BETA


2010/2124(INI) Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) in 2009

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET ALBERTINI Gabriele (icon: PPE PPE) SWOBODA Hannes (icon: S&D S&D), DUFF Andrew (icon: ALDE ALDE), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion BUDG NEYNSKY Nadezhda (icon: PPE PPE), GUALTIERI Roberto (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 142-p1

Events

2011/05/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/05/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/05/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.

Whilst welcoming the Council's annual report, Parliament reiterates its position in favour of developing a coherent EU foreign policy strategy which should clearly identify the common foreign and security policy interests of the EU. It calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) to use to the full her powers to initiate, implement and ensure compliance with the CFSP, involving Parliament’s relevant bodies fully in that endeavour.

The resolution stresses the need to enhance coherence between the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States under the leadership of the VP/HR with a view to better integrating all relevant instruments and policies and delivering a single EU message on key political issues.

The resolution expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and other external policies, to help strengthen the EU’s role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status. It calls on the VP/HR to set up the necessary coordination structures and mechanisms inside the EEAS.

It stresses that the role of EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) should generally be to represent and coordinate EU policy towards regions with specific strategic or security interests for the EU which require a continuous EU presence and visibility . Close coordination must be established between the EUSRs and the relevant EEAS departments and that important thematic issues should be reconsidered and proposals put forward for this role to be taken over by high-ranking EEAS officials or EUSRs.

Members recall the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres and have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations. In this context, Members underline that in order to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the CFSP, a new culture of dialogue, reciprocal trust and exchange of information should finally pervade interinstitutional relations, both in the defining phase and in the conducting and a posteriori assessment phases.

Members take the view that the European Parliament should receive adequate information prior to the adoption of mandates and strategies in the CFSP sphere. They believe, in this regard, that full transparency and democratic scrutiny require separate budget lines for each and every mission; reiterates its position that, in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the CFSP.

Parliament reiterates its willingness to reach an agreement with national parliaments that will result in a real enhancement of the parliamentary dimension of the European Union as global actor.

(1) Main CFSP thematic issues : the resolution emphasises that CSDP actions should be embedded in a comprehensive policy targeting countries and regions in crisis where the EU's values and strategic interests are at stake and where CSDP operations would provide a real added value in promoting peace, stability and the rule of law. Members stress, further, the need for a lessons learnt process more accurate in assessing the successful implementation of each operation and its lasting impact on the ground. They call on the VP/HR, the Council and the Member States to overcome the imbalance between civilian and military planning capabilities in the EEAS and to increase the number of staff in the fields of justice, civilian administration, customs and mediation so as to ensure that adequate and sufficient expertise can be provided for CSDP missions.

Parliament considers that the main strategic priorities for the Union are as follows:

the need for optimal coordination between EU disaster responses and other EU instruments – such as CSDP civilian and/or military missions – which are already being deployed on the ground or which could be set up in the aftermath of a crisis; strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors – such as the UN, NATO, the African Union (AU), the OSCE and third countries such as the USA, Turkey, etc; further expand the EU’s capacity to prevent conflict as an alternative to crisis management; reduce EU energy dependence on third countries: in this regard, the committee calls on the VP/HR to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of a coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in constructive dialogue with energy suppliers, and especially with Russia as well as with transit countries; formulate strategies which draw attention to a new generation of security challenges and risks, e.g. cyber-attacks, social unrest, political insurgencies, global criminal networks and economic activities endangering the rule of law and the principles of democracy; point out that European foreign policy must take account of the external dimension of the European area of freedom, security and justice; reiterates the importance of orderly migration management ; strengthen the EU’s role in the area of global climate governance and further develop a dialogue with other key actors, such as the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India), Russia, the United States and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations; firmly mainstream human rights into EU foreign policy; urge the VP/HR to ensure that CFSP policies and actions fully implement UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security .

(2) Main CFSP geographical priorities : the resolution emphasises that effective multilateralism should be the overriding strategic concern of the Union and that, in this context, the EU should take a leading role in international cooperation, support international institutions, facilitate international consensus and advance global action.

Transatlantic relations : Members invite the Union to reconfirm its commitment to the transatlantic partnership with the US and the goal of a barrier-free transatlantic market, which should provide the basis for reinforced transatlantic partnership. They urge the development of a comprehensive EU-US strategy for the improvement of the security situation throughout the greater Middle East, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan which involves cooperation with Turkey, Russia and China.

Western Balkans : the resolution confirms the EU membership prospects of all the Western Balkan countries and underlines the importance of a continuous commitment to the process from both the countries of the region and the EU. It notes, however, that political instability and institutional weaknesses, together with unresolved bilateral issues, are hampering the further progress of some countries towards EU integration. It stresses that the Union needs a clear and common vision towards the region and calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to actively engage in solving the persistent problems.

Eastern Partnership : Members encourage the VP/HR and the Commission to pursue their commitment to the Eastern Partnership with the eastern European neighbours, with a view to their political association and economic integration, including in the area of energy, on the basis of shared European values and within a framework of conditions and incentives intended to trigger reforms. Members reaffirm the necessity of a coherent approach in the regional cooperation processes through the operationalisation of the initiatives and instruments proposed by the EU for its Eastern neighbourhood (European Partnership, Black Sea Synergy/EU Strategy for the Black Sea, etc.). They call for the prompt establishment of the EU-Neighbourhood-East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST), without the participation of the Belarusian Parliament.

Central Asia : Parliament recognises the big potential for developing strategic cooperation between the EU and Central Asia to tackle common security challenges as well as on political, economic and energy issues. It also stresses the urgency to address water management issues at regional level.

Russia : the VP/HR is called upon to: (i) ensure that the EU's approach towards Russia, including in the negotiations on a new EU-Russia Agreement, is coherent; (ii) ensure that enhancing the rule of law, including international law, the principles of reciprocity and transparency, as well as a commitment to the values of pluralist democracy and respect for human rights, constitute the core of the new comprehensive agreement; (iii) assure the unconditional fulfilment and implementation of all the provisions of the six-point agreement of 2008 between Russia, the European Union and Georgia as well as to work towards an ultimate solution of this conflict which respects the territorial integrity of Georgia.

Turkey : Members stress the need for a renewed momentum in Turkey’s accession negotiations to avoid a potential standstill in EU-Turkey relations. They deplore the virtual stagnation of Turkey's accession process. Parliament recalls that the EU and Turkey are both responsible for overcoming the obstacles on Turkey's path towards membership of the EU. They hope in any case that Turkey will continue its modernisation along European lines.

The Middle East : the resolution supports the resumption of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and stresses the need for meaningful negotiations to be conducted within a limited time frame and in a climate of mutual trust, a climate which can only exist if the policy of continuing to build settlements is immediately stopped by Israel.

Given that the EU is the largest contributor to the PA and Israel's main trading partner, it has a direct interest in persuading both parties to address as soon as possible the fundamental questions to be settled (namely refugees, borders and the status of Jerusalem) and in having a viable State of Palestine living in peace, side by side with the State of Israel. Members call on the EU to assume a stronger political role commensurate with its financial involvement in the region. They call on the VP/HR to present a new European strategy for the region outlining the EU’s interests and aims and the means it can employ, promoting democracy and the rule of law in the region.

The Mediterranean region : Members call on the EU to offer unequivocal and prompt support to new aspirations to democracy, freedom and social justice. They remain concerned by the absence in the EU's Mediterranean policy of a clear long-term strategic vision for progress and development in the region and call for clarification and improvement of the rationale, goals and working methods of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM).

The resolution calls on the EU to build up a partnership based on mutual interest and focusing on employment, education and training in order to help alleviate the current social and economic crisis in these countries, and to provide appropriate assistance that may be needed to support the ongoing political reforms and social and economic development. Members urge the authorities of Syria, Bahrain and Yemen to refrain from the use of force against protesters and to respect their right to freedom of assembly and expression.

Whilst regretting the lack of cohesion between EU Member States on how to address the situation in Libya , Parliament welcomes, however, the Council's decision to set up a European Union military operation in support of humanitarian assistance operations in response to the crisis situation in Libya, the so called EUFOR Libya operation.

Asia : Members stress that the starting point for any long-term solution to the Afghan crisis must be the Afghan citizens’ interests as regards their internal security, civil protection, and economic and social progress, and should include concrete measures for the eradication of poverty and discrimination against women, for enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, as well as reconciliation mechanisms, an end to opium production, a robust state-building exercise, the integration of Afghanistan into the international community and the banishing of al-Qa'ida from the country. The resolution reiterates its view that Pakistan has a key role in the region and that a stable, secular, democratic and prosperous Pakistan is of vital importance to stability in Afghanistan and the wider region.

Parliament fully endorses the commitment to seek an early negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear issue and supports the Council's twin-track approach aimed at finding a diplomatic solution, as that is the only viable option for a response to the Iranian nuclear issue. It strongly condemns the continuing provocative, inflammatory and anti-Semitic rhetoric of the Iranian President, who has called for Israel to be ‘wiped out’, and particularly deplores the threats made against the very existence of the State of Israel. It is very concerned by the exponentially rising numbers of executions in Iran, which come down to extrajudicial state murder in view of the lack of any due process, as well as by the continued systematic repression of citizens aspiring to more freedom and democracy.

Members express their satisfaction at the intensification of sectoral dialogues with China and call for concerted joint work on the controversial issues highlighted at the recent EU-China Summit. They expect the EU to show solidarity and provide support in order to help Japan and the Japanese authorities following the terrible earthquake, tsunami and subsequent nuclear catastrophe which has struck the country. Members also recognise the enormous importance of India as an emerging regional economic power and as a great democratic partner for Europe.

Africa : Parliament supports the partnerships with the African Union (AU) and other African regional organisations in addressing stability and security concerns on the African continent and in ensuring progress in other key areas, such as democratic governance and human rights, climate change and the achievement of the MDGs. It expresses support for the decision to devise a comprehensive EU approach to the Horn of Africa region. Members believe that the EU should adopt a comprehensive approach to security and stability concerns in the Sahel region.

Documents
2011/05/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/04/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/04/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2011/04/13
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Gabriele ALBERTINI (EPP, IT) on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.

Whilst welcoming the Council's annual report, the committee reiterates its position in favour of developing a coherent EU foreign policy strategy which should clearly identify the common foreign and security policy interests of the EU. It calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) to involve Parliament’s relevant bodies fully in that endeavour.

The report stresses the need to enhance coherence between the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States under the leadership of the VP/HR with a view to better integrating all relevant instruments and policies and delivering a single EU message on key political issues.

The report expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and other external policies, to help strengthen the EU’s role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status. It calls on the VP/HR to set up the necessary coordination structures and mechanisms inside the EEAS.

It stresses that the role of EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) should generally be to represent and coordinate EU policy towards regions with specific strategic or security interests for the EU which require a continuous EU presence and visibility . Close coordination must be established between the EUSRs and the relevant EEAS departments and that important thematic issues should be reconsidered and proposals put forward for this role to be taken over by high-ranking EEAS officials or EUSRs.

Members recall the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres and have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations. In this context, Members underline that in order to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the CFSP, a new culture of dialogue, reciprocal trust and exchange of information should finally pervade interinstitutional relations, both in the defining phase and in the conducting and a posteriori assessment phases.

(1) Main CFSP thematic issues : the report emphasises that CSDP actions should be embedded in a comprehensive policy targeting countries and regions in crisis where the EU's values and strategic interests are at stake and where CSDP operations would provide a real added value in promoting peace, stability and the rule of law. Members stress, further, the need for a lessons learnt process more accurate in assessing the successful implementation of each operation and its lasting impact on the ground.

The committee considers that the main strategic priorities for the Union are as follows:

the need for optimal coordination between EU disaster responses and other EU instruments – such as CSDP civilian and/or military missions – which are already being deployed on the ground or which could be set up in the aftermath of a crisis; strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors – such as the UN, NATO, the African Union (AU), the OSCE and third countries such as the USA, Turkey, etc; further expand the EU’s capacity to prevent conflict as an alternative to crisis management; reduce EU energy dependence on third countries: in this regard, the committee calls on the VP/HR to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of a coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in constructive dialogue with energy suppliers, and especially with Russia as well as with transit countries; formulate strategies which draw attention to a new generation of security challenges and risks, e.g. cyber-attacks, social unrest, political insurgencies, global criminal networks and economic activities endangering the rule of law and the principles of democracy; point out that European foreign policy must take account of the external dimension of the European area of freedom, security and justice; reiterates the importance of orderly migration management ; strengthen the EU’s role in the area of global climate governance and further develop a dialogue with other key actors, such as the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India), Russia, the United States and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations; firmly mainstream human rights into EU foreign policy; urge the VP/HR to ensure that CFSP policies and actions fully implement UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security .

(2) Main CFSP geographical priorities : the report emphasises that effective multilateralism should be the overriding strategic concern of the Union and that, in this context, the EU should take a leading role in international cooperation, support international institutions, facilitate international consensus and advance global action.

Transatlantic relations : Members invite the Union to reconfirm its commitment to the transatlantic partnership with the US and the goal of a barrier-free transatlantic market, which should provide the basis for reinforced transatlantic partnership. They urge the development of a comprehensive EU-US strategy for the improvement of the security situation throughout the greater Middle East, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan which involves cooperation with Turkey, Russia and China.

Western Balkans : the report confirms the EU membership prospects of all the Western Balkan countries and underlines the importance of a continuous commitment to the process from both the countries of the region and the EU. It notes, however, that political instability and institutional weaknesses, together with unresolved bilateral issues, are hampering the further progress of some countries towards EU integration. It stresses that the Union needs a clear and common vision towards the region and calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to actively engage in solving the persistent problems.

Eastern Partnership : Members encourage the VP/HR and the Commission to pursue their commitment to the Eastern Partnership with the eastern European neighbours, with a view to their political association and economic integration, including in the area of energy, on the basis of shared European values and within a framework of conditions and incentives intended to trigger reforms. Members reaffirm the necessity of a coherent approach in the regional cooperation processes through the operationalisation of the initiatives and instruments proposed by the EU for its Eastern neighbourhood (European Partnership, Black Sea Synergy/EU Strategy for the Black Sea, etc.). They call for the prompt establishment of the EU-Neighbourhood-East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST), without the participation of the Belarusian Parliament.

Russia : the VP/HR is called upon to: (i) ensure that the EU's approach towards Russia, including in the negotiations on a new EU-Russia Agreement, is coherent; (ii) ensure that enhancing the rule of law, including international law, the principles of reciprocity and transparency, as well as a commitment to the values of pluralist democracy and respect for human rights, constitute the core of the new comprehensive agreement; (iii) assure the unconditional fulfilment and implementation of all the provisions of the six-point agreement of 2008 between Russia, the European Union and Georgia as well as to work towards an ultimate solution of this conflict which respects the territorial integrity of Georgia.

Turkey : Members stress the need for a renewed momentum in Turkey’s accession negotiations to avoid a potential standstill in EU-Turkey relations. They deplore the virtual stagnation of Turkey's accession process; recalls that the EU and Turkey are both responsible for overcoming the obstacles on Turkey's path towards membership of the EU. They hope in any case that Turkey will continue its modernisation along European lines.

The Middle East : the report supports the resumption of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and stresses the need for meaningful negotiations to be conducted within a limited time frame and in a climate of mutual trust, a climate which can only exist if the policy of continuing to build settlements is immediately stopped by Israel.

Given that the EU is the largest contributor to the PA and Israel's main trading partner, it has a direct interest in persuading both parties to address as soon as possible the fundamental questions to be settled (namely refugees, borders and the status of Jerusalem) and in having a viable State of Palestine living in peace, side by side with the State of Israel. Members call on the EU to assume a stronger political role commensurate with its financial involvement in the region. They call on the VP/HR to present a new European strategy for the region outlining the EU’s interests and aims and the means it can employ, promoting democracy and the rule of law in the region.

The Mediterranean region : Members call on the EU to offer unequivocal and prompt support to new aspirations to democracy, freedom and social justice. They remain concerned by the absence in the EU's Mediterranean policy of a clear long-term strategic vision for progress and development in the region and call for clarification and improvement of the rationale, goals and working methods of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM).

The report calls on the EU to build up a partnership based on mutual interest and focusing on employment, education and training in order to help alleviate the current social and economic crisis in these countries, and to provide appropriate assistance that may be needed to support the ongoing political reforms and social and economic development. Members urge the authorities of Syria, Bahrain and Yemen to refrain from the use of force against protesters and to respect their right to freedom of assembly and expression.

Asia : Members stress that the starting point for any long-term solution to the Afghan crisis must be the Afghan citizens’ interests as regards their internal security, civil protection, and economic and social progress, and should include concrete measures for the eradication of poverty and discrimination against women, for enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, as well as reconciliation mechanisms, an end to opium production, a robust state-building exercise, the integration of Afghanistan into the international community and the banishing of al-Qa'ida from the country. The report reiterates its view that Pakistan has a key role in the region and that a stable, secular, democratic and prosperous Pakistan is of vital importance to stability in Afghanistan and the wider region.

The committee fully endorses the commitment to seek an early negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear issue and supports the Council's twin-track approach aimed at finding a diplomatic solution, as that is the only viable option for a response to the Iranian nuclear issue. It strongly condemns the continuing provocative, inflammatory and anti-Semitic rhetoric of the Iranian President, who has called for Israel to be ‘wiped out’, and particularly deplores the threats made against the very existence of the State of Israel. It is very concerned by the exponentially rising numbers of executions in Iran, which come down to extrajudicial state murder in view of the lack of any due process, as well as by the continued systematic repression of citizens aspiring to more freedom and democracy.

Members express their satisfaction at the intensification of sectoral dialogues with China and call for concerted joint work on the controversial issues highlighted at the recent EU-China Summit. They expect the EU to show solidarity and provide support in order to help Japan and the Japanese authorities following the terrible earthquake, tsunami and subsequent nuclear catastrophe which has struck the country. Members also recognise the enormous importance of India as an emerging regional economic power and as a great democratic partner for Europe.

Africa : the report supports the partnerships with the African Union (AU) and other African regional organisations in addressing stability and security concerns on the African continent and in ensuring progress in other key areas, such as democratic governance and human rights, climate change and the achievement of the MDGs. Members express support for the decision to devise a comprehensive EU approach to the Horn of Africa region. They believe that the EU should adopt a comprehensive approach to security and stability concerns in the Sahel region.

2011/03/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/01/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/01/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/09/13
   EP - NEYNSKY Nadezhda (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2010/09/13
   EP - GUALTIERI Roberto (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2010/09/09
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/07/14
   EP - ALBERTINI Gabriele (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0168/2011 - Gabriele Albertini - § 38/2 #

2011/05/11 Outcome: +: 530, -: 117, 0: 14
DE IT PL ES GB RO HU BG PT BE SK CZ EL FI IE LT NL DK SI AT LU EE MT SE LV FR CY
Total
96
56
43
40
62
28
20
16
21
20
13
20
20
12
11
11
25
13
7
17
5
6
5
17
8
65
3
icon: PPE PPE
236

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
170

Hungary S&D

Against (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

5

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Italy ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
44

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
1

Austria PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

5

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

4

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0168/2011 - Gabriele Albertini - § 85/2 #

2011/05/11 Outcome: +: 478, -: 167, 0: 9
DE PL ES IT GB RO HU PT BG SK BE CZ LT SE NL FI DK SI MT LV AT IE EE LU EL CY FR
Total
96
43
39
56
61
28
20
20
16
12
20
19
11
17
25
13
13
7
5
8
17
11
4
4
20
3
65
icon: PPE PPE
236

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
168

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
45

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Romania NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Belgium NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
24

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

2

Greece EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (2)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A7-0168/2011 - Gabriele Albertini - § 85/3 #

2011/05/11 Outcome: +: 452, -: 170, 0: 10
DE IT PL ES GB RO BG LT SK CZ FI PT SE BE NL SI DK MT HU AT LV LU IE EE EL CY FR
Total
90
56
39
38
64
26
15
11
13
18
13
17
17
19
25
7
12
5
18
13
7
5
11
4
20
3
65
icon: S&D S&D
161

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Austria S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: PPE PPE
221

Czechia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2
3

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
42

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

1

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

4

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

2

Greece EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
53

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
273 2010/2124(INI)
2011/03/07 AFET 273 amendments...
source: PE-452.878

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-05-11-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ALBERTINI Gabriele date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ALBERTINI Gabriele date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.857
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-445857_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.859&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-452859_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.878
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-452878_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html title: A7-0168/2011
events/2
date
2011-04-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html title: A7-0168/2011
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2011-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0227_EN.html title: T7-0227/2011
summary
events/5
date
2011-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0227_EN.html title: T7-0227/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 142-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ALBERTINI Gabriele date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2010-07-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALBERTINI Gabriele group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
rapporteur
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0168_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-227
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0227_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: SWOBODA Hannes group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2010-09-13T00:00:00 2010-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: S&D name: GUALTIERI Roberto
  • date: 2011-04-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: SWOBODA Hannes group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2010-09-13T00:00:00 2010-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: S&D name: GUALTIERI Roberto type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0168/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20032&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-227 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0227/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2010-07-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ALBERTINI Gabriele group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2010-07-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
rapporteur
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
docs
  • date: 2011-01-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.857 title: PE445.857 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-01-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.859&secondRef=02 title: PE452.859 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.878 title: PE452.878 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN title: A7-0168/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-04-13T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Gabriele ALBERTINI (EPP, IT) on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006. Whilst welcoming the Council's annual report, the committee reiterates its position in favour of developing a coherent EU foreign policy strategy which should clearly identify the common foreign and security policy interests of the EU. It calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) to involve Parliament’s relevant bodies fully in that endeavour. The report stresses the need to enhance coherence between the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States under the leadership of the VP/HR with a view to better integrating all relevant instruments and policies and delivering a single EU message on key political issues. The report expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and other external policies, to help strengthen the EU’s role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status. It calls on the VP/HR to set up the necessary coordination structures and mechanisms inside the EEAS. It stresses that the role of EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) should generally be to represent and coordinate EU policy towards regions with specific strategic or security interests for the EU which require a continuous EU presence and visibility . Close coordination must be established between the EUSRs and the relevant EEAS departments and that important thematic issues should be reconsidered and proposals put forward for this role to be taken over by high-ranking EEAS officials or EUSRs. Members recall the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres and have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations. In this context, Members underline that in order to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the CFSP, a new culture of dialogue, reciprocal trust and exchange of information should finally pervade interinstitutional relations, both in the defining phase and in the conducting and a posteriori assessment phases. (1) Main CFSP thematic issues : the report emphasises that CSDP actions should be embedded in a comprehensive policy targeting countries and regions in crisis where the EU's values and strategic interests are at stake and where CSDP operations would provide a real added value in promoting peace, stability and the rule of law. Members stress, further, the need for a lessons learnt process more accurate in assessing the successful implementation of each operation and its lasting impact on the ground. The committee considers that the main strategic priorities for the Union are as follows: the need for optimal coordination between EU disaster responses and other EU instruments – such as CSDP civilian and/or military missions – which are already being deployed on the ground or which could be set up in the aftermath of a crisis; strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors – such as the UN, NATO, the African Union (AU), the OSCE and third countries such as the USA, Turkey, etc; further expand the EU’s capacity to prevent conflict as an alternative to crisis management; reduce EU energy dependence on third countries: in this regard, the committee calls on the VP/HR to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of a coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in constructive dialogue with energy suppliers, and especially with Russia as well as with transit countries; formulate strategies which draw attention to a new generation of security challenges and risks, e.g. cyber-attacks, social unrest, political insurgencies, global criminal networks and economic activities endangering the rule of law and the principles of democracy; point out that European foreign policy must take account of the external dimension of the European area of freedom, security and justice; reiterates the importance of orderly migration management ; strengthen the EU’s role in the area of global climate governance and further develop a dialogue with other key actors, such as the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India), Russia, the United States and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations; firmly mainstream human rights into EU foreign policy; urge the VP/HR to ensure that CFSP policies and actions fully implement UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security . (2) Main CFSP geographical priorities : the report emphasises that effective multilateralism should be the overriding strategic concern of the Union and that, in this context, the EU should take a leading role in international cooperation, support international institutions, facilitate international consensus and advance global action. Transatlantic relations : Members invite the Union to reconfirm its commitment to the transatlantic partnership with the US and the goal of a barrier-free transatlantic market, which should provide the basis for reinforced transatlantic partnership. They urge the development of a comprehensive EU-US strategy for the improvement of the security situation throughout the greater Middle East, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan which involves cooperation with Turkey, Russia and China. Western Balkans : the report confirms the EU membership prospects of all the Western Balkan countries and underlines the importance of a continuous commitment to the process from both the countries of the region and the EU. It notes, however, that political instability and institutional weaknesses, together with unresolved bilateral issues, are hampering the further progress of some countries towards EU integration. It stresses that the Union needs a clear and common vision towards the region and calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to actively engage in solving the persistent problems. Eastern Partnership : Members encourage the VP/HR and the Commission to pursue their commitment to the Eastern Partnership with the eastern European neighbours, with a view to their political association and economic integration, including in the area of energy, on the basis of shared European values and within a framework of conditions and incentives intended to trigger reforms. Members reaffirm the necessity of a coherent approach in the regional cooperation processes through the operationalisation of the initiatives and instruments proposed by the EU for its Eastern neighbourhood (European Partnership, Black Sea Synergy/EU Strategy for the Black Sea, etc.). They call for the prompt establishment of the EU-Neighbourhood-East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST), without the participation of the Belarusian Parliament. Russia : the VP/HR is called upon to: (i) ensure that the EU's approach towards Russia, including in the negotiations on a new EU-Russia Agreement, is coherent; (ii) ensure that enhancing the rule of law, including international law, the principles of reciprocity and transparency, as well as a commitment to the values of pluralist democracy and respect for human rights, constitute the core of the new comprehensive agreement; (iii) assure the unconditional fulfilment and implementation of all the provisions of the six-point agreement of 2008 between Russia, the European Union and Georgia as well as to work towards an ultimate solution of this conflict which respects the territorial integrity of Georgia. Turkey : Members stress the need for a renewed momentum in Turkey’s accession negotiations to avoid a potential standstill in EU-Turkey relations. They deplore the virtual stagnation of Turkey's accession process; recalls that the EU and Turkey are both responsible for overcoming the obstacles on Turkey's path towards membership of the EU. They hope in any case that Turkey will continue its modernisation along European lines. The Middle East : the report supports the resumption of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and stresses the need for meaningful negotiations to be conducted within a limited time frame and in a climate of mutual trust, a climate which can only exist if the policy of continuing to build settlements is immediately stopped by Israel. Given that the EU is the largest contributor to the PA and Israel's main trading partner, it has a direct interest in persuading both parties to address as soon as possible the fundamental questions to be settled (namely refugees, borders and the status of Jerusalem) and in having a viable State of Palestine living in peace, side by side with the State of Israel. Members call on the EU to assume a stronger political role commensurate with its financial involvement in the region. They call on the VP/HR to present a new European strategy for the region outlining the EU’s interests and aims and the means it can employ, promoting democracy and the rule of law in the region. The Mediterranean region : Members call on the EU to offer unequivocal and prompt support to new aspirations to democracy, freedom and social justice. They remain concerned by the absence in the EU's Mediterranean policy of a clear long-term strategic vision for progress and development in the region and call for clarification and improvement of the rationale, goals and working methods of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM). The report calls on the EU to build up a partnership based on mutual interest and focusing on employment, education and training in order to help alleviate the current social and economic crisis in these countries, and to provide appropriate assistance that may be needed to support the ongoing political reforms and social and economic development. Members urge the authorities of Syria, Bahrain and Yemen to refrain from the use of force against protesters and to respect their right to freedom of assembly and expression. Asia : Members stress that the starting point for any long-term solution to the Afghan crisis must be the Afghan citizens’ interests as regards their internal security, civil protection, and economic and social progress, and should include concrete measures for the eradication of poverty and discrimination against women, for enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, as well as reconciliation mechanisms, an end to opium production, a robust state-building exercise, the integration of Afghanistan into the international community and the banishing of al-Qa'ida from the country. The report reiterates its view that Pakistan has a key role in the region and that a stable, secular, democratic and prosperous Pakistan is of vital importance to stability in Afghanistan and the wider region. The committee fully endorses the commitment to seek an early negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear issue and supports the Council's twin-track approach aimed at finding a diplomatic solution, as that is the only viable option for a response to the Iranian nuclear issue. It strongly condemns the continuing provocative, inflammatory and anti-Semitic rhetoric of the Iranian President, who has called for Israel to be ‘wiped out’, and particularly deplores the threats made against the very existence of the State of Israel. It is very concerned by the exponentially rising numbers of executions in Iran, which come down to extrajudicial state murder in view of the lack of any due process, as well as by the continued systematic repression of citizens aspiring to more freedom and democracy. Members express their satisfaction at the intensification of sectoral dialogues with China and call for concerted joint work on the controversial issues highlighted at the recent EU-China Summit. They expect the EU to show solidarity and provide support in order to help Japan and the Japanese authorities following the terrible earthquake, tsunami and subsequent nuclear catastrophe which has struck the country. Members also recognise the enormous importance of India as an emerging regional economic power and as a great democratic partner for Europe. Africa : the report supports the partnerships with the African Union (AU) and other African regional organisations in addressing stability and security concerns on the African continent and in ensuring progress in other key areas, such as democratic governance and human rights, climate change and the achievement of the MDGs. Members express support for the decision to devise a comprehensive EU approach to the Horn of Africa region. They believe that the EU should adopt a comprehensive approach to security and stability concerns in the Sahel region.
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN title: A7-0168/2011
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20032&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-227 title: T7-0227/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006. Whilst welcoming the Council's annual report, Parliament reiterates its position in favour of developing a coherent EU foreign policy strategy which should clearly identify the common foreign and security policy interests of the EU. It calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) to use to the full her powers to initiate, implement and ensure compliance with the CFSP, involving Parliament’s relevant bodies fully in that endeavour. The resolution stresses the need to enhance coherence between the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States under the leadership of the VP/HR with a view to better integrating all relevant instruments and policies and delivering a single EU message on key political issues. The resolution expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and other external policies, to help strengthen the EU’s role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status. It calls on the VP/HR to set up the necessary coordination structures and mechanisms inside the EEAS. It stresses that the role of EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) should generally be to represent and coordinate EU policy towards regions with specific strategic or security interests for the EU which require a continuous EU presence and visibility . Close coordination must be established between the EUSRs and the relevant EEAS departments and that important thematic issues should be reconsidered and proposals put forward for this role to be taken over by high-ranking EEAS officials or EUSRs. Members recall the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres and have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations. In this context, Members underline that in order to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the CFSP, a new culture of dialogue, reciprocal trust and exchange of information should finally pervade interinstitutional relations, both in the defining phase and in the conducting and a posteriori assessment phases. Members take the view that the European Parliament should receive adequate information prior to the adoption of mandates and strategies in the CFSP sphere. They believe, in this regard, that full transparency and democratic scrutiny require separate budget lines for each and every mission; reiterates its position that, in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the CFSP. Parliament reiterates its willingness to reach an agreement with national parliaments that will result in a real enhancement of the parliamentary dimension of the European Union as global actor. (1) Main CFSP thematic issues : the resolution emphasises that CSDP actions should be embedded in a comprehensive policy targeting countries and regions in crisis where the EU's values and strategic interests are at stake and where CSDP operations would provide a real added value in promoting peace, stability and the rule of law. Members stress, further, the need for a lessons learnt process more accurate in assessing the successful implementation of each operation and its lasting impact on the ground. They call on the VP/HR, the Council and the Member States to overcome the imbalance between civilian and military planning capabilities in the EEAS and to increase the number of staff in the fields of justice, civilian administration, customs and mediation so as to ensure that adequate and sufficient expertise can be provided for CSDP missions. Parliament considers that the main strategic priorities for the Union are as follows: the need for optimal coordination between EU disaster responses and other EU instruments – such as CSDP civilian and/or military missions – which are already being deployed on the ground or which could be set up in the aftermath of a crisis; strengthen international crisis-management partnerships and enhance dialogue with other major crisis-management actors – such as the UN, NATO, the African Union (AU), the OSCE and third countries such as the USA, Turkey, etc; further expand the EU’s capacity to prevent conflict as an alternative to crisis management; reduce EU energy dependence on third countries: in this regard, the committee calls on the VP/HR to pursue with determination Parliament's recommendations for the development of a coherent and coordinated policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in constructive dialogue with energy suppliers, and especially with Russia as well as with transit countries; formulate strategies which draw attention to a new generation of security challenges and risks, e.g. cyber-attacks, social unrest, political insurgencies, global criminal networks and economic activities endangering the rule of law and the principles of democracy; point out that European foreign policy must take account of the external dimension of the European area of freedom, security and justice; reiterates the importance of orderly migration management ; strengthen the EU’s role in the area of global climate governance and further develop a dialogue with other key actors, such as the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India), Russia, the United States and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations; firmly mainstream human rights into EU foreign policy; urge the VP/HR to ensure that CFSP policies and actions fully implement UNSCR 1325 on women, peace and security . (2) Main CFSP geographical priorities : the resolution emphasises that effective multilateralism should be the overriding strategic concern of the Union and that, in this context, the EU should take a leading role in international cooperation, support international institutions, facilitate international consensus and advance global action. Transatlantic relations : Members invite the Union to reconfirm its commitment to the transatlantic partnership with the US and the goal of a barrier-free transatlantic market, which should provide the basis for reinforced transatlantic partnership. They urge the development of a comprehensive EU-US strategy for the improvement of the security situation throughout the greater Middle East, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan which involves cooperation with Turkey, Russia and China. Western Balkans : the resolution confirms the EU membership prospects of all the Western Balkan countries and underlines the importance of a continuous commitment to the process from both the countries of the region and the EU. It notes, however, that political instability and institutional weaknesses, together with unresolved bilateral issues, are hampering the further progress of some countries towards EU integration. It stresses that the Union needs a clear and common vision towards the region and calls on the VP/HR and the Commission to actively engage in solving the persistent problems. Eastern Partnership : Members encourage the VP/HR and the Commission to pursue their commitment to the Eastern Partnership with the eastern European neighbours, with a view to their political association and economic integration, including in the area of energy, on the basis of shared European values and within a framework of conditions and incentives intended to trigger reforms. Members reaffirm the necessity of a coherent approach in the regional cooperation processes through the operationalisation of the initiatives and instruments proposed by the EU for its Eastern neighbourhood (European Partnership, Black Sea Synergy/EU Strategy for the Black Sea, etc.). They call for the prompt establishment of the EU-Neighbourhood-East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST), without the participation of the Belarusian Parliament. Central Asia : Parliament recognises the big potential for developing strategic cooperation between the EU and Central Asia to tackle common security challenges as well as on political, economic and energy issues. It also stresses the urgency to address water management issues at regional level. Russia : the VP/HR is called upon to: (i) ensure that the EU's approach towards Russia, including in the negotiations on a new EU-Russia Agreement, is coherent; (ii) ensure that enhancing the rule of law, including international law, the principles of reciprocity and transparency, as well as a commitment to the values of pluralist democracy and respect for human rights, constitute the core of the new comprehensive agreement; (iii) assure the unconditional fulfilment and implementation of all the provisions of the six-point agreement of 2008 between Russia, the European Union and Georgia as well as to work towards an ultimate solution of this conflict which respects the territorial integrity of Georgia. Turkey : Members stress the need for a renewed momentum in Turkey’s accession negotiations to avoid a potential standstill in EU-Turkey relations. They deplore the virtual stagnation of Turkey's accession process. Parliament recalls that the EU and Turkey are both responsible for overcoming the obstacles on Turkey's path towards membership of the EU. They hope in any case that Turkey will continue its modernisation along European lines. The Middle East : the resolution supports the resumption of direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) and stresses the need for meaningful negotiations to be conducted within a limited time frame and in a climate of mutual trust, a climate which can only exist if the policy of continuing to build settlements is immediately stopped by Israel. Given that the EU is the largest contributor to the PA and Israel's main trading partner, it has a direct interest in persuading both parties to address as soon as possible the fundamental questions to be settled (namely refugees, borders and the status of Jerusalem) and in having a viable State of Palestine living in peace, side by side with the State of Israel. Members call on the EU to assume a stronger political role commensurate with its financial involvement in the region. They call on the VP/HR to present a new European strategy for the region outlining the EU’s interests and aims and the means it can employ, promoting democracy and the rule of law in the region. The Mediterranean region : Members call on the EU to offer unequivocal and prompt support to new aspirations to democracy, freedom and social justice. They remain concerned by the absence in the EU's Mediterranean policy of a clear long-term strategic vision for progress and development in the region and call for clarification and improvement of the rationale, goals and working methods of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM). The resolution calls on the EU to build up a partnership based on mutual interest and focusing on employment, education and training in order to help alleviate the current social and economic crisis in these countries, and to provide appropriate assistance that may be needed to support the ongoing political reforms and social and economic development. Members urge the authorities of Syria, Bahrain and Yemen to refrain from the use of force against protesters and to respect their right to freedom of assembly and expression. Whilst regretting the lack of cohesion between EU Member States on how to address the situation in Libya , Parliament welcomes, however, the Council's decision to set up a European Union military operation in support of humanitarian assistance operations in response to the crisis situation in Libya, the so called EUFOR Libya operation. Asia : Members stress that the starting point for any long-term solution to the Afghan crisis must be the Afghan citizens’ interests as regards their internal security, civil protection, and economic and social progress, and should include concrete measures for the eradication of poverty and discrimination against women, for enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, as well as reconciliation mechanisms, an end to opium production, a robust state-building exercise, the integration of Afghanistan into the international community and the banishing of al-Qa'ida from the country. The resolution reiterates its view that Pakistan has a key role in the region and that a stable, secular, democratic and prosperous Pakistan is of vital importance to stability in Afghanistan and the wider region. Parliament fully endorses the commitment to seek an early negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear issue and supports the Council's twin-track approach aimed at finding a diplomatic solution, as that is the only viable option for a response to the Iranian nuclear issue. It strongly condemns the continuing provocative, inflammatory and anti-Semitic rhetoric of the Iranian President, who has called for Israel to be ‘wiped out’, and particularly deplores the threats made against the very existence of the State of Israel. It is very concerned by the exponentially rising numbers of executions in Iran, which come down to extrajudicial state murder in view of the lack of any due process, as well as by the continued systematic repression of citizens aspiring to more freedom and democracy. Members express their satisfaction at the intensification of sectoral dialogues with China and call for concerted joint work on the controversial issues highlighted at the recent EU-China Summit. They expect the EU to show solidarity and provide support in order to help Japan and the Japanese authorities following the terrible earthquake, tsunami and subsequent nuclear catastrophe which has struck the country. Members also recognise the enormous importance of India as an emerging regional economic power and as a great democratic partner for Europe. Africa : Parliament supports the partnerships with the African Union (AU) and other African regional organisations in addressing stability and security concerns on the African continent and in ensuring progress in other key areas, such as democratic governance and human rights, climate change and the achievement of the MDGs. It expresses support for the decision to devise a comprehensive EU approach to the Horn of Africa region. Members believe that the EU should adopt a comprehensive approach to security and stability concerns in the Sahel region.
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/7/03499
New
  • AFET/7/03499
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p1
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
New
6.10
Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
procedure/title
Old
Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Inter-institutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
New
Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) in 2009
activities
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: SWOBODA Hannes group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2010-09-13T00:00:00 2010-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: S&D name: GUALTIERI Roberto
  • date: 2011-04-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: SWOBODA Hannes group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2010-09-13T00:00:00 2010-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: S&D name: GUALTIERI Roberto type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-168&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0168/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20032&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-227 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0227/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: SWOBODA Hannes group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew group: ECR name: TANNOCK Charles group: GUE/NGL name: MEYER Willy responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2010-07-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ALBERTINI Gabriele
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2010-09-13T00:00:00 2010-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE name: NEYNSKY Nadezhda group: S&D name: GUALTIERI Roberto
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/7/03499
reference
2010/2124(INI)
title
Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Inter-institutional Agreement of 17 May 2006
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132-p1
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Annual report
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)