Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | DAVIES Chris ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | GLATTFELDER Béla ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | PIRILLO Mario ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 398 votes to 132 with 104 abstentions, a resolution tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety on a Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. It endorses the Commission's Roadmap to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, together with its trajectory, the specific milestones for domestic emission reductions of 40 %, 60 % and 80 % for 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively, and the ranges for sector-specific milestones, as the basis for proposing legislative and other initiatives on economic and climate policy. However, the Roadmap demonstrates that the current 20 % climate target, of which more than half could be achieved through non-domestic offsets, is not on a cost-effective pathway towards a 80 % reduction in 2050 as compared to 1990. Members note that 80 % is on the low end of the 80-95 % range, which the IPCC considered necessary for industrialised countries, and which, the European Council adopted as the EU target for 2050.
Parliament calls on the Commission to:
· set interim greenhouse gas emission reduction for 2030 and 2040, including concrete objectives for each sector, together with an ambitious timetable;
· bring forward within the next two years the measures necessary to achieve the 2030 objectives, taking into account particular national capacities and potentials, as well as international progress on climate action;
· present a cost-benefit analysis of meeting the proposed pathway at Member State level, taking into account national circumstances stemming from different technological development, as well as the necessary investments (and the attendant social acceptability) and the existence of a wider range of possible global conditions.
Parliament calls for greater consistency among Community programmes and policies in order to achieve the Roadmap's objectives and ensure that its priorities are fully integrated in the new 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework. It acknowledges that delivering the 20 % energy efficiency target would allow the EU to reduce its internal CO2 emissions by 25 % or more by 2020, and that this reduction would still be on a cost-effective path towards the long-term 2050 target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95 % from 1990 levels. It notes that, according to the Roadmap, a less ambitious approach would result in significantly higher costs over the entire period . Members recall, however, that the cost-effectiveness of investments should always be measured in the light of Member State budgets.
The international dimension : Parliament notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and that it is essential for Europe's future competitiveness to increase levels of investment in research, development and application in relation to these technologies. It notes also the shift in sustainable scientific and technological innovation away from Europe to other parts of the world. Members emphasise the leading role played by China and India in wind technologies and call for steps to promote the eco-efficient development and production in the EU of these technologies and of the new and innovative technologies that are needed to achieve the ambitious targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Welcoming the outcome of the Durban conference in agreeing a clear timeline for drafting an international post-2012 agreement and the acceptance that large emitters, Parliament calls on the EU to continue to play an active role in international negotiations to finalise an ambitious, comprehensive and legally binding agreement. It reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system. Even with a pathway of 30 % reductions in 2020, 55 % in 2030, 75 % in 2040 and 90 % in 2050, the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share of the global 2°C compatible carbon budget, and delaying emissions reductions increases the cumulative share significantly.
The Emissions Trading System (ETS ): Parliament recognises that the ETS is the principal instrument, although not the only one, for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies. Further improvement of the ETS is necessary , and Members call for the EU ETS to be complemented with a technology- and innovation-based approach in order to secure the significant reductions needed.
They recognise that the ETS is experiencing problems not originally anticipated , and that the accumulating surplus of allowances will depress the incentive to promote low carbon investments for many years to come. This endangers the effectiveness of the ETS as the EU's principal mechanism to reduce emissions in a manner that creates a level playing field for competing technologies. Parliament calls on the Commission to adopt measures to correct the failings of the ETS and to allow it to function as originally envisaged. It makes recommendations on appropriate measures and asks for a report examining the impacts on incentives for investments in low carbon technologies and the risk of carbon leakage.
Parliament also calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement in full the legislation on aviation in the ETS.
Members recall that at least 50 % of auctioning revenues must be reinvested in climate action, and they urge the Commission to monitor the spending of such revenues by Member States , and report on this on an annual basis to Parliament. Member States must make effective use of the auction revenues in order to promote R&D and innovation with a view to achieving long-term reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Energy efficiency : Parliament recalls the existing assessments that indicate that reducing energy use by 20 % compared to 2020 projections is not currently on track. It calls for rapid action, greater ambition and stronger political commitment in terms of achieving the 2020 targets and looking beyond 2020, thus attracting appropriate investment. Since energy efficiency policies are key to further reducing carbon emissions, binding targets should not be excluded. Members welcome the priorities set by the proposed Energy Efficiency Directive for increasing energy efficiency in all sectors, and particularly in buildings through the renovation of existing building stock. They call for the mobilisation of new sources of funding at European and national level, including through new financing instruments, highlighting the importance of private investment.
Renewable energy : Parliament underlines the important role of renewable energy, and the urgent need for better solutions as regards storage, increasing energy efficiency and ensuring efficient energy transmission , including appropriate infrastructure measures. It recognises the significant progress achieved by Member States in the development of renewable sources of energy since binding targets were set for 2020, and draws attention to the importance of setting further binding renewable energy targets for 2030 . Members stress that meeting the targets set in the national renewable energy action plans is crucial for the achievement of the overall EU targets for 2050 , and they consider that the Commission should take measures if national targets are not met .
They also call for a biomass supply policy to encourage sustainable biomass production and use. It insists that meeting the EU's biofuels target must not adversely affect food and feed production or lead to a loss of biodiversity. Accordingly, the Commission is asked to promote adequate protection of the environment in third countries affected by land use change bilaterally and multilaterally in order to take account of the greenhouse gas emissions attributable to changes in land use patterns.
Power generation : Parliament calls on the EU to commit itself to the decarbonisation of the energy sector by 2050. It invites the Member States and the Commission to invest more in the energy infrastructure necessary for the transition to a sustainable economy . Europe should be at the cutting edge in the development of standards and interoperable energy-related Internet technologies and energy-efficient ICT applications. With regard to interregional connections, Parliament stresses the need to launch an investment plan based notably on the European Energy Infrastructure Package, so as to secure the diversification of energy supply sources. It also calls for the swift integration and uptake of cross-border electricity markets.
Transport : Members endorse the requirement of the Commission Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 60 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels in the EU. Furthermore, they call on the Commission to come forward with interim emissions reduction targets for the sector in order to ensure that sufficient action is taken at an early stage.
Parliament calls on the Commission to include maritime transport in its roadmap and, in the absence of an international agreement to reduce emissions from shipping, to propose legislation so that these emissions are included in the Community reduction commitment with the aim of the proposed act entering into force by 2013.
Agriculture: Members call on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land and reduce the use of fossil fuel based fertilisers, taking particular account of the role of agriculture as producer of food (rather than fuel).
They also call for a strategy for EU land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), and encourage Member States to develop their national policies in order to deliver the mitigation potential of their respective LULUCF sectors.
Financing : Parliament supports the proposals made by the Commission for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 to provide dedicated funding to increase investment and promote the development and application of low-carbon technologies . It endorses the intention to mainstream climate-related funding of the total MFF and earmark 20 % of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for renewable energy and energy- efficient investment, while insisting that this must be effectively monitored. It recommends that the Commission should ensure that particular use is made of this funding to assist Member States that have a high potential for reducing emissions below the existing targets but lack the capacity to make the necessary investment.
The Council examined draft conclusions on a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, which aimed to establish a sustainable and cost-effective trajectory to 2050, on the basis of milestones for domestic greenhouse gas emissions reductions of 40% by 2030, 60% by 2040 and 80% by 2050 compared to 1990, as proposed in the Commission’s communication "A roadmap for moving to a competitive a low-carbon economy in 2050".
The Presidency and Commissioner Hedegaard pointed out that the European Council had in the last year repeatedly called for progress on the roadmap. They also stressed that the milestones were not binding targets but that the EU should give a political sign that it was willing to move forward on climate issues.
Although 26 Member States could agree on the Presidency's final compromise proposal, one Member State could not accept the provisions regarding in particular the milestones for EU domestic emission reductions and further work on the 2030 milestone.
The Presidency concluded that while it was not possible to adopt Council conclusions on the roadmap, 26 Member States supported continuing work, and that it would have to consider the situation and report on it to the European Council.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report drafted by Chris DAVIES (ADLE, UK) in response to the Commission Communication entitled “Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050”.
The report endorses the Commission’s Roadmap to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, together with its trajectory, the specific milestones for domestic emission reductions of 40%, 60% and 80% for 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively, and the ranges for sector-specific milestones, as the basis for proposing legislative and other initiatives on economic and climate policy.
The Commission is called upon to:
set interim greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2030 and 2040 , including concrete objectives for each sector, and in particular agriculture, together with an ambitious timetable; these targets should follow a linear trajectory between current emissions levels, the 2020 objective and the 95 % reductions to be made by 2050; bring forward within the next two years the measures necessary to achieve the 2030 objectives , taking into account particular national capacities and potentials, as well as international progress on climate action; present a cost-benefit analysis of meeting the proposed pathway at Member State level , taking into account national circumstances stemming from different technological development, as well as the necessary investments (and the attendant social acceptability).
Members underline that moving to a low carbon economy would have significant potential for creating additional jobs , while securing economic growth and providing a competitive advantage for European industry.
(1) The international dimension : Members note that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and that it is essential for Europe’s future competitiveness to increase levels of investment in research, development and application in relation to these technologies .
It notes the shift in sustainable scientific and technological innovation away from Europe to other parts of the world, which may lead to the EU losing its technological leadership in the field and turn it into a net importer of these technologies and the related finished products. For example, China is the world leader in terms of installed wind farm capacity, that Chinese and Indian producers are among the top ten wind turbine producers, and that China and Taiwan currently manufacture most of the world’s photovoltaic panels.
Members highlight the importance of European added value for the development and domestic production of technologies and products , in particular for energy efficiency and renewables. They call on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to promote the eco-efficient development and production in the EU of these technologies and of the new and innovative technologies that are needed to achieve the ambitious targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
The EU is called upon to continue to play an active role in the international negotiations to finalise an ambitious, comprehensive and legally binding agreement. The EU must also continue to act constructively in global climate negotiations, and that European climate diplomacy needs to be further developed under the umbrella of the EEAS.
(2) The Emissions Trading System : the report recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument, although not the only one, for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies. Members call on the Commission to adopt measures to correct the failings of the ETS in particular by taking the following steps before the end of 2012:
recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase, by setting aside a significant amount of allowances so as to restore scarcity; proposing legislation at the earliest appropriate date to modify the 1.74 % annual linear reduction requirement so as to meet the requirements of the 2050 CO2 reduction target; including transport in emissions trading ; establishing, from the earliest possible date, a reserve price for auctions of allowances , with that price being set at a level which is below the carbon price envisaged when the current legislation was approved so as to avoid carbon leakage, but is sufficient to provide reassurance for firms making long-term investments; stimulating demand within the ETS by proposing extensions to include emissions from fossil fuels sold from the heat and transport sectors that are not directly exposed to international competition, as also from the maritime shipping sector; further improving the use of offset mechanisms , for example by limiting access to offsets that subsidise Europe’s industrial competitors, as in the area of Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).
The report acknowledges that, in order to achieve the targets of the Low Carbon Roadmap, not only the ETS but also the Effort Sharing Decision (Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) will have to be adjusted.
(3) Carbon leakage : Members insist that the transition to a low-carbon economy should be underpinned by a reasonable and measured regulatory approach. They affirm that administratively and financially burdensome environmental compliance has a significant impact on employment and output in energy-intensive sectors, and increases the risk of carbon leakage, while also forcing businesses and therefore jobs out of the EU. They concur with the Commission’s view that border adjustment measures or measures including imports in the ETS would need to be combined with full auctioning to the sectors concerned. The Commission is called upon to:
produce an analysis of sectors for which free allocation of allowances fails to prevent carbon leakage; put forward proposals for border adjustment measures requiring importers of products in these sectors to purchase allowances equivalent to those which would have been required if the product had been manufactured in the EU; provide Member States with guidance for the adoption of any measures intended to compensate industries proven to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage for indirect costs relating to greenhouse gas emissions as foreseen in the directive as soon as possible.
(4) Energy efficiency : the report calls for rapid action, greater ambition and stronger political commitment in terms of achieving the 2020 targets and looking beyond 2020, thus attracting appropriate investment. It calls for an increase in resources and measures to mobilise new sources of funding at European and national level, including through new financing instruments and highlights the importance of private investment in order to overcome the current budgetary constraints in the public sector.
It calls for acceleration of the work under the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC) , for strict application of the least life-cycle cost principle or for implementing measures to be set at the level of the best performers, as well as for minimum requirements also to be set for non-electrical products. Members also call for work under the Eco Design Directive to include heating equipment, boilers and insulating materials that can facilitate reductions in energy and resource use while enabling greater recycling, as well as for the extension and development of labelling requirements that can assist consumers in making informed decisions.
The report stresses the need to update the Energy Efficiency Action Plan with binding targets including a full range of genuine, quantified measures across the energy supply chain. It states that in order to achieve the 2020 energy efficiency objective an adequate degree of harmonisation of European efficiency standards should be guaranteed.
The Commission is called upon to: (i) support efforts made by Member States to promote energy efficiency by putting in place stable long-term incentives schemes to promote technologies which are most effective from a cost-benefit perspective; (ii) establish specific measures in order to tackle the reverse incentives that occur between the consumers and the distributors of energy; (iii) introduce a long-term target for the reduction of energy consumption of the EU building stock by 2050.
(5) Renewable energy : the report calls on the Commission to develop a biomass supply policy to encourage sustainable biomass production and use. It emphasises that this should include sustainability criteria for different biomass taking into account lifecycle carbon profiles of different sources, with priority being given to securing first value from biomass raw materials rather than their use for energy. Members insist that meeting the EU’s biofuels target must not adversely affect food and feed production or lead to a loss of biodiversity.
They underline the important role of renewable energy, including innovative developments in this field, and the urgent need for better solutions as regards storage, increasing energy efficiency and ensuring efficient energy transmission, including appropriate infrastructure measures.
Stressing that meeting the targets set in the national renewable energy action plans is crucial for the achievement of the overall EU targets for 2050, Members consider that the Commission should take measures if national targets are not met .
( 6) Power generation : the report maintains that Member States should have the widest possible means of achieving low carbon electricity generation (including renewable energy sources, nuclear power, use of carbon capture and storage technology, and sustainably produced biomass), and that none should be excluded from the range of options available to meet the requirements.
Members call on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of mechanisms that enable sound operation of the electricity market in a low carbon economy, and if necessary to submit legislative proposals for the closer integration of crossborder electricity markets and for other measures to address the need to determine the balance and availability of generation capacity. They call on the EU to commit itself to the total decarbonisation of the energy sector by 2050 . They invite the Member States and the Commission to invest more in the energy infrastructure necessary for the transition to a sustainable economy.
The report draws attention to the fact that the current 20 % target is based on the contribution made by nuclear power to the energy mix in number of Member States. They reiterate that the decision by some Member States to shut down some existing nuclear reactors must not serve to justify reducing the level of ambition of their current climate policies.
(7) Transport : Members endorse the requirement of the Commission Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 60 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels in the EU. They call on the Commission to come forward with interim emissions reduction targets for the sector in order to ensure that sufficient action is taken at an early stage.
The Commission is called upon to:
propose ways of ensuring that average CO2 emissions by new cars meet the agreed 2020 target of not more than 95g/km by 2020, and do not exceed 70g/km by 2025; include maritime transport in its roadmap and, in the absence of an international agreement to reduce emissions from shipping, to propose legislation so that these emissions are included in the Community reduction commitment with the aim of the proposed act entering into force by 2013; put forward proposals to improve the fuel efficiency of heavy goods vehicles, and, in its 2013 review of legislation on emissions from light commercial vehicles, to take greater account of the need to improve fuel efficiency so as to reduce the cost to business of increased fuel prices; take immediate steps to ensure that the test cycles used to evaluate emissions from new cars accurately reflect the realities of the use of such vehicles in normal driving conditions.
Members call on the Commission and the Member States to consider it a priority, with a view to reducing transport pollutant emissions, to invest in developing a pan-European intelligent energy network that can harness energy generated at local and regional level, including from renewable sources, and which helps to develop the necessary infrastructure for the use of electric vehicles.
(8) Agriculture : Members call on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land and reduce the use of fossil fuel based fertilisers, taking particular account of the role of agriculture as producer of food (rather than fuel). They also call on the Commission to step up research on the functioning of different kinds of agriculture and effective agrienvironmental practices, with due respect for prevailing climatic conditions.
The report calls for the necessary measures, including research funding, education efforts, investment aid and other incentive-based initiatives, to be implemented under the CAP in order to support and enable the use of agricultural and forestry residue in the production of sustainable energy. It calls for specific targets for EU land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), ensuring the permanence and environmental integrity of the sector’s contribution to emissions reduction.
(9) Financing : the report supports the proposals made by the Commission for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 to provide dedicated funding to increase investment and promote the development and application of low-carbon technologies. It endorses the intention to mainstream climate-related funding of the total MFF and earmark 20% of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for renewable energy and energy- efficient investment.
Members recall that the long-term economic costs of not taking action to prevent climate change far outweigh the short-term costs of taking strong and decisive action now. They call on the Commission to explore and consider complementary and innovative funding sources , including the potential use of regional development funds, in order to further promote the development and application of low-carbon technologies. They also call for coordinated action aimed at identifying and phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020, in order to support budget consolidation and the transition towards a sustainable economy. The Commission is invited to publish, by the end of 2013, a communication indicating all means by which the EU budget is used to justify financial support, directly or through Member States, to activities that contradict the objectives of its Low-Carbon Roadmap.
Lastly, as regards industry , the report insists that EU support for the ‘green economy’ should recognise the importance of investment by existing industries used to significantly improve the efficiency of resource use and reduce CO2 emissions and to reach the EU 2020 Strategy targets on green jobs creation.
The Council discussed key questions concerning the roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, presented by the Commission in March. The presidency noted acceptance of draft conclusions by 26 Member States and decided to issue presidency conclusions on the roadmap which is a crucial element of the EU2020 ‘ Resource-efficient Europe ’ flagship initiative.
The Council reaffirms the EU objective to reduce emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels . It recalls the EU’s independent commitment to achieve a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990 as well as the EU's conditional offer to move to a 30% reduction by 2020 compared to 1990 , as part of a global and comprehensive agreement for the period beyond 2012 and provided that i) other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and that ii) more advanced developing countries contribute adequately according to their responsibilities and respective capabilities.
The Council’s conclusions stress the following key points :
the proposed milestones for EU domestic emission reductions presented in the 2050 Low-carbon economy roadmap of 40% by 2030, 60% by 2040 and 80% by 2050 compared to the 1990 level as the basis for further work on the action needed to make the transition in a gradual, cost-effective way. The Council also notes the Commission’s finding that the 25% domestic reduction by 2020 would be in line with the pathway, consistent with the long-term climate objective; the Commission is invited to present timely options for delivering the reductions for the period to 2030 ; in this context, the Council stresses the need for a balanced approach that respects the principles of “polluter pays”, cost-effectiveness, fairness and solidarity in the distribution of additional efforts and benefits between Member States; it is important that Member States prepare low-carbon and cost-efficient development strategies over the long-term; there is an urgent need to give clear signals for businesses, investors and other stakeholders, underlining that delays in the adoption of adequate measures. can generate additional costs. The Council underlines the economic and employment opportunities and challenges for the EU of increased investment in safe and sustainable low-carbon technologies . The Commission is invited to consider how public and private resources and investments could be stepped up and used more efficiently within the EU to facilitate a cost-effective transition to a low-carbon economy; in order to deliver the domestic reductions necessary for the transition to a competitive low-carbon economy by 2050, all sectors of the economy will need to contribute : there is, therefore, the need to integrate climate change objectives and milestones into all relevant sectoral policy areas, such as energy, transport, industry, and buildings, and specifically to mainstream mitigation and adaptation strategies into the future Common Agriculture Policy and Cohesion Policy; there is the need for consistency between the 2050 Low-carbon economy roadmap and all other relevant components of the Resource-efficient Europe flagship initiative, such as the Commission's recently published White Paper on Transport and Energy Efficiency Plan , as well as the forthcoming Energy Roadmap; the Commission is invited, based on analyses of sectoral constraints and potentials, to further develop sectoral roadmaps and policy initiatives in order to elaborate the cost-efficient reduction pathway to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 ; the crucial role of R&D and demonstration of safe and sustainable low-carbon technologies is stressed. The Council calls for the implementation of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan as one of the key tools to manage the transition towards a low-carbon economy; the Commission is invited to further consider the possible practical modalities that may be needed to ensure that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) continues to reward energy efficiency and low-carbon investments in all relevant sectors of the economy while ensuring the consistency of emission reduction efforts between the EU ETS and non-ETS sectors, with due attention to be paid to the risk of carbon leakage.
The Council invites the Commission to inform the Council on a timetable for future work as soon as possible and decides to revert to these issues as soon as possible and no later than March 2012 in the light of existing and forthcoming analyses and initiatives.
PURPOSE: to present a Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050.
BACKGROUND: climate change has long been recognised as one long-term shaping factor where coherent EU action is needed, both inside the EU and internationally.
The Commission recently proposed the Europe 2020 for a resource efficient Europe and is now putting forward a series of long-term policy plans in areas such as transport, energy and climate change.
One of the objectives of Europe 2020 relates to climate and energy: Member States have committed themselves to reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 20%, increasing the share of renewables in the EU's energy mix to 20%, and achieving the 20% energy efficiency target by 2020. The EU is currently on track to meet two of those targets, but will not meet its energy efficiency target unless further efforts are made.
In order to keep climate change below 2ºC, the European Council reconfirmed in February 2011 the EU objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990. Some Member States have already made steps in this direction, or are in the process of doing so, including setting emission reduction objectives for 2050.
CONTENT: together with the White Paper on transport and the Energy Efficiency Plan , this Communication is a key deliverable under the Resource Efficiency Flagship. It presents a Roadmap for possible action up to 2050 which could enable the EU to deliver greenhouse gas reductions in line with the 80 to 95% target agreed. It outlines milestones which would show whether the EU is on course for reaching its target, policy challenges, investment needs and opportunities in different sectors, bearing in mind that the 80 to 95% reduction objective in the EU will largely need to be met internally.
The approach is based on the view that innovative solutions are required to mobilise investments in energy, transport, industry and information and communication technologies, and that more focus is needed on energy efficiency policies.
The Commission's detailed analysis of cost-effective ways of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 has produced a number of important findings.
(1) In order to be in line with the 80 to 95% overall GHG reduction objective by 2050, the Roadmap indicates that a cost effective and gradual transition would require a 40% domestic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions compared to 1990 as a milestone for 2030, and 80% for 2050. Building on what has already been achieved, the EU needs to start working now on appropriate strategies to move in this direction, and all Member States should soon develop national low carbon Roadmaps if not already done. The Commission is prepared to provide some of the necessary tools and policies.
(2) The analysis also shows that with existing policies, the EU will achieve the goal of a 20% GHG reduction domestically by 2020. If the revised Energy Efficiency Plan were to be fully and effectively implemented, meeting the 20% energy efficiency target, this would enable the EU to outperform the current 20% emission reduction target and achieve 25% reductions.
The Communication does not suggest setting new 2020 targets, nor does it affect the EU's offer in the international negotiations to take on a 30% reduction target for 2020, if the conditions are right. This discussion continues based on the Communication from the Commission of 26 May 2010.
(3) As well as reducing the threat of dangerous climate change as part of ambitious global action, deep reductions in the EU’s emissions have the potential to deliver benefits in the form of savings on fossil fuel imports and improvements in air quality and public health.
(4) The Roadmap gives ranges for emissions reductions for 2030 and 2050 for key sectors:
Power (CO2) : -54 to -68% in 2030 and -93 à -99% in 2050 ; Industry (CO2) : -34 to -40% in 2030 and -83 to -87% in 2050 ; Transport (including CO2 aviation, excluding maritime) : +20% to -9% in 2030 and -54 to -67% in 2050 ; Residential and services (CO2) : -37 to -53% in 2030 and-88 to-91% in 2050 ; Agriculture (non CO2): -36 to -37% in 2030 and -42 to -49% in 2050.
To realise these milestones as cost-effectively as possible, and to maximise benefits for EU manufacturing industries, the implementation of the Strategic Energy Technology Plan is of crucial importance. Considering the important labour market implications, the New Skills and
Jobs Agenda will need to support the transition process.
(5) The international dimension is important. The EU with little more than 10% of global emissions will not be able to tackle climate change on its own. Progress internationally is the only way to solve the problem of climate change, and the EU must continue to engage its partners.
If no firm global action is taken against climate change, temperatures might increase by more than 2°C already by 2050, and more than 4ºC by 2100. In order to avoid this scenario, science indicates that by 2050 global greenhouse gas emissions need to be reduced by at least 50% compared to 1990. With the preparation of this Roadmap, the EU is taking a new initiative to stimulate international negotiations in the run-up to Durban.
The Commission will continue to ensure that the EU ETS remains a key instrument to drive low carbon investments in a cost-efficient manner. It will also remain attentive to the risk of carbon leakage in order to ensure a level-playing field for industry.
As part of the development of the next Multi-Annual Financial Framework, it will also examine how EU funding can support instruments and investments that are necessary to promote the transition to a low carbon economy, taking into account the specificities of sectors, countries and regions.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)387
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0086/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0033/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.425
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.402
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.426
- Committee opinion: PE472.209
- Committee draft report: PE473.818
- Committee opinion: PE467.262
- Debate in Council: 3097
- Contribution: COM(2011)0112
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0112
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE467.262
- Committee draft report: PE473.818
- Committee opinion: PE472.209
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.402
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.426
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.425
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)387
- Contribution: COM(2011)0112
Activities
- Luís Paulo ALVES
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sophie AUCONIE
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michał Tomasz KAMIŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alexander MIRSKY
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Maria do Céu PATRÃO NEVES
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inês Cristina ZUBER
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Radvilė MORKŪNAITĖ-MIKULĖNIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sergio Paolo Francesco SILVESTRIS
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Damien ABAD
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Luc BENNAHMIAS
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bernd POSSELT
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ewald STADLER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pino ARLACCHI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastian Valentin BODU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan BŘEZINA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roger HELMER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rafał TRZASKOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Regina BASTOS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philippe BOULLAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anne DELVAUX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Adam GIEREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Satu HASSI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Filip KACZMAREK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Claudio MORGANTI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Paul MURPHY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- James NICHOLSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sławomir NITRAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kristiina OJULAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jacek PROTASIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mitro REPO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Licia RONZULLI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vladimir URUTCHEV
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dominique VLASTO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Josef WEIDENHOLZER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Angelika WERTHMANN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marina YANNAKOUDAKIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zbigniew ZIOBRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Johannes Cornelis van BAALEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gerard BATTEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Arkadiusz Tomasz BRATKOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philip CLAEYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tadeusz CYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- George Sabin CUTAȘ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francesco DE ANGELIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Robert DUŠEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Elisa FERREIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Béla GLATTFELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert GOEBBELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nick GRIFFIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine GRÈZE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Matthias GROOTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jolanta Emilia HIBNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore IACOLINO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Romana JORDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dennis de JONG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eija-Riitta KORHOLA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Holger KRAHMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vytautas LANDSBERGIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alajos MÉSZÁROS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Henryk MIGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Norica NICOLAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav OUZKÝ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Riikka PAKARINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Justas Vincas PALECKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios PAPASTAMKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mario PIRILLO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ROATTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Oreste ROSSI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nikolaos SALAVRAKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Richard SEEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joanna SENYSZYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Theodoros SKYLAKAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba SÓGOR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bogusław SONIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Francisco SOSA WAGNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Konrad SZYMAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Frank VANHECKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek VAUGHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sabine WILS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Amendments | Dossier |
510 |
2011/2095(INI)
2011/07/27
AGRI
68 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the agricultural sector can contribute to further mitigating climate change
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio- energy
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio- energy
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio- energy and stresses that agriculture is not part of the problem but a solution to it, being a producer of biomass and biofuels; emphasises that synergies should be sought between the development of renewable energies and rendering bio-energy production more efficient, with a view to reducing the impact on the agrifood sector;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio- energy and stresses therefore that agriculture is not only part of the problem but
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises the importance of new technologies in the development of renewable energies and the production of bio-energy and indicates that the EU should harness every available innovation in order to achieve its objectives for the reduction of CO2 emissions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the action on climate change and the need to ensure global food security are dual challenges which need to be pursued together; stresses that the essential need, on the one hand, to expand production and the need, on the other hand, to increase the sequestration of carbon in soil and biomass must not lead to a conflict of goals;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the action on climate change
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the action on climate change and the need to ensure global food security are dual challenges which need to be pursued together; in the light of the fact that water, in particular drinking water, will be a scarce resource in future, considers it necessary to develop efficient irrigation systems in order to enable efficient agricultural production methods in the Member States, which will permit the population’s food needs to be met and ensure that agricultural products are able to be exported;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises the fact that climate change is a decisive long-term factor and that it is therefore necessary for the EU to take cohesive action, both within the EU and internationally, to combat climate change and to achieve a competitive low-CO2 emission economy by 2050;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that a careful, internationally concerted approach is needed since EU agriculture is prone to carbon leakage
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that improved agricultural and forestry practices should increase the capacity of the sector to preserve and sequester carbon in soils and forests; stresses at the same time that most forest owners are also farmers;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that improved agricultural and forestry practices, the introduction of targeted measures and a reduction in demand for wood in the rough should increase the
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the agricultural sector
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that improved agricultural and forestry practices should increase the capacity of the sector to preserve and sequester carbon in soils and forests; notes that both adaptation to and mitigation of climate change can be achieved by increasing the carbon content of the soil, re-linking animal and arable production, decreasing dependency on oil-based fertiliser and pesticides, while also closing nutrient cycles and making nutrient cycles efficient and non-polluting while ensuring optimal crop growth;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that crop rotation, especially combined with conservation tillage, leads to a higher soil-carbon content and therefore contributes to combating climate change;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. emphasises the importance of developing suitable measures and/or mechanisms that enable actual financial recognition of the role played by agriculture and forestry in conserving carbon;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that in order to ensure the cohesion between the common policies, any new regulation or standard imposed on agricultural producers by any policy
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses that in order to ensure the cohesion between the common policies, any new regulation or standard imposed on agricultural producers by any policy
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the necessary measures, including research funding, education efforts, investment aid and other incentive based initiatives, in the CAP that would support and enable the use of agricultural and forestry residue in the production of sustainable energy;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for the CAP to include targets for the use of sustainable energy; believes that the agriculture sector could use 40% renewable fuels by 2020 and be fossil free by 2030;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls for the 30% greening component of the direct payments to be used as an EU-wide incentivisation scheme targeted at enhancing sustainability by improving both resource and production efficiency, making EU agriculture more competitive, in line with the Commission's 'Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050';
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the agricultural sector can contribute to further mitigating climate change, and the CAP post 2013
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shortened and the consumption of locally produced food should be encouraged, including
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shortened and the consumption of locally produced food should be encouraged, including
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shortened and the consumption of locally produced food should be encouraged, including
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shortened and the consumption of locally produced food should be encouraged, including the support for local markets, in order to reduce the transport related emissions of agricultural production; notes that transport-related emissions of agricultural products only represent a relatively small part of the total carbon footprint of these products and therefore agricultural production and product losses also need to be addressed;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shorte
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that the food chain should be shortened and the consumption of locally produced food should be encouraged, including
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that there is a need for better management of bio-waste and of agriculture and forestry by-
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that there is a need for better management of bio-waste and of agriculture and forestry by- products; notes in this respect the use of animal waste and plant based by-products and processing waste e.g. in biofermenters to produce on- farm energy, while at the same time also reducing farmers' production costs;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Already with the knowledge and techniques available today agricultural holdings may become self-sufficient in energy with the possibility to both increase profitability and create environmental gains through the local production of bio-energy from organic waste;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the agricultural sector can contribute to further mitigating climate change, and the CAP post 2013 is expected to enhance this contribution; notes
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that, for reasons of resource efficiency, farmers should be encouraged to better use the potential of biogas and biogas by-products to replace fertilisers;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses that the potential framework from the Commission for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) should avoid excessive regulation, which could undermine the EU's possibilities to reach the climate targets, and, due to Europe's diversity, should respect the principle of subsidiarity and the role of local and national governments;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Stresses the need for increased investments in energy infrastructure, such as smart grids and biogas distribution, to be able to handle the increased Cloud Energy production from renewable energy sources;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Supports th
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Supports the financing by EU funds,
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Supports the financing by EU funds, including the Rural Development Fund
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Supports the financing by EU funds, including the Rural Development Fund, of only energy efficient projects for agricultural facilities, especially of those applying renewable energy sources which can reduce carbon emissions to a level as far as possible closer to zero; hopes to this end that a list will be drawn up of European agricultural and livestock holdings that fulfil the energy efficiency criterion, for which appropriate statistical data should be collected;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Supports the financing by EU funds, including the Rural Development Fund,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Recalls that the agricultural sector can contribute to further mitigating climate change, and the CAP post 2013 is expected to enhance this contribution;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Emphasises the importance of carbon neutral farming; urges the European Commission to promote this via the greening measures envisaged in the first pillar of the new CAP;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Emphasises to this end the importance of manure processing which not only provides renewable energy, but also reduces environmental pressure and is a substitute for artificial fertiliser in the form of mineral concentrates; emphasises in this respect that if manure is to be considered as an energy source, it is essential that processed manure be recognised as a substitute for artificial fertiliser in the Nitrates Directive;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that more research is necessary to develop less energy intensive agricultural methods and considers research and development in this area to be an essential part of full implementation of the strategic energy technology plan, and that this calls for additional investment.
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that more research funding is necessary to develop and mainstream less energy intensive a
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that more research is
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Believes that better livestock feed management, including protein crops in arable rotations and increasing the diversity of protein crops in permanent pasture mixes, in order to grow more animal feed on-farm, would reduce dependence on animal feed imports with a high carbon cost; this would also reduce costs of animal feed for farmers, and invest into better soil management, through increasing soil water retention, and also reducing susceptibility to pests;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Stresses the need to improve the energy self-sufficiency of farms, through incentives for on-farm renewable energy, such as wind turbines, solar panels and bio fermentation technology, to reduce production costs and increase their economic viability by providing an alternative income stream for farmers;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Notes the FAO study "Low Greenhouse Gas Agriculture" from 2009, and its finding that organic agriculture reduced energy requirements for production systems by 25 to 50 percent compared to conventional chemical-based agriculture; stresses that integration of organic techniques into farming have a major role to play in tackling carbon emissions while boosting farm productivity, such as sequestering carbon in the soil, thus increasing soil organic matter content and boosting plant growth fertility, plus increasing retention of water and reducing the need to irrigate.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that clear emission targets will stimulate the necessary early investments in R&D, demonstration and deployment of low-emitting technologies and that defining a long-term strategy is paramount to ensuring that the EU is on track for achieving its agreed objective of reducing emissions by 2050; calls on the Commission to propose mid-term emission reduction objectives for 2030 and 2040 for all relevant sectors, including agriculture; these targets should follow a linear trajectory between current emissions levels, the 2020 objective and the 95% reductions are to be made until 2050;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that livestock production is responsible for around 10% of EU greenhouse gas emissions; notes that both sustainable livestock production and reduced meat consumption are vital to reducing agricultural emissions; recalls that such a transition to a more healthy diet could reduce methane and nitrous oxides emissions substantially;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers that long term competitiveness can only be achieved by having healthy, biologically diverse agro- ecosystems that are climate resilient and by taking due care of limited and finite natural resources, such as soil, water and land;
source: PE-469.998
2011/10/17
ITRE
125 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current financial crisis must be borne in mind, but considers that this should not divert attention from the potential that measures for achieving a low carbon emission society have in terms of economic growth and increased employment, particularly in green jobs; considers also that the European Union must develop a competitive advantage by exploiting its position as a first mover;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ in the most cost-efficient and effective way; points out that the current financial crisis must be borne in mind;
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in modernising and developing energy networks and smart meters and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based notably on the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks and smart meters which are both prerequisites for creating an energy efficient market, and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the EU and Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks and smart meters and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks and smart meters and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on national priorities and the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks, LNG infrastructures and smart meters and, with regard to inter- regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States and the European Commission to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in e
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Emphasises that Europe should be at the cutting edge in the development of energy-related Internet technologies and low-carbon ICT applications, Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks and smart meters and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on the European Energy Infrastructure Package;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current financial crisis must be borne in mind, that the proposed measures must be cost-effective and that they must have no negative consequences in terms of redistribution;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – introductory part 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks, smart meters and smart
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Invites the Member States to invest more in energy infrastructure, in particular in energy networks and smart meters and, with regard to inter-regional connections, to launch an investment plan based on the European Energy Infrastructure Package; Calls on the European Commission to respond appropriately to the financing needs of building an integrated European network;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – indent 1 (new) - Stresses the need to set binding targets for renewable energies and energy efficiency beyond 2020 (indicative targets for 2030, 2040 and 2050) so as to provide clarity for investments and promote technological leadership and industrial innovation.
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 (new) Hopes that discussions will soon be launched on the financial instruments that need to be deployed to achieve the policy objectives of the roadmap and without which it will be difficult to establish a system for investment in new, high energy efficiency and low carbon emission technologies;
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2 (new) Emphasises the important role of regional and cohesion policy funding as the main instrument for cofinancing regional measures for the transition to a low carbon emission economy, and considers that a significant proportion of financing for the 2014-2020 programming period should be allocated to meeting the objectives of the 2050 roadmap;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Acknowledges that alongside an adequate electricity transmission infrastructure it is necessary for the efficient integration of large amounts of renewables to have market rules that allow for efficient and transparent international power exchange; calls therefore for a swift integration and uptake of cross-border electricity markets, in particular on the intra-day and day- ahead timeframe;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the importance of proper functioning of the market in order to develop the necessary energy infrastructure, but notes that in some cases market forces will not be sufficient to attain the desired results, so that it is vital for government to provide the requisite financial support, particularly to finance cross-border projects or key projects which in the short term are not attractive to the market but which are necessary in order to develop an integrated European infrastructure network;
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Calls on the Commission to give a clear indication to investors by proposing now that, from 2030, no new source of electricity generation shall be authorised that emits more than 50g CO2/Kw hour, while insisting that all means of achieving such low carbon generation (including renewable energy sources, nuclear power, use of carbon capture and storage technology, and sustainably produced biomass) shall be available to meet this requirement;
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Invites the Commission to present a legislative proposal on project bonds to finance European infrastructure (energy and transport) projects of strategic interest;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Regrets the non-linearity of the emissions reduction pathway in the 2050 Roadmap, contradicting the fact that strong action is required now to trigger innovation in and dramatically reduce the cost of sustainable technologies; considers that this is at odds with competitiveness of the European economy;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Stresses that ICT can and should play a major role in promoting responsible energy consumption in households, transport, energy generation and manufacturing; considers that smart meters, efficient lighting, cloud computing and distributed software have the potential to transform energy use patterns;
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Notes the contribution made by nuclear energy to reducing carbon dioxide emissions, since closing nuclear power plants operating in the EU would lead to a 50% increase in emissions; shares, however, the concern of European citizens about the risks associated with the use of nuclear power and calls for the tightening-up of the European framework for nuclear safety and the decommissioning of nuclear power plants fitted with obsolete technology;
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Stresses the imperative need of adapting standardisation policy to market developments requiring interoperability which will contribute to speeding up work on technical standards for electronic vehicles and smart grids and meters, with a view to its completion by 2012;
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Stresses the need, when looking at future electricity prices, to take into account the merit order effect, whereby large volumes of low marginal cost renewables drive electricity prices down.
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to push for a more rapid implementation of the G-20 agreement on removing fossil-fuel subsidies; stresses that the implementation in order to have the desired impact has to be internationally coordinated;
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that, in approaching the transition to a low carbon economy, one of the most sensitive issues is that of securing the EU’s competitiveness, and therefore takes the view that close attention should be paid to international climate-change negotiations in order to ensure that all the developed countries and countries with high rates of economic growth adopt ambitious and sufficient targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that, as the UK government’s Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change showed, the long term economic costs of not taking action to prevent climate change far outweigh the short term costs of taking strong and decisive action now;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that world primary energy demand will increase by more than 30% until 2035, thereby increasing global competition for energy resources;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary; yet recognises that from an EU industrial perspective, first movers on low carbon technologies have a competitive advantage in today and tomorrow’s low carbon world;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary, and that an international post-Kyoto agreement containing targets and firm commitments from all the developed countries of the world needs to be concluded;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary; notes that in light of this emission reductions have to be achieved in a way which doesn’t harms competitiveness of the EU
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary to achieve the completion of the EU internal energy market;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that while the current financial crisis must be
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary in the context of a global, legally-binding, post-2012 emissions reduction agreement;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Rec
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that unilateral action is not sufficient for the purposes of reducing emissions and that the extensive involvement of non-EU countries is also necessary; points out that the main challenge for a low carbon economy is to ensure that climate-change policies are integrated into all key fields of activity in relation to energy, transport, agriculture, education, innovation, etcetera;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share of the global 2°C compatible carbon budget, and that delaying emissions reductions increases the cumulative share significantly;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Notes that the Roadmap demonstrates that the current 20% target for 2020, of which more than half could achieved through non-domestic offsets, is not on a cost effective pathway towards a 80% reduction in 2050 compared to 1990; points out that 80% is on the low end of the 80-95% range the IPCC has assessed necessary for industrialised countries, that the European Council has set as a target for the EU in 2050;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Stresses that without a stronger cap on 2020 emissions the majority of power generation and buildings capital stock will be high carbon, and would need to be abandoned and rapidly replaced in later years incurring high cost; furthermore points out that delayed action for 2020 will result in reduced abatement potential for 2030 and beyond;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for the necessary action to be taken quickly and in a coordinated manner, and for greater consistency with Community programmes and policies in order that the roadmap objectives can be achieved;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that while the current financial crisis must be
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for greater consistency with and among Community programmes and policies in
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls for greater consistency with Community programmes and policies, where appropriate and cost-effective, in order that the roadmap objectives can be achieved;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that China is the world leader in terms of installed wind farm capacity, that Chinese and Indian producers are among the top ten wind turbine producers, and that China and Taiwan currently manufacture most of the world’s photovoltaic panels; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to promote the eco-efficient development and production in the EU of these technologies and of new, innovative technologies needed to achieve ambitious targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls for the reinforcement of existing financing schemes, as well as for the facilitating of better synergies between national and European financing schemes in order to support the roadmap objectives; believes that multisource financing schemes can be an effective tool towards this direction;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that binding objectives will be established for each sector together with a realistic timetable, in order to inspire confidence among, and to encourage, private investors; welcomes the roadmap’s conclusion that the power sector should and is able to decarbonise almost completely by 2050 (93%-99% emissions reduction);
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that binding and attainable objectives will swiftly be established for each sector, together with a realistic timetable, in order to inspire confidence and cooperation among, and to encourage, private investors and a better absorption of European funds;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that binding objectives will be established for each sector together with a
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current economic and financial crisis must be borne in mind and that innovative solutions are needed to mobilise investments that can increase energy efficiency in the fields of energy provision, transport, manufacturing and communications and information technology;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that binding objectives will be established for each sector, together with a realistic timetable, in order to inspire confidence among, and to encourage, private investors and guarantee new job creation in the EU;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that clear and binding objectives will be established for each sector together with a realistic timetable, in
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Hopes that
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – point 1 (new) Emphasises that every proposed CO2 emissions-reduction measure must be the subject of a social impact assessment so that its effects in relation to social policy are made clear;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Draws attention to the fact that the EU and the Member States have not invested sufficiently in measures to reduce CO2 emissions or increase energy efficiency in the fields of construction and transport; calls on the Commission and Member States to allocate increased funding to measures to increase the energy efficiency of buildings and of centralised urban heating and cooling networks, both in the review of the current Financial Perspective and under future Multiannual Financial Frameworks;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls for the European Commission, in its energy 2050 roadmap to concentrate on the period up to 2030 including by setting milestones for 2030; calls for the European Commission to assess the option of extending renewable energy targets beyond 2020, as this would provide the industry in which the EU has developed a competitive advantage, continued clarity for investment, and foster EU technological leadership and industrial innovation.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recalls that the proposed scenarios for emissions reduction measures should take full account of the specific characteristics, potential and possibilities of individual Member States;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Draws attention to the fact that the current 20% target is based on contribution made by nuclear power to the energy mix in some Member States; welcomes the Commission’s decision to subject nuclear power stations in the EU to stress testing, so that the requisite measures can be adopted to ensure their safety; believes that the decision by some Member States to shut down some existing nuclear reactors, and the increased investment in the construction of new nuclear power stations, could lead to some Member States revising the national measures adopted to achieve the current 20% target;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current financial crisis and the economic, financial and social situation of all the Member States must be borne in mind;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a secure energy supply, improve the EU’s competitiveness and bring about a
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a secure and steady energy supply, fair and competitive energy prices for consumers and businesses, and a
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a secure energy supply and higher rate of employment growth for the EU and stresses the role that an interconnected European electricity supergrid could have in further improving security and reliability of supply;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a secure energy supply, competitiveness, environmental sustainability and higher rate of employment growth for the EU;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that the achievement of these objectives by 2050 could lead to a secure energy supply and higher rate of employment growth for the EU and should aim to reduce the risk of carbon leakage in the EU especially in energy intensive sectors;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the ETS has proved ineffective as an instrument for encouraging emission reductions and calls on the Commission and the Member States to evaluate and introduce new instruments to encourage the development of eco-efficient industries, increased energy efficiency and the efficient use of resources;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls existing assessments which indicate that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20%
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20%
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20% will be difficult to achieve by 2020 and that support needs to be provided for this by developing new European-level and national-level financing instruments; calls for more resources, particularly for increasing energy efficiency in buildings, in line with the Energy Efficiency Directive;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20%
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20% will be difficult to achieve by 2020; calls for more resources
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20% will be difficult to achieve by 2020; calls
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Recalls that the energy efficiency (EE) target of cutting current energy use by 20% will be difficult to achieve by 2020; calls for more resources and measures, particularly for increasing energy efficiency in buildings, in line with the new Energy Efficiency
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current financial crisis must be borne in mind in designing policies to ensure and support upfront investments necessary for cost-efficient climate action to be attained in the longer time perspective;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Acknowledges that - according to the Commission’s 2050 Roadmap - if the EU delivers on its current policies, in particular on the 20% energy efficiency target, this would allow the EU to reduce its CO2 emissions by 25% internally or more in 2020 and that this reduction would still be on a cost-effective path towards the long-term target of a 80-95% GHG emission reduction over 1990 levels by 2050; notes that according to the Roadmap a less ambitious approach would result in significantly higher costs over the entire period; recalls, however, that the cost-effectiveness of investments should always be measured in the light of their budgetary implications;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Notes that the IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2011 will include a Lower- Nuclear Case according to which the projected increase of world-wide CO2 emissions from the power sector would be substantially higher in the medium-term due to an increased use of fossil fuels; states that according such IEA assumptions achieving the 2 degrees celsius goal would require an acceleration of the development and deployment of CCS technologies in both coal and gas- fired power plants;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon 2020 initiative be
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions and zero carbon technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon 2020 initiative be at least doubled; recalls that in its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan, the European Parliament called for €2 billion per year from the EU budget to be spent on research and development in the Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan to help lower the cost of low carbon energy technology;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of new energy technologies, and especially low emissions technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions and energy efficient technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon 2020 initiative be at least doubled;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions technolog
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon 2020 initiative be at least
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the importance of R&D for the development of low emissions technology, and requests that funds for energy research as part of the Horizon 2020 initiative be at least
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 – indent 1 (new) - Considers that increased energy efficiency can be achieved by replacing existing systems with the latest generation of heating and cooling systems;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’; points out that the current economic and financial crisis must be borne in mind;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider it a priority, with a view to reducing transport pollutant emissions, to invest in developing a pan-European intelligent energy network that can harness energy generated at local and regional level from renewable sources and which helps to develop the necessary infrastructure for the use of electric vehicles;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points out that the proposed emissions reduction targets for the energy and industrial sector rely to a large extent on CCS technology, which is still at the testing and pre-commercial stage; stresses the need for alternative scenarios to be considered given the serious doubts over whether it will be possible to use this technology on a large scale and the strong likelihood of it being a commercial failure;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the need to implement fully and appropriately the measures provided for in the Energy Efficiency Plan which are necessary in order to meet energy efficiency targets;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses the need for Europe to assume a leading role in research into the climate and energy-efficient technologies and to develop close scientific cooperation in the field with international partners, particularly the BRICS countries;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Notes the shift in sustainable scientific and technology innovation away from Europe to other parts of the world, which may lead to the EU losing its technological forefront in the field and turn it into a net importer of these technologies and related finished products; Emphasizes, in this direction, the importance of European added value for the development and domestic production of technologies and products for energy efficiency and renewables;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Points out that recent decisions in certain Member States to restrict the use of nuclear energy will have a major impact on the EU’s energy mix in the future, and that this was not taken into account in the communication or in the accompanying impact assessment;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the important role of renewable energy, including innovative developments in this field
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the important role of renewable energy, including innovative developments in this field, and the urgent need for better solutions as regards storing this energy
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Underlines the important role of renewable energy, including innovative developments in this field, and the urgent need for better solutions as regards storing this energy and increasing energy efficiency, including appropriate infrastructural measures;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission communication on ‘a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Draws attention to the importance of further developing renewable energy and imposing renewable energy targets for 2030, as they will support the attainment of the objectives by 2050, give industry the necessary investment certainty, significantly reduce GHG emissions, create employment and promote the EU’s energy independence;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that increasing resource efficiency through, for instance, waste recycling, better waste management and behavioural change plays a very important role in the pursuit of the EU’s strategic objectives for CO2 emissions reduction;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Underlines the importance of a stable and fertile investment environment for the deployment of renewable energy beyond 2020; calls therefore on the Commission to develop a strategy for the deployment of renewable energy beyond 2020 based on an interim binding European target of 45% renewable energy by 2030;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Recognises the very great progress in the development of renewable sources of energy achieved by Member States since binding targets were set for 2020, and calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals for appropriately ambitious targets for 2030;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Reiterates the importance of providing incentives for public and private investments geared to designing and developing easily replicable technologies to improve the quality of energy saving and efficiency;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses that attaining the targets set in national renewable energy action plans is crucial for the attainment of the general EU targets for 2050 and considers that the Commission should take measures if the national targets are not attained;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses that public procurement can contribute substantially to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly through the introduction of energy efficiency criteria in procurement procedures for construction and public services;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Recalls that electricity grids will have to be upgraded and developed, in particular to transport renewable energy produced in areas with major potential, such as offshore wind energy in the Northern Sea and solar energy in southern Europe and to accomodate decentralised production of renewable energy;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Stresses that ICT standardisation could be highly beneficial to market sectors requiring interoperability; furthermore, investing in ICT developments will have a positive impact on the long term use of electric vehicles and smart grids and meters;
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
source: PE-473.944
2011/12/12
ENVI
202 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) Ab. whereas the EU climate and energy package was adopted on the basis of an assurance that the other large emitters would make similar commitments, and whereas this has not happened and perhaps never will;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new) Ac. Whereas some 90 parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, collectively responsible for more than 80% of global emissions, have made unilateral declarations of quantified economy-wide emission reduction objectives albeit non-legally binding;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A d (new) Ad. whereas some 90 parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, including emerging economies, collectively responsible for more than 80% of global emissions, have made unilateral declarations of quantified economy-wide emission reduction objectives,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A e (new) Ae. whereas some 90 parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, collectively responsible for more than 80% of global emissions, have made unilateral declarations of quantified economy-wide emission reduction objectives,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the European Union
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas, in the light of all scientific studies on climate change, including those that take a critical view, it needs to be questioned whether and to what extent the European Union
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the European Union must agree specific targets for emission reductions to provide the basis and framework for the
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the Roadmap demonstrates that the current 20% climate target, of which more than half could be achieved through non-domestic offsets, is not on a cost effective pathway towards a 80% reduction in 2050 compared to 1990; whereas 80% is on the low end of the 80- 95% range the IPCC assessed necessary for industrialised countries and the European Council agreed as the EU target for 2050;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas a reduction target of 40% for 2020 for the EU compared to 1990 would be more in line with science and maintaining climate change to 2°C;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2011,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas in order to comply with the accorded emissions target it is important to focus attention on compliance not only at Member State level, but also on those regions with fiscal and legislative powers
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas industry must have clarity about
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -13 after Subheading 8 National and sector-specific roadmaps
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the production of low carbon strategies by some EU Member States
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Welcomes the production of low carbon strategies by some EU Member States but calls on all to produce them
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the adequacy of such plans with regard to contributing to the Cancun objective of holding the increase in global average temperatures below 2 deg C above pre- industrial levels;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Expects the Commission to take roadmaps fully into account when preparing policy initiatives, and also to highlight instances where industry sectors have not prepared such action plans;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that national and sector specific roadmaps are subjected to independent scrutiny to assess whether full account has been taken of the potential use of best available technology and that proposed costs accord with understood practice;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on relevant industry groups to prepare sector-specific roadmaps that will set out
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Considers, however, that some of the targets for sectors set in the roadmap (notably the de facto zeroing of emissions in the energy, residential and services sectors) are implausible; calls on the Commission therefore to reset them to more realistic levels;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Expects the Commission and member states to support those sectors that have made roadmaps to further develop the initiatives and partnerships that follow from these roadmaps, for the development of breakthrough technologies to decarbonise these energy intensive industries;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas industry must have clarity about Europe's low carbon strategy supported by regulatory certainty, ambitious targets and well designed funding mechanisms in order to make long-term investments;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Calls upon the Commission to update the 2050 roadmap and forecasting every 3-5 years, and calls upon the Commission to integrate sectoral, regional and Member State roadmaps into the updated version of the Commission roadmaps. The models and methodologies used to that purpose should be fully transparent;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 d (new) 14d. Stresses that a much more efficient use of resources is essential for achieving a low carbon economy; therefore, urges Member States to develop or strengthen existing resource efficiency strategies, and mainstream these into national policies for growth and jobs by 2013.
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 e (new) 14e. Stresses that protecting, valuing and restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services is key in order to reach a low carbon economy.
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the Commission to propose legislation before the end of 2013 that will give a clear long- term signal to investors
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the Commission to propose legislation before the end of 2013 that will give a clear long-
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas industry must have clarity about Europe's low carbon strategy in order to make long-term green investments;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the Commission to propose legislation before the end of 2013 that will give a clear long- term signal to investors by requiring that, from 2015, new sources of electricity generation that emit more than
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the Commission to propose legislation before the end of 2013 that will give a clear long- term signal to investors by requiring that, from 2015, new sources of electricity generation that emit more than 100g CO2/kWh shall not have a permit to operate for more than ten years unless intended solely as peaking plant with operating time limited to 10% of the total in any one year, and to apply the same limit to all existing power stations from 2025;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Considers that the roadmap is overly reliant on nuclear energy and notes some Member States oppose it, whilst all recognise the viability of renewable energy
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) 15b. Urges the Commission to produce a new and detailed impact assessment that takes account of the EU’s latest energy mix scenarios in light of the nuclear- energy exit plans various Member States are adopting following the accident at Fukushima;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15c. Maintains that Member States should have the widest possible means of achieving low carbon electricity generation (including renewable energy sources, nuclear power, use of carbon capture and storage technology, and sustainably produced biomass) and that none shall be excluded from the range of options available to meet the requirements;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new) 15d. Calls for the Commission to be particularly vigilant for any leakage of energy production outside the EU ETS, paying attention to Member States with interconnections to countries outside the EU;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 e (new) 15e. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of mechanisms that enable sound operation of the electricity market in a low carbon economy, and if necessary to make legislative proposals for better integration of cross-border electricity markets and for other measures to address the need to determine the balance and availability of generation capacity;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 f (new) 15f. Calls on the European Union to commit to a complete decarbonisation of the energy sector by 2050;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Insists that EU support for the ‘green economy’ should recognise the importance of investment by existing industries used to
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas it is in the interests of Member States to reduce their dependence on foreign energy suppliers, mainly from politically problematic countries
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Insists that EU support for the ‘green economy’ should recognise the importance of investment by existing industries used to promote significant reductions in resource
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Insists that EU support for the ‘green economy’ should recognise the importance of investment by existing industries used to promote significant reductions in resource use and CO2 emissions and to reach the EU 2020 Strategy targets on green jobs creation;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to explore innovative financial instruments for investments in a low carbon economy;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls to the Member States and the European Commission to support the creation of innovation clusters to develop regional and national solutions;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Endorses the requirement of the Commission Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 60 % by 2050 compared to 1990 levels in the EU; furthermore calls on the Commission to come forward with interim emissions reduction targets for the sector in order to ensure that sufficient action is taken at an early stage;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of accelerating further fuel efficiency improvements;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of accelerating further fuel efficiency improvements; affirms that in preparing its forthcoming review the Commission should
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas it is in the interests of Member States to reduce their dependence on foreign energy suppliers,
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of accelerating further fuel efficiency improvements;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of accelerating further fuel efficiency improvements; affirms that in preparing its forthcoming review the Commission should be proposing ways of ensuring that average CO2 emissions by new cars meet the agreed 2020 target of not more than 95g/km by 2020, and do not exceed 70g/km by 2025. Calls on the Commission to increase dialogue and cooperation with the International Maritime Organisation to ensure the prompt and full inclusion of the shipping sector in CO2 reduction commitments;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – subparagraph 1 (new) Recalling that the Commission shall evaluate the progress of the IMO on emissions from shipping by 31 December, 2011 pursuant to 2009/29/EC; Calls on the Commission to include maritime transport in its roadmap; to evaluate the progress made by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on emissions reductions and energy efficiency; and to propose legislative measures to reduce emissions from shipping in case sufficient progress has not been made by the IMO.
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Insists that the Commission put forward proposals to include international maritime emissions in the Community reduction commitment with a view to entering into force by 2013 in the absence of an international agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions from shipping as agreed between Council and Parliament in the Climate and Energy Package;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Calls on the Commission to make proposals to include international maritime emissions in the Community reduction commitment with the aim of entry into force before the end of 2013, as agreed between Council and Parliament in the Climate and Energy Package;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Calls on the Commission to make proposals to include international maritime emissions in the Community reduction commitment with the aim of entry into force before the end of 2013, as agreed between Council and Parliament in the Climate and Energy Package;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 d (new) 17d. Calls for greater involvement of the maritime and air transport sectors through the introduction at international level of a market mechanism (tax or market in licences);
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 e (new) 17e. Calls on the Commission and Member States to implement in full the legislation on aviation in the ETS;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 f (new) 17f. Calls on the Commission and Member States to implement in full the legislation on aviation in the ETS;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 g (new) 17g. Calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals to improve the fuel efficiency of heavy goods vehicles, and in its 2013 review of legislation on emissions from light commercial vehicles to take greater account of the need to improve fuel efficiency to reduce the costs to business resulting from increased fuel prices;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas the European low carbon economy roadmap can only be realised when taking close account of global developments and international carbon reduction commitments,
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 h (new) 17h. Calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals to improve the fuel efficiency of heavy goods vehicles, and in its 2013 review of legislation on emissions from light commercial vehicles to take greater account of the need to improve fuel efficiency to reduce the costs to business resulting from increased fuel prices;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 i (new) 17i. Calls on the Commission to provide purchasers of all types of passenger and freight vehicles with greater clarity about their fuel efficiency, and to bring forward long delayed proposals for reform of the Labelling Directive that should encompass all forms of sales promotion;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 j (new) 17j. Calls on the Commission to take immediate steps to ensure that the test cycles used to evaluate emissions from new cars accurately reflect the realities of the use of such vehicles in normal driving conditions;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 k (new) 17k. Calls on the Commission to take immediate steps to ensure that the test cycles used to evaluate emissions from new cars accurately reflect the realities of the use of such vehicles in normal driving conditions;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 l (new) 17l. Acknowledges the efforts being made by some Member States to establish recharging/refuelling infrastructure to promote the use of electric and ultra-low carbon vehicles, and calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals to set minimum requirements in each Member State in order to establish a Europe-wide network;
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 m (new) 17m. Acknowledges the efforts being made by some Member States to establish recharging/refuelling infrastructure to promote the use of electric and ultra-low carbon vehicles, and calls on the Commission to bring forward proposals to set minimum requirements in each Member State in order to establish a Europe-wide network;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 n (new) 17n. Considers that a cultural shift towards more sustainable modes of transport is needed, asks therefore the Commission and Member states to encourage new investments both to facilitate the modal shift to more environmentally friendly modes of transport and to decrease the need of transport inter alia by applying IT and through spatial planning;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 o (new) 17o. Calls for consistency with the Roadmap priorities of the envisaged new transport infrastructure investments as the € 1.5 trillion over the next two decades between 2010-2030 asked by the European Commission risk not to be channelled to adequate low carbon priorities; urges therefore the need for greening the EU budget for infrastructure especially when related to the structural and cohesion funds;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 p (new) 17p. Welcomes the proposed new guidelines for the Trans-European Transport Network and the importance given to the development of rail corridors for passengers and freight; call on the Commission to present, as soon as possible, a strategy for the use of alternative fuels and new technologies in transport; encourages Member States to urgently implement the measures of the Single European Sky and, thus, improve the efficiency of aircraft and traffic management operations;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 q (new) 17q. Calls on the Commission to ascertain to what extent speed reductions can help to reduce total CO2 emissions from road transport and possibly to make recommendations on the subject;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new) Cd. whereas the International Energy Agency has calculated that four-fifths of the total energy-related CO2 emissions permitted to 2035 in the 450 Scenario are already locked-in by existing capital stock;
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 r (new) 17r. Stresses that the internalisation into transport prices of the external costs of transport, graduated by level of pollution, is a key challenge to stimulate energy savings and energy efficiency whose increased performances will lead to an environmentally friendly choice of transport mode;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land; recalls that precisely the same agri- environmental measures are not necessarily equally effective in all Member States; recalls that, in many Member States, effective agri- environmental practices have been well developed whose application will remain beneficial and important in future too;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land, taking particular account of the role of agriculture as the producer of food;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote efficiency gains from the use of agricultural land. Stresses the need for assistance, including technical guidance and training, to be provided to small and medium sized farmers to ensure that the full GHG reduction and energy-saving potential is realised across the sector;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to propose a phasing out on the use within the European Union of fuel made from sources that can also provide food products.
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Calls on the Commission to propose specific measures on fuel made from sources that can also provide food product within the European Union, including restrictive or prohibited use if appropriate, in order to guarantee a sustainable food resource and land use balance.
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) 18c. Asks the Commission and the Member States not to incentivise the designation of agricultural land for uses or commodities other than food production;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new) Ce. whereas the Stern Report estimates that the costs of non-action in climate protection will be equivalent to losing at least 5% of global GDP per year;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new) 18d. Calls for the CAP to include targets for the use of sustainable energy; believes that the agriculture sector could use 40% renewable fuels by 2020 and be fossil free by 2030;
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new) 18e. Calls for the 30% greening component of the CAP direct payments to be used as an EU-wide incentivisation scheme targeted at enhancing nutrient, energy and carbon efficiency by focussing in particular on increasing carbon soil sequestration, reducing GHG emissions, and improving nutrient management, making EU agriculture more competitive and more sustainable at the same time;
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 f (new) 18f. Special attention has to be paid to the afforestation, as the only means for naturally increasing the carbon sink and source of wood for bio-energy;
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 g (new) 18g. Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a major contribution to tackling climate change, creating new jobs through green growth and supplying renewable energy; notes that greenhouse gas emission reductions in the agricultural sector is a win-win-win situation by increasing farmers’ long term economic and agronomic viability;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 h (new) 18h. Notes that emission mitigation efforts are expected to increase demand for bio-energy; stresses the potential of the agriculture sector to contribute to the Europe-2020 strategy by increasing the production of sustainable energy, such as biogas, thereby creating new jobs in rural areas; calls therefore, for greater recognition of the contribution made by agriculture and forestry through the sustainable production of renewable energy, which is currently credited to the energy, transport and heating sectors when taking stock;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 i (new) 18i. Recalls that as the world's arable land decreases, while the population increases, the action on climate change and the need to ensure global food security are dual challenges which need to be pursued together; stresses that the need, on the one hand, to expand production and the need, on the other hand, to increase the sequestration of carbon in soil and biomass must not lead to a conflict of goals;
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 j (new) 18j. Notes that an internationally concerted approach towards a global climate agreement is needed, so as to ensure a level playing field with agricultural sectors in other economies;
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 k (new) 18k. Deplores the fact that too much agricultural waste is currently not used to its full potential; considers that agricultural waste should be seen as an asset; calls on the Commission and Member States to put forward national strategies on the need for better management of bio-waste and of agriculture and forestry by-products; notes in this respect the use of animal waste and plant based by-products and processing waste e.g. in biofermenters to produce on-farm energy, while at the same time also reducing farmers' production costs;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Supports proposals made by the Commission for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 to provide dedicated funding to increase investment and promote the development and application of low carbon technologies; endorses the intention to mainstream climate-related funding
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C f (new) Cf. whereas demand for low carbon technologies both within the EU and internationally must come to be regarded as an opportunity for new EU green industries
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Supports proposals made by the Commission for the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 to provide dedicated funding to increase investment and promote the development and application of low carbon technologies; endorses the intention to mainstream climate-related funding to 20% of the total MFF as well as the intention to earmark 20% of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for renewable energy and energy efficiency investments and insists that provision must be
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recommends that the Commission should ensure that particular use is made of this funding to assist Member States with a high potential to reduce emissions well below the existing targets but that lack the capacity to make the necessary investments;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Recognises that those Member States where income per capita is still significantly below the Community average will need to make a significant effort to make substantial investments to reduce the carbon intensity for the transition towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050;
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 c (new) 19c. Recognises that those Member States where income per capita is still significantly below the Community average will need to make a significant effort to make substantial investments to reduce the carbon intensity for the transition towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050;
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 d (new) 19d. Notes that, due to the low carbon price, the auction of ETS allowances will not mobilise resources for climate investments as expected unless the cap is adjusted for the third trading period; recalls that at least 50% of auctioning revenues must be reinvested in climate action both in the EU and in developing countries and urges the Commission to actively monitor the spending of such revenues by Member States and report on this on an annual basis to the Parliament; calls for the Member States to make effective use of the auction revenues to promote R&D and innovation with a view to achieving long-term reductions in greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 e (new) 19e. Calls on the Commission from 2013 to collate information relating to the use of funds derived from the auction of ETS allowances, and to publish annually a report comparing the extent to which each Member State makes use of such money to promote development of low carbon technologies and other means of curbing greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 f (new) 19f. Calls on the Commission from 2013 to collate information relating to the use of funds derived from the auction of ETS allowances, and to publish annually a report comparing the extent to which each Member State makes use of such money to promote development of low carbon technologies and other means of curbing greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 g (new) 19g. Calls on the Commission to propose that Member States provide a proportion of auctioning funds to provide additional EU funding to support innovation through the SET plan or through equivalent initiatives;
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 h (new) 19h. Calls on the Commission to explore and consider complementary and innovative funding sources, including the potential use of regional development funds, in order to further promote the development and application of low carbon technologies;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 i (new) 19i. Draws attention to the fact that the current 20% target is based on contribution made by nuclear power to the energy mix in number of Member States; notes that the IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2011 includes a Lower-Nuclear Case according to which the projected increase of world-wide CO2 emissions would be substantially higher in the medium-term due to an increased use of fossil fuels; states that according to the IEA, achieving the 2 degrees Celsius goal would require an acceleration of the development and deployment of CCS technologies, which are however at premature stage, thus calls for an increased support for the development and application of breakthrough technologies in order to increase energy efficiency and decouple economic growth from energy consumption;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 b (new) – having regard to the proposals to recast and amend the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)1 and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)2 with regard to emission allowances under the EU’s ETS, __________________ 1 COM(2011)0656 and COM(2011)0652. 2 COM(2011)0651.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C g (new) Cg. whereas social aspects should be taken into account by means of the ‘social impact assessment’ instrument,
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 j (new) 19j. Stresses the urgent need to tackle environmentally harmful subsidies; calls for coordinated action aimed at identifying and phasing out all environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020, in order to support budget consolidation;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 k (new) 19k. Supports the need for the gradual elimination of Environmental Harmful Subsidies from the EU budget by an appropriate phasing out environmentally harmful subsidies in all the Member States within the framework of the Roadmap in order to accelerate the transition to a real green economy;
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 l (new) 19l. Calls on the Commission to publish before the end of 2013 a Communication indicating all means by which the EU Budget is used to justify financial support, directly or through Member States, to activities that contradict the objectives of its Low Carbon Roadmap;
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 m (new) 19m. Calls the Commission to develop and to implement CO2 and resource use indicators to serve as a basis for low- carbon policies with legally binding measures in all policy sectors;
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 n (new) 19n. Calls on the Commission to assess the carbon and resource use footprint of the EU budget to serve as an indicator for future action as regards reaching the targets stipulated in the Roadmap;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 o (new) 19o. Insists that provision should be made within Common Agricultural Policy funding arrangements for reducing greenhouse gas emissions within this sector;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 p (new) 19p. Insists that provisions should be made within the Common Agricultural Policy funding arrangements for sustainable production for biomass for bio based products and bio energy;
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to bring forward before the end of 2012 ambitious proposals to
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to bring forward
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C h (new) Ch. whereas the production and consumption of biomass as an energy source are not by definition carbon neutral;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to bring forward before the end of 2012
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission to bring forward before the end of 2012 ambitious proposals to reduce the emission of
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Recalls that wood could replace very carbon intensive materials inter alia in the construction sector, and calls for a clear hierarchy of use of sustainably harvested wood to be established to ensure consistency with climate as well as resource efficiency objectives; considers that sustainable bioenergy can be sourced from waste, some residues and industrial byproducts, provided sufficient safeguards are set against loss of soil carbon and biodiversity as well as indirect emissions due to displacement of other uses of the same material;
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Recalls that construction has a big ecological footprint, as it consumes large quantities of non-renewable natural resources and energy and is responsible for substantial carbon dioxide emissions; recalls that the use of renewable building materials reduces the consumption of natural resources and environmental damage; urges the Commission, therefore, to take better account of the low-emission character and energy efficiency of building materials over the whole of their life cycle, and urges the Commission to promote the use of ecologically sustainable, renewable and low-emission materials such as wood in construction; recalls that wood binds carbon as it grows, so that it is a carbon- neutral material;
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Calls on the Commission to invest in energy infrastructures like gas networks and storage facilities and a high performance transport grid based on High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) that will also allow a minimisation of energy storage needs;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20d. Warns that it will be very difficult to offset entirely through ‘green jobs’ the continuing enormous losses in industrial fabric and employment related thereto occurring as a result of ‘climate dumping’, not in the short-term at least and nor will this happen automatically;
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 e (new) 20e. Fears that Member States will no longer be able to sustain the social costs of ‘climate dumping’ if the strong market pressure being brought to bear on their budget stability at present continues; calls therefore on the Commission to adopt appropriate necessary anti-dumping measures;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C i (new) Ci. whereas it is necessary to assess and act against risks that in the absence of sufficient global effort, domestic action leads to a shift in market share towards less efficient installations elsewhere, thereby resulting in increased emissions globally, i.e. carbon leakage;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading -1 (new) International dimension and strategic framework
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Stresses that the EU is now having to operate on what is no longer a level playing field and has placed itself in a position where it could be subjected to full-scale ‘climate dumping’ alongside the other forms of dumping from which it is already suffering;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises not only the benefits
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits and risks to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore endorses in principle the Commission’s Roadmap to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to Article 9 TFEU (the Social Clause),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore endorses the Commission’s Roadmap to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, together with its trajectory, the specific milestones for domestic emission reductions of 40%, 60% and 80% for 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively, and the ranges for sector- specific
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore endorses the Commission
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore endorses the
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economy; therefore endorses the Commission
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Calls on the Commission to define its long-term objective as 95 % in recognition of the uncertainty connected to the current 80-95% target as defined by the IPCC to keep global warming below 2 degrees.
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes notes of the high levels of uncertainty generally associated with making long-term GHG projections, particularly with regard to technological and policy developments related to carbon capture and storage (CCS), the scale and nature of global action and other conditions such as the oil price.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls for the Commission to come forward, as soon as possible and before the end of 2011, with proposals to achieve a 25% internal greenhouse gas reduction by 2020 consistent with a cost effective pathway to the 2050 objective as outlined in the 2050 Roadmap, and to move to a 30% overall target for 2020;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Recalls that in the run-up to the Durban Climate Conference, the European Parliament called for the CO2 reduction target to be increased above 20% by 2020;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Underlines that moving to a low carbon economy would have significant potential of creating additional jobs while securing economic growth and providing a competitive advantage for the European industry;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Parliament and the European Council have declared their ambition to secure 80-95% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Recalls that the transition to clean technologies would drastically reduce air pollution and thus provide for significant health as well as environmental benefits;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Acknowledges the systemic importance of some regions due to their demographic weight; believes that surveys and specific targets should be also applied to them and analysed at European level, particularly in the case of those with fiscal and legislative powers as they have a bigger margin of manoeuvre
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission not to bring forward
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission to bring forward within the next
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission to bring forward within the next two years the measures necessary to achieve the 2030 objectives, taking into account particular national capacities and potentials, cost- effectiveness, technological and market developments, fairness and solidarity in the distribution of additional efforts and benefits among Member States, as well as international progress on climate action;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Invites the Commission to bring forward within the next two years the measures which in its opinion are currently necessary to achieve the 2030 objectives, taking into account particular national capacities and potentials, as well as international progress on climate action;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that achieving the climate goals will lead to significant co-benefits in terms of reduced energy costs and dependency of fossil fuel imports as well as health care savings due to reduced air pollution, outweighing the initial costs of achieving the ghg reductions;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. In the meantime, invites the Commission to evaluate all policy options that may help Europe move towards the proposed indicative milestone reduction levels for 2030 and 2040 without further damaging the competitiveness of its industrial base.
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Calls on the Commission to present cost benefit analysis of meeting the proposed pathway at the Member State level by taking into account national circumstances stemmed from different technological developments and necessary investments (and their social acceptability) and a wider range of possible global conditions.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Parliament and the European Council have declared their ambition to secure 80-95% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Calls on the Commission to present cost benefit analysis of meeting the proposed pathway at the Member State level by taking into account national circumstances stemming from different technological developments and necessary investments (and their social acceptability) and a wider range of possible global conditions;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the worldwide development
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and that it is essential for Europe’s future competitiveness
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and Europe
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and Europe’s future competitiveness will depend upon it increasing levels of investment
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and Europe’s future competitiveness will depend upon it increasing levels of investment
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises that due to a lack of ambition in some third countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, it is very unlikely that an ambitious international agreement on climate change will be reached in the near future. Believes that the EU should look for common measures at international level e.g. adaptation measures and measures whereby every country should invest a similar proportion of their GDP in energy technology research
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls for the EU to continue playing an active role in the international negotiations to finalise an ambitious, comprehensive and legally binding agreement;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Recognizes that the proposed reduction milestones should be considered in a global rather than domestic context and fully acknowledges the role of international offsets in achieving any reduction level.
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Recognises that climate change is a global issue and recalls that the EU unilateral action is not sufficient and that the extensive involvement of big emitters is necessary,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Parliament and the European Council have declared their ambition to secure 80-95% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 in the context of necessary reductions by developing countries as a group;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Recalls the need for a clear timeline for an international post-2012 agreement and for firm and more ambitious commitments from big emitters to adopt ambitious and sufficient targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 f (new) 3f. Notes that the European Union has an important role to play internationally as a role model in demonstrating the benefits and viability of the low-carbon economy.
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 g (new) 3g. Stresses that delaying global and European climate action would result in higher costs not only for achieving the 2050 target, due to stranded investment in high-carbon capital stock and slower technological learning, but also in losing an innovative leading role for the EU in research, job creation and guidance for a greener sustainable economy; points out furthermore that delayed action for 2020 will result in reduced abatement potential for 2030 and beyond;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 h (new) 3h. Reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share of the global 2°C compatible carbon budget, and that delaying emissions reductions increases the cumulative share significantly;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 i (new) 3i. Points out that the science demands that industrialised countries need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions in the range of 25-40% for 2020 compared to 1990 in order to keep rise of the global average temperature below 2°C and thus calls on the EU to increase the target to above 20% for 2020 ;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 j (new) 3j. Recalls that limiting the raise of global temperature to an average of 2°C does not guarantee avoiding significant adverse climate impacts;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 k (new) 3k. Points out that while the climate targets pledged by most countries are not sufficient to meet the 2°C objective, EU is by no means acting alone or most ambitious in its targets;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is currently the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the European Parliament and
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal but not the only instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the current carbon price is very much lower than was originally envisaged and at present, as a result of the recession, is failing to provide the necessary investment stimulus; expects, however, that the situation will improve from 2013, largely as a result of the reforms that have already been agreed;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the present-day carbon price is very much lower than was originally envisaged and is failing to provide the necessary investment stimulus; expects, however, that the situation will improve from 2013 as a result of the reform that has already been agreed;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the carbon price, due to lower actual emissions because of the economic crisis, is very much lower than was originally envisaged and is failing to
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the carbon price is
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the carbon price is
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises that the ultimate aim of building an international carbon trading market is not feasible. Calls therefore on the Commission to propose legislation to replace the EU-ETS with the so called "McKitrick tax", i.e. a variable carbon tax to be established at international level that takes into account the temperature development in the tropical troposphere.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas, however, the UNFCCC COP negotiations have stalled because some of the large economies (such as Japan, Canada and Russia) have already stated that they do not intend to sign up for a second commitment period with a view to a ‘Kyoto II’ agreement, and the United States have not even ratified the first commitment period; whereas in response to this deadlock the Commission has stated that it would be a strategic error to attempt to push forward unilaterally;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that the
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recognizes the fact that current carbon price will not incentivise investments in low carbon technologies and thus will have a very limited role in driving emission reductions, while risking to lock the EU into carbon intensive infrastructures for the decades to come;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that climate change mitigation and adaptation cannot rely solely upon market based mechanisms as they, most often fail to deliver important technologies and the necessary ideological shift towards a sustainable society,
source: PE-478.402
2011/12/19
ENVI
115 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by setting aside 1.4 billion allowances so as to restore scarcity, thus allowing the original objective of providing incentives for investments in low carbon technologies and energy efficiency measures to be met, and thereafter proposing a legislative act to enable such allowances to be eliminated;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by setting aside 1.4 billion allowances so as to restore scarcity, thus allowing the original objective of providing incentives for investments in low carbon technologies and energy efficiency measures to be met, and thereafter proposing a legislative act to enable such allowances to be eliminated;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point a (a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by setting aside allowances so as to restore scarcity, thus allowing the original objective of providing incentives for investments in low carbon technologies and energy efficiency measures to be met, and thereafter proposing a legislative act to enable such allowances to be eliminated; this should be done after making special provision for instances where a substantial but temporary drop in output occurs as a result of the economic crisis;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b (b)
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b (b) proposing legislation
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b (b) proposing legislation before the end of 2013 to modify
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b (b) proposing legislation before the end of 201
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point b a (new) (ba) include transport in emissions trading so as to step up innovation and energy efficiency in this sector, internalise costs more effectively and create a level playing field between the various transport modes;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c (c)
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c (c)
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c (c) proposing legislation to implement art. 24a of the EU ETS revised directive and establish from the earliest possible date a reserve price for the auction of allowances taking into account, inter alia, existing provisions of Auctioning Regulation and avoidance of distortions of competition and greater predictability, all of which should reinforce the carbon price signal to achieve abatement of emissions at least cost;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c (c) proposing legislation to implement art. 24a of the EU ETS revised directive and establish from the earliest possible date a reserve price for the auction of allowances taking into account, inter alia, existing provisions of Auctioning Regulation and avoidance of distortions of competition and greater predictability, all of which should reinforce the carbon price signal to achieve abatement of emissions at least cost;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c a (new) (ca) calls on the reserve price to be set at a level below the carbon price envisaged when the current legislation was approved to avoid carbon leakage, but sufficient to provide reassurance to firms making long term investments;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c b (new) (cb) calls on the reserve price to be set at a level below the carbon price envisaged when the current legislation was approved but sufficient to provide reassurance to firms making long term investments;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c c (new) (cc) In any case, the ETS should be made simpler by requiring that any purchase of fossil fuels is accompanied by a corresponding purchase of emission allowances, so to establish equal competition between sectors and therefore promoting, the fastest and cheapest way to cut emissions, notes that the present approach provides for a sectoral approach and issue of free allowances in the proportion of around 50% means market mechanisms hardly work, recommends that free allowances should be restricted to the sustainable level and to be distributed according to the principle of "one person- one emission allowance" which expresses the equal right to access to natural resources in a sustainable way,
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c d (new) (cd) but shall ensure that through none of these measures the amount of allowances given out for free for the carbon leakage industry that meets the benchmark is reduced.
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c e (new) (ce) stimulating demand within the ETS by proposing extensions to include emissions from fossil fuels sold from the heat and transport sectors that are not directly exposed to international competition, and from the maritime shipping sector;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c f (new) (cf) stimulating demand within the ETS by proposing extensions to include emissions from the maritime shipping sector;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c g (new) (cg) taking steps to increase the input of relevant information and the transparency of the ETS registry to enable more effective monitoring and evaluation;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c h (new) (ch) further improving the use of offset mechanisms, for example by limiting access to offsets that subsidise Europe’s industrial competitors, i.e. in the area of HFCs;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – point c i (new) (ci) further improving the use of offset mechanisms, for example by limiting access to offsets that subsidise Europe’s industrial competitors;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that these measures will increase the auctioning revenue for Member States, reminds governments that there is no limit on the proportion of such money that can be spent on climate related purposes, and recommends that it be used to spur low carbon investments in industry or to encourage other means of job creation such as by reducing taxes on labour;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes that these measures will increase the auctioning revenue for Member States, reminds governments that there is no limit on the proportion of such money that can be spent on climate related purposes, and recommends that it be used to spur low carbon investments in industry or to encourage other means of job creation such as by reducing taxes on labour;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls for the Commission to bring forward proposals by the end of 2013 for extending to those energy intensive industries that face only minimal threat from overseas competition the requirement that allowances be purchased through auction;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Stresses, in this connection, that the reclassification of the EU ETS emission units as financial instruments, as contained in the MiFid review proposal, will entail new market surveillance requirements to avoid toxic instruments being generated by highly speculative derivative finance, along the same lines as in other market sectors; considers that all possible steps must be taken to prevent this from happening; calls on the Commission, therefore, to review this proposal to ensure that the ETS system is protected from the effects of purely financial speculation;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Calls on the Commission to ensure that legislation impacting the incentives provided for under the ETS, e.g. the Energy Efficiency Directive (COD/2011/0172), is monitored, and that the reduction requirement is adjusted accordingly.
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 f (new) 6f. Acknowledges that in order to achieve the targets of the Low Carbon Roadmap, not only the ETS, but also the Effort Sharing Decision (Decision No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) has to be adjusted.
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to publish details of the EU’s real contribution to reducing global CO2 emissions since 1990
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls upon the Commission
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Insists that the transition to a low carbon economy should be underpinned by a reasonable and measured regulatory approach; affirms that administratively and financially burdensome environmental compliance has a significant impact on employment and output in energy-intensive sectors, and increases the risk of carbon leakage, while also forcing businesses and therefore jobs out of the European Union.
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Call on the Commission to produce an analysis of sectors for which free allocation of allowances fails to prevent carbon leakage
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Concurs with the Commission analysis that border adjustment measures or including imports in the ETS would need to be combined with full auctioning to the sectors concerned, and calls on the Commission to produce an analysis of sectors for which free allocation of allowances fails to prevent carbon leakage, and recommends that the Commission bring forward proposals for border adjustment measures requiring importers of products in these sectors to purchase allowances equivalent to those which would have been required if the product had been manufactured in the EU;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Call on the Commission to produce an analysis of sectors for which free allocation of allowances fails to prevent carbon
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes that the current standards aimed at preventing carbon leakage are, on the whole, proving ineffective; points out, in this connection, that in the EU sectors most exposed to this problem companies are still closing down owing to the additional indirect costs introduced by the ETS system and not adequately offset;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission to provide Member States with guidance for the adoption of any measures intended to compensate industries proven to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage for indirect costs relating to greenhouse gas emissions as foreseen in the directive as soon as possible;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Calls on the Commission to provide Member States with guidance for the adoption of any measures intended to compensate industries proven to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage for indirect costs relating to greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Considers, in view of the ‘climate dumping’ currently suffered by the EU, that only a carbon tax at its borders could effectively prevent carbon leakage; calls also for the Member States to be allowed to offset up to 100% of the additional indirect costs incurred by the most exposed sectors;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 e (new) Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Calls on the Commission to produce an analysis on the absence of the geographical criterion in the carbon leakage assessment, for products with high transport cost;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 g (new) 8g. Calls on the Commission to produce an analysis on the absence of the geographical criterion in the carbon leakage assessment for the electricity market in South-East Europe;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls for acceleration of the work under the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC), for implementing measures to be set close to the level of the best performers, avoiding the distortion of competition, and for minimum requirements also to be set for non-electrical products;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for work under the Eco Design Directive to include heating equipment, boilers and insulating materials, that can facilitate reductions in energy and resource use while enabling greater recycling, as well as for the extension and development of labelling requirements that can assist consumers make informed decisions;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls for work under the Eco Design Directive to include heating equipment, boilers and insulating materials, that can facilitate reductions in energy and resource use while enabling greater recycling, as well as for the extension and development of labelling requirements that can assist consumers make informed decisions;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Draws attention to the basic premise that it is not energy saving measures that ensure energy efficiency, but vice versa; calls for all energy efficiency legislation to take this into account;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 d (new) 9d. Stresses the need to update the Energy Efficiency Action Plan with binding targets including a full range of genuine, quantified measures across the whole energy supply chain;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 e (new) 9e. Energy efficiency is the most effective instrument to upgrade industrial technological innovation and contribute to overall emissions reduction in an economically efficient way while stimulating job growth. Therefore, calls on the Commission to support efforts made by Member States to promote energy efficiency by putting in place stable long-term incentives schemes to promote technologies which are most effective from a cost-benefit perspective. In order to reach the 2020 energy efficiency objective, an adequate degree of harmonization of European efficiency standards should be guaranteed;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 f (new) 9f. Calls on the Commission, when promoting energy efficiency, to establish specific measures in order to tackle the reverse incentives that occur between the consumers and the distributors of energy;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 g (new) 9g. Calls for the Commission to introduce a long-term target for the reduction of energy consumption of the EU building stock by 2050;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 h (new) 9h. Stresses the need to step up energy efficiency in the building sector and the major contribution which could be made by European funds in this respect;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU's target for the use of biofuels must
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production and use by introducing binding sustainability criteria that take account of the carbon debt of different biomass feedstocks; insists that meeting the EU
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to develop a biomass supply policy as part of the upcoming 2050 energy roadmap to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU's target for the use of biofuels must n
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU’s target for the use of biofuels must not result in the release of disproportionate quantities of greenhouse gases and lead to higher food prices;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; recalls that promoting the production and use of biomass reduces dependence on fossil energy resources; recalls that, in comparison with fossil energy resources, the advantages of sustainably produced and renewable biomass are substantial from the point of view of the environment and sustainable development; insists that meeting the EU’s target for the use of biofuels must not result in the release of disproportionate quantities of greenhouse gases;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production and use; insists that meeting the EU’s target for the use of
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU’s target for the use of biofuels must not result in the release of disproportionate quantities of greenhouse gases, and calls for recognition of the positive contribution the agriculture and forestry sectors make by producing renewable energy sources in the European Union;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to encourage sustainable biomass production; insists that meeting the EU
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to introduce an indirect land use (ILUC) factor that takes full account of such disbenefits that render useless the objectives of the policy as a means of reducing CO2 emissions, and to bring forward proposals for sustainability criteria for the use of all biomass
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Calls upon the Commission to develop sustainability criteria for biomass that include the efficiency of the use of biomass, and focus the policies on a future where first value is created out of biomass raw materials, only after which biomass is used for energy;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10 c. Calls on the Commission to commit itself to making every effort to ensure that the percentage of renewable energy in the electricity sector is increased to 40% by 2020;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 d (new) 10d. Calls on the Commission to give guidance to industry and investors by introducing before the end of 2013 a legislative proposal for the proportion of energy that each Member State must derive from renewable sources by 2030 to achieve an overall target of 40%; stresses the need for the Commission to ensure that adoption of such a target does not reduce the incentives for investment in other forms of low carbon power generation;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 e (new) 10e. Calls on the Commission to give guidance to industry and investors by introducing before the end of 2013 a legislative proposal for the proportion of energy that each Member State must derive from renewable sources by 2030; stresses the need for the Commission to ensure that adoption of such a target does not reduce the incentives for investment in other forms of low carbon power generation;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 f (new) 10f. Calls on the Commission when publishing before the end of 2012 its required report of progress being made by each Member State towards meeting their legal requirements regarding renewable energy production, together with an assessment of whether the 2020 targets will be met, to propose a programme of actions that will be undertaken in order to promote compliance by Member States not presently on course to fulfil the requirements;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Horizon 2020 prioritises the need to develop
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Horizon 2020 prioritises the need to develop low carbon technologies
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Horizon 2020 prioritises the need to develop low carbon technologies to spur EU competitiveness and bring about a change in consumer behaviour;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Horizon 2020 prioritises the need to develop low carbon technologies to spur EU competitiveness and green jobs opportunities;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls for budgetary support to be consistent with the €50 billion needed from public and private sources to fully implement the SET plan;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Horizon 2020 and the European Innovation Partnerships under the Innovation Union prioritize the need to develop all kinds of low carbon technologies to spur EU competitiveness;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new) 11c. Calls on the commission to boost and ensure the necessary investments on the research & development & innovation of clean technologies in order to avoid possible over-lapping legally binding RES and energy efficiency targets after 2020;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new) 11d. Calls Member States and regions with fiscal and legislative powers in climate change to put in place strong tax incentives in order to promote research in this field
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 e (new) 11e. Calls on the Commission to guarantee impartiality in technological choice in order to ensure that the most appropriate emission reduction technologies for each sector and geographical are tested and applied;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises th
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the potential importance of applying CCS technology if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology as an interim solution if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays, financial shortfalls and lack of commitment by some Member States are likely to frustrate achievement of the European Council’s ambition of having up to 12 CCS demonstration projects in operation by 2015; calls on the Commission to publish a CCS Action Plan;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology if
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays, financial shortfalls and lack of commitment by some Member States are likely to frustrate achievement of the European Council's ambition of having up to 12 CCS demonstration projects in operation by 2015; calls on the Commission to publish a CCS Action Plan; recognises that CCS can and will not be applied in all circumstances, even by 2050, but will be limited to large installations. Calls for support on breakthrough technologies in other areas to increase energy efficiency and lower energy consumption, to provide solutions outside CCS;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technolog
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Points out that CCS technology is still at a fairly experimental stage and that its actual carbon emission reduction potential and its safety and environmental sustainability are far from proven;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Points out, however, that, with regard to the achievement of the goals laid down by the roadmap, the Commission places too much trust in this technology, treating it as a panacea, thus undermining the entire communication’s credibility;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of mechanisms that can support the deployment of low carbon power generation and address in particular: a) how the anticipated shortfall in NER300 funds for the current demonstration programme will be overcome and the revised operational timetable for the projects selected; b) how knowledge of the application of CCS can be advanced to embrace gas- fired power stations and industrial installations; c) what additional funding mechanism can be introduced to enable CCS development to continue after exhaustion of these funds and during the years before use of the technology becomes commercially viable on a stand-alone basis; d) how early investment in pipeline infrastructure, which is anticipated to prove a major source of delay, will be secured, and how the Connecting Europe Facility for transport, energy and ICT will contribute to this; e) how research into the characteristics and suitability of geological storage reservoirs in Europe will be supported in order to provide better understanding of their location, capacity and security;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Calls on the Commission to propose that unspent funds for CCS projects within the European Economic Recovery Programme be reallocated towards alternative CCS demonstration projects;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 e (new) 12e. Condemns as incoherent, contradictory and self-defeating the Commission's proposal to exclude Cohesion Fund support for the development and application of carbon capture and storage technology;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 f (new) 12f. Calls for specific targets for EU land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), ensuring permanence and the environmental integrity of the sector’s contribution to emissions reductions as well as accurate monitoring and accounting;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – introductory part Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – introductory part Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – introductory part 6.
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. Calls on the Commission to adopt measures to correct the failings of the ETS and to allow it to function as originally envisaged, in particular by taking the following steps
source: PE-478.425
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
events/11/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.262&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-467262_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.818New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-473818_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.209&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-472209_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.402New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-478402_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.426New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-478426_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.425New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-478425_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/6/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/11/docs |
|
events/12 |
|
events/12 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-33&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0033_EN.html |
events/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-86New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0086_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/05827New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0112:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0112:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=112New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0112/COM_COM(2011)0112(COR1)_EN.pdf |
procedure/subject/3 |
Old
3.70.03 Climate change, ozoneNew
3.70.03 Climate change, ozone layer |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|