Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | RAPKAY Bernhard ( S&D) | BALDASSARRE Raffaele ( PPE), WIKSTRÖM Cecilia ( ALDE), ENGSTRÖM Christian ( Verts/ALE), KARIM Sajjad ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | MÉSZÁROS Alajos ( PPE) | Adam GIEREK ( S&D), Jens ROHDE ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 118-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 118-p1Events
PURPOSE: the creation of unitary patent protection.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
CONTENT: this Regulation aims to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection. The other Regulation concerns the applicable translation arrangements .
BACKGROUND: on 10 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/167/EU authorising enhanced cooperation between 25 countries - Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom ("participating Member States") in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection. On 15 February, the European Parliament approved the establishment of enhanced cooperation. The main obstacle to the creation of unitary patent protection valid in 27 Member States is the lack of unanimity on the choice of the language regime.
The main elements of this Regulation on unitary patent protection are as follows:
Treating a European patent with unitary effect as a national patent : a European patent with unitary effect as an object of property shall be treated in its entirety and in all the participating Member States as a national patent of the participating Member State in which that patent has unitary effect
Uniform protection : the European patent with unitary effect shall confer on its proprietor the right to prevent any third party from committing acts against which that patent provides protection throughout the territories of the participating Member States in which it has unitary effect. The scope of that right and its limitations shall be uniform in all participating Member States in which the patent has unitary effect.
Uniform patent protection will be available to proprietors of a European patent from both the participating Member States and from other States, regardless of their nationality, residence or place of establishment.
Administrative tasks in the framework of the European Patent Organisation (EPO): the EPO has the task of granting European patents valid in the 25 participating States. Furthermore, the participating Member States shall give the EPO certain tasks, particularly: (i) to administer requests for unitary effect by proprietors of European patents; (ii) to administer the Register for unitary patent protection; (iii) to receive and register statements on licensing; (iv) publish translations; (v) to collect and administer renewal fees; (vi) to administer the compensation scheme for the reimbursement of translation costs.
As requested by the European Parliament, participating Member States shall ensure compliance with the Regulation in fulfilling their international obligations undertaken in the Convention on the Grant of European Patents (EPC) and shall cooperate to that end. They must also set the annual renewal fee and the setting of the share of distribution of the renewal fees in accordance with the Regulation.
Renewal fees: patent proprietors should pay a single annual renewal fee to the EPO for a European patent with unitary effect. At the request of Parliament, the level of the renewal fees should be set with the aim of facilitating innovation and fostering the competitiveness of European businesses, taking into account the situation of specific entities such as small and medium-sized enterprises, for example in the form of lower fees.
The Regulation lays down that the EPO shall retain 50% of the renewal fees paid for European patents with unitary effect. The remaining amount shall be distributed to the participating Member States, and the share of distribution of renewal fees among the participating Member States shall be based on fair, equitable and relevant criteria. These include the size of the market, while ensuring a minimum amount to be distributed to each participating Member State.
Report: not later than three years from the date on which the first European patent with unitary effect takes effect, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report on the operation of the Regulation and, where necessary, make appropriate proposals for amending it. It shall also submit regular reports on the functioning of the renewal fees.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20/01/2013.
APPLICATION: from 01/01/2014 or the date of entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, whichever is the later.
The European Parliament adopted by 484 votes to 164, with 35 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
Parliament reached its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the proposal as follows:
Definitions: it is stipulated that a "European patent with unitary effect" means a European patent which benefits from unitary effect in the territories of all the participating Member States by virtue of this Regulation. The definition of "Register for unitary patent protection" means the register constituting part of the European Patent Register in which the unitary effect and any limitation, license, transfer revocation or lapse of a European patent with unitary effect are registered.
European unitary patent: European patents granted with the same set of claims in respect of all the participating Member States shall benefit from unitary effect in the participating Member States provided that their unitary effect has been registered in the Register for unitary patent protection.
In addition, a European patent with unitary effect may be licensed in respect of the whole or part of the territories of the participating Member States.
Uniform protection: according to the amended text, the European patent with unitary effect shall confer on its proprietor the right to prevent any third party from committing acts against which that patent provides protection throughout the territories of the participating Member States in which it has unitary effect, subject to applicable limitations. The scope of that right and its limitations shall be uniform in all participating Member States in which the patent has unitary effect.
In its report on the operation of the Regulation, the Commission shall evaluate the functioning of the applicable limitations and shall, where necessary, make appropriate proposals.
Treating a European patent with unitary effect as a national patent: a European patent with unitary effect as an object of property shall be treated in its entirety and in all the participating Member States as a national patent of the participating Member State in which that patent has unitary effect and in which, according to the European Patent Register:
(a) the applicant had his residence or principal place of business on the date of filing of the application for the European patent; or
(b) where point (a) does not apply, the applicant had a place of business on the date of filing of the application for the European patent.
Administrative tasks in the framework of the European Patent Organisation (governance): the participating Member States shall entrust the following tasks to the EPO:
the inclusion within the European Patent Register and the administration of the Register for unitary patent protection the collection and administration of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect, in respect of the years following the year in which the European Patent Bulletin mentions their grant; ensuring that requests by the patent proprietor for unitary effect for a European patent are submitted in the language of the proceedings as defined in Article 14(3) of the EPC no later than one month after the mention of the grant is published in the European Patent Bulletin; ensuring that the unitary effect is indicated in the Register for unitary patent protection, where a request for unitary effect has been filed and, during the transitional period provided for in Council Regulation on translation arrangements , has been submitted together with the translations referred to in that Article and that the European Patent Office is informed of any limitations, licenses, transfers and revocations of European patents with unitary effect.
As requested by Members, the Member States shall ensure compliance with the provisions of this Regulation in implementing their international obligations undertaken in the EPC and shall cooperate amongst themselves to that end. The participating Member States shall ensure the setting of the level of renewal fees in accordance with Article 15 and the setting of the share of distribution of the renewal fees.
The Select Committee of the Administrative Council shall consist of the representatives of the Member States and a representative of the Commission as an observer, as well as alternates who will represent them in their absence. The members of the Select Committee may be assisted by advisers or by experts. Decisions of the Select Committee of the Administrative Council shall be taken with due regard for the position of the Commission and in accordance with the rules set out in Article 35(2) of the EPC.
The participating Member States shall ensure effective legal protection before a competent court of one or several participating Member States against the decisions of the European Patent Office.
Level of renewal fees: the level of the renewal fees, shall be fixed, taking into account, among others, the situation of specific entities such as small and medium-sized enterprises.
Distribution: the amended text stipulates that the European Patent Office shall retain 50% of the renewal fees paid for European patents with unitary effect. The remaining amount shall be distributed to the participating Member States in accordance with the share of distribution of the renewal fees.
The share of distribution of renewal fees among the participating Member States shall be based on fair, equitable and relevant criteria which include the size of the market, while ensuring a minimum amount to be distributed to each participating Member State.
Report: not later than three years (rather than six) from the date on which the first European patent with unitary effect takes effect in the territories of the participating Member States, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the operation of this Regulation and, where necessary, make appropriate proposals for amending it. The Commission shall regularly submit to the European Parliament and the Council reports on the functioning of the renewal fees.
Notification: each participating Member State shall notify the Commission of the measures adopted in accordance with Article 4(2 )by the date of application of this Regulation or, in the case of a participating Member State in which the Unified Patent Court does not have exclusive jurisdiction with regard to European patents with unitary effect on the date of application of this Regulation, the date from which the Unified Patent Court has such exclusive jurisdiction in that participating Member State.
Entry into force and application: in accordance with Members’ wishes, the Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2014 or the date of entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, whichever is the later.
Ministers addressed the last outstanding issue in the draft agreement for the creation of a Unified Patent Court, with a view to finalising the "patent package" without delay , with a view to the European Council reaching a successful decision on the matter at its meeting on 28-29 June 2012.
The debate showed that further work was needed to reach consensus on the location of the Central Division of the Court of First instance for the future unitary patent jurisdiction.
The debate followed the statement issued by the Heads of State or Government of the EU Member States participating in enhanced cooperation on the creation of unitary patent protection in which they made a commitment to reach a final agreement on the last outstanding issue in the patent package in June 2012 at the latest.
In December 2011 the Council and the Parliament reached a provisional agreement on the two draft regulations implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection (see also CNS/2011/0094 ).
With regard to the third pillar of the patent system, the creation of a Unified Patent Court that would judge patent litigation cases, final agreement on the seat of the Court is still pending.
The Presidency recalled the statement made on 30 January by the Heads of State or Government of the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation for the creation of unitary patent protection in which they committed to reaching a final agreement on the last outstanding issue in the patent package in June 2012 at the latest.
The Presidency highlighted the significant benefits that the new system will provide to European companies in terms of innovation potential, economic savings and legal certainty, and committed itself to striving to facilitate a final compromise.
Several delegations and the Commission urged the finalisation of a draft agreement by Member States for establishing a Unified Patent Court.
Last December the Council and the Parliament reached a provisional agreement on the two draft regulations implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection ( CNS/2011/0094 ).
The third pillar of the patent system, the creation of a Unified Patent Court that would judge patent litigation cases, is still pending final agreement on the seat of the Court.
The Council exchanged views on a draft agreement aimed at establishing a unified patent litigation system in the context of the creation of unitary patent protection.
The outcome of the debate provides the Presidency with political guidance for continuing work with a view to reaching a political agreement on the patent package before the end of the year .
The draft package is made of legislative measures on how to obtain European patent titles with unitary effect that ensure uniform protection for inventions together with the translation arrangements, and the creation of a unified patent litigation system.
The debate focused on the main principles of a future agreement for creating a common patent court that would ensure compliance with the EU treaties, as requested by the Court of Justice of the EU in its Opinion 1/09 on the compatibility of the envisaged system with EU law.
The vast majority of delegations supported the creation of a cost-effective and legally sound system that would include the following main features:
the future court will be common to EU Member States and thus part of the judicial order of the EU, including the arrangements for requesting a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the EU; third countries will not participate in the agreement setting up the unified patent court; the new court will apply EU law in its entirety and respect its primacy; the draft agreement will contain guarantees for the protection of individuals' rights in the case of infringements of Union law committed by the future unified patent court.
On 27 June 2011 the Council agreed on general approaches on two draft regulations implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection:
proposal for a Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection; proposal for a Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements.
On 30 May 2011, a large majority of member states endorsed the way forward proposed by the Commission of setting up a common jurisdiction by means of an agreement to be concluded between Member States.
During a public session, the Council unanimously agreed on general approaches on two draft regulations implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection.
The first proposal prescribes how patent holders can obtain European patents with unitary effect that ensures uniform protection for their invention and the second one contains the translation arrangements .
The Council authorised the launch of enhanced cooperation in the field of the creation of unitary patent protection on 10 March after having received the European Parliament’s consent to the use of this procedure on 15 February. The enhanced cooperation is a procedure enshrined in the EU treaty that allows a group of countries to adopt new common rules when EU-wide agreement cannot be reached within a reasonable period of time.
The use of enhanced cooperation was requested by 25 out of 27 EU Member States with the aim of establishing a unitary patent that will be valid across the territory of the participating Member States.
All Member States except Italy and Spain were in favour of the use of enhanced cooperation. The main obstacle to the creation of a unitary patent valid throughout the EU (i.e. in all 27 Member States) is the lack of unanimity on the number of languages in which the future unitary patent will be valid, hence the recourse to enhanced cooperation.
Enhanced cooperation is open to non-participating countries, and access to the unitary patent on the territory of participating Member States will also be available to businesses from non-participating Member States.
The Council exchanged views at a public session on the creation of unitary patent protection. The outcome of the debate provides a political orientation for the implementation of enhanced cooperation among 25 Member States towards the creation of a unitary patent title. It paves the way for further work with a view to reaching a general approach at the extraordinary Competitiveness Council meeting devoted to unitary patent protection in Luxembourg on 27 June 2011.
The debate was conducted on the basis of a Presidency compromise text, following the two proposals submitted by the Commission on 13 April with provisions to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection:
the first proposal prescribes how patent holders can obtain European patents with unitary effect that ensures uniform protection for their invention; the second proposal contains the translation arrangements.
Key issues : despite their general support, delegations identified three key matters where they wish to depart from the Commission's proposal, in order to better reflect the conditions set out in their requests and the Council's authorising decision. The draft proposals were also adjusted to accommodate the additional technical issues raised by delegations.
A) All delegations are strongly opposed to empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts on the level of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect , as well as the distribution of renewal fees between the participating Member States. Delegations argued that this proposal represents a significant departure from the content of their request for launching enhanced cooperation since point 38 of the 2009 Council conclusions on an Enhanced patent system in Europe which sets out that a "Select Committee of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation should […] fix both the exact level of the renewal fees and the distribution key for their allocation". One delegation raised some concerns relating to the proposed solution and argued that the tasks entrusted to the Select Committee, including setting the level of the renewal fees and their distribution could also be regulated by implementing acts in accordance with Article 291(2) of the TFEU. The Commission, on the other hand, considers any solution other than the use of delegated acts illegal and insists on the use of the latter instrument for determining the level of renewal fees and their distribution. The Presidency compromise proposals acknowledge the concerns of the delegations and propose that the level of renewal fees and their distribution should be set by the Select Committee. The Presidency suggests that the draft Regulation should be modified in accordance with the wording set out in Articles 12 and 12a, of the compromise proposal in the Annex.
B) Almost all delegations underlined the need to reflect the political link between the creation of unitary patent protection and the unified patent litigation system. Consequently, they consider it necessary to establish a legal link between application of the regulations on unitary patent protection and the setting up of the unified jurisdiction. Some delegations underlined that the establishment of such a link should not hinder or block progress in either area. The Commission expressed its understanding towards the request to highlight the political link between the projects through appropriate wording in the draft Regulations. The Presidency suggests that the draft Regulations should be modified accordingly.
C) A majority of delegations requested the proper reflection of the criteria for the distribution of renewal fees to the national patent offices . One delegation requested the deletion of all provisions on renewal fees and their distribution from the draft Regulation.
Several delegations wished to reopen the discussion on the criteria and requested adding a new element, i.e. "an equal amount per participating Member State determined on the basis of an established percentage of the annual renewal fees". A significant number of delegations as well as the Commission were against this proposal, insisting that such direct transfer had not been foreseen in the compromise achieved under the Swedish Presidency.
These conclusions state that, according to which the "distribution key should be fixed taking into account a basket of fair, equitable and relevant criteria such as for instance the level of patent activity and the size of the market. The distribution key should provide compensation for, among other things, having an official language other than one of the official languages of the European Patent Office, for having disproportionately low levels of patent activity and for more recent EPC-membership". One delegation requested the deletion of all provisions on renewal fees and their distribution from the draft Regulation. The Presidency is of the opinion that the proposals in the Annex represent a balanced compromise between the different positions and respect the agreement enshrined in the 2009 Council conclusions without reopening the principles set therein.
PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: the current patent system in the EU, in particular in terms of translation requirements, involves very high costs and complexity. The overall cost of validation of an average European patent reaches 12 500 EUR if validated only in 13 Member States and over 32 000 EUR if validated in the whole EU. It is estimated that the actual validation costs are around 193 million EUR per year in the EU.
Despite broad recognition of the competitive disadvantage European business faces in the absence of unitary patent protection, the Union has not been able to establish unitary patent protection.
The Commission first proposed a Council Regulation on the Community patent in August 2000. On 30 June 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the EU patent .
It was confirmed at the Competitiveness Council meeting on 10 December 2010 that insurmountable difficulties existed, making a decision requiring unanimity impossible now and in the foreseeable future.
25 Member States then asked for recourse enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection (all Member States except Italy and Spain) in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
The proposal for the authorising decision was adopted by the Council, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, on 10 March 2011. The present regulation implements the enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection as authorised by Council Decision 2011/167/EU..
IMPACT ASSESSMENT : the proposal is accompanied by an impact assessment which analyses the impacts of the following options:
Option 1 (base-line scenario): the Commission takes no action;
Option 2 : the Commission continues to work with the other institutions towards an EU patent covering 27 Member States;
Option 3 : the Commission presents proposals for regulations implementing enhanced cooperation:
Sub-option 3.1 - the Commission proposes translation arrangements applicable in the area of unitary patent protection that correspond to its proposal of 30 June 2010, or Sub-option 3.2 - the Commission proposes translation arrangements applicable in the area of unitary patent protection based on its proposal of 30 June 2010 and incorporating elements of a compromise proposal discussed by the Council.
The analysis carried out in the impact assessment has demonstrated that option 3 with sub-option 3.2 is the preferred option .
LEGAL BASIS: Article 118 (1) TFEU provides for the legal basis for creating European intellectual property rights providing uniform protection throughout the Union by means of a regulation adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.
CONTENT: the proposal aims to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection authorised by Council Decision No 2011/167/EU. The main provisions are as follows :
European patent with unitary effect : in comparison to the Commission's proposal in 2000, this proposal builds on the existing system of European patents by providing unitary effect to European patents granted for the territories of the participating Member States. The unitary patent protection will be optional and co-exist with national and European patents. The proprietors of European patents granted by the EPO, may submit a request to the EPO within one month after the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, asking for the registration of the unitary effect. Once it is registered, the unitary effect will provide uniform protection and will have equal effect throughout the territories of all participating Member States. European patents with unitary effect may only be granted, transferred, revoked or may lapse in respect of those territories as a whole. The participating Member States shall give the task of administrating European patents with unitary effect to the EPO.
Rights and limitations : the rights conferred by the European patent with unitary effect should enable the patent proprietor to prevent any third party not having his consent from the direct and indirect use of the invention on the territories of the participating Member States. However, a number of limitations of the patent proprietor's rights should enable third parties to use the invention, for instance for private and for non-commercial purposes, for experimental purposes, for acts allowed specifically under Union law (in the area of veterinary medicinal products, medicinal products for human use, plant variety rights, the legal protection of computer programs by copyright and the legal protection of biotechnological inventions) under international law and for the use by a farmer of protected livestock for farming purposes.
Treating a European patent with unitary effect as a national patent : a European patent with unitary effect shall be dealt with in its entirety, and in all the participating Member States, as a national patent of the participating Member State in which, according to the European Patent Register, the proprietor of the patent had his residence or principal place of business on the date of filing of the application for the patent. Where no proprietor has his residence or a place of business in a participating Member State, the European patent with unitary effect as an object of property shall be dealt with as a national patent of the State where the European Patent Organisation has its seat.
Licenses of right : the draft regulation enables the proprietor of a European patent with unitary effect to file a statement with the EPO that he is prepared to allow any person to use the invention as a licensee in return for appropriate compensation (contractual license).
Renewal fees : renewal fees in respect of European patents with unitary effect shall be paid to the European Patent Organisation. If a renewal fee is not been paid in due time, the European patent with unitary effect shall lapse. The proposal provides that renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect shall be progressive throughout the term of the patent and shall be sufficient not only to cover all costs associated with the grant and administration of the unitary patent protection but also, together with the fees to be paid to the European Patent Organisation during the pre-grant stage, to ensure a balanced budget for the Organisation.
The share for distributing 50% of the amount of the renewal fees paid for European patents with unitary effect minus the costs associated with the administration of the unitary patent protection among the participating Member States shall be set by the Commission on the basis of fair, equitable and relevant criteria, i.e the number of patent applications and the size of the market. Participating Member States shall use the amount of the renewal fees allocated to them for patent-related purposes.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no impact on the Union budget.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions delegating to the Commission the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the level of the renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect and the distribution of such fees between the European Patent Organisation and the participating Member States.
PURPOSE: to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: the current patent system in the EU, in particular in terms of translation requirements, involves very high costs and complexity. The overall cost of validation of an average European patent reaches 12 500 EUR if validated only in 13 Member States and over 32 000 EUR if validated in the whole EU. It is estimated that the actual validation costs are around 193 million EUR per year in the EU.
Despite broad recognition of the competitive disadvantage European business faces in the absence of unitary patent protection, the Union has not been able to establish unitary patent protection.
The Commission first proposed a Council Regulation on the Community patent in August 2000. On 30 June 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the EU patent .
It was confirmed at the Competitiveness Council meeting on 10 December 2010 that insurmountable difficulties existed, making a decision requiring unanimity impossible now and in the foreseeable future.
25 Member States then asked for recourse enhanced cooperation in the area of unitary patent protection (all Member States except Italy and Spain) in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
The proposal for the authorising decision was adopted by the Council, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, on 10 March 2011. The present regulation implements the enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection as authorised by Council Decision 2011/167/EU..
IMPACT ASSESSMENT : the proposal is accompanied by an impact assessment which analyses the impacts of the following options:
Option 1 (base-line scenario): the Commission takes no action;
Option 2 : the Commission continues to work with the other institutions towards an EU patent covering 27 Member States;
Option 3 : the Commission presents proposals for regulations implementing enhanced cooperation:
Sub-option 3.1 - the Commission proposes translation arrangements applicable in the area of unitary patent protection that correspond to its proposal of 30 June 2010, or Sub-option 3.2 - the Commission proposes translation arrangements applicable in the area of unitary patent protection based on its proposal of 30 June 2010 and incorporating elements of a compromise proposal discussed by the Council.
The analysis carried out in the impact assessment has demonstrated that option 3 with sub-option 3.2 is the preferred option .
LEGAL BASIS: Article 118 (1) TFEU provides for the legal basis for creating European intellectual property rights providing uniform protection throughout the Union by means of a regulation adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure.
CONTENT: the proposal aims to implement enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection authorised by Council Decision No 2011/167/EU. The main provisions are as follows :
European patent with unitary effect : in comparison to the Commission's proposal in 2000, this proposal builds on the existing system of European patents by providing unitary effect to European patents granted for the territories of the participating Member States. The unitary patent protection will be optional and co-exist with national and European patents. The proprietors of European patents granted by the EPO, may submit a request to the EPO within one month after the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, asking for the registration of the unitary effect. Once it is registered, the unitary effect will provide uniform protection and will have equal effect throughout the territories of all participating Member States. European patents with unitary effect may only be granted, transferred, revoked or may lapse in respect of those territories as a whole. The participating Member States shall give the task of administrating European patents with unitary effect to the EPO.
Rights and limitations : the rights conferred by the European patent with unitary effect should enable the patent proprietor to prevent any third party not having his consent from the direct and indirect use of the invention on the territories of the participating Member States. However, a number of limitations of the patent proprietor's rights should enable third parties to use the invention, for instance for private and for non-commercial purposes, for experimental purposes, for acts allowed specifically under Union law (in the area of veterinary medicinal products, medicinal products for human use, plant variety rights, the legal protection of computer programs by copyright and the legal protection of biotechnological inventions) under international law and for the use by a farmer of protected livestock for farming purposes.
Treating a European patent with unitary effect as a national patent : a European patent with unitary effect shall be dealt with in its entirety, and in all the participating Member States, as a national patent of the participating Member State in which, according to the European Patent Register, the proprietor of the patent had his residence or principal place of business on the date of filing of the application for the patent. Where no proprietor has his residence or a place of business in a participating Member State, the European patent with unitary effect as an object of property shall be dealt with as a national patent of the State where the European Patent Organisation has its seat.
Licenses of right : the draft regulation enables the proprietor of a European patent with unitary effect to file a statement with the EPO that he is prepared to allow any person to use the invention as a licensee in return for appropriate compensation (contractual license).
Renewal fees : renewal fees in respect of European patents with unitary effect shall be paid to the European Patent Organisation. If a renewal fee is not been paid in due time, the European patent with unitary effect shall lapse. The proposal provides that renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect shall be progressive throughout the term of the patent and shall be sufficient not only to cover all costs associated with the grant and administration of the unitary patent protection but also, together with the fees to be paid to the European Patent Organisation during the pre-grant stage, to ensure a balanced budget for the Organisation.
The share for distributing 50% of the amount of the renewal fees paid for European patents with unitary effect minus the costs associated with the administration of the unitary patent protection among the participating Member States shall be set by the Commission on the basis of fair, equitable and relevant criteria, i.e the number of patent applications and the size of the market. Participating Member States shall use the amount of the renewal fees allocated to them for patent-related purposes.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no impact on the Union budget.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions delegating to the Commission the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the level of the renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect and the distribution of such fees between the European Patent Organisation and the participating Member States.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)111
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2012/1257
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 361 31.12.2012, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00072/2011/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0474/2012
- Debate in Council: 3169
- Debate in Council: 3147
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0001/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0001/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.394
- Committee opinion: PE472.085
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.775
- Committee draft report: PE472.059
- Debate in Council: 3113
- Debate in Council: 3094
- Contribution: COM(2011)0215
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0215
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0482
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0483
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0215
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0215 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0482 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0483 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE472.059
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.775
- Committee opinion: PE472.085
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.394
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0001/2012
- Draft final act: 00072/2011/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)111
- Contribution: COM(2011)0215
Activities
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (18)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (18)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (18)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (17)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (17)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander MIRSKY
Plenary Speeches (17)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (17)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (17)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (16)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (16)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (16)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (15)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (15)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mário DAVID
Plenary Speeches (14)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (14)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Paolo Francesco SILVESTRIS
Plenary Speeches (14)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christine DE VEYRAC
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Iva ZANICCHI
Plenary Speeches (12)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe BOULLAND
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mario MAURO
Plenary Speeches (10)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vito BONSIGNORE
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (9)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Radvilė MORKŪNAITĖ-MIKULĖNIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (8)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Amelia ANDERSDOTTER
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (7)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michał Tomasz KAMIŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine GRÈZE
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Agnès LE BRUN
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Syed KAMALL
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tunne KELAM
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabeth KÖSTINGER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maurice PONGA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Amalia SARTORI
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creation of unitary patent protection - Unitary patent protection - Jurisdictional system for patent disputes (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique VLASTO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
Plenary Speeches (4)
- Salvatore CARONNA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Emer COSTELLO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ioan ENCIU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gaston FRANCO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mojca KLEVA KEKUŠ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Justas Vincas PALECKIS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mitro REPO
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Nikolaos SALAVRAKOS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Thomas ULMER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Justina VITKAUSKAITE BERNARD
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dame Glenis WILLMOTT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacek WŁOSOWICZ
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alfredo ANTONIOZZI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Liam AYLWARD
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raffaele BALDASSARRE
- Erik BÁNKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gerard BATTEN
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Andrzej GRZYB
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jim HIGGINS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sajjad KARIM
- Jan KOZŁOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Klaus-Heiner LEHNE
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Emma McCLARKIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonio MASIP HIDALGO
- Erminia MAZZONI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Wojciech Michał OLEJNICZAK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bernhard RAPKAY
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander Nuno PICKART ALVARO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pino ARLACCHI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nora BERRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nikolaos CHOUNTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Minodora CLIVETI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tadeusz CYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francesco DE ANGELIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe DE BACKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nirj DEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christian ENGSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard FALBR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ashley FOX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mariya GABRIEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marielle BOULLIER GALLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pat the Cope GALLAGHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Julie GIRLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mikael GUSTAFSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacky HÉNIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nadja HIRSCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabeth JEGGLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dan JØRGENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edvard KOŽUŠNÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Béla KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick LE HYARIC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eva LICHTENBERGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George LYON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Judith A. MERKIES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Morten MESSERSCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vital MOREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Paul MURPHY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jens NILSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antigoni PAPADOPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pier Antonio PANZERI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Britta REIMERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Horst SCHNELLHARDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alda SOUSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ewald STADLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gianluca SUSTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alexandra THEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Britta THOMSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Patrice TIROLIEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rafał TRZASKOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cecilia WIKSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
133 |
2011/0093(COD)
2011/10/13
ITRE
50 amendments...
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) In accordance with Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the Union shall establish an internal market, shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and shall promote the dissemination of information on scientific and technological advance. The creation of the legal conditions enabling undertakings to adapt their activities in manufacturing and distributing products across national borders and providing them with more choice and opportunities contributes to attaining these objectives. Uniform patent protection within the internal market, or at least a significant part thereof, should feature amongst the legal instruments which undertakings have at their disposal.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Convention on the Grant of European Patents (European Patent Convention), as amended (hereinafter ‘EPC’), established the European Patent Organisation and entrusted it with the task of granting European patents. This task is
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The rights conferred by the European patent with unitary effect should enable the patent proprietor to prevent any third party not having his consent from the direct and indirect use of the invention on the territories of the participating Member States. However,
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The participating Member States should give the European Patent Office certain administrative tasks relating to European patents with unitary effect, in particular as regards
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect. Renewal fees should be progressive throughout the term of the patent protection and, together with the fees to be paid to the European Patent Organisation during the pre-grant stage, should cover all costs associated with the grant of the European patent and the administration of the unitary patent protection. The level of the renewal fees should be fixed with the aim of facilitating innovation and fostering the competitiveness of European businesses, and should take into account the specific situation of small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as the urgent need to promote energy saving and the use of renewables in the form of lower fees. It should also reflect the size of the market covered by the patent and be similar to the level of the national renewal fees for an average European patent taking effect in the participating Member States at the time where the level of the renewal fees is first fixed by the Commission.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect. Renewal fees should be progressive throughout the term of the patent protection and, together with the fees to be paid to the European Patent Organisation during the pre-grant stage, should cover all costs associated with the grant of the European patent and the administration of the unitary patent protection. The level of the renewal fees should be fixed with the aim of facilitating innovation and fostering the competitiveness of European businesses taking particular account of micro and small enterprises as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC1. It should also reflect the size of the market covered by the patent and be similar to the level of the national renewal fees for an average European patent taking effect in the participating Member States at the time where the level of the renewal fees is first fixed by the Commission. _____________ 1 Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect. Renewal fees should be progressive throughout the term of the patent protection and, together with the fees to be paid to the European Patent Organisation during the pre-grant stage, should cover all costs associated with the grant of the European patent and the administration of the unitary patent protection. The level of the renewal fees should be fixed with the aim of facilitating innovation and fostering the competitiveness of European businesses and should take into account the status and financing capacities of SMEs. It should also reflect the size of the market covered by the patent and be similar to the level of the national renewal fees for an average European patent taking effect in the participating Member States at the time where the level of the renewal fees is first fixed by the Commission.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect. Renewal fees should be
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) In order to determine the appropriate level and distribution of renewal fees and to ensure that
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the European Patent Organisation. 50 percent thereof minus expenses incurred by the European Patent Office in carrying out tasks in relation to the unitary patent protection shall be distributed among the participating Member States, which should be used for
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the European Patent Organisation. 50 percent thereof minus expenses incurred by the European Patent Office in carrying out tasks in relation to the unitary patent protection shall be distributed among the participating Member States, which should be used for patent-related purposes. The share of distribution should be set on the basis of fair, equitable and relevant criteria
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure the appropriate level and distribution of renewal fees in compliance with the principles set out in this Regulation, the power to negotiate with the European Patent Office and to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the level of the renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect and the distribution of such fees between the European Patent Organisation and the participating Member States. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) An Enhanced communication partnership between the European Patent Office and central industrial property offices of the EU Member States should enable the European Patent Office to make regular use, where appropriate, on a fee- paying basis, of the result of any search
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new) By …*, the Commission shall present a proposal for a directive by the European Parliament and the Council, along with an impact assessment, for harmonisation of substantive patent law relevant for European patents with unitary effect. _____________ * Date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. European patents with unitary effect shall be granted for any inventions, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application. The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions within the meaning of the first subparagraph: (a) discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers; (d) presentations of information.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. A set of instructions for solving a problem by means of an automated system consisting only of generic data-processing hardware (universal computer), also called “program for computers” or “computer-implemented solution”, is not an invention within the meaning of the substantive patent law applicable to a European patent with unitary effect, regardless of the form under which it is claimed. A claimed object can be an invention within the meaning of the substantive patent law applicable to the European patent with unitary effect only if it contributes knowledge to the state of the art in a field of applied natural science; an invention is something which imparts new knowledge about cause-and-effect relationships in the use of controllable forces of nature.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. A European patent with unitary effect
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) A European patent with unitary effect shall have an autonomous character. It shall be subject only to the provisions of this Regulation, to the general principles of Union law, and, to the extent that this Regulation does not lay down specific rules, to those provisions of the European Patent Convention which are binding upon every European patent and which are consequently deemed to be provisions of this Regulation.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. A European patent with unitary effect shall take effect in the territories of the participating Member States on the
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. The European patent with unitary effect shall confer on its proprietor
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The European patent with unitary effect shall confer on its proprietor
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point a a (new) (aa) acts allowed pursuant to the Treaties and Union law;
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point b a (new) (ba) the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing a new plant variety;
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point e (e) the use on board vessels of countries other than participating Member States of the patented invention, in the body of the vessel, in the machinery, tackle, gear and other accessories, when such vessels temporarily or accidentally enter the waters of participating Member States, provided that the invention is used there exclusively
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point h (h)
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point i (i) the use
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point i (i) the use by a farmer of protected livestock or reproductive material for farming purposes, on condition that the
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. The participating Member States shall give
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In their capacity as Contracting States to the EPC, the participating Member States together with the European Parliament shall ensure the governance and supervision of the activities related to the tasks referred to in paragraph 1 by the European Patent Office. To that end they shall set up a Select Committee of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States shall ensure effective legal protection before a national court against
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 The expenses incurred by the European Patent Office in carrying out the additional tasks given, within the meaning of Article 143 of the EPC, by Member States to the European Patent Office shall be covered by the fees generated by the European patents with unitary effect, in line with the simulation set out in Annex I.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. Renewal fees and additional fees for the late payment of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect shall be paid to the European Patent Organisation by the patent proprietor as part of the resources required to carry out the tasks referred to in Article 13. Those fees shall be due in respect of the years following the year in which the European Patent Register mentions the grant of the European patent which benefits from unitary effect by virtue of this Regulation.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) such as to take into account the status and financing capacities of SMEs.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The level of the renewal fees shall, in line with the simulation set out in Annex II, be fixed with the aim of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) taking into account the specific situation of micro and small enterprises as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC in the form of lower fees;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The part of the collected renewal fees to be distributed to the participating Member States referred to in Article 12(1)(e) shall be 50 percent of the renewal fees referred to in Article 14 paid for European patents with unitary effect minus the costs associated with the administration of the unitary patent protection referred to in Article 12, in line with the simulation set out in Annex III.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. In order to reach these objectives set out in this Chapter, the Commission shall set the share of distribution of renewal fees referred to in paragraph 1 among the participating Member States on the basis of the following fair, equitable and relevant criteria, in line with the simulation set out in Annex IV, taking into account:
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States shall use the amount allocated to them in accordance with paragraph 1
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. The power to adopt delegated acts pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 15 and 16 shall be conferred for a
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The delegation of powers relating to the disbursement of funds shall always be subject to approval by the European Parliament.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of the Treaties and Union Law, including competition law and the law relating to unfair competition.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than six years from the date on which the first European patent with unitary effect takes effect in the territories of the participating Member States, the Commission shall present to the Council and the European Parliament a report on the operation of this Regulation and, where necessary, make appropriate proposals for amending it. Subsequent
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 4. Unitary patent protection may be requested for any European patent granted on the basis of a European patent application filed on or after the date set out in paragraph 2.
source: PE-473.869
2011/10/27
JURI
50 amendments...
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Unitary patent protection should foster scientific and technological advance and the functioning of the internal market by making access to the patent system easier, less costly and legally secure, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons, non-profit organisations and academic institutions. It should improve the level of patent protection by providing the possibility to obtain uniform patent protection in the territories of the participating Member States and eliminate costs and complexity for undertakings throughout the Union. It should be available to patent applicants from both participating Member States and other States, regardless of nationality, residence or place of establishment.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Unitary patent protection should foster scientific and technological advance and the functioning of the internal market by making access to the patent system easier, less costly and legally secure for everyone participating in the patent system. It should improve the level of patent protection by providing the possibility to obtain uniform
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) On 10 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/167/EU authorising enhanced cooperation between Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom (hereinafter ‘participating Member States’) in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection. Spain and Italy should be called upon to join the enhanced cooperation procedure in order to make the unitary patent a fully European patent that enhances the single market and increases Europe’s competitiveness.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The participating Member States should give the European Patent Office certain administrative tasks relating to European patents with unitary effect, in particular as regards administration of requests for unitary effect, the registration of unitary effect and of any limitation, licence, transfer, revocation or lapse of European patents with unitary effect, the collection and redistribution of renewal fees, the publication of translations for information purposes during a transitional period and the administration of a compensation scheme of translation costs for applicants filing European patent applications in a language other than one of the official languages of the European Patent Office. The participating Member States should ensure that requests for unitary effect are filed with the European Patent Office within
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) In order to support patenting activities by small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons, non-profit organisations and academic institutions, applicants falling into these categories should benefit of a reduction of renewal fees. To this extent, renewal fees for such applicants should be reduced by 50% for the first six years following the grant of the European patent with unitary effect.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the European Patent Organisation. 50 percent thereof minus expenses incurred by the European Patent Office in carrying out tasks in relation to the unitary patent protection shall be distributed among the participating Member States, which should be used for
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the European Patent Organisation.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) In order to ensure the appropriate level and distribution of renewal fees in compliance with the principles set out in this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the level of the renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect and
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) An Enhanced partnership between the European Patent Office and central industrial property offices of the Member States should enable the European Patent Office to make regular use, where appropriate, of the result of any search carried out by central industrial property offices on a national patent application the priority of which is claimed in a subsequent European patent application. All central industrial property offices, including those which do not perform searches in the course of a national patent granting procedure, can have an essential role under the enhanced partnership, inter alia by giving advice and support to potential patent applicants, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons and non-profit organisations by receiving applications, by forwarding applications to the European Patent Office and by disseminating patent information.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 a (new) (20a) In order to make this Regulation more efficient, it should be applied in all Member States, deepening the single market and extending its economic benefits for all Union citizens and businesses.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) In view of the current European Patent Convention and the importance of Article 53 thereof, which relates to exceptions to patentability, notably in the field of living things, a clause providing for the automatic inclusion of any future changes to EU law should be inserted into that Convention;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 A European patent with unitary effect
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) A European patent with unitary effect shall have an autonomous character. It shall be subject only to the provisions of this Regulation, to the general principles of Union law, and, to the extent that this Regulation does not provide for specific rules, to those provisions of the European Patent Convention which are binding upon every European patent and which shall consequently be deemed to be provisions of this Regulation.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) European patents with unitary effect shall not be granted for biological materials produced by an essentially biological process;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 a (new) Article 3a Harmonisation of substantive patent law By …, the Commission shall present a proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, along with an impact assessment, for harmonisation of substantive patent law relevant for European patents with unitary effect.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 b (new) Article 3b Patentability of inventions 1. European patents with unitary effect shall be granted for any inventions, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application. 2. The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1: (a) discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; (b) aesthetic creations; (c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and programs for computers; (d) presentations of information.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 c (new) Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point a a (new) (aa) the acts allowed pursuant to the Treaties and Union law
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point b a (new) (ba) the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, or discovering and developing other plant varieties;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point b b (new) (bb) acts with the plant varieties developed in accordance with point (ba);
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point b c (new) (bc) acts in respect of biological material having the same properties as patented biological material but produced by an essentially biological process and without using the patented biological material;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point h (h) acts as covered by the
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point k (k) the acts allowed pursuant to Article
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall investigate how the existing plant breeders’ rights system and the plants breeders’ exemption, based on the 1991 International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, and biological material resulting from the application of essentially biological processes, can be brought into line with this Regulation, and shall come up with proposals where appropriate.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) The application of this Article shall not prejudice the application of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)1 and Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II)2. ____________________ 1 OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p. 6. 2 OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p. 40.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory wording 1. The participating Member States shall give
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) the administration of a compensation scheme of translation costs for applicants filing European patent applications in one of the official
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 For the purposes of point a), the participating Member States shall ensure that requests by the patent proprietor for unitary effect for a European patent are filed in the language of the proceedings as defined in Article 14(3) of the EPC no later
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. In their capacity as Contracting States to the EPC, the participating Member States together with the European Parliament shall ensure the governance and supervision of the activities related to the tasks referred to in paragraph 1 by the European Patent Office. To that end they shall set up a Select Committee of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States shall ensure effective legal protection before a national court against
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) taking into account the specific situation of small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons and non- profit organisations in the form of lower fees,
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons, non-profit organisations and academic institutions which are under no contractual or legal obligation to assign, grant or license any rights in the invention shall be entitled to a reduction of 50% of the renewal fees during the six years following the grant of the European patent with unitary effect.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States shall use the amount allocated to them in accordance with paragraph 1 to patent- related purposes, including measures aimed at providing legal and technical advice to applicants, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises, natural persons, non-profit organisations and academic institutions.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. The power to adopt delegated acts pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 15 and 16 shall be conferred for a
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall establish a close cooperation through a working agreement with the European Patent Office in the fields covered by this Regulation. This cooperation shall include regular exchanges of views on the functioning of the working agreement and in particular on the issue of renewal fees and the impact on the budget of the European Patent Organisation, including regular assessments of specific provisions aimed at supporting patenting activities.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of the Treaties and Union law, including competition law and the law
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. Not later than
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. It shall apply from [a specific date will be set and it will coincide with the date of application of Council Regulation
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Unitary patent protection may be requested for any European patent granted on the basis of a European patent application filed on or after the date set out in paragraph 2.
source: PE-475.775
2011/12/08
JURI
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The creation of unitary patent protection should be achieved by giving unitary effect to European patents in the post-grant phase by virtue of this Regulation and in respect of all the participating Member States. The main feature of European patents with unitary effect should be their unitary character, i.e. providing uniform protection and having equal effect in all participating Member States. Consequently, a European patent with unitary effect should only be limited,
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 2. The participating Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where the unitary effect of a European patent has been registered and extends to their territory, the European patent is deemed not to have taken effect as a national patent in their territory on the date of the publication of the mention of the grant in the European Patent Bulletin.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – point b (b) using a process which is the subject matter of the patent or, where the third party knows, or should have known, that the use of the process is prohibited without the consent of the proprietor of the patent, from offering the process for use within the territory of the participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect;
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The European patent with unitary effect shall confer on its proprietor the right to prevent any third party not having the proprietor's consent from supplying or offering to supply, within the participating Member States
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point e (e) the use on board vessels of countries other than participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect of the patented invention, in the body of the vessel, in the machinery, tackle, gear and other accessories, when such vessels temporarily or accidentally enter the waters of participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect, provided that the invention is used there exclusively for the needs of the vessel;
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point f (f) the use of the patented invention in the construction or operation of aircraft or land vehicles or other means of transport of States other than participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect, or of accessories to such aircraft or land vehicles, when these temporarily or accidentally enter the territory of the participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect;
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – point g (g) the acts specified in Article 27 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 7 December 1944, where these acts concern the aircraft of a country other than a participating Member State in which that patent has unitary effect;
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 The rights conferred by a European patent with unitary effect shall not extend to acts concerning the product covered by that patent which are carried out within the territories of the participating Member States in which that patent has unitary effect after that product has been put on the market in the Union by the proprietor of the patent or with his/her consent, unless there are legitimate grounds for the proprietor to oppose further commercialisation of the product.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. A European patent with unitary effect as an object of property shall be treated in its entirety and in all the participating Member States as a national patent of the participating Member State in which that patent has unitary effect in which, according to the European Patent Register:
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 3. Where no proprietor has his/her residence, principal place of business or
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The matter of compulsory licences is not covered by this Regulation. Compulsory licences for European patents with unitary effect should be governed by the national legislations of the participating Member States on their respective territories.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – title Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) the collection and administration of renewal fees for European patents with unitary effect, in respect of the years following the year in which the
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) ensuring that requests by the patent proprietor for unitary effect for a European patent are submitted in the language of the proceedings as defined in Article 14(3) of the EPC no later than one month after the mention of the grant is published in the European Patent Bulletin;
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f b (new) (fb) ensuring that the unitary effect is indicated in the Register for unitary patent protection, where a request for unitary effect has been filed and, during the transitional period provided for in Article 6 of Council Regulation …/… [translation arrangements], has been submitted together with the translations referred to in that Article and that the European Patent Office is informed of any limitations, licenses, transfers and revocations of European patents with unitary effect.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure compliance with the provisions of this Regulation in implementing their international obligations undertaken in the EPC and shall cooperate amongst themselves to that end. In their capacity as Contracting States to the EPC, the participating Member States shall ensure the governance and supervision of the activities related to the tasks referred to in paragraph 1 by the European Patent Office
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The participating Member States shall ensure effective legal protection before a
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. The level of the renewal fees, shall be fixed, taking into account, among others, the situation of specific entities such as small and medium-sized enterprises, with the aim of
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – introductory wording 3. In order to reach these objectives set out in this Chapter,
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) The regime applicable to damages should be governed by the law of the participating Member States, in particular the provisions implementing Article 13 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 1. The
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 1. The participating Member States shall notify the Commission of the measures adopted in accordance with Article
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. It shall apply from
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 4a. Unitary patent protection may be requested for any European patent granted on or after the date set out in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15a) In the framework of the Select Committee, the participating Member States should ensure the governance and supervision of the activities related to the tasks entrusted to the European Patent Office by the participating Member States, ensure that requests for unitary effect are filed with the European Patent Office within one month of the date of the publication of the mention of the grant in the European Patent Bulletin and ensure that they are submitted in the language of the proceedings before the European Patent Office together with the translation prescribed for, during a transitional period, by Council Regulation…/… [translation arrangements]. The participating Member States should also ensure the setting, in accordance with the voting arrangements in Article 35(2) of the EPC, of the level of the renewal fees and the share of the distribution of the renewal fees in accordance with the criteria set out in this Regulation.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Patent proprietors should pay one common annual renewal fee for European patents with unitary effect. Renewal fees should be progressive throughout the term of the patent protection and, together with
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Renewal fees should be paid to the European Patent Organisation.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21a) The jurisdiction for European patents with unitary effect should be established and governed by an instrument setting up a unified patent litigation system for European patents and European patents with unitary effect.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 b (new) (21b) In order to ensure the proper functioning of the European patent with unitary effect, the consistency of the case- law and hence legal certainty, and the cost effectiveness for patent holders, the establishment of a Unified Patent Court to hear cases concerning the European patent with unitary effect is essential. It is therefore of paramount importance that the participating Member States ratify the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court in accordance with their national constitutional and parliamentary procedures and take the necessary steps for that Court to be operational as soon as possible.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 European patents granted with
source: PE-478.394
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdf |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/10/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0093&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0093&appLng=EN |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0482/COM_SEC(2011)0482_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0482/COM_SEC(2011)0482_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0483/COM_SEC(2011)0483_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0483/COM_SEC(2011)0483_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.059New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-472059_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.775New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-475775_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.085&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-472085_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.394New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-478394_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/10/docs |
|
events/11 |
|
events/11 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0482/COM_SEC(2011)0482_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0482/COM_SEC(2011)0482_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0483/COM_SEC(2011)0483_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0483/COM_SEC(2011)0483_EN.pdf |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdf |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-1&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0001_EN.html |
events/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-474New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0474_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/05848New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R1257New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012R1257 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0215:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0215:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0215/COM_COM(2011)0215_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|