BETA


2011/2157(INI) Review of the European neighbourhood policy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET DAVID Mário (icon: PPE PPE), SIWIEC Marek (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion DEVE STRIFFLER Michèle (icon: PPE PPE) Enrique GUERRERO SALOM (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion BUDG FÄRM Göran (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion EMPL RAPTI Sylvana (icon: S&D S&D) Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER (icon: PPE PPE), Gabriele ZIMMER (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz (icon: PPE PPE) Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion REGI KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion CULT MIGALSKI Marek Henryk (icon: ECR ECR) Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion LIBE FLAUTRE Hélène (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion AFCO DUFF Andrew (icon: ALDE ALDE) Morten MESSERSCHMIDT (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2012/04/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/12/16
   BG_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2011/12/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy.

Members began by recalling that it is in the highest interest of the EU to be ambitious in economic cooperation and adopt a mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible strategy based on support for democratic transitions and defence of human rights, towards its southern neighbourhood. In this new context, relations with these countries should be given fresh impetus, based on cooperation focusing on democracy and prosperity on both shores of the Mediterranean, and not only security and migration control and should provide itself with flexible and properly funded instruments in order to match its ambitions and events in the regions.

Accordingly, Members welcome the Joint Communications of the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on ‘ A new response to a changing Neighbourhood ’ and ‘ A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean ’ and the approach presented therein.

Acknowledging the European aspirations and the European choice of some partners, Parliament insists that tangible and credible incentives should be given to the neighbourhood countries to engage in the common goal of building deep democracy. For its part, the EU should apply the principle of differentiation based on each country's political, economic and social realities. Performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable and regularly monitored benchmarks for each individual partner country.

Recalling the objectives of development cooperation, Parliament asks the Commission and the EEAS to work towards eradicating poverty. It supports the consolidation in the ENP of previously separated strands of foreign and assistance policy in order to develop closer economic integration and political association among all those involved.

At the same time, the new neighbourhood policy should aim to strengthen stability and economic integration by focusing on the following points:

-Deep democracy and partnership with societies : Parliament advocates measures to strengthen the values of democracy, human rights, the rule of law, the fight against corruption, the market economy and good governance. These include:

strengthening civil society (which will benefit, between 2011 and 2013 from a budget of EUR 22 millions with the Facility being more substantially funded in the next Multiannual Financial Framework; the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy (EED), which should complement already existing EU instruments and should involve a right of scrutiny and the involvement of the European Parliament in its governance structure; a ‘more for more’ performance-based approach to continue to encourage all types of political reform; a annual assessment of the situation on human rights (particularly women’s rights) with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed; human rights dialogues conducted with all partner countries, including strengthening freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism, and access to the Internet; strengthening women's participation and that of young people and respecting the rights of the child’; full and effective respect for the freedom of religion (at individual, collective, public, private and institutional level) should be identified as a priority, as well as the development of democratically oriented political parties with women in positions of responsibility; enhancing the visibility of the EaP and UfM projects in the partner countries.

At the same time, Members insist that the international community freeze its financial assistance to the Belarusian regime until all detained and arrested opposition leaders, journalists, presidential candidates and their supporters are released and cleared of charges and rehabilitated. They urge the European Union to reorient towards society and increase its assistance to Belarus in order to address the needs of the population.

-Sustainable economic and social development : generally, Members call on the EU to encourage structural reforms in the economic, social and legal arenas as part of its support for democratic transitions noting emphatically the close interweaving of democratic and socio-economic development.

They call for immediate measures, to alleviate the situation of the countries currently facing significant socioeconomic crises, with special regard to partner countries where democratic transition aggravates economic difficulties, if all parties involved commit themselves to verifiable compliance in each specific case with the social, environmental and labour standards applicable internationally and in the EU.

Others measures recommended are as follows:

the promotion of sub-regional cooperation and cross-border projects (particularly the development of South-South’ and ‘East-East’ trade and economic integration among the countries concerned; the strengthening of administrative capacity building in employment and social affairs ensuring that the minimum wage according to national practices provides an adequate standard of living for workers and their families embracing the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) as the guiding policy framework for medium-term pro-poor economic growth.

-Association agreements : Members underline the opportunity that negotiations on Association Agreements provide to boost reforms. They should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks, which should be regularly monitored. As well as real and tangible incentives for the partners. Parliament wants to move forward on creating the conditions that will allow the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs), subject to: (i) the necessary alignment of safety and quality specifications, to European standards, (ii) ensuring that international conventions on labour laws and child labour are monitored; (iii) assessment of the political, social and environmental circumstances of each country.

Parliament notes that a European perspective, and the membership aspirations of Eastern Partnership countries pursuant to article 49 of the TEU, constitutes a driving force for reforms in these countries and further strengthens their commitment to shared values and principles such as democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance.

It believes that the conclusion of Association Agreements can be an important step towards further political engagement and a stronger relationship with Europe.

It reaffirms that, for the Southern partnership, the aim is to bring the two shores of the Mediterranean closer together with a view to establishing an area of peace, democracy, security and prosperity for their 800 million inhabitants. Members would like to see DCFTAs as the first step towards a big ‘Euro-Mediterranean Economic Space’, and they call on the Commission and the Council to facilitate the implementation of the six packages of measures outlined in the Commission document of 30 March 2011 concerning the monitoring of trade and investment initiatives for the benefit of partners on the Southern shore of the Mediterranean.

-Sectoral cooperation : Parliament calls for closer cooperation on matters such as job creation, and, in particular with regard to all policies and issues entailing a cross-border dimension. Members recommend further cooperation in sectors such as industry, SMEs, research, development and innovation, ICT including security of IT systems, space, and tourism and stress the benefits of joint research programming initiatives by the EU and its neighbours. They welcome the reinforcement of the energy cooperation dimension of the ENP .

They consider it necessary to step up energy efficiency and the promotion of renewable energy, to strengthen energy supply. Parliament wants closer coordination on nuclear safety measures, particularly in regions that are prone to high seismic activity. It welcomes the proposal for the creation of a European Energy Community and believes that it could be an important step towards cooperation with our neighbours. It emphasises the strategic significance of the Nabucco project and of its swift implementation, as well as of liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation under the AGRI project.

The resolution draws attention, furthermore, to the supporting role which the EU could play in tackling environmental problems in neighbouring countries, particularly in eliminating large stocks of ‘obsolete pesticides’, which can cause large-scale chemical pollution. Further cooperation in the transport sector, international, regional and interregional cultural cooperation, education and sport is also considered to be essential. Members call on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus programme , an initiative which – assuming that it were successful – would be suitable to extend to the neighbourhood as a whole. In addition, the Commission should take over take over Parliament’s proposal to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme. Members reaffirm the great support for the EU-funded project of ENP scholarships to the university graduates from the ENP and the EU at the College of Europe.

-Mobility : overall, Members recall that the EU should improve the management and maximise the mutual benefits of migration for development, inter alia by providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU and dealing with the root causes of irregular migration in the partner countries. The Union needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships , which take account of the demographic, sociological and occupational balance on both sides, and encouraging exchanges of specialists between the EU and third countries. The EU should advance its work on visa facilitation and readmission agreements on a parallel basis in the utmost transparency with a view to moving – gradually and on a case-by-case basis, once all conditions are met – to a visa-free regime (particularly in the cultural sphere). Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to set up a structured dialogue with third country authorities in order to develop a win-win approach to mobility in order to guarantee equal and fair conditions for applicants in all Member States, focusing in particular on the effects of the interdependence between development aid, security, regular migration and irregular migration as defined in the Global Approach to Migration. It calls for special attention to be paid to ensuring that partner countries do not suffer from a ‘brain drain’.

Reaffirming the principle of ‘non-refoulement’as part of European asylum policy, Members insist that the Union shall facilitate access to EU funding for projects to inform migrants about their rights and responsibilities, including unaccompanied minors, women and other vulnerable groups and make every effort to facilitate the development of an accessible, fair and protective EU asylum system.

-Regional dimension : Members reiterate their firmly held view that the European Neighbourhood Policy will not be wholly effective unless synergy is created between its bilateral and multilateral dimensions. The multilateral dimension of the EaP should be further strengthened and developed, including the Civil Society Forum; notes the importance of establishing a constructive dialogue with Turkey and Russia on regional issues of common interest and particularly as far as security issues are concerned.

Members consider that the territorial cooperation principles apply also to external borders and are a key tool to improve EU economic development as well as the EU’s overall ENP political goals. They consider that the new ENP approach must allow the EU’s macro-regional strategies and that the potential of the EU macro-regions which include EU neighbouring countries should be fully used for better coordination of priorities and projects of common interest to the EU and the ENP countries in order to achieve mutually positive results and to optimise invested resources.

Members insist on the following issues:

to boost ‘Euroregions’ within the European Neighbourhood Policy; the high potential of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) involving regions beyond the external borders; take into account the role of the outermost regions in the EU external relations policy; the importance of further fostering regional cooperation in the Black Sea space and developing further the EU Black Sea Strategy.

Members stress the importance of the Union for the Mediterranean as a permanent forum for dialogue and cooperation and an instrument for the promotion of democracy. The UfM should promote sound economic, social and democratic development and create a strong and common basis for a close regional cooperation between the EU and its Southern neighbours. Members welcome the increase in the overall budget of the Neighbourhood Investment Facility. They call on the Commission and the EEAS to explore opportunities for an institutional interlink between the ENP and the neighbourhood policies of key regional players, above all Turkey.

-Conflict resolution : Parliament recalls that peaceful resolution of regional military conflicts, including frozen ones, is the essential precondition for democracy consolidation, respect for human rights, prosperity and economic growth, and thus should be of the highest interest to the EU. The EU should get more involved and play a more active, coherent and constructive role in the resolution of regional conflicts, inter alia via the EEAS, by developing more confidence-building measures, reconciliation and mediation. Political cooperation should be intensified for the purposes of security and combating terrorism and individual forms of extremism.

Members believe that intercultural and inter-religious dialogue is crucial to enhancing mutual understanding among the neighbourhood partner countries. They stress the need for a task force for the South Caucasus and a proactive role of the EU in the Transnistria talks. Parliament supports the EU's humanitarian action in the eastern neighbourhood partner countries, but regrets that this action is not yet accompanied by a strengthening of the EU as a leading political actor in the Middle East which matches its decisive commitment to humanitarian aid.

-Parliamentary dimension : Members reaffirm that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EURONEST and the PA-UfM, are crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence-building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves, and therefore greatly contribute to the achievement of the goals of the Eastern Partnership and the Union for the Mediterranean. They call on the EEAS and the Commission to associate EURONEST members to the maximum extent possible with the multilateral structures and platforms of the EaP and insist on the need to recognise the PA-UfM as a legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM. Parliament calls on the EC to provide enhanced financial, technical and expert support to the EaP countries’ national parliaments’ administrations within the Comprehensive Institution Building programme in order to strengthen their efficiency, transparency and accountability, which is crucial if the parliaments are to play their proper role in the democratic decision making processes. It confirms its openness to welcome representatives of the Belarusian Parliament in EURONEST as soon as parliamentary elections in Belarus are considered democratic by the international community, including the OSCE.

-Funding : Members welcome the proposal for the new European Neighbourhood Instrument and the increase of funding for the ENP, as requested in its previous resolutions. The distribution of funds should be flexible and adequate for both regions while keeping the regional balance. They consider that maintaining a reasonable balance between East and South components is important, especially since Eastern neighbouring countries are in the process of implementing Eastern Partnership related programmes and reforms and have an EU perspective. Members demand a sizeable increase in the Heading 4 ceiling of the EU budget for the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument , given that over the last years despite some progress in promoting enhanced cooperation and progressive economic integration between the European Union and the partner countries, more needs to be done as new challenges and areas for cooperation emerge.

Moreover, Members underline that the reallocation of appropriations needed for the increased funding for the ENP should be based on clear priorities and should therefore not be to the detriment of the Union’s only crisis response and peace-building tool , the Instrument for Stability, as proposed by the Commission. They emphasise that the funding of the ENP should not be affected by the current sovereign debt crisis.

Other measures are suggested such as:

Integration Facility to support civil society in the European Neighbourhood, the allocation of resources on a limited number of clearly defined priorities and measurable objectives; the provision of budget support if and only if there are guarantees of sound financial management in the countries concerned; the need for a consistent approach in the assistance provided to neighbouring countries by each individual EU Member State and the EU within the ENP framework; mobilisation by the ENP countries themselves, their own domestic resources, in order to establish transparent systems of taxation, involve the private sector, local governments and civil society effectively in the ENP agenda and aim for their greater ownership of ENP projects.

In parallel, Members call, in the light of the Arab Spring as well as the retreat from democracy in some of the Eastern partnership countries, for a specific self-critical evaluation of the financial instruments used in the past within the ENPI, with regard to their functioning in the fields of democracy, human rights, governance, fighting corruption, institution-building and support to civil society. They are of the firm conviction that financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA must also be examined in the context of this review and be subject to long-term programming, as an integral part of the Neighbourhood Policy. They do not consider the argument valid that the political instability in the region and the specificities of the peace process only allow provisional programming and case-by-case reinforcement.

Given the current pressing needs, especially in the Southern neighbourhood, Members call for a swift agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the proposal for reinforcing the Neighbourhood Instrument over the period 2012 to 2013 .

They also insists that the Council should adopt without further delay the legislative proposal to amend Article 23 of the ENPI Regulation, which would make it possible to reinvest funds returned following past operations.

Lastly, they call on the Commission to consider alternative ways to ensure additional risk capital funds to be immediately made available through the EIB, for both the Southern and the Eastern dimensions.

Documents
2011/12/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/12/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/11/25
   SE_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2011/11/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Marek SIWIEC (S&D, PL) and Mário DAVID (PPE, PT) on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy.

Members began by recalling that it is in the highest interest of the EU to be ambitious in economic cooperation and adopt a mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible strategy based on support for democratic transitions and defence of human rights, towards its southern neighbourhood. In this new context, relations with these countries should be given fresh impetus, based on cooperation focusing on democracy and prosperity on both shores of the Mediterranean, and not only security and migration control. Accordingly, Members welcome the Joint Communications of the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on ‘ A new response to a changing Neighbourhood ’ and ‘ A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean ’ and the approach presented therein.

Acknowledging the European aspirations and the European choice of some partners, the committee insists that tangible and credible incentives should be given to the neighbourhood countries to engage in the common goal of building deep democracy, and that differentiation based on each country’s political, economic and social realities, performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable and regularly monitored benchmarks for each individual partner country. Recalling the objectives of development cooperation, it asks the Commission and the EEAS to work towards eradicating poverty. At the same time, it looks for a strengthened network of institutional arrangements, which is stable, economical and dedicated to developing closer economic integration and political association among all those involved.

The report raises several points with regard to the revision of the ENP:

(1) Deep democracy and partnership with societies : Members advocate measures to strengthen the values of democracy, human rights, the rule of law, the fight against corruption, the market economy and good governance. These include:

· strengthening civil society (which will benefit, between 2011 and 2013 from a budget of EUR 22 millions with the Facility being more substantially funded in the next Multiannual Financial Framework;

· the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy (EED), which should complement already existing EU instruments and should involve a right of scrutiny and the involvement of the European Parliament in its governance structure;

· a ‘more for more’ performance-based approach;

· human rights dialogues conducted with all partner countries, including strengthening freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism, and access to the Internet;

· an annual assessment of the situation as well as the outcomes of the dialogues should be included in the annex to the annual progress report of each partner country with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed;

· strengthening women's participation and that of young people and respecting the rights of the child’;

· full and effective respect for the freedom of religion (at individual, collective, public, private and institutional level) should be identified as a priority, as well as the development of democratically oriented political parties with women in positions of responsibility;

· enhancing the visibility of the EaP and UfM projects in the partner countries.

At the same time, Members insist that the international community freeze its financial assistance to the Belarusian regime until all detained and arrested opposition leaders, journalists, presidential candidates and their supporters are released and cleared of charges and rehabilitated. They urge the European Union to reorient towards society and increase its assistance to Belarus in order to address the needs of the population.

(2) Sustainable economic and social development : generally, Members call on the EU to encourage structural reforms in the economic, social and legal arenas as part of its support for democratic transitions noting emphatically the close interweaving of democratic and socio-economic development.

They call for immediate measures, to alleviate the situation of the countries currently facing significant socioeconomic crises, with special regard to partner countries where democratic transition aggravates economic difficulties, if all parties involved commit themselves to verifiable compliance in each specific case with the social, environmental and labour standards applicable internationally and in the EU.

Others measures recommended are as follows:

· the promotion of sub-regional cooperation and cross-border projects (particularly the development of South-South’ and ‘East-East’ trade and economic integration among the countries concerned;

· the strengthening of administrative capacity building in employment and social affairs ensuring that the minimum wage according to national practices provides an adequate standard of living for workers and their families

· embracing the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) as the guiding policy framework for medium-term pro-poor economic growth.

(3) Association agreements : Members underline the opportunity that negotiations on Association Agreements provide to boost reforms. They should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks, which should be regularly monitored. As well as real and tangible incentives for the partners. They invite ENP partner countries to move forward on creating the conditions that will allow the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) ensuring that international conventions on labour laws and child labour are monitored.

The committee notes that a European perspective, and the membership aspirations of Eastern Partnership countries pursuant to article 49 of the TEU, constitutes a driving force for reforms in these countries and further strengthens their commitment to shared values and principles such as democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance.

It believes that the conclusion of Association Agreements can be an important step towards further political engagement and a stronger relationship with Europe.

It reaffirms that, for the Southern partnership, the aim is to bring the two shores of the Mediterranean closer together with a view to establishing an area of peace, democracy, security and prosperity for their 800 million inhabitants. Members would like to see DCFTAs as the first step towards a big ‘Euro-Mediterranean Economic Space’, and they call on the Commission and the Council to facilitate the implementation of the six packages of measures outlined in the Commission document of 30 March 2011 concerning the monitoring of trade and investment initiatives for the benefit of partners on the Southern shore of the Mediterranean.

(4) Sectoral cooperation : Members recommend further cooperation in sectors such as industry, SMEs, research, development and innovation, ICT including security of IT systems, space, and tourism and stress the benefits of joint research programming initiatives by the EU and its neighbours. They welcome the reinforcement of the energy cooperation dimension of the ENP . They consider it necessary to step up energy efficiency and the promotion of renewable energy, to strengthen energy supply and nuclear safety measures, particularly in regions that are prone to high seismic activity. The committee welcomes the proposal for the creation of a European Energy Community and believes that it could be an important step towards cooperation with our neighbours. It emphasises the strategic significance of the Nabucco project and of its swift implementation, as well as of liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation under the AGRI project.

The report draws attention, furthermore, to the supporting role which the EU could play in tackling environmental problems in neighbouring countries, particularly in eliminating large stocks of ‘obsolete pesticides’, which can cause large-scale chemical pollution. Further cooperation in the transport sector, international, regional and interregional cultural cooperation, education and sport is also considered to be essential. Members call on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus programme , an initiative which – assuming that it were successful – would be suitable to extend to the neighbourhood as a whole. In addition, the Commission should take over take over Parliament’s proposal to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme. They reaffirm the great support for the EU-funded project of ENP scholarships to the university graduates from the ENP and the EU at the College of Europe.

(5) Migration policy : overall, Members recall that the EU should improve the management and maximise the mutual benefits of migration for development, inter alia by providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU and dealing with the root causes of irregular migration in the partner countries. The Union needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships , which take account of the demographic, sociological and occupational balance on both sides, and encouraging exchanges of specialists between the EU and third countries. The EU should advance its work on visa facilitation and readmission agreements on a parallel basis in the utmost transparency with a view to moving – gradually and on a case-by-case basis, once all conditions are met – to a visa-free regime.

Reaffirming the principle of ‘non-refoulement’as part of European asylum policy, Members insist that the Union shall facilitate access to EU funding for projects to inform migrants about their rights and responsibilities, including unaccompanied minors, women and other vulnerable groups and make every effort to facilitate the development of an accessible, fair and protective EU asylum system.

(6) Regional dimension : Members reiterate their firmly held view that the European Neighbourhood Policy will not be wholly effective unless synergy is created between its bilateral and multilateral dimensions. The multilateral dimension of the EaP should be further strengthened and developed, including the Civil Society Forum; notes the importance of establishing a constructive dialogue with Turkey and Russia on regional issues of common interest and particularly as far as security issues are concerned.

Members consider that the territorial cooperation principles apply also to external borders and are a key tool to improve EU economic development as well as the EU’s overall ENP political goals. They consider that the new ENP approach must allow the EU’s macro-regional strategies and that the potential of the EU macro-regions which include EU neighbouring countries should be fully used for better coordination of priorities and projects of common interest to the EU and the ENP countries in order to achieve mutually positive results and to optimise invested resources.

Members insist on the following issues:

to boost Euroregions’ within the European Neighbourhood Policy; the high potential of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) involving regions beyond the external borders; take into account the role of the outermost regions in the EU external relations policy; the importance of further fostering regional cooperation in the Black Sea space and developing further the EU Black Sea Strategy.

Members stress the importance of the Union for the Mediterranean as a permanent forum for dialogue and cooperation and an instrument for the promotion of democracy. The UfM should promote sound economic, social and democratic development and create a strong and common basis for a close regional cooperation between the EU and its Southern neighbours. Members welcome the increase in the overall budget of the Neighbourhood Investment Facility. They call on the Commission and the EEAS to explore opportunities for an institutional interlink between the ENP and the neighbourhood policies of key regional players, above all Turkey.

(7) Conflict resolution : the report recalls that peaceful resolution of regional military conflicts, including so called frozen ones, is the essential precondition for democracy consolidation, respect for human rights, prosperity and economic growth, and thus should be of the highest interest to the EU. The EU should get more involved and play a more active, coherent and constructive role in the resolution of regional conflicts, inter alia via the EEAS, by developing more confidence-building measures, reconciliation and mediation. Political cooperation should be intensified for the purposes of security and combating terrorism and individual forms of extremism.

Members believe that intercultural and inter-religious dialogue is crucial to enhancing mutual understanding, respect, solidarity and tolerance with and among the neighbourhood partner countries. They insist on the need to keep a regional approach and welcomes the decision both to appoint an EUSR for the South Caucasus and for the Southern Mediterranean Region and to establish a task force for the Southern Mediterranean. A similar task force for the South Caucasus should be considered and a proactive role of the EU in the Transnistria talks.

(8) Parliamentary dimension : Members reaffirm that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EURONEST and the PA-UfM, are crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence-building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves, and therefore greatly contribute to the achievement of the goals of the Eastern Partnership and the Union for the Mediterranean. They call on the EEAS and the Commission to associate EURONEST members to the maximum extent possible with the multilateral structures and platforms of the EaP and insist on the need to recognise the PA-UfM as a legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM. The report calls on the EC to provide enhanced financial, technical and expert support to the EaP countries’ national parliaments’ administrations within the Comprehensive Institution Building programme in order to strengthen their efficiency, transparency and accountability, which is crucial if the parliaments are to play their proper role in the democratic decision making processes. It confirms its openness to welcome representatives of the Belarusian Parliament in EURONEST as soon as parliamentary elections in Belarus are considered democratic by the international community, including the OSCE.

Funding : Members welcome the proposal for the new European Neighbourhood Instrument and the increase of funding for the ENP, as requested in its previous resolutions. The distribution of funds should be flexible and adequate for both regions while keeping the regional balance. They considers that maintaining a reasonable balance between East and South components is important, especially since Eastern neighbouring countries are in the process of implementing Eastern Partnership related programmes and reforms and have an EU perspective. Members demand a sizeable increase in the Heading 4 ceiling of the EU budget for the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument , given that over the last years despite some progress in promoting enhanced cooperation and progressive economic integration between the European Union and the partner countries, more needs to be done as new challenges and areas for cooperation emerge.

Moreover, Members underline that the reallocation of appropriations needed for the increased funding for the ENP should be based on clear priorities and should therefore not be to the detriment of the Union’s only crisis response and peace-building tool , the Instrument for Stability, as proposed by the Commission. They emphasise that the funding of the ENP should not be affected by the current sovereign debt crisis.

Other measures are suggested such as:

Integration Facility to support civil society in the European Neighbourhood, the allocation of resources on a limited number of clearly defined priorities and measurable objectives, the provision of budget support if and only if there are guarantees of sound financial management in the countries concerned, mobilisation by the ENP countries themselves, their own domestic resources, in order to establish transparent systems of taxation, involve the private sector, local governments and civil society effectively in the ENP agenda and aim for their greater ownership of ENP projects.

In parallel, Members call, in the light of the Arab Spring as well as the retreat from democracy in some of the Eastern partnership countries, for a specific self-critical evaluation of the financial instruments used in the past within the ENPI, with regard to their functioning in the fields of democracy, human rights, governance, fighting corruption, institution-building and support to civil society. They are of the firm conviction that financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA must also be examined in the context of this review and be subject to long-term programming, as an integral part of the Neighbourhood Policy. They do not consider the argument valid that the political instability in the region and the specificities of the peace process only allow provisional programming and case-by-case reinforcement.

Given the current pressing needs, especially in the Southern neighbourhood, Members call, for a swift agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the proposal for reinforcing the Neighbourhood Instrument over the period 2012 to 2013 .

They also insists that the Council should adopt without further delay the legislative proposal to amend Article 23 of the ENPI Regulation, which would make it possible to reinvest funds returned following past operations.

Lastly, they call on the Commission to consider alternative ways to ensure additional risk capital funds to be immediately made available through the EIB, for both the Southern and the Eastern dimensions.

Documents
2011/11/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2011/11/09
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/11/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/11/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/10/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/10/06
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted conclusions emphasising the importance of strengthened transport cooperation and better transport connections with neighbouring regions covered by the Enlargement and European Neighbourhood policies , in particular the Western Balkans, the Mediterranean region and the Eastern Partnership countries, with a view to bringing about deeper economic integration and closer political association.

To achieve these goals, the Council advocates improvement of transport infrastructure, especially by:

better linking of the infrastructure of neighbouring countries with the trans-European transport network, and closer integration of transport markets, in particular by extending the European Common Aviation Area, removing barriers in maritime transport, increasing interoperability of railway systems and streamlining border crossing and administrative procedures.

The Council is, however, stressing that closer market integration will depend on neighbouring countries' readiness to do so and on their progress in applying safety, security, environmental and social standards equivalent to those of the EU .

The existing financial resources such as the Neighbourhood Investment Facility, which can leverage funding from international financial institutions, should be used to help those countries make the necessary reforms.

Moreover, the Council welcomes the establishment of an Eastern Partnership Transport Panel, due to be launched at the Eastern Partnership ministerial conference on 24-25 October in Krakow (Poland).

2011/10/06
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/09/28
   EP - DUFF Andrew (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2011/09/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/08/11
   CZ_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2011/07/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2011/07/12
   EP - FÄRM Göran (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2011/07/12
   EP - FLAUTRE Hélène (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2011/07/07
   EP - MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2011/06/21
   EP - KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2011/06/15
   EP - STRIFFLER Michèle (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2011/06/15
   EP - MIGALSKI Marek Henryk (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2011/05/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : proposal for a new strategy with regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). BACKGROUND : the European Neighbourhood includes Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt, Georgia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, the Republic of Moldova, Morocco, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Syria, Tunisia and Ukraine. These are countries whose hopes and futures make a direct and significant difference to the EU.

Recent events have brought this into sharper relief, highlighting the challenges that the EU and these countries face together. The overthrow of long-standing repressive regimes in Egypt and Tunisia; the ongoing military conflict in Libya, the recent violent crackdown in Syria, continued repression in Belarus and the lingering protracted conflicts in the region, including in the Middle East, require the EU to look afresh at the its relationship with its neighbours.

The Lisbon Treaty has allowed the EU to strengthen the delivery of its foreign policy: co-operation with neighbouring countries can now be broadened to cover the full range of issues in an integrated and more effective manner. This was a key driver for initiating a review, in consultation with partner countries and other stakeholders, of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in summer 2010. Recent events and the results of the review have shown that EU support to political reforms in neighbouring countries has met with limited results.

A new approach is needed to strengthen the partnership between the EU and the countries and societies of the neighbourhood: (i) to build and consolidate healthy democracies, and (ii) pursue sustainable economic growth and manage cross-border links.

CONTENT : the new approach in the framework of the ENP aims to:

provide greater support to partners engaged in building deep democracy and other civil and human rights that many Europeans take for granted, such as the freedom of thought, conscience and religion; support inclusive economic development – so that EU neighbours can trade, invest and grow in a sustainable way, reducing social and regional inequalities, creating jobs for their workers and higher standards of living for their people; strengthen the two regional dimensions of the European Neighbourhood Policy, covering respectively the Eastern Partnership and the Southern Mediterranean, so that we can work out consistent regional initiatives in areas such as trade, energy, transport or migration and mobility complementing and strengthening our bilateral co-operation; provide the mechanisms and instruments fit to deliver these objectives.

The major themes of this new approach are the following:

1) Supporting progress towards deep democracy : the Commission proposes to adapt levels of EU support to partners according to progress on political reforms and building deep democracy. It suggests the following actions: (i) support deep and sustainable democracy; (ii) establish a partnership with societies, with the establishment of a European Endowment for Democracy to help political parties, non-registered NGOs and trade unions and other social partners; (iii) intensifying our political and security co-operation to enhance EU involvement in solving protracted conflicts, mainly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and other conflicts in the Middle East, the South Caucasus, the Republic of Moldova and Western Sahara.

2) Supporting sustainable social and economic development : this involves mainly proposals to:

support partner countries' adoption of policies conducive to stronger, sustainable and more inclusive growth, to the development of micro, small and medium-sized companies and to job creation; strengthen industrial cooperation and support improvements to the business environment; help to organise events to promote investment; promote direct investment from EU SMEs and micro-credit; build on the pilot regional development programmes to tackle economic disparities between regions; launch pilot programmes to support agricultural and rural development; enhance the macro-economic policy dialogue with partners making the most advanced economic reforms; improve the effectiveness of Macro-Financial Assistance by streamlining its decision-making process; enhance dialogue on employment and social policies.

3) Building effective regional partnerships : the EU offers partnership to each individual neighbour through a single policy, based on mutual accountability. The eastern and southern dimensions of the ENP seek to complement that single policy by fostering regional cooperation and developing regional synergies and responses to the specific geographic, economic and social challenges of each region.

-Strengthening the Eastern Partnership : in the area, the EU will :

move to conclude and implement Association Agreements including DCFTAs; pursue democratisation; pursue the visa facilitation and liberalisation process; enhance sectoral cooperation, notably in the area of rural development; promote benefits of the Eastern Partnership to citizens; increase work with civil society and social partners.

-Building the Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity in the Southern Mediterranean : the joint Communication on a Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity in the Southern Mediterranean outlined first elements of the EU’s offer of a new partnership with partners engaged in building democracies and extensive reforms. The three main directions along which the EU intends to further develop its relations with its Mediterranean partners are carried over into this communication: democratic transformation and institution-building; a stronger partnership with the people; and sustainable and inclusive economic development. The long-term vision for our most advanced Mediterranean partners is close political association with the EU and economic integration into the Internal Market. In the short term, Comprehensive Institution-Building programmes similar to those implemented with its Eastern neighbours will be set up to support democratic transformation.

The Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) which complements the bilateral relations between the EU and partners should enhance its potential to organise effective and result-oriented regional cooperation.

4) Policy and programme framework : the Commission proposes focusing ENP Action Plans and EU assistance on a smaller number of priorities, backed with more precise benchmarks.

While ENP Action Plans remain the framework for our general cooperation, the EU will suggest to partners that they focus on a limited number of short and medium-term priorities, incorporating more precise benchmarks and a clearer sequencing of actions.

In terms of funding, the EU shall: i) re-focus and target foreseen and programmed funds in the ENPI as well as other relevant external policy instruments in the light of this new approach; (ii) provide additional resources of over EUR 1 billion until 2013 to address the urgent needs of our neighbourhood ; (iii) mobilise budgetary reinforcement from various sources; (iv) swiftly proceed with submitting concurring budget proposals to the Budget Authority.

Implementing the new approach of the neighbourhood policy based on mutual accountability and a shared commitment to the universal values of human rights, democracy and the rule of law requires additional resources of up to EUR 1242 million until 2013. These resources are in addition to the EUR 5700 million provided under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument for 2011-2013. Additional resources will be provided through reallocations from within Heading 4 of the 2007-2013 multi-annual financial framework , and by making use of the unallocated margin under the expenditure ceiling in 2012 and - to the extent necessary - through the Flexibility Instrument. The Commission will submit an Amending Letter to Draft Budget 2012 shortly.

Planning for 2013 and beyond : the Commission proposes to : i) promote more flexible and simpler aid delivery under the post-2013 successor to the present ENPI; ii) step up efforts of co-ordination between the EU, its Member States and other key IFIs and bilateral donors.

The key source of funding, the new European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), will provide the bulk of financial support to partner countries, essentially through bilateral, regional and cross border co-operation programmes.

2011/04/07
   EP - RAPTI Sylvana (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2011/03/22
   EP - DAVID Mário (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2011/03/22
   EP - SIWIEC Marek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2011/03/08
   EC - For information

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
671 2011/2157(INI)
2011/09/09 CULT 46 amendments...
source: PE-472.077
2011/09/15 LIBE 72 amendments...
source: PE-472.228
2011/09/21 REGI 25 amendments...
source: PE-472.311
2011/09/28 ITRE 60 amendments...
source: PE-472.330
2011/09/29 EMPL 66 amendments...
source: PE-472.309
2011/10/11 AFET 367 amendments...
source: PE-472.271
2011/10/17 DEVE 9 amendments...
source: PE-473.896
2011/10/26 BUDG 26 amendments...
source: PE-473.915

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0200/COM_COM(2011)0200_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0200/COM_COM(2011)0200_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.805
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-469805_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.798&secondRef=02
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.271
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-472271_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.892&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.053&secondRef=03
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE470.004&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.292&secondRef=02
docs/8/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.222&secondRef=02
docs/9/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.186&secondRef=02
docs/10/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.869&secondRef=02
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2011-11-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0400_EN.html title: A7-0400/2011
summary
events/4
date
2011-11-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0400_EN.html title: A7-0400/2011
summary
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111213&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-13-TOC_EN.html
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0576_EN.html title: T7-0576/2011
summary
events/7
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0576_EN.html title: T7-0576/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
rapporteur
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: STRIFFLER Michèle date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STRIFFLER Michèle group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: FÄRM Göran date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FÄRM Göran group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: RAPTI Sylvana date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2011-04-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RAPTI Sylvana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2011-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2011-06-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: FLAUTRE Hélène date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FLAUTRE Hélène group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
rapporteur
name: DUFF Andrew date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2011-09-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DUFF Andrew group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/11/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-400&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0400_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-576
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0576_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-05-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=303 title: COM(2011)0303 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52011DC0303:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2011-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFCO date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: DAVID Mário group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3116 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2011-10-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFCO date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: DAVID Mário group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
  • date: 2011-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-400&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0400/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20901&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-576 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0576/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
rapporteur
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFCO
date
2011-09-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STRIFFLER Michèle group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FÄRM Göran group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2011-04-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RAPTI Sylvana group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2011-07-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2011-04-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2011-06-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2011-06-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2011-07-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FLAUTRE Hélène group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2011-07-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2011-09-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DUFF Andrew group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2011-06-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 3116 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3116*&MEET_DATE=06/10/2011 date: 2011-10-06T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0200/COM_COM(2011)0200_EN.pdf title: COM(2011)0200 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=200 title: EUR-Lex type: For information body: EC
  • date: 2011-07-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.805 title: PE469.805 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.798&secondRef=02 title: PE469.798 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.271 title: PE472.271 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.892&secondRef=02 title: PE469.892 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.053&secondRef=03 title: PE472.053 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE470.004&secondRef=02 title: PE470.004 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.292&secondRef=02 title: PE472.292 committee: AFCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.222&secondRef=02 title: PE472.222 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.186&secondRef=02 title: PE472.186 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.869&secondRef=02 title: PE469.869 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2012-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=20901&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)162/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2011-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0303 title: COM(2011)0303 type: Contribution body: BG_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2011-08-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0303 title: COM(2011)0303 type: Contribution body: CZ_SENATE
  • date: 2011-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2011)0303 title: COM(2011)0303 type: Contribution body: SE_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2011-05-25T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0303/COM_COM(2011)0303_EN.doc title: COM(2011)0303 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=303 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : proposal for a new strategy with regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). BACKGROUND : the European Neighbourhood includes Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Egypt, Georgia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, the Republic of Moldova, Morocco, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Syria, Tunisia and Ukraine. These are countries whose hopes and futures make a direct and significant difference to the EU. Recent events have brought this into sharper relief, highlighting the challenges that the EU and these countries face together. The overthrow of long-standing repressive regimes in Egypt and Tunisia; the ongoing military conflict in Libya, the recent violent crackdown in Syria, continued repression in Belarus and the lingering protracted conflicts in the region, including in the Middle East, require the EU to look afresh at the its relationship with its neighbours. The Lisbon Treaty has allowed the EU to strengthen the delivery of its foreign policy: co-operation with neighbouring countries can now be broadened to cover the full range of issues in an integrated and more effective manner. This was a key driver for initiating a review, in consultation with partner countries and other stakeholders, of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in summer 2010. Recent events and the results of the review have shown that EU support to political reforms in neighbouring countries has met with limited results. A new approach is needed to strengthen the partnership between the EU and the countries and societies of the neighbourhood: (i) to build and consolidate healthy democracies, and (ii) pursue sustainable economic growth and manage cross-border links. CONTENT : the new approach in the framework of the ENP aims to: provide greater support to partners engaged in building deep democracy and other civil and human rights that many Europeans take for granted, such as the freedom of thought, conscience and religion; support inclusive economic development – so that EU neighbours can trade, invest and grow in a sustainable way, reducing social and regional inequalities, creating jobs for their workers and higher standards of living for their people; strengthen the two regional dimensions of the European Neighbourhood Policy, covering respectively the Eastern Partnership and the Southern Mediterranean, so that we can work out consistent regional initiatives in areas such as trade, energy, transport or migration and mobility complementing and strengthening our bilateral co-operation; provide the mechanisms and instruments fit to deliver these objectives. The major themes of this new approach are the following: 1) Supporting progress towards deep democracy : the Commission proposes to adapt levels of EU support to partners according to progress on political reforms and building deep democracy. It suggests the following actions: (i) support deep and sustainable democracy; (ii) establish a partnership with societies, with the establishment of a European Endowment for Democracy to help political parties, non-registered NGOs and trade unions and other social partners; (iii) intensifying our political and security co-operation to enhance EU involvement in solving protracted conflicts, mainly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and other conflicts in the Middle East, the South Caucasus, the Republic of Moldova and Western Sahara. 2) Supporting sustainable social and economic development : this involves mainly proposals to: support partner countries' adoption of policies conducive to stronger, sustainable and more inclusive growth, to the development of micro, small and medium-sized companies and to job creation; strengthen industrial cooperation and support improvements to the business environment; help to organise events to promote investment; promote direct investment from EU SMEs and micro-credit; build on the pilot regional development programmes to tackle economic disparities between regions; launch pilot programmes to support agricultural and rural development; enhance the macro-economic policy dialogue with partners making the most advanced economic reforms; improve the effectiveness of Macro-Financial Assistance by streamlining its decision-making process; enhance dialogue on employment and social policies. 3) Building effective regional partnerships : the EU offers partnership to each individual neighbour through a single policy, based on mutual accountability. The eastern and southern dimensions of the ENP seek to complement that single policy by fostering regional cooperation and developing regional synergies and responses to the specific geographic, economic and social challenges of each region. -Strengthening the Eastern Partnership : in the area, the EU will : move to conclude and implement Association Agreements including DCFTAs; pursue democratisation; pursue the visa facilitation and liberalisation process; enhance sectoral cooperation, notably in the area of rural development; promote benefits of the Eastern Partnership to citizens; increase work with civil society and social partners. -Building the Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity in the Southern Mediterranean : the joint Communication on a Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity in the Southern Mediterranean outlined first elements of the EU’s offer of a new partnership with partners engaged in building democracies and extensive reforms. The three main directions along which the EU intends to further develop its relations with its Mediterranean partners are carried over into this communication: democratic transformation and institution-building; a stronger partnership with the people; and sustainable and inclusive economic development. The long-term vision for our most advanced Mediterranean partners is close political association with the EU and economic integration into the Internal Market. In the short term, Comprehensive Institution-Building programmes similar to those implemented with its Eastern neighbours will be set up to support democratic transformation. The Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) which complements the bilateral relations between the EU and partners should enhance its potential to organise effective and result-oriented regional cooperation. 4) Policy and programme framework : the Commission proposes focusing ENP Action Plans and EU assistance on a smaller number of priorities, backed with more precise benchmarks. While ENP Action Plans remain the framework for our general cooperation, the EU will suggest to partners that they focus on a limited number of short and medium-term priorities, incorporating more precise benchmarks and a clearer sequencing of actions. In terms of funding, the EU shall: i) re-focus and target foreseen and programmed funds in the ENPI as well as other relevant external policy instruments in the light of this new approach; (ii) provide additional resources of over EUR 1 billion until 2013 to address the urgent needs of our neighbourhood ; (iii) mobilise budgetary reinforcement from various sources; (iv) swiftly proceed with submitting concurring budget proposals to the Budget Authority. Implementing the new approach of the neighbourhood policy based on mutual accountability and a shared commitment to the universal values of human rights, democracy and the rule of law requires additional resources of up to EUR 1242 million until 2013. These resources are in addition to the EUR 5700 million provided under the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument for 2011-2013. Additional resources will be provided through reallocations from within Heading 4 of the 2007-2013 multi-annual financial framework , and by making use of the unallocated margin under the expenditure ceiling in 2012 and - to the extent necessary - through the Flexibility Instrument. The Commission will submit an Amending Letter to Draft Budget 2012 shortly. Planning for 2013 and beyond : the Commission proposes to : i) promote more flexible and simpler aid delivery under the post-2013 successor to the present ENPI; ii) step up efforts of co-ordination between the EU, its Member States and other key IFIs and bilateral donors. The key source of funding, the new European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), will provide the bulk of financial support to partner countries, essentially through bilateral, regional and cross border co-operation programmes.
  • date: 2011-09-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-06T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted conclusions emphasising the importance of strengthened transport cooperation and better transport connections with neighbouring regions covered by the Enlargement and European Neighbourhood policies , in particular the Western Balkans, the Mediterranean region and the Eastern Partnership countries, with a view to bringing about deeper economic integration and closer political association. To achieve these goals, the Council advocates improvement of transport infrastructure, especially by: better linking of the infrastructure of neighbouring countries with the trans-European transport network, and closer integration of transport markets, in particular by extending the European Common Aviation Area, removing barriers in maritime transport, increasing interoperability of railway systems and streamlining border crossing and administrative procedures. The Council is, however, stressing that closer market integration will depend on neighbouring countries' readiness to do so and on their progress in applying safety, security, environmental and social standards equivalent to those of the EU . The existing financial resources such as the Neighbourhood Investment Facility, which can leverage funding from international financial institutions, should be used to help those countries make the necessary reforms. Moreover, the Council welcomes the establishment of an Eastern Partnership Transport Panel, due to be launched at the Eastern Partnership ministerial conference on 24-25 October in Krakow (Poland).
  • date: 2011-11-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-400&language=EN title: A7-0400/2011 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Marek SIWIEC (S&D, PL) and Mário DAVID (PPE, PT) on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Members began by recalling that it is in the highest interest of the EU to be ambitious in economic cooperation and adopt a mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible strategy based on support for democratic transitions and defence of human rights, towards its southern neighbourhood. In this new context, relations with these countries should be given fresh impetus, based on cooperation focusing on democracy and prosperity on both shores of the Mediterranean, and not only security and migration control. Accordingly, Members welcome the Joint Communications of the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on ‘ A new response to a changing Neighbourhood ’ and ‘ A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean ’ and the approach presented therein. Acknowledging the European aspirations and the European choice of some partners, the committee insists that tangible and credible incentives should be given to the neighbourhood countries to engage in the common goal of building deep democracy, and that differentiation based on each country’s political, economic and social realities, performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable and regularly monitored benchmarks for each individual partner country. Recalling the objectives of development cooperation, it asks the Commission and the EEAS to work towards eradicating poverty. At the same time, it looks for a strengthened network of institutional arrangements, which is stable, economical and dedicated to developing closer economic integration and political association among all those involved. The report raises several points with regard to the revision of the ENP: (1) Deep democracy and partnership with societies : Members advocate measures to strengthen the values of democracy, human rights, the rule of law, the fight against corruption, the market economy and good governance. These include: · strengthening civil society (which will benefit, between 2011 and 2013 from a budget of EUR 22 millions with the Facility being more substantially funded in the next Multiannual Financial Framework; · the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy (EED), which should complement already existing EU instruments and should involve a right of scrutiny and the involvement of the European Parliament in its governance structure; · a ‘more for more’ performance-based approach; · human rights dialogues conducted with all partner countries, including strengthening freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism, and access to the Internet; · an annual assessment of the situation as well as the outcomes of the dialogues should be included in the annex to the annual progress report of each partner country with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed; · strengthening women's participation and that of young people and respecting the rights of the child’; · full and effective respect for the freedom of religion (at individual, collective, public, private and institutional level) should be identified as a priority, as well as the development of democratically oriented political parties with women in positions of responsibility; · enhancing the visibility of the EaP and UfM projects in the partner countries. At the same time, Members insist that the international community freeze its financial assistance to the Belarusian regime until all detained and arrested opposition leaders, journalists, presidential candidates and their supporters are released and cleared of charges and rehabilitated. They urge the European Union to reorient towards society and increase its assistance to Belarus in order to address the needs of the population. (2) Sustainable economic and social development : generally, Members call on the EU to encourage structural reforms in the economic, social and legal arenas as part of its support for democratic transitions noting emphatically the close interweaving of democratic and socio-economic development. They call for immediate measures, to alleviate the situation of the countries currently facing significant socioeconomic crises, with special regard to partner countries where democratic transition aggravates economic difficulties, if all parties involved commit themselves to verifiable compliance in each specific case with the social, environmental and labour standards applicable internationally and in the EU. Others measures recommended are as follows: · the promotion of sub-regional cooperation and cross-border projects (particularly the development of South-South’ and ‘East-East’ trade and economic integration among the countries concerned; · the strengthening of administrative capacity building in employment and social affairs ensuring that the minimum wage according to national practices provides an adequate standard of living for workers and their families · embracing the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) as the guiding policy framework for medium-term pro-poor economic growth. (3) Association agreements : Members underline the opportunity that negotiations on Association Agreements provide to boost reforms. They should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks, which should be regularly monitored. As well as real and tangible incentives for the partners. They invite ENP partner countries to move forward on creating the conditions that will allow the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) ensuring that international conventions on labour laws and child labour are monitored. The committee notes that a European perspective, and the membership aspirations of Eastern Partnership countries pursuant to article 49 of the TEU, constitutes a driving force for reforms in these countries and further strengthens their commitment to shared values and principles such as democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance. It believes that the conclusion of Association Agreements can be an important step towards further political engagement and a stronger relationship with Europe. It reaffirms that, for the Southern partnership, the aim is to bring the two shores of the Mediterranean closer together with a view to establishing an area of peace, democracy, security and prosperity for their 800 million inhabitants. Members would like to see DCFTAs as the first step towards a big ‘Euro-Mediterranean Economic Space’, and they call on the Commission and the Council to facilitate the implementation of the six packages of measures outlined in the Commission document of 30 March 2011 concerning the monitoring of trade and investment initiatives for the benefit of partners on the Southern shore of the Mediterranean. (4) Sectoral cooperation : Members recommend further cooperation in sectors such as industry, SMEs, research, development and innovation, ICT including security of IT systems, space, and tourism and stress the benefits of joint research programming initiatives by the EU and its neighbours. They welcome the reinforcement of the energy cooperation dimension of the ENP . They consider it necessary to step up energy efficiency and the promotion of renewable energy, to strengthen energy supply and nuclear safety measures, particularly in regions that are prone to high seismic activity. The committee welcomes the proposal for the creation of a European Energy Community and believes that it could be an important step towards cooperation with our neighbours. It emphasises the strategic significance of the Nabucco project and of its swift implementation, as well as of liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation under the AGRI project. The report draws attention, furthermore, to the supporting role which the EU could play in tackling environmental problems in neighbouring countries, particularly in eliminating large stocks of ‘obsolete pesticides’, which can cause large-scale chemical pollution. Further cooperation in the transport sector, international, regional and interregional cultural cooperation, education and sport is also considered to be essential. Members call on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus programme , an initiative which – assuming that it were successful – would be suitable to extend to the neighbourhood as a whole. In addition, the Commission should take over take over Parliament’s proposal to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme. They reaffirm the great support for the EU-funded project of ENP scholarships to the university graduates from the ENP and the EU at the College of Europe. (5) Migration policy : overall, Members recall that the EU should improve the management and maximise the mutual benefits of migration for development, inter alia by providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU and dealing with the root causes of irregular migration in the partner countries. The Union needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships , which take account of the demographic, sociological and occupational balance on both sides, and encouraging exchanges of specialists between the EU and third countries. The EU should advance its work on visa facilitation and readmission agreements on a parallel basis in the utmost transparency with a view to moving – gradually and on a case-by-case basis, once all conditions are met – to a visa-free regime. Reaffirming the principle of ‘non-refoulement’as part of European asylum policy, Members insist that the Union shall facilitate access to EU funding for projects to inform migrants about their rights and responsibilities, including unaccompanied minors, women and other vulnerable groups and make every effort to facilitate the development of an accessible, fair and protective EU asylum system. (6) Regional dimension : Members reiterate their firmly held view that the European Neighbourhood Policy will not be wholly effective unless synergy is created between its bilateral and multilateral dimensions. The multilateral dimension of the EaP should be further strengthened and developed, including the Civil Society Forum; notes the importance of establishing a constructive dialogue with Turkey and Russia on regional issues of common interest and particularly as far as security issues are concerned. Members consider that the territorial cooperation principles apply also to external borders and are a key tool to improve EU economic development as well as the EU’s overall ENP political goals. They consider that the new ENP approach must allow the EU’s macro-regional strategies and that the potential of the EU macro-regions which include EU neighbouring countries should be fully used for better coordination of priorities and projects of common interest to the EU and the ENP countries in order to achieve mutually positive results and to optimise invested resources. Members insist on the following issues: to boost Euroregions’ within the European Neighbourhood Policy; the high potential of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) involving regions beyond the external borders; take into account the role of the outermost regions in the EU external relations policy; the importance of further fostering regional cooperation in the Black Sea space and developing further the EU Black Sea Strategy. Members stress the importance of the Union for the Mediterranean as a permanent forum for dialogue and cooperation and an instrument for the promotion of democracy. The UfM should promote sound economic, social and democratic development and create a strong and common basis for a close regional cooperation between the EU and its Southern neighbours. Members welcome the increase in the overall budget of the Neighbourhood Investment Facility. They call on the Commission and the EEAS to explore opportunities for an institutional interlink between the ENP and the neighbourhood policies of key regional players, above all Turkey. (7) Conflict resolution : the report recalls that peaceful resolution of regional military conflicts, including so called frozen ones, is the essential precondition for democracy consolidation, respect for human rights, prosperity and economic growth, and thus should be of the highest interest to the EU. The EU should get more involved and play a more active, coherent and constructive role in the resolution of regional conflicts, inter alia via the EEAS, by developing more confidence-building measures, reconciliation and mediation. Political cooperation should be intensified for the purposes of security and combating terrorism and individual forms of extremism. Members believe that intercultural and inter-religious dialogue is crucial to enhancing mutual understanding, respect, solidarity and tolerance with and among the neighbourhood partner countries. They insist on the need to keep a regional approach and welcomes the decision both to appoint an EUSR for the South Caucasus and for the Southern Mediterranean Region and to establish a task force for the Southern Mediterranean. A similar task force for the South Caucasus should be considered and a proactive role of the EU in the Transnistria talks. (8) Parliamentary dimension : Members reaffirm that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EURONEST and the PA-UfM, are crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence-building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves, and therefore greatly contribute to the achievement of the goals of the Eastern Partnership and the Union for the Mediterranean. They call on the EEAS and the Commission to associate EURONEST members to the maximum extent possible with the multilateral structures and platforms of the EaP and insist on the need to recognise the PA-UfM as a legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM. The report calls on the EC to provide enhanced financial, technical and expert support to the EaP countries’ national parliaments’ administrations within the Comprehensive Institution Building programme in order to strengthen their efficiency, transparency and accountability, which is crucial if the parliaments are to play their proper role in the democratic decision making processes. It confirms its openness to welcome representatives of the Belarusian Parliament in EURONEST as soon as parliamentary elections in Belarus are considered democratic by the international community, including the OSCE. Funding : Members welcome the proposal for the new European Neighbourhood Instrument and the increase of funding for the ENP, as requested in its previous resolutions. The distribution of funds should be flexible and adequate for both regions while keeping the regional balance. They considers that maintaining a reasonable balance between East and South components is important, especially since Eastern neighbouring countries are in the process of implementing Eastern Partnership related programmes and reforms and have an EU perspective. Members demand a sizeable increase in the Heading 4 ceiling of the EU budget for the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument , given that over the last years despite some progress in promoting enhanced cooperation and progressive economic integration between the European Union and the partner countries, more needs to be done as new challenges and areas for cooperation emerge. Moreover, Members underline that the reallocation of appropriations needed for the increased funding for the ENP should be based on clear priorities and should therefore not be to the detriment of the Union’s only crisis response and peace-building tool , the Instrument for Stability, as proposed by the Commission. They emphasise that the funding of the ENP should not be affected by the current sovereign debt crisis. Other measures are suggested such as: Integration Facility to support civil society in the European Neighbourhood, the allocation of resources on a limited number of clearly defined priorities and measurable objectives, the provision of budget support if and only if there are guarantees of sound financial management in the countries concerned, mobilisation by the ENP countries themselves, their own domestic resources, in order to establish transparent systems of taxation, involve the private sector, local governments and civil society effectively in the ENP agenda and aim for their greater ownership of ENP projects. In parallel, Members call, in the light of the Arab Spring as well as the retreat from democracy in some of the Eastern partnership countries, for a specific self-critical evaluation of the financial instruments used in the past within the ENPI, with regard to their functioning in the fields of democracy, human rights, governance, fighting corruption, institution-building and support to civil society. They are of the firm conviction that financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA must also be examined in the context of this review and be subject to long-term programming, as an integral part of the Neighbourhood Policy. They do not consider the argument valid that the political instability in the region and the specificities of the peace process only allow provisional programming and case-by-case reinforcement. Given the current pressing needs, especially in the Southern neighbourhood, Members call, for a swift agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the proposal for reinforcing the Neighbourhood Instrument over the period 2012 to 2013 . They also insists that the Council should adopt without further delay the legislative proposal to amend Article 23 of the ENPI Regulation, which would make it possible to reinvest funds returned following past operations. Lastly, they call on the Commission to consider alternative ways to ensure additional risk capital funds to be immediately made available through the EIB, for both the Southern and the Eastern dimensions.
  • date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20901&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-576 title: T7-0576/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Members began by recalling that it is in the highest interest of the EU to be ambitious in economic cooperation and adopt a mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible strategy based on support for democratic transitions and defence of human rights, towards its southern neighbourhood. In this new context, relations with these countries should be given fresh impetus, based on cooperation focusing on democracy and prosperity on both shores of the Mediterranean, and not only security and migration control and should provide itself with flexible and properly funded instruments in order to match its ambitions and events in the regions. Accordingly, Members welcome the Joint Communications of the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on ‘ A new response to a changing Neighbourhood ’ and ‘ A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean ’ and the approach presented therein. Acknowledging the European aspirations and the European choice of some partners, Parliament insists that tangible and credible incentives should be given to the neighbourhood countries to engage in the common goal of building deep democracy. For its part, the EU should apply the principle of differentiation based on each country's political, economic and social realities. Performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable and regularly monitored benchmarks for each individual partner country. Recalling the objectives of development cooperation, Parliament asks the Commission and the EEAS to work towards eradicating poverty. It supports the consolidation in the ENP of previously separated strands of foreign and assistance policy in order to develop closer economic integration and political association among all those involved. At the same time, the new neighbourhood policy should aim to strengthen stability and economic integration by focusing on the following points: -Deep democracy and partnership with societies : Parliament advocates measures to strengthen the values of democracy, human rights, the rule of law, the fight against corruption, the market economy and good governance. These include: strengthening civil society (which will benefit, between 2011 and 2013 from a budget of EUR 22 millions with the Facility being more substantially funded in the next Multiannual Financial Framework; the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy (EED), which should complement already existing EU instruments and should involve a right of scrutiny and the involvement of the European Parliament in its governance structure; a ‘more for more’ performance-based approach to continue to encourage all types of political reform; a annual assessment of the situation on human rights (particularly women’s rights) with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed; human rights dialogues conducted with all partner countries, including strengthening freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism, and access to the Internet; strengthening women's participation and that of young people and respecting the rights of the child’; full and effective respect for the freedom of religion (at individual, collective, public, private and institutional level) should be identified as a priority, as well as the development of democratically oriented political parties with women in positions of responsibility; enhancing the visibility of the EaP and UfM projects in the partner countries. At the same time, Members insist that the international community freeze its financial assistance to the Belarusian regime until all detained and arrested opposition leaders, journalists, presidential candidates and their supporters are released and cleared of charges and rehabilitated. They urge the European Union to reorient towards society and increase its assistance to Belarus in order to address the needs of the population. -Sustainable economic and social development : generally, Members call on the EU to encourage structural reforms in the economic, social and legal arenas as part of its support for democratic transitions noting emphatically the close interweaving of democratic and socio-economic development. They call for immediate measures, to alleviate the situation of the countries currently facing significant socioeconomic crises, with special regard to partner countries where democratic transition aggravates economic difficulties, if all parties involved commit themselves to verifiable compliance in each specific case with the social, environmental and labour standards applicable internationally and in the EU. Others measures recommended are as follows: the promotion of sub-regional cooperation and cross-border projects (particularly the development of South-South’ and ‘East-East’ trade and economic integration among the countries concerned; the strengthening of administrative capacity building in employment and social affairs ensuring that the minimum wage according to national practices provides an adequate standard of living for workers and their families embracing the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) as the guiding policy framework for medium-term pro-poor economic growth. -Association agreements : Members underline the opportunity that negotiations on Association Agreements provide to boost reforms. They should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks, which should be regularly monitored. As well as real and tangible incentives for the partners. Parliament wants to move forward on creating the conditions that will allow the establishment of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs), subject to: (i) the necessary alignment of safety and quality specifications, to European standards, (ii) ensuring that international conventions on labour laws and child labour are monitored; (iii) assessment of the political, social and environmental circumstances of each country. Parliament notes that a European perspective, and the membership aspirations of Eastern Partnership countries pursuant to article 49 of the TEU, constitutes a driving force for reforms in these countries and further strengthens their commitment to shared values and principles such as democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance. It believes that the conclusion of Association Agreements can be an important step towards further political engagement and a stronger relationship with Europe. It reaffirms that, for the Southern partnership, the aim is to bring the two shores of the Mediterranean closer together with a view to establishing an area of peace, democracy, security and prosperity for their 800 million inhabitants. Members would like to see DCFTAs as the first step towards a big ‘Euro-Mediterranean Economic Space’, and they call on the Commission and the Council to facilitate the implementation of the six packages of measures outlined in the Commission document of 30 March 2011 concerning the monitoring of trade and investment initiatives for the benefit of partners on the Southern shore of the Mediterranean. -Sectoral cooperation : Parliament calls for closer cooperation on matters such as job creation, and, in particular with regard to all policies and issues entailing a cross-border dimension. Members recommend further cooperation in sectors such as industry, SMEs, research, development and innovation, ICT including security of IT systems, space, and tourism and stress the benefits of joint research programming initiatives by the EU and its neighbours. They welcome the reinforcement of the energy cooperation dimension of the ENP . They consider it necessary to step up energy efficiency and the promotion of renewable energy, to strengthen energy supply. Parliament wants closer coordination on nuclear safety measures, particularly in regions that are prone to high seismic activity. It welcomes the proposal for the creation of a European Energy Community and believes that it could be an important step towards cooperation with our neighbours. It emphasises the strategic significance of the Nabucco project and of its swift implementation, as well as of liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation under the AGRI project. The resolution draws attention, furthermore, to the supporting role which the EU could play in tackling environmental problems in neighbouring countries, particularly in eliminating large stocks of ‘obsolete pesticides’, which can cause large-scale chemical pollution. Further cooperation in the transport sector, international, regional and interregional cultural cooperation, education and sport is also considered to be essential. Members call on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus programme , an initiative which – assuming that it were successful – would be suitable to extend to the neighbourhood as a whole. In addition, the Commission should take over take over Parliament’s proposal to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme. Members reaffirm the great support for the EU-funded project of ENP scholarships to the university graduates from the ENP and the EU at the College of Europe. -Mobility : overall, Members recall that the EU should improve the management and maximise the mutual benefits of migration for development, inter alia by providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU and dealing with the root causes of irregular migration in the partner countries. The Union needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships , which take account of the demographic, sociological and occupational balance on both sides, and encouraging exchanges of specialists between the EU and third countries. The EU should advance its work on visa facilitation and readmission agreements on a parallel basis in the utmost transparency with a view to moving – gradually and on a case-by-case basis, once all conditions are met – to a visa-free regime (particularly in the cultural sphere). Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to set up a structured dialogue with third country authorities in order to develop a win-win approach to mobility in order to guarantee equal and fair conditions for applicants in all Member States, focusing in particular on the effects of the interdependence between development aid, security, regular migration and irregular migration as defined in the Global Approach to Migration. It calls for special attention to be paid to ensuring that partner countries do not suffer from a ‘brain drain’. Reaffirming the principle of ‘non-refoulement’as part of European asylum policy, Members insist that the Union shall facilitate access to EU funding for projects to inform migrants about their rights and responsibilities, including unaccompanied minors, women and other vulnerable groups and make every effort to facilitate the development of an accessible, fair and protective EU asylum system. -Regional dimension : Members reiterate their firmly held view that the European Neighbourhood Policy will not be wholly effective unless synergy is created between its bilateral and multilateral dimensions. The multilateral dimension of the EaP should be further strengthened and developed, including the Civil Society Forum; notes the importance of establishing a constructive dialogue with Turkey and Russia on regional issues of common interest and particularly as far as security issues are concerned. Members consider that the territorial cooperation principles apply also to external borders and are a key tool to improve EU economic development as well as the EU’s overall ENP political goals. They consider that the new ENP approach must allow the EU’s macro-regional strategies and that the potential of the EU macro-regions which include EU neighbouring countries should be fully used for better coordination of priorities and projects of common interest to the EU and the ENP countries in order to achieve mutually positive results and to optimise invested resources. Members insist on the following issues: to boost ‘Euroregions’ within the European Neighbourhood Policy; the high potential of European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) involving regions beyond the external borders; take into account the role of the outermost regions in the EU external relations policy; the importance of further fostering regional cooperation in the Black Sea space and developing further the EU Black Sea Strategy. Members stress the importance of the Union for the Mediterranean as a permanent forum for dialogue and cooperation and an instrument for the promotion of democracy. The UfM should promote sound economic, social and democratic development and create a strong and common basis for a close regional cooperation between the EU and its Southern neighbours. Members welcome the increase in the overall budget of the Neighbourhood Investment Facility. They call on the Commission and the EEAS to explore opportunities for an institutional interlink between the ENP and the neighbourhood policies of key regional players, above all Turkey. -Conflict resolution : Parliament recalls that peaceful resolution of regional military conflicts, including frozen ones, is the essential precondition for democracy consolidation, respect for human rights, prosperity and economic growth, and thus should be of the highest interest to the EU. The EU should get more involved and play a more active, coherent and constructive role in the resolution of regional conflicts, inter alia via the EEAS, by developing more confidence-building measures, reconciliation and mediation. Political cooperation should be intensified for the purposes of security and combating terrorism and individual forms of extremism. Members believe that intercultural and inter-religious dialogue is crucial to enhancing mutual understanding among the neighbourhood partner countries. They stress the need for a task force for the South Caucasus and a proactive role of the EU in the Transnistria talks. Parliament supports the EU's humanitarian action in the eastern neighbourhood partner countries, but regrets that this action is not yet accompanied by a strengthening of the EU as a leading political actor in the Middle East which matches its decisive commitment to humanitarian aid. -Parliamentary dimension : Members reaffirm that the multilateral parliamentary assemblies, such as EURONEST and the PA-UfM, are crucial vectors of confidence- and coherence-building between the EU and the partner countries and among the partner countries themselves, and therefore greatly contribute to the achievement of the goals of the Eastern Partnership and the Union for the Mediterranean. They call on the EEAS and the Commission to associate EURONEST members to the maximum extent possible with the multilateral structures and platforms of the EaP and insist on the need to recognise the PA-UfM as a legitimate parliamentary institution of the UfM. Parliament calls on the EC to provide enhanced financial, technical and expert support to the EaP countries’ national parliaments’ administrations within the Comprehensive Institution Building programme in order to strengthen their efficiency, transparency and accountability, which is crucial if the parliaments are to play their proper role in the democratic decision making processes. It confirms its openness to welcome representatives of the Belarusian Parliament in EURONEST as soon as parliamentary elections in Belarus are considered democratic by the international community, including the OSCE. -Funding : Members welcome the proposal for the new European Neighbourhood Instrument and the increase of funding for the ENP, as requested in its previous resolutions. The distribution of funds should be flexible and adequate for both regions while keeping the regional balance. They consider that maintaining a reasonable balance between East and South components is important, especially since Eastern neighbouring countries are in the process of implementing Eastern Partnership related programmes and reforms and have an EU perspective. Members demand a sizeable increase in the Heading 4 ceiling of the EU budget for the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument , given that over the last years despite some progress in promoting enhanced cooperation and progressive economic integration between the European Union and the partner countries, more needs to be done as new challenges and areas for cooperation emerge. Moreover, Members underline that the reallocation of appropriations needed for the increased funding for the ENP should be based on clear priorities and should therefore not be to the detriment of the Union’s only crisis response and peace-building tool , the Instrument for Stability, as proposed by the Commission. They emphasise that the funding of the ENP should not be affected by the current sovereign debt crisis. Other measures are suggested such as: Integration Facility to support civil society in the European Neighbourhood, the allocation of resources on a limited number of clearly defined priorities and measurable objectives; the provision of budget support if and only if there are guarantees of sound financial management in the countries concerned; the need for a consistent approach in the assistance provided to neighbouring countries by each individual EU Member State and the EU within the ENP framework; mobilisation by the ENP countries themselves, their own domestic resources, in order to establish transparent systems of taxation, involve the private sector, local governments and civil society effectively in the ENP agenda and aim for their greater ownership of ENP projects. In parallel, Members call, in the light of the Arab Spring as well as the retreat from democracy in some of the Eastern partnership countries, for a specific self-critical evaluation of the financial instruments used in the past within the ENPI, with regard to their functioning in the fields of democracy, human rights, governance, fighting corruption, institution-building and support to civil society. They are of the firm conviction that financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA must also be examined in the context of this review and be subject to long-term programming, as an integral part of the Neighbourhood Policy. They do not consider the argument valid that the political instability in the region and the specificities of the peace process only allow provisional programming and case-by-case reinforcement. Given the current pressing needs, especially in the Southern neighbourhood, Members call for a swift agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the proposal for reinforcing the Neighbourhood Instrument over the period 2012 to 2013 . They also insists that the Council should adopt without further delay the legislative proposal to amend Article 23 of the ENPI Regulation, which would make it possible to reinvest funds returned following past operations. Lastly, they call on the Commission to consider alternative ways to ensure additional risk capital funds to be immediately made available through the EIB, for both the Southern and the Eastern dimensions.
  • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 150
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/7/06494
    New
    • AFET/7/06494
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy
    New
    6.40.15
    European neighbourhood policy
    procedure/title
    Old
    Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy
    New
    Review of the European neighbourhood policy
    activities/0/docs/0/celexid
    CELEX:52011DC0303:EN
    activities/0/docs/0/celexid
    CELEX:52011DC0303:EN
    activities
    • date: 2011-05-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=303 title: COM(2011)0303 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52011DC0303:EN body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document published commission:
    • date: 2011-09-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFCO date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: DAVID Mário group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 3116 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2011-10-06T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2011-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFCO date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: DAVID Mário group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
    • date: 2011-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-400&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0400/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20901&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-576 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0576/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFCO date: 2011-09-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DUFF Andrew
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-03-22T00:00:00 2011-03-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: DAVID Mário group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: S&D name: FÄRM Göran
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ECR name: MIGALSKI Marek Henryk
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2011-06-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: STRIFFLER Michèle
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2011-04-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: RAPTI Sylvana
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: MARCINKIEWICZ Bogdan Kazimierz
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: FLAUTRE Hélène
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2011-06-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/7/06494
      reference
      2011/2157(INI)
      title
      Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      Modified legal basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy