Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | GAUZÈS Jean-Paul ( PPE) | GOULARD Sylvie ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution in response to the Commission communication on the contribution to the Annual Growth Survey (AGS) 2012.
Members welcome the AGS 2012 as presented by the Commission as a good basis for this year’s European Semester. They agree with the Commission’s analysis that efforts at national and EU level should concentrate on the following five priorities :
pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation while ensuring economic recovery and job creation; ensuring long-term financing of the real economy; promoting sustainable growth through more competitiveness and investments; tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis; modernising EU public administration and services of general interest.
The resolution stresses that the solutions specifically targeting the current sovereign debt and financial crisis, on which all the institutions are working on a daily basis, should go hand in hand with a major focus on medium- and long-term growth-enhancing measures , as well as an overhaul of the general economic framework, in order to improve the sustainability and competitiveness of the European economy and ensure its long-lasting success.
Members deem however that the Annual Growth Survey falls short of what is necessary to restore confidence among European households and enterprises as well as financial markets, since it overlooks the need to take urgent action to support short-term activity and employment in investing in the EU 2020 objectives. They d eplore the lack of, or unevenness in, the implementation in the Member States of guidelines agreed at the EU level.
In this context, the resolution makes the following recommendations:
(1) Pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation while ensuring economic recovery and job creation : Parliament urges Member States to take the appropriate steps to correct their excessive deficits by the deadlines set by the Council and to reduce their sovereign debts to a sustainable level. It underlines the fact that Member States should pursue differentiated strategies according to their budgetary situations and insist that Member States must keep their public expenditure growth below the rate of medium-term trend GDP growth provided that increased expenditure is not matched by additional discretionary revenue measures.
Member States are invited to prioritise, on the expenditure and revenue sides of the budget, growth-friendly policies , such as education, research, innovation, infrastructure and energy, and to ensure the efficiency of such expenditures and revenues. Members call for efficient, socially just and sustainable reform:
of the pension and social security systems , growth-friendly tax policies in the Member States, better tax coordination and where appropriate harmonisation in the EU; encourages the Member States to improve their domestic fiscal frameworks as agreed with a view to promoting efficient and sustainable fiscal policies.
The Commission for its part is called upon to ensure the coordination of measures against tax evasion .
(2) Ensuring long-term financing of the real economy : Members believe that more diligent and ambitious measures are required in order to enhance the resilience of the EU financial system . The resolution underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks’ capital positions and measures to support their access to funding, as far as possible curtailing short-term remuneration systems and inadequate business models.
It stresses that, after having been correctly capitalised, banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy and therefore regulatory actions should lay the basis for an increase in their lending capacity. The Commission is invited to ensure that the European system of financial supervision maintains bank lending, in particular by those institutions that benefited from crisis-related State aid and the support of ECB liquidity lines. Parliament expects the Commission to make its proposals on crisis bank management before Summer 2012 .
Parliament supports the creation of project bonds designed to contribute to the financing of key infrastructure projects in order to promote sustainable growth and jobs.
(3) Promoting sustainable growth through more competitiveness and investments : Members are worried by the macroeconomic imbalances within the EU and the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity. They insist on the role of enhanced coordination of economic policies as well as structural reforms in tackling these problems in both deficit and surplus countries in an adequate way.
(4) Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis : Parliament believes that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour will hinder recovery and long-term growth. It therefore calls for structural reforms in the labour market , while respecting the subsidiarity principle and ensuring social cohesion. It draws attention to the role and responsibilities of the social partners in the design and implementation of structural reforms.
(5) Modernising EU public administration and services of general interest : the resolution recalls that the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of competitiveness and an important productivity factor. Public-sector reforms are an imperative part of restoring competitiveness.
Members call for more efficiency in the delivery of public services as well as an increase in the transparency and quality of public administration and the judiciary, and further encourage reductions in the unnecessary administrative burden and red tape . They underline the importance of monitoring and evaluating civil service performance in conformity with the subsidiarity principle. Lastly, regretting the slow pace of the implementation of EU legislation by certain Member States, Members call on the latter to deliver the agreed results concerning the quality of statistics .
(6) Procedural framework : the resolution deplores the fact that the involvement of the European Parliament in the elaboration of the BEPG (Broad Economic Policy Guidelines)/AGS is not formally provided for by the Treaty, whilst Parliament’s contribution to employment topics is made under the consultation procedure (Article 148(2) TFEU). It recalls that the AGS should be subject to a codecision procedure that should be introduced by the next treaty change.
Stressing that the European Semester is now part of EU secondary legislation, Parliament wishes to step up dialogue between EU and national institutions, in particular parliamentary institutions, where appropriate and with mutual respect and consent. They recall that the economic governance legal framework (the ‘six pack’) provides the tool of economic dialogue and should be utilised as much as possible.
Members invite the Commission to present future surveys under the title ‘ Annual Sustainable Growth Guidelines ’. Parliament also urges the Commission to provide a detailed assessment of the implementation by Member States of the country-specific recommendations that it will make public before the June 2012 European Council. It also recalls the fact that the Council should explain its position publicly as part of the economic dialogue in Parliament when it diverges significantly from Commission recommendations and proposals.
Lastly, the Commission, the Council and the European Council are urged to agree with Parliament on a streamlined timetable for the European Semester in order to make it as effective, transparent and legitimate as possible.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Jean-Paul GAUZÈS (EPP, FR) in response to the Commission communication on the contribution to the Annual Growth Survey (AGS) 2012.
Members welcome the AGS 2012 as presented by the Commission as a good basis for this year’s European Semester. They agree with the Commission’s analysis that efforts at national and EU level should concentrate on the following five priorities :
pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation while ensuring economic recovery and job creation; ensuring long-term financing of the real economy; promoting sustainable growth through more competitiveness and investments; tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis; modernising EU public administration and services of general interest.
Members deem however that the Annual Growth Survey falls short of what is necessary to restore confidence among European households and enterprises as well as financial markets, since it overlooks the need to take urgent action to support short-term activity and employment in investing in the EU 2020 objectives. They d eplore the lack of, or unevenness in, the implementation in the Member States of guidelines agreed at the EU level, bearing in mind the necessary margin of discretion which the Member States enjoy to pursue their own policies, which prevents the agreed guidelines from unleashing their full potential to achieve EU 2020 goals.
In this context, the report makes the following recommendations:
Pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation while ensuring economic recovery and job creation : Members urge Member States to take the appropriate steps to correct their excessive deficits by the deadlines set by the Council and to reduce their sovereign debts to a sustainable level. They underline the fact that Member States should pursue differentiated strategies according to their budgetary situations and insist that Member States must keep their public expenditure growth below the rate of medium-term trend GDP growth provided that increased expenditure is not matched by additional discretionary revenue measures.
Member States are invited to prioritise, on the expenditure and revenue sides of the budget, growth-friendly policies , such as education, research, innovation, infrastructure and energy, and to ensure the efficiency of such expenditures and revenues. Members call for efficient, socially just and sustainable reform:
of the pension and social security systems , growth-friendly tax policies in the Member States, better tax coordination and where appropriate harmonisation in the EU; encourages the Member States to improve their domestic fiscal frameworks as agreed with a view to promoting efficient and sustainable fiscal policies.
The Commission for its part is called upon to ensure the coordination of measures against tax evasion .
Ensuring long-term financing of the real economy : Members believe that more diligent and ambitious measures are required in order to enhance the resilience of the EU financial system . The report underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks’ capital positions and measures to support their access to funding, as far as possible curtailing short-term remuneration systems and inadequate business models.
It stresses that, after having been correctly capitalised, banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy and therefore regulatory actions should lay the basis for an increase in their lending capacity. The Commission is invited to ensure that the European system of financial supervision maintains bank lending, in particular by those institutions that benefited from crisis-related State aid and the support of ECB liquidity lines. Members expect the Commission to make its proposals on crisis bank management before Summer 2012 .
Promoting sustainable growth through more competitiveness and investments : Members are worried by the macroeconomic imbalances within the EU and the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity. They insist on the role of enhanced coordination of economic policies as well as structural reforms in tackling these problems in both deficit and surplus countries in an adequate way.
Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis : Members believe that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour will hinder recovery and long-term growth. They therefore calls for structural reforms in the labour market , while respecting the subsidiarity principle and ensuring social cohesion. They draw attention to the role and responsibilities of the social partners in the design and implementation of structural reforms.
Modernising EU public administration and services of general interest : the report recalls that the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of competitiveness and an important productivity factor. Public-sector reforms are an imperative part of restoring competitiveness.
Members call for more efficiency in the delivery of public services as well as an increase in the transparency and quality of public administration and the judiciary, and further encourage reductions in the unnecessary administrative burden and red tape . They underline the importance of monitoring and evaluating civil service performance in conformity with the subsidiarity principle. Lastly, regretting the slow pace of the implementation of EU legislation by certain Member States, Members call on the latter to deliver the agreed results concerning the quality of statistics .
Procedural framework : the committee responsible deplores the fact that the involvement of the European Parliament in the elaboration of the BEPG (Broad Economic Policy Guidelines)/AGS is not formally provided for by the Treaty, whilst Parliament’s contribution to employment topics is made under the consultation procedure (Article 148(2) TFEU). It recalls that the AGS should be subject to a codecision procedure that should be introduced by the next treaty change.
Members wish to step up dialogue between EU and national institutions, in particular parliamentary institutions, where appropriate and with mutual respect and consent. They recall that the economic governance legal framework (the ‘six pack’) provides the tool of economic dialogue and should be utilised as much as possible.
The report urges the Commission to provide a detailed assessment of the implementation by Member States of the country-specific recommendations that it will make public before the June 2012 European Council. It also recalls the fact that the Council should explain its position publicly as part of the economic dialogue in Parliament when it diverges significantly from Commission recommendations and proposals.
Lastly, the Commission, the Council and the European Council are urged to agree with Parliament on a streamlined timetable for the European Semester in order to make it as effective, transparent and legitimate as possible.
The Council discussed the Commission's annual growth survey, focusing on ways at the current juncture to promote growth and employment in the short and medium term without compromising the fiscal consolidation necessary for restoring sustainability and confidence. Draft conclusions will be prepared in the light of the Council's discussion, for adoption at its meeting on 21 February 2012.
The Commission's annual growth survey outlines priority actions to be taken by Member States in order to ensure better-coordinated and more effective policies for putting Europe's economy on a path to sustainable growth.
1. Pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation:
M ember States benefitting from financial assistance programmes and those under close market scrutiny should continue to meet agreed budgetary targets in spite of possibly changing macro-economic conditions; Member States with a significant adjustment gap under excessive deficit procedure, or a high deficit should step up their consolidation efforts. Possible limited downwards revisions of the main macro-economic scenario should not result in delays in the correction of excessive deficits; i n Member States which do not have an excessive deficit, and that are on an appropriate adjustment path towards their medium-term objectives, budgetary policy can play its counter-cyclical and stabilising role, as long as medium-term fiscal sustainability is not put at risk.
On the expenditure side, Member States should keep public expenditure growth below the rate of medium-term trend GDP growth.
2) Restoring normal lending to the economy: t he bank excesses leading up to the crisis have resulted in a widespread fragility in the sector and now risk acting as a brake on economic recovery. Restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of banks capital positions and measures to support banks access to funding, and will help to sever the link between the sovereign crisis and the financial sector. The objective is also to address the weakness in the current regulatory and supervisory framework and enable more normal lending patterns to business and to private households, without the excessive risk taking of the pre-crisis period.
3) Promoting growth and competitiveness : placing particular emphasis on the digital economy, the internal market for services, as well as a better use of the EU budget (in particular the potential of the Structural Funds) in favour of growth and competitiveness.
4) Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis , in particular by i) promoting labour mobility, ii) facilitating the recognition of professional qualifications, iii) strengthening cooperation between public employment services, iv) restricting access to early retirement schemes while supporting longer working lives, v) improving access to lifelong learning, and vi) protecting the vulnerable.
5) Modernising public administration: the Commission is of the opinion that the Member States should give priority to the following actions: i) improving their business environments by minimising administrative burdens, reducing unnecessary regulations and permits and introducing simpler and quicker procedures in particular in their judicial systems; ii) ensuring that exchanges between administrations and enterprises, as well as citizens, can be done digitally; iii) facilitating the creation of new businesses by implementing the commitment in the Small Business Act to reduce the time for starting up of a company to 3 days, and iv) building administrative capacity, in particular the necessary expertise to ensure speedier disbursement of unused funds on growth-enhancing projects.
The European Semester was implemented for the first time in 2011 as part of a reform of EU economic governance. The 2012 European Semester will be the second such exercise, but the first since a new procedure on excessive economic imbalances was introduced as part of the governance reform.
At its meeting on 1 and 2 March , the European Council will assess implementation of country-specific recommendations made under the 2011 European Semester and will provide guidance for 2012.
The Council took note of oral information from the Commission concerning the Annual Growth Survey for 2012 ( 17229/11 + ADD 1 + ADD 2 + ADD 3 + ADD 4 ), which was published on 23 November 2011, launching the 2012 European semester of economic governance. The survey is the basis for building the necessary common understanding on the priorities for action at national and EU level for the next twelve months, which should then feed into national economic and budgetary decisions, taking up the EU country-specific recommendations and where relevant the commitments made under the Euro Plus Pact.
The Commission will present to the June European Council a detailed assessment of the implementation by member states of the country-specific recommendations and the Euro Plus Pact commitments in the country-by-country analysis.
It should be recalled that, for 2012, the Commission is of the opinion that efforts at national and EU level should concentrate on the following five priorities:
1) pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation;
2) restoring normal lending to the economy;
3) promoting growth and competitiveness for today and tomorrow;
4) tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis; and
5) modernising public administration.
PURPOSE: to present the Annual Growth Survey 2012.
CONTENT: the annual growth survey is the starting point for the European Semester, which involves simultaneous monitoring of the member states' fiscal policies and structural reforms, in accordance with common rules, during a six-month period every year.
The European Semester was implemented for the first time in 2011 as part of a reform of EU economic governance. The 2012 European Semester will be the second such exercise, but the first since the establishment of a new procedure for excessive economic imbalances in the framework of the “ six pack ” on the reform of economic governance.
The Autumn forecasts for 2011-2013 published by the Commission show that economic recovery has come to a standstill and that low levels of confidence are adversely affecting investment and consumption. The impact has been particularly acute in the Euro area. As a result, GDP is likely to stagnate in the coming year and overall growth in the EU is forecast to be as low as 0.6% for 2012. Unemployment levels are likely to remain high at around 10% in 2012 and into 2013, exacerbating the social impact of the crisis.
The growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, depend on dealing decisively with the sovereign debt crisis and demonstrating that the Euro is a stable and strong currency whose members are determined and capable of implementing sound economic policies.
The growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, depend on dealing decisively with the sovereign debt crisis and demonstrating that the Euro is a stable and strong currency whose members are determined and capable of implementing sound economic policies.
The annual growth review fir this year has a strong emphasis on the need to implement the agreed measures. Now that the parties reached agreement on a new form of economic governance that recognises the greater interdependence of economies of Member States, the priority must be to implement what was agreed but with a clear focus on measures conducive to growth.
CONTENT: the Commission’s annual review presents a series of priority actions to be undertaken by Member States to ensure a better coordination and greater effectiveness of policies so that the European economy may lead the way in terms of sustainable growth. For 2012, is suggested that efforts at national and EU level should focus on the following priorities:
(1) Pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation : government debt levels have increased markedly – by 20 percentage points on average over 2007-2010 as a result of the crisis – and are expected to reach 85% of GDP in the EU and 90% in the Euro area by 2012 . Member States are not all in the same situation so differentiated strategies should be pursued within the common framework, taking account of country-specific fiscal and macro-financial risks. In particular:
Member States benefitting from financial assistance programmes and those under close market scrutiny should continue to meet agreed budgetary targets in spite of possibly changing macro-economic conditions; Member States with a significant adjustment gap under excessive deficit procedure, or a high deficit should step up their consolidation efforts. Possible limited downwards revisions of the main macro-economic scenario should not result in delays in the correction of excessive deficits; in Member States which do not have an excessive deficit, and that are on an appropriate adjustment path towards their medium-term objectives, budgetary policy can play its counter-cyclical and stabilising role, as long as medium-term fiscal sustainability is not put at risk.
On the expenditure side , Member States should keep public expenditure growth below the rate of medium-term trend GDP growth. The Commission considers that Member States should give particular attention to the following:
prioritising growth-friendly expenditure, such as education, research, innovation and energy which are an investment in future growth; pursuing the reform and modernisation of pension systems.
To take better account of the need to integrate tax policy this year's Annual Growth Survey contains a new annex on growth-friendly tax policies in Member States and better tax coordination in the EU.
(2) Restoring normal lending to the economy : the bank excesses leading up to the crisis have resulted in a widespread fragility in the sector and now risk acting as a brake on economic recovery. Restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of banks capital positions and measures to support banks access to funding, and will help to sever the link between the sovereign crisis and the financial sector. The objective is to address the weakness in the current regulatory and supervisory framework.
In a short-term perspective, the Commission considers that priority should be given to:
strengthening of the capital positions of systemic banks; facilitating bank access to term funding by implementing temporary measures (e.g. public guarantees) so as to limit the impact of banking sector reform on the flow of credit to the real economy, avoiding the risk of further tightening credit conditions; creating a specific regime adapted for SME growth markets allowing them to be more visible to investors and subjecting SMEs to proportionate listing requirements; developing a new European venture capital regime that will enable EU venture capital funds to market their funds and raise capital on a pan-European basis across the Single Market; completing the implementation of a new regulatory framework for EU financial markets in accordance with G20 commitments and strengthening the new EU-level arrangements for financial supervision.
(3) Promoting growth and competitiveness : by putting particular emphasis on the digital economy , the internal market for services and external trade as well as better use of EU budget (including the potential of structural funds) in favour of growth and competitiveness.
Putting emphasis on efficient use of resources, for example, in areas such as energy efficiency and waste reduction can improve competitiveness, create new jobs and help preserve the environment. Priority should also be given to reforms to improve the business environment.
A targeted programme to accelerate growth is also necessary. To support these efforts, the Commission has identified a series of EU-level decisions which, if taken quickly, could give an immediate boost to growth. These include the 12 proposals of the " Small Business Act ", which the European Parliament and the Council have already agreed to adopt by using the accelerated procedure.
(4) Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis : unemployment has increased significantly as a result, with 23 million people unemployed in the EU today. Between 2008 and 2010, the total number of young (under 25) unemployed in the EU increased by one million – making it one of the groups that have been worst affected by the crisis. Moreover, one out of seven (14.4%) currently leaves the education system with no more than lower secondary education and participates in no further education and training.
To create jobs and ensure a job-rich recovery , the Commission considers that Member States should give particular priority to the following: (i) enhancing labour mobility; (ii) facilitating the recognition of professional qualifications and experience ; (iii) strengthening cooperation between public employment services; (iv) supporting employment especially of young people; (v) protecting the vulnerable.
(5) Modernising public administration : the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of competitiveness, and an important productivity factor. The on-going pressure on public finances is driving major changes and restructuring of the public sector.
The Commission considers that Member States should give priority to: (i) improving their business environments by minimising administrative burdens, including by avoiding "gold plating" when transposing EU legislation and by reducing unnecessary regulations and permits, and introducing simpler and quicker procedures, in particular in their judicial systems; (ii) ensuring that exchanges between administrations and enterprises as well as citizens can be done digitally; (iii) facilitating the creation of new businesses by implementing the commitment in the Small Business Act to reduce the time for starting up of a company to 3 days; (iv) where absorption rates of EU structural funds is low, building administrative capacity, including the necessary expertise and continuity of management, to ensure speedier disbursement of unused funds on growth-enhancing projects.
In conclusion, the Commission invites:
the European Council to take note of this Annual Growth Survey and to task Council formations to consider it and report to the Spring European Council so that the March European Council can adopt appropriate guidance for the 2012 European semester; the Member States to reflect the guidance agreed by the Spring European Council in their next Stability and Convergence Programmes and their National Reform Programmes in the spring 2012.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)322
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0048/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0018/2012
- Debate in Council: 3141
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.675
- Debate in Council: 3139
- Committee draft report: PE478.513
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0815
- Committee draft report: PE478.513
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE478.675
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)322
Activities
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
111 |
2011/2319(INI)
2012/01/12
ECON
111 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 – having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 23 November 201
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Asks the Commission to work in close cooperation with the Council in order to develop a genuine and common budget and accounting nomenclature;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines the fact that the Council
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines the fact that the Council is expected
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19 a. Stresses in this regard that the Commission recommendations and proposals must respect and preserve Member State policy space required for implementation in conformity with the principle of subsidiary and the provisions of article 126 as several means can be conducive to the attainment of goals and target recommended;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19 b. Urges the Commission to explain thoroughly the reason why it assessed negatively the NRP or SCP and any other document the Member States have submitted in the economic governance framework; expects that by doing so, the Commission will provide the Member State concerned its detailed methodology and working hypothesis underpinning its assessment;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Applauds the Commission for having published its Annual Growth Survey by the
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Deems however the Annual Growth Survey falls short of what is necessary to restore confidence amid European households and enterprises as well as financial markets since it overlooks the need to take urgent action to support short term activity and employment in investing in the EU 2020 objectives;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23 a. Mandates its President to defend this position during the Spring European Council ( 1-2 March 2012);
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Instructs the European Council and the Commission to integrate the following changes into the recommendations for the European Semester 2012 as proposed in this resolution ans presented in its annex;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Deems that National Reform Programmes should contain an investment chapter designed by Member States in consultation with the European Commission setting out investments to be gradually undertaken in order to bridge the gap between the commitments they took regarding the five headline targets and the current levels in those fields;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Annual Growth Survey 2011 and a number of other initiatives such as the Euro Plus Pact
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the Annual Growth Survey 2011 and a number of other initiatives such as the Euro Plus Pact, which needs to be implemented through national and European legislation, already contained most of the elements which are necessary to regain confidence, increase competitiveness and achieve growth;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the lack of, or unevenness in, the implementation in the Member States of
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Deplores the lack of, or unevenness in, the implementation in the Member States of policies and actions agreed at the EU level, which prevent the agreed measures from unleashing their full potential to achieve EU 2020 goals; welcomes the fact of this year's Annual Growth Survey's emphasis being put on the need for implementation as well as on growth- enhancing actions; underlines the fact that
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2011 on the financial, economic and social crisis: recommendations concerning the measures and initiatives to be taken1, ________________________ 1 P7_TA(2011)0331
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees that the AGS s
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees that the AGS, and the official positions published by the other European institutions, should continue to lay the basis for building the necessary common understanding about the priorities for action at national and EU level for the next twelve months, which should then feed into national economic and budgetary decisions, in line with the EU's country- specific recommendations;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Agrees that the AGS should continue to lay the basis for building the necessary common understanding about the priorities for action at national and EU level for the next twelve months
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. A
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point 1 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point 2 ·
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point 3 · Promoting
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – point 5 · Modernising EU public administration and services of general interest;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Believes that the dominant economic and growth model promoted by the Annual Growth Survey 2012 is wrong; The priorities of the Annual Survey of 2012 that Commission sets, are dramatically far from the targets of economic efficiency, social and environmental justice, real economic convergence, solidarity and sustainable development;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A (new) A. Whereas the latest statistical evidence highlights rising inequalities and unemployment in the European Union,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the evaluation of the progress of the flagship initiatvies of the EU 2020 strategy, but underlines that the fight against social exclusion and poverty should remain at the centre of every policy;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Believes that access to basic banking services remains a key factor for social inclusion and therefore encourages the Commission to take bolder actions to guarantee this access;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 (new) I- Pursuing differentiated growth-friendly fiscal consolidation while ensuring economic recovery and job creation
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the interdependence between Member State economies and fiscal policies; stresses that the debt crisis is a product of unregulated financial markets operate; emphasizes that the pursuit of zero deficits and balanced budgets, essentially institutionalizes the continuing austerity, recession, poverty and unemployment; stresses that the growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the interdependence and therefore spill-over effects between Member State economies and fiscal policies; stresses that the growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, are highly dependent on how decisively the private and the sovereign debt crisis is dealt with; urges Member States to correct their excessive deficits by the deadlines set by the Council provided that neither additional exceptional circumstances nor a renewed economic downturn could be invoked; urges Member States to implement with due diligence and as soon as possible the recapitalisation of their banking systems;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the interdependence between Member State economies and fiscal policies; stresses that the growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, are highly dependent on how decisively the sovereign debt crisis is dealt with; urges Member States experiencing financial problems to take the appropriate steps to correct their excessive deficits by the deadlines set by the Council and to reduce their sovereign debts to a sustainable level according to the stipulations in the "6 pack";
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the interdependence between Member State economies and fiscal policies; stresses that the growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, are highly dependent on how decisively the sovereign debt crisis is dealt with; urges Member States to correct their excessive deficits by the deadlines set by the Council and to better focus on investment and growth orientated expenditure;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Acknowledges the interdependence between Member State economies and fiscal policies; stresses that the growth prospects of all Member States, whether they are currently in the Euro area or not, are highly dependent on how decisively the sovereign debt crisis is dealt with
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Emphasises that because of structural weaknesses in the eurozone, it is extremely doubtful that relatively small economies will manage successfully to follow adjustment procedures in times of turbulence and crisis; stresses also that because of its inherent characteristics, the single currency has served the interests of the economically strong countries at the expense of the weaker economies;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B (new) B. Whereas most Member States have lost track of the headline targets of the EU2020 objectives,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Takes note of the new legislative proposals on economic governance, believes that such proposals offer the opportunity to enhance the role of the European Parliament regarding the definition and implementation of economic policy surveillance procedures within the European Semester framework in conformity with the provisions of article 121 and 136 of the Treaty;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Recalls that in the current context where several Members States are confronted with stringent and difficult choices in terms of allocation of public resources it is urgent to ensure the consistency of different economic policy instruments and in particular policies conducive to the respect of EU 2020 objectives and headline targets on an equal basis; deems that specific economic surveillance procedures could be created or enhanced with that purpose;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6 c. Recalls in that perspective the need to explicitly identify assess and address spill- over effects of Member States economic policies as well as to carry on social impact assessments of economic policy instruments included in the EU Semester framework;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the fact that Member States should pursue differentiated strategies according to their budgetary and macroeconomic situations and insists that Member States must keep their
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the fact that Member States should pursue differentiated strategies
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines the fact that Member States should pursue differentiated strategies according to their budgetary situations and insists that Member States must keep their public expenditure growth below or equal to the rate of medium-term trend GDP growth provided that increased expenditure is not matched by additional discretionary revenue measures ; invites the Member States to explicitly identify and prioritise growth-
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Underlines that fiscal policy is an important tool in the management of economic and development policy; EU Member States must have the capability and the flexibility to pursue an effective, and counter-cyclical stabilization policy, geared to redistribution and sustainable development.EU Member States should provide an adequate level of social goods, public services and infrastructure for EU citizens;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Stresses that the taxation policy promoted by the EU is far from a fair and socially acceptable, common European taxation policy. Such policy would have a growth-oriented and redistributive role and would be able to address the serious problem of tax competition, of the effective control and the booming of the tax havens. Believes that the dominant political choice of the EU is the reduction of direct taxes on higher incomes, businesses and all sources of wealth. Moreover, Member States adopt fiscal measures to further facilitate the growth of multinationals companies while at the same time put the burden further on workers who have to face and increases in indirect taxes combined with austerity programs and cuts in wages and pensions;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 (new) II- Ensuring long-term financing of the real economy
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the fact that a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector is underway, stresses that this should not hinder the competitiveness of the European Union;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the fact that a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector is underway; stresses that this must be undertaken in a way that discourages regulatory arbitrage and which does not encourage capital flight or the relocation of financial activity from the EU;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the fact that a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector is underway; believes that more diligent and ambitious measures are required in order to enhance the resilience of the EU financial system;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks' capital positions and measures to support their access to funding; a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector will be necessary, which includes a strengthening of the capital positions of systemic banks; stresses that banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks' capital positions and measures to support their access to funding; a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector will be necessary, which includes a strengthening of the capital positions of systemic banks; stresses that banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy; underlines the important role of the EIB group in supporting the real economy and SMEs in particular; encourages the EIB to preserve its "AAA" credit rating;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks' capital positions and measures to support their access to funding; deems that a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector will be necessary, which includes a strengthening of the capital positions of
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks' capital positions and measures to support their access to funding; a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector will be necessary in order to reflect heightened risks in the sovereign debt markets, which includes a strengthening of the capital positions of systemic banks; stresses that banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 a (new) Key message with a view of the Spring European Council:
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines the fact that restoring investor confidence will require a strengthening of the banks' capital positions and measures to support their access to funding in a way that prohibits short term featured remuneration systems and inadequate business models; a major overhaul of regulation and supervision of the financial sector will be necessary, which includes a strengthening of the capital positions of systemic banks; stresses that banks should not unduly restrict lending to the real economy;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Notes that the main reasons for the huge deficits and the subsequent steep increase in borrowing costs are phenomena such as tax competition that has reduced the tax burden of capital at the expense of labour, the socialization of private losses through injections of liquidity in the banking sector and the speculative behaviour of rating agencies and international financial centres;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Supports the creation of project bonds designed to contribute to the financing of key infrastructures projects in order to promote sustainable growth and jobs;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Underlines the key role of the EIB to maintain and increase the loan to SME and to ensure investments in the long- term infrastructure project in line with the EU 2020 strategy;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 (new) III- Promoting sustainable growth through more competitiveness and investments
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is worried by the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity; insists on the role of structural reforms and the liberalisation of services in tackling this problem; is worried by the fact that the bulk of global growth is expected to come from outside the EU in the coming years, which will necessitate a strengthening of the export capacity of Member States;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is worried by the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity; insists on the role of structural reforms in tackling this problem; is worried by the fact that the bulk of global growth is expected to come from outside the EU in the coming years, which will necessitate a strengthening of the export capacity of Member States, as well as providing a stable framework for direct foreign investment;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is worried by the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity; insists on the role of structural reforms in tackling this problem in both deficit and surplus countries; is worried by the fact that the bulk of global growth is expected to come from outside the EU in the coming years
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Is worried by the macroeconomic imbalances within the EU and the fact that many Member States, in particular those under market pressure, are falling behind in terms of productivity; insists on the role of enhanced coordination of economic policies and structural reforms in tackling th
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Believes that the EU should use the existing resources and create innovative financing instruments for the Member States with limited room for a fiscal stimulus;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Recalls its requests addressed to the Council and the Commission in its resolution of 1 December 2011 on the European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination and demands a public response to the elements contained in such resolution;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 (new) IV- Tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis (Competence of the EMPL Committee)
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Underlines the failure of the neoliberal economic growth model. Believes that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour will hinder recovery and long-term growth and therefore calls for structural reforms in the labour market, which would include revising the wage-setting mechanism in order to better reflect productivity developments; draws attention to the role and responsibilities of the social partners in the design and implementation of structural reforms; underlines the fact that the labour market in the EU is still fragmented and reiterates its call for lifting the existing labour restrictions in some Member States for Bulgarian and Romanian citizens;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour will hinder recovery and long-term growth and therefore calls for structural reforms in the labour market, which would include
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Believes that the structural mismatch between supply and demand for labour will hinder recovery and long-term growth and therefore calls for structural reforms
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 6 (new) V- Modernising EU public administration and services of general interest
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of competitiveness and an important productivity factor; notes that market- oriented public sector reforms are an imperative part of restoring competitiveness;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of sustainable growth and employment competitiveness and an important productivity factor; considers that a high quality of public administration needs adequate budgetary resources and reforms in respecting the subsidiary principle as stated in the protocol N°26 on Services of General Interest;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Recalls that the quality of public administration at EU, national, regional and local level is a determining element of
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Takes note of the Quality framework on Services of General Interest to enhance clarity and legal certainty on how EU rules apply to services of general interest (SGI), ensure access to essential services and promote quality; Considers that all these elements should be set in a EU regulation based on the article 14 TFEU;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Regrets the slow pace of the implementation of EU legislation by certain Member States and urges them to deliver the agreed results concerning the quality of statistics; welcomes the efforts of the European Commission for improving the reliability of the data provided by Eurostat;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Regrets the slow pace of the implementation of EU legislation by certain Member States and urges them to deliver the agreed results concerning the quality of statistics; is firmly convinced that the availability of reliable, accurate and up-to-date data provides a key element of the political decision making process; calls on the Member States to implement the recently adopted Council Directive on Requirements for the Budgetary Framework of the Member States as soon as possible;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for more efficiency in the delivery of public services as well as an increase in the transparency and quality of public administration and the judiciary, and further encourages reducing the administrative burden and red tape; underlines the importance of monitoring and evaluating civil service performance;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for more efficiency in the delivery of public services as well as an increase in the transparency and quality of public administration and the judiciary, and further encourages
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls for more efficiency in the delivery of public services as well as an increase in the transparency and quality of public administration and the judiciary, and further encourages reducing the unnecessary administrative burden and red tape;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Encourages the Commission, considering that the AGS covers much more than just economic elements, to develop programmes for specific policy sectors, such as defense, where joint management or joint ownership between multiple Member States would provide economies of scale, which would bring added-value and financial savings to the Member States involved;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14 b. Underlines, in the current economic context, the even more crucial role played by community funded programs and encourages the Commission to put forward a proposal to fund EU 2020 strategy actions through the transfer of unused payment appropriations;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Deplores the fact that the involvement of the European Parliament in the elaboration of the BEPG (Broad Economic Policy Guidelines)/AGS is not formally foreseen by the Treaty, whilst Parliament's contribution to the employment topics is made under the consultation procedure (Art. 148.2 TFEU);
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Deplores the fact that the involvement of the European Parliament in the elaboration of the BEPG (Broad Economic Policy Guidelines)/AGS is not formally foreseen by the Treaty, whilst Parliament's contribution to the employment topics is made under the consultation procedure (Art. 148.2 TFEU);
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Recognises and respects the democratic process of national Parliaments including their national parliamentary calendars;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Points out that the democratic deficit, as the Annual Growth Survey which sets the guidelines for employment, growth and Member States' economic policies and which provides the basis for the European Semester, is not subject to the usual parliamentary procedure; the European Parliament, the only EU institution elected directly by the people, has no power to amend the final text;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Recalls that the economic governance legal framework ('the six pack') provides the tool of economic dialogue: "in order to enhance the dialogue between the Union institutions, in particular the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and to ensure greater transparency and accountability, the competent committee of the European Parliament may invite the President of the Council, the Commission and, where appropriate, the President of the European Council or the President of the Eurogroup to appear before the committee to discuss decisions taken...The competent committee of the European Parliament may offer the opportunity to the Member State concerned by such decisions to participate in an exchange of views"; calls on this tool, which enables economic co- operation and mutual understanding, to be utilised as much as possible;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Notes that the 2012 edition of the European Semester is the first under the agreed enhanced economic governance legal framework (
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 4 a. Invites the Commission to present the next ewercises under the denomination "Annual Sustainable Growth Guidelines";
source: PE-478.675
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.513New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-478513_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.675New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-478675_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20120215&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-02-15-TOC_EN.html |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-18&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0018_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-48New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0048_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/08055New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Contribution to the Annual Growth Survey 2012New
Contribution to the annual growth survey 2012 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0815:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0815:EN
|
other/1/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|