Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE) | SONIK Bogusław ( PPE), ESTRELA Edite ( S&D), BÉLIER Sandrine ( Verts/ALE), EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE), GIRLING Julie ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | PECH | RIVELLINI Crescenzio ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | DĂNCILĂ Viorica ( S&D) | Julie GIRLING ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | BEARDER Catherine ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | JORDAN Romana ( PPE) | Vicky FORD ( ECR), Jens ROHDE ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Commission presents the mid-term review of the EU Biodiverstiy Strategy to 2020, which takes stock of progress in implementing the EU biodiversity strategy against the 2010 baseline.
The report recalls that the opportunity cost of not reaching the 2020 EU biodiversity headline target has been estimated at up to EUR 50 billion a year . One in six jobs in the EU depend to some extent on nature. At around EUR 5.8 billion, the annual costs of maintaining the EU Natura 2000 network, established under the Habitats Directive , are but a fraction of the economic benefits generated by the network through services such as carbon storage, flood mitigation, water purification, pollination and fish protection, together worth EUR 200-300 billion annually.
Summary of progress since 2011 : the mid-term review assessing progress under the EU biodiversity strategy shows that the 2020 biodiversity targets can only be reached if implementation and enforcement efforts become considerably bolder and more ambitious.
Overall, as compared with the EU 2010 biodiversity baseline, biodiversity loss and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU have continued , as confirmed by the 2015 European environment - state and outlook report. This is consistent with global trends and has serious implications for the capacity of biodiversity to meet human needs in the future. While many local successes demonstrate that action on the ground delivers positive outcomes, these examples need to be scaled up to have a measurable impact on the overall negative trends. Since the last reporting period, the number of species and habitats of EU importance with secure/favourable or improved conservation status has increased slightly. Populations of some common birds appear to be stabilising but other species linked to fragile freshwater, coastal and agricultural ecosystems continue to decline. 70 % of EU species are threatened by habitat loss. While some ecosystem services (in particular provisioning) are increasing, others such as pollination are decreasing. The key threats to biodiversity — habitat loss (in particular through urban sprawl, agricultural intensification, land abandonment, and intensively managed forests), pollution, over-exploitation (in particular fisheries), invasive alien species and climate change — continue to exert pressure causing loss of species and habitats and resulting in ecosystem degradation and weakening ecosystem resilience. The EU-28 footprint is still over twice its biocapacity and this compounds pressures on biodiversity outside Europe. The report also notes that favourable conservation status assessments of forest habitats of European importance have decreased from nearly 17 % to about 15 % in the latest assessment. The vast majority of assessments remain unfavourable (80 %) but results vary considerably across Europe’s biogeographical regions, with the highest proportion of favourable assessments being found in the Mediterranean region.
Outlook : the Commission makes the following points:
progress has been made in establishing important policy frameworks: the new Common Fisheries Policy, the Invasive Alien Species ( which cause damage of at least EUR 12 billion a year to EU sectors) and Timber Regulation , and the introduction of biodiversity provisions in bilateral trade agreements, to name just a few. The reformed Common Agricultural Policy provides opportunities for enhanced integration of biodiversity concerns but the extent of take-up by Member States will be decisive for success. The Commission has supported efforts made by Member States, regional and local authorities and stakeholders in enforcing environmental legislation, addressing policy gaps, providing guidelines, funding, promoting partnerships and fostering research and the exchange of best practice.
It is now urgent to intensify the implementation of measures across all targets and to ensure that the principles included in the policy frameworks are fully reflected on the ground.
Achieving the 2020 biodiversity objectives will require strong partnerships and the full engagement and efforts from key actors at all levels, in particular with respect to completing the Natura 2000 network for the marine environment, ensuring effective management of Natura 2000 sites and implementing the Invasive Alien Species Regulation , and considering the most suitable approach for recognizing our natural capital throughout the EU.
Achieving this target will also require more effective integration with a wide range of policies, by setting coherent priorities underpinned by adequate funding — in particular in the sectors of agriculture and forestry which together account for 80% of land use in the EU , as well as marine, fisheries and regional development . EU financing instruments can assist in the process. Achieving biodiversity objectives will also contribute to the growth and jobs agenda, food and water security, and to quality of life, as well as to the implementation of sustainable development goals globally and in the EU.
The European Parliament adopted by 452 votes to 172, with 36 abstentions, a resolution in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020’.
Parliament deplores the fact that the EU failed to meet its 2010 biodiversity target. It supports the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, including all its targets and actions and takes the view, nevertheless, that some actions may have to be strengthened and specified more clearly , and that more concrete measures should be deployed in order to ensure effective implementation of the strategy.
Members welcome the Commission communication on Biodiversity 2020, and note that climate change, biodiversity loss, threats from invasive species and overconsumption of natural resources are transnational and transregional challenges which affect every EU citizen, whether living in an urban or a rural area, and that urgent action is needed at every level of government – local, regional and national – in order to mitigate these effects. Member States are invited, therefore, to integrate the strategy into their plans, programmes and/or national strategies.
The main recommendations made by the European Parliament are as follows:
Mainstreaming biodiversity in all EU policies : Parliament highlights the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, implementation and funding of all other EU policies – including those on agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation, research and innovation – in order to make the EU’s sectoral and budgetary policies more coherent and ensure that it honours its binding commitments on biodiversity protection.
The resolution states that:
the EU Biodiversity Strategy should be fully integrated into the strategies for the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate change; protecting, valuing, mapping and restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services is essential in order to meet the goals of the Roadmap to a Resource-Efficient Europe , and calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider, as part of specific measures, presenting a timetable for mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU which will enable targeted and efficient measures to be taken to halt the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services; given that the loss of biodiversity has devastating economic costs for society, the Commission and the Member States should value ecosystem services and to integrate these values into accounting systems as a basis for more sustainable policies.
Conserving and restoring nature : the resolution emphasises the need to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature conservation legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status at EU level.
Regretting that, in the EU only 17% of habitats and species and 11% of key ecosystems protected under EU legislation are in a favourable state, Members call on the Commission to analyse, as a matter of urgency, why current efforts have not yet succeeded and to consider whether other, potentially more effective instruments are available .
Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to undertake to adopt integrated strategies in order to identify each geographical area’s natural values and the features of its cultural heritage, as well as the conditions necessary for maintaining them. It considers it necessary to have digitised, accessible maps containing accurate information about the principal natural resources, protected areas, land uses, water bodies and areas at risk, in order to facilitate compliance by regional and local authorities with environmental legislation, especially that relating to biodiversity.
The resolution also stresses that, in order to establish a clear pathway to achieving the 2050 vision, at least 40 % of all habitats and species must have a favourable conservation status by 2020 . It recalls that, by 2050, 100 % (or almost 100 %) of habitats and species must have a favourable conservation status.
In this regard, the resolution:
urges the Member States to ensure that the process of designating Natura 2000 sites is finalised by 2012; the Commission and the Member States are called upon to ensure proper conservation of the Natura 2000 network through adequate funding for those sites. It also calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure proper conservation of the Natura 2000 network through adequate funding for those sites; calls, in particular, on the Member States to develop binding national instruments in cooperation with the different stakeholders, through which they define priority conservation measures and state the relevant planned source of financing (whether from EU funds or Member States' own budgets); highlights the urgent need to step up efforts to protect oceans and marine environments , both through EU action and by improving international governance of oceans and areas beyond national jurisdiction; underlines the need to organise biodiversity awareness and information campaigns for all ages and social categories, on the understanding that awareness campaigns for children and adolescents should, as a priority, be organised at school ; recommends extending governance to the mobilisation of citizens, and also to non-profit organisations and economic actors, with the emphasis, in the case of the latter, being on integrating biodiversity into company strategies.
Members stress the need to invest more in research on biodiversity , including in relation to one or more of the relevant ‘societal challenges’ addressed by Horizon 2020.
Maintain and restore ecosystems and their services : the resolution notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020. Members regard this as a minimum, however, and wish the EU to set a considerably higher restoration target reflecting its own more ambitious headline target and its 2050 vision, taking into account country-specific natural conditions.
The Commission is urged to:
adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection as a primary objective; underlines that this strategy should address objectives relating to urban as well as rural areas; develop an effective regulatory framework based on the ‘No Net Loss’ initiative, taking into account the past experience of the Member States while also utilising the standards applied by the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme; devote particular attention to species and habitats whose ‘functions’ are of priceless economic value.
The resolution recognises the need to promote green infrastructure , eco-innovation and the adoption of innovative technologies in order to create a greener economy, and calls on the Commission to draw up good practice guides in this area.
Agriculture : Parliament stresses that the CAP is not confined to the aim of food provision and rural development, but is a crucial tool for biodiversity, conservation, mitigation of climate change, and maintenance of ecosystem services. It considers it regrettable, however, that these measures have so far failed to halt the overall decline in biodiversity in the EU and that farmland biodiversity is in continued decline. It calls therefore, for a reorientation of the CAP towards the provision of compensation to farmers for the delivery of public goods, since the market is currently failing to integrate the economic value of the important public goods agriculture can deliver.
Members call for the greening of Pillar I of the CAP in order to ensure the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improve connectivity and adapt to the effects of climate change. The resolution calls for:
all CAP payments, including those made from 2014, to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules which help to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services, covering the Birds and Habitats Directives (without watering down the current standards applicable from 2007 to 2013), pesticides and biocides legislation and the Water Framework Directive; a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements in all Member States to the environmental focus of that pillar and to the effectiveness of its agri-environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory spending on environmental measures – such as agri-environmental measures, Natura 2000 and forest environment measures – and support for High Nature Value and organic farming; the inspection of agricultural practices to be strengthened in order to prevent biodiversity loss; maintains, in particular, that discharges of slurry should be controlled and even prohibited in the most sensitive areas in order to preserve ecosystems.
Parliament calls on the Commission, in the context of the new CAP reform, to step up its efforts in support of agricultural sectors which make a proven contribution to preserving biodiversity, and in particular the bee-keeping sector.
Forestry : the resolution calls for specific action with a view to achieving Aichi Target 5, whereby the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, should be at least halved by 2020 and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation significantly reduced.
Fisheries : Members welcome the Commission’s proposals for the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which should guarantee the implementation of the ecosystem approach and the application of updated scientific information serving as the basis for long-term management plans for all commercially exploited fish species. They emphasise that only by securing the long-term sustainability of fish stocks can we ensure the economic and social viability of the European fisheries sector.
Invasive alien species : in addition, they call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas. They urge the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien plant and animal species in order to establish a common EU policy on the prevention, monitoring, eradication and management of these species and on rapid alert systems in this area.
Financing : Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to identify all existing environmentally harmful subsidies , according to objective criteria, and calls on the Commission to publish, by the end of 2012, an action plan (including a timetable) on how to phase such subsidies out by 2020 in line with the Nagoya commitments.
The resolution also emphasises:
the importance of mobilising both EU and national financial support from all possible sources, including the creation of a specific instrument to finance biodiversity, and of developing innovative financial mechanisms – in particular habitat banking in conjunction with offsetting – in order to reach the targets set in the area of biodiversity; the imperative need to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020) dedicates at least 1 % of resources to environmental protection and supports efforts to achieve the six targets set out in the Biodiversity Strategy, and that funding for the LIFE programme is stepped up.
Members note, furthermore, that the enormous economic value of biodiversity offers a worthwhile return on the investment in its conservation. They call, therefore, for an increase in funding for nature conservation measures.
Lastly, Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States, with a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, to ensure that at least EUR 5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ADLE, NL) in response to the Commission communication entitled ‘Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020’.
The committee deplores the fact that the EU failed to meet its 2010 biodiversity target. It supports the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, including all its targets and actions and takes the view, nevertheless, that some actions may have to be strengthened and specified more clearly , and that more concrete measures should be deployed in order to ensure effective implementation of the strategy.
Mainstreaming biodiversity in all EU policies : Members highlight the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, implementation and funding of all other EU policies – including those on agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation, research and innovation – in order to make the EU’s sectoral and budgetary policies more coherent and ensure that it honours its binding commitments on biodiversity protection.
The report states that:
the EU Biodiversity Strategy should be fully integrated into the strategies for the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate change; protecting, valuing, mapping and restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services is essential in order to meet the goals of the Roadmap to a Resource-Efficient Europe , and calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider, as part of specific measures, presenting a timetable for mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU which will enable targeted and efficient measures to be taken to halt the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services; given that the loss of biodiversity has devastating economic costs for society, the Commission and the Member States should value ecosystem services and to integrate these values into accounting systems as a basis for more sustainable policies.
Conserving and restoring nature : the report emphasises the need to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature conservation legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status at EU level.
Regretting that, in the EU only 17 % of habitats and species and 11 % of key ecosystems protected under EU legislation are in a favourable state, Members call on the Commission to analyse, as a matter of urgency, why current efforts have not yet succeeded and to consider whether other, potentially more effective instruments are available .
Members call on the Commission and the Member States to undertake to adopt integrated strategies in order to identify each geographical area’s natural values and the features of its cultural heritage, as well as the conditions necessary for maintaining them. They stress that, in order to establish a clear pathway to achieving the 2050 vision, at least 40 % of all habitats and species must have a favourable conservation status by 2020 . The report recalls that, by 2050, 100 % (or almost 100 %) of habitats and species must have a favourable conservation status.
In this regard, the report:
urges the Member States to ensure that the process of designating Natura 2000 sites is finalised by 2012; the Commission and the Member States are called upon to ensure proper conservation of the Natura 2000 network through adequate funding for those sites; highlights the urgent need to step up efforts to protect oceans and marine environments , both through EU action and by improving international governance of oceans and areas beyond national jurisdiction; underlines the need to organise biodiversity awareness and information campaigns for all ages and social categories, on the understanding that awareness campaigns for children and adolescents should, as a priority, be organised at school ; recommends extending governance to the mobilisation of citizens, and also to non-profit organisations and economic actors, with the emphasis, in the case of the latter, being on integrating biodiversity into company strategies.
Members stress the need to invest more in research on biodiversity , including in relation to one or more of the relevant ‘societal challenges’ addressed by Horizon 2020.
Maintain and restore ecosystems and their services : the report notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020. Members regard this as a minimum, however, and wish the EU to set a considerably higher restoration target reflecting its own more ambitious headline target and its 2050 vision, taking into account country-specific natural conditions. Members recognise, however, that it is unlikely that a more ambitious EU target for the restoration of degraded ecosystems will be a stimulus to more ambitious international and national commitments, within or outside the CBD.
The Commission is urged to:
adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection as a primary objective; underlines that this strategy should address objectives relating to urban as well as rural areas; develop an effective regulatory framework based on the ‘No Net Loss’ initiative, taking into account the past experience of the Member States while also utilising the standards applied by the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme; devote particular attention to species and habitats whose ‘functions’ are of priceless economic value.
The report recognises the need to promote green infrastructure , eco-innovation and the adoption of innovative technologies in order to create a greener economy, and calls on the Commission to draw up good practice guides in this area.
Agriculture : the committee stresses that the CAP is not confined to the aim of food provision and rural development, but is a crucial tool for biodiversity, conservation, mitigation of climate change, and maintenance of ecosystem services. It considers it regrettable, however, that these measures have so far failed to halt the overall decline in biodiversity in the EU and that farmland biodiversity is in continued decline. It calls therefore, for a reorientation of the CAP towards the provision of compensation to farmers for the delivery of public goods, since the market is currently failing to integrate the economic value of the important public goods agriculture can deliver.
Members call for the greening of Pillar I of the CAP in order to ensure the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improve connectivity and adapt to the effects of climate change. The report calls for:
all CAP payments, including those made from 2014, to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules which help to preserve biodiversity and ecosystem services, covering the Birds and Habitats Directives (without watering down the current standards applicable from 2007 to 2013), pesticides and biocides legislation and the Water Framework Directive; a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements in all Member States to the environmental focus of that pillar and to the effectiveness of its agri-environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory spending on environmental measures – such as agri-environmental measures, Natura 2000 and forest environment measures – and support for High Nature Value and organic farming; the inspection of agricultural practices to be strengthened in order to prevent biodiversity loss; maintains, in particular, that discharges of slurry should be controlled and even prohibited in the most sensitive areas in order to preserve ecosystems.
The committee calls on the Commission, in the context of the new CAP reform, to step up its efforts in support of agricultural sectors which make a proven contribution to preserving biodiversity, and in particular the bee-keeping sector.
As regards forestry , the report calls for specific action with a view to achieving Aichi Target 5, whereby the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, should be at least halved by 2020 and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation significantly reduced.
Members welcome the Commission’s proposals for the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which should guarantee the implementation of the ecosystem approach and the application of updated scientific information serving as the basis for long-term management plans for all commercially exploited fish species. They emphasise that only by securing the long-term sustainability of fish stocks can we ensure the economic and social viability of the European fisheries sector.
In addition, they call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures are taken to prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas. They urge the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien plant and animal species in order to establish a common EU policy on the prevention, monitoring, eradication and management of these species and on rapid alert systems in this area.
Financing : the committee calls on the Commission and the Member States to identify all existing environmentally harmful subsidies , according to objective criteria, and calls on the Commission to publish, by the end of 2012, an action plan (including a timetable) on how to phase such subsidies out by 2020 in line with the Nagoya commitments.
The report also emphasises:
the importance of mobilising both EU and national financial support from all possible sources, including the creation of a specific instrument to finance biodiversity, and of developing innovative financial mechanisms – in particular habitat banking in conjunction with offsetting – in order to reach the targets set in the area of biodiversity; the imperative need to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020) dedicates at least 1 % of resources to environmental protection and supports efforts to achieve the six targets set out in the Biodiversity Strategy, and that funding for the LIFE programme is stepped up.
Members note, furthermore, that the enormous economic value of biodiversity offers a worthwhile return on the investment in its conservation. They call, therefore, for an increase in funding for nature conservation measures.
Lastly, the committee calls on the Commission and the Member States, with a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, to ensure that at least EUR 5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding.
The Council had an exchange of views and adopted conclusions on the implementation of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020.
Following the Environment Council conclusions of June 2011, endorsing the Strategy as proposed in the Commission's communication, the present conclusions constitute the second political response of the Council, intervening in the context of ongoing negotiations on the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020 and at a time when other EU policies which are relevant to the achievement of the EU biodiversity headline target by 2020 - in particular the Common Agricultural Policy, the Common Fisheries Policy and the Cohesion Policy – are undergoing a reform process.
Without prejudging the outcomes of these negotiations, the Council stressed the need to integrate biodiversity concerns into all EU and national sectoral policies, in order to reverse the continuing trends of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. It confirms the importance of mobilising both EU and national financial resources from all possible sources as appropriate, including innovative financial mechanisms, in order to ensure adequate levels of funding towards meeting biodiversity objectives for example by providing incentives to attract private sector investments.
The conclusions concern in particular the measures required to reach the main objectives of the Strategy:
Target 1: Fully implement the Birds and Habitats Directives : the Council encourages the Member States to complete, in a timely manner, the establishment of the Natura 2000 network, develop and implement management plans or other equivalent instruments which set out conservation objectives, as well as if appropriate, restoration measures for Natura 2000 sites, including in the marine environment, thereby establishing a solid basis for strategic planning with a view to the subsequent implementation of the MFF 2014-2020.
Target 2: Maintain and Restore Ecosystems and their Services : the Council stresses the need of maintaining, restoring as far as feasible and enhancing ecosystems and their services. They call on the Commission to consider, within the scope of the Green Infrastructure Strategy under preparation, among others, the following issues:
possible scope and key components of GI; possible framework for GI implementation based on existing experience, particularly in spatial planning, including coastal; methodological issues related to GI, including with regard to spatial connectivity between protected areas and basic requirements for the delivery of the necessary ecosystem services; options to integrate GI in existing policy instruments and importance of GI in terms of climate change adaptation; identifying opportunities for financing GI; communication and promotion of GI targeting different stakeholders and sectors, and in particular local authorities.
The Council stresses the importance of ensuring appropriate funding at EU and Member States level for maintenance and restoration of ecosystems and their services. It agrees that a common approach is needed for the implementation in the EU of the ‘ no net loss’ principle.
Target 3: Increase the contribution of Agriculture and Forestry to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity : the Council encourages conservation and sustainable use of all genetic resources, especially genetic resources for food, agriculture and forestry. It calls on the Member States to encourage the widespread adoption and implementation of Forest Management Plans or equivalent instruments, inter alia, through effective application of rural development measures, and stresses the importance to include in forest management plans or equivalent instruments appropriate measures for conservation and recovery of protected species and habitats within as well as beyond Natura 2000 areas.
Target 4: Ensure the sustainable use of Fisheries Resources : the Council supports the ongoing efforts to protect and sustainably use of fish populations and aquatic genetic resources in seas and inland waters, including aquaculture. It calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen efforts for the collection of scientific data on fish populations, where these are deficient, in order to provide stronger scientific advice.
The Member States are called upon to make sure that their activities comply with the requirements for achieving favourable conservation status of species and habitats in the Birds and Habitats Directives as well as for achieving good environmental status of the marine environment in accordance with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
Target 5: Combat Invasive Alien Species (IAS) : the Council reiterates the need for an EU strategy on IAS including a dedicated legislative instrument on IAS by 2012 , which should consider all aspects of the challenge posed by IAS, including their identification and prioritisation, control and eradication as well as management of their pathways following a risk-based approach and in a proportionate and cost-effective manner.
Target 6: Help Avert Global biodiversity loss : the Council considers it necessary for the Commission and Member States to develop specific initiatives to reduce the negative impacts on natural resources of the EU consumption and production patterns, and to ensure that biodiversity concerns are systematically reflected in all relevant trade agreements concluded by the EU, where appropriate, and in the Union's development cooperation actions and programmes.
The Commission is called upon to:
include, as part of its work to reform, reorient and/or eliminate environmentally harmful subsidies by 2020, criteria for identification of subsidies harmful to biodiversity at EU level, and to prepare a road map for the achievement of this objective, taking into account the specificities of each Member State; deliver on the commitments made at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP 10) in Nagoya; present a proposal, based on the results of the impact assessment and as regards matters falling within EU competence, for the timely ratification and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation on behalf of the EU in preparation for the first Meeting of the Parties; continue promoting a common approach to nature conservation in the whole EU territory, including Member States' outermost regions and overseas territories which are home to several important global biodiversity hotspots.
Lastly, the Council invites the Commission to develop and agree with Member States a common implementation framework to underpin the effectiveness of the Strategy. It calls on the Commission to report back on the progress on the development of the common implementation framework to the Council in early 2012.
PURPOSE: to provide a framework for action to enable the EU to reach its 2020 biodiversity target and set it on the right path to attain the 2050 vision.
BACKGROUND: biodiversity loss is the most critical global environmental threat alongside climate change — and the two are inextricably linked.
Current rates of species extinction are unparalleled . Driven mainly by human activities, species are currently being lost 100 to 1000 times faster than the natural rate: according to the FAO, 60% of the world's ecosystems are degraded or used unsustainably; 75% of fish stocks are over-exploited or significantly depleted and 75% of the genetic diversity of agricultural crops has been lost worldwide since 1990.
An estimated 13 million hectares of tropical forests are cleared each year and 20% of the world’s tropical coral reefs have already disappeared, while 95% will be at risk of destruction or extreme damage by 2050 if climate change continues unabated.
In the EU, only 17% of habitats and species and 11% of key ecosystems protected under EU legislation are in a favourable state . This is in spite of action taken to combat biodiversity loss, particularly since the EU 2010 biodiversity target was set in 2001.
The EU mandate : in March 2010, EU leaders recognised that the 2010 biodiversity target would not be met despite some major successes, such as establishing Natura 2000, the world’s largest network of protected areas. They therefore endorsed the long-term vision and ambitious headline target proposed by the Commission in its Communication ‘Options for an EU vision and target for biodiversity beyond 2010’.
2050 vision : by 2050, European Union biodiversity and the ecosystem services it provides — its natural capital — are protected, valued and appropriately restored for biodiversity's intrinsic value and for their essential contribution to human wellbeing and economic prosperity, and so that catastrophic changes caused by the loss of biodiversity are avoided. 2020 headline target : halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restoring them in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss.
The global mandate : the tenth Conference of the Parties (CoP10) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), held in Nagoya in 2010, led to the adoption of a global Strategic Plan for biodiversity 2011-2020, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation (ABS Protocol), and a strategy to mobilise resources for global biodiversity. The EU 2020 biodiversity strategy responds to both mandates, setting the EU on the right track to meet its own biodiversity objectives and its global commitments.
CONTENT: t his strategy is aimed at reversing biodiversity loss and speeding up the EU's transition towards a resource efficient and green economy . It is an integral part of the Europe 2020 Strategy, and in particular the resource efficient Europe flagship initiative .
The 2020 Biodiversity strategy includes six mutually supportive and inter-dependent targets that respond to the objectives of the 2020 headline target. Each target is broken down into a package of actions designed to respond to the specific challenge addressed by the target.
Target 1: Conserving and restoring nature : to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status so that, by 2020, compared to current assessments: (i) 100% more habitat assessments and 50% more species assessments under the Habitats Directive show an improved conservation status; and (ii) 50% more species assessments under the Birds Directive show a secure or improved status.
Target 2: Maintaining and enhancing ecosystems and their services : this target incorporates the global target agreed by EU Member States and the EU in Nagoya to restore 15% of degraded ecosystems by 2020.
Target 3: Ensuring the sustainability of agriculture, forestry and fisheries :
Agriculture : by 2020, maximise areas under agriculture across grasslands, arable land and permanent crops that are covered by biodiversity-related measures under the CAP so as to ensure the conservation of biodiversity and to bring about a measurable improvement in the conservation status of species and habitats that depend on or are affected by agriculture and in the provision of ecosystem services as compared to the EU2010 Baseline, thus contributing to enhance sustainable management. Forests : by 2020, Forest Management Plans or equivalent instruments, in line with Sustainable Forest Management (SFM), are in place for all forests that are publicly owned and for forest holdings above a certain size (to be defined by the Member States or regions and communicated in their Rural Development Programmes) that receive funding under the EU Rural Development Policy so as to bring about a measurable improvement in the conservation status of species and habitats that depend on or are affected by forestry and in the provision of related ecosystem services as compared to the EU 2010 Baseline.
Target 4: Ensuring the sustainability of fisheries : the aim is toachieve Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) by 2015. Achieve a population age and size distribution indicative of a healthy stock, through fisheries management with no significant adverse impacts on other stocks, species and ecosystems, in support of achieving Good Environmental Status by 2020, as required under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive .
Target 5: Combating invasive alien species : by 2020, Invasive Alien Species and their pathways are identified and prioritised, priority species are controlled or eradicated, and pathways are managed to prevent the introduction and establishment of new IAS.
Target 6: Addressing the global biodiversity crisis : the EU has pledged to meet the international 2020 biodiversity goals and objectives agreed to under the CBD. This requires taking action within the EU, but also at global level since the EU derives significant benefits from global biodiversity and is at the same time responsible for some of the loss and degradation that occurs beyond its borders, notably due to its unsustainable consumption patterns. Through this strategy, targeted efforts will strive to alleviate pressure on biodiversity emanating from the EU while contributing to greening the economy in line with EU priorities for the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. The EU will also need to meet specific COP10 commitments relating to resource mobilisation and implement the Nagoya Protocol on ABS if it is to continue to lead international biodiversity policy.
Follow-up : this strategy provides a framework for action to enable the EU to reach its 2020 biodiversity target and set it on the right path to attain the 2050 vision. It will be subject to a mid-term review in early 2014 , so that results can feed into the preparation of the EU’s fifth National Report as required under the CBD. The targets and measures will be reconsidered as new information becomes available and progress is made on the objectives set in the strategy.
Because many of the actions taken today to safeguard biodiversity and enhance our natural assets will take a long time to bring about real improvements, implementation of this strategy needs to begin now for the EU to meet its 2020 headline target.
PURPOSE: to provide a framework for action to enable the EU to reach its 2020 biodiversity target and set it on the right path to attain the 2050 vision.
BACKGROUND: biodiversity loss is the most critical global environmental threat alongside climate change — and the two are inextricably linked.
Current rates of species extinction are unparalleled . Driven mainly by human activities, species are currently being lost 100 to 1000 times faster than the natural rate: according to the FAO, 60% of the world's ecosystems are degraded or used unsustainably; 75% of fish stocks are over-exploited or significantly depleted and 75% of the genetic diversity of agricultural crops has been lost worldwide since 1990.
An estimated 13 million hectares of tropical forests are cleared each year and 20% of the world’s tropical coral reefs have already disappeared, while 95% will be at risk of destruction or extreme damage by 2050 if climate change continues unabated.
In the EU, only 17% of habitats and species and 11% of key ecosystems protected under EU legislation are in a favourable state . This is in spite of action taken to combat biodiversity loss, particularly since the EU 2010 biodiversity target was set in 2001.
The EU mandate : in March 2010, EU leaders recognised that the 2010 biodiversity target would not be met despite some major successes, such as establishing Natura 2000, the world’s largest network of protected areas. They therefore endorsed the long-term vision and ambitious headline target proposed by the Commission in its Communication ‘Options for an EU vision and target for biodiversity beyond 2010’.
2050 vision : by 2050, European Union biodiversity and the ecosystem services it provides — its natural capital — are protected, valued and appropriately restored for biodiversity's intrinsic value and for their essential contribution to human wellbeing and economic prosperity, and so that catastrophic changes caused by the loss of biodiversity are avoided. 2020 headline target : halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restoring them in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss.
The global mandate : the tenth Conference of the Parties (CoP10) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), held in Nagoya in 2010, led to the adoption of a global Strategic Plan for biodiversity 2011-2020, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation (ABS Protocol), and a strategy to mobilise resources for global biodiversity. The EU 2020 biodiversity strategy responds to both mandates, setting the EU on the right track to meet its own biodiversity objectives and its global commitments.
CONTENT: t his strategy is aimed at reversing biodiversity loss and speeding up the EU's transition towards a resource efficient and green economy . It is an integral part of the Europe 2020 Strategy, and in particular the resource efficient Europe flagship initiative .
The 2020 Biodiversity strategy includes six mutually supportive and inter-dependent targets that respond to the objectives of the 2020 headline target. Each target is broken down into a package of actions designed to respond to the specific challenge addressed by the target.
Target 1: Conserving and restoring nature : to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status so that, by 2020, compared to current assessments: (i) 100% more habitat assessments and 50% more species assessments under the Habitats Directive show an improved conservation status; and (ii) 50% more species assessments under the Birds Directive show a secure or improved status.
Target 2: Maintaining and enhancing ecosystems and their services : this target incorporates the global target agreed by EU Member States and the EU in Nagoya to restore 15% of degraded ecosystems by 2020.
Target 3: Ensuring the sustainability of agriculture, forestry and fisheries :
Agriculture : by 2020, maximise areas under agriculture across grasslands, arable land and permanent crops that are covered by biodiversity-related measures under the CAP so as to ensure the conservation of biodiversity and to bring about a measurable improvement in the conservation status of species and habitats that depend on or are affected by agriculture and in the provision of ecosystem services as compared to the EU2010 Baseline, thus contributing to enhance sustainable management. Forests : by 2020, Forest Management Plans or equivalent instruments, in line with Sustainable Forest Management (SFM), are in place for all forests that are publicly owned and for forest holdings above a certain size (to be defined by the Member States or regions and communicated in their Rural Development Programmes) that receive funding under the EU Rural Development Policy so as to bring about a measurable improvement in the conservation status of species and habitats that depend on or are affected by forestry and in the provision of related ecosystem services as compared to the EU 2010 Baseline.
Target 4: Ensuring the sustainability of fisheries : the aim is toachieve Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) by 2015. Achieve a population age and size distribution indicative of a healthy stock, through fisheries management with no significant adverse impacts on other stocks, species and ecosystems, in support of achieving Good Environmental Status by 2020, as required under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive .
Target 5: Combating invasive alien species : by 2020, Invasive Alien Species and their pathways are identified and prioritised, priority species are controlled or eradicated, and pathways are managed to prevent the introduction and establishment of new IAS.
Target 6: Addressing the global biodiversity crisis : the EU has pledged to meet the international 2020 biodiversity goals and objectives agreed to under the CBD. This requires taking action within the EU, but also at global level since the EU derives significant benefits from global biodiversity and is at the same time responsible for some of the loss and degradation that occurs beyond its borders, notably due to its unsustainable consumption patterns. Through this strategy, targeted efforts will strive to alleviate pressure on biodiversity emanating from the EU while contributing to greening the economy in line with EU priorities for the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. The EU will also need to meet specific COP10 commitments relating to resource mobilisation and implement the Nagoya Protocol on ABS if it is to continue to lead international biodiversity policy.
Follow-up : this strategy provides a framework for action to enable the EU to reach its 2020 biodiversity target and set it on the right path to attain the 2050 vision. It will be subject to a mid-term review in early 2014 , so that results can feed into the preparation of the EU’s fifth National Report as required under the CBD. The targets and measures will be reconsidered as new information becomes available and progress is made on the objectives set in the strategy.
Because many of the actions taken today to safeguard biodiversity and enhance our natural assets will take a long time to bring about real improvements, implementation of this strategy needs to begin now for the EU to meet its 2020 headline target.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0478
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2015)0187
- Contribution: COM(2011)0244
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0146/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0101/2012
- Committee opinion: PE480.548
- Committee opinion: PE478.368
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.679
- Committee opinion: PE478.435
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.669
- Committee opinion: PE476.103
- Committee draft report: PE478.540
- Contribution: COM(2011)0244
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0244
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0244
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2011)0244 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE478.540
- Committee opinion: PE476.103
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.669
- Committee opinion: PE478.435
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE480.679
- Committee opinion: PE478.368
- Committee opinion: PE480.548
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)487
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0478 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2015)0187
- Contribution: COM(2011)0244
- Contribution: COM(2011)0244
Activities
- Lucas HARTONG
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Karin KADENBACH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Elena Oana ANTONESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kriton ARSENIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sandrine BÉLIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew Henry William BRONS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Julie GIRLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matthias GROOTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Romana JORDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Christa KLASS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Véronique MATHIEU HOUILLON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrés PERELLÓ RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel POC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anni PODIMATA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Crescenzio RIVELLINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ROSBACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alfreds RUBIKS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bogusław SONIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Csaba Sándor TABAJDI
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
419 |
2011/2307(INI)
2012/01/09
PECH
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. points out that no country alone can resolve the decline of biodiversity, particularly within marine ecosystems, and that Member States must collaborate and coordinate their efforts more effectively in order to solve this global problem; emphasizes that strong implementation of biodiversity policy benefits both society and economy;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points out that the commitment to maintain or restore fish stocks to levels above those that can produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) by 2015, as provided for in the common fisheries policy reform package proposed by the Commission, was endorsed by the Heads of State and Government at the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the Commission to consider the way to deal with those species and habitats whose economic value cannot be directly calculated, as well as those on whose functional economic value a price cannot be put;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises the importance of scientific advice based on reliable and
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the commitment to avoid by-catch of unwanted species, preserve vulnerable marine ecosystems and eliminate discards;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. stresses that in order to achieve the six new EU Biodiversity Strategies by 2020, the objectives need to follow already laid down EU regulations and to manage related initiatives and programs appropriately, in particular the network of protected sites Natura 2000 and the LIFE +; calls for adequate funding for Natura 2000 sites in the new financial period;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Considers that marine biodiversity conservation needs to be addressed at the highest level at the Rio+20 summit in Rio de Janeiro in June 2012;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Welcomes the UN General Assembly resolution on ensuring sustainability of the world's fisheries adopted 6 December 2011 stressing that urgent action is needed in efforts to achieve sustainable use of the world's oceans and seas;
source: PE-478.664
2012/01/17
ITRE
35 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Agrees with the Commission analysis that biodiversity loss is not only costly for society as a whole, but also for economic actors in sectors that depend directly on ecosystem services and on the long-term availability and diversity of natural assets, such as tourism and tertiary sector, generally speaking, which is a major in the EU; agrees furthermore that nature- based innovation and action to restore ecosystems and conserve biodiversity has a significant potential to create new skills, jobs and business opportunities; to that extent, European institutions should get the youth involved as it is particularly sensitive to environmental issues and, as it represents EU's future, it has a great concern on this topic;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that biodiversity safeguards contained in existing EU law must not be weakened;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Acknowledges that it is possible and necessary to achieve a full renewables- based economy without compromising biodiversity objectives and that, on the contrary, such an economy could contribute towards achieving these objectives; in this context, deems it necessary to introduce further safeguards regarding the sources, efficiency and quantity of biomass used for energy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that one reason why we have failed to reverse the continuing trend of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation globally is our incomplete understanding of the complexity of biodiversity and the interactions of its parts with each other and with the living environment, including the value of biodiversity for current and future human generations; reiterates that biodiversity science is the necessary backbone for any kind of policy implementation; considers that the failure to stop biodiversity loss is unacceptable both ethically and economically because future generations will be unable to benefit from the normal functions of ecosystems and the well- being created by natural assets.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers that one reason why we have failed to reverse the continuing trend of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation globally is our incomplete understanding of the complexity of biodiversity and the interactions of its parts with each other and with the living environment, including the value of biodiversity for current and future human generations; reiterates that biodiversity science is the necessary backbone for any kind of policy implementation and underlines the need to keep on raising social awareness and setting binding commitments to help reversing the ecosystem's jeopardised situation;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses therefore the need to invest more in biodiversity research
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses therefore the need to invest more in biodiversity, conservation and ecology research – also by means of Horizon 2020 – that will enable us to have a better understanding of biodiversity and its importance for all aspects of human activities on the one hand and will contribute, through innovative concepts, to new and improved policies and management and development strategies on the other;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the importance of demonstrating to the citizens of the EU, especially in the current economic climate, that the protection of biodiversity is not contradictory with sustainable economic and social development; to this end it asks for the promotion of successful projects and the dissemination of information to the public on the feasibility of environmentally benign economic development in areas of important natural and cultural heritage like the Natura 2000 network;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to clarify, as soon as possible, what effect biofuels have on biodiversity, including the impact of indirect land use;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the need for a multidisciplinary and transboundary research approach when it comes to biodiversity, as it is inherently connected to ecology, genetics, epidemiology, climate science, economics, social anthropology, theoretical modelling etc.; emphasizes the need for science-based policies in the sustainable management of ecosystems and natural resources, especially in the economically and socially vital sectors of agriculture, fisheries and forestry;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5c. Calls for the establishment of sustainability criteria for solid biofuels;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Agrees with the Commission analysis that biodiversity loss is not only costly for society as a whole, but also for economic actors in sectors that depend directly on ecosystem services and on the long-term availability and diversity of natural assets; agrees furthermore that nature-based innovation and action to restore ecosystems
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers it vital that available scientific data on biodiversity, examples of good practice for halting biodiversity loss and information on nature-based innovation potential be more widely known and shared among policy makers and key stakeholders; as such ICTs should have a crucial role to play in order to help delivering new opportunities and tools;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers it vital that available scientific data on biodiversity, examples of
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it vital that available scientific data on biodiversity, examples of good practice for halting biodiversity loss and information on nature-based innovation potential be more widely known and shared among policy makers and key stakeholders; welcomes therefore the Commission for setting up the EU Business and Biodiversity Platform, encourage the Commission to further develop the Platform and encourage greater cooperation between administration and businesses in Europe, including SMEs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for the Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE) web portal to be available in all the official EU languages in order to contribute to data and information sharing;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on Member States to urgently review the implementation of the Habitats Directive, which in many Member States causes a costly and time consuming bureaucratic burden;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls for both the Commission and Member States to consider presenting a timetable, as part of specific measures, for mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe, which will enable targeted, efficient measures to be taken to halt the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to consider whether increasing the emphasis on mitigation (including providing more habitat, enhanced habitat and design changes to accommodate species, etc.) versus background documentation, data collection and on-site species protection would have a more beneficial impact on biodiversity;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Commission to review whether the current regulatory regime adequately incentivises strategies to enhance biodiversity and to propose cost- effective solutions to shift spending on biodiversity from bureaucracy towards protection and enhancement;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Calls on the Commission to review the European Protected Species categories and to ensure that this is focused on species which are most at risk;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's intention to reform, phase out and eliminate harmful subsidies in accordance with the 2020 Strategy and agrees that well-designed market-based instruments aimed at internalising the external costs of consumption and production activities on the environment contribute to achieving the objective of halting biodiversity loss if combined with incentives for green investments within the sectors concerned; in view of the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) negotiations, EC should bear in mind the great need to provide the appropriate financial resources for the Biodiversity Strategy goals to be fully achieved;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets, however, that the Commission has not actually analysed why current efforts have not succeeded and whether there are other and potentially more effective instruments available instead of reintroducing existing measures which have not delivered so far;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the Commission's intention to reform, phase out and eliminate harmful subsidies in accordance with the 2020 Strategy and agrees that well-designed
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to undertake to adopt integrated strategies in order to learn about each geographical area’s natural values and the features of its cultural heritage, as well as the conditions necessary for maintaining them. In order to conserve biodiversity and all species, account should be taken of the specific ecosystems, which include agriculture, water and the other minimum conditions required;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. In view of the fact that, due to industrial and agricultural activities, as well as climate change, potable water has become a scarce resource, calls on the Commission and Member States to adopt an EU strategy and an action plan for the protection and efficient use of potable water by 30 June 2012;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recognises that biodiversity and ecosystem services represent significant non-monetised benefits to industries and other economic actors; invites organisations representing the private sector to come forward with proposals on how best to preserve and restore biodiversity on a meaningful scale;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission continuously to conduct investigations into the impact of new and existing policies, including the EU prohibition on the sale of seal products, on biodiversity in EU Member States and affected countries, including members of EFTA and OCTA;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Welcomes attempts to develop methodologies for establishing biodiversity footprint accounting for products and economic activities; takes note of concepts such as 'no net loss' or 'biodiversity offsets'; considers that this does not conflict with strategies avoiding and mitigating negative impacts which should take priority wherever possible.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets that, in spite of the action taken to combat biodiversity loss, in the EU only 17% of habitats and species and 11% of key ecosystems protected under EU legislation are in a favourable state;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission further to intensify their efforts in integrating biodiversity into the development, implementation and funding of other EU policies, thereby making the EU’s sectoral and budgetary policies more consistent and ensuring compliance with binding commitments on biodiversity protection; calls for an increase in funding for nature conservation measures, at both European and national level;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses, however, that biodiversity measures under sectoral policies should not create additional administrative and regulatory burdens for the affected parties such as the agricultural sector and believes that the proposed greening element of the CAP should remain focused on creating incentives for the individual farmer for a more sustainable active agricultural production;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers it particularly important to maintain the status of all protected habitats and species registered up to 2020 in the EU, including locations situated in Natura 2000 area and beyond in order to ensure a favourable conservation status for all habitats and species up to 2050;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that biodiversity objectives need to be implemented through concrete actions to be effective;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the fact that development of the Commission's Green Infrastructure Strategy is planned only for 2012, while energy and transport corridors have already been identified in the European Infrastructure Package proposal; calls therefore on the Commission to accelerate the work on the Green Infrastructure Strategy and to ensure realisation of the proposed target No 2; agrees that synergies between the energy, transport and ICT projects should be maximised in order to limit the negative impact on biodiversity and that only actions in conformity with Union law and which are in line with relevant Union policies shall be financed with EU funding;
source: PE-480.542
2012/02/01
ENVI
139 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 21 September 2010 on the implementation of EU legislation aiming at the conservation of biodiversity1; 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0325
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the Composite Report on the Conservation Status of Habitat Types and Species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, (COM(2009) 358 final);
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious target and long-term vision; calls, therefore,
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Underscores the need to assess the condition of ecosystems and their services; urges the Commission and the Member States to determine the economic value of those services in order to incorporate them into accounting systems and thus contribute to more effective responses through decisions that incorporate the consideration of biodiversity’s real value;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Concerned of the negative trends in degrading soil quality in the EU, stresses the need to act against soil degradation at all levels, including through EU legislation; calls for the forthcoming Council Presidencies to renew efforts to progress on the Soil Framework Directive;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection in rural areas as a primary objective;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection as a primary objective; underlines that this Strategy should address urban as well as rural areas
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection as a primary objective; in this context, rejects the further loss of productive agricultural land;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by 2012 at the latest, with biodiversity protection as a primary objective
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Urges the Commission to adopt a specific Green Infrastructure Strategy by
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Recognises it is unlikely that a more ambitious EU target on the restoration of degraded ecosystems will be a stimulus for more ambitious international and national commitments, within or outside the CBD;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the its resolution of 8 July 2010 on the future of the Common Agricultural Policy after 20131 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0286
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasizes that the creation of nature should not be limited to designated areas alone; but should also be stimulated in different places, such as cities, along highways and rail roads, and at industrial sites in order to create a true green infrastructure,
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges the Commission to develop a
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges the Commission to
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges the Commission to develop as a matter of high priority the
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Urges the Commission to develop as a matter of high priority the ‘No Net Loss’ initiative, drawing also on the standards which form part of the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Takes the view that the enforcement of nature legislation should be improved; Furthermore, calls on the Commission to incorporate measures to improve the implementation and joint enforcement of the Birds and Habitats Directives in the framework of its current work on the improved implementation and inspection of environmental legislation; recalling its resolution of 20 November 2008, considers it essential to strengthen the European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL) and urges the Commission to report on possible ways of doing so, including the establishment of a Community environmental inspection force, and urges the Commission to come forward with a proposal for a directive on environmental inspections;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Given the current lack of knowledge among the general public about the importance of biodiversity, welcomes the communication campaign on Natura 2000 to be launched by Commission together with Member States, by 2013;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Welcomes attempts to develop methodologies for establishing biodiversity footprint accounting, emphasises however that avoiding and mitigating negative impacts must remain the priority while 'biodiversity offsets' and compensation necessarily entail approximations that are imprecise and can be questionable;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to devote particular attention to species and habitats the economic value of whose “functions” is priceless, since efforts to preserve biodiversity in the future will be directed at those areas that over a short period of time will produce economic benefits, or be expected to do so;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Recognises the great importance of maintaining a close relationship with the local actors and direct managers of the land, and therefore encourages the Commission to make greater efforts in this regard, paying attention to the experience and privileged knowledge that these actors can contribute when drafting legislation to ensure the good condition of the habitats that house the biodiversity that we wish to preserve in the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 b (new) - having regard to the its resolution of 23 June 2011 on the CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future1 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0297
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Supports the Commission initiative regarding training programmes for judges and prosecutors; Stresses however that the Commission and Member States should ensure that the training programmes are also available to professionals dealing with Natura 2000, e.g. regional and local authorities dealing with law enforcement and other administration units responsible for implementation of the Birds and habitats Directive;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Calls for specific Action towards the achievement of target 5 Nagoya Strategic Plan requiring that by 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and fragmentation is significantly reduced;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Awaiting for the results of the study on the impacts of European consumption on deforestation, calls on the Commission follow up with new policy initiatives to address the identified impacts
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 d (new) 12d. Calls on the Member States to adopt and implement forest management plans, taking into account appropriate public consultation ,including effective measures for conservation and recovery of protected species and habitats, and related ecosystem services;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity conservation and the continuation of the associated ecosystem services it provides; calls, therefore, for a strong reorientation of the CAP towards the delivery of public goods;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the Staff Working Paper of the European Commission on Financing Natura 2000;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers, that farmland biodiversity is in continued decline, and that funding for the
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for ensuring the competitiveness of the agricultural sector the development of rural areas and the protection of the environment and biodiversity; calls, therefore
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity; calls, therefore, for
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe’s territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity; calls, therefore, for a strong reorientation of the CAP towards the delivery of environmentally friendly public goods;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Recalling that over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers and that funding for the common agricultural policy (CAP) represents the largest single part of the EU budget, stresses that the CAP
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Emphasises the importance of halting and reversing the reduction in species diversity and crop varieties, leading to an erosion of the genetic basis on which human and animal nutrition depends; advocates the need to promote the use of traditional agricultural varieties specific to certain regions and rejects the homogenisation/specialisation of agricultural production, flowing from successive CAP reforms;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Emphasises the connection between water management and biodiversity as an essential component for sustaining life and for sustainable development.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 b (new) - having regard to the communication from the Commission on The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future (COM(2010) 672 final);
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 c (new) - having regard to the European Commission's proposals for a reform of the CAP after 2013;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas biological biodiversity is the irreplaceable basis on which humanity has evolved, and the loss of it and of the natural heritage associated with it causes imbalances and leads to significant economic losses and losses of well-being, and that, therefore, it is essential to the existence of human life and the well-being of societies, both directly and indirectly through the ecosystem services it provides;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas biodiversity is essential to the existence of human life and the well- being of societies, both directly and indirectly through the ecosystem services it provides – e.g. in particular the benefits flowing only from the European Union's Natura 2000 network of protected areas are estimated to amount to 200-300 € billion, and the number of full-time equivalent jobs supported directly from the visitor expenditure in and around these sites adds up to about 4.5 to 8 million
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas nearly 65 % of the habitat types and 52 % of the species listed in the Annexes of the Habitats Directive has an unfavourable conservation status;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas 88 % of fish stocks are fished beyond maximum sustainable yield;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Environment Council conclusions of 21 June and 19 December 2011 on the ‘EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020’
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) Bc. whereas Europe's borders have already been breached by more than 11,000 alien species, at least 15 % of which are invasive and cause harm to biodiversity;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas genetic selection in forest tree species should not favour performance traits at the expense of adaptive ones;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas farmers play a vital role in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective; Whereas in 1992 an initial impetus was given to integrating protection of biodiversity into the common agricultural policy (CAP), and that subsequently the 2003 reform has introduced measures such as cross compliance, the single farm payment (decoupling) and rural development which have benefits for biodiversity,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas payment for ecosystem services (PES) is a promising innovative financial tool for biodiversity conservation;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas a comprehensive Framework Directive on Soil is crucial for the EU to meet its new biodiversity strategy targets;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Deplores the fact that despite considerable efforts to maintain nature values the EU failed to meet its 2010 biodiversity target;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that some actions
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Environment Council conclusions of 21 June 2011 and of 19 December 2011 on the ‘EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020’
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that some actions should be
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that some actions should be strengthened after their effectiveness has been examined;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Evaluates positively and supports the EU Biodiversity Strategy to the year 2020, including its aims and activities; nonetheless considers that some measures need to be better developed and its strategy directed more towards implementation;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes and supports the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, including all its targets and actions; considers, nevertheless, that some actions should be strengthened
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the urgent need for action, and the need to give higher political priority to
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the urgent need for action, and the need to give higher political priority to biodiversity in order to meet the EU's 2020 headline target for biodiversity and global biodiversity commitments; emphasises that, with adequate financial resources and political will, the tools exist to halt the loss of biodiversity;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the urgent need for action, and the need to give higher political priority to biodiversity in order to meet the EU’s 2020 headline target for biodiversity and global biodiversity commitments; emphasises that, with adequate resources and political will, the tools exist to halt the loss of biodiversity; emphasises that the preservation of biodiversity is a collective challenge that should be addressed with the commitment and participation of numerous interested parties, mainly landowners and members of the private sector;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the urgent need for action, and the need to give higher political priority to biodiversity in order to meet the EU's 2020 headline target for biodiversity and global biodiversity commitments; emphasises that, with adequate financial resources and political will, the tools exist to halt the loss of biodiversity;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to the Environmental Council conclusion of 19 November 2011 on EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020: towards implementation
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the new strategy cannot fail again; therefore calls on the Commission to provide two-yearly progress reports to the Parliament; in which Council and Commission elaborate on the state of play;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Whereas habitats and species are threatened by climate change; whereas nature conservation and biodiversity are crucial for mitigation of and adaptation to climate change,
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Considers that the difficulties encountered in meeting the target set for 2010 demand an in-depth review of the methods applied to date; strategic studies including all of the components that could influence protected areas must be carried out; these studies should be incorporated into urban planning and be accompanied by educational and informational campaigns about the importance of local natural resources and their conservation;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes the limited EU public awareness on the importance of biodiversity conservation and the severe environmental as well as socio-economic costs associated with its loss; stresses the need for a more comprehensive communication strategy, in line with Aichi target 1;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises that NGOs have important role to play in biodiversity protection, as regards contributing to decision-making process, as actors on the ground, and in raising the public awareness;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. invites the Member States to integrate the strategy within their plans, programmes and/or national strategies;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Deplores the fact that the Soil Framework Directive is still under consideration; calls on the Member States to give this issue a higher political priority and act urgently so as to fill this legislative gap and protect soil biodiversity across the EU;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Stresses that biodiversity loss refers not only to species and habitats but also to genetic diversity; calls on the European Commission to develop a strategy for the conservation of genetic diversity;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation into all EU policies;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises the importance of the inclusion of
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 b (new) - having regard to the Commission Staff working paper Financing Natura 2000; Investing in Natura 2000: delivering benefits for nature and people (SEC(2011)1573);
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection into all EU policies – such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional policy and cohesion, energy, industry, transport tourism, development cooperation, research and innovation – in order to make the European Union's sectoral and budgetary policies more coherent;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Highlights the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection into all EU policies and insists that any production model that eschews the proper preservation of biodiversity is not viable; therefore, asks that the principle of sustainability be incorporated systematically into any future Community policy and, in particular, into legislation on biodiversity;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises the importance of the inclusion of aspects of biodiversity protection in all areas of EU policy; notes that until now biodiversity policy has been insufficiently integrated into EU economic and financial policy;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that a significant number of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic (transmissible among wildlife, domestic animals and humans), and recognizes that trade in wildlife as well as changes in land use and management may lead to new or modified interfaces between humans, domestic animals and wildlife that could favour disease transmission and loss of biodiversity; Stresses that policy integration of biodiversity strategies with animal health, animal welfare, and trade policies is paramount.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that the EU biodiversity strategy should be fully integrated with the strategies for the mitigation of and adaption to climate change;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for more action from the Member States for the full implementation of EU environmental legislation; emphasises however that further proposals from the Commission are also necessary to improve uniform and equal implementation and application of the existing EU environmental legislation,
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that protecting, valuing and restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services is essential in order to meet the
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that protecting, valuing, mapping and restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services is essential in order to meet the EU's resource efficiency goals;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to pay greater attention to ensuring compliance with all European regulations and directives dealing in particular with nature conservation and maintaining biodiversity;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. underlines the necessity to give special attention to biodiversity in the context of creating ecological jobs in the whole of Europe, especially within the implementation of the Natura 2000 network;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 c (new) - having regard to the Strategic Financial Framework 2014-2020
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need to establish a thorough impact assessment of the negative impacts on biodiversity regarding different sectors of economy;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Recalls that the precautionary principle constitutes a legal basis to be applied in all legislation and decisions affecting biodiversity;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Recalls the principle of non patentability of life forms
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the need to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature conservation legislation and achieve a
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the need to halt the deterioration in the status of all species and habitats covered by EU nature conservation legislation and achieve a significant and measurable improvement in their status at EU level; stresses that this should take the form of an improvement in at least one of the parameters for conservation status defined in Article 1 of the Habitats Directive, without any deterioration in the other parameters;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that to establish a clear pathway to achieving the 2050 vision, at least 40 % of all habitats and species must be in favourable conservation status by 2020; Recalls that by 2050, 100 % (or almost 100 %) of habitat and species must be in favourable conservation status;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that even with the full implementation of Target 1 of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy, the majority of EU habitats and species will still be left in an unfavourable conservation status; calls for the revision of Target 1, and stresses the need to adopt more ambitious targets in improving the conservation status of EU habitats and species;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6a (new) 6a. Expresses concern at the increasing deterioration of essential habitats, such as wetlands, which should be treated as a priority and addressed with urgent measures that actually correspond to the special protection status that the EU grants them;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges Member States to ensure that the process of designating Natura 2000 sites is
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges Member States to ensure that the process of designating Natura 2000 sites is finalised by 2012 in line with the Aichi Target 11; deplores greatly the delay in designating marine sites;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 d (new) - having regard to Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions on: Europe Budget for 2020, together with supporting documents,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Urges Member States to ensure that the process of designating Natura 2000 sites is finalised by 2012; deplores greatly the delay in designating marine sites; Is concerned about the reintroduction of hunting in the Danube Delta and its possible negative impact on biodiversity; calls on the Commission to verify that Member States are implementing Article 7 of the Birds Directive EC 2009/147, particularly with respect to hunting,
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Highlights the urgent need to step up efforts to protect oceans and marine environment, both through EU action and through improving international governance of oceans and areas beyond national jurisdiction,
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to set 2015 as the deadline for the development of management plans or equivalent instruments for all Natura 2000 sites, and in any case within a maximum of 6 years after the Decision of the Commission approving the sites, as stated in the Habitats Directive;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Member States to
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Member States to ensure that civil society is actively involved at all implementation levels and that the relevant stakeholders (the public, local authorities, environmental protection groups and businesses) are made more aware and are included in all stages of the selection, definition and administration of protected areas;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers that it is necessary to have digitised, accessible maps with accurate information about the principal natural resources, protected areas, land uses, water bodies and areas at risk to facilitate compliance by regional and local authorities with environmental legislation, especially that relating to biodiversity;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Given the vast differences between Member States as to the implementation of Natura 2000 legislation and the cost of implementation, invites the Commission to provide further clarification of the Directives or guidance where necessary, with such clarification or guidance ideally being based on and/or illustrated by best practices, in order to warrant an as large as possible return on investments;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Believes that better cross-border cooperation could have significant benefits for meeting the Natura 2000 objectives;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having particular regard to the outcome of the 10th Conference of the Parties (COP 10) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), in particular the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi targets, the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the benefits arising from their utilisation, and the strategy to mobilise resources for global biodiversity,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure adequate funding for the Natura 2000 sites;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure adequate funding for the Natura 2000 sites; in particular, calls on Member States to develop
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure adequate funding for the Natura 2000 sites, including creating a specific financial instrument at EU level, which can complement either the LIFE program or other sectoral policy instruments; in particular, calls on Member States to develop binding national instruments through which they define priority conservation measures and the related planned source of financing (both from EU funds and Member States’ own budgets);
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure good conservation of the Nature 2000 Network through adequate funding for the Natura 2000 sites; in particular, calls on
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission to increase its capacity to process and effectively inspect complaints and infringements on the proper implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives and to develop adequate guidance to Member States with regard to the control of on the ground implementation of the Directives;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Welcomes the intention of the Commission, together with the Member States, to launch a major communication campaign for Natura 2000 by 2013, to draw up directives for the relevant local authorities to improve the application of EU environmental protection provisions and to foster the coexistence of environmental protection and sustainable economic growth as equal principles;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Warns of the relationship between biodiversity and natural disasters caused by man, and urges the European Commission to adopt, without delay, the recommendations contained in the resolution of the European Parliament concerning a Community approach to the prevention of natural disasters caused by man, passed in 2010.
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the trade in European threatened species, in accordance with the IUCN Red List, must be subject to particularly strict regulation in order not to endanger further their survival and must only be authorized in exceptional circumstances;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls for monitoring and regular reporting on imports of all exotic /non- native species and for Member States to implement increased restrictions on the import and private ownership of threatened species;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS),
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Requests that, based on the importance of the good condition of zones that adjoin areas protected for the very survival of the species they house, the Commission pool guidance and best practices for the management of the territories adjoining the Natura 2000 areas;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Recognising that the Convention on Biological Diversity requires Contracting Parties to 'adopt measures for ex situ conservation of components of biological diversity' (Article 9), and that these requirements formed the basis of the EC Zoos Directive (no.1999/22), zoos should therefore prioritise ex situ conservation preferably in the county of origin and predominantly for the purpose of complementing in situ measures; and adopt measures for the recovery and rehabilitation of threatened species and their reintroduction into their natural habitat. Recommends regular evaluation of the effectiveness of conservation programmes taking place within EU Member States. Recommends the European Commission to recognise the importance of individual animal welfare in conservation and trade, and calls upon all Member States to ensure that species-specific needs are always adequately provided for.
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls for a ban on wild-caught animals for the pet trade;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Concerned over findings in a recent review of EU zoo performance that demonstrate majority of zoos in the EU are not meeting their legal obligations in conserving biodiversity, calls for the Commission to ensure Member States are fully implementing the Zoos Directive and that the species-specific needs are adequately provided for;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however,
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious target and long-term vision; calls
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious target and long-term vision; calls
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious target and long-term vision; calls, therefore, on the EU to set the restoration of 30 % of degraded ecosystems as its target for 2020, taking into account country-specific natural conditions and amount of natural ecosystems, and urges the Commission to define clearly what is meant by ‘degraded ecosystems’ and to set a baseline against which progress can be measured;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes the requirement under the CBD target 15 of the Strategic Plan 2011 – 2020 to restore 15 % of degraded ecosystems, such as wetlands and forests, by 2020; considers, however, that this is a minimum and that the EU should have its own, more ambitious target and long-term vision; calls, therefore, on the EU to set the restoration of 30 % of degraded
source: PE-480.669
2012/02/02
REGI
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission Communication on Biodiversity 2020 and notes that climate change, biodiversity loss, threats from invasive species and overconsumption of natural resources are transnational and transregional challenges which affect every EU citizen, whether living in an urban or a rural area, and that urgent action is needed at every level
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the ‘green economy’ is a way of generating skills and employment and calls for it to be supported with funding which will help build capacity at a local level and build on local and traditional knowledge in the fight to protect biodiversity; highlights the fact that approximately 30 % of the total allocations for Cohesion Policy for 2007-2013 are available for activities with a particular impact on sustainable growth; encourages Member States and
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises that the ‘green economy’ is a way of generating skills and employment and calls for it to be supported with funding which will help build capacity at a local level and build on local and traditional knowledge in the fight to protect biodiversity; highlights the fact that approximately 30 % of the total allocations
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Encourages Member States to make full use of the possibility to realign the current operational programmes to Europe 2020 sustainable growth objectives by reconsidering the investments priorities for projects and urges them to deploy available researches more effectively;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines the opportunities to tackle biodiversity problems through cross- border interregional and transnational cooperation and recommends Member states to fully exploit these possibilities;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need to promote green infrastructure
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need to promote green infrastructure and eco-innovation in order to create a greener economy; urges the Commission, the Member States, and local and regional authorities to take the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) study recommendations into account, as this study is intended as a useful advisory tool for local and regional policymakers, administrators and managers; underlines the need to
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need to promote green infrastructure and eco-innovation in order to create a greener economy, and calls on the Commission to draw up a good practice guide in this connection; urges the Commission, the Member States, and local and regional authorities to take the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) study recommendations into account, as this study is intended as a useful advisory tool for local and regional policymakers, administrators and managers; underlines the need to train beneficiaries of the Structural and Cohesion Funds and local and regional governments in dealing with the complex
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the need to promote green infrastructure and eco-innovation in order to create a greener economy; urges the Commission, the Member States, and local and regional authorities to take the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) study recommendations into account, as this study is intended as a useful advisory tool for local and regional policymakers, administrators and managers; underlines the need to train beneficiaries of the Structural and Cohesion Funds and local and regional governments in dealing with the complex European and national legislation that seeks to protect nature and increase awareness of the importance of biodiversity loss; invites the Commission to put in place technical assistance mechanisms to promote knowledge at regional and local level on implementation-related problems;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises the importance of green purchasing and believes that more attention should be focused on its use, especially by public authorities in receipt of EU funding; recommends that the authorities responsible for the management and control systems created in the Member States to manage structural and cohesion funding support projects which provide for such procedures;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises the important role that regional policies can play in enhancing and safeguarding biodiversity, and calls on the Council and Member States to adopt the proposal for a regulation approved by the European Parliament amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the Commission Communication on Biodiversity 2020 and notes that climate change, biodiversity loss, threats from invasive species and overconsumption of natural resources are transnational and transregional challenges which affect every EU citizen, whether living in an urban or a rural area, and that
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to provide support and guidance on biodiversity partnerships in order to increase awareness and determine more possible partners to engage on biodiversity issues through positive action;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for better policy coherence and climate and environmental proofing in the EU's funding instruments, particularly the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, in order to deliver the Biodiversity 2020 and EU 2020 objectives; considers, therefore, appropriate allocation of funding inevitable;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for better policy coherence and climate and environmental proofing in the EU
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls for better policy coherence and climate and environmental proofing in the EU's funding instruments, particularly the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, in order to deliver the Biodiversity 2020 and EU 2020 objectives; moreover, stresses also the possibility of synergies between the structural funds and the European agricultural fund for rural development, LIFE+ programme and the R&D framework programme; with a view to a next programming period urges for effective coordination between the 5 CSF funds in order to ensure an optimal delivery of the sustainable growth target of the Union;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the Commission proposal to invest in the protection and restoration of biodiversity under the Cohesion Fund in the funding period 2014-2020; recommends also considering the potential of Natura 2000 for local economies and labour markets;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 а (new) 5a. Calls for more effective and coordinated use of the funding provided from the cohesion policy instruments and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) for environmental protection, biodiversity and climate-related projects, including, where necessary, through the provision of additional technical support;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers it essential to run biodiversity awareness and information campaigns aimed at all ages and social categories, and at local and regional authorities; takes the view that educational and professional training programmes, and those intended for related sectors, should focus more closely on protecting biodiversity.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports strengthening the use of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), Sustainability Impact Assessments (SIAs), Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) and other instruments to take account of biodiversity loss and the effects of climate change in regional and local decision making; points out that all regions will benefit from projects that recognise climate change mitigation and the protection of biodiversity loss, including less developed regions;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Supports the use of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), Sustainability
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that 80% of Europe's biodiversity is to be found in the Outermost Regions; wishes to see a strengthening of the specific instruments for safeguarding and protecting biodiversity there, particularly the BEST (Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Territories of European Overseas) pilot scheme supported by Parliament since 2010;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that the Strategy is part of the Resource Efficient flagship initiative and reminds that regional policy plays an essential role in ensuring sustainable growth through the actions it supports to tackle climate, energy and environmental issues;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 а (new) 7a. Highlights the need for closer cooperation between European, national, regional and local authorities with regard to protecting biodiversity and natural resources, and considers that more extensive use of the scope for territorial cooperation and exchanges of information, experience and good practice would contribute significantly to achieving that aim. Points out that the inclusion of biodiversity-related priorities in regional macro-strategies is an important step towards restoring and preserving biodiversity.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building and urbanisation are the most significant drivers of the fragmentation of ecosystems and habitats; asks local and regional governments to consider this threat to
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building and urbanisation are the most significant drivers of the fragmentation of ecosystems and habitats; asks local and regional governments to consider this threat to ecosystems and habitats in their planning and development projects on both a large and a small scale; supports further reform and use of regional and local development policies to deliver biodiversity benefits and to halt further loss of habitats; recommends that local and regional authorities be mindful to strike a balance between the needs of development and biodiversity;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building and urbanisation are the most significant drivers of the fragmentation of ecosystems and habitats; asks local and regional governments to consider this threat to ecosystems and habitats in their planning and development projects on both a large and a small scale; calls, in this connection, for a reduction in urban expansion and the introduction of measures for the redevelopment of existing urban land; supports further reform and use of regional and local development policies to deliver biodiversity benefits and to halt further loss of habitats;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that infrastructure building and urbanisation are the most significant drivers of the fragmentation of ecosystems and habitats; asks local and regional governments to consider this threat to ecosystems and habitats in their planning and development projects on both a large and a small scale; supports further reform and use of regional and local development policies to deliver biodiversity benefits and to halt further loss of habitats, also in times of economic and financial crisis;
source: PE-480.804
2012/02/08
AGRI
59 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that our natural heritage is a major ecological asset which
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and acknowledges the Commission recommendations for CAP reform
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and the Commission recommendations for CAP reform, including
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and notes the Commission
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and notes the Commission recommendations for CAP reform, including clearly formulated measures under both the first and second pillars seeking to conserve and improve biodiversity; stresses in this connection the particular role played by farming, which has already made a great contribution to preserving the diversity of species and biotopes and will also make a crucial contribution to the success of the European biodiversity strategy;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and the Commission
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and the Commission recommendations for CAP reform, including clearly formulated measures under both the first and second pillars seeking to conserve and improve biodiversity; stresses the need to move from a means-based approach to a results-based approach to assess the effectiveness of the instruments applied;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy and the Commission recommendations for CAP reform, including clearly formulated measures under both the first and second pillars seeking to conserve and improve biodiversity, based on good agricultural practice including sustainable use of water resources;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that before we undertake a further greening of the CAP we should examine the impact of such actions on the competitiveness of EU farming in the global market;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that many measures are already being implemented as part of the CAP that are helping to improve environmental protection and the preservation of natural resources and are responding to the challenges of climate change, the preservation of biodiversity and depletion of water resources and soil fertility; calls for the rural development measures defined and financed under the second pillar to be recognised in the biodiversity strategy;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Is convinced that the so-called 'greening' of the CAP should be implemented efficiently and unbureaucratically, without leading to discrimination against existing agri- environmental measures; calls, with regard to the necessary reduction in the administrative burden, for, inter alia, all CAP payments to continue to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules after 2014, which should be both transparent and as easy as possible to implement and monitor;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that our natural heritage is a major ecological asset which contributes to human wellbeing; takes the view that all EU Member States should cooperate and coordinate their efforts to ensure a
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights that the under-use and abandonment of agricultural land can have disastrous consequences for the natural environment, in this connection calls for the CAP budget after 2013 to, at the very least, be maintained at the current level in order to ensure the vitality of rural areas and the continuation of agricultural practices in Europe;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 а (new) 2а. Calls on the Commission in the context of the new CAP reform to step up its efforts in support of agriculture sectors which make a proven contribution to preserving biodiversity, and in particular the bee-keeping sector;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for specific measures aimed at preserving biodiversity to by elaborated and applied; believes that specific measures relating to habitats and species should be applied to farms on a case-by- case basis;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. As over half of Europe's territory is managed by farmers, stresses that the CAP is an absolutely crucial tool for biodiversity as European farmers significantly contribute to reaching European biodiversity and climate goals; supports a further reorientation of the CAP towards the compensation for the delivery of public goods by a package of workable practices at farm level;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that the Commission proposal for greening the first pillar of the CAP runs counter to the aim of food security; in particular, the requirement to designate 7% of eligible land as ‘ecological focus areas’ limits the extent to which the production potential of commercial farms, on which food production and security depend, can be exploited; believes that in order to achieve the environmental goals it is vital for the land in question to be determined and geographically distributed at regional or national level, not farm level;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Takes the view that rural development measures must continue to respond to the challenges of climate change, the preservation of biodiversity, food security and the sustainable management of natural resources and foster balanced territorial cohesion and employment; calls, therefore, for a strengthening of Pillar II and for significant improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar and the effectiveness of its agri- environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory agricultural fund spending on agri-environmental measures;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that only functioning, sustainable, broad-based and productive agriculture is in a position to provide the additional services demanded by society in the form of public assets; is therefore in favour of an approach that balances and integrates the introduction of additional environmental protection measures and the key role of the CAP in safeguarding efficient production;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Recalls the key role played by the CAP in guaranteeing a secure supply of high- quality and affordable food for consumers; points out in this connection that the Commission proposal for the mandatory across-the-board designation of 7% of farmland as environmental focus areas is considered to be inappropriate and impracticable, particularly where these areas would no longer be available to produce food in productive regions;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes with concern that domesticated biodiversity of crop varieties and animal breeds is decreasing and that, because of the nature of susceptibility to pests and resistance against widely used biocides, long term food security is therefore threatened by reliance on a narrowing range of genotypes; Stresses the need for more effective co-operation and measures at European level
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need for more effective cooperation at European level regarding the diversity of animal and plant genetic resources in order to ensure their conservation
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that our natural heritage is a major ecological asset which contributes to human wellbeing; takes the view that all EU Member States should cooperate and coordinate their efforts to ensure a more effective use of natural resources and limit damage to the biodiversity; considers that the importance of biodiversity for the island and outermost regions needs to be underlined in this context; believes that these regions offer unique features for research, development and innovation that should be stimulated and utilised by the European Union as a way of promoting sustainable development based on knowledge and innovation, since much of their tremendous potential has yet to be harnessed;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need for more effective cooperation at European level in the field of scientific and applied research regarding the diversity of animal and plant genetic resources in order to ensure their conservation and improve their ability to adapt to climate change
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that the 'greening' of the CAP must take account of tasks already fulfilled within the framework of the second pillar;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Believes that additional environmental effects at EU level can be achieved within the CAP framework without increasing administrative costs, principally through more effective implementation of cross- compliance rules (including by all Member States applying the Standards of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition (GAEC) and alignment of the way in which the directives are implemented), the implementation of agri- environmental programmes and support for Natura 2000 areas under a better- funded second pillar of the CAP;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it necessary to strike a balance between European biodiversity strategy and rural development projects within the Member States so as to ensure the conservation of biodiversity and sustainable development in rural and urban areas;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it necessary to strike a balance between European biodiversity strategy and rural development projects within the Member States so as to ensure the conservation of biodiversity. In that context, innovative solutions and cooperation projects should be given a prominent place. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote projects in which farmers are involved as partners;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Considers it necessary to strike a balance between European biodiversity strategy and rural development projects within the Member States so as to ensure the conservation of biodiversity; notes that agriculture should slow the process of eutrophication and loss of biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the diversity of species and biotopes now seen as meriting protection can be attributed to the way in which land has been used for farming and forestry in Europe in the past, which should therefore be continued as part of a sustainable land-use strategy; points out in this connection that differing conditions such as climate, soil and the availability of water are found mainly at a local and regional level, and that regional conditions should therefore be taken into account and correspondingly differentiated possibilities for use should be found;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Reiterates the importance of maintaining strong and economically competitive agriculture and forestry so as to preserve Europe’s landscapes and biodiversity;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that our natural heritage is a major
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Points out that wild and domestic insects such as bees account for 80% of the pollination of flowering plants, and that the decline with which they are threatened represents an enormous challenge for our societies, whose agricultural production, and therefore food, depends in large part on the pollination of flowering plants; stresses, therefore, that particular attention should be paid to apiculture in the measures to be taken to protect biodiversity;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Believes that GMOs are a threat to biodiversity because they are spearheading the advance of monoculture and hence of a form of intensive agriculture which is impoverishing the countries of the South in particular and the entire farming population in general, and because they enrich those in whose hands the largest areas of land are concentrated; the wealth gap is exacerbated by the worldwide decline in the agricultural population;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to support initiatives by European citizens to protect biodiversity and encourage their participation through the introduction of a civilian biodiversity and environmental volunteering scheme to identify basis procedures and good practices also highlighting successful examples of ecosystem service payments both public and private, which could be subsequently applied at European level;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to support initiatives by European citizens, NGOs and the academic world to protect biodiversity
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to support initiatives by European citizens to protect biodiversity and encourage their participation through the introduction of a civilian biodiversity and environmental volunteering scheme to identify basis procedures and good practices which could be subsequently applied at European level; calls for farmers’ important role in maintaining biodiversity and their contribution to ecosystem services to be taken into account, with voluntary agri- environmental measures being the key approach;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recommends extending governance to the mobilisation of citizens, and also to non-profit organisations and economic actors, with the emphasis, in the case of the latter, being on integrating biodiversity into company strategies;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that our natural heritage is a major ecological asset which contributes to human wellbeing; takes the view that all EU Member States should cooperate and coordinate their efforts to ensure a more effective use of natural resources and limit damage to the biodiversity both of rural and of urbanised areas;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to organise biodiversity awareness and information campaigns for all ages and social categories, with the understanding that awareness campaigns for children and adolescents should, as a priority, be organised at school; takes the view that education and professional training, particularly in farming and related sectors, should be concentrated more on the
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to organise biodiversity awareness and information campaigns for all ages and social categories; believes that farmers have a major role in the conservation of biodiversity, and that they should therefore be encouraged and motivated to participate actively in the relevant programmes; takes the view that education and professional training, particularly in farming and related sectors, should be concentrated more on the protection of biodiversity.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need to organise biodiversity awareness and information campaigns for all ages and social categories; takes the view that education and professional training, particularly in farming, forestry and related sectors, should be concentrated more on the protection of biodiversity.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the need to support environmentally friendly farming practices, including the use of traditional seeds and local plant varieties in order to preserve biodiversity.
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that soil plays a vital role in achieving the EU’s biodiversity objective; considers that the CAP should, via an EU-funded top-up direct area payment, reward farmers who provide additional ecosystem services also for actions fostering biodiversity, implemented in addition to the obligations arising from good agro-environmental cross-compliance;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers it necessary to raise public awareness of the challenge for biodiversity towards 2020, particularly the part played by the Agricultural Sector in protecting their ecosystems.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Draws the Commission’s attention to the consequences for agricultural activity of certain biodiversity support policies, and in particular the impact of large predators (notably the bear and the wolf) on the agricultural economy, working conditions and the psychology of farmers;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to take into account the impact of climate change on species and habitats when setting targets for conservation and restoration of biodiversity (Target 1);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that current threats to biodiversity are principally fragmentation of ranges and habitats and toxicological effects on populations, leading to local and regional extinction, as well as abandonment of High Nature Value grazed pastoralist systems; Notes further that the environmental fluctuations inherent in climate change mean that species need to be able to move to adapt their ranges if large-scale local extinctions are to be avoided, therefore habitat connectivity is crucial; Considers that biodiversity should not and can not be limited to reserves, and a matrix of nature-friendly land use is needed, incorporating Natura 2000 sites, agri- environmental measures, permanent grasslands, ecological focus areas, within a diverse agricultural system that does not erode biodiversity but adds to it, e.g. via crop rotation which reduces the need to apply costly pesticides;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the new EU biodiversity strategy
source: PE-480.860
2012/02/14
ENVI
146 amendments...
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of the environment and therefore of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to further legitima
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change ; welcomes the Commission's CAP reform proposal that provides for a ‘greening’ of the CAP through the allocation of 30 % of Pillar I payments to a package of worthwhile, basic good practices applied at farm level, which should include crop rotation and diversification, permanent pasture and a minimum ‘ecological focus area’;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change ; welcomes the Commission’s CAP reform proposal that provides for a ‘greening’ of the CAP through the allocation of 30 % of Pillar I payments to a package of worthwhile, basic good practices applied at farm level, which should include crop rotation and diversification, permanent pasture and a minimum ‘ecological focus area’;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change by means of a greening component; welcomes the Commission’s CAP reform proposal that provides for a ‘greening’ of the CAP through the allocation of 30 % of Pillar I payments to a package of worthwhile, basic good greening practices applied at farm level, which should include crop rotation and diversification, permanent pasture and a minimum ‘ecological focus area’;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape,
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I, not forgetting its primary food production function, in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in a practical, cost-effective and simple way, in order to make income support for farmers more legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change; welcomes the Commission’s CAP reform proposal that provides for a ‘greening’ of the CAP through the allocation of 30 % of Pillar I payments to a package of worthwhile, basic good practices applied at the farm level, which should include
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for the greening of Pillar I in order to make income support for farmers legitimate by ensuring the conservation of biodiversity in the wider farmed landscape, improving connectivity and adapting to the effects of climate change ; welcomes the Commission's CAP reform proposal that provides for a
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Advocates the appropriateness of “Greening” practices to agricultural diversity in the various Member States, taking into account, for example, the specific situation of Mediterranean countries, which is not addressed by the proposed thresholds in relation to the diversification of crops and land of ecological importance; assembled crops, permanent crops (olive groves, vineyards, apple orchards) or rice crops are some examples of the practices that should be compatible with “greening”, given the high ecological and conservation value that some of these agricultural systems may have.
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Maintains that assistance to public and private actors protecting forest biodiversity of species, habitats and ecosystem services must increase in the new CAP, and eligibility must also be extended to areas connecting NATURA 2000 sites;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Notes that the general philosophy of the current CAP reform proposal points to a “greater market orientation” and towards “competitiveness”, calls for the dismantling or sever limitation of the instruments regulating production and the markets, as well as subjecting agriculture to the WTO rules, thereby promoting productavist models, which are intensive and export orientated, threaten and destroy the natural resources and biodiversity and are contradictory to the proclaimed “greening”;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules,
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments, including those made after 2014, to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments, to continue to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules, covering the Water Framework Directive, pesticides legislation and the Birds and Habitats Directives; further calls for an examination of these cross compliance rules in terms of the red tape involved and for their significant simplification if this red tape is found to be excessive;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules, covering the Water Framework Directive, pesticides legislation and the Birds and Habitats Directives; Supports, however, the Commission's proposal to apply less stringent cross compliance rules to small farmers participating in the Small Farmers Scheme, in recognition of their relatively low environmental impact and the bureaucratic difficulties they face as regards cross compliance measures.
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust cross-compliance rules, covering the Water Framework Directive, pesticides and biocides legislation and the Birds and Habitats Directives;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by robust
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls for all CAP payments to be underpinned by
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II in all Member States and for
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar in all Member States and the effectiveness of its agro-environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory spending on environmental measures;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II in all EU Member States and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar and the effectiveness of its agro-environmental measures, including through minimum mandatory spending on environmental measures; calls for the introduction of genuine incentive components with the aim of rewarding services to the ecosystem in agriculture;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements to the
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of th
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II, currently the core element of the CAP delivering environmental benefits, and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar and the effectiveness of its agr
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for drastic improvements to the environmental focus of that pillar and the effectiveness of its agro-environmental measures, including through m
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls for a strengthening of Pillar II and for
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Draws attention to the fact that the increase in the demand for agricultural fuels and the consequent intensification of pressure for their production in developing countries is threatening biodiversity, particularly in developing countries, through the degradation and conversion of habitats and ecosystems such as wetlands and forests, among others;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Acknowledges the critical report from the European Court of Auditors on the agri-environment schemes; notes that with the €22.2 billion available for 2007-2013 very limited environmental objectives have been met; urges the Commission to ensure that future agri-environmental subsidies are only approved under strict environmental criteria;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Considers that the inspection of agricultural practices should be strengthened in order to prevent the loss of biodiversity; in particular, considers that discharges of slurry should be controlled and even prohibited in the most sensitive areas in order to preserve ecosystems;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls for the inclusion of a new CAP measure "in situ and ex situ conservation of source-identified forest genetic material";
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. In order to enhance the ecological performance of production systems, demands an agro-ecological orientation of the EIP (European Innovation Partnership) in agriculture;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Calls for adapted legislation and incentives for the maintenance and further development of a diversity of farm genetic resources, e.g. locally adapted breeds and varieties;
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Calls on the Commission to safeguard European biodiversity with regard to the release of genetically modified organisms in the natural environment and come forward with an adequate liability regime to ensure restoration in case of release;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member States to take advantage of the phenomenon of land abandonment in various parts of Europe to
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member States, taking into full account the opinions and needs of the remaining communities living and or working in the area concerned, to take advantage of the phenomenon of land abandonment in various parts of Europe to rewild large parts of the landscape as major wilderness areas, providing new socio-economic opportunities for rural development whilst preserving Europe's biodiversity;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member States to take advantage, where possible and necessary for reaching concrete biodiversity targets, of the phenomenon of land abandonment in various parts of Europe to rewild large parts of the landscape as major wilderness areas, providing new socio-economic
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Urges the Member States and the Commission to encourage the adoption of Forest Management Plans, inter alia through the use of rural development measures and the LIFE+ programme; Stresses the need to include in forest management plans special biodiversity measures, notably special measures for conservation of protected species and natural habitats, in order to improve their status, within and beyond Natura 2000 areas;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Urges Member States to design their forestry policy in a way that takes fully into account the importance of forests in protecting biodiversity, in preventing soil erosion, in carbon sequestration and air purification and in maintaining the water cycle;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Warns of the fact that various highly valued species and habitats, from a conservation perspective, including those protected by Community legislation, are dependent on the agricultural environmental systems in which the man’s presence is a key factor; in this context, it highlights the importance in halting and reversing land abandonment, promoting the placement of people in rural areas; advocates increased support for small and medium sized agriculture, for family-based agriculture and for comprehensive agricultural practices, promoting good conservation practices of natural resources.
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Urges the Member States to include ecosystem-based measures to increase the resilience of forests against fires, as part of forest fire prevention schemes in their forest management plans;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Deplores the fact that up to date, the common fisheries policy has been driving biodiversity decline across marine environment and resources;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the Commission's proposals for the reform of the common fisheries policy (CFP), which should guarantee the implementation of the ecosystem approach and the application of updated scientific information serving as the basis for long- term management plans for all commercially exploited fish species and non-target species affected by commercial fishing; emphasises that only sustainable fishing offers a future for the fisheries sector;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the Commission's proposals for the reform of the common fisheries policy (CFP), which should guarantee the implementation of the ecosystem approach and the application of updated scientific information serving as the basis for long- term management plans for all commercially exploited fish species; emphasises that only
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement marine protected areas in which economic activities, including fishing, are the subject of strengthened ecosystem based management, making it possible to reconcile preserving the environment and practising sustainable fishing;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Raises, as a concern, the Commission’s insistence on the centralised management of the CFP, often resulting in inadequate guidelines of the reality and with results that are very often contrary to what was intended, considers the amendment of the CFP should ensure conditions for effective proximity management – the one that best ensures the necessary environmental sustainability – that defined objectives of a general nature have the complete freedom and autonomy to provide the most appropriate instruments to achieve these objectives, taking into account local, regional and national specificities;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Requests the Commission and Member States to consolidate their efforts in collecting scientific data on fish populations, where they are deficient, with the aim of offering more reliable scientific advice;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Stresses that there remain large gaps in knowledge regarding the state of marine ecosystems and fisheries resources, and calls for increased Community effort directed towards marine research and an increase in EU co-financing in the acquisition of biological data by the Member States, within the scope of the CFP (currently restricted to a maximum amount of 50 %);
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up efforts to ensure that catches fall below Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) levels by 2015 and to incorporate ecological considerations into the definition of MSYs; recalls the legal obligation – as set out in the Marine Framework Strategy Directive – to ensure that all commercially exploited fish stocks are within safe biological limits by 2020;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Underlines that Fisheries management should contribute to achieving favourable conservation status pursuant to the Birds and Habitats Directives and achieving the objective of Good Environmental Status (GES) under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD); Stresses that long-term management plans should be multi- species based rather than based on single species in order to better reflect an ecosystem-based approach and that strict timelines for their development should be set;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that the new CFP and all subsequent measures adopted by Member States shall be in full compliance with Directive 92/43/EEC, Directive 2009/147/EC and Directive 2008/56/EC;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that the aim of eliminating discards and by-catches of protected non- target species, including cetaceans, sea turtles and sea birds should be incorporated into the CFP and implemented as a matter of urgency; Moreover the new CFP should include a clear obligation to release non-target species with a high chance of survival;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that the aim of eliminating discards of less valuable target-species, and discards and by-catches of protected non-
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that the aim of eliminating discards and by-catches of protected non- target species should be incorporated into the CFP and implemented as a matter of urgency, given the diversity of fisheries at European level and differentiated approach that it necessarily demands;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Underlines that targets and timelines should be set for the reduction of overcapacity so that a net reduction of the fleet capacity can be pursued;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that the biodiversity of the marine environment is seriously jeopardised by illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU fishing) and stresses that cooperation between the EU Member States and third countries should be strengthened to combat IUU fishing;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Stresses the urgent need to ensure the identification and protection of spawning grounds and the creation of sanctuaries in the interests of marine biodiversity and food security;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes the establishment of fisheries reserves, areas in which fishing activities may be banned or restricted, is a particularly effective and cost-efficient measure to achieve the long term conservation of fish stocks; in this respect calls on Member States and the Council to designate fisheries reserves and the management rules to be established therein, with a particular focus on nursery grounds or spawning grounds for fish stocks;
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Points out that measures against the discards of juvenile and under-sized fish or catches beyond quota should be designed so as not to provide any perverse incentives to the landing and commercialisation of discards;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new) 21c. Stresses that the CFP regulation should be strengthened to ensure that catch limits and fishing efforts ceilings cannot be set above scientific advice;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken to prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas are recorded and documented to enable risk assessments to be carried out and recommendations to be made;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas; stresses the importance of making strategies on and surveys of alien species for each Member State at regular intervals;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas; encourages the Commission to support similar activities to those under the DASIE project (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe) to identify alien species;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken to prevent
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22 .Recognises the significant risk of invasive alien species from zoos, and other captive animal facilities, and through the accidental or deliberate release of wild pet animals and recommends that the Commission and Member States ensure adequate measures are taken to prevent animal escapes and restrict the private keeping of DAISIE- listed species as pets. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that measures taken prevent both the entry of new invasive alien species into the EU and the spread of currently established invasive alien species to new areas;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Recognises that prevention is more cost-effective and environmentally desirable than measures taken following the introduction and establishment of an invasive alien species; calls therefore on the Commission and the Members States to ensure that, as supported in the Convention on Biological Diversity, prevention is a priority with the import, trade and keeping of invasive alien species regulated at the EU-level based on transparent, scientific guidelines;
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Recognises that prevention is more cost-effective and environmentally desirable than measures taken following the introduction and establishment of an invasive alien species. Priority should therefore be given to preventing the introduction of invasive alien species, as supported in the Convention on Biological Diversity's hierarchical approach to IAS;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Advocates the need for strategies to manage and eradicate alien invading species, which have spread to such a degree has turned them into a serious ecological problem; considers these strategies should not be restricted to only those species considered a “priority”, as advocated by the Commission in its communication;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. In this regard, requests that the new legislation take into account greater preventive and palliative aid in order to confront the infestations of invasive species that already severely affect broad areas of Community territory. Considers that, until the planned legislation on invasive species enters into force, the appropriations to the territories currently affected by infestations of species included in the IUCN catalogue and the DAISIE system should be handled in a urgent manner;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Acknowledges that the majority of invasive vertebrate animal species in Europe were introduced intentionally (for deliberate release into the environment or for keeping in controlled settings in which animals escaped or were released); calls on the Commission and Members States to ensure that prevention is a priority with the import, trade and keeping of invasive alien species regulated at the EU-level based on transparent, scientific guidelines;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new) 22b. Calls on Member States to monitor and report regularly to the Commission and the other Member States on imports of exotic species into its territory; calls for greater restrictions on the importation and private possession of endangered species, such as primates, reptiles and amphibians;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien species in order to establish a common EU policy on the prevention, rapid alert, eradication and management of these species;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien species, which includes requirements to monitor imports of exotic and native species and increased restrictions on the import and private ownership of threatened species;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Urges the Commission to come forward in 2012 with a legislative proposal which takes a holistic approach to the problem of invasive alien
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Invites the Commission to continue and strengthen the support offered to research programmes aimed at preventing and monitoring harmful organisms concerning plant protection and to fund programmes targeted at specific parasites, both within the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (7th FP, 2007-2013) and in Horizon 2020, the future Strategic Framework for Research and Innovation (2014-2020); highlights the need to ensure the continued existence of the EUPHRESCO II project which links up phytosanitary research laboratories, and the Q-Detect and ISEFOR projects;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Calls on the Commission to note existing national strategies and action plans, and ensure that island habitats receive proportionate consideration in the upcoming Invasive Alien Species Regulation;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Climate change Recalls the inter-linkages between biodiversity and the climate system; conscientious of the significant negative impacts of climate change on biodiversity, underlines the inherent exacerbating impacts of biodiversity loss on climate due to the degradation of the carbon sink provided by natural environment; emphasises the urgency of biodiversity protection also as a means to mitigate climate change and maintain natural carbon sinks;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Invites the Commission to promote the modernisation of the Community phytosanitary system by 2012 based on recommendations arising from the external assessment conducted in 2009- 2010;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges the Commission to p
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to continue promoting a common approach to nature conservation in the whole EU territory, including Member States' outermost regions and overseas territories which are home to several important global biodiversity hotspots, noting in this regards, the Parliament's Preparatory Action on Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in Overseas Territories (BEST) for 2011-2012.
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Given the global character of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their crucial role for the global objectives of sustainable development, underlines that the EU strategy must also step up EU international efforts to avert biodiversity loss and thereby contribute more effectively to achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls of the Commission and the EU Member States to strictly implement and enforce Multilateral Environmental Agreements, including (but not limited to) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS);
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Recognises that the EU is a top importer of wildlife and through its policies and commercial activities influences biodiversity conservation in other parts of the world; Calls on the EU to take measures to reduce the negative impacts of EU consumption patterns on biodiversity by incorporating initiatives for sustainable agriculture and wildlife trade in all trade agreements;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the mainstreaming of biodiversity into global processes such as the Millennium Development Goals;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Acknowledges that there are direct and direct impacts on biodiversity resulting from liberalization of international trade; considers it essential that the same are appropriately assessed and avoided;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Encourages the Commission and Member States to continue to promote a common approach to nature conservation throughout the whole EU territory, including the outermost regions and overseas territories of the Member States, which host many biodiversity “hot spots” of global importance;
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to effectively mainstream environmental sustainability in their relations with third countries and to take measures to reduce the negative impacts of EU consumption patterns on biodiversity, by incorporating initiatives for sustainable agriculture and wildlife trade in all trade agreements; supports the Commission's proposal to include a chapter on sustainable development including biodiversity goals in all new trade agreements;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Supports the Commission's proposal to include a chapter on sustainable development in all new trade agreements providing for substantial environmental provisions of importance in the trade context including on biodiversity goals;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Calls on the Rio +20 Earth Summit to make concrete progress on innovative and independent sources of finance for biodiversity protection in developing countries and insists that the EU and its Member States be proactive in achieving results in this regard;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Urges the Commission to enhance the contribution of EU trade policy to conserving biodiversity; therefore underlines its support for including a chapter on sustainable development in all new trade agreement providing for substantial environmental provions of importance in the trade context on biodiversity goals;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new) 24c. Calls on Commission and Member States to 'biodiversity proof' EU development cooperation in order to prevent biodiversity loss; taking into account that people with lowest incomes are the most dependent on ecosystem services;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 d (new) 24d. Recognises the increase in the illegal international trafficking of species that fall under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to increase the capacity of Interpol in this respect and to prioritise the issue of illegal wildlife trade in bilateral discussions with third countries;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission and Member States to identify all existing environmentally harmful subsidies, and calls on the Commission to publish by the end of 2012 an action plan, including a timetable, to phase such
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission and Member States to identify all existing environmentally harmful subsidies according to objective criteria, and calls on the Commission to publish by the end of 2012 an action plan to phase such subsidies out by 2020, in line with the Nagoya commitments;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the Commission and Member States to identify all existing environmentally harmful subsidies, and calls on the Commission to publish by the end of 2012 an action plan on how to phase such subsidies out by 2020, in line with the Nagoya commitments;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new) 25a. Stresses the need to increase the budget for research dedicated to the environment and biodiversity under the next Research Framework Programme, proportionate to the huge needs and challenges of tackling both biodiversity loss and climate change, in order to contribute to closing identified knowledge gaps and supporting policy;
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Emphasises the importance of mobilising both EU and national financial support from all possible sources, including the creation of a specific instrument to finance biodiversity, and developing innovative financial mechanisms to
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Emphasises the importance of mobilising both EU and national financial support from all possible sources and developing innovative financial mechanisms
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Welcomes the launch of the Business and Biodiversity Platform by the Commission to engage the private sector in the biodiversity agenda;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new) 26a. Urges the Commission to report to Parliament and the Council on options for the introduction of payments for ecosystem services taking into account the role of biodiversity conservation;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses the imperative need to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020) supports the achievement of the six targets set out in the Biodiversity Strategy and that the funding for the LIFE programme is reinforced;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses the imperative need to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020) supports the achievement of the six targets set out in the Biodiversity Strategy; emphasises the necessity to focus on corporate social responsibility projects towards biodiversity;
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Stresses the imperative need to ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (2014-2020) dedicates at least 1 % of the resources to environment protection and supports the achievement of the six targets set out in the Biodiversity Strategy;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Advocates for greater Community accountability for the protection of the natural resources in the Natura 2000 Network, especially in terms of its financing;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new) 27b. Notes the difficulties experienced by several Members States in the management of areas included in the Natura 2000 Network, due to the lack of a specific financial instrument aimed at the management of the areas included in the Natura 2000 Network, which complements the inclusion of biodiversity concerns in the sectoral policies;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding;
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding; calls, further, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate funding is made available through the CAP funds, the European Maritime and
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that a
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding; calls, further, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate funding is made available through the CAP funds, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the cohesion funds and the strengthening of the LIFE+ fund;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding; calls, further, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate funding, assesses with regard to the Member States' Natura 2000 Priority Action Frameworks, is made available through the CAP funds, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the cohesion funds and the LIFE+ fund;
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. With a view to ensuring adequate financing of the Natura 2000 network, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that at least €5.8 billion per year is provided through EU and Member State funding; calls, further, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate funding is made available through several EU funds (such as the CAP funds, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the cohesion funds and the LIFE+ fund);
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Notes with concern that the number of projects financed under the LIFE+ programme each year is below the indicative allocation in various Member States; invites the Commission to assess the reasons for this under-implementation and where necessary to propose changes to the rules governing the programme, particularly as regards co-financing levels;
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Calls on the Commission and the EIB Group to design innovative, joint budget-EIB financing instruments for investments supporting biodiversity, and the related provision by the EIB Group of technical and financial advisory services, consistent with the Bank's environmental performance standards;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Proposes holding an annual tripartite meeting between the Council and the Commission and the European Parliament, to review the progress of the Strategy on biodiversity, as well as an annual conference on biodiversity involving non-governmental organisations from several Member States, European and national parliamentarians, paying special attention each year to a previously defined subject;
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new) 28b. Expresses its disappointment with the proposed allocation for the new LIFE program, which, despite the remarkable success of this program over two decades, continues to have an insignificant part of the EU budge; considers that the challenges posed in the biodiversity and Nature conservation plan require a substantial increase funds allocated to the LIFE program;
source: PE-480.679
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-478368_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-480548_EN.html
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.540New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-PR-478540_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE476.103&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-476103_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.669New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-480669_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.435&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-478435_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.679New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-480679_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.368&secondRef=02
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.548&secondRef=02
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0244/COM_COM(2011)0244_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0244/COM_COM(2011)0244_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/8/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-101&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0101_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-146New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0146_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/06548New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0244:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0244:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0244/COM_COM(2011)0244_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0244/COM_COM(2011)0244_EN.pdf |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-0101&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-101&language=EN |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|