Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | DEVE | GUERRERO SALOM Enrique ( S&D) | STRIFFLER Michèle ( PPE), JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | MUÑIZ DE URQUIZA María ( S&D) | Syed KAMALL ( ECR), Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 283 votes to 278, with 15 abstentions, a resolution on the effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation.
The resolution notes that the past two years have seen a succession of global crises (food, energy, climate, financial, economic and social) which have serious impacts on industrialised and emerging countries, but devastating implications for the poor population groups in developing countries. Members stress that it is the EU’s obligation to assist developing countries in coping with the burdens of the global economic crisis and climate change , for which they are not responsible. They urge the Member States, in this respect, fully to fulfil their ODA commitments towards developing countries.
Increase ODA volumes : Member States are asked to increase ODA volumes in order to reach their collective target of an ODA/gross national income (GNI) ratio of 0.56% by 2010 and the target of 0.7% ODA/GNI for 2015 and to accelerate efforts to improve aid effectiveness. Stressing that while fulfilment of the ODA commitments is imperative it is not sufficient in terms of tackling the development emergency, Members call on the Commission for active promotion of existing innovative development-financing instruments and for urgent identification of additional innovative sources of finance.
Parliament notes with concern the reduction in ODA efforts for public health – in particular sexual and reproductive health rights – which is crucial to attaining the MDGs. It points out that a healthy, strong workforce is a precondition for economic development.
Priority given to overcoming the crisis : Parliament takes the view that priority should continue to be given to overcoming the financial and economic crisis. It expresses, however, major concern about the possibility and threat of a rise in the indebtedness of developing countries and a further crisis in relation to the viability of the debt, and calls on governments to take urgent action to reform the International Financial Institutions. The Commission is called upon to look into the implementation of the proposal by the World Bank to establish a vulnerability fund to finance food security, social protection and human development. It also calls on the Council and the Commission to take steps to bring about the increase in funding for international financial institutions and to advocate an ambitious reform of the IMF.
Reforming governance : the resolution asks the leaders of the G20 to act, without delay, on the commitment made at the September 2009 summit in Pittsburgh to reform the global development architecture and, within this framework, shift at least 5% of the IMF quota shares to emerging and developing economies and at least 3% of the World Bank voting shares to developing and transition countries. It stresses the need to reform world economic governance in order to ensure better representation of developing countries in decision-making forums. It proposes, to this end, that the G20 should be expanded to include at least one representative of the developing countries, who could be the President-in-Office of the G77.
The resolution stresses the need to move to an international system of governance that will protect the most vulnerable people and countries, especially those hardest hit by the crisis and with ineffective or no safety nets. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to devote particular attention to the promotion and protection of decent work and action to combat gender discrimination and child labour, adhering to the recommendations made on this subject by the International Labour Organisation, whose role should be expanded.
Levying financial transactions : convinced that taxing the banking system would be a fair contribution from the financial sector to global social justice, Members call for an international levy on financial transactions to make the overall tax system more equitable and to generate additional resources for financing development and global public goods, including adaptation of developing countries to cope with and mitigate climate change and its impact. The Commission is urged to present a communication on how a tax on international financial transactions can, inter alia, help to achieve the MDGs, correct global imbalances and promote sustainable development worldwide.
Debt : the resolution notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial shortfall of USD 315 billion in 2010 and that mounting fiscal distress in the most vulnerable countries is imperilling USD 11.6 billion of core spending in education, health, infrastructure and social protection. It advocates, therefore, a temporary moratorium on debt repayments, including capital and interest, and a debt cancellation for least developed countries to enable developing countries to implement countercyclical fiscal policies to mitigate the severe effects of the crisis. It proposes the establishment at international level of an independent and transparent body for debt arbitration.
Climate exchange : Parliament welcomes the European Council’s commitment in October 2009 not to undermine the MDGs with regard to combating climate change. It urges the Council to agree, as soon as possible and in the framework of the Copenhagen summit conclusions and the G20 compromises, on firm financial commitments that enable developing countries to cope with deteriorating climatic conditions and to ensure that assistance needed as a result of the economic crisis will not lead to a relapse into external over-indebtedness.
The Commission and the Member States are invited to: (i) to pay further attention to the link between the environmental crisis and the development crisis, and urges them to make sustainable development and ‘green growth’ strategic priorities for the EU; (ii) to allocate additional money for its commitments to fighting climate change in developing countries, also taking into account the increasing number of environmental refugees.
Trade : Members regard trade as a main driver of economic growth and poverty reduction in developing countries and call upon the EU and the Member States to leverage their international influence to ensure that development remains at the heart of the Doha Round negotiations and that a successful, fair and development-oriented conclusion of the Doha Round is achieved, while enhancing the pro-poor focus of EU Aid for Trade policy. The resolution points out that, in order to achieve greater financial stability and improve the functioning of the global trade system within the WTO, progress needs to be made towards a new international monetary and financial system which is based on multilateral rules that address the specific problems of developing countries and which falls within the United Nations framework.
Economic Partnership Agreements : Parliament reaffirms the fact that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) should be designed as pro-development tools and should not be regarded simply as international trade instruments. It urges the Commission to work towards a rapid conclusion of the negotiations, while taking into account the ways in which EPA provisions may impact on the ability of ACP countries to cope with the crisis. The Commission is called upon – when negotiating and implementing trade agreements, in particular the Economic Partnership Agreements – to strengthen EU policy coherence for development and, inter alia, the promotion of decent work, wealth and job creation.
Protectionism : Members believe that protectionism is no sound response to the crisis and reinforce their call upon the EU to do its part by reducing trade barriers and trade-distorting Union and other subsidies that cause so much harm to developing countries. They take the view that EU development policy should respect both the interests of the EU and those of developing countries and considers that the reciprocal opening-up of markets, which should not be achieved at the expense of economic stability in developing countries.
Tax havens : the resolution stresses that tax havens and off-shore centres encourage tax avoidance strategies, tax evasion and illicit capital flight. It underlines, in particular, that tax fraud in developing countries leads to an annual loss of tax revenue corresponding to 10 times the amount of injected development aid from developed countries. Members urge the Member States, therefore, to make the fight against tax havens, tax evasion and illicit capital flights from developing countries one of its overriding priorities. They reiterate in this context its conviction that the automatic exchange of information should be globally extended and implemented within a multilateral framework. They note the need for real improvement in the banking systems in developing countries as a concrete measure to secure investments and the development and growth of the financial sector, migrant remittances and commercial and any other relevant exchanges.
Microcredit : Parliament considers that one of the major obstacles to economic development in developing countries lies in the limited access which potential entrepreneurs enjoy to credit and microcredit. It stresses moreover that, in most cases, credit guarantees are not available. The Commission and the EIB are called upon to hugely increase credit and microcredit access programmes. Lastly, it invites the Commission to give full consideration to the recommendations expressed in this resolution while drafting the proposal for a decision on the EIB’s external lending mandate following the mid-term review.
The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by GUERRERO SALOM (S&D, ES) on the effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation.
The report notes that the past two years have seen a succession of global crises (food, energy, climate, financial, economic and social) which have serious impacts on industrialised and emerging countries, but devastating implications for the poor population groups in developing countries. Members stress that it is the EU’s obligation to assist developing countries in coping with the burdens of the global economic crisis and climate change , for which they are not responsible. They urge the Member States, in this respect, fully to fulfil their ODA commitments towards developing countries.
Increase ODA volumes : Member States are asked to increase ODA volumes in order to reach their collective target of an ODA/gross national income (GNI) ratio of 0.56% by 2010 and the target of 0.7% ODA/GNI for 2015 and to accelerate efforts to improve aid effectiveness. Stressing that while fulfilment of the ODA commitments is imperative it is not sufficient in terms of tackling the development emergency, Members call on the Commission for active promotion of existing innovative development-financing instruments and for urgent identification of additional innovative sources of finance.
Priority given to overcoming the crisis : the committee takes the view that priority should continue to be given to overcoming the financial and economic crisis. It expresses, however, major concern about the possibility and threat of a rise in the indebtedness of developing countries and a further crisis in relation to the viability of the debt, and calls on governments to take urgent action to reform the International Financial Institutions. The Commission is called upon to look into the implementation of the proposal by the World Bank to establish a vulnerability fund to finance food security, social protection and human development. It also calls on the Council and the Commission to take steps to bring about the increase in funding for international financial institutions and to advocate an ambitious reform of the IMF.
Reforming governance : the report asks the leaders of the G20 to act, without delay, on the commitment made at the September 2009 summit in Pittsburgh to reform the global development architecture and, within this framework, shift at least 5% of the IMF quota shares to emerging and developing economies and at least 3% of the World Bank voting shares to developing and transition countries. It stresses the need to reform world economic governance in order to ensure better representation of developing countries in decision-making forums. It proposes, to this end, that the G20 should be expanded to include at least one representative of the developing countries, who could be the President-in-Office of the G77.
The report stresses the need to move to an international system of governance that will protect the most vulnerable people and countries, especially those hardest hit by the crisis and with ineffective or no safety nets. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to devote particular attention to the promotion and protection of decent work and action to combat gender discrimination and child labour, adhering to the recommendations made on this subject by the International Labour Organisation, whose role should be expanded.
Levying financial transactions : convinced that taxing the banking system would be a fair contribution from the financial sector to global social justice, Members call for an international levy on financial transactions to make the overall tax system more equitable and to generate additional resources for financing development and global public goods, including adaptation of developing countries to cope with and mitigate climate change and its impact. The Commission is urged to present a communication on how a tax on international financial transactions can, inter alia, help to achieve the MDGs, correct global imbalances and promote sustainable development worldwide.
Debt : the report notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial shortfall of USD 315 billion in 2010 and that mounting fiscal distress in the most vulnerable countries is imperilling USD 11.6 billion of core spending in education, health, infrastructure and social protection. It advocates, therefore, a temporary moratorium on debt repayments, including capital and interest, and a debt cancellation for least developed countries to enable developing countries to implement countercyclical fiscal policies to mitigate the severe effects of the crisis. It proposes the establishment at international level of an independent and transparent body for debt arbitration.
Climate exchange : the committee welcomes the European Council’s commitment in October 2009 not to undermine the MDGs with regard to combating climate change. It urges the Council to agree, as soon as possible and in the framework of the Copenhagen summit conclusions and the G20 compromises, on firm financial commitments that enable developing countries to cope with deteriorating climatic conditions and to ensure that assistance needed as a result of the economic crisis will not lead to a relapse into external over-indebtedness.
The Commission and the Member States are invited to: (i) to pay further attention to the link between the environmental crisis and the development crisis, and urges them to make sustainable development and ‘green growth’ strategic priorities for the EU; (ii) to allocate additional money for its commitments to fighting climate change in developing countries, also taking into account the increasing number of environmental refugees.
Trade : Members regard trade as a main driver of economic growth and poverty reduction in developing countries and call upon the EU and the Member States to leverage their international influence to ensure that development remains at the heart of the Doha Round negotiations and that a successful, fair and development-oriented conclusion of the Doha Round is achieved, while enhancing the pro-poor focus of EU Aid for Trade policy. The report points out that, in order to achieve greater financial stability and improve the functioning of the global trade system within the WTO, progress needs to be made towards a new international monetary and financial system which is based on multilateral rules that address the specific problems of developing countries and which falls within the United Nations framework.
Economic Partnership Agreements : the committee reaffirms the fact that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) should be designed as pro-development tools and should not be regarded simply as international trade instruments. It urges the Commission to work towards a rapid conclusion of the negotiations, while taking into account the ways in which EPA provisions may impact on the ability of ACP countries to cope with the crisis. The Commission is called upon – when negotiating and implementing trade agreements, in particular the Economic Partnership Agreements – to strengthen EU policy coherence for development and, inter alia, the promotion of decent work, wealth and job creation.
Protectionism : Members believe that protectionism is no sound response to the crisis and reinforce their call upon the EU to do its part by reducing trade barriers and trade-distorting Union and other subsidies that cause so much harm to developing countries. They take the view that EU development policy should respect both the interests of the EU and those of developing countries and considers that the reciprocal opening-up of markets, which should not be achieved at the expense of economic stability in developing countries.
Tax havens : the report stresses that tax havens and off-shore centres encourage tax avoidance strategies, tax evasion and illicit capital flight. It underlines, in particular, that tax fraud in developing countries leads to an annual loss of tax revenue corresponding to 10 times the amount of injected development aid from developed countries. Members urge the Member States, therefore, to make the fight against tax havens, tax evasion and illicit capital flights from developing countries one of its overriding priorities. They reiterate in this context its conviction that the automatic exchange of information should be globally extended and implemented within a multilateral framework. They note the need for real improvement in the banking systems in developing countries as a concrete measure to secure investments and the development and growth of the financial sector, migrant remittances and commercial and any other relevant exchanges.
Microcredit : the committee considers that one of the major obstacles to economic development in developing countries lies in the limited access which potential entrepreneurs enjoy to credit and microcredit. It stresses moreover that, in most cases, credit guarantees are not available. The Commission and the EIB are called upon to hugely increase credit and microcredit access programmes.
PURPOSE: to propose a broad-spectrum strategy to support developing countries in coping with the crisis.
BACKGROUND: according to recent analyses, after the advanced and emerging economies, the "third wave" of the crisis has reached developing countries. T he World Bank estimates that capital flows to developing countries will fall from 1 trillion dollars in 2007 to around 600 billion dollars in 2009.
The effects of the global economic slowdown are being felt in developing countries. The IMF expects developing economies to grow by a meagre 3.25% in 2009, down from 6.3% in 2008 and 7.9% in 2007 . This economic slowdown is accompanied by a fall in global demand for commodities, lower export revenues and thus a slowdown in trade in developing countries. As a result, developing countries are likely to face a financing gap of 270 to 700 billion dollars in 2009.
Besides the purely financial aspect, the crisis may also have serious political and security consequences in the countries in question, in particular the most fragile ones: poverty and social unrest could turn latent political divergences into acute strife.
The Commission, therefore, considers that there is a need to take rapid action to ensure that the crisis does not affect these countries with even greater severity.
CONTENT: to come to the assistance of those countries under greatest threat, the Commission envisages a large arsenal of measures which may be summarised as follows:
1) activation of new resources: European overseas development aid (ODA) continues to be by far the greatest since the EU provides 59% of the overall total. In 2008, the rate of collective ODA was 0.4% of GNI, i.e. an amount of almost €50 billion (an increase in comparison with previous years). Despite this financial support, the outlook for the coming years appears rather problematic. Many Member States are far removed from the 2010 individual milestones and the additional effort to reach the collective target of 0.56% ODA/GNI in 2010 amounts to €20 billion. The Commission proposes that the Union uses all the sources and instruments available to leverage assistance aimed at stimulating growth, investment, trade and job creation. This would be achieved by:
EU Member States honouring their individual and collective commitments to reach their ODA targets by 2010 and 2015. This will release an extra €20 billion in ODA in 2010; Member States should step up efforts to mobilise additional development-relevant finance. (e.g. building on ongoing voluntary solidarity levies, such as the airline tax to finance health programmes).
2) counter-cyclical action: the Commission considers that action is needed now in order to have a direct counter-cyclical effect in the countries in question. For this reason, it suggests that:
priorities in the strategy papers and support programmes in 2009 and 2010 be redefined with a view to reflecting new needs and emerging priorities; disbursements and made more rapidly to a certain number of countries or regions in emergency situations; aid is frontloaded (€4.3 billion frontloaded in 2009 in the ACP countries); budget support is accelerated; macro-economic assistance is investigated for the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), accession and pre-accession countries.
3) improving effectiveness of aid: the Commission recalls that the dispersion of action undertaken in the developing countries has a considerable cost in terms of effectiveness. The volatility and lack of predictability of aid alone can increase costs by between 15% and 20% and that some calculations show that the cost of failure to apply the full aid effectiveness agenda could range from €5 to €7 billion/year. A coordinated European effort based on common priorities now has to be proposed. Several actions are envisaged:
bilateral actions involving Member States and the Commission; collective European actions such as the setting in place of an EU approach towards cross-country division of labour with regard to development aid; collective EU approach to address the crisis; further reforms of the international aid architecture.
4) cushioning the social impact, supporting the real economy: several initiatives are envisaged to provide practical help to the countries concerned:
protect the most vulnerable (women, children, the aged and disabled): the Commission considers that those most in need of help should receive assistance by: (i) taking targeted social protection measures; (ii) support mechanisms to safeguard social spending (via funding through the EDF, in particular); sustaining economic activity and employment: the aim is to create a maximum of jobs in the maintenance and building of local infrastructures. Several initiatives could be envisaged such as: (i) support for quick delivery infrastructure and job creation; (ii) the establishment of regional infrastructure in the Mediterranean (in the contest of the Union for the Mediterranean); (iii) an increase by €500 million by 2010 of the grant inlay in the EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund; revitalising agriculture: although they have been falling gradually, food prices are always a subject of concern in developing countries. Revitalising agriculture in these countries requires a comprehensive approach: (i) speeding up financing for agriculture (e.g. by frontloading payments for the Food Facility with a billion euros); (ii) investment in certain agricultural corridors (align investments in support of linking markets and production areas); investing in green growth: the crisis offers a major opportunity to create greener economies, including in the least developed countries. The Commission suggests (i) supporting the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) which seeks to boost support for the poorest and most climate-vulnerable developing countries; (ii) use innovative financing for climate change (the Member States should use part of the revenues from auctioning emissions allowances, as agreed in the European Emissions Trading System legislation for, amongst others, climate adaptation measures, afforestation, reforestation and technology transfer in developing countries that will have ratified the Copenhagen agreement). The Commission also recommends the Member States to explore the possibility of launching the Global Climate Financing Mechanism (GCFM); (iii) focus on renewable energy via projects funded by the EIB; (iv) support the transfer of environmentally friendly and sustainable technologies via the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund; stimulating trade and private investment: the Union needs to act at two levels: (i) accelerate its Aid for Trade (AfT) strategy and respect the collectively pledged intent to devote €2 billion to trade-related assistance by 2010; (ii) promote the work on trade financing, extending the work under way in the G20, by increasing export credits, credit facilities and guarantees in order to stimulate trade.
5) strengthening governance: governance and fighting corruption are key to sustainable economic development. Several areas deserve special support. Good governance in the fiscal area , i.e. transparency, exchange of information, fair tax competition, and sound customs systems will increase domestic financial resources for development. Moreover external debt should be managed carefully. Countries in fragile situations (involved in conflicts or in crisis) will require specific attention and action; Lastly, this national governance agenda should be complemented by a strengthening of regional integration processes.
6) improve the institutional approach to the crisis : the Union’s strategy to assist developing countries to cope with the crisis falls within a broader, global context which requires action from global institutions. A more efficient and inclusive world order is required. The ongoing crisis offers an opportunity to make the UN system and international financial institutions fit to tackle global challenges in an effective manner and the G20 should expedite the reform process. In this regard, the Commission proposes:
that the UN must be in a position to effectively coordinate international efforts to help developing countries tackle a variety of global social, economic, financial and economic challenges; that the G20 keeps its promises by motivating the international financial institutions to act in favour of developing countries (this implies an immediate financing on the part of the G20 members of some 250 billion dollars); that regional and continental groups, such as the African Union or ASEAN, should be invited to participate in informal international economic platforms in order to vouchsafe greater efficiency and representation.
PURPOSE: to propose a broad-spectrum strategy to support developing countries in coping with the crisis.
BACKGROUND: according to recent analyses, after the advanced and emerging economies, the "third wave" of the crisis has reached developing countries. T he World Bank estimates that capital flows to developing countries will fall from 1 trillion dollars in 2007 to around 600 billion dollars in 2009.
The effects of the global economic slowdown are being felt in developing countries. The IMF expects developing economies to grow by a meagre 3.25% in 2009, down from 6.3% in 2008 and 7.9% in 2007 . This economic slowdown is accompanied by a fall in global demand for commodities, lower export revenues and thus a slowdown in trade in developing countries. As a result, developing countries are likely to face a financing gap of 270 to 700 billion dollars in 2009.
Besides the purely financial aspect, the crisis may also have serious political and security consequences in the countries in question, in particular the most fragile ones: poverty and social unrest could turn latent political divergences into acute strife.
The Commission, therefore, considers that there is a need to take rapid action to ensure that the crisis does not affect these countries with even greater severity.
CONTENT: to come to the assistance of those countries under greatest threat, the Commission envisages a large arsenal of measures which may be summarised as follows:
1) activation of new resources: European overseas development aid (ODA) continues to be by far the greatest since the EU provides 59% of the overall total. In 2008, the rate of collective ODA was 0.4% of GNI, i.e. an amount of almost €50 billion (an increase in comparison with previous years). Despite this financial support, the outlook for the coming years appears rather problematic. Many Member States are far removed from the 2010 individual milestones and the additional effort to reach the collective target of 0.56% ODA/GNI in 2010 amounts to €20 billion. The Commission proposes that the Union uses all the sources and instruments available to leverage assistance aimed at stimulating growth, investment, trade and job creation. This would be achieved by:
EU Member States honouring their individual and collective commitments to reach their ODA targets by 2010 and 2015. This will release an extra €20 billion in ODA in 2010; Member States should step up efforts to mobilise additional development-relevant finance. (e.g. building on ongoing voluntary solidarity levies, such as the airline tax to finance health programmes).
2) counter-cyclical action: the Commission considers that action is needed now in order to have a direct counter-cyclical effect in the countries in question. For this reason, it suggests that:
priorities in the strategy papers and support programmes in 2009 and 2010 be redefined with a view to reflecting new needs and emerging priorities; disbursements and made more rapidly to a certain number of countries or regions in emergency situations; aid is frontloaded (€4.3 billion frontloaded in 2009 in the ACP countries); budget support is accelerated; macro-economic assistance is investigated for the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), accession and pre-accession countries.
3) improving effectiveness of aid: the Commission recalls that the dispersion of action undertaken in the developing countries has a considerable cost in terms of effectiveness. The volatility and lack of predictability of aid alone can increase costs by between 15% and 20% and that some calculations show that the cost of failure to apply the full aid effectiveness agenda could range from €5 to €7 billion/year. A coordinated European effort based on common priorities now has to be proposed. Several actions are envisaged:
bilateral actions involving Member States and the Commission; collective European actions such as the setting in place of an EU approach towards cross-country division of labour with regard to development aid; collective EU approach to address the crisis; further reforms of the international aid architecture.
4) cushioning the social impact, supporting the real economy: several initiatives are envisaged to provide practical help to the countries concerned:
protect the most vulnerable (women, children, the aged and disabled): the Commission considers that those most in need of help should receive assistance by: (i) taking targeted social protection measures; (ii) support mechanisms to safeguard social spending (via funding through the EDF, in particular); sustaining economic activity and employment: the aim is to create a maximum of jobs in the maintenance and building of local infrastructures. Several initiatives could be envisaged such as: (i) support for quick delivery infrastructure and job creation; (ii) the establishment of regional infrastructure in the Mediterranean (in the contest of the Union for the Mediterranean); (iii) an increase by €500 million by 2010 of the grant inlay in the EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund; revitalising agriculture: although they have been falling gradually, food prices are always a subject of concern in developing countries. Revitalising agriculture in these countries requires a comprehensive approach: (i) speeding up financing for agriculture (e.g. by frontloading payments for the Food Facility with a billion euros); (ii) investment in certain agricultural corridors (align investments in support of linking markets and production areas); investing in green growth: the crisis offers a major opportunity to create greener economies, including in the least developed countries. The Commission suggests (i) supporting the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) which seeks to boost support for the poorest and most climate-vulnerable developing countries; (ii) use innovative financing for climate change (the Member States should use part of the revenues from auctioning emissions allowances, as agreed in the European Emissions Trading System legislation for, amongst others, climate adaptation measures, afforestation, reforestation and technology transfer in developing countries that will have ratified the Copenhagen agreement). The Commission also recommends the Member States to explore the possibility of launching the Global Climate Financing Mechanism (GCFM); (iii) focus on renewable energy via projects funded by the EIB; (iv) support the transfer of environmentally friendly and sustainable technologies via the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund; stimulating trade and private investment: the Union needs to act at two levels: (i) accelerate its Aid for Trade (AfT) strategy and respect the collectively pledged intent to devote €2 billion to trade-related assistance by 2010; (ii) promote the work on trade financing, extending the work under way in the G20, by increasing export credits, credit facilities and guarantees in order to stimulate trade.
5) strengthening governance: governance and fighting corruption are key to sustainable economic development. Several areas deserve special support. Good governance in the fiscal area , i.e. transparency, exchange of information, fair tax competition, and sound customs systems will increase domestic financial resources for development. Moreover external debt should be managed carefully. Countries in fragile situations (involved in conflicts or in crisis) will require specific attention and action; Lastly, this national governance agenda should be complemented by a strengthening of regional integration processes.
6) improve the institutional approach to the crisis : the Union’s strategy to assist developing countries to cope with the crisis falls within a broader, global context which requires action from global institutions. A more efficient and inclusive world order is required. The ongoing crisis offers an opportunity to make the UN system and international financial institutions fit to tackle global challenges in an effective manner and the G20 should expedite the reform process. In this regard, the Commission proposes:
that the UN must be in a position to effectively coordinate international efforts to help developing countries tackle a variety of global social, economic, financial and economic challenges; that the G20 keeps its promises by motivating the international financial institutions to act in favour of developing countries (this implies an immediate financing on the part of the G20 members of some 250 billion dollars); that regional and continental groups, such as the African Union or ASEAN, should be invited to participate in informal international economic platforms in order to vouchsafe greater efficiency and representation.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)2953
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0089/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0034/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0034/2010
- Committee opinion: PE431.180
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE438.374
- Committee opinion: PE430.634
- Committee draft report: PE430.840
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0160
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0160
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2009)0160 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE430.840
- Committee opinion: PE430.634
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE438.374
- Committee opinion: PE431.180
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0034/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)2953
Activities
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (11)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (11)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (11)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (11)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Licia RONZULLI
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation (short presentation)
- Alfredo PALLONE
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Willy MEYER
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (4)
- Nikolaos CHOUNTIS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabeth KÖSTINGER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Wojciech Michał OLEJNICZAK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marta ANDREASEN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander MIRSKY
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bernd POSSELT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonello ANTINORO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pino ARLACCHI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mariya GABRIEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation (A7-0034/2010, Enrique Guerrero Salom)
- 2016/11/22 The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation (short presentation)
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation (A7-0034/2010, Enrique Guerrero Salom)
- 2016/11/22 The effects of the global financial and economic crisis on developing countries and on development cooperation (A7-0034/2010, Enrique Guerrero Salom)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique BAUDIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bendt BENDTSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan BŘEZINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David CAMPBELL BANNERMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Daniel COHN-BENDIT
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mário DAVID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Proinsias DE ROSSA
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis GRECH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marek Józef GRÓBARCZYK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jiří HAVEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dan JØRGENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergej KOZLÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Clemente MASTELLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kyriakos MAVRONIKOLAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Siiri OVIIR
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO
- Olle SCHMIDT
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Brian SIMPSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eva-Britt SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hannes SWOBODA
- Csanád SZEGEDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Britta THOMSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Traian UNGUREANU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Amendments | Dossier |
142 |
2009/2150(INI)
2009/12/14
ECON
44 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Takes the view that priority should continue to be given to overcoming the financial and economic crisis;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Stresses that the credit crunch, uncertainty caused by the depressionary cycle and the drop in international trade, investment and remittances by migrant workers have been the channels by which the crisis has been transmitted from the developed countries to the developing countries. In all these areas, the Union needs to adopt initiatives and assert its presence on the international stage in a concerted, comprehensive and coherent manner;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls for stronger macroeconomic cooperation within the G20, a more powerful role for the United Nations system and the reform of international financial institutions to ensure a concerted response to the crisis and its effects in developing countries;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Points out that in order to achieve greater financial stability and improve the functioning of the global trade system within the WTO, progress needs to be made towards a new international monetary and financial system which is based on multilateral rules that address the specific problems of developing countries and falls within the United Nations framework;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the European Council's commitment in October 2009 not to undermine the MDGs in combating climate change; urges the Council to agree as soon as possible and in the framework of the Copenhagen summit conclusions and the G-20 compromises on firm financial commitments that enable developing countries to cope with deteriorating climatic conditions and to ensure that assistance needed due to the economic crisis will not lead to a relapse in external over-indebtedness;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that the principle of policy coherence for development (PCD), which is enshrined in the Treaty, is a pioneering concept for attaining the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); urges the EU accordingly to develop a trade policy which is consistent and coherent with the achievement of the MDGs; calls for the elaboration of robust legal mechanisms that would ensure that the EU is held accountable for its commitments towards policy coherence;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for better coherence of development aid and other policies of the EU; notes that for example marketing EU-subsidised agricultural products may run counter to creating sound markets for the products of the poor local farmers and thus may negate efforts made by the projects which try to enhance local agriculture;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes with concern the reduction in ODA efforts for public health, in particular sexual and reproductive health rights, which is key to attaining the MDGs; points out that a healthy, strong work force is a precondition for economic development;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that EU development policy should
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes the view that EU development policy should not impose EU interests
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Notes that developing countries are withstanding the financial and economic crisis better than was first feared;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that various companies have already attained hundreds of thousands of hectares of land in some developing countries for the production of biofuels to the EU-markets; calls for such land acquisition to be countered by introducing criteria with clear limits to the amount of permitted greenhouse gas emissions during the whole life cycle of the production of biofuels and criteria which make this kind of use of land suitable for food production disadvantageous;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that tax havens and off-shore centres encourage tax avoidance strategy (for instance, through transfer mispricing), tax evasion and illicit capital flight; in particular, underlines that tax fraud in developing countries leads to an annual loss of tax revenue corresponding to ten times the amount of injected development aid from developed countries; urges the Member States therefore to make the fight against tax havens, tax evasion and illicit capital flights from developing countries one of its overriding priorities; reiterates in this context its conviction that automatic exchange of information should be globally extended and implemented within a multilateral framework;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. In order to achieve better results in development cooperation calls for enhanced cooperation, monitoring and evaluation during planning and implementation of the development cooperation projects in which the EU is involved; calls for the new high representative of foreign affairs to consider putting up separate units in each of the recipient countries for monitoring and evaluating these projects on a continuous basis;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Notes that monitoring and evaluation could be enhanced by using suitable computer programmes, such as that being developed by OLAF or those created by EU-support, for example ODAMoz, with the help of which one can list, classify, analyse and follow all development projects, and keep track on how they really achieve their goals;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Notes that Member States could benefit from enhanced cooperation within the evaluation and monitoring units of the EU for example by sending their personnel to these units to monitor and evaluate the projects funded by the individual Member State; notes that cooperation and co-use of infrastructure can be especially useful to those Member States whose development cooperation structures are relatively recent, especially if personnel training can be attached to those units; notes that such cooperation would enhance necessary transparency, the use of best practices and even acceptance in the donor countries of increases in development budgets;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of supporting developing countries to build up effective
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of supporting developing countries to build up effective taxation capacities,
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of supporting
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that there are dozens of tax havens world wide which are used even by some OECD-based companies in order to avoid paying taxes to those developing countries where they have profitable activities or to their home countries; asks the Commission to report on how automatic exchange of information can be globally extended and sanctions for uncooperative tax havens and their users could be implemented and how country- by-country reporting on profits and taxes paid can become a rule for transnational companies in the EU;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) -1b. Notes, further, that globalisation has also had positive effects on the overall economic situation of developing countries;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes with concern that the further deterioration of the economic well-being of developing countries could lead to unacceptably high levels of unemployment and increased economic migration (including illegal immigration); adds that such migration flows could lead to a 'brain drain' from developing nations and damage their future economic growth;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls upon the EU to support free trade and to remove all trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies, especially the European subsidies in the field of agriculture;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks the EIB to ensure that its guarantees and investments are not executed through tax heavens; asks the EIB
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks the EIB to ensure that its guarantees and investments are not executed through tax heavens; asks the EIB not to
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need to move to an international system of governance that will protect the most vulnerable people and countries, especially those most badly hit by the crisis and with ineffective or absent safety nets;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Asks the Council and Commission to advocate an ambitious reform of the IMF
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the report to be prepared by the International Monetary Fund for the next G20 meeting on the contribution to be made by the financial system towards paying for the burdens associated with the different government interventions to look at all the direct and indirect burdens imposed on public finances and, in particular, their impact on the budgets of developing countries;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to press ahead with the reform of international development cooperation;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Urges the Commission to present a communication on how a tax on international financial transactions can, inter alia, help achieve the Millennium Development Goals, correct global imbalances and promote sustainable development worldwide;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 c (new) -1c. Stresses the need to continue to provide assistance and constantly to adapt it to new realities and circumstances;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Council and Commission to take steps to bring about the increase in funding for international financial institutions agreed at the G-20 summit;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Takes the view that the volume of development assistance funding alone does not provide a sufficient basis for judging the effectiveness and efficiency of the European Union's development assistance measures;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Calls on the Council and Commission constantly to monitor their development cooperation policies and instruments for their effectiveness and efficiency and their contribution to economic growth and poverty reduction in developing countries;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Calls on the Council and Commission, when monitoring their development cooperation instruments and policies, also to take care to minimise unintended consequences for the economies of developing countries, such as increasing dependence on development assistance transfers with negative repercussions on growth, wages and employment and the emergence of rent-seeking structures and corruption;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 f (new) 6f. Calls on the Council and Commission to improve the coordination of bilateral and multilateral development cooperation, since this is one of the main factors undermining the effectiveness of development assistance.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Stresses that the global economic crisis has necessitated an enhanced development cooperation both in quantity and quality;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that it is the EU's obligation to assist developing countries in coping with the burdens of the global economic crisis and climate change, for which they are not responsible; urges the Member States in this respect to fulfil their Official Development Assistance commitments towards the developing countries fully and recalls that fulfilling those commitments would be both a faster and an easier way to assure funds for developing countries than creating a new system for financial transaction taxation;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that a comprehensive response must be provided to the economic and financial crisis, that no financial institution, market segment or jurisdiction must be exempt from regulation or supervision and that the transparency and accountability of all parties must form the bedrock of a new brand of international finance governance;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that developing countries, which are particularly dependent on development cooperation funding and are highly export-oriented, have been hit hardest by the crisis up to now, since financial flows from north to south are increasingly drying up and the internal markets of many developing countries are too weak to offset the decline in exports;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the scale, depth and complexity of the financial crisis is linked to the disconnect between the development of finance and the real economy, the existence of escalating global imbalances and worsening environmental problems on the planet that must be corrected to put the economic system on the path of global sustainable development;
source: PE-430.910
2010/02/02
INTA
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recognises that 20 years of global trade liberalisation and a predominant orientation towards exports, especially in developing countries, have contributed to the build-up of the enormous global imbalances that are at the roots of the global economic and financial crisis;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that a fair and development-oriented conclusion of the Doha Round in 2010 could help the WTO in aiding the economic recovery from the crisis and continuing the fight against protectionism in developed, developing and less-developed countries and could contribute to poverty alleviation in developing and less-developed countries, the creation of good-quality jobs and the reduction of consumer prices;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out to the Commission that the current crisis should be used as an opportunity to revise the EU's mandate for negotiations within the WTO, in particular on agricultural products, the full liberalisation of trade in which poses a threat to developing countries' food sovereignty;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support all action to combat climate change, which is hitting developing countries hardest, and, in this connection, to step up the transfer of appropriate technologies;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Asks the Commission to conduct an assessment of the export dependency of ACP countries and its compatibility with development goals in country strategy papers, before continuing negotiations on full Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs);
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Asks the Commission and Member States to assess the vulnerability of developing countries’ economies to external shocks and to support measures to increase developing countries’
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Asks the Commission and Member States to support measures to ease developing countries’ access to credit, including the substantial capitalisation of multilateral development banks, and creating a framework to allow the licensing of a diversity of financial services providers to meet local citizens’ needs;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the Agreement on the Global System of Trade Preferences (GSTP), a mechanism established by 22 developing countries to reduce tariffs and other barriers to the export of goods traded between them, in an attempt to
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Is convinced that current global trade and economic integration policies have to be reviewed in the light of their evident failure to provide for stable and socially and environmentally sustainable development patterns in developing countries;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) -1b. Considers that an orientation towards regional, rather than global, integration could more effectively safeguard developing countries from the fall-out of global turbulence; suggests reform of the existing international commodity agreements and the re-establishment of national trade boards for the most important commodities as potential options for developing countries to reduce the volatility of terms of trade;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the significant decrease in export revenues in many developing countries, and in particular in the least developed countries, is threatening to shatter the growth and development of the South; calls on the Commission – when negotiating and implementing trade agreements, in particular the Economic Partnership Agreements – to strengthen EU Policy Coherence for Development and, inter alia, the promotion of decent work and to ensure adequate asymmetry and transitional periods in trade commitments as well as respect for the priorities of each country and adequate consultation of key actors and civil society;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the significant decrease in export revenues in developing countries
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that a balanced, fair and development-oriented conclusion of the Doha Round
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is convinced that a
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
source: PE-438.435
2010/02/10
DEVE
80 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 - having regard to the European Consensus on Development1 and the EU Code of Conduct on Complementarity and Division of Labour in Development Policies2,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the international financial institutions are stretching to meet the needs of developing countries and will face serious lending constraints unless more capital is raised,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the effects of the global crisis on the middle-income developing countries should not be overlooked,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the deregulation of financial markets has caused a systemic crisis of global dimensions, which requires international compensation and burden sharing; whereas the privatisation and deregulation policies of the IMF and the World Bank also contributed to the acceleration of the economic and financial crisis,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas worldwide corruption has now grown to such an extent that it is costing USD 50 billion, equivalent to nearly half the total volume of worldwide ODA and to the investment needed to attain the objectives in the field of drinking water and public health,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the decline in output of advanced economies brought about by the global crisis will inevitably lead to a drop in the volume of ODA at a time when external aid is paramount to developing countries,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is acutely aware that the past two years have seen a succession of global crises (food,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is acutely aware that the past two years have seen a succession of global crises (food,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the report of the IMF entitled ‘World Economic Outlook Update’ published in January 2010,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the reinforcement of the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls upon Member States to deliver fully on their ODA commitments, both bilateral and multilateral;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Asks Member States to increase ODA volumes in order to reach their collective target of 0.56 % of ODA/gross national income (GNI) by 2010 and the target of 0.7 % ODA/GNI for 2015; asks furthermore that they accelerate efforts to improve aid effectiveness by implementing the Paris Declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Deplores that all EU pledges (99%) are from existing commitments; 8.8bn are frontloaded, meaning there is a danger that in the coming years there will be less development aid climate finance; urges the EU to allocate additional money for its commitments;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the fulfilment of the ODA commitments is imperative but still not
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the new Commission to play a leading role internationally with regard to the commitment to a thorough reform of the development aid and investment system, whose strategic priority should be sustainable development and 'green growth';
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recognises that the deregulation of financial and labour markets
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recognises that the
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recognises that the deregulation of financial and labour markets, together with the privatisation of public services and social programmes, due to conditionalities imposed on developing countries by the International Financial Institutions (IFIs), proved ineffective in preventing the crisis, amplifying instead its negative effects; underlines that
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes on the one hand the improved borrowing facilities for low-income countries provided by the IFIs with a higher level of pro-poor spending and emphasis on poverty reduction and pro- growth spending in developing countries; expresses, however, major concern about the unleashing of a new debt crisis,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes on the one hand the improved borrowing facilities for low-income countries provided by the IFIs with a higher level of pro-poor spending and emphasis on poverty reduction and pro- growth spending in developing countries; expresses, however, major concern about the
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to promote reform of the IFIs and to implement the proposal by the World Bank to establish a vulnerability fund to finance food security, social protection and human development;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the need to reform world economic governance in order to ensure better representation of developing countries in decision-making fora; proposes, to this end, that the G20 should be expanded to include at least one representative of the developing countries, which could be the President-in-Office of the G77;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls also on the Commission and Member States to support the proposal by the UN Commission of Experts on Reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System for the establishment of a world council to coordinate economic policies;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. calls on the Commission and Member States to devote particular attention to the promotion and protection of decent work, adhering to the recommendations made on this subject by the International Labour Organisation, whose role should be expanded;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the IMF
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Regrets that the financial sector has not
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to the report by UNCTAD entitled ‘Trade and Development Report, 2009’ published in September 2009,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Firmly believes that taxing the banking system to fund a deposit insurance or a resolution fund would
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Firmly believes that taxing the banking system to fund a deposit insurance or a resolution fund would not be a fair contribution from the financial sector to global social justice; calls instead for an international levy on financial transactions to make the overall tax system more equitable and to generate additional resources for financing development and global public goods, particularly adaptation of developing countries to cope with climate change and its impact;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Recalls the international commitments given with regard to the attainment of the MDGs and stresses the priority character of the objective of earmarking 0.7% of GDP, which it is essential to achieve;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial gap of between USD 350 billion and USD 635 billion in 2009 and that mounting fiscal distress in the most vulnerable countries is imperilling USD 11.6 billion of core spending in education, health, infrastructure and social protection;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial gap of between USD 350 billion and USD 635 billion in 2009 and that mounting fiscal distress in the most vulnerable countries is imperilling USD 11.6 billion of core spending in education, health, infrastructure and social protection; advocates therefore a
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial gap of between USD 350 billion and USD 635 billion in 2009 and that mounting fiscal distress in the most vulnerable countries is imperilling USD 11.6 billion of core spending in education, health, infrastructure and social protection; advocates therefore a
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with great concern that developing countries are expected to face a financial gap of
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to include among the priority policies of the European Union greater attention, including at the stage of provision of funds, to the relationship between the environmental crisis and underdevelopment, taking account of the growing number of environmental refugees and the increase in the number of victims of malnutrition and disease;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls upon the Member States, within the European Union Emission Trading System framework, to devote
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls upon the Member States and the Commission to agree, within the European Union Emission Trading System framework, to devote a
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to the UNCTAD report 'The Least Developed Countries Report 2009: The State and Development Governance',
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls upon the Member States, within the European Union Emission Trading System framework, to devote a fair share of the revenues generated from the auctioning of carbon emission allowances to support developing countries effectively, using public investment, in coping with climate change, in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC1;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the creation of joint public- public and public-private initiatives for development, based on a public lead with private donors
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the creation of joint public- private initiatives for development, based on a public lead with private donors
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the creation of joint public- private initiatives for development, based on a public lead with private donors
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Expresses its great concern that gender imbalance in the labour market will deepen as the crisis develops and that the use of children as cheap labour will increase;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Recalls the crucial role of local authorities and decentralised cooperation in development processes; calls on the Commission accordingly to make decentralisation a priority sector for European aid funding in developing countries;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Regards
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Regards trade as a main driver of economic growth and poverty reduction in developing countries and calls upon the EU and Member States to leverage their international influence
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 26 November 2009 on the FAO summit and food security,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that, pursuant to Article 208 of the TFEU, the European Union must ensure that its policies on trade, security, migration, agriculture and other fields serve coherently to benefit developing countries on the one hand and promote an equitable international financial and trading system which is favourable to development on the other hand;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reaffirms the fact that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) should be
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reaffirms the fact that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) should not only be regarded as an international trade instrument but also as a pro-development tool and urges the Commission to work towards a rapid conclusion of the negotiations, while taking into account the ways in which EPA provisions may impact on the ability of developing countries to cope with the crisis;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls for the 'Aid for Trade' strategy to assist all developing countries and not only those which agree to greater opening of their markets, particularly under EPAs;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Recommends that the rule of law conditionality be emphasised through trade agreements;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that protectionism is no sound response to the crisis and reinforces its call upon the EU to do its part by reducing trade barriers
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Believes that protectionism is no sound response to the crisis and reinforces its call upon the EU to do its part by reducing trade barriers and trade-distorting Union subsidies that have caused so much harm to developing countries;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Expresses its concern about the menacing effect of the crisis, with the long-term strategic approach compromised in order to resolve shorter- term challenges through an excessive shift of focus onto immediate results;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that it will meet its long-term development objectives while preparing for sustained humanitarian aid for the peak period of the crisis, when developing countries will be especially burdened;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 18 a (new) - having regard to the joint resolution adopted by the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly on 3 December 2009 in Luanda on the impact of the financial crisis on the ACP countries,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that half of all illicit financial flows out of developing countries are related to the mispricing of trade and reinforces its call for a new binding, global financial agreement at EU as well as UN level which forces transnational corporations to automatically disclose the profits made and the taxes paid on a country-by-country basis, so as to ensure transparency about sales, profits and taxes in every jurisdiction where they are located;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that half of all illicit financial
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Commission to actively promote corporate social and environmental responsibility (CSR) in order to permit effective monitoring of the impact - social, environmental and in terms of respect for human rights - of the operations of transnational undertakings and their subsidiaries in developing countries;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Notes the need for real improvement in the banking systems in developing countries as a concrete measure to insure investments and the development and growth of the financial sector, migrant remittances and commercial and any other relevant exchanges, leading to social cohesion and political and economic stability;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the European Investment Bank’s (EIB) enforcement of its existing policy towards Offshore Financial Centres; requests the EU, the Member States and the EIB to take up a vanguard role and
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Welcomes the European Investment Bank’s (EIB) enforcement of its existing policy towards Offshore Financial Centres; requests the EU, the Member States and the EIB to take up a vanguard role
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Recognises the current mid-term review of the external lending activity of the EIB and cooperation arrangements, to be completed in 2010 and in which the European Parliament acts as co-legislator, as a major opportunity to increase the EIB role in development cooperation,
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Deplores the downward trend in investment in agriculture in developing countries since the 1980s and urges the Commission to make food security and food sovereignty priorities in the European Union's development policies and therefore to increase support for agriculture, particularly for food production, and rural development;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to accord greater recognition to the role of civil society in coping with crises in developing countries and consequently to step up their support for civil-society organisations (CSO);
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 24 - having regard to the Commission Communication of 15 September entitled ‘Policy Coherence for Development – Establishing the policy framework for a whole-of-the-Union approach’ (COM (2009)458), to the General Affairs and External Relations Council conclusions of 17 November 2009 on Policy Coherence for Development and the Operational Framework of Aid Effectiveness,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 c (new) 29c. Considers that one of the major obstacles to economic development in developing countries lies in the limited access which potential entrepreneurs enjoy to credit and microcredit; stresses moreover that in most cases credit guarantees are not available; calls on the Commission and the European Investment Bank, therefore, to hugely increase credit and microcredit access programmes;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas emerging and developing economies
source: PE-438.374
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2009-04-08T00:00:00New
2009-04-07T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.840New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.840 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.634&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-430634_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE438.374New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE438.374 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE431.180&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-431180_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0034_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0034_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100324&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100324&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-34&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0034_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-34&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0034_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-89New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0089_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
DEVE/7/01291New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0160/COM_COM(2009)0160_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0160/COM_COM(2009)0160_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|