Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | JORDAN Romana ( PPE) | HERCZOG Edit ( S&D), HALL Fiona ( ALDE), HARMS Rebecca ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | LAMBERT Jean ( Verts/ALE) | Julie GIRLING ( ECR), Thomas HÄNDEL ( GUE/NGL), Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE), Csaba SÓGOR ( PPE), Jutta STEINRUCK ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | POC Pavel ( S&D) | |
Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 031, Euratom Treaty A 032
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 031, Euratom Treaty A 032Subjects
Events
Under Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom on the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, the Commission is required to submit to the European Parliament and Council, every three years, a progress report on the implementation of this Directive and an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community’s territory, with a view to future developments.
The first report presented a comprehensive overview of the situation, which covered a reporting period until August 2015 with a reference date of December 2013.
The present report provides an update of progress accomplished by Member States in implementing the Directive, in particular on the measures put in place to ensure that workers and the general public are protected against dangers arising from ionising radiation now and in the future, through the highest safety standards for radioactive waste and spent fuel management, and to avoid imposing undue burdens on future generations.
Situation in the EU
The report noted that all Member States generate radioactive waste through various activities ranging from medical applications to electricity generation. 21 Member States also manage spent nuclear fuel on their territory. Owing to its radiological properties and the potential hazard it poses to workers, the general public, and the environment, the safe management of such material from generation to disposal must be ensured.
Each Member State defines its own electricity generation mix and as of the reporting date nuclear power plants are in operations in 14 countries. Two other Member States, Lithuania and Italy, have terminated their nuclear power programmes and are decommissioning their nuclear installations. These 16 Member States with nuclear power programmes together account for 99.7% in volume of the radioactive waste inventory in the EU.
At the time of reporting, 126 nuclear power reactors were in operation, with a total capacity of about 119 GWe, 90 nuclear power reactors were shut-down, and 3 were decommissioned. In addition, there were 82 research reactors in 19 Member States either in operation, long-term shutdown, or under decommissioning.
Inventory estimates and trends
The estimated total inventory of radioactive waste on the EU territory at the end of 2016 was 3 466 000 m3 (4.6 % increase over three years), corresponding to an average of about 7 liters per-capita in the EU. On average the amount of the radioactive waste in storage (983 000 m3) did not significantly change in comparison to 2013. Low-level waste dominates EU radioactive waste inventory. Intermediate-level waste and high-level waste are generated and stored predominantly in the Member States with nuclear power programmes. At the end of 2016, approximately 58 000 tHM of spent fuel was stored in the EU, (7% increase over three years).
According to the Commission, by 2030 very-low-level waste amounts are expected to double, while the other waste classes are expected to increase by 20-50%. Therefore, attention should be paid to the minimisation of radioactive waste at the origin, development and implementation of predisposal options to reduce waste volumes and the development of new storage or disposal facilities.
Measures taken by the Member States
The report noted that in the last three years Member States have made a number of steps towards demonstrating that they have been taking reasonable actions to ensure that no undue burden is passed to future generations and that radioactive waste and spent fuel is managed safely. Member States need to further accelerate in addressing key challenges.
The Commission encourages Member States, which have not yet done so, to take a swift decision on their policies, concepts and plans for the disposal of radioactive waste, in particular intermediate-level waste and high-level waste. Member States that consider shared solutions, should cluster up and take practical measures, including site-specific matters. Another key challenge remains ensuring that adequate funds will be available for the costs of national programmes.
National Programmes
The Commission noted different stages of implementation of the national programmes. Several Member States reported a few years' delays in the implementation of programmes, including for the first geological disposal facilities. In most Member States, further work is needed in developing and implementing clear key performance indicators to monitor progress in effective and transparent ways, and to ensure timely accomplishments.
Further efforts are also needed to:
- improve the inventory projections for the scope of the national programmes, including decommissioning waste, institutional waste and waste from remediation activities, and the demonstration of sufficient capacities for storage and disposal;
- specify, demonstrate or guarantee the functional independence of the competent regulatory authority;
establish adequate arrangements requiring sufficient human and financial resources for the competent national authorities;
- share the outcomes of self-assessments and international peer reviews, engage in a transparent dialogue with stakeholders and facilitate the exchange of good practice and knowledge at Union level;
- continue research, development and training which play an important role in defining long-term solutions for the management of intermediate and high-level waste and spent fuel;
- to improve the quality of the national reports which they notify to the Commission.
The Commission intends to follow up on the infringement procedures and legal actions initiated in the previous reporting cycle and will continue to assist Member States in fully implementing the legislation.
This Commission staff working document provides an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects.
This document is based on the information provided in the second national reports of EU Member States on the implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. Its inventory reference date is end of 2016, although more than half of the Member States reported inventory as of end of 2017 or 2018.
The main findings of this document are as follows:
EU radioactive waste inventory
The estimated total inventory of radioactive waste on EU territory at the end of 2016 is 3 466 000 m3. Of this waste, 71.6% is already disposed of (2 483 000 m3) and 28% (983 000 m3) is in storage and will have to be managed in the future. Compared to the 2013 radioactive waste inventory, this is a 4.6% increase of total radioactive waste volumes.
Currently, thirteen Member States have radioactive waste disposal facilities either in operation or closed (nuclear power programme countries: Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, UK; non-nuclear programme countries: Latvia, Poland and Portugal) although based on the information from the national programmes and reports it is expected that more repositories will be built in the coming years.
A number of Member States (both with and without nuclear power plants) have dedicated disposal sites for institutional radioactive waste. In some cases, the disposal of waste undertaken in the past at several sites is now being reconsidered and there are plans for the retrieval of the waste disposed of several decades ago.
France and UK have by far the highest share with 44.5% and 36% respectively. The next Member State with the highest share is Germany with 6.5%.
Spent fuel inventory
Based on the Member State strategy, spent fuel is stored pending either disposal or reprocessing. During reprocessing, uranium and plutonium are recovered and separated from fission products, which are radioactive waste.
At the end of 2016 approximately 58 000 tHM of spent fuel was stored in the EU (7% increase from 2013 and 29% increase since 2007) and around 900 tHM of spent fuel (about 1.5 %) was sent for reprocessing outside the EU with the expected returns of resulting radioactive waste from reprocessing. These amounts include both spent fuel coming from power and non-power (e.g. research, isotope production) reactors.
Future estimations
With regards to spent fuel, an increase from present 58 000 tHM to 76 000 tHM in 2030 is estimated. It has to be noted, that the majority of Member States have not reported inventories from planned new build nuclear power plants. It is expected that by 2030 the spent fuel inventory will increase by approximately 10%. As some Member States proceed with spent fuel reprocessing, the actual increase does not represent the actual amount of spent fuel discharged from the reactors.
This Commission staff working document lays down the progress of implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
This document is primarily based on the information provided in Member States' national programmes for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and national reports on the implementation of the Directive, as notified to the Commission by March 2019.
It provides background information related to the main findings, progress, challenges, and trends with a view to improving the quality of reporting.
The document noted that all Member States submitted their second national reports to the Commission by March 2019 and a few Member States also notified to the Commission their final or updated national programmes during the reporting period.
In the previous reporting cycle in 2015 most of the EU Member States notified their national programmes for the first time and submitted national reports on the implementation of the Directive at the same time. In most of the cases Member States focused in their national reports on national policies and principles, national frameworks, national programmes and their implementation. As this is the second time that Member States report on the implementation of the Directive, particular attention was given by the Commission to the progress made during the reporting period by the Member States in implementing the Directive.
In most areas, progress is very little, or insufficiently reported to the Commission. The next Member States reports to be submitted to the Commission are due by 23 August 2021, when the Commission expects a significant improvement of the quality of reporting.
The Commission presented a report on the progress of the implementation of Council Directive 2011/70/EURATOM and an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community's territory and the future prospects.
As part of the implementation of Directive 2011/70/Euratom, Member States are required to report to the Commission their inventory of all radioactive waste and spent fuel, clearly indicating the location and amount in accordance with an appropriate classification.
Moreover, Member States’ reports should include estimates of future quantities, including those from decommissioning, and they should provide an update of their inventory and projections every three years.
Estimated inventory : according to the report, the estimated total inventory of radioactive waste on the EU territory is 3 313 000 m3, of which about 70% has been disposed of (2 316 000 m3) and about 30% is in storage (997 000 m3).
At the end of 2013, more than 54 000 tonnes of spent fuel was stored in the EU. More than 800 tonnes of spent fuel (about 1.5% of the total inventory) was stored in a third country pending reprocessing.
The majority of Member States operating nuclear power plants intend to dispose of their spent fuel in deep geological facilities without reprocessing in the future. This is expected to lead to an increase in the volume of high level waste for storage and disposal. Moreover, decommissioning of nuclear power plants will become an increasingly important activity for the European nuclear industry in the coming years.
Several Member States have not provided detailed estimates of their future inventory of spent fuel and/or radioactive waste, as most of them use their own classification system and the Directive does not provide for a harmonised approach. In addition, a number of Member States have not reported on all types of radioactive waste, particularly radioactive waste originating from decommissioning and new builds, future forecasts and institutional waste. The Commission is therefore not in a position to make forecasts on the future total EU inventories .
National policies and programmes : the Directive requires Member States to put in place: (i) national policies , which broadly describe the approach Member States are taking for all steps of radioactive waste and spent fuel management; (ii) national programmes , which translate the national policies into concrete plans of action, in order to ensure progress is made, and to enable monitoring thereof; (iii) national legislative, regulatory and organisational frameworks to enable the implementation of the national policies and programmes.
After examining national policies, frameworks and programmes, the Commission concluded that the legislative and regulatory framework at national level is broadly in line with the Directive. It noted that all but one Member State have reported to the Commission their national policies. Most Member States have established clear ultimate responsibility of the State for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in line with the Directive.
The most important outstanding issue in a large number of Member States with regard to national policies is the decision on the long-term management of intermediate level waste, high level waste and spent fuel, and specifically their disposal. Moreover, half of Member States are considering the possibility of shared solutions for disposal.
While the Directive allows shared disposal solutions to be developed, a policy based only on this option, without a clear path towards implementation, cannot be regarded as being in line with the aims of the Directive. The Commission sees important challenges in putting shared solutions into practice .
The Commission will continue supporting Member States in addressing the relevant challenges as follows:
· assist Member States in the next reporting cycle (in 2018) to improve radioactive waste inventory data , for example by providing a clear definition of the different sources of radioactive waste and their origins;
· carry out additional work with the aim of compiling a comprehensive overview of the total costs for spent fuel and waste management and how Member States ensure that these are financed according to the principle that all generators are to cover the costs of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (from generation to disposal);
· discussion on options for radioactive waste and spent fuel disposal , including shared solutions and the role of public participation in the decision-making process. The Commission stands ready to support the Member States in assessing the economic, legal and social impacts of shared repositories.
In addition, the Commission, in consultation with Member States and the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group, will continue working together with international organisations (e.g. the IAEA and the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency) on exploring the possibilities for harmonising and facilitating reporting requirements for Member States’ inventories for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
In this regard, the periodic international peer reviews of the national programmes, frameworks and competent regulatory authorities are of high importance in building stakeholders’ trust and confidence in the management of these materials in the EU. The Commission will continue to promote an open and transparent dialogue and facilitate the exchange of good practices and knowledge.
The Commission presents the seventh situation report on radioactive waste management in the EU. It presents the status concerning waste generation, inventories and disposal capacities in the EU Member States, mainly in tabular form. The reference date for generation and inventories is end 2007, in line with the data available in the latest national reports provided by Member States.
The report states that annual generation of High Level Waste (HLW) / Spent Fuel, which generally depends on the size of the nuclear power programme, remains broadly constant, but some increases are seen or expected due to decommissioning activities.
Quantities of waste in storage have increased, especially HLW and long-lived low and intermediate level radioactive waste (LILW-LL) as there are as yet no disposal facilities in operation available.
In the case of Very Low Level Waste (VLLW) and short-lived low and intermediate level radioactive waste (LILW-SL) it is likely that almost all Member States with nuclear power programmes (and some 'non-nuclear power' States) will implement disposal solutions in the medium term i.e. by 2020. However, for HLW and spent fuel (for direct disposal) only a few Member States, i.e. those actively pursuing repository developments, can be said to have definitive policies in place.
The same situation exists for LILW-LL, since for these wastes also the preferred solution is geological disposal, whether in the same repository as HLW /spent fuel or separately. It is expected that Member States will take concrete decisions for the safe long-term management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, in implementing the Council Directive.
PURPOSE: to set out an EU legal framework for spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
CONTENT: the Council adopted a directive establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste in order to avoid imposing undue burdens on future generations. The Austrian, Luxembourg and Swedish delegations abstained from voting.
Scope : the Directive shall apply to all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from civilian activities and radioactive waste management, from generation to disposal, when the radioactive waste results from civilian activities.
High level of safety : the directive ensures that Member States provide for national arrangements for a high level of safety in spent fuel and radioactive waste management to protect workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiation and sets out key principles on which national policies should be based.
To this end, Member States will establish and maintain a national framework addressing the setting of national programmes for the management of fuel and waste, licensing, control and inspections, enforcement actions such as suspension of activities, allocations of responsibilities, public information and consultation and financing. In addition, each Member State will establish and maintain a regulatory authority for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, with certain conditions set to ensure their independence.
Member States shall ensure that the national framework require licence holders to provide for and maintain adequate financial and human resources to fulfil their obligations with respect to the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Competent regulatory authority : each Member State shall establish and maintain a competent regulatory authority in the field of safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management. Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is functionally separate from any other body or organisation concerned with the promotion or utilisation of nuclear energy or radioactive material, including electricity production and radioisotope applications, or with the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, in order to ensure effective independence from undue influence on its regulatory function.
General principles : Member States shall establish and maintain national policies on spent fuel and radioactive waste management. Each Member State shall have ultimate responsibility for management of the spent fuel and radioactive waste generated in it.
National policies shall be based on all of the following principles:
(a) the generation of radioactive waste shall be kept to the minimum which is reasonably practicable, both in terms of activity and volume, by means of appropriate design measures and of operating and decommissioning practices, including the recycling and reuse of materials;
(b) the interdependencies between all steps in spent fuel and radioactive waste generation and management shall be taken into account;
(c) spent fuel and radioactive waste shall be safely managed, including in the long term with passive safety features;
(d) implementation of measures shall follow a graded approach ;
(e) the costs for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste shall be borne by those who generated those materials;
(f) an evidence-based and documented decision-making process shall be applied with regard to all stages of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Transparency : Member States shall ensure that necessary information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste be made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations.
Reports: Member States shall submit a report to the Commission on the implementation of this Directive for the first time by 23 August 2015, and every 3 years thereafter, taking advantage of the review and reporting under the Joint Convention. On the basis of the Member States’ reports, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council the following: (a) a report on progress made with the implementation of this Directive; and (b) an inventory of radioactive waste and spent fuel present in the Community’s territory and the future prospects.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 22/08/2011.
TRANSPOSITION: 23/08/2013.
The European Parliament adopted by 489 votes to 52, with 75 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
The main amendments made to the proposal are as follows:
Objective : Parliament wants to specify that the Directive also relates to the protection of the natural environment and that it ensures the provision of necessary public information and participation in relation to spent fuel and radioactive waste management. The directive defines the minimum standards for the Member States, but they must be free to impose stricter standards in relation to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Scope : the directive applies to all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities on EU territory, including the spent fuel originating from military defence programmes if and when such spent fuel is permanently transferred to and managed in the context of exclusively civilian activities.
Disposal : this is defined as the emplacement of spent fuel or radioactive waste in a potentially definitive manner in an authorised facility with due regard for the reversibility principle .
Furthermore, spent fuel must be defined as waste, unless it is clear that it can be reprocessed in the near term without further impact on the environment.
General principles : the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste should remain, as a last resort, the responsibility of the Member States on whose territory they were produced. National policies on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste should be implemented through a well-founded and documented stepwise decision-making process having regard to long-term safety. According to Members, national policies should be based on the following principles:
the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, respecting the ‘as low as reasonably achievable’ (ALARA) principle; spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed for as long as they are hazardous to people and the environment; exposure of workers, the public and the environment to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided; measures are taken to cover the future health and environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public; the costs of managing radioactive waste, including spent fuels, are borne by those who have generated such waste; the financial reserves which the originators of the waste have to provide so as to cover all the costs arising from the management of spent fuels und radioactive waste are administered in a State-controlled fund, in order to ensure that they are available for use in connection with permanent safe disposal; competent national bodies are involved in supervising the availability of adequate financial resources.
Spent fuel pools : since spent fuel pools involve major risks, especially when they are uncovered, all spent fuels shall therefore be moved out of pools and into dry storage as soon as possible. As part of that process, priority shall be given to the oldest of the spent fuel pools.
Establishment of regional disposal facilities : on a voluntary basis, Member States may decide to establish a joint or regional disposal facility in cooperation with other Member States or a third country in order to utilise the favourable geological or technical advantages of a particular site and to share the financial burden of the joint project.
Before launching such a project through an intergovernmental agreement, the Member States concerned shall ensure that the initiative fulfils a number of requirements including public acceptance and support in all the Member States concerned throughout all phases of the project development and the lifetime of the disposal.
Exportation : the text stipulates that in no circumstances may radioactive waste be exported to non-EU countries; shipment of spent fuel outside the EU should be allowed under the condition of its subsequent import back into the EU after recycling.
Seismic regions or coastal areas : all nuclear waste facilities in seismic regions or coastal areas at significant risk of rising sea levels or of tsunamis shall be prohibited
National framework for the management of used fuels and radioactive waste : this needs to include, among other things:
a national programme, respecting subsidiarity, for implementation of the policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management which ensures that all radioactive waste producers have access to safe disposal of radioactive waste under the same conditions; national requirements for the health and safety, education and training of workers ; a system of licensing of spent fuel and radioactive waste management activities and facilities, including prohibition of the operation of a spent fuel or radioactive waste management facility without a licence, and ensuring that all radioactive waste, regardless of who produces it, is managed on a non-discriminatory basis; a system of appropriate institutional control, regulatory inspections, documentation and reporting, as well as the requisite training for the workers involved in the whole process, in order to secure and maintain their occupational safety and health; measures to guarantee adequate financial resources in the long term for activities and facilities relating to spent fuel and radioactive waste management; measures to ensure that the funding required for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and for emplacement is set by the competent regulatory authority on the basis of a transparent process which is regularly reviewed and in which all interested stakeholders are regularly consulted.
Safety evaluation : the competent regulatory authority shall have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary to take enforcement action in facilities, even during the decommissioning process. The health and safety of workers, including any sub-contractors, as well as staff levels and training, shall form part of those assessments. The competent regulatory authority shall have the power to order that certain activities cease where the assessments have shown that they are not safe. Those and all other assessments by the competent regulatory authority shall be made public.
Safety case : Member States shall ensure that a safety case and a supporting safety assessment are prepared as part of the application for a licence to carry on a radioactive waste management activity or to operate a disposal facility located on EU territory. The safety case was originally the purpose of Article 8, the provisions of which are now dispersed in the relevant articles.
Licence-holders : licence-holders are required to inform cross-border regional and local authorities at the earliest possible date of their plans to establish a waste management facility, if the distance of such a facility from the national border is such that it is likely to have cross-border effects during the building or operation of the facility or after its abandonment, or in the event of an accident or incident related to the facility.
Marking and documentation : Member States shall ensure that licence holders mark containers and document the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste in a form not subject to weathering. The documentation shall comprise both the chemical, toxicological and radiological composition of the inventory and an indication whether it is solid, liquid or gaseous.
Recording and tracking, especially with regard to the health and safety of workers : Members want to oblige Member States to establish a recording and tracking system in the field of used fuels and radioactive waste. Information regarding workers who have been exposed in the course of their working life must be kept either by the licence-holder or by a state body, so as to enable work-related diseases to be followed up in the long term.
Sanctions : sanctions that are effective, dissuasive and proportionate in relation to the seriousness of the offence, are applicable in the event of infringement of the obligations arising from this Directive.
Expertise and qualifications : Members consider that particular attention needs to be paid to parties indirectly involved on-site and shall ensure that they are offered up-to-date appropriate education and training before the operations involving radioactive waste and spent fuel are carried out. Education and training for workers shall comply with internationally recognised standards, so as to strengthen overall responsibility for health and safety in the nuclear industry.
Financial resources : in Parliament’s view, the proposal should guarantee that sufficient financial resources are available when needed to cover all necessary expenses related to decommissioning and the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, thereby fully respecting the responsibility of radioactive waste producers according to the ‘polluter-pays’ principle and avoiding any recourse to State aid.
The amendments adopted by Members lay down more restrictive obligations on Members States , in accordance with their national procedures: i) an assessment of the costs related to the waste management; ii) reserves to be established to cover future decommissioning or waste management activities and the necessary assets to cover these reserves; iii) appropriate monitoring of the adequacy of the reserves and the management of the assets; iv) the costs of disposal shall be transparently set out and published by the Member States and reassessed each year; v) a national body capable of providing an expert judgment on the management of funds and decommissioning costs; vi) regular communications from Member States to the Commission.
Civil responsibility : Member States shall ensure that full third party liability in respect of any damage caused by accidents and long-term radioactive waste management, including damage to the terrestrial, water and marine environments, is borne by the licence holders .
Transparency : Member States shall ensure that all information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste which is necessary in order to preserve the health, safety and security of workers and the general public is available on a regular basis. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, in particular the Aarhus Convention. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the public, in particular concerning radioactive and toxic emissions and exposure to such emissions, shall be made public, irrespective of the circumstances.
Public participation : Member States shall ensure that members of the public are given early opportunities to participate effectively in the preparation or review of national programmes for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste needing to be drawn up pursuant to Article 13, and that members of the public have access to them once they have been drawn up. They shall place the programmes on a publicly available website.
Member States shall inform cross-border regional and local authorities of their national programmes at the earliest possible date, if the implementation thereof is likely to have cross-border effects.
Review : the Commission shall, no later than two years after peer reviews by Member States have taken place as provided for in the directive, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council which focuses on a reassessment of the concept of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The report shall, if necessary, be followed by a revision of this Directive.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Romana Jordan CIZELJ (EPP, SI) on the proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
The main amendments are as follows:
Objective : Members want to specify that the Directive also relates to the protection of the natural environment and that it ensures the provision of necessary public information and participation in relation to spent fuel and radioactive waste management. The directive defines the minimum standards for the Member States, but they must be free to impose stricter standards in relation to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Scope : the directive applies to all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities on EU territory, including the spent fuel originating from military defence programmes if and when such spent fuel is permanently transferred to and managed in the context of exclusively civilian activities.
Disposal : this is defined as the emplacement of spent fuel or radioactive waste in a potentially definitive manner in an authorised facility with due regard for the reversibility principle . According to Members, any disposal should ensure the removal of waste package or the access in deep geological repository. Reversibility principle forms part of the social acceptability for such repository and is linked to the long-term monitoring of the site and its memory keeping.
Furthermore, spent fuel must be defined as waste, unless it is clear that it can be reprocessed in the near term without further impact on the environment.
General principles : the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste should remain, as a last resort, the responsibility of the Member States on whose territory they were produced. National policies on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste should be implemented through a well-founded and documented stepwise decision-making process having regard to long-term safety. According to Members, national policies should be based on the following principles:
the need to protect human health and the environment;
measures to cover future health and the environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public; the costs of managing radioactive waste, including spent fuels, are borne by those who have generated such waste; the financial reserves which the originators of the waste have to provide so as to cover all the costs arising from the management of spent fuels und radioactive waste are administered in a State-controlled fund, in order to ensure that they are available for use in connection with permanent safe disposal; national parliaments are involved in supervising the availability of adequate financial resources.
Agreement with a third country: in the event of an agreement with a third country on the storage of radioactive waste, the Member State that is party to the agreement must ensure that the storage conditions meet the requirements of the directive. In the case of export to a third country, the exporting Member State shall take reasonable measures to make sure that the other country has a radioactive waste management programme with safety objectives equivalent to those prescribed by the Directive.
Establishment of regional disposal facilities : on a voluntary basis, Member States may decide to establish a joint or regional disposal facility in cooperation with other Member States or a third country in order to utilise the favourable geological or technical advantages of a particular site and to share the financial burden of the joint project.
Before launching such a project through an intergovernmental agreement, the Member States concerned shall ensure that the initiative fulfils a number of requirements including public acceptance and support in all the Member States concerned throughout all phases of the project development and the lifetime of the disposal.
National framework for the management of used fuels and radioactive waste : this needs to include, among other things:
national requirements for the health and safety, education and training of workers; measures to guarantee adequate financial resources in the long term for activities and facilities relating to spent fuel and radioactive waste management; measures to ensure that the funding required for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and for emplacement is set by the competent regulatory authority on the basis of a transparent process which is regularly reviewed and in which all interested stakeholders are regularly consulted.
Safety evaluation : the competent regulatory authority shall have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary to take enforcement action in facilities, even during the decommissioning process. The health and safety of workers, including any sub-contractors, as well as staff levels and training, shall form part of those assessments.
Safety case : Member States shall ensure that a safety case and a supporting safety assessment are prepared as part of the application for a licence to carry on a radioactive waste management activity or to operate a disposal facility located on EU territory. The safety case was originally the purpose of Article 8, the provisions of which are now dispersed in the relevant articles.
Licence-holders : licence-holders are required to inform cross-border regional and local authorities at the earliest possible date of their plans to establish a waste management facility, if the distance of such a facility from the national border is such that it is likely to have cross-border effects during the building or operation of the facility or after its abandonment, or in the event of an accident or incident related to the facility.
Recording and tracking, especially with regard to the health and safety of workers : Members want to oblige Member States to establish a recording and tracking system in the field of used fuels and radioactive waste. Information regarding workers who have been exposed in the course of their working life must be kept either by the licence-holder or by a state body, so as to enable work-related diseases to be followed up in the long term.
Sanctions: sanctions that are effective, dissuasive and proportionate in relation to the seriousness of the offence, are applicable in the event of infringement of the obligations arising from this Directive.
Expertise and qualifications: Members consider that particular attention needs to be paid to parties indirectly involved on-site and shall ensure that they are offered up-to-date appropriate education and training before the operations involving radioactive waste and spent fuel are carried out. Education and training for workers shall comply with internationally recognised standards, so as to strengthen overall responsibility for health and safety in the nuclear industry.
Financial resources : in Members’ view, the proposal should guarantee that sufficient financial resources are available when needed to cover all necessary expenses related to decommissioning and the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, thereby fully respecting the responsibility of radioactive waste producers according to the ‘polluter-pays’ principle and avoiding any recourse to State aid.
The amendments adopted by Members lay down more restrictive obligations on Members States, in accordance with their national procedures: i) an assessment of the costs related to the waste management; ii) reserves to be established to cover future decommissioning or waste management activities and the necessary assets to cover these reserves; iii) appropriate monitoring of the adequacy of the reserves and the management of the assets; iv) the costs of disposal shall be transparently set out and published by the Member States and reassessed each year; v) a national body capable of providing an expert judgment on the management of funds and decommissioning costs; vi) regular communications from Member States to the Commission.
Transparency and public participation : Member States shall: i) ensure that information is made available to the public concerning the financial resources for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; ii) all decisions concerning sites for, and the management of, spent fuel and radioactive waste close to neighbouring countries involve the public and the institutions of the countries concerned.
Members also want Member States to ensure that members of the public are given early opportunities to participate effectively in the preparation or review of the national programmes for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste needing to be drawn up, and that they have access to them once they have been drawn up. The programmes shall be placed on a publicly available website. Member States shall inform cross-border regional and local authorities of their national programmes at the earliest possible date, if the implementation thereof is likely to have cross-border effects.
Review : the Commission shall, no later than two years after peer reviews by Member States have taken place as provided for in the directive, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council which focuses on a reassessment of the concept of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
PURPOSE: to set out an EU legal framework for spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
BACKGROUND: all Member States have radioactive waste. It is generated by many beneficial activities, such as electricity production in nuclear power plants and a range of radioisotope applications in medicine, industry, agriculture, research and education.
Radioactive wastes are classified into low-, intermediate-, and high-level waste depending on their level of activity. In the EU, more than 85% of the generated volume of radioactive waste constitutes short lived LILW, about 5% long lived LILW and less than 10% HLW, which includes both vitrified waste from reprocessing and spent fuel considered as waste. For High Level Waste (HLW), by contrast, there is a world-wide scientific and technical consensus that deep geological disposal represents the safest and most sustainable option. Whatever the future of nuclear power and non-power applications, the implementation of disposal as the end point in the management of existing and future radioactive waste is needed in order to assure safety in the long term.
Ultimate responsibility for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste rests with the States. However, most countries have yet to take key decisions regarding the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste . The consequences of the delay are that burdens will be passed on to future generations, both to implement disposal as well as maintaining interim storage options.
The general objective of this proposal is therefore to set up an EU legal framework for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste as an integral part of the safe use of nuclear energy for electricity production and of the ionizing radiation in medicine, industry, agriculture, research and education.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a thorough impact assessment concluded that the lack of binding EU legislation is likely to lead to postponement of taking key decisions, with potentially adverse environmental, economic and social impacts, including undue burdens on future generations and possibly distortion of competition in the electricity market. In contrast, binding EU legislation would result in a uniformly high level of safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management EU-wide in the long term, without imposing undue burdens on future generations or compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
LEGAL BASIS: Articles 31 and 32 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community .
Community competences regarding spent fuel and radioactive waste arising from civil nuclear activities fall under the framework of the Euratom Treaty. The issue of spent fuel and radioactive waste management is clearly an area where national legislation has to be supplemented by legislation at EU level owing to the cross-border aspect of safety. At the same time the internal market requires the Commission to ensure a level-playing field to avoid distortion of competition.
The recently adopted Council Directive establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations only covers spent fuel storage facilities and other storage facilities for radioactive waste that are on the same site as and are directly related to nuclear installations. However, it states that it is also important to ensure the safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, including at storage and disposal facilities. Thus, the proposed Directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is a logical next step after the Nuclear Safety Directive.
CONTENT: the proposed Directive's objective is the establishment of a Community framework for responsible management of spent fuel and radioactive waste , ensuring that Member States make appropriate national arrangements for a high level of safety and maintain and promote public information and participation. Its scope covers all stages of the management of civilian spent fuel and radioactive waste from generation to disposal, but not the management of specific types of waste, such as authorised releases and waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive, as already covered by existing European legislation.
Special attention was paid to ensuring the Directive is consistent with existing European legislation while making internationally accepted principles and requirements , laid down in the IAEA Safety Standards and the Joint Convention, legally binding and enforceable in the EU .
Obligations associated with the application of the general principles include:
a national framework for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in the long term; a competent regulatory authority in the field of safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management; license holders having the prime responsibility for safety; education and training to obtain the expertise and skills required; transparency in decision-making on spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Owing to the specificity of radioactive waste management, specific obligations are also introduced:
setting out the approach to safety, including requirements for a safety case and a supporting safety assessment of facilities and activities relating to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; addressing the need to ensure that sufficient financial resources are available for spent fuel and radioactive waste management when needed, in accordance with the 'polluter-pays-principle'; seeking to ensure an appropriate quality of the safety.
A conditional set of requirements in respect of the national programmes for radioactive waste and spent fuel management, needed to fulfil objectives and satisfy requirements, are included. (i) the basic requirements for national programmes; (ii) the content of a national programme; (iii) the notification of the national programmes to the Commission.
Lastly, the proposal provides that the Member States:
will report to the Commission on the implementation of the proposed Directive, taking advantage of the reporting cycles under the Joint Convention. On the basis of the Member States′ reports, the Commission will submit a progress report to the Council and the European Parliament; will invite international peer review of their national frameworks and national programmes with the aim of achieving the required high standards in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The outcomes of any peer review will be reported to the Member States and the Commission.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: this proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0632
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2019)0435
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2019)0436
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0236
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0159
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0161
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)1007
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2011/70
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 199 02.08.2011, p. 0048
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)6334
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0295/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0214/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0214/2011
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0817/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.874
- Committee opinion: PE456.851
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.870
- Committee opinion: PE460.611
- Contribution: COM(2010)0618
- Contribution: COM(2010)0618
- Committee draft report: PE460.863
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1289
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1290
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2010)0618
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1289 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1290 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE460.863
- Committee opinion: PE460.611
- Committee opinion: PE456.851
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.870
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE462.874
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0817/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0214/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)6334
- Follow-up document: SEC(2011)1007 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0236 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0159
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0161
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0632 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2019)0435
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2019)0436
- Contribution: COM(2010)0618
- Contribution: COM(2010)0618
Activities
- Werner LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- 2016/11/22 Prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances - Implementation of excessive deficit procedure - Requirements for budgetary frameworks of Member States - Budgetary surveillance in euro area - Surveillance of budgetary positions and surveillance and coordination of economic policies - Enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in euro area (continuation of debate)
- Elena BĂSESCU
- Bas BELDER
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
- Frédéric DAERDEN
- Leonardo DOMENICI
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
- Elisa FERREIRA
- Diogo FEIO
- Ashley FOX
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
- Sylvie GOULARD
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
- Jiří HAVEL
- Iliana IVANOVA
- Romana JORDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
- Thomas MANN
- Sławomir NITRAS
- Kristiina OJULAND
- Alfredo PALLONE
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
- Nikolaos SALAVRAKOS
- Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO
- Theodor Dumitru STOLOJAN
- Hannes SWOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
- Marianne THYSSEN
- Rafał TRZASKOWSKI
- Jarosław WAŁĘSA
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Corien WORTMANN-KOOL
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Votes
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 19 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 120 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 59 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 61 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 62/1 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 63 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 118rev #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 129 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 136/1 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 136/2 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 124 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Am 127 #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Proposition modifiée #
A7-0214/2011 - Romana Jordan Cizelj - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
436 |
2010/0306(NLE)
2011/02/17
EMPL
76 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – point 4 a (new) (4a) The safety case shall cover not only the site but also any related issues, such as the transport of radioactive waste or spent fuel to or from the site.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Recording and tracking (1) Member States shall establish a recording and tracking system in the field of management of the spent fuel and radioactive waste. (2) Member States shall ensure that the recording and tracking system is capable of defining the location and the conditions of the spent fuel and radioactive waste in their production, use, transport, storage or disposal. (3) Member States shall ensure that information on workers that have been exposed to spent fuel and radioactive waste during their work is stored, either by the licence holder or a state body, so as to ensure follow-up for work-related diseases in the long term.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 b (new) Article 8b Procedures and Sanctions In accordance with general principles, Member States shall ensure that administrative or judicial procedures, as well as sanctions that are effective, dissuasive and proportionate in relation to the seriousness of the offence, should be applicable in the event of infringement of the obligations arising from this Directive.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and skills. Member States shall pay special attention to parties indirectly involved and ensure that they are offered state-of-the- art, appropriate education and training before the operations involving radioactive waste and spent fuel are carried out.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and skills, in line with technical and scientific progress.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall ensure that the licence holders provide adequate financial resources to fulfil their obligations with respect to the education and training laid down in paragraph 1.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers, health and safety matters and occupational diseases which might occur following long-term exposure to radioactive emissions.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 Member States shall ensure that appropriate quality assurance programmes, including education and training, concerning the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management are established and regularly implemented.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – point 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that all information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – point 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – point 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that information on the Financial Resources reserved for the management of the spent fuel and radioactive waste referred to in Article 10 is available to the general public, with due regard to the share of the costs between the Member States and the Producers.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to disposal, with top priority being given to historic radioactive waste and spent fuel in intermediate storage pools;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (7)
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 a (new) Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and in particular Article 153 thereof,
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 b (new) Having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in particular Articles 31 and 35 thereof,
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Article 2(b) of the Euratom Treaty provides for the establishment of uniform safety standards to protect the health of workers and of the general public.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Article 30 of the Euratom Treaty provides for the establishment of basic standards for the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionizing radiations.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty requires Member States to provide the Commission with general data relating to any plan for
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 provides for the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) Article 153 TFEU provides for the establishment of minimum standards for the health and safety of workers.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 b (new) Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 c (new) (3c) Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights provides the basic right for everyone to high level of health protection.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The ILO adopted a Convention[1] and a Recommendation[2] on Radiation Protection to all activities involving exposure of workers to ionizing radiation in the course of work and requires appropriate steps to be taken to ensure the effective protection of workers in the light of knowledge available at the time. [1] C115 Convention concerning the Protection of Workers against Ionising Radiations, 22. 6. 1960 [2] C114 Recommendation concerning the Protection of Workers against Ionising Radiations, 22. 6. 1960
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires appropriate conditioning, containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including disposal in appropriate facilities as the end point of its management. The storage of radioactive waste, including long-term storage, is an interim solution but not an alternative to disposal.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that policy should respect the relevant
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) It is necessary for workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; it is necessary for the long term effects on the health and safety of workers to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34b) When this Directive is implemented, it is necessary that particular attention be given to workers at risk and that non- compliance with health and safety legislation be followed by immediate and effective sanctions.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 c (new) (34c) Since, in many instances, the health consequences for workers of exposure to radioactivity do not emerge for years or decades, all documentation drawn up on the workers concerned in connection with the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste should be kept.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Transparency is important in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. It should be provided by requiring effective public information, in Member States' customary official publications, and opportunities for all concerned stakeholders to participate in the decision- making processes.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) Maintaining and further developing competences and skills in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as an essential element to ensure high levels of safety and to protect workers, should be based on a combination of learning through preventive training, operational experience, scientific research and technological development, and technical cooperation between all actors.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 3 (3) It maintains and promotes a high level of public information and participation with regard to spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – point 4 a (new) (4a) This Directive sets minimum standards for the Member States, but Member States are free to impose higher standards on management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 1 – subpoint b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 2 Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 2 a (new) (2a) The following shall be excluded from the scope of this directive:
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 2 a (new) – subpoint a (a) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 2 a (new) – subpoint b (b) authorised releases;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – point 3 Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) (5a) 'exposed worker' means any person involved in activities along the chain of the management of waste fuel or radioactive waste management, regardless their activity or status;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 (6)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 (7) ‘radioactive waste management’ means all activities, that relate to handling, pretreatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, or disposal of radioactive waste, including the monitoring of those operations and subsequent maintenance work on interim or final radioactive waste storage premises, excluding off-site transportation;
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d a (new) (da) exposure of workers and the public to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d b (new) (db) measures are taken to cover the future health risks for exposed workers, including those not documented;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d c (new) (dc) measures are taken which cover all workers involved in the processes relating to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, including those workers indirectly involved, such as transport workers, security workers, members of the armed forces and police officers;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d d (new) (dd) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 2 – subpoint d a (new) (da) there is a legal framework on joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – point 3 a (new) (3a) The transfer of radioactive waste and spent fuel to outside of the Union shall be prohibited.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – point 1 – subpoint b a (new) (ba) national requirements for the health and safety, education and training of workers;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – point 1 – subpoint d (d) a system of appropriate institutional control, regulatory inspections, documentation and reporting, as well as needed training for the workers involved in the whole process in order to secure and maintain their occupational safety and health;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – point 1 – subpoint e (e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence, covering, inter alia, infringements of health and safety rules applicable to the workers concerned;
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that the regulatory authority is democratically controlled and that practical workers, scientists and elected parliamentarians are part of that regulatory authority.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 b (new) (3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority has the powers and resources needed to carry out regular nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls and, where necessary, enforcement actions in the facilities, even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including those employed by any subcontractors, as well as staffing levels and training shall form part of these assessments.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 c (new) Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 d (new) (3d) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority establishes or specifies a body which is to be responsible for conserving records relating to workers involved in the handling of spent fuel and radioactive waste for at least 50 years and for compiling records independently of the employer or subcontractor, in keeping with applicable data protection rules, and which is required to release information to the workers concerned and their descendants.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is given the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary enforcement actions in the facilities even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including any sub-contractors, as well as staff levels and training shall be part of these assessments.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – point 3 b (new) (3b) The assessment on the health and safety of the workers referred to in paragraph 3a shall be carried out in cooperation with the authorities responsible for safety and health of workers.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – point 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – point 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder’s administrative procedures for protection that would have to fail before workers and the general public would be significantly affected by ionizing radiation.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – point 4 (4) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to establish and implement
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – point 5 (5) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to provide for and maintain adequate financial and human resources to fulfil their obligations with respect to the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management, laid down in paragraphs 1 to 4, including for the long term over 250 years or more.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – point 5 a (new) (5a) Member States shall ensure that the licence holders are able to guarantee and implement the application of occupational and health safety standards to all the workers involved in the process as well as ensure the needed training for them throughout the whole process in view of scientific progress.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – point 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or closure of a disposal facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall include an assessment of the health and safety risks for workers, including those employed by subcontractors, and of the skill levels and number of staff required for the safe operation of the facility at all times, so that action can be taken in the event of an accident.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – point 4 (4) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall be submitted to the competent regulatory authority for approval.
source: PE-458.766
2011/03/22
ENVI
113 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Existing Community legislation does not lay down specific rules ensuring safe and sustainable management of spent fuel and radioactive waste at all stages, from
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 (3) The safety case for a facility shall describe all safety-relevant aspects of the site, the design of the facility, the decommissioning of the facility or parts thereof and the managerial control measures and regulatory controls. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall demonstrate the level of protection provided and shall provide assurance to the competent regulatory authority and other interested parties that safety requirements will be met.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and skills, in line with technical and scientific progress.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers according to the polluter pays principle.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers, health and safety matters and occupational diseases which might occur in the longer term following radioactive exposure, according to the polluter-pays principle.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that workers and the general public have access to information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, notably the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the public (in particular radioactive and toxic emissions and the exposure to emissions) must be made publicly available irrespective of the circumstances.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters grants the public rights and imposes on Parties and public authorities obligations regarding access to information and public participation and access to justice in environmental matters, which include the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the public is given opportunities to participate
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) The public participation procedures shall include reasonable time-frames for the different phases, allowing sufficient time for informing the public and for the public to prepare and participate effectively during the decision-making.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 b (new) (2b) Each Member State shall ensure that in the decision due account is taken of the outcome of the public participation.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 a (new) Article 12a Review Each Member State shall ensure that each legal or natural person has access to a comprehensive review procedure before a court. In addition, each Member State shall ensure that each legal or natural person has access to administrative or judicial procedures by means of which to contest the actions and omissions of the competent regulatory authorities.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States shall inform cross- border regional and local authorities of their national programmes at the earliest possible date, if implementation is likely to have cross-border effects.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Within the National Programmes, Member States shall clearly indicate the available financial resources for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point -1 (new) (-1) an integrated, detailed classification system for spent fuel and radioactive waste which covers all stages in disposing of spent fuel and radioactive waste, from production to the completion of disposal;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 1 (1) on the basis of the classification system provided for in point -1, an inventory of all spent fuel and radioactive waste and previsions of future quantities, including those from decommissioning. The inventory shall clearly indicate the location and amount of
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) While it is up to the Member States to define their energy mix, all Member States generate radioactive waste from power generation or in the course of military, industrial, medical or research activities, whether or not they have nuclear reactors. Radioactive waste arises mainly from activities of the nuclear fuel cycle, such as the operation of nuclear power plants and the reprocessing of spent fuel, but also from other activities, such as applications of radioactive isotopes in medicine, research and industry.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors, as well as their decommissioning, also generates spent fuel and radioactive waste. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy considering spent fuel as a valuable resource that may be reprocessed, or deciding to dispose of it as waste. Whatever option is chosen, the final storage or disposal of high level waste, separated at reprocessing, or of spent fuel regarded as waste should be considered.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy considering spent fuel
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Spent fuels stored in pools represent an additional potential source of radioactivity in the environment, in particular if the cooling ponds are not covered anymore, as recently shown in Fukushima.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 b (new) (25b) The management of spent fuels starts at the moment of the fuel rods are moved from the nuclear reactor.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including disposal in appropriate facilities as the end point of its management.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including final storage or disposal in appropriate facilities as the end point of its management. The storage of radioactive waste
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) The hazards of radioactive waste disposal were made evident by the Fukushima accident and similar accidents could take place in existing or under construction nuclear installations in areas of the Union and its neighbouring countries with high seismic and tsunami risk, such as in Akkuyu (Turkey). The Union should take any appropriate measures to prevent radioactive waste disposal in such areas.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal. Following 30 years of research, it is broadly accepted at the technical level that deep geological disposal could represent
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal. Following 30 years of research, it is
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that policy should respect the relevant fundamental safety principles set by the IAEA. It is an ethical obligation of each Member State to avoid any undue burden on future generations in respect of the existing spent fuel and radioactive waste, as well as those expected from decommissioning of existing nuclear installations. Member States should therefore establish a decommissioning policy that guarantees that facilities are dismantled in the safest manner as early as possible after their closure.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) For the responsible management of
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) A national programme should be established to ensure the transposition of the political decisions into clear provisions for the timely implementation of all steps of spent fuel and radioactive waste management from generation to disposal. This should include all activities that relate to handling, pre-treatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, and disposal of radioactive waste and spent fuel and comply with the principles laid down in the Aarhus Convention. The national programme may be a reference document or a set of documents.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management need to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; the long term effects on the health and safety of workers need to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34b) When implementing this Directive, special attention must be given to workers at risk. Non-compliance with health and safety legislation must be followed by immediate and severe sanctions.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) T
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including storage and/or disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. Shared final storage and/or disposal may only be considered for small amounts of radioactive waste from medical use or industrial operations. Radioactive waste from energy generation or military activities as well as from research for energy generation or military applications is prohibited to be emplaced in shared final storage and/or disposal facilities.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial and cost-effective option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including storage and/or disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. Shared final storage and/or disposal should only be considered for small amounts of radioactive waste from research, medical use or industrial operations other than energy generation.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a storage, including spent fuels in pools, and disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the storage or disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein. The safety case for low-level waste and short-lived intermediate-level waste has to be made for at least 500 years and for high-level waste or spent nuclear fuel for at least 100 000 years. It should therefore provide the collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity related to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) Maintaining and further developing competences and skills in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as an essential element to ensure high levels of
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 (3) It ma
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian or military activities;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management, including transportation, when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to disposal, when the radioactive waste results from civilian or military activities or is managed within civilian or military activities;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 (3) This Directive
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 3 (6) ‘radioactive waste’ means any radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6)
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – punctul 7 (7) 'radioactive waste management' means all activities
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 7 (7) ‘radioactive waste management’ means all activities, that relate to handling, pretreatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, or disposal of radioactive waste,
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 9 Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10) ‘spent fuel’ means nuclear fuel that has been irradiated in and permanently removed from a reactor core; spent fuel
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 11 (11) ‘spent fuel management’ means all activities that relates to the handling, storage, reprocessing, or disposal of spent fuel,
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 11 (11)
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13) ‘storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in an authorised facility with the intention or the possibility of retrieval
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13) ‘storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in an authorised facility with the intention or possibility of retrieval.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13)
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, in terms of both activity and volume, by means of
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, in terms of both activity and volume, by means of the use of alternatives where economically, socially and environmentally sustainable alternatives exist, appropriate design measures and of operating and decommissioning practices, including recycle and reuse of conventional materials;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital -1 (new) (-1) Article 191 TFEU provides the legal basis for preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and protecting human health, including from hazards arising from spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the public and all interest groups concerned have access to all information concerning disposal, the public and all interest groups concerned are involved in decision-making processes on a mandatory basis at an early stage and if access to information is denied in relation to decisions where public participation is provided for, and generally in connection with violations of environmental provisions, any natural or legal person has the right of objection and to bring legal proceedings;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the disposal reserves which the originators of the waste have to provide so as to cover costs are administered in a State-controlled fund, in order to ensure that they are available for permanent safe disposal.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) exposure of workers, the public and the environment to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) measures are taken to cover the future health and environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public;
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new) (dc) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless for small amounts agreements are concluded between Member States to use storage or disposal facilities in one of them. These agreements prohibit to license the shared final storage and/or disposal of radioactive waste and spent fuel from energy generation or military activities as well as from research for energy generation or military applications.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless agreements are concluded between Member States to use storage or disposal facilities in one of them.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) This Directive shall not affect the right of a Member State or an undertaking in the Member State to which: (a) radioactive waste is to be shipped for processing; or (b) other material is to be shipped with the purpose to recover the radioactive waste, to return the radioactive waste after treatment to its country of origin. Nor shall it affect the right of a Member State or an undertaking in that Member State to which spent fuel is to be shipped for reprocessing to return to its country of origin radioactive waste recovered from the reprocessing operation.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Radioactive waste shall not be disposed of in areas of high seismic and tsunami risk.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Article
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) national requirements for the safety and environmentally sound disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) a system of
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) access for the public and all interest groups concerned to all information concerning disposal, early participation by the public and all interest groups concerned in decision-making processes and, if access to information is denied in relation to decisions where public participation is provided for, and generally in connection with violations of environmental provisions, a right for any natural or legal person to object and to bring legal proceedings;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) measures to ensure that the funding required for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and for emplacement purposes is set by the competent regulatory authority on the basis of a transparent process which is regularly reviewed and in which the licence holder is involved at all times.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework is maintained and improved as necessary, taking into account operating experience, insights gained from safety cases as referred to in Article 8, the
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) National programmes shall be subject to socio-economic and environmental impact assessments and ensure no risk of uranium leakage.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The competent regulatory authority will have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary enforcement actions in the facilities even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including any sub- contractors, as well as staff levels and training are to form part of these assessments.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new) (3c) The competent regulatory authority will report to the Member States and relevant competent organisations, licence holders, workers’ representatives of the licence holder, sub-contractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Article
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 - paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Marking and documentation Member States shall ensure that licence- holders mark containers and document the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste in a form not subject to weathering. The documentation shall comprise both the chemical, toxic and radiological composition of the inventory and an indication of whether it is solid, liquid or gaseous.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall determine the moment at which responsibility for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is transferred from the licence holder to the body entrusted with such management under national law.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and human interference including physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and human interference, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder's administrative procedures for protection that would have to fail before workers and the general public would be significantly affected by ionizing radiation.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5 (5) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and
source: PE-460.954
2011/04/15
ITRE
209 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29a) The Commission should call on the Member States to create registers of similar suitable sites for deep geological disposal.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30) Although each Member State is responsible for its own policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, that
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 30 (30)
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 31 (31) For the responsible management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, each Member State should establish a national framework which is harmonised with the Commission and assures political commitments and stepwise decision making implemented through adequate legislation, regulation and organisation with a clear allocation of responsibilities.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 32 a (new) (32a) Member States should ensure there is sufficient funding for the management and storage of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) A national programme should be established to ensure the transposition of
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 (33) A national programme should be established to ensure the transposition of the political decisions into clear provisions for the timely implementation of all steps of spent fuel and radioactive waste management from generation to final disposal. This should include all activities that relate to handling, pre-treatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, and disposal of radioactive waste. The national programme may be a reference document or a set of documents.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Workers along the whole chain of spent fuel and radioactive waste management need to be protected and covered, regardless of their activity or status; the long term effects on the health and safety of workers need to be considered in any management instrument for spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 34 b (new) (34b) When implementing this Directive, special attention must be given to workers at risk; non-compliance with health and safety legislation must be followed by immediate and severe sanctions.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Transparency is important in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and it is crucial for there to be public confidence in the principles that govern the safety of repositories and in waste management programmes. It should be provided by requiring effective public information and
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Transparency is important in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. It should be provided by requiring effective public information and opportunities for all concerned stakeholders to participate
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 35 (35) Transparency is important in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. It should be provided by
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 (36) Cooperation between Member States and at an international level could facilitate and accelerate decision-making through access to high quality expertise and technology, as well as to best practices.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including storage and/or disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. Shared final storage and/or disposal should only be considered for small amounts of radioactive waste from research, medical use or industrial operations other than energy generation.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned. In this connection, it is important not to hamper specific arrangements such as pre-existing agreements on spent fuel derived from research reactors.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial and cost-effective option when based on an agreement between
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial option when based on an agreement between
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 (37) Some Member States consider that the sharing of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management, including disposal facilities, is a potentially beneficial and safe option when based on an agreement between Member States concerned.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 37 a (new) Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a storage, including spent fuels in pools, and disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the storage or disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein. The safety case for low-level waste and short-lived intermediate-level waste has to be made for at least 500 years and for high-level waste or spent nuclear fuel for at least 100 000 years. It should therefore provide the collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity related to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development,
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 (39) The safety case and the graded approach should provide a basis for decisions related to the development, operation and closure of a disposal facility and should allow the identification of areas of uncertainty on which attention needs to be focused to further improve the understanding of those aspects influencing the safety of the disposal system, including natural (geological) and engineered barriers, such as the region’s susceptibility to earthquakes, and its expected development over the time. The safety case should include the findings of the safety assessment and information on the robustness and reliability of the safety assessment and the assumptions made therein. It should
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Union legislation on health and safety at work is also applicable to the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 40 (40) While recognizing that all hazards associated with spent fuel and radioactive waste should be taken into account in the national framework, this Directive does not cover non radiological hazards with non- radiological consequences, which fall under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 41 (41) Maintaining and further developing competences and skills in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as an essential element to ensure high levels of safety, should be based on a combination of learning through operational experience, scientific research and technological development, and technical cooperation between all actors; given ongoing research into the sustainability and safety of long- term management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, a reassessment of the concept of deep geological disposal viz-à- viz other options such as final storage with retrievability should be undertaken in 10 years' time.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 (42) Peer review
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 42 a (new) (42a) Reiterates the need for further funds to be allocated for energy projects, including the possibility of future decommissioning projects and consequently, waste management projects.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for a high level of safety in spent fuel and
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 (2) It ensures that Member States provide for appropriate national arrangements for
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 3 (3) It
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part (1)
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities, including spent fuel originating from military defence programmes which is transferred to exclusively civilian use and managed within civilian activities;
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities on the EU territory;
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) all stages of spent fuel management, including transportation, when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors or is managed within civilian activities;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to disposal, and including transportation, when the radioactive waste results from civilian activities or is managed within civilian activities;
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to disposal, when the radioactive waste results from civilian activities or is managed within civilian activities on the EU territory;
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste management, from generation up to disposal or final storage, when the radioactive waste results from civilian activities or is managed within civilian activities;
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) all stages of radioactive waste
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 (2) Waste from extractive industries which may be radioactive and falls within the scope of Directive 2006/21/EC shall
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The specific provisions of this Directive for nuclear safety of radioactive waste and spent fuel facilities and activities shall not apply to nuclear installations covered by Directive 2009/71/Euratom.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Art.4(3) of this Directive shall not apply to: – repatriation of spent fuel from research reactors in compliance with special contracts; – repatriation of wastes generated as part of reprocessing of spent fuel to the country of its origin; – exports based on spent fuel or radioactive waste management contracts.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6)
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6) 'radioactive waste' means radioactive material, including stored spent fuel, in gaseous, liquid or solid form
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6) ‘radioactive waste’ means radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form, including spent fuel and radioactive material originating from reprocessing, for which no further use is foreseen by the Member State or by a natural or legal person whose decision is accepted by the Member State
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6) ‘radioactive waste’ means radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form, reduced to the technologically possible minimum volume, for which no further use is foreseen by the Member State or by a natural or legal person whose decision is accepted by the Member State
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 6 (6) 'radioactive waste' means radioactive material in gaseous, liquid or solid form for which no further use is foreseen or envisaged, taking account of future technological developments and progress, by the Member State or by a natural or legal person whose decision is accepted by the Member State, and which is controlled as radioactive waste by a competent regulatory authority under the legislative and regulatory framework of the Member State;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 7 (7) ‘radioactive waste management’ means all activities, that relate to handling, pretreatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, or disposal of radioactive waste
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 7 (7) ‘radioactive waste management’ means all activities, that relate to handling, pretreatment, treatment, conditioning, storage, or disposal of radioactive waste,
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 9 a (new) (9a) 'safety case' means a collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity, which includes the findings of a safety assessment and a statement of confidence in these findings. For a disposal facility, the safety case may relate to a given stage of development. In such cases, the safety case should acknowledge the existence of areas of uncertainty or of any unresolved issues and should provide guidance for work to resolve these issues in future development stages;
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10)
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 10 (10) ‘spent fuel’ means nuclear fuel that has been irradiated in and permanently removed from a reactor core; spent fuel m
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 11 (11) ) ‘spent fuel management’ means all activities that relates to the handling, storage including intermediate storage, reprocessing, or disposal of spent fuel,
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13) ‘storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 (13) ‘storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in an authorised facility with the
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point 13 a (new) (13a) ‘final storage’ means the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in an authorised final storage facility with no intention of retrieval but where there exists the possibility of retrieval should this become necessary in the interests of safety and security.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall establish and maintain national policies on spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall establish and maintain national policies on spent fuel and
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that national policies on management and spent fuel and radioactive waste are implemented through a well founded and documented stepwise decision-making process with regard to the long-term safety.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part (2) Member States shall ensure that national policies are based on the following principles:
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, respecting the ALARA principle, in terms of both activity and volume, by means of appropriate design measures and of operating and decommissioning practices, including reprocessing, recycle and reuse of conventional materials;
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable, in terms of both activity and volume, by means of appropriate design measures and of operating and decommissioning practices, including recycle and reuse of
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) no undue burdens are imposed on
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) to move all spent fuel out of pools into dry storage;
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed, including in the long term
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed, including in the long term; special attention shall be given to the safe transportation, by land and sea, of spent fuel and radioactive waste, especially in the case of nuclear installations in neighbouring non-member state countries.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) spent fuel and radioactive waste are safely managed
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) intermediate storage in spent fuels pools should take place within the containment and should be kept to the shortest time necessary for cooling spent fuels before off-site transportation due to the additional risk potential as proven in Fukushima.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) to inform the public regarding national policies on spent fuel and radioactive waste management, in a way that is transparent and impartial, according to Article 12.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) exposure of workers, the public and the environment to spent fuel and radioactive waste is avoided.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) the disposal financial reserves which the originators of the waste have to provide so as to cover all the costs of from spent fuels und radioactive waste management are administered in a State- controlled fund, in order to ensure that they are available for permanent safe disposal.
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) measures are taken to cover the future health and environmental risks for exposed workers and the general public.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d c (new) (dc) there is joint and several liability so as to protect all actors involved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste; full accidents and long-term waste management third party liability in relation to any damage caused by such activities, including damage to the terrestrial, water and marine environments, are borne by the nuclear operators and nuclear waste licensees.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d d (new) (dd) the costs for the management of radioactive waste, including spent fuels, are borne by those who have generated them.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) (2a) competent national bodies are involved as supervisor for adequate financial resources.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of, or placed in longer-term safe storage, in the Member State in which it was generated
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless agreements are concluded between Member States to use disposal facilities in one of them or if regional disposal centres have been established under intergovernmental agreements between Member States.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel, shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless agreements for small amounts are concluded between Member States which have not developed any activity related to nuclear fuel to use disposal facilities in one of them.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless agreements are concluded between Member States to use disposal or final storage facilities in one of them; no shipments of waste outside the EU should be allowed.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3) Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless a
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 (3)
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a (new) (a) in case of export to a third country the exporting Member State shall take reasonable measures to be assured that the other country has radioactive waste management program with safety objectives equivalent to those of this Directive;
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b (new) (b) the agreements shall be notified to the Commission.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States may decide, on a voluntary basis, to take appropriate measures in cooperation with other Member States to establish a joint or regional disposal facility, where this is necessary or advisable taking into account particular geological or technical circumstances. The activities and studies undertaken by ERDO – WG (European Repository Development Organization Working Group) are of particular interest in this context.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States may decide, on a voluntary basis, to take appropriate measures in cooperation with other Member States to establish a joint or regional disposal facility, where this is necessary or advisable taking into account particular geological or technical circumstances. First, however, the general public and local and regional authorities concerned must be informed and consulted.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) On a voluntary basis, Member States may decide to establish a joint or regional disposal facility in cooperation with other Member States or third country in order to utilise the favourable geological or technical advantages of a particular site and to share the financial burden of the joint project.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States may decide, on a voluntary basis, to take appropriate measures in cooperation with other Member States to establish a joint or regional disposal facility if this has societal, technical or economic benefits.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The export of radioactive waste, including plutonium, and spent fuel to third countries is prohibited.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The transfer of radioactive waste and spent fuel to places outside the Union shall be prohibited.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) In no circumstances may radioactive waste be exported to non-EU countries.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) It is not allowed to export radioactive waste outside the European Union.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Such a project shall be based upon an intergovernmental agreement, by which Member States ensure that: (a) public acceptance and support in all the Member States concerned shall be continuously nurtured through all phases of the project development and the lifetime of the disposal by organising the access to information and the participation of the public in the consultation process; (b) cooperation between and supervision by the competent regulatory bodies and national safety authorities is established; the safety case and supporting safety assessments shall be agreed and accepted by in each Member State concerned, covering the exploratory, the selection and the implementation phases of the facility; (c) agreement shall be reached on liability issues and clear allocation of responsibilities, each Member States bearing ultimate responsibility for its own radioactive waste.
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) All nuclear waste facilities in seismic regions or coastal areas with significant risk for rising sea level or a possibility for tsunamis are forbidden.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a national programme for implementation of the policy on spent fuel and radioactive waste management that secures that all radioactive waste producers are in a position to ensure the disposal or final storage of nuclear waste in accordance with the same high safety standards;
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a national programme, respecting subsidiarity, for implementation of the policy on spent fuel
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) national requirements for the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management; the determination on how they are adopted and through which instrument they are applied remains of the competence of the Member State;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) a system of licensing of spent fuel and radioactive waste management activities and facilities, including prohibition of the operation of a spent fuel or radioactive waste management facility without a licence and ensuring that all radioactive waste, by whomsoever it is produced, is managed on a non-discriminatory basis;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) obligations for licence holders on making radioactive waste management facility available for all market players on equal terms;
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) enforcement actions, including suspension of activities and modification or revocation of a licence, covering, inter alia, infringements of health and safety legislation for the workers concerned;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) provisions to guarantee adequate financial resources in the long term for activities and facilities relating to spent fuel and radioactive waste management;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) fa. measures to ensure that the funding required for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and for emplacement purposes is set by the competent regulatory authority on the basis of a transparent process which is regularly reviewed and in which the licence holder is involved at all times.
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) shall include a calculation of all the costs generated by spent fuel and radioactive waste management. The information must comprise the institutions bearing the costs.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework is maintained and improved as necessary, taking into account operating experience, insights gained from safety cases as referred to in Article 8, the development of technology, health and safety standards and the results of research.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is functionally separate from any other body or organisation concerned with the promotion or
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The competent regulatory authority will have the powers and resources to regularly carry out nuclear safety assessments, investigations and controls, and where necessary enforcement actions in the facilities even during decommissioning. The health and safety of workers, including any sub- contractors, as well as staff levels and training are to form part of these assessments.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authorities inform the public regularly and transparently about their activities and those of the licence holders, about the operation of storage and disposal facilities and about safety and security risks.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is empowered to order the suspension of operations in cases where safety is not guaranteed.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 c (new) (3c) The competent regulatory authority will report to the Member States and relevant competent organisations, licence holders, workers’ representatives of the licence holder, sub-contractors and the general public regarding the results of their assessments.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that the prime responsibility for the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management rests with the licence holder
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall determine the moment at which responsibility for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is transferred from the licence holder to the body entrusted with such management under national law.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that licence holders report to the competent regulatory authority, to other relevant competent organisations.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve, as far as reasonably achievable, the safety of their activities and facilities in a systematic and verifiable manner. The extent of these actions shall be commensurate with the complexity and the magnitude of the hazards associated with the facility or the activity.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders, under the supervision of the competent regulatory authority, to regularly assess and verify, and continuously improve
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The a
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and physical attacks and mitigate the consequences of accidents and physical attacks, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and mitigate the consequences of accidents, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder's administrative procedures for protection that would have to fail before workers
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 3 (3) The assessments referred to in paragraph 2 shall include verification that measures are in place to prevent accidents and mitigate the consequences of accidents, including verification of the physical barriers and the licence holder’s administrative procedures for protection that would have to fail before workers and the general public would be
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 (4) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to establish and implement management systems which give
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5 (5) Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires licence holders to provide for and maintain adequate financial and human resources, also in the long term, to fulfil their obligations with respect to the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management, laid down in paragraphs 1 to 4.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new) (5a) Member States shall ensure that license holders inform cross-border regional and local authorities of their plans to establish a waste management facility at the earliest possible date, if such a facility is located within such a distance of the national border that cross-border influence is likely to occur during building, operation or after abandonment of the facility, or in the case of an accident or incident related to the facility.
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new) (5a) Member State shall ensure that revocation or expiration of the validity of a license will not exempt the licensee from compliance with the requirements for the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management unless the regulatory authority takes a decision for transferring or expiring of responsibilities.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 (1) A safety case and a supporting safety assessment shall be prepared as part of the license application for a facility or activity located on the EU territory. They shall be updated, as necessary, over the evolution of the facility or activity. The extent and detail of the safety case and the safety assessment shall be commensurate with the complexity of the operations and the magnitude of the hazards associated with the facility or activity.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or operation of spent fuels pools, a final storage facility or operation and closure of a disposal facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term and post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall include an assessment of the health and safety risks for workers, including those employed by subcontractors, and of the skill levels and number of staff required for the safe operation of the facility at all times, so that action can be taken in the event of an accident.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 2 (2) The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall cover the siting, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of a facility or closure of a disposal or final storage facility; the safety case shall specify the standards applied for this assessment. The long-term post-closure safety shall be addressed, in particular how it is ensured by passive means to the fullest extent possible.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 3 (3) The safety case for a facility shall describe all safety-relevant aspects of the site, the design of the facility, the intermediate storage cooling pools including a regular reporting of the quantity of therein contained spent fuels and the managerial control measures and regulatory controls. The safety case and supporting safety assessment shall demonstrate the level of protection provided and shall provide assurance to the competent regulatory authority and other interested parties that safety requirements will be met.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Recording and tracking (1) Member States shall establish a recording and tracking system in the field of spent fuel and radioactive waste management. (2) Member States shall ensure that the recording and tracking system is capable of defining the location and the condition of the spent fuel and radioactive waste in the course of their production, use, transport, storage or disposal.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 b (new) Article 8b Procedures and Sanctions In accordance with general principles, Member States shall ensure that administrative or judicial procedures, as well as sanctions that are effective, dissuasive and proportionate in relation to the seriousness of the offence, should be applicable in the event of infringement of the obligations arising from this Directive.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and skills. Member States shall also ensure that the national framework includes arrangements to promote further scientific research into existing disposal projects.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework includes arrangements for education and training covering the needs of all parties with responsibilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management in order to maintain and to further develop necessary expertise and
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste,
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste,
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that adequate financial resources are available when needed for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste, taking due account of the responsibility of radioactive waste producers according to the polluter pays principle.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Member States shall ensure that the national framework guarantees that rad
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) The costs of disposal shall be transparently set out and published by the Member States and reassessed each year. The obligations imposed on radioactive waste producers shall be revised accordingly.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) The Commission shall ensure that a harmonised method of calculation of the costs related to the decommissioning of nuclear installations and the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is established by 31 December 2011.
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 b (new) (1b) Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the harmonised method referred in para 1a, the costs shall cover at least decommissioning of the installation, safe, long-term management of the conventional and radioactive wastes from decommissioning of the installation; and safe, long-term management of the spent fuel from nuclear power stations and of the wastes from reprocessing operations not already fully covered as an operational cost.
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 c (new) (1c) The decommissioning and waste management funds shall be created from contributions by operators of nuclear installations during their operation, in order to reach a level of resources, at the time of the final shutdown, sufficient to cover all expenses related to decommissioning and waste management as defined in paragraph 1b.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 d (new) (1d) The assets of the funds are to be used only to cover the costs set out in paragraph 1b in line with the decommissioning strategy and may not be used for other purposes. To this end the decommissioning funds shall be duly established with their own legal personality, separate from the operator of the installation.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 1 e (new) (1e) These funds must be reviewed and audited annually by independent experts under the authority of the respective national parliament in order to verify that the revenues and the associated interest raised for these future activities shall only be used for these purposes, i.e. for decommissioning or waste management activities, and not used directly or indirectly to fund activities in the market.
Amendment 47 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 48 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2011 on the situation in Japan,
Amendment 49 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Article
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Article 191 TFEU provides for the legal basis for preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and protecting human health establishment, including from hazards arising from spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Article
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Council Directive 96/29/Euratom of 13 May 1996
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The Community has taken part in rising of financial resources to support under certain conditions the decommissioning of several nuclear power units in Bulgaria, Slovakia and Lithuania, subject to early closure under specific circumstances of the accession of these countries to EU.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) The three EU candidate countries, Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria, operated old Soviet design nuclear power plants which could not be economically upgraded to EU safety standards, and entailed the shut-down and subsequent decommissioning of their nuclear power plants.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 b (new) (15b) The decommissioning of the nuclear power plants of the three EU countries represented a significant financial and economical burden which could not be fully covered by the Member States concerned, and therefore the Community provided for financial resources to the respective Member States, intended to cover a part of the cost of decommissioning and waste projects and compensate for economic consequences.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Existing Community legislation does not lay down specific rules ensuring safe and sustainable management of spent fuel and radioactive waste at all stages, from generation to disposal or final storage.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) Existing Community legislation does not lay down specific rules ensuring safe and sustainable management of spent fuel and radioactive waste at all stages, from generation to final disposal.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Radioactive waste, spent fuel and their storage and disposal involve major risks, as became painfully clear in Fukushima where severe accidents occurred in storage and disposal facilities; safety measures regarding radioactive waste and spent fuel should be tightened.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (hereafter referred to as ‘the Joint Convention’)36 , concluded under the auspices of the IAEA,
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) The Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (hereafter referred to as ‘the Joint Convention’)36 , concluded under the auspices of the IAEA,
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In 2006 the IAEA updated its entire corpus of standards and published the Fundamental Safety Principles37 , which were jointly
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22a) Nuclear undertakings in all Member States should have sufficient financial resources to cover the costs of possible decommissioning in compliance with the priority of the polluter pays principle and in the context of strict rules for possible State aid. The Commission should therefore draw up precise rules for the use of financial resources in the case of decommissioning of installations and for the management and final disposal of the resultant radioactive waste.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23)
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) There is a growing recognition in the Union as well as worldwide
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 (23) There is a growing recognition in the Union as well as worldwide of the need for a responsible use of nuclear energy, which offers an essential alternative to fossil energies, covering in particular nuclear safety and security. In this context the issue of spent fuel and radioactive waste management needs to be addressed in order to ensure a safe, optimised and sustainable use of nuclear energy.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) 23a. It should be stressed in this connection that a large proportion of spent fuel material is recoverable. The recycling of spent fuel is therefore an aspect that needs to be taken into account, together with the disposal of final waste.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 b (new) 23b. The recycling and recovery of spent fuel are technically feasible and play a vital role in reducing waste toxicity and volume, while avoiding the generation of additional waste and offering additional scope for energy use.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24)
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) While it is up to the Member States to define their energy mix, all Member States generate radioactive waste, whether or not they have nuclear power reactors. Radioactive waste arises mainly from activities
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) While it is up to the Member States to define their energy mix, all Member States
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy considering spent fuel as a valuable resource that may be reprocessed, or deciding to dispose of it as waste or to place it in final storage. Whatever option is chosen, the disposal or final storage of high level waste, separated at reprocessing, or of spent fuel regarded as waste should be considered.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 (25) The operation of nuclear reactors also generates spent fuel. Each Member State may define its fuel cycle policy
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 a (new) (25a) Spent fuels stored in pools represent an additional potential source of radioactivity in the environment, in particular if the cooling ponds are not covered anymore, as recently shown in Fukushima.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 25 b (new) (25b) The management of spent fuels starts at the moment of the fuel rods are moved from the nuclear reactor.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 26 Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including disposal in appropriate facilities as the end point of its management.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered as waste, requires containment and isolation from humans and the living environment over the long term. Its specific nature (content of radionuclides) requires arrangements to protect human health and the environment against dangers arising from ionizing radiation, including disposal in appropriate facilities
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 (27) Radioactive waste, including spent fuel considered
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 a (new) (27a) Workers and the general public face an unacceptable and growing risk due to the conditions under which some historic wastes, such as plutonium-bearing sludges or contaminated graphite, are being stored. Unconditioned, readily dispersible waste forms and spent fuel in unprotected pools constitute stores which are radiotoxic as well as being highly vulnerable and pose an ongoing risk of accident or target for terrorist attack.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 b (new) (27b) Interim storage of spent fuels requires protection from external events; all spent fuels should therefore be moved out of pools into dry storage as soon as the residual heat level allows.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28) A national radioactive waste
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 28 (28) A national radioactive waste classification scheme should support these arrangements taking fully into account the specific types and properties of radioactive waste. The precise criteria according to which waste is assigned to a particular waste class will depend on the specific situation in the State in relation to the nature of the waste and the disposal or final storage options available or under consideration.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal. Following 30 years of research,
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal. Following 30 years of research, it is broadly accepted at the technical level that deep geological disposal represents the safest and most sustainable option as the end point of the management of high level waste and spent fuel considered as waste.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) The typical disposal concept for short lived low and intermediate level waste is near surface disposal. Following 30 years of research, it is broadly accepted at the technical level that deep geological disposal represents the safest and most sustainable option as the end point of the management of high level waste and spent fuel considered as waste. Thus moving
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29a) The hazards of radioactive waste depositories, in particular spent fuels in pools, were made evident by the Fukushima accident and similar accidents could take place in existing or under construction nuclear installations in areas of the Union and its neighbouring countries with seismic, tsunami and other natural risks. The Union should take any appropriate measures to prevent radioactive waste disposal in such areas.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 a (new) (29a) In view of the research into the disposal of radioactive waste by transmutation or other means of reducing its radioactivity and half-life, longer-term reversible storage of radioactive waste in deep geological formations should also be considered;
source: PE-462.870
2011/04/26
ITRE
38 amendments...
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that full third party liability in respect of any damage caused by accidents and long- term radioactive waste management, including damage to the terrestrial, water and marine environments, is borne by the licence holders.
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security. Information directly relevant to the health and safety of workers and the general public (in particular radioactive and toxic emissions and the exposure to emissions) shall be made publicly available irrespective of the circumstances.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations,
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste is made available to the local and regional authorities concerned, workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall ensure that information on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste from all sites is made available to workers and the general public. This obligation includes ensuring that the competent regulatory authority informs the public in the fields of its competence. Information shall be made available to the public in accordance with national legislation and international obligations, provided that this does not jeopardise other interests recognised in national legislation or international obligations such as, inter alia, security.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that information is made available to the public concerning the financial resources for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste referred to in Article 10, taking due account of the proportion of the costs incurred by producers.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) Member States shall ensure that all decisions concerning sites for, and management of, spent fuel and radioactive waste close to neighbouring countries shall involve the public and the institutions of the countries concerned.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the public is given opportunities to participate effectively in the process of decision making on spent fuel and radioactive waste management at an early stage, when all options are still open and public participation can be effective.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the public is given opportunities to participate
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 2 (2) Member States shall ensure that the
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 a (new) Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 (1) As part of the national framework, Member States shall establish, implement and keep updated programmes for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (hereafter referred to as ‘national programmes’), covering all types of spent fuel and radioactive waste under their jurisdiction and all stages of spent fuel and radioactive waste management from generation to disposal or final storage.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 (3) Member States shall regularly review and update their national programmes
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Member States shall inform cross- border regional and local authorities of their national programmes at the earliest possible date, if implementation is likely to have cross-border effects.
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point -1 (new) (-1) an integrated, detailed classification scheme for all types of radioactive waste;
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 1 (1) an inventory of all spent fuel and radioactive waste and previsions of future quantities, including those from decommissioning. The inventory shall clearly indicate the location and amount of the material and, through appropriate classification, the level of hazard and the source of the origin of the waste;
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to relatively long-term storage or disposal;
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to disposal or final storage;
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 2 (2) concepts, plans and technical solutions from generation to final disposal;
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 3 (3) concepts and plans for the post-closure period of a disposal facility, including time over which institutional controls are retained and the means to be employed to ensure the surveillance and preserve knowledge of the facility in the longer term;
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 3 (3) concepts and plans for the post-closure period of a disposal or final storage facility, including time over which institutional controls are retained and the means to be employed to preserve knowledge of the facility in the longer term;
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 5 a (new) (5a) 'organisational aspects related to an overall national management plan for radioactive waste of all types and from all operators, including a description of the allocation of responsibilities between public and private actors at national level';
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 8 (8) description of the financing scheme(s) in force to ensure all programme costs can be met according to the foreseen schedule and strictly following the 'polluter-pays' principle.
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 8 a (new) (8a) a binding and verifiable time-frame for the implementation of national programmes and compliance with requirements 1 to 8 above.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – point 8 a (new) (8a) education and vocational training plans to maintain and develop the expertise and skills necessary for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall notify the Commission of their national programmes and of subsequent significant changes. The Commission shall ensure that the national programmes of the Member States for managing spent fuel and radioactive waste comply with the most stringent safety standards.
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) The Commission shall monitor compliance with the time-frames submitted pursuant to Article 14(8a) for the implementation of the national programmes of the Member States.
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 4 (4) The Commission will
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall submit a report to the Commission on the implementation of
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 (3) Member States shall periodically, and at least every 10 years, arrange for self- assessments of their national framework, competent regulatory authority, national programme and its implementation regarding the disposal or final storage of spent fuel and radioactive waste, and invite international peer review of their national framework, authority and/or programme with the aim of ensuring that high standards are achieved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The outcomes of any peer review shall be reported to the Commission and the Member States.
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 (3) Member States shall periodically, and at least every
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 3 (3) Member States shall periodically, and at least every
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 a (new) Article 16a Sunset Clause Articles in this Directive related to the deep geological disposal or final storage of nuclear waste shall expire in 15 years time, following a reassessment of the concept of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste which shall be undertaken. This reassessment should in particular consider the issues of reversibility and retrievability of waste once placed into a disposal or final storage site in the light of research developments and further scientific expertise in this field.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 (1) Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by
source: PE-462.874
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdf |
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=20192&j=0&l=en
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdf |
docs/11 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2010&number=0306&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2010&number=0306&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1289/COM_SEC(2010)1289_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1289/COM_SEC(2010)1289_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.863New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-460863_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.611&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-460611_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.851&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-456851_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.870New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-462870_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.874New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-462874_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0817)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0817)(documentyear:2011)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=20192&j=0&l=en
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdf |
docs/15/docs/1 |
|
docs/16/docs/0 |
|
docs/17/docs/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.html |
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdf |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-214&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.html |
docs/10/body |
EC
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1007/COM_SEC(2011)1007_EN.pdf |
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-214&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0214_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-295New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0295_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1289/COM_SEC(2010)1289_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1289/COM_SEC(2010)1289_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1290/COM_SEC(2010)1290_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0618/COM_COM(2010)0618_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/04422New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011L0070New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011L0070 |
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|