BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2010/0251(COD) Financial markets: short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON CANFIN Pascal (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion JURI LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114-p1

Events

2013/12/13
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the evaluation of the Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (CDS).

This Report was prepared in light of discussions with the competent authorities and ESMA. On the basis of this work, ESMA issued its technical advice on the evaluation of the SSR on 3 June 2013.

The Commission is therefore of the view that it is to o early, based on available evidence, to draw firm conclusions on the operation of the SSR framework which would warrant a revision of the legislation at this stage . The Commission considers that, based on the limited data available so far, it can be said that the SSR has had a positive impact in terms of greater transparency of short sales and reduced settlement failures, and a relatively mixed economic impact.

Overall, the empirical evidence available shows that the SSR has had some beneficial effects on volatility , mixed effects on liquidity and led to a slight decrease in price discovery .

Notification and public disclosure of significant net short positions in shares : the Commission concurs with ESMA’s conclusion that the notification and public disclosure thresholds of significant net positions in shares appear to be well-calibrated and appropriate and sees, at this stage, no compelling evidence for the need to change them or the current methodology for calculating the net short positions in shares.

Reporting of significant net short positions in sovereign debt and notification of uncovered positions in sovereign CDS : the Commission takes note of the relatively low level of short selling notifications in sovereign debt compared to the number of notifications received on shares, as well as the pros and cons of both the duration adjusted and nominal methods.

However, given the limited period of time since the application of the SSR and the consequent lack of data, the Commission sees, at this stage, no compelling evidence justifying revisions of the SSR framework in this area.

Impact of individual dosclosure requirements : ESMA reports that 224 holders publicly disclosed 1090 short positions on 427 shares, with the bulk of disclosures from the UK, followed by France and Sweden. Among the 3 508 notifications made public by these 224 holders, 90% were from holders domiciled in the UK or the US, and the ten biggest holders accounted for 37.5% of those published notifications.

Competent authorities considered the individual reporting thresholds to be appropriate, but they received mixed views from market participants. ESMA also comments that market participants may tend to avoid crossing the notification threshold so as to remain under the 0.5% thresholds to avoid disclosing information on short selling activities.

ESMA’s Report does not recommend any changes to the disclosure thresholds. The Commission agrees with ESMA that no changes in the individual disclosure requirements are required.

Settlement discipline including buy-in procedures : m arket participants reported a general improvement in settlement discipline in shares since the entry into application of the SSR, Overall, the number of buy-ins and buy-in attempts across the Union has increased by 35% since the application of the SSR. However this increase could largely be attributed to one particular Member State.

ESMA considers that the settlement discipline requirements, notably the buy-in procedures, could be more appropriately addressed in a single, horizontal piece of legislation. In particular, ESMA is of the view that the forthcoming Regulation on central securities depositories (CSD) provides a more efficient tool to set out a more detailed regime and to ensure a level-playing field in the application of the buy-in and settlement penalties procedures. The Commission shares this opinion.

New evaluation of the Regulation : although ESMA has made some recommendations for adjustments to the SSR, notably concerning the locate rule, market making exemption and the power of competent authorities to impose short term bans, ESMA has advised the Commission to revisit the assessment of the SSR and its implementing texts at a later stage , once more data and greater experience will be available. ESMA has also drawn the Commission’s attention to the cost implications that changes in the legislative framework so soon after its entry into application might have on investors and on competent authorities.

The Commission will, therefore, continue monitoring the application of the SSR. In order to ensure a smooth functioning of the short selling legal framework, the Commission considers that a new evaluation of the appropriateness and impact of the SSR could be carried out based on more empirical data and evidence and once the competent authorities have accumulated sufficient regulatory experience of applying the SSR. Such an evaluation could be concluded by 2016 , i.e. three years after the entry into application of the SSR. It should be based on the input of ESMA, the analysis of available data and the feedback of competent authorities and market participants.

Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(2013)0885
2012/03/24
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to lay down a common regulatory framework with regard to the requirements and powers relating to short selling and credit default swaps in order to ensure a high level of consumer and investor protection.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps

CONTENT: following an agreement negotiated in first reading, the European Parliament and Council adopted a Regulation on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps which introduces common EU transparency requirements and harmonises the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability. The United Kingdom delegation abstained.

At the height of the financial crisis in 2008, several Member States adopted emergency measures to restrict or ban short selling in some or all securities in order to counter a downward spiral in the prices of shares that could create systemic risks. "Uncovered" or "naked" short selling is a practice where the seller has not made arrangements to borrow the security.

As the EU lacks a common regulatory framework for dealing with short selling, Member States adopted divergent measures. The current fragmented approach limits the effectiveness of the adopted measures and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in the markets and impose additional costs on market participants. The Regulation is intended to address these issues, whilst acknowledging the role of short selling in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in providing liquidity and contributing to efficient pricing.

The main points of the Regulation are as follows:

Scope: in order to provide for a preventive regulatory framework to be used in exceptional circumstances, the Regulation covers all types of financial instruments but provides for a response proportionate to the potential risks posed by the short selling of different instruments. It is only in the case of exceptional circumstances that competent authorities and ESMA are entitled to take measures concerning all types of financial instruments, going beyond the permanent measures that only apply to particular types of instruments where there are clearly identified risks that need to be addressed.

Transparency of significant net short positions : for shares admitted to trading on a trading venue in the Union, a two-tier model is introduced, that provides for greater transparency of significant net short positions in shares at the appropriate level: (i) at the lower threshold, notification of a position should be made privately to the regulators concerned; (ii) at the higher threshold, positions should be publicly disclosed to the market. A relevant publication threshold is a percentage that equals 0.5 % of the issued share capital of the company concerned and each 0.1 % above that.

A requirement to notify regulators of significant net short positions relating to sovereign debt in the Union should be introduced as such notification would provide important information to assist regulators in monitoring whether such positions are in fact creating systemic risks or being used for abusive purposes. Such a requirement should only include private disclosure to regulators as publication of information to the market for such instruments could have a detrimental effect on sovereign debt markets where liquidity is already impaired.

For sovereign debt , on the other hand, significant net short positions relating to issuers in the EU will always require private disclosure to regulators. The proposed regime also provides for notification of significant positions in credit default swaps that relate to EU sovereign debt issuers.

Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of 5 years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position.

The text states that the relevant time for calculation of a net short position shall be at midnight at the end of the trading day on which the natural or legal person holds the relevant position.

The notification of information to a relevant competent authority shall ensure the confidentiality of the information and incorporate mechanisms for authenticating the source of the notification.

Restrictions on uncovered short selling in shares : to reduce the risks of uncovered short selling of shares, the Regulation provides that a natural or legal person may enter into a short sale of a share admitted to trading on a trading venue only where that person has: (i) borrowed the share or has made alternative provisions resulting in a similar legal effect; or (ii) entered into an agreement to borrow the share or has another absolutely enforceable claim under contract or property law to be transferred ownership of a corresponding number of securities of the same class so that settlement can be effected when it is due or (iii) an arrangement with a third party under which that third party has confirmed that the share has been located and has taken measures vis-à-vis third parties necessary for the natural or legal person to have a reasonable expectation that settlement can be effected when it is due.

However, these restrictions don't apply to the short selling of sovereign debt if the transaction serves to hedge a long position in debt instruments of an issuer. Moreover, if the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below a specified threshold, the restrictions on uncovered short selling may be temporarily suspended by the competent authority.

Exceptional situations : in exceptional situations that threaten financial stability or market confidence in a Member State or the EU, the Regulation provides that competent authorities should have temporary powers to require greater transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or to limit individuals from entering into derivative transactions.

In such a situation, the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA) is given a key coordination role, to ensure consistency between competent authorities and to guarantee that such measures are only taken where they are necessary and proportionate. ESMA is also given the power to take measures where the situation has cross-border implications.

ESMA inquiries : ESMA may, on the request of one or more competent authorities, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative conduct an inquiry into a particular issue or practice relating to short selling or relating to the use of credit default swaps to assess whether that issue or practice poses any potential threat to financial stability or market confidence in the Union.

Cooperation with third countries : the competent authorities of Member States shall wherever possible conclude cooperation arrangements with competent authorities of third countries concerning the exchange of information with competent authorities in third countries, the enforcement of obligations arising under the Regulation in third countries and the taking of similar measures in third countries by their competent authorities.

Penalties: the measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA may adopt guidelines to ensure a consistent approach is taken concerning the measures, sanctions and penalties to be established by Members States. ESMA shall publish on its website and update regularly a list of existing administrative measures, sanctions and penalties per Member State.

Review and report: by 30 June 2013, the Commission shall, in light of discussions with the competent authorities and ESMA, report on:(i) the appropriateness of the notification and disclosure thresholds; (ii) the impact of the individual disclosure, in particular with regard to the efficiency and volatility of financial markets; (iii) the appropriateness of direct, centralised reporting to ESMA; (iv) the operation of the restrictions and requirements in the Regulation (v) the appropriateness of the restrictions on the uncovered sovereign credit default swaps and (vi) the appropriateness of any other restrictions or conditions on short selling or credit default swaps.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25/03/2012.

APPLICATION: from 01/11/2012 (certain provisions will apply from 25/03/2012).

DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, where a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, notification or disclosure thresholds and further specification of criteria and factors for determining in which cases an adverse event or development creates a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in a Member State or the Union.

The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time. A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification (which may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or Council objects, the delegated act shall not enter into force.

Documents
Regulation 2012/236
OJ L 086 24.03.2012, p. 0001
2012/03/14
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
00068/2011/LEX
2012/03/14
   CSL - Final act signed
2012/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/02/21
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2012/02/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2012/01/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
SP(2012)29
2011/11/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 507 votes to 25, with 109 abstentions, a legislative resolution on theproposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps.

The vote had been postponed from the 5 July session.

Parliament adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission's proposal as follows:

Purpose : to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to improve the conditions of its functioning, in particular with regard to the financial markets, and to ensure a high level of consumer and investor protection, it is therefore appropriate to lay down a common regulatory framework with regard to the requirements and powers relating to short selling and credit default swaps and to ensure greater coordination and consistency between Member States where measures have to be taken in exceptional situations.

It is recalled that while in certain situations it may have adverse effects, under normal market conditions short selling plays an important role in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in the context of market liquidity and efficient price formation.

Transparency of net short positions : a natural or legal person who has a net short position in relation to the issued share capital of a company that has shares admitted to trading on a trading venue shall disclose details of that position to the public whenever the position reaches or falls below a relevant publication threshold referred to in the Regulation. A relevant publication threshold is a percentage that equals 0.5% of the issued share capital of the company concerned and each 0.1% above that.

The European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA) may issue an opinion to the Commission on adjusting the thresholds referred to in the regulation, taking into account the developments in financial markets.

In addition, a natural or legal person who has a net short position relating to the issued sovereign debt of a sovereign issuer shall notify the relevant competent authority whenever such position reaches or falls below the relevant notification thresholds for the Member State concerned or the Union. ESMA shall publish on its website the notification thresholds for each Member State.

Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years , records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position.

The text stipulates the relevant time for calculation of a net short position shall be at midnight at the end of the trading day on which the natural or legal person has the relevant position. It shall apply to all transactions irrespective of the means of trading used, including transactions executed through either manual or automated trading, and irrespective of whether the transactions have taken place during normal trading hours.

The notification of information to a relevant competent authority shall ensure the confidentiality of the information and incorporate mechanisms for authenticating the source of the notification. This information shall be posted on a central website operated or supervised by the relevant competent authority. The competent authorities shall communicate the address of this website to ESMA, which, in turn, shall put a link to all such central websites on its own website.

The competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State concerned or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide ESMA with any available information based on the notification requirements outlined in the Regulation within 24 hours.

In order to ensure consistent application of these provisions , ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provided. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 March 2012.

Uncovered Short Sales : uncovered short selling of shares and sovereign debt is sometimes viewed as increasing the potential risk of settlement failure and volatility. To reduce such risks it is appropriate to place proportionate restrictions on uncovered short selling of such instruments.

- Restrictions on uncovered short sales in shares and in sovereign debt :

A natural or legal person may only enter into a short sale of a share admitted to trading on a trading venue where one of the following conditions is fulfilled:

(a) the natural or legal person has borrowed the share; or has made alternative provisions resulting in a similar legal effect ;

(b) the natural or legal person has entered into an agreement to borrow the share or has another absolutely enforceable claim under contract or property law to be transferred ownership of a corresponding number of securities of the same class so that settlement can be effected when it is due ;

(c) the natural or legal person has an arrangement with a third party under which that third party has confirmed that the share has been located and has taken measures vis-à-vis third parties necessary for the natural or legal person to have reasonable expectation that settlement can be effected when it is due.

Where the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below the threshold determined in accordance with the methodology referred to in paragraph 4, the restrictions referred to in paragraph 1 may be temporarily suspended by the relevant competent authority. Before suspending these restrictions, the relevant competent authority shall notify ESMA and other competent authorities about the proposed suspension.

The suspension shall be valid for an initial period not exceeding six months from the date of its publication on the website of the relevant competent authority. Such a suspension may be renewed for further periods not exceeding six months at a time if the grounds for the suspension continue to be applicable. If the suspension is not renewed after that six-month period, it shall automatically expire.

ESMA shall within 24 hours after the notification by the relevant competent authority issue an opinion based on paragraph 4 on any notified suspension or renewal of a suspension. The opinion shall be published on ESMA's web site.

ESMA shall, in particular, take into account the need to preserve liquidity of markets, especially sovereign bond markets and sovereign bond repurchase markets (repo markets).

- Restrictions on uncovered credit default swaps in sovereign debt: since entering into a sovereign credit default swap without underlying exposure to the risk of a decline in the value of the sovereign debt instrument may have an adverse impact on the stability of sovereign debt markets, natural or legal persons should be prohibited from entering into such uncovered credit default swap position s. However, at the first initial signals that the sovereign debt market is not functioning properly, the competent authority should be empowered to suspend temporarily such a restriction . Such a suspension should be based on the belief of the competent authority based on objective elements consisting of the analysis of certain indicators set out in this Regulation. However, competent authorities should be empowered to use additional indicators.

The suspension shall be valid for an initial period not exceeding twelve months from the date of its publication on the website of the relevant competent authority. Such a suspension may be renewed for further periods not exceeding six months at a time. ESMA shall within 24 hours after the notification by the relevant competent authority issue an opinion on the intended suspension or on the renewal of that suspension. The opinion shall be published on ESMA's web site.

- Buy-in procedure : the new Regulation also imposes requirements on central counterparties relating to buy-in procedures and fines for failed settlement of transactions in those shares.

Notification by lenders in exceptional situations : the new Regulation provides that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it or to disclose to the public details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where all the following conditions are fulfilled:

(a) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State concerned or in one or more other Member States;

(b) the measure is necessary to address the threat and will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits.

Power to temporarily restrict short selling of financial instruments in case of a significant fall in price : where the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue has significantly fallen during a single trading day in relation to the closing price on that venue on the previous trading day, the competent authority of the home Member State for that venue shall consider whether it is appropriate to prohibit or restrict natural or legal persons from engaging in short selling of the financial instrument on that trading venue or otherwise limit transactions in that financial instrument on that trading venue in order to prevent a disorderly decline in the price of the financial instrument.

A competent authority shall notify ESMA about any decision of this nature so that ESMA can immediately inform the competent authorities of the home Member States of venues which trade the same financial instrument and, if necessary, assist those authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.

ESMA inquiries : ESMA may, on the request of one or more competent authorities, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative conduct an inquiry into a particular issue or practice relating to short selling or relating to the use of credit default swaps to assess whether that issue or practice poses any potential threat to financial stability or market confidence in the Union. ESMA shall publish a report setting out its findings and any recommendations relating to the issue or practice within three months as from the end of the inquiry.

Cooperation with third countries : the competent authorities of Member States shall wherever possible conclude cooperation arrangements with competent authorities of third countries concerning the exchange of information with competent authorities in third countries, the enforcement of obligations arising under this Regulation in third countries and the taking of similar measures in third countries by their competent authorities.

Penalties : the measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA may adopt guidelines to ensure a consistent approach is taken concerning the measures, sanctions and penalties to be established by Members States. ESMA shall publish on its website and update regularly a list of existing administrative measures, sanctions and penalties per Member State.

Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. ESMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.

Documents
T7-0486/2011
2011/07/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2011/07/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament amended, at first reading of the ordinary procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps.

The vote on the legislative resolution was postponed to a later date.

Reduction of risk : Members consider that the requirements to be imposed should address the identified risks taking into account differences in the Member States and the potential economic impact of the requirements and without unduly detracting from the benefits that short selling provides to the quality and efficiency of markets by increasing market liquidity (as the short seller sells securities and then later repurchases those securities to cover the short sale) and by allowing investors to act when they believe a security is overvalued short selling leading therefore to the more efficient pricing of securities.

Scope : commodity markets and, in particular, agricultural markets do not fall within the scope of the Regulation. The report states that the Commission should, by 1 January 2012, report to the European Parliament and the Council on the risks existing on those markets, taking into account their specificities, and put forward any appropriate proposals. Commodities relevant to the energy sector should be addressed in the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on energy market integrity and transparency .

Furthermore, the technical details of the settlement discipline regimes should not be included in the scope of this Regulation and should be defined in the appropriate post-trading legislative proposal of the Commission. The latter should therefore make concrete proposals by the end of 2011, in parallel with a proposal to create a harmonised legal framework for central securities depositories.

Uncovered position in a credit default swap : the amended proposal specifies that a natural or legal person shall be considered to have an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or the Union, to the extent that the credit default swap is not serving to hedge against:

either the risk of default of the issuer where the natural or legal person has a long position in the sovereign debt of that issuer

or the risk of decline in the value of any asset or portfolio of assets to the natural or legal person holding such asset or portfolio of assets where the decline of the price of those asset or portfolio of assets has a high correlation with the decline of the price of the obligation of a Member state or the Union in the case of a decline in the creditworthiness of a Member State or the Union.

Effective transparency regime and marking of sell orders : Members state that transparency requirements should include short positions created by trading outside trading venues and economic net short positions created by the use of derivatives, such as options, futures, index-related instruments, contracts for differences and spread bets relating to shares or sovereign debt. The calculation of short position or long position should include indices, baskets and exchange traded funds.

In addition to the transparency regime for the reporting of net short positions in shares, Parliament includes a requirement for the marking of sell orders that are executed as short sales as observed at the end of the day should be introduced to provide supplementary information about the volume of short sales of shares executed. Information about short sell transactions should be collated by the firm and communicated to the competent authority at least daily in order to help competent authorities to monitor levels of short selling.

A failure to cover a short position at the end of the trading day should result in sufficiently high penalties so as not to allow the seller to make a profit.

In order to improve transparency on short sales, the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) ( ESMA ) may issue and send to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission an opinion on adjusting the thresholds, taking into account the developments in financial markets.

Notification to competent authorities of significant net short positions in sovereign debt and credit default swaps : a natural or legal person who has a net short position relating to the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or of the Union shall notify the relevant competent authority whenever such position reaches or falls below a relevant notification threshold for the Member State concerned or the Union.

Method of notification and disclosure : any disclosure shall include details, in anonymous form, of the size of the relevant position, the issuer in relation to which the relevant position is held and the date on which the relevant position was created, was changed or ceased to be held. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position.

Information to be provided to ESMA : the proposal stated that the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Members add that where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA within 24 hours.

In order to ensure consistent harmonisation, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provide. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 December 2011.

Sovereign credit default swap : these should be based on the insurable interest principle whilst recognising that there can be interests in a sovereign state other than bond ownership.

Temporary restrictions on short selling : in the case of a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue a competent authority should also have the ability to temporarily restrict short selling of the financial instrument on that venue within its own jurisdiction or request to ESMA such restriction in other jurisdictions in order to be able to intervene rapidly where appropriate to prevent a disorderly price fall of the instrument concerned.

Disclosure in exceptional situations : Parliament inserted a provision stating that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or one or more other Member States; (ii) the measure will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits.

Penalties : based on guidelines adopted by ESMA and taking into consideration the Commission's Communication on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, Member States shall establish rules on administrative measures, sanctions and pecuniary penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation. The measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. SMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.

Documents
T7-0312/2011
2011/07/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
Debate in Parliament
2011/05/17
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council agreed a general approach on a draft regulation on short selling and credit default swaps. This will enable the presidency, on behalf of the Council, to start negotiations with the European Parliament, with a view to reaching agreement at first reading .

The draft regulation is aimed at harmonising rules for short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps. It introduces common EU transparency requirements and harmonises the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability.

As the EU lacks a common regulatory framework for dealing with short selling, Member States adopted divergent measures. The current fragmented approach limits the effectiveness of the adopted measures and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in the markets and impose additional costs on market participants.

The draft regulation is intended to address these issues, whilst acknowledging the role of short selling in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in providing liquidity and contributing to efficient pricing.

Scope : the proposal covers all types of financial instruments, providing for a response that is proportionate to the potential risks posed by short selling of different instruments. In particular, for shares of companies listed in the EU, it creates a two-tier model for transparency of significant net short positions: While at a lower threshold, notification of a position must be made privately to the regulator, at a higher threshold; positions must be disclosed to the market.

Sovereign debt : for sovereign debt, on the other hand, significant net short positions relating to issuers in the EU would always require private disclosure to regulators. The proposed regime also provides for notification of significant positions in credit default swaps that relate to EU sovereign debt issuers.

Uncovered short sales : to tackle the increased risks posed by uncovered short sales (practice whereby an investor sells a security he doesn't own with the intention of buying it back when the price has fallen), the proposal requires that anyone entering into a short sale must at the time of the sale have borrowed the instruments, entered into an agreement to borrow them or made other arrangements to ensure they can be borrowed in time to settle the deal.

However, these restrictions don't apply to the short selling of sovereign debt if the transaction serves to hedge a long position in debt instruments of an issuer. Moreover, if the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below a specified threshold, the restrictions on uncovered short selling may be temporarily suspended by the relevant competent authority.

In exceptional situations that threaten financial stability or market confidence in a Member State or the EU , the draft regulation provides that competent authorities have temporary powers to require further transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or to limit individuals from entering into derivative transactions.

In such a situation, the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA) is given a coordination role to ensure consistency between competent authorities and to guarantee that such measures are only taken where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. ESMA is also given the power to take measures where the situation has cross-border implications.

Documents
3088
2011/05/17
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/04/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
A7-0055/2011
2011/04/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
A7-0055/2011
2011/03/22
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
COM(2010)0482
2011/03/15
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council was briefed by the presidency on ongoing work on a draft regulation on short selling and credit default swaps. The short selling of securities is a practice whereby an investor sells a security he doesn't own with the intention of buying it back when the price has fallen. A credit default swap is a financial instrument with the characteristics of insurance, guaranteeing the creditworthiness of a loan.

The Council asked the Permanent Representatives Committee rapidly to resolve the remaining outstanding issues so as to establish a general approach that will enable the presidency to start negotiations with the European Parliament.

Documents
3076
2011/03/15
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/03/07
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Pascal CANFIN (Greens/ALE, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps. It recommended that the European Parliament’s position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should be to amend the Commission proposal. The main amendments are as follows:

Reduction of risk : Members consider that the requirements to be imposed should address the identified risks taking into account differences in the Member States and the potential economic impact of the requirements and without unduly detracting from the benefits that short selling provides to the quality and efficiency of markets.

Scope : commodity markets and, in particular, agricultural markets do not fall within the scope of the Regulation. The report states that the Commission should, by 1 January 2012, report to the European Parliament and the Council on the risks existing on those markets, taking into account their specificities, and put forward any appropriate proposals. Commodities relevant to the energy sector should be addressed in the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on energy market integrity and transparency .

Furthermore, the technical details of the settlement discipline regimes should not be included in the scope of this Regulation and should be defined in the appropriate post-trading legislative proposal of the Commission. The latter should therefore make concrete proposals by the end of 2011, in parallel with a proposal to create a harmonised legal framework for central securities depositories.

Uncovered position in a credit default swap : the amended proposal specifies that a natural or legal person shall be considered to have an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or the Union, to the extent that the credit default swap is not serving to hedge against:

either the risk of default of the issuer where the natural or legal person has a long position in the sovereign debt of that issuer

or the risk of decline in the value of any asset or portfolio of assets to the natural or legal person holding such asset or portfolio of assets where the decline of the price of those asset or portfolio of assets has a high correlation with the decline of the price of the obligation of a Member state or the Union in the case of a decline in the creditworthiness of a Member State or the Union.

Effective transparency regime and marking of sell orders : Members state that transparency requirements should include short positions created by trading outside trading venues and economic net short positions created by the use of derivatives, such as options, futures, index-related instruments, contracts for differences and spread bets relating to shares or sovereign debt.

In addition to the transparency regime for the reporting of net short positions in shares, a requirement for the marking of sell orders that are executed as short sales as observed at the end of the day should be introduced. Information about short sell transactions should be collated by the firm and communicated to the competent authority at least daily. A failure to cover a short position at the end of the trading day should result in sufficiently high penalties so as not to allow the seller to make a profit.

In order to improve transparency on short sales, the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (ESMA) may issue and send to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission an opinion on adjusting the thresholds, taking into account the developments in financial markets.

Method of notification and disclosure : any disclosure shall include details, in anonymous form, of the size of the relevant position, the issuer in relation to which the relevant position is held and the date on which the relevant position was created, was changed or ceased to be held. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position.

Information to be provided to ESMA : the proposal stated that the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Members add that where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA within 24 hours.

In order to ensure consistent harmonisation, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provide. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 December 2011.

Sovereign credit default swap : these should be based on the insurable interest principle whilst recognising that there can be interests in a sovereign state other than bond ownership.

Temporary restrictions on short selling : in the case of a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue a competent authority should also have the ability to temporarily restrict short selling of the financial instrument on that venue within its own jurisdiction or request to ESMA such restriction in other jurisdictions in order to be able to intervene rapidly where appropriate to prevent a disorderly price fall of the instrument concerned.

Disclosure in exceptional situations : Members inserted a provision stating that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or one or more other Member States; (ii) the measure will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits.

Penalties : based on guidelines adopted by ESMA and taking into consideration the Commission's Communication on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, Member States shall establish rules on administrative measures, sanctions and pecuniary penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation. The measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. SMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.

2011/03/03
   ECB - European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
Details

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps.

General observations : the ECB welcomes the main aim of the proposed regulation, which is to establish a Union regulatory framework to cover short selling and equivalent practices based on the use of credit default swaps (CDSs).

Specific observations

Scope: the ECB recommends that sovereign debt instruments covered by the proposed regulation are defined as those which are issued or guaranteed by the entities belonging to the public sector of the Member States or of the Union, where the applicable definition of the ‘public sector’ should be the one already present in the Union secondary legislation. This will ensure that the debt instruments issued by the ESCB central banks as part of the implementation of the monetary policy are not classified as sovereign debt instruments, which would be contrary to the prohibition of the central bank financing of the public sector expressed in Article 123 of the Treaty.

Furthermore, certain specified market making and primary market activities are exempted from the transparency and regulatory interventions regime envisaged by the proposed regulation. Potential abuses of the market making exemption should be avoided, in particular by ensuring that the proprietary business of a market maker does not benefit from this exemption. The ECB recommends that powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt relevant technical standards , on the basis of a proposal by ESMA which would adequately balance the above considerations. Such technical standards may consider: (a) detailed features of the market making activities benefiting from this exemption; (b) reporting procedures to disclose the market making activity to the competent authorities; and (c) portfolio structures and booking procedures to be used by market makers with a view to clearly identifying the character of a transaction as either market making or another type of transaction, and excluding the rebooking of transactions without a notification to the competent authority.

The ECB also recommends that powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt, on the basis of a proposal by ESMA, the implementing technical standards ensuring uniform application of the exemption for stabilisation measures under the short selling regime. Such technical standards would complement the technical standards developed with regard to the exemption for stabilisation measures under the market abuse regime.

Reporting and public disclosure standards : under the proposed regulation, powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt (a) regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provided to the competent authorities with respect to net short positions exceeding the specified reporting threshold; and (b) implementing technical standards specifying the means by which information will be provided to the public with respect to net short positions exceeding the specified public disclosure threshold. The ECB recommends specifying the legislative delegation to the Commission to the effect that the formats used for the purposes of reporting and public disclosure in such cases should allow for timely Union-wide consolidation and assessment of short selling positions affecting specific issuers. Consistency of reporting formats will be crucial for ensuring an effective response to potential market disturbances by ESMA and the competent national authorities, as well as, in relation to their respective competences, by the ESCB and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB).

Regarding the specific issue of the public disclosure obligations imposed on entities engaged in short selling , the ECB understands that the proposed regulation envisages that such disclosure will be performed through the use of officially appointed mechanisms for the central storage of regulated information , introduced as part of the Union’s tran sparency regime for securities. In principle the ECB supports this method of disclosure, while recommending that it should be based on interactive reporting, using standard data formats, so as to allow efficient consolidation and flexible access to Union-wide information on an integrated basis. For instance, all disclosed information could be available through ESMA by way of centralised access to officially appointed mechanisms. This would reflect the cross-border implications of risks generated by short selling and the coordination role envisaged for ESMA under the proposed regulation.

Information sharing: t he proposed regulation establishes information sharing arrangements between the competent national authorities and ESMA with respect to net short positions reported to those competent authorities. The ECB makes the following recommendations in this respect:

as a minimum, the proposed modalities for information sharing between the competent authorities and ESMA should become more efficient, in particular by allowing ESMA to make requests for real-time information sharing where this is necessary for it to perform its tasks effectively. In the longer term ESMA should obtain automatic access to all information reported under the proposed regulation. Hence, the ECB recommends that ESMA initiates work on establishing centralised Union information collection mechanisms that apply a common identifier of reporting entities and a minimum common taxonomy; such mechanisms should allow for flexible real-time access to information for policy purposes, while ensuring the confidentiality of the received data. The ECB considers that the establishment of such centralised mechanisms would help to overcome the limits inherent in the usage of uncoordinated micro-data pools and would also allow the information collected under the proposed regulation to be used in connection with other available datasets, minimising the administrative burden for the reporting entities and public authorities; the proposed regulation should also expressly provide for information sharing between ESMA and ESCB central banks in order to facilitate performance of the ESCB functions of collecting statistical data and monitoring and assessing financial stability; the proposed regulation should provide for information sharing between the ESMA and the ESRB, with a view to facilitating the ESRB’s collection of information for the performance of its tasks and identifying and prioritising systemic risks that may arise from developments within the financial system.

Intervention powers : the ECB recommends that ESMA should also have the right to consult the ESRB when it is notified of measures introduced by the competent national authorities. Appropriate time constraints could be laid down to ensure the efficient handling of ESRB consultations. Moreover, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESA), including ESMA, must cooperate closely with the ESRB and provide it with all information necessary for the fulfilment of its tasks in a regular and timely manner, while the ESRB may request additional information from the ESA. . Provisions envisaging the consultation of the ESRB by ESMA on contemplated short selling interventions will allow the ESRB (i), to make an informed and timely assessment if a request for further information is needed in a specific situation in view of the potential systemic risks, and (ii) to formulate such requests, if any, in a pragmatic and consistent manner.

Documents
CON/2011/0017
OJ C 091 23.03.2011, p. 0001
2011/01/30
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
COM(2010)0482
2011/01/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE454.492
2011/01/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE456.805
2011/01/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE456.773
2011/01/19
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
CES0066/2011
2010/12/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council took note of a presidency progress report regarding work on a draft regulation on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps.

Documents
3054
2010/12/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2010/11/30
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
COM(2010)0482
2010/11/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE454.372
2010/10/27
   EP - LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2010/10/17
   AT_NATIONALRAT - Contribution
Documents
COM(2010)0482
2010/10/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2010/09/21
   EP - CANFIN Pascal (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2010/09/15
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
SEC(2010)1055
EUR-Lex
2010/09/15
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
SEC(2010)1056
EUR-Lex
2010/09/15
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a common framework concerning requirements and powers in relation to short selling and credit default swaps.

PROPOSED ACT: European Parliament and Council Regulation.

BACKGROUND: short selling of securities is a practice where a natural or legal person sells a security he does not own with the intention of buying back an identical security at a later point in time. It is an established and common practice in most financial markets. Short selling can be divided into two types: covered short selling where the seller has borrowed the security, or made arrangements to ensure they can be borrowed before the short sale and uncovered or naked short selling (where at the time of the short sale the seller has not borrowed the securities or ensured they can be borrowed).

At the height of the financial crisis, in September 2008, competent authorities in several EU Member States and the USA adopted emergency measures to restrict or ban short selling in some or all securities. The measures adopted by Member States were divergent as the European Union lacks a specific legislative framework for dealing with short selling issues.

Earlier this year concerns were expressed by some Member States about the possible role played by derivative transactions, notably credit default swaps, in relation to the prices for Greek sovereign bonds. A number of Member States (notably Germany and Greece) have recently adopted temporary or permanent restrictions at national level relating to short selling of shares and/or credit default swaps.

The current fragmented approach to short selling and credit default swaps limits the effectiveness of supervision and the measures imposed and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in markets and costs and difficulties for market participants.

In its communication of 2 June 2010 on Regulating Financial Services for Sustainable Growth, the Commission considered that it would be desirable to have a regulation addressing the potential risks arising from short selling. The intention is to i) harmonise requirements relating to short selling across the European Union, ii) harmonise the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability or market confidence and iii) ensure greater co-ordination and consistency between Member States in such situations.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission undertook an impact assessment of policy alternatives. Policy options related to the scope of the proposals, the proposed transparency regimes, requirements relating to uncovered short selling, exemptions and exceptional powers to restrict short selling.

LEGAL BASE: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Although all the problems outlined above have important implications for each individual Member State, their overall impact can only be fully perceived in a cross-border context.

CONTENT: the proposal covers all financial instruments but provides for a proportionate response to the risks that that short selling of different instruments may represent. Its main features are as follows:

Transparency requirements for short positions in certain instruments: for instruments such as shares and derivatives relating to shares, sovereign bonds and derivatives relating to sovereign bonds and credit default swaps relating to sovereign issuers where taking short positions is more common and there are clearly identifiable risks or concerns, transparency requirements and requirements relating to uncovered short selling are applied.

For companies that have shares admitted to trading on a trading venue in the Union, the proposal provides for a two tier model for transparency of significant net short positions in shares. At a lower threshold notification of a position must be made privately to the regulator and at a higher threshold positions must be disclosed to the market .

As regards significant net short positions relating to sovereign debt issuers in the EU, private disclosure to regulators is required.

The proposal includes a requirement for the marking of short orders . A requirement for the marking or flagging of sell orders executed on trading venues as short orders where the seller is entering into a short sale of shares on that venue will provide additional information about volumes of short sales executed on the trading venue. A trading venue will be required to publish daily information about volumes of short sales executed on the venue that is obtained from the marking of orders.

Uncovered short sales : uncovered or naked short selling of shares and sovereign debt is sometimes viewed as increasing the potential risk of settlement failure and market volatility. The proposals include detailed requirements aimed at addressing these risks.

To this end, natural or legal persons entering into short sales of such instruments must at the time of the sale have borrowed the instruments, entered into an agreement to borrow the shares or made other arrangements which ensure that the security can be borrowed so that settlement can be effected when it is due.

Furthermore, trading venues must ensure that there are adequate arrangements in place for buy-in of shares or sovereign debt where there is a failure to settle a transaction. Trading venues will have the power to prohibit a natural or legal person who failed to settle to enter into further short sales.

Exemptions: provisions are made for exemptions – for example, for shares of a company where the principal market for the shares is outside the European Union and for market making activities which play a crucial role in providing liquidity to European markets.

Intervention powers: in exceptional situations which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence, competent authorities should have temporary powers to require further transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or limit natural and legal persons from entering into derivative transactions.

Where an adverse development or event creates a threat to financial stability or market confidence that extends beyond one Member State or has other cross border implications, the proposal introduces various procedural requirements aimed at ensuring that other competent authorities are notified if a competent authority intends to take exceptional measures related to short selling. The European Securities Market Authority ( ESMA ) is given a key coordination role in such a situation to try to ensure consistency between competent authorities.

Powers and sanctions: t he proposal gives competent authorities all the powers necessary for the enforcement of the rules. For example, the powers cover access to documents, the right to obtain information from natural or legal persons and to take enforcement action.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the EU budget.

Documents
COM(2010)0482
EUR-Lex

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0055/2011 - Pascal Canfin - Am 1/3 #

2011/07/05 Outcome: +: 529, -: 117, 0: 20
DE FR IT ES PT EL RO HU PL AT SK BE NL CY BG SI DK IE LV LT LU MT SE FI CZ EE GB
Total
96
60
67
43
21
21
30
19
43
16
13
22
23
6
16
7
13
9
7
12
6
4
15
12
18
6
60
icon: PPE PPE
241

Germany PPE

41

France PPE

28

Italy PPE

33

Spain PPE

19

Portugal PPE

10

Greece PPE

7

Romania PPE

13

Hungary PPE

13

Poland PPE

23

Austria PPE

5

Slovakia PPE

6

Belgium PPE

5

Netherlands PPE

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Bulgaria PPE

5

Slovenia PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

Bendt BENDTSEN
1

Ireland PPE

2

Latvia PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Sweden PPE

3

Finland PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

Tunne KELAM
1
icon: S&D S&D
165

Germany S&D

22

France S&D

7

Italy S&D

20

Spain S&D

19

Portugal S&D

6

Greece S&D

8

Romania S&D

10

Hungary S&D

4

Poland S&D

7

Austria S&D

4

Slovakia S&D

5

Belgium S&D

5

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

4

Slovenia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

4

Ireland S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

Robert GOEBBELS
1

Malta S&D

2

Sweden S&D

5

Finland S&D

2

Czechia S&D

5

Estonia S&D

For (1)

Ivari PADAR
1

United Kingdom S&D

10
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

Germany Verts/ALE

14

France Verts/ALE

12

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

Claude TURMES
1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Indrek TARAND
1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Germany GUE/NGL

8

France GUE/NGL

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

5

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

Paul MURPHY
1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

Alfreds RUBIKS
1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
24

France NI

3

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Austria NI

5

Belgium NI

2

Netherlands NI

3

Bulgaria NI

2

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: EFD EFD
23

Italy EFD

9

Greece EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

Jaroslav PAŠKA
1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

Bas BELDER
1

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

Sampo TERHO
1

United Kingdom EFD

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
80

Germany ALDE

11

France ALDE

6

Italy ALDE

For (1)

Sonia ALFANO
5

Spain ALDE

2

Greece ALDE

Abstain (1)

Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS
1

Romania ALDE

5

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

Sergej KOZLÍK
1

Belgium ALDE

Abstain (1)

Frédérique RIES
5

Netherlands ALDE

6

Bulgaria ALDE

5

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Ivo VAJGL

Against (1)

Jelko KACIN
2

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

Marian HARKIN
3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

Leonidas DONSKIS

Abstain (1)

Viktor USPASKICH
2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

Charles GOERENS
1

Sweden ALDE

4

Finland ALDE

4

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

11
icon: ECR ECR
51

Poland ECR

13

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

Derk Jan EPPINK
1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Peter van DALEN
1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

Anna ROSBACH
1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

Roberts ZĪLE
1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI
1

Czechia ECR

9

United Kingdom ECR

24

A7-0055/2011 - Pascal Canfin - Am 2=3/2 #

2011/07/05 Outcome: -: 533, +: 128, 0: 13
GB EE CZ BG IE SE SI LV LU LT DK MT CY FI NL SK BE AT RO PL EL PT HU ES FR IT DE
Total
61
6
19
16
9
15
7
8
6
12
13
5
6
13
25
13
22
16
30
43
21
21
20
43
60
67
96
icon: ALDE ALDE
82

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

Sir Graham WATSON
12

Estonia ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

5

Ireland ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

4

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

Ivars GODMANIS
1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

Charles GOERENS
1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

Viktor USPASKICH
2

Denmark ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

4

Netherlands ALDE

6

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

Sergej KOZLÍK
1

Belgium ALDE

Abstain (1)

Frédérique RIES
5

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

Adina VĂLEAN
5

Greece ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

2

France ALDE

For (1)

Sylvie GOULARD
6

Italy ALDE

Against (1)

Sonia ALFANO
5

Germany ALDE

11
icon: ECR ECR
51

United Kingdom ECR

24

Czechia ECR

9

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Roberts ZĪLE
1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

Anna ROSBACH
1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Peter van DALEN
1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

Derk Jan EPPINK
1

Poland ECR

Abstain (1)

Zbigniew ZIOBRO
13
icon: NI NI
25

United Kingdom NI

4

Bulgaria NI

2

Netherlands NI

4

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

5

Romania NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

3
icon: EFD EFD
23

United Kingdom EFD

Against (1)

Nigel FARAGE
6

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

Morten MESSERSCHMIDT
1

Finland EFD

For (1)

Sampo TERHO
1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

Bas BELDER
1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

Jaroslav PAŠKA
1

Greece EFD

2

Italy EFD

9
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Bairbre de BRÚN
1

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Paul MURPHY
1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Alfreds RUBIKS
1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

5

France GUE/NGL

4

Germany GUE/NGL

8
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Indrek TARAND
1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Tatjana ŽDANOKA
1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Claude TURMES
1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

Satu HASSI, Tarja CRONBERG
2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Michail TREMOPOULOS
1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

12

Germany Verts/ALE

14
icon: S&D S&D
166

United Kingdom S&D

For (1)

Arlene McCARTHY
10

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

Ivari PADAR
1

Czechia S&D

5

Bulgaria S&D

4

Ireland S&D

3

Sweden S&D

5

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

Alexander MIRSKY
1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

Robert GOEBBELS
1

Lithuania S&D

3

Denmark S&D

4

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

5

Belgium S&D

5

Austria S&D

4

Romania S&D

10

Poland S&D

7

Greece S&D

8

Portugal S&D

6

Hungary S&D

4

Spain S&D

19

France S&D

7

Italy S&D

20

Germany S&D

22
icon: PPE PPE
244

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

Tunne KELAM
1

Czechia PPE

2

Bulgaria PPE

5

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

Jim HIGGINS, Seán KELLY
2

Sweden PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

3

Latvia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

Bendt BENDTSEN
1

Malta PPE

Against (2)

David CASA, Simon BUSUTTIL
2

Cyprus PPE

2

Finland PPE

4

Netherlands PPE

5

Slovakia PPE

6

Belgium PPE

5

Austria PPE

5

Romania PPE

13

Poland PPE

23

Greece PPE

7

Portugal PPE

10

Hungary PPE

14

Spain PPE

19

France PPE

28

Italy PPE

33

Germany PPE

41
AmendmentsDossier
433 2010/0251(COD)
2011/01/13 JURI 55 amendments...
source: PE-456.688
2011/01/20 ECON 198 amendments...
source: PE-456.773
2011/01/26 ECON 180 amendments...
source: PE-456.805

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2023-08-03Show (17) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
docs/1
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/12
date
2011-03-22T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/13
date
2011-01-30T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/13
date
2011-03-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/14
date
2010-10-17T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
AT_NATIONALRAT
docs/14
date
2011-01-31T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
CZ_SENATE
docs/15
date
2010-11-30T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/15
date
2010-10-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
AT_NATIONALRAT
docs/16
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
events/0
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
events/5
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
events/5/date
Old
2011-04-19T00:00:00
New
2011-04-18T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2010&number=0251&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2010&number=0251&appLng=EN
2021-12-18Show (35) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/2
date
2010-11-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.372 title: PE454.372
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2010-11-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.372 title: PE454.372
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2011-01-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0066)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0066/2011
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.372
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-454372_EN.html
docs/4
date
2011-01-19T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0066)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0066/2011
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/4
date
2011-01-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.773 title: PE456.773
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0066)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0066)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/5
date
2011-01-20T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.773 title: PE456.773
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2011-01-26T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.805 title: PE456.805
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.773
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-456773_EN.html
docs/6
date
2011-01-26T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.805 title: PE456.805
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/6
date
2011-01-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.492&secondRef=02 title: PE454.492
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.805
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-456805_EN.html
docs/7
date
2011-01-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.492&secondRef=02 title: PE454.492
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.492&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-454492_EN.html
docs/8
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/9
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html
events/0
date
2010-10-07T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2010-09-15T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1
date
2010-10-07T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2011-03-07T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2011-03-07T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/4
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
events/5
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html title: A7-0055/2011
events/6
date
2011-07-04T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-07-04-TOC_EN.html
events/7
date
2011-07-04T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/8
date
2011-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0312_EN.html title: T7-0312/2011
summary
events/9
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0486_EN.html title: T7-0486/2011
summary
events/9
date
2011-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0312_EN.html title: T7-0312/2011
summary
events/10
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0486_EN.html title: T7-0486/2011
summary
2020-01-19Show (16) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: CANFIN Pascal date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2010-09-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CANFIN Pascal group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1056/COM_SEC(2010)1056_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1056/COM_SEC(2010)1056_EN.pdf
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html
docs/9/body
EC
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-55&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0055_EN.html
events/8
date
2011-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312 title: T7-0312/2011
summary
events/8
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19811&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/8/date
Old
2011-11-15T00:00:00
New
2011-07-05T00:00:00
events/9
date
2011-07-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312 title: T7-0312/2011
summary
events/9
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19811&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/9/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0312_EN.html
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0486
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0486_EN.html
2019-07-12Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1056/COM_SEC(2010)1056_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1056/COM_SEC(2010)1056_EN.pdf
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-55&language=EN
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0482/COM_COM(2010)0482_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0482/COM_COM(2010)0482_EN.pdf
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-55&language=EN
2019-07-06Show (15) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2010-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0482/COM_COM(2010)0482_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0482 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0482:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3054 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3054*&MEET_DATE=07/12/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3054 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3076 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3076*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3076 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0055/2011 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3088 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3088*&MEET_DATE=17/05/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3088 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-05-17T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0312 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0312/2011 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19811&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-486 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0486/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3148
  • date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0236 title: Regulation 2012/236 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2012:086:TOC title: OJ L 086 24.03.2012, p. 0001
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BARNIER Michel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2010-09-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CANFIN Pascal group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2010-09-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3148 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3148*&MEET_DATE=21/02/2012 date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3088 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3088*&MEET_DATE=17/05/2011 date: 2011-05-17T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3076 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3076*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2011 date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3054 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3054*&MEET_DATE=07/12/2010 date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2010-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1055/COM_SEC(2010)1055_EN.pdf title: SEC(2010)1055 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=1055 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2010-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1056/COM_SEC(2010)1056_EN.pdf title: SEC(2010)1056 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=1056 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2010-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.372 title: PE454.372 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-01-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0066)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0066/2011 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.773 title: PE456.773 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-01-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.805 title: PE456.805 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-01-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.492&secondRef=02 title: PE454.492 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52011AB0017:EN:NOT title: CON/2011/0017 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2011:091:TOC title: OJ C 091 23.03.2011, p. 0001 summary: OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps. General observations : the ECB welcomes the main aim of the proposed regulation, which is to establish a Union regulatory framework to cover short selling and equivalent practices based on the use of credit default swaps (CDSs). Specific observations Scope: the ECB recommends that sovereign debt instruments covered by the proposed regulation are defined as those which are issued or guaranteed by the entities belonging to the public sector of the Member States or of the Union, where the applicable definition of the ‘public sector’ should be the one already present in the Union secondary legislation. This will ensure that the debt instruments issued by the ESCB central banks as part of the implementation of the monetary policy are not classified as sovereign debt instruments, which would be contrary to the prohibition of the central bank financing of the public sector expressed in Article 123 of the Treaty. Furthermore, certain specified market making and primary market activities are exempted from the transparency and regulatory interventions regime envisaged by the proposed regulation. Potential abuses of the market making exemption should be avoided, in particular by ensuring that the proprietary business of a market maker does not benefit from this exemption. The ECB recommends that powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt relevant technical standards , on the basis of a proposal by ESMA which would adequately balance the above considerations. Such technical standards may consider: (a) detailed features of the market making activities benefiting from this exemption; (b) reporting procedures to disclose the market making activity to the competent authorities; and (c) portfolio structures and booking procedures to be used by market makers with a view to clearly identifying the character of a transaction as either market making or another type of transaction, and excluding the rebooking of transactions without a notification to the competent authority. The ECB also recommends that powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt, on the basis of a proposal by ESMA, the implementing technical standards ensuring uniform application of the exemption for stabilisation measures under the short selling regime. Such technical standards would complement the technical standards developed with regard to the exemption for stabilisation measures under the market abuse regime. Reporting and public disclosure standards : under the proposed regulation, powers are delegated to the Commission to adopt (a) regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provided to the competent authorities with respect to net short positions exceeding the specified reporting threshold; and (b) implementing technical standards specifying the means by which information will be provided to the public with respect to net short positions exceeding the specified public disclosure threshold. The ECB recommends specifying the legislative delegation to the Commission to the effect that the formats used for the purposes of reporting and public disclosure in such cases should allow for timely Union-wide consolidation and assessment of short selling positions affecting specific issuers. Consistency of reporting formats will be crucial for ensuring an effective response to potential market disturbances by ESMA and the competent national authorities, as well as, in relation to their respective competences, by the ESCB and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). Regarding the specific issue of the public disclosure obligations imposed on entities engaged in short selling , the ECB understands that the proposed regulation envisages that such disclosure will be performed through the use of officially appointed mechanisms for the central storage of regulated information , introduced as part of the Union’s tran sparency regime for securities. In principle the ECB supports this method of disclosure, while recommending that it should be based on interactive reporting, using standard data formats, so as to allow efficient consolidation and flexible access to Union-wide information on an integrated basis. For instance, all disclosed information could be available through ESMA by way of centralised access to officially appointed mechanisms. This would reflect the cross-border implications of risks generated by short selling and the coordination role envisaged for ESMA under the proposed regulation. Information sharing: t he proposed regulation establishes information sharing arrangements between the competent national authorities and ESMA with respect to net short positions reported to those competent authorities. The ECB makes the following recommendations in this respect: as a minimum, the proposed modalities for information sharing between the competent authorities and ESMA should become more efficient, in particular by allowing ESMA to make requests for real-time information sharing where this is necessary for it to perform its tasks effectively. In the longer term ESMA should obtain automatic access to all information reported under the proposed regulation. Hence, the ECB recommends that ESMA initiates work on establishing centralised Union information collection mechanisms that apply a common identifier of reporting entities and a minimum common taxonomy; such mechanisms should allow for flexible real-time access to information for policy purposes, while ensuring the confidentiality of the received data. The ECB considers that the establishment of such centralised mechanisms would help to overcome the limits inherent in the usage of uncoordinated micro-data pools and would also allow the information collected under the proposed regulation to be used in connection with other available datasets, minimising the administrative burden for the reporting entities and public authorities; the proposed regulation should also expressly provide for information sharing between ESMA and ESCB central banks in order to facilitate performance of the ESCB functions of collecting statistical data and monitoring and assessing financial stability; the proposed regulation should provide for information sharing between the ESMA and the ESRB, with a view to facilitating the ESRB’s collection of information for the performance of its tasks and identifying and prioritising systemic risks that may arise from developments within the financial system. Intervention powers : the ECB recommends that ESMA should also have the right to consult the ESRB when it is notified of measures introduced by the competent national authorities. Appropriate time constraints could be laid down to ensure the efficient handling of ESRB consultations. Moreover, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESA), including ESMA, must cooperate closely with the ESRB and provide it with all information necessary for the fulfilment of its tasks in a regular and timely manner, while the ESRB may request additional information from the ESA. . Provisions envisaging the consultation of the ESRB by ESMA on contemplated short selling interventions will allow the ESRB (i), to make an informed and timely assessment if a request for further information is needed in a specific situation in view of the potential systemic risks, and (ii) to formulate such requests, if any, in a pragmatic and consistent manner. type: European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report body: ECB
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN title: A7-0055/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=19811&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)29 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F12&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00068/2011/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2013-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=0885 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2013)0885 summary: The Commission presents a report on the evaluation of the Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (CDS). This Report was prepared in light of discussions with the competent authorities and ESMA. On the basis of this work, ESMA issued its technical advice on the evaluation of the SSR on 3 June 2013. The Commission is therefore of the view that it is to o early, based on available evidence, to draw firm conclusions on the operation of the SSR framework which would warrant a revision of the legislation at this stage . The Commission considers that, based on the limited data available so far, it can be said that the SSR has had a positive impact in terms of greater transparency of short sales and reduced settlement failures, and a relatively mixed economic impact. Overall, the empirical evidence available shows that the SSR has had some beneficial effects on volatility , mixed effects on liquidity and led to a slight decrease in price discovery . Notification and public disclosure of significant net short positions in shares : the Commission concurs with ESMA’s conclusion that the notification and public disclosure thresholds of significant net positions in shares appear to be well-calibrated and appropriate and sees, at this stage, no compelling evidence for the need to change them or the current methodology for calculating the net short positions in shares. Reporting of significant net short positions in sovereign debt and notification of uncovered positions in sovereign CDS : the Commission takes note of the relatively low level of short selling notifications in sovereign debt compared to the number of notifications received on shares, as well as the pros and cons of both the duration adjusted and nominal methods. However, given the limited period of time since the application of the SSR and the consequent lack of data, the Commission sees, at this stage, no compelling evidence justifying revisions of the SSR framework in this area. Impact of individual dosclosure requirements : ESMA reports that 224 holders publicly disclosed 1090 short positions on 427 shares, with the bulk of disclosures from the UK, followed by France and Sweden. Among the 3 508 notifications made public by these 224 holders, 90% were from holders domiciled in the UK or the US, and the ten biggest holders accounted for 37.5% of those published notifications. Competent authorities considered the individual reporting thresholds to be appropriate, but they received mixed views from market participants. ESMA also comments that market participants may tend to avoid crossing the notification threshold so as to remain under the 0.5% thresholds to avoid disclosing information on short selling activities. ESMA’s Report does not recommend any changes to the disclosure thresholds. The Commission agrees with ESMA that no changes in the individual disclosure requirements are required. Settlement discipline including buy-in procedures : m arket participants reported a general improvement in settlement discipline in shares since the entry into application of the SSR, Overall, the number of buy-ins and buy-in attempts across the Union has increased by 35% since the application of the SSR. However this increase could largely be attributed to one particular Member State. ESMA considers that the settlement discipline requirements, notably the buy-in procedures, could be more appropriately addressed in a single, horizontal piece of legislation. In particular, ESMA is of the view that the forthcoming Regulation on central securities depositories (CSD) provides a more efficient tool to set out a more detailed regime and to ensure a level-playing field in the application of the buy-in and settlement penalties procedures. The Commission shares this opinion. New evaluation of the Regulation : although ESMA has made some recommendations for adjustments to the SSR, notably concerning the locate rule, market making exemption and the power of competent authorities to impose short term bans, ESMA has advised the Commission to revisit the assessment of the SSR and its implementing texts at a later stage , once more data and greater experience will be available. ESMA has also drawn the Commission’s attention to the cost implications that changes in the legislative framework so soon after its entry into application might have on investors and on competent authorities. The Commission will, therefore, continue monitoring the application of the SSR. In order to ensure a smooth functioning of the short selling legal framework, the Commission considers that a new evaluation of the appropriateness and impact of the SSR could be carried out based on more empirical data and evidence and once the competent authorities have accumulated sufficient regulatory experience of applying the SSR. Such an evaluation could be concluded by 2016 , i.e. three years after the entry into application of the SSR. It should be based on the input of ESMA, the analysis of available data and the feedback of competent authorities and market participants. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2011-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2011-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2010-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482 type: Contribution body: AT_NATIONALRAT
  • date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0482 title: COM(2010)0482 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2010-09-15T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0482/COM_COM(2010)0482_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0482 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=482 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish a common framework concerning requirements and powers in relation to short selling and credit default swaps. PROPOSED ACT: European Parliament and Council Regulation. BACKGROUND: short selling of securities is a practice where a natural or legal person sells a security he does not own with the intention of buying back an identical security at a later point in time. It is an established and common practice in most financial markets. Short selling can be divided into two types: covered short selling where the seller has borrowed the security, or made arrangements to ensure they can be borrowed before the short sale and uncovered or naked short selling (where at the time of the short sale the seller has not borrowed the securities or ensured they can be borrowed). At the height of the financial crisis, in September 2008, competent authorities in several EU Member States and the USA adopted emergency measures to restrict or ban short selling in some or all securities. The measures adopted by Member States were divergent as the European Union lacks a specific legislative framework for dealing with short selling issues. Earlier this year concerns were expressed by some Member States about the possible role played by derivative transactions, notably credit default swaps, in relation to the prices for Greek sovereign bonds. A number of Member States (notably Germany and Greece) have recently adopted temporary or permanent restrictions at national level relating to short selling of shares and/or credit default swaps. The current fragmented approach to short selling and credit default swaps limits the effectiveness of supervision and the measures imposed and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in markets and costs and difficulties for market participants. In its communication of 2 June 2010 on Regulating Financial Services for Sustainable Growth, the Commission considered that it would be desirable to have a regulation addressing the potential risks arising from short selling. The intention is to i) harmonise requirements relating to short selling across the European Union, ii) harmonise the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability or market confidence and iii) ensure greater co-ordination and consistency between Member States in such situations. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission undertook an impact assessment of policy alternatives. Policy options related to the scope of the proposals, the proposed transparency regimes, requirements relating to uncovered short selling, exemptions and exceptional powers to restrict short selling. LEGAL BASE: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Although all the problems outlined above have important implications for each individual Member State, their overall impact can only be fully perceived in a cross-border context. CONTENT: the proposal covers all financial instruments but provides for a proportionate response to the risks that that short selling of different instruments may represent. Its main features are as follows: Transparency requirements for short positions in certain instruments: for instruments such as shares and derivatives relating to shares, sovereign bonds and derivatives relating to sovereign bonds and credit default swaps relating to sovereign issuers where taking short positions is more common and there are clearly identifiable risks or concerns, transparency requirements and requirements relating to uncovered short selling are applied. For companies that have shares admitted to trading on a trading venue in the Union, the proposal provides for a two tier model for transparency of significant net short positions in shares. At a lower threshold notification of a position must be made privately to the regulator and at a higher threshold positions must be disclosed to the market . As regards significant net short positions relating to sovereign debt issuers in the EU, private disclosure to regulators is required. The proposal includes a requirement for the marking of short orders . A requirement for the marking or flagging of sell orders executed on trading venues as short orders where the seller is entering into a short sale of shares on that venue will provide additional information about volumes of short sales executed on the trading venue. A trading venue will be required to publish daily information about volumes of short sales executed on the venue that is obtained from the marking of orders. Uncovered short sales : uncovered or naked short selling of shares and sovereign debt is sometimes viewed as increasing the potential risk of settlement failure and market volatility. The proposals include detailed requirements aimed at addressing these risks. To this end, natural or legal persons entering into short sales of such instruments must at the time of the sale have borrowed the instruments, entered into an agreement to borrow the shares or made other arrangements which ensure that the security can be borrowed so that settlement can be effected when it is due. Furthermore, trading venues must ensure that there are adequate arrangements in place for buy-in of shares or sovereign debt where there is a failure to settle a transaction. Trading venues will have the power to prohibit a natural or legal person who failed to settle to enter into further short sales. Exemptions: provisions are made for exemptions – for example, for shares of a company where the principal market for the shares is outside the European Union and for market making activities which play a crucial role in providing liquidity to European markets. Intervention powers: in exceptional situations which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence, competent authorities should have temporary powers to require further transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or limit natural and legal persons from entering into derivative transactions. Where an adverse development or event creates a threat to financial stability or market confidence that extends beyond one Member State or has other cross border implications, the proposal introduces various procedural requirements aimed at ensuring that other competent authorities are notified if a competent authority intends to take exceptional measures related to short selling. The European Securities Market Authority ( ESMA ) is given a key coordination role in such a situation to try to ensure consistency between competent authorities. Powers and sanctions: t he proposal gives competent authorities all the powers necessary for the enforcement of the rules. For example, the powers cover access to documents, the right to obtain information from natural or legal persons and to take enforcement action. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the EU budget.
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3054*&MEET_DATE=07/12/2010 title: 3054 summary: The Council took note of a presidency progress report regarding work on a draft regulation on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps.
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Pascal CANFIN (Greens/ALE, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps. It recommended that the European Parliament’s position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should be to amend the Commission proposal. The main amendments are as follows: Reduction of risk : Members consider that the requirements to be imposed should address the identified risks taking into account differences in the Member States and the potential economic impact of the requirements and without unduly detracting from the benefits that short selling provides to the quality and efficiency of markets. Scope : commodity markets and, in particular, agricultural markets do not fall within the scope of the Regulation. The report states that the Commission should, by 1 January 2012, report to the European Parliament and the Council on the risks existing on those markets, taking into account their specificities, and put forward any appropriate proposals. Commodities relevant to the energy sector should be addressed in the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on energy market integrity and transparency . Furthermore, the technical details of the settlement discipline regimes should not be included in the scope of this Regulation and should be defined in the appropriate post-trading legislative proposal of the Commission. The latter should therefore make concrete proposals by the end of 2011, in parallel with a proposal to create a harmonised legal framework for central securities depositories. Uncovered position in a credit default swap : the amended proposal specifies that a natural or legal person shall be considered to have an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or the Union, to the extent that the credit default swap is not serving to hedge against: either the risk of default of the issuer where the natural or legal person has a long position in the sovereign debt of that issuer or the risk of decline in the value of any asset or portfolio of assets to the natural or legal person holding such asset or portfolio of assets where the decline of the price of those asset or portfolio of assets has a high correlation with the decline of the price of the obligation of a Member state or the Union in the case of a decline in the creditworthiness of a Member State or the Union. Effective transparency regime and marking of sell orders : Members state that transparency requirements should include short positions created by trading outside trading venues and economic net short positions created by the use of derivatives, such as options, futures, index-related instruments, contracts for differences and spread bets relating to shares or sovereign debt. In addition to the transparency regime for the reporting of net short positions in shares, a requirement for the marking of sell orders that are executed as short sales as observed at the end of the day should be introduced. Information about short sell transactions should be collated by the firm and communicated to the competent authority at least daily. A failure to cover a short position at the end of the trading day should result in sufficiently high penalties so as not to allow the seller to make a profit. In order to improve transparency on short sales, the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (ESMA) may issue and send to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission an opinion on adjusting the thresholds, taking into account the developments in financial markets. Method of notification and disclosure : any disclosure shall include details, in anonymous form, of the size of the relevant position, the issuer in relation to which the relevant position is held and the date on which the relevant position was created, was changed or ceased to be held. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position. Information to be provided to ESMA : the proposal stated that the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Members add that where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA within 24 hours. In order to ensure consistent harmonisation, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provide. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 December 2011. Sovereign credit default swap : these should be based on the insurable interest principle whilst recognising that there can be interests in a sovereign state other than bond ownership. Temporary restrictions on short selling : in the case of a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue a competent authority should also have the ability to temporarily restrict short selling of the financial instrument on that venue within its own jurisdiction or request to ESMA such restriction in other jurisdictions in order to be able to intervene rapidly where appropriate to prevent a disorderly price fall of the instrument concerned. Disclosure in exceptional situations : Members inserted a provision stating that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or one or more other Member States; (ii) the measure will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits. Penalties : based on guidelines adopted by ESMA and taking into consideration the Commission's Communication on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, Member States shall establish rules on administrative measures, sanctions and pecuniary penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation. The measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. SMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.
  • date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3076*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2011 title: 3076 summary: The Council was briefed by the presidency on ongoing work on a draft regulation on short selling and credit default swaps. The short selling of securities is a practice whereby an investor sells a security he doesn't own with the intention of buying it back when the price has fallen. A credit default swap is a financial instrument with the characteristics of insurance, guaranteeing the creditworthiness of a loan. The Council asked the Permanent Representatives Committee rapidly to resolve the remaining outstanding issues so as to establish a general approach that will enable the presidency to start negotiations with the European Parliament.
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN title: A7-0055/2011
  • date: 2011-05-17T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3088*&MEET_DATE=17/05/2011 title: 3088 summary: The Council agreed a general approach on a draft regulation on short selling and credit default swaps. This will enable the presidency, on behalf of the Council, to start negotiations with the European Parliament, with a view to reaching agreement at first reading . The draft regulation is aimed at harmonising rules for short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps. It introduces common EU transparency requirements and harmonises the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability. As the EU lacks a common regulatory framework for dealing with short selling, Member States adopted divergent measures. The current fragmented approach limits the effectiveness of the adopted measures and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in the markets and impose additional costs on market participants. The draft regulation is intended to address these issues, whilst acknowledging the role of short selling in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in providing liquidity and contributing to efficient pricing. Scope : the proposal covers all types of financial instruments, providing for a response that is proportionate to the potential risks posed by short selling of different instruments. In particular, for shares of companies listed in the EU, it creates a two-tier model for transparency of significant net short positions: While at a lower threshold, notification of a position must be made privately to the regulator, at a higher threshold; positions must be disclosed to the market. Sovereign debt : for sovereign debt, on the other hand, significant net short positions relating to issuers in the EU would always require private disclosure to regulators. The proposed regime also provides for notification of significant positions in credit default swaps that relate to EU sovereign debt issuers. Uncovered short sales : to tackle the increased risks posed by uncovered short sales (practice whereby an investor sells a security he doesn't own with the intention of buying it back when the price has fallen), the proposal requires that anyone entering into a short sale must at the time of the sale have borrowed the instruments, entered into an agreement to borrow them or made other arrangements to ensure they can be borrowed in time to settle the deal. However, these restrictions don't apply to the short selling of sovereign debt if the transaction serves to hedge a long position in debt instruments of an issuer. Moreover, if the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below a specified threshold, the restrictions on uncovered short selling may be temporarily suspended by the relevant competent authority. In exceptional situations that threaten financial stability or market confidence in a Member State or the EU , the draft regulation provides that competent authorities have temporary powers to require further transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or to limit individuals from entering into derivative transactions. In such a situation, the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA) is given a coordination role to ensure consistency between competent authorities and to guarantee that such measures are only taken where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. ESMA is also given the power to take measures where the situation has cross-border implications.
  • date: 2011-07-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-07-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312 title: T7-0312/2011 summary: The European Parliament amended, at first reading of the ordinary procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps. The vote on the legislative resolution was postponed to a later date. Reduction of risk : Members consider that the requirements to be imposed should address the identified risks taking into account differences in the Member States and the potential economic impact of the requirements and without unduly detracting from the benefits that short selling provides to the quality and efficiency of markets by increasing market liquidity (as the short seller sells securities and then later repurchases those securities to cover the short sale) and by allowing investors to act when they believe a security is overvalued short selling leading therefore to the more efficient pricing of securities. Scope : commodity markets and, in particular, agricultural markets do not fall within the scope of the Regulation. The report states that the Commission should, by 1 January 2012, report to the European Parliament and the Council on the risks existing on those markets, taking into account their specificities, and put forward any appropriate proposals. Commodities relevant to the energy sector should be addressed in the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on energy market integrity and transparency . Furthermore, the technical details of the settlement discipline regimes should not be included in the scope of this Regulation and should be defined in the appropriate post-trading legislative proposal of the Commission. The latter should therefore make concrete proposals by the end of 2011, in parallel with a proposal to create a harmonised legal framework for central securities depositories. Uncovered position in a credit default swap : the amended proposal specifies that a natural or legal person shall be considered to have an uncovered position in a credit default swap relating to an obligation of a Member State or the Union, to the extent that the credit default swap is not serving to hedge against: either the risk of default of the issuer where the natural or legal person has a long position in the sovereign debt of that issuer or the risk of decline in the value of any asset or portfolio of assets to the natural or legal person holding such asset or portfolio of assets where the decline of the price of those asset or portfolio of assets has a high correlation with the decline of the price of the obligation of a Member state or the Union in the case of a decline in the creditworthiness of a Member State or the Union. Effective transparency regime and marking of sell orders : Members state that transparency requirements should include short positions created by trading outside trading venues and economic net short positions created by the use of derivatives, such as options, futures, index-related instruments, contracts for differences and spread bets relating to shares or sovereign debt. The calculation of short position or long position should include indices, baskets and exchange traded funds. In addition to the transparency regime for the reporting of net short positions in shares, Parliament includes a requirement for the marking of sell orders that are executed as short sales as observed at the end of the day should be introduced to provide supplementary information about the volume of short sales of shares executed. Information about short sell transactions should be collated by the firm and communicated to the competent authority at least daily in order to help competent authorities to monitor levels of short selling. A failure to cover a short position at the end of the trading day should result in sufficiently high penalties so as not to allow the seller to make a profit. In order to improve transparency on short sales, the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) ( ESMA ) may issue and send to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission an opinion on adjusting the thresholds, taking into account the developments in financial markets. Notification to competent authorities of significant net short positions in sovereign debt and credit default swaps : a natural or legal person who has a net short position relating to the issued sovereign debt of a Member State or of the Union shall notify the relevant competent authority whenever such position reaches or falls below a relevant notification threshold for the Member State concerned or the Union. Method of notification and disclosure : any disclosure shall include details, in anonymous form, of the size of the relevant position, the issuer in relation to which the relevant position is held and the date on which the relevant position was created, was changed or ceased to be held. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position. Information to be provided to ESMA : the proposal stated that the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Members add that where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA within 24 hours. In order to ensure consistent harmonisation, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provide. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 December 2011. Sovereign credit default swap : these should be based on the insurable interest principle whilst recognising that there can be interests in a sovereign state other than bond ownership. Temporary restrictions on short selling : in the case of a significant fall in the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue a competent authority should also have the ability to temporarily restrict short selling of the financial instrument on that venue within its own jurisdiction or request to ESMA such restriction in other jurisdictions in order to be able to intervene rapidly where appropriate to prevent a disorderly price fall of the instrument concerned. Disclosure in exceptional situations : Parliament inserted a provision stating that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where both of the following conditions are fulfilled: (i) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State or one or more other Member States; (ii) the measure will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits. Penalties : based on guidelines adopted by ESMA and taking into consideration the Commission's Communication on reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector, Member States shall establish rules on administrative measures, sanctions and pecuniary penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation. The measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. SMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19811&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0486 title: T7-0486/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 507 votes to 25, with 109 abstentions, a legislative resolution on theproposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps. The vote had been postponed from the 5 July session. Parliament adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission's proposal as follows: Purpose : to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to improve the conditions of its functioning, in particular with regard to the financial markets, and to ensure a high level of consumer and investor protection, it is therefore appropriate to lay down a common regulatory framework with regard to the requirements and powers relating to short selling and credit default swaps and to ensure greater coordination and consistency between Member States where measures have to be taken in exceptional situations. It is recalled that while in certain situations it may have adverse effects, under normal market conditions short selling plays an important role in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in the context of market liquidity and efficient price formation. Transparency of net short positions : a natural or legal person who has a net short position in relation to the issued share capital of a company that has shares admitted to trading on a trading venue shall disclose details of that position to the public whenever the position reaches or falls below a relevant publication threshold referred to in the Regulation. A relevant publication threshold is a percentage that equals 0.5% of the issued share capital of the company concerned and each 0.1% above that. The European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority – ESMA) may issue an opinion to the Commission on adjusting the thresholds referred to in the regulation, taking into account the developments in financial markets. In addition, a natural or legal person who has a net short position relating to the issued sovereign debt of a sovereign issuer shall notify the relevant competent authority whenever such position reaches or falls below the relevant notification thresholds for the Member State concerned or the Union. ESMA shall publish on its website the notification thresholds for each Member State. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of five years , records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position. The text stipulates the relevant time for calculation of a net short position shall be at midnight at the end of the trading day on which the natural or legal person has the relevant position. It shall apply to all transactions irrespective of the means of trading used, including transactions executed through either manual or automated trading, and irrespective of whether the transactions have taken place during normal trading hours. The notification of information to a relevant competent authority shall ensure the confidentiality of the information and incorporate mechanisms for authenticating the source of the notification. This information shall be posted on a central website operated or supervised by the relevant competent authority. The competent authorities shall communicate the address of this website to ESMA, which, in turn, shall put a link to all such central websites on its own website. The competent authority shall provide the requested information to ESMA at the latest within seven calendar days. Where there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State concerned or in another Member State, the competent authority shall provide ESMA with any available information based on the notification requirements outlined in the Regulation within 24 hours. In order to ensure consistent application of these provisions , ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the information to be provided. ESMA shall submit drafts for those regulatory technical standards to the Commission by 31 March 2012. Uncovered Short Sales : uncovered short selling of shares and sovereign debt is sometimes viewed as increasing the potential risk of settlement failure and volatility. To reduce such risks it is appropriate to place proportionate restrictions on uncovered short selling of such instruments. - Restrictions on uncovered short sales in shares and in sovereign debt : A natural or legal person may only enter into a short sale of a share admitted to trading on a trading venue where one of the following conditions is fulfilled: (a) the natural or legal person has borrowed the share; or has made alternative provisions resulting in a similar legal effect ; (b) the natural or legal person has entered into an agreement to borrow the share or has another absolutely enforceable claim under contract or property law to be transferred ownership of a corresponding number of securities of the same class so that settlement can be effected when it is due ; (c) the natural or legal person has an arrangement with a third party under which that third party has confirmed that the share has been located and has taken measures vis-à-vis third parties necessary for the natural or legal person to have reasonable expectation that settlement can be effected when it is due. Where the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below the threshold determined in accordance with the methodology referred to in paragraph 4, the restrictions referred to in paragraph 1 may be temporarily suspended by the relevant competent authority. Before suspending these restrictions, the relevant competent authority shall notify ESMA and other competent authorities about the proposed suspension. The suspension shall be valid for an initial period not exceeding six months from the date of its publication on the website of the relevant competent authority. Such a suspension may be renewed for further periods not exceeding six months at a time if the grounds for the suspension continue to be applicable. If the suspension is not renewed after that six-month period, it shall automatically expire. ESMA shall within 24 hours after the notification by the relevant competent authority issue an opinion based on paragraph 4 on any notified suspension or renewal of a suspension. The opinion shall be published on ESMA's web site. ESMA shall, in particular, take into account the need to preserve liquidity of markets, especially sovereign bond markets and sovereign bond repurchase markets (repo markets). - Restrictions on uncovered credit default swaps in sovereign debt: since entering into a sovereign credit default swap without underlying exposure to the risk of a decline in the value of the sovereign debt instrument may have an adverse impact on the stability of sovereign debt markets, natural or legal persons should be prohibited from entering into such uncovered credit default swap position s. However, at the first initial signals that the sovereign debt market is not functioning properly, the competent authority should be empowered to suspend temporarily such a restriction . Such a suspension should be based on the belief of the competent authority based on objective elements consisting of the analysis of certain indicators set out in this Regulation. However, competent authorities should be empowered to use additional indicators. The suspension shall be valid for an initial period not exceeding twelve months from the date of its publication on the website of the relevant competent authority. Such a suspension may be renewed for further periods not exceeding six months at a time. ESMA shall within 24 hours after the notification by the relevant competent authority issue an opinion on the intended suspension or on the renewal of that suspension. The opinion shall be published on ESMA's web site. - Buy-in procedure : the new Regulation also imposes requirements on central counterparties relating to buy-in procedures and fines for failed settlement of transactions in those shares. Notification by lenders in exceptional situations : the new Regulation provides that the competent authority of a Member State may require natural or legal persons who have net short positions in relation to a specific financial instrument or class of financial instruments to notify it or to disclose to the public details of the position whenever the position reaches or falls below a notification threshold fixed by the competent authority, where all the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) there are adverse events or developments which constitute a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in the Member State concerned or in one or more other Member States; (b) the measure is necessary to address the threat and will not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets which is disproportionate to its benefits. Power to temporarily restrict short selling of financial instruments in case of a significant fall in price : where the price of a financial instrument on a trading venue has significantly fallen during a single trading day in relation to the closing price on that venue on the previous trading day, the competent authority of the home Member State for that venue shall consider whether it is appropriate to prohibit or restrict natural or legal persons from engaging in short selling of the financial instrument on that trading venue or otherwise limit transactions in that financial instrument on that trading venue in order to prevent a disorderly decline in the price of the financial instrument. A competent authority shall notify ESMA about any decision of this nature so that ESMA can immediately inform the competent authorities of the home Member States of venues which trade the same financial instrument and, if necessary, assist those authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. ESMA inquiries : ESMA may, on the request of one or more competent authorities, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative conduct an inquiry into a particular issue or practice relating to short selling or relating to the use of credit default swaps to assess whether that issue or practice poses any potential threat to financial stability or market confidence in the Union. ESMA shall publish a report setting out its findings and any recommendations relating to the issue or practice within three months as from the end of the inquiry. Cooperation with third countries : the competent authorities of Member States shall wherever possible conclude cooperation arrangements with competent authorities of third countries concerning the exchange of information with competent authorities in third countries, the enforcement of obligations arising under this Regulation in third countries and the taking of similar measures in third countries by their competent authorities. Penalties : the measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA may adopt guidelines to ensure a consistent approach is taken concerning the measures, sanctions and penalties to be established by Members States. ESMA shall publish on its website and update regularly a list of existing administrative measures, sanctions and penalties per Member State. Delegated acts : power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU is delegated to the Commission in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, when a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, and notification or disclosure thresholds. ESMA should play a central role in the drafting of delegated acts by delivering advice to the Commission.
  • date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2012-03-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to lay down a common regulatory framework with regard to the requirements and powers relating to short selling and credit default swaps in order to ensure a high level of consumer and investor protection. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps CONTENT: following an agreement negotiated in first reading, the European Parliament and Council adopted a Regulation on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps which introduces common EU transparency requirements and harmonises the powers that regulators may use in exceptional situations where there is a serious threat to financial stability. The United Kingdom delegation abstained. At the height of the financial crisis in 2008, several Member States adopted emergency measures to restrict or ban short selling in some or all securities in order to counter a downward spiral in the prices of shares that could create systemic risks. "Uncovered" or "naked" short selling is a practice where the seller has not made arrangements to borrow the security. As the EU lacks a common regulatory framework for dealing with short selling, Member States adopted divergent measures. The current fragmented approach limits the effectiveness of the adopted measures and results in regulatory arbitrage. It may also create confusion in the markets and impose additional costs on market participants. The Regulation is intended to address these issues, whilst acknowledging the role of short selling in ensuring the proper functioning of financial markets, in particular in providing liquidity and contributing to efficient pricing. The main points of the Regulation are as follows: Scope: in order to provide for a preventive regulatory framework to be used in exceptional circumstances, the Regulation covers all types of financial instruments but provides for a response proportionate to the potential risks posed by the short selling of different instruments. It is only in the case of exceptional circumstances that competent authorities and ESMA are entitled to take measures concerning all types of financial instruments, going beyond the permanent measures that only apply to particular types of instruments where there are clearly identified risks that need to be addressed. Transparency of significant net short positions : for shares admitted to trading on a trading venue in the Union, a two-tier model is introduced, that provides for greater transparency of significant net short positions in shares at the appropriate level: (i) at the lower threshold, notification of a position should be made privately to the regulators concerned; (ii) at the higher threshold, positions should be publicly disclosed to the market. A relevant publication threshold is a percentage that equals 0.5 % of the issued share capital of the company concerned and each 0.1 % above that. A requirement to notify regulators of significant net short positions relating to sovereign debt in the Union should be introduced as such notification would provide important information to assist regulators in monitoring whether such positions are in fact creating systemic risks or being used for abusive purposes. Such a requirement should only include private disclosure to regulators as publication of information to the market for such instruments could have a detrimental effect on sovereign debt markets where liquidity is already impaired. For sovereign debt , on the other hand, significant net short positions relating to issuers in the EU will always require private disclosure to regulators. The proposed regime also provides for notification of significant positions in credit default swaps that relate to EU sovereign debt issuers. Natural and legal persons that hold significant net short positions shall keep, for a period of 5 years, records of the gross positions which make a significant net short position. The text states that the relevant time for calculation of a net short position shall be at midnight at the end of the trading day on which the natural or legal person holds the relevant position. The notification of information to a relevant competent authority shall ensure the confidentiality of the information and incorporate mechanisms for authenticating the source of the notification. Restrictions on uncovered short selling in shares : to reduce the risks of uncovered short selling of shares, the Regulation provides that a natural or legal person may enter into a short sale of a share admitted to trading on a trading venue only where that person has: (i) borrowed the share or has made alternative provisions resulting in a similar legal effect; or (ii) entered into an agreement to borrow the share or has another absolutely enforceable claim under contract or property law to be transferred ownership of a corresponding number of securities of the same class so that settlement can be effected when it is due or (iii) an arrangement with a third party under which that third party has confirmed that the share has been located and has taken measures vis-à-vis third parties necessary for the natural or legal person to have a reasonable expectation that settlement can be effected when it is due. However, these restrictions don't apply to the short selling of sovereign debt if the transaction serves to hedge a long position in debt instruments of an issuer. Moreover, if the liquidity of sovereign debt falls below a specified threshold, the restrictions on uncovered short selling may be temporarily suspended by the competent authority. Exceptional situations : in exceptional situations that threaten financial stability or market confidence in a Member State or the EU, the Regulation provides that competent authorities should have temporary powers to require greater transparency or to impose restrictions on short selling and credit default swap transactions or to limit individuals from entering into derivative transactions. In such a situation, the European Securities Market Authority (ESMA) is given a key coordination role, to ensure consistency between competent authorities and to guarantee that such measures are only taken where they are necessary and proportionate. ESMA is also given the power to take measures where the situation has cross-border implications. ESMA inquiries : ESMA may, on the request of one or more competent authorities, the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative conduct an inquiry into a particular issue or practice relating to short selling or relating to the use of credit default swaps to assess whether that issue or practice poses any potential threat to financial stability or market confidence in the Union. Cooperation with third countries : the competent authorities of Member States shall wherever possible conclude cooperation arrangements with competent authorities of third countries concerning the exchange of information with competent authorities in third countries, the enforcement of obligations arising under the Regulation in third countries and the taking of similar measures in third countries by their competent authorities. Penalties: the measures, sanctions and penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, ESMA may adopt guidelines to ensure a consistent approach is taken concerning the measures, sanctions and penalties to be established by Members States. ESMA shall publish on its website and update regularly a list of existing administrative measures, sanctions and penalties per Member State. Review and report: by 30 June 2013, the Commission shall, in light of discussions with the competent authorities and ESMA, report on:(i) the appropriateness of the notification and disclosure thresholds; (ii) the impact of the individual disclosure, in particular with regard to the efficiency and volatility of financial markets; (iii) the appropriateness of direct, centralised reporting to ESMA; (iv) the operation of the restrictions and requirements in the Regulation (v) the appropriateness of the restrictions on the uncovered sovereign credit default swaps and (vi) the appropriateness of any other restrictions or conditions on short selling or credit default swaps. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 25/03/2012. APPLICATION: from 01/11/2012 (certain provisions will apply from 25/03/2012). DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in respect of details concerning calculating short positions, where a natural or legal person has an uncovered position in a credit default swap, notification or disclosure thresholds and further specification of criteria and factors for determining in which cases an adverse event or development creates a serious threat to financial stability or to market confidence in a Member State or the Union. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time. A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification (which may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or Council objects, the delegated act shall not enter into force. docs: title: Regulation 2012/236 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0236 title: OJ L 086 24.03.2012, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2012:086:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/7/03846
New
  • ECON/7/03846
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0236
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0236
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amended by 2012/0029(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.50.03 Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
  • 2.50.08 Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
  • 2.50.10 Financial supervision
New
2.50.03
Securities and financial markets, stock exchange, CIUTS, investments
2.50.08
Financial services, financial reporting and auditing
2.50.10
Financial supervision
procedure/summary
  • Amended by
2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0482:EN
2015-11-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52010PC0482:EN
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
2015-01-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-0312
2014-11-09Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 2010-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0482/COM_COM(2010)0482_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52010PC0482:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2010)0482 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2010-10-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3054 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3054*&MEET_DATE=07/12/2010 type: Debate in Council title: 3054 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2010-12-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3076 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3076*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3076 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-03-15T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-0055&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0055/2011 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3088 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3088*&MEET_DATE=17/05/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3088 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-05-17T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-312 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0312/2011 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19811&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-486 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0486/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3148
  • date: 2012-02-21T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2012-03-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2012-03-24T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R0236 title: Regulation 2012/236 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2012:086:TOC title: OJ L 086 24.03.2012, p. 0001
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2010-09-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CANFIN Pascal
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/7/03846
reference
2010/0251(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 114-p1
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amended by
subtype
Legislation
title
Financial markets: short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation