Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA Lena ( PPE) | OLEJNICZAK Wojciech Michał ( S&D), VLASÁK Oldřich ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ENCIU Ioan ( S&D) | Krišjānis KARIŅŠ ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 530 votes to 112, with 29 abstentions, a resolution on the role of EU cohesion policy and its actors in implementing the new European energy policy.
Parliament welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives . It recalls:
the importance of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund in achieving these short- and long-term objectives in combating energy poverty in the less developed regions of the EU and the most vulnerable households; the need for strong EU support for economic, social and territorial cohesion bearing in mind the current crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe.
Members believe that European energy projects could contribute to regional development and stronger cross-border cooperation by helping regions increase their capacity to manage energy resource. According to them, investment in low-emission and renewable energy sources and energy efficiency can result in supporting regional growth and jobs .
The resolution stresses that the European Union should act as quickly as possible to secure its energy future and protect its interests in this field, and should at the same time offer substantial financial support for drawing up projects. Stressing that projected increases in energy pricing may place citizens in the less developed EU regions at a particular disadvantage, Members ask that this factor be considered within cohesion policy planning.
1. Capacity building : the resolution stresses that the current climate and energy targets and any future energy goals beyond 2020 should be based on fair burden-sharing between European regions and should allow them the possibility of future development, which is needed.
Parliament :
supports the simplification of rules and procedures , the removal of red tape, and increased flexibility in allocating these funds at both EU and national level; stresses the importance of increasing administrative capacity at regional and local level in order to make full and effective use of the funding that will be allocated to energy projects under cohesion policy; believes, not only that JESSICA, ELENA and IEE-MLEI should be strengthened, but that any funding allocations for low-emission economy thematic concentrations within the cohesion policy should be reviewed by 2018 in light of their absorption rate and adjusted as needed; stresses the importance of regularly reviewing the allocation of cohesion funding for energy projects, in order to increase the absorption rate and channel the funds into programmes which have a proven record of absorption, added value and effectiveness; draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that towns, especially small and medium-sized towns, and rural communities should be eligible for direct funding aid for energy efficiency, and building renovation projects, as well as trans-regional and cross-border projects asks for support for initiatives supporting local and regional capacities to deal with energy savings, inter alia by ERDF and ESF investments; calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide cooperation programme , based on the experience of the twinning programme, in order to improve cooperation between regions with high rates of absorption of EU funds and those with low absorption rates and to facilitate the dissemination of best practices.
2. Partnership agreements : for projects to be properly implemented, Members feel that regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements. They call, therefore, for the partnership principle to be strengthened , and support a multi-level governance and decentralised approach to energy policy and energy efficiency.
Parliament points out that cohesion policy funding arrangements should ensure that the differing economic, social and territorial features of regions are fully taken into consideration. It highlights, in this connection, the role of the regions located on the external borders of the European Union, and single out the need to apply broad criteria for assessing energy projects put forward for cohesion policy funding.
3. Implementation and policy suggestions : Parliament considers that all regions still dependent on fossil fuels ought to be encouraged to use sources of energy compatible with the goals of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth .
The resolution:
takes the view that consistent rules are needed at European level along with a mechanism for authorities to access information from across the Union in order to fully understand energy market developments; supports the use of cohesion and energy policy funds for cross-border projects with third partner countries and connections between national networks; urges the Commission to maximise the degree of coordination between the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, on the one hand, and the Connecting Europe Facility , on the other; encourages implementation of cross-border strategies on efficient energy production, distribution and use; calls for full use to be made of synergies between public and private funds in financing energy projects ; supports the revision of the EU VAT Regulation (2006/112/EC) to allow for a reduction of the VAT rate applied to regional, local and cross-border projects seeking to increase energy efficiency. calls for the cohesion policy to encourage and support the upgrade and creation of district heating and cogeneration plants especially in Central and Eastern Europe..
4. Energy efficiency, renewables and infrastructure : Parliament agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU's energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure and Operational Programmes . EU measures should support energy efficiency in the energy production, distribution and consumption phases. It considers it to be of paramount importance for investments to be made in energy efficiency and renewable energy use, in particular in the housing sector .
The resolution also:
stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy storage and transmission infrastructure and networks (with particular reference to smart grids and distribution) between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions; no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks; emphasises the need to develop an integrated and interconnected energy system , and local and regional smart distribution and transmission networks for electricity and gas, together with storage facilities; the sustainable production of biogas is supported; asks the Commission to ensure that energy policy is ‘rural proof’ by addressing in a more comprehensive and coordinated way the challenges and opportunities that rural areas face when it comes to energy use and production; points out that energy efficiency potential remains unrealised in the construction and transport sectors, where invest ments in the heating of buildings and energy-efficient public transport represent an opportunity to increase employment in the sectors concerned; notes the imbalance in sustainable resource use between different Member States and stresses the economies of scale possible through cross-border cooperation on the sustainable use of resources and energy efficiency.
5. Competitiveness, jobs and fighting energy poverty : the resolution stresses that investments in energy infrastructure and energy-efficient construction and transport will lead directly to the creation of new jobs.
Members call for the EU-wide exchange of best practices so that the impact on energy poverty of policies adopted in the area of energy may be monitored. They also highlight the need to address the fragmentation of the EU energy market by removing barriers and bottlenecks in the relevant legislative frameworks and in the system of access to public and private funds for project development and implementation.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA (EPP, PL) on the role of EU cohesion policy and its actors in implementing the new European energy policy.
It welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives. It recalls, in addition, the importance of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund in achieving these short- and long-term objectives in combating energy poverty in the less developed regions of the EU and the most vulnerable households . Members emphasise the need for strong EU support for economic, social and territorial cohesion bearing in mind the current crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe.
They believe that European energy projects could contribute to regional development and stronger cross-border cooperation by helping regions increase their capacity to manage energy resources.
In order to achieve the EU 2020-targets, the regions of Europe should promote smart, sustainable and inclusive growth that takes into account local specificities and conditions, allowing the regions of Europe sufficient flexibility to focus on those sustainable energy sources which are best suited to local and regional conditions.
The report calls for the deployment of renewable sources of energy within the EU to be made more efficient by striving towards a system of EU-wide incentives for renewable sources. It recommends taking into account the fact that Europe’s energy markets are organised in regional groups.
Members take the view that the European Union should act as quickly as possible to secure its energy future and protect its interests in this field, and should at the same time offer substantial financial support for drawing up projects.
Stressing that projected increases in energy pricing may place citizens in the less developed EU regions at a particular disadvantage, Members ask that this factor be considered within cohesion policy planning.
Capacity building : Members stress that the current climate and energy targets and any future energy goals beyond 2020 should be based on fair burden-sharing between European regions and should allow them the possibility of future development, which is needed.
The report:
· supports the simplification of rules and procedures , the removal of red tape, and increased flexibility in allocating these funds at both EU and national level;
· stresses the importance of increasing administrative capacity at regional and local level in order to make full and effective use of the funding that will be allocated to energy projects under cohesion policy;
· stresses the importance of regularly reviewing the allocation of cohesion funding for energy projects, in order to increase the absorption rate and channel the funds into programmes which have a proven record of absorption, added value and effectiveness;
· draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that towns, especially small and medium-sized towns, and rural communities should be eligible for direct funding aid for energy efficiency, and building renovation projects, as well as transregional and cross-border projects
· asks for support for initiatives supporting local and regional capacities to deal with energy savings, inter alia by ERDF and ESF investments;
· calls on the Commission to establish an EU-wide cooperation programme , based on the experience of the twinning programme, in order to improve cooperation between regions with high rates of absorption of EU funds and those with low absorption rates and to facilitate the dissemination of best practices.
Partnership agreements : for projects to be properly implemented, Members feel that regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements. They call, therefore, for the partnership principle to be strengthened , and support a multi-level governance and decentralised approach to energy policy and energy efficiency. Members point out that cohesion policy funding arrangements should ensure that the differing economic, social and territorial features of regions are fully taken into consideration. They highlight, in this connection, the role of the regions located on the external borders of the European Union, and single out the need to apply broad criteria for assessing energy projects put forward for cohesion policy funding.
Implementation and policy suggestions : Members believe that all regions still dependent on fossil fuels ought to be encouraged to use sources of energy compatible with the goals of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, including those of a transitional nature.
The report:
· takes the view that consistent rules are needed at European level along with a mechanism for authorities to access information from across the Union in order to fully understand energy market developments;
· supports the use of cohesion and energy policy funds for cross-border projects with third partner countries and connections between national networks . Bordering regions should be incorporated into the EU system as much as possible to ensure sustainable development on both sides of the border;
· urges the Commission to maximise the degree of coordination between the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund, on the one hand, and the Connecting Europe Facility , on the other;
· encourages implementation of cross-border strategies on efficient energy production, distribution and use;
· supports the revision of the EU VAT Regulation (2006/112/EC) to allow for a reduction of the VAT rate applied to regional, local and cross-border projects seeking to increase energy efficiency.
Energy efficiency, renewables and infrastructure : Members believe that investment in low-emission and renewable energy sources, energy efficiency and other measures can result in supporting regional growth and jobs. While cohesion policy energy funding is at present mainly spent on renewables, Members note that a better balance must be reached to enable a greater percentage of funding to be targeted at energy-efficiency projects.
The report also:
· stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy storage and transmission infrastructure and networks (with particular reference to smart grids and distribution) between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions. Members stress that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;
· emphasises the need to develop an integrated and interconnected energy system , and local and regional smart distribution and transmission networks for electricity and gas, together with storage facilities. The energy thematic concentration should support grid creation, and renovation for renewable sources of energy, i.e. sustainable production of biogas;
· considers that funding for renewables should focus primarily on the local distribution of the power/fuel produced and small-scale renewable projects ;
· asks the Commission to ensure that energy policy is ‘rural proof’ by addressing in a more comprehensive and coordinated way the challenges and opportunities that rural areas face when it comes to energy use and production;
· stresses the economies of scale possible through cross-border cooperation on the sustainable use of resources and energy efficiency.
Competitiveness, jobs and fighting energy poverty : the report stresses that investments in energy infrastructure and energy-efficient construction and transport will lead directly to the creation of new jobs . Members call for the EU-wide exchange of best practices so that the impact on energy poverty of policies adopted in the area of energy may be monitored. They also highlight the need to address the fragmentation of the EU energy market by removing barriers and bottlenecks in the relevant legislative frameworks and in the system of access to public and private funds for project development and implementation.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)251
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0017/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0437/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE501.895
- Committee draft report: PE500.485
- Committee opinion: PE494.625
- Committee opinion: PE494.625
- Committee draft report: PE500.485
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE501.895
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)251
Activities
- Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
165 |
2012/2099(INI)
2012/10/11
ITRE
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives and its flagship initiatives in order to move towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to support the shift towards a
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Welcomes the launch of Smart Cities and Communities European Innovation Partnership and calls on relevant partners involved in planning processes for sustainable urban development to better promote and profit from the benefits that the JESSICA and ELENA initiatives can provide for investments in sustainable energy at local level, with a view to helping cities and regions embark on viable investment projects in the fields of energy efficiency, clean-burning, renewable energy sources, and sustainable urban transport;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Emphasises that cooperation between municipalities and regions on a national and European level contributes to eliminating energy islands, to the completion of the internal energy market and to the implementation of energy infrastructure projects; takes the view that the European territorial cooperation objective of cohesion policy, as well as macro-regional strategies, can increase cooperation opportunities for cross-border projects with a view to achieving efficient and intelligent interconnections between non-conventional local and regional energy sources and large energy grids;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy transmission infrastructure and networks between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy transmission infrastructure and networks between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market, for security of supply and for achieving the goal of convergence among EU regions, taking into the account special needs of European citizens in every Member State; stresses that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy and gas transmission infrastructure and networks (with particular reference to smart transmission) between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market, for security of supply and for achieving the goal of convergence among EU regions; stresses that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the importance of cohesion policy, and of the financial resources allocated to it, for the full development of energy storage and transmission infrastructure and networks between the Member States and all regions of the EU, including the outermost regions, for the completion and functioning of the internal energy market, for security of supply and for achieving the goal of convergence among EU regions; stresses that no region of the Member States should remain isolated from European gas and electricity networks after 2015 or suffer from inadequate connection to energy networks;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises the importance of the ex- ante conditionality for energy investments proposed in the regulation for the next cohesion policy and underscores the need for the Commission to strictly enforce the ex-ante conditionality related to energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to ensure qualitative investments, in line with the EU policies and objective;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that utilisation of Structural Funds and Cohesion funds for programmes which finance energy efficiency and renewable energy projects so far has been successful and has contributed to the achievement of the EU policy goals;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Council and the Commission to agree on higher thresholds for the ring-fencing of ERDF funding for this shift towards an energy-efficient renewables-based economy, setting the minimum share at 22% for more developed and transition regions and 12% for less developed regions;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives and its flagship initiatives in order to move towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to support the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors; recalls,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it to be of paramount importance to be able to use the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and other financial instruments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy use in the housing sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it to be of paramount importance to be able to use the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and other financial instruments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy use in the housing sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to establish innovative financial mechanisms and disseminate clear, easily accessible information on the financial instruments, incentives, grants and loans available to support energy efficiency service projects.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it to be of paramount importance to be able to use the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and other financial and leverage instruments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it to be of paramount importance to be able to use the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund and other financial instruments to finance energy efficiency and renewable energy use in the housing sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to disseminate clear, easily accessible information on the financial instruments, incentives, grants and loans available to support energy efficiency service projects; stresses that, in order to improve the energy efficiency of new and existing residential buildings and increase the use of renewable energy sources, the measures planned under the structural funds should also appear in the Member States’ regional operational programmes, thereby ensuring that the final decisions are taken at regional level.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of integrating the renewable and energy efficiency dimensions in the research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation that Member States and regions will have to design to access the innovation funding of the future cohesion policy; regional and local authorities and stakeholders have a key role to play in deploying the most needed innovations in the energy sector if the EU is to meet its renewables and energy efficiency targets;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Highlights that the Cohesion Policy and the funds allocated to it should be delivered more effectively, based on the principles of proportionality, cost- effectiveness and accountability; supports, therefore, the use of financial instruments as leverage for private sector investment, especially in view of large energy infrastructure, energy efficiency and renewable energy projects;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of regular reviewing of allocation of cohesion funding for energy projects in order to increase the absorption rate and channel the funds into programmes which have a proven record of absorption, added value and effectiveness;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of the advantage of using the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for the implementation of information and communication networks needed for the development of a secure and robust smart EU energy grid;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Shares the Commission views on encouraging and increasing the use of financial instruments in Cohesion policy for the 2014-2020; considers that these instruments can prove to be very cost- efficient, creating a leverage effect by mobilising additional public or private co- investments in order to address market failures in the energy sector while minimizing market distortions;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Underlines the critical importance for Member States and regions to ensure the adequate governance and capacity development in order to make full and effective use of the funding that cohesion policy will allocate to renewable and energy efficiency;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the general approach of linking cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 objectives and its flagship initiatives in order to move towards smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and to support the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors; highlights the need for effective regional cooperation when identifying regional infrastructure priorities and implementing projects of common interest; recalls, however, the importance of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for achieving the social dimension of the energy policy, in accordance with the spirit of solidarity between Member States as enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty, and for combating energy poverty in the most vulnerable households;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Welcomes the Commission's new approach to apply financial instruments more widely to its Cohesion Policy, acknowledging the current financial scarcity and EU's financial needs to complete the 2020 strategy; believes that financial instruments provide an efficient and effective support for investments for projects with potential economic viability, believes that financial instruments should be tailored to the specific needs of regions and their target recipients, thereby improving significantly access to finance to the benefit of a wide range of socio- economic actors on the ground;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Welcomes the new proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility as an additional and complementary instrument to the Cohesion policy to address the extensive needs for investments to modernize and expand Europe's energy infrastructures, thereby contributing to the 2020 strategy targets; urges the Commission to maximize the coordination between the Cohesion and Structural Funds and the Connecting Europe Facility;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Highlights the need to address the fragmentation of the EU energy market by removing the barriers and the bottlenecks in the legislative frameworks and in the access to public and private funds for the elaboration and implementation of projects;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that bureaucracy and lack of procedural clarity have made the accession of Cohesion and Structural Funds difficult and have discouraged the actors most in need of these funds from applying; supports, therefore, the simplification of the award process, the removal of red tape and increased flexibility in allocating these funds, so that the poorest Member States and regions can fully take advantage of the financial instruments meant to reduce regional and inter-state disparities;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses the need to distinguish between the cohesion policy goals which contribute to the EU 2020 strategy and wider energy policy goals of the EU which affect also the countries which are eligible for cohesion funding; underlines that cohesion funds can be used as an additional source of funding for energy projects only if a project contributes to goals of the cohesion policy;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Underlines the need to simplify rules and procedures at both EU and national level without creating major difficulties for the beneficiaries; believes that simplification will contribute to the efficient allocation of funds, higher absorption rates, fewer errors and reduced payment periods; considers that a balance needs to be struck between simplification and the stability of rules and procedures;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission to establish a EU-wide cooperation programme based on experience with the twinning programme in order to improve cooperation between regions with high absorption and regions with low absorption rates of EU funds and to facilitate the dissemination of best practices;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Stresses the importance of increasing administrative capacity in the Member States, at regional and local level as well as among stakeholders, in order to overcome barriers to effective synergies between structural funds and other funds and to support effective policy design and implementation; calls on Member States to make further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds;
source: PE-497.884
2012/11/30
REGI
134 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 – having regard to the communication of 15 December 2011 entitled ‘Energy Roadmap 20
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the European Union’s energy markets are increasingly extending beyond national borders and this trend is set to gain considerable pace in the period ahead;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Supports the revision of the EU VAT Regulation (2006/112/EC) to allow for a reduction of the VAT rate applied to regional
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that excluding projects which might come under Directive 2003/87/EC from the ERDF and the C
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Believes that excluding projects which
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Notes that district heating and cogeneration plants are widely present especially in Central-Eastern Europe; believes that their upgrade and the one of their distribution network, and where necessary the creation of high efficiency new plants, would have a positive environmental impact and should therefore be encouraged and supported by Cohesion Policy;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Points out that the geographical obstacles inherent in the location of islands and mountain areas make it very difficult to integrate them into the EU energy network; asks the Commission and the Council to ensure that the future post-2013 cohesion policy pays special attention to regions with specific geographical and demographic features, such as islands, mountainous regions and regions with a low population density, aiming at greater diversification of energy sources and far more promotion of renewable energy;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU's energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure; believes that EU measures should support energy efficiency in both energy consumption and production; notes that while currently cohesion policy energy funding is overwhelming spent on renewables, renewables are already supported by targeted EU and Member States schemes, including feed-in tariffs; notes that this raises questions of the collective impact of cohesion funding in relations to the development of renewables in individual regions; believes, therefore, a greater balance must be reached by which a greater percentage of funding is targeted at energy efficiency projects;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU's energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure; believes that EU measures should support energy efficiency in both energy
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU’s energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure; believes that EU measures should support energy efficiency in both energy consumption and production, as well as the development of public-private research and innovation partnerships to identify the best solutions in this area;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Agrees that energy efficiency is vital to the EU's energy goals and should be promoted above all within the thematic concentration structure; believes that EU measures should support energy efficiency in
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas, under the original Commission proposal, that at least 80 % of ERDF resources in more developed and 50% in less developed regions should going to a 'low-carbon economy';
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Takes the view that, by making intelligent use of Community funds for the forthcoming programming period 2014-2020, it will be possible to achieve the 20% target for energy efficiency and thus the sustainability and competitiveness objectives in the European Union; stresses that cutting consumption by means of energy efficiency is the most sustainable way of reducing dependence on fossil fuels, leading to a reduction in imports of around 25%;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Considers it to be of paramount importance for investments to be made in energy efficiency and renewable energy use, in particular in the housing sector;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Takes the view that the European Union requires close cooperation in the field of energy infrastructure, as well as appropriate European funding; stresses the need to stimulate investment in the energy sector, including private sector investment, by offering the necessary political and administrative support, a certain level of funding, and some public guarantees or other innovative forms of funding;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that any EU energy policy requires the development of local and regional smart distribution and transmission networks for electricity
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses th
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Stresses that any EU energy policy requires the development of an integrated and interconnected energy system, and of local and regional smart distribution and transmission networks for electricity and gas, together with gas storage facilities; believes that the energy thematic concentration should support grid creation and renovation;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Considers, taking into account regional demands, that funding for renewables should focus primarily on the local distribution of the power/fuel produced and small-scale renewable projects; notes that large scale renewables project often either focus on the transmission of this energy outside the region of its production or find local grids do not have the capacity to absorb this intermittent energy;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Points out that the cohesion policy should contribute to a balance of energy flows across borders of Member States in order to avoid possible threat of black- outs (by means of e.g. transformers);
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes the need for energy efficiency and development of renewable energy in rural areas; stresses the increasing energy saving potential in rural households, which might require innovative funding schemes; supports steps to facilitate access to new technologies for rural areas, especially in the area of microgeneration;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the European Commission earmarked 20% of EU funds to mitigating climate change;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes the need for energy efficiency and development of renewable energy in rural areas; stresses the increasing energy saving potential in rural households, which
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Notes the need for energy efficiency and development of renewable energy also in rural areas; stresses the increasing energy saving potential in rural households, which might require innovative funding schemes; supports steps to facilitate access to new technologies for rural areas;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Points out that energy efficiency potential remains unrealised in the construction and transport sectors, where investments in the heating of buildings and energy-efficient public transport represent an opportunity to increase employment in the sectors concerned; believes that multiannual objectives should be set in this regard;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Notes that investments in energy-efficient transport should take account of the need to reduce pollution and noise, especially in urban areas;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the imbalance in sustainable resource use between different Member States, takes the view that measures to support resource efficiency and the recycling of materials should be stepped up; underlines the risk of carbon leakage and its effect on regional development and social cohesion and therefore believes that there must be created a balance between the application between our climate objectives and the need for energy security of Europe's regions which is needed for sustainable and competitive growth;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the imbalance in sustainable resource use between different Member States, takes the view that measures to support the development of renewable sources of energy, resource efficiency and the recycling of materials, should be stepped up;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the imbalance in sustainable resource use between different Member States
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Supports the use of cohesion policy resources in ensuring that all energy islands in the EU are eliminated as quickly as possible;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Competitiveness, jobs and fighting energy poverty Stresses that investments in energy infrastructure and energy-efficient construction and transport will lead directly to the creation of new jobs;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Supports the development of innovative and ecological energy solutions as a means of increasing the economic competitiveness of Europe’s regions;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the price of energy has risen significantly in recent years and has now reached historic levels, posing major problems for European industries;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 d (new) 20d. Calls for the EU-wide exchange of best practices so that the impact on energy poverty of policies adopted in the area of energy may be monitored;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Asks the Commission to ensure that energy policy is 'rural proof' by addressing in a more comprehensive and coordinated way the challenges and opportunities that rural areas face when it comes to energy use and production;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new) 21b. Underlines that the deployment of renewables can come with new revenue sources, new job and business opportunities, product innovation, community empowerment and affordable energy;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new) 21c. Emphasises that for obvious financial reasons, the natural gas grid will never cover certain parts of the rural territory in the EU and thus LPG and LNG could play the back-up role for renewable energies in these off-grid areas, bringing the same environmental benefits as natural gas.
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas within this theme, a minimum of 20% and 6% respectively are required to be allocated to energy efficiency and renewables, which is a significant amount of funding;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the revised Energy Efficiency directive failed to set binding targets for Members States;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas the minimum amount for an ELENA eligible project is 50 Million Euros and for the Intelligent Energy programme, the minimum is greater than 6 Million Euros, which is larger than many projects in small and rural communities;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas the achievement of targets set in the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC are lacking behind in several Members States;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new) Cd. whereas the Member States decreased their support for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency due to the economic slowdown;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new) Ce. whereas the Energy Roadmap 2050 identifies Renewable Energy as playing a major share in the future Energy policy;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas the European Energy Policy should also ensure safety of the energy resources, diversification of the supplies, and affordable prices for the end user;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis’ negative effect
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis' negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for economic, social and territorial cohesion; believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development through investments in decentralised energy
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for cohesion; believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development through investments in decentralised energy sources, development of local and regional smart transport networks, energy efficiency and other measures which support growth and jobs;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for cohesion; believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development and stronger cross-border cooperation through investments in decentralised energy sources, the development of projects of common interest, energy efficiency and other
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for cohesion; believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development through investments in
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis' negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for cohesion
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis’ negative effect of increasing local and regional disparities in Europe, the need for strong EU support for cohesion; believes that European energy projects could contribute to regional development and help regions increase their autonomous capacity to manage energy resources through investments in decentralised energy sources, energy efficiency and other measures which support growth and jobs;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Emphasises, in view of the crisis' negative effect of increasing local and regional di
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the common objectives of the EU cohesion policy are the economic, social and territorial cohesion of Europe’s regions through investment in sustainable growth and jobs;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses, however, that the cohesion policy programmes should not be seen as a replacement for the proper funding of European energy policy proposals or national renewables support schemes; stresses that cohesion policy can support actions, such as energy efficiency measures, as an additional source of funding, but only when these programmes promote the cohesion policy objectives;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses, however, that the cohesion policy programmes should not be seen as a replacement for the proper funding of European energy policy proposals; stresses that cohesion policy can support actions, such as energy efficiency measures or cross-border energy transferability measures, as an additional source of funding, but only when these programmes promote the cohesion policy objectives;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses, however, that the cohesion policy programmes should not be seen as a replacement for the proper funding of European energy policy proposals; stresses that cohesion policy can support
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses, however, that the cohesion policy programmes should
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should be able to focus on those energy sources which are best suited to the local conditions and that the EU should start measuring European energy objectives on an EU-wide scale; calls for the deployment of renewable sources of energy within the EU to be made more efficient by striving towards a system of EU-wide incentives for renewable sources, on which basis specific types of renewables would be deployed in those parts of the EU where they are most efficient, thereby lowering the cost of promoting them and guaranteeing the efficient allocation of funding;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should be able to focus on those energy sources which are best suited to the local conditions and that the EU should start measuring European energy objectives on an EU-wide scale; stresses that all regions should seek to give priority to renewable energy sources;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should be able to focus on those energy sources which are best suited to the local conditions and resources and that the EU should start measuring European energy objectives on an EU-wide scale;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should be able to focus on those energy sources which are best suited to the local conditions and that the EU should start
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should be able to focus on those
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Believes that the regions of Europe should
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recommends taking into account the fact that Europe’s energy markets are organised in regional groups and takes the view that greater attention should continue to be paid to the specific features of national and regional markets so that the proper enforcement of legislative regulations can be guaranteed;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Takes the view that the European Union should act as quickly as possible to secure its energy future and protect its interests in this field, which will entail exerting additional pressure on local and regional representatives to comply with EU guidelines; takes the view that they should at the same time be offered substantial financial support for drawing up projects;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses, that, owing to the
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses, that, owing to the EU's climate change objectives, developments in energy pricing may place citizens in the less
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses, that, owing to the EU’s climate change objectives, developments in energy pricing may place citizens in
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Proposes the adoption of a twin-track strategy for the development of forward-looking energy infrastructure in Europe, which would involve constructing a trans-European electricity transmission network while simultaneously supporting complementary generation on a smaller scale at a local level;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy could contribute to the realisation of both policies by promoting growth
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that any future energy goals should be based on fair burden sharing between European regions and should allow them the possibility of future development; firmly believes, therefore, that any multiannual financial allocation needs to take into consideration not only the general Europe-wide objectives, but also the institutional capacities of regions throughout the EU which is in need of being strengthened;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that the EU2020 targets, an
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out, with regard to large-scale energy projects, the possible capacity deficiencies of various regional and local authorities, which might seriously hamper implementation; believes, therefore, not only that JESSICA, ELENA and IEE- MLEI should be strengthened, but that any
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out, with regard to large-scale energy projects, the possible capacity deficiencies of various regional and local authorities, which might seriously hamper implementation; believes, therefore, not only that JESSICA, ELENA and IEE- MLEI should be strengthened, but that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Points out, with regard to large-scale energy projects, the possible capacity deficiencies of various regional and local authorities, which might seriously hamper implementation; believes, therefore,
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments for energy projects, that this should be in addition to direct grants and co-financing of energy projects and not a replacement for them; draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that individuals, small and medium-sized towns and rural communities should be eligible for direct funding aid for energy efficiency and building renovation projects, as well as transregional and cross-border projects, as they are likely to lack the administrative capacity to use other financial instruments fully;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments for energy projects, that this should be in addition to direct grants and co-financing of energy projects and not a
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy could contribute to the realisation of both policies by promoting growth in
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments for energy projects, that this should be in addition to direct grants and co-financing of energy projects and not a replacement for them; draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that individuals, small and medium-sized towns and rural communities should be
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses, while supporting new financial instruments for energy projects, that this should be in addition to direct grants and co-financing of energy projects and not a replacement for them; draws the attention of the Member States and the Commission to the fact that individuals, small and medium-sized towns and rural communities should be eligible for direct funding aid for energy efficiency and building renovation projects as they are likely to lack the administrative capacity to use other financial instruments fully; suggests to the Commission, in this regard, that an energy-efficiency strategy needs to be drawn up for smaller towns;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that initiatives supporting local and regional capacities to deal with energy savings should be supported, among others by ERDF and ESF investments;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, for projects to be properly implemented, regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, for projects to be properly implemented, regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements in such a way as to give them a real opportunity to influence their goals, the content of expenditure and their implementation; supports therefore a multi-level governance and decentralised approach to energy policy and energy efficiency, including the Covenant of Mayors and the further development of the Smart Cities initiative;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, for projects to be properly implemented, regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements in such a way as to give them a real opportunity to influence their goals, the content of expenditure and their implementation; asks, therefore, to strengthen the partnership principle;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that, for projects to be properly implemented, regional and local authorities should be consulted on partnership agreements in such a way as to give them a real opportunity to influence their goals, the content of expenditure and their implementation and promote the best solutions at regional and local level by means of information campaigns;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Points out that cohesion policy funding arrangements should ensure that the differing economic, social and territorial features of regions are fully taken into consideration; highlights in this respect the role of the regions located on the external borders of the European Union;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that, while the
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that, while the Common Strategic Framework provides for general earmarking, ring-fencing and other thematic targets, these measures should be applied in a flexible manner within partnership agreements to allow Member States to pursue individual national paths towards the 2020 goals and cohesion policy objectives;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that, while the Common
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Singles out the need to apply the broadest possible
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Singles out the need to apply the broadest possible terms of reference and definitions in the energy projects put forward for cohesion policy funding; notes in particular, that different geographical conditions makes impossible to 'one-size- fits-all' energy policy to all regions;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that not only low-carbon, but all low-emission sources of energy, such as shale gas, ought to be accepted, including those of a transitional nature; stress that the shale gas exploration will give some regions not only energy security but a source of regional development, which is even more needed in this time of crisis in Europe; notes also that shale gas will allow those regions where fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, is the major source of energy to lower their emissions by moving towards natural gas; underline that Europe should promote energy diversification and not prevent all paths to a low emission economy;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that not only low-carbon, but all low-emission and renewable sources of energy
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy could contribute to the realisation of both policies by promoting growth in underdeveloped
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU’s climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are still dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that not only low-carbon, but all low-emission sources of energy,
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are still dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU’s climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU’s climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels; believes, therefore, that not only low-carbon, but all low-emission sources of energy, such as shale gas, ought to be accepted, including those of a transitional nature; is aware of recent reactions in relation to the possible effects of shale gas extraction and proposes that the Member States open public consultations with a view to increased transparency as regards exploitation methods;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that, while Member States are changing their energy mixes in accordance with the EU's climate goals, many regions are dependent on fossil fuels;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Stresses the need to select local sources of energy generation prudently and in such a manner as to ensure that they fit in as well as possible with the regional landscape;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Takes the view that consistent rules are needed at European level along with a mechanism for authorities to access information from across the Union to fully understand energy market developments;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Commission to provide, on the basis of in-depth studies and case- analysis, on whether the production of natural gas from shale should be allowed and under which conditions. Believes that until when EU specific legislation is in place, such activity should be avoided;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the cohesion policy investments in the area of energy could contribute to the realisation of both policies by promoting
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Takes the view that cohesion policy can play a key role in exploiting the potential offered by innovation, research and development, so that future challenges in the field of energy can be turned into an opportunity that will revitalise the Union's economic strength;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Stresses the necessity to support research and innovation in the energy sector, as a tool to ensure secure, safe, competitive and sustainable new energy sources; underlines the important role Cohesion Policy can play in this field;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports the use of cohesion and energy policy funds for cross-border projects with third partner countries; stresses that bordering regions should be incorporated into the EU system to ensure sustainable development on both sides of the border; stresses that such funding should be subject to the application of the EU energy market rules, including the third energy package;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports the use of cohesion and energy policy funds for cross-border projects with third partner countries; stresses that
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Supports the use of cohesion and
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Encourages use of the European territorial cooperation objective and the Connecting Europe Facility to implement cross-border strategies on efficient energy production, distribution and use; emphasises the importance of adapting EU rules on energy infrastructure managers to the cross-border context;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes that cohesion policy funds should be available to educate SMEs and individuals on national renewable energy schemes; notes that this is especially needed in those Member States where a
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes that cohesion policy funds should be available to
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Believes that cohesion policy funds should be available to
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls for full use to be made of synergies between public and private funds in financing energy projects;
source: PE-501.895
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE494.625&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-494625_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.485New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-500485_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.895New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-501895_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-437&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0437_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-17New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0017_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/7/09602New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
4.70.02 Cohesion, Cohesion FundNew
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund |
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-12-21T00:00:00New
2012-05-24T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-11-12T00:00:00New
2012-12-18T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-12-18T00:00:00New
2012-12-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/4/docs/0 |
|
activities/4/docs/1/text |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184800fb8127435bdbda1New
4f1ac7c0b819f25efd0000a9 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186060fb8127435bdbfcbNew
4f1ac9afb819f25efd00014b |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
ALDENew
S&D |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4f1ada1ab819f207b3000052 |
committees/1/shadows/0/name |
Old
MĂNESCU Ramona NicoleNew
OLEJNICZAK Wojciech Michał |
committees/1/shadows/1/group |
Old
S&DNew
ECR |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1873e0fb8127435bdc183New
4f1adc6eb819f207b3000119 |
committees/1/shadows/1/name |
Old
OLEJNICZAK Wojciech MichałNew
VLASÁK Oldřich |
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-01-15T00:00:00New
2013-01-16T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-437&language=EN
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/5 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.895
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2013-01-14T00:00:00 |
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-05-16T00:00:00New
2012-11-30T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.485
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-01-14T00:00:00New
2013-01-17T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2012-03-20T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-03-20T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
REGI/7/09602
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|