Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
2012/2024(INI) Law of Administrative procedure of the European Union
Next event: Amendments tabled in committee 2012/09/19 more...
Lead committee dossier: JURI/7/08737
Legal Basis RoP 042
Next event: Amendments tabled in committee 2012/09/19 more...
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2012/11/06
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2012/11/12
- Vote scheduled 2013/01/15
- Debate scheduled 2013/01/14
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | AFCO | JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli (ALDE) | |
Lead | JURI | BERLINGUER Luigi (S&D) | GARGANI Giuseppe (EPP), KARIM Sajjad (ALDE), WIKSTRÖM Cecilia (ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva (Verts/ALE), MAŠTÁLKA Jiří (GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (EFD) |
Opinion | PETI | AUKEN Margrete (Verts/ALE) |
Legal Basis RoP 042
Subjects
Activites
-
2013/01/15
Vote scheduled
-
2013/01/14
Debate scheduled
- 2012/11/12 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2012/11/06
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2012/09/19 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/06/21 Committee draft report
-
2012/03/15
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
- Committee draft report: PE492.584
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.437
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0369/2012
Amendments | Dossier |
21 |
2012/2024(INI)
2012/05/07
PETI
21 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that, with the development of the competences of the European Union, citizens are increasingly directly confronted with the Union's administration, without always having the corresponding procedural rights which they could enforce against it in cases where such actions may prove necessary;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the introduction of the service principle – that is, that the administration seeks to guide and help citizens, acts with appropriate courtesy and avoids unnecessarily cumbersome procedures thus saving the time and effort of both citizens and officials – would benefit both citizens and the administration in terms of improved service and increased efficiency;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that generally applicable rules are necessary in order to guarantee the procedural rights – such as the right to be informed and the right to be heard – of natural or legal persons when a decision is taken on a matter in which they can be considered a party and which implies legal effects on the person or entity concerned, and regarding the right to access one’s own
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to introduce a specific administrative provision for the infringement procedure based on Article 258 TFUE, in order to prevent any possibility of abuse of power and arbitrary decisions;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to introduce
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Notes that the Staff Regulations lay down general rules on conflicts of interest as regards when an official must inform his/her superiors, etc., but these would need to be complemented with rules governing the consequences, such as the possible revocation of decisions taken in violation of the rules on conflicts of interests, as well as the establishment of a deadline for enforcement of all decisions, in order to ensure the predictability of administrative processes;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EU citizens should expect a high level of transparency from the Commission, regardless of whether they are making a formal complaint or exercising their right of petition under the Treaty, together with information as to the possibility of their taking any further action in the matter.
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EU citizens should expect a high level of transparency, efficiency and swift execution from the Commission, regardless of whether they are making a formal complaint or exercising their right of petition under the Treaty.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers that EU citizens should expect a high level of transparency and responsiveness from the Commission, regardless of whether they are making a formal complaint or
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to engage in sufficient consultation with all relevant actors when drawing up a regulation on the introduction of general EU administrative procedures and in particular to make use of the special knowledge and expertise of the European Ombudsman, since it is to him that public complaints about abuses in the bodies and institutions of the EU are made;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that, after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the right to good administration is a fundamental right of citizens and ‘soft law’ administrative procedures, which can be modified unilaterally by the institution concerned,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Considers that the Commission should also investigate the use of a further extension of IT-based services under the regulation; recalls in this regard systems such as EU Pilot, which are already successfully proving that not only is the potential of IT-supported administrative procedures not limited to new online information systems but can also encompass interactive ‘settlement systems’ between administrative authorities and also between the authorities and citizens;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 c (new) 12c. Calls on the Commission when drawing up a general administrative act to increase public awareness of the right of EU citizens to good administration, including through its relevant information services and networks (such as Europe Direct); stresses that such information initiatives should also take into account the appeal procedures in the event of a presumed violation of the right to good administration and, in particular, the specific limits of these procedures, as laid down, for example, in Article 228 TFEU on the European Ombudsman; is convinced that constructive public pressure will result from increased knowledge and awareness of citizens concerning this right and the associated complaints procedures, and this may be conducive to the formation of an open, efficient and independent administration in everyday affairs.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that, after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the right to good administration is a fundamental right of citizens and ‘soft law’ administrative procedures, which can be modified unilaterally by the institution concerned, cannot sufficiently protect the individual’s right to good administration; however, they will retain their importance for an overall culture of good administration as an addition to ‘hard law’ provisions;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that, previously, the first European Ombudsman proposed the adoption of a binding code on good administrative behaviour and that the European Parliament supported that proposal and called on the Commission to present a proposal, based on the code, for a general regulation on administrative procedures, but that the Commission agreed only to the adoption of non- binding guidelines;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to envisage a regulation, based on Article 298 TFEU, that provides for minimum standards of
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission to guarantee the right to good administration by an open, efficient and independent European administration, with the right to good administration, as defined by Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and subject to the general restrictions of Article 51, being understood as everyone’s right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the general principles of the future European administrative regulation
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Notes that the general principles of the future European administrative regulation
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the introduction of the
source: PE-488.048
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2012-12-14Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/6/date |
Old
2012-12-13T00:00:00New
2013-01-15T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
2012-12-01Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
activities/0 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-12T00:00:00New
2012-06-21T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/title |
Old
A7-0369/2012New
PE492.584 |
activities/1/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.584
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/2 |
|
activities/4/body |
Old
ECNew
EP |
activities/4/commission |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-12-13T00:00:00New
2012-11-12T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Prev DG PRESNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
2012-11-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/8/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2013-01-14T00:00:00 |
2012-11-27Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
activities/7/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
REDING VivianeNew
ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš |
activities/7/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
JusticeNew
Secretariat General |
activities/7/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/New
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm |
activities/8 |
|
other/0/commissioner |
Old
REDING VivianeNew
ŠEFČOVIČ Maroš |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
JusticeNew
Secretariat General |
other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/New
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm |
2012-11-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/7 |
|
2012-11-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/5 |
|
2012-11-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
2012-09-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.437
|
2012-09-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
2012-09-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ALDE |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
ECRNew
ALDE |
2012-08-07Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-12-12T00:00:00New
2012-06-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
EP 1R PlenaryNew
Committee draft report |
activities/6 |
|
2012-08-06Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
activities/5/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/6 |
|
activities/7 |
|
2012-07-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
procedure/legal_basis |
|
2012-06-30Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.584
|
2012-06-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
2012-06-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2 |
|
2012-06-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
2012-06-05Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-09-18T00:00:00New
2012-09-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/type |
Old
EP 1R CommitteeNew
Deadline Amendments |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/4 |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2012-06-20T00:00:00New
2012-12-12T00:00:00 |
activities/6/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
2012-06-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Committee |
activities/5 |
|
2012-05-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
procedure/legal_basis |
|
2012-04-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
committees/1/shadows/0 |
|
2012-04-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/2 |
|
2012-04-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-09-11T00:00:00New
2012-10-22T00:00:00 |
2012-03-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-06-19T00:00:00New
2012-09-18T00:00:00 |
2012-03-21Show (5) Changes
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|