Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | SCHMIDT Olle ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the Annual Tax Report.
Recalling that effective taxation is of fundamental importance for public authorities, especially in Europe, Parliament considers is necessary to consolidate the tax system, together with fairer and more targeted distribution of the tax burden, is necessary to ensure fiscal credibility. It considers that the reduction of debt requires both expenditure restraint and tax increases, while growth-oriented tax changes must be given priority; whereas this will create the foundations for long-term growth.
Parliament notes that taxation is still a matter for national and in some cases local sovereignty and that Treaty changes would be necessary in order for decision-making on tax policies to be transferred from the national to the EU level . Under these circumstances, that an increase in scrutiny of budgetary procedures by the Commission should be mirrored by greater democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament .
The resolution makes certain recommendations on preventing double non-taxation, tax fraud and tax havens and increasing tax transparency. The main points are as follows:
some tax harmonisation could be a key factor for encouraging growth and job creation. Tax policies must aim to foster European competitiveness and lower costs for European business, particularly Small and Medium-sized Enterprises; Member States should make their tax systems more growth-friendly by improving tax design and implementing shifts towards less distortionary taxes while safeguarding the social market objective; it is necessary to simplify of VAT regimes in order to eliminate double taxation and bureaucracy for employers; a low tax level is essential not only for the social welfare of families and households but also for competitiveness and new jobs; stresses the need for controlled and efficient public spending and stable public finances; proposals from the Commission regarding taxation must contribute to European competitiveness by eliminating distortions of competition which arise from the various taxation systems in place; they must not contribute to increased tax burdens; in Member States with high deficits or which have suffered the worst decline in GDP growth, tax reforms should prioritise closing loopholes and broadening the tax base, without affecting the capacity of Member States to collect revenue ; that fiscal federalism might be a useful tool in order to achieve self-responsibility in tax management at regional level and so entails greater economic efficiency the Commission and Member States must cooperate further on their respective tax policies against double taxation, tax fraud and tax evasion; Member States should look to reduce the tax compliance costs for SMEs , where possible, by streamlining procedures and reducing bureaucratic costs; Member States should swiftly adopt the existing proposals and on the Commission to put forward proposals in line with the proposals made by the European Parliament on savings taxation, green and consumption taxation, avoidance of tax fraud, good governance and double taxation; a coordination of tax policies could be an important component of a fiscal consolidation strategy at EU level and improve the effectiveness of the Member States’ new tax policies.
In order to remove cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens , Parliament calls upon the Commission to:
share information about best practices in the EU Member States and in other OECD countries concerning tax information to citizens and businesses; propose ways of simplifying tax compliance in cross-border situations; more actively pursue complaints and ensure greater transparency and information for citizens on the results of complaints about Member States’ tax laws and infringement cases in the tax field, as well as on their follow-up; reinforce administrative cooperation among Member States in the field of double taxation, including by concentrating more projects and resources of the Fiscalis programme on solutions to taxpayers’ concrete problems.
Member States are asked to support the Commission’s plans to improve the coordination and cooperation with and between Member States’ tax administrations on appropriate solutions to prevent double taxation and other cross-border tax obstacles.
Stressing the need to remove discrimination and double taxation for EU citizens and businesses, the resolution welcomes the Commission’s idea of setting up a working group on double taxation problems, involving tax authorities of Member States and, where appropriate, consumer associations. It calls on the Commission to initiate a new VAT forum, and to propose a binding dispute settlement mechanism covering double taxation suffered by individuals and businesses.
Member States are asked to:
improve the procedures which allow Small and Medium-sized Enterprises to claim back more quickly VAT which they have paid, thus shortening the reimbursement period; modernise and update the rules on cross-border relief for companies and to simplify and modernise electronic invoicing rules with a view to ultimately creating a single ‘ European e-invoice template’ .
Lastly, in the area of tax fraud , the resolution notes that there is a need to strike a proper balance between the public interest in combating abuse, avoiding disproportionate restrictions on cross-border activity within the EU, and better coordinating the application of anti-abuse measures in relation to third countries. It regrets that some Member States have concluded agreements with third countries that permit the continuance of tax avoidance and tax secrecy.
Member States are called upon to:
set up and implement effective tax systems that prevent their tax bases from being unduly eroded because of inadvertent non-taxation and abuse; apply anti-abuse measures to target artificial arrangements designed to circumvent national legislation or Community rules as transposed into national legislation; continue to share information about aggressive tax planning schemes on corporate losses and their detection and response strategies, and to measure and then publish information on the effectiveness of the strategies used; consider the introduction of cooperative compliance programmes and the introduction or revision of disclosure initiatives targeted at aggressive tax planning schemes; finally conclude the reform of the Savings Tax Directive to enforce automatic information exchange, which has been blocked for some time in the Council, in order to ensure fair and appropriate taxation of savings in the EU; provide tax incentives for SMEs, such as tax exemptions and cuts, to encourage entrepreneurship, innovation and job creation; promote reforms to limit the room for tax evasion by establishing efficient revenue-collecting mechanisms.
Members ask Member States to give top priority to combating the use of tax havens for illicit purposes and calls on the Commission in cooperation with the European Parliament-taking into account, as a first step, the OECD definition and list of tax havens or secrecy jurisdictions -to establish an EU definition and list. It calls for a single European agreed definition, pending agreement on a definition at global level.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Olle SCHMIDT (ADLE, SE) on the Annual Tax Report.
For the first time the European Parliament decided to publish an Annual Tax report. The objective of the report is to feed in to the work of the Commission work programme for 2012.
The report focuses on the tax initiatives taken by the Commission during 2011 (such as on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, on a Financial Transaction Tax, on the future EU VAT system and on the field of energy) and on areas where further initiatives are necessary in order to improve the functioning of the Single market and to create a more competitive Europe.
The report also aims to address tax problems that EU citizens face in cross-border situations within the EU. This is the case for EU citizens working or investing in another EU Member State, who may encounter issues of double taxation and may have difficulties with obtaining allowances, tax reliefs or deductions from foreign tax authorities.
It also aims to examine areas where further tax coordination may be necessary and where the EU can play a role.
The committee notes that taxation is still a matter for national and in some cases local sovereignty and that Treaty changes would be necessary in order for decision-making on tax policies to be transferred from the national to the EU level . Under these circumstances, that an increase in scrutiny of budgetary procedures by the Commission should be mirrored by greater democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament.
The report makes certain recommendations on preventing double non-taxation, tax fraud and tax havens and increasing tax transparency. The main points are as follows:
· some tax harmonisation could be a key factor for encouraging growth and job creation. Tax policies must aim to foster European competitiveness and lower costs for European business, particularly Small and Medium-sized Enterprises;
· Member States should make their tax systems more growth-friendly by improving tax design and implementing shifts towards less distortionary taxes while safeguarding the social market objective;
· it is necessary to simplify of VAT regimes in order to eliminate double taxation and bureaucracy for employers;
· proposals from the Commission regarding taxation must contribute to European competitiveness by eliminating distortions of competition which arise from the various taxation systems in place; they must not contribute to increased tax burdens;
· in Member States with high deficits or which have suffered the worst decline in GDP growth, tax reforms should prioritise closing loopholes and broadening the tax base, without affecting the capacity of Member States to collect revenue ;
· the Commission and Member States must cooperate further on their respective tax policies against double taxation, tax fraud and tax evasion;
· Member States should look to reduce the tax compliance costs for SMEs , where possible, by streamlining procedures and reducing bureaucratic costs;
· Member States should swiftly adopt the existing proposals and on the Commission to put forward proposals in line with the proposals made by the European Parliament on savings taxation, green and consumption taxation, avoidance of tax fraud, good governance and double taxation;
· a coordination of tax policies could be an important component of a fiscal consolidation strategy at EU level and improve the effectiveness of the Member States’ new tax policies.
In order to remove cross-border tax obstacles for EU citizens , Members call upon the Commission to:
· share information about best practices in the EU Member States and in other OECD countries concerning tax information to citizens and businesses;
· propose ways of simplifying tax compliance in cross-border situations;
· more actively pursue complaints and ensure greater transparency and information for citizens on the results of complaints about Member States’ tax laws and infringement cases in the tax field, as well as on their follow-up;
· reinforce administrative cooperation among Member States in the field of double taxation, including by concentrating more projects and resources of the Fiscalis programme on solutions to taxpayers’ concrete problems.
Member States are asked to support the Commission’s plans to improve the coordination and cooperation with and between Member States’ tax administrations on appropriate solutions to prevent double taxation and other cross-border tax obstacles.
Stressing the need to remove discrimination and double taxation for EU citizens and businesses, the report welcomes the Commission’s idea of setting up a working group on double taxation problems, involving tax authorities of Member States and, where appropriate, consumer associations. It calls on the Commission to initiate a new VAT forum, and to propose a binding dispute settlement mechanism covering double taxation suffered by individuals and businesses.
Member States are asked to:
· improve the procedures which allow Small and Medium-sized Enterprises to claim back more quickly VAT which they have paid, thus shortening the reimbursement period;
· modernise and update the rules on cross-border relief for companies and to simplify and modernise electronic invoicing rules with a view to ultimately creating a single ‘European e-invoice template’.
Lastly, in the area of tax fraud , the report notes that there is a need to strike a proper balance between the public interest in combating abuse, avoiding disproportionate restrictions on cross-border activity within the EU, and better coordinating the application of anti-abuse measures in relation to third countries. It regrets that some Member States have concluded agreements with third countries that permit the continuance of tax avoidance and tax secrecy.
Members ask Member States to give top priority to combating the use of tax havens for illicit purposes and calls on the Commission in cooperation with the European Parliament-taking into account, as a first step, the OECD definition and list of tax havens or secrecy jurisdictions -to establish an EU definition and list. It calls for a single European agreed definition, pending agreement on a definition at global level.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)260
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0030/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0014/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE473.965
- Committee draft report: PE472.402
- Committee draft report: PE472.402
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE473.965
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)260
Activities
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Diogo FEIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Annual tax report (short presentation)
Amendments | Dossier |
170 |
2011/2271(INI)
2011/11/23
ECON
170 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation -1 (new) - having regard to the Communication of the European Commission "Double taxation in the single market" (COM(2011)712, and to the Proposal (recast) for a Council Directive on interest and royalty payments (COM(2011)714,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the tax burden in most Member States is disproportionately weighted on labour rather than on consumption;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to share information about best practices in
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to share information about best practices in Europe concerning information to citizens and businesses, to develop appropriate tools for exchange of information and to set up pilot projects which it will in due course assess with a view to ensuring that it is possible to derive long-term benefit from them as well;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to share information about best practices in Europe concerning information to citizens and businesses, to foster European competitiveness, to develop appropriate tools for exchange of information and to set up pilot projects;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recognises that certain MS have established simplified procedures for claiming tax refunds under their double taxation agreements, and that some MS have developed internet sites for non- residents or foreign taxpayers with information and forms in various languages, and calls for the deadlines for applying for tax refunds to be extended;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Commends the United Kingdom for its anti-carousel fraud mechanism in the mobile-phone and computer-hardware sectors, and invites the UK to share its expertise with other Member States in this field;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Asks the M
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Ask the MS to support the Commission’s plans to improve the coordination
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Notes that double taxation is a barrier to cross-border activities and investments and that there is need for coordinated solutions to overcome this problem; Calls upon the Commission in 2012 to come forward with some proposals;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and MS to find ways of removing tax obstacles to cross-border work and transnational mobility as soon as possible so that the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy – namely increased economic growth and employment – can be attained as soon as possible;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission to more actively pursue complaints and ensure greater transparency and information for citizens on the results of complaints about MS’ tax laws and infringement cases in the tax field, as well as on their follow-up;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas the administrative cost caused by tax systems to medium sized companies is unnecessarily burdensome and high in some Member States;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to reinforce the administrative cooperation among Members States in the field of double taxation, also by concentrating more projects and resources of the Fiscalis programme for the solutions of taxpayers concrete problems;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that it is in the interest of business and citizens to
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that it is in the interest of business and citizens to remove tax barriers within the single market since they are an obstacle to cross-border activities and investments
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Emphasises that it is in the interest of business and citizens to remove tax barriers within the single market as soon as possible since they are an obstacle to cross- border activities and investments in the EU;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Asks the Commission to create information and service centres based on the one-stop-shop principle and tasked with providing all requisite information about taxation as well as other services in the field of certificate and document issuing;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Emphasizes that double taxation reduces the competitiveness of the businesses affected as well as hinders the single market as a whole;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the Comm
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Believes that the EU Treaty obliges MS to resolve the issue of double taxation
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the current economic and financial crisis has led to a significant rise in public debt in Europe; in this context, the welfare state remains more relevant than ever to ensure growth and social cohesion;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Concludes that bilateral tax treaties between M
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Strongly opposes to the initiatives taken by the German and the British Governments to sign bilateral tax agreements with Switzerland The EC should take on behalf of the EU a strong initiative to conclude EU treatments with secrecy jurisdictions in order to close tax loopholes;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Asks the Commission to start a working group on double taxation problems, involving tax authorities of Member States and, where appropriate, consumer associations; calls on the Commission to strengthen the EU working group on business taxation, the Joint Transfer
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Asks the Commission to simplify the administrative procedures applied to bilateral and multilateral cross-border transactions in all the Member States, including by eliminating double taxation and using the administrative instruments designed to ensure the seamless application of the numerous existing agreements in that field;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Invites the EC further to take the proposals of the EP in the vat report on board, e.g. in guaranteeing a same vat treatment for different transport modes as well as for e-books and physical books;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls on the MS to improve the procedures which allows Small and Medium Enterprises to claim-back VAT paid faster; thus shortening the reimbursement period;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the Commission to propose a
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that administrative obstacles and legal uncertainty make if difficult for EU citizens to move freely with their cars within the single market; calls therefore on M
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on M
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the current economic and financial crisis with its origin in market deregulation has led to a significant rise in public debt in Europe; whereas speculation on public debt has further aggravated the crisis in Europe;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that tax
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that the lack of tax transparency and the failure to eliminat
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Notes that the lack of tax transparency and
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Believes that EU fund distribution should take into account the taxation strategy of Member States and their willingness to cooperate in combating tax evasion and promoting tax harmonisation;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Asks the Commission to consider the introduction of tax equalisation mechanisms, enabling workers who change their place of work between countries within the EU on a frequent basis to continue paying tax to a single tax authority, preferably that of the country where the worker is registered for social security purposes;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Notes that the lack of coordination of tax policies for businesses in the EU is leading to a bottom race in tax rates eroding tax revenues;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Notes that there is a need to strike a proper balance between the public interest in combating abuse, avoiding disproportionate restrictions on cross- border activity within the EU, and better coordinating the application of anti-abuse measures in relation to third countries; regrets that some Member States have concluded agreements with third countries which permit the continuance of tax avoidance and tax secrecy, while hampering efforts by the EU to achieve a comprehensive settlement;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Acknowledges the fact that fiscal federalism gives incentives to regions to be responsible for their own resources and so can be a useful tool in order to fight against tax fraud;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Calls upon the EU to give top priority combating the use of tax havens for illicit purposes;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – introductory part 28. Calls on MS and regional authorities to
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the current
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 1 a (new) introduce wealth taxes or levies in order to make society as a whole contribute to the damages caused by the financial crisis in Europe;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 3 continue to share information about aggressive tax planning schemes on corporate losses, their detection and response strategies, and measure and then publish information on the effectiveness of the strategies used;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 4 a (new) · implement administrative cooperation and exchange of information that is not violating the taxpayers' procedural rights and right to privacy, and to develop appropriate mechanisms to ensure citizens' rights to lodge an appeal against any violations that would have incurred to them as a result;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 · finally conclude the reform of the Savings Tax Directive, which has been blocked for some time in the Council, in order to ensure fair and appropriate taxation of savings in the EU; stresses that the all affected jurisdictions must offer automatic information exchange in full and this must be extended to companies and trusts and not just be applied to individuals;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 · finally conclude the reform of the Savings Tax Directive to generalise automatic information exchange, which has been blocked for some time in the Council, in order to ensure fair and appropriate taxation of savings in the EU;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 a (new) · reconsider, if they have eliminated taxes on wealth, their reintroduction especially considering the information losses that its elimination has caused, and the consequences for tax evasion;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 a (new) · notify and make public tax rulings by national authorities for companies operating cross boarder;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 a (new) · provide tax incentives for SMEs, such as tax exemptions and cuts, to encourage entrepreneurship, innovation and job creation;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 b (new) · promote reforms designed to ensure a more effective and fairer tax system meeting market needs arising from the economic crisis, as well as individual needs and the needs of social cohesion;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 – point 5 c (new) · promote reforms to limit the room for tax evasion by establishing efficient revenue- collecting mechanisms that minimize the relation between the taxpayer and the tax authorities and maximize the use of modern technology and focus on e-governance in recording and monitoring economic activity;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas effective taxation is of fundamental importance for public authorities, especially in Europe, to fulfil their tasks and obligations as well as citizens' expectations; whereas it is also an instrument for wealth distribution and the eradication of poverty;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 1 a (new) · tackle tax fraud more seriously, by taking the initiative to negotiate on behalf of the EU strict agreements with tax havens starting from the principle of an automatic data exchange between states;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 1 b (new) · underline the need to set up a European tax authority, in charge of the collection and automatic exchange of fiscal data in the EU;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 · provide
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 a (new) · tackle harmful tax competition and double non taxation of large companies that artificially shift profits to minimise the effective tax rate. Particular focus should be put on well known harmful practices such as the "Double Irish", the "Dutch Sandwich", the Maltese ACIT, the Hungarian fixed profit allocation to branch income combined with an exemption of the branch profit, the abuse of the Spanish ETVE etc;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 a (new) · to tackle tax fraud stricter, by criminal prosecuting;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 b (new) · identify - in the absence of a meaningful international definition and corresponding list of tax havens or secrecy jurisdictions - the appropriate legislative vehicle to establish an EU definition and a list, starting from the assumption that secrecy jurisdictions are places that intentionally create regulation for the primary benefit and use of those not resident in their geographical domain, designed to undermine the legislation or regulation of another jurisdiction. To facilitate its use, secrecy jurisdictions also create a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that ensures that those from outside the jurisdiction making use of its regulation cannot be identified to be doing so. In sum, secrecy jurisdictions are amongst other things assumed to be characterised by no or nominal taxes, a lack of effective exchange of information with foreign tax authorities and a lack of transparency in legislative, legal or administrative provisions;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 b (new) · to define clearly tax havens as secrecy jurisdictions which create intentionally regulation for the primary benefit and use of those not resident in their geographical domain. This regulation is designed to undermine the legislation or regulation of another jurisdiction. Tax havens also create a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that ensures that those from outside the jurisdiction making use of its regulation cannot be identified to be doing so;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – point 2 c (new) · conclude anti-fraud and tax information exchange agreements with Andorra, Monaco and San Marino and a new agreement with Switzerland;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Ask the Commission to promote minimum rates for the taxation of corporations;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas states with high deficits are currently facing the need to apply measures to increase their taxes, those measures should not be harmful to growth;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Acknowledges that the OECD's Global Forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes is one of the leading international forums for combating tax
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Acknowledges that the OECD
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Calls upon the European Union to give top priority to combat the use of the so-called tax havens for illicit purposes, including banning EU institutions and other bodies from making financial transactions through foreign non- cooperative jurisdictions characterised notably by no or nominal taxes; a lack of effective exchange of information with foreign tax authorities; and a lack of transparency in legislative, legal or administrative provisions or as identified by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) or the Financial Action Task Force (FATF);
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Asks the Commission for more swift action towards tax evasion and fraud;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Calls on
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Concludes that a lack of cooperation and coordination between Member States' tax systems may result in unintended non- taxation and lead to tax avoidance, abuse and fraud;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Regrets that the European Semester lacks democratic legitimacy due to the minor role assigned to the European Parliament and the marginal involvement of National Parliaments, thus depriving citizens of their right to express their views on the European Semester through their elected representatives at both the national and European level; Calls on the Commission to analyse the fiscal implications of the implementation of the European Semester and publish a report during 2012;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Calls on the Commission to analyse the fiscal implications of the implementation of the European Semester and publish a report during 2012; In the context of the European Semester, calls on the Commission to put revenue generation through just taxation and expenditure reduction on an equal footing;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Calls for adequate budgetary resources and staffing to be provided to the European Court of Auditors and OLAF to develop efficient control mechanisms and oversight of budgetary procedures at EU level;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Calls on the European Commission to identify and give priority of policy measures that have fiscal implications of the MS Stability and Convergence Programmes and National Reform Programmes;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 b (new) 32b. Concludes that the EU institutions need to adapt to the new economic policy coordination cycle, and that the Union's budget as well as the individual budgets of the many EU institutions and bodies shall be subjected to the same level of transparency and public accountability as is now required under the European Semester from Member States;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas comprehensive and sustained fiscal consolidation
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas comprehensive and sustained fiscal consolidation is necessary to restore fiscal credibility
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 – having regard to the Commission's Recommendation on Withholding Tax Relief Procedures (COM (2009)7
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas off-shore centres and tax havens facilitate an annual illicit capital flight of US$1 trillion; whereas these illicit monetary outflows are roughly ten times the amount of aid money going into developing countries for poverty alleviation and economic development; Whereas tax havens that offer secrecy rules and fictional domiciles combined with ‘zero tax’ regimes in order to attract capital and revenues that should have been taxed in other countries generate harmful tax competition;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas fiscal federalism inside Member States has been a great economic success when applied, with a relevant increase in tax self-responsibility both for the regions involved and the central government, and so the possibility to extend this policy to other regions in Europe should therefore be thoroughly studied;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas sustainable exit from the fiscal crisis and enhancing of EU growth require not only rationalising of public expenditure by targeting it to investments of high added value , but also a progressive shift of tax burden from labour and productive investments to sectors with important negative externalities;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas rendering the VAT system fraud-proof must be a key priority, given the massive losses incurred by Member States; whereas particular attention needs to be paid to "carousel" fraud;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas existing environmental taxation is insufficient to ensure the internationalisation of externalities, in particular with regards to pollution, loss of biodiversity and CO2 emissions;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas globalization has led to increasing difficulties in combating fiscal fraud at an international level;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 a (new) The economic and financial crisis impacts on EU tax systems
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Notes that the essential role of taxes is to raise revenue in order to make available goods and services to citizens and to further pursuit social objectives by internalizing externalities, modifying harming behaviours and redistributing income and wealth in accordance with the citizens’ preference for the size of their public sector;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls that taxation serves to Finance public services such as education, healthcare, public transports and infrastructures, etc. Protect public goods, by incentivizing for example the production and consumption of environmentally-friendly products; Bring down social inequalities, by ensuring a more equal distribution of income and wealth across the board;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 21 a (new) - having regard to the Report of the European Parliament on a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud (2008/2033(INI)),
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Notes that improving the single market is the key factor for encouraging growth and job creation;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation is still a matter for national sovereignty and that the different structures of the Member States'
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation is still a matter for national and in some cases regional sovereignty, and that the different structures of theses regions and Member States' (MS) tax systems should therefore be respected; notes that Treaty changes would be necessary in order for decision- making on tax policies to be transferred from the national to the EU level;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Notes that taxation is still a matter for national sovereignty and that the different structures of the Member States’ (MS) tax systems should therefore be respected; notes that Treaty changes – and therefore complete agreement among the Member States – would be necessary in order for decision-making on
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that tax policies must aim to foster European competitiveness and lowers costs for European business, namely for Small and Medium Enterprises;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes a lack of coordination of tax policies in the EU that can lead to significant costs and administrative burdens for citizens and businesses operating cross-border within the EU
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes a lack of coordination of tax policies in the EU
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas stimulating growth and fostering completion, broadening and deepening of the EU
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that direct taxation is better adapted to mitigate negative social impact and contribute instead to a fairer and more equitable society via a progressive redistribution of wealth; underlines that progressive and fair taxation can be an effective tool to increase citizens' trust in public authorities and democracy as such; notes that it is not tolerable for a modern and developed society that the strongest and most wealthiest are not forced to contribute to the funding of the State's tasks in a way that corresponds to their capacities;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that both EMU and the internal market require a stronger shift towards tax harmonisation. Believes such a move to be critical in the current context, in which Member States need to consolidate their budgets; notes that tax competition is acceptable only as long as it does not jeopardise the capacity of Member States to collect revenue;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that in areas where it is considered necessary to increase tax coordination, Member States' subsidiarity with respect to the actual tax rates and eligible tax allowances should be respected;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls upon the Member States to make their tax systems more growth-friendly by improving tax design and implementing shifts towards less distortionary taxes while safeguarding the social market objective;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that fruitful lessons can be learnt for all by the examples of those Member States where taxation and the collection of tax have proven track- records;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that the core function of the tax systems are to finance public services, such as child care, education, health care, police, public transports and infrastructure; Notes that taxes mainly are used for financing pensions and social security systems;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Reminds that sufficiently high taxation of assets can contribute to bridging the rising gap between rich and poor in our societies as well as encourage real economy investment, employment creation and contribute to more stability in the financial sector;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Underlines the need for a simplification of VAT regimes in order to eliminate double taxation and bureaucracy for employers;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Calls for proposals from the Commission regarding the establishment of one-stop-shops for VAT, thereby simplifying for small and medium sized enterprises active in cross-border trade;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Calls for the Commission to take initiatives together with Member States to achieve a VAT system adapted to conditions of the digital market and digital services in order to facilitate the development of the European digital market and create the best preconditions for the development of European digital services;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the EU's internal market with mobility of persons, services, goods and capital is not fully functioning and there are still areas that need to be improved;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 e (new) 2e. Underlines that a low tax level is essential not only for the social welfare of families and households but also for competitiveness and new jobs; stresses the need for controlled and efficient public spending and stable public finances;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 f (new) 2f. Underlines that proposals from the Commission regarding taxation must contribute to European competitiveness by eliminating distortions to competition which arise from the various taxation systems in place; also underlines that Commission proposals must not contribute to increased tax burdens;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will have to explore carefully and the roots of their deficits and increase tax revenues through higher taxes, pursue expenditure reductions and increase public savings taking due consideration to social and economic effects of any such measures; notes that solidarity among EU MS can also be necessary in order to overcome serious budgetary and interlinked economic problems;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS w
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that M
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will have to increase tax revenues through
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will have to increase tax revenues through higher taxes, pursue expenditure reductions, fight against tax fraud and increase public savings;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will have to increase tax revenues
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes that MS with high deficits will have to increase tax revenues through higher taxes,
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that the 'six pack' is over focussing on the expenditure side; underlines the need to focus on the revenue side. In this respect underlines the crucial role of new sources of income. Reiterates therefore the necessity of a strong FTT and energy tax in order to redesign the tax system and try as much as possible to shift taxation from labour to other factors of production in accordance with the union’s growth and employment strategy. Asks the EC to evaluate efforts in this respect of the different MS in this field in the framework of the EU semester; Recalls that indirect taxation, although less noticeable for the taxpayer, hence easier to implement is less progressive and more distorting than direct taxation; Recalls that, especially during the crisis we are experiencing since 2008, ensuring the adequate funding of the welfare state is of outmost importance to maintain social cohesion but also to ensure long term growth by maintaining health and education systems which increase the human capital of the population;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Introducing the FTT, the Commission should find still more precise measures to prevent tax evasion, for example by expanding the residence principle as already used as a basis for the application of the FTT in COM 2011/594. The transaction should not only be taxable in the EU in the case that one of the counterparties is settled in the EU, but also in the case that the orderer is settled in the EU, whereas double taxation has to be prevented;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that fiscal federalism is the best tool in order to achieve self- responsibility in the tax management at regional level and so entails a higher economic efficiency;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Takes note of the recent initiatives of the Commission in the field of taxation, such as, on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, on a Financial Transaction Tax and on the field of energy;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Believes that excessive deficits at the regional level are sometimes related to a lack of relation between tax revenue and tax expenditure, that at the same time impede the creation of the necessary environment to build a self-sustaining growth model;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Welcomes the introduction of the European Semester as a possible revenue generator for the MS by the mean of the exchange of best practices for a more coordinated and sustainable fiscal path;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Ask the Commission and Member States to move forward the introduction of a FTT at worldwide level whereas income should be used to reach the Millennium Development Goals;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Asks the Commission and M
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Asks the Commission and MS to cooperate in order to increase transparency and reduce loopholes and uncertainties for businesses and citizens with regard to tax collection; calls on them to ensure that they do not increase bureaucracy excessively as a result;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas there is a clear need to reduce the significant VAT compliance gap between the theoretical and actual tax revenue;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Contends that Member States should look to reduce the tax compliance costs for SMEs, where possible, by streamlining procedures and reducing bureaucratic costs;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to place a greater duty of accountability on privately run companies that receive or have received public monies;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes that Member States have different corporate tax bases which can in practice function as trade barriers to growth and employment;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Supports the proposal from the Commission to introduce an EU-wide voluntary common consolidated corporate tax base, CCCTB, in the EU which would not involve harmonisation of tax rates and would not therefore interfere with tax competition;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes that the administrative cost per net revenue varies among Member States; consequently, calls on Member States to compare results and improve efficiency;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Stresses that the CCCTB would improve growth and lead to more jobs in Europe by reducing the administrative costs and reduce red tape for companies, particularly for small businesses operating in several EU countries;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals on corporate taxation, green and consumption taxation, good governance and double taxation; in line with the proposals made by the EP in its initiative reports on these subjects;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the MS to swiftly adopt existing and the Commission to put forward additional proposals on corporate taxation, savings taxation, FTT, green and consumption taxation, good governance and double taxation;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals on corporate taxation, green and consumption taxation, avoidance of tax fraud, good governance and double taxation;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas excessive debt in the MS has triggered the current financial crisis and;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to put forward proposals on corporate taxation, green and consumption taxation, good governance and double taxation which Member States can apply in their fiscal policies in accordance with their different tax systems;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Emphasizes that the Directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation recognizes that the mandatory automatic exchange of information without preconditions is the most effective means of enhancing the correct assessment of taxes in cross-border situations and of fighting fraud. Urges the EU to defend within the G20 and OECD a system of information by automatic exchange on tax matters to ensure aspects of transparency and to fight against fiscal fraud;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Whereas the current economic and financial crisis has led to significant raise of public debt in Europe. The reduction of huge public debt requires both expenditure restraint and tax increases;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. The European Parliament defines a Tax Haven as any place which fulfils the following criteria: (a) a country or jurisdiction imposes no or only nominal taxes (generally or in special circumstances) and offers itself, or is perceived to offer itself, as a place to be used by non-residents to escape tax in their country of residence; (b) a country lacks transparency in tax matters; (c) a country's legislation or administrative practices prevent the effective exchange of information for tax purposes with other governments on taxpayers benefiting from the no or nominal taxation; (d) a country or jurisdiction does not require substantial activity for corporations registered on its territory;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Points out that the Member states who suffered the worst decline in GDP growth were the ones who had to increase their taxes the most. In general, the Members states that were able to cut taxes were the ones who managed to avoid a negative growth less than 4 % of GDP[1]; [1] EC publication ‘Taxation Trends in the EU’ (2011 Edition).
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Asks the Commission to elaborate an inclusive strategy on the fight against international tax evasion and tax heavens; considers that the elaboration of an annual list of tax heavens and effective prosecution of European companies and citizens making use of tax heavens must be core elements of such a strategy;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls upon the Member States to make their tax systems more growth-friendly by improving tax design and implementing shifts towards less distortionary taxes while safeguarding the social equity objective;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Welcomes the Commission's proposal for the introduction of an EU Financial Transaction Tax. Asks the Commission to carry on its efforts for establishing the Financial Transaction Tax as proposed in COM 2011/594. Asks the Council to make quick and constructive negotiations on the implementation of a European FTT possible. Calls for the introduction of a European FTT until 2013 whereas may Euro area countries be required to go ahead. Considers though that the implementation of an EU 27 FTT must remain a core objective of European taxation policies. Underlines that the FTT must be an instrument to replace the current trend to austerity policies in the EU and serve the fight against poverty and the preservation of high quality public services;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Stresses the importance of avoiding increased taxes on income, corporate and capital gains, as they tend to be harmful to growth. The focus should instead be to rebalance the tax system towards taxing immobile tax bases, as for example property, and items with negative external effects such as carbon dioxide;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 e (new) 5e. Asks the Commission to consider rising the tax rate from 0.01 % on financial products as defined in article 6 of COM 2011/594 to 0.05 % and from 0.1 to 0.3 % on financial products as defined in article 5 of COM 2011/594, whereby a considerable part of the additional revenue should be used to reach the Millennium Development Goals. The Member States on the other hand should not reduce their own effort in reaching the MDG;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas according to the Europe 2020 strategy for intelligent, sustainable and inclusive growth, growth and job creation must not be achieved without strengthening, deepening and broadening the single market, and therefore one of its fundamental aims is the creation of the single market for 21st century Europe;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 e (new) 5e. Recognises that Member states were more focused to increase their expenditure than cut taxes in their approach to fight recession. However, some Member states made some tax cuts mainly on labour taxation;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 f (new) 5f. Calls upon Member States to reduce labour taxes in order to enable the Europe 2020 goal of an employment rate of 75 %[1]. Due to the fact that low employment numbers in several Member states seems to coincide with high taxation on labour; [1] EC publication ‘Taxation Trends in the EU’ (2011 Edition).
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 g (new) 5g. Acknowledges that EU-27 in relation to countries like the U.S and Japan had a much higher overall tax-to-GDP ratio in 2009, 38,4 % compare to 24 % and 28,1 %[1]; [1] EC publication ‘Taxation Trends in the EU’ (2011 Edition).
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 h (new) 5h. Concludes that a coordination of tax policies could be an important component of a fiscal consolidation strategy at EU level and improve the effectiveness of the Member States new tax policies;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that eliminating tax obstacles can play an important role in increasing citizens' ability and confidence to work, retire, shop and together with enterprises to invest in the EU;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to present legislative proposals in order to reduce the VAT compliance gap and therefore achieve greater fiscal efficiency;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes that the Commission wants to increase its efforts to ensure that all EU citizens have access to information and advice they need on tax rules within the EU;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Notes that Member States have agreed that citizens should have better access to tax information;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Underlines the importance of ensuring that citizens do note face tax obstacles to exercising the freedoms in the Internal Market;
source: PE-473.965
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.402New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-472402_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE473.965New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-473965_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120202&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-02-02-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-14&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0014_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-30New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0030_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/06967New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|