Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ITRE | BŘEZINA Jan ( PPE) | HERCZOG Edit ( S&D), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE), RIVASI Michèle ( Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen ( ECR), TZAVELA Niki ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | HAGLUND Carl ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 007
Legal Basis:
Euratom Treaty A 007Events
PURPOSE: to ensure the continuation of research and training activities funded by the EU in the area of nuclear science and technology for the period 2012-2013.
NON LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2012/93/Euratom concerning the Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (2012 to 2013).
CONTENT: the Council extended, for a two-year period, the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) framework programme for nuclear research.
The Euratom programme, which expires at the end of 2011, has been extended in order to align it with the end of the EU's current financial cycle in 2013. Euratom programmes are limited by the Euratom Treaty to five years, whereas the general 7th framework programme for research, which runs until the end of 2013, lasts for seven years.
This Decision forms part of the package of decisions relating to framework programmes comprising two types of activities ( direct and indirect actions) and the rules of participation .
The Framework Programme will build on the achievements of the Seventh Framework Programme adopted by Council Decision 2006/970/Euratom concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of Euratom for the period 2007 to 2011), whilst including necessary reinforced emphasis on nuclear safety contributing to reorientation of nuclear research. Regarding policy, the most significant development has been the adoption and endorsement of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) as part of a broad portfolio approach to addressing future energy challenges.
Priorities: the programme will place particular stress on nuclear safety and security as well as radiation protection and, at the same time, will contribute to Innovation Union and to the creation of the European Research Area.
The Framework Programme will cover Community research, technological development, international cooperation, and dissemination of technical information, exploitation activities and training, to be set out in two specific programmes.
The first specific programme shall cover the following indirect actions:
· fusion energy research, with the objective of developing the technology for a safe, sustainable, environmentally responsible and economically viable energy source;
· nuclear fission, safety and radiation protection, with the objective of enhancing the safety of nuclear fission and other uses of radiation in industry, in medicine and in improving the management of radioactive waste.
The second specific programme shall cover the direct research activities of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) in the field of nuclear waste management, environmental impact, safety and security.
Ethical principles : all the research activities carried out under the Framework Programme shall be carried out in compliance with fundamental ethical principles, including those reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Financial envelope: the maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme shall be EUR 2 560 270 000 . This amount shall be distributed as follows:
· for the specific programme to be carried out by means of indirect actions: (i) fusion energy research EUR 2 208 809 000 ; (ii) nuclear fission, safety, and radiation protection EUR 118 245 000;
· for the specific programme, to be carried out by means of direct actions: nuclear activities of the JRC : EUR 233 216 000.
Monitoring, assessment and review: the Commission shall continually and systematically monitor the implementation of the Framework Programme and its specific programmes and regularly report and disseminate the results of this monitoring. In early 2013, a specific monitoring report shall be presented to the Council, dedicated to the implementation of nuclear safety and security activities of the Framework Programme.
Following the completion of the Framework Programme, the Commission shall, by 31 December 2015, have an external evaluation carried out by independent experts of its rationale, implementation and achievements.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 21/02/2012.
The European Parliament adopted a non-legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council decision concerning the Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (2012-2013).
Parliament considers that the prime reference amount set in the legislative proposal is not compatible with the ceiling of Heading 1a of the current Multiannual Financial Framework 2007- 2013 (MFF). It takes note of the Commission proposal to revise the current MFF in order to accommodate the additional unforeseen funding for ITER for the years 2012-2013, and it is willing to enter into negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority with a view to reaching a swift agreement on the financing of the Euratom research programme by the end of 2011. Members recall their opposition to any form of redeployment from the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) as proposed in the Commission proposal.
The main amendments to the proposal are as follows:
Nuclear safety : Parliament states that the improvement of nuclear safety and, where relevant, security aspects, should be prioritised given the possible cross-border impact of nuclear incidents. In view of the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan resulting from the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011, additional research work in the field of nuclear fission safety is necessary in order to reassure Union citizens that the safety of nuclear facilities based in the Union continues to meet the highest international standards. Such additional work requires an increase in the budget allocation for nuclear fission.
Additional funding of ITER : an agreement on additional funding of ITER solely through transfers of unused 2011 margins of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and without redeployments from the Seventh EU Framework Programme (2007-2013) to the Framework Programme (2012-2013) would allow for swift adoption of the programme in 2011.
A recital states that to accommodate the Framework Programme (2012-2013) in the MFF for the years 2012 and 2013, it will be necessary to amend the MFF by increasing the ceiling of Heading 1a. If no other 2011 MFF margins are available to be transferred in 2012 and 2013, the Flexibility Instrument, as provided for in point 27 of the IIA, should be mobilised.
For the 2014-2020 MFF, the financial resources dedicated to the ITER project should be fixed for the whole programming period so that any over-running of the costs beyond the EU share of EUR 6.6 billion for the ITER construction period, currently planned to be finalised in 2020, should be financed outside the MFF ceilings ('ring fencing').
Parliament adds that the Framework Programme (2012-2013) should be on the one hand be open to the participation of countries that have concluded the necessary agreements to this effect, and should also be open, at project level and on the basis of mutual benefit, to the participation of entities from third countries and of international organisations for scientific cooperation. On the other hand, this also means that, particularly with regard to the ITER project, the international partners should fully respect their financial obligations.
Framework Programme : the resolution stresses the need to place particular emphasis on nuclear safety, security and radiation protection.
It adds that the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall contribute to implementing the SET-plan. Its actions should take into account the Strategic Research Agenda of the three existing European technology platforms on nuclear energy: SNETP, IGDTP and MELODI.
Funding : the maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR 2 100270 000 (rather than EUR 2 560270 000). This amount shall be distributed as follows:
fusion energy research EUR 1 748 809 000; this figure include the necessary funds for the continuation of the JET programme in Culham; nuclear fission, especially safety, improving the management of nuclear waste and radiation protection EUR 118 245 000; nuclear activities of the JRC relating to nuclear safety, environmental protection and decommissioning EUR 233 216 000.
Special attention shall be paid to the development of contractual arrangements that reduce the risk of failure to perform as well as the reallocation of risks and costs over time.
Special attention shall also be paid to initiatives ancillary to core nuclear research, in particular as regards investment in human capital and adequate working conditions and actions aimed at addressing the risk of skills shortages in the coming years .
Monitoring, assessment and review : Member States and the Commission shall establish a review of professional qualifications, training and skills in the nuclear field in the Union, which gives an overall picture of the current situation and enable appropriate solutions to be identified and implemented.
Annex : on nuclear fission and radiation protection, Parliament states that special attention should be given to long-lived nuclear waste when decommissioning outdated systems. It stresses continued support for the retention and development of qualified personnel required to maintain the nuclear independence of the Union and consistently ensure, and improve the level of, nuclear safety. It is crucial to keep nuclear expertise in the Union, as regards radioprotection and the dismantling of nuclear facilities, as nuclear energy will play a key role in the Union's energy mix, including decommissioning and long-life waste-management activities.
Lastly, Parliament states that the management of European research funding should be more trust-based and risk-tolerant towards participants at all stages of the projects, while ensuring accountability, with flexible Union rules to improve alignment, where possible, with existing different national regulations and recognised accounting practices. It adds that it is necessary to strike a balance between trust and control – between risk taking and the dangers that risk involves – in ensuring the sound financial management of Union research funds.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the report by Jan BREZINA (EPP, CZ) on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (2012-2013).
It recommended that the European Parliament made some amendments to the Commission proposal. The committee considers that the prime reference amount set in the legislative proposal is not compatible with the ceiling of Heading 1a of the current Multiannual Financial Framework 2007- 2013 (MFF). It takes note of the Commission proposal to revise the current MFF in order to accommodate the additional unforeseen funding for ITER for the years 2012-2013, and it is willing to enter into negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority with a view to reaching a swift agreement on the financing of the Euratom research programme by the end of 2011. Members recall their opposition to any form of redeployment from the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) as proposed in the Commission proposal.
The main amendments to the proposal are as follows:
Nuclear safety : the report states that the improvement of nuclear safety and, where relevant, security aspects, should be prioritised given the possible cross-border impact of nuclear incidents. In view of the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan resulting from the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011, additional research work in the field of nuclear fission safety is necessary in order to reassure Union citizens that the safety of nuclear facilities based in the Union continues to meet the highest international standards. Such additional work requires an increase in the budget allocation for nuclear fission.
Additional funding of ITER : an agreement on additional funding of ITER solely through transfers of unused 2011 margins of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and without redeployments from the Seventh EU Framework Programme (2007-2013) to the Framework Programme (2012-2013) would allow for swift adoption of the programme in 2011.
A recital states that to accommodate the Framework Programme (2012-2013) in the MFF for the years 2012 and 2013, it will be necessary to amend the MFF by increasing the ceiling of Heading 1a. If no other 2011 MFF margins are available to be transferred in 2012 and 2013, the Flexibility Instrument, as provided for in point 27 of the IIA, should be mobilised.
For the 2014-2020 MFF, the financial resources dedicated to the ITER project should be fixed for the whole programming period so that any over-running of the costs beyond the EU share of EUR 6.6 billion for the ITER construction period, currently planned to be finalised in 2020, should be financed outside the MFF ceilings ('ring fencing').
Framework Programme : the report stresses the need to place particular emphasis on nuclear safety, security and radiation protection.
It adds that the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall contribute to implementing the SET-plan. Its actions should take into account the Strategic Research Agenda of the three existing European technology platforms on nuclear energy: SNETP, IGDTP and MELODI. Members consider that more emphasis could be put on the need for coherence between the research and training activities to be pursued in 2012-2013 and the strategic research agendas of three major European cooperative initiatives which have been launched under the 7 th Euratom framework program: the European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial Initiative under SET-Plan (encompassing the Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform – SNETP - and the Implementing Geological Disposal Technology Platform - IGDTP) and the Multidisciplinary European Low-Dose Initiative (MELODI).
Funding: the maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR 2 100270 000 (rather than EUR 2 560270 000). This amount shall be distributed as follows:
fusion energy research EUR 1 748 809 000; nuclear fission, especially safety, improving the management of nuclear waste and radiation protection EUR 118 245 000; nuclear activities of the JRC relating to nuclear safety, environmental protection and decommissioning EUR 233 216 000.
Special attention shall be paid to the development of contractual arrangements that reduce the risk of failure to perform as well as the reallocation of risks and costs over time.
Monitoring, assessment and review : Member States and the Commission shall establish a review of professional qualifications, training and skills in the nuclear field in the Union, which gives an overall picture of the current situation and enable appropriate solutions to be identified and implemented.
Annex : on nuclear fission and radiation protection, the report states that special attention should be given to long-lived nuclear waste when decommissioning outdated systems. It stresses continued support for the retention and development of qualified personnel required to maintain the nuclear independence of the Union and consistently ensure, and improve the level of, nuclear safety. It is crucial to keep nuclear expertise in the Union, as regards radioprotection and the dismantling of nuclear facilities, as nuclear energy will play a key role in the Union's energy mix, including decommissioning and long-life waste-management activities.
Lastly, the committee states that the management of European research funding should be more trust-based and risk-tolerant towards participants at all stages of the projects, while ensuring accountability, with flexible Union rules to improve alignment, where possible, with existing different national regulations and recognised accounting practices. It adds that it is necessary to strike a balance between trust and control – between risk taking and the dangers that risk involves – in ensuring the sound financial management of Union research funds.
Following a public debate , the Council took note of a progress report submitted by the Presidency on the proposal for extending, for a two-year period, the current European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) framework programme, which expires at the end of 2011. A number of delegations asked to continue efforts in order to achieve an agreement on the proposal as soon as possible .
The proposal will extend the Euratom programme in order to align it with the end of the EU's current financial cycle in 2013. Euratom programmes are limited by the Euratom Treaty to five years, whereas the general 7th framework programme for research, which runs until end 2013, lasts for seven years.
This ex-ante evaluation accompanies the legislative package of Commission's proposals for the Euratom nuclear research and training activities (2012-13).
The legislative package consists of:
the draft Council Decisions for the Framework Programme; specific Programmes for direct and indirect actions; rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the framework programme and for the dissemination of research results.
The legislative package aims to continue supporting R&D actions in the nuclear field carried out under the 7th Euratom Framework Programme (2007-2011). The proposals will only cover two years (2012-13), in accordance with the current financial perspectives (2007-2013) and in line with the timeframe of the EU 7th Framework Programme (2007-2013).
Research co-funded by Euratom plays an important role in enhancing the safety, resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness of nuclear fission and other uses of radiation in industry and medicine, and some of the research project are playing a key initiating role in the recently launched European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial Initiative (ESNII), one of the six European industrial initiatives launched under the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-plan) in 2010.
The proposals for the Euratom Framework Programme are clearly linked to the objectives of the Europe 2020 and Energy 2020 strategies. The programme will contribute to the Innovation Union flagship by supporting pre-commercial research and facilitating technology transfer process between academia and industry and to the Resource efficient Europe flagship by greatly increasing the overall sustainability of nuclear energy. By putting emphasis on training in all its activities, boosting competitiveness in the current nuclear industry and creating a new sector of high-tech industry for fusion energy in particular, the Euratom programme will lead to growth and new jobs in a wide range of disciplines. Proposals for the Euratom Framework Programme follow up the conclusions of the European Council (4 February 2011) which agreed that the EU and its Member States will promote investment in renewables, safe and sustainable low carbon technologies and focus on implementing the technology priorities established in the SET-plan. Both nuclear fission and fusion are identified in the SET-Plan as energy technologies which Europe must maintain, develop and deploy in order to meet its short and longer term energy objectives.
Lastly, proposals for the Euratom Framework Programme (2012-2013) take account of the simplification process, launched by the Commission in 2010, which makes current and future research programme more attractive and more accessible to the best researchers and most innovative companies. Simplification measures for the Euratom Framework Programme (2012-2013) will be implemented through the Commission decision C(2011)174 of 24 January 2011.
PURPOSE: to adopt a multiannual framework programme for nuclear research and training activities (Framework Programme (2012-2013)’) for the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
BACKGROUND: joint national and European efforts in the area of research and training are essential to promote and ensure economic growth and the well-being of citizens in Europe. Under Article 7 of the Euratom Treaty, the Euratom Framework Programme is the Community’s main instrument for supporting and complementing Member States’ activities in nuclear research and development (R&D). The existing provisions are contained in Council Decision 2006/970/Euratom on the Euratom Framework Programme and they will expire at the end of 2011.
The proposal is for the adoption of a Council decision concerning Euratom's Framework Programme for 2012-2013.
This Framework Programme is part of a legislative package that contains proposals for decisions for the Framework Programme itself, two Specific Programmes (for direct and indirect actions), and the Rules for Participation ).
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: in accordance with Article 21 of the Implementing Rules for the Financial Regulation (Commission Regulation N° 2342/2002), the Commission has prepared an ex ante evaluation. Since this proposal aims to continue the activities of the Euratom Framework Programme for 2012-13 under the same financial perspectives, the requirement for an Impact Assessment has been waived.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 7 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). The added value of Euratom involvement in nuclear research is intimately linked to cross-border effects, economies of scale, and contributing to the resolution of market failures. Euratom projects in fission, fusion and radiation protection can allow research to achieve the required ‘critical mass’, while lowering commercial risk and levering private investment. Euratom actions also play a key role in transferring nuclear skills and knowledge across frontiers, helping to foster excellence in research and innovation.
CONTENT: the overall aim of the proposal is to ensure the continuation of EU-funded research and training activities in nuclear science and technology during the years 2012-13. The Euratom Framework Programme is also crucial if Europe is to maximise the return on investment in ITER which has now entered its construction phase and relies on the continued support of Europe's fusion energy research programme. In addition, both nuclear fission and fusion are identified in the SET-Plan as energy technologies which Europe must develop in order to meet its energy objectives.
The Euratom Framework Programme for 2012-13 contains broadly the same scientific, technical and strategic objectives and uses the same funding schemes as the current Euratom FP7 programme (2007-2011). Nonetheless, the programme has evolved over the last five years, and must take into account the results of recent research and the new policy context and research landscape in Europe. Regarding policy, the most significant development has been the adoption and endorsement of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) as part of a broad portfolio approach to addressing future energy challenges. The Framework Programme (2012-2013) will cover Community research, technological development, international cooperation, dissemination of technical information, exploitation activities and training, to be set out in the two specific programmes.
The broad objectives for the Euratom Framework Programme for the years 2012-13 are:
in the area of fusion energy research, to develop the technology for a safe, sustainable, environmentally responsible and economically viable energy source; in the area of nuclear fission and radiation protection, to enhance the safety, resource efficiency and cost-effectiveness of nuclear fission and other uses of radiation in industry and medicine, and to enhance nuclear security (nuclear safeguards, non-proliferation, combating illicit trafficking and nuclear forensics).
Budget for Euratom Framework Programme 2012-2013 (including ITER): the draft appropriations initially provided for nuclear research in the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2007-2013 (MFF) are insufficient owing to the substantial cost increase of the ITER project. The cost increase of the ITER project was the subject of an in-depth assessment in the Commission Communication “ITER status and possible way forward”. If no decision were taken on the increase of budget for ITER, Euratom's contribution to ITER would be limited to the appropriations envisaged for this purpose in the MFF, which would as a consequence prevent Euratom from fulfilling its legal obligations under the ITER agreement.
In its conclusions of 12 July 2010, the Council reaffirmed its commitment to ITER, acknowledged its increased financing needs and set out a number of guidelines on cost containment and management. The Council agreed on a EUR 6.6 billion limit of the European contribution to the construction phase of ITER until 2020. This includes EUR 1.4 billion during period of 2012-2013. The Council also mandated the Commission to support the adoption of the ITER Baseline, which prompted the Commission's proposal to amend the Multiannual Financial Framework, to address additional financing needs of ITER
At the extraordinary ITER Council meeting of 28 July 2010 the Baseline was adopted. Euratom's support was given ad referendum. The European Parliament and the Council are still to approve the Commission's proposed amendments.
Following Commission's proposal to amend the MFF, the Council reached an agreement in November 2010 on the use of existing margins of the 2010 budget and redeployment within the MFF and 7th EU Research Framework Programme to cover the additional ITER needs at the level of EUR 1.3 billion, i.e. 100 million short of the needs of EUR 1.4 billion acknowledged by the Council conclusions of 12 July 2010. The reduction of EUR 100 million for the period 2012-2013 does not contradict, nor cancel, the Council's commitment to an overall European contribution to the ITER construction costs at the level of EUR 6.6 billion.
In the context of the conciliation procedure for the 2011 budget and the related discussion on the flexibility instrument, the budgetary authority did not conclude an agreement on additional European funding for ITER. Therefore, a decision on that matter, based on the Commission's proposal will have to be taken as soon as possible during 2011. The Commission proposes that, in these circumstances, the legislative process concerning proposals for Euratom FP for 2012-13 will be carried out in parallel to the continuing discussion on the budget for ITER and the 2012 budget. Agreement on additional funding will allow for swift adoption of the Euratom research programme in 2011, a decision that will be important in view of maintaining Euratom's support for exploitation of nuclear facilities such as JET as well as JRC direct actions.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR 2 560 270 000 . This amount shall be distributed as follows (in EUR): (i) for the specific programme, to be carried out by means of indirect actions: – fusion energy research 2 208 809 000; nuclear fission and radiation protection 118 245 000; (ii) for the specific programme, to be carried out by means of direct actions: nuclear activities of the JRC 233 216 000.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2012/93
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 047 18.02.2012, p. 0025
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)29
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0509/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0360/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0360/2011
- Committee opinion: PE469.793
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.074
- Committee draft report: PE469.877
- Debate in Council: 3104
- Debate in Council: 3094
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0204
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0072
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)0204
- Committee draft report: PE469.877
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.074
- Committee opinion: PE469.793
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0360/2011
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)29
Activities
- Jan BŘEZINA
- Diana WALLIS
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carl HAGLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edit HERCZOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Romana JORDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír REMEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Teresa RIERA MADURELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimir URUTCHEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
91 |
2011/0046(NLE)
2011/09/13
BUDG
91 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 2 (2) The Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for nuclear research and training activities (2012 - 2013), hereinafter ‘the Framework Programme (2012 - 2013)’, should co
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The framework programme (2012- 2013) should take account of the impact, notably financial and budgetary, on the ITER programme of the Fukushima catastrophe and of the decisions made in its wake, in particular Germany’s decision to abandon its nuclear programme, and should therefore conduct an impact assessment.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The design and implementation of the Framework Programme (2012 - 2013) should be based on the principles of simplicity, stability, transparency, legal certainty, consistency, excellence and trust following the recommendations of the European Parliament in its Report on simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) should contribute to the implementation of the Innovation Union, one of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives adopted by the Communication from the
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5)
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) should contribute to the implementation of the Innovation Union
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The improvement of nuclear safety and, where relevant, security aspects, should be prioritised given the possible cross-border impact of nuclear incidents.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 4 (4) The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) should contribute to the implementation of the Innovation Union
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 a (new) (6a) The European Sustainable Nuclear Industrial Initiative (ESNII) has as its aim the deployment of Gen-IV Fast Neutron Reactors with closed fuel cycle between 2035 and 2040. It follows three lines of technological development and includes four major projects: the ASTRID prototype (sodium cooled), the ALLEGRO experimental model (gas cooled), the ALFRED demonstrator (lead cooled) and, as support infrastructure for the latter technology, the MYRRHA fast neutron irradiation facility (lead-bismuth cooled).
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The Energy Policy for Europe recognises the significant potential contribution from nuclear power in the areas of competitiveness, CO2 emission reduction
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In view of the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan resulting from the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March 2011, additional research work in the field of nuclear fission safety is necessary in order to reassure Union citizens that the safety of nuclear facilities based in the Union continues to meet the highest international standards. Such additional work requires an increase in the budget allocation for nuclear fission.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) The Energy Policy for Europe recognises the significant potential contribution from nuclear power in the areas of competitiveness, CO2 emission reduction
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 (7)
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 6 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 8 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 7 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) Euratom has created a
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 (9) Euratom has created a single and fully integrated fusion research programme that has taken a leading international role in the development of fusion as a source of energy, but whose results are meagre and whose costs are out of control;
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 9 a (new) (9a) An agreement on additional funding of ITER solely through transfers of unused 2011 margins of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and without redeployments from the Seventh Framework Programme for Research to the Euratom Framework Programme would allow for swift adoption of the Euratom research programme in 2011.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 10 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 (11) The Council Conclusions on the need for skills in the nuclear field, adopted at its meeting held on 1 and 2 December 2008, recognise that it is essential to maintain within the Community a high level of training, and proper working conditions, in the nuclear field.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 16 (16) This Decision should establish, for the entire duration of the Framework Programme (2012-2013), a financial envelope that constitutes the prime reference, within the meaning of point 37 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 13 (13) The realisation of ITER in Europe, in accordance with the Agreement of 21 November 2006 on the establishment of the ITER International Fusion Energy Organisation for the joint implementation of the ITER project, should be
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 16 (16) This Decision should establish, for the entire duration of the Framework Programme (2012-2013), a financial envelope that constitutes the prime reference, within the meaning of point 37 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA), for the budgetary authority during the annual budgetary procedure
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 16 a (new) (16a) For the 2014-2020 MFF, the financial resources dedicated to the ITER project should be fixed for the whole programming period so that any over- running of the costs beyond the EU share of EUR 6.6 billion for the ITER construction period, currently planned to be finalised in 2020, should be financed outside the MFF ceilings (‘ring fencing’);
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 14 a (new) (14a) The Commission, the European Council, the Council and the Member States are to start a process to amend the Euratom Treaty, strengthening its provisions on the information and co- legislation rights of the European Parliament on Euratom research and environmental protection issues.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) The Joint Research Centre (JRC) should contribute to providing customer- driven scientific and technological support for the formulation, development, implementation and monitoring of the Union
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 16 (16) This Decision should establish, for the entire duration of the Framework
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) The Joint Research Centre (JRC) should contribute to providing customer- driven scientific and technological support for the formulation, development, implementation and monitoring of the Union's policies. In this regard, the JRC should continue to function as an independent reference centre of science and technology and of the latest expertise in nuclear and reactor safety in the Union in the areas of its specific competence;
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 16 a (new) (16a) For the 2014-2020 MFF, the financial resources dedicated to the ITER project should be fixed for the whole programming period so that any over- running of the costs beyond the EU share of EUR 6.6 billion for the ITER construction period, currently planned to be finalised in 2020, should be financed outside the MFF ceilings ('ring fencing').
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 17 (17) The Joint Research Centre (JRC) should contribute to providing
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b b) nuclear fission and radiation protection, with the objective of enhancing
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 18 (18) The international and global dimension of European research activities is important with a view to obtain mutual benefits. The Framework Programme (2012-2013) should therefore on the one hand be open to the participation of countries that have concluded the necessary agreements to this effect, and should also be open, at project level and on the basis of mutual benefit, to the participation of entities from third countries and of international organisations for scientific cooperation. On the other hand, this also means that, particularly with regard to the ITER project, the international partners should fully respect their financial obligations.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR 2.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) shall pursue the general objectives set out in Article 1 and Article 2(a) of the Treaty, placing particular emphasis on nuclear safety, security and radiation protection, while contributing towards the creation of the Innovation Union and building on the European Research Area.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 – fusion energy research
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. The Framework Programme (2012- 2013) shall pursue the general objectives set out in Article
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 – fusion energy research
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – nuclear
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point b b)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – nuclear fission, especially safety, improving the management of nuclear waste and radiation protection 118.245.000;
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – part I.A Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The maximum amount for the implementation of the Framework Programme (2012-2013) shall be EUR 2
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – part I.B – paragraph 2 Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 – fusion energy research
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 –
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – nuclear fission and radiation protection
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – nuclear
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 – nuclear activities of the JRC:
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 – nuclear activities of the JRC relating to nuclear security, environmental protection and decommissioning 233 216 000
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) Special attention shall be paid to the development of contractual arrangements that reduce the risk of failure to perform as well as the reallocation of risks and costs over time.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Special attention shall be paid to initiatives ancillary to core nuclear research, in particular as regards investment in human capital and adequate working conditions and actions aimed at addressing the risk of skills shortages in the coming years.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Member States and the Commission should establish a review of professional qualifications, training and skills in the nuclear field in the European Union, which would give an overall picture of the current situation and enable appropriate solutions to be identified and implemented.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – paragraph 1 The Framework Programme (2012-2013) is organised in two parts corresponding to the ‘indirect’ actions on
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – part I.A – point 2 A focused physics and technology programme will exploit the Joint European Torus (JET) and other ITER-relevant magnetic confinement devices (including, potentially, via new experiments to be implemented and run in parallel with ITER). It will assess specific key ITER technologies, consolidate ITER project choices, and prepare for ITER operation.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B - title I.B.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 1 Establishing a sound scientific and technical basis in order to accelerate practical developments for the safe
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 2 - paragraph 1 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 2 - paragraph 2 Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 2 - paragraph 3 Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 2 - paragraph 4 The Euratom Framework Programme (2012-2013) is characterised by an overriding concern to promote
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 3 - point 1 Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 3 - point 2 Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 3 - point 4 Support for the use and continued availability of, and cooperation between, key research infrastructures in the
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Annex 1 – part I.B – section 3 - point 5 Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part I.B – section 3 - point 5 Support for the retention and further development of scientific competence and human capacity in order to guarantee, as regards radioprotection and the dismantling of nuclear facilities, the availability of suitably qualified researchers, engineers and employees in the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part II – section 1 The JRC Nuclear Specific Programme aims at satisfying the R&D obligations of the Treaty and supporting both the Commission and Member States, in particular in the fields of safeguards and non-proliferation,
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part II – section 2 - paragraph 1 Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part II – section 2 - paragraph 2 To fulfil this goal, there is a clear need for developing knowledge, skills and competence to provide the required scientific state of the art independent and reliable expertise in support to the Union's policies in the domains of nuclear
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part II – section 3 - point 1 1.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – part II – section 3 - point 2 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision Annex II – paragraph 1 a (new) The management of European research funding should be more trust-based and risk-tolerant towards participants at all stages of the projects, while ensuring accountability, with flexible EU rules to improve alignment, where possible, with existing different national regulations and recognised accounting practices;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a decision Annex II – paragraph 1 b (new) It is necessary to strike a balance between trust and control – between risk taking and the dangers that risk involves – in ensuring the sound financial management of Union research funds.
Amendment 7 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the prime reference amount set in the legislative proposal is not compatible with the ceiling of Heading 1a of the current Multiannual Financial Framework 2007-13 (MFF); takes note of the proposal of the Commission of 20.04.2011 (COM (2011)0226) to revise the current MFF on the basis of points 21 to 23 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (IIA) in order to accommodate the additional unforeseen funding for ITER for the years 2012- 2013; is willing to enter into negotiations with the other arm of the budgetary authority, on the basis of all the means provided in the IIA, with a view to reaching a swift agreement on the financing of the Euratom research programme by the end of 2011; recalls its opposition to any form of redeployment from the Seventh Framework Programme for research as proposed in the above- mentioned Commission proposal;
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 a (new) (1a) Whereas it has clearly been demonstrated that the risks of nuclear energy have become unmanageable;
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 1 b (new) (1b) Whereas hardly any progress has been made during the last decades in the production of fusion energy, despite billions of allocations of EU research money;
source: PE-472.176
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.877New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-469877_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.074New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-472074_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.793&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-469793_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111116&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-11-16-TOC_EN.html |
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-360&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.html |
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-360&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0360_EN.html |
events/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-509New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0509_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/05611New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0093New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012D0093 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DecisionNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0072:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0072:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|