Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | MACOVEI Monica ( PPE) | GEIER Jens ( S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros ( ALDE), STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard ( ECR), EHRENHAUSER Martin ( NA) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ASHWORTH Richard ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 325-p4
Legal Basis:
TFEU 325-p4Events
The Commission staff working document provides an annual overview with information on the results of the Hercule III Programme in 2018.
As a reminder, the budget for the implementation of the Programme amounted to EUR 15.35 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 13.2 million in payment appropriations.
The overview states that the Hercule III programme continues to be an important and effective tool in the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The results of the annual overview demonstrate that the actions undertaken with support from the programme contributed to the prevention and fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.
The relevance of the Programme's aims and objectives is supported by the findings of the mid-term evaluation carried out in 2017. The evaluation demonstrated that the Programme, in its current form and stage of implementation, has largely fulfilled its mission. The Programme has been efficiently implemented while effectively addressing the Member States' needs.
The introduction of the electronic submission and processing of grant applications is an important development which has considerably shortened the time for notifying applicants about the outcome of the evaluation procedure. As its full implementation continues, this electronic system is expected to further reduce the administrative burden for applicants, grant beneficiaries and the Commission.
Way forward
The Hercule III programme will come to an end on 31 December 2020. Acknowledging its contribution, the Commission adopted on 30 May 2018 a proposal for a new EU Anti-Fraud Programme under the financial framework 2021-2027. The proposal combines two types of spending activities:
(1) a classic spending programme following up on the Hercule III programme;
(2) the financing of two operational activities which are tasked to the Commission by secondary legislation (the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) which supports, essentially, operational activities in the area of mutual administrative assistance between Member States’ customs authorities, and the Irregularity Management System (IMS), an IT established for the reporting by Member States of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities to the EU budget in shared management and pre-accession funds).
This combination will permit the creation of synergies and allow for flexibility between the three components of the new programme as well as with other relevant programmes.
This Commission staff working document concerns the annual overview with information on the results of the Hercule III programme in 2017.
The legal basis of the programme requires the Commission to adopt an annual work programme for the implementation of the programme and to submit a report on the main results and achievements every year to the European Parliament and to the Council.
This is the fourth annual overview of the achievements and results.
Actions : the overview covers information on actions (technical assistance, training and other actions) for which financial commitments were made under the 2017 annual work programme, as well as the results of actions that were finalised in 2017, but committed under the Hercule programme in previous years.
As regards technical assistance, the amount committed was higher than the earmarked budget in the annual work programme. At the end of 2016, appropriations that were not committed for other types of eligible actions were transferred to technical assistance. The payments under the grant agreements and most of the contracts signed in 2017 cannot be reported as most of them will only be made in 2018 and beyond.
Findings : the report highlighted that overall the programme continues to be an important and effective tool in the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The results demonstrated that the actions undertaken with support from the programme contributed to the prevention and fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.
The relevance of the programme's aims and objectives is supported by the findings of the mid-term evaluation carried out in 2017. In particular because of the relatively modest size of the programme, the demand for financing from eligible bodies consistently exceeds available funds.
The introduction of the electronic submission and processing of grant applications was an important development in 2017 which has considerably shortened the time for notifying applicants about the outcome of the evaluation procedure. As its full implementation continues, this electronic system is expected to reduce the administrative burden for applicants, grant beneficiaries and the Commission.
Revised EU financial Regulation : this is expected to enter into force in July 2018. It will further simply the beneficiaries' access to EU funds . The new rules will emphasise the achievement of results, reducing the administrative burden for both beneficiaries and authorities, who will be able to focus on policy achievements rather than collecting and checking financial documents. The risk of error will also decrease and it will become easier for small beneficiaries with limited resources to access EU funds.
Way forward : the Hercule III programme will come to an end on 31 December 2020. Acknowledging the contribution of the Hercule III programme, the Commission has adopted on 30 May 2018 a proposal for a new anti-fraud programme under the financial framework 2021-2027. The proposal is essentially to replicate the Hercule programme , and combine it with two activities carried out by OLAF: the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) which supports, essentially, operational activities in the area of mutual administrative assistance between Member States’ customs authorities, and the Irregularity Management System (IMS), an IT system that allows the Member States to report detected irregularities to EU funds and which supports the management and analysis of these. This combination will create synergies and flexibility between the three components of the new programme.
The Commission presented a mid-term evaluation of the Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme).
The time period covered by the evaluation is the first half of the seven year period that Hercule III programme lasts for, starting on 1 January 2014 (when the Regulation entered into force) until June 2017. To perform the mid-term evaluation, the Commission services relied primarily on the external contractor’s study, as well as the impact assessment carried out at the time of the legislative proposal for the programme, the Commission’s evaluation of the previous Hercule programme, the annual work programmes of Hercule III, and the annual overviews on the implementation of the programme that are prepared by the Commission.
The mid-term evaluation has shown that the Hercule III programme, in its present form and at this stage of its implementation, has largely fulfilled its mission :
the specific and operational objectives of, and activities under, the programme continue to be relevant . The drivers behind the Commission's proposal for the Hercule III programme are still prevalent today, in particular the occurrence of fraud to the EU financial interests; the evaluation showed that the internal and external coherence of the programme was ensured. Internal coherence is primarily ensured by the allocation of the budget for the period 2014-2020 (EUR 104.9 million) between the different categories of actions. Additionally the Commission, at the selection stage, examines the applications with a view to also prevent possible overlaps and repetitions; the evaluation found that the programme has been effective : the programme financed actions which, by nature (e.g., by financing scanners to detect smuggled goods, or supporting digital forensic trainings to the benefit of national services in charge of investigating cases involving the EU financial interests), clearly contributed to the protection of the EU financial interests. With regards to technical assistance, the timing for the evaluation, i.e. early in the life of the programme, made it challenging to further substantiate the above finding that the programme is effective; the stakeholders almost unanimously recognised the added value of the programme. The majority of stakeholders also considered that the benefits from the programme would not materialise without the support of Hercule III or equivalent EU funding. The actions allowed for a better protection of the Union's external borders. The programme is an enabler for cross-border cooperation, in particular cross-border exchanges of information and best practices; there is a consensus among beneficiaries that the actions funded under the programme will continue producing benefits, even after their completion . This was particularly relevant for technical assistance actions where the deployment of equipment will continue generating results beyond the closing date of the activity; on the revenue side, it contributes to securing the financial means necessary for the initiatives taken to achieve the Europe 2020 strategy’s objectives and, on the expenditure side, it contributes to ensuring that these resources are not diverted to other ends.
Suggestions for improvements : some ideas have been tabled of possible new objectives and activities for the programme going forward. These ideas, with the limitation that the external study did not test to what extent they are shared by a large part of the stakeholders, could feed into the Commission services’ reflection for the next three years of the life of the programme , in particular in the areas of cross-border cooperation between Member States, cooperation with non EU partners, as well as new technological developments.
These ideas will also feed into the wider reflection about the support to antifraud activities in the context of the preparations for the future multi-annual financial framework post-2020.
PURPOSE: to establish the ‘Hercule III’ Programme to combat fraud and to protect the taxpayers’ money for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme) and repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC.
CONTENT: Hercule III was inspired by two previous programmes, Hercules and Hercules II, which covered the periods 2004-2006 and 2007-2013, respectively. It is designed to protect the financial interests of the Union by contributing to the actions carried out at Union level and the Member States in particular to combat cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting .
The Programme in particular shall create savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from specialised training.
Eligible actions : the Programme shall in particular support the following actions:
· specialised technical assistance for the competent authorities of the Member States (such as providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission; support in setting up cross-border operations; supporting Member States’ capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes; exchange of personnel and data);
· organisation of targeted specialised training , and risk analysis training workshops (such as exchange of experience and best practices ; coordination of the activities of participating countries, and representatives of international organisations; raising the awareness of the judiciary).
Financial envelope : this is established at EUR 104 918 000 (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 (including at least 70% for technical assistance and 25% maximum for training).
In exceptional cases, for example, concerning Member States exposed to high risks, the maximum co-financing rate of 90% of the eligible costs will apply.
Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the Commission must ensure such protection when implementing financed actions by the application of preventive measures of effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by administrative and financial penalties. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections.
Monitoring and evaluation : in the interests of transparency, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis, with information on the implementation of the Programme. It must present an independent mid-term evaluation report by 31 December 2017 and a final evaluation report by 31 December 2021.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 21/03/2014. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2014.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delagated acts in order to provide for a degree of flexibility in the allocation of funds. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of seven years from 21 March 2014 . The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections in regard to a delegated act within two months of notification of that act (this period may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or the Council make objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 644 votes to 14 with 12 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests.
Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of an agreement between Parliament and Council. They amend the proposal as follows:
Added value: Parliament stated that the Programme must also contribute to increased transnational cooperation and coordination at Union level, between Member States' authorities, the Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
Specific objective : attaining the specific objective of the Programme - to prevent and combat fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union – must be measured referring to target levels and baselines and through all of the following key performance indicators:
· the number of seizures, confiscations and recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations;
· the added value and effective use of the co-financed technical equipment;
· the exchange of information among Member States on the results achieved with the technical material;
· the number and type of training activities, including the amount of specialised training.
Operational objectives : these shall be:
· to improve the prevention and investigation of fraud and other illegal activities beyond current levels by enhancing transnational and multi-disciplinary cooperation;
· to increase the protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud, facilitating the exchange of information, experiences and best practices, including staff exchanges;
· to limit the currently known exposure of the financial interests of the Union to fraud, corruption and other illegal activities with a view to reducing the development of an illegal economy in key risk areas such as organised fraud, including cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;
· to enhance the degree of development of the specific legal and judicial protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud by promoting comparative law analysis.
Financial envelope : this shall be EUR 104 918 000 , (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The Commission may depart from the indicative allocation of funds laid down in the Annex, but may not increase the allocated share of the financial envelope by more than 20 % for each type of action.
Type of financial intervention and co-financing : the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the Programme shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. In exceptional cases, such as cases concerning Member States exposed to a high risk in relation to the financial interests of the Union, the co-financing rate shall not exceed 90 % of the eligible costs.
OLAF’s investigations : the amended text states that OLAF may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.
Monitoring and evaluation : to increase transparency on the use of the funds, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis , with information on the implementation of the Programme, including an independent mid term report on the implementation of the Programme and a final evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of the Programme, including its added value.
All participating countries and other beneficiaries shall provide the Commission with all the data and information necessary to increase transparency and accountability and to permit the monitoring and evaluation.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Monica Luisa MACOVEI (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests.
The committee recommends that the position of the European Parliament adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
The Programme’s added value : Members consider that the Programme should also contribute to:
· an increased transparency in the use of the funds relating to the protection of the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;
· an increased cooperation and coordination within the Commission's services, between the Commission and the Member States and between the different Member States.
Key performance indicators , including target levels and baselines, shall be developed by the Commission in order to assess the effectiveness of the Programme, and in particular its specific objective.
Members feel that the operational objectives of the Programme should be found in the main body of the proposed Regulation rather than in the Annexes.
Eligible actions : the proposed Regulation should provide finance for the maintenance costs of technical equipment purchased under the Programme . The equipment co-financed by the Programme shall be used exclusively for the protection of the financial interests of the Union.
Furthermore, the organisation of targeted specialised training shall aim at exchanging experience and best practices between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries, including specialised law enforcement services, as well as representatives of international public organisations.
Types of financing and financing : at the request of the Commission, beneficiaries of the Programme shall transmit detailed data about their activities funded under the Programme in order to increase transparency and accountability as well as to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme.
Members require that the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not be less than 50% and shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. The cofinancing rate shall not exceed: (i) 90 % of the eligible costs in cases of vulnerable and high-risk Member States; (ii) 30% of the eligible costs in respect of the funding of the maintenance of technical material purchases under the Programme.
The co-financing rate shall be inversely proportional to the total amount per annum the Member States receive as revenue derived from the agreements concluded by the Commission and Member States with four major tobacco companies.
Multiannual work plans : in order to implement the Programme, the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes to carry out the multiannual work plans and indicative timetables for the call of proposals for the period covered by the multiannual work plan. The annual work programmes shall specify the criteria for the awarding of a grant covering the maintenance of the technical equipment purchased under the Programme.
The Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, with information on the annual implementation of the Programme on an annual basis.
Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.
Implementation : in order to provide for a detailed but flexible framework for implementation, the power to adopt delegated acts shall be delegated to the Commission in respect of: (i) the revision of the operational objectives and general allocation of funds, (ii) the adoption of key performance indicators, (iii) the eligible actions, (iv) the establishment of criteria defining vulnerable and high-risk Member States for co-financing, and (v) the updating or revision of the multiannual plans.
Financial envelope : the report points out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal is only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. The amendments proposed by the committee stress the role of the budgetary authority in this regard.
PURPOSE: to establish the programme "Hercule III" to fight fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.
BACKGROUND: Decision 804/2004/EC established the Hercule I programme and Decision 878/2007/EC extended this programme over the period 2007 to 2013, as Hercule II. The latter placed specific emphasis on the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting to reflect the legal obligations of the Commission stemming from the Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement with Philip Morris International signed in 2004. It was the first of the agreements signed with international cigarette manufacturers under which, in recognition of more than US$ 2 billion to be paid by them into national and the Union Budgets over periods of up to 20 years, the Commission and Member States agreed that European efforts to suppress the illegal traffic in tobacco products would be enhanced. The annual provision for Hercule was duly increased from 2007.
As the legal basis for Hercule II will expire at the end of 2013, its replacement should ensure the continuity of European support for the activities carried out by the Commission and Member States in providing better information, carrying out studies and providing training or technical and scientific assistance in the fight against fraud.
Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, the protection of the Union's financial interests against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union is a shared responsibility between the Commission and Member States.
The Hercule III programme concerns this specific sphere of activity of the Commission and its cooperation with Member States’ competent authorities, as well as with the other European institutions and bodies, particularly OLAF.
It is essential that there should continue to be an instrument specifically dedicated to fighting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment. Four options, with their impact on the budget, were considered.
Option 1 : to continue the programme with the same level of funding (baseline scenario); Option 2 : to renew the Hercule programme with improved objectives and a better methodology, including in particular a higher maximum rate of co-financing for technical support such as the procurement of equipment; Option 3 : to significantly alter the distribution between the different spending objectives and put much greater support on operational and law enforcement activities; Option 4 : discontinue the Hercule programme, with the possibility of continuing some actions under other Union co-financing programmes and/or to leave other actions to the Member States.
In view of the past experience, the option to renew the programme with improved objectives and a better methodology is the preferred option (option 2) with a budgetary envelope in real prices which remains similar to the current envelope (approximately EUR 15 million per year). In contrast, Option 3 would result in an imbalance to the detriment of specific support for actions of prevention and detection of fraud and it might lead to confusion with regard to the attribution of responsibilities between Member States and the European Union. Member States are primarily responsible for the fight against fraud. Discontinuing the programme would reduce expenditure at Union level, without creating real economies and offsetting resources at national level or in the framework of another Union programme.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 325 TFEU.
CONTENT: this proposal establishes the Hercule III programme to promote activities against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. This objective shall be measured, inter alia, through the amount of recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations, the increased percentage of successful joint operations, and the increased number of cases accepted by the criminal investigative authorities.
The Programme shall run from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.
Purpose: the aims are to:
· target exclusively the protection of the financial interests of the Union, in the context of a long term vision which is coherent with other Union objectives, on the basis of the priorities defined each year for this specific field of expertise;
· allow the implementation of other Union programmes to focus on priorities other than the protection of the financial interests;
· fully take into account the results of the actions already co-financed in the past in this field, including in terms of targeted beneficiaries and geographical balance;
· have direct impact on not only some Member States investigations, but also on OLAF investigations.
Added value: the programme in particular creates savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from the collective specialised training. An increased effectiveness of the cross-border operations is expected on the basis of common technical standards and joint training.
The Programme shall contribute to:
· developing the activities at Union level and the Member States to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;
· an increased transnational cooperation at the Union level and in particular to the effectiveness of the cross-border operations;
· an effective prevention of fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, by offering joint specialised training for staff of national, regional administrations and to other stakeholders.
Bodies eligible for funding : these are (i) national or regional administrations of a Member State or a third country which promote the strengthening of action at Union level to protect the Union's financial interests; (ii) research and educational institutes and non-profit making entities provided that they have been established and have been operating for at least one year, in a Member State or in a third country.
Eligible actions : the Programme shall provide financial support for the following actions:
(a) Provision of specialised technical assistance for national authorities through:
· providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission;
· ensuring the necessary support and facilitating investigations, in particular the setting up of joint investigation teams and cross border operations ;
· supporting Member States' capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes as well as independent analytical services for the analysis of seized cigarettes;
· enhancing staff exchanges for specific projects, in particular in the field of the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting ;
· providing technical and operational support for the law enforcement authorities of the Member States in their fight against illegal cross border activities and fraud affecting the Union financial interests, including in particular support for customs authorities ;
· building information technology capacity throughout the Member States and third countries by providing specific databases and IT tools facilitating data access and analysis;
· increasing data exchange, developing and providing IT tools for investigations, and monitoring intelligence work.
(b) Organisation of specialised training, and risk analysis training workshops, as well as conferences, aimed at:
· further fostering better understanding of Union and national mechanisms;
· exchanging experience between the relevant authorities in Member States, and third countries as well as representatives of international organisations, including specialised law enforcement services;
· coordinating the activities of Member States, third countries, and international public organisations;
· disseminating knowledge, particularly on better identification of risk for investigative purposes;
· developing high-profile research activities, including studies;
· improving cooperation between practitioners and academics;
· further raising the awareness of the judiciary and other branches of the legal profession for the protection of the financial interests of the Union.
(c) Any other action, provided by the annual work programmes, which is necessary for attaining the general and specific objectives provided for in the text.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the programme will cover the period 2014-2020, and the overall budgetary envelope is EUR 110 000 000 in current prices. This amount is in line with the Commission's Communication on the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ''A Budget for Europe 2020''.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0809
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2021)0386
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2019)0361
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0381
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0003
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0003
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2014/250
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 084 20.03.2014, p. 0006
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)167
- Draft final act: 00039/2013/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0029/2014
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0385/2012
- Committee opinion: PE496.328
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE498.050
- Committee draft report: PE496.377
- Contribution: COM(2011)0914
- Contribution: COM(2011)0914
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1610
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1611
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0914
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)1610
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)1611
- Committee draft report: PE496.377
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE498.050
- Committee opinion: PE496.328
- Draft final act: 00039/2013/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)167
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0003 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0003
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0381
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2019)0361
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0809 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0386
- Contribution: COM(2011)0914
- Contribution: COM(2011)0914
Activities
- Inés AYALA SENDER
- Monica MACOVEI
- Marta ANDREASEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard ASHWORTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ingeborg GRÄSSLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lucas HARTONG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vojtěch MYNÁŘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan MULDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios STAVRAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nikola VULJANIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0385/2012 - Monica Luisa Macovei - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
53 |
2011/0454(COD)
2012/10/16
BUDG
16 amendments...
Amendment 13 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls its resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe1; reiterates that sufficient additional resources are needed in the next MFF in order to enable the Union to fulfil its existing policy priorities and the new tasks provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, as well as to respond to unforeseen events; points out that even with an increase in the level of resources for the next MFF of at least 5 % compared to the 2013 level only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union’s agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; challenges the Council, if it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its policy priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value; ___________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0266.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The Commission should present to the European Parliament and to the Council an
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 This objective shall be measured, inter alia, through the amount of recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations, the increased percentage of successful joint operations, and the increased number of cases accepted by the criminal investigative authorities, and the increased exchange of information on the results achieved with the technical material purchased under the Programme.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Representatives of countries forming part of the stabilisation and association process for countries of South-Eastern Europe, the Russian Federation, and certain countries with which the Union has concluded an agreement for mutual assistance in fraud-related matters, and representatives of international and other relevant organisations, may take part in activities organised under the Programme wherever this is useful for the achievement of the objectives referred to in Articles 3 and 4. The
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 7 – increasing data exchange, including between the Member States and the Commission, developing and providing IT tools for investigations, and monitoring intelligence work.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – exchanging experience between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries as referred to in Article 6(2), including specialised law enforcement services, as well as representatives of international public organisations as mentioned in Article 6
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 5 – developing high-profile research activities, including comparative-law studies;
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) The budgetary authority shall authorise the available annual appropriations without prejudice to the provisions of the Council Regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 and the Interinstitutional Agreement of xxx/201z between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters and sound financial management.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a a) grants, including relating to the maintenance of technical material purchased under the Programme;
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The maintenance of equipment shall be conducted and financed by the owner of the equipment, ie. by the respective national customs authorities in the Member States.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not exceed
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The co-financing rate for grants awarded under the
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 In order to implement the Programme the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes. The
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 In order to implement the Programme the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes. They shall set out the objectives pursued, the expected results, the method of implementation and their total amount. The annual work programmes shall also specify the criteria for being awarded a grant covering the maintenance of the technical equipment purchased under the Programme. They shall also contain a description of the actions to be financed, an indication of the amount allocated to each action and an indicative implementation timetable. They shall include for grants the priorities, the essential evaluation criteria and the maximum rate of co-financing.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 Budget allocated to communication actions to be carried out by the Commission under this Regulation shall also cover the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union as far as they are related to the general objectives of this Regulation.
source: PE-497.922
2012/10/23
CONT
37 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union and the Member States have set themselves the objective of countering fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting. Together with the Commission, the Member States should
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union and the Member States have set themselves the objective of countering fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including tobacco and cigarette smuggling a
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Activities with the aim of providing better information, specialised training or technical and scientific assistance help significantly to protect the financial interests of the Union and at the same time to attain an equivalent level of protection across the Union. The allocation of resources to the several points of entry should be risk-based and allocation mechanisms should be able to quickly adjust to changing circumstances.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) To continue and even develop the activities at Union and Member State level to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against tobacco and cigarette smuggling a
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) To continue and even develop the activities at Union and Member State level to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting, also taking into account the new challenges in a context of budgetary austerity, a new programme based on the results of an analysis of the existing programme should be adopted.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) This Regulation complies with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. The Hercule III programme facilitates cooperation between the Member States and between the Commission and the Member States in order to protect the financial interests of the Union,
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) In order to provide for a detailed but flexible framework for implementation, power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the revision of the operational objectives and general allocation of funds, the adoption of key performance indicators and the eligible actions, the establishment of criteria defining vulnerable and high-risk Member States for co-financing and the updating or revision of the multiannual plans established pursuant to this Regulation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The Commission should adopt the annual work programmes setting out
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) The Commission should adopt the annual work programmes setting out the priorities,
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) developing the activities at Union level and the Member States to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against tobacco and cigarette smuggling a
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) an increased transnational cooperation and coordination at the Union level and in particular to the effectiveness and efficiency of the cross-border operations specifically delivering added value to already existing activities in this field in and between Member States and at Union level (such as activities of DG HOME, DG JUST, DG TAXUD and OLAF);
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) increasing cooperation and coordination within the Commission's services, between the Commission and the Member States and between the different Member States.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 The general objective of the Programme shall be to protect the financial interest of the Union thus
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 12a establishing specific key performance indicators.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 This specific objective shall be measured taking into account the key performance indicators, inter alia, through the amount of seizures, confiscations and recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations, the
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 12a concerning the modification of the operational objectives of the Programme, as set out in Article 4a.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 b (new) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 12a concerning the general allocation of funds to the operational objectives of the Programme as set out in Article 4a and the definition of the operational objectives for the use of unallocated funds in accordance with Regulation (EU) No …/2012 [the Financial Regulation].
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1 – providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission; in accordance with Article 3, the equipment co-financed by the programme shall be used exclusively for the protection of the financial interests of the Union;
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2 – ensuring the necessary support and facilitating investigations, in particular the setting up of joint investigation teams and cross border operations, whilst respecting the distinct traditions of each Member State;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 4 – enhancing staff exchanges for specific projects, in particular in the field of the fight against tobacco and cigarette smuggling a
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 6 – building information technology capacity throughout the Member States and third countries as referred to in Article 6(2) by developing and providing specific databases and IT tools facilitating data access and analysis. The Commission shall ensure that any potential overlaps between different systems and databases co-financed by the programme will be avoided;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 7 a (new) - financing for maintenance costs of technical equipment purchased under the Programme;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – exchanging experience and best practices between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries as referred to in Article 6(2) as well as representatives of international organisations as mentioned in Article 6 (3), including specialised law enforcement services;
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – exchanging experience between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries as referred to in Article 6(2), including specialised law enforcement services, as well as representatives of international organisations as mentioned in Article 6 (3), including specialised law enforcement services;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 12a concerning amendments to this Article in order to take account of specific key performance indicators and of developments not foreseen at the time of adoption of this Regulation.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The maintenance of equipment is conducted and financed by the owner of the equipment, hence the respective national customs authority in the Member States.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not exceed
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. The co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not be less than 50% and not exceed 80
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 12a concerning the establishment of criteria for the definition of vulnerable and high-risk Member States, based inter alia on geographical and border location, volume of freight, customs operations and relevant latest available statistics published by Eurostat enabling to annually analyse and evaluate the risk of illegal activities.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Member States shall be encouraged to have increased financial contribution under the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the Programme.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – title Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 In order to implement the Programme the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes. They shall set out the objectives pursued, the expected results, the method of implementation and their total amount. They shall also contain a description of the actions to be financed, an indication of the amount allocated to each
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall provide
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 An independent and thorough evaluation of the Programme shall be carried out by the Commission. No later than by 31 December 2017, an evaluation report shall be established by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, results and impacts, the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, in view of a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The evaluation shall additionally address the scope for simplification, its internal and external coherence, the continued relevance of all objectives, as well as the contribution of the measures to the Union priorities of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It shall take into account the evaluation results on the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In addition, by 31 December 2021, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council an evaluation report on the achievements of the objectives of the
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 a (new) Article 12 a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4(1a) and (2a), the second paragraph of Article 7, Article 9(4a) and Article 10(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of seven years from ...*. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 4(1a) and (2a), the second paragraph of Article 7, Article 9(4a) and Article 10(1) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or on a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to 4(1a) and (2a), the second paragraph of Article 7, Article 9(4a) and Article 10(1) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council. _______________ * OJ: please insert the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
source: PE-498.050
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0454&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0454&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.377New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-496377_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.050New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-498050_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.328&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-496328_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-01-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-385&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0385_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0029New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0029_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/7/08304New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0914:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0914:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf |
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI Monica LuisaNew
MACOVEI Monica |
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI Monica LuisaNew
MACOVEI Monica |
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
|
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI Monica LuisaNew
MACOVEI Monica |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MACOVEI Monica LuisaNew
MACOVEI Monica |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|