Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CULT | BELET Ivo ( PPE) | KAMMEREVERT Petra ( S&D), SCHAAKE Marietje ( ALDE), KIRKHOPE Timothy ( ECR), SOINI Timo ( EFD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 522 votes to 22, with 62 abstentions, a resolution on public service broadcasting in the digital era: the future of the dual system.
Recalling the crucial role that broadcasting plays with regard to European audiovisual production, the resolution notes that the co-existence of public service and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of freely accessible programming, which benefits all EU citizens and contributes to media pluralism, cultural and linguistic diversity, editorial competition (in terms of content quality and diversity) and freedom of expression,
Members reaffirm their commitment to the dual broadcasting system , in which private and public service media play their respective roles, independent of political and economic pressure, and call for access to broadcasting of the highest level to be ensured irrespective of consumers’ and users’ ability to pay. They reiterate the need to maintain strong and vibrant independent public service broadcasting , whilst adapting it to the requirements of the digital age, and calls for specific measures to be taken to attain this objective.
Member States are invited to:
ensure that there are sufficient resources to enable public service broadcasters to take advantage of the new digital technologies and to secure the benefits of modern audiovisual services for the general public; address the digital divide – for example between urban and rural areas – and to ensure that, with digitisation, all individuals in all regions have equal access to public service broadcasting; consider the possibility of making it easier for consumers to switch from analogue to digital television; define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original audiovisual production and high-quality programming and journalism regardless of commercial considerations or political influence; maintain a balance amongst the digital media services on offer , to ensure fair competition between public service broadcasting and private media intensify the cooperation between national media regulators within the European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (EPRA) and step up the exchange of experience and best practice in relation to their respective national broadcasting systems.
Recalling the commitments made in the context of the Council and Council of Europe, Parliament recommends that Member States respect European standards and provide appropriate, proportionate and stable funding for public service media. It calls on the Commission and the Member States to give the European Audiovisual Observatory a mandate to gather data and carry out research on the way in which the Member States have applied these standards. It urges that Member States be held accountable for failing to fulfil these commitments.
Parliament invites the Member States to deal with the problem of insufficient financing . It recalls the financial instruments offered by the EIB, and encourages public service broadcasters facing financial difficulties to apply for a soft loan from the EIB for the renewal of their infrastructure, particularly in connection with digitisation and innovation.
Members encourage the various stakeholders to intensify their cooperation with a view to safeguarding the dual system and, in particular, encourage public service and private broadcasters to cooperate with one another and with publishers in relation to content-sharing and innovative projects and to find ways of working together.
The Commission is invited to:
adapt copyright to the new digital era, launch an initiative bringing together different media actors in order to help identify possible areas of cooperation, facilitate exchanges of best practice and address relevant issues; ensure that content aggregators comply with the existing legal framework, and calls on it to consider ways in which search engines and internet service providers could contribute to the financing of content creation.
Lastly, Parliament underlines the importance of media education for the responsible use of services provided by content aggregators.
The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Ivo BELET (EPP, BE) on public service broadcasting in the digital era: the future of the dual system.
Members reaffirm their commitment to the dual broadcasting system , in which private and public service media play their respective roles, independent of political and economic pressure, and call for access to broadcasting of the highest level to be ensured irrespective of consumers’ and users’ ability to pay. They reiterate the need to maintain strong and vibrant independent public service broadcasting , whilst adapting it to the requirements of the digital age, and calls for specific measures to be taken to attain this objective.
Member States are invited to:
ensure that there are sufficient resources to enable public service broadcasters to take advantage of the new digital technologies and to secure the benefits of modern audiovisual services for the general public; address the digital divide – for example between urban and rural areas – and to ensure that, with digitisation, all individuals in all regions have equal access to public service broadcasting; consider the possibility of making it easier for consumers to switch from analogue to digital television; define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original audiovisual production and high-quality programming and journalism regardless of commercial considerations or political influence, which is precisely what marks them out as distinctive; notes that these remits should be defined as precisely as possible, but with due regard for the broadcasters' programming autonomy; intensify the cooperation between national media regulators within the European Platform of Regulatory Authorities (EPRA) and step up the exchange of experience and best practice in relation to their respective national broadcasting systems.
Recalling the importance of the Council of Europe's recommendations and declarations, Members are reminded of their commitment to these European standards, and recommends that they provide appropriate, proportionate and stable funding for public service media so as to enable them to fulfil their remit, guarantee political and economic independence and contribute to an inclusive information and knowledge society with representative, high quality media available to all.
The report invites the Member States to treat the problem of insufficient financing . It recalls the financial instruments offered by the EIB, and encourages public service broadcasters facing financial difficulties to apply for a soft loan from the EIB for the renewal of their infrastructure, particularly in connection with digitisation and innovation.
Members encourage the various stakeholders to intensify their cooperation with a view to safeguarding the dual system and, in particular, encourage public service and private broadcasters to cooperate with one another and with publishers in relation to content-sharing and innovative projects and to find ways of working together.
The Commission is invited to:
launch an initiative bringing together different media actors in order to help identify possible areas of cooperation, facilitate exchanges of best practice and address relevant issues; adapt copyright to the new digital era, ensure that content aggregators comply with the existing legal framework, and calls on it to consider ways in which search engines and internet service providers could contribute to the financing of content creation.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)1476
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0438/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0286/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0286/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE442.961
- Committee draft report: PE442.905
- Committee draft report: PE442.905
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE442.961
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0286/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)1476
Activities
- Roberta ANGELILLI
- Ivo BELET
- Martin EHRENHAUSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Emil STOYANOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
155 |
2010/2028(INI)
2010/07/08
CULT
155 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 16 December 2008 on media literacy in a digital world,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas public service broadcasting can make
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reminds Member States of their commitments to these European standards and
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reminds Member States of their commitments to these European standards and urges them to provide appropriate and
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reminds Member States of their commitments to these European standards and urges them to provide appropriate and stable funding for public service media to enable them to fulfil their remit, guarantee their political and economic independence, contribute to an inclusive information and knowledge society and avoid a
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reminds Member States of their commitments to these European standards and urges them to provide appropriate and stable funding for public service media to enable them to fulfil their remit, guarantee their political and economic independence, contribute to an inclusive information and knowledge society and avoid
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reminds Member States of their commitments to these European standards and urges them to provide appropriate and stable funding for public service media, without changing the law applicable to the private market, to enable them to fulfil their remit, guarantee their political and economic independence, contribute to an inclusive information and knowledge society and avoid a division between information haves and have-nots;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8а. Calls on the Member States to adopt the administrative and legal measures necessary to guarantee the existence of the dual system and to establish an approach that strikes a balance between public and private-sector broadcasters in full accordance with EU competition law;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the exchange of best practices between Member States on different levels (national media authorities, stakeholders, public service broadcasters' managers, independent regulators, viewers' and citizens' representatives);
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas public service broadcasting makes a vital contribution to European audiovisual production, cultural diversity and identity, information, pluralism, social cohesion, the promotion of fundamental freedoms and the functioning of democracy
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give a mandate, including the necessary resources, to the European Audiovisual Observatory to
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give a mandate to the European Audiovisual Observatory to
Amendment 113 #
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give a mandate to the European Audiovisual Observatory to monitor the way in which Member States adhere to these standards, bearing in mind the need for media impartiality, and insists that Member States should be held accountable for failing to fulfil these commitments;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to give a mandate to the European Audiovisual Observatory to monitor the way in which Member States adhere to these standards, and insists that Member States should be held accountable for
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Member States to end political interference regarding the organisation and content of services offered by public broadcasters and calls on the Commission to take measures where necessary;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Reminds the Member States that appointments to public broadcasting boards must be on the basis of merit;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Invites the Member States to support the idea of a European Network of National Controlling Authorities to provide a platform for the exchange of experience and best practices related to their respective national broadcasting system;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Encourages the implementation of the media pluralism monitor, an efficient tool to diagnose threats to media pluralism; supports the establishment of a centre/forum where European citizens, journalists and others can share concerns about threats to fundamental European values such as freedom of expression, press freedom and media pluralism;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas public broadcasters have a pioneering role in stimulating and utilising technological developments to offer their content to the public via innovative media and distribution techniques,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to give higher priority to the dual system as a part of the EU acquis during membership negotiations and insists that the progress achieved by candidate countries in this respect be
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Asks the Commission to monitor the implementation of the provisions of the AVMS directive regarding broadcasting time allocated to European programmes, given that certain Member States have failed to take any action in this respect;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges public service television broadcasters in the Member States to contribute items of European interest to the Euronews programme;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls further on Member States to adequately
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls further on Member States adequately to address the issue of underfunding of public service broadcasters, making sure that this does not overlap with the sources of funding for private broadcasters;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls further on Member States adequately to address the issue of
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Points out, in this context, that community broadcasters, especially in smaller communities, have problems with long-term financing (e.g. from advertising) and that there is potential here for using the new options available with digitisation in order to set up regional-level community broadcasting, covering a wide area;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that transparency of ownership of private broadcasters
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that transparency of ownership of private broadcasters is not guaranteed in all Member States
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the EU audiovisual landscape is unique, and is characterised by what has been described as ‘the dual system’ based
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that the transparency of ownership of private broadcasters
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that transparency of ownership of private broadcasters
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that transparency of ownership of private broadcasters is not guaranteed in all Member States, and calls on the Commission to monitor and support progress to this end; believes that the convoluted ownership arrangements applying to private broadcasters often create an illusion of media pluralism in individual Member States;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalls the financial instruments of the EIB, and encourages public broadcasters facing financial difficulties to apply for a soft loan from the EIB for the renewal of their infrastructure, in particular for digitisation and innovation;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the various stakeholders to
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the various stakeholders to cooperate and exchange best practices in order to ensure the sustainability of their respective business models and
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the various stakeholders to cooperate in order to ensure the sustainability of their respective business models and, in particular, encourages public and private broadcasters to cooperate with publishers on content sharing and to
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to launch an initiative bringing together different media
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to launch an initiative bringing together different media actors, to
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Dа. whereas, in the current media environment, it is in the general interest to preserve diversity and a balanced supply of both public and private-sector media,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Encourages the Commission to adapt copyright to the new digital era, allowing broadcasters to maintain a wide offer of qualitative European content and to consider in particular ways to facilitate the re-use of archive content and to put in place extended collective license-systems and easy one-stop-shop systems for the clearance of rights;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Welcomes the conclusions of the independent study conducted at the Commission’s initiative on defining indicators to measure the pluralism of Europe’s media;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls for exchanges of ideas between European media professionals on issues of common interest;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Urges the Commission to introduce training courses in Brussels or elsewhere in the Member States for public broadcasting journalists and managers;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. In
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to launch an initiative on a possible legal framework
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to launch an initiative on a possible
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas it is exceptionally important, for the existence and effectiveness of the dual system, that public and private-sector broadcasters should be on an equal footing,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to launch an initiative on a possible legal framework for content aggregators under which search engines would contribute to content creation in order to safeguard users’ rights and above all freedom of expression, privacy and personal data protection; calls in this regard for particular attention to be paid to questions of transparency relating to: 1. the terms and conditions of use of those services; 2. the decisions taken by the providers of those services; 3. fair representation of research findings, whatever its source of funding; 4. provisions on content;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Invites the Commission to launch an initiative on a possible legal framework for content aggregators under which search engines would contribute to content creation ensuring that the Internet mirrors the principle of the dual system and guaranteeing a desired level of media literacy over and above users' rights;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Emphasises the importance of media education for the responsible use of services provided by content aggregators;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Deplores the existing borders within the EU with regard to livestreams and online viewing of missed programmes from other EU countries; believes that this situation is no longer appropriate in the European Union in the 21st century and calls on the Commission to create a European framework for these problems as part of the concept of the Digital Agenda;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Invites the Commission to draw up a survey of the impact which the advent of 3D television will have on viewers and on journalistic practices;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Recommends that the Commission consider the possibility of introducing a European public radio broadcasting service;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas such a coexistence of public and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of programming, which benefits all EU citizens and contributes to media pluralism, cultural and linguistic diversity,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas such a coexistence of public and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of freely accessible programming, which benefits all EU citizens and contributes to media pluralism, cultural and linguistic diversity, editorial competition (in terms of content quality and diversity) and freedom of expression,
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas such a coexistence of public and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of freely accessible programming, which
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas such a coexistence of public and commercial broadcasters has ensured a diverse range of programming, which can benefit
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the Commission staff working document on media pluralism in the Member States of the European Union (SEC(2007)0032),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the EU attaches specific importance to the role of the dual system in contributing to the production and dissemination of EU content,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas changes in the audiovisual landscape in recent years, with the development of digital technologies, proprietary pay platforms and new media actors online, have impacted on the traditional dual broadcasting system, and linguistic diversity, editorial competition (in terms of content quality and diversity) and freedom of expression,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas changes in the audiovisual landscape in recent years, with the development of digital technologies, proprietary pay platforms and new media actors online, have impacted on the traditional dual broadcasting system,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas changes in the audiovisual landscape in recent years, with the development of digital technologies and new media actors online, have impacted on the traditional dual broadcasting system, even contributing to a significant decline in the market and working conditions for professionals in the area,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas changes in the audiovisual landscape in recent years, with the development of digital technologies and new media actors online, have impacted on the traditional dual broadcasting system, compelling public-service and private broadcasters to differentiate their operations and think of new distribution platforms,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas newspapers and magazines are essential components of a pluralistic and
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the traditional boundaries in the media sector can no longer be upheld in the online environment since traditional media cannot survive without expanding into new platforms (SMS services, internet pages, applications for smart phones, etc.) in line of the objectives of the EU's Digital Agenda,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ηa. whereas the spread of the new technologies changes the time, the method and the means of broadcasting information and is also essential in facilitating access for European citizens to the media and information,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas a democratic European society, the participation of citizens in public debate and access to information in the digital world depend on a vibrant and competitive audiovisual, online and written press
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a crucial asset in providing high quality, socially valuable programming that is largely independent of advertising revenues, while maintaining a public sphere in the digital era, which is characterised by audience fragmentation,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a crucial asset in maintaining a public sphere in the digital era, which is characterised by audience fragmentation, increasing media concentration, the rise of vertically integrated media companies, and a shift towards pay-services and encryption,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a crucial asset in maintaining a public sphere in the digital era, which is characterised by audience fragmentation, increasing media concentration, the rise of vertically integrated media companies and a shift towards pay-services and encryption,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas, in the digital era, which is characterised by audience fragmentation, public service broadcasting is a crucial asset in maintaining a public sphere in
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas public service broadcasting is a crucial asset in maintaining a public sphere in the digital era, which is characterised by a risk of audience fragmentation,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with fundamental, life-threatening problems, both financially and
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with fundamental
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with fundamental
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas broadcast
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with fundamental, life-threatening problems, both financially and politically, which poses a direct threat to the very existence of the dual system and European standards of press freedom and free expression,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K К. whereas public broadcasters in some Member States are confronted with fundamental, life-threatening problems, both financially and politically, and whereas more than 200 private-sector television channels shut down in 2009 because of the impact of recession on the advertising market, all of which poses a direct threat to the very existence of the dual system,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas commercial television has recently been going through economic hardship due to the advertising recession,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas it lies within the competence of the Member States to define the public service remit and to provide for
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas it lies within the exclusive competence of Member States to define the public service
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas it lies within the competence of Member States to define the public service remit and to provide for its funding according to the principles of the Amsterdam Protocol,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas public service broadcasting can be improved through the exchange of experience and best practice between the Member States,
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas public service broadcasters, with full editorial independence, have a particular responsibility to inform citizens about politics and policy making at European level,
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas public service media need sufficient public funding, participation in relevant new technologies and platforms and a stable and foreseeable regulatory environment, to enable them to fulfil their remit in terms of offering a high standard of cultural and news content,
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas broadcasting is still
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas public service media need sufficient public funding to enable them to fulfil their remit in terms of offering a high standard of cultural and news content, and as such to explicitly develop media literacy for the public benefit,
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas public service media need sufficient and balanced public funding to enable them to fulfil their remit in terms of offering a high standard of cultural and news content,
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas state aid to public broadcasters should be subject to the same scrutiny as state aid to other sectors,
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N a (new) Na. whereas in certain Member States public service broadcasting is not yet sufficiently socially embedded and does not have adequate resources at its disposal,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas the EU currently does not have the appropriate instruments at its disposal to monitor, and react to, threats to the public media and the dual system in Member States or specific regions of the EU, despite the existence and presence of bodies representing professionalsc in the area and the public,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O a (new) Oa. whereas the digitisation of audiovisual media and the switch to digital television by 2012, on the basis of Directive 89/552/EEC, are contributory factors in improving the quality of public and private broadcasting,
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms its attachment to the dual
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms its attachment to the dual broadcasting system, where private and public media play their respective roles, and access to
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas broadcasting is still the main source of information for most citizens in the EU and as such is uniquely placed to
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms its
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms its attachment to the dual broadcasting system, where private and public media play their respective roles independent of political and economic pressure, and access to information must be ensured irrespective of consumers’ ability to pay;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reaffirms its attachment to the dual broadcasting system, where private and public media play their respective roles, and access to information must be ensured irrespective of consumers’ and users’ ability to pay;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines in particular the fundamental role of the European dual system in
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines in particular the fundamental role of the European dual system in promoting democracy, social cohesion
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines in particular the fundamental role of the European dual system in promoting democracy, social cohesion and integration, as well as in preserving and promoting both media pluralism and cultural and linguistic diversity when it adheres to European press freedom standards;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that the coexistence of public and private media has broadly contributed to innovation and diversification of content and has had a positive impact on quality;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reiterates the need to maintain strong and vibrant independent public service broadcasting, whilst adapting it to the requirements of the digital age, and calls for specific measures to be taken to attain this objective;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring media content to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring high-quality media content to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere within the
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring media content of public interest and created according to European press freedom standards to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere with the aim of overcoming audience fragmentation;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring quality media content to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere with the aim of overcoming audience fragmentation;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring media content, on both national and European issues, to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere with the aim of overcoming audience fragmentation;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring media content to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere with the aim of overcoming risk of audience fragmentation;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Highlights against this background the specific mission of public service broadcasting in the digital era to bring media content to as many European citizens as possible and to maintain a public sphere with the aim of overcoming audience fragmentation; reiterates the importance for broadcasters to use available funds in order to ensure promotion of European activities, so that citizens can better understand the decision making process in the European Union;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls, in this regard, on public broadcasters to be structured in such a way as to offer attractive, quality online content in order to reach young people who access the media almost exclusively via the internet;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to address the digital divide – for example between urban and rural areas – and to ensure that, with digitisation, all individuals in all regions have equal access to public service broadcasting;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Urges Member States to consider the possibility of offering coupons or taking measures to offset the cost to users of conversion from analogue to digital television;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas public service broadcasting makes a
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3а. Calls on the Member States to ensure that there are sufficient resources to enable public-sector broadcasters to take advantage of the new digital technologies and to secure for the public generally the benefits of modern audiovisual services;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges Member States to precisely define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original audiovisual production and high-quality programming and journalism regardless of commercial considerations;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges Member States to define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original audiovisual production and high-quality programming and journalism regardless of commercial considerations and political influence;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges Member States to define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original audiovisual production and high-quality programming and journalism regardless of commercial or political considerations;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Urges Member States to define the remits of public service broadcasters so that they can retain their distinctiveness through a commitment to original
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that, according to the principle of technological neutrality, public service broadcasters, within the remit of their mission, must have the opportunity to offer their services, including new services, on all platforms, ensuring that they stay competitive within the market, but do not gain an advantage over the private sector;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls that terrestrial broadcasting platforms based on open and interoperable standards play a central role in the dual broadcasting system and are ideal to provide users with free basic services and easily accessible audiovisual media services, which can better cope with the fragmentation of local markets and thereby address local cultural and social expectations, and should consequently be preserved from the growing pressure of global players and exclusive proprietary platforms;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasises the lack of legal provisions in most Member States relating to public service broadcasting activities on the internet and that this could influence the sector’s ability to expand into new platforms;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C В. whereas both public service and private-sector broadcasting make
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the Commission broadcasting Communication of July 2009 and calls on Member States to implement its guidelines in order to maintain a balance amongst the digital media services on offer, to ensure
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes, at the same time, that it must be borne in mind that the role of the Internet is inevitable and that it requires both a national and a European regulation system concerning the content management and matters relating to authors' rights;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the recognition of the principle of technological neutrality and of the need to respect the editorial independence of public service broadcasters, taking due account of their need for stable and secured funding;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Points, however, to the enormous costs of (existing) ex ante tests and stresses its support for proportionate evaluations;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Recalls that terrestrial broadcasting platforms based on open and interoperable standards play a central role in the dual broadcasting system and are ideal to provide users with free and easily accessible audiovisual media services, which can better cope with the fragmentation of local markets and thereby address local cultural and social expectations;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls the body of Council of Europe recommendations and declarations, which have been agreed upon by all the EU Member States and which lay down European standards with regard to freedom of expression
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls the body of Council of Europe recommendations and declarations, which have been agreed upon by all the EU Member States and which lay down European standards by guarding the credibility of public broadcasting with regard to freedom of expression and media pluralism and the independence, organisation, remit and funding of public service media, particularly in the information society;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls the body of Council of Europe recommendations and declarations, which have been agreed upon by all the EU Member States and which lay down European standards with regard to freedom of expression, press freedom and media pluralism and the independence, organisation, remit and funding of public service media, particularly in the information society;
source: PE-442.961
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.905New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-442905_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.961New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-442961_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0286_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0286_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101122&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-11-22-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-286&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0286_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-286&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0286_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-438New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0438_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CULT/7/02205New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|