Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | GERINGER DE OEDENBERG Lidia Joanna ( S&D) | NIEBLER Angelika ( PPE), THEIN Alexandra ( ALDE), ENGSTRÖM Christian ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | VERHEYEN Sabine ( PPE) | Emma McCLARKIN ( ECR), Marietje SCHAAKE ( ALDE), Helga TRÜPEL ( Verts/ALE), Marie-Christine VERGIAT ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | MANDERS Antonius ( ALDE) | Ashley FOX ( ECR), Dennis de JONG ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 056-p2, TFEU 114-p1, TFEU 49
Legal Basis:
TFEU 056-p2, TFEU 114-p1, TFEU 49Subjects
- 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
- 3.30.01 Audiovisual industry and services
- 3.30.08 Press, media freedom and pluralism
- 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
- 3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright
- 4.45.08 Cultural and artistic activities, books and reading, arts
- 4.45.10 Literary and artistic property
Events
PURPOSE: to create a legal framework to ensure the lawful, cross-border online access to orphan works.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain permitted uses of orphan works.
CONTENT: following agreement at first reading, the European Parliament and Council adopted the Directive establishing a legal framework aimed at improving access to and digitisation of orphan works across the EU. Orphan works are works (such as books, newspapers, magazines, audio recordings, films, etc.) that are protected by copyright but whose owners cannot be identified or found.
The Directive facilitates the digitisation of and lawful cross-border online access to orphan works contained in the collections of libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, audiovisual heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations. These beneficiary institutions will be able to use orphan works when fulfilling their public interest missions without the risk of infringing copyright. It is a major step for the creation and development of digital libraries, such as Europeana , which contribute to the preservation and dissemination of European cultural heritage.
The Directive will apply to works that are first published or broadcast in the territory of an EU Member State. A diligent search for right holders will be carried out in that Member State prior to granting the orphan work status. Material catalogued as having orphan status in a Member State will have the same status in all Member States. A single publicly accessible online database will contain the information related to orphan works, including the results of searches for right holders.
The Directive provides for a system of compensation in the event of reappearing right holders.
The main points of the Directive are as follows:
Copyright as the basis of innovation : as suggested by Parliament, the Directive stresses that copyright is the economic foundation for the creative industry, since it stimulates innovation, creation, investment and production. Mass digitisation and dissemination of works is therefore a means of protecting Europe’s cultural heritage. It also recalls that copyright is an important tool for ensuring that the creative sector is rewarded for its work.
Purpose and scope : the Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, film and audio heritage institutions, publishers and public service broadcasting organisations established in the Member States, in order to achieve aims related to their public-interest missions.
The Directive applies to:
· works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as in the collections of archives or of film or audio heritage institutions;
· cinematographic or audiovisual works and phonograms contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as in the collections of archives or of film or audio heritage institutions; and
· cinematographic or audiovisual works and phonograms produced by public-service broadcasting organisations up to and including 31 December 2002 and contained in their archives which are protected by copyright or related rights and which are first published in a Member State or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in a Member State.
Orphan works:
· a work or a phonogram shall be considered an orphan work if none of the rightholders in that work or phonogram is identified or, even if one or more of them is identified, none is located despite a diligent search for the rightholders having been carried out and recorded;
· where there is more than one rightholder in a work or phonogram, and not all of them have been identified or, even if identified, located after a diligent search has been carried out and, the work or phonogram may be used in accordance with the Directive provided that the rightholders that have been identified and located have, in relation to the rights they hold, authorised the organisations referred to in the Directive to carry out the acts of reproduction and making available to the public covered Directive 2001/29/EC.
Diligent search:
· a diligent search must be carried out in good faith prior to the use of the work or phonogram;
· it shall be carried out in the Member State of first publication or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast, except in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works the producer of which has his headquarters or habitual residence in a Member State, in which case the diligent search shall be carried out in the Member State of his headquarters or habitual residence;
· if there is evidence to suggest that relevant information on rightholders is to be found in other countries, sources of information available in those other countries shall also be consulted;
· the organisations referred to in the Directive must maintain records of their diligent searches and provide information to the competent national authorities showing that that a work or a phonogram is considered an orphan work;
· the information on the diligent searches must be recorded in a single publicly accessible online database established and managed by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market.
End of orphan work status : a rightholder in a work or phonogram considered to be an orphan work must have h, at any time, the possibility of putting an end to the orphan work status in so far as his rights are concerned.
Permitted uses of orphan works : Member States shall provide for an exception or limitation to the right of reproduction and the right of making available to the public provided for respectively in Directive 2001/29/EC to ensure that the organisations referred to above are permitted to use orphan works contained in their collections in the following ways:
· by making the orphan work available to the public;
· by acts of reproduction, for the purposes of digitisation, making available, indexing, cataloguing, preservation or restoration.
The organisations may use an orphan work only in order to achieve aims related to their public-interest missions, in particular the preservation of, the restoration of, and the provision of cultural and educational access to, works and phonograms contained in their collection. They may generate revenues in the course of such uses, for the exclusive purpose of covering their costs of digitising orphan works and making them available to the public. The organisations shall indicate the name of identified authors and other rightholders in any use of an orphan work;
A fair compensation must be due to rightholders that put an end to the orphan work status of their works or other protected subject matter for the use that has been made of such works and other protected subject matter in accordance with the Directive. Member States shall be free to determine the circumstances under which the payment of such compensation may be organised. The level of the compensation shall be determined, within the limits imposed by Union law, by the law of the Member State in which the organisation that uses the orphan work in question is established.
Review: the Commission shall submit 3 years after entry into force of the Directive and at annual intervals thereafter, a report concerning the possible inclusion in the scope of application of this Directive of publishers and of works or other protected subject-matter not currently included in its scope.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 28/10/2012
TRANSPOSITION: by 29/10/ 2014.
APPLICATION: the Directive shall apply in respect of all works and phonograms which are protected by Member States' legislation in the field of copyright on or after 29/10/ 2014, and shall apply without prejudice to any acts concluded and rights acquired before that date.
The European Parliament adopted by 531 votes to 11 with 65 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain permitted uses of orphan works.
Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise negotiated between Parliament and Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Copyright as the basis of innovation : as suggested by Parliament, the amended text stresses that copyright is the economic foundation for the creative industry, since it stimulates innovation, creation, investment and production. Mass digitisation and dissemination of works is therefore a means of protecting Europe’s cultural heritage. It also recalls that copyright is an important tool for ensuring that the creative sector is rewarded for its work.
Purpose and scope : the Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, film and audio heritage institutions, publishers and public service broadcasting organisations established in the Member States, in order to achieve aims related to their public-interest missions.
The Directive applies to:
· works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as in the collections of archives or of film or audio heritage institutions;
· cinematographic or audiovisual works and phonograms contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as in the collections of archives or of film or audio heritage institutions; and
· cinematographic or audiovisual works and phonograms produced by public-service broadcasting organisations up to and including 31 December 2002 and contained in their archives which are protected by copyright or related rights and which are first published in a Member State or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast in a Member State.
Orphan works:
· a work or a phonogram shall be considered an orphan work if none of the rightholders in that work or phonogram is identified or, even if one or more of them is identified, none is located despite a diligent search for the rightholders having been carried out and recorded;
· where there is more than one rightholder in a work or phonogram, and not all of them have been identified or, even if identified, located after a diligent search has been carried out and, the work or phonogram may be used in accordance with the Directive provided that the rightholders that have been identified and located have, in relation to the rights they hold, authorised the organisations referred to in the Directive to carry out the acts of reproduction and making available to the public covered Directive 2001/29/EC.
Diligent search:
· a diligent search must be carried out in good faith prior to the use of the work or phonogram;
· a diligent search shall be carried out in the Member State of first publication or, in the absence of publication, first broadcast, except in the case of cinematographic or audiovisual works the producer of which has his headquarters or habitual residence in a Member State, in which case the diligent search shall be carried out in the Member State of his headquarters or habitual residence;
· if there is evidence to suggest that relevant information on rightholders is to be found in other countries , sources of information available in those other countries shall also be consulted;
· the organisations referred to in the Directive must maintain records of their diligent searches and provide information to the competent national authorities showing that that a work or a phonogram is considered an orphan work;
· the information on the diligent searches must be recorded in a single publicly accessible online database established and managed by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market.
End of orphan work status : a rightholder in a work or phonogram considered to be an orphan work must have h, at any time, the possibility of putting an end to the orphan work status in so far as his rights are concerned.
Permitted uses of orphan works :
· the organisations may generate revenues in the course of such uses, for the exclusive purpose of covering their costs of digitising orphan works and making them available to the public. The organisations shall indicate the name of identified authors and other rightholders in any use of an orphan work;
· a fair compensation must be due to rightholders that put an end to the orphan work status of their works or other protected subject matter for the use that has been made of such works and other protected subject matter in accordance with the Directive. Member States shall be free to determine the circumstances under which the payment of such compensation may be organised. The level of the compensation shall be determined, within the limits imposed by Union law, by the law of the Member State in which the organisation that uses the orphan work in question is established.
Review: the Commission shall submit 3 years after entry into force of the Directive and at annual intervals thereafter, a report concerning the possible inclusion in the scope of application of this Directive of publishers and of works or other protected subject-matter not currently included in its scope.
Ministers took note of the progress made on three files under examination by the Council preparatory bodies in the field of intellectual property:
· a draft directive on the protection of orphan works;
· a draft regulation for entrusting the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market with certain tasks related to the protection of intellectual property ; and
· a draft regulation concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights.
PURPOSE: to create a legal framework to ensure the lawful, cross-border online access to orphan works.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: l ibraries, museums, archives, educational establishments, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations are engaged in large-scale digitisation of their collections or archives in order to create European Digital Libraries. In so doing, they contribute to the preservation and dissemination of European cultural heritage, which is also important for the creation of European Digital Libraries, such as Europeana.
Prior authorisations are necessary to make works protected by copyright available to the public in an online digital library or archive. When the relevant copyright owner cannot be identified or found the works in question are known as orphan works. Libraries or other institutions that make works available online to the public without prior authorisation risk infringing copyright.
This initiative builds on the Commission's 2006 Recommendation on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural content and digital preservation. Despite the Recommendation, only a handful of Member States have implemented orphan works legislation. The few existing national solutions are circumscribed by the fact that they limit online access to citizens resident in their national territories.
The creation of a legal framework to facilitate the cross-border digitisation and dissemination of orphan works in the single market is also one of the key actions identified in the Digital Agenda for Europe which is part of the Europe 2020 Strategy.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: t he impact assessment analyses six options :
Option 1 : do nothing, Option 2 : a statutory exception to copyright, Option 3 : extended collective licensing, Option 4 : an orphan-specific licence granted by collecting societies, Option 5 : an orphan-specific licence granted by a public body, and Option 6 : the mutual recognition of national solutions regarding orphan works.
All policy options (except Option 1) are premised on the adoption of a directive that will require all Member States to enact specific orphan works legislation within a specified timeframe. All policy options, except Option 3, are premised on the requirement that a diligent search is necessary prior to the making available of an orphan work in an online digital library.
The Commission considers that an approach based on mutual recognition of the orphan status ( Option 6 ) allows libraries and other beneficiaries to enjoy legal certainty as to the "orphan status" of a particular work. Mutual recognition ensures that the orphan works contained in a digital library would be available to citizens across Europe.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the main objective of this proposal is to create a legal framework to ensure the lawful, crossborder online access to orphan works contained in online digital libraries or archives operated by a variety of institutions that are specified in the proposal when such orphan works are used in the pursuance of the public interest mission of such institutions.
Such works include:
works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings, and which are contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives, or cinematographic or audiovisual works contained in the collections of film heritage institutions, or cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations before the 31 December 2002 and contained in their archives.
The proposal deals with the diligent search necessary to identify whether a particular work is an orphan work and, once this has been established, to make it legal to make this work available to the public online under certain conditions and for specific purposes. The proposal also clarifies the application of extended collective licences to works which are potentially orphan works.
More specifically, the proposal:
contains the definition of an orphan work. The definition of an orphan work incorporates the requirement of a diligent search; explains how the diligent search is to be carried out by those who are permitted to use orphan works. It also clarifies that a diligent search need only be carried out in the Member State of first publication of the work; establishes the principle of mutual recognition whereby a work deemed to be an orphan work after a diligent search shall be considered an orphan work in all Member States; concerns the possibility to put an end to the orphan work status; enumerates the uses that the named beneficiaries are permitted to undertake with respect to orphan works (to make them available to the public, within the meaning of Directive 2001/29/EC, and to reproduce such works, within the meaning of Directive 2001/29/EC, for the purposes of achieving their public interest mission); specifies how Member States may permit certain additional uses under specific conditions.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the Union budget.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0412
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2012/28
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 299 27.10.2012, p. 0005
- Draft final act: 00036/2012/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)665
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0349/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0055/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0055/2012
- Committee opinion: PE473.720
- Committee opinion: PE472.125
- Debate in Council: 3133
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.839
- Committee draft report: PE472.338
- Contribution: COM(2011)0289
- Contribution: COM(2011)0289
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0615
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0616
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0289
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0615 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)0616 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE472.338
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE475.839
- Committee opinion: PE472.125
- Committee opinion: PE473.720
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0055/2012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)665
- Draft final act: 00036/2012/LEX
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0412
- Contribution: COM(2011)0289
- Contribution: COM(2011)0289
Activities
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Charalampos ANGOURAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Raffaele BALDASSARRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Luigi BERLINGUER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Christian ENGSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Marielle BOULLIER GALLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Eva LICHTENBERGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Marco SCURRIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Alexandra THEIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Helga TRÜPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Cecilia WIKSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Jacek WŁOSOWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Permitted uses of orphan works (debate)
Votes
A7-0055/2012 - Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
398 |
2011/0136(COD)
2011/10/14
CULT
193 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to promote learning and culture, Member States should
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to promote learning and culture, Member States should permit libraries, educational establishments and museums which are publicly accessible, as well as archives, records offices, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations, to make available and reproduce orphan works, provided such use fulfils their public interest missions, notably preservation, restoration and the provision of cultural and educational access to works contained in their collections. Film heritage institutions should, for the purposes of this Directive, cover organisations designated by Member States to collect, catalogue, preserve and restore films forming part of their cultural heritage.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being understood that libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives and film heritage institutions may, with a view to undertake the uses permitted under this Directive, conclude agreements with commercial partners for the digitisation and making available of orphan works. These agreements may include financial contributions by such partners, provided the works are not used for secondary commercial purposes.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) In order to foster the Union's citizens' access to Europe's cultural heritage, it is also necessary to ensure that orphan works which have been digitised and made available to the public in one Member State are also available in other Member States.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) In order to foster the Union's citizens' access to Europe's cultural heritage, it is also necessary to ensure that orphan works which have been digitised and made available to the public in one Member State are also available in other Member States. Publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museum, archives, records offices, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations that use an orphan work in order to achieve their public interest missions should be able to make the orphan work available to the public in other Member States.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 (19) In order to foster the Union's citizens' access to Europe's cultural heritage, it is also necessary to ensure that orphan works which have been digitised and made available to the public in one Member State are also available in other Member States. Publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museum, archives, film heritage institutions
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to existing and future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to existing or future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Member States should also be allowed to permit the use of orphan works for purposes which go beyond the public interest missions of the publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions or public service broadcasting organisations covered by this Directive. In such circumstances, the rights and legitimate
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions or public service broadcasting organisations for purposes beyond their public interest mission,
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises,
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions or public service broadcasting organisations for purposes beyond their public interest mission, rightholders who come forward to claim their works should be remunerated. Such remuneration should take account of the
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions or public service broadcasting organisations for purposes beyond their public interest mission, right holders who come forward to claim their works should be remunerated. Such remuneration should take account of the type of work and the use concerned. Member States may provide that revenues collected from such use of orphan works for the purpose of remuneration but which are unclaimed after the expiry of the period fixed in accordance with this Directive
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 a (new) (22a) Member States should, in conjunction with different stakeholders in the content creation and rights ownership chain, implement a policy to prevent works from becoming orphan works, in order to limit the appearance of orphan works and reduce their number. Effective identification of works, exchanges of information on orphan works, and promotion of collective management or extended collective management are necessary in order to prevent the appearance of orphan works.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 23 a (new) (23a) This Directive is without prejudice to Directive 2001/29/EC and deals specifically with certain permitted uses of orphan works. It does not introduce new exceptions or limitations to copyright and related rights,
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 (1) This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, records offices, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organi
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, non-profit research institutes or museums as well as by archives, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organizations.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. This Directive applies to works
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. This Directive applies to orphan works first published or broadcast or fixed in a Member State and which are:
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. This Directive applies to works first published, exhibited or broadcast in a Member State and which are:
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory wording 2. This Directive applies to works first published
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (1) Works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings,
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (1) Works published in their entirety in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings, and which are contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives, or
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 1. Works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings, and which are contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, records offices or archives, or
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (1) Works published in the form of books, journals, newspapers, magazines or other writings, and which are contained in the collections of publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 2 (2) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works or cont
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3)
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations before the 31 December 2002 and contained in their archives
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Recordings of live performances, or photographs and other images of public performances, contained in the collections of other cultural institutions.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work shall be considered an orphan work if
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work shall be considered an orphan work if the
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work shall be considered an orphan work if the rightholder in the work is not identified or, even if identified,
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 (1) A work shall be considered an orphan work if the rightholder in the work is not identified or, even if identified, is not located after a diligent search for the rightholder has been carried out within a reasonable time and recorded in accordance with Article 3.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work has more than one rightholder
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work has more than one
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations or copyright collection societies referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a diligent search is carried out for each work, by consulting the appropriate sources for the category of works in question.
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a good faith and diligent search is carried out for each
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may have the diligent search carried out by other organisations, including collecting societies.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works or any other protected subject-matter shall be determined by each Member State, in consultation with rightholders and users, and may include
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in consultation with right holders and users, and include
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State of first publication or broadcast or fixation.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State of first publication, exhibition, or broadcast.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State of first publication
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State of first publication or broadcast
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Should the work have more than one rightholder, including from states outside the EU, the organisation carrying out the diligent search shall take steps to locate such rightholders.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In the event that a cinematographic or audiovisual work is known to be a co- production, the diligent search must be carried out in each of the Member States where the co-production took place.
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. If a cinematographic or audiovisual work for which a diligent search is being carried out is presumed to be the fruit of a co-production, then the diligent search shall be carried out in the country with the majority participation in the co- production, identifying said country by taking account of material factors such as the language used in the film or the film’s original title. In the event that the search in said country proves unsuccessful, continuing the search in the countries where there is a strong presumption that minority co-producers may be found shall be mandatory.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a publicly accessible and user-friendly database.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a database which is publicly accessible
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a database publicly
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a publicly accessible database. The start date of the diligent searches shall be indicated in that public database.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Duly authorised collecting societies shall be entitled to operate on behalf of those right holders who, even after a diligent search, cannot be located.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the event that the cinematographic and audiovisual work subject to a diligent search is known to be a co-production, the search must be carried out in each of the Member States where the co-production took place.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Where this is compatible with Community law and international agreements on copyright and related rights, Member States may adopt comprehensive arrangements providing for simple and extended systems for the declaration of rights.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that a rightholder or rightholders in a work considered to be orphan ha
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that a rightholder in a work considered to be orphan who has meanwhile been located has, at any time, the possibility of initiating putting an end to the orphan status.
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The loss of a work’s orphan status shall not affect existing contracts for the use, in accordance with this Directive, of the work in question.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. However, unless otherwise provided in
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. However, unless otherwise provided in Article 7, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may not use orphan works in order to achieve aims other than their public interest missions, notably the preservation
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall be free to choose a given method for the management of rights, such as extended collective licensing.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. This Directive is without prejudice to the
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. For this Directive to be fully effective, broadcasting organisations need to be able to use recognised orphan works, under the conditions established by this directive, in the course of their normal activities.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The uses of orphan works within the framework of this Directive shall fully respect the moral rights of the right holders. In the case of an orphan work where a right holder has been identified but not located, the name of the right holder shall be indicated in any use of the work.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. This Directive is without prejudice to existing arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights, such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – title Article 7 deleted Authorised uses of orphan works
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – title Article 7 deleted Authorised uses of orphan works
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. Member States may authorise the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) to
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory wording 1. Member States may authorise the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) to use an orphan work for purposes other than those referred to in Article 6(2), on a reasonable fixed fee basis, provided that:
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) the organisations maintain user- friendly, detailed and publicly accessible, records of their use of orphan works;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 4. rightholders which put an end to the orphan status of the work, within the meaning of Article 5, are subsequently remunerated for the use that has been made of the work by
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may cho
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 a (new) Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 b (new) Article 7b Records of use and remuneration 1. Member States shall ensure that diligent searches for orphan works or orphan contributions to works are recorded in a publicly accessible form. To that end they, in collaboration with the Commission, shall devise EU-wide uniform minimum standards and seek to set up or use a central data bank. 2. Member States shall ensure that the use of orphan works or orphan contributions to works is recorded in a publicly accessible form. To that end they, in collaboration with the Commission, shall devise EU-wide uniform minimum standards and seek to set up or use a central data bank. 3. In the case of orphan works or orphan contributions to works where authors or holders of copyright-related rights have been identified but not located, the names of those persons shall be indicated whenever the works are used. 4. Authors or holders of copyright-related rights who put an end to the orphan status of a work in accordance with Article 5 shall be remunerated for the use previously made of the work. They may claim their remuneration within a period fixed by Member States, which shall not be less than five years from the date of the act giving rise to the claim. If a collecting society as referred to in Article 3 was entitled to collect remuneration as a trustee, claims for remuneration shall be made against the collecting society. 5. Revenues available within collecting societies which are unclaimed after the expiry of the period fixed in accordance with paragraph 4 shall be used for the purposes for which collecting societies normally use such revenues. Member States may provide for those revenues to be used to cover the costs of diligent search or of maintenance and servicing of the data banks required for that purpose.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 This Directive shall be without prejudice to provisions concerning in particular patent rights, trade marks, design rights, utility models, topographies of semi-conductor products, type faces, conditional access, access to cable of broadcasting services, protection of national treasures, legal deposit requirements, laws on restrictive practices and unfair competition, state secrets, trade secrets, security, confidentiality, data protection and privacy, protection of personal privacy rights, access to public documents, the law of contract.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Directive shall apply without prejudice to provisions on the management of rights over works and other protected subject matter, notably provisions on collective licensing, legal presumptions of representation or transfer, mandatory collective licensing, or any combinations thereof, whether said works or protected subject matter are orphan works or not within the meaning of Article 2, in accordance with EU laws and international treaties on copyright and related rights. Where such provisions exist or are introduced, each of the other Member States shall ensure that the beneficiaries referred to in Article 1(1) are legally protected in regard to their use of works or other protected subject matter that is the subject of a licence or authorisation in accordance with these provisions.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. This Directive shall be without prejudice to existing or future arrangements in Member States for the management of rights in respect of objects protected by copyright or related rights, in particular collective licensing systems, presumptions concerning the representation of rightholders or the transfer of rights, legally obligatory management systems, or combinations thereof.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Preventive measures In coordination with the parties concerned, the Member States shall promote all preventive measures likely to limit the appearance of orphan works and to reduce their number.
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 3 – point a (a) The publishers and the publishers association in the respective country and the authors and
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 3 – point c a (new) (ca) The publishing company.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 5 – introductory wording 5) For audiovisual works contained in the collections of film heritage institutions and
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 5 – point d a (new) (da) Professional associations in relevant Member States.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, archives, educational establishments, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, archives, ed
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, archives, ed
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, archives, educational establishments, film heritage institutions
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, records offices, archives, educational establishments, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations are engaged in large-scale digitisation of their collections or archives in order to create European Digital Libraries. Libraries, museums, records offices, archives,
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) The need to promote free movement of knowledge and innovation in the internal market is an important component of the Europe 2020 Strategy, as set out in the Communication from the Commission "Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth", which includes as one of its flagship initiatives the development of a Digital Agenda for Europe. The Europe 2020 Strategy cannot be achieved unless a true single market for intellectual property is created.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of so called orphan works for which no author is identified or, even if identified, is not located,
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no author or holder of a related right is identified or, even if identified, is not located, so called orphan works, is a key action of the Digital Agenda for Europe, as set out in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions – A Digital Agenda for Europe.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no author is identified or, even if identified, is not located, so called orphan works, is a key action of the Digital Agenda for Europe, as set out in the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions – A Digital Agenda for Europe. The digitisation and dissemination of orphan works pose a particular cultural and economic challenge.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for authors of reproduction and of
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for authors of reproduction and of
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for authors of reproduction, of communication to the public and of making available to the public of their works, as harmonised under Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, require the consent of the author prior to the digitisation and making available of a work.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In the case of orphan works, such prior consent
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In the case of orphan works, such prior consent to carry out acts of reproduction or of
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In the case of orphan works, such prior consent to carry out acts of reproduction or
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) In the case of orphan works, such prior author’s consent to carry out acts of reproduction or of making available to the public cannot be obtained.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) Different approaches in the Member States to the recognition of orphan work status can present obstacles to the functioning of the internal market and the use and cross-border access to orphan works. Such different approaches can also result in restrictions on the free movement of goods and services which incorporate cultural content, and make it difficult for the public to access and benefit from such goods and services. Therefore, ensuring the mutual recognition of such status is appropriate.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, educational establishments, archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, educational establishments, archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, records offices, archives, educational establishments,
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) The nature of intellectual property rights governance is also crucial to the flourishing of European culture and the quality of life enjoyed by European citizens. In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, educational establishments, archives, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, educational establishments, archives, film heritage institutions
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of public service broadcasting organisations and produced by them include orphan works.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of public service broadcasting organisations and produced by them include orphan works.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of public service broadcasting organisations and produced by them include orphan works. Taking into account the special position of broadcasters as producers of audio and audiovisual material and the need to adopt measures to limit the phenomena of orphan works in the future, it is appropriate to
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of public service broadcasting organisations and produced by them include orphan works. Taking into account the special position of broadcasters as producers of audio and audiovisual material and the need to adopt measures to limit the phenomena of orphan
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works, or contributions to works contained therein, in the archives of
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive,
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works, and photographs and other images, in the archives of public service broadcasting organisations and other cultural organisations should be understood as including works commissioned by such organisations for their exclusive exploitation.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) For the purposes of this Directive publicly accessible libraries should be understood as meaning publicly funded libraries.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) For reasons of international comity, this Directive should only apply to works that are first published, exhibited or broadcast in a Member State.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the author or holder of related rights should be carried out. Member States
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the author or authors holding the rights to it should be carried out. Member States should be permitted to provide that such a diligent search may be carried out by the organisations referred to in this Directive or by other organisations, such as collecting societies.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) It is appropriate to provide for a harmonised approach concerning such diligent search in order to ensure a high level of protection of copyright in the Union. A diligent search should involve the consultation of publicly accessible databases that supply information on the copyright status of a work. Moreover, in order to avoid duplication of costly digitisation, Member States should ensure that use of orphan works
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) It is appropriate to provide for a harmonised approach concerning such diligent search in order to ensure a high level of protection of copyright in the Union. A diligent search should involve the consultation of publicly accessible databases that supply information on the copyright status of a work. Moreover, in order to avoid duplication of costly digitisation, Member States should ensure that use of orphan works by the organisations referred to in this Directive, in particular duly entitled collecting societies, is recorded in a publicly accessible database. To the extent possible, publicly accessible databases of search results and use of orphan works should be designed and implemented so as to permit interlinkage with each other on a pan- European level and consultation thereof through a single entry point.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several authors who hold the rights to them or include other works or protected subject matter. This Directive should not affect the rights of known or identified rightholders.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several authors or holders of related rights or include other works or protected subject matter. This Directive should not affect the rights of known or identified rightholders.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several authors or holders of related rights or include other works or protected subject matter. This Directive should not affect the rights of known or identified rightholders.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to avoid duplication of search efforts, a diligent search should be conducted
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that authors are entitled to
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The ending of orphan work status allows for the payment of remuneration normally due for the exploitation of a work, including past uses. It should be for Member States to decide whether a time limit is to be set for the recovery of royalties by right holders.
source: PE-472.126
2011/10/27
IMCO
83 amendments...
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Libraries, museums, archives, educational establishments, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Copyright is the economic foundation for the creative industry, since it stimulates innovation, creation, investments and productions. Mass digitisation and dissemination of works is therefore a means of protecting Europe’s cultural heritage.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Copyright is an important tool for ensuring that the creative sector is rewarded for its work.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In particular, a common approach to determine the orphan status and the permitted uses of orphan works is necessary to ensure legal certainty in the internal market with respect to the use of orphan works by libraries, museums, educational establishments, archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) Cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Musical works, included those embedded in the audio, audiovisual, and cinematographic works referred to in Article 1.2 (2) and (3) should be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the author should be carried out in the manner decided by the authors and publishers or their representatives in the Member State where the work was first published. Member States should be permitted to provide that such a diligent search may be carried out by the organisations referred to in this Directive or by other organisations.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) It is appropriate to provide for a harmonised approach concerning such diligent search in order to ensure a high level of protection of copyright in the Union. A diligent search should involve the consultation of publicly accessible databases that supply information on the copyright status of a work. Moreover, in order to avoid duplication of costly digitisation, Member States should ensure that use of orphan works by the organisations referred to in this Directive is recorded in a publicly accessible database. To the extent possible, publicly accessible databases of search results and use of orphan works should be designed and implemented within a clear and user- friendly framework so as to permit interlinkage
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) It is appropriate to provide for a harmonised approach concerning such diligent search in order to ensure a high level of protection of copyright in the Union. A diligent search should involve the consultation of publicly accessible databases that supply information on the copyright status of a work.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13a) In order to facilitate cross border access to publicly accessible online databases recording the search results and the use of orphan works, it is appropriate that Member States communicate to the Commission the online location of databases in their territory and that such information is shared by the Commission with other Member States. Practical arrangements should be found to permit the on-line consultation and the interlinkage of these databases through a single European entry point accessible at a distance and by electronic means by the general public and to facilitate access to information contained therein, in particular through technical mechanisms such as machine translations to ease language barriers.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14)
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to avoid duplication of search efforts, a diligent search should be conducted only in the Member State where the work was first published or broadcast or, where relevant, in the country most associated with the work. In order to enable other Member States to ascertain whether the orphan status of a work has been established in another
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to avoid duplication of search efforts, a diligent search should be conducted only in the Member State where the work was first published or broadcast.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 a (new) (15a) This Directive should also cover works or other protected subject matter which are contained in works, which have first been published or broadcasted in a Member State.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17)
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being understood that libraries, educational
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being understood that libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives and film heritage institutions may, with a view to undertake the uses permitted under this Directive, conclude agreements with commercial partners for the digitisation and making available of orphan works.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being understood that libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 19 a (new) (19a) The economic basis for the creative sector is laid by the interplay of action to protect and promote existing cultural heritage, quality education and manufacturing with the creative sector. Coherent Member State policy in all these areas is needed for a quality creative sector1. 1 TNO, 12 September 2011, ‘Vormgeving verder op de kaart’, study on behalf of Premsela.org: http://www.premsela.org/sbeos/doc/file.ph p?nid=7350
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive is
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Member States should also be allowed to permit the use of orphan works for purposes which go beyond the public interest missions of the organisations covered by this Directive.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments, museums, archives, film heritage institutions or public service broadcasting organisations for purposes beyond their public interest mission, rightholders who come forward to claim their works should be remunerated. Such remuneration should
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works first published or broadcast in a Member State or, where relevant, in the country most associated with the work, and which are:
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works protected by copyright which were first published or broadcast in a Member State and which are:
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 2 a (new) (2a) Works in the form of stand alone photographs and other images, when the diligent search can proceed due to some identifying information attached to such works (e.g. stamps of the photographer’s atelier, etc.) and where the personality rights do not represent the legal obstacle, which are contained in the collections of organisations referred to in Article 1(1), or
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work shall be considered an orphan work if the rightholder in the work is not identified or, even if identified, is not located after a diligent search for the rightholder has been carried out, in good faith and in reasonable terms, and recorded in accordance with Article 3.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a good faith and reasonable diligent search is carried out for each work, by consulting the appropriate sources for the category of works in question.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a diligent search is carried out
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a good faith and reasonable diligent search is carried out for each work, by consulting the appropriate sources for the category of works in question.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In case the diligent search is carried out by other organisations than those referred to in Article 1(1), the latter shall remain liable for the search performed.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In case the diligent search is carried out by other organisations than those referred to in Article 1(1), the latter shall remain liable for the search performed.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State of first publication or broadcast or, where relevant, in the country most associated with the work.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out, in good faith and in reasonable terms, only in the Member State of first publication
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In particular cases, where territorial boundaries of Member State have changed over time, the diligent search in the Member State of first publication may lead to the consultation of information in another Member State to which the work is the most closely associated because of geographical, linguistic or other relevant reasons.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. When a cinematographic and audiovisual work is known to be a co- production, the diligent search shall be carried out in each of the Member States involved in the co-production.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall appoint entities entitled to certify that diligent searches have been properly carried out in good faith, and shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a publicly accessible database.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States that choose an implementation method that imply a right to individual remuneration for the rightholders for the use made of their works, shall introduce an obligation of diligent search a posteriori, and an obligation to reserve for a time to be prescribed by law a share of the remuneration to the rightholders of orphan works.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 A work which is considered an orphan work according to Article 2 in a Member State shall be considered an orphan work in all Member States, and Member States shall recognise the validity of each others’ implementation, and recognise that the reproductions and the initial act of making available for the purposes of Articles 6 and 7, and the provision of access to protected works outside the Member State of the initial act, are lawful acts.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 A work which is considered an orphan work according to Article 2 in a Member State shall be considered an orphan work in all Member States. This Directive shall not prejudice legally recognised arrangements in the Member States which concern the management of rights, such as extended collective licensing.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) by acts of reproduction, within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) by acts of reproduction, within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC, for
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) by acts of reproduction, within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 2001/29/EC
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. However, unless otherwise provided in Article 7, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may not use orphan works in order to achieve aims other than their public interest missions, notably preservation, restoration and the provision of cultural, research and educational access to works contained in their collections.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1), when using orphan works in accordance with paragraph 1, maintain records of their diligent search and publicly accessible records of use and ensure that in the case of an orphan work where a rightholder has been identified but not located, the name of the rightholder is indicated in any use of the work.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1), when using orphan works in accordance with
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the list and the online location of the databases in their territory, and any modification thereafter, where the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) maintain records of their diligent searches and of the use they make of orphan works. The Commission shall transmit this information to all Member States.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Together with the Commission, Member States shall put in place practical arrangements to ensure that the databases referred to above can be consulted through a single on-line entry point at the European level.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 c (new) Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may authorise the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) to use an orphan work for purposes other than those referred to in Article 6(2),
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) rightholders which
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new) (5a) ultimate liability for payment of the remuneration lies with the Member State in which the work was used.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new) (5b) The organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may commercialize the orphan work in a reasonable manner and in good faith until the day on which the act giving rise to entitlement by the rightholder thereto first occurs. Until this day the rightholder shall not be renumerated and copyright legislation shall not apply.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States may choose to use existing or future national schemes to facilitate the mass digitisation of orphan works and to permit the commercial use of orphan works.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 a (new) Article 7a Preventive measures In accordance with the parties concerned, Member States shall promote measures to prevent the development of orphan works in the future.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall keep under constant review the development of rights information sources and shall, at the latest one year after the entry into force of this Directive, and at annual intervals thereafter, submit a report concerning the possible inclusion in the scope of application of this Directive of beneficiaries other than those listed in Article 1(1), and of works or other protected subject matter not currently included in such scope, and in particular phonograms and stand alone photographs and other images.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall keep under constant review the development of works, which are out of commerce, and shall, at the latest two years after the entry into force of this Directive, and regularly thereafter, submit a report concerning the possible solution on the digitisation and wide public access across the Member States to the out-of-commerce-works.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall regularly update (at least every two years) the list of the bodies referred to in Article 1(1) which are responsible for managing orphan works.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – introductory part The sources referred to in Article 3(2) shall
source: PE-475.793
2011/10/28
JURI
122 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work protected by copyright shall be considered an orphan work if
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work or a sound recording shall be considered
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 1. A work shall be considered an orphan work if the rightholder in the work is not identified or, even if identified, is not located after a reasonably diligent search for the rightholder has been carried out in good faith and recorded in accordance with Article 3.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work has more than one rightholder, and at least one of the rightholders has not been identified
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work has more than one rightholder in copyright or related rights, and one of the rightholders has been identified and located, th
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Where a work or a sound recording has more than one rightholder, and one of the rightholders has been identified and located, that work shall not be considered an orphan
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a good faith and diligent search is carried out for each work, by consulting the appropriate sources for the category of works in question.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a diligent search is carried out
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) shall ensure that a diligent search is carried out
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. For the purposes of establishing whether a work is an orphan work, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) or authorised copyright collection societies shall ensure that a diligent search is carried out for each work, by consulting the appropriate sources for the category of works in question.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. In the event that the cinematographic and audiovisual work subject to a good faith diligent search is known to be a co- production, such a search must be carried out in each of the Member States involved in the coproduction.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works or sound recordings shall be determined by each Member State, in consultation with rightholders and users, and include, the sources listed in the Annex.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The sources that are appropriate for each category of works shall be determined by each Member State, in consultation with rightholders and users, and include, the sources listed in the Annex, provided these sources are publicly accessible online.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) The sources listed in the 'Due Diligence Guidelines' which are referred to in point 1 of the 'Memorandum of Understanding on Diligent Search Guidelines for Orphan Works' shall also be consulted.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. A diligent search is required to be carried out only in the Member State
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new) In some cases, a good faith and diligent search will involve a search in Member States other than the Member State of first publication or broadcast.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where a work has not been published or broadcast, or the Member State of first publication or broadcast cannot be determined, a diligent search shall be carried out in the country of origin or country most associated with the work. If necessary, the additional consultation of information available in other countries shall be undertaken.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a publicly accessible database. The Member States’ databases shall be designed and implemented so as to permit interlinkage with each other on a pan-European level.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Authorised copyright collection societies shall act on behalf of those rightholders who cannot be located even after a diligent search.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. If the cinematographic or audiovisual work subject to a bona fide diligent search is a co-production, the bona fide diligent search shall be carried out in each of the Member States involved in the co- production.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 A work or a sound recording which is considered
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Directive shall be without prejudice to the current or future arrangements laid down by the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Directive is without prejudice to present and future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights, such as extended collective licences or requirements for authorisation.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 If a work considered to be orphan has only one rightholder, Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Member States shall ensure that a rightholder in a work considered to be orphan has, at any time, the possibility of putting an end to the orphan status in respect of himself, by making himself known in an appropriate manner.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Member States shall ensure that a
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Member States shall ensure that a rightholder in a work considered to be orphan has, at any time, the enforceable possibility of putting an end to the orphan status and, to that end, shall establish a speedy, uniform, cheap procedure.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 Member States shall ensure that a rightholder in a work considered to be orphan has, at any time, the real possibility of putting an end to the orphan status in a speedy, uniform and cost-effective manner, in the Member State of his choice.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) Termination of the status of orphan work in respect of a rightholder that makes himself known shall not call into question contracts previously entered into for the use, in accordance with the present Directive, of the work which was previously orphan in respect of that rightholder.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) are permitted to use an orphan work or a sound recording in the following ways:
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by making the orphan work or the sound recording available, within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC;
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) by
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) by communication to the public of the orphan work, including making it available to the public, by wire or wireless means, so that everybody can have access to it at a place and a time chosen individually.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. However, unless otherwise provided in Article 7, the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may not use orphan works or sound recordings in order to achieve aims other than their public interest missions, notably preservation, restoration and the provision of cultural and educational access to works
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. However,
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. If, in the case of an orphan work, one or more rightholders has been identified but not located, the name(s) of the rightholder(s) shall be indicated every time a work is used.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member States shall provide that rightholders which put an end to the orphan status of the work, within the meaning of Article 5, are remunerated for the use that has been made of the work by the organisations referred to in Article 1(1);
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1), when using orphan works in accordance with paragraph 1, maintain records of their diligent search and publicly accessible records of use. Those records shall be designed and implemented so as to permit interlinkage with each other on a pan- European level.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1), when using orphan works or sound recordings in accordance with paragraph 1, maintain records of their diligent search and publicly accessible records of use.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the organisations referred to in Article 1(1),
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall ensure that rightholders which put an end to the orphan status of the work, within the meaning of Article 5, are remunerated for the use that has been made of the work by the organisations referred to in Article 1(1);
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. In the case of an orphan work where a rightholder has been identified but not located, the name of the rightholder shall be indicated in any use of the work.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 A
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 A
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States may authorise the organisations referred to in Article 1(1) to use an orphan work or a sound recording for purposes other than those referred to in Article 6(2), provided that:
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) the organisations maintain publicly accessible records of their use of orphan works or sound recordings;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 (3) in the case of an orphan work or a sound recording where a rightholder has been identified but not located, the name of the rightholder is indicated in any use of the work or the sound recording;
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new) (3a) The organisations referred to in Article 1(1) may commercialise the orphan work in a reasonable manner and in good faith until the day in which the rightholder claims the work and puts an end to the orphan status in accordance with Article 5. Until this day the rightholder will not be remunerated and copyright legislation will not be applicable.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) rightholders which put an end to the orphan status of the work, within the meaning of Article 5, are remunerated according to fixed tariffs determined by the Member States for the use that has been made of the work by the organisations referred to in Article 1(1);
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 4 (4) rightholders which put an end to the orphan status of the work, within the
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) rightholders may claim their remuneration under point (4) within a period of
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) rightholders may claim their remuneration under point (4) within a period fixed by Member States and which shall not be less than five years from the date of the act
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may choose the means for authorising use within the meaning of paragraph 1
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – title Co
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Directive shall be without prejudice to the Member States’ arrangements concerning mass-scale digitisation of works, such as those relating to out-of- commerce works.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) This Directive shall be without prejudice to provisions for managing the rights to works and other protected subject matter, in particular collective licensing arrangements, legal presumptions of representation or transfer, mandatory collective management, or combinations of them, irrespective of whether such works or protected subject matter are orphan works under Article 2, in accordance with Union law and the international treaties on copyright and related rights. Where such provisions exist or are introduced, each other Member State shall ensure that the beneficiaries of Article 1(1) are legally protected with regard to their use of works or other protected subject matter as licensed or permitted under such provisions.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 a (new) Article 8a Management of rights This Directive shall be without prejudice to the Member States’ arrangements concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The provisions of this Directive shall apply in respect of all works or sound recordings referred to in Article 1 which are, on [transposition date], protected by the Member States' legislation in the field of copyright.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall keep under constant review the development of rights information sources and shall, at the latest one year after the entry into force of this Directive, and at annual intervals thereafter, submit a report concerning the possible inclusion in the scope of application of this Directive of beneficiaries other than those listed in Article 1(1), and of works or other protected subject matter not currently included in such scope, and in particular
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall regularly update (at least every two years) the list of the bodies referred to in Article 1(1) which are responsible for managing orphan works.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 3 – point a (a) The publishers and the publishers' association in the respective country and the authors and journalists associations;
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 5 – point d a (new) (da) Credits and other information appearing on the work's packaging;
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – point 5 – point d b (new) (db) Databases/membership lists of all relevant associations or institutions representing the relevant category of rightholder.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works for which no
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) Creating a legal framework to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of works protected by copyright and neighbouring rights for which no
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) The exclusive rights for authors of reproduction and of making available to the public of their works, as harmonised under Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 22
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) This Directive is without prejudice to Directive 2001/29/EC and deals solely with certain permitted uses of orphan works. It does not introduce new exceptions or limitations to copyright and related rights.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) Copyright stimulates innovation, creation, investments and productions and thus it is the economic foundation for the creative industry. Mass digitisation and dissemination of works is therefore a means of protecting Europe's cultural heritage.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, sound recordings and cinematographic
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) For the purposes of this Directive, cinematographic, audio and audiovisual works in the archives of
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) The creation of large online libraries facilitate electronic search and discovery tools which open up new sources of discovery for researchers and academics that would otherwise have to content themselves with more traditional and analogue search methods. Moreover, cloud computing technologies should be adequately used in order to create a European-wide database, which is comprehensive and easy to access.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) For reasons of international comity, this Directive should only apply to works that are first published, exhibited, or broadcast in the territory of a Member State.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) For reasons of international comity, this Directive should only apply to works that
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 12 (12) Before a work can be considered an orphan work, a good faith and reasonable diligent search for the
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) It is appropriate to provide for a harmonised approach concerning such diligent search in order to ensure a high level of protection of copyright in the Union. A diligent search should involve the consultation of publicly accessible databases that supply information on the copyright status of a work.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Online accessibility of cultural content and digital preservation often fail to fulfil their potential owing, inter alia, to inadequate resources in the Member States and interconnection of databases that are incompatible. For the purposes of this Directive, Member States should be asked to consider standardisation at European level for digitisation of works, in order to improve the central registration, accessibility and interoperability of their public databases.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Orphan works may have several
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to avoid duplication of search efforts, a good faith and diligent search should be conducted only in the Member State where the work was first published or broadcast. In some cases, however, such as with regard to coproduction of an audiovisual work, for example, a good faith and diligent search would involve a search in Member States other than the Member State of first publication or broadcast. In order to enable other Member States to ascertain whether the orphan status of a work has been established in another Member State, Member States should ensure that the results of diligent searches
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) In order to avoid duplication of search efforts, a diligent search should be conducted only in the Member State where the work was first published or broadcast, or, where this is unclear or the work has not been published, the country most associated with the work. In order to enable other Member States to ascertain whether the orphan status of a work has been established in another Member State, Member States should ensure that the results of diligent searches carried out in their territories are recorded in a publicly accessible database.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) It is appropriate to provide that
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) If a work has been wrongly found to be an orphan work, following a search which was not diligent and reasonable or not carried out in good faith, Member States should provide that the user be held liable, for breach of copyright, in accordance with the relevant national provisions and Union law.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to promote learning and culture, Member States should permit libraries, educational establishments and museums which are publicly accessible, as well as archives, film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organisations, to make available and reproduce orphan works, provided such use fulfils their public interest missions, notably preservation, restoration and the provision of cultural and educational access to works contained in their collections. Film heritage institutions should, for the purposes of this Directive, cover organisations designated by Member States to collect, catalogue, preserve and restore films forming part of their cultural heritage. For the purposes of this Directive, public-service broadcasting organisations should cover broadcasters with a public-service remit laid down and organised by a Member State.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) In order to promote learning and culture, Member States should permit libraries, educational establishments and museums which are publicly accessible, as well as archives, film heritage institutions and
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) Contractual arrangements may play a role in fostering the digitisation of European cultural heritage, it being understood that libraries, educational establishments, museums or archives, audio and film heritage institutions may, with a view to undertake the uses permitted under this
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to existing or future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences, legal presumptions of representation or transfer, mandatory collective management, or combinations of them.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to existing or future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences or requirement for authorisation.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 20 (20) This Directive should be without prejudice to existing and future arrangements in the Member States concerning the management of rights such as extended collective licences.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) Member States should also be allowed to permit the use of orphan works for purposes which go beyond the public interest missions of the organisations covered by this Directive.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) When a Member State authorises, under the conditions established in this Directive, the use of orphan works by
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Directive concerns certain uses of orphan works undertaken by publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments or museums as well as by archives, audio and film heritage institutions and public service broadcasting organizations.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works subject to copyright and related rights in the collections of organisations referred to in Article 1(1) and first published or broadcast in the territory of a Member State
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works protected by copyright, which are contained in the collections of organisations referred to in Article 1(1), originate or have been first published or broadcast in the territory of a Member State and which are:
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. This Directive applies to works first published
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (1) Works
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (1)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 2 (2)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 (3) Cinematographic, audio or audiovisual works produced by public service broadcasting organisations
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point 3 a (new) (3a) Works that constitute an integral or embedded part of works referred to in Article 1(2).
source: PE-475.839
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0615/COM_SEC(2011)0615_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0615/COM_SEC(2011)0615_EN.pdf |
docs/6 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0289/COM_COM(2011)0289_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0289/COM_COM(2011)0289_EN.pdf |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0136&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0136&appLng=EN |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.338New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-472338_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE475.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-475839_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.125&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-472125_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.720&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-473720_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0289/COM_COM(2011)0289_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0289/COM_COM(2011)0289_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120913&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-09-13-TOC_EN.html |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0615/COM_SEC(2011)0615_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0615/COM_SEC(2011)0615_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0616/COM_SEC(2011)0616_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/0616/COM_SEC(2011)0616_EN.pdf |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-55&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0055_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-349New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0349_EN.html |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
4289
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4560
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/06115New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0028New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32012L0028 |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 049
|
procedure/legal_basis/2 |
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 49
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0289:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0289:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/subject/2 |
Old
3.30.08 Press, media pluralismNew
3.30.08 Press, media freedom and pluralism |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|