 14 # Olle LUDVIGSSON Proposal for a directive – amending act Recital 8 a (new) (8a) By July 2014, the Commission should submit an impact assessment to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals, on the basis of the Member States' evaluation reports, assessing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the measure applying the mechanism. Amendment 15 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 2 – point c (c) impose periodical transaction-based or global reporting obligations on any taxable person receiving goods or services to which that mechanism applies for cross- checking purposes against information submitted by the supplier; Amendment 16 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) impose specific data-based obligation reports on any taxable person receiving goods or services to which that mechanism applies to clarify whether those goods and services are used for usual business purposes or for other purposes. Amendment 17 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 2 – point d (d) introduce appropriate and effective control measures accompanied by already existing unannounced inspections to monitor and mitigate current forms of fraud, as well as to prevent the emergence of fraudulent activities in respect of other goods or services at the retail level or in other Member States. Amendment 18 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) ensure that suppliers are not liable in cases of fraud by the customer or purchaser, insofar as they have properly fulfilled their reporting obligation. Amendment 19 # Olle LUDVIGSSON Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The evaluation criteria referred to in paragraph 3(b) shall be defined by the Commission after consulting the VAT Committee. Amendment 20 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 4 – point f a (new) (fa) possible changes in VAT revenues arising from the mechanism with regard to the goods and services listed in Annex VIA, selected and applied by the respective Member States. Amendment 21 # Wolf KLINZ Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. By July 2014, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals on the basis of the Member States' reports referred to in paragraph 4, assessing the cost-benefit ratio of the measure in order to re- evaluate whether an extension or widening of its scope is appropriate. Amendment 22 # Olle LUDVIGSSON Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Directive 2006/112/EC Article 199a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. By July 2014, the Commission shall submit an impact assessment to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals on the basis of the Member States' reports referred to in paragraph 4, assessing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the measure applying the mechanism. Amendment 23 # Enikő GYŐRI Proposal for a directive – amending act Article 2 a (new) Article 2a Member States that decide to introduce the reverse-charge mechanism to certain categories of goods and service provided for in Annex VIA may establish a threshold above which VAT is to be charged reversely to the categories concerned. Amendment 24 # Hans-Peter MARTIN Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex Directive 2006/112/EC Annex VIA – point 2 a (new) (2a) computers, notebooks, printers and scanners; Amendment 25 # Enikő GYŐRI Proposal for a directive – amending act Annex Directive 2006/112/EC Annex VIA – point 4 a (new) (4a) personal computers and related information technology products. source: PE-430.935

Amendments

Dossier

2009/0139(CNS)

2009/12/10 ECON 15 amendments...

Amendment 11 #

Olle LUDVIGSSON

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 7

(7) In order to assess the effect of the application of the mechanism on fraudulent activities in a transparent manner, evaluation reports by Member States should be based on pre-defined criteria ~~established by Member States~~. With a view to ensuring uniform application, the Commission should be empowered to adopt measures designed to specify, taking into account the advice of the VAT Committee, the evaluation criteria that will be used by Member States when assessing the effect of the application of the reverse-charge mechanism on fraudulent activities. Such criteria should be established by the Commission by June 2010. Any such evaluation should clearly assess the level of fraud before and after the application of the mechanism and any shifts in trends of fraudulent activities, including supplies of other goods and services, supplies at the retail level and supplies in other Member States.

Amendment 12 #

Wolf KLINZ

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 8

(8) The report should also evaluate compliance costs for taxable persons and implementation costs incurred by Member States, including those entailed by control and audit measures as well as possible changes in VAT revenues arising from the mechanism with regard to the goods and services listed in Annex VIA, selected and applied by the respective Member States.

Amendment 13 #

Wolf KLINZ

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 8 a (new)

(8a) By June 2014, the Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals on the basis of the Member States' evaluation reports, assessing the cost-benefit ratio of the measure in order to re-evaluate whether an extension or widening of its scope would be reasonable.

Amendment 14 #

Olle LUDVIGSSON

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 8 a (new)

(8a) By July 2014, the Commission should submit an impact assessment to the European Parliament and the Council together with appropriate proposals, on the basis of the Member States' evaluation reports, assessing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the measure applying the mechanism.

Amendment 15 #

Wolf KLINZ