Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | BUDE | ||
Former Responsible Committee | BUDG | MAZUR Sidonia ( PPE), TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AFCO | SAUDARGAS Algirdas ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | DEVE | BERMAN Thijs ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | CULT | LØKKEGAARD Morten ( ALDE) | Ivo BELET ( PPE), Cătălin Sorin IVAN ( S&D) |
Former Committee Opinion | AFET | SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio ( PPE) | Roberto GUALTIERI ( S&D), Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI ( ALDE), Sabine LÖSING ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Committee Opinion | PECH | RODUST Ulrike ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | AGRI | MCGUINNESS Mairead ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ENVI | HAUG Jutta ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | EMPL | BERÈS Pervenche ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | ITRE | HERCZOG Edit ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Former Committee Opinion | ECON | SCHWAB Andreas ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | CONT | LIBERADZKI Bogusław ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | LIBE | LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando ( S&D) | |
Former Committee Opinion | INTA | ŠŤASTNÝ Peter ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | IMCO | RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE) | Wim van de CAMP ( PPE), Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Former Committee Opinion | TRAN | RIQUET Dominique ( PPE) | Jaromír KOHLÍČEK ( GUE/NGL) |
Former Committee Opinion | REGI | SURJÁN László ( PPE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | PETI | VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | FEMM |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The 2011 draft budget - the first to be negotiated under the new arrangements put in place by the Lisbon Treaty - was presented by the Commission on 27 April 2010. It was transmitted in all official languages on 15 June 2010.
The Council completed its reading of the draft budget and adopted its position on 12 August 2010, making cuts to the Commission's proposals. The European Parliament then held its vote on the Council's position on the draft budget on 20 October 2010. As Parliament adopted amendments to the draft budget which could not be accepted by the Council, a Conciliation Committee was convened, in accordance with Article 314, paragraph 4(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
The Conciliation Committee worked over a period of 21 days, between 26 October 2010 and 15 November 2010. However, it was finally not possible to reconcile the positions of Parliament and Council within the time period allowed. Following the failure of the conciliation negotiations, the Commission was required to submit a new draft budget, in accordance with Article 314, paragraph 8 of the TFEU. This procedure file has now lapsed and the new draft budget is the subject of a separate new procedure file (see BUD/2010/2290 ).
.
The Council decided not to approve all amendments to its position on the draft budget for 2011 voted by the European Parliament.
In accordance with Article 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, a conciliation committee will now be convened in order to agree on a joint text within 21 days.
PURPOSE: presentation of a Letter of Amendment No 3 to the Draft General Budget 2011 – Section III (Commission).
CONTENT: the Amending Letter No 3 (AL 3) to the Draft Budget for 2011 (DB 2011) covers the following:
the line by line updating of the estimated needs for agricultural expenditure . In addition to changing market factors, the AL also incorporates legislative decisions adopted in the agricultural sector since the DB 2011 was drawn up, revised estimates of needs for some direct payments, as well as any proposals, which are expected to have effect during the coming budget year. Commitment and payment appropriations are decreased by EUR 346 million ; an update of the situation for International Fisheries Agreements , decreasing commitment appropriations by EUR 1 million ; the creation of a new budget item 32 04 14 04 - Energy projects to aid economic recovery - Energy efficiency and renewable initiatives.
Updating agricultural needs : the purpose of the AL 3 is to ensure that the agricultural budget is based on the most up-todate economic data and legislative framework. As in the past, the Commission has carefully reviewed all its estimates of agricultural expenditure line by line. As well as taking into account market factors, this AL 3 also incorporates any legislative decisions adopted in the agricultural sector since the DB was drawn up, as well as proposals made by the Commission. The Commission concludes that:
EAGF appropriations are decreased by EUR 346 million. This is mostly due to lower needs in chapter 05 02 Intervention in Agricultural markets (- EUR 136 million) and to a modification in the level of EAGF assigned revenue available in 2011. Firstly, additional assigned revenue received in 2010 amounting to EUR 210 million will be carried over from 2010 to 2011. Secondly, the Commission expects some increase in the assigned revenue generated in 2011 (+ EUR 19 million), so that the total increase in available assigned revenue is EUR 229 million; total commitment appropriations requested for agricultural expenditure financed by the EAGF are EUR 43 401 million, lower than in the DB 2011 (- EUR 346 million), resulting in a margin under the EAGF sub-ceiling which is now EUR 1 065 million. The new margin for heading 2 in total is EUR 1 199 million.
Energy projects : in May 2010, the Commission proposed an amendment to Regulation (EC) 663/2009 to use the uncommitted funds under Chapter II of the EERP Regulation for the creation of a dedicated financial instrument to support energy efficiency and renewable initiatives. The financial facility shall support the development of bankable energy efficiency and renewable energy projects and facilitate the financing of investments in energy efficiency and renewable energy, in particular in urban settings. In compliance with the EERP Regulation, the facility should be limited to the financing of measures that have a rapid, measurable and substantial impact on economic recovery within the EU, increased energy security and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the Commission proposes the creation of a new budget item 32 04 14 04 – Energy projects to aid economic recovery - Energy efficiency and renewable initiatives. The budget item is created under the new Title 32 "Energy". The creation of the same budget item is proposed in Amending Budget 10/2010 under Title 6 "Energy and Transport as line 06 04 14 04.
Conclusion : on a budgetary note, the consequences of the AL 3/2011 is characterised by a decrease of EUR 347.2 million in commitment appropriations and a decrease of EUR 346.2 in payment appropriations.
The European Parliament adopted by 546 votes to 88, with 39 abstentions a resolution on the Council's position on draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011 – all sections. Overall, Parliament proposes an increase in commitments of 0.8% in comparison with the 2010 budget. Aware of the pressures on Member States’ national budget, as a result of the crisis, Parliament broke with the tradition that it proposes a budget considerably higher than that proposed by the Commission.
The amounts are as follows: EUR 130.56 billion in payments and EUR 143.07 billion in commitments (in comparison with the Commission’s proposal which provided for EUR 130.14 billion in payments and EUR 142.56 billion in commitments). Parliament considers, however, that an arbitrary reduction in credits would compromise the implementation of the Union’s policies. This is why the reductions proposed by the Council, in the form of budget cuts, were rejected.
As far as Section III of the budget (Commission) is concerned, the key elements and the 2011 budgetary priorities may be summarised as follows:
A new procedure and a high-level commitment : Parliament is firmly convinced that the budgetary procedure under the new Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) requires full and high-level political involvement of all institutions concerned. It underlines that the conciliation procedure aims at reconciling the views of both branches of the budgetary authority and that the Joint Text on Budget 2011 will still have to be approved by both branches. It considers, in particular, the written procedure for the adoption of the Council's position to be particularly inappropriate for the budgetary procedure, and questionable in the absence of public and clear political endorsement by the Council at ministerial level.
A necessary “Lisbonisation” of the budget : overall, the plenary considers that the entry into force of the TFEU, which strengthens EU policies and creates new fields of competence - notably Common Foreign and Security Policy, competitiveness and innovation, space, tourism, the fight against climate change, social policy, energy policy, justice and home affairs - implies a "lisbonisation" of the budget and therefore requires that the EU should be endowed with the necessary financial means to attain its objectives and, therefore, requires both branches of the budgetary authority to be coherent and consistent as regards increased financial capacities.
New own resources: in an amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament recalls that, since 2007 (see resolution on the future of the European Union's own resources ), it has underlined that the current system of EU own resources - where 70 % of the Union's revenue comes directly from national budgets - results in the contribution to the European Union being perceived as an additional burden on national budgets. It calls for a clear and binding timetable to be set in order to agree on a new system of own resources before the entry into force of the next post-2013 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). It also expresses its willingness to explore all possible avenues in that respect and recalls, once more, that the EU budget should in no way be perceived and evaluated as a simple financial item added as a burden to national budgets but, on the contrary, is to be understood as an opportunity to gear up those initiatives and investments that are of interest and of added value to the EU as a whole.
Too restricted a budget to meet the challenges : the resolution recalls that, despite consecutive Treaty changes and increased responsibilities transferred to Union level, the EU budget amounts to a modest 1% of GNI. It opposes consequently the severe cuts adopted by the Council . It calls on the EU institutions to define a proper mechanism to evaluate and assess the ‘cost of non Europe’ which would highlight the savings in national budgets generated by the pooling of resources.
Vital budget priorities to facilitate economic recovery : Parliament recalls that youth-, education- and mobility-related policies have been identified by Parliament as its most important priorities for the 2011 budget. It reiterates its firm conviction that, in a context of scarce funds and global economic slowdown, the financing of EU policies should be closely monitored in order to avoid any expenditure which is not driven by a clear and identifiable objective. It also emphasises that an overwhelming part of EU budget expenditures supports long-term investments necessary to stimulate EU economic growth.
A budget with no room for manoeuvre : Parliament points out that the margins stemming from the MFF do not allow real room for manoeuvre, especially in subheadings 1a and 3b and heading 4, and reduce the capacity of the EU to react to policy changes and unforeseen needs while maintaining its priorities. It also points out that the scope of the challenges the EU faces, would require means well beyond the current ceilings of the MFF.
It recalls, in that respect, that a substantial budget review is absolutely needed and that an immediate revision of the ceilings of the current MFF, as well as some provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management has been rendered unavoidable by the various challenges and new priorities that have arisen. The plenary also recalls that the financing of its priorities and of the new policies stemming from the entry into force of the TFEU is rendered impossible by the ceilings of the current MFF. Parliament stresses that, in order to ease the negotiation on the budget within the Conciliation Committee, it has, at the price of severe compromises, proposed the financing of these policies within the ceilings. It points out, nevertheless, that this can only be managed through the decrease of appropriations on other, specific and carefully chosen, budget lines .
Creation of a guarantee fund : the plenary calls for the creation of a guarantee fund in the EU budget linked to the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism. Both arms of the budgetary authority could be involved in decisions concerning the activation of this mechanism. Any possible budgetary needs linked to this mechanism should be financed through an ad-hoc revision of the current MFF 2007-13 or the IIA to ensure that sufficient involvement of the budgetary authority is guaranteed on time.
Payment appropriations outstanding : as far as the payment appropriations are concerned, Parliament refuses to consider an overall figure of the Council's position as a final target arrived at by decreasing or increasing expenditure on different lines without in-depth assessments of the real needs . It points out that this practice of the Council may impact on the execution rate for commitments for the same year, by slowing down the rate of signing new contracts, especially in the final quarter, therefore disturbing multiannual life cycles of the EU programmes.
More concretely, the analysis of the budget line by line is as follows:
Heading 1a (EUR 13.485 billion ): the Parliament reaffirms its priorities for 2011, which are youth, education and mobility and indicates that these require substantial sums. This is why it increases the appropriations relating to the related programmes as follows: Lifelong Learning Programme (+ EUR 18 million), the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme (+ EUR 10 million) and Intelligent Energy — Europe programme (+ EUR 10 million). It also increases the appropriations for the European Employment Service (e.g. preparatory action ‘Your first EURES job’ and compensates for these increases by cutting the fusion energy research project "ITER" by EUR 47 million; Heading 1b (EUR 50.98 billion ): Parliament deplores Council's restrictive approach on payments, which were cut by EUR 1 075 million (half of which for the completion of the 2006-2010 programming period) as compared to Commission's forecasts of payment needs for 2011. These payments were already considered by the Parliament to having been underestimated. It restores Council's cuts in payment appropriations to the level of the draft budget (DB), while sticking to its initial position that Commission and Council should present and adopt swiftly an amending budget in case payment appropriations happen not to be sufficient to cover the needs. Parliament granted an increase of EUR 2.5 million increase for the Baltic Strategy; Heading 2 (EUR 59.875 billion) : given that the CAP's primary goal should be to provide market stability, food security, fair prices revenues for farmers, Parliament calls on the Commission to provide in the 2011 budget a financial buffer for the means necessary to make access to funding uncomplicated, should the market experience volatility in 2011. It also wants a new budget line for the dairy sector (+ EUR 300 million) fund to provide support for modernisation, diversification and restructuring and to improve marketing and the bargaining position of dairy farmers in the food chain. Parliament also increased appropriations for the School Fruit Scheme and the School Milk Scheme, as well as the programme for deprived persons. It also increased appropriations for the LIFE+ Programme (+ EUR 6.7 million) and support for fisheries management (+ EUR 2 million); Subheading 3a (EUR 1.139 billion) : here, Parliament focuses on the funding of actions for the fight against violence against women and children (+EUR 2.35 million) and for prevention of terrorism (+ EUR 1 million). Due to the poor level of information on the next steps of the SIS II project presented to Parliament,it considers a reserve for appropriations to be the most appropriate means of obtaining the requested information on necessary improvements; Subheading 3b (EUR 683 million) : Parliament recalls that heading 3b includes policies which have a direct impact on the daily lives of European citizens. It increases appropriation to support the World Special Olympics in Athens (+ EUR 4 million) to the Youth in Action programme (+ EUR 3 million). The plenary also awaits the Commission’s presentation of a comprehensive strategy on improved communication with EU citizens and on the creation of a European public sphere ; Heading 4 (EUR 8.683 billion) : once again, Parliament draws attention to the limited margins within which it is convinced that the role of the EU as a global player cannot be properly financed. It recalls that a review of the MFF and the revision of the ceiling of heading 4 to take into account the needs that have arisen and which could not have been foreseen in 2006 is a condition sine qua non for the manageability and sustainability of this heading. The financing of priorities can only be guaranteed through selected decreases of appropriations on a limited number of budget lines, in particular by reducing assistance to rehabilitation of Afghanistan and restoring appropriations for the Common and Foreign Security Policy at the level of Budget 2010. Parliament does not reduce appropriations for assistance to Palestine, the peace process and UNRWA even if the discrepancy between its global financial assistance and its limited influence in the region and in the Peace Process poses a problem. It reiterates its opposition to the proposed redeployment of appropriations from several instruments and programmes to Bananas Accompanying Measures and to the Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised Countries (ICI+), the financing of which was not foreseen at the time of the adoption of the current MFF. Parliament decides to i) put part of the appropriations for environment and sustainable management of natural resources, including energy, in reserve, pending a presentation by the Commission of a politically binding document demonstrating that the ‘fast start’ climate finance package is truly additional, ii) initiate a mainstreamed approach on EU support to Fair Trade across budgetary titles; iii) request the creation of a specific budget line on ‘Cooperation with the United States; iv) demand an increase of the financial envelope to support the Turkish Cypriot community. Concerning the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS), Parliament asks for an enhanced identification of CFSP and CDSP missions, in the interests of improved transparency and the facilitation of budgetary overview. Consequently, it decides to split certain budget lines in order to create separate budget lines for EUMM Georgia, EULEX Kosovo and EUPOL Afghanistan, which are the major missions conducted under CFSP/CDSP for the year 2011. The main changes are as follows: +EUR100 million to Palestine, the peace process and UNRWA, compensated by cuts in the Banana accompanying measures (-EUR 18 million), in the Cooperation activities other than Official Development Assistance (-EUR 23.5 million) and in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP - EUR 45.7 million). It should be noted that in an amendment adopted in plenary, Members ask why payments are still being made to retired Commissioners when they subsequently have alternative employment. They request the Commission to undertake a detailed review of current procedures and submit a detailed report to Parliament by 30 April 2011; Heading 5 (EUR 8.223 billion) : Parliament rejects outright Council's general position on heading 5 expenditure, which consists in an overall reduction of more than EUR 115 million. It stresses that such a restrictive approach, while resulting in short-term savings for the EU budget and the Member States, endangers the implementation of EU policies and programmes. It restores generally the cuts made by the Council, while putting in reserve the amounts corresponding to the 1.85% salary adjustment pending the judgment of the Court of Justice on this matter. It restores the Commission's Draft budget for all other abovementioned cuts except the one in respect of conferences, meetings and committees. It considers the cuts made to the budget of the European Schools to be unacceptable. It requests the Council to adopt quickly Amending Letter No 1/2011, so that the European External Action Service can start functioning with adequate resources at the very beginning of 2011. It decides to put appropriations in reserve pending further consultation of Parliament's relevant bodies by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the priorities to be realised by the resources freed by the merging of current Commission and Council structures.
As far as other sections of the budget are concerned, the resolution points to minor changes made to the budget as a result of the creation of new posts directly as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. The Parliament has restored some of the sums rejected by the Council in the budget for the institutions until the needs for each one are considered fully justified.
As regards the specific budget of the European Parliament , Parliament indicates that its budget will increase in 2011 to a bit over EUR 1.7 billion, 20.21% share of expenditure under heading 5 (administrative appropriations) of the MFF, i.e. in line with its previous resolutions to the effect that expenditure should be situated around the 20% mark. It stresses, in this respect that considerable increases of competences under the Lisbon Treaty with the resulting needs for personnel and other resources, have been absorbed into this amount (this budget has been reduced by EUR 25 million compared to the EP Bureau’s initial budget proposals). Overall, Parliament maintains its position that, in any event, a policy of identifying savings wherever possible and the continued pursuit of reorganisation and redeployment of existing resources are crucial elements of its budgetary policy , especially in this time of economic crisis.
On 15 September 2010, the Commission submitted to the Council letter of amendment No 1 to the draft budget (DB) for 2011. This concerns expenditure in Section II (European Council and Council), Section III (Commission) and new Section X (European External Action Service (EEAS)) of the EU budget and modifications to the corresponding establishment plans.
It relates to the creation of Section X (EEAS) in the DB 2011 with the appropriate budgetary structure and establishment plan.
The proposed expenditure amounts to EUR 475.80 million in c/a and p/a (of which EUR 82.15 million transferred from Section II, EUR 359.19 million from Section III, and EUR 34.46 million additional expenditure compared to the DB 2011). The establishment plan of Section X (EEAS) shall include the posts transferred from other institutions (411 posts transferred from Section II and 1 114 posts from Section III), as well as the creation of 118 additional posts compared to the DB 2011 (100 of these 118 additional posts were already accepted by the Council in its position on draft amending budget No 6/2010).
At the end of its examination, the Council agreed on its position on this letter of amendment . Letter of amendment No 1 to the DB 2011 as presented by the Commission is modified in order to take into account the Council's position on DB 2011. The total expenditure in new Section X (EEAS) will thus amount to EUR 469.85 million , by including:
the reduction in c/a and p/a (-EUR 5.60 million) already made in the Council's position on DB 2011 in Section II and Section III. In compensation, an equal reduction of the amounts to be transferred from Section II (-EUR 2.50 million) and Section III (-EUR 3.10 million), both in c/a and p/a, is made; a further reduction in c/a and p/a related to 118 additional posts (for a total amount of EUR 0.35 million) as the Council did not accept to include the 1.85 % increase linked to the adjustment of the 2009 salaries , pending the decision of the Court of Justice.
Council also agreed on the following Council statement on budget neutrality of the EEAS : the concept of budget neutrality should be seen in the context of resources within the EU budget, including when deciding on any new premises. It expects a report on an efficiency savings/redeployment plan early in 2011 outlining concrete steps to be taken in the short- as well as medium-term to progress towards budget neutrality.
The Council adopted its position on letter of amendment No 1 to the draft budget for the financial year 2011 on the basis of the aforementioned elements and as set out in the technical annex to this explanatory memorandum (see Council Doc 15000/10 ADD 1 ).
PURPOSE: presentation of amending budget N° 2 to the draft general budget 2011 for the EU - Section III – Commission.
CONTENT: the Amending Letter No 2 (AL 2) to the Draft Budget for 2011 (DB 2011) covers the following:
a reinforcement of the EU contribution to Europol by EUR 552 000, as well as modifications to the establishment plan of Europol, reflecting a request for four additional establishment plan posts (all AD posts); a reinforcement of the EU contribution to the three Financial Supervision Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) by EUR 1 224 000, as well as modifications to the establishment plans of the Authorities, reflecting a request for six additional establishment plan posts for EBA (of which 3 AD posts and 3 AST posts), six additional establishment plan posts for EIOPA (of which 5 AD posts and 1 AST post), and fifteen additional establishment plan posts for ESMA (of which 10 AD posts and 5 AST posts); the creation of a new budget item 01 04 01 03 for the guarantee provided by the European Union in accordance with the provisions of Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and, correspondingly, a new article 802 on the revenue side. This has no budgetary implications.
The net financial impact of this amending letter is EUR 1 776 000 , both in commitment appropriations and payment appropriations.
The Committee on Budgets adopted the report jointly drafted by Sidonia Elżbieta JĘDRZEJEWSKA (EPP, PL) - (Section III - Commission) and Helga TRÜPEL (Greens/EFA, DE) - (Other sections) on the Council's position on draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011 - all sections as well as Letters of Amendment 1, 2 and 3/2011 to the EU 2011 draft general budget.
Under Section III , the key issues and priorities for the 2011 budget may be summarised as follows:
A new procedure and a high-level commitment : the committee is firmly convinced that the budgetary procedure under the new Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) requires full and high-level political involvement of all institutions concerned. It underlines that the conciliation procedure aims at reconciling the views of both branches of the budgetary authority and that the Joint Text on Budget 2011 will still have to be approved by both branches according to their own rules and Article 314(7) of the Treaty.
Members consider the written procedure for the adoption of the Council's position to be particularly inappropriate for the budgetary procedure , and questionable in the absence of public and clear political endorsement by the Council at ministerial level of an essential piece of EU legislation.
“Lisbonisation” of the budget : importantly, Members consider that the entry into force of the TFEU, which strengthens EU policies and creates new fields of competence - notably Common Foreign and Security Policy, competitiveness and innovation, space, tourism, the fight against climate change, social policy, energy policy, justice and home affairs - implies a " lisbonisation " of the budget and therefore requires both branches of the budgetary authority to be coherent and consistent as regards increased financial capacities.
A tight budget : the committee recalls that, despite consecutive Treaty changes and increased responsibilities transferred at Union level, the EU budget amounts to a modest 1% of GNI. It opposes consequently the severe cuts adopted by the Council . The EU institutions are called upon to define a proper mechanism to evaluate and assess the "cost of non Europe" which would highlight the savings in national budgets generated by the pooling of resources.
Although Members consider that savings are necessary, they consider arbitrary reductions in payments appropriations not to be in line with sound budgeting and that arbitrary reductions in commitments appropriations jeopardize the implementation of Union policies and programmes already agreed.
However, MEPs understand the pressures on Member States' budgets and therefore broke with the tradition of suggesting a much larger budget than the Commission proposes, and increased it only very slightly. The committee agreed on a total of €130.14 billion in payments and €142.65 billion in commitments (compared to the Commission's €130.14 billion in payments and €142.56 billion in commitments).
Moreover, the budget should be viewed not as an additional burden to national budgets, but rather as an opportunity to gear up national initiatives and investments to which it can add value.
The report recalls that youth-, education- and mobility-related policies have been identified by Parliament as one of its most important priorities for the 2011 budget since they are essential and necessary parts of the EU strategy for the economic recovery and the Europe 2020 strategy .
Members reiterate their firm conviction that the financing of EU policies should be closely monitored in order to avoid any expenditure which is not driven by a clear and identifiable objective. They emphasise that an overwhelming part of EU budget expenditures supports long-term investments necessary to stimulate EU economic growth.
As regards the margins stemming from the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), Members state that these do not allow real room for manoeuvre, especially in subheadings 1a and 3b and heading 4, and reduce the capacity of the EU to react to policy changes and unforeseen needs while maintaining its priorities. They point out that the scope of the challenges the EU faces, would require means well beyond the current ceilings of the multiannual financial framework. They recall, in that respect, that a substantial budget review is absolutely needed and that an immediate revision of the ceilings of the current MFF as well as some provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management has been rendered unavoidable by the various challenges and new priorities that have arisen.
The committee recalls that the financing of its priorities and of the new policies stemming from the entry into force of the Treaty could not have been rendered possible by the ceilings of the MFF . It stresses that, in order to ease the negotiation within the Conciliation Committee, it has, at the price of severe compromises, proposed the financing of these policies within the ceilings. Members points out, nevertheless, that this can only be managed through the decrease of appropriations on other, specific and carefully chosen, budget lines.
Payment appropriations : as regards payment appropriations , the committee refuses to consider an overall figure of the Council's position as a final target arrived at by decreasing or increasing expenditure on different lines without in-depth assessments of the real needs. It recalls that this practice of the Council may impact on the execution rate for commitments for the same year, by slowing down the rate of signing new contracts, especially in the final quarter, therefore disturbing multiannual life cycles of the EU programmes.
New own resources : Members also wants to start talks with the Council and the Commission about new sources of income for the EU. It therefore added two new lines to the 2011 budget. One line asks the Council to open the negotiations on new own resources, adding that this element is a full part of the overall agreement on the 2011 budget. The other budget line asks the Council and the Commission to decide on mechanisms to facilitate the transfer of unused appropriations of year N in particular in the context of the revision of the Financial Regulations. Until now, money that is not used has been paid back to the Member States at the end of the year. The budget lines do not contain any figures.
Lastly, Members state that administrative expenditure supporting EU programmes should not be cut. Therefore, they restore all of the Council's cuts in respect of the administrative management lines of those programmes.
On the other Sections of the EU budget, the report outlines the minor changes regarding the creation of new posts as a consequence of the Lisbon Treaty.
PURPOSE: presentation of the amending letter No. 1 to the EU’s Draft General Budget 2011 - Sections II (European Council and Council), III (Commission) and X (European External Action Service - EEAS).
CONTENT: the Treaty of the European Union (TEU) provides for the creation of a European external action service (or EEAS) to support the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in fulfilling her mandate. The EEAS was formally created on 26 July 2010 with the adoption of Council Decision 2010/427/EU establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service.
In order to become established, this new institution needs to have its own budget structure. However, the draft budget for 2011 was adopted without an EEAS section. This amending letter therefore proposes, in line with the amending budget No. 6/2010 to create for the EEAS, this new budget section , with corresponding expenditures, effective from 1 January 2011.
The present amending letter provides the budgetary resources allowing a viable and efficient start-up in view of an autonomous EEAS as from 2011, by creating a fully-fledged budget section for the EEAS, while ensuring the smooth functioning and continuity of all ongoing activities.
The EEAS will operate with the means transferred from the Commission and Council , which have been responsible for most of the tasks to be performed by the EEAS until now. This implies that this proposal does not only create the 2011 draft budget for the EEAS, but also amends the budget sections of the Commission and the Council.
An efficient organisational structure within a context of fiscal consolidation:t he establishment of the EEAS has to be guided by the principles of cost-efficiency, budget neutrality, and sound and efficient management, also taking into account the impact of the current economic crisis on national public finances and the required efforts for fiscal consolidation. Transitional arrangements and gradual build-up of capacity will have to be used in the setting up of this service. Upon their transfer to the EEAS, each official will be assigned to a post in the function group corresponding to his/her grade. In addition, the EEAS will be gradually staffed with diplomats from Member States (temporary agents) and support staff. Once it reaches cruising speed, staff originating from the national diplomatic services is expected to represent one third of all AD staff.
Proposed budget for the EEAS in 2011: this proposal covers the transfer of staff and related appropriations from the budget sections of the Commission (Section III) and the Council (Section II) to the budget section of the EEAS (Section X). The budget sections of the Commission and the Council are reduced accordingly.
The amending letter also includes the full-year cost related to the additional staff requested in draft amending budget 6/2010 (see BUD/2010/2094 ), an additional requests for 18 additional new posts at headquarters (EUR 2 million additional expenditure in 2011) and for upgraded security of the EEAS premises (EUR 3.275 million additional expenditure in 2011).
The resulting administrative expenditure for the EEAS in 2011 amounts to EUR 475.8 million , of which EUR 184.9 million at headquarters (Titles 1 and 2 of the section X of the general budget) and EUR 290.9 million in delegations (Title 3).
Staffing : the total number of posts in the establishment plan of the EEAS is 1 643 : 1 114 posts are transferred from the Commission, 411 from the Council, 100 new posts requested in draft amending budget 6/2010, and 18 new posts requested in this amending letter. The additional 18 new post are requested at this stage to address the most urgent needs in relation to increased workload resulting from taking over tasks previously carried out by the rotating presidency and other tasks flowing from the Lisbon Treaty, and to consolidate the EEAS’s capacity to function autonomously.
In addition to the 1 643 posts in its own establishment plan, the EEAS will also have another estimated 2 077 full-time equivalent (FTE) human resources, including seconded national experts, contract agents, agency staff, and local agents (the latter only in delegations).
The establishment plans of Section II (European Council and Council) and Section III (Commission) of the general budget are reduced by the number of posts transferred to the EEAS, i.e. 1 114 posts from the Commission and 411 posts from the Council. The related appropriations are transferred to the EEAS from the relevant budget lines in the Council and Commission budget which are reduced accordingly.
Conclusion : this amending letter proposes amending Sections II (European Council and Council) and III (Commission) of the general budget to create a new section, Section X (European External Action Service) in the draft 2011 budget.
The proposed establishment plan of the EEAS includes:
1 643 posts, of which 1 114 are transferred from the Commission, 411 from the Council, + 1 00 new posts requested in draft amending budget 6/2010, and 18 additional new posts requested for 2011 ; 2 077 full-time equivalent human resources, including seconded national experts, contract agents, agency staff, and local agents (the latter in delegations).
The resulting administrative expenditure for the EEAS in 2011 amounts to EUR 475.8 million, of which
EUR 82.2 million transferred from Section II (European Council and Council), EUR 359.2 million from Section III (Commission), EUR 29.2 million requested as additional appropriations in relation to the full-year cost of the new human resources (100 new AD posts, 60 local agents in delegations and 10 contract agents at headquarters) requested in draft amending budget 6/2010, EUR 5.2 million requested for 18 additional posts and strengthened security of the EEAS definitive premises in 2011.
In total, amending letter 1/2011 provides for an increase to the 2011 budget of EUR 34, 461,399 .
This document is to be annexed to Council's position on the draft budget for the financial year 2011. It presents estimates of commitments, payments and contributions for the period 2010 to 2011, taking into account the forecasts of the European Investment Bank (EIB) concerning the Investment Facility.
As in previous years, this document sets out:
implementation of the EDFs (8th to 10th) at 31.12.2009; financial implementation forecasts for the current year; expenditure forecasts for 2011.
The Member States contribute funds directly to the European Investment Bank for the instruments which it manages under the 9th and 10th EDFs (the Investment Facility and interest-rate subsidies). Contributions for other instruments, including contributions for the old instruments managed by the EIB (risk capital and interest-rate subsidies), go to the Commission.
The Commission and the EIB have updated their commitment and payment forecasts for 2010 and 2011 for each of the ACP countries and the OCTs. The payment forecasts in particular have been compiled with great care with the aim of helping the Member States to assess as accurately as possible the amounts they need to earmark in their national budgets while ensuring that sufficient financial resources are available for the EDF to avoid liquidity problems.
As regards the financial implementation forecasts for 2010 and 2011, the report notes that:
that the new forecasts for the 2010 contributions confirm the Commission's needs at €3 500 million and the EIB's at €240 million . Note that these amounts are the same as those decided by the Council in November 2009; co ntributions for 2011 are forecast at €3 690 million for the Commission and €210 million for the EIB . The ceiling for the amount of contributions for 2011 is the result of a compromise proposal between the Member States and the Commission and the EIB.
The Council adopted its position on the draft budget for 2011.
The main features of the position are as follows:
Commitment appropriations: EUR 141 777.33 million; Payment appropriations: EUR 126 527.13 million.
Under the Council's position on the draft budget for 2011 adopted by the Council, commitment appropriations increase by 0.22 % compared to the 2010 budget and payment appropriations increase by 2.91 %.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the draft budget for 2011 corresponds to 1.02 % of EU GNI.
A. General respects : when adopting its position on the draft budget for 2011, the Council followed a number of guidelines:
shows due regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management; is within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2011 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in March 20101. to follow an approach leading to a budget that is realistic and comprehensively balanced , complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management. While recognising the efforts already made by the Commission in its draft budget, the need of additional efforts was underlined; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of the budget implementation rate in 2009, budget forecast alerts in 2010, realistic absorption capacities and performance information provided in the activity statements. This approach was also followed with regard to allocations for administrative expenditure arising from operational programmes and the expenditure of the executive agencies responsible for their management; to ensure a limited and controlled growth of payment appropriations in comparison with 2010 under all headings and sub-headings of the financial framework, adjusting the amounts on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts. This approach should be seen in the context of the budgetary constraints applied in all Member States. It also approved the following declaration on a specific procedure regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b: "The Council urges the Commission to present by the end of September 2011 at the latest updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment) and, if necessary, to present a draft amending budget for this sole purpose; to apply for decentralised agencies a similar approach as for the administrative expenditure of the institutions; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the financial framework, with the exception of subheading 1b, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations, while respecting the amounts in commitment appropriations proposed by the Commission regarding co-decided programmes.
The following principles have also been respected:
respect for the nomenclature proposed in the DB; creation of a new budget line for the preparatory action for the preservation of commemorative sites in Europe.
B. Expenditure by main headings of the financial framework : as to expenditure under the different headings of the financial framework the Council's position leads to:
Heading 1: Sustainable growth (EUR 64.361 billion in commitments):
1.a) competitiveness for growth and employment expenditure: the amount of commitments is set at EUR 13.390 billion , that is a total reduction of EUR 46.55 million in the appropriations requested in the DB in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities. The financial envelope is characterised by the following:
fixing the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 3.04 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. A total of 184 temporary posts for new agencies and agencies in charge of new tasks were accepted; setting the level of payment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 891.14 million in the appropriations requested in the DB of which EUR 62.40 million in the field of competitiveness, EUR 121.80 million in the field of transports, EUR 545.97 million in the field of research, EUR 50 million on the budget line for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and EUR 110.97 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a would be EUR 96.70 million.
1.b) cohesion for growth and employment expenditure: the Council provides an amount of EUR 50.970 billion in commitments which is the same amount as the Commission’s DB. It is also provided to set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 1 075 million while resulting in an increase of 13.97 % in comparison with 2010. This amount represents a reduction in payment appropriations concentrated in the field of the European Regional Development Fund (EUR 386 million), the European Social Fund (EUR 129 million), and the completion of the former programmes (EUR 560 million), representing a correction in budgeting on the basis of the available information. The Council also approved declarations on payment appropriations and on a specific procedure regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b.
The margin available under sub-heading 1b would be EUR 16.91 million.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 59.011 billion in commitments, that is a total reduction of EUR 474.64 million in commitment appropriations requested in the DB, of which EUR 38.75 million in the field of interventions in agricultural markets, EUR 420 million on the budget line for clearance of accounts and EUR 15.89 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and taking into account the available information related to some specific agricultural areas. The Council has decided to:
fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 0.46 million in commitments and EUR 0.31 million in payments as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. One temporary post was accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 820.71 million, of which EUR 38.75 million in the field of interventions in agricultural markets,EUR 420 million on the budget line for clearance of accounts, EUR 143 million in the field of Rural development, EUR 142.90 million in the field of European Fisheries Fund and EUR 76.06 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of past and current budget implementation.
These amounts estimated on the basis of past budget implementation and available information may be reviewed in the light of the Autumn letter of amendment.
The margin available under heading 2 would be EUR 1 326.40 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : the amount for this heading is EUR EUR 1.792 billion in commitments, split into 2 sub-headings:
3.a) freedom, security and justice expenditure (EUR 1.124 billion in commitments): for this sub-heading, the Council asks to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, reducing by a total of EUR 10.91 million commitment appropriations requested in the DB in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 8.36 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. A total of 90 temporary posts were accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 49.61 million in the appropriations requested in the DB on a number of budget lines on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The margin available under sub-heading 3a would be EUR 81.66 million.
3.b) citizenship expenditure (EUR 668 million in commitments), the Council aims to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, increasing by a total of EUR 0.16 million the commitment appropriations requested in the DB. This increase was the result on the one hand of slight reductions in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading on the basis of past and current budget implementation and on realistic absorption capacities and on the other hand of an increase of EUR 4 million for the financing of a preparatory action for the preservation of commemorative sites in Europe; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 1.49 million in commitments as a result of the approach followed for these agencies; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing by a total amount of EUR 19.30 million the appropriations requested in the DB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The available margin under sub-heading 3b would be EUR 15.02 million.
Heading 4: the EU as a global player : the Council provides an overall amount of EUR 8.520 billion in commitments. It has also decided to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, reducing by a total amount of EUR 93.74 million the commitment appropriations requested in the DB on a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and on realistic absorption capacities; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 0.9 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing by a total of EUR 590.90 million the appropriations requested in the DB, of which on the one hand EUR 387.90 million in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts, and on the other hand not retaining the amount proposed in the DB of EUR 203 million regarding the Emergency Aid Reserve. The Council also approved a declaration on payment appropriations.
The margin available under Heading 4 would be EUR 164.07 million to cover at a later stage additional needs.
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : amounts to EUR 8.093 billion in commitments. The Council has decided to:
limit the global increase of the administrative expenditure of the EU institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil service; set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; carry out targeted reductions under certain budgetary lines for all the institutions, taking into account the 2009 budget outturn and real needs; accept part of the appropriations related to the preparation of the accession of Croatia, on the basis of an accession in 2012; not accept the 1.85 % increase linked to the adjustment of the 2009 salaries included by some institutions in their draft estimate, pending the decision of the Court of Justice; increase the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for most of the institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate; not accept any new post requested by the institutions with the exception of the posts for the European Council which is a new institution; accept requested conversions, transformations, upgradings and transfers of posts.
Agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council applied a similar approach as for the institutions. Therefore, the increase was limited to 1.5 % compared to 2010 for the agencies at "cruising speed" and to 3 % for the agencies in charge of "new tasks". For the latter, half of the new posts requested were accepted. For "new agencies", the requests were accepted without changes, except for the Agency for the operational management of large scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice for which appropriations and posts are foreseen for 6 months.
A margin of EUR 322.77 million remained available under the ceiling of heading 5 of the financial framework.
The Council adopted its position on the draft budget for 2011.
The main features of the position are as follows:
Commitment appropriations: EUR 141 777.33 million; Payment appropriations: EUR 126 527.13 million.
Under the Council's position on the draft budget for 2011 adopted by the Council, commitment appropriations increase by 0.22 % compared to the 2010 budget and payment appropriations increase by 2.91 %.
The total amount of payment appropriations provided for in the draft budget for 2011 corresponds to 1.02 % of EU GNI.
A. General respects : when adopting its position on the draft budget for 2011, the Council followed a number of guidelines:
shows due regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management; is within the framework of the budget guidelines established for the 2011 budget in the Council conclusions adopted in March 20101. to follow an approach leading to a budget that is realistic and comprehensively balanced , complying with budgetary discipline and sound financial management. While recognising the efforts already made by the Commission in its draft budget, the need of additional efforts was underlined; to provide adequate funding for the European Union's various priorities, determining appropriations on the basis of the budget implementation rate in 2009, budget forecast alerts in 2010, realistic absorption capacities and performance information provided in the activity statements. This approach was also followed with regard to allocations for administrative expenditure arising from operational programmes and the expenditure of the executive agencies responsible for their management; to ensure a limited and controlled growth of payment appropriations in comparison with 2010 under all headings and sub-headings of the financial framework, adjusting the amounts on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts. This approach should be seen in the context of the budgetary constraints applied in all Member States. It also approved the following declaration on a specific procedure regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b: "The Council urges the Commission to present by the end of September 2011 at the latest updated figures concerning the state of affairs and estimates regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b (Cohesion for growth and employment) and, if necessary, to present a draft amending budget for this sole purpose; to apply for decentralised agencies a similar approach as for the administrative expenditure of the institutions; to leave adequate margins under the ceilings of the headings and subheadings of the financial framework, with the exception of subheading 1b, in order to be able to cope with unforeseen situations, while respecting the amounts in commitment appropriations proposed by the Commission regarding co-decided programmes.
The following principles have also been respected:
respect for the nomenclature proposed in the DB; creation of a new budget line for the preparatory action for the preservation of commemorative sites in Europe.
B. Expenditure by main headings of the financial framework : as to expenditure under the different headings of the financial framework the Council's position leads to:
Heading 1: Sustainable growth (EUR 64.361 billion in commitments):
1.a) competitiveness for growth and employment expenditure: the amount of commitments is set at EUR 13.390 billion , that is a total reduction of EUR 46.55 million in the appropriations requested in the DB in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and realistic absorption capacities. The financial envelope is characterised by the following:
fixing the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 3.04 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. A total of 184 temporary posts for new agencies and agencies in charge of new tasks were accepted; setting the level of payment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 891.14 million in the appropriations requested in the DB of which EUR 62.40 million in the field of competitiveness, EUR 121.80 million in the field of transports, EUR 545.97 million in the field of research, EUR 50 million on the budget line for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and EUR 110.97 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The margin available under sub-heading 1a would be EUR 96.70 million.
1.b) cohesion for growth and employment expenditure: the Council provides an amount of EUR 50.970 billion in commitments which is the same amount as the Commission’s DB. It is also provided to set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 1 075 million while resulting in an increase of 13.97 % in comparison with 2010. This amount represents a reduction in payment appropriations concentrated in the field of the European Regional Development Fund (EUR 386 million), the European Social Fund (EUR 129 million), and the completion of the former programmes (EUR 560 million), representing a correction in budgeting on the basis of the available information. The Council also approved declarations on payment appropriations and on a specific procedure regarding payment appropriations under sub-heading 1b.
The margin available under sub-heading 1b would be EUR 16.91 million.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources : the amount of this heading is set at EUR 59.011 billion in commitments, that is a total reduction of EUR 474.64 million in commitment appropriations requested in the DB, of which EUR 38.75 million in the field of interventions in agricultural markets, EUR 420 million on the budget line for clearance of accounts and EUR 15.89 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and taking into account the available information related to some specific agricultural areas. The Council has decided to:
fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 0.46 million in commitments and EUR 0.31 million in payments as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. One temporary post was accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 820.71 million, of which EUR 38.75 million in the field of interventions in agricultural markets,EUR 420 million on the budget line for clearance of accounts, EUR 143 million in the field of Rural development, EUR 142.90 million in the field of European Fisheries Fund and EUR 76.06 million on various other budget lines, on the basis of past and current budget implementation.
These amounts estimated on the basis of past budget implementation and available information may be reviewed in the light of the Autumn letter of amendment.
The margin available under heading 2 would be EUR 1 326.40 million.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : the amount for this heading is EUR EUR 1.792 billion in commitments, split into 2 sub-headings:
3.a) freedom, security and justice expenditure (EUR 1.124 billion in commitments): for this sub-heading, the Council asks to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, reducing by a total of EUR 10.91 million commitment appropriations requested in the DB in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 8.36 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies. A total of 90 temporary posts were accepted; set the level of payment appropriations, targeting a total reduction of EUR 49.61 million in the appropriations requested in the DB on a number of budget lines on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The margin available under sub-heading 3a would be EUR 81.66 million.
3.b) citizenship expenditure (EUR 668 million in commitments), the Council aims to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, increasing by a total of EUR 0.16 million the commitment appropriations requested in the DB. This increase was the result on the one hand of slight reductions in respect of a number of specific budget lines under this heading on the basis of past and current budget implementation and on realistic absorption capacities and on the other hand of an increase of EUR 4 million for the financing of a preparatory action for the preservation of commemorative sites in Europe; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 1.49 million in commitments as a result of the approach followed for these agencies; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing by a total amount of EUR 19.30 million the appropriations requested in the DB in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts.
The available margin under sub-heading 3b would be EUR 15.02 million.
Heading 4: the EU as a global player : the Council provides an overall amount of EUR 8.520 billion in commitments. It has also decided to:
set the level of commitment appropriations, reducing by a total amount of EUR 93.74 million the commitment appropriations requested in the DB on a number of specific budget lines under this heading, on the basis of past and current budget implementation and on realistic absorption capacities; fix the level of the appropriations for subsidies for decentralised agencies, reducing the appropriations requested in the DB by a total of EUR 0.9 million as a result of the approach followed for these agencies; set the level of payment appropriations, reducing by a total of EUR 590.90 million the appropriations requested in the DB, of which on the one hand EUR 387.90 million in a targeted manner over a series of budget lines, on the basis of an analysis of the 2009 budget implementation and the 2010 budget forecast alerts, and on the other hand not retaining the amount proposed in the DB of EUR 203 million regarding the Emergency Aid Reserve. The Council also approved a declaration on payment appropriations.
The margin available under Heading 4 would be EUR 164.07 million to cover at a later stage additional needs.
Heading 5: Administrative expenditure : amounts to EUR 8.093 billion in commitments. The Council has decided to:
limit the global increase of the administrative expenditure of the EU institutions, in line with the approach followed by the Member States for their national civil service; set the administrative budget of each institution at the appropriate level, taking into account their specificities and real and justified needs; carry out targeted reductions under certain budgetary lines for all the institutions, taking into account the 2009 budget outturn and real needs; accept part of the appropriations related to the preparation of the accession of Croatia, on the basis of an accession in 2012; not accept the 1.85 % increase linked to the adjustment of the 2009 salaries included by some institutions in their draft estimate, pending the decision of the Court of Justice; increase the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for most of the institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate; not accept any new post requested by the institutions with the exception of the posts for the European Council which is a new institution; accept requested conversions, transformations, upgradings and transfers of posts.
Agencies : as regards decentralised agencies, the Council applied a similar approach as for the institutions. Therefore, the increase was limited to 1.5 % compared to 2010 for the agencies at "cruising speed" and to 3 % for the agencies in charge of "new tasks". For the latter, half of the new posts requested were accepted. For "new agencies", the requests were accepted without changes, except for the Agency for the operational management of large scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice for which appropriations and posts are foreseen for 6 months.
A margin of EUR 322.77 million remained available under the ceiling of heading 5 of the financial framework.
PURPOSE: to present the draft budget of the Commission for the financial year 2011.
CONTENT: the Commission adopted the first draft budget of the "Lisbon era” - the draft budget for the financial year 2011. It is also the fifth budget under the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013 whose main objective will be to boost economic recovery, invest in Europe's youth and in tomorrow's infrastructures.
Budget details : out of a total of €142.6 billion, some €64.4 billion are geared towards economic recovery actions (+3.4% on 2010). Furthermore, the funds backing the flagship initiatives of the EU 2020 strategy (for growth) represent some €57.9 billion (some 40% of the Budget).
For payment appropriations, the total amounts to €130 136,0 million, corresponding to 1.04 % of GNI. This is an increase of €7 179.1 million compared to payment appropriations in the 2010 budget, and leaves a margin of €4 429,0 million under the ceiling.
The main budgetary priorities for 2011 : the main objective in 2011 will fully support the European economic recovery, strengthening and improving growth prospects. The EU budget has two main priorities:
Supporting the EU economy post-crisis : competitiveness for growth and employment, with €13.4 billion, and Cohesion for growth and employment, allocated with €51.0 billion, support the EU economy by reinforcing the conditions for future growth. Investments in research, development, and innovation, infrastructure and human capital are at the heart of economic modernisation and are reinforced through relevant key programmes. These actions are in line with the priority areas identified by the Europe 2020 strategy. In these key policy areas, the 2011 Draft Budget foresees significant increases in payment appropriations, delivering real implementation on the ground. In particular, increased payment levels for activities under Competitiveness for Growth and Employment and for Cohesion for growth and employment prove that these policies are implemented vigorously to accelerate the recovery process. Accompanied by actions in favour of education, training and lifelong learning, the European Microfinance facility and the support of programmes addressed to youth will contribute in consolidating our exit from the crisis and assist the younger generations. Reinforced payment levels for growth and employment are combined in the 2011 Draft Budget with stable funding levels for market related expenditure and direct aids under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as well as for rural development. Adapting to new requirements in the area of financial services and supervision : three new EU Authorities will assist national authorities in applying EU rules and link national supervisors into a strong EU network. The financial supervision authorities will be part of the European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS). In addition, the financing of Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) begins in 2011 with the allocation of €10 million. This initiative provides better environmental monitoring and management, and increased security. The substantial increase foreseen for the area of Freedom, Security and Justice (heading 3a, + 12.8% in commitment appropriations and + 15.4% in payment appropriations), and in particular for Solidarity and management of migration flows, reflects the importance attached to the implementation of the recently adopted ‘Stockholm programme’ for which an Action Plan has been proposed by the Commission. Other new initiatives are preparatory actions on ‘Mainstreaming climate action and adaptation’ (heading 2), the ‘European Year of Volunteering’ (heading 3b on citizenship) and, under heading 4, the new ‘European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps’. Finally, the sustained level of commitment appropriations for the EU as a global player (heading 4) will allow the Union, reinforced by the new European External Action Service, to continue to play its role on the world stage, including in the area of climate action (additional commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 65 million) further to the Copenhagen Accord reached in December 2009.
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS BY BUDGET HEADING: the presentation below is structured according to the budget categories of the financial framework 2007-2013:
Heading 1: Sustainable Growth : this section includes expenditure related to competitiveness, employment and cohesion:
1a Competitiveness for growth and employment : this sub-section brings together many of the flagship initiatives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy including ‘innovation Union’, ‘youth on the move’, ‘resource efficiency Europe’, ‘new skills and jobs’ and ‘industrial policy for the globalisation era’. The main programmes of this heading are the 7th Framework Programme for research and technological development (FP7), the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP), the Trans-European Networks (TENs), GALILEO/EGNOS and Marco Polo II, and the PROGRESS Programme. Other actions contributing to the goals of the priority themes of the Europe 2020 strategy concern the internal market, statistics, financial services and supervision, the fight against fraud, taxation and the customs union. Commitment appropriations for heading 1a are set at €13.436,9 million, which is a decrease of 9.6% compared to the 2010 budget. This leaves a margin of €50.1 million. Payment appropriations increase by 6.8 % to €12.109,7 million. The apparent reduction in commitment appropriations for this heading must be seen in the context of the inclusion in the 2010 budget of the second tranche of additional appropriations for the funding of energy projects to aid economic recovery, as mentioned above. Once this element is excluded, commitment and payment appropriations increase by 4.4% and 7.0 % respectively. 1b Cohesion for growth and employment : the sub-section covers mainly the Structural Funds (ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund). The commitments included up 3.2% to €50.970,1 million, which leaves a margin of €16.9 million. The payment appropriations rise 16.9% to €42.540,8 million. The substantial increase in the level of payments reflects the momentum of the Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 on the ground, and hence its contribution to economic recovery in Europe. Because the management systems and controls are in place and that programmes are on track, further significant increases in annual payment needs are expected towards the end of the current programming period. Overall and by their nature, the Cohesion policy objectives contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy in terms of promoting smart greener and competitive growth of regional economies based on knowledge, innovation and resource efficiency.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources : for 2011, the Commission proposes commitment appropriations amounting to €59.486.2 million for heading 2. This level of funding, stable compared to 2010, leaves a margin of €851.8 million under the ceiling. The margin increase compared to 2010 is due primarily to a decrease in interventions in agricultural markets (expected decline of approximately €900 million). The continuation of the progressive introduction of direct aid to the EU 12 countries as well as improving the situation on agricultural markets are the main factors behind this development. Payment appropriations amount to €58.136.7 million. The amount for market related expenditure and direct aid amounted to €43.747,4 million in commitment appropriations and €43.656,8 million in payments.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : this section is divided into two sub-sections:
3.a Freedom, Security and Justice : this sub-heading is devoted to activities in the area of freedom, security and justice. The year 2010 will correspond to an implementation consistent and reinforced by specific actions, grouped into three general programmess (Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows, Fundamental Rights and Justice and Security and Safeguarding Liberties). The PB provides a substantial increase in the sub-heading in the order of 12.8% to €1.135.3 million, so there remains a margin of €70.7 million. Payment appropriations are also subject to a significant increase of 15.4% to €852.4 million. It should be noted that the funds originally earmarked for the Information System (VIS) and the Schengen Information System (SIS) have been lower than originally forecast, totalling €60 million. Part of this allocation will be used to finance (up to €10.6 million) the new agency for the operational management of information systems to large scale. 3.b Citizenship : this sub-heading contributes to numerous Europe 2020 strategy flagship initiatives including ‘youth on the move’, ‘an agenda for new skills and jobs’, ‘European platform against poverty’ and ‘innovative Union’. In particular this heading covers issues which are of key concern to the citizens of Europe, including health, consumer protection, and civil protection. The crucial task of reaching out to the citizens and communicating Europe also fall within this heading, through the funding of cultural programmes and the policy area Communication. The commitment appropriations amounted to €667.8 million, leaving a margin of €15.2 million. Payment appropriations for this category fell by 3.1%, to €639 million. The annual limit for this section remains generally stable in the current financial framework. The Commission has deliberately kept a margin to account for unforeseen expenses and possible policy adjustments during budget procedure and, consequently, the level of commitments remain unchanged from 2010.
Heading 4: EU as a global player : Heading 4 shows an increase of 5.6% in commitment appropriations to €8 613.5 million, leaving a margin of €70.3 million under the ceiling. Payment appropriations decreased by 2.4% to €7.601,8 million. In 2011, the implementation of almost all programmes should continue at cruising speed. Based on the financial framework 2007-2013, the PB 2011 continues to meet the overall profile of the multiannual financial envelope allocated to the respective instruments. The major action planned for 2011 is the further intensification of bilateral, regional and thematic EU programmes. Additional efforts to address the causes and consequences of climate change in third countries will be increasingly financed from funds committed for annual action plans of the geographic instruments. The following should also be noted: (a) the strengthening EU commitments at the forthcoming UN conference on Millennium Development Goals (€65 million); (b) strengthening the support provided by EU to efforts in developing countries to address climate change (€65 million); (c) a new framework to support the economic and social development of the Turkish Cypriot community (€25 million).
Heading 5: Administration : commitments and payments increased by 4.4%, the first amounting to EUR 8255.4 million and the second to €8.256 million. Thus there remains a margin of €160.6 million. The Commission has made special efforts to reduce its administrative expenditure, which grew 2.9%, resulting partly from an increase in wages which were higher than expected in 2009. This moderate increase in administrative expenditure results also in the fact that the Commission is not requesting any additional posts. The Commission expects to achieve its priority objectives, including those arising from the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon by a major redevelopment effort. Section 5 also covers the administrative expenditure of other institutions based on their respective estimates. These estimates take into account the additional requirements associated with entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, particularly as regards the Parliament, the European Council and the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. The Commission’s draft budget was established without prejudice to the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS). This means that the funds and staff of the Commission who will be part of the EEAS will be included in the Commission’s request. Subsequently, when the EEAS will be established and the relevant section of the budget created, the posts and appropriations should be transferred from the relevant sections of the Commission and the Council by the use of a letter of amendment related to the draft budget 2011.
New budget procedure : the Draft Budget for 2011, as presented by the new Commission, marks the beginning of the first full budgetary procedure under the completely revised Lisbon Treaty provisions, on the basis of which a single reading of each arm of the budgetary authority will culminate in a Conciliation procedure in the autumn.
PURPOSE: to present the draft budget of the Commission for the financial year 2011.
CONTENT: the Commission adopted the first draft budget of the "Lisbon era” - the draft budget for the financial year 2011. It is also the fifth budget under the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013 whose main objective will be to boost economic recovery, invest in Europe's youth and in tomorrow's infrastructures.
Budget details : out of a total of €142.6 billion, some €64.4 billion are geared towards economic recovery actions (+3.4% on 2010). Furthermore, the funds backing the flagship initiatives of the EU 2020 strategy (for growth) represent some €57.9 billion (some 40% of the Budget).
For payment appropriations, the total amounts to €130 136,0 million, corresponding to 1.04 % of GNI. This is an increase of €7 179.1 million compared to payment appropriations in the 2010 budget, and leaves a margin of €4 429,0 million under the ceiling.
The main budgetary priorities for 2011 : the main objective in 2011 will fully support the European economic recovery, strengthening and improving growth prospects. The EU budget has two main priorities:
Supporting the EU economy post-crisis : competitiveness for growth and employment, with €13.4 billion, and Cohesion for growth and employment, allocated with €51.0 billion, support the EU economy by reinforcing the conditions for future growth. Investments in research, development, and innovation, infrastructure and human capital are at the heart of economic modernisation and are reinforced through relevant key programmes. These actions are in line with the priority areas identified by the Europe 2020 strategy. In these key policy areas, the 2011 Draft Budget foresees significant increases in payment appropriations, delivering real implementation on the ground. In particular, increased payment levels for activities under Competitiveness for Growth and Employment and for Cohesion for growth and employment prove that these policies are implemented vigorously to accelerate the recovery process. Accompanied by actions in favour of education, training and lifelong learning, the European Microfinance facility and the support of programmes addressed to youth will contribute in consolidating our exit from the crisis and assist the younger generations. Reinforced payment levels for growth and employment are combined in the 2011 Draft Budget with stable funding levels for market related expenditure and direct aids under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as well as for rural development. Adapting to new requirements in the area of financial services and supervision : three new EU Authorities will assist national authorities in applying EU rules and link national supervisors into a strong EU network. The financial supervision authorities will be part of the European System of Financial Supervisors (ESFS). In addition, the financing of Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) begins in 2011 with the allocation of €10 million. This initiative provides better environmental monitoring and management, and increased security. The substantial increase foreseen for the area of Freedom, Security and Justice (heading 3a, + 12.8% in commitment appropriations and + 15.4% in payment appropriations), and in particular for Solidarity and management of migration flows, reflects the importance attached to the implementation of the recently adopted ‘Stockholm programme’ for which an Action Plan has been proposed by the Commission. Other new initiatives are preparatory actions on ‘Mainstreaming climate action and adaptation’ (heading 2), the ‘European Year of Volunteering’ (heading 3b on citizenship) and, under heading 4, the new ‘European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps’. Finally, the sustained level of commitment appropriations for the EU as a global player (heading 4) will allow the Union, reinforced by the new European External Action Service, to continue to play its role on the world stage, including in the area of climate action (additional commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 65 million) further to the Copenhagen Accord reached in December 2009.
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS BY BUDGET HEADING: the presentation below is structured according to the budget categories of the financial framework 2007-2013:
Heading 1: Sustainable Growth : this section includes expenditure related to competitiveness, employment and cohesion:
1a Competitiveness for growth and employment : this sub-section brings together many of the flagship initiatives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy including ‘innovation Union’, ‘youth on the move’, ‘resource efficiency Europe’, ‘new skills and jobs’ and ‘industrial policy for the globalisation era’. The main programmes of this heading are the 7th Framework Programme for research and technological development (FP7), the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP), the Trans-European Networks (TENs), GALILEO/EGNOS and Marco Polo II, and the PROGRESS Programme. Other actions contributing to the goals of the priority themes of the Europe 2020 strategy concern the internal market, statistics, financial services and supervision, the fight against fraud, taxation and the customs union. Commitment appropriations for heading 1a are set at €13.436,9 million, which is a decrease of 9.6% compared to the 2010 budget. This leaves a margin of €50.1 million. Payment appropriations increase by 6.8 % to €12.109,7 million. The apparent reduction in commitment appropriations for this heading must be seen in the context of the inclusion in the 2010 budget of the second tranche of additional appropriations for the funding of energy projects to aid economic recovery, as mentioned above. Once this element is excluded, commitment and payment appropriations increase by 4.4% and 7.0 % respectively. 1b Cohesion for growth and employment : the sub-section covers mainly the Structural Funds (ERDF, ESF and Cohesion Fund). The commitments included up 3.2% to €50.970,1 million, which leaves a margin of €16.9 million. The payment appropriations rise 16.9% to €42.540,8 million. The substantial increase in the level of payments reflects the momentum of the Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 on the ground, and hence its contribution to economic recovery in Europe. Because the management systems and controls are in place and that programmes are on track, further significant increases in annual payment needs are expected towards the end of the current programming period. Overall and by their nature, the Cohesion policy objectives contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy in terms of promoting smart greener and competitive growth of regional economies based on knowledge, innovation and resource efficiency.
Heading 2: Preservation and management of natural resources : for 2011, the Commission proposes commitment appropriations amounting to €59.486.2 million for heading 2. This level of funding, stable compared to 2010, leaves a margin of €851.8 million under the ceiling. The margin increase compared to 2010 is due primarily to a decrease in interventions in agricultural markets (expected decline of approximately €900 million). The continuation of the progressive introduction of direct aid to the EU 12 countries as well as improving the situation on agricultural markets are the main factors behind this development. Payment appropriations amount to €58.136.7 million. The amount for market related expenditure and direct aid amounted to €43.747,4 million in commitment appropriations and €43.656,8 million in payments.
Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice : this section is divided into two sub-sections:
3.a Freedom, Security and Justice : this sub-heading is devoted to activities in the area of freedom, security and justice. The year 2010 will correspond to an implementation consistent and reinforced by specific actions, grouped into three general programmess (Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows, Fundamental Rights and Justice and Security and Safeguarding Liberties). The PB provides a substantial increase in the sub-heading in the order of 12.8% to €1.135.3 million, so there remains a margin of €70.7 million. Payment appropriations are also subject to a significant increase of 15.4% to €852.4 million. It should be noted that the funds originally earmarked for the Information System (VIS) and the Schengen Information System (SIS) have been lower than originally forecast, totalling €60 million. Part of this allocation will be used to finance (up to €10.6 million) the new agency for the operational management of information systems to large scale. 3.b Citizenship : this sub-heading contributes to numerous Europe 2020 strategy flagship initiatives including ‘youth on the move’, ‘an agenda for new skills and jobs’, ‘European platform against poverty’ and ‘innovative Union’. In particular this heading covers issues which are of key concern to the citizens of Europe, including health, consumer protection, and civil protection. The crucial task of reaching out to the citizens and communicating Europe also fall within this heading, through the funding of cultural programmes and the policy area Communication. The commitment appropriations amounted to €667.8 million, leaving a margin of €15.2 million. Payment appropriations for this category fell by 3.1%, to €639 million. The annual limit for this section remains generally stable in the current financial framework. The Commission has deliberately kept a margin to account for unforeseen expenses and possible policy adjustments during budget procedure and, consequently, the level of commitments remain unchanged from 2010.
Heading 4: EU as a global player : Heading 4 shows an increase of 5.6% in commitment appropriations to €8 613.5 million, leaving a margin of €70.3 million under the ceiling. Payment appropriations decreased by 2.4% to €7.601,8 million. In 2011, the implementation of almost all programmes should continue at cruising speed. Based on the financial framework 2007-2013, the PB 2011 continues to meet the overall profile of the multiannual financial envelope allocated to the respective instruments. The major action planned for 2011 is the further intensification of bilateral, regional and thematic EU programmes. Additional efforts to address the causes and consequences of climate change in third countries will be increasingly financed from funds committed for annual action plans of the geographic instruments. The following should also be noted: (a) the strengthening EU commitments at the forthcoming UN conference on Millennium Development Goals (€65 million); (b) strengthening the support provided by EU to efforts in developing countries to address climate change (€65 million); (c) a new framework to support the economic and social development of the Turkish Cypriot community (€25 million).
Heading 5: Administration : commitments and payments increased by 4.4%, the first amounting to EUR 8255.4 million and the second to €8.256 million. Thus there remains a margin of €160.6 million. The Commission has made special efforts to reduce its administrative expenditure, which grew 2.9%, resulting partly from an increase in wages which were higher than expected in 2009. This moderate increase in administrative expenditure results also in the fact that the Commission is not requesting any additional posts. The Commission expects to achieve its priority objectives, including those arising from the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon by a major redevelopment effort. Section 5 also covers the administrative expenditure of other institutions based on their respective estimates. These estimates take into account the additional requirements associated with entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, particularly as regards the Parliament, the European Council and the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. The Commission’s draft budget was established without prejudice to the creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS). This means that the funds and staff of the Commission who will be part of the EEAS will be included in the Commission’s request. Subsequently, when the EEAS will be established and the relevant section of the budget created, the posts and appropriations should be transferred from the relevant sections of the Commission and the Council by the use of a letter of amendment related to the draft budget 2011.
New budget procedure : the Draft Budget for 2011, as presented by the new Commission, marks the beginning of the first full budgetary procedure under the completely revised Lisbon Treaty provisions, on the basis of which a single reading of each arm of the budgetary authority will culminate in a Conciliation procedure in the autumn.
Documents
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: COM(2010)0601
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0372/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 15000/2010
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1199
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0284/2010
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary: A7-0284/2010
- Committee opinion: PE448.855
- Committee draft report: PE448.942
- Committee opinion: PE445.830
- Committee opinion: PE445.838
- Committee opinion: PE443.010
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1064
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE441.302
- Committee opinion: PE445.946
- Committee opinion: PE443.149
- Committee opinion: PE443.101
- Committee opinion: PE443.155
- Committee opinion: PE442.916
- Committee opinion: PE443.012
- Committee opinion: PE445.749
- Committee opinion: PE443.053
- Committee opinion: PE445.757
- Committee opinion: PE443.179
- Document attached to the procedure: 12700/2010
- Council position on draft budget: 12699/2010
- Council position on draft budget published: 12699/2010
- Committee opinion: PE442.807
- Commission draft budget: EUR-Lex
- Commission draft budget: COM(2010)0300
- Commission draft budget published: EUR-Lex
- Commission draft budget published: COM(2010)0300
- Commission draft budget: EUR-Lex COM(2010)0300
- Committee opinion: PE442.807
- Document attached to the procedure: 12700/2010
- Council position on draft budget: 12699/2010
- Committee opinion: PE443.179
- Committee opinion: PE443.053
- Committee opinion: PE445.757
- Committee opinion: PE443.012
- Committee opinion: PE445.749
- Committee opinion: PE442.916
- Committee opinion: PE443.101
- Committee opinion: PE443.155
- Committee opinion: PE443.149
- Committee opinion: PE445.946
- Committee opinion: PE441.302
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1064 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE443.010
- Committee opinion: PE445.830
- Committee opinion: PE445.838
- Committee draft report: PE448.942
- Committee opinion: PE448.855
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2010)1199 EUR-Lex
- Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0284/2010
- Amending/supplementary letter on draft budget: 15000/2010
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex COM(2010)0601
Votes
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 17/1 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 17/2 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 12 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 19 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 20/1 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 20/2 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 13 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 21/1 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 21/2 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 21/3 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 27/1 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 27/2 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 8 S #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 14/1 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 14/2 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 14/3 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 14/4 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 15 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 16 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Am 6 #
Rapport Jędrzejewska/Trüpel A7-0284/2010 - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
149 |
2010/2001(BUD)
2010/06/29
EMPL
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the aim of the Union’s 2011 budget is to build a future beyond the financial, economic, and social crisis,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Deplores the cuts under the budget headings related to the PROGRESS programme; maintains that in this instance substantial expansion is required, given that, because of the crisis, greater attention and support have to be focused on the social sectors encompassed within the PROGRESS programme;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points to the need to continue the studies and actions concerning the living conditions of posted workers, bearing in mind the current upward migration trend;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Proposes a pilot project to improve the health, well-being and safety at work of older workers and in that way respond to the challenges arising in the working lives of workers and employers on account of the population trend;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Proposes the continuation of the pilot project to encourage a change from insecure jobs to work with rights, this being a key issue where workers’ rights are concerned;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Proposes a pilot project intended to integrate successfully the 15% of young people who leave school early into the labour market;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas even before the crisis more than 84 million people, in other words 17% of the EU population, were faced with the risk of poverty,
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores the fact that only 1.4% of the appropriations under heading 1a have been set aside to implement the agenda for a social policy designed to facilitate the transition to a post-crisis economy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Maintains that budget allocations for social action need to be increased across the board; considers that the European Social Fund in particular needs to double in volume in order to cope with the social consequences of the crisis, especially unemployment and poverty;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Questions the substantial reduction in payment appropriations for the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), a decision at odds with the objectives of the 2020 strategy, which lays emphasis on lifelong learning and on developing workers’ skills as the most effective way to tackle unemployment;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Deplores, against the background of the large-scale restructuring of firms and mass redundancies, the failure to increase appropriations against the budget headings covering EURES and industrial relations and social dialogue; points to the need to boost the means of facilitating a return to work and to the important role that the social partners have to play in devising inclusive solutions;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the flagship initiative ‘Youth on the move’
source: PE-443.099
2010/07/19
ENVI
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the fight against climate change and the efficient use of natural resources are two priorities set out in the Europe 2020 strategy, and notes that the priority on climate action was also translated into the creation of a specific Directorate General dedicated to climate policy, mitigation and adaptation; considers nevertheless the fight against climate change as a horizontal priority in EU policies; notes that mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change in the EU budget is now a pending priority and recommends that relevant pilot projects and preparatory actions should also be prioritised;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the increase of the overall level of appropriations of the LIFE+ to EUR 333,5 million which represent an increase of 8,68% compared to 2010 budget levels and notes that this increase will finance an increase in the level of resources available for projects in all policy areas, including climate, an increase of 60 % of the resources available
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses again the need to raise public awareness of the harmful effects of tobacco consumption, including passive smoking, especially the exposure of children not only in public places but also at home and in private cars, and is concerned that the Community Tobacco Fund which grants financial support to information and education projects will come to an end in 2010; requests a new legal base to continue this successful awareness-raising instrument and calls on the Commission, i.e. DG AGRI and DG SANCO, to find a satisfactory solution to continue the campaign in the transitional period;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Expresses its concern about the planned decrease in commitment appropriations for public health, veterinary and phytosanitary measures to EUR 340 million, and stresses the need to remain vigilant with regard to animal disease eradication;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. With regard to the ambitious objectives set in the EU 2020 strategy related to climate change, there is a need for reinforced measures to be taken among which an increase in LIFE+ appropriations and in particular an emphasis on waste wood valorisation to energy and solar energy in order to preserve natural resources.
source: PE-445.842
2010/07/20
ECON
34 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises that the new financial supervisory authorities must be adequately financed and that additional tasks entrusted to them must be accompanied by the corresponding allocation of resources; underlines that there should be close scrutiny of the actual expenditure of each authority to ensure adequate budget monitoring and resources;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's proposed increase in commitment and payment appropriations for the European Fisheries Fund (EFF);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the proposed cut in commitment appropriations for support for the management of fish resources (improvement of scientific advice), since expanding fisheries research is an essential
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Deplores the reduction in the appropriations for the common organisation of the market in fishery products, which will result in constraints on the intervention mechanisms at a time when the latter are even more necessary in view of the persistent and worsening socio-economic problems in the sector; believes it is essential to devote more budget resources to this area in order to boost stability and yield in the fisheries sector;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the Community Fisheries Control Agency is becoming increasingly active, which is reflected in the increases in the proposed budget
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that, in order for the Union to be able to fulfil its international fisheries control responsibilities, the operational budget of the Fisheries Control Agency should be enhanced so as to allow it to charter the patrol vessels when necessary;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that, as in the case of the CFP, the funds proposed for the development of an Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) are not sufficient to cover the most important aspects of the launch of this new policy; calls for specific budget headings to be created for the European Union's new maritime policy, which must be endowed with the appropriations needed for successful development of the IMP
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the quality of EU statistics has to be improved and that
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1a (new) -1a. Rejects the severe cuts in the fisheries chapter in the Council's common position on the 2011 budget; deplores the Member States' willingness to reduce drastically the Community's already inadequate contribution to this sector;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Point
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Is concerned at the reduction in support for the most remote regions, especially in the case of the compensation regime in respect of the additional costs of disposal of certain fisheries products in the Azores, Madeira, the Canaries and the French departments of Guyane and Réunion;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deplores the lack of funding for a number of areas in which coordinated action at EU level is imperative, in particular for the dissemination of knowledge already gained about selective fishing gear and for the coordination of, and support for, applied fisheries research; stresses the need for R&D funding to build up expertise on all stocks and establish the average sustainable yield under the CFP.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Strongly deplores the Council's proposals to cut commitment and payment appropriations in the area of fisheries control, both as regards EU involvement in the tasks carried out by the Member States in this field and with respect to the Union's own control activities; points out that the Commission is already only able to provide funds for 20 inspectors, which is no more than a drop in the ocean as regards the urgent need to further expand the EU control network, given the scale of fishing activity and the expanse of EU waters;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Deplores also the Council proposal to cut the appropriations for the Community Fisheries Control Agency in Vigo in comparison with the Commission's proposal; points out that this Agency provides significant value added in that it helps coordinate EU-wide fisheries control;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Deplores the Council's proposal to make massive cuts in the resources to support Member States in the collection of scientific data; reminds the Council in this context that the database for fisheries policies decisions is currently highly unsatisfactory; also reminds the Council that European Commission support is all the more valuable since Member States are not always diligent in fulfilling their obligations to collect and transmit fisheries data;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers that, in the light of the fiscal constraints of many Member States, the Commission should provide a more detailed justification of proposed programmes and identifiable actions, especially where these require new budget lines;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fisheries and maritime policy proposals in the 2011 general budget despite the fact that the 2007-2013 multiannual financial framework does not
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Calls on the Council to review its position on the level of payments under the European Fisheries Fund (EFF), as ex post redeployment otherwise seems inevitable; condemns the Council's call to cut the budgetary resources intended to monitor the proper use of EFF resources.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Considers that "year-to-date" management accounting information would add clarity and aid scrutiny when setting priorities for future budgets.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's moderate fisheries and maritime policy proposals in the 2011 general budget despite the fact that the 2007-2013 multiannual financial framework does not take adequate account of the political importance of the common fisheries policy (CFP), in particular as regards the
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1a (new) 1a. Rejects forcefully, therefore, the cuts proposed by the Council, since the existing low level of funding for the CFP is such as to render unjustified, even in a context of economic difficulties, cuts such as those proposed, be it for administrative expenditure or for any other type of spending;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that any further cuts in EU funding are not conducive to sustainable development in the fisheries sector and should therefore be avoided;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's proposed increase in commitment and payment appropriations for the European Fisheries Fund (EFF); is, however, opposed to the severe cuts supported by the Council;
source: PE-445.849
2010/07/26
TRAN
36 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that financing transport should contribute to better integration of this sector in favour of a more efficient society as far as the economy, safety, social interests and the environment are concerned;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Finds the cuts in the area of education and culture proposed by the Council unacceptable for both political and technical reasons; is committed to restoring the figures in the Commission's Draft budget;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that there is great potential in the transport sector for action to combat climate change, and calls on the Commission to give priority to decarbonisation measures for all transport modes, based on the EU 2020 targets for overall CO2 emissions reduction;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the importance of the Erasmus and People programmes for the mobility of students, professors and researchers in Europe and for the modernisation of Europe's universities; urges Member States to support and promote the exchange of professors and assist the higher education institutions in addressing shortcomings in the recognition of qualifications acquired through student exchange, in particular in the context of the Erasmus programme, as these shortcomings may lower interest amongst students;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that there is great potential in the transport sector for action to combat climate change, and calls on the
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises th
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Insists on the necessity of a single interface to purchase tickets for all modes of transport, combined with clear information on the journey and on passenger rights in order to facilitate freedom of movement;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses shock at the cuts which the Council is proposing for the education programmes, given that this is completely at odds with its own statements concerning the importance of education in the context of the EU 2020 strategy and with the mobility objectives set as part of the Lisbon process;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the necessity to allocate sufficient financial support to elaborate the new competence for sport under Article 165 TFEU;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Finds that ICT education and training is vital to ensure that Europe develops new skills for new jobs and takes full advantage of the potentials of an ever more digital society; therefore suggests that EU programmes should contribute more to develop these skills; recommends that protection of personal data form an integral part of ICT-related programmes;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Finds that ICT education and training is vital to ensure that Europe develops new skills for new jobs and takes full advantage of the potentials of an ever more digital society; therefore suggests that EU programmes should contribute more to develop these skills, along with skills associated with the green economy and sustainable development;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Expresses deep surprise and concern at the Council's proposals to cut payment appropriations substantially against a number of budget headings, given that this will prevent funding which has already been pledged from being paid out in good time, with the result that it will have to be paid out with interest at a later date, increasing costs in the longer term;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Is concerned about the low level of appropriations for communication and the significant
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises the particularly important role sport plays in shaping a sense of European identity and developing further the concept of Union citizenship; emphasises, moreover, the power sport has to integrate people into society; points out that the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty offers no justification for cutting appropriations in the 2011 budget, but that instead the Union has an obligation to continue implementing the preparatory measures with undiminished commitment with a view to fulfilling its new tasks in the area of sport;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers, in this regard, that a transport policy package should include concepts of transport avoidance, modal shift towards more sustainable modes and improved sustainability of the entire sector, including barrier-free accessibility for persons with reduced mobility and those who are socially disadvantaged;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the lack of ambition in the Commission's Draft Budget for funding measures to achieve the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy adopted by the European Council; regrets in particular that no additional funds, beyond the financial programming, have been allocated to the areas of education
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises that following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty sport has become an area of Union competence, so that more resources than before need to be made available with a view to supporting measures in this area and gaining experience in preparation for the implementation of a fully-fledged sport programme as from 2012;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers it strategically important to make a greater financial commitment to promoting the European Union’s cultural heritage (both tangible and intangible), including in synergy with the Union’s newly acquired competence for tourism;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Asks that funding to promote sport and assist associations active in this area be increased, in view of the Union's newly acquired competence for sport;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Wishes to note that, given the current economic climate, it would be irresponsible to increase spending on non-essential programmes whilst, at the same time, seeing many Member States reducing their own public spending and freezing public sector workers' pay;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Requests moving the Media Mundus programme from subheading 3b back to heading 4, where the preparatory action was located, as this action has a strong international dimension, making it an element of the Union's foreign policy;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the lack of ambition in the Commission's Draft Budget for funding measures to achieve the headline targets of the Europe 2020 strategy adopted by the European Council; regrets in particular that no additional funds, beyond the financial programming, have been allocated to the area of education and training, despite their importance for Europe 2020 and the very high level of implementation; therefore calls for an increase in appropriations for the Lifelong Learning programme to help Europe meet its headline targets;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Is concerned that the cuts in payments proposed by the Council will lead to late payment and result in additional payments of interest rates and thereby in higher costs in 2012;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Given the new budget procedure and the economic situation, acknowledges the need to identify political priorities; emphasises, nevertheless, the importance of avoiding a shortfall in payment appropriations and the need to adopt an amending budget if necessary;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that restricting funding in the areas of culture, education, sport and youth policies sets a bad example to those drawing up national budgets in the Member States, as it sends a message that savings need to be made in these areas, which are fundamental to the implementation of the flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that, with a view to securing economic recovery in Europe, investment in transport, in particular the TEN-Ts, has a crucial role to play in driving forward growth and employment as well as in advancing Europe's economic and environmental interests;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to allocate more funding for the professional training of youth in order to facilitate their reorientation towards those areas of the economy that are functional and more viable in these times of economic crisis;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that, with a view to securing economic recovery in Europe, investment in transport, in particular the TEN-Ts, has a crucial role to play in driving forward growth and employment as well as in advancing Europe's economic and environmental interests; believes, accordingly, that, with a view to enabling the largest possible number of projects to be implemented, all possible funding mechanisms should be considered, including the creation of a European fund for transport;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Attaches great importance to investment geared to ensuring that all modes of transport are safe; recognises that the main safety problem is caused by the road sector, and that better working conditions for those employed in the entire sector will improve safety; stresses nevertheless that rail safety and interoperability in signalling should get a boost;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Attaches great importance to investment geared to ensuring that all modes of transport are safe; and points out the necessity of ensuring equivalent rights for all passengers in all modes of transport;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the "Youth on the Move" initiative; stresses however that it
source: PE-445.827
2010/07/27
REGI
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses concern at the low take-up rate of Structural Funds and calls on the Commission to identify the reasons for this; considers that achieving an optimum take-up of funds should be a political priority, particularly in the run-up to the next budget planning period;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for further simplification and clarification of regional policy practices and administration, so that all the appropriations set aside for regional development can be used more effectively and in a more result-oriented way, in order to achieve the EU 2020 objectives;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to undertake a pilot project aiming at promoting a common regional identity and reconciliation of nations, e.g. in the
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to undertake a pilot project aiming at promoting a common regional identity and reconciliation of nations, e.g. in the Danube macro-region, and drawing lessons from these experiences that can be taken into account in other potential macro-regions; considers that these pilot projects should consist of training programmes, seminars organised for young people with a view to fostering opportunities of cultural exchange and contributing to a progressive, sustainable,
source: PE-445.866
2010/07/28
AFCO
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas the current economic and Euro crisis facing the European Union has not only stressed the need for a more united Europe and greater cooperation between Member
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009 has brought about institutional changes favouring a more democratic Union, such as strengthened powers for the European Parliament and national parliaments and the creation of the citizens' initiative, which will require a comprehensive communication policy towards the citizens, as well as optimal operating conditions, so that they can make proper use of this new
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that the emergence of European economic governance and all the recent steps taken by the Member
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that at the moment when there is a need for a stronger financial support in favour of a communication policy aiming at both promoting the goals and benefits of the Union and at the same time allowing for a better understanding of its structures and of the possibilities for the citizens to influence its policies, with a view to strengthening their sense of European identity, the amounts proposed by the Commission in its draft budget for 2011 are either low, or even lower than in 2010; believes that discussion of this crucial challenge for European democracy must not be shirked in the debate on the financial perspective;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
source: PE-445.890
2010/08/16
IMCO
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out the importance of the budgetary allocation in chapter 02 03 of the Commission's
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks for the financing of a pilot project entitled 'Single Market Forum', an annual event
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers the slight increase in the amount, allocated to budget line 14 04 02 to the Programme Customs 2013 to be justified and appropriate to achieve the goals in this policy area, such as reinforcing security and protection of the external borders, supporting the fight against illicit trafficking and fraud and improving the efficiency of customs systems; supports the achievement of the
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Deems the amount allocated to budget line 17 02 02 in the field of consumer policy to be justified and appropriate to achieve an internal market with safe products and services, as well as equal rights for all consumers; emphasises the importance of close cooperation between the Community, Member States and third countries, including the United States, China and India on more effective enforcement mechanisms in order to attain greater consumer confidence; urges the Commission to develop a knowledge base and training programmes in the area of market surveillance; considers furthermore common efforts in the area of consumer education, in particular regarding financial literacy, a priority; calls also on the Commission to support the functioning of the Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network in order to enable a more efficient use of the CPC cooperation mechanisms by the enforcement authorities in the field of consumer protection in the Member States; recalls that the European Consumer Centres Network needs appropriate funding in order to promote consumer confidence in the single market; points out the important role of consumer organisations for awareness-raising in the Union and advocates the financing of their projects; accordingly, calls for a prolongation of the TRACE Programme which empowers consumer organisations through training activities to build up strong and efficient organisations and networks;
source: PE-445.907
2010/08/20
INTA
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the European Parliament has new powers in the field of international trade agreements; urges the Commission to fully respect Parliament's new prerogatives, particularly regarding transparency and flow of information; stresses that Parliament may use all means at its disposal if it is not satisfied with the way the Commission treats it in this respect;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Reiterates its declared aim to accompany WTO negotiations with a parliamentary process; stresses that there will be a continual future need to finance this crucial activity; notes that in 2011 there will be at least an Annual Session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO, either in parallel with the WTO Ministerial Conference - if it is organised - or otherwise in Brussels or Geneva and that there will be two sessions of its Steering Committee in Geneva;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Notes that the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO aims to enhance the transparency of the WTO; is determined to ensure sufficient appropriations including covering the defrayal of travel and subsistence expenses of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that, should a WTO Ministerial Conference be organised in 2011, Parliament would guarantee the reinforcement of budget line 3 0 4 4 in order to cover the costs connected with the organisation, in parallel, of a session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Points out that it is necessary to maintain funding for research and development in the field of poverty- related, tropical and neglected diseases; asks the Commission to make available the progress reports and the proposals for the follow-up of this action as soon as possible;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to clarify the way it is financing Aid for Trade and to ensure that this is not done at the expense of the development funds;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the proposal to amend the regulation creating an instrument for industrialised countries but resolutely opposes its being financed with appropriations programmed for use under the Development Cooperation Instrument; stresses that funds earmarked for development cooperation must target poverty alleviation; calls on the Commission to present, on a regular basis, detailed information on the budget lines which are used for financing the ICI; reiterates the need for a framework regulation on MFA, adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes note of the proposed increase in the draft budget for 2011, as compared to the budget for 2010, against the macro- financial assistance budget line (01 03 02); recalls that the mobilisation of this instrument for each third country falls under the ordinary legislative procedure and requests the Commission to provide further explanation on its proposed increase;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the proper functioning of the external business centres (Beijing, four locations in India and ASEAN trade Centre in Thailand) financed under preparatory action must be secured
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes note that the Commission has prepared the Aid for Trade Monitoring Report covering the operations in 2010;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. S
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the adequate financing of Banana Accompanying
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Firmly rejects any attempts to finance the programme for ACP banana- producing countries through redeployment of development appropriations within heading 4, in particular from the budget lines for development cooperation; is particularly opposed to the proposal in the draft budget to redeploy for this purpose EUR 13 million from the Development Cooperation Instrument and EUR 5 million from the Civil Protection Financial Instrument;
source: PE-445.882
2010/08/27
LIBE
15 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that, in the draft budget as proposed by the Commission, the budget for subheading 3a has been increased significantly compared to 2010, by 12.8% in commitment appropriations and by 15.4% in payment appropriations;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reminds the Commission and the Council that the revision of the Europol Decision1 in light of the Lisbon Treaty is a priority for the European Parliament, that it should be considered as a matter of urgency and that Parliament should be constantly and fully informed and involved; ________________________________ 1 Council Decision 2009/371/JHA of 6 April 2009 establishing the European Police Office (Europol) (OJ L 121, 15.5.2009, p. 37).
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that the increase in the appropriations concerning the agencies in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice is primarily intended for the education and development of skills of their staff, as regards their knowledge of, and monitoring of compliance with, Union law and international law;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls and reiterates its position on the necessity for Parliament to be informed in a reliable, precise, detailed and timely manner of the budget and execution of the budget throughout the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, and notably of the implementation of large- scale IT information systems, such as the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) and the Visa Information System (VIS)
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls and reiterates its position on the necessity for Parliament to be informed in a reliable, precise, detailed and timely manner of the implementation of large- scale IT information systems, such as the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for the budget planned for the Schengen Information System in 2011 to be held in reserve pending the publication of an audit covering the period since the inception of the SIS II programme (as voted on 5 May 2010 in Parliament's 2008 discharge) and the presentation of proof of substantial progress in the development of the platform;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the 19% increase in commitments and the 29% increase in payments for the European Fund for the Integration of Third-country nationals; underlines that this increase is justified by the proposals on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of seasonal work and intra-corporate transfers currently being discussed between Parliament and the Council.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that, in the draft budget as proposed by the Commission, the budget for subheading 3a has been
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Insists, however, that the projects must have reasonable and objectively justifiable funding at times of economic crisis and budgetary constraints, and must be focused on the priorities already identified in the Stockholm Programme; recalls that effective budgetary programming presupposes an efficient use of the funds already available;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the agencies of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice must have appropriate funding to enable them to carry out their activities, especially those agencies with new tasks; finds it regrettable that the agencies working in the field of policing have been treated differently from those working in the fields of migration and refugees, justice and fundamental rights, the funding for which is not commensurate with the Union’s new responsibilities in those areas;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the agencies of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice must have appropriate funding to enable them to carry out their activities, especially those agencies with new tasks; underlines in this context that it will be necessary to increase the 2011 Europol budget by EUR 600 000 in order for Europol to fulfil its function of verifying US requests for information as described in the TFTP agreement between the European Union and the United States of America;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the agencies of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice must have appropriate funding enabling them to carry out their activities, especially those having new tasks; in this regard, calls on the Commission to ensure that the European Asylum Support Office commences its operations in good time before 2011 and that sufficient financial resources are made available for the Office to start to perform its mandate;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the agencies of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice must have appropriate, reasonable and objectively justifiable funding enabling them to carry out their activities, especially those having new tasks as identified in the Stockholm Programme;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Insists that the agencies of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, in dealing with issues concerning fundamental rights and civil liberties, must have appropriate funding enabling them to carry out their activities, especially those having new tasks;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the imminent review of the mandate of the Frontex agency will include decisions which in due course will involve significant financial considerations, such as those concerning the ability of the agency to purchase or hire its own assets and equipment, and as a result emphasises the need to ensure that the agency has sufficient financial resources to be able to perform its mandate;
source: PE-445.965
2010/09/01
AFET
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that, in order to allow the EU to play a
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates that, in order to allow the EU to play an active role in the world, sufficient funds need to be provided in the EU budget; underlines that the allocation of additional administrative resources for the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS) must follow clear political priorities, such as conflict prevention, and be reflected in an appropriate increase of the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Understands that, at times of economic difficulties and budgetary restraint, efforts need to be made to identify possible savings
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Understands that, at times of economic difficulties and budgetary restraint, efforts need to be made to identify possible savings
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Reaffirms its support for the enlargement process and strongly disagrees with the decreases in operational appropriations relating to the Instrument for Pre-
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that the new budgetary procedure introduced by the Lisbon Treaty fully applies to the CFSP budget, and looks forward to cooperating with the High Representative/Vice President on increasing – in line with the commitment given by her vis-à-vis Parliament in the context of negotiations on the establishment of the EEAS – the transparency
source: PE-445.959
2010/09/08
AGRI
3 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the School Fruit Scheme and the School Milk Scheme are important programmes in terms of encouraging healthy diets amongst children; welcomes the Commission's proposed increase in funding for the School Fruit Scheme;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
source: PE-448.701
2010/09/13
CONT
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that the EU Budget can and should be used to support initiatives to promote the green economy, cohesion and trans-European networks which can enhance much needed employment in the current economic climate, and regrets the severity of the cuts proposed by the Council during the 2011 budget negotiations;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Article 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that the EU Budget can and should be used to support initiatives to promote the green economy, cohesion and trans European networks which can enhance much-needed employment in the current economic climate, and regrets the severity of the cuts proposed by the Council during the 2011 budget negotiations;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recalls its demands expressed in its resolution of 5 May 2010 on Commission discharge for the financial year 2008, and reiterates that despite some improvement in recoveries, concerns remain about the problems which subsist regarding irregularly disbursed Community funds and the poor quality of the information supplied on the correction mechanism applied at Member State level, and therefore draws all the more attention to the urgent need for a 100% recovery rate in respect of funds that have been falsely used;
source: PE-448.696
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
committees/20 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AD-442807_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-442916_EN.html
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-441302_EN.html
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1064/COM_SEC(2010)1064_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1064/COM_SEC(2010)1064_EN.pdf |
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-443010_EN.html
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-445838_EN.html
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/20/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-448855_EN.html
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/21/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1199/COM_SEC(2010)1199_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1199/COM_SEC(2010)1199_EN.pdf |
docs/22 |
|
docs/24 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2010-04-27T00:00:00New
2010-04-26T00:00:00 |
events/1/date |
Old
2010-08-12T00:00:00New
2010-08-11T00:00:00 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.807&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.179&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-443179_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.053&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-443053_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.757&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-445757_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.012&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-443012_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.749&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-445749_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.916&secondRef=02
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.101&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-443101_EN.html |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.155&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-443155_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.149&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-443149_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.946&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-445946_EN.html |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE441.302&secondRef=03
|
docs/14/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE443.010&secondRef=03
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.830&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-445830_EN.html |
docs/16/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.838&secondRef=02
|
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.942New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-PR-448942_EN.html |
docs/18/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.855&secondRef=02
|
docs/20/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0284_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0284_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101019&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-10-19-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs/20/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-284&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0284_EN.html |
docs/22 |
|
docs/22 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-284&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0284_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-372New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0372_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
BUDE/7/04374;BUDG/7/01917New
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
BudgetNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
8.70.51 2011 budgetNew
8.70.60 Previous annual budgets |
procedure/summary |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|