Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | HARMS Rebecca ( Verts/ALE) | URUTCHEV Vladimir ( PPE), KALFIN Ivailo ( S&D), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad ( ECR), TZAVELA Niki ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | PARVANOVA Antonyia ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 203
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 203Events
The Commission presents a report on the use of financial resources provided to Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria to support the decommissioning of early shut-down nuclear power-plants under the Acts of Accession. The report assesses the implementation status of EU financial assistance, particularly covering the implementation of the decommissioning programme during the period 2004 – 2009. It also considers financial assistance from the preceding period and recent progress made in 2010 in order to provide a consistent and comprehensive picture.
It recalls that the EU assistance programme is dedicated to the following NPPs:
Ignalina NPP (INPP) units 1 and 2 in Lithuania. Bohunice V1 NPP (V1 NPP) units 1 and 2 in Slovakia and Kozloduy NPP (KNPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria.
All designated nuclear units in Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria have been safely shut down in line with their Accession Agreements. Decommissioning works are currently ongoing. This situation has been achieved as a direct consequence of the successful implementation of the EU assistance programme, which have faced a variety of difficulties, at both the political and technical level. Considerable efforts were taken by Member States to renegotiate their political commitments, however through the EU`s expression of solidarity and the provision of appropriate financial assistance all countries respected their Accession Treaty commitments to shut down their reactor units.
The boundary conditions for each country are unique and impact upon the choice of technology, strategy and reasoning associated with the selection of projects. Therefore it is difficult to present a direct comparison of the effectiveness of the EU assistance provided to each Member State. An assessment of the needs and capabilities was undertaken prior to the instigation of projects at each NPP. Identification and implementation of projects also benefited from a regular re-evaluation of the national strategies and decommissioning plans.
Lithuania-Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut down on 31 December 2004, and unit 2 on 31 ecember 2009. The total EU assistance to Lithuania between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 1367 million.
The programme evolved within a difficult political climate. Up to 2009 Lithuania campaigned strongly to postpone the closure of unit 2 until 2012. The lack of commitment to closure impacted negatively on the progress towards decommissioning. Despite these difficulties, both units were finally shut down on schedule as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Today they are safely maintained, and are in a decommissioning phase. As of today the reactor core of unit 1 has been completely defueled. No electricity shortages or black-out were experienced following the closures. Considering this difficult background, the performance towards decommissioning can be considered as satisfactory. Although delays have been experienced in some of the decommissioning projects and have given rise to additional costs, these delays have not as yet had a direct impact on the critical path of the decommissioning. However, the project "slack" has been exhausted and significant efforts will be required in order to avoid major delays and additional cost increases.
Slovakia– Bohunice V1 Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut-down on 31 December 2006 and unit 2 on 31 December 2008. The total EU assistance to Slovakia between 1999 and 2013 is foreseen to be EUR 613 million.
Since the beginning of the programme several issues such as: the reorganisation of JAVYS (the state-owned organisation responsible for the post-shut down supervision and for the decommissioning of V1 NPP), communication difficulties between the parties; the gas crisis in early 2009 have contributed to the complexity of the programme implementation and delays in some projects. Despite these difficulties, both units were shut down on schedule, and have been safely maintained. They are now in the decommissioning phase. No electricity shortages were experienced following the closure. As such the overall performance can be considered satisfactory. Delays experienced in some projects might have a negative impact on issuance of decommissioning license (scheduled for mid 2011). The EU continues to monitor closely the progress towards the achievement of this key milestone.
Bulgaria – Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant : Units 1 and 2 were shut down on 31 December 2002 and units 3 and 4 were shut down on 31 December 2006. The total EU assistance to Bulgaria between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 867.78 million.
The decommissioning programme has progressed in a particularly unfavourable political context. In 2006 attempts were made to postpone the closures, and again, after 2006 to reopen the shutdown reactors. Despite these difficulties the overall performance of the programme can be considered satisfactory given that all units have been shut down as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Units 1&2 are entirely defueled, the dry spent fuel storage is close to completion and first dismantling works have started. Waste treatment and storage facilities are under implementation. No electricity black-out occurred following the closure of the reactor units.
The commitment of the current Bulgarian government, together with the separation of units 1&2 from 3&4 will support and impact positively on the timely progression of the decommissioning programme. A major benefit realised in relation to the EU assistance is the change in the decommissioning strategy from one of "deferred dismantling" to "immediate – continuous dismantling". This reduces the overall time for decommissioning and makes best use of available staff to execute dismantling works. This will have a positive impact on the overall costs for decommissioning. A substantial proportion of the funds have been allocated to energy projects to address consequences of the early-closure.
Conclusion: the scale of the problem encountered by each country was a function of the different reactor types to be decommissioned, the state of the existing infrastructure required to support the decommissioning and waste management challenges, the possibilities regarding replacing the lost electrical generating capacity, the regulatory and political environment and the choice of decommissioning strategy. Despite initial difficulties, the reactors were shut-down on schedule and the majority have been de-fueled as a first important step towards irreversible closure and decommissioning of the NPPs.
In each Member State the finances available for projects exceed the disbursements. The funds have been made available on an annual basis since 1999 at a time when Member States were not yet able to make full use of them. As a consequence, some funds have accumulated. More recently these funds have been utilised more effectively and efficiently and they will be fully absorbed within the next two years.
Significant progress has been demonstrated for the three programmes over the past years and up to the end of the reporting period with the majority of the decommissioning and energy-sector-related projects having been identified or prepared and with a significant proportion already under implementation.
In all countries the majority of funding was directed towards decommissioning and radioactive waste (RAW) management related projects. Lithuania and Bulgaria used a significant portion for spent fuel storage and waste management. Currently, the facilities necessary for decommissioning, treatment and storage of RAW and spent nuclear fuel are under construction, the licensing documentation is elaborated and first preparatory dismantling works have started. The energy sector has benefited where projects were in line with the EU and national energy policies. EU assistance was advanced from an early stage to the energy sector in order to address the loss of electricity generating capacity. This approach proved to be particularly beneficial and effective in the case of Bulgaria, in mitigating the effects of the recent energy and financial crises. Although delays occurred in some decommissioning projects, these are actively addressed to minimise their impact on the critical path of the decommissioning.
The countries' legal framework and management structures continue to be adapted taking into account the changes from electricity producing companies to decommissioning organisations.
Outlook: measures in the decommissioning and energy windows will continue up until the end of the financing perspective as guided by the strategies identified. Decommissioning related projects will be prioritised above energy related projects where funds are limited.
The use of the EU assistance within the decommissioning window will be focusing on the completion of the necessary infrastructure, RAW treatment, the realisation of the necessary decommissioning licenses and on dismantling. New decommissioning organisation and management structures will be instigated and reinforced to address the dismantling activities, while the execution of the dismantling works by plant staff continues.
Energy sector projects are well advanced. Actions in this area are currently considered to be sufficient. Although the final financial commitment will be made in 2013, the implementation of the works from these commitments will extend beyond this date. The aim of the EU assistance remains to provide assistance to the Member States rather than the full financing of the decommissioning or the full compensation of closure consequences. The assistance provided shall be complemented by adequate national resources.
PURPOSE: to lay down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution of EUR 300 to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (Euratom) No 647/2010 of the Council on financial assistance of the Union with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria (Kozloduy Programme).
BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations in 2005, Bulgaria agreed to the closure of Units 1 and 2 and Units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant by 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2006, respectively and to the subsequent decommissioning of those units. The EU expressed its willingness to continue to provide financial assistance up to 2009 as an extension of the pre-accession aid planned under the Phare programme in support of Bulgaria’s decommissioning efforts. The Union recognises the effort made and the good progress achieved by Bulgaria in the decommissioning preparation stage of the Kozloduy Programme utilising the Union funds put in place until 2009, and the need for further financial support beyond 2009 in order to continue the progress with the actual dismantling operations.
CONTENT: this Regulation establishes a programme (the ‘Kozloduy Programme’) laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Union’s financial contribution to address the further process of the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria and the consequences of their early closure, with regard to the environment, the economy and the security of supply in the region.
Purpose of Community contribution : the Union contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for:
measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Plant, and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission the Plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in Bulgaria.
Financial contribution : the financial reference amount for the implementation of the Kozloduy Programme for the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 shall be EUR 300 million. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the Programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. Financial assistance for measures under the Kozloduy Programme shall be made available as a Union contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund, managed by the EBRD, in line with the Financial Regulation.
The contribution for certain measures may amount to up to 100 % of the total expenditure. However, every effort shall be made to continue the co-financing practice established under the pre- accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2009 for Bulgaria’s decommissioning effort as well as to attract co-financing from other sources, as appropriate.
Commission audit : the Commission may cause an audit of the use made of the assistance to be carried out, either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Union and the EBRD on making Union funds available to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund and for a period of 5 years from the date of payment of the balance. Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission. Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access needed in order to conduct such audits.
Evaluation: the Commission shall ensure the implementation of the Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council.
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11 August 2010.
The European Parliament adopted by 518 votes to 17 against with 73 abstentions a resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme'
Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited. They stress that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. Parliament reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23.
The main amendments are as follows:
Funding : new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site infrastructure may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4.
Purpose : the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries.
Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.
Audit : Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning.
Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.
Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament. The ex-post evaluation shall contain a complete and precise budget of the costs for decommissioning a nuclear power plant so as to plan for future decommissioning expenditure. It shall also analyse the economic, social and environmental costs, focusing on the impact of residual free-radiation and consequences for security of supply.
Compliance assessment : a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement.
Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria : in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions.
Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Rebecca HARMS (Greens/EFA, DE)) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme'.
Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : in this draft resolution, Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited and stresses that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. The committee reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23.
The main amendments are as follows:
Funding: new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of the Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4.
Purpose: the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries.
Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.
Audit: Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning.
Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.
Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament.
Compliance assessment: a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement. Members note that further to the Financial Regulation and Implementing Rules, the Commission is entitled to implement its budget by joint management with international organisations if these organisations apply standards which offer guarantees equivalent to internationally accepted standards, in, at least, their accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures.
Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria: in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions.
Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.
The Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
These changes had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the Lisbon Treaty.
In addition, some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of procedure .
The Lisbon Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure . The old "codecision procedure" was extended to new areas and renamed the "ordinary legislative procedure". A new "consent procedure" replaced the old "assent procedure". New interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international agreements.
The ongoing proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).
· In the case of the proposal for a Council Regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria “Kozloduy Programme”, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty had the following impacts :
· the proposal, which had previously fallen under the old consultation procedure (CNS), was classified as an interinstitutional non-legislative procedure (NLE).
PURPOSE: to establish the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution (€300 million) to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences of their closure in Bulgaria.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations, Bulgaria committed itself to the closure of Units 1 and 2 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant by 31 December 2002 and to the closure of Units 3 and 4 by 31 December 2006 at the latest. The 2005 Act of Accession provides, inter alia, for Community support under the Kozloduy Programme of €210 million for the period 2007 – 2009.
Initially a "deferred dismantling strategy" was chosen in 2001. However, the Bulgarian Government decided to change to an "immediate dismantling strategy" in 2006. The consequence of having changed the decommissioning strategy is that funding must be available much earlier.
This situation called for Community solidarity in response: the country has nuclear reactors for which early shutdown commitments were negotiated at the time of accession and included in the Act of Accession that entered into force on 1 January 2007.
The support to Bulgaria ends in 2009, whereas in the case of Lithuania and Slovakia the support runs until 2013. For equal treatment the proposed extension of support for Bulgaria shall cover the period 2010 – 2013.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable.
CONTENT: The main objective of this proposal is to extend the support to Bulgaria to accompany and to ascertain the safe maintenance and decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant units 1 - 4. It aims to establish the legal framework to enable Community support to be provided from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013.
Therein the specific objective is the advancement in the approved decommissioning plan. This includes the safe maintenance, the actual physical decommissioning and dismantling of the nuclear power plant – units 1 to 4 – as well as the waste treatment. At the same time it contributes to mitigate social/economic impacts of the early closure by continuously employing the staff from the closed nuclear power plant. This is important to maintain a sufficiently high safety standard after the closure.
In the non-nuclear window, security of supply needs to be assured after the shutdown, as well as sufficient replacement capacity for the closed down capacity.
The continuation of the financial support is vital to keep the safety up to the required standards. Safety could be compromised by losing the necessary expertise, an international best practice to use to a large extend own staff, a clear risk if no adequate funding is available over the next years to maintain this expertise and to progress with the dismantling works.
A €300 million financial envelope : to meet the above mentioned objectives and taking into consideration the absorption capacity evaluated in the light of the assistance given during the current period, a total Community contribution of additional €300 million will enable Bulgaria to progress in decommissioning and to mitigate the consequences of the early closure. The extension of financial support is of course related to the immediate dismantling of all four units. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.
The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with:
· the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant;
· measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant;
· other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria;
· enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in this country.
Implementation : as under the current support, the additional support will be committed through an annual Commission Decision on Financing fixing the amount of the annual contribution as well as the objectives of the use of the funds detailed in the annually updated Combined Programming Document annexed to the Commission Decision on Financing. The continuation of the current implementation route for the financial Community assistance would lead to an additional Community contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Funds administrated by the EBRD.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the specific budget line, 060505, has been created and is used for financing the international decommissioning support programmes under the Financial Perspective 2007-2013, specifically up to 2009 for Bulgaria. Financial assistance for the period 2010-2013 for Bulgaria should also be accommodated through this budget line. Accordingly the additional €300 million should be made available for the budget line 060505.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0432
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)0914
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2010/647
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 189 22.07.2010, p. 0009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)3805
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0188/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0142/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0142/2010
- Committee opinion: PE439.828
- Committee opinion: PE439.141
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.416
- Committee draft report: PE438.485
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)1431
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0581
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2009)1431 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE438.485
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.416
- Committee opinion: PE439.141
- Committee opinion: PE439.828
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0142/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)3805
- Follow-up document: COM(2011)0432 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)0914 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- Rebecca HARMS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- Antonyia PARVANOVA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- Dimitar STOYANOV
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria – ‘Kozloduy Programme’ (debate)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
- Ivailo KALFIN
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
- Franz OBERMAYR
- Justas Vincas PALECKIS
- Miloslav RANSDORF
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
- Michail TREMOPOULOS
- Vladimir URUTCHEV
Amendments | Dossier |
66 |
2009/0172(NLE)
2010/03/01
ENVI
26 amendments...
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The agreement to close Units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant ahead of schedule on safety grounds should be reflected in the earliest possible transfer of the irradiated fuel elements from the storage ponds of the two units to an external temporary storage facility.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The transfer at the earliest possible juncture of the irradiated fuel elements from the storage ponds in Units 3 and 4 to an external temporary storage facility is essential in order to make the closure of the two units irreversible on safety grounds, in keeping with the need to protect people and the environment.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) It is equally important to use the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant's own resources, as this contributes to the availability of the necessary expertise, enhances know-how and skills, and at the same time mitigates the social and economic impact of the early closure by continuously employing the staff from the closed nuclear power plant. The continued financial support is therefore important to maintain the required safety standard.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Union recognises also the need for financial support to progress further with mitigating measures in the energy sector given the extent of the capacity loss by the closure of the nuclear units and its impact on the security of supply in the region, with special emphasis on the need to increase energy efficiency and develop the renewable energy sector.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Mitigation measures to reduce the socio-economic impact of the closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 to 4, such as retraining programs for affected personnel to use their skills in other sectors, for example, industrial research or renewable energy, could require EU financial assistance.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The loss of generating capacity due to the early closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 to 4 has not led to a domestic shortage of electricity in Bulgaria. Consequently, an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, if any, can not be linked to the closure of these units.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme, and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund direct final storage arrangements and measures to develop the dry interim storage facilities which will be needed until final storage arrangements have been made.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and for the assistance towards achieving safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for 715 experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site infrastructure referred to as part of Project 4 may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4. The remaining EUR 120 million is intended to assist progress towards direct final disposal and more rapid expansion of capacity for the temporary dry storage which is required until final disposal.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Given the unresolved issue of final storage arrangements for irradiated fuel elements and radioactive waste, a problem which both Bulgaria and other Member States face, the Union has no choice but to provide financial support so that initial progress can be made in this area. In addition, the co-financing of final storage arrangements should make the reprocessing of irradiated fuel elements in Russia superfluous.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union. These appropriations should also be used to finance measures to compensate the loss of production capacity in line with the acquis.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In order to ensure the highest possible efficiency and to minimise possible environmental consequences, the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant should be carried out with recourse to the best available technical expertise, and with due regard to the nature and technological specifications of the units to be shut down.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The Kozloduy case should serve as an example; a complete and precise budget of decommissioning should be drawn up by the Commission for analysis and forecasting of costs of future decommissioning of nuclear power plants.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant,
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall monitor and may have an audit of the use made of the assistance carried out either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Community and the EBRD on making
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access, particularly to the beneficiary
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report
source: PE-439.326
2010/03/08
ITRE
37 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The Union recognises the effort made and the good progress achieved by Bulgaria in the decommissioning preparation stage of the Kozloduy Programme utilising the community funds put in place until 2009, and the need for further financial support beyond 2009 in order to continue the progress with the actual dismantling operations in accordance with the 2005 Accession Treaty, whilst applying the highest safety standards.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Union recognises also the need for financial support to progress further with mitigating measures in the energy sector given the extent of the capacity loss by the closure of the nuclear units and its impact on the security of supply
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Union recognises also the need for financial support as was the case with the other two Member States having prematurely to close down nuclear facilities in line with their Accession Treaties to progress further with mitigating measures in the energy sector given the extent of the capacity loss by the closure of the nuclear units and its impact on the security of supply in the region.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) The Union recognises also the ne
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The loss of generating capacity due to the early closure of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 to 4 has not led to a domestic shortage of electricity in Bulgaria. Consequently, an increase in greenhouse gas emissions, if any, cannot be linked to the closure of these units.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The Union recognises the need to mitigate the effect of increased environmental damage and emissions due to the replacement capacity coming mostly from increased use of lignite plants.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, recognising that the premature closure of these plants has prevented adequate allocation of decommissioning and radioactive waste treatment funds from operating profits, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and for assistance towards achieving safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the measures to mitigate the resultant consequences of the early closure of these units over the period from 2010 to 2013.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) Consequently, provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the European Union to fund the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013 and the energy sector’s needs, stemming from the capacity loss caused by the decommissioning.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) The contribution, as part of the Kozloduy Programme, to the financing of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility should be used solely for the storage of low-level and intermediate-level radioactive waste.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union. These appropriations should also be used to finance measures to compensate the loss of production capacity in line with the acquis, including modernisation and increase of the efficiency of existing energy production capacity, the transmission and distribution networks as well as enhancing energy savings and promoting the use of renewable energy.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union. These appropriations should also be used to finance measures to compensate the loss of production capacity in line with the acquis and the rules of the functioning of the internal market.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The appropriations of the general budget of the European Union for decommissioning should not lead to distortions of competition in relation to power supply companies on the energy market in the Union. These appropriations should also be used to finance measures to compensate the loss of production capacity in line with the acquis, with a focus on increasing energy efficiency.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The tasks of the EBRD include managing the public funds allocated to the programmes for decommissioning those nuclear power
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) In order to ensure the highest possible efficiency, the decommissioning of the Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant should be carried out with recourse to the best available technical expertise, and with due regard to the nature and technological specifications of the units t
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The decommissioning of
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The mitigation measures in the energy sector through energy efficiency and renewable energy should be supported by a specific Bulgarian national strategy.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 b (new) (12b) The economy, efficiency and effectiveness principles of the allocated funds can be ensured through evaluation and performance audits of the previously financed programmes.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the further process of the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences of their closure in Bulgaria (hereinafter referred to as ‘Kozloduy Programme’).
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 This Regulation establishes the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences of their early closure in Bulgaria (hereinafter referred to as ‘Kozloduy Programme’).
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the priority purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 The Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply and energy efficiency in Bulgaria.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial perspectives and according to the requirements of the decommissioning process.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 2. Measures under the Kozloduy Programme shall be adopted in accordance with Article 8(2). They shall comply with EU rules on public procurement. The contract-award criteria shall reflect a preference for EU companies.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may have an audit of the use made of the assistance carried out either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Community and the EBRD on making Community funds available to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund and for a period of five years from the date of payment of the balance. Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission. The funding of such audits and any other assessments will fall outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may have an audit of the use made of the assistance carried out either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Community and the EBRD on making Community funds available to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund in accordance with the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the International Energy Agency and for a period of five years from the date of payment of the balance. Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 The Court of Auditors and the European Parliament shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 a (new) Article 6a 1. Prior to the signature of the contribution agreements with the EBRD for the period 2010-2013, the Commission shall ensure the existence of a specific Bulgarian national strategy in the energy efficiency and renewable energy sector and assess it. In particular, in order to avoid double funding in the energy efficiency/renewable energy sector, it shall evaluate whether financing of short and long term objectives of the strategy have already been identified through Kozloduy International decommissioning Support Funds (KIDSF), Structural Funds or other European, national or international funds. 2. The European Commission shall perform in 2010 a specific ex-post evaluation of the Phare programme related to the closure of Kozloduy and of the projects financed up until 2009 under the EU Contribution to the KIDSF and managed by the EBRD. 3. The European Court of Auditors is invited to include in its 2010 annual programme a performance audit of the 2007-2009 EU Contribution of KIDSF.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 The Commission shall ensure the implementation of this Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council on the use of funds and the activities carried out. It shall carry out a mid-term review, as provided for in Article 3 (3).
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The 2005 Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union, and in particular Article 30 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the
source: PE-439.416
2010/03/22
BUDG
3 amendments...
Amendment 5 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Considers that the financial envelope indicated in the legislative proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework 2007-2013, but emphasises that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for the years 2011 -2013 is extremely limited; stresses that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes or any other initiatives under subheading 1a;
Amendment 6 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1b (new) 1b.Considers that the minimum levels of margins remaining in the MFF for the period 2011-2013 jeopardise the financing of other priorities; calls therefore for the immediate opening of negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority on the basis of the mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, particularly those provided for in points 21 to 23;
Amendment 7 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1c (new) 1c. Points out that the annual amount for the mentioned programme will be determined during the annual budgetary procedure in accordance with the provisions of point 38 of the IIA of 17 May 2006;
source: PE-439.953
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18333&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2009&number=0172&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2009&number=0172&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.485New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.485 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.416New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.416 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.141&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-439141_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.828&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-439828_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18333&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0914/COM_SEC(2011)0914_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0914/COM_SEC(2011)0914_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100519&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-188New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0188_EN.html |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0432/COM_COM(2011)0432_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0432/COM_COM(2011)0432_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/01478New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|