Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | MILANA Guido ( S&D) | GALLAGHER Pat the Cope ( ALDE), STEVENSON Struan ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 420 votes to 15, with 7 abstentions a resolution on the subject of a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture in response to a Commission communication on the same subject.
Members welcome the Commission's initiative as an indication of greater attention being given to the sustainable aquaculture sector. They hope that this will lead to a legislative review that will be better geared to the needs and the challenges facing the sector, with a view to consolidating this at global level.
Parliament expresses the view that a strong sustainable aquaculture sector could act as a catalyst for the development of many remote, coastal and rural areas in the Member States and contribute to the development of local production, with significant benefits also for consumers in the form of high-quality, healthy and sustainably produced food products. As a result, the EU should give greater strategic importance to a sustainable aquaculture sector and its development at Union level by according it the necessary financial assistance without ignoring the fact that advanced technologies, of which aquaculture is one, often require significant investment from businesses, whatever their size.
Parliament considers that a sustainable and organic aquaculture sector should be in a position to provide consumers with high-quality food products ensuring healthy and balanced nutrition. An amendment adopted in plenary also underlines that aquaculture systems which deplete wild fish stocks or pollute coastal waters are to be considered unsustainable and that European aquaculture should give priority to herbivorous species and carnivorous species which can thrive on reduced consumption of fishmeals and oils.
Members consider that any legislative reform of the aquaculture sector should fit in, in a smooth and complementary manner, with the current process of reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. They also point out that, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament has ceased to be a consultative body in the fisheries sector and has become a co-legislator in the aquaculture sector as well.
Legislative, administrative and financial framework : Parliament calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly a proposal for a regulation consolidating in a single text all the EU legislation governing the aquaculture sector and to promote coordination between the different Directorates-General that have responsibility in this field.
The Commission is invited to:
set out in that regulation specific European certification criteria and general basic rules for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, together with provisions for maximum harmonisation of environmental impact criteria at Community level in order to avoid any distortion of competition between Member States; equip the aquaculture sector with a real economic crisis instrument and to devise support systems to deal with biological natural disasters (like toxic algal blooms), man-made disasters; support the experimental farming of native species , technologies for the production of healthy fish and efforts to combat diseases occurring in aquaculture, in the interests of diversifying Community aquaculture production; take into account the trend towards the development of offshore aquaculture facilities as a potential solution to the problem of the availability of space on European coasts; guarantee appropriate vocational training in the field of aquaculture, boost the competitiveness of the sector and encourage the possible retraining of members of the professional fishing industry in alternative methods of managing aquatic environments; consider creating specialist organisations for the promotion of aquaculture products .
Member States are called upon to work towards a " maritime development plan " and the integrated management of coastal areas, as provided for under the EU's new maritime policy and in line with environmental impact assessments, which covers all the different product categories in the sector, such as shellfishing, sub-coastal aquaculture, offshore and freshwater aquaculture, and to undertake to reduce existing bureaucratic obstacles to obtaining the requisite permits and concessions to start a sustainable aquaculture activity.
Members hope that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed Common Fisheries Policy will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector.
They stress too the need to ensure increased financial contributions for scientific research, innovation and technology transfers in the field of sustainable, organic, offshore and freshwater aquaculture.
Quality and consumer protection policy : Parliament takes the view that sustainable aquaculture development cannot take precedence over a stringent quality policy, environment-friendly production methods respectful of animal welfare rigorous health standards and a high level of consumer protection. They call on the Commission, therefore, to develop a specific EU quality label for aquaculture products , along with a specific organic aquaculture label, establishing strict rules in accordance with EU principles of high-quality organic production. The Commission is invited, among other things to:
organise and promote, in close cooperation with the Member States, institutional information campaigns to promote aquaculture products, including organic aquaculture products; take the steps called for by Parliament with regard to the implementation of a staged cormorant population management plan , and to bring forward proposals for comprehensive legislation in this field; propose specific sustainable criteria in relation to the well-being of farmed fish ; extend the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport so as to limit the transport of fish over long distances, thus promoting locally based hatchery operations and encouraging slaughter close to the fish farm; ensure that the sourcing of raw materials used for fish feed follows an environmentally acceptable practice and does not have negative impacts on the ecosystems from which these ingredients are harvested; pre-slaughter procedures classed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as harmful to the wellbeing of the fish are avoided; issue specific technical guidelines on the certification of sustainable fish feed .
External relations : recalling that EU products face strong competition from products from third countries (especially Turkey, Chile, Vietnam and China), where companies can produce at much lower cost, Members call on the Commission and the Member States to strive to ensure that Community legislation is applied rigorously throughout the whole chain of aquaculture products, including feedstuffs and raw materials for feedstuffs, imported from third countries . They stress the need to ensure that aquatic food products that are manufactured in or imported into the EU comply with high environmental protection and consumer health and safety standards. In this context, they reiterate the importance of conducting systematic checks at places giving access to the internal market and key import hubs .
The Commission is called to:
strive to ensure that the principle of mutual recognition and free movement of goods is applied to curative and preventive pharmaceuticals used in aquaculture, to promote reciprocal advanced know-how agreements with third countries and to promote the introduction of best practices by other countries and international bodies; sponsor, as part of the EU's policy on cooperation with developing countries, support and training measures designed to help promote sustainable aquaculture and steer the awareness of aquaculturists in those countries towards a policy on quality and higher production standards; submit a report on environmental and social standards in the aquaculture industry outside the EU and to explore ways of improving the provision of information to consumers; launch impact assessment studies concerning the possible effects that Community trade agreements may have on the aquaculture sector.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Guido MILANA (S&D, IT) on a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture in which it recalls that, at present, there is no specific, harmonised EU legislative framework for the aquaculture sector.
Legislative and administrative considerations : the sector is covered by a variety of EU legislative texts in different areas (environment, public health, etc.) and national legislation which may vary considerably from one Member State to another. Therefore, in order to avoid causing discrimination and market distortions, Members call on the Commission to bring forward swiftly a proposal for a regulation consolidating in a single text all the EU legislation governing the aquaculture sector and thus introducing the necessary legislative clarity. The Commission is also called upon to:
set out in that regulation specific European certification criteria and general basic rules for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, together with provisions for maximum harmonisation of environmental impact criteria at Community level in order to avoid any distortion of competition between Member States; work towards, with the help of the Member States, a ‘maritime development plan’ and the integrated management of coastal areas, as provided for under the EU’s new maritime policy; undertake to reduce existing bureaucratic obstacles to obtaining the requisite permits and concessions to start a sustainable aquaculture activity, possibly by setting up ‘ one-stop shops’ that centralise the administrative formalities incumbent on operators in a single location; equip the aquaculture sector with a real economic crisis instrument and to devise support systems to deal with biological natural disasters (like toxic algal blooms), man-made disasters (like the Erika or the Prestige) or extreme weather events (cyclones, floods, etc.); support the experimental farming of native species, technologies for the production of healthy fish and efforts to combat diseases occurring in aquaculture,; consider creating specialist organisations for the promotion of aquaculture products and to extend the rules on the common market organisations to the sustainable aquaculture sector and to support and provide incentives for promotional campaigns at EU level and on external markets.
Members point out that with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament has ceased to be a consultative body in the fisheries sector and has become a co-legislator in the aquaculture sector. They consider that any legislative reform of the aquaculture sector should fit in, in a smooth and complementary manner, with the current process of reform of the Common Fisheries Policy .
Rural and coastal regions : Members express the view that a strong sustainable aquaculture sector could act as a catalyst for the development of many remote, coastal and rural areas in the Member States and contribute to the development of local production. They consider that the success of the European sustainable aquaculture sector will be largely dependent on the establishment, nationally and locally, of a more business-friendly environment, and calls on the Member States, therefore, to speed up their work towards this without delay and to promote exchanges of experience and best practices at EU level. The Commission is also called upon to guarantee appropriate vocational training in the field of aquaculture, boost the competitiveness of the sector and encourage the possible retraining of members of the professional fishing industry in alternative methods of managing aquatic environments , thus also helping to create secure jobs for young people in rural and coastal areas and in the outermost regions.
Sustainable aquaculture systems : noting that all forms of aquaculture must be sustainable and socially just and, consequently, no harm must be done to ecosystems through an increase in the concentrations of natural substances, Members consider that aquaculture systems which deplete capture fisheries or pollute coastal waters are to be considered unsustainable and that European aquaculture should give priority to herbivorous species and carnivorous species which can thrive on reduced consumption of fishmeals and oils. They stress that, in order to expand the aquaculture industry in Europe, the sector relies on continuous development to decrease the feed factor of wild-caught protein to product. They point out that the stocks of wild fish suitable for feed production are limited and in many cases overfished and therefore aquaculture development should focus more on herbivorous species and piscivorous species which can further significantly decrease the feed factor.
Transparency and quality : Members consider it urgent and essential to lay down and strengthen the rigorous, transparent quality and traceability criteria for EU aquaculture products, to improve fish feedstuffs, and to introduce and strengthen labelling criteria for high-quality aquaculture products and organic aquaculture production. They consider that the priority aim of environmental quality certification for aquaculture products should be to promote the environment-friendly use of living aquatic resources in the context of a sustainable development that takes due account of environmental, economic and social factors, with due respect for the principles of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and future FAO guidelines. The Commission is called upon to:
introduce a European eco-labelling programme for fishery and aquaculture products that follows the Community guidelines on eco-labelling; organise and promote, in close cooperation with the Member States, institutional information campaigns to promote aquaculture products, including organic aquaculture products; extend the scope of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport so as to limit the transport of fish over long distances, thus promoting locally based hatchery operations and encouraging slaughter close to the fish farm; ensure that the sourcing of raw materials used for fish feed follows an environmentally acceptable practice and does not have negative impacts on the ecosystems from which these ingredients are harvested; ensure that pre-slaughter procedures classed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as harmful to the wellbeing of the fish are avoided; methods of slaughter, such as asphyxiation in ice slurry, in which, according to the EFSA, fish retain consciousness for a long time before death, should be prohibited; issue specific technical guidelines on the certification of sustainable fish feed.
Financing : Members view that financial assistance compensating for damage caused by legally protected animals as an essential precondition for the development of a sustainable, modern and efficient aquaculture sector. The report stresses the need for a firmer commitment from the EU on investments in sustainable aquaculture, in the form of additional financing under the Community Fisheries Fund . The report points out, however, that future financing of aquaculture related activities should only be possible with the effective implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive, to ensure that projects funded do not lead to degradation of the environment or of wild-fish or shellfish stocks. Members reiterate the need to include traditional shellfishing activities along with the rest of the aquaculture sector in the Common Fisheries Policy to ensure economic, social and environmental sustainability and to guarantee them non-discriminatory access to European funding.
In addition, Members emphasise the need to ensure increased financial contributions for scientific research , innovation and technology transfers in the field of sustainable, organic, offshore and freshwater aquaculture. Members hope that the future European Fisheries Fund will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector. They stress that these budget lines should not be financed through an overall cut in spending in other sectors, in particular fisheries.
External relations : in this field, the Commission is called upon to:
strive to ensure that Community legislation is applied rigorously throughout the whole chain of aquaculture products, including feedstuffs and raw materials for feedstuffs, imported from third countries; strive to ensure that the principle of mutual recognition and free movement of goods is applied to curative and preventive pharmaceuticals used in aquaculture, to promote reciprocal advanced know-how agreements with third countries and to promote the introduction of best practices by other countries and international bodies; sponsor, as part of the EU’s policy on cooperation with developing countries, support and training measures designed to help promote sustainable aquaculture and steer the awareness of aquaculturists in those countries towards a policy on quality and higher production standards, particularly as regards the environment, hygiene and social standards in the industry; submit a report on environmental and social standards in the aquaculture industry outside the EU and to explore ways of improving the provision of information to consumers; launch impact assessment studies concerning the possible effects that Community trade agreements may have on the aquaculture sector.
PURPOSE: to give a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture.
BACKGROUND: modern aquaculture represents a major innovation in the production of fish and aquatic food and has been the fastest growing food production sector with an average worldwide growth rate of 6-8% a year.
Aquaculture is an important economic activity in certain coastal and continental areas of the EU. The EU-27 aquaculture industry produced about 1.3 million tonnes of fish, shellfish and crustaceans in 2006, representing a turnover of around EUR 3 billion and generating approximately 65 000 jobs. Current EU consumption demand accounts for about 12 million tonnes.
The EU strategy for sustainable aquaculture adopted in 2002 has set out policy directions to promote the growth of aquaculture. Seven years on, significant progress has been made in ensuring the environmental sustainability, safety and quality of EU aquaculture production.
Against the background of fast-changing technologies and persisting economic and environmental challenges, it is time to take stock of the strengths and weaknesses of the EU aquaculture sector.
CONTENT: this Communication aims at increasing awareness among policy makers and public bodies, about the importance of aquaculture in the European Union. This Strategy also aims at providing EU leadership and guidance to both stakeholders and administrations to ensure consistency and clarity in designing the policies needed for the sustainable development of European aquaculture.
This Communication aims to identify and address the causes of this stagnation as well as examining the root causes of the stagnation in EU aquaculture production and looks at ways to improve the sector's competitiveness, sustainability and governance:
1) Promoting a sector (including equipment and technology providers):
through competitiveness and diversity : this should be supported by the most advanced research and technology, covering the whole supply chain and meeting consumer demands in a sustainable manner. The EU has been a key contributor to research and technological development in aquaculture (EUR 98 million under the 6th Research Framework Programme, among which EUR 32 million for SMEs. It is essential to: (i) allocate a sufficient EU budget to aquaculture projects to further develop the knowledge-base for sustainable and competitive aquaculture practices; (ii) promote optimisation and development of key research infrastructures and reinforce networks and integration into broader scientific networks to address global challenges such as adaptation to climate change in the context of the new Maritime Policy and its strategic research agenda; (iii) invite Member States to recognise the importance of extensive and traditional forms of aquaculture and to consider possibilities of developing production in existing sites and facilities; through a better development of space in coastal aquaculture, as well as freshwater fish-farming : the Commission: (i) will continue its initiatives to promote the development of maritime spatial planning and Integrated Coastal Zone Management, as identified in the framework of the new EU Maritime Policy ; (ii) invites all Member States to develop marine spatial planning systems, in which they fully recognise the strategic importance of aquaculture; through the integration of specific needs in the EU’s market policy for fisheries : the EU aquaculture industry should be able to answer to consumer demands, be adaptable to changing market requirements and be capable of interacting on an equal footing with the other actors of the marketing chain. The Commission will review the market policy of fisheries and aquaculture products in 2009. The Commission will consider establishing a basis for promoting aquaculture development in third countries and to increase business opportunities for EU aquaculture firms, in the framework of the external dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy.
2) Establishing conditions for sustainable growth of aquaculture : the Community shall ensure that the EU aquaculture industry develops in a way which is compatible with a high level of protection of the natural environment. On the same lines, aquatic food products that are manufactured in or imported to the EU shall comply with high protection standards of consumer health and safety. The Community should also pursue its objectives for a high level of protection of health and welfare in farmed aquatic animals. The Commission will continue to emphasise the importance of environmentally sustainable development of aquaculture in its policies and actions. It will ensure that Member States provide an appropriate level of protection of shellfish waters under the first river basin management plans established under the water framework directive. The Commission will ensure consumer health protection and recognise the health benefit of aquatic food. It will continue to address the need to ensure that aquatic food products are safe for the consumer, both such food produced in the Community and food imported from third countries. To guarantee a high level of consumer protection, competent authorities have to take preventive measures and impose requirements to ensure food quality and safety, as well as to establish surveillance and market prohibitions where necessary. Lastly, it will maintain the legislative tools in accordance with new knowledge on food safety in order to address the food safety risks in the most appropriate way.
3) Improving the sector’s image and governance : Aquaculture's success will depend to a large extend on there being a business-friendly environment for the sector at national and/or local level. Better implementation of EU legislation by Members States should ensure a level-playing field among economic operators on decisions affecting the development of aquaculture.
Therefore, the Commission proposes to provide Member States and regional authorities with guidance to ensure that targeted measures at local, national and EU level help the sector make full use of its assets. It also proposes to reduce the administrative burden, ensure proper stakeholder participation and appropriate information to the public and adequate monitoring of the aquaculture sector.
PURPOSE: to give a new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture.
BACKGROUND: modern aquaculture represents a major innovation in the production of fish and aquatic food and has been the fastest growing food production sector with an average worldwide growth rate of 6-8% a year.
Aquaculture is an important economic activity in certain coastal and continental areas of the EU. The EU-27 aquaculture industry produced about 1.3 million tonnes of fish, shellfish and crustaceans in 2006, representing a turnover of around EUR 3 billion and generating approximately 65 000 jobs. Current EU consumption demand accounts for about 12 million tonnes.
The EU strategy for sustainable aquaculture adopted in 2002 has set out policy directions to promote the growth of aquaculture. Seven years on, significant progress has been made in ensuring the environmental sustainability, safety and quality of EU aquaculture production.
Against the background of fast-changing technologies and persisting economic and environmental challenges, it is time to take stock of the strengths and weaknesses of the EU aquaculture sector.
CONTENT: this Communication aims at increasing awareness among policy makers and public bodies, about the importance of aquaculture in the European Union. This Strategy also aims at providing EU leadership and guidance to both stakeholders and administrations to ensure consistency and clarity in designing the policies needed for the sustainable development of European aquaculture.
This Communication aims to identify and address the causes of this stagnation as well as examining the root causes of the stagnation in EU aquaculture production and looks at ways to improve the sector's competitiveness, sustainability and governance:
1) Promoting a sector (including equipment and technology providers):
through competitiveness and diversity : this should be supported by the most advanced research and technology, covering the whole supply chain and meeting consumer demands in a sustainable manner. The EU has been a key contributor to research and technological development in aquaculture (EUR 98 million under the 6th Research Framework Programme, among which EUR 32 million for SMEs. It is essential to: (i) allocate a sufficient EU budget to aquaculture projects to further develop the knowledge-base for sustainable and competitive aquaculture practices; (ii) promote optimisation and development of key research infrastructures and reinforce networks and integration into broader scientific networks to address global challenges such as adaptation to climate change in the context of the new Maritime Policy and its strategic research agenda; (iii) invite Member States to recognise the importance of extensive and traditional forms of aquaculture and to consider possibilities of developing production in existing sites and facilities; through a better development of space in coastal aquaculture, as well as freshwater fish-farming : the Commission: (i) will continue its initiatives to promote the development of maritime spatial planning and Integrated Coastal Zone Management, as identified in the framework of the new EU Maritime Policy ; (ii) invites all Member States to develop marine spatial planning systems, in which they fully recognise the strategic importance of aquaculture; through the integration of specific needs in the EU’s market policy for fisheries : the EU aquaculture industry should be able to answer to consumer demands, be adaptable to changing market requirements and be capable of interacting on an equal footing with the other actors of the marketing chain. The Commission will review the market policy of fisheries and aquaculture products in 2009. The Commission will consider establishing a basis for promoting aquaculture development in third countries and to increase business opportunities for EU aquaculture firms, in the framework of the external dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy.
2) Establishing conditions for sustainable growth of aquaculture : the Community shall ensure that the EU aquaculture industry develops in a way which is compatible with a high level of protection of the natural environment. On the same lines, aquatic food products that are manufactured in or imported to the EU shall comply with high protection standards of consumer health and safety. The Community should also pursue its objectives for a high level of protection of health and welfare in farmed aquatic animals. The Commission will continue to emphasise the importance of environmentally sustainable development of aquaculture in its policies and actions. It will ensure that Member States provide an appropriate level of protection of shellfish waters under the first river basin management plans established under the water framework directive. The Commission will ensure consumer health protection and recognise the health benefit of aquatic food. It will continue to address the need to ensure that aquatic food products are safe for the consumer, both such food produced in the Community and food imported from third countries. To guarantee a high level of consumer protection, competent authorities have to take preventive measures and impose requirements to ensure food quality and safety, as well as to establish surveillance and market prohibitions where necessary. Lastly, it will maintain the legislative tools in accordance with new knowledge on food safety in order to address the food safety risks in the most appropriate way.
3) Improving the sector’s image and governance : Aquaculture's success will depend to a large extend on there being a business-friendly environment for the sector at national and/or local level. Better implementation of EU legislation by Members States should ensure a level-playing field among economic operators on decisions affecting the development of aquaculture.
Therefore, the Commission proposes to provide Member States and regional authorities with guidance to ensure that targeted measures at local, national and EU level help the sector make full use of its assets. It also proposes to reduce the administrative burden, ensure proper stakeholder participation and appropriate information to the public and adequate monitoring of the aquaculture sector.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6508
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0243/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0150/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0150/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.917
- Committee opinion: PE431.038
- Committee draft report: PE439.290
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0162
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0162
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0162 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE439.290
- Committee opinion: PE431.038
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.917
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0150/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)6508
Activities
- Guido MILANA
- Josefa ANDRÉS BAREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luis Manuel CAPOULAS SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Józef GRÓBARCZYK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iliana IOTOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabeth KÖSTINGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Werner KUHN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George LYON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mario PIRILLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Britta REIMERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ulrike RODUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Struan STEVENSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ioannis A. TSOUKALAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
162 |
2009/2107(INI)
2010/02/04
ENVI
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas environmentally sustainable forms of aquaculture could prove to be a positive contribution to environmental protection as well as an alternative way of meeting much of the demand for fisheries products,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Observes that there are substantial regulatory disparities concerning aquaculture, which may prompt undertakings to relocate production to those places where the least stringent provisions apply and urges the Commission to bar from the European market products which fail to meet European production standards;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to investigate at first hand production methods on fish farms outside the European Union and report on any health hazards;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to insist that aquaculture facilities outside the EU undergo stringent inspection and monitoring in order to ensure that imports comply with EU standards and that European producers face fair competition;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises the need to ensure that aquatic food products that are manufactured in or imported into the EU comply with high environmental protection and consumer health and safety standards;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses that respect for biodiversity should be established as a basic principle of EU aquaculture policy, as regards both domestic waters and the external dimension of the aquaculture strategy, with support being given to the farming of fish only where the species involved are local or already well established; calls for scientific risk assessment for all non- native introductions and for measures to contain and monitor ecologically harmful species;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. Calls on the Commission to issue guidance with regard to the resolution of conflicts arising out of the implementation of the Water Framework Directive regarding aquaculture activities; stresses, however, that this guidance should not jeopardise the overall objective of good water status, as set out in the Water Framework Directive1; 1 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, OJ L 327, 22.12.2000.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) 4e. Calls on the Commission to promote the development of Maritime Spatial Planning1 in the context of the new EU Integrated Maritime Policy1, as a way of coordinating Community actions in related fields, including aquaculture; 1 Commission Communication COM(2007) 575 final - 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union'.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 f (new) Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 g (new) 4g. Urges the Commission to promote research and development relating to aquaculture, placing the emphasis on integrated and closed water-recirculation systems;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas fish
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas fish can suffer pain and stress and many forms of aquaculture do not meet
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the European Commission has recently published a Communication on A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture1, 1 COM(2009) 162 final, Building a sustainable future for aquaculture: A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that many forms of aquaculture may have a negative impact on both animal welfare and human health, such as destruction of habitats, use of chemicals for combating disease, depletion and salinisation of drinking water and agricultural land, nutrient contamination and disturbance of biodiversity through the escaping of farmed fish, and calls on the Commission to introduce legislation to eliminate these negative effects;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that many forms of aquaculture have a negative impact, such as destruction of habitats, use of chemicals for combating disease, depletion and salinisation of drinking water and agricultural land, nutrient contamination, especially in lakes and in closed and semi-closed sea areas such as the Baltic Sea, and disturbance of
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include
source: PE-438.411
2010/04/14
PECH
143 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the OSPAR Convention and PARCOM Recommendation 94/6 on Best Environmental Practice (BEP) for the Reduction of Inputs of Potentially Toxic Chemicals from Aquaculture Use,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the 2002 Commission communication has proved clearly restrictive and inadequate in encouraging the sector and Member States to give a significant boost to the development of the EU aquaculture sector, while the past decade has seen a substantial growth of the sector worldwide,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Urges the Commission to equip the aquaculture sector with a real economic crisis instrument and to devise support systems to deal with biological natural disasters (like toxic algal blooms), man- made disasters (like the Erika or Prestige) or extreme weather events (cyclones, floods, etc.);
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the experimental farming of native species, technologies for the production of healthy fish and efforts to combat diseases occurring in aquaculture, in the interests of diversifying Community aquaculture production, so that it can offer high-quality and high added-value products, by
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Stresses the need to take measures to ensure the replenish stocks of species that are becoming rarer in rivers, in particular traditionally migratory species with a significant economic impact on local populations (sturgeon, shad, salon, etc.) and certain species at sea, and draws the attention of the Commission and the Member States to the need to guarantee the necessary funding for the implementation of such initiatives;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Hopes that the European Fisheries Fund, in taking account of the international financial crisis also, will provide financial support for all enterprises in the sector, on the same terms and conditions, regardless of geographical/spatial criteria;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to provide incentives for the development of offshore aquaculture facilities operating in difficult environmental and climate conditions (e.g. in the Atlantic Ocean) by allowing suitable derogations to the rules on state aid and proposes to the Commission to determine the extent, intensity and size of these derogations among Member States, and even within the same Member State, in order to avoid the distortion of fair competition between producers of aquaculture products;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to provide appropriate incentives for the development of inshore or offshore aquaculture facilities operating in difficult environmental and climate conditions (e.g. in the Atlantic Ocean) by allowing suitable derogations to the rules on state aid;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop the role of the professional aquaculturist and to introduce a training policy which meets the needs of the sector and which fully harnesses the possibility not only of retraining members of the professional fishing industry in alternative methods of managing aquatic environments but also contributes to creating secure jobs for young people in rural and coastal areas and the outermost regions and especially in regions that depend to a great extent on fisheries and aquaculture activities;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the EU is a net importer of fishery and aquaculture products, and the demand for these products is increasing both globally, due to the growing world population, and at Community level due to the past and future accession to the EU of countries in which this trend in demand is even more accentuated, and also because consumption patterns are changing towards foods based on healthier products,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Member States to consider
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Calls on the Commission to adjust, or set out an interpretation of, the Natura 2000 directives without delay, so as to prevent the enactment in the Member States of legislation damaging to aquaculture (for example, prohibitions or excessively rigorous requirements in impact assessments) on the grounds that European law requires it;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Points out that only less than 50% of fishmeal is used in aquaculture feedingstuffs and that most of this raw material is used for the production of feedingstuffs for other animals (pigs, cattle, etc.); considers, nevertheless, that the aquaculture sector should work towards a reduction in its dependence on oil products and fishmeal and invest in the development of alternative raw materials, without however abandoning high-quality animal feedingstuffs, which guarantee top-quality end products;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Takes the view that the responsible production of ingredients to feed fish, including marine ingredients, is a prerequisite for the sustainability of aquaculture;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the sustainable aquaculture sector can make a major contribution to ensuring high-quality food supplies as regards fish products and thus to
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Reiterates the views it has already
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Reiterates the views it has already expressed in its resolution on the adoption of a European Cormorant Management Plan
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific criteria in relation to the well- being of farmed fish, such as maximum levels of farming density, the quantity of vegetable and animal proteins that can be used in feedstuffs on fish farms, and which take into account the nutritional requirements of the fish species farmed, the phases in their life cycle and the environmental conditions, and to promote transportation and slaughter practices which limit sources of stress, and the changing of water in fish ponds in such a way as to guarantee the well-being of the fish being farmed there; however, strategic research into replacements for the essential ingredients should be of highest priority; fishmeal and fish oil contain specific nutrients that make them essential for fish even at low levels; research into the essential nutrients and how to produce them from alternative sources such as microalgae and yeast would reduce the need for fish meal in the longer term; although we do not wish to see fishmeal and oil completely eliminated from diets, research on alternative sources of the essential nutrients found in fish meal can be a long-term solution to sustainable expansion of the industry;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose, in close cooperation with the Member States and having taken account of the various geographical and climatological conditions, the production techniques used, the particular nature of the species farmed and the impact on the cost of production, specific criteria in relation to the well-being of farmed fish, such as maximum levels of farming density, the quantity of vegetable and animal proteins that can be used in feedstuffs on fish farms, and which take into account the nutritional requirements of the fish species farmed, the phases in their life cycle and the environmental conditions, and to promote transportation and slaughter practices which limit sources of stress, and the changing of water in fish ponds in such a way as
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific sustainable criteria in relation to the well-
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific criteria in relation to the well- being of farmed fish, such as maximum levels of farming density, the quantity of vegetable and animal proteins that can be used in feedstuffs on fish farms, and which take into account the nutritional requirements of the fish species farmed – on the understanding that the long-term goal must be to replace animal proteins with vegetable proteins –, the phases in their life cycle and the environmental conditions, and to promote transportation and slaughter practices which limit sources of stress, and the changing of water in fish ponds in such a way as to guarantee the well-being of the fish being farmed there;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls on the Commission to propose specific criteria in relation to the well being of farmed fish, such as maximum levels of farming density, the quantity of vegetable and animal proteins that can be used in feedstuffs on the different types of fish farms, and which take into account the nutritional requirements of the fish species farmed, the phases in their life cycle and the environmental conditions, and to promote transportation and slaughter practices which limit sources of stress, and the changing of water in fish ponds in such a way as to guarantee the well being of the fish being farmed there;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Calls on the Commission to extend the scope of Council Regulation 1/2005 (EC) on the protection of animals during transport so as to limit the transport of fish over long distances, thus promoting locally based hatchery operations and encouraging slaughter close to the fish farm;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the Community sustainable aquaculture sector can make a major contribution to ensuring high-quality food supplies as regards fish products and thus to reducing the pressure on wild species, as well as playing an important role as regards food security, economic activities and employment, especially in rural and coastal regions,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Takes the view that farms should, in conjunction with a veterinarian, draw up a written Veterinary Health Plan, which should be updated annually;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the sourcing of raw materials used for fish feed follows an environmentally acceptable practice and does not have negative impacts on the ecosystems from which these ingredients are harvested;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that pre-slaughter procedures classed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as harmful to the wellbeing of the fish are avoided; methods of slaughter, such as asphyxiation in ice slurry, in which, according to the EFSA, fish retain consciousness for a long time before death, should be prohibited;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new) 30b. Urges the Commission to issue specific technical guidelines on the certification of sustainable fish feed;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strive to ensure that Community customs legislation is applied rigorously t
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strive to ensure that Community
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. 32. Calls on the Commission to strive to ensure
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on the Commission to strive to
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Reiterates the importance of conducting systematic checks at ports and key import hubs giving access to the internal market in order to provide consumers with a watertight guarantee that the aquaculture products imported from third countries are systematically subject to stringent quality control and are therefore fully compliant with EU rules in the field of hygiene and public health;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Reiterates the importance of conducting systematic checks at p
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the EU should therefore give the sustainable aquaculture sector and its development at EU level greater strategic importance, providing it with the necessary financial aid, bearing in mind that the high technology required by aquaculture activities often entails substantial investment by companies, whatever their size,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the Commission, lastly, to sponsor, as part of the EU policy on cooperation with developing countries, support and training measures designed to help promote sustainable aquaculture and steer the awareness of aquaculturists in those countries towards a policy on quality and higher production standards, particularly as regards the environment and hygiene;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Calls on the Commission, lastly, to sponsor, as part of the EU policy on cooperation with developing countries, support and training measures designed to help steer the awareness of aquaculturists
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Calls on the Commission to submit a report on environmental and social standards in the aquaculture industry outside the EU and to explore ways of improving the provision of information to consumers;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 a (new) 35a. Calls on the Commission to launch impact assessment studies concerning the possible effects that Community trade agreements may have to the aquaculture sector;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas, given the importance of developing the aquaculture sector, the Commission is urged to ring-fence a portion of the European Fisheries Fund for that purpose; and whereas the relevant instruments will need to be sufficiently flexible and effective to secure the development of the sector, including scientific research,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the considerable research and technological innovation required to ensure the competitiveness and sustainability of aquaculture and enable operators to be successful in the sector is beyond the possibilities of many companies in the sector,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas, in order to be effective, a sustainable aquaculture policy will need to be structured in such a way as to benefit
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) – having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 271/2010 of 24 March 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as regards the organic production logo of the European Union,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the EU is already applying a
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas any sustainable aquaculture policy, whether at Community or national level, must take account of distinctions between various types of aquaculture production (saltwater fish, freshwater fish, molluscs
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas any sustainable aquaculture policy, whether at Community or national level, must take account of distinctions between various types of aquaculture
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the aquaculture industry must take into account the organic and physiological differences between fish species, having due regard to their feeding cycles and habits and the stress levels caused by farm density or transport, and
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union recognises fish as sentient beings and provides that the Union and the Member States shall, in formulating and implementing their policies on fisheries, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of the animals,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas aquaculture operators in many EU countries
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas aquaculture operators in many countries complain about bureaucratic obstacles and administrative formalities, resulting from the existing legal framework, that limit their productivity and competitiveness, doing more than a little to discourage new plants and investment in the industry
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) – having regard to the Scientific Reports and Opinions produced by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in 2008 on the welfare of six of the main fish species farmed in the EU and to the Scientific Opinions produced by EFSA in 2009 on the welfare at slaughter of eight farmed fish species,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas fish are the natural diet of many farmed fish species and most fish farms rely on diets which contain some fishmeal and fish oil,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, at the same time, many EU countries lack
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, at the same time, many EU countries lack specific national or regional sectoral development plans that regulate installations in continental, coastal and marine areas and clearly identify the zones
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, at the same time, many EU countries lack specific national or regional development plans that regulate installations in coastal and marine areas and clearly identify the zones
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas, at the same time, many EU countries lack specific national or regional development plans that regulate installations in coastal and marine areas and clearly identify the zones and conditions available for aquaculture plants, thereby preventing easily foreseeable conflicts of interest with other economic sectors, such as tourism, agriculture and coastal fishing,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas – contrary to legislative provisions and interpretations of Community law in certain Member States (for example, rules prohibiting aquaculture in marine 'Natura 2000' areas and the inclusion in impact assessments of impossibly rigorous requirements for the establishment of new aquaculture plants or the expansion of existing ones) – a sustainable aquaculture policy can coexist with 'Natura 2000' areas and can even contribute positively to the management thereof,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas a sustainable aquaculture policy can coexist with 'Natura 2000' areas and can even contribute positively to the management thereof and to the welfare of the populations concerned when it deals with traditional shellfishing activities or provides for aquaculture plants of an appropriate size for which there are no alternative locations, that comply with Community rules on environmental impact assessments and are compatible with the provisions on the protection of habitats,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas a sustainable aquaculture policy can coexist with 'Natura 2000' areas and can even contribute positively to the management thereof, in cases where the conservation objectives of the site so allow,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas a sustainable aquaculture policy
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas EU products currently face fierce competition from imports from non- EU countries (above all, Turkey, Chile, Vietnam and China), where companies can operate with much lower overheads, as they are not subject to the same legal constraints, the same stringent environmental and plant health legislation, and low wages (social dumping), thereby putting the EU aquaculture sector under further pressure,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, in this context, the most appropriate step is for the Commission to propose a regulation laying down rules for the aquaculture sector and thus introducing the necessary legislative clarity,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas EU products currently face fierce competition from imports from non- EU countries (above all, Turkey, Chile, Vietnam and China), where companies can operate with much lower overheads, as they are not subject to the same stringent environmental and plant health legislation, thereby putting the EU aquaculture sector under further pressure, affecting food quality and putting consumers' health in danger,
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas EU products currently face fierce competition from imports from non- EU countries (above all, Turkey, Chile, Vietnam and China), where companies can operate with much lower overheads, as they are not subject to the same stringent environmental
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas aquaculture activities have a lower environmental impact than other primary sectors (agriculture and stockbreeding), and aquaculture products are thus more sustainable than agricultural and stockbreeding products; whereas a section of European civil society is also unaware of this fact, which may give rise to unfounded prejudices about these products,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas the depredations of cormorants are threatening, in many areas, to put traditional, more natural fish ponds out of business,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Points out that, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament has ceased to be a consultative body in the fisheries sector and has become a co-
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Expresses the view that a strong sustainable aquaculture sector could act as a catalyst for the development of many coastal and rural areas in the EU and contribute to the development of related production activities, with significant benefits also for consumers in the form of high-quality, healthy and sustainably produced food products;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Expresses the view that a strong sustainable aquaculture sector
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Expresses the view that a strong sustainable aquaculture sector could act as a catalyst for the development of many remote, coastal and rural areas in the EU and contribute to the development of related production activities;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that t
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Considers that targeted support for technological and scientific research is an essential prerequisite for the development of a sustainable, modern, efficient, economically viable and environment- friendly aquaculture sector; also points out that research networks, multidisciplinary research groups, technology transfer and coordination between the sector and scientists through technology platforms are essential to ensure a good return on investment in R&D;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the aquaculture sector is an innovative, potentially high-technology economic sector requiring intensive structural and research investment, long- term operational and financial planning, and hence legal
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the creation of the European Aquaculture Technology and Innovation Platform, taking into account the need for the aquaculture sector to be supported by excellence in research and innovation in order to respond to the emerging challenges;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the success of the European sustainable aquaculture sector will be largely dependent on the establishment, nationally and locally, of a more business-friendly environment, and calls on the Member States, therefore, to speed up their work towards this without delay and to promote exchanges of experience and best practices at EU level;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers it essential that the Member States
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Considers that aquaculture systems which deplete capture fisheries or pollute coastal waters, such as farming without any wastewater treatment, are to considered unsustainable and that European aquaculture should give priority to herbivorous species and carnivorous species which can thrive on reduced consumption of fishmeals and oils;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Stresses that, in order to expand the aquaculture industry in Europe, the sector relies on continuous development to decrease the feed factor of wild caught protein to product, currently at best 2.5 to 1; wild fish stocks suitable for feed production are limited and in many cases overfished, aquaculture development should focus more on herbivorous species and piscivorous species which can further significantly decrease the feed factor;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it urgent and essential to lay down rigorous, transparent quality and traceability criteria for EU aquaculture products, also applicable to products marketed in this area, to improve feedstuffs and general fish health and to introduce and strengthen certification criteria for high-quality aquaculture products and organic aquaculture production;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it urgent and essential to lay down rigorous, transparent quality and traceability criteria for EU aquaculture products, to improve fish feedstuffs and
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers it urgent and essential to lay down and strengthen the rigorous, transparent quality and traceability criteria for EU aquaculture products, to improve feedstuffs and general fish health and to introduce and strengthen certification criteria for high-quality aquaculture products and organic aquaculture production;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the aquaculture sector is an innovative, potentially high-technology economic sector requiring intensive structural and research investment, long- term operational and financial planning, and hence legal certainty and clear and stable legislative frameworks,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the priority aim of environmental quality certification for aquaculture products should be to promote the environment-friendly use of living aquatic resources in the context of a sustainable development that takes due account of environmental, economic and social factors and flood protection and water retention systems, with due respect for the principles of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and future FAO guidelines;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to introduce a European eco-labelling programme for fishery and aquaculture products that follows the Community guidelines on eco-labelling; emphasises that eco-labelling not only gives European aquaculture products a competitive advantage, but also brings transparency to a market in which the proliferation of private certifications can confuse consumers;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to take action to ensure that the stocking of aquaculture farms does not affect the natural status or viability of wild populations, marine ecosystems and biodiversity in general;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Takes the view that continental aquaculture should be developed in close tandem with flood protection and water retention measures as a means of improving water management with a view to safeguarding the environment and protecting people against the effects of flooding;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes the view that, while
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the need for a firmer commitment from the EU on investments in sustainable aquaculture, in the form of financing under the Community Fisheries Fund
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the need for a firmer commitment from the EU on investments in sustainable aquaculture, in the form of financing under the Community Fisheries Fund, which should cover larger business initiatives and provide support for short- term business financing;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the need for a firmer commitment from the EU on investments in sustainable aquaculture, in the form of additional financing under the Community Fisheries Fund;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the aquaculture sector directly interacts with policy areas which are of prime importance to our society, such as the
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Reiterates the need to include traditional shellfishing activities along with the rest of the aquaculture sector in the Common Fisheries Policy to ensure economic, social and environmental sustainability and to guarantee them non- discriminatory access to European funding;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers it essential, lastly, that all the appropriate steps be taken to ensure that any aquaculture product imported into the EU from a third country complies in full with the same public health and food safety standards as the equivalent Community product, and that meticulous checks at the appropriate sites contribute effectively towards this,
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Considers it essential, lastly, that all the appropriate steps be taken to ensure that any aquaculture product imported into the EU from a third country, either for consumption or for processing, complies in full with the same public health and food safety standards as the equivalent Community product, and that meticulous checks at the
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that marine aquaculture and continental aquaculture represent different business realities, that both form an integral part of the CFP and that aquaculture should be considered as complementary to the catch sector, in particular as regards market supply and employability;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out in that regulation specific criteria and general rules, together with provision for maximum harmonisation of environmental impact criteria at Community level in order to avoid any distortion of competition between Member States, for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, but to delegate responsibility for the implementation phase to the competent territorial authorities, in full accordance with the principle of subsidiarity e.g. parameters on environmental impact, water
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out in that regulation specific basic criteria and general rules for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, but to delegate responsibility for the implementation phase
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out in that regulation specific European certification criteria and general rules for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, but to delegate responsibility for the implementation phase to the competent territorial authorities, in full accordance with the principle of subsidiarity – e.g. parameters on environmental impact,
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to set out in that regulation specific criteria and general rules for the various product categories, with which every aquaculture establishment in the Community must comply, but to delegate responsibility for the implementation phase to the competent territorial authorities, in full accordance with the principle of subsidiarity – e.g. parameters on environmental impact, water supply, feeding of farmed fish, molluscs and crustaceans, product traceability and labelling, and
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the aquaculture sector directly interacts with policy areas which are of prime importance to our society, such as the environment, tourism, urban planning, regional development, public health and consumer protection, and whereas it is therefore essential that due consideration be given to the sector's interests and that it be treated fairly,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Believes that the aquaculture sector should be duly supervised and should cover a wider range of marine activities, such as: maritime transport, nautical tourism, offshore wind farms, fishing, etc.;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the Commission to strive to ensure that the Member States make a formal undertaking to document and apply their countries’ existing environmental and tourism protection and general territorial planning legislation and – in respect of those zones not subject to restrictions – to adopt the necessary development plans for the management of marine, coastal and inland water areas, so that sectoral plans for aquaculture
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Member States to work towards a ‘maritime development plan’ and the integrated management of coastal areas, as provided for under the EU’s new maritime policy and
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Member States to work towards
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18а. Believes that the Commission should bring forward proposals for all measures required to promote competitiveness in the sector, with the aim of giving it a level economic playing field and enabling it to develop in a balanced way in the Member States;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector,
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote fish health and sustainable forms of aquaculture; stresses that these budget lines should provide for additional funding from the European Fisheries Fund and should not be financed through an overall cut in spending in other sectors, in particular fisheries;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector, with a particular focus on support for larger business initiatives, technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote fish health and sustainable forms of aquaculture;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector to promote economic activity and employment, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote fish health and sustainable forms of aquaculture;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector following best environmental practice, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote fish health and welfare and sustainable forms of aquaculture;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Hopes that the future European Fisheries Fund in support of the reformed CFP will provide for specific budget lines for sustainable aquaculture development and support for investment in that sector, with a particular focus on technologically innovative plants with a lesser environmental impact (e.g. water purification systems for eliminating residues and pollutants), farms that promote
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for SMEs and family-run enterprises, for young people setting up in aquaculture and for the development of tools to cover the climate-, health- and market-related risks to which aquaculturists are exposed;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Hopes that this Fund will take into due account the need to provide financial support for SMEs and family-run enterprises as these companies provide a vital local employment opportunity;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Supports the Member States in simplifying the licensing procedures that would encourage access to new sites and facilitate long-term access to existing sites, especially in the sites where SMEs and family-run enterprises operate;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises also the need to ensure increased financial contributions for scientific research, innovation and technology transfers in the field of sustainable, organic, offshore and freshwater aquaculture, by means of sectoral policies covering all key aspects, from the supply chain to the optimisation and promotion of products on the market, with better management of those aspects in the thematic axes set out under the Structural Funds and in Community programmes, all intended to ensure that aquaculture is conducted in a manner that is environmentally sustainable, leading to neither resource depletion nor marine pollution;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Emphasises also the need to ensure increased financial contributions for scientific research, innovation and technology transfers in the field of sustainable, organic, offshore and freshwater aquaculture, and for enterprises which are to convert part or all of conventional production to organic production, by means of sectoral policies covering all key aspects,
source: PE-439.917
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2009-04-08T00:00:00New
2009-04-07T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.290New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.290 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE431.038&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-431038_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.917New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.917 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0150_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0150_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0162/COM_COM(2009)0162_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0162/COM_COM(2009)0162_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100617&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100617&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-150&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0150_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-150&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0150_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-243New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0243_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/7/00515New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European AquacultureNew
New impetus for the strategy for the sustainable development of European aquaculture |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|