Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | KOŽUŠNÍK Edvard ( ECR) | COMI Lara ( PPE), REPO Mitro ( S&D), MANDERS Antonius ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | BÜTIKOFER Reinhard ( Verts/ALE) | Paul RÜBIG ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the future of European harmonisation standards, as a follow up to the Commission’s report on the application of procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations as laid down by Directive 98/34/EC.
Members welcome the Commission's intention to review the European standardisation system and to adopt and submit without delay a proposal for a modern, integrated standardisation policy, including a revision of Directive 98/34/EC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations. The Commission is called upon to accompany the proposal for the review of the current legal framework on European standardisation with a strategy document establishing a comprehensive framework for action at European and national level.
Parliament endorses the Commission’s intention to integrate into the legal framework of European standardisation the principles of the World Trade Organization's agreement on technical barriers to trade (transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, effectiveness, relevance and coherence) in order to reinforce their application within the European standardisation system. It considers that these principles could be complemented by additional attributes such as maintenance, availability, quality, neutrality and accountability. It stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that all stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standard-setting process within the European standardisation system. It considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of ‘appropriate representation’.
The resolution asks the Commission to identify, through its impact assessment in the context of the revision of the European standardisation system, the best way to reach this aim, evaluating the necessary funding to help SMEs. It stresses, that the development of European service standards, and the drawing-up by professional bodies of their own quality charters or labels at Union level should benefit further harmonisation in the services sector, increase the transparency, quality and competitiveness of European services and promote competition, innovation, the reduction of trade barriers and consumer protection.
1) Empowering the European standardisation system : Parliament stresses that the European legislator must be highly vigilant and precise when defining the essential requirements in regulation, while the Commission must clearly and accurately define the objectives of the standardisation work in the mandates. It stresses that the role of standardisers should be limited to defining the technical means of reaching the goals set by the legislator as well as ensuring a high level of protection.
Parliament maintains that it is of the utmost importance to draw a clear line between legislation and standardisation and reiterates that it is essential for European standards to be developed within a reasonable period of time. It recognises the importance of simplifying the procedure for establishing standards.
The Commission is also invited to:
develop and implement, in cooperation with the European Standards Organisations (ESOs), an improved and coherent system for coordinating standardisation policy and activities, which should cover all aspects of the standardisation process, from the preparation and delivery of mandates, through the monitoring of technical committee work, ensuring that the standards produced are consistent with EU policies and meet the essential requirements of the respective legislation, to the formal adoption, publication and use of the standards; revise and rationalise the process to deliver standardisation mandates to ESOs, so as to include a consultation phase with relevant stakeholders; present an action plan aiming at a more integrated EU standardisation system, more efficient and effective standard-setting, better access to standardisation, in particular for SMEs, a stronger EU role in standard-setting at international level and a more sustainable financing system for the development of standards; identify a procedure for ensuring that mandated standards comply with other EU policies and legislation beyond the scope of the ‘New Approach’; make decisions on formal objections to standards public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of all actions in relation to formal objections; present an annual report on the standardisation mandates and the progress on their fulfilment.
In this context, the report sets out a series of recommendations which aim to improve access to the standardisation process; enhance the national delegation principle; facilitate access to standards.
2) Standardisation in support of innovation and sustainable competitiveness : the report recognises that European standardisation is an important tool for promoting innovation, research and development (R&D) and contributing to the Union's competitiveness and the completion of the internal market. It stresses the need to improve mutual awareness and cooperation between standardisers, innovators, academia and the research communities. It calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with NSBs, to promote the inclusion of standardisation in academic curricula, education (e.g. economic and technical schools), lifelong learning programmes and information campaigns in order to raise awareness amongst current and prospective economic operators and policy-makers about the importance and benefits of standards.
The committee calls on the Commission to develop technology-watch activities so as to identify future R&D output that could benefit from standardisation. It stresses that the improvement of human health and living conditions implies developing products that can contribute to the healthy development of the population and improve accessibility, in particular for children and vulnerable people and considers, therefore, that there is an urgent need to integrate health aspects into all relevant products and services and that the European standardisation system needs to develop an improved system to ensure that such aspects are properly addressed when standards are developed.
Lastly, the report stresses the imperative need to adapt ICT standardisation policy to market and policy developments , which will lead to achieving important European policy goals requiring interoperability, such as e-health, accessibility, security, e-business, e-government and transport, and will contribute to the development of standards in support of personal data protection.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Edvard KOŽUŠNÍK (ECR, CZ) on the future of European harmonisation standards, as a follow up to the Commission’s report on the application of procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations as laid down by Directive 98/34/EC.
Members welcome the Commission's intention to review the European standardisation system and to adopt and submit without delay a proposal for a modern, integrated standardisation policy, including a revision of Directive 98/34/EC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations. The Commission is called upon to accompany the proposal for the review of the current legal framework on European standardisation with a strategy document establishing a comprehensive framework for action at European and national level.
The report endorses the Commission’s intention to integrate into the legal framework of European standardisation the principles of the World Trade Organization's agreement on technical barriers to trade (transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, effectiveness, relevance and coherence) in order to reinforce their application within the European standardisation system. It stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that all stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standard-setting process within the European standardisation system. It considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of ‘appropriate representation’.
Members ask the Commission to identify, through its impact assessment in the context of the revision of the European standardisation system, the best way to reach this aim, evaluating the necessary funding to help SMEs. It stresses, that the development of European service standards, and the drawing-up by professional bodies of their own quality charters or labels at Union level should benefit further harmonisation in the services sector, increase the transparency, quality and competitiveness of European services and promote competition, innovation, the reduction of trade barriers and consumer protection.
1) Empowering the European standardisation system : Members stress that the European legislator must be highly vigilant and precise when defining the essential requirements in regulation, while the Commission must clearly and accurately define the objectives of the standardisation work in the mandates. It stresses that the role of standardisers should be limited to defining the technical means of reaching the goals set by the legislator as well as ensuring a high level of protection.
The report maintains that it is of the utmost importance to draw a clear line between legislation and standardisation and reiterates that it is essential for European standards to be developed within a reasonable period of time. It recognises the importance of simplifying the procedure for establishing standards.
The Commission is also invited to:
develop and implement, in cooperation with the European Standards Organisations (ESOs), an improved and coherent system for coordinating standardisation policy and activities, which should cover all aspects of the standardisation process, from the preparation and delivery of mandates, through the monitoring of technical committee work, ensuring that the standards produced are consistent with EU policies and meet the essential requirements of the respective legislation, to the formal adoption, publication and use of the standards; revise and rationalise the process to deliver standardisation mandates to ESOs, so as to include a consultation phase with relevant stakeholders; present an action plan aiming at a more integrated EU standardisation system, more efficient and effective standard-setting, better access to standardisation, in particular for SMEs, a stronger EU role in standard-setting at international level and a more sustainable financing system for the development of standards; identify a procedure for ensuring that mandated standards comply with other EU policies and legislation beyond the scope of the ‘New Approach’; make decisions on formal objections to standards public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of all actions in relation to formal objections; present an annual report on the standardisation mandates and the progress on their fulfilment.
In this context, the Parliament sets out a series of recommendations which aim to:
Improve access to the standardisation process : Parliament encourages European and national standardisation bodies, therefore, to promote and facilitate effective participation in the standardisation process by all interested parties, in particular representatives of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and all stakeholders representing the public interest such as consumers (including people with disabilities and vulnerable consumers), environmentalists, workers and bodies representing other societal interests. Enhance the national delegation principle : the resolution notes that, although National Standards Boards (NSBs) constitute a core element in the European standardisation system, there are significant differences among them in terms of resources, technical expertise and stakeholder engagement in the standardisation process. It stresses that the existing inequalities create a significant imbalance in their effective participation in the European standardisation system. It asks the Commission and the ESOs to promote training programmes and to take all measures needed to enable weaker NSBs to assume a more active role in the standardisation process. Facilitate access to standards : Parliament maintains that users’ access to European standards developed in support of EU policies and legislation is an important issue that needs to be further examined. It takes the view that different systems of price setting should be considered for private/industrial standards and for harmonised/mandated standards. It calls, in particular, on NSBs to reduce costs through special rates and by offering bundles of standards at a reduced price, and to investigate additional ways of improving access, especially for SMEs. Members emphasise that standards should be comprehensible, simple and easy to use so that they can be implemented better by users and it underlines the importance of providing standards in all EU official languages in order to ensure proper understanding by users. The Commission is called upon to further support, and simplify the financial arrangements for, the translation of harmonised standards.
2) Standardisation in support of innovation and sustainable competitiveness : Parliament recognises that European standardisation is an important tool for promoting innovation, research and development (R&D) and contributing to the Union's competitiveness and the completion of the internal market. It stresses the need to improve mutual awareness and cooperation between standardisers, innovators, academia and the research communities.
The resolution calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with NSBs, to promote the inclusion of standardisation in academic curricula, education (e.g. economic and technical schools), lifelong learning programmes and information campaigns in order to raise awareness amongst current and prospective economic operators and policy-makers about the importance and benefits of standards.
Parliament calls on the Commission to develop technology-watch activities so as to identify future R&D output that could benefit from standardisation. It stresses that the improvement of human health and living conditions implies developing products that can contribute to the healthy development of the population and improve accessibility, in particular for children and vulnerable people and considers, therefore, that there is an urgent need to integrate health aspects into all relevant products and services and that the European standardisation system needs to develop an improved system to ensure that such aspects are properly addressed when standards are developed.
The resolution stresses the imperative need to adapt ICT standardisation policy to market and policy developments , which will lead to achieving important European policy goals requiring interoperability, such as e-health, accessibility, security, e-business, e-government and transport, and will contribute to the development of standards in support of personal data protection.
Lastly, Parliament urges all the Member States to ratify without delay the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and implement effectively its provisions with regard to the promotion of universal design principles in the standards-setting process.
PURPOSE: to report on the application of the procedures laid down by Directive 98/34/EC for standardisation and technical regulations between 2006 and 2008.
CONTENT: this report analyses the application between 2006 and 2008 of the procedures laid down by Directive 98/34/EC for standardisation and technical regulations. It highlights their important contribution to the implementation of better regulation and to the functioning of the single market.
The standardisation part of the report consists of the information procedure on standards, Commission requests to the European Standards Organisations (ESOs) for standardisation work (“mandates”) and formal objections against standards. They have proved to be an important element in the functioning of the single market.
Information procedure : the information procedure has brought transparency in standards and has encouraged National Standards Bodies (NSBs) to continue to take initiatives to promote European harmonisation. The information procedure still plays an important role in encouraging national standardisation bodies to bring their initiatives to European level. Enlargement has led to an increase in notifications from new Member States, which will stabilise and even fall as they become more fully integrated, thus following the trend led by older Member States.
Mandates : mandates have provided the means by which the relationship between the Commission services and standardisers is determined; the interface between the policy level and its technical expression. The process of mandating is well-established, but care must be taken to ensure it continues to operate smoothly. To this end, the informal consultation of all the relevant parties prior to the Committee consultation is essential and should continue. To improve transparency in the functioning of the Committee, the Commission services have from 2006 invited the European standardisation stakeholders, ANEC, ECOS, ETUI and NORMAPME, to participate in its enlarged meeting. For the sake of transparency the services of the Commission will consider the possibility of organising a written procedure inspired by internet forums. The objective will be to ensure that all committee members can read the observations of the other members, rendering this type of consultation similar to that held at the Committee meeting. The process of mandating has proved to be instrumental in enlarging the role of standardisation in new areas of EU legislation and policy. This is also reflected by the fact that a number of new EU legislative acts refer to the Directive.
Formal objections : formal objections have enabled Member States and the Commission to ensure that standards meet the goals of regulation when used for the purposes of “New Approach” legislation. The latter contain safeguards for cases where a harmonised standard cannot enable products to meet the essential requirements of the directives concerned. When such cases occur, the Member States or the Commission may introduce a formal objection to the standard in question on which the Committee is consulted. Although the process from receiving the objection to issuing of the Decision is quite time-consuming, the procedure in general has worked adequately. In a similar way to the mandates, and for the sake of transparency, the Commission will make decisions on formal objections public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of the actions in relation to the formal objections to the Committee at each meeting.
In the technical regulations part of the report , the Commission notes that the notification to the Commission of national technical regulations prior to their adoption has proved to be an effective instrument of prevention of barriers to trade and of cooperation between the Commission and the Member States and among the Member States themselves as well as improving the regulatory framework. Moreover, at the end of 2008, this procedure showed to be useful in preventing the emergence within the internal market of protectionist measures which might have been proposed by Member States in the context of the economic and financial crisis. The notification procedure has also been an important tool for guiding national regulatory activity in emerging sectors and improving the quality of national technical regulations - in terms of increased transparency, readability and effectiveness - in non-harmonised or partly harmonised areas. The greater clarity in the legal framework of each Member State has helped economic operators to reduce the cost of accessing the regulations and applying them correctly.
The report states that the Commission will remain vigilant as regards the principles of better regulation and the need to sustain a favourable environment for the competitiveness of the European economy. Therefore notified drafts continue to be available electronically, free of charge and in all the official languages of the EU. Moreover efforts will continue to provide economic operators with a legal framework that is as clear as possible, will continue to seek to avoid "goldplating" and provide with comments, aiming at enhancing the competitiveness of European enterprises in the EU and abroad, taking into account the links between this procedure and that established by the Agreement on technical barriers to trade (TBT) in the context of the World Trade Organisation
The Commission presents its report analysing the application between 2006 and 2008 of the procedures laid down by Directive 98/34/EC for standardisation and technical regulations. It highlights their important contribution to the implementation of better regulation and to the functioning of the single market.
1) Standardisation: this consists of the information procedure on standards, Commission requests to the European Standards Organisations (ESOs) for standardisation work (“mandates”) and formal objections against standards. They have proved to be an important element in the functioning of the single market. The information procedure has brought transparency in standards and has encouraged National Standards Bodies (NSBs) to continue to take initiatives to promote European harmonisation. Formal objections have enabled Member States and the Commission to ensure that standards meet the goals of regulation when used for the purposes of “New Approach” legislation. Mandates have provided the means by which the relationship between the Commission services and standardisers is determined: the interface between the policy level and its technical expression.
· On the information procedure , the report notes that the procedure still plays an important role in encouraging national standardisation bodies to bring their initiatives to European level. Enlargement has led to an increase in notifications from new Member States, which will stabilise and even fall as they become more fully integrated, thus following the trend led by older Member States.
· With regard to mandates, the report states that the process of mandating is well-established, but care must be taken to ensure it continues to operate smoothly. To this end, the informal consultation of all the relevant parties prior to the Committee consultation is essential and should continue. To improve transparency in the functioning of the Committee, the Commission services have from 2006 invited the European standardisation stakeholders, ANEC, ECOS, ETUI and NORMAPME, to participate in its enlarged meeting. The process of mandating has proved to be instrumental in enlarging the role of standardisation in new areas of EU legislation and policy. This is also reflected by the fact that a number of new EU legislative acts refer to the Directive.
· With regard to formal objections , although the process from receiving the objection to issuing of the Decision is time-consuming, the procedure in general has worked adequately. In a similar way to the mandates, and for the sake of transparency, the Commission will make decisions on formal objections public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of the actions in relation to the formal objections to the Committee at each meeting.
2) Technical regulations : the notification procedure allows the Commission and Member States to examine preventively the technical regulations Member States intend to introduce for products (industrial, agricultural and fishery) and for Information Society services. The notification to the Commission of national technical regulations prior to their adoption has proved to be an effective instrument of prevention of barriers to trade and of cooperation between the Commission and the Member States and among the Member States themselves as well as improving the regulatory framework. Between 2006 and 2008, the utility of the procedure has been fully confirmed in terms of effectiveness, transparency and administrative cooperation. The fact that, in relation to the number of technical draft regulations notified, the number of infringement proceedings remains minimal shows that the correct application of Community legislation can be ensured through a preventive approach and the close partnership between the Commission and the Member States as well as between the Member States themselves.
This networking approach and the high degree of cooperation between the Commission and the Member States have also ensured that national regulatory activities have been carried out without creating technical barriers to trade and that Community harmonisation has occurred only where really needed, in strict compliance with the subsidiarity principle. At the same time, in certain areas where harmonisation measures already exist, the procedure has allowed to detect the need to supplement or reinforce them.
When applying the Directive the Commission will remain vigilant as regards the principles of better regulation and the need to sustain a favourable environment for the competitiveness of the European economy. Therefore notified drafts continue to be available electronically, free of charge and in all the official languages of the EU. Moreover efforts will continue to provide economic operators with a legal framework that is as clear as possible, will continue to seek to avoid "goldplating" and provide with comments, aiming at enhancing the competitiveness of European enterprises in the EU and abroad, taking into account the links between this procedure and that established by the Agreement on technical barriers to trade (TBT) in the context of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)609/3
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0384/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0276/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0276/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE448.863
- Committee draft report: PE442.975
- Committee opinion: PE442.804
- Follow-up document: COM(2009)0690
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2009)0690
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2009)0690 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE442.804
- Committee draft report: PE442.975
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE448.863
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0276/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)609/3
Activities
- Stavros LAMBRINIDIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edvard KOŽUŠNÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mitro REPO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csanád SZEGEDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
186 |
2010/2051(INI)
2010/06/25
ITRE
68 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a -1a. Stresses that the new European standardisation model must contribute to European innovation and sustainable development, enhance the Union’s competitiveness, strengthen its place in international trade and benefit the welfare of its citizens;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Recognises the importance of simplification the procedure for establishing standards;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission to introduce into the standardisation part of the 98/34/EC Directive an explicit possibility for the Commission to issue mandates in certain sectors of the field of services;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Calls on the Commission to introduce into the legal framework the possibility to refer, only in the field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and only under the condition of the compliance with certain basic standardisation principles, to deliverables of fora and consortia;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes efforts by the European Standards Organisations (ESOs)
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes efforts by the European Standards Organisations (ESOs) and National Standards Bodies to include all stakeholders;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes efforts by the European Standards Organisations (ESOs) to include all stakeholders and ensure balanced representation; considers that thought should be given to setting an upper limit for participation by particular types of stakeholders on technical committees and working parties, so that SMEs, for example, are given fair representation;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes efforts by the European Standards Organisations (ESOs) to include all stakeholders and stresses the need to continually improve cooperation between standardization bodies, R&D and Academia from the early phases of standards´ development;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Invites the Commission and the Council to consider promotion of standards benefits for the economy and in society needs through information companies as well as through the education system;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Member States to support national/sectoral SME representative organisations, as well as other national societal stakeholders in national standardisation processes;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the important role played by stakeholder organisations pursuing interests of the public good such as ANEC, ECOS and ETUI-REHS, as well as the
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the important role played by stakeholder organisations pursuing interests of the public good
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the important role played by stakeholder organisations pursuing interests of the public good such as, but not limited to, ANEC, ECOS and ETUI- REHS, as well as the essential role played by NORMAPME, and calls on the Commission to
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges the important role played by stakeholder organisations pursuing interests of the public good on the European level such as ANEC, ECOS and ETUI-REHS, as well as the essential role played by NORMAPME; recognizes that their limited resources can hinder effective participation in the standard- making process, and calls on the Commission to earmark some of the financing
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission and all stakeholders to ensure the financial sustainability of the European standardisation system, including through public-private partnerships and through multiannual financial planning, which is essential to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for each of these stakeholder organisations to be given a
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for each of these stakeholder organisations to be given a single vote when it comes to the formal approval of European Standards; calls for the development of a fast-track conflict- resolution mechanism that can efficiently resolve disagreements in the setting of standards;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines the important economic benefits of European standardization, which enables companies to achieve a faster knowledge transfer, cost and risk reduction, faster time to market and a higher value for innovation;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to launch information campaigns on standardisation in order to raise awareness particularly within the R&D sector, academia and educational institutions;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to integrate the WTO principles (transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, efficiency, relevance and consistency) in the legal framework of European standardisation; also recalls that respect for intellectual property rights must underlie the future European standardisation policy;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recommends that the Commission include the issue of standardization in the next SME week;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Acknowledges that the complexity and cost of standards, and the need to participate in them, can represent an obstacle to SMEs;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the national standards bodies (NSBs) to provide SMEs with bundles of standards for reduced fees and to facilitate access to them, in particular by provid
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the national and European standards bodies
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the NSBs
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to integrate the WTO principles (transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, efficiency, relevance and consistency) in the legal framework of European standardisation particularly in Directive 98/34/EC; encourages the Commission to promote the principle of balanced representation in the European Standardisation System (ESS);
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses that the need to bring European innovation efforts to bear on global strategies to combat climate change and respond to the challenges of energy, society and the environment must also be reflected in the establishment of new guidelines for standardisation models;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the imperative need of adapting ICT standardisation policy to market and policy developments which will lead to achieving important European policy goals requiring interoperability such as e-health, accessibility, security, e- business, e-government, transport, etc. and contribute to the development of international standards for personal data protection;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Emphasis the role that relevant ICT stakeholder categories could play as advisory group to the Commission in developing a harmonized European ICT standardization policy platform;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Notes the increasing number of standards developed by industry fora and consortia, which are well-established global standardisation structures in the ICT sector; considers that the European ICT infrastructure cannot be realised without making more use of standards from industry fora and consortia;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 d (new) 7d. Calls on the Commission to put in place a mechanism for recognizing specific standards developed by industry fora and consortia which could have a significant impact on filling standardisation gaps and on the international cooperation in ICT standardisation matters;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 e (new) 7e. Calls on the Commission to enhance the coordination between the ICT fora and consortia and the formal standard- developing bodies which could increase interoperability and minimize the risk of duplication and conflict between standards in the ICT sector;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to develop technology-watch activities so as to identify future R&D output that could benefit from standardisation
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to develop technology-watch activities so as to identify future R&D output that could benefit from standardisation; calls on the Commission, in this connection, to promote easily accessible and user- friendly evaluation mechanisms via the internet;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls for a reform of the mandating process and its timetable, so that standards can be issued promptly to render European innovations marketable, thus enhancing the innovativeness of European industry;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Draws attention to the European Parliament’s April 2010 resolution on electric cars (B7-0261/2010), which stresses the need for effective standardisation processes in various areas to accelerate the market introduction of electric cars in the interests of competitiveness and the environment;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to integrate the
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Requests the Commission to place particular emphasis on standards in its Research Framework and Competitiveness and Innovation Framework programmes, and in particular to promote a systematic approach further upstream, between research, design and standardisation;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to consider implementing a 'relevance for standardisation' section in the evaluation of Commission-funded R&D projects;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the issue of standardisation is raised within the Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs programme;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 c (new) Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Calls on the Commission to use the New Approach and the New Legislative Framework as a model for a modernised ICT standardisation policy in support of EU policy;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 e (new) 9e. Calls on the Commission to make effective use of existing legal bases enabling information technology standardisation;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 f (new) 9f. Calls on the Commission to identify additional information technology sectors, areas or applications where effective use of EU standardisation could be used to support EU policies and to present appropriate proposals accordingly;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 g (new) 9g. Calls on the Commission to make sure that achievement of EU policy goals is not put at risk through uncoordinated standardisation efforts or competing or unnecessary standards, an excess of certification schemes, lack of trustworthiness of standardisation and verification, etc.;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to coordinate its standardisation activities with our international partners, and particularly the United States
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to coordinate its standardisation activities with our international partners
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that International Standards are enablers for a global market by virtue of the use of one identical standard in many countries, "performance-based" approach, consumer understanding and market confidence;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to coordinate its standardisation activities with
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to urge the adoption of the Communication on a more integrated European Standardisation System Revision of Directive 98/34/EC, Decision 87/95/EEC on ICT standardisation and on Decision 1673/2006 on the financing of European standardisation, as stated within the Working Program of the Commission for 2010;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Encourages the Commission, with this in mind, to consider and take the necessary measures to reinforce the influence of European standardisation at world level so as to enhance the competitiveness of its products and services in international trade;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to simplify procedures where possible, and specifically to take the ‘think small first’ principle into account in future changes;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges the Commission to submit without delay a proposal for a modern, integrated standardisation policy;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls on the Commission to provide an Action Plan aiming at a more integrated EU standardization system more efficient and effective standards- setting, better access to standardization, in particular for innovative and high-growth companies, a stronger EU role in standard-setting at international level and a more sustainable financing system for the development of standards;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) 10b. Recommends that a rapid conflict- resolution system be established to resolve certain problems inherent in the standardisation process;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Requests the Commission to set clear eligibility criteria for the organisations entitled to design standards;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the Commission's White paper on Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission to introduce into the standardisation part of the 98/34/EC Directive or its successor the obligation of the Member States to ensure that National Standards Bodies (NSBs) notify national standards on services;
source: PE-443.134
2010/09/15
IMCO
118 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) having regard to the Commission communication of 25 June 2008 entitled "Think Small First" - A "Small Business Act" for Europe (COM(2008)0394),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas it is necessary to develop a strategic approach to European standardisation and review the current system in order for it to remain successful and respond to the needs of the forthcoming decade,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Emphasises that standards should be comprehensible and easy to use so that they can be implemented better by users; considers it essential to reduce, where appropriate, the excessive number of cross- references between standards, and to address current difficulties in identifying the group of standards relevant to a given product or process; calls on the national and European standards bodies and trade associations to provide user-friendly guidelines for the use of standards, free online abstracts and better online access to consultation drafts;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Welcomes the ongoing initiative of the ESOs to draw up and publish on-line, without any access restriction, a summary of all their standards, and asks for the fast completion of this project; stresses, however, that this project should be also implemented at national level, in order to enable standards users to obtain information on the items covered by each standard in their own language via the web-site of NSBs;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new) 25b. Underlines the importance of providing standards into all EU official languages in order to ensure proper understanding by users; calls on the Commission to further support, and simplify the financial arrangements for, the translation of harmonised standards;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new) 25c. Recognises that European standardisation is an important tool for promoting innovation, research and development, contributing to the EU's competitiveness and the completion of the internal market;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Stresses the need to promote the inclusion of standardisation in academic curricula, education and lifelong learning programmes in order to raise awareness amongst current and prospective economic operators and policy makers about the importance and benefits of standards; encourages actions aimed to assess, quantify and communicate the economic and social benefits of standardisation;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new) 26b. Stresses the need to promote the inclusion of standardisation in education programmes and academic curricula in order to familiarise students with the strategic benefits of standardisation; encourages the development of studies and surveys to assess, quantify and communicate the economic and social benefits of standards;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new) 26c. Calls on the Member States, in cooperation with NSBs, to increase awareness among SMEs of the economic advantages arising from the use of standards, through training and information campaigns;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 d (new) 26d. Calls on Member States and the European Commission to promote education about the role of standards and the benefits of using them at all levels, in economic and technical schools for instance; invites NSBs to enhance their cooperation with trade associations in order to provide plausible information to SMEs on the benefits provided by standards;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 e (new) 26e. Believes that the European programmes for innovation and research can provide an important contribution to the standardisation process by devoting a chapter to "research and standardisation"; considers that such a measure would contribute financially to the system, while at the same time increasing the knowledge of the operators involved;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Reaffirms that tackling climate change and other future global energy and environmental challenges implies developing and promoting clean technologies and green products; considers, therefore, that there is an urgent need to integrate environmental aspects into all relevant products and services, and that the European Standardisation System needs to develop an improved system to ensure such aspects are properly addressed when standards are developed; stresses the need to promote the active involvement in standardisation committees – at national and European level – of environmental organisations and public authorities responsible for environmental protection;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's intention to review the European Standardisation System with a view to preserving its many successful elements, improving its deficiencies and striking the right balance between the European and national
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Points out that both intellectual property rights (IPRs) and standardisation encourage innovation and facilitate the dissemination of technology; emphasises that a correct balance should be established between the interests of the users of standards and the rights of owners of intellectual property; calls on European and national standards bodies to be particularly vigilant when developing standards based on proprietary technologies, in order to allow broad access to all users; stresses the need to ensure that licenses for any essential IPRs contained in standards are provided on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions; encourages owners of intellectual property to apply royalty-free policies in order to promote the broad implementation of the standards;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recognises that fora and consortia contribute considerably to the standardisation system by providing specifications with global relevance, which are often more receptive to innovative technologies; points out that, most notably in the ICT sector, a number of fora and consortia have evolved into global organisations producing widely implemented specifications on the basis of open, transparent and consensus-based development processes; believes that the ESOs and fora/consortia must find ways of cooperating in planning their activities by transferring standards to the most appropriate level, international or European, in order to ensure coherence and avoid fragmentation or duplication; calls on the ESOs to develop and implement an improved mechanism for the adoption of fora/consortia specifications as European
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Recognises that fora and consortia contribute considerably to the standardisation system by providing specifications with global relevance, which are often more receptive to innovative technologies; points out that, most notably in the ICT sector, a number of fora and consortia have evolved into global organisations producing widely implemented specifications on the basis of open, transparent and consensus-based development processes; believes that the ESOs and fora/consortia must find ways of cooperating in planning their activities by transferring standards to the most appropriate level, international or European, in order to ensure coherence and avoid fragmentation or duplication; calls on the ESOs to develop and implement an improved mechanism for the adoption of fora/consortia specifications as European standards, which should not restrict the possibility of submitting them directly to international standards organisations in order to seek more global status, provided that this complies with the principles set out in the World Trade Organization's agreement on technical barriers to trade: transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, efficiency, relevance and consistency;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Recognises that interoperability is key to innovation and competitiveness, especially in the ICT sector, where fora and consortia play a fundamental role; points out that interoperability depends not only on standard/specification definitions but also on the implementation of such standard/specifications by users; acknowledges the important role played by user driven fora and consortia to achieve interoperability;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Emphasises the need to safeguard and enhance Europe
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Emphasises that the regulatory dialogue is an important aspect of the external dimension of the Internal Market and considers thus the need to safeguard and enhance the European standardisation system's position in the international standardisation environment in order to promote the development of international standards with genuine global relevance, facilitate trade and increase European competitiveness;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Emphasises the need to safeguard and enhance Europe's position in the international standardisation environment in order to promote the development of international standards with genuine global relevance, facilitate trade and increase European competitiveness, whilst taking into account the legitimate interests of the development countries;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Emphasises the need to safeguard and enhance
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Supports the secondment of two European standardisation experts to China and India with the aim to support the ESOs, promote European standards and provide feedback on the standardisation systems of these countries;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission's intention to review the European Standardisation System with a view to preserving its many successful elements, improving its deficiencies and striking the right balance between the European
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the Commission white paper on ‘Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU – The Way Forward’ (COM(2009)0324); calls on the Member States and the Commission to implement the key recommendations outlined in the white paper in order to ensure the availability of relevant global ICT standards for implementation and use in EU policies and public procurement;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Endorses the Commission's intention to
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Holds the view that the integration of the WTO principles in the legal framework should not increase the number of recognised European standardisation organisations (ESOs) beyond the three existing ones, namely CEN, CENELEC, and the European Telecom Standards Institute (ETSI),
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Considers that these principles could be complemented by additional attributes such as maintenance, availability, quality, neutrality and accountability; believes that all those principles need to be further detailed and defined, and a specific monitoring system must be introduced to ensure their implementation at national and European level in the development of standards in support of EU policies and legislation;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societal stakeholders – in particular
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) having regard to the Commission communication of 25 June 2008 entitled “Think Small First” - A “Small Business Act” for Europe (COM(2008)0394),
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societal stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standardisation process; considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societal stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standardisation process; considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of "
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societal stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societal stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standardisation process; considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of ‘balanced representation’, given that it is of the utmost importance, whenever the public interest is concerned, to incorporate all stakeholder positions in a balanced manner, especially in the development of standards intended to support EU legislation and policies; the principle of ‘balanced representation’ should be underpinned by the establishment of some form of contribution towards participation in standardisation work by societal stakeholders that ought to be involved but have no commercial interest in the work, e.g. consumer organisations;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the European Union and Member States should make it possible to take greater account of the interests of SMEs and craft enterprises when drawing up standards by implementing the strategic measures contained in the 'Small Business Act', in accordance with its seventh principle: EU financial support, cutting the cost of access to standards, the systematic publication of abstracts of European standards, and the equitable composition of standardisation committees;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that SMEs, although they represent an essential part of the European market, they are not adequately involved in the standardisation system and cannot, therefore, exploit entirely the benefits derived from standardisation; believes that it is essential to improve their representation and participation in the system, especially in the technical committees at national level; asks the European Commission to identify, through its impact assessment in the context of the revision of the European Standardisation System, the best way to reach this aim, evaluating the necessary funding to help SMEs;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recognises that service standards often respond to national specificities and that their development is related to the needs of the market, the interests of consumers and the public interest; stresses, however, that the development of European service standards and the drawing-up by professional bodies of their own quality charters or labels, as provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports, therefore, the Commission’s intention to include service standards in the legal framework of European standardisation, as this will
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Su
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) having regard to the Commission communication of 25 June 2008 entitled “Think Small First” - A “Small Business Act” for Europe (COM(2008)0394),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports, therefore, the
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Su
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that it is necessary to find an agreement between the Member States on establishing minimum European standards for products which affect the healthy development of the population (such as orthopaedically sound footwear for children). Such standards would ensure not only that the quality of goods manufactured in the EU is maintained, but also and above all that the quality of goods imported from third countries is significantly improved; calls therefore on the Commission and the European standardisation organisations, in the light of the findings of scientific studies showing that there is a link between orthopaedically unsound footwear and the increasing occurrence of orthopaedic defects amongst the populations of EU Member States, to establish European standards in this area;.
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that, in order to further strengthen consumer protection, the procedure for implementing standards relating to the General Product Safety Directive should be speeded up;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reaffirms that European standardisation in support of
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Reaffirms that European standardisation in support of "New Approach" legislation has proved to be a successful and essential tool for completion of the single market; notes that the number of standardisation mandates supporting legislation in areas beyond those covered by the "New Approach" has increased in recent years,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Maintains that it is of the utmost importance to draw a clear line between legislation and standardisation in order to avoid any misinterpretation with regard to the objectives of the law and the desired level of protection; stresses that the European legislator must be highly vigilant and precise when defining the essential requirements in regulation, while the Commission must clearly and accurately define the objectives of the standardisation work in the mandates; stresses that the role of standardisers should be limited to defining the technical means of reaching the goals set by the legislator
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Reiterates that it is essential for European standards to be developed within a reasonable period of time, in particular in those areas where standards are needed quickly in order to meet the requirements of public policies and rapidly changing market conditions; invites, therefore, the European and national standards bodies to continue improving their efficiency and effectiveness, bearing in mind that the acceleration of the standardisation process must not take place to the detriment of the principles of openness, quality, transparency and consensus among all interested parties;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Believes that the standardisation process will be partly accelerated through a better consultation between the Commission and the ESOs prior to issuing a mandate, which will enable them to respond quicker, preferably within a two-month period, about their possibility to undertake a standardisation work;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Notes the importance of the Directive 98/34 Committee as a forum between the European Commission and the Member States in the discussion of issues related to technical regulations and standardisation; considers that European Parliament representatives should be invited to the meetings of this Committee (or its successor body) which should be also, where appropriate, open to the observership of the European and national standardisation bodies and European-level stakeholder organisations, especially during the discussion of standardisation mandates;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Monti report on a new strategy for the single market affirms that standardisation is key for the governance of the single market and emphasises that it is necessary to review the European standards process, maintaining the benefits of the current system and striking the right balance between the European and national dimensions,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the important role of the "New Approach consultants" in verifying that harmonised standards comply with the corresponding EU legislation; draws attention to the fact that such consultants are currently selected by, and operate within, the ESOs, which places a significant administrative burden on these organisations and, at times, causes concern among stakeholders about the impartiality and independence of the process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to assess the need for a review of the existing procedures; believes, furthermore, that the Commission should identify a procedure for ensuring that mandated standards comply with other EU policies and legislation beyond the scope of the "New Approach"; considers that this should take place during the development of the standards in order to avoid delays and inefficiencies due to ex-post rejection;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to check standards against delivery in a more thorough way in order to ensure that they meet the requirements of the mandate, in particular when the standards are used for the purposes of ‘New Approach’ legislation, while ensuring that no significant delay shall be added to the standards approval; intends to examine – in the context of the forthcoming review of the European Standardisation System – the possibility of extending to the Parliament the right, currently accorded to the Commission and Member States, to dispute a harmonised standard which does not appear to entirely satisfy the essential requirements of the corresponding legislation;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Asks the Commission, for the sake of transparency, to make decisions on formal objections to standards public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of all actions in relation to formal objections; calls also on the Commission to present an annual report on the standardisation mandates and the progress on their fulfilment;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Invites the ESOs to reinforce their existing appeal mechanisms which are meant to be used should a disagreement over a standard arise; notes that the current mechanisms may not always be effective as their composition reflects in practice the position of those that approved a standard; proposes, therefore, to enlarge the composition with the participation of external independent experts and/or European societal stakeholders that are currently associate members or cooperating partners of the ESOs;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Is aware that the current system of EU funding in support of European standardisation often leads to frustration in terms of rule changes, the large cost of auditing and delays in the authorisation of payments; stresses that there is an urgent need to reduce these costs and the high administrative burden that at times outweigh the benefits of the provided financial support, while respecting EU financial rules; considers that the Commission and the ESOs could improve their cooperation in order to guarantee a stable and user-friendly framework for the EU financial contribution to European standardisation which will increase significantly the efficiency of the system;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 e (new) 12e. Expresses its support for the Keymark, a voluntary European certification mark, owned by CEN/CENELEC, which demonstrates compliance with European standards; stresses that the Keymark is a valuable alternative to the various national certification schemes that entail multiple testing and marking of products in several Member States and can therefore become a barrier to trade within the Internal Market and cause significant costs for small companies that may be reflected in higher prices for the consumer; encourages, therefore, national standards bodies, and other national certification bodies, to promote the Keymark as an alternative to national certification schemes; calls also for a pan-European information campaign in order to raise awareness amongst business and consumers about the benefits of the Keymark;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages European and national standardisation bodies, therefore, to promote and facilitate effective participation in the standardisation process by all interested parties, in particular representatives of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), consumers (including people with disabilities and vulnerable consumers), environmentalists, workers and bodies representing other societal interests; this facilitation may, inter alia, involve better possibilities for providing assistance especially to parties that have no commercial interest in the standardisation process, e.g. consumer representatives;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages European and national standardisation bodies, therefore, to promote and facilitate effective participation in the standardisation process by all interested parties, in particular representatives of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas principle VII of the “Small Business Act” underlines the importance of promoting SME's participation and defence of SME's interests in standardisation,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees remains weak; affirms that, as
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders and SMEs at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees remains weak; affirms that, as very limited progress has been made to increase SMEs and societal stakeholder participation at national level, financial and political support for the European organisations established to represent such stakeholders needs to be maintained at least in the period to 2020;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders and SMEs at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees in most Member States remains weak; affirms that, as very limited
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees remains weak; affirms that, as very limited progress has been made to increase societal stakeholder participation at national level, financial and political support for the European organisations established to represent such stakeholders needs to be maintained
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by SMEs, craft enterprises and societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees remains weak; affirms that, as very limited progress has been made to increase participation by SMEs, craft enterprises and societal stakeholder
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas principle VII of the "Small Business Act" underlines the importance of promoting SME's participation and defence of SME's interests in standardisation,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Holds the view that
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Holds the view that these European organisations
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Holds the view that these European organisations must obtain a stronger role within the ESOs; recommends that,
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Holds the view that these European organisations must obtain a stronger role within the ESOs; recommends that, without prejudice to the national delegation principle, all such organisations should be given a vote in the ESO technical bodies, on condition that they are associate members or cooperating partners of the ESOs and have participated in the respective work item at technical level; considers also that such organisations should, under the same conditions, be given a symbolic vote in the formal adoption of standards, which would
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Holds the view that these European organisations must obtain a stronger role within the ESOs;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes recent developments in the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), in particular the model used to develop the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility, in which national standards bodies were entitled to nominate to the respective working group only one representative from each of six stakeholder categories (industry, consumers, government, labour, NGO, SSRO (service, support, research and others)) that were identified; considers however that the industry category should be represented, where appropriate, by a second expert representing SMEs;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas the development of European standards contributes to the development of global standards, which remains the ultimate goal,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that similar procedures,
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that similar procedures, establishing an alternative model featuring a predetermined number of seats for the various stakeholder
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Believes that
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Commends the initiative of CEN and CENELEC to introduce a peer assessment process in order to evaluate the correct application by the NSBs of the WTO principles (and additional attributes) and to encourage continuous improvement and exchange of good practice; stresses that this project should serve as an effective tool for the strengthening of the NSBs and the improved participation of all relevant stakeholders at national level; believes that this project should involve all NSBs and be underpinned by independent audits; invites CEN and CENELEC to prepare and make publicly available a report on the results of the peer assessment process;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Asks the Commission and the ESOs to promote training programmes and to take all measures needed to enable weaker NSBs, which do not currently
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Asks the Commission and the ESOs to promote training programmes and to take all measures needed to enable weaker NSBs, which do not currently run technical-committee secretariats, to assume a more active role in the standardisation process; considers that these programmes should target notably SMEs by raising the importance of standardisation as a strategic offering marketing tool;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Asks the Commission and the ESOs to promote training programmes and to take all measures needed to enable weaker NSBs, which do not currently run technical-committee secretariats, to assume a more active role in the standardisation process in order to enhance confidence in the Internal Market by ensuring a level- playing field; considers that these programmes should also target SMEs by raising the importance of standardisation as a strategic offering marketing tool;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas European Standardisation operates within - and in various relations towards - the global ecosystem and relies on specific structures and a dedicated set of processes for standards development as implemented by CEN and CENELEC on the basis of the national delegation principle and by ETSI on the basis of direct membership,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that national standards bodies in some Member States are encountering problems with the national legislative body, since in many cases the significance of standardisation and the correct use of standards in legislation is misinterpreted;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Recognises that limited resources in both national and European bodies may hamper the effective involvement of these bodies in the standard-setting process;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and, where necessary, providing training and financial support to weaker societal stakeholders, including SMEs, in order to facilitate their participation;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and, where necessary, providing financial support to SMEs, craft enterprises and weaker societal stakeholders in order to facilitate their participation;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and, where necessary, providing financial support to weaker societal stakeholders and to SMEs in order to facilitate their participation;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the ESOs and Member States to provide periodically to the Commission a progress report on their actions to ensure balanced representation in the technical bodies responsible for the development of mandated standards, which should be based on specific reporting requirements; stresses that these reports should subsequently feed into a Commission report on the efforts undertaken by the European and national standardisation organisations and the results achieved;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Invites NSBs to provide free access to standardisation committees for the weaker stakeholders and develop tools to improve stakeholder involvement, including a free- of-charge easy-to-use online consultation mechanism for all new standards proposals; encourages NSBs to ensure communication beyond the system boundaries, especially for public enquiries on new standards, given that public enquiries are usually directed at the current participants of the system;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Regrets that public authorities in
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D d (new) Dd. whereas a modern and flexible European standardisation system is a crucial component for an ambitious and renewed European industrial policy;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Regrets that public authorities in most Member States show limited interest in participating in the standards-development process, notwithstanding the importance of standardisation as a tool to support legislation and public policies; urges Member States
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Member States, in the interests of fair competition in the internal market, to follow the ISO Code of Ethics, in particular as regards the implementation of the requirements of ISO conformity assessment standards and guides (integrity, objectivity and impartiality);
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Calls on NSBs to follow the ISO Code of Ethics in order to ensure that the impartiality of standards is not endangered from other activities such as certification or accreditation;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 c (new) 22c. Calls on national standard bodies (NSBs) to follow the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) Code of Ethics in order to ensure that the impartiality of standards is not endangered from other activities, such as certification.
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates that, although small and
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Reiterates that, although small and medium-sized enterprises form the backbone of the European economy, their involvement in standardisation is not always commensurate with their economic importance; emphasises that standards should be designed and adapted to take account of the characteristics and environment of SMEs, in particular small, micro and craft enterprises; welcomes recent initiatives taken by the European and national standardisation bodies to implement the recommendations in the study on SME access to European standardisation, and believes that they must be considered as best practices; stresses that further measures should be taken to ensure that SMEs can participate fully in the development of standards and have
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Maintains that users’ access to European standards developed in support of EU policies and legislation is an important issue that needs to be further examined; takes the view that different systems of price setting should be considered for private/industrial standards and for harmonised/mandated standards; calls, in particular, on NSBs to reduce costs
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Reminds, however, that the purchase price of a standard corresponds only to a small proportion of the overall cost incurred by standards users who usually need to dedicate substantially more resources in order to transpose the required standard into their business process;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Recommends that a free-availability model be applied on a trial basis for a handful of key pieces of legislation; considers that this could offer safe judgements as to whether the use of the model could be further generalised or whether there is no feasible and sustainable alternative to the purchase of EU standards;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Emphasises that standards should be comprehensible and easy to use so that they can be implemented better by users; considers it essential to reduce, where appropriate, the excessive number of cross- references between standards, and to address current difficulties in identifying the group of standards relevant to a given product or process; calls on the national and European standards bodies and trade associations to provide user-friendly guidelines for the use of standards; emphasises that summaries of standards should be publicly available free of charge;
source: PE-448.863
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18889&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.804&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-442804_EN.html |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE442.975New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-442975_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE448.863New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-448863_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0276_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0276_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20101018&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-10-18-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdf |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-276&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0276_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-276&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0276_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-384New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0384_EN.html |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
4560
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/02721New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0690/COM_COM(2009)0690_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|