BETA


2009/0172(NLE) Nuclear safety: financial assistance to decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria, 'Kozloduy Programme'

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE HARMS Rebecca (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) URUTCHEV Vladimir (icon: PPE PPE), KALFIN Ivailo (icon: S&D S&D), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana (icon: ALDE ALDE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad (icon: ECR ECR), TZAVELA Niki (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion ENVI PARVANOVA Antonyia (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion BUDG TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 203

Events

2011/07/13
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the use of financial resources provided to Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria to support the decommissioning of early shut-down nuclear power-plants under the Acts of Accession. The report assesses the implementation status of EU financial assistance, particularly covering the implementation of the decommissioning programme during the period 2004 – 2009. It also considers financial assistance from the preceding period and recent progress made in 2010 in order to provide a consistent and comprehensive picture.

It recalls that the EU assistance programme is dedicated to the following NPPs:

Ignalina NPP (INPP) units 1 and 2 in Lithuania. Bohunice V1 NPP (V1 NPP) units 1 and 2 in Slovakia and Kozloduy NPP (KNPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria.

All designated nuclear units in Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria have been safely shut down in line with their Accession Agreements. Decommissioning works are currently ongoing. This situation has been achieved as a direct consequence of the successful implementation of the EU assistance programme, which have faced a variety of difficulties, at both the political and technical level. Considerable efforts were taken by Member States to renegotiate their political commitments, however through the EU`s expression of solidarity and the provision of appropriate financial assistance all countries respected their Accession Treaty commitments to shut down their reactor units.

The boundary conditions for each country are unique and impact upon the choice of technology, strategy and reasoning associated with the selection of projects. Therefore it is difficult to present a direct comparison of the effectiveness of the EU assistance provided to each Member State. An assessment of the needs and capabilities was undertaken prior to the instigation of projects at each NPP. Identification and implementation of projects also benefited from a regular re-evaluation of the national strategies and decommissioning plans.

Lithuania-Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut down on 31 December 2004, and unit 2 on 31 ecember 2009. The total EU assistance to Lithuania between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 1367 million.

The programme evolved within a difficult political climate. Up to 2009 Lithuania campaigned strongly to postpone the closure of unit 2 until 2012. The lack of commitment to closure impacted negatively on the progress towards decommissioning. Despite these difficulties, both units were finally shut down on schedule as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Today they are safely maintained, and are in a decommissioning phase. As of today the reactor core of unit 1 has been completely defueled. No electricity shortages or black-out were experienced following the closures. Considering this difficult background, the performance towards decommissioning can be considered as satisfactory. Although delays have been experienced in some of the decommissioning projects and have given rise to additional costs, these delays have not as yet had a direct impact on the critical path of the decommissioning. However, the project "slack" has been exhausted and significant efforts will be required in order to avoid major delays and additional cost increases.

Slovakia– Bohunice V1 Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut-down on 31 December 2006 and unit 2 on 31 December 2008. The total EU assistance to Slovakia between 1999 and 2013 is foreseen to be EUR 613 million.

Since the beginning of the programme several issues such as: the reorganisation of JAVYS (the state-owned organisation responsible for the post-shut down supervision and for the decommissioning of V1 NPP), communication difficulties between the parties; the gas crisis in early 2009 have contributed to the complexity of the programme implementation and delays in some projects. Despite these difficulties, both units were shut down on schedule, and have been safely maintained. They are now in the decommissioning phase. No electricity shortages were experienced following the closure. As such the overall performance can be considered satisfactory. Delays experienced in some projects might have a negative impact on issuance of decommissioning license (scheduled for mid 2011). The EU continues to monitor closely the progress towards the achievement of this key milestone.

Bulgaria – Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant : Units 1 and 2 were shut down on 31 December 2002 and units 3 and 4 were shut down on 31 December 2006. The total EU assistance to Bulgaria between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 867.78 million.

The decommissioning programme has progressed in a particularly unfavourable political context. In 2006 attempts were made to postpone the closures, and again, after 2006 to reopen the shutdown reactors. Despite these difficulties the overall performance of the programme can be considered satisfactory given that all units have been shut down as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Units 1&2 are entirely defueled, the dry spent fuel storage is close to completion and first dismantling works have started. Waste treatment and storage facilities are under implementation. No electricity black-out occurred following the closure of the reactor units.

The commitment of the current Bulgarian government, together with the separation of units 1&2 from 3&4 will support and impact positively on the timely progression of the decommissioning programme. A major benefit realised in relation to the EU assistance is the change in the decommissioning strategy from one of "deferred dismantling" to "immediate – continuous dismantling". This reduces the overall time for decommissioning and makes best use of available staff to execute dismantling works. This will have a positive impact on the overall costs for decommissioning. A substantial proportion of the funds have been allocated to energy projects to address consequences of the early-closure.

Conclusion: the scale of the problem encountered by each country was a function of the different reactor types to be decommissioned, the state of the existing infrastructure required to support the decommissioning and waste management challenges, the possibilities regarding replacing the lost electrical generating capacity, the regulatory and political environment and the choice of decommissioning strategy. Despite initial difficulties, the reactors were shut-down on schedule and the majority have been de-fueled as a first important step towards irreversible closure and decommissioning of the NPPs.

In each Member State the finances available for projects exceed the disbursements. The funds have been made available on an annual basis since 1999 at a time when Member States were not yet able to make full use of them. As a consequence, some funds have accumulated. More recently these funds have been utilised more effectively and efficiently and they will be fully absorbed within the next two years.

Significant progress has been demonstrated for the three programmes over the past years and up to the end of the reporting period with the majority of the decommissioning and energy-sector-related projects having been identified or prepared and with a significant proportion already under implementation.

In all countries the majority of funding was directed towards decommissioning and radioactive waste (RAW) management related projects. Lithuania and Bulgaria used a significant portion for spent fuel storage and waste management. Currently, the facilities necessary for decommissioning, treatment and storage of RAW and spent nuclear fuel are under construction, the licensing documentation is elaborated and first preparatory dismantling works have started. The energy sector has benefited where projects were in line with the EU and national energy policies. EU assistance was advanced from an early stage to the energy sector in order to address the loss of electricity generating capacity. This approach proved to be particularly beneficial and effective in the case of Bulgaria, in mitigating the effects of the recent energy and financial crises. Although delays occurred in some decommissioning projects, these are actively addressed to minimise their impact on the critical path of the decommissioning.

The countries' legal framework and management structures continue to be adapted taking into account the changes from electricity producing companies to decommissioning organisations.

Outlook: measures in the decommissioning and energy windows will continue up until the end of the financing perspective as guided by the strategies identified. Decommissioning related projects will be prioritised above energy related projects where funds are limited.

The use of the EU assistance within the decommissioning window will be focusing on the completion of the necessary infrastructure, RAW treatment, the realisation of the necessary decommissioning licenses and on dismantling. New decommissioning organisation and management structures will be instigated and reinforced to address the dismantling activities, while the execution of the dismantling works by plant staff continues.

Energy sector projects are well advanced. Actions in this area are currently considered to be sufficient. Although the final financial commitment will be made in 2013, the implementation of the works from these commitments will extend beyond this date. The aim of the EU assistance remains to provide assistance to the Member States rather than the full financing of the decommissioning or the full compensation of closure consequences. The assistance provided shall be complemented by adequate national resources.

2011/07/13
   EC - Follow-up document
2010/07/22
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to lay down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution of EUR 300 to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (Euratom) No 647/2010 of the Council on financial assistance of the Union with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria (Kozloduy Programme).

BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations in 2005, Bulgaria agreed to the closure of Units 1 and 2 and Units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant by 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2006, respectively and to the subsequent decommissioning of those units. The EU expressed its willingness to continue to provide financial assistance up to 2009 as an extension of the pre-accession aid planned under the Phare programme in support of Bulgaria’s decommissioning efforts. The Union recognises the effort made and the good progress achieved by Bulgaria in the decommissioning preparation stage of the Kozloduy Programme utilising the Union funds put in place until 2009, and the need for further financial support beyond 2009 in order to continue the progress with the actual dismantling operations.

CONTENT: this Regulation establishes a programme (the ‘Kozloduy Programme’) laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Union’s financial contribution to address the further process of the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria and the consequences of their early closure, with regard to the environment, the economy and the security of supply in the region.

Purpose of Community contribution : the Union contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for:

measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Plant, and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission the Plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in Bulgaria.

Financial contribution : the financial reference amount for the implementation of the Kozloduy Programme for the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 shall be EUR 300 million. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the Programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. Financial assistance for measures under the Kozloduy Programme shall be made available as a Union contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund, managed by the EBRD, in line with the Financial Regulation.

The contribution for certain measures may amount to up to 100 % of the total expenditure. However, every effort shall be made to continue the co-financing practice established under the pre- accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2009 for Bulgaria’s decommissioning effort as well as to attract co-financing from other sources, as appropriate.

Commission audit : the Commission may cause an audit of the use made of the assistance to be carried out, either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Union and the EBRD on making Union funds available to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund and for a period of 5 years from the date of payment of the balance. Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission. Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access needed in order to conduct such audits.

Evaluation: the Commission shall ensure the implementation of the Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council.

ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11 August 2010.

2010/07/13
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2010/07/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2010/07/13
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/06/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2010/05/20
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/05/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 518 votes to 17 against with 73 abstentions a resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme'

Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited. They stress that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. Parliament reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23.

The main amendments are as follows:

Funding : new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site infrastructure may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4.

Purpose : the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries.

Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.

Audit : Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning.

Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.

Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament. The ex-post evaluation shall contain a complete and precise budget of the costs for decommissioning a nuclear power plant so as to plan for future decommissioning expenditure. It shall also analyse the economic, social and environmental costs, focusing on the impact of residual free-radiation and consequences for security of supply.

Compliance assessment : a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement.

Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria : in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions.

Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.

Documents
2010/05/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2010/05/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/05/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/04/28
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Rebecca HARMS (Greens/EFA, DE)) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme'.

Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : in this draft resolution, Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited and stresses that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. The committee reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23.

The main amendments are as follows:

Funding: new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of the Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4.

Purpose: the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries.

Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.

Audit: Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning.

Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission.

Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament.

Compliance assessment: a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement. Members note that further to the Financial Regulation and Implementing Rules, the Commission is entitled to implement its budget by joint management with international organisations if these organisations apply standards which offer guarantees equivalent to internationally accepted standards, in, at least, their accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures.

Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria: in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions.

Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.

2010/04/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/04/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/03/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/02/04
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/02/02
   EP - PARVANOVA Antonyia (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2010/01/15
   EP - HARMS Rebecca (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2009/12/16
   EP - TRÜPEL Helga (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2009/12/02
   all - Additional information
Details

The Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

These changes had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the Lisbon Treaty.

In addition, some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of procedure .

The Lisbon Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure . The old "codecision procedure" was extended to new areas and renamed the "ordinary legislative procedure". A new "consent procedure" replaced the old "assent procedure". New interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international agreements.

The ongoing proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).

· In the case of the proposal for a Council Regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria “Kozloduy Programme”, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty had the following impacts :

· the proposal, which had previously fallen under the old consultation procedure (CNS), was classified as an interinstitutional non-legislative procedure (NLE).

2009/11/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2009/10/27
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2009/10/27
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution (€300 million) to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences of their closure in Bulgaria.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations, Bulgaria committed itself to the closure of Units 1 and 2 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant by 31 December 2002 and to the closure of Units 3 and 4 by 31 December 2006 at the latest. The 2005 Act of Accession provides, inter alia, for Community support under the Kozloduy Programme of €210 million for the period 2007 – 2009.

Initially a "deferred dismantling strategy" was chosen in 2001. However, the Bulgarian Government decided to change to an "immediate dismantling strategy" in 2006. The consequence of having changed the decommissioning strategy is that funding must be available much earlier.

This situation called for Community solidarity in response: the country has nuclear reactors for which early shutdown commitments were negotiated at the time of accession and included in the Act of Accession that entered into force on 1 January 2007.

The support to Bulgaria ends in 2009, whereas in the case of Lithuania and Slovakia the support runs until 2013. For equal treatment the proposed extension of support for Bulgaria shall cover the period 2010 – 2013.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable.

CONTENT: The main objective of this proposal is to extend the support to Bulgaria to accompany and to ascertain the safe maintenance and decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant units 1 - 4. It aims to establish the legal framework to enable Community support to be provided from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013.

Therein the specific objective is the advancement in the approved decommissioning plan. This includes the safe maintenance, the actual physical decommissioning and dismantling of the nuclear power plant – units 1 to 4 – as well as the waste treatment. At the same time it contributes to mitigate social/economic impacts of the early closure by continuously employing the staff from the closed nuclear power plant. This is important to maintain a sufficiently high safety standard after the closure.

In the non-nuclear window, security of supply needs to be assured after the shutdown, as well as sufficient replacement capacity for the closed down capacity.

The continuation of the financial support is vital to keep the safety up to the required standards. Safety could be compromised by losing the necessary expertise, an international best practice to use to a large extend own staff, a clear risk if no adequate funding is available over the next years to maintain this expertise and to progress with the dismantling works.

A €300 million financial envelope : to meet the above mentioned objectives and taking into consideration the absorption capacity evaluated in the light of the assistance given during the current period, a total Community contribution of additional €300 million will enable Bulgaria to progress in decommissioning and to mitigate the consequences of the early closure. The extension of financial support is of course related to the immediate dismantling of all four units. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity.

The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with:

· the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant;

· measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant;

· other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria;

· enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in this country.

Implementation : as under the current support, the additional support will be committed through an annual Commission Decision on Financing fixing the amount of the annual contribution as well as the objectives of the use of the funds detailed in the annually updated Combined Programming Document annexed to the Commission Decision on Financing. The continuation of the current implementation route for the financial Community assistance would lead to an additional Community contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Funds administrated by the EBRD.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the specific budget line, 060505, has been created and is used for financing the international decommissioning support programmes under the Financial Perspective 2007-2013, specifically up to 2009 for Bulgaria. Financial assistance for the period 2010-2013 for Bulgaria should also be accommodated through this budget line. Accordingly the additional €300 million should be made available for the budget line 060505.

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
66 2009/0172(NLE)
2010/03/01 ENVI 26 amendments...
source: PE-439.326
2010/03/08 ITRE 37 amendments...
source: PE-439.416
2010/03/22 BUDG 3 amendments...
source: PE-439.953

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18333&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2009&number=0172&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2009&number=0172&appLng=EN
committees/0/shadows/4
name
RANSDORF Miloslav
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.485
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.485
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.416
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.416
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.141&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-439141_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.828&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-439828_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18333&j=0&l=en
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0914/COM_SEC(2011)0914_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0914/COM_SEC(2011)0914_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE
events/7
date
2010-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0188_EN.html title: T7-0188/2010
summary
events/7
date
2010-05-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0188_EN.html title: T7-0188/2010
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2010-01-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2009-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: PARVANOVA Antonyia date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2010-02-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARVANOVA Antonyia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0142_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-188
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0188_EN.html
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0432/COM_COM(2011)0432_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0432/COM_COM(2011)0432_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0581 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52009PC0581:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport Commissioner: KALLAS Siim type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
  • date: 2009-12-02T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
  • date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0142/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18333&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-188 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0188/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3027
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-22T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647 title: Regulation 2010/647 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:189:TOC title: OJ L 189 22.07.2010, p. 0009
commission
  • body: EC dg: Mobility and Transport commissioner: KALLAS Siim
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2010-01-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2009-12-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2009-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRÜPEL Helga group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2010-02-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2010-02-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARVANOVA Antonyia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2010-01-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3027 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3027*&MEET_DATE=13/07/2010 date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/1431/COM_SEC(2009)1431_EN.pdf title: SEC(2009)1431 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=1431 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2010-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.485 title: PE438.485 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2010-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.416 title: PE439.416 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2010-04-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.141&secondRef=02 title: PE439.141 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.828&secondRef=03 title: PE439.828 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN title: A7-0142/2010 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=18333&j=0&l=en title: SP(2010)3805 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0432/COM_COM(2011)0432_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0432 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=432 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a report on the use of financial resources provided to Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria to support the decommissioning of early shut-down nuclear power-plants under the Acts of Accession. The report assesses the implementation status of EU financial assistance, particularly covering the implementation of the decommissioning programme during the period 2004 – 2009. It also considers financial assistance from the preceding period and recent progress made in 2010 in order to provide a consistent and comprehensive picture. It recalls that the EU assistance programme is dedicated to the following NPPs: Ignalina NPP (INPP) units 1 and 2 in Lithuania. Bohunice V1 NPP (V1 NPP) units 1 and 2 in Slovakia and Kozloduy NPP (KNPP) units 1 to 4 in Bulgaria. All designated nuclear units in Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria have been safely shut down in line with their Accession Agreements. Decommissioning works are currently ongoing. This situation has been achieved as a direct consequence of the successful implementation of the EU assistance programme, which have faced a variety of difficulties, at both the political and technical level. Considerable efforts were taken by Member States to renegotiate their political commitments, however through the EU`s expression of solidarity and the provision of appropriate financial assistance all countries respected their Accession Treaty commitments to shut down their reactor units. The boundary conditions for each country are unique and impact upon the choice of technology, strategy and reasoning associated with the selection of projects. Therefore it is difficult to present a direct comparison of the effectiveness of the EU assistance provided to each Member State. An assessment of the needs and capabilities was undertaken prior to the instigation of projects at each NPP. Identification and implementation of projects also benefited from a regular re-evaluation of the national strategies and decommissioning plans. Lithuania-Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut down on 31 December 2004, and unit 2 on 31 ecember 2009. The total EU assistance to Lithuania between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 1367 million. The programme evolved within a difficult political climate. Up to 2009 Lithuania campaigned strongly to postpone the closure of unit 2 until 2012. The lack of commitment to closure impacted negatively on the progress towards decommissioning. Despite these difficulties, both units were finally shut down on schedule as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Today they are safely maintained, and are in a decommissioning phase. As of today the reactor core of unit 1 has been completely defueled. No electricity shortages or black-out were experienced following the closures. Considering this difficult background, the performance towards decommissioning can be considered as satisfactory. Although delays have been experienced in some of the decommissioning projects and have given rise to additional costs, these delays have not as yet had a direct impact on the critical path of the decommissioning. However, the project "slack" has been exhausted and significant efforts will be required in order to avoid major delays and additional cost increases. Slovakia– Bohunice V1 Nuclear Power Plant : Unit 1 was permanently shut-down on 31 December 2006 and unit 2 on 31 December 2008. The total EU assistance to Slovakia between 1999 and 2013 is foreseen to be EUR 613 million. Since the beginning of the programme several issues such as: the reorganisation of JAVYS (the state-owned organisation responsible for the post-shut down supervision and for the decommissioning of V1 NPP), communication difficulties between the parties; the gas crisis in early 2009 have contributed to the complexity of the programme implementation and delays in some projects. Despite these difficulties, both units were shut down on schedule, and have been safely maintained. They are now in the decommissioning phase. No electricity shortages were experienced following the closure. As such the overall performance can be considered satisfactory. Delays experienced in some projects might have a negative impact on issuance of decommissioning license (scheduled for mid 2011). The EU continues to monitor closely the progress towards the achievement of this key milestone. Bulgaria – Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant : Units 1 and 2 were shut down on 31 December 2002 and units 3 and 4 were shut down on 31 December 2006. The total EU assistance to Bulgaria between 1999 and 2013 is anticipated to be EUR 867.78 million. The decommissioning programme has progressed in a particularly unfavourable political context. In 2006 attempts were made to postpone the closures, and again, after 2006 to reopen the shutdown reactors. Despite these difficulties the overall performance of the programme can be considered satisfactory given that all units have been shut down as prescribed in the Accession Treaty. Units 1&2 are entirely defueled, the dry spent fuel storage is close to completion and first dismantling works have started. Waste treatment and storage facilities are under implementation. No electricity black-out occurred following the closure of the reactor units. The commitment of the current Bulgarian government, together with the separation of units 1&2 from 3&4 will support and impact positively on the timely progression of the decommissioning programme. A major benefit realised in relation to the EU assistance is the change in the decommissioning strategy from one of "deferred dismantling" to "immediate – continuous dismantling". This reduces the overall time for decommissioning and makes best use of available staff to execute dismantling works. This will have a positive impact on the overall costs for decommissioning. A substantial proportion of the funds have been allocated to energy projects to address consequences of the early-closure. Conclusion: the scale of the problem encountered by each country was a function of the different reactor types to be decommissioned, the state of the existing infrastructure required to support the decommissioning and waste management challenges, the possibilities regarding replacing the lost electrical generating capacity, the regulatory and political environment and the choice of decommissioning strategy. Despite initial difficulties, the reactors were shut-down on schedule and the majority have been de-fueled as a first important step towards irreversible closure and decommissioning of the NPPs. In each Member State the finances available for projects exceed the disbursements. The funds have been made available on an annual basis since 1999 at a time when Member States were not yet able to make full use of them. As a consequence, some funds have accumulated. More recently these funds have been utilised more effectively and efficiently and they will be fully absorbed within the next two years. Significant progress has been demonstrated for the three programmes over the past years and up to the end of the reporting period with the majority of the decommissioning and energy-sector-related projects having been identified or prepared and with a significant proportion already under implementation. In all countries the majority of funding was directed towards decommissioning and radioactive waste (RAW) management related projects. Lithuania and Bulgaria used a significant portion for spent fuel storage and waste management. Currently, the facilities necessary for decommissioning, treatment and storage of RAW and spent nuclear fuel are under construction, the licensing documentation is elaborated and first preparatory dismantling works have started. The energy sector has benefited where projects were in line with the EU and national energy policies. EU assistance was advanced from an early stage to the energy sector in order to address the loss of electricity generating capacity. This approach proved to be particularly beneficial and effective in the case of Bulgaria, in mitigating the effects of the recent energy and financial crises. Although delays occurred in some decommissioning projects, these are actively addressed to minimise their impact on the critical path of the decommissioning. The countries' legal framework and management structures continue to be adapted taking into account the changes from electricity producing companies to decommissioning organisations. Outlook: measures in the decommissioning and energy windows will continue up until the end of the financing perspective as guided by the strategies identified. Decommissioning related projects will be prioritised above energy related projects where funds are limited. The use of the EU assistance within the decommissioning window will be focusing on the completion of the necessary infrastructure, RAW treatment, the realisation of the necessary decommissioning licenses and on dismantling. New decommissioning organisation and management structures will be instigated and reinforced to address the dismantling activities, while the execution of the dismantling works by plant staff continues. Energy sector projects are well advanced. Actions in this area are currently considered to be sufficient. Although the final financial commitment will be made in 2013, the implementation of the works from these commitments will extend beyond this date. The aim of the EU assistance remains to provide assistance to the Member States rather than the full financing of the decommissioning or the full compensation of closure consequences. The assistance provided shall be complemented by adequate national resources. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0914/COM_SEC(2011)0914_EN.pdf title: SEC(2011)0914 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=914 title: EUR-Lex type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0581 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=581 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish the programme laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution (€300 million) to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and the consequences of their closure in Bulgaria. PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation. BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations, Bulgaria committed itself to the closure of Units 1 and 2 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant by 31 December 2002 and to the closure of Units 3 and 4 by 31 December 2006 at the latest. The 2005 Act of Accession provides, inter alia, for Community support under the Kozloduy Programme of €210 million for the period 2007 – 2009. Initially a "deferred dismantling strategy" was chosen in 2001. However, the Bulgarian Government decided to change to an "immediate dismantling strategy" in 2006. The consequence of having changed the decommissioning strategy is that funding must be available much earlier. This situation called for Community solidarity in response: the country has nuclear reactors for which early shutdown commitments were negotiated at the time of accession and included in the Act of Accession that entered into force on 1 January 2007. The support to Bulgaria ends in 2009, whereas in the case of Lithuania and Slovakia the support runs until 2013. For equal treatment the proposed extension of support for Bulgaria shall cover the period 2010 – 2013. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: not applicable. CONTENT: The main objective of this proposal is to extend the support to Bulgaria to accompany and to ascertain the safe maintenance and decommissioning of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant units 1 - 4. It aims to establish the legal framework to enable Community support to be provided from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013. Therein the specific objective is the advancement in the approved decommissioning plan. This includes the safe maintenance, the actual physical decommissioning and dismantling of the nuclear power plant – units 1 to 4 – as well as the waste treatment. At the same time it contributes to mitigate social/economic impacts of the early closure by continuously employing the staff from the closed nuclear power plant. This is important to maintain a sufficiently high safety standard after the closure. In the non-nuclear window, security of supply needs to be assured after the shutdown, as well as sufficient replacement capacity for the closed down capacity. The continuation of the financial support is vital to keep the safety up to the required standards. Safety could be compromised by losing the necessary expertise, an international best practice to use to a large extend own staff, a clear risk if no adequate funding is available over the next years to maintain this expertise and to progress with the dismantling works. A €300 million financial envelope : to meet the above mentioned objectives and taking into consideration the absorption capacity evaluated in the light of the assistance given during the current period, a total Community contribution of additional €300 million will enable Bulgaria to progress in decommissioning and to mitigate the consequences of the early closure. The extension of financial support is of course related to the immediate dismantling of all four units. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. The Community contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with: · the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant; · measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant; · other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission this plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria; · enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in this country. Implementation : as under the current support, the additional support will be committed through an annual Commission Decision on Financing fixing the amount of the annual contribution as well as the objectives of the use of the funds detailed in the annually updated Combined Programming Document annexed to the Commission Decision on Financing. The continuation of the current implementation route for the financial Community assistance would lead to an additional Community contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Funds administrated by the EBRD. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the specific budget line, 060505, has been created and is used for financing the international decommissioning support programmes under the Financial Perspective 2007-2013, specifically up to 2009 for Bulgaria. Financial assistance for the period 2010-2013 for Bulgaria should also be accommodated through this budget line. Accordingly the additional €300 million should be made available for the budget line 060505.
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-12-02T00:00:00 type: Additional information body: all summary: The Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). These changes had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the Lisbon Treaty. In addition, some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of procedure . The Lisbon Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure . The old "codecision procedure" was extended to new areas and renamed the "ordinary legislative procedure". A new "consent procedure" replaced the old "assent procedure". New interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international agreements. The ongoing proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665). · In the case of the proposal for a Council Regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria “Kozloduy Programme”, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty had the following impacts : · the proposal, which had previously fallen under the old consultation procedure (CNS), was classified as an interinstitutional non-legislative procedure (NLE).
  • date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Rebecca HARMS (Greens/EFA, DE)) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme'. Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : in this draft resolution, Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited and stresses that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. The committee reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23. The main amendments are as follows: Funding: new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of the Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4. Purpose: the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries. Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. Audit: Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning. Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission. Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament. Compliance assessment: a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement. Members note that further to the Financial Regulation and Implementing Rules, the Commission is entitled to implement its budget by joint management with international organisations if these organisations apply standards which offer guarantees equivalent to internationally accepted standards, in, at least, their accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures. Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria: in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions. Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN title: A7-0142/2010
  • date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-20T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18333&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-20T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-188 title: T7-0188/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 518 votes to 17 against with 73 abstentions a resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on Community financial assistance with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria - 'Kozloduy Programme' Financial margin remaining to finance the decommissioning of the Bulgarian Power Plant : Members consider that the proposal is compatible with the ceiling for subheading 1a of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 but that the margin remaining in subheading 1a for 2011-2013 is very limited. They stress that the funding of new activities must not jeopardise existing programmes and initiatives under subheading 1a. Parliament reiterates its call, therefore, for the presentation of a multiannual strategy for the Kozloduy decommissioning programme, as well as for other political priorities under subheading 1a, in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF, accompanied by concrete proposals to adjust and revise it before the end of the first semester of 2010 by using all mechanisms available under the Interinstitutional Agreement ( IIA ) of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA of 17 May 2006), particularly those in points 21 to 23. The main amendments are as follows: Funding : new recitals note that provision should be made for a sum of EUR 300 million from the general budget of the EU to fund the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant over the period from 2010 to 2013. Of this sum, EUR 180 million should be used to support the decommissioning programme and the remaining EUR 120 million to fund both energy efficiency and savings measures. In view of the Commission Ex Ante Evaluation of 27 October 20091, EUR 180 million of the funds is intended to assist the following projects: (1) project management, technical assistance for the support of the implementation of the decommissioning programme; (2) the provision of salaries for experts (operation, maintenance, technical support, project management) at the Kozloduy site, working for the decommissioning of Units 1-4; (3) contribution to the construction of the National Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility, crucial for the implementation of the decommissioning programme, in particular for the storage of low and intermediate level waste in the first 10 years of implementation; (4) site infrastructure and treatment of dismantled waste (including additional allocation for projects already in the tendering process). The improvement of site infrastructure may only comprise measures relating to the decommissioning of Units 1-4. Purpose : the text now states that the Community contribution to the Kozloduy Programme shall be granted for the primary purpose of providing financial support for measures connected with the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant. It shall also be directed at measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission those units and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation and strengthening of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security and a higher standard of supply, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy in Bulgaria, while encouraging energy-saving measures and promoting renewable energies. Financial support can also be provided in order to mitigate the socio-economic transition in the affected communities, for example through developing new sustainable jobs and industries. Review: the amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme shall be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the programme, and to take account of the long-term impacts on, and consequences for, the environment, economy and security of supply as a result of the early closure of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. Audit : Members clarify that the funding of audits and any other assessments falls outside the scope of the budget for decommissioning assistance. They state that the audits shall also cover the stage reached in the issuing of permits for decommissioning. Rights of access : Members specify that the European Parliament as well as the Court of Auditors shall enjoy the same rights, especially of access, as the Commission. Ex-post evaluation : the Commission shall carry out a mid-term evaluation and an ex-post evaluation, and report on them both to the European Parliament. The ex-post evaluation shall contain a complete and precise budget of the costs for decommissioning a nuclear power plant so as to plan for future decommissioning expenditure. It shall also analyse the economic, social and environmental costs, focusing on the impact of residual free-radiation and consequences for security of supply. Compliance assessment : a new clause states that the Commission shall perform a compliance assessment, in line with the internationally accepted standards of, at least, the EBRD accounting, audit, internal control and procurement procedures, before the signing of the contribution agreement. Study on the disposal of all radioactive substances in Bulgaria : in the recitals, Members call for a study to be carried out by the Bulgarian Government relating to the safe final disposal of all radioactive substances involved in the decommissioning. As more progress is needed in Bulgaria with regard to the final disposal of irradiated fuel elements and highly radioactive waste, and as the final disposal of all radioactive substances resulting from the closure of Kozloduy nuclear plant is a highly important process which needs to be carefully planned, Members consider that the Union should assist the Bulgarian Government in the process of identifying the final disposal solutions. Members call for the activities related to the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant to be carried out in line with the fundamental objective of protecting workers and the general public from the harmful effects of ionising radiation and in respect of the obligations laid down in international conventions that already provide for the necessary requirements in national, international, or trans-boundary contexts, such as the Aarhus Convention.
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2010-07-22T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to lay down detailed rules for the implementation of Community's financial contribution of EUR 300 to address the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (Euratom) No 647/2010 of the Council on financial assistance of the Union with respect to the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria (Kozloduy Programme). BACKGROUND: during the accession negotiations in 2005, Bulgaria agreed to the closure of Units 1 and 2 and Units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant by 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2006, respectively and to the subsequent decommissioning of those units. The EU expressed its willingness to continue to provide financial assistance up to 2009 as an extension of the pre-accession aid planned under the Phare programme in support of Bulgaria’s decommissioning efforts. The Union recognises the effort made and the good progress achieved by Bulgaria in the decommissioning preparation stage of the Kozloduy Programme utilising the Union funds put in place until 2009, and the need for further financial support beyond 2009 in order to continue the progress with the actual dismantling operations. CONTENT: this Regulation establishes a programme (the ‘Kozloduy Programme’) laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the Union’s financial contribution to address the further process of the decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria and the consequences of their early closure, with regard to the environment, the economy and the security of supply in the region. Purpose of Community contribution : the Union contribution to the Kozloduy programme shall be granted for the purpose of providing financial support for: measures connected with the decommissioning of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant, measures for environmental upgrading in line with the acquis and for modernising conventional production capacity to replace the production capacity of the four reactors at the Plant, and other measures which stem from the decision to close and decommission the Plant and which contribute to the necessary restructuring, upgrading of the environment and modernisation of the energy production, transmission and distribution sectors in Bulgaria as well as to enhancing security of supply and energy efficiency in Bulgaria. Financial contribution : the financial reference amount for the implementation of the Kozloduy Programme for the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 shall be EUR 300 million. The amount of the appropriations allocated to the Kozloduy Programme may be reviewed in the course of the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 to take account of the progress made with the implementation of the Programme and to ensure that the programming and allocation of the resources are based on actual payment needs and absorption capacity. Financial assistance for measures under the Kozloduy Programme shall be made available as a Union contribution to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund, managed by the EBRD, in line with the Financial Regulation. The contribution for certain measures may amount to up to 100 % of the total expenditure. However, every effort shall be made to continue the co-financing practice established under the pre- accession assistance and the assistance given over the period 2007-2009 for Bulgaria’s decommissioning effort as well as to attract co-financing from other sources, as appropriate. Commission audit : the Commission may cause an audit of the use made of the assistance to be carried out, either directly by its own staff or by any other qualified outside body of its choice. Such audits may be carried out throughout the duration of the agreement between the Union and the EBRD on making Union funds available to the Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund and for a period of 5 years from the date of payment of the balance. Where appropriate, the audit findings may lead to recovery decisions by the Commission. Commission staff and outside personnel authorised by the Commission shall have appropriate right of access needed in order to conduct such audits. Evaluation: the Commission shall ensure the implementation of the Regulation and shall report at regular intervals to the European Parliament and the Council. ENTRY INTO FORCE : 11 August 2010. docs: title: Regulation 2010/647 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647 title: OJ L 189 22.07.2010, p. 0009 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:189:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/7/01478
New
  • ITRE/7/01478
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealed by 2011/0363(NLE)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60.04 Nuclear energy, industry and safety
New
3.60.04
Nuclear energy, industry and safety
procedure/summary
  • Repealed by
activities
  • date: 2009-10-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0581/COM_COM(2009)0581_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0581 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52009PC0581:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport Commissioner: KALLAS Siim type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2009-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
  • date: 2009-12-02T00:00:00 body: all type: Additional information
  • date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-05-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-142&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0142/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-05-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100519&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2010-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=18333&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-188 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0188/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3027
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-13T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2010-07-22T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R0647 title: Regulation 2010/647 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:189:TOC title: OJ L 189 22.07.2010, p. 0009
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PARVANOVA Antonyia
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: URUTCHEV Vladimir group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: ECR name: SZYMAŃSKI Konrad group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
links
National parliaments
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm title: Mobility and Transport commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/7/01478
geographical_area
Bulgaria
reference
2009/0172(NLE)
subtype
Consultation of Parliament
legal_basis
Euratom Treaty A 203
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Repealed by
instrument
Regulation
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
title
Nuclear safety: financial assistance to decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria, 'Kozloduy Programme'
type
NLE - Non-legislative enactments
final
subject
3.60.04 Nuclear energy, industry and safety