BETA
This is a historical view (2012/05/15)

Changes: 2023/08/03docs, links.National_parliaments.url, events, 2021/12/18procedure.Modified_legal_basis, events, docs.docs.url, events.docs.url, events.type, procedure.Other_legal_basis, 2020/01/19docs.body, committees, events.docs.url, events, 2019/07/06procedure.instrument, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, events, procedure.final.url, procedure.subject, activities, docs, committees, other, commission, procedure.summary, 2016/07/06activities, activities.docs.url, procedure.stage_reached, 2016/07/02activities, procedure.final, 2016/04/25activities.docs.url, 2015/11/04activities.docs.celexid, 2015/10/24activities.docs.url, 2015/10/23activities.docs.url, 2015/10/21activities.docs.url, 2015/06/04activities.docs.celexid, 2015/06/01activities.docs.celexid, 2015/05/30activities.docs.celexid, 2015/05/27links.European_Commission.title, 2014/08/27activities.committees.shadows.mepref, committees.shadows.mepref, committees.rapporteur.mepref, activities.committees.rapporteur.mepref, 2014/07/27activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/26activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/25activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/24activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/23activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/22activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/21activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/20activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/19activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/18activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/17activities.committees.shadows.group, committees.shadows.group, 2014/07/16activities.committees.date, committees.rapporteur, activities.committees.rapporteur, activities.committees.shadows, committees.date, committees.shadows, 2014/07/07activities.committees.date, committees.rapporteur, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, activities.committees.rapporteur, activities.committees.shadows, committees.date, committees.shadows, 2014/02/11procedure.Modified_legal_basis, 2014/01/18activities.date, activities.docs.url, activities.docs.type, activities.type, activities, activities.body, activities.commission, activities.docs.celexid, activities.docs.title, activities.docs.text

View current state | View Changes for this date

Sorry, but we failed to recreate history before 2013-12-08T05:34:15

Awaiting final decision



2012/0102(CNS) Common system of value added tax (VAT): treatment of vouchers
Next event: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report 2012/11/14 more...
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó (EPP) KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca (S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros (ALDE), GIEGOLD Sven (Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (ECR)
Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier: ECON/7/09537
Legal Basis TFEU 113

Activites

  • 2013/05/15 Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    • SP(2013)338
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Taxation and Customs Union'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • 2013/04/17 Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    • T7-0175/2013 summary
  • 2013/03/04 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
    • A7-0058/2013 summary
  • 2013/02/26 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/01/24 Amendments tabled in committee
  • 2012/12/11 Committee draft report
  • 2012/11/14 Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
  • 2012/06/12 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2012/05/10 Legislative proposal
    • COM(2012)0206 summary
    • SWD(2012)0126
    • SWD(2012)0127
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm', 'title': 'Taxation and Customs Union'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/legal_basis
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/8
date
2013-05-15T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/spdoc.do?i=22629&j=0&l=en type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary title: SP(2013)338
body
EC
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/7/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 602 votes to 24, with 37 abstentions, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament consultation), a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of vouchers.

    Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended:

    Scope, transparency and neutrality: a new recital states that in order to eradicate opportunities for tax evasion and tax fraud, to increase VAT collection from vouchers and hence increase public revenue, it is necessary to reinforce the scope, neutrality and transparency with regard to tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers.

    Members also propose clarifying the different definitions:

    • “place of supply”: shall mean the Member State in which the underlying supply of goods or services takes place;
    • “multi-purpose voucher”: shall mean any voucher, other than a discount or rebate voucher, which does not constitute a single-purpose voucher and which entitles the holder to receive goods or services where neither those goods or services nor the place of supply of the Member State where they are to be taxed are sufficiently identified and, as a consequence, the VAT treatment of the voucher cannot be determined with certainty at the date of the sale or issuance;
    • “discount voucher”: means a voucher carrying a right to receive a price discount or rebate with regard to a supply of goods or services which is expressed either as a percentage or as a fixed amount with a nominal value.

    Taxable amount: an amendment stipulates that the taxable amount of the supply of goods or services redeemed against a multi-purpose voucher shall be equal to the nominal value of that voucher in fact used to acquire those goods and services.

    Review: by 1 January 2017, the Commission shall review the application of Directive 2006/112/EC on its economic and fiscal impact. That report shall include an analysis of the impact of this Directive on the economies of the Member States.

activities/7/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-175 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0175/2013
activities/7/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting final decision
procedure/subject/1
Old
8.50.01 Implementation of Community law
New
8.50.01 Implementation of EU law
activities/6/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted, in the framework of a special legislative procedure (Parliament consultation), the report by Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ (EPP, HU) on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of vouchers.

    The committee suggested amending the Commission proposal as follows:

    Scope, transparency and neutrality: a new recital states that in order to eradicate opportunities for tax evasion and tax fraud, to increase VAT collection from vouchers and hence increase public revenue, it is necessary to reinforce the scope, neutrality and transparency with regard to tax treatment of transactions involving vouchers.

    Members also propose clarifying the different definitions:

    • “place of supply”: shall mean the Member State in which the underlying supply of goods or services takes place;
    • “multi-purpose voucher”: shall mean any voucher, other than a discount or rebate voucher, which does not constitute a single-purpose voucher and which entitles the holder to receive goods or services where neither those goods or services nor the place of supply of the Member State where they are to be taxed are sufficiently identified and, as a consequence, the VAT treatment of the voucher cannot be determined with certainty at the date of the sale or issuance;
    • “discount voucher”: means a voucher carrying a right to receive a price discount or rebate with regard to a supply of goods or services which is expressed either as a percentage or as a fixed amount with a nominal value.

    Review: by 1 January 2017, the Commission shall review the application of Directive 2006/112/EC on its economic and fiscal impact. That report shall include an analysis of the impact of this Directive on the economies of the Member States.

activities/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-58&language=EN
activities/7/date
Old
2013-04-16T00:00:00
New
2013-04-17T00:00:00
activities/6
date
2013-03-04T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0058/2013
body
EP
committees
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: GIEGOLD Sven group: ECR name: FOX Ashley responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
activities/5/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time.

Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers.

For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate.

A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge.

The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers. A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment. In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State.

To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings:

1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes: the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as ‘single-purpose vouchers’ and the latter as ‘multi-purpose vouchers’. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption.

2. Time of taxation: the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for.

To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT.

3. Rules for distribution: once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed.

Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article.

The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV – the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services – are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent.

4. Discount vouchers: difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer.

5. Other technical or consequential changes: some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.

New

PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time.

Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers.

For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate.

A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge.

The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers. A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States.

LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment. In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State.

To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings:

1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes: the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as ‘single-purpose vouchers’ and the latter as ‘multi-purpose vouchers’. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption.

2. Time of taxation: the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for.

To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT.

3. Rules for distribution: once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed.

Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article.

The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV – the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services – are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent.

4. Discount vouchers: difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer.

5. Other technical or consequential changes: some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.

activities/5/date
Old
2013-02-25T00:00:00
New
2013-02-26T00:00:00
activities/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.194
activities/4
date
2013-01-24T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE502.194
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012AE1401:EN
activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.925
activities/3
date
2012-12-11T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE501.925
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/4
date
2013-02-25T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9
New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
KLEVA Mojca
New
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9
New
4f1ac4c4b819f25896000033
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
KLEVA Mojca
New
KLEVA KEKUŠ Mojca
activities/3/date
Old
2012-05-24T00:00:00
New
2013-04-16T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
EP officialisation
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0206/COM_COM(2012)0206_FR.pdf
activities/2
date
2012-06-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3/body
Old
EP
New
ESOC
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: CASA David responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
activities/3/date
Old
2012-06-12T00:00:00
New
2012-11-14T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=1401&year=2012 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report title: CES1401/2012
activities/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de183db0fb8127435bdbcb9
New
4de186040fb8127435bdbfc9
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
CASA David
New
KLEVA Mojca
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ALDE
name
SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
GIEGOLD Sven
committees/0/shadows/3
group
ECR
name
FOX Ashley
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
activities/2/committees/0/date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
committees/0/date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: GÁLL-PELCZ Ildikó
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
procedure/legal_basis
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
activities/0/docs/1
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0126:FIN:EN:PDF
type
Document attached to the procedure
title
SWD(2012)0126
activities/0/docs/2/url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0127:FIN:EN:PDF
activities/2/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: CASA David
activities/2
date
2012-06-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/7/09537
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to clarify and harmonise the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

    PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

    BACKGROUND: the world has moved on since common VAT rules were adopted in 1977 and the increased use of vouchers is just one of many changes which have transformed the way in which business is done, introducing complexities which were not envisaged at the time.

    Neither the Sixth VAT Directive (Council Directive 77/388/EEC) nor the VAT Directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC) provide for rules on the treatment of transactions involving vouchers.

    For the purposes of the VAT rules, a voucher is an instrument which gives the holder a right to goods or services, or to receive a discount or rebate in relation to a supply of goods or services. The issuer assumes an obligation to supply goods or services, to give a discount or pay a rebate.

    A voucher may be in electronic or physical form and generally has an underlying commercial or promotional objective, which may be to promote the supply of particular goods or services or to expedite the payment for particular goods or services. Vouchers come in different types. Some are issued against consideration and today can be taxed either at sale or at redemption, depending on the approach of individual Member States. A voucher may also be issued for free and entitle the holder to the supply of goods or services without further charge.

    The absence of common rules has obliged Member States to develop their own solutions, inevitably uncoordinated. The resultant mismatches in taxation cause problems such as double or non-taxation but also contribute to tax avoidance and form barriers to business innovation.

    The Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) has on several occasions been asked to explain how the VA Directives should apply in such circumstances. For vouchers, this process has given some guidance but has left other problems unresolved. The objective of this proposal is to deal with these issues by clarifying and harmonising the rules in EU legislation on the VAT treatment of vouchers.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the proposal is accompanied by an Impact Assessment. It concludes that the only realistic way to deal with the identified shortcomings is a modernisation of the VAT Directive by inserting new provisions which deal with vouchers. A study undertaken made by Deloitte is included as an annex to the Impact Assessment. It sustains the economic justification for making this legislative proposal, in particular the actual and potential consequences from mismatches between Member States.

    LEGAL BASIS: Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

    CONTENT: the proposal consists of several amendments to the VAT Directive aimed to define clearly the different types of vouchers and to harmonise their VAT treatment. In making this legislative proposal, the search is for clarity. This should extend to the tax consequences of the different types of vouchers when issued, distributed or redeemed, either within a single Member State or in operations which extend to more than one Member State.

    To solve these problems, changes to the VAT Directive are envisaged. They fall under five headings:

    1. Defining vouchers for VAT purposes: the VAT Directive needs to be clear about which vouchers are to be taxed when issued and which are to be taxed only when redeemed. The former are described as ‘single-purpose vouchers’ and the latter as ‘multi-purpose vouchers’. This distinction hinges on whether the information is available to tax on issue or whether, because their end-use is subject to choice, taxation has to await redemption.

    2. Time of taxation: the current rules on the time of chargeability of the tax (in Article 65) should be adjusted to ensure that single-purpose vouchers (SPVs) are subject to VAT at the time they are issued and paid for.

    To avoid confusion, the supply of the right which is inherent in a voucher and the underlying supply of goods or services cannot be regarded as separate transactions. SPVs are taxed from the outset so this potential problem will not arise. For vouchers which are not taxed when issued because the place and level of taxation cannot yet be established, tax should only be charged when the underlying goods or services are supplied. To make sure this happens, and that only this happens, a new Article 30b is proposed. This makes it clear that the issue of a voucher and the subsequent supply of goods or services constitute a single transaction for VAT.

    3. Rules for distribution: once the VAT Directive has established that multi-purpose vouchers (MPVs) are to be taxed on redemption, some issues which relate to their distribution need to be addressed.

    Since distribution chains for MPVs can extend across several Member States, common rules are necessary for identifying and measuring this distribution service. An additional point makes clear that the distribution is a supply of a service for the purposes of the VAT Directive. The computation of the taxable amount for this service is dealt with in a new Article.

    The proposal aims to ensure that the totality of the taxable operations associated with an MPV – the supply of a distribution service and the supply of the underlying goods or services – are described and taxed in a manner which is comprehensive, neutral and transparent.

    4. Discount vouchers: difficulties arise with discount vouchers when the discount is ultimately met by the issuer rather than the redeemer. To avoid a complex series of adjustments, it is proposed to treat this discount as a separate supply of a service by the redeemer to the issuer.

    5. Other technical or consequential changes: some further technical changes to the VAT Directive will be required to ensure the proper functioning of these solutions, notably as regards the right of deduction (Article 169), the person liable for payment of the tax (Article 193) and other obligations (Article 272). Technical changes are needed to deal correctly with MPVs and SPVs respectively.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.

activities/1
body
EP
date
2012-05-24T00:00:00
type
EP officialisation
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/docs/0
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=206
title
COM(2012)0206
type
Legislative proposal published
celexid
CELEX:52012PC0206:EN
activities/0/docs/1/title
Old
COM(2012)0206
New
SWD(2012)0127
activities/0/docs/1/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Document attached to the procedure
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities
  • date: 2012-05-10T00:00:00 docs: type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2012)0206 type: Legislative proposal body: EC commission:
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
    procedure
    reference
    2012/0102(CNS)
    instrument
    Directive
    title
    Common system of value added tax (VAT): treatment of vouchers
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    summary
    Amending Directive 2006/112/EC
    subtype
    Legislation
    type
    CNS - Consultation procedure
    subject