BETA


2011/0454(COD) Protection of the financial interests of the European Union: Hercule III programme (2014-2020)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT MACOVEI Monica (icon: PPE PPE) GEIER Jens (icon: S&D S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion BUDG ASHWORTH Richard (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 325-p4

Events

2021/12/16
   EC - Follow-up document
2021/12/16
   EC - Follow-up document
2019/10/11
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission staff working document provides an annual overview with information on the results of the Hercule III Programme in 2018.

As a reminder, the budget for the implementation of the Programme amounted to EUR 15.35 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 13.2 million in payment appropriations.

The overview states that the Hercule III programme continues to be an important and effective tool in the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The results of the annual overview demonstrate that the actions undertaken with support from the programme contributed to the prevention and fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

The relevance of the Programme's aims and objectives is supported by the findings of the mid-term evaluation carried out in 2017. The evaluation demonstrated that the Programme, in its current form and stage of implementation, has largely fulfilled its mission. The Programme has been efficiently implemented while effectively addressing the Member States' needs.

The introduction of the electronic submission and processing of grant applications is an important development which has considerably shortened the time for notifying applicants about the outcome of the evaluation procedure. As its full implementation continues, this electronic system is expected to further reduce the administrative burden for applicants, grant beneficiaries and the Commission.

Way forward

The Hercule III programme will come to an end on 31 December 2020. Acknowledging its contribution, the Commission adopted on 30 May 2018 a proposal for a new EU Anti-Fraud Programme under the financial framework 2021-2027. The proposal combines two types of spending activities:

(1) a classic spending programme following up on the Hercule III programme;

(2) the financing of two operational activities which are tasked to the Commission by secondary legislation (the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) which supports, essentially, operational activities in the area of mutual administrative assistance between Member States’ customs authorities, and the Irregularity Management System (IMS), an IT established for the reporting by Member States of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities to the EU budget in shared management and pre-accession funds).

This combination will permit the creation of synergies and allow for flexibility between the three components of the new programme as well as with other relevant programmes.

2018/09/03
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This Commission staff working document concerns the annual overview with information on the results of the Hercule III programme in 2017.

The legal basis of the programme requires the Commission to adopt an annual work programme for the implementation of the programme and to submit a report on the main results and achievements every year to the European Parliament and to the Council.

This is the fourth annual overview of the achievements and results.

Actions : the overview covers information on actions (technical assistance, training and other actions) for which financial commitments were made under the 2017 annual work programme, as well as the results of actions that were finalised in 2017, but committed under the Hercule programme in previous years.

As regards technical assistance, the amount committed was higher than the earmarked budget in the annual work programme. At the end of 2016, appropriations that were not committed for other types of eligible actions were transferred to technical assistance. The payments under the grant agreements and most of the contracts signed in 2017 cannot be reported as most of them will only be made in 2018 and beyond.

Findings : the report highlighted that overall the programme continues to be an important and effective tool in the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The results demonstrated that the actions undertaken with support from the programme contributed to the prevention and fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

The relevance of the programme's aims and objectives is supported by the findings of the mid-term evaluation carried out in 2017. In particular because of the relatively modest size of the programme, the demand for financing from eligible bodies consistently exceeds available funds.

The introduction of the electronic submission and processing of grant applications was an important development in 2017 which has considerably shortened the time for notifying applicants about the outcome of the evaluation procedure. As its full implementation continues, this electronic system is expected to reduce the administrative burden for applicants, grant beneficiaries and the Commission.

Revised EU financial Regulation : this is expected to enter into force in July 2018. It will further simply the beneficiaries' access to EU funds . The new rules will emphasise the achievement of results, reducing the administrative burden for both beneficiaries and authorities, who will be able to focus on policy achievements rather than collecting and checking financial documents. The risk of error will also decrease and it will become easier for small beneficiaries with limited resources to access EU funds.

Way forward : the Hercule III programme will come to an end on 31 December 2020. Acknowledging the contribution of the Hercule III programme, the Commission has adopted on 30 May 2018 a proposal for a new anti-fraud programme under the financial framework 2021-2027. The proposal is essentially to replicate the Hercule programme , and combine it with two activities carried out by OLAF: the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) which supports, essentially, operational activities in the area of mutual administrative assistance between Member States’ customs authorities, and the Irregularity Management System (IMS), an IT system that allows the Member States to report detected irregularities to EU funds and which supports the management and analysis of these. This combination will create synergies and flexibility between the three components of the new programme.

2018/01/10
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presented a mid-term evaluation of the Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme).

The time period covered by the evaluation is the first half of the seven year period that Hercule III programme lasts for, starting on 1 January 2014 (when the Regulation entered into force) until June 2017. To perform the mid-term evaluation, the Commission services relied primarily on the external contractor’s study, as well as the impact assessment carried out at the time of the legislative proposal for the programme, the Commission’s evaluation of the previous Hercule programme, the annual work programmes of Hercule III, and the annual overviews on the implementation of the programme that are prepared by the Commission.

The mid-term evaluation has shown that the Hercule III programme, in its present form and at this stage of its implementation, has largely fulfilled its mission :

the specific and operational objectives of, and activities under, the programme continue to be relevant . The drivers behind the Commission's proposal for the Hercule III programme are still prevalent today, in particular the occurrence of fraud to the EU financial interests; the evaluation showed that the internal and external coherence of the programme was ensured. Internal coherence is primarily ensured by the allocation of the budget for the period 2014-2020 (EUR 104.9 million) between the different categories of actions. Additionally the Commission, at the selection stage, examines the applications with a view to also prevent possible overlaps and repetitions; the evaluation found that the programme has been effective : the programme financed actions which, by nature (e.g., by financing scanners to detect smuggled goods, or supporting digital forensic trainings to the benefit of national services in charge of investigating cases involving the EU financial interests), clearly contributed to the protection of the EU financial interests. With regards to technical assistance, the timing for the evaluation, i.e. early in the life of the programme, made it challenging to further substantiate the above finding that the programme is effective; the stakeholders almost unanimously recognised the added value of the programme. The majority of stakeholders also considered that the benefits from the programme would not materialise without the support of Hercule III or equivalent EU funding. The actions allowed for a better protection of the Union's external borders. The programme is an enabler for cross-border cooperation, in particular cross-border exchanges of information and best practices; there is a consensus among beneficiaries that the actions funded under the programme will continue producing benefits, even after their completion . This was particularly relevant for technical assistance actions where the deployment of equipment will continue generating results beyond the closing date of the activity; on the revenue side, it contributes to securing the financial means necessary for the initiatives taken to achieve the Europe 2020 strategy’s objectives and, on the expenditure side, it contributes to ensuring that these resources are not diverted to other ends.

Suggestions for improvements : some ideas have been tabled of possible new objectives and activities for the programme going forward. These ideas, with the limitation that the external study did not test to what extent they are shared by a large part of the stakeholders, could feed into the Commission services’ reflection for the next three years of the life of the programme , in particular in the areas of cross-border cooperation between Member States, cooperation with non EU partners, as well as new technological developments.

These ideas will also feed into the wider reflection about the support to antifraud activities in the context of the preparations for the future multi-annual financial framework post-2020.

2018/01/10
   EC - Follow-up document
2014/03/20
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the ‘Hercule III’ Programme to combat fraud and to protect the taxpayers’ money for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme) and repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC.

CONTENT: Hercule III was inspired by two previous programmes, Hercules and Hercules II, which covered the periods 2004-2006 and 2007-2013, respectively. It is designed to protect the financial interests of the Union by contributing to the actions carried out at Union level and the Member States in particular to combat cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting .

The Programme in particular shall create savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from specialised training.

Eligible actions : the Programme shall in particular support the following actions:

· specialised technical assistance for the competent authorities of the Member States (such as providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission; support in setting up cross-border operations; supporting Member States’ capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes; exchange of personnel and data);

· organisation of targeted specialised training , and risk analysis training workshops (such as exchange of experience and best practices ; coordination of the activities of participating countries, and representatives of international organisations; raising the awareness of the judiciary).

Financial envelope : this is established at EUR 104 918 000 (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 (including at least 70% for technical assistance and 25% maximum for training).

In exceptional cases, for example, concerning Member States exposed to high risks, the maximum co-financing rate of 90% of the eligible costs will apply.

Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the Commission must ensure such protection when implementing financed actions by the application of preventive measures of effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by administrative and financial penalties. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections.

Monitoring and evaluation : in the interests of transparency, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis, with information on the implementation of the Programme. It must present an independent mid-term evaluation report by 31 December 2017 and a final evaluation report by 31 December 2021.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 21/03/2014. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2014.

DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delagated acts in order to provide for a degree of flexibility in the allocation of funds. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of seven years from 21 March 2014 . The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections in regard to a delegated act within two months of notification of that act (this period may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or the Council make objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.

2014/03/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2014/02/26
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2014/02/26
   CSL - Final act signed
2014/02/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/02/11
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2014/02/11
   CSL - Council Meeting
2014/01/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/01/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 644 votes to 14 with 12 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests.

Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of an agreement between Parliament and Council. They amend the proposal as follows:

Added value: Parliament stated that the Programme must also contribute to increased transnational cooperation and coordination at Union level, between Member States' authorities, the Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).

Specific objective : attaining the specific objective of the Programme - to prevent and combat fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union – must be measured referring to target levels and baselines and through all of the following key performance indicators:

· the number of seizures, confiscations and recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations;

· the added value and effective use of the co-financed technical equipment;

· the exchange of information among Member States on the results achieved with the technical material;

· the number and type of training activities, including the amount of specialised training.

Operational objectives : these shall be:

· to improve the prevention and investigation of fraud and other illegal activities beyond current levels by enhancing transnational and multi-disciplinary cooperation;

· to increase the protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud, facilitating the exchange of information, experiences and best practices, including staff exchanges;

· to limit the currently known exposure of the financial interests of the Union to fraud, corruption and other illegal activities with a view to reducing the development of an illegal economy in key risk areas such as organised fraud, including cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;

· to enhance the degree of development of the specific legal and judicial protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud by promoting comparative law analysis.

Financial envelope : this shall be EUR 104 918 000 , (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The Commission may depart from the indicative allocation of funds laid down in the Annex, but may not increase the allocated share of the financial envelope by more than 20 % for each type of action.

Type of financial intervention and co-financing : the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the Programme shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. In exceptional cases, such as cases concerning Member States exposed to a high risk in relation to the financial interests of the Union, the co-financing rate shall not exceed 90 % of the eligible costs.

OLAF’s investigations : the amended text states that OLAF may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.

Monitoring and evaluation : to increase transparency on the use of the funds, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis , with information on the implementation of the Programme, including an independent mid term report on the implementation of the Programme and a final evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of the Programme, including its added value.

All participating countries and other beneficiaries shall provide the Commission with all the data and information necessary to increase transparency and accountability and to permit the monitoring and evaluation.

Documents
2014/01/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/11/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Monica Luisa MACOVEI (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests.

The committee recommends that the position of the European Parliament adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:

The Programme’s added value : Members consider that the Programme should also contribute to:

· an increased transparency in the use of the funds relating to the protection of the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;

· an increased cooperation and coordination within the Commission's services, between the Commission and the Member States and between the different Member States.

Key performance indicators , including target levels and baselines, shall be developed by the Commission in order to assess the effectiveness of the Programme, and in particular its specific objective.

Members feel that the operational objectives of the Programme should be found in the main body of the proposed Regulation rather than in the Annexes.

Eligible actions : the proposed Regulation should provide finance for the maintenance costs of technical equipment purchased under the Programme . The equipment co-financed by the Programme shall be used exclusively for the protection of the financial interests of the Union.

Furthermore, the organisation of targeted specialised training shall aim at exchanging experience and best practices between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries, including specialised law enforcement services, as well as representatives of international public organisations.

Types of financing and financing : at the request of the Commission, beneficiaries of the Programme shall transmit detailed data about their activities funded under the Programme in order to increase transparency and accountability as well as to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme.

Members require that the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not be less than 50% and shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. The cofinancing rate shall not exceed: (i) 90 % of the eligible costs in cases of vulnerable and high-risk Member States; (ii) 30% of the eligible costs in respect of the funding of the maintenance of technical material purchases under the Programme.

The co-financing rate shall be inversely proportional to the total amount per annum the Member States receive as revenue derived from the agreements concluded by the Commission and Member States with four major tobacco companies.

Multiannual work plans : in order to implement the Programme, the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes to carry out the multiannual work plans and indicative timetables for the call of proposals for the period covered by the multiannual work plan. The annual work programmes shall specify the criteria for the awarding of a grant covering the maintenance of the technical equipment purchased under the Programme.

The Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, with information on the annual implementation of the Programme on an annual basis.

Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.

Implementation : in order to provide for a detailed but flexible framework for implementation, the power to adopt delegated acts shall be delegated to the Commission in respect of: (i) the revision of the operational objectives and general allocation of funds, (ii) the adoption of key performance indicators, (iii) the eligible actions, (iv) the establishment of criteria defining vulnerable and high-risk Member States for co-financing, and (v) the updating or revision of the multiannual plans.

Financial envelope : the report points out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal is only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. The amendments proposed by the committee stress the role of the budgetary authority in this regard.

Documents
2012/11/15
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2012/11/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/10/23
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/09/18
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/06/05
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2012/03/14
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2012/02/29
   EP - ASHWORTH Richard (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2012/01/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2012/01/12
   EP - MACOVEI Monica (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2011/12/19
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2011/12/19
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2011/12/19
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the programme "Hercule III" to fight fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

BACKGROUND: Decision 804/2004/EC established the Hercule I programme and Decision 878/2007/EC extended this programme over the period 2007 to 2013, as Hercule II. The latter placed specific emphasis on the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting to reflect the legal obligations of the Commission stemming from the Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement with Philip Morris International signed in 2004. It was the first of the agreements signed with international cigarette manufacturers under which, in recognition of more than US$ 2 billion to be paid by them into national and the Union Budgets over periods of up to 20 years, the Commission and Member States agreed that European efforts to suppress the illegal traffic in tobacco products would be enhanced. The annual provision for Hercule was duly increased from 2007.

As the legal basis for Hercule II will expire at the end of 2013, its replacement should ensure the continuity of European support for the activities carried out by the Commission and Member States in providing better information, carrying out studies and providing training or technical and scientific assistance in the fight against fraud.

Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, the protection of the Union's financial interests against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union is a shared responsibility between the Commission and Member States.

The Hercule III programme concerns this specific sphere of activity of the Commission and its cooperation with Member States’ competent authorities, as well as with the other European institutions and bodies, particularly OLAF.

It is essential that there should continue to be an instrument specifically dedicated to fighting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment. Four options, with their impact on the budget, were considered.

Option 1 : to continue the programme with the same level of funding (baseline scenario); Option 2 : to renew the Hercule programme with improved objectives and a better methodology, including in particular a higher maximum rate of co-financing for technical support such as the procurement of equipment; Option 3 : to significantly alter the distribution between the different spending objectives and put much greater support on operational and law enforcement activities; Option 4 : discontinue the Hercule programme, with the possibility of continuing some actions under other Union co-financing programmes and/or to leave other actions to the Member States.

In view of the past experience, the option to renew the programme with improved objectives and a better methodology is the preferred option (option 2) with a budgetary envelope in real prices which remains similar to the current envelope (approximately EUR 15 million per year). In contrast, Option 3 would result in an imbalance to the detriment of specific support for actions of prevention and detection of fraud and it might lead to confusion with regard to the attribution of responsibilities between Member States and the European Union. Member States are primarily responsible for the fight against fraud. Discontinuing the programme would reduce expenditure at Union level, without creating real economies and offsetting resources at national level or in the framework of another Union programme.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 325 TFEU.

CONTENT: this proposal establishes the Hercule III programme to promote activities against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. This objective shall be measured, inter alia, through the amount of recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations, the increased percentage of successful joint operations, and the increased number of cases accepted by the criminal investigative authorities.

The Programme shall run from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020.

Purpose: the aims are to:

· target exclusively the protection of the financial interests of the Union, in the context of a long term vision which is coherent with other Union objectives, on the basis of the priorities defined each year for this specific field of expertise;

· allow the implementation of other Union programmes to focus on priorities other than the protection of the financial interests;

· fully take into account the results of the actions already co-financed in the past in this field, including in terms of targeted beneficiaries and geographical balance;

· have direct impact on not only some Member States investigations, but also on OLAF investigations.

Added value: the programme in particular creates savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from the collective specialised training. An increased effectiveness of the cross-border operations is expected on the basis of common technical standards and joint training.

The Programme shall contribute to:

· developing the activities at Union level and the Member States to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting;

· an increased transnational cooperation at the Union level and in particular to the effectiveness of the cross-border operations;

· an effective prevention of fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, by offering joint specialised training for staff of national, regional administrations and to other stakeholders.

Bodies eligible for funding : these are (i) national or regional administrations of a Member State or a third country which promote the strengthening of action at Union level to protect the Union's financial interests; (ii) research and educational institutes and non-profit making entities provided that they have been established and have been operating for at least one year, in a Member State or in a third country.

Eligible actions : the Programme shall provide financial support for the following actions:

(a) Provision of specialised technical assistance for national authorities through:

· providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission;

· ensuring the necessary support and facilitating investigations, in particular the setting up of joint investigation teams and cross border operations ;

· supporting Member States' capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes as well as independent analytical services for the analysis of seized cigarettes;

· enhancing staff exchanges for specific projects, in particular in the field of the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting ;

· providing technical and operational support for the law enforcement authorities of the Member States in their fight against illegal cross border activities and fraud affecting the Union financial interests, including in particular support for customs authorities ;

· building information technology capacity throughout the Member States and third countries by providing specific databases and IT tools facilitating data access and analysis;

· increasing data exchange, developing and providing IT tools for investigations, and monitoring intelligence work.

(b) Organisation of specialised training, and risk analysis training workshops, as well as conferences, aimed at:

· further fostering better understanding of Union and national mechanisms;

· exchanging experience between the relevant authorities in Member States, and third countries as well as representatives of international organisations, including specialised law enforcement services;

· coordinating the activities of Member States, third countries, and international public organisations;

· disseminating knowledge, particularly on better identification of risk for investigative purposes;

· developing high-profile research activities, including studies;

· improving cooperation between practitioners and academics;

· further raising the awareness of the judiciary and other branches of the legal profession for the protection of the financial interests of the Union.

(c) Any other action, provided by the annual work programmes, which is necessary for attaining the general and specific objectives provided for in the text.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the programme will cover the period 2014-2020, and the overall budgetary envelope is EUR 110 000 000 in current prices. This amount is in line with the Commission's Communication on the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ''A Budget for Europe 2020''.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0385/2012 - Monica Luisa Macovei - Résolution législative #

2014/01/15 Outcome: +: 644, -: 14, 0: 12
DE FR ES IT GB PL RO HU PT BE CZ AT BG SE EL NL SK DK FI HR IE LT LV LU EE SI MT CY
Total
92
54
50
51
62
45
28
21
21
20
19
18
18
18
19
23
13
12
12
12
12
11
9
6
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
230

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Austria ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1
3

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
28

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Bulgaria EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2
icon: NI NI
26

France NI

2

Spain NI

1

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

5

Romania NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
53 2011/0454(COD)
2012/10/16 BUDG 16 amendments...
source: PE-497.922
2012/10/23 CONT 37 amendments...
source: PE-498.050

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/6
date
2013-12-11T00:00:00
docs
title: PE524.885
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/11
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/12
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2021)0386
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/12/docs/0
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2021:0386:FIN:EN:PDF
title
EUR-Lex
docs/13
date
2012-06-05T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/13
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: COM(2021)0809
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/14
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2021)0386
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/14
date
2012-03-14T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/15
date
2012-06-06T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914
type
Contribution
body
IT_SENATE
docs/16
date
2012-03-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0454&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0454&appLng=EN
committees/0/shadows/4
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/2
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.377 title: PE496.377
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.377 title: PE496.377
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.050 title: PE498.050
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.377
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-496377_EN.html
docs/4
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.050 title: PE498.050
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2012-11-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.328&secondRef=02 title: PE496.328
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.050
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-498050_EN.html
docs/5
date
2012-11-07T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.328&secondRef=02 title: PE496.328
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.328&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-496328_EN.html
docs/11
date
2019-10-11T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2019)0361
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/12
date
2019-10-11T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2019)0361
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/12/docs/0
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2019:0361:FIN:EN:PDF
title
EUR-Lex
docs/13
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: COM(2021)0809
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/14
date
2021-12-16T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2021)0386
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0
date
2012-01-19T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1
date
2012-01-19T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1
date
2012-11-15T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/2
date
2012-11-15T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2012-11-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0385_EN.html title: A7-0385/2012
summary
events/3
date
2014-01-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/3
date
2012-11-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0385_EN.html title: A7-0385/2012
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2014-01-14-TOC_EN.html
events/4
date
2014-01-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2014-01-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0029_EN.html title: T7-0029/2014
summary
events/6
date
2014-01-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0029_EN.html title: T7-0029/2014
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2012-01-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ASHWORTH Richard date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ASHWORTH Richard group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs/7/body
EC
docs/10
date
2018-09-03T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/10
date
2018-09-03T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
docs/11
date
2019-10-11T00:00:00
docs
title: SWD(2019)0361
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-385&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0385_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0029
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0029_EN.html
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
activities
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0914 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52011PC0914:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2012-01-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-385&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0385/2012 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-23T00:00:00
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22249&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0029 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0029/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3292
  • date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250 title: Regulation 2014/250 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:084:TOC title: OJ L 084 20.03.2014, p. 0006
commission
  • body: EC dg: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2012-01-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MACOVEI Monica group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ASHWORTH Richard group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2012-01-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3292 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3292*&MEET_DATE=11/02/2014 date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=1610 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2011)1610 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=1611 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2011)1611 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.377 title: PE496.377 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.050 title: PE498.050 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.328&secondRef=02 title: PE496.328 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE524.885 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F14&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00039/2013/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2014-03-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22249&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)167 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2018-01-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0003/COM_COM(2018)0003_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0003 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0003 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presented a mid-term evaluation of the Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme). The time period covered by the evaluation is the first half of the seven year period that Hercule III programme lasts for, starting on 1 January 2014 (when the Regulation entered into force) until June 2017. To perform the mid-term evaluation, the Commission services relied primarily on the external contractor’s study, as well as the impact assessment carried out at the time of the legislative proposal for the programme, the Commission’s evaluation of the previous Hercule programme, the annual work programmes of Hercule III, and the annual overviews on the implementation of the programme that are prepared by the Commission. The mid-term evaluation has shown that the Hercule III programme, in its present form and at this stage of its implementation, has largely fulfilled its mission : the specific and operational objectives of, and activities under, the programme continue to be relevant . The drivers behind the Commission's proposal for the Hercule III programme are still prevalent today, in particular the occurrence of fraud to the EU financial interests; the evaluation showed that the internal and external coherence of the programme was ensured. Internal coherence is primarily ensured by the allocation of the budget for the period 2014-2020 (EUR 104.9 million) between the different categories of actions. Additionally the Commission, at the selection stage, examines the applications with a view to also prevent possible overlaps and repetitions; the evaluation found that the programme has been effective : the programme financed actions which, by nature (e.g., by financing scanners to detect smuggled goods, or supporting digital forensic trainings to the benefit of national services in charge of investigating cases involving the EU financial interests), clearly contributed to the protection of the EU financial interests. With regards to technical assistance, the timing for the evaluation, i.e. early in the life of the programme, made it challenging to further substantiate the above finding that the programme is effective; the stakeholders almost unanimously recognised the added value of the programme. The majority of stakeholders also considered that the benefits from the programme would not materialise without the support of Hercule III or equivalent EU funding. The actions allowed for a better protection of the Union's external borders. The programme is an enabler for cross-border cooperation, in particular cross-border exchanges of information and best practices; there is a consensus among beneficiaries that the actions funded under the programme will continue producing benefits, even after their completion . This was particularly relevant for technical assistance actions where the deployment of equipment will continue generating results beyond the closing date of the activity; on the revenue side, it contributes to securing the financial means necessary for the initiatives taken to achieve the Europe 2020 strategy’s objectives and, on the expenditure side, it contributes to ensuring that these resources are not diverted to other ends. Suggestions for improvements : some ideas have been tabled of possible new objectives and activities for the programme going forward. These ideas, with the limitation that the external study did not test to what extent they are shared by a large part of the stakeholders, could feed into the Commission services’ reflection for the next three years of the life of the programme , in particular in the areas of cross-border cooperation between Member States, cooperation with non EU partners, as well as new technological developments. These ideas will also feed into the wider reflection about the support to antifraud activities in the context of the preparations for the future multi-annual financial framework post-2020. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2018-01-10T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0003:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2018)0003 type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2018-09-03T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2018:0381:FIN:EN:PDF title: EUR-Lex title: SWD(2018)0381 summary: This Commission staff working document concerns the annual overview with information on the results of the Hercule III programme in 2017. The legal basis of the programme requires the Commission to adopt an annual work programme for the implementation of the programme and to submit a report on the main results and achievements every year to the European Parliament and to the Council. This is the fourth annual overview of the achievements and results. Actions : the overview covers information on actions (technical assistance, training and other actions) for which financial commitments were made under the 2017 annual work programme, as well as the results of actions that were finalised in 2017, but committed under the Hercule programme in previous years. As regards technical assistance, the amount committed was higher than the earmarked budget in the annual work programme. At the end of 2016, appropriations that were not committed for other types of eligible actions were transferred to technical assistance. The payments under the grant agreements and most of the contracts signed in 2017 cannot be reported as most of them will only be made in 2018 and beyond. Findings : the report highlighted that overall the programme continues to be an important and effective tool in the protection of the financial interests of the Union. The results demonstrated that the actions undertaken with support from the programme contributed to the prevention and fight against fraud, corruption and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. The relevance of the programme's aims and objectives is supported by the findings of the mid-term evaluation carried out in 2017. In particular because of the relatively modest size of the programme, the demand for financing from eligible bodies consistently exceeds available funds. The introduction of the electronic submission and processing of grant applications was an important development in 2017 which has considerably shortened the time for notifying applicants about the outcome of the evaluation procedure. As its full implementation continues, this electronic system is expected to reduce the administrative burden for applicants, grant beneficiaries and the Commission. Revised EU financial Regulation : this is expected to enter into force in July 2018. It will further simply the beneficiaries' access to EU funds . The new rules will emphasise the achievement of results, reducing the administrative burden for both beneficiaries and authorities, who will be able to focus on policy achievements rather than collecting and checking financial documents. The risk of error will also decrease and it will become easier for small beneficiaries with limited resources to access EU funds. Way forward : the Hercule III programme will come to an end on 31 December 2020. Acknowledging the contribution of the Hercule III programme, the Commission has adopted on 30 May 2018 a proposal for a new anti-fraud programme under the financial framework 2021-2027. The proposal is essentially to replicate the Hercule programme , and combine it with two activities carried out by OLAF: the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) which supports, essentially, operational activities in the area of mutual administrative assistance between Member States’ customs authorities, and the Irregularity Management System (IMS), an IT system that allows the Member States to report detected irregularities to EU funds and which supports the management and analysis of these. This combination will create synergies and flexibility between the three components of the new programme. type: Legislative proposal
  • date: 2012-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2012-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0914 title: COM(2011)0914 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0914 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=914 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish the programme "Hercule III" to fight fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. BACKGROUND: Decision 804/2004/EC established the Hercule I programme and Decision 878/2007/EC extended this programme over the period 2007 to 2013, as Hercule II. The latter placed specific emphasis on the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting to reflect the legal obligations of the Commission stemming from the Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement with Philip Morris International signed in 2004. It was the first of the agreements signed with international cigarette manufacturers under which, in recognition of more than US$ 2 billion to be paid by them into national and the Union Budgets over periods of up to 20 years, the Commission and Member States agreed that European efforts to suppress the illegal traffic in tobacco products would be enhanced. The annual provision for Hercule was duly increased from 2007. As the legal basis for Hercule II will expire at the end of 2013, its replacement should ensure the continuity of European support for the activities carried out by the Commission and Member States in providing better information, carrying out studies and providing training or technical and scientific assistance in the fight against fraud. Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, the protection of the Union's financial interests against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union is a shared responsibility between the Commission and Member States. The Hercule III programme concerns this specific sphere of activity of the Commission and its cooperation with Member States’ competent authorities, as well as with the other European institutions and bodies, particularly OLAF. It is essential that there should continue to be an instrument specifically dedicated to fighting fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission carried out an impact assessment. Four options, with their impact on the budget, were considered. Option 1 : to continue the programme with the same level of funding (baseline scenario); Option 2 : to renew the Hercule programme with improved objectives and a better methodology, including in particular a higher maximum rate of co-financing for technical support such as the procurement of equipment; Option 3 : to significantly alter the distribution between the different spending objectives and put much greater support on operational and law enforcement activities; Option 4 : discontinue the Hercule programme, with the possibility of continuing some actions under other Union co-financing programmes and/or to leave other actions to the Member States. In view of the past experience, the option to renew the programme with improved objectives and a better methodology is the preferred option (option 2) with a budgetary envelope in real prices which remains similar to the current envelope (approximately EUR 15 million per year). In contrast, Option 3 would result in an imbalance to the detriment of specific support for actions of prevention and detection of fraud and it might lead to confusion with regard to the attribution of responsibilities between Member States and the European Union. Member States are primarily responsible for the fight against fraud. Discontinuing the programme would reduce expenditure at Union level, without creating real economies and offsetting resources at national level or in the framework of another Union programme. LEGAL BASIS: Article 325 TFEU. CONTENT: this proposal establishes the Hercule III programme to promote activities against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union. This objective shall be measured, inter alia, through the amount of recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations, the increased percentage of successful joint operations, and the increased number of cases accepted by the criminal investigative authorities. The Programme shall run from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. Purpose: the aims are to: · target exclusively the protection of the financial interests of the Union, in the context of a long term vision which is coherent with other Union objectives, on the basis of the priorities defined each year for this specific field of expertise; · allow the implementation of other Union programmes to focus on priorities other than the protection of the financial interests; · fully take into account the results of the actions already co-financed in the past in this field, including in terms of targeted beneficiaries and geographical balance; · have direct impact on not only some Member States investigations, but also on OLAF investigations. Added value: the programme in particular creates savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from the collective specialised training. An increased effectiveness of the cross-border operations is expected on the basis of common technical standards and joint training. The Programme shall contribute to: · developing the activities at Union level and the Member States to counter fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting; · an increased transnational cooperation at the Union level and in particular to the effectiveness of the cross-border operations; · an effective prevention of fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union, by offering joint specialised training for staff of national, regional administrations and to other stakeholders. Bodies eligible for funding : these are (i) national or regional administrations of a Member State or a third country which promote the strengthening of action at Union level to protect the Union's financial interests; (ii) research and educational institutes and non-profit making entities provided that they have been established and have been operating for at least one year, in a Member State or in a third country. Eligible actions : the Programme shall provide financial support for the following actions: (a) Provision of specialised technical assistance for national authorities through: · providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission; · ensuring the necessary support and facilitating investigations, in particular the setting up of joint investigation teams and cross border operations ; · supporting Member States' capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes as well as independent analytical services for the analysis of seized cigarettes; · enhancing staff exchanges for specific projects, in particular in the field of the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting ; · providing technical and operational support for the law enforcement authorities of the Member States in their fight against illegal cross border activities and fraud affecting the Union financial interests, including in particular support for customs authorities ; · building information technology capacity throughout the Member States and third countries by providing specific databases and IT tools facilitating data access and analysis; · increasing data exchange, developing and providing IT tools for investigations, and monitoring intelligence work. (b) Organisation of specialised training, and risk analysis training workshops, as well as conferences, aimed at: · further fostering better understanding of Union and national mechanisms; · exchanging experience between the relevant authorities in Member States, and third countries as well as representatives of international organisations, including specialised law enforcement services; · coordinating the activities of Member States, third countries, and international public organisations; · disseminating knowledge, particularly on better identification of risk for investigative purposes; · developing high-profile research activities, including studies; · improving cooperation between practitioners and academics; · further raising the awareness of the judiciary and other branches of the legal profession for the protection of the financial interests of the Union. (c) Any other action, provided by the annual work programmes, which is necessary for attaining the general and specific objectives provided for in the text. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the programme will cover the period 2014-2020, and the overall budgetary envelope is EUR 110 000 000 in current prices. This amount is in line with the Commission's Communication on the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ''A Budget for Europe 2020''.
  • date: 2012-01-19T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-385&language=EN title: A7-0385/2012 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Monica Luisa MACOVEI (EPP, RO) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests. The committee recommends that the position of the European Parliament adopted in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows: The Programme’s added value : Members consider that the Programme should also contribute to: · an increased transparency in the use of the funds relating to the protection of the financial interests of the Union, including the fight against cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting; · an increased cooperation and coordination within the Commission's services, between the Commission and the Member States and between the different Member States. Key performance indicators , including target levels and baselines, shall be developed by the Commission in order to assess the effectiveness of the Programme, and in particular its specific objective. Members feel that the operational objectives of the Programme should be found in the main body of the proposed Regulation rather than in the Annexes. Eligible actions : the proposed Regulation should provide finance for the maintenance costs of technical equipment purchased under the Programme . The equipment co-financed by the Programme shall be used exclusively for the protection of the financial interests of the Union. Furthermore, the organisation of targeted specialised training shall aim at exchanging experience and best practices between the relevant authorities in the Member States, and third countries, including specialised law enforcement services, as well as representatives of international public organisations. Types of financing and financing : at the request of the Commission, beneficiaries of the Programme shall transmit detailed data about their activities funded under the Programme in order to increase transparency and accountability as well as to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the Programme. Members require that the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not be less than 50% and shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. The cofinancing rate shall not exceed: (i) 90 % of the eligible costs in cases of vulnerable and high-risk Member States; (ii) 30% of the eligible costs in respect of the funding of the maintenance of technical material purchases under the Programme. The co-financing rate shall be inversely proportional to the total amount per annum the Member States receive as revenue derived from the agreements concluded by the Commission and Member States with four major tobacco companies. Multiannual work plans : in order to implement the Programme, the Commission shall adopt annual work programmes to carry out the multiannual work plans and indicative timetables for the call of proposals for the period covered by the multiannual work plan. The annual work programmes shall specify the criteria for the awarding of a grant covering the maintenance of the technical equipment purchased under the Programme. The Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, with information on the annual implementation of the Programme on an annual basis. Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. Implementation : in order to provide for a detailed but flexible framework for implementation, the power to adopt delegated acts shall be delegated to the Commission in respect of: (i) the revision of the operational objectives and general allocation of funds, (ii) the adoption of key performance indicators, (iii) the eligible actions, (iv) the establishment of criteria defining vulnerable and high-risk Member States for co-financing, and (v) the updating or revision of the multiannual plans. Financial envelope : the report points out that the financial envelope specified in the legislative proposal is only an indication to the legislative authority and cannot be fixed until agreement is reached on the proposal for a regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020. The amendments proposed by the committee stress the role of the budgetary authority in this regard.
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22249&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0029 title: T7-0029/2014 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 644 votes to 14 with 12 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Hercule III programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the European Union's financial interests. Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of an agreement between Parliament and Council. They amend the proposal as follows: Added value: Parliament stated that the Programme must also contribute to increased transnational cooperation and coordination at Union level, between Member States' authorities, the Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). Specific objective : attaining the specific objective of the Programme - to prevent and combat fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union – must be measured referring to target levels and baselines and through all of the following key performance indicators: · the number of seizures, confiscations and recoveries following fraud cases detected by joint actions and cross border operations; · the added value and effective use of the co-financed technical equipment; · the exchange of information among Member States on the results achieved with the technical material; · the number and type of training activities, including the amount of specialised training. Operational objectives : these shall be: · to improve the prevention and investigation of fraud and other illegal activities beyond current levels by enhancing transnational and multi-disciplinary cooperation; · to increase the protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud, facilitating the exchange of information, experiences and best practices, including staff exchanges; · to limit the currently known exposure of the financial interests of the Union to fraud, corruption and other illegal activities with a view to reducing the development of an illegal economy in key risk areas such as organised fraud, including cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting; · to enhance the degree of development of the specific legal and judicial protection of the financial interests of the Union against fraud by promoting comparative law analysis. Financial envelope : this shall be EUR 104 918 000 , (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The Commission may depart from the indicative allocation of funds laid down in the Annex, but may not increase the allocated share of the financial envelope by more than 20 % for each type of action. Type of financial intervention and co-financing : the co-financing rate for grants awarded under the Programme shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. In exceptional cases, such as cases concerning Member States exposed to a high risk in relation to the financial interests of the Union, the co-financing rate shall not exceed 90 % of the eligible costs. OLAF’s investigations : the amended text states that OLAF may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. Monitoring and evaluation : to increase transparency on the use of the funds, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis , with information on the implementation of the Programme, including an independent mid term report on the implementation of the Programme and a final evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of the Programme, including its added value. All participating countries and other beneficiaries shall provide the Commission with all the data and information necessary to increase transparency and accountability and to permit the monitoring and evaluation.
  • date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to establish the ‘Hercule III’ Programme to combat fraud and to protect the taxpayers’ money for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) No 250/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 establishing a programme to promote activities in the field of the protection of the financial interests of the European Union (Hercule III programme) and repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC. CONTENT: Hercule III was inspired by two previous programmes, Hercules and Hercules II, which covered the periods 2004-2006 and 2007-2013, respectively. It is designed to protect the financial interests of the Union by contributing to the actions carried out at Union level and the Member States in particular to combat cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting . The Programme in particular shall create savings deriving from the collective procurement of specialised equipment and databases to be used by the stakeholders and those derived from specialised training. Eligible actions : the Programme shall in particular support the following actions: · specialised technical assistance for the competent authorities of the Member States (such as providing specific knowledge, specialised and technically advanced equipment and effective information technology (IT) tools facilitating transnational cooperation and cooperation with the Commission; support in setting up cross-border operations; supporting Member States’ capacity to store and destroy seized cigarettes; exchange of personnel and data); · organisation of targeted specialised training , and risk analysis training workshops (such as exchange of experience and best practices ; coordination of the activities of participating countries, and representatives of international organisations; raising the awareness of the judiciary). Financial envelope : this is established at EUR 104 918 000 (in current prices) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 (including at least 70% for technical assistance and 25% maximum for training). In exceptional cases, for example, concerning Member States exposed to high risks, the maximum co-financing rate of 90% of the eligible costs will apply. Protection of the financial interests of the Union : the Commission must ensure such protection when implementing financed actions by the application of preventive measures of effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by administrative and financial penalties. The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections. Monitoring and evaluation : in the interests of transparency, the Commission shall provide the European Parliament and the Council, on an annual basis, with information on the implementation of the Programme. It must present an independent mid-term evaluation report by 31 December 2017 and a final evaluation report by 31 December 2021. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 21/03/2014. The Regulation shall apply from 01/01/2014. DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delagated acts in order to provide for a degree of flexibility in the allocation of funds. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of seven years from 21 March 2014 . The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections in regard to a delegated act within two months of notification of that act (this period may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or the Council make objections, the delegated act will not enter into force. docs: title: Regulation 2014/250 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250 title: OJ L 084 20.03.2014, p. 0006 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:084:TOC
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/08304
New
  • CONT/7/08304
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC 2003/0152(COD) Repealed by 2018/0211(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
New
8.70.04
Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
procedure/summary
  • Repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0914:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52011PC0914:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
4f1ad952b819f207b300000e
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
MACOVEI Monica Luisa
New
MACOVEI Monica
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/1/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities
  • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0914/COM_COM(2011)0914_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52011PC0914:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2011)0914 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2012-01-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-385&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0385/2012 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-23T00:00:00
  • date: 2014-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20140114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22249&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0029 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0029/2014 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3292
  • date: 2014-02-11T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2014-02-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2014-03-20T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014R0250 title: Regulation 2014/250 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:084:TOC title: OJ L 084 20.03.2014, p. 0006
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ECR name: ASHWORTH Richard
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-01-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PPE name: MACOVEI Monica Luisa
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/08304
reference
2011/0454(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 325-p4
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Repealing Decision No 804/2004/EC
subtype
Legislation
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
title
Protection of the financial interests of the European Union: Hercule III programme (2014-2020)
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud