Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR) | KOUMOUTSAKOS Georgios ( PPE), FLECKENSTEIN Knut ( S&D), SAVISAAR-TOOMAST Vilja ( ALDE), BESSET Jean-Paul ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same subject.
The resolution stresses the importance of the maritime transport sector to the European economy, not only as a carrier of passengers, raw materials, goods and energy products but also as the core of a wider cluster of maritime activities such as the naval industry, logistics, research, tourism, fisheries and aquaculture, and education. Members would like to see EU maritime policies being designed within the framework of a ‘single European sea’ henceforth and, consequently, calls on the Commission to develop a European maritime transport policy as part of a common maritime area.
The market: Parliament calls on the Commission to continue to combat abuses of flags of convenience . Member States are urged to encourage the use of their flags and to support their maritime clusters on shore, for example by providing fiscal facilities such as a tonnage tax system for ships as well as fiscal facilities for seafarers and ship owners.
Parliament considers that the maritime sector must in principle be governed by the rules on State aid . It underlines that State aid should be used exclusively to support European maritime sectors that are committed to social standards, the promotion of jobs and the training of personnel in Europe, and to ensure the global competitiveness of European shipping.
Members consider that the Community guidelines on State aid to shipping, which expire in 2011, must be retained and extended. They call on the Commission to submit the promised new rules on State aid for maritime transport in 2010, as well as the guidelines on State aid to sea ports.
The Commission is invited to: (i) to give greater consideration to maritime transport and its land-based structures during the forthcoming revision of the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, (ii) encourage short sea shipping.
Social aspects: the resolution stresses the need to provide lifelong learning and retraining for seafarers at all levels, on shore and on board, with a view to strengthening the professional qualifications and skills of the workforce . Members States are urged, within the scope of international conventions, to improve and modernise existing training programmes.
Parliament emphasises the fact that seafarers from third countries must comply with satisfactory training requirements and calls on ship owners and national inspectorates to guarantee and enforce this. It invites the Member States to encourage the use of EU seafarers in their own fleets and to create sufficient facilities to prevent the migration of seafarers outside the Union.
Members underline that the social dimension and the working conditions of EU seafarers are closely linked to the competitiveness of the European fleet. They encourage the exchange of good practices in relation to employment conditions and social standards, as well as an improvement in living conditions on board vessels, particularly through the development of information and communication technologies, better access to healthcare, better safety standards and training.
Environment: the resolution recognises that considerable progress must be made on reducing emissions of sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides, particulates (PM10) and CO2. It stresses that the sector can contribute to the fight against harmful emissions and climate change. In this regard, public and private investments in research and development will be of particular interest.
Members underline that emissions reductions must be agreed rapidly and implemented with binding force via the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in order to limit disparities in competitive conditions, but that this must not prevent the Union from taking initiatives aimed at further reductions by the fleets of its Member States, Member States are urged to make more use of the option of designating maritime emission control areas .
Parliament deplores the fact that the Copenhagen Climate Summit did not succeed in reaching any conclusions with regard to reducing emissions from seagoing vessels, but stresses that intensive efforts must continue to agree global measures to bring about such reductions . It invites Member States to make every effort to ensure that the IMO receives a mandate for the next international climate negotiations, with quantifiable reduction targets for maritime transport.
The resolution supports measures that encourage modal shifts towards maritime transport with a view to easing congestion on major roads. It hopes to see the rapid and extensive introduction, within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean, of ‘motorways of the sea’. It is concerned, however, about a possible shift back from short sea transport to road haulage as a result of the introduction of the 0.1% sulphur limit, envisaged as of 2015, in the sulphur emission control areas in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. The Commission is invited to submit a relevant impact assessment to Parliament as swiftly as possible and by the end of 2010 at the latest.
Members consider that all modes of transport, including maritime transport, must gradually internalise their external costs. They call on the Commission and the Member States to work on alternative instruments such as the introduction of a levy on bunker fuel or the concept of ‘ green ports ’, where clean vessels are dealt with more quickly and/or pay reduced harbour dues. They stress that, as part of its research and development policy, the Commission must give priority to innovation in the area of renewable technologies for use on vessels, such as solar and wind technologies.
Safety: the resolution welcomes the adoption of the Third Maritime Safety Package, and calls on Member States to implement the package speedily. Parliament supports the change of course in the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Port State Control, which entails replacing regular inspections with risk-based inspections , so that precisely those vessels which display numerous shortcomings are tackled effectively. Members also advocate stringent checks on shipbuilding, including on the quality of steel used and on vessel design and maintenance.
Parliament calls on national inspectorates and other national authorities to cooperate more closely in exchanging data on vessels and their cargoes, so as to reduce regulatory pressure but increase the effectiveness of inspections. It calls for the rapid introduction of an integrated information management system through the use and improvement of resources already available, especially SafeSeaNet. The Commission is invited to put in place, as soon as possible, an EU-wide cross-border and cross-sectoral surveillance system.
Aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas , notably in the Horn of Africa area and the waters off the coast of Somalia, Parliament calls on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives to protect them against piracy, along the lines of the EU’s successful first naval operation, Atalanta.
The resolution stresses that shipping is a global industry and that agreements ought, in preference, to be concluded on a global scale . It calls on Member States to make more effort to ratify and implement quickly IMO conventions which they have signed.
Lastly, Parliament underlines the need to speed up the modernisation and expansion of port infrastructure capacities in anticipation of the expected rise in the volume of goods transported by sea. It points out that this will require huge investments, which will have to comply with transparent and fair financing rules in order to ensure fair competition among European ports. The Commission is invited to ensure that the regulatory framework is coherent in this regard.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Peter van DALEN (ECR, NL) on strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018, in response to the Commission’s communication on the same subject.
The report stresses the importance of the maritime transport sector to the European economy, not only as a carrier of passengers, raw materials, goods and energy products but also as the core of a wider cluster of maritime activities such as the naval industry, logistics, research, tourism, fisheries and aquaculture, and education. Members would like to see EU maritime policies being designed within the framework of a ‘single European sea’ henceforth and, consequently, calls on the Commission to develop a European maritime transport policy as part of a common maritime area.
The market: Members call on the Commission to continue to combat abuses of flags of convenience . Member States are urged to encourage the use of their flags and to support their maritime clusters on shore, for example by providing fiscal facilities such as a tonnage tax system for ships as well as fiscal facilities for seafarers and ship owners.
Parliament’s committee considers that the maritime sector must in principle be governed by the rules on State aid . It underlines that State aid should be used exclusively to support European maritime sectors that are committed to social standards, the promotion of jobs and the training of personnel in Europe, and to ensure the global competitiveness of European shipping.
Members consider that the Community guidelines on State aid to shipping, which expire in 2011, must be retained and extended. They call on the Commission to submit the promised new rules on State aid for maritime transport in 2010, as well as the guidelines on State aid to sea ports.
The Commission is invited to: i) to give greater consideration to maritime transport and its land-based structures during the forthcoming revision of the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, ii) encourage short sea shipping.
Social aspects: the report stresses the need to provide lifelong learning and retraining for seafarers at all levels, on shore and on board, with a view to strengthening the professional qualifications and skills of the workforce . Members States are urged, within the scope of international conventions, to improve and modernise existing training programmes.
The committee emphasises the fact that seafarers from third countries must comply with satisfactory training requirements and calls on ship owners and national inspectorates to guarantee and enforce this. It invites the Member States to encourage the use of EU seafarers in their own fleets and to create sufficient facilities to prevent the migration of seafarers outside the Union.
Members underline that the social dimension and the working conditions of EU seafarers are closely linked to the competitiveness of the European fleet. They encourage the exchange of good practices in relation to employment conditions and social standards, as well as an improvement in living conditions on board vessels, particularly through the development of information and communication technologies, better access to healthcare, better safety standards and training.
Environment: the report recognises that considerable progress must be made on reducing emissions of sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides, particulates (PM10) and CO2, It stresses that the sector can contribute to the fight against harmful emissions and climate change. In this regard, public and private investments in research and development will be of particular interest.
Members underline that emissions reductions must be agreed rapidly and implemented with binding force via the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in order to limit disparities in competitive conditions, but that this must not prevent the Union from taking initiatives aimed at further reductions by the fleets of its Member States, Member States are urged to make more use of the option of designating maritime emission control areas .
The report deplores the fact that the Copenhagen Climate Summit did not succeed in reaching any conclusions with regard to reducing emissions from seagoing vessels, but stresses that intensive efforts must continue to agree global measures to bring about such reductions . It invites Member States to make every effort to ensure that the IMO receives a mandate for the next international climate negotiations, with quantifiable reduction targets for maritime transport.
Parliament’s committee supports measures that encourage modal shifts towards maritime transport with a view to easing congestion on major roads. It hopes to see the rapid and extensive introduction, within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean, of ‘motorways of the sea’. It is concerned, however, about a possible shift back from short sea transport to road haulage as a result of the introduction of the 0.1% sulphur limit, envisaged as of 2015, in the sulphur emission control areas in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. The Commission is invited to submit a relevant impact assessment to Parliament as swiftly as possible and by the end of 2010 at the latest.
Members consider that all modes of transport, including maritime transport, must gradually internalise their external costs. They call on the Commission and the Member States to work on alternative instruments such as the introduction of a levy on bunker fuel or the concept of ‘ green ports ’, where clean vessels are dealt with more quickly and/or pay reduced harbour dues. It stresses that, as part of its research and development policy, the Commission must give priority to innovation in the area of renewable technologies for use on vessels, such as solar and wind technologies.
Safety: the report welcomes the adoption of the Third Maritime Safety Package, and calls on Member States to implement the package speedily. It supports the change of course in the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Port State Control, which entails replacing regular inspections with risk-based inspections , so that precisely those vessels which display numerous shortcomings are tackled effectively. Members also advocate stringent checks on shipbuilding, including on the quality of steel used and on vessel design and maintenance.
The committee calls on national inspectorates and other national authorities to cooperate more closely in exchanging data on vessels and their cargoes, so as to reduce regulatory pressure but increase the effectiveness of inspections. It calls for the rapid introduction of an integrated information management system through the use and improvement of resources already available, especially SafeSeaNet. The Commission is invited to put in place, as soon as possible, an EU-wide cross-border and cross-sectoral surveillance system.
Aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas , notably in the Horn of Africa area and the waters off the coast of Somalia, Members call on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives to protect them against piracy, along the lines of the EU’s successful first naval operation, Atalanta.
The report stresses that shipping is a global industry and that agreements ought, in preference, to be concluded on a global scale . It calls on Member States to make more effort to ratify and implement quickly IMO conventions which they have signed.
Lastly, Members underline the need to speed up the modernisation and expansion of port infrastructure capacities in anticipation of the expected rise in the volume of goods transported by sea. They point out that this will require huge investments, which will have to comply with transparent and fair financing rules in order to ensure fair competition among European ports. The Commission is invited to ensure that the regulatory framework is coherent in this regard.
The Council adopted the following conclusions on integrated maritime policy:
it welcomes the strong commitment towards integrated maritime governance in Member States and invites them and the Commission to continue to implement a comprehensive strategy for growth, jobs and sustainability for the oceans, seas and European coastal regions, with due respect to subsidiarity and proportionality and on the basis of a continued strong involvement of stakeholders; it recalls that the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) has been welcomed by the European Council as the environmental pillar of the EU Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) and acknowledges the MSFD, with the ecosystem based-approach to the management of human activities as an overarching principle, as a basis on which to develop more successfully all maritime activities within the concepts of sustainability in line with the MSFD. The Council stresses the need to integrate the sustainable use of marine goods and services by present and future generations into decision-making; it welcomes the continued implementation of the EU Strategy for Marine and Maritime Research aimed at providing the knowledge base for the implementation of the IMP, and underlines that efforts should also foster innovation by identifying the economic value of marine goods and services, including ecosystem services, and by developing core ocean technologies and exploring future market potentials in relation to maritime clusters; the Council calls for further dialogue and co-operation in order to improve the governance of the marine space and coastal areas in the Mediterranean area, taking into account its sub-regions, emphasising the need to engage in an early dialogue with Mediterranean neighbours on this item, taking into account the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It also encourages S further dialogue in order to strengthen the Black Sea Synergy-based cooperation and its relevance for the IMP; it calls for a further development of the strategic approaches to regional sea basins where there is a demand and a perspective of clear added value, and a sound and speedy implementation of the specific actions under these specific strategies, inter alia by setting up relevant pilot projects, and by including seeking synergies with other EU policy instruments and funding, such as Cohesion Policy, Neighbourhood policy and External Relations, and the regional dimension in the implementation of the MSFD; the Council notes with satisfaction that a number of Member States are proposing to host the European Maritime Day Stakeholder conference from 2011 onwards, and encourages Member States and stakeholders to also organise de-centralised events celebrating the European Maritime Day across Europe.
The Council invites the Commission to do the following:
to report on the outcomes of the discussion on the Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Roadmap and to come forward with initiatives aimed at encouraging the development and use of MSP that is based on an ecosystem approach during early 2010, and which, in the light of increased economic activities at sea, help coordinate and balance sectoral interests to contribute to a sustainable use and development of the European maritime areas; to make proposals regarding governance of marine and maritime research, with a view to improving the use of scientific knowledge by policymakers and ensuring a coordinated and sustained development of marine research infrastructure at EU level; to detail its policy intentions on the IMP during 2010, taking account of these conclusions, inter alia with a renewed focus on sustainable economic growth, employment and innovation in an eco-efficient way for consultation with Member States and stakeholders; to present the necessary proposals for the financing of integrated maritime policy actions within the existing Financial Perspective, with a view to entry into force by 2011; to present a progress report on the implementation of the IMP in good time for the European Council at the end of 2012; to explore the opportunities and synergies that can be achieved by a further development of the integrated approach to maritime affairs.
PURPOSE: to present the main strategic goals for the European maritime transport system up to 2018 and to identify key areas for action where action by the EU will strengthen the competitiveness of the sector while enhancing its environmental performance.
BACKGROUND: for Europe, shipping and all related maritime industries have been one of the key stepping stones to economic growth and prosperity throughout its history. They are essential in helping the European economy and European companies to compete globally and are an important source of revenues and jobs in Europe. Europe plays a major role in today’s shipping world, with European companies owning 41% of the world’s total fleet (in dwt). 80% of world trade is carried by sea whilst short-sea shipping carries 40% of intra-European freight.
With more than 400 million sea passengers passing through European ports each year, maritime transport has also a direct impact on the quality of life of citizens, both as tourists and inhabitants of islands and peripheral regions.
However, at the end of 2008, the impact of the financial crisis on the real economy is also felt in the shipping sector. An appropriate policy approach is needed in order to ensure the continuous performance of the EU maritime transport system and its contribution to the recovery of the world economy.
CONTENT: this communication is set in the broader context of the EU Transport Policy (‘ Keep Europe moving: a transport policy for sustainable mobility ’) and the EU Integrated Maritime Policy (the ‘ Blue Paper ’). It aims at supporting other relevant policies, namely the EU’s energy and environmental policy. It is the result of continuous dialogue with the experts of the Member States, the independent advice of a group of senior shipping professionals and an analytical study examining trends and signals of change in seaborne transport.
The strategic options presented in this Communication for European shipping and for the European maritime transport system, looking ahead to 2018, represent a vision for achieving these goals. The proposed options are built on an integrated approach to maritime policy and based on the core values of sustainable development, economic growth and open markets in fair competition and high environmental and social standards. The benefits set out in this vision should go beyond the frontiers of Europe and extend to the whole maritime world, including the developing countries.
The main issues of this communication are the following:
1) European Shipping in Globalised markets : European flags continue to face acute competition from the registers of third countries. Often, foreign competitors have significant advantages in terms of government support . In the context of the current economic crisis, other factors such as the risks of overcapacity in certain market segments, protectionist trade measures by third countries, volatility in energy markets or loss of know-how due to the scarcity of skilled human resources in Europe could prompt shipping head offices and maritime industries to relocate overseas, undermining the EU’s efforts to ensure quality shipping around the world.
The conclusions of the Commission’s strategic review exercise are as follows:
to achieve and maintain stable and predictable global competitive conditions for shipping and other maritime industries. This will also ensure the resilience of the European maritime transport sector in the face of economic slowdown; to maintain a clear and competitive EU framework for tonnage taxation, income taxation and state aids at EU level; to act in a determined manner to support fair international maritime trade conditions and access to markets; to work together to achieve a level playing field for maritime transport, by observing internationally agreed rules at global level; that the Commission should take the lead role to promote alignment of the substantive competition rules globally; to concentrate on the question of the delicate balance of the international framework governing the rights and responsibilities of nations as flag on which i ntensified globalisation has put more stress.
2) Human resources, seamanship and maritime know-how : some 70% of shipping-related jobs are knowledge-intensive, high-quality jobs on shore. The growing shortage of maritime professionals entails the risk of losing the critical mass of human resources that sustains the competitiveness of the European maritime industries in general. There is a genuine EU interest in emphasizing the attractiveness of the maritime professions. Community actions should aim, in particular, to:
adopt positive measures facilitating lifelong career prospects in the maritime clusters; enhance the image of shipping and careers at sea, improve awareness of job opportunities, facilitate labour mobility in the maritime industries throughout Europe and encourage best practices in promotion and recruitment campaigns; support the work of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) on the fair treatment of seafarers; promote better use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for improving quality of life at sea; implement simplification measures to reduce the administrative burden on Masters and senior officers on board ships; provide the appropriate framework for the provision of education and training for crews in the form of measures aimed in particular at: (i) ensuring thorough enforcement of international and Community requirements under the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watch keeping for Seafarers (STCW) by all nations granting seafarers’ certificates of competence; (ii) promoting cooperation between European maritime training institutions ; (iii) establishing ‘ maritime certificates of excellence’ (European maritime postgraduate courses); (iv) introducing, for the education of officers, an ‘Erasmus’- type model for exchanges between the maritime training institutions of the Member States.
With regard to labour conditions , the first priority of the European Union is to ensure the implementation of the ILO 2006 Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) to improve working and living conditions on board ships. The action of the EU and its Member States should aim to move towards rapid ratification of the 2006 MLC by Member States (see CNS/2006/0103 and RSP/2008/2660 ).
3) Quality shipping as a key competitive advantage : by 2018, the world fleet could count some 100 000 vessels in operation (77 500 vessels in 2008). In terms of volume, the increase would be even more spectacular: its total capacity is expected to reach more than 2 100 million dwt in 2018 (up from 1 156 million dwt in 2008). In this context, the Commission insists on:
Improving the environmental performance : the Commission, Member States and the European maritime industry should work together towards the long-term objective of ‘zero-waste, zero emission’ maritime transport . To that end, the main priorities should be to: (i) ensure steady progress towards a coherent and comprehensive approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from international shipping; (ii) ensure that Member States are able to achieve "good environmental status" by 2020; (iii) strengthen EU legislation regarding port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residue; (iv) follow up the proposals detailed in the Commission's Communication on an EU strategy for better ship dismantling; (v) reduce sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides emissions from ships; (vi) re-launch the Commission’s ‘Quality Shipping Campaign’, by means of partnership agreements with the EU maritime administrations, the maritime industries at large and the users of maritime transport services.
Maritime transport safety : in the years to come, the EU and the Member States should: (i) give priority to the enforcement of existing EU and international rules and the speedy implementation of measures introduced with the 3rd Maritime Safety Package; (ii) revise the mandate and the functioning of the European Maritime Safety Agency, in order to further enhance the technical and scientific assistance it can give to the Member States and the Commission; (iii) reinforce international cooperation with EU trading and shipping partners; (iv) take care to ensure the systematic application of the IMO “Guidelines on the treatment of persons rescued at sea"; (v) ensure that, by 2012 at the latest, all Member States are on the "White List" of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control.
Maritime transport security : very serious concerns about acts of terrorism, piracy and armed robbery at sea persist. A further difficulty relates to incidents involving people smuggling, trafficking and stowaways. The challenge is to complete the work already started in e stablishing a comprehensive framework of security measures based on prevention, reaction capacity and resilience . This should lead to a genuine ‘security culture’ becoming an integral part of quality shipping and port operations, while not compromising unnecessarily the performance of shipping and the quality of life of seafarers and passengers. In that regard, the most urgent priority is to protect seafarers, fishermen and passengers on ships sailing off the coast of Somalia, in the Gulf of Aden or in any other region of the world that could become problematic in the future.
Maritime surveillance : looking ahead to 2018, the capacities of the EU’s maritime transport system should be strengthened by putting in place an integrated information management system to enable the identification, monitoring, tracking and reporting of all vessels at sea and on inland waterways to and from European ports and in transit through or in close proximity to EU waters. In a broader context, building on the resources currently available, such as AIS, LRIT, SafeSeaNet or CleanSeaNet, or those that are being developed, such as Galileo and GMES, the EU should promote the creation of a platform to ensure the convergence of sea-, land- and space-based technologies, the integrity of applications and appropriate management and control of information on a "need-to-know" basis.
EU energy security : m aritime transport is key to Europe's energy security and therefore is an important instrument of the European energy policy. It is to be seen as part of the EU strategy of diversification of routes and of energy sources. 90 % of oil is transported by sea, while there is an increasing trend towards transport of natural gas in a liquefied form by tankers (LNG). Many other energy products are transported by sea as well. As emphasized notably in the Second Strategic Energy Review , LNG facilities are essential for increasing flexibility in gas supplies in the internal energy market, thus enabling solidarity in crisis.
4) Working together on the international scene : the European Union has a longstanding commitment to open and fair competition in shipping and also to quality shipping. The Commission and the Member States are well placed to push for change in order to achieve a comprehensive international regulatory framework for shipping, suited to face the challenges of the 21st century: concerted action at European level is crucial in several fora, for example concerning: governance (UNCLOS), international trade (WTO and bilateral maritime transport dialogues and agreements, UNCITRAL), safety, security and environmental protection (IMO), labour (ILO) or customs (WCO). EU international cooperation efforts should lead to the establishment of a mechanism to ensure actual enforcement of internationally agreed rules by all flag and coastal states in the world .
5) Short-sea shipping : maritime transport in the EU-27 is predicted to grow from 3.8 billion tonnes in 2006 to some 5.3 billion tonnes in 2018. Passenger traffic, including ferries and cruise ships, will also grow. Territorial continuity, regional cohesion and quality standards for sea passengers will have to be ensured. In that regard, the main priorities should be to:
establish a true ‘European maritime transport space without barriers’; implement the measures announced in the Communication on a European Ports Policy ; ensure the right conditions for attracting investment flows to the port sector; generalise fast-track procedures that cut the overall lead time significantly; issue guidelines on the application of relevant Community environmental legislation to port development; reinforce the EU strategy for ensuring the full deployment of Motorways of the Sea projects; support EU funding programmes such as the Trans-European Network Transport projects, Marco Polo, etc; facilitate better connection of islands and long-distance intra-EU passenger transport; examine economic instruments (such as taxes, charges or emission trading schemes) for "getting the prices right" encouraging users to make use of short sea shipping alternatives addressing road congestion problems; address the issue of passenger rights for users of ferry and cruise services in Europe.
6) Europe, the world leader in maritime research and innovation : the European maritime industries should capitalise on the significant RTD efforts carried out under successive EU Research Framework Programmes and other activities: (i) come up with new ship designs and equipment to improve safety and environmental performance; (ii) technological development and advanced logistics conceptions which maximise the efficiency of the overall transport chain by means of short sea shipping and inland waterway transport are also required for achieving sustainable mobility; (iii) adequate ICT inspection and monitoring tools, also related to surveillance; (iv) the deployment of ‘e-Maritime’ services at European and global levels.
The Commission's intention is to pursue constructive dialogue with all stakeholders concerned in view of undertaking action for the practical implementation of the measures identified in this strategic review.
PURPOSE: to present the main strategic goals for the European maritime transport system up to 2018 and to identify key areas for action where action by the EU will strengthen the competitiveness of the sector while enhancing its environmental performance.
BACKGROUND: for Europe, shipping and all related maritime industries have been one of the key stepping stones to economic growth and prosperity throughout its history. They are essential in helping the European economy and European companies to compete globally and are an important source of revenues and jobs in Europe. Europe plays a major role in today’s shipping world, with European companies owning 41% of the world’s total fleet (in dwt). 80% of world trade is carried by sea whilst short-sea shipping carries 40% of intra-European freight.
With more than 400 million sea passengers passing through European ports each year, maritime transport has also a direct impact on the quality of life of citizens, both as tourists and inhabitants of islands and peripheral regions.
However, at the end of 2008, the impact of the financial crisis on the real economy is also felt in the shipping sector. An appropriate policy approach is needed in order to ensure the continuous performance of the EU maritime transport system and its contribution to the recovery of the world economy.
CONTENT: this communication is set in the broader context of the EU Transport Policy (‘ Keep Europe moving: a transport policy for sustainable mobility ’) and the EU Integrated Maritime Policy (the ‘ Blue Paper ’). It aims at supporting other relevant policies, namely the EU’s energy and environmental policy. It is the result of continuous dialogue with the experts of the Member States, the independent advice of a group of senior shipping professionals and an analytical study examining trends and signals of change in seaborne transport.
The strategic options presented in this Communication for European shipping and for the European maritime transport system, looking ahead to 2018, represent a vision for achieving these goals. The proposed options are built on an integrated approach to maritime policy and based on the core values of sustainable development, economic growth and open markets in fair competition and high environmental and social standards. The benefits set out in this vision should go beyond the frontiers of Europe and extend to the whole maritime world, including the developing countries.
The main issues of this communication are the following:
1) European Shipping in Globalised markets : European flags continue to face acute competition from the registers of third countries. Often, foreign competitors have significant advantages in terms of government support . In the context of the current economic crisis, other factors such as the risks of overcapacity in certain market segments, protectionist trade measures by third countries, volatility in energy markets or loss of know-how due to the scarcity of skilled human resources in Europe could prompt shipping head offices and maritime industries to relocate overseas, undermining the EU’s efforts to ensure quality shipping around the world.
The conclusions of the Commission’s strategic review exercise are as follows:
to achieve and maintain stable and predictable global competitive conditions for shipping and other maritime industries. This will also ensure the resilience of the European maritime transport sector in the face of economic slowdown; to maintain a clear and competitive EU framework for tonnage taxation, income taxation and state aids at EU level; to act in a determined manner to support fair international maritime trade conditions and access to markets; to work together to achieve a level playing field for maritime transport, by observing internationally agreed rules at global level; that the Commission should take the lead role to promote alignment of the substantive competition rules globally; to concentrate on the question of the delicate balance of the international framework governing the rights and responsibilities of nations as flag on which i ntensified globalisation has put more stress.
2) Human resources, seamanship and maritime know-how : some 70% of shipping-related jobs are knowledge-intensive, high-quality jobs on shore. The growing shortage of maritime professionals entails the risk of losing the critical mass of human resources that sustains the competitiveness of the European maritime industries in general. There is a genuine EU interest in emphasizing the attractiveness of the maritime professions. Community actions should aim, in particular, to:
adopt positive measures facilitating lifelong career prospects in the maritime clusters; enhance the image of shipping and careers at sea, improve awareness of job opportunities, facilitate labour mobility in the maritime industries throughout Europe and encourage best practices in promotion and recruitment campaigns; support the work of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) on the fair treatment of seafarers; promote better use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for improving quality of life at sea; implement simplification measures to reduce the administrative burden on Masters and senior officers on board ships; provide the appropriate framework for the provision of education and training for crews in the form of measures aimed in particular at: (i) ensuring thorough enforcement of international and Community requirements under the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watch keeping for Seafarers (STCW) by all nations granting seafarers’ certificates of competence; (ii) promoting cooperation between European maritime training institutions ; (iii) establishing ‘ maritime certificates of excellence’ (European maritime postgraduate courses); (iv) introducing, for the education of officers, an ‘Erasmus’- type model for exchanges between the maritime training institutions of the Member States.
With regard to labour conditions , the first priority of the European Union is to ensure the implementation of the ILO 2006 Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) to improve working and living conditions on board ships. The action of the EU and its Member States should aim to move towards rapid ratification of the 2006 MLC by Member States (see CNS/2006/0103 and RSP/2008/2660 ).
3) Quality shipping as a key competitive advantage : by 2018, the world fleet could count some 100 000 vessels in operation (77 500 vessels in 2008). In terms of volume, the increase would be even more spectacular: its total capacity is expected to reach more than 2 100 million dwt in 2018 (up from 1 156 million dwt in 2008). In this context, the Commission insists on:
Improving the environmental performance : the Commission, Member States and the European maritime industry should work together towards the long-term objective of ‘zero-waste, zero emission’ maritime transport . To that end, the main priorities should be to: (i) ensure steady progress towards a coherent and comprehensive approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from international shipping; (ii) ensure that Member States are able to achieve "good environmental status" by 2020; (iii) strengthen EU legislation regarding port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residue; (iv) follow up the proposals detailed in the Commission's Communication on an EU strategy for better ship dismantling; (v) reduce sulphur oxides and nitrogen oxides emissions from ships; (vi) re-launch the Commission’s ‘Quality Shipping Campaign’, by means of partnership agreements with the EU maritime administrations, the maritime industries at large and the users of maritime transport services.
Maritime transport safety : in the years to come, the EU and the Member States should: (i) give priority to the enforcement of existing EU and international rules and the speedy implementation of measures introduced with the 3rd Maritime Safety Package; (ii) revise the mandate and the functioning of the European Maritime Safety Agency, in order to further enhance the technical and scientific assistance it can give to the Member States and the Commission; (iii) reinforce international cooperation with EU trading and shipping partners; (iv) take care to ensure the systematic application of the IMO “Guidelines on the treatment of persons rescued at sea"; (v) ensure that, by 2012 at the latest, all Member States are on the "White List" of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control.
Maritime transport security : very serious concerns about acts of terrorism, piracy and armed robbery at sea persist. A further difficulty relates to incidents involving people smuggling, trafficking and stowaways. The challenge is to complete the work already started in e stablishing a comprehensive framework of security measures based on prevention, reaction capacity and resilience . This should lead to a genuine ‘security culture’ becoming an integral part of quality shipping and port operations, while not compromising unnecessarily the performance of shipping and the quality of life of seafarers and passengers. In that regard, the most urgent priority is to protect seafarers, fishermen and passengers on ships sailing off the coast of Somalia, in the Gulf of Aden or in any other region of the world that could become problematic in the future.
Maritime surveillance : looking ahead to 2018, the capacities of the EU’s maritime transport system should be strengthened by putting in place an integrated information management system to enable the identification, monitoring, tracking and reporting of all vessels at sea and on inland waterways to and from European ports and in transit through or in close proximity to EU waters. In a broader context, building on the resources currently available, such as AIS, LRIT, SafeSeaNet or CleanSeaNet, or those that are being developed, such as Galileo and GMES, the EU should promote the creation of a platform to ensure the convergence of sea-, land- and space-based technologies, the integrity of applications and appropriate management and control of information on a "need-to-know" basis.
EU energy security : m aritime transport is key to Europe's energy security and therefore is an important instrument of the European energy policy. It is to be seen as part of the EU strategy of diversification of routes and of energy sources. 90 % of oil is transported by sea, while there is an increasing trend towards transport of natural gas in a liquefied form by tankers (LNG). Many other energy products are transported by sea as well. As emphasized notably in the Second Strategic Energy Review , LNG facilities are essential for increasing flexibility in gas supplies in the internal energy market, thus enabling solidarity in crisis.
4) Working together on the international scene : the European Union has a longstanding commitment to open and fair competition in shipping and also to quality shipping. The Commission and the Member States are well placed to push for change in order to achieve a comprehensive international regulatory framework for shipping, suited to face the challenges of the 21st century: concerted action at European level is crucial in several fora, for example concerning: governance (UNCLOS), international trade (WTO and bilateral maritime transport dialogues and agreements, UNCITRAL), safety, security and environmental protection (IMO), labour (ILO) or customs (WCO). EU international cooperation efforts should lead to the establishment of a mechanism to ensure actual enforcement of internationally agreed rules by all flag and coastal states in the world .
5) Short-sea shipping : maritime transport in the EU-27 is predicted to grow from 3.8 billion tonnes in 2006 to some 5.3 billion tonnes in 2018. Passenger traffic, including ferries and cruise ships, will also grow. Territorial continuity, regional cohesion and quality standards for sea passengers will have to be ensured. In that regard, the main priorities should be to:
establish a true ‘European maritime transport space without barriers’; implement the measures announced in the Communication on a European Ports Policy ; ensure the right conditions for attracting investment flows to the port sector; generalise fast-track procedures that cut the overall lead time significantly; issue guidelines on the application of relevant Community environmental legislation to port development; reinforce the EU strategy for ensuring the full deployment of Motorways of the Sea projects; support EU funding programmes such as the Trans-European Network Transport projects, Marco Polo, etc; facilitate better connection of islands and long-distance intra-EU passenger transport; examine economic instruments (such as taxes, charges or emission trading schemes) for "getting the prices right" encouraging users to make use of short sea shipping alternatives addressing road congestion problems; address the issue of passenger rights for users of ferry and cruise services in Europe.
6) Europe, the world leader in maritime research and innovation : the European maritime industries should capitalise on the significant RTD efforts carried out under successive EU Research Framework Programmes and other activities: (i) come up with new ship designs and equipment to improve safety and environmental performance; (ii) technological development and advanced logistics conceptions which maximise the efficiency of the overall transport chain by means of short sea shipping and inland waterway transport are also required for achieving sustainable mobility; (iii) adequate ICT inspection and monitoring tools, also related to surveillance; (iv) the deployment of ‘e-Maritime’ services at European and global levels.
The Commission's intention is to pursue constructive dialogue with all stakeholders concerned in view of undertaking action for the practical implementation of the measures identified in this strategic review.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)4415
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0128/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0114/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0114/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE438.180
- Committee draft report: PE431.002
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0008
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0008
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0008 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE431.002
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE438.180
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0114/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)4415
Activities
- Georgios KOUMOUTSAKOS
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Paul BESSET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Knut FLECKENSTEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jacky HÉNIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvana KOCH-MEHRIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Libor ROUČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport van DALEN A7-0114/2010 - AM 1 #
Amendments | Dossier |
99 |
2009/2095(INI)
2010/03/03
TRAN
99 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. taking the view therefore that structural and integrated measures to preserve and develop the thriving maritime sector in Europe are important
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas on 1 January 2007, the date on which Romania and Bulgaria joined the Union, the EU acquired direct access to the Black Sea, an area of significant geo-strategic importance as a result of its proximity to the Caspian Sea and to strategic partners of the EU, such as Russia, Ukraine, Turkey and Georgia,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of the maritime sector for the European economy as a
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the EU
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Hopes that the EU’s maritime policies will henceforth be designed within the framework of a ‘single European sea’ and, consequently, calls on the Commission to develop a European maritime transport policy as part of a common maritime area;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Urges the Commission to continue to combat abuses of flags of convenience and to look at the possibility of creating a European register;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on EU Member States therefore to
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on EU Member States therefore to encourage the use of their flag, for example by providing fiscal facilities such as a tonnage tax
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas attracting young people to maritime careers and keeping them in the profession is an absolute necessity, and the level of training for maritime professionals in Europe needs to be improved through the impending revision of the STCW Convention,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, like any other sector of transport, the maritime sector ought in principle not to receive any State aid, although
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers that, like any
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the guidelines on State aid to shipping (which expire in 2011) must be retained and extended, since they have contributed substantially towards maintaining the international competitiveness of European shipping, towards its ability to successfully overcome the often unfair competition from third countries, and towards maintaining its leading position worldwide, and have therefore helped to support the economies of Member States;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to submit to the Council and to the European Parliament by June 2010 a list of the State aid provided in the last three years to European maritime transport companies and a breakdown of the market, as a percentage, between container line consortia and maritime conferences;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to submit the promised new rules on State aid
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines, in this context, that State aid should be used exclusively to support European maritime sectors that are committed to social standards, safeguarding jobs and the training of personnel in Europe;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls on the Commission to give greater consideration to maritime transport and its land-based structures during the forthcoming revision of the Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, in particular the multimodal linking of European sea ports with the hinterland;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal (COM(2009 11 ) of 21 January 2009 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in or departing from ports of the Member States of the Community, in order to simplify/reduce/eliminate administrative procedures for European short sea shipping; calls on the Commission to continue to support short sea shipping with a view to substantially increasing the performance capacities of maritime transport within the Community;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas maritime transport is a relatively environmentally sound mode of transport, which nonetheless still has much potential to become even cleaner than it already is; whereas it must participate in the efforts to combat climate change through a gradual reduction in the carbon footprint of vessels and port infrastructures,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes initiatives by Member States and the Commission to make maritime occupations more attractive to young EU citizens;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes initiatives by Member States and the Commission to make maritime occupations more attractive to young EU citizens; advocates, to this end, linking work and multiannual training in the maritime sector at all levels; advocates also that more information on the sector be provided at schools and that more traineeships be made available;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes initiatives by Member States and the Commission to make land-based and sea-based maritime occupations more attractive to young EU citizens; advocates, to this end, linking work and multiannual training in the maritime sector; advocates also that more information on the sector be provided at schools and that more traineeships be made available;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on Member States to improve lifelong learning facilities in the maritime sector and therefore increase employability prospects for seafarers within and outside EU fleets;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Calls on Member States, within the scope of international conventions such as the STCW Convention and the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, to improve and modernise the existing training programmes with a view to further qualitative development of maritime colleges; at the same time, considers that setting a required minimum number of crew members for each category of ship (e.g. dry cargo carriers, tankers, LNG carriers, etc.), in conjunction with an improvement in working and living conditions on board, could contribute substantially towards reducing the problems and risks associated with fatigue;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Calls on Member States to ratify the 2006 ILO Maritime Labour Convention;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Calls on Member States to encourage the use of EU seafarers in their own fleets and to create enough facilities in order to prevent the migration of seafarers outside EU;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Welcomes the Commission's suggestion toward Member States to promote cooperation between European maritime institutions and encourage Member States to harmonise the respective curricula and training in order to promote and develop high qualification and advanced skills for the EU seafarers;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that seafarers from third countries must
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas safety is
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that seafarers from third countries must comply with satisfactory training requirements in accordance with the STCW Convention and calls on ship owners and national inspectorates to guarantee and enforce this, where necessary assisted by EMSA;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Calls on the Commission, in this context, to review the mandate and working methods of the European Maritime Safety Agency;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Recognises that the interest of EU citizens in seafaring professions could be strengthened by the introduction of rules improving working conditions on board ships, and calls on Member States to move towards ratification and enforcement of the ILO 2006 Maritime Labour Convention (MLC);
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines th
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines that
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Underlines th
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that the maritime training based on the STCW International Convention was used to downgrade maritime training and replace it with an ad hoc, superficial form of training, and to encourage the influx of a cheaper workforce from third countries, and that it has served only to increase the profits of the maritime business groups and private training companies; emphasises the need to substantially upgrade maritime training with the adoption of an international convention on crews and officers of ships, within the IMO framework, and also the need to recognise intermediate and higher maritime training as an equivalent level of training for related sectors on land;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls, in this context, for the ratification of the International Labour Organisation’s 2006 Maritime Labour Convention by all Member States, in order to guarantee uniform and globally applicable social standards for seafarers;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Encourages the exchange of good practices in the area of employment conditions and social standards and encourages an improvement in living conditions on board vessels, particularly through the development of information and communication technologies, better access to healthcare, better safety standards and training to enable seafarers to cope with the risks inherent in their jobs;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Underlines that the social rules governing maritime workers, as laid down by the ILO, must be respected;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Calls on maritime port authorities to improve facilities for seafarers on ships waiting at anchor in roadsteads, including easier transportation facilities from ship to shore and vice versa;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that considerable progress
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Acknowledges that considerable progress is still possible with a view to reducing emissions of SOx, NOx, particulates (PM10) and CO2 in shipping, and that this is necessary within the framework of the European Union’s climate protection goals;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Urges the Commission to propose before the end of 2010 a system of ‘maritime emissions trading schemes’ (METS), which would be used as an additional tool for the reduction of CO2 emissions from maritime transport;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that these reductions must be agreed in global fora in order to limit disparities in competitive conditions, but that this must not prevent the EU from taking initiatives aimed at further reductions in the fleets of its Member States, thereby encouraging the other continents to follow suit and helping them to become competitive in this area;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that these reductions must be agreed in global fora in order to limit disparities in competitive conditions; draws attention in this context to the major disparities between short and long- distance sea shipping, which must be considered when reaching agreements in global fora;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that these reductions must be agreed
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States to make more use of the option
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on Member States to make more use of the option – where possible in conjunction with neighbouring countries – of designating maritime emission control areas, particularly for NOx; emphasises that the establishment of further maritime emission control areas must not lead to distortion of competition within Europe;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas climate change poses the greatest challenge for all European policy areas in the 21st century,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Supports the measures that encourage modal shifts towards maritime transport with a view to easing congestion on major roads; invites the European Union and the Member States to create logistics platforms at ports, which are essential for developing intermodality and strengthening territorial cohesion; stresses that the international and Community rules must not hinder the efforts undertaken by the national authorities in this regard; hopes to see the rapid and extensive introduction, within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean, of motorways of the sea, which will help to reduce both pollution and congestion in land networks;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Supports in principle the amendments to Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention to reduce sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ships, adopted by the International Maritime Organisation in October 2008; is concerned, however, about a possible shift back from short sea transport to road haulage as a result of the introduction of the 0.1% sulphur limit, envisaged as of 2015, in the sulphur emission control areas in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea; therefore calls on the Commission to submit a relevant impact assessment to the European Parliament as swiftly as possible and by the end of 2010 at the latest;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15 b. Considers that all modes of transport, including maritime transport, must gradually internalise their external costs; believes that the introduction of this principle will generate funds that can subsequently be used primarily for efforts to encourage innovation;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission and Member States also to
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission and Member States also to work on, and analyse the possible effects of, alternative instruments such as the introduction of a levy on bunker fuel,
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Member States to work within IMO to set and implement appropriate and globally applicable environmental standards;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes in this connection the breakthrough in inland shipping technology which has made it possible to reduce emissions from existing ships' engines substantially
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) D b. whereas the European maritime industry is a leading global industry and this lead role can only, and must be, safeguarded in the long term through innovation,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Deplores the fact that the Copenhagen Climate Summit did not succeed in reaching any conclusions with regard to reducing emissions from seagoing vessels, but stresses that intensive efforts must continue, both in the post-Kyoto process and in the IMO, to agree global measures to bring about such reductions; invites the Commission to make every effort to ensure that the IMO receives a mandate with quantifiable reduction targets for maritime transport during the next international climate negotiations;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls on the European Union to lead this process at global level, notably in the IMO, to reduce the emissions from the maritime sector;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the importance of interoperable technical facilities for the supply of electricity from shore to ship in European ports, which can considerably reduce pollution; calls on the Commission to ascertain in which ports these facilities can be utilised efficiently;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Stresses that, as part of its research and development policy, the Commission must give priority to innovation in the area of renewable technologies for use on vessels, such as solar and wind technologies;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Calls on the European Commission to examine the potential for reducing and monitoring pollution by using intelligent technologies in the transport sector, notably Galileo;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Stresses the necessity to promote paper-free port and customs operations as well as to ease up cooperation between different service providers and consumers at the port, using different intelligent transport systems and networks such as SafeSeaNet and e-Custom, in order to speed up port operations and to reduce pollution;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20 a. Underlines the importance of establishing, in all coastal Member States, European emergency response centres for maritime accidents;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Advocates stringent checks on shipbuilding, including the quality of the steel used, and vessel design and maintenance, as provided for inter alia in the amended legislation on classification societies;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21 a. Notes with great concern that EU policy on the shipbuilding industry, and on privatisation of ports and port services, strengthens monopoly business groups in shipping and related sectors, inflicting a serious blow to workers;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on Member States and ship owners to seek to be placed
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. having regard to the ongoing criminal attacks on European fishing and commercial vessels and passenger ships in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia and in international waters,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on national inspectorates and other national authorities to cooperate more closely in exchanging data on vessels and their cargoes, so as to reduce regulatory pressure but increase the effectiveness of inspections; calls for the rapid introduction of an integrated information management system by using and strengthening the resources already available, especially SafeSeaNet; calls on the Commission to put in place as soon as possible an EU-wide cross-border and cross-sectoral surveillance system;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Is aware
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Is aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas and calls on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives such as Atalanta which can protect them against piracy; invites vessels sailing off the Horn of Africa to identify themselves by registering in advance on the Maritime Security Centre – Horn of Africa website; regrets that such acts of piracy hinder the free movement of merchant vessels operating legally on the high seas and pose a serious threat to navigation, mariners, fishermen and travellers, and more generally to the stability of the international maritime transport system; notes that the global approach to combating piracy cannot be limited to an international naval force but should form part of a comprehensive plan aimed at promoting peace and development in the area;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Is aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas and calls on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives such
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Is aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas, notably in the Horn of Africa area and the waters off the coast of Somalia, and calls on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives such as Atalanta which can protect them against piracy;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Is aware of the danger of piracy on the high seas and calls on all ship owners to cooperate with government initiatives such as Atalanta
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Underlines the need for coherent and coordinated action by the EU to combat the proliferation of acts of piracy against merchant ships in Africa and South-East Asia, using the possibilities afforded by the EU’s external action and in particular by the Common Foreign and Security Policy, including development aid and the strengthening of cooperation with the UN, with the strategic aim of improving the political, economic and social conditions in countries which are sources of international piracy;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen their cooperation among themselves and within the international context in order to protect seafarers, fishermen and passengers as well as the fleet crossing the Gulf of Aden as well as other regions with potential piracy threats;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25 a. Welcomes the success of Operation Atalanta, the EU’s first naval operation;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas maritime transport contributes to the realisation of the Community objectives of territorial continuity and territorial cohesion; whereas, in order to guarantee territorial continuity, certain companies provide a service in the general interest that gives them the right to funding to enable them to finance this service and to guarantee fair competition on specific maritime routes; whereas this requirement has a significant impact on the organisation of the sector, ports and their links with the hinterland,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25 b. Calls for this maritime surveillance and protection to be supplemented with actions on the ground to eradicate the phenomenon of piracy;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25 b. Calls on the maritime and defence industry to develop as quickly as possible new models of speedboats designed for coastal police and intervention forces, equipped for prompt and efficient response in the event of highjacking, armed robbery and/or piracy in the high seas;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Underlines the need to speed up the modernisation and expansion of port infrastructure capacities in anticipation of the expected rise in the volume of goods transported by sea; points out that this will require huge investments, which will have to comply with transparent and fair financing rules in order to ensure fair competition among European ports; calls on the Commission to ensure a coherent regulatory framework in this regard;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Calls on the Commission to consider the communication on 'Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018' and this resolution as the basis for the forthcoming review of the Transport White Paper;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27 a. Calls for a policy that promotes connections between ports and inland areas (dry ports and logistics platforms) in regions suffering from congestion; this policy should be incorporated in the TEN- T review;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27 c. Underlines the economic and strategic importance of shipbuilding, which makes it possible to develop and use the new technologies applicable to vessels and to preserve crucial European skills that are needed to build new generations of vessels; calls for measures to support innovation, research and development, and training with a view to developing a competitive and innovative European shipbuilding industry;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27 b. Requests that it be obligatory in port modernisation and expansion projects to equip passenger terminals and new passenger ships with facilities for people with reduced mobility;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new) 27 c. Welcomes the initiative to develop a campaign to promote best practices among passenger transport and cruise ship operators in relation to passengers’ rights;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new) 27 d. Calls on the Commission to take into account during the current TEN-T review the recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018, notably those concerning the efficient integration of the motorways of the sea and inland waterway transport, as well as the integration of the network of ports of European interest as integrating nodes;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28 a. Calls on the Commission to draft a comparable strategy for European inland waterway transport and to coordinate it with the present strategy, in order to promote the development of an optimised transport chain between maritime freight transport and goods transport on inland waterways;
source: PE-438.180
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE431.002New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE431.002 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.180New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.180 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0114_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0114_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100419&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100419&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-114&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0114_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-114&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0114_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-128New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0128_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/00992New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0008/COM_COM(2009)0008_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0008/COM_COM(2009)0008_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
3.20.03 Sea transport: passengers and freightNew
3.20.03 Maritime transport: passengers and freight |
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|