Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | IMCO | SCHALDEMOSE Christel ( S&D) | KORHOLA Eija-Riitta ( PPE), CREUTZMANN Jürgen ( ALDE), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), SALVINI Matteo ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | COMI Lara ( PPE) | Sajjad KARIM ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | HANDZLIK Małgorzata ( PPE) | David MARTIN ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 628 votes to 11, with 7 abstentions, a resolution on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance.
The resolution notes that the legislative framework regarding product safety and market surveillance consists of three layers of legal acts, i.e. Directive 2001/95/EC concerning General Product Safety (GPSD), Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 regarding market surveillance adopted in July 2008 (new legislative framework) and the sectoral harmonisation directives. The level of market surveillance differs considerably among Member States and a number of them fail to designate necessary resources for efficient market surveillance and interpret ‘products posing serious risk’ differently, which can create barriers to the free movement of goods, disturb competition and jeopardise consumers' safety within the internal market.
(1) European framework for market surveillance: Parliament believes that the current legislative framework for market surveillance does not provide enough coherence and should therefore be reviewed and further coordinated. It proposes that the Commission establish a common European framework for market surveillance, concerning all products on the internal market or entering the EU market.
The Commission is invited:
to play a more active role in coordinating the activities of the European market surveillance authorities, the customs authorities and the competent authorities of the Member States ; with the participation of market surveillance authorities and of the customs authorities, to co-fund further joint market surveillance actions ; to establish a public Consumer Product Safety Information Database , including a platform for complaints, if possible based on already existing regional and national systems in the Member States; to intensify international cooperation in the international Consumer Product Safety Caucus so as to exchange tried and tested practices and jointly to prevent the production in third countries of dangerous substances intended for export to the European single market.
The resolution calls on Member States to introduce in a coordinated manner penalties, including heavy fines , for economic operators who deliberately introduce dangerous or non-compliant products into the single market. It proposes that product bans should be made public as often as possible in order to increase the visibility of border controls and market surveillance and to deter criminal market operators .
It also suggests establishing offices for education on product safety e.g. in the framework of the Product Contact Points, that can facilitate training and transfer information across industries.
(2) A new General Product Safety and Market Surveillance Regulation : Parliament supports the revision of the GPSD and of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 with regard to definitions and obligations for economic operators, while avoiding the creation of unnecessary administrative burdens, especially for SMEs. Members consider that having one single regulation is the only way to have one single market surveillance system for all products. They therefore urge the Commission to establish a single market surveillance system for all products , based on one legislative act covering both the GPSD and Regulation 765/2009/EC.
They call for alignment between traceability requirements in the GPSD and the new legislative framework so as to guarantee a coherent traceability system avoiding the creation of new red tape.
(3) Additional specific changes to the GPSD: Members regard it as problematic that products operated by service providers are not covered by the current GPSD and stress the need to rectify this legal loophole . In order to ensure the safety of the widest range of particularly vulnerable consumers, they call for the introduction of a reference to people with disabilities (along with the references to children and elderly people that are already present) and invite the Commission to include an obligation for manufacturers to carry out a risk analysis in their design phase .
The resolution stresses the need for a more effective regulatory framework , allowing rapid emergency Community measures to be taken. It underlines the importance of ensuring reliable traceability throughout all stages of the life of a product. It stresses, however, that no single technical solution should be imposed as the official traceability system/method within the EU market and calls for overall proportionality.
Parliament acknowledges that RAPEX is a useful and efficient tool for disseminating information among the Member States about the measures taken with regard to dangerous products, but believes that this tool can be further improved. It calls on the Commission to allow product safety professionals, producers, trade and consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information while ensuring the necessary confidentiality.
The resolution also stresses the need to continue improving and strengthening the RAPEX information exchange system on dangerous products originating in third countries (such as China and India). It calls on the Commission to consider the usefulness of setting up a system similar to RAPEX – CHINA for other trading partners, in particular those whose products have been notified in the RAPEX system.
With a view to increasing consumers’ confidence in e-commerce , the Commission is invited to step up and standardise customs checks on products bought on the internet and to carry out market surveillance, paying special attention to products which can cause direct harm to consumers, such as pharmaceutical and food products.
Lastly, Members stress the need for the market surveillance authorities to systematically participate in the process of security-relevant standard development . They urge that the currently applicable Commission procedures for establishing mandates for the development of European standards be improved so as to guarantee timely reaction to new or emerging risks in a more efficient manner.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Christel SCHALDEMOSE (S&D, DK) on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance.
The legislative framework regarding product safety and market surveillance consists of three layers of legal acts, i.e. Directive 2001/95/EC concerning General Product Safety (GPSD), Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 regarding market surveillance adopted in July 2008 (new legislative framework) and the sectoral harmonisation directives.
Members believe that the current legislative framework for market surveillance does not provide enough coherence and should therefore be reviewed and further coordinated. They propose that the Commission establish a common European framework for market surveillance, concerning all products on the internal market or entering the EU market.
The Commission is invited:
to play a more active role in coordinating the activities of the European market surveillance authorities, the customs authorities and the competent authorities of the Member States; with the participation of market surveillance authorities and of the customs authorities, to co-fund further joint market surveillance actions ; to establish a public Consumer Product Safety Information Database , including a platform for complaints, if possible based on already existing regional and national systems in the Member States; to intensify international cooperation in the international Consumer Product Safety Caucus so as to exchange tried and tested practices and jointly to prevent the production in third countries of dangerous substances intended for export to the European single market.
The report calls on Member States to introduce in a coordinated manner penalties , including heavy fines, for economic operators who deliberately introduce dangerous or non-compliant products into the single market. It proposes that product bans should be made public as often as possible in order to increase the visibility of border controls and market surveillance and to deter criminal market operators.
It also suggests establishing offices for education on product safety e.g. in the framework of the Product Contact Points, that can facilitate training and transfer information across industries.
A new General Product Safety and Market Surveillance Regulation: Members consider that having one single regulation is the only way to have one single market surveillance system for all products. They therefore urge the Commission to establish a single market surveillance system for all products , based on one legislative act covering both the GPSD and Regulation 765/2009/EC.
They call for alignment between traceability requirements in the GPSD and the new legislative framework so as to guarantee a coherent traceability system avoiding the creation of new red tape.
Additional specific changes to the GPSD : Members regard it as problematic that products operated by service providers are not covered by the current GPSD and stress the need to rectify this legal loophole. In order to ensure the safety of the widest range of particularly vulnerable consumers, they call for the introduction of a reference to people with disabilities (along with the references to children and elderly people that are already present) and invite the Commission to include an obligation for manufacturers to carry out a risk analysis in their design phase .
The report stresses the need for a more effective regulatory framework, allowing rapid emergency Community measures to be taken . It underlines the importance of ensuring reliable traceability throughout all stages of the life of a product. It stresses, however, that no single technical solution should be imposed as the official traceability system/method within the EU market and calls for overall proportionality.
Parliament’s committee acknowledges that RAPEX is a useful and efficient tool for disseminating information among the Member States about the measures taken with regard to dangerous products, but believes that this tool can be further improved. It calls on the Commission to allow product safety professionals, producers, trade and consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information while ensuring the necessary confidentiality.
The report also stresses the need to continue improving and strengthening the RAPEX information exchange system on dangerous products originating in third countries (such as China and India).
With a view to increasing consumers’ confidence in e-commerce , the Commission is invited to step up and standardise customs checks on products bought on the internet and to carry out market surveillance, paying special attention to products which can cause direct harm to consumers, such as pharmaceutical and food products.
Lastly, Members stress the need for the market surveillance authorities to systematically participate in the process of security-relevant standard development . They urge that the currently applicable Commission procedures for establishing mandates for the development of European standards be improved so as to guarantee timely reaction to new or emerging risks in a more efficient manner.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)5426/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0076/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0033/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0033/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE454.674
- Committee opinion: PE450.700
- Committee opinion: PE450.905
- Committee draft report: PE452.795
- Committee draft report: PE452.795
- Committee opinion: PE450.700
- Committee opinion: PE450.905
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE454.674
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0033/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2011)5426/2
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0033/2011 - Christel Schaldemose - Vote unique #
Amendments | Dossier |
97 |
2010/2085(INI)
2010/11/09
INTA
7 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that globalisation, increased outsourcing and the growth in international trade mean that more products are being traded on markets across the world; considers that close cooperation between global regulators and other stakeholders in the area of consumer product safety is key for addressing the challenges posed by complex supply chains and the higher volume of trade; expects that the revision of the GPSD proposes market surveillance provisions adequate to the task to hold companies effectively accountable for the entire supply chain of their products;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that a single EU control system for all products, under the condition that its standards are at least equal to the highest standards in any one of the EU Member States, is essential for our trading partners and producers from third countries who place their products on the EU market; is of the opinion that when preparing a proposal on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive the Commission should seriously consider the possibility of including the market surveillance provisions of the GPSD in the New Legislative Framework;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that a single EU control system for all products is
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to consider usefulness of setting up similar system as RAPEX - CHINA for other trading partners, in particular for those, which products have been notified in the RAPEX system;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4b (new) 4b. Underlines the importance of product traceability and tracking labels for determining country of origin of the product and responsible manufacturer;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises th
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recognises that more and more products from third countries are being bought on line by consumers, who might not be aware that those products do not necessarily comply with European standards and may pose safety hazards for their users; notes that products bought by consumers on line from third countries constitute a challenge for customs and market surveillance authorities; calls on the Commission to study possible solutions to that problem
source: PE-452.667
2010/11/16
ITRE
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Asks the Commission to consider a unified system of market surveillance when it revises the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD); stresses the need for a European framework for market surveillance so as to ensure a coherent approach across the EU Member States, highlights the role of consumers’ association in market surveillance;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to coordinate an EU-funded accident statistics system, accessible by relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Requests the Commission to incorporate into RAPEX, or any other appropriate system at EU level, penalties for infringements by the Member States, in order to ensure
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and all stakeholders to ensure the financial sustainability of the European standardisation system, including through public-private partnerships and through multiannual financial planning, which is essential to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Underlines the need for stability and simplification of European standards and for the reduction of standards development time, and calls on the national and European standardisation bodies to simplify standards by reducing the number of references to other standards and providing user-friendly guidelines;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Asks the Commission to consider a unified system of market surveillance when it revises the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD); in this regard, asks the Commission to take due account to prevent any potential overlap of legislation;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Asks the Commission to consider a unified system of market surveillance to ensure increased harmonisation on the single market when it revises the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the intention of the Commission to present a proposal for a revision of Directive 2001/95/EC of 03.12.2001 on general product safety;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to establish an effective regulatory framework allowing swift market interventions and reliable long-term solutions;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of ensuring reliable traceability throughout all stages of the life of a product, while making sure that it does not lead to increased administrative burdens;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Acknowledges the fact that more and more products are shaped in ways that make them appealing to children; requires therefore that products featuring child-appealing characteristics be safe for children and the introduction of a definition of child-appealing products in the GPSD so as to protect children’s health and ensure their safety;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Furthermore, stresses the importance of uniform definitions and assessments in Member States of products posing serious risks in order to unify the safety level throughout the Union and the traceability system;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Insists on the importance of defining precisely the content of recall notices so as to avoid the risk that consumers perceive them as advertisements for the products notified;
source: PE-452.843
2010/12/14
IMCO
77 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 14 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the current legislative framework for market surveillance has to be enforced in an effective manner and be further coordinated
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that the current legislative framework for market surveillance
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to play a more active role in coordinating the activities of the European market surveillance authorities, customs authorities and the competent authorities of Member States in order to increase the effectiveness of market surveillance and allow the immediate recall and withdrawal from the European market of products which constitute a threat to the health and safety of consumers;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes to the Commission to establish a common European
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Proposes to the Commission to establish a common European framework for market surveillance concerning all products on the internal market or entering the EU market;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on Member States and the Commission to designate adequate financial
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on Member States and the Commission to designate adequate financial and human resources to market surveillance activities; calls on the Commission to put pressure on, assist and encourage the Member States to increase
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on Member States to designate adequate financial and human resources to market surveillance activities; calls on the Commission to put pressure on, assist and encourage the Member States to increase the resources for market surveillance; emphasizes that failing market surveillance systems generate a distortion of competition, jeopardize consumers' safety and undermine the citizen's trust in the internal market;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on Member States to designate adequate financial and human resources to market surveillance activities; calls on the Commission to put pressure on, assist and encourage the Member States to increase the resources for market surveillance; and to allocate resources in the Commission as well to coordinate the marked surveillance activities between member states; emphasizes that failing market surveillance systems undermine the citizen's trust in the internal market;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on Member States and the Commission to designate adequate
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on Member States to introduce in a coordinated manner penalties, including large fines, for economic operators who deliberately introduce dangerous or non-compliant products in the single market; proposes that product bans should be made public as often as possible in order to increase the visibility of border controls and market surveillance and to deter criminal market operators;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that TAXUD has also underlined the need for a harmonised approach for customs controls in the area of product safety; welcomes therefore the creation of a project group between the Member States and the Commission which will produce guidelines for customs controls in the area of product safety;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission with the participation of market surveillance authorities and of the customs authorities to co-fund further joint market surveillance actions;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasizes the necessity to share best practices among the Member States; calls for joint cooperation, pooling the know- how and sharing the best practices among market surveillance authorities; suggests that Pro safe could be the network to be given this task; reminds of the importance of cooperation between customs and market surveillance authorities at the external borders to carry out appropriate checks of products entering the Community;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasizes the necessity to share best practices among the Member States; calls for joint cooperation, pooling the know- how and sharing the best practices among market surveillance authorities;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Emphasizes the necessity to share best practices among the Member States; calls for joint cooperation and coordination, pooling the know-
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls upon the EU Member States to share product safety related inquiries and studies with other Member States. Reference numbers of concerned products should be included to facilitate product identification by other authorities, who could benefit from translating and using the information provided in the studies; calls upon Member States to allow their competent authorities to take market surveillance measures on the basis of test results or studies which have been delivered by other Member States in order to avoid duplication of works;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas it is essential to ensure that all
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognises the important contribution made by PROSAFE as regards the coordination of joint market surveillance actions and the exchange of tried and tested practices; points out, however, that coordination through PROSAFE is restricted by limited resources and its informal structure; proposes therefore the establishment of a specialised, independent EU agency which, acting in close cooperation with PROSAFE, could carry out additional tasks alongside the operational coordination between market surveillance and customs authorities of the Member States, for instance monitoring the implementation of joint operational standards and supporting Member States in training market surveillance and customs officials;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls upon Member States to share best practice and to allow their competent authorities to take market surveillance measures on the basis of test results or studies which have been delivered by other Member States in order to avoid duplication of work, to improve consistency and to ensure better coordination of the Single Market;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to establish a public Consumer Product safety Information Database, which the RAMs Article 23 database might serve as a basis for, including a platform for complaints which will raise awareness of dangerous products across the borders in the internal market;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges the Commission to establish a public Consumer Product safety Information Database, including a platform for complaints which will raise awareness of dangerous products across the borders in the internal market; calls for the establishment of a accident statistical system wherefrom mandatory annual reports will be published
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to intensify international cooperation in the international Consumer Product Safety Caucus so as to exchange tried and tested practices and jointly to prevent the production in third countries of dangerous substances intended for export to the European single market;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the revi
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the review of the GPSD and calls for an alignment of the definitions of the GPSD with the Regulation on Market Surveillance in regards to definitions
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Supports the review of the GPSD and calls for an alignment of the definitions of the GPSD with the Regulation on Market Surveillance in regards to definitions and in regards to the obligations for economic operators as defined in the decision 768/2008;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC (hereinafter - GPSD) which establishes at Community level general safety requirements for consumer products has to be reviewed and brought into conformity with NLF through integration, in particular the Regulation on market surveillance,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls for alignment between traceability requirements in GPSD and the NLF so as to guarantee the coherent traceability system; avoiding the creation of new red tape;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses the importance of uniform definitions and assessments in Member States of products posing serious risk in order to unify the safety level throughout the Union
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that a common definition of
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Insists that a common
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the simplification of the European product safety legislation, in particular as regards the Commission objectives 'better law-making' and 'think small first' as set out in the Communication 'Towards a Single Market Act' and encourages the provisions on the Food-
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include an obligation for manufacturers to do a risk analysis in their design phase; urges that if any risks are identified they should be documented
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the Commission to include an obligation for manufacturers to do a risk analysis appropriate to the product in the
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the level of market surveillance differs considerably among Member States and a number of them fail to designate necessary resources for the efficient market surveillance and interpret ‘products posing serious risk’ differently, which can create barriers to the free movement of goods within the internal market;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that products posing serious risk must be permanently withdrawn or recalled from the market as quickly as possible and traceability through out the
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 – introductory part 19. Insists on effective enforcement of the identification procedures that are already in place; encourages the Commission to make assessments and evaluations on the use of new technologies, e.g. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), technology tags and nano-printed intelligent packaging,
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Insists on effective enforcement of the identification procedures that are already in place; encourages the Commission to make assessments and evaluations on the use of new technologies,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a 19a. Stresses however, that one technical solution should not be forced as the official traceability system/method within the EU market; and calls for overall proportionality;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Emphasizes the need to improve and further strengthen RAPEX exchanges of information in respect of dangerous products from Third countries (China/India) and for its latest studies to be evaluated.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on Commission to improve the awareness of RAPEX and the EU recall systems outside the EU; and to allow product safety professionals, trade and consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information; while respecting the confidentiality of commercial data and ensuring that the only sources of information are national authorities;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on Commission to allow product safety professionals, consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information and to promote such access through information campaigns;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on Commission to allow product safety professionals, business groups, consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant non-confidential information;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on Commission to allow manufacturers, product safety professionals, consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital 24 a (new) Εa. whereas the effectiveness of the national surveillance authorities is central to the operation of an adequate market surveillance system.
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on Commission to allow product safety professionals, consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information while ensuring the necessary confidentiality;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Welcomes the new RAPEX guidelines which contribute to the improvement of
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Welcomes the new RAPEX guidelines which contribute to the improvement of operation of RAPEX; Invites the Commission to streamline the new risk assessment method with those in place for harmonised
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission to explain the classification of products as a 'serious risk' for RAPEX notifications;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Is particularly concerned that each year there is an increase of RAPEX notifications relating to products of Chinese origin, which is more than half of the RAPEX notifications, and where it appears that it is not possible to identify the manufactures of those products in 20 per cent of cases; therefore calls on enhanced efforts to be made internationally and welcomes EU-China-US cooperation on product traceability strategies; welcomes any support, training, seminars organised by EU and Chinese authorities to improve product safety; underlines that there is a need for multiannual programmes to face these challenges;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Calls on the Commission and Member States Authorities to ensure proper training of officers so products presenting a risk can be further detected; urges for better cooperation between customs and market surveillance authorities before products are released on the market which calls for a multiannual programme here as well;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Calls on the Commission and national competent authorities to further develop awareness-raising campaigns targeting consumers to inform them about the risk of buying counterfeited products online;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses the need for the market surveillance authorities to
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses the need for the market surveillance authorities to fully participate in the process of standard development, as this is a suitable mean to ensure that the voluntary application of standards will contribute to increase consumers safety and health as well as legal certainty by allowing a correct interpretation and application of the European Standards by Member States authorities;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas the absence of efficient and proportionate market surveillance appears as one of the main reasons for unfair competition to legitimate and responsible market operators, especially SMEs;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Urges for improvement of the currently applicable Commission procedures for establishing
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls for the European standardisation organisations and the Commission to investigate all possible systems able to speed up the process of standards development, while ensuring a proper involvement of all relevant stakeholders, such as the introduction of a fast track procedure or the possibility for the Commission of publishing existing European or ISO standards reference, developed outside a Commission mandate, if such standards are deemed to provide a high level of consumer protection or to address a specific risk as an interim measure until a permanent solution becomes available;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls for standardisation to be limited to providing the technical means through which compliance with a political decision is achieved or evaluated. Political issues which have a direct impact on the protection of welfare of consumers/users should be dealt with at the political level and not delegated to the standardisation bodies;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Calls for Commission's mandates for standardisation to be
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls for the introduction of a safeguard procedure
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Calls for the introduction of a safeguard procedure which would allow
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls for the Commission to take further steps
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas the existing differences in the level of market surveillance between EU Member States may generate distortion of competition and jeopardize consumers' safety;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas cooperation among market surveillance authorities and joint market surveillance actions are essential and should therefore be strengthened further and community resources delegated hereto, which will strengthen the infrastructure of the national market surveillance authorities.
source: PE-454.674
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/5/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=19547&j=0&l=en
|
events/2/date |
Old
2011-02-24T00:00:00New
2011-02-23T00:00:00 |
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.795New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-452795_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.700&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-450700_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE450.905&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-450905_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.674New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-454674_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0033_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0033_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-33&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0033_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-33&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0033_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-76New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0076_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/7/03134New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
InitiativeNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|