BETA


2010/0067(CNS) Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. Implementing rules. Council Regulation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI ZWIEFKA Tadeusz (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion FEMM NIEBLER Angelika (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion LIBE GEBHARDT Evelyne (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 081-p3

Events

2011/02/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2010/12/29
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.

CONTENT: this Regulation constitutes the implementation of the first enhanced cooperation in the history of the EU. It provides for a comprehensive legal framework in matrimonial matters ensuring legal certainty and predictability in the field of divorce and legal separation in 14 participating Member States : Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia. Other EU Member States which are not yet ready but wish to join this pioneer group at a later stage will be able to do so.

This Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests.

Scope : this Regulation shall apply, in situations involving a conflict of laws, to divorce and legal separation. It shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; (d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; (f) parental responsibility; (g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions.

Choice of applicable law by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation provided that it is one of the following laws:

· the law of the State where the spouses are habitually resident at the time the agreement is concluded; or

· the law of the State where the spouses were last habitually resident, in so far as one of them still resides there at the time the agreement is concluded; or

· the law of the State of nationality of either spouse at the time the agreement is concluded; or

· the law of the forum.

An agreement designating the applicable law may be concluded and modified at any time, but at the latest at the time the court is seized.

If the law of the forum so provides, the spouses may also designate the law applicable before the court during the course of the proceeding. In that event, such designation shall be recorded in court in accordance with the law of the forum.

Applicable law in the absence of a choice by the parties : in the absence of a choice, divorce and legal separation shall be subject to the law of the State:

· where the spouses are habitually resident at the time the court is seized; or, failing that

· where the spouses were last habitually resident, provided that the period of residence did not end more than 1 year before the court was seized, in so far as one of the spouses still resides in that State at the time the court is seized; or, failing that

· of which both spouses are nationals at the time the court is seized; or, failing that

· where the court is seized.

Where the law applicable makes no provision for divorce or does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the law of the forum shall apply.

Differences in national law : nothing in this Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings to pronounce a divorce by virtue of the application of this Regulation.

Measures are also laid down in the case where a State has two or more legal systems — territorial conflicts of laws and inter-personal conflicts of laws.

Where a State comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules concerning matters governed by this Regulation:

Review clause : by 31 December 2015, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals to adapt this Regulation.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 30/12/2010. The Regulation shall apply from 21/06/2012, with the exception of Article 17 (Information to be provided by participating Member States), which shall apply from 21/06/2011.

2010/12/20
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2010/12/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2010/12/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/12/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2010/12/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 537 votes to 20, with 80 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the special legislative procedure (consultation procedure), the proposal for a Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.

The main amendments are as follows:

Exclusion from the scope : Parliament clarified that the Regulation shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; (d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; (f) parental responsibility; (g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions.

Relationship with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 : the Regulation shall not affect the application of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003.

Definition of “court” : the term "court" shall cover all authorities in the participating Member State shaving jurisdiction in the matters falling within the scope of the Regulation.

Universal application : the Regulation should be universal, in the sense that its uniform conflict-of-law rules may designate the law of a participating Member State, the law of a non-participating Member State or the law of a State which is not a member of the European Union.

Choice of law applicable by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, provided that it is one of the laws prescribed in the text. A new recital notes that where the Regulation refers to nationality as a connecting factor for the application of the law of a State, the question of how to deal with cases of multiple nationality should be determined in accordance with national law, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union.

If the law of the forum so provides, the spouses may also designate the law applicable before the court during the course of the proceeding. In that event, such designation shall be recorded in court in accordance with the law of the forum.

Mediation : if the spouses are unable to agree on the applicable law, they should complete a mediation procedure including at least one consultation with an authorised mediator.

Consent and material validity : the amended text stipulates that the existence and validity of an agreement on choice of law or of any term thereof shall be determined by the law which would govern it under this Regulation if the agreement or term were valid.

Nevertheless, a spouse, in order to establish that he or she did not consent, may rely on the law of the country in which he or she has his or her habitual residence at the time the court is seised if it appears from the circumstances that it would not be reasonable to determine the effect of his or her conduct in accordance with the law specified in this Regulation.

Formal validity : Members introduce a new provision which provides for that the agreement as regards the law applicable shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses. Any communication by electronic means which provides a durable record of the agreement shall be deemed equivalent to writing. If the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States at the time the agreement is concluded and the laws of those States lay down different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws.

If only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a participating Member State at the time the agreement is concluded and that State lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply.

Conversion of legal separation into divorce : where the court is seised of an application to convert a legal separation into divorce and the parties have not made any choice as to the law applicable, the law which applied to the legal separation should also apply to the divorce. Such continuity would promote predictability for the parties and increase legal certainty. If the law applied to the legal separation does not provide for the conversion of legal separation into divorce, the divorce should be governed by the conflict-of-law rules which apply in the absence of a choice by the parties. This should not prevent the spouses from seeking divorce on the basis of other rules laid down in this Regulation.

Differences in national law : according to the European Parliament, nothing in the Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce, or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings, to pronounce a decree of divorce by virtue of the application of the Regulation.

States with two or more legal systems : in the absence of rules designating the applicable law, spouses choosing the law of the State of the nationality of one of them should at the same time indicate, where the State whose law is chosen comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules in respect of divorce, which territorial unit's law they have agreed upon.

Non-application of this Regulation to internal conflicts : a participating Member State in which different systems of law or sets of rules apply to matters governed by this Regulation shall not be required to apply this Regulation to conflicts of law arising solely between such different systems of law or sets of rules.

Report : by five years after the entry into force of this Regulation at the latest, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals to adapt this Regulation. To that end, the participating Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information on the application of this Regulation by their courts.

Documents
2010/12/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/12/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2010/12/02
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted, under the consultation procedure, the report drawn up by Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (EPP, PL) amending the proposal for a Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. The main amendments are as follows:

Exclusion from the scope : Members clarified that the Regulation shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; f) parental responsibility; g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions.

The report notes that the Regulation should apply only to the dissolution or loosening of marriage ties. The law determined by the conflict-of-law rules of the Regulation should apply to the grounds for divorce and legal separation. Preliminary questions on issues such as legal capacity and others matters referred to above or any other ancillary measures, should be determined by the conflict-of-law rules applicable in the participating Member State concerned.

Relationship with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 : it is clarified that the Regulation shall not affect the application of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003.

Definition of “court” : the term "court" shall cover all authorities in the participating Member State shaving jurisdiction in the matters falling within the scope of the Regulation.

Universal application : the Regulation should be universal, in the sense that its uniform conflict-of-law rules may designate the law of a participating Member State, the law of a non-participating Member State or the law of a State which is not a member of the European Union.

Choice of law applicable by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, provided that it is one of the laws prescribed in the text. A new recital notes that where the Regulation refers to nationality as a connecting factor for the application of the law of a State, the question of how to deal with cases of multiple nationality should be determined in accordance with national law, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union.

With regard to consent and material validity, the text states that the existence and validity of an agreement on choice of law or of any term thereof shall be determined by the law which would govern it under this Regulation if the agreement or term were valid. Nevertheless, a spouse, in order to establish that he or she did not consent, may rely on the law of the country in which he or she has his or her habitual residence at the time the court is seised if it appears from the circumstances that it would not be reasonable to determine the effect of his or her conduct in accordance with the law specified in the text.

A new provision on formal validity specifies that the agreement shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses. Any communication by electronic means which provides a durable record of the agreement shall be deemed equivalent to writing. However, if the law of the participating Member State in which the spouses have their habitual residence at the time the agreement is concluded lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply. If the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States at the time the agreement is concluded and the laws of those States lay down different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws. If only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a participating Member State at the time the agreement is concluded and that State lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply.

Conversion of legal separation into divorce : Members state that where the court is seised of an application to convert a legal separation into divorce and the parties have not made any choice as to the law applicable, the law which applied to the legal separation should also apply to the divorce. Such continuity would promote predictability for the parties and increase legal certainty. If the law applied to the legal separation does not provide for the conversion of legal separation into divorce, the divorce should be governed by the conflict-of-law rules which apply in the absence of a choice by the parties. This should not prevent the spouses from seeking divorce on the basis of other rules laid down in this Regulation.

Differences in national law : it is specified that nothing in the Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce, or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings, to pronounce a decree of divorce by virtue of the application of the Regulation.

States with two or more legal systems : in the absence of rules designating the applicable law, spouses choosing the law of the State of the nationality of one of them should at the same time indicate, where the State whose law is chosen comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules in respect of divorce, which territorial unit's law they have agreed upon.

Mediation : lastly, a recital notes that if the spouses are unable to agree on the applicable law, they should complete a mediation procedure including at least one consultation with an authorised mediator.

2010/12/02
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/11/30
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/11/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2010/11/21
   AT_NATIONALRAT - Contribution
Documents
2010/11/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2010/10/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/10/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council examined the state of play regarding a regulation on the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (Rome III).

The dossier constitutes the first instance of enhanced cooperation in the history of the EU. 14 member states are currently taking part (Spain, Italy, Hungary, Luxembourg, Austria, Romania, Slovenia, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Belgium, Latvia, Malta and Portugal).

In July 2010, after having received the consent of the European Parliament, the Council adopted a decision authorising this first enhanced cooperation.

The Belgian presidency aims to adopt the regulation by the end of the year, once the European Parliament has adopted its opinion. For the final adoption of the new rules, unanimity among the participating Member States is required.

Once adopted, the regulation will lay down clear rules on how international couples can seek divorce or legal separation in the participating countries. Other EU member states who are not yet ready but wish to join this pioneering group at a later stage will be able to do so.

Documents
2010/10/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/10/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/09/13
   AT_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2010/07/14
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2010/07/12
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2010/07/12
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/06/22
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2010/06/20
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2010/06/03
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/05/10
   EP - GEBHARDT Evelyne (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2010/05/04
   EP - NIEBLER Angelika (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2010/04/28
   EP - ZWIEFKA Tadeusz (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2010/03/24
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications.

On 14 March 2005, the Commission adopted a Green paper on applicable law and jurisdiction in divorce matters. On 17 July 2006, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters. In June 2008, the Council adopted political guidelines which recorded that there was no unanimity to go ahead with the proposed Regulation and insurmountable difficulties existed, making unanimity impossible at the time and in the foreseeable future.

In 2008 and 2009, 10 Member States – Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Romania and Slovenia - addressed a request to the Commission indicating that they intended to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of applicable law in matrimonial matters and that the Commission should submit a proposal to the Council to that end. On 3 March 2010, Greece withdrew its request.

The proposal for a Council Decision would authorise enhanced cooperation in the area of the last applicable to divorce and legal separation, and the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing this enhanced cooperation, that the Commission adopted simultaneously, represent the Commission’s response to the nine Member States .

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment which it attached to its original July 2006 proposal which remains relevant to the question of the applicable law. The present Commission proposal implements enhanced cooperation – a procedure that may be used only as a last resort, according to the Treaty on European Union. Thus, the Commission may propose enhanced cooperation, and the Council may give its agreement, only on matters which the Council has already dealt with and on which it has concluded that no other solution can be found. Moreover, the content of the Commission's proposal implementing enhanced cooperation is limited by the scope specified in the participating Member States' requests for enhanced cooperation, i.e. applicable law in matrimonial matters. In the present case, a new impact assessment covering the same subject area does not therefore appear appropriate.

LEGAL BASE: Article 81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) . The objectives of the proposal can be met only at Union level by way of common rules governing applicable law, if necessary through enhanced cooperation. These conflict rules must be identical if the proposal's objective of increasing legal certainty, predictability and flexibility for citizens is to be attained. One-sided action by the Member States would therefore run counter to these objectives. There is no international convention in force between the Member States on the question of applicable law in matrimonial matters. Given the nature and the scale of the problem which concerns tens of thousands of citizens each year, the objectives can be achieved only at Union level.

CONTENT: the proposed Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests.

The main objectives of the proposal are as follows:

s trengthening legal certainty and predictability: the great differences between and the complexity of national conflict-of-law rules make it very difficult for international couples to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. Having due regard to the relevant parts of the explanatory memorandum to the Commission's proposal for a Regulation of 17 July 2006 (Rome III), the purpose of this proposal for a Regulation is to introduce a clear legal framework in the European Union, covering applicable law rules in the area of divorce and legal separation and allowing the parties a degree of freedom of choice of applicable law. The enhanced cooperation measure concerns only applicable law and not jurisdiction, unlike in the Commission’s initial proposal; increasing flexibility by introducing some party autonomy: the proposal renders the legal framework more flexible by introducing a limited possibility for the spouses to choose another law as the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. To avoid the application of laws with which they have little or no connection, the spouses' choice is confined to laws with which the marriage has a close link. Special safeguards are introduced to ensure that the spouses are aware of the consequences of their choice and to protect the weaker spouse; preventing a 'rush to court' by one spouse: the proposal addresses the problem of a 'rush to court' by one spouse, i.e. where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she regards as more favourable to his or her own interests. This may lead to the application of a law with which the other spouse has little connection or which fails to take into account his or her interests. The introduction of harmonised conflict-of-law rules should greatly reduce the risk of a rush to court, since any court seized in one of the participating Member States would apply the law designated on the basis of common rules. In the absence of choice, the applicable law would be determined on the basis of a scale of connecting factors giving priority to the law of the spouses' habitual residence, which will ensure that the divorce or legal separation proceeding is governed by a legal system with which the couple has a close connection.

The rule on the law applicable in the absence of choice is intended to protect the weaker spouse by giving priority to the application of the law of the family's habitual residence prior to separation, irrespective of the court seized by one or other spouse. It would therefore enable spouses easily to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding.

BUDGETARY IMPACT: the proposal has no impact on the budget of the European Union.

2010/03/24
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications.

On 14 March 2005, the Commission adopted a Green paper on applicable law and jurisdiction in divorce matters. On 17 July 2006, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters. In June 2008, the Council adopted political guidelines which recorded that there was no unanimity to go ahead with the proposed Regulation and insurmountable difficulties existed, making unanimity impossible at the time and in the foreseeable future.

In 2008 and 2009, 10 Member States – Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Romania and Slovenia - addressed a request to the Commission indicating that they intended to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of applicable law in matrimonial matters and that the Commission should submit a proposal to the Council to that end. On 3 March 2010, Greece withdrew its request.

The proposal for a Council Decision would authorise enhanced cooperation in the area of the last applicable to divorce and legal separation, and the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing this enhanced cooperation, that the Commission adopted simultaneously, represent the Commission’s response to the nine Member States .

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment which it attached to its original July 2006 proposal which remains relevant to the question of the applicable law. The present Commission proposal implements enhanced cooperation – a procedure that may be used only as a last resort, according to the Treaty on European Union. Thus, the Commission may propose enhanced cooperation, and the Council may give its agreement, only on matters which the Council has already dealt with and on which it has concluded that no other solution can be found. Moreover, the content of the Commission's proposal implementing enhanced cooperation is limited by the scope specified in the participating Member States' requests for enhanced cooperation, i.e. applicable law in matrimonial matters. In the present case, a new impact assessment covering the same subject area does not therefore appear appropriate.

LEGAL BASE: Article 81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) . The objectives of the proposal can be met only at Union level by way of common rules governing applicable law, if necessary through enhanced cooperation. These conflict rules must be identical if the proposal's objective of increasing legal certainty, predictability and flexibility for citizens is to be attained. One-sided action by the Member States would therefore run counter to these objectives. There is no international convention in force between the Member States on the question of applicable law in matrimonial matters. Given the nature and the scale of the problem which concerns tens of thousands of citizens each year, the objectives can be achieved only at Union level.

CONTENT: the proposed Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests.

The main objectives of the proposal are as follows:

s trengthening legal certainty and predictability: the great differences between and the complexity of national conflict-of-law rules make it very difficult for international couples to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. Having due regard to the relevant parts of the explanatory memorandum to the Commission's proposal for a Regulation of 17 July 2006 (Rome III), the purpose of this proposal for a Regulation is to introduce a clear legal framework in the European Union, covering applicable law rules in the area of divorce and legal separation and allowing the parties a degree of freedom of choice of applicable law. The enhanced cooperation measure concerns only applicable law and not jurisdiction, unlike in the Commission’s initial proposal; increasing flexibility by introducing some party autonomy: the proposal renders the legal framework more flexible by introducing a limited possibility for the spouses to choose another law as the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. To avoid the application of laws with which they have little or no connection, the spouses' choice is confined to laws with which the marriage has a close link. Special safeguards are introduced to ensure that the spouses are aware of the consequences of their choice and to protect the weaker spouse; preventing a 'rush to court' by one spouse: the proposal addresses the problem of a 'rush to court' by one spouse, i.e. where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she regards as more favourable to his or her own interests. This may lead to the application of a law with which the other spouse has little connection or which fails to take into account his or her interests. The introduction of harmonised conflict-of-law rules should greatly reduce the risk of a rush to court, since any court seized in one of the participating Member States would apply the law designated on the basis of common rules. In the absence of choice, the applicable law would be determined on the basis of a scale of connecting factors giving priority to the law of the spouses' habitual residence, which will ensure that the divorce or legal separation proceeding is governed by a legal system with which the couple has a close connection.

The rule on the law applicable in the absence of choice is intended to protect the weaker spouse by giving priority to the application of the law of the family's habitual residence prior to separation, irrespective of the court seized by one or other spouse. It would therefore enable spouses easily to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding.

BUDGETARY IMPACT: the proposal has no impact on the budget of the European Union.

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
52 2010/0067(CNS)
2010/11/11 FEMM 11 amendments...
source: PE-452.685
2010/11/15 JURI 8 amendments...
source: PE-452.610
2010/11/19 LIBE 33 amendments...
source: PE-452.869

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2010-03-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/7
date
2010-09-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
AT_BUNDESRAT
docs/8
date
2010-09-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
AT_BUNDESRAT
docs/8
date
2010-11-22T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
AT_NATIONALRAT
docs/9
date
2010-11-21T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
AT_NATIONALRAT
docs/9
date
2010-06-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/10
date
2010-06-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/10
date
2010-06-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/11
date
2010-06-20T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2010&number=0067&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2010&number=0067&appLng=EN
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0975)(documentyear:2010)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0975)(documentyear:2010)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.583
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-450583_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.610
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-452610_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.553&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-452553_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.858&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-448858_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
events/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
events/7
date
2010-12-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0477_EN.html title: T7-0477/2010
summary
events/7
date
2010-12-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0477_EN.html title: T7-0477/2010
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-04-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: GEBHARDT Evelyne date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2010-05-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GEBHARDT Evelyne group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: NIEBLER Angelika date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2010-05-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NIEBLER Angelika group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0360_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-477
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0477_EN.html
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
4289
activities
  • date: 2010-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0105/COM_COM(2010)0105_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0105 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0105:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: REDING Viviane type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3018
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3026 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3026*&MEET_DATE=12/07/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3026 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2010-07-12T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3034 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3034*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3034 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne
  • date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3051
  • date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0360/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19244&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-477 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0477/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 3061
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R1259 title: Regulation 2010/1259 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:343:TOC title: OJ L 343 29.12.2010, p. 0010
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: REDING Viviane
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-04-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2010-05-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2010-05-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GEBHARDT Evelyne group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2010-04-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2010-05-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: NIEBLER Angelika group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2010-05-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 3061 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3061*&MEET_DATE=20/12/2010 date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3051 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3051*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2010 date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3034 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3034*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2010 date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 3026 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3026*&MEET_DATE=12/07/2010 date: 2010-07-12T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3018 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3018*&MEET_DATE=03/06/2010 date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0975)(documentyear:2010)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0975/2010 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2010-10-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.583 title: PE450.583 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2010-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.610 title: PE452.610 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2010-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.553&secondRef=02 title: PE452.553 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.858&secondRef=02 title: PE448.858 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN title: A7-0360/2010 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=19244&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)1477 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2010-09-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105 type: Contribution body: AT_BUNDESRAT
  • date: 2010-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105 type: Contribution body: AT_NATIONALRAT
  • date: 2010-06-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2010-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0105 title: COM(2010)0105 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2010-03-24T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0105/COM_COM(2010)0105_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0105 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=105 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation. BACKGROUND: for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications. On 14 March 2005, the Commission adopted a Green paper on applicable law and jurisdiction in divorce matters. On 17 July 2006, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters. In June 2008, the Council adopted political guidelines which recorded that there was no unanimity to go ahead with the proposed Regulation and insurmountable difficulties existed, making unanimity impossible at the time and in the foreseeable future. In 2008 and 2009, 10 Member States – Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Hungary, Austria, Romania and Slovenia - addressed a request to the Commission indicating that they intended to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of applicable law in matrimonial matters and that the Commission should submit a proposal to the Council to that end. On 3 March 2010, Greece withdrew its request. The proposal for a Council Decision would authorise enhanced cooperation in the area of the last applicable to divorce and legal separation, and the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing this enhanced cooperation, that the Commission adopted simultaneously, represent the Commission’s response to the nine Member States . IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment which it attached to its original July 2006 proposal which remains relevant to the question of the applicable law. The present Commission proposal implements enhanced cooperation – a procedure that may be used only as a last resort, according to the Treaty on European Union. Thus, the Commission may propose enhanced cooperation, and the Council may give its agreement, only on matters which the Council has already dealt with and on which it has concluded that no other solution can be found. Moreover, the content of the Commission's proposal implementing enhanced cooperation is limited by the scope specified in the participating Member States' requests for enhanced cooperation, i.e. applicable law in matrimonial matters. In the present case, a new impact assessment covering the same subject area does not therefore appear appropriate. LEGAL BASE: Article 81(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) . The objectives of the proposal can be met only at Union level by way of common rules governing applicable law, if necessary through enhanced cooperation. These conflict rules must be identical if the proposal's objective of increasing legal certainty, predictability and flexibility for citizens is to be attained. One-sided action by the Member States would therefore run counter to these objectives. There is no international convention in force between the Member States on the question of applicable law in matrimonial matters. Given the nature and the scale of the problem which concerns tens of thousands of citizens each year, the objectives can be achieved only at Union level. CONTENT: the proposed Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests. The main objectives of the proposal are as follows: s trengthening legal certainty and predictability: the great differences between and the complexity of national conflict-of-law rules make it very difficult for international couples to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. Having due regard to the relevant parts of the explanatory memorandum to the Commission's proposal for a Regulation of 17 July 2006 (Rome III), the purpose of this proposal for a Regulation is to introduce a clear legal framework in the European Union, covering applicable law rules in the area of divorce and legal separation and allowing the parties a degree of freedom of choice of applicable law. The enhanced cooperation measure concerns only applicable law and not jurisdiction, unlike in the Commission’s initial proposal; increasing flexibility by introducing some party autonomy: the proposal renders the legal framework more flexible by introducing a limited possibility for the spouses to choose another law as the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. To avoid the application of laws with which they have little or no connection, the spouses' choice is confined to laws with which the marriage has a close link. Special safeguards are introduced to ensure that the spouses are aware of the consequences of their choice and to protect the weaker spouse; preventing a 'rush to court' by one spouse: the proposal addresses the problem of a 'rush to court' by one spouse, i.e. where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she regards as more favourable to his or her own interests. This may lead to the application of a law with which the other spouse has little connection or which fails to take into account his or her interests. The introduction of harmonised conflict-of-law rules should greatly reduce the risk of a rush to court, since any court seized in one of the participating Member States would apply the law designated on the basis of common rules. In the absence of choice, the applicable law would be determined on the basis of a scale of connecting factors giving priority to the law of the spouses' habitual residence, which will ensure that the divorce or legal separation proceeding is governed by a legal system with which the couple has a close connection. The rule on the law applicable in the absence of choice is intended to protect the weaker spouse by giving priority to the application of the law of the family's habitual residence prior to separation, irrespective of the court seized by one or other spouse. It would therefore enable spouses easily to predict which law will apply to their divorce or legal separation proceeding. BUDGETARY IMPACT: the proposal has no impact on the budget of the European Union.
  • date: 2010-07-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3026*&MEET_DATE=12/07/2010 title: 3026
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3034*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2010 title: 3034 summary: The Council examined the state of play regarding a regulation on the law applicable to divorce and legal separation (Rome III). The dossier constitutes the first instance of enhanced cooperation in the history of the EU. 14 member states are currently taking part (Spain, Italy, Hungary, Luxembourg, Austria, Romania, Slovenia, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Belgium, Latvia, Malta and Portugal). In July 2010, after having received the consent of the European Parliament, the Council adopted a decision authorising this first enhanced cooperation. The Belgian presidency aims to adopt the regulation by the end of the year, once the European Parliament has adopted its opinion. For the final adoption of the new rules, unanimity among the participating Member States is required. Once adopted, the regulation will lay down clear rules on how international couples can seek divorce or legal separation in the participating countries. Other EU member states who are not yet ready but wish to join this pioneering group at a later stage will be able to do so.
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted, under the consultation procedure, the report drawn up by Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (EPP, PL) amending the proposal for a Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. The main amendments are as follows: Exclusion from the scope : Members clarified that the Regulation shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; f) parental responsibility; g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions. The report notes that the Regulation should apply only to the dissolution or loosening of marriage ties. The law determined by the conflict-of-law rules of the Regulation should apply to the grounds for divorce and legal separation. Preliminary questions on issues such as legal capacity and others matters referred to above or any other ancillary measures, should be determined by the conflict-of-law rules applicable in the participating Member State concerned. Relationship with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 : it is clarified that the Regulation shall not affect the application of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003. Definition of “court” : the term "court" shall cover all authorities in the participating Member State shaving jurisdiction in the matters falling within the scope of the Regulation. Universal application : the Regulation should be universal, in the sense that its uniform conflict-of-law rules may designate the law of a participating Member State, the law of a non-participating Member State or the law of a State which is not a member of the European Union. Choice of law applicable by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, provided that it is one of the laws prescribed in the text. A new recital notes that where the Regulation refers to nationality as a connecting factor for the application of the law of a State, the question of how to deal with cases of multiple nationality should be determined in accordance with national law, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union. With regard to consent and material validity, the text states that the existence and validity of an agreement on choice of law or of any term thereof shall be determined by the law which would govern it under this Regulation if the agreement or term were valid. Nevertheless, a spouse, in order to establish that he or she did not consent, may rely on the law of the country in which he or she has his or her habitual residence at the time the court is seised if it appears from the circumstances that it would not be reasonable to determine the effect of his or her conduct in accordance with the law specified in the text. A new provision on formal validity specifies that the agreement shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses. Any communication by electronic means which provides a durable record of the agreement shall be deemed equivalent to writing. However, if the law of the participating Member State in which the spouses have their habitual residence at the time the agreement is concluded lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply. If the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States at the time the agreement is concluded and the laws of those States lay down different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws. If only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a participating Member State at the time the agreement is concluded and that State lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply. Conversion of legal separation into divorce : Members state that where the court is seised of an application to convert a legal separation into divorce and the parties have not made any choice as to the law applicable, the law which applied to the legal separation should also apply to the divorce. Such continuity would promote predictability for the parties and increase legal certainty. If the law applied to the legal separation does not provide for the conversion of legal separation into divorce, the divorce should be governed by the conflict-of-law rules which apply in the absence of a choice by the parties. This should not prevent the spouses from seeking divorce on the basis of other rules laid down in this Regulation. Differences in national law : it is specified that nothing in the Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce, or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings, to pronounce a decree of divorce by virtue of the application of the Regulation. States with two or more legal systems : in the absence of rules designating the applicable law, spouses choosing the law of the State of the nationality of one of them should at the same time indicate, where the State whose law is chosen comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules in respect of divorce, which territorial unit's law they have agreed upon. Mediation : lastly, a recital notes that if the spouses are unable to agree on the applicable law, they should complete a mediation procedure including at least one consultation with an authorised mediator.
  • date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN title: A7-0360/2010
  • date: 2010-12-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19244&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-477 title: T7-0477/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 537 votes to 20, with 80 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the special legislative procedure (consultation procedure), the proposal for a Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. The main amendments are as follows: Exclusion from the scope : Parliament clarified that the Regulation shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; (d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; (f) parental responsibility; (g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions. Relationship with Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 : the Regulation shall not affect the application of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003. Definition of “court” : the term "court" shall cover all authorities in the participating Member State shaving jurisdiction in the matters falling within the scope of the Regulation. Universal application : the Regulation should be universal, in the sense that its uniform conflict-of-law rules may designate the law of a participating Member State, the law of a non-participating Member State or the law of a State which is not a member of the European Union. Choice of law applicable by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, provided that it is one of the laws prescribed in the text. A new recital notes that where the Regulation refers to nationality as a connecting factor for the application of the law of a State, the question of how to deal with cases of multiple nationality should be determined in accordance with national law, in full observance of the general principles of the European Union. If the law of the forum so provides, the spouses may also designate the law applicable before the court during the course of the proceeding. In that event, such designation shall be recorded in court in accordance with the law of the forum. Mediation : if the spouses are unable to agree on the applicable law, they should complete a mediation procedure including at least one consultation with an authorised mediator. Consent and material validity : the amended text stipulates that the existence and validity of an agreement on choice of law or of any term thereof shall be determined by the law which would govern it under this Regulation if the agreement or term were valid. Nevertheless, a spouse, in order to establish that he or she did not consent, may rely on the law of the country in which he or she has his or her habitual residence at the time the court is seised if it appears from the circumstances that it would not be reasonable to determine the effect of his or her conduct in accordance with the law specified in this Regulation. Formal validity : Members introduce a new provision which provides for that the agreement as regards the law applicable shall be expressed in writing, dated and signed by both spouses. Any communication by electronic means which provides a durable record of the agreement shall be deemed equivalent to writing. If the spouses are habitually resident in different participating Member States at the time the agreement is concluded and the laws of those States lay down different formal requirements, the agreement shall be formally valid if it satisfies the requirements of either of those laws. If only one of the spouses is habitually resident in a participating Member State at the time the agreement is concluded and that State lays down additional formal requirements for agreements of that type, those requirements shall apply. Conversion of legal separation into divorce : where the court is seised of an application to convert a legal separation into divorce and the parties have not made any choice as to the law applicable, the law which applied to the legal separation should also apply to the divorce. Such continuity would promote predictability for the parties and increase legal certainty. If the law applied to the legal separation does not provide for the conversion of legal separation into divorce, the divorce should be governed by the conflict-of-law rules which apply in the absence of a choice by the parties. This should not prevent the spouses from seeking divorce on the basis of other rules laid down in this Regulation. Differences in national law : according to the European Parliament, nothing in the Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce, or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings, to pronounce a decree of divorce by virtue of the application of the Regulation. States with two or more legal systems : in the absence of rules designating the applicable law, spouses choosing the law of the State of the nationality of one of them should at the same time indicate, where the State whose law is chosen comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules in respect of divorce, which territorial unit's law they have agreed upon. Non-application of this Regulation to internal conflicts : a participating Member State in which different systems of law or sets of rules apply to matters governed by this Regulation shall not be required to apply this Regulation to conflicts of law arising solely between such different systems of law or sets of rules. Report : by five years after the entry into force of this Regulation at the latest, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals to adapt this Regulation. To that end, the participating Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information on the application of this Regulation by their courts.
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. CONTENT: this Regulation constitutes the implementation of the first enhanced cooperation in the history of the EU. It provides for a comprehensive legal framework in matrimonial matters ensuring legal certainty and predictability in the field of divorce and legal separation in 14 participating Member States : Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia. Other EU Member States which are not yet ready but wish to join this pioneer group at a later stage will be able to do so. This Regulation should create a clear, comprehensive legal framework in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation in the participating Member States, provide citizens with appropriate outcomes in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and prevent a situation from arising where one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests. Scope : this Regulation shall apply, in situations involving a conflict of laws, to divorce and legal separation. It shall not apply to the following matters, even if they arise merely as a preliminary question within the context of divorce or legal separation proceedings: (a) the legal capacity of natural persons; (b) the existence, validity or recognition of a marriage; (c) the annulment of a marriage; (d) the name of the spouses; (e) the property consequences of the marriage; (f) parental responsibility; (g) maintenance obligations; (h) trusts or successions. Choice of applicable law by the parties : the spouses may agree to designate the law applicable to divorce and legal separation provided that it is one of the following laws: · the law of the State where the spouses are habitually resident at the time the agreement is concluded; or · the law of the State where the spouses were last habitually resident, in so far as one of them still resides there at the time the agreement is concluded; or · the law of the State of nationality of either spouse at the time the agreement is concluded; or · the law of the forum. An agreement designating the applicable law may be concluded and modified at any time, but at the latest at the time the court is seized. If the law of the forum so provides, the spouses may also designate the law applicable before the court during the course of the proceeding. In that event, such designation shall be recorded in court in accordance with the law of the forum. Applicable law in the absence of a choice by the parties : in the absence of a choice, divorce and legal separation shall be subject to the law of the State: · where the spouses are habitually resident at the time the court is seized; or, failing that · where the spouses were last habitually resident, provided that the period of residence did not end more than 1 year before the court was seized, in so far as one of the spouses still resides in that State at the time the court is seized; or, failing that · of which both spouses are nationals at the time the court is seized; or, failing that · where the court is seized. Where the law applicable makes no provision for divorce or does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the law of the forum shall apply. Differences in national law : nothing in this Regulation shall oblige the courts of a participating Member State whose law does not provide for divorce or does not deem the marriage in question valid for the purposes of divorce proceedings to pronounce a divorce by virtue of the application of this Regulation. Measures are also laid down in the case where a State has two or more legal systems — territorial conflicts of laws and inter-personal conflicts of laws. Where a State comprises several territorial units each of which has its own system of law or a set of rules concerning matters governed by this Regulation: Review clause : by 31 December 2015, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Regulation. The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals to adapt this Regulation. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 30/12/2010. The Regulation shall apply from 21/06/2012, with the exception of Article 17 (Information to be provided by participating Member States), which shall apply from 21/06/2011. docs: title: Regulation 2010/1259 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R1259 title: OJ L 343 29.12.2010, p. 0010 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:343:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/7/02599
New
  • JURI/7/02599
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R1259
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R1259
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.02 Family policy, family law, parental leave
  • 7.40.02 Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
New
4.10.02
Family policy, family law, parental leave
7.40.02
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0105:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0105:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0105/COM_COM(2010)0105_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0105/COM_COM(2010)0105_EN.pdf
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2010-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0105/COM_COM(2010)0105_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0105 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0105:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice Commissioner: REDING Viviane
  • date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3018
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3026 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3026*&MEET_DATE=12/07/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3026 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2010-07-12T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3034 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3034*&MEET_DATE=07/10/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3034 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne
  • date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 3051
  • date: 2010-12-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-360&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0360/2010 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2010-12-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19244&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-477 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0477/2010 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 3061
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-20T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2010-12-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010R1259 title: Regulation 2010/1259 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:343:TOC title: OJ L 343 29.12.2010, p. 0010
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2010-05-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE name: NIEBLER Angelika
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-04-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2010-05-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEBHARDT Evelyne
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/7/02599
reference
2010/0067(CNS)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 081-p3
stage_reached
Procedure completed
instrument
Regulation
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
title
Enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation. Implementing rules. Council Regulation
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject