BETA


2012/2094(INI) Digital freedom strategy in EU foreign policy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET SCHAAKE Marietje (icon: ALDE ALDE) ZALEWSKI Paweł (icon: PPE PPE), SIWIEC Marek (icon: S&D S&D), TARAND Indrek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion INTA ANDERSDOTTER Amelia (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Christofer FJELLNER (icon: PPE PPE), Syed KAMALL (icon: ECR ECR), Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2013/05/13
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2012/12/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/12/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 630 votes to 25, with 13 abstentions, a resolution on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy.

Members recall that technological developments enable individuals all over the world to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and to connect to the internet, thus fostering revolutionary changes in societies, the functioning of democracy, governance, the economy, business, media, development and trade. They consider that the internet is a key enabler of access to information, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and economic, social, political and cultural development. Human rights need to be protected and promoted by the EU, both offline and online.

The main recommendations contained in the resolution are the following:

Human rights and development: the resolution recognises that uncensored access to the open internet, mobile phones and ICTs have impacted on human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting an enabling effect, by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly across the world. Nevertheless, Members are aware of the new risks and dangers for human rights arising from the misuse of ICTs.

Stressing that effective EU development and human rights policies require the mainstreaming of ICTs and bridging the digital divide , the resolution calls on the Commission to:

to duly address the fact that there are countries practising the repression and control of citizens, civil society organisations and activists, while business in some countries involves a growing technological component in terms of the blocking of content and the monitoring and identification of human rights defenders, journalists, activists and dissidents; act against the criminalisation of legitimate expression online and the adoption of restrictive legislation to justify such measures ; ensure coherence between the EU's external actions and its own internal strategies when defending strictly necessary and proportionate restrictions on fundamental rights.

Parliament stresses that the promotion and protection of digital freedoms should be mainstreamed and annually reviewed so as to ensure accountability and continuity, in all the EU’s external actions , financing and aid policies and instruments, under the leadership of the High Representative and the EEAS. They encourage the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to name digital freedoms and the ‘No Disconnect Strategy’ among his key priorities .

Trade: Parliament believes that digital freedoms and cross-border trade should go hand in hand in order to create and optimise business opportunities for European companies in the global digital economy. It deplores the fact that EU-made technologies and services are sometimes used in third countries to violate human rights. It urges the Commission to take all necessary steps to stop this ‘digital arms trade’ and call for a ban on exports of repressive technologies and services to authoritarian regimes .

The Commission is invited to

submit, during 2013 at the latest, proposals requiring increased transparency and accountability on the part of EU-based companies , as well as the disclosure of human rights impact assessment policies, with a view to improving the monitoring of exports of ICTs, products and services aimed at blocking websites, mass surveillance, tracking and monitoring of individuals, breaking into private (email) conversations or the filtering of search results; submit proposals for an EU legal framework that would oblige companies engaging in public procurement in Member States to perform human rights impact assessments on the relevant ICTs, starting at the R&D phase, and ensure non-complicity in possible human rights violations in third countries.

Parliament calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in EU FTAs, stipulating transparent safeguards, preserving unrestricted access to the internet, and ensuring the free flow of information. It calls on the EU to provide political backing to European companies which are faced with requests to remove user-generated content or provide personal information in ways that breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business.

Members consider that restrictions on access for EU businesses and online consumers to (digital) markets arising through mass censorship in third countries constitute protectionist measures and trade barriers. They call on the Commission and the Council to (i) include a safeguard mechanism in all future trade agreements, especially those which contain provisions affecting online services and (ii) develop a strategy for challenging measures by third countries which restrict EU companies' access to global online markets.

In addition, the Commission is invited to present a new draft regulatory framework on dual-use exports , addressing potentially harmful exports of ICT products and services to third countries and providing for a coordinating and monitoring role for the Commission.

Internet governance: Members consider transparent and collaborative decision-making to be essential in order to ensure respect for the open and participatory nature of the internet. In their view, any debate on regulations concerning the internet should be open and involve all stakeholders, especially those specialised in fundamental rights protection. They believe the EU should play a leading role in the development of digital freedom ground-rules and norms of behaviour in cyberspace, including dispute settlement mechanisms and taking account of conflicting jurisdictions.

The resolution stresses the importance of an overall EU strategy for internet governance , as also for issues related to telecom regulation, recalling that the sector is internationally governed through the International Telecom Union, in which EU Member States each have one vote. In this context, the Commission is called upon to swiftly present its EU-wide Cloud Computing Strategy, as highlighted in the Digital Agenda for Europe.

Parliament considers that more global cooperation is needed in order to uphold and modernise intellectual property rights (IPR) in the future, this being vital to ensure innovation, employment and open world trade. It calls on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPRs to do so. It recommends a revision of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), which would balance the need for relevant copyright reform and protection with the need to protect fundamental rights online and preserve the open internet.

A digital freedom strategy: the resolution invites the Commission and the Council to adopt a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU foreign policy as soon as possible.

Underlining that human rights must also be protected online, the resolution calls for:

ICTs to be mainstreamed in all EU programmes , especially in the European Neighbourhood Policy and the strategic partnerships; the Union to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights.

The resolution calls on the Commission and the Council to:

support, train and empower human rights defenders , civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities; promote and preserve high standards of digital freedom in the EU, in particular by codifying the principle of net neutrality by means of appropriate regulation, so as to strengthen the Union’s credibility in terms of promoting and defending digital freedoms around the world.

Lastly, Parliament considers coordination and joint diplomatic initiatives with other OECD countries in developing and executing a digital freedom strategy to be essential for efficient and agile action.

Documents
2012/12/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/12/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2012/11/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Marietje SCHAAKE (ADLE, NL) on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy.

Members recall that technological developments enable individuals all over the world to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and to connect to the internet, thus fostering revolutionary changes in societies, the functioning of democracy, governance, the economy, business, media, development and trade. They consider that the internet is a key enabler of access to information, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and economic, social, political and cultural development. Human rights need to be protected and promoted by the EU, both offline and online.

The main recommendations contained in the report are the following:

Human rights and development: the report recognises that uncensored access to the open internet, mobile phones and ICTs have impacted on human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting an enabling effect, by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly across the world. Nevertheless, Members are aware of the new risks and dangers for human rights arising from the misuse of ICTs.

Stressing that effective EU development and human rights policies require the mainstreaming of ICTs and bridging the digital divide , the report calls on the Commission to:

to duly address the fact that there are countries practising the repression and control of citizens, civil society organisations and activists, while business in some countries involves a growing technological component in terms of the blocking of content and the monitoring and identification of human rights defenders, journalists, activists and dissidents; act against the criminalisation of legitimate expression online and the adoption of restrictive legislation to justify such measures ; ensure coherence between the EU's external actions and its own internal strategies when defending strictly necessary and proportionate restrictions on fundamental rights.

Members stress that the promotion and protection of digital freedoms should be mainstreamed and annually reviewed so as to ensure accountability and continuity, in all the EU ’ s external actions , financing and aid policies and instruments, under the leadership of the High Representative and the EEAS. They encourage the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to name digital freedoms and the ‘ No Disconnect Strategy ’ among his key priorities .

Trade: Members believe that digital freedoms and cross-border trade should go hand in hand in order to create and optimise business opportunities for European companies in the global digital economy. They deplore the fact that EU-made technologies and services are sometimes used in third countries to violate human rights. They urge the Commission to take all necessary steps to stop this ‘ digital arms trade ’ and call for a ban on exports of repressive technologies and services to authoritarian regimes .

The Commission is invited to

submit, during 2013 at the latest, proposals requiring increased transparency and accountability on the part of EU-based companies , as well as the disclosure of human rights impact assessment policies, with a view to improving the monitoring of exports of ICTs, products and services aimed at blocking websites, mass surveillance, tracking and monitoring of individuals, breaking into private (email) conversations or the filtering of search results; submit proposals for an EU legal framework that would oblige companies engaging in public procurement in Member States to perform human rights impact assessments on the relevant ICTs, starting at the R&D phase, and ensure non-complicity in possible human rights violations in third countries.

The report calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in EU FTAs, stipulating transparent safeguards, preserving unrestricted access to the internet, and ensuring the free flow of information. It calls on the EU to provide political backing to European companies which are faced with requests to remove user-generated content or provide personal information in ways that breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business.

Internet governance: Members consider transparent and collaborative decision-making to be essential in order to ensure respect for the open and participatory nature of the internet. In their view, any debate on regulations concerning the internet should be open and involve all stakeholders, especially those specialised in fundamental rights protection. They believe the EU should play a leading role in the development of digital freedom ground-rules and norms of behaviour in cyberspace, including dispute settlement mechanisms and taking account of conflicting jurisdictions.

The report stresses the importance of an overall EU strategy for internet governance , as also for issues related to telecom regulation, recalling that the sector is internationally governed through the International Telecom Union, in which EU Member States each have one vote. In this context, the Commission is called upon to swiftly present its EU-wide Cloud Computing Strategy, as highlighted in the Digital Agenda for Europe.

Members consider that more global cooperation is needed in order to uphold and modernise intellectual property rights (IPR) in the future, this being vital to ensure innovation, employment and open world trade. They call on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPRs to do so. They recommend a revision of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), which would balance the need for relevant copyright reform and protection with the need to protect fundamental rights online and preserve the open internet.

A digital freedom strategy: the report invites the Commission and the Council to adopt a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU foreign policy as soon as possible.

Underlining that human rights must also be protected online, the report calls for:

ICTs to be mainstreamed in all EU programmes , especially in the European Neighbourhood Policy and the strategic partnerships; the Union to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights.

The report calls on the Commission and the Council to:

support, train and empower human rights defenders , civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities; promote and preserve high standards of digital freedom in the EU, in particular by codifying the principle of net neutrality by means of appropriate regulation, so as to strengthen the Union ’ s credibility in terms of promoting and defending digital freedoms around the world.

Lastly, Members consider coordination and joint diplomatic initiatives with other OECD countries in developing and executing a digital freedom strategy to be essential for efficient and agile action.

Documents
2012/11/06
   EP - Vote in committee
2012/09/27
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/09/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/08/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/05/29
   EP - ANDERSDOTTER Amelia (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2012/05/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/12/14
   EP - SCHAAKE Marietje (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
175 2012/2094(INI)
2012/07/23 INTA 57 amendments...
source: PE-494.563
2012/09/27 AFET 118 amendments...
source: PE-496.512

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.252
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-491252_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.658&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-492658_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-496512_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2012-11-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0374_EN.html title: A7-0374/2012
summary
events/2
date
2012-11-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0374_EN.html title: A7-0374/2012
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121210&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-12-10-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2012-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0470_EN.html title: T7-0470/2012
summary
events/5
date
2012-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0470_EN.html title: T7-0470/2012
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SCHAAKE Marietje date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHAAKE Marietje group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2012-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-374&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0374_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0470_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-05-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
  • date: 2012-11-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-374&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0374/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121210&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22199&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0470/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHAAKE Marietje group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2011-12-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2012-05-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2012-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
docs
  • date: 2012-08-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.252 title: PE491.252 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-09-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.658&secondRef=02 title: PE492.658 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2012-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 title: PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-05-13T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22199&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)175 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2012-05-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-374&language=EN title: A7-0374/2012 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Marietje SCHAAKE (ADLE, NL) on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy. Members recall that technological developments enable individuals all over the world to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and to connect to the internet, thus fostering revolutionary changes in societies, the functioning of democracy, governance, the economy, business, media, development and trade. They consider that the internet is a key enabler of access to information, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and economic, social, political and cultural development. Human rights need to be protected and promoted by the EU, both offline and online. The main recommendations contained in the report are the following: Human rights and development: the report recognises that uncensored access to the open internet, mobile phones and ICTs have impacted on human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting an enabling effect, by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly across the world. Nevertheless, Members are aware of the new risks and dangers for human rights arising from the misuse of ICTs. Stressing that effective EU development and human rights policies require the mainstreaming of ICTs and bridging the digital divide , the report calls on the Commission to: to duly address the fact that there are countries practising the repression and control of citizens, civil society organisations and activists, while business in some countries involves a growing technological component in terms of the blocking of content and the monitoring and identification of human rights defenders, journalists, activists and dissidents; act against the criminalisation of legitimate expression online and the adoption of restrictive legislation to justify such measures ; ensure coherence between the EU's external actions and its own internal strategies when defending strictly necessary and proportionate restrictions on fundamental rights. Members stress that the promotion and protection of digital freedoms should be mainstreamed and annually reviewed so as to ensure accountability and continuity, in all the EU ’ s external actions , financing and aid policies and instruments, under the leadership of the High Representative and the EEAS. They encourage the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to name digital freedoms and the ‘ No Disconnect Strategy ’ among his key priorities . Trade: Members believe that digital freedoms and cross-border trade should go hand in hand in order to create and optimise business opportunities for European companies in the global digital economy. They deplore the fact that EU-made technologies and services are sometimes used in third countries to violate human rights. They urge the Commission to take all necessary steps to stop this ‘ digital arms trade ’ and call for a ban on exports of repressive technologies and services to authoritarian regimes . The Commission is invited to submit, during 2013 at the latest, proposals requiring increased transparency and accountability on the part of EU-based companies , as well as the disclosure of human rights impact assessment policies, with a view to improving the monitoring of exports of ICTs, products and services aimed at blocking websites, mass surveillance, tracking and monitoring of individuals, breaking into private (email) conversations or the filtering of search results; submit proposals for an EU legal framework that would oblige companies engaging in public procurement in Member States to perform human rights impact assessments on the relevant ICTs, starting at the R&D phase, and ensure non-complicity in possible human rights violations in third countries. The report calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in EU FTAs, stipulating transparent safeguards, preserving unrestricted access to the internet, and ensuring the free flow of information. It calls on the EU to provide political backing to European companies which are faced with requests to remove user-generated content or provide personal information in ways that breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business. Internet governance: Members consider transparent and collaborative decision-making to be essential in order to ensure respect for the open and participatory nature of the internet. In their view, any debate on regulations concerning the internet should be open and involve all stakeholders, especially those specialised in fundamental rights protection. They believe the EU should play a leading role in the development of digital freedom ground-rules and norms of behaviour in cyberspace, including dispute settlement mechanisms and taking account of conflicting jurisdictions. The report stresses the importance of an overall EU strategy for internet governance , as also for issues related to telecom regulation, recalling that the sector is internationally governed through the International Telecom Union, in which EU Member States each have one vote. In this context, the Commission is called upon to swiftly present its EU-wide Cloud Computing Strategy, as highlighted in the Digital Agenda for Europe. Members consider that more global cooperation is needed in order to uphold and modernise intellectual property rights (IPR) in the future, this being vital to ensure innovation, employment and open world trade. They call on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPRs to do so. They recommend a revision of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), which would balance the need for relevant copyright reform and protection with the need to protect fundamental rights online and preserve the open internet. A digital freedom strategy: the report invites the Commission and the Council to adopt a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU foreign policy as soon as possible. Underlining that human rights must also be protected online, the report calls for: ICTs to be mainstreamed in all EU programmes , especially in the European Neighbourhood Policy and the strategic partnerships; the Union to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights. The report calls on the Commission and the Council to: support, train and empower human rights defenders , civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities; promote and preserve high standards of digital freedom in the EU, in particular by codifying the principle of net neutrality by means of appropriate regulation, so as to strengthen the Union ’ s credibility in terms of promoting and defending digital freedoms around the world. Lastly, Members consider coordination and joint diplomatic initiatives with other OECD countries in developing and executing a digital freedom strategy to be essential for efficient and agile action.
  • date: 2012-12-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121210&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2012-12-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22199&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-12-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470 title: T7-0470/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 630 votes to 25, with 13 abstentions, a resolution on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy. Members recall that technological developments enable individuals all over the world to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and to connect to the internet, thus fostering revolutionary changes in societies, the functioning of democracy, governance, the economy, business, media, development and trade. They consider that the internet is a key enabler of access to information, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and economic, social, political and cultural development. Human rights need to be protected and promoted by the EU, both offline and online. The main recommendations contained in the resolution are the following: Human rights and development: the resolution recognises that uncensored access to the open internet, mobile phones and ICTs have impacted on human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting an enabling effect, by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly across the world. Nevertheless, Members are aware of the new risks and dangers for human rights arising from the misuse of ICTs. Stressing that effective EU development and human rights policies require the mainstreaming of ICTs and bridging the digital divide , the resolution calls on the Commission to: to duly address the fact that there are countries practising the repression and control of citizens, civil society organisations and activists, while business in some countries involves a growing technological component in terms of the blocking of content and the monitoring and identification of human rights defenders, journalists, activists and dissidents; act against the criminalisation of legitimate expression online and the adoption of restrictive legislation to justify such measures ; ensure coherence between the EU's external actions and its own internal strategies when defending strictly necessary and proportionate restrictions on fundamental rights. Parliament stresses that the promotion and protection of digital freedoms should be mainstreamed and annually reviewed so as to ensure accountability and continuity, in all the EU’s external actions , financing and aid policies and instruments, under the leadership of the High Representative and the EEAS. They encourage the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to name digital freedoms and the ‘No Disconnect Strategy’ among his key priorities . Trade: Parliament believes that digital freedoms and cross-border trade should go hand in hand in order to create and optimise business opportunities for European companies in the global digital economy. It deplores the fact that EU-made technologies and services are sometimes used in third countries to violate human rights. It urges the Commission to take all necessary steps to stop this ‘digital arms trade’ and call for a ban on exports of repressive technologies and services to authoritarian regimes . The Commission is invited to submit, during 2013 at the latest, proposals requiring increased transparency and accountability on the part of EU-based companies , as well as the disclosure of human rights impact assessment policies, with a view to improving the monitoring of exports of ICTs, products and services aimed at blocking websites, mass surveillance, tracking and monitoring of individuals, breaking into private (email) conversations or the filtering of search results; submit proposals for an EU legal framework that would oblige companies engaging in public procurement in Member States to perform human rights impact assessments on the relevant ICTs, starting at the R&D phase, and ensure non-complicity in possible human rights violations in third countries. Parliament calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in EU FTAs, stipulating transparent safeguards, preserving unrestricted access to the internet, and ensuring the free flow of information. It calls on the EU to provide political backing to European companies which are faced with requests to remove user-generated content or provide personal information in ways that breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business. Members consider that restrictions on access for EU businesses and online consumers to (digital) markets arising through mass censorship in third countries constitute protectionist measures and trade barriers. They call on the Commission and the Council to (i) include a safeguard mechanism in all future trade agreements, especially those which contain provisions affecting online services and (ii) develop a strategy for challenging measures by third countries which restrict EU companies' access to global online markets. In addition, the Commission is invited to present a new draft regulatory framework on dual-use exports , addressing potentially harmful exports of ICT products and services to third countries and providing for a coordinating and monitoring role for the Commission. Internet governance: Members consider transparent and collaborative decision-making to be essential in order to ensure respect for the open and participatory nature of the internet. In their view, any debate on regulations concerning the internet should be open and involve all stakeholders, especially those specialised in fundamental rights protection. They believe the EU should play a leading role in the development of digital freedom ground-rules and norms of behaviour in cyberspace, including dispute settlement mechanisms and taking account of conflicting jurisdictions. The resolution stresses the importance of an overall EU strategy for internet governance , as also for issues related to telecom regulation, recalling that the sector is internationally governed through the International Telecom Union, in which EU Member States each have one vote. In this context, the Commission is called upon to swiftly present its EU-wide Cloud Computing Strategy, as highlighted in the Digital Agenda for Europe. Parliament considers that more global cooperation is needed in order to uphold and modernise intellectual property rights (IPR) in the future, this being vital to ensure innovation, employment and open world trade. It calls on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPRs to do so. It recommends a revision of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), which would balance the need for relevant copyright reform and protection with the need to protect fundamental rights online and preserve the open internet. A digital freedom strategy: the resolution invites the Commission and the Council to adopt a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU foreign policy as soon as possible. Underlining that human rights must also be protected online, the resolution calls for: ICTs to be mainstreamed in all EU programmes , especially in the European Neighbourhood Policy and the strategic partnerships; the Union to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights. The resolution calls on the Commission and the Council to: support, train and empower human rights defenders , civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities; promote and preserve high standards of digital freedom in the EU, in particular by codifying the principle of net neutrality by means of appropriate regulation, so as to strengthen the Union’s credibility in terms of promoting and defending digital freedoms around the world. Lastly, Parliament considers coordination and joint diplomatic initiatives with other OECD countries in developing and executing a digital freedom strategy to be essential for efficient and agile action.
  • date: 2012-12-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 150
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/7/09574
    New
    • AFET/7/09574
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
    New
    3.30.06
    Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
    6.10
    Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    procedure/title
    Old
    Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy
    New
    Digital freedom strategy in EU foreign policy
    activities/0
    date
    2012-05-24T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/0/committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
    activities/0/date
    Old
    2012-08-24T00:00:00
    New
    2012-05-24T00:00:00
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.252 type: Committee draft report title: PE491.252
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Committee draft report
    New
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/1/committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2012-12-11T00:00:00
    New
    2012-11-06T00:00:00
    activities/1/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0470/2012
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    New
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/2
    date
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Marietje SCHAAKE (ADLE, NL) on a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy.

      Members recall that technological developments enable individuals all over the world to use new information and communication technologies (ICTs) and to connect to the internet, thus fostering revolutionary changes in societies, the functioning of democracy, governance, the economy, business, media, development and trade. They consider that the internet is a key enabler of access to information, freedom of expression, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and economic, social, political and cultural development. Human rights need to be protected and promoted by the EU, both offline and online.

      The main recommendations contained in the report are the following:

      Human rights and development: the report recognises that uncensored access to the open internet, mobile phones and ICTs have impacted on human rights and fundamental freedoms, exerting an enabling effect, by expanding the scope of freedom of expression, access to information, the right to privacy and freedom of assembly across the world. Nevertheless, Members are aware of the new risks and dangers for human rights arising from the misuse of ICTs.

      Stressing that effective EU development and human rights policies require the mainstreaming of ICTs and bridging the digital divide, the report calls on the Commission to:

      • to duly address the fact that there are countries practising the repression and control of citizens, civil society organisations and activists, while business in some countries involves a growing technological component in terms of the blocking of content and the monitoring and identification of human rights defenders, journalists, activists and dissidents;
      • act against the criminalisation of legitimate expression online and the adoption of restrictive legislation to justify such measures ;
      • ensure coherence between the EU's external actions and its own internal strategies when defending strictly necessary and proportionate restrictions on fundamental rights.

      Members stress that the promotion and protection of digital freedoms should be mainstreamed and annually reviewed so as to ensure accountability and continuity, in all the EUs external actions, financing and aid policies and instruments, under the leadership of the High Representative and the EEAS. They encourage the EU Special Representative for Human Rights to name digital freedoms and the No Disconnect Strategyamong his key priorities.

      Trade: Members believe that digital freedoms and cross-border trade should go hand in hand in order to create and optimise business opportunities for European companies in the global digital economy. They deplore the fact that EU-made technologies and services are sometimes used in third countries to violate human rights. They urge the Commission to take all necessary steps to stop this digital arms trade and call for a ban on exports of repressive technologies and services to authoritarian regimes.

      The Commission is invited to

      • submit, during 2013 at the latest, proposals requiring increased transparency and accountability on the part of EU-based companies, as well as the disclosure of human rights impact assessment policies, with a view to improving the monitoring of exports of ICTs, products and services aimed at blocking websites, mass surveillance, tracking and monitoring of individuals, breaking into private (email) conversations or the filtering of search results;
      • submit proposals for an EU legal framework that would oblige companies engaging in public procurement in Member States to perform human rights impact assessments on the relevant ICTs, starting at the R&D phase, and ensure non-complicity in possible human rights violations in third countries.

      The report calls for the inclusion of conditionality clauses in EU FTAs, stipulating transparent safeguards, preserving unrestricted access to the internet, and ensuring the free flow of information. It calls on the EU to provide political backing to European companies which are faced with requests to remove user-generated content or provide personal information in ways that breach fundamental rights and curtail the freedom to conduct business.

      Internet governance: Members consider transparent and collaborative decision-making to be essential in order to ensure respect for the open and participatory nature of the internet. In their view, any debate on regulations concerning the internet should be open and involve all stakeholders, especially those specialised in fundamental rights protection. They believe the EU should play a leading role in the development of digital freedom ground-rules and norms of behaviour in cyberspace, including dispute settlement mechanisms and taking account of conflicting jurisdictions.

      The report stresses the importance of an overall EU strategy for internet governance, as also for issues related to telecom regulation, recalling that the sector is internationally governed through the International Telecom Union, in which EU Member States each have one vote. In this context, the Commission is called upon to swiftly present its EU-wide Cloud Computing Strategy, as highlighted in the Digital Agenda for Europe.

      Members consider that more global cooperation is needed in order to uphold and modernise intellectual property rights (IPR) in the future, this being vital to ensure innovation, employment and open world trade. They call on the Member States and the Commission to develop IPR policy in order to continue to allow those who wish to create their own content and share it without acquiring IPRs to do so. They recommend a revision of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), which would balance the need for relevant copyright reform and protection with the need to protect fundamental rights online and preserve the open internet.

      A digital freedom strategy: the report invites the Commission and the Council to adopt a Digital Freedom Strategy in EU foreign policy as soon as possible.

      Underlining that human rights must also be protected online, the report calls for:

      • ICTs to be mainstreamed in all EU programmes, especially in the European Neighbourhood Policy and the strategic partnerships;
      • the Union to recognise digital freedoms as fundamental rights and as indispensable prerequisites for enjoying universal human rights.

      The report calls on the Commission and the Council to:

      • support, train and empower human rights defenders, civil society activists and independent journalists using ICTs in their activities;
      • promote and preserve high standards of digital freedom in the EU, in particular by codifying the principle of net neutrality by means of appropriate regulation, so as to strengthen the Unions credibility in terms of promoting and defending digital freedoms around the world.

      Lastly, Members consider coordination and joint diplomatic initiatives with other OECD countries in developing and executing a digital freedom strategy to be essential for efficient and agile action.

    activities/3/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121210&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
    activities/4/date
    Old
    2012-11-06T00:00:00
    New
    2012-12-11T00:00:00
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22199&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0470/2012
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
    Old
    4de1889d0fb8127435bdc384
    New
    4f1adb1bb819f207b30000a9
    committees/0/shadows/0/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    4de1898e0fb8127435bdc4c8
    New
    4f1adcbfb819f207b3000136
    committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
    Old
    4de188870fb8127435bdc365
    New
    4f1adb6cb819f207b30000c3
    committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
    Old
    4de188e50fb8127435bdc3e8
    New
    4f1adbd4b819f207b30000e8
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
    New
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    activities/5/type
    Old
    Debate scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/6/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-470 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0470/2012
    activities/6/type
    Old
    Vote scheduled
    New
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/5
    date
    2012-12-10T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate scheduled
    activities/6
    date
    2012-12-11T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled
    activities/2
    date
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2013-01-14T00:00:00
    New
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2012-05-16T00:00:00
    New
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    activities/2/type
    Old
    EP officialisation
    New
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/3
    body
    EP
    date
    2012-09-25T00:00:00
    type
    Deadline Amendments
    activities/4
    date
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/4/date
    Old
    2012-12-10T00:00:00
    New
    2012-11-15T00:00:00
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-374&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0374/2012
    activities/4/type
    Old
    EP 1R Plenary
    New
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/6
    date
    2012-11-15T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0374/2012
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/8
    body
    EC
    date
    2012-12-10T00:00:00
    type
    Prev DG PRES
    commission
    activities/9
    date
    2013-01-14T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/7/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    EP 1R Plenary
    activities/8
    body
    EC
    date
    2012-12-10T00:00:00
    type
    Prev DG PRES
    commission
    activities/6
    date
    2012-11-15T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0374/2012
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/5/committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ZALEWSKI Paweł group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
    activities/5/type
    Old
    Prev Adopt in Cte
    New
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/4/docs/0/url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.512
    activities/4
    date
    2012-09-27T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE496.512
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/1/committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: ZALEWSKI Paweł
    • group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek
    • group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: EPP name: ZALEWSKI Paweł
    • group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek
    • group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek
    activities/2/docs/0/url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.252
    activities/4
    body
    EP
    date
    2012-10-18T00:00:00
    type
    Prev Adopt in Cte
    activities/4/date
    Old
    2012-11-19T00:00:00
    New
    2012-11-06T00:00:00
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Prev Adopt in Cte
    activities/5
    body
    EP
    date
    2012-10-25T00:00:00
    type
    EP 1R Plenary
    activities/5/body
    Old
    EC
    New
    EP
    activities/5/commission
      activities/5/date
      Old
      2012-10-25T00:00:00
      New
      2012-12-10T00:00:00
      activities/5/type
      Old
      Prev DG PRES
      New
      Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      activities/5
      body
      EP
      date
      2012-10-25T00:00:00
      type
      EP 1R Plenary
      activities/6
      body
      EC
      date
      2012-10-25T00:00:00
      type
      Prev DG PRES
      commission
      activities/7/date
      Old
      2012-10-25T00:00:00
      New
      2012-11-19T00:00:00
      activities/2
      date
      2012-08-24T00:00:00
      docs
      type: Committee draft report title: PE491.252
      body
      EP
      type
      Committee draft report
      activities/2/date
      Old
      2012-08-29T00:00:00
      New
      2012-09-25T00:00:00
      activities/3/date
      Old
      2012-09-20T00:00:00
      New
      2012-10-18T00:00:00
      procedure/legal_basis
      • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
      activities/2/date
      Old
      2012-06-27T00:00:00
      New
      2012-08-29T00:00:00
      activities/2
      body
      EP
      date
      2012-06-27T00:00:00
      type
      Deadline Amendments
      activities/1/committees/1/date
      2012-05-29T00:00:00
      activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
      • group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
      committees/1/date
      2012-05-29T00:00:00
      committees/1/rapporteur
      • group: Verts/ALE name: ANDERSDOTTER Amelia
      activities/1
      date
      2012-05-24T00:00:00
      body
      EP
      type
      Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      committees
      procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/7/09574
      procedure/stage_reached
      Old
      Preparatory phase in Parliament
      New
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      activities
      • body: EP date: 2012-05-16T00:00:00 type: EP officialisation
      • body: EP date: 2012-09-20T00:00:00 type: Prev Adopt in Cte
      • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      committees
      • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2011-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SCHAAKE Marietje
      • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
      links
      other
        procedure
        reference
        2012/2094(INI)
        title
        Digital Freedom Strategy in EU Foreign Policy
        stage_reached
        Preparatory phase in Parliament
        subtype
        Initiative
        type
        INI - Own-initiative procedure
        subject