Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | LEINEN Jo ( S&D) | SOULLIE Catherine ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | MARTIN Hans-Peter ( NA) | Sylvie GOULARD ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 338-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 338-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts. The previous reports were published in 2016 and 2013. This third implementation report covers the period from 2016 to 2018.
At EU level, the European economic environmental accounts highlight the supranational dimension of environmental issues and provide a systematic approach and coverage of Member States and environmental issues, allowing for assessments and comparisons of policies between Member States.
Legal framework
The Regulation establishes the European economic environment accounts and structures these accounts into modules. It initially provided for three modules (annexes I-III): (i) air emission accounts; (ii) environmental taxes by economic activity (energy, transport, pollution and resources); and (iii) economy-wide material flow accounts. From 2013 onwards, it is mandatory to submit data for these modules to the Commission to Eurostat.
Three additional modules were added in 2014 (Annexes IV to VI): (i) environmental protection expenditure accounts; (ii) environmental goods and services sector accounts; (iii) physical energy flow accounts. These data are to be submitted to Eurostat from 2017 onwards.
Developments since the last report
There have been no new legislative acts related to the Regulation since the last implementation report in 2016.
The Commission and the Member States continue to improve the European environmental accounts under Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 by various means, including: (i) improving data quality and efficiency, (ii) improving reporting, (iii) developing additional indicators to meet user needs, and (iv) assessing the need to adapt the European environmental accounts to new priorities and areas.
Data Quality
Some issues identified in the previous implementation report (in particular with regard to Annex I) have now been resolved or are in the process of being resolved.
In addition to the resolution of these issues, the quality of the data for Annexes I to III has improved since the 2016 implementation report through (i) the production of longer time series; (ii) closing data gaps; (iii) improved consistency; (iv) improved validation and dissemination procedures; and (v) increased voluntary reporting of supplementary variables and breakdowns beyond the Regulation’s requirements. Furthermore, the data are disseminated faster thanks to special, model-based early estimates by Eurostat and a faster delivery by Member States.
In general, for all Annexes I to VI, data quality has improved over the period 2016 to 2018.
Proposals for new modules
Several new accounts continue to be developed and the pilot study programme established under the Regulation continues to be used. During the period 2016-2018, Member States carried out pilot studies on ecosystem accounts, environmental subsidies and similar transfers, water accounting, and resource management expenditure accounts.
Priorities about relevance may shift in the future. Many technical developments are underway, for example, in the field of mega-data, satellite images (Copernicus), etc., and there is a need to develop new tools for data analysis. The demand for information for policy-making is increasing in areas such as those related to sustainable development goals, the circular economy, natural capital. The Commission shall continue to monitor the implementation of the Regulation.
Improving the quality of the accounts shall remain a priority for the coming years.
Ongoing and future activities include the following:
- grants for pilot studies and quality improvements;
- production of early estimates in order to reduce delays in data availability;
- publication of handbooks and provision of methodological guidance;
- setting standards for data transmission and quality reporting;
- maintain classifications;
- provision of tools for compiling accounts available to Member States and other countries;
- facilitating training;
- promoting the exchange of experience between countries and participation in international initiatives organised by the OECD, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and the United Nations.
The Commission presented a report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts. The first report was published in 2013.2 This is the second report.
As a reminder, environmental economic accounts are a statistical system bringing together economic and environmental information, in order to measure on the one hand the contribution of the environment to the economy and on the other hand the impact of the economy on the environment. They offer a means of monitoring the pressures exerted by the economy on the environment and of exploring how these might be reduced.
Legal framework : the Regulation establishes the European environmental economic accounts. The Regulation structures the accounts in modules. It originally created three modules as follows: (i) air emissions accounts; (ii) environmentally related taxes by economic activity (energy, transport, pollution and resources); (iii) economy-wide material flow accounts.
One major development since the last implementation report was the amendment of the Regulation with the addition of three further modules as follows: (i) environmental protection expenditure accounts; (ii) environmental goods and services sector accounts; (iii) physical energy flow accounts.
Developments since the last report :
in 2015, the Commission adopted one Implementing Regulation and one Delegated Regulation to complement the general framework established in the Regulation. Both Regulations were designed to ensure comparability across countries and to enforce quality standards; whilst the environmental accounts are already contributing to a number of policymaking initiatives, they have not yet achieved their full potential . The accounts are new and still relatively unknown among institutional users. Statisticians can accelerate the growth of awareness by better communicating and promoting the data already available. Explaining the analytical power of environmental economic accounts is also part of the initiatives currently being implemented; the statistical data submitted by Member States under the Regulation is, overall, of high quality . There are still a number of areas where improvement is needed, and the Commission (Eurostat) continues to work with the Member States to resolve issues at a technical level. A number of measures are being implemented or are planned to improve quality.
Measures being taken for improving data quality : the European strategy on environmental accounts for the period 2014 to 2018 shall co-ordinate European efforts and paves the way for possible new modules in the Regulation. The strategy programme of work for the period 2014 to 2018 focuses on:
consolidating the quality of the accounts in Annexes I to III to the Regulation (air emissions, environmental taxes and material flows); promoting the use of existing environmental economic accounts; improving timeliness of the accounts, including by developing early estimates, in order to make environmental policy aspects more prominent in economic planning; implementing the accounts in Annexes IV to VI to the Regulation (expenditure on environmental protection, the environmental goods and services sector and physical energy flow accounts); investing in statistical infrastructure (i.e., reference methodologies, classifications, specialised software, etc.) to improve the availability, quality and usefulness of the environmental accounts; developing methodologies for and launching voluntary data collections in other areas (water and forests, environmental subsidies and similar transfers and expenditure on resource management).
Of the areas where new developments are taking place, environmental subsidies accounts is perhaps the most promising in the short term. A regular, annual voluntary data collection exercise was introduced in 2015, with the agreement and cooperation of the Member States. Experimental work on ecosystem accounts will also be a focus.
At the same time, work is also being carried out to further improve the quality of the existing modules.
The Commission (Eurostat) continues to assist the Member States in improving the quality of accounts in a variety of ways, including:
providing grants for pilot studies and quality improvements; reducing the time delay in the availability of data by producing early estimates; setting up voluntary annual data collection exercises in preparation for obligatory reporting; producing EU aggregates even where some Member State data are missing; publishing handbooks and providing methodological guidance; facilitating training courses under the European Statistical Training Programme as well as promoting the exchange of experience between countries.
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts
To recall, the Regulation, which was the first Union Regulation on environmental accounting, introduced three modules:
· air emission accounts showing 14 different gases by 64 industry groups and by households;
· environmental taxes distinguishing 4 tax types - on energy, transport (other than fuel) pollution, resources - all broken down into 64 industry groups, households and non-residents who pay these taxes;
· material flow accounts for 50 material types showing domestic extraction, imports and exports. Then, Domestic Material Consumption, which equals domestic extraction plus imports, less exports, for each type of material and in total.
At the time this first Regulation was discussed, users in the Parliament and the Commission’s DGs emphasised that these first three modules were to be seen as a beginning and that the policy needs for environmental accounting went much further. The European Parliament actually inserted into Article 10 a list of new possible modules as priorities for future development.
The main observations set out in the report are as follows:
Data transmission for the first three modules is good and improving : at the time of writing the report, the formal deadlines for the delivery of the data for the first data collection under the regulation have only just or not yet passed. However, a large number of countries have already supplied a considerable amount of data on a voluntary basis: by mid-2013 about 20 countries had supplied complete or almost complete data for the environmental taxes and the air emissions accounts and 24 had supplied the material flow accounts.
Progressively the coverage (number of countries and degree of completion of individual tables), the timeliness and reliability have consistently improved. Eurostat and the national statistical institutes work together in working groups and special thematic task forces to ensure a high level of accuracy, coherence and comparability of the data.
Eurostat has been assisting the Member States who needed it to implement the first three modules through grants for pilot studies, and facilitating sharing of experience between countries. The report notes that the administrative burden of fulfilling the data requirements of the Regulation is small.
The results of the voluntary data collections are published on Eurostat’s web site and in various publications.
The Commission (Eurostat ) will thoroughly check the quality of the data received for the first three modules at the end of 2013 and suggest improvements to individual countries, or to the overall methodology, where needed.
Three additional modules have been proposed : Eurostat and the Member States continued to develop new modules in statistical working groups. In the period 2011-2012 methodologies were developed and pilot tests were carried out, in particular regarding the first three modules listed in Article 10: (i) environmental protection expenditure, (ii) environmental goods and services sector and (iii) physical energy flow accounts.
The Commission (Eurostat) Eurostat is assisting the countries to prepare for the three new modules with grants, exchange of experience, handbooks, etc. as in previous years for the first three modules.
The Commission adopted on 2 May 2013 a proposal for an amending regulation with the purpose of adding these three modules to the first Regulation. Discussions on the second “batch” of modules will continue in 2014 in the European Parliament and Council . Statisticians will continue to prepare for the practical implementation of these three additional modules.
Work is also continuing on most of the other accounts listed in Article 10: (i) environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies), (ii) resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA), (iii) water flow accounts, (iv) forest accounts.
These are potential candidates for a third “batch” of modules.
The Commission indicates that the European Strategy for Environmental Accounts will be revised in conjunction with main user groups and with the national statistical institutes. The target date for completion of this new ESEA is mid- 2014.
The Commission and the Member States administrations will continue to work together to ensure greater visibility and use of the results of the environmental accounts.
PURPOSE: to draw up a common framework for the collection, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts.
CONTENT: Regulation establishing a common framework for the compilation of European environmental economic accounts.
Supplement existing indicators : in its Communication of 20 August 2009 entitled " GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing world ", the Commission recognised the need to supplement existing indicators with data that incorporate environmental and social aspects in order to allow more coherent and comprehensive policy making.
To that end, environmental economic accounts offer a means of monitoring the pressures exerted by the economy on the environment and of exploring how these might be abated. Environmental economic accounts show the interaction between economic, household and environmental factors and consequently are more informative than national accounts alone. They provide a significant source of data for environmental decisions and the Commission should consult them when drawing up impact assessments.
Environmental statistics : the new regulation obliges member states to annually report to the Commission (Eurostat) statistics concerning their air emissions, the environmentally related taxes they charge and the material flows in their economy. It may be extended to other environmentally-related statistics in the future. The first reporting year is 2011 and member states have up to two years to transmit their data to Eurostat.
Pilot studies : the Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States on a voluntary basis in order to develop reporting and improve data quality, establish long time series and develop methodology. The programme shall include pilot studies to test the feasibility of introducing new environmental economic account modules. In drawing up the programme, the Commission shall ensure that no additional administrative or financial burdens are placed on the Member States and on the respondent units.
Report and review : by 31 December 2013 and every 3 years thereafter, the Commission shall submit a report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council. That report shall evaluate in particular the quality of the data transmitted, the data collection methods, the administrative burden on the Member States and on the respondent units, as well as the feasibility and effectiveness of those statistics.
The report shall be accompanied by proposals: for introducing new environmental economic account modules, such as Environmental Protection Expenditure and Revenues (EPER)/Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts (EPEA), Environmental Goods and Services Sector (EGSS), Energy Accounts, Environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies), Resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA), Water Accounts (quantitative and qualitative), Waste Accounts, Forest Accounts, Ecosystem services Accounts, Economy-Wide Material Stock Accounts (EW-MSA) and the measurement of unused excavated earthen materials (including soil).
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 11/08/2011.
DELEGATED ACTS: the power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to certain conditions. The delegation of power shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from 11 August 2011 (tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than 3 months before the end of each period). It may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council.
The European Parliament adopted by 616 votes to 26, with 24 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts.
It adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Sound information : the text underlines the need to develop instruments with a view to enhancing public awareness of the environmental effects of economic activity. Environmental economic accounts show the interaction between economic, household and environmental factors and consequently are more informative than national accounts alone. They provide a significant source of data for environmental decisions and the Commission should consult them when drawing up impact assessments.
Environmental tax : the text stipulates that ‘environmentally related tax’ means a tax whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of a physical unit) of something that has a proven, specific negative impact on the environment, and which is identified in ESA-95 as a tax.
Modules : the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, where necessary to take account of environmental, economic and technical developments and provide methodological guidance. The Commission shall ensure that its delegated acts do not impose significant additional administrative burdens on the Member States and on the respondent units.
Pilot studies : the Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States on a voluntary basis in order to develop reporting and improve data quality, establish long time series and develop methodology. The programme shall include pilot studies to test the feasibility of introducing new environmental economic account modules. In drawing up the programme, the Commission shall ensure that no additional administrative or financial burdens are placed on the Member States and on the respondent units.
The findings of the pilot studies shall be evaluated and published by the Commission, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of collection and the administrative burden of responding. These findings shall be taken into account in the proposals for introducing new environmental economic account modules that the Commission may include in the report referred to in the Regulation.
Quality assessment : in applying the quality criteria, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts with a view to defining the modalities, structure and periodicity of the quality reports. The Commission (Eurostat) shall assess the quality of the data transmitted and may, within one month of receipt of the data, request the Member State in question to submit additional information regarding the data or a revised dataset, as appropriate.
Derogations : the Commission may adopt implementing acts with a view to granting derogations to Member States during the transitional periods referred to in the Annexes insofar as the national statistical systems require major adaptations. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in this Regulation.
Delegated acts : the delegation of power shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years and shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
Review : by 31 December 2013 and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall submit a report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council. That report shall evaluate in particular the quality of the data transmitted, the data collection methods, the administrative burden on the Member States and on the respondent units, as well as the feasibility and effectiveness of those statistics.
The report shall be accompanied by proposals:
for introducing new environmental economic account modules, such as Environmental Protection Expenditure and Revenues (EPER)/Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts (EPEA), Environmental Goods and Services Sector (EGSS), Energy Accounts, Environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies), Resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA), Water Accounts (quantitative and qualitative), Waste Accounts, Forest Accounts, Ecosystem services Accounts, Economy-Wide Material Stock Accounts (EW-MSA) and the measurement of unused excavated earthen materials (including soil); designed to further improve data quality and data collection methods, thereby improving the coverage and comparability of data and reducing the administrative burden on business and administration.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Jo LEINEN (S&D, DE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts.
It recommended that the European Parliament’s position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should be to amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Scope : Members stipulate that this Regulation must enable the Commission (Eurostat) to make reliable forecasts, based on comparable national data, about the environmental and economic situation of the individual Member States and the Union as a whole. They also state that it is of great importance that the European environmental economic accounts, as soon as the system is fully operational, are actively and accurately used in all relevant EU policy taking as a key input to impact assessments, action plans, legislative proposals and other significant products of the policy process.
Modules : in accordance with the Treaty of Lisbon delegated powers to the Commission should happen in accordance with Art. 290 of TFEU. This delegation of power should be restricted to the adjustment of modules and not encompass the introduction of new modules, since this would require a new legislative proposal in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.
Development of new environmental account modules : an amendment proposed by the committee states that as a matter of priority, the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, develop the following modules for inclusion into the scope of this Regulation
by the end of 2014:
Environmental Protection Expenditure and Revenues (EPER)/Environmental Protection and Expenditure Accounts (EPEA), Environmental Goods and Services Sector (EGSS); Energy Accounts; Environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies) and Resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA); Water Accounts (quantitative and qualitative) and Waste Accounts; Forest Accounts; and Ecosystem services Accounts.
Pilot studies : Members consider that pilot studies should also be used for the introduction of new environmental account modules in order to obtain experience in using this instrument at an early stage, with a possible view to expanding the scope of the regulation.
In carrying out the evaluation of the results of the pilot studies, the Commission shall ensure that no additional administrative or financial burdens are placed on respondents.
Data collection : Members clarify that the collection requirements should be clarified. The regional data are of the same importance as national data. They call, in accordance with the annexes of this Regulation, on Member States to collect the necessary data for the observation of the modules’ characteristics referred to in this Regulation, at national and regional level as relevant. The Commission may adopt delegated acts to provide methodological guidance to facilitate the application of this provision.
Quality assessment : the Commission (Eurostat) shall assess the quality of the data transmitted and may, within a time-limit of one month, raise an objection and require the Member State in question to submit an improved report.
Feasibility and effectiveness : a new measure provides for the Commission to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of environmental economic accounts.
Delegated acts : the report specifies that the powers to adopt the delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years following the entry into force of this
Regulation. The Commission shall make a report in respect of the delegated powers at the latest 6 months before the end of the five-year period.
Review : the Commission shall submit a report on the implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and the Council every three years. The report shall assess the possibilities for introducing new environmental account modules. The first report shall be submitted not later than 31 December 2013.
The report highlights that the Member States should regularly make available to the public information in a comprehensible form contained in environmental accounts by publishing it together with GDP data, for example.
PURPOSE: to draw up a common framework for the collection, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: users put much emphasis on analysis and applications of environmental accounts in modelling and forecasts/outlooks, both for preparing policy proposals and reporting on policy implementation and impacts. Examples are the design of taxation policies related, for instance, to climate change and energy uses, or the assessment of the effects of international trade on emissions and resource use. User needs may differ somewhat across countries reflecting national endowments with natural resources and environmental assets or specific national policy priorities but the key standard components of environmental accounts are similar: selected natural resources accounts, air emissions and energy accounts, material flows accounts, environmental expenditure, activities and taxes.
By gentlemen’s agreement, Environmental Accounts data compiled in National Statistics Institutes (NSIs) is transmitted to Eurostat on a regular basis (yearly or two-yearly) via the following means: i) Joint Eurostat/OECD questionnaire (environmental protection expenditure and revenues); ii) a separate questionnaire on Economy-Wide Material Flows Accounts; iii) a separate questionnaire on air emissions accounts; iv) a separate questionnaire regarding environmental taxes by industry.
The concepts in the European System of Accounts (ESA) are multi-purpose: for a great range of uses the ESA concepts are accepted, though they need to be supplemented for some uses. For some specific data needs, as for e.g. the analysis of the interaction between the environment and the economy, the best solution is to draw up separate satellite accounts.
In its June 2006 conclusions, the European Council called on the European Union and its Member States to extend the national accounts to key aspects of Sustainable Development. The national accounts have therefore to be complemented with integrated environmental economic accounting that provides data that are fully consistent.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: two options were identified:
Option 1 : continue with the existing Gentlemen’s agreement ; Option 2 : establish a legal base to support the data collection on environmental economic accounts.
Option 2 is the preferred option because it is the one that produces better results. The required consistent and regular production and reporting of environmental accounts would improve the quality of the statistics. Moreover, other EU policies (e.g. recycling and prevention of waste, air emissions and climate change, sustainable consumption and production) would be much better monitored if good quality data linking environment and the economy were to exist. This data can be collected by means of the framework of environmental accounts, but it is necessary that every country participates and that harmonisation is fully guaranteed. An appropriate legal base for this data collection can ensure these requirements: data collection in an important area EU-wide, increased visibility of environmental accounts as a tool for policy monitoring exploring the possibility to link environmental and economic data, possibility to take advantage of the current revision of SNA / ESA and get synergies for data collection.
LEGAL BASE: Article 338 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) . The objective of the proposed action, namely the collection, compilation, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at EU level on the basis of a Community legal act, because only the Commission can coordinate the necessary harmonisation of statistical information at Community level, while the collection of data and compilation of comparable environmental economic accounts can be organised by the Member States.
CONTENT: this proposed Regulation establishes a common framework for the collection, compilation, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts for the purpose of setting up environmental economic accounts as satellite accounts to ESA 95 by providing methodology, common standards, definitions, classifications and accounting rules, intended to be used for compiling environmental economic accounts.
The environmental accounts to be compiled within the common framework shall be grouped in the following modules:
a module for air emissions accounts (as set out in Annex I of the proposal); a module for environmentally related taxes by economic activities (as set out in Annex II); a module for economy-wide material flow accounts (as set out in Annex III).
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States on a voluntary basis in order to develop the reporting and data quality, establish long time series and develop methodology. The results of the pilot studies shall be evaluated and published by the Commission, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of collection and the response burden. On the basis of the conclusions of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary delegated acts.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the collection of data will have no additional impact on the Budget of the European Union.
PURPOSE: to draw up a common framework for the collection, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: users put much emphasis on analysis and applications of environmental accounts in modelling and forecasts/outlooks, both for preparing policy proposals and reporting on policy implementation and impacts. Examples are the design of taxation policies related, for instance, to climate change and energy uses, or the assessment of the effects of international trade on emissions and resource use. User needs may differ somewhat across countries reflecting national endowments with natural resources and environmental assets or specific national policy priorities but the key standard components of environmental accounts are similar: selected natural resources accounts, air emissions and energy accounts, material flows accounts, environmental expenditure, activities and taxes.
By gentlemen’s agreement, Environmental Accounts data compiled in National Statistics Institutes (NSIs) is transmitted to Eurostat on a regular basis (yearly or two-yearly) via the following means: i) Joint Eurostat/OECD questionnaire (environmental protection expenditure and revenues); ii) a separate questionnaire on Economy-Wide Material Flows Accounts; iii) a separate questionnaire on air emissions accounts; iv) a separate questionnaire regarding environmental taxes by industry.
The concepts in the European System of Accounts (ESA) are multi-purpose: for a great range of uses the ESA concepts are accepted, though they need to be supplemented for some uses. For some specific data needs, as for e.g. the analysis of the interaction between the environment and the economy, the best solution is to draw up separate satellite accounts.
In its June 2006 conclusions, the European Council called on the European Union and its Member States to extend the national accounts to key aspects of Sustainable Development. The national accounts have therefore to be complemented with integrated environmental economic accounting that provides data that are fully consistent.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: two options were identified:
Option 1 : continue with the existing Gentlemen’s agreement ; Option 2 : establish a legal base to support the data collection on environmental economic accounts.
Option 2 is the preferred option because it is the one that produces better results. The required consistent and regular production and reporting of environmental accounts would improve the quality of the statistics. Moreover, other EU policies (e.g. recycling and prevention of waste, air emissions and climate change, sustainable consumption and production) would be much better monitored if good quality data linking environment and the economy were to exist. This data can be collected by means of the framework of environmental accounts, but it is necessary that every country participates and that harmonisation is fully guaranteed. An appropriate legal base for this data collection can ensure these requirements: data collection in an important area EU-wide, increased visibility of environmental accounts as a tool for policy monitoring exploring the possibility to link environmental and economic data, possibility to take advantage of the current revision of SNA / ESA and get synergies for data collection.
LEGAL BASE: Article 338 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) . The objective of the proposed action, namely the collection, compilation, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at EU level on the basis of a Community legal act, because only the Commission can coordinate the necessary harmonisation of statistical information at Community level, while the collection of data and compilation of comparable environmental economic accounts can be organised by the Member States.
CONTENT: this proposed Regulation establishes a common framework for the collection, compilation, transmission and evaluation of European environmental economic accounts for the purpose of setting up environmental economic accounts as satellite accounts to ESA 95 by providing methodology, common standards, definitions, classifications and accounting rules, intended to be used for compiling environmental economic accounts.
The environmental accounts to be compiled within the common framework shall be grouped in the following modules:
a module for air emissions accounts (as set out in Annex I of the proposal); a module for environmentally related taxes by economic activities (as set out in Annex II); a module for economy-wide material flow accounts (as set out in Annex III).
The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States on a voluntary basis in order to develop the reporting and data quality, establish long time series and develop methodology. The results of the pilot studies shall be evaluated and published by the Commission, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of collection and the response burden. On the basis of the conclusions of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary delegated acts.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the collection of data will have no additional impact on the Budget of the European Union.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0718
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0776
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0056
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2016)0663
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0663
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0577
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0864
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2011/691
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 192 22.07.2011, p. 0001
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)6334
- Draft final act: 00011/2011/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0253/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0330/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0330/2010
- Committee opinion: PE448.687
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE450.860
- Committee draft report: PE448.872
- Contribution: COM(2010)0132
- Contribution: COM(2010)0132
- Legislative proposal: COM(2010)0132
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2010)0132
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2010)0132 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE448.872
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE450.860
- Committee opinion: PE448.687
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0330/2010
- Draft final act: 00011/2011/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)6334
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2013)0864
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0577 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0663 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0056 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0776 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0718 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2010)0132
- Contribution: COM(2010)0132
- Contribution: COM(2016)0663
Activities
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander MIRSKY
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Licia RONZULLI
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Clemente MASTELLA
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Slavi BINEV
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hans-Peter MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alfredo PALLONE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Phil PRENDERGAST
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Niki TZAVELA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- Vito BONSIGNORE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mário DAVID
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christine DE VEYRAC
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Paul NUTTALL
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 European environmental economic accounts (debate)
- Iva ZANICCHI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Artur ZASADA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kriton ARSENIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liam AYLWARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe BOULLAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan BŘEZINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John BUFTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nessa CHILDERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberto GUALTIERI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Agnès LE BRUN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cristiana MUSCARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel PORTAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Fiorello PROVERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Horst SCHNELLHARDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Brian SIMPSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michèle STRIFFLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michail TREMOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Amendments | Dossier |
52 |
2010/0073(COD)
2010/10/04
ECON
17 amendments...
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital -1 a (new) (-1a) The funding made available must be used by the Commission (Eurostat) in an economically responsible, transparent and bureaucratically efficient manner. The results of the environmental economic accounts should be made available to the public in a readily accessible and understandable form.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital -1 b (new) (-1b) The additional human and financial resources which the Commission (Eurostat) will need in order to fulfil its expanded remit could be released, in the form of an ‘enlargement dividend’, by the transfer of superfluous staff from the Commission’s DG Enlargement.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1a) The planned extension of ESA 95 by means of this Regulation is overdue and urgent. The worldwide shortage of resources means, however, that this extension of the accounting system can be no more than a first step towards an internationally recognised system of ‘European sustainability statistics’ (ESS) which, as a priority, must include the full range of environmental and social indicators alongside economic indicators.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union provides that the Union 'shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment', taking into consideration that these goals may be best achieved through open markets.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) A scientifically sound approach to the shortage of resources and to the ecosystem will, in future, be crucial to the sustainable economic development of the European Union.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The need to supplement already existing indicators with data that incorporate environmental and social aspects in order to allow more coherent and comprehensive policy making has been recognised in Commission Communication COM(2009) 433 of August 2009 on GDP and beyond. To this end, environmental accounts offer a means of monitoring the pressures exerted by the economy on the environment and of exploring how these might be abated. In line with the tenets of sustainable development and the drive to achieve a low-carbon economy, embedded in the
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The need to supplement already existing indicators with data that incorporate environmental and social aspects in order to allow more coherent and comprehensive policy making has been recognised in Commission Communication COM(2009) 433 of August 2009 on GDP and beyond. To this end, environmental accounts offer a means of monitoring
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The need to supplement already existing indicators with data that incorporate environmental and social aspects in order to allow more coherent and comprehensive policy making has been recognised in Commission Communication COM(2009) 433 of August 2009 on GDP and beyond. To this end, environmental accounts offer a means of monitoring the pressures exerted by the economy on the environment and of exploring how these might be abated. In line with the tenets of sustainable development and the drive to
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) It is of great importance that the European environmental economic accounts, as soon as the system is fully operational, are actively and accurately used in all relevant EU policy making as a key input to impact assessments, action plans, legislative proposals and other significant products of the policy process.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18a) In order for the Commission (Eurostat) to be able to meet the key new responsibilities that it acquires under this Regulation, adequate human and financial resources should be allocated.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order for this Regulation to contribute to building a system of ‘European sustainability statistics’ (ESS) providing a comprehensive overview of European interests of environmental relevance, the Commission shall conduct an impact assessment on developing a number of modules, including: (a) modules for financial factors: (i) environmental expenditure accounts; (ii) environmental manufacturing and service provision accounts; (iii) accounts for environment-related subsidies and measures; (iv) accounts for use of resources; (b) modules for tangible factors: (i) energy accounts; (ii) water accounts; (iii) waste accounts; (iv) accounts for international raw- materials cycles; (v) accounts for imported emissions; (c) asset modules: (i) forestation accounts; (ii) biodiversity accounts; (iii) accounts for protected natural areas.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order for this Regulation to contribute to building a system of ‘European sustainability statistics’ (ESS) providing a comprehensive overview of European interests of environmental relevance, the Commission shall develop indicators for measuring the sustainable environmental conditions, on such issues as: (a) traffic-related matters; (b) environment-related matters; (c) economic matters; (d) social matters.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall draw up
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall draw up a comprehensive and coordinated programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. During the transitional periods, and for those Member States which need the transitional period to forward their data to Eurostat, the Commission (Eurostat) may assess the values of the modules listed in Article 3 of this Regulation.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In order to further develop the European environmental economic accounts, including the cooperation between the national statistics authorities and the Commission (Eurostat) in this field, the Commission shall, by ...* and every four years thereafter, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the quality and usefulness of the statistics compiled pursuant to this Regulation. * Two years from the entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – section 1 – paragraph 1 EW-MFA covers all solid, gaseous, and liquid materials and technosphere materials, except for flows of air and water, measured in mass units per year. Like the system of national accounts, economy-wide material flow accounts serve two major purposes. The detailed material flows provide a rich empirical database for numerous analytical studies. They are also used to compile different economy-wide material flow indicators for national economies.
source: PE-450.577
2010/10/15
ENVI
35 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The need to account for the environment and the economy in an integrated way arises because of the crucial functions of the environment in economic performance and in the generation of human welfare. These functions include the provision of natural resources to production and consumption activities, waste absorption by environmental media and environmental services of life support and other human amenities. Conventional national accounts have only partly accounted for these functions, focusing on market transactions and indicators that reflect important factors in welfare generation, but they do not measure welfare itself.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 b (new) (3b) However, new scarcities of natural resources now threaten the sustained productivity of the economy, and economic production and consumption activities may impair environmental quality by overloading natural sinks with wastes and pollutants. By not accounting for the private and social costs of the use of natural resources and the degradation of the environment, conventional accounts may send wrong signals of progress to decision makers who may then set society on a non-sustainable development path.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The introduction of environmental economic accounts is essential but should not replace the development of alternative indicators to GDP, to cover various environmental, social and quality-of-life dimensions. The Commission should make proposals before the start of the new multiannual financial framework period for a limited set of synthetic indicators to be used as a complement for GDP in policy making. This should include both a monetarised indicator (e.g. Adjusted Net Savings) and a physical indicator (e.g. Ecological Footprint, Carbon Footprint or Decoupling Indicators) for the environmental dimension, as well as indicators integrating the social dimension such as an assessment of inequalities (e.g. GINI Index) and an indicator of social inclusion and human well-being (e.g. Human Poverty Index or Index of Social Health).
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The introduction of additional reporting requirements must be made conditional upon an impact assessment. National competences will not be affected.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15α) The Commission, through its policies of cooperation with neighbouring third countries which share environmental resources (mainly water) with the Member States, encourages the national statistical offices of these countries to present equivalent environmental economic accounts regarding fundamental aspects of sustainable development and contributes to the introduction of corresponding accounting methods.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a - indent 5 b (new) - Soil Accounts, where possible.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Development of new modules As a matter of priority, the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States, develop the following modules for inclusion into the scope of this Regulation by the end of 2014: - Environmental Protection Expenditure and Revenues (EPER)/Environmental Protection and Expenditure Accounts (EPEA), Environmental Goods and Services Sector (EGSS); - Energy Accounts; - Environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies) and Resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA); - Water Accounts and Waste Accounts; - Forest Accounts; and - Ecosystem services Accounts.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Development of new modules As a matter of priority, the Commission shall, in cooperation with the Member States and provided that the necessary methodologies are settled and that there is a sufficient user demand, consider to develop the following modules for inclusion into the scope of this Regulation: - Environmental Protection Expenditure and Revenues (EPER)/Environmental Protection and Expenditure Accounts (EPEA), Environmental Goods and Services Sector (EGSS); - Energy Accounts; - Environmentally Related Transfers (subsidies) and Resource Use and Management Expenditure Accounts (RUMEA); - Waste Accounts and Forest Accounts.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall draw up a programme for pilot studies to be carried out by Member States on a voluntary basis in order to develop the reporting and data quality, establish long time series and develop methodology. This will ensure that no additional administrative or financial burdens are placed on respondents.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The results of the pilot studies shall be evaluated and published by the Commission, taking into account the benefits of the availability of the data in relation to the cost of collection and the response burden. In carrying out the evaluation it shall ensure that no additional administrative or financial burdens are placed on respondents. On the basis of the conclusions of the pilot studies, the Commission shall adopt the necessary delegated acts in accordance with Article 9.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall collect the necessary data for the observation of the modules" characteristics referred to in Article 3(2), at national and regional level when relevant.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall transmit to the Commission (Eurostat) the data set out in the Annexes, including the confidential data, within the time limits specified therein. National competences shall not be affected.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The data shall be transmitted in an appropriate technical format, which shall be laid down
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. In applying the quality criteria referred to in paragraph 1 to the data covered by this Regulation, the modalities, structure and periodicity of the quality reports shall be defined
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Feasibility and effectiveness The Commission shall establish the feasibility and effectiveness of environmental economic accounts.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission may grant derogations to Member States during the transitional periods referred to in the Annexes, by delegated acts in accordance with
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The powers to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(3)
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 3(3)
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – section 4 - point 2 a (new) 2a. In order to meet user needs for timely data, Eurostat shall produce "now-casts" for data that Member States have not transmitted within 12 months after the end of the reference year.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – section 4 - point 2 a (new) 2a. In order to meet user needs for timely data, Eurostat shall produce "now-casts" for data that Member States have not transmitted within 12 months after the end of the reference year.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – title MODULE FOR ECONOMY-WIDE MATERIAL STOCK AND FLOW ACCOUNTS (EW-
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 1 - paragraph 1 EW-MSA and EW-MFA cover
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 3 - paragraph 1 Member States shall produce statistics on the characteristics listed in Section 5 for the EW-MFA and for EW-MSA where applicable.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 4 - point 2 a (new) 2a. In order to meet user needs for timely data, Eurostat shall produce "now-casts" for data that Member States have not transmitted within 12 months after the end of the reference year at the 2-digit level according to table A and B.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 5 - table A - point 1.4 1.4 Wild fish catch, aquatic plants/animals, hunting and gathering (*)
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 5 - table A - point 1.4.1 1.4.1 Wild fish catch (*) (*) In addition, optional reporting of the net increment of fish stock.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 5 – table A - first footnote (*) In addition,
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – section 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In order to meet user needs for complete European data, Eurostat shall produce and publish an estimate in cases in which a transitional period is granted, at the 2- digit level according to table A and B.
source: PE-450.860
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=0132New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=132 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19095&j=0&l=en
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2010&number=0073&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2010&number=0073&appLng=EN |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.872New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-448872_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.860New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-450860_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.687&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-448687_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0330_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0330_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19095&j=0&l=en
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110606&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-06-06-TOC_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-0330&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0330_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0132/COM_COM(2010)0132_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0132/COM_COM(2010)0132_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-0330&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0330_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0253New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0253_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0132/COM_COM(2010)0132_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0132/COM_COM(2010)0132_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/02690New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R0691New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R0691 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0132:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52010PC0132:EN
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-0330&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-330&language=EN |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-330&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-0330&language=EN |
activities/5/docs/1/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-253New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0253 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|