Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | OJULAND Kristiina ( ALDE) | ZALA Boris ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 118, RoP 134o-p3
Legal Basis:
RoP 118, RoP 134o-p3Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a recommendation to the Council on establishing common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magitsky case.
Recalling Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe and of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which entails full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, Parliament states that the arrest, conditions of detention and subsequent death in custody of Sergei Magnitsky represent a well documented and substantial case of disrespect for fundamental human rights . Furthermore, the posthumous prosecution of Sergei Magnitsky is a violation of international and national laws and clearly shows the malfunctioning of the Russian criminal justice system .
Despite the 2011 conclusions of the inquiry conducted by the Russian President’s Human Rights Council on the illegality of Sergei Magnitsky’s arrest, Parliament notes that the investigations are stalled and the officials involved have been exonerated and even assigned to the posthumous case . Such actions on the part of the authorities demonstrate the politically motivated nature of Magnitsky's prosecution.
The resolution also cites the adoption of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act by the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee on 26 June 2012, seeking to impose visa bans and asset freezes on Russian officials allegedly involved in the detention, abuse and death of Sergei Magnitsky. In an oral amendment adopted in plenary, Parliament indicates that several national parliaments of EU Member States – among them the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland – have already passed resolutions urging their governments to introduce sanctions on the Magnitsky case, while several other national parliaments, such as those in Portugal, France, Spain and Latvia, are at the initial drafting stage for such resolutions.
In this context, in a series of recommendations , Parliament calls on the Council to:
establish a common EU list of officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky , for the subsequent judicial cover-up and for the ongoing and sustained harassment of his mother and widow; impose and implement an EU-wide visa ban on these officials and to freeze any financial assets they or their immediate family may hold inside the European Union; call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case, and to bring all those responsible to justice; urge the Russian authorities to put an end to the widespread corruption and to reform the judicial system, and bring it into line with international standards, by creating an independent, just and transparent system that cannot, under any circumstances, be misused for political reasons; raise, in the course of bilateral meetings with Russian authorities, this issue as well as the issue of intimidation and impunity in cases involving human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers, in a more determined, resolute and result-oriented manner.
Whilst acknowledging that visa restrictions and other restrictive measures are not traditional judicial sanctions per se , Parliament indicates that they constitute a political signal of the EU’s concern to a larger target audience and thus remain a necessary and legitimate foreign policy tool. It encourages the Council to take a coherent and proactive stance on other serious human rights violations in Russia, as well as to urge the Russian authorities to put an end to the current climate of impunity.
Lastly, Parliament calls on the Russian authorities to respect basic values such as the rule of law, and respect for human rights and basic freedoms, which remain the main prerequisites for EU-Russia relations and for the development of a stable and reliable partnership between the two parties.
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Guy VERHOFSTADT (ADLE, BE), and Kristiina OJULAND (ADLE, EE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation on establishing common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magnitsky case.
To recall, the arrest and subsequent death in custody of Sergei Magnitsky represents a well documented and substantial case of disrespect for fundamental human rights in Russia, and serves as a chilling reminder of the many documented shortcomings in the respect shown for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Russia;
It is also recalled that Russia, as a member of the Council of Europe, has committed itself to fully respecting fundamental rights and the rule of law, and the European Union has repeatedly offered additional assistance and expertise to help Russia modernise, and abide by, its constitutional and legal order, in line with Council of Europe standards.
The following points are made: (i) there is an increasing need for a firm, robust and comprehensive EU policy towards Russia, offering support and assistance backed up by firm and fair criticism, including sanctions and restrictive measures when needed; (ii) visa restrictions and other restrictive measures are not traditional judicial sanctions per se, but constitute a political signal of the EU’s concern to a larger target audience and thus remain a necessary and legitimate foreign policy tool.
Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
to establish a common EU list of officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky, for the subsequent judicial cover-up and for the ongoing and sustained harassment of his mother and widow; to impose and implement an EU-wide visa ban on these officials and to freeze any financial assets they or their immediate family may hold inside the European Union; to call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case.
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Guy VERHOFSTADT (ADLE, BE), and Kristiina OJULAND (ADLE, EE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation on establishing common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magnitsky case.
To recall, the arrest and subsequent death in custody of Sergei Magnitsky represents a well documented and substantial case of disrespect for fundamental human rights in Russia, and serves as a chilling reminder of the many documented shortcomings in the respect shown for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Russia;
It is also recalled that Russia, as a member of the Council of Europe, has committed itself to fully respecting fundamental rights and the rule of law, and the European Union has repeatedly offered additional assistance and expertise to help Russia modernise, and abide by, its constitutional and legal order, in line with Council of Europe standards.
The following points are made: (i) there is an increasing need for a firm, robust and comprehensive EU policy towards Russia, offering support and assistance backed up by firm and fair criticism, including sanctions and restrictive measures when needed; (ii) visa restrictions and other restrictive measures are not traditional judicial sanctions per se, but constitute a political signal of the EU’s concern to a larger target audience and thus remain a necessary and legitimate foreign policy tool.
Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
to establish a common EU list of officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky, for the subsequent judicial cover-up and for the ongoing and sustained harassment of his mother and widow; to impose and implement an EU-wide visa ban on these officials and to freeze any financial assets they or their immediate family may hold inside the European Union; to call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0369/2012
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0285/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0285/2012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.666
- Committee draft report: PE492.835
- Non-legislative basic document: B7-0196/2012
- Non-legislative basic document published: B7-0196/2012
- Non-legislative basic document: B7-0196/2012
- Committee draft report: PE492.835
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.666
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0285/2012
Activities
- Kristiina OJULAND
- Slavi BINEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Henryk MIGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jacek PROTASIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
11 |
2012/2142(INI)
2012/08/30
AFET
11 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) Aa. Whereas the posthumous prosecution of Sergei Magnitsky is a violation of international and national laws, which clearly shows the malfunctioning of Russian criminal justice system;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Encourages the Council to take a coherent and proactive stance on other serious human rights violations in Russia, on the basis of well documented, converging and independent sources, and to introduce similar restrictive measures against offenders as a last resort measure provided that there is a clear evidence of an offence or a crime committed;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines that the commitment of the Russian authorities to the basic shared values, such as the rule of law, human rights and basic freedoms, remains the main prerequisite of EU-Russia relations and for the development of a stable and reliable partnership between them;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, despite the 2011 conclusions of the inquiry conducted by the Russian President's Human Rights Council on the illegality of Sergei Magnitsky's arrest, detention and being denied access to justice, the investigations are stalled and the officials involved have been exonerated and even assigned to the posthumous case; whereas such actions of the authorities demonstrate a politically motivated nature of Magnitsky's prosecution;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the European Union urged the Russian authorities on many occasions and formats from regular Human Rights consultations up to summit level to conduct thorough independent investigations in that special, well documented case and to put an end the current climate of impunity;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas the case of Sergei Magnitsky is only one but the most prominent and well documented case of abuse of powers by the Russian law enforcement authorities, heavily violating the rule of law; whereas a multitude of other juridical cases exist using systematically the pretext of economic crimes and alleged corruption for eliminating business competitors or political rivals;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas EU sanctions related to the Magnitsky case could urge the Russian authorities to make genuine and fresh efforts in order address more concretely and convincingly the question of the rule of law in Russia and the current impunity climate;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas several national parliaments of EU member states such as Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland have already passed resolutions urging their governments to introduce sanctions on the Magnitsky case while several other parliaments such as Portugal, France, Spain and Latvia are at initial drafting stage for such resolutions;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c (c) to call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case and to bring all those responsible to justice;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) to urge the Russian authorities to put an end to a widespread corruption, to reform the judicial system and bring it in line with international standards by creating an independent, just and transparent system so that under no circumstances it could be misused for political reasons;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) to raise this issue during bilateral meetings with Russian authorities in a more determined, resolute and result- oriented manner as well as the question of intimidation and impunity regarding cases involving human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers;
source: PE-494.666
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2012-04-12T00:00:00New
2012-04-11T00:00:00 |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.835New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-492835_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE494.666New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-494666_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0196_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0196_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20121022&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-10-22-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 118
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 011
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134o-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-196&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0196_EN.html |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-285&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0285_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-369New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0369_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/7/09989New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 011
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 011
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/committees |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-07-05T00:00:00New
2012-04-12T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-04-12T00:00:00New
2012-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-08-29T00:00:00New
2012-09-20T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Kristiina OJULANDON (ALDE, EE) establishing common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magnitsky case. Recalling Russias membership of the Council of Europe and of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which entails full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, Members state that the arrest, conditions of detention and subsequent death in custody of Sergei Magnitsky represent a well documented and substantial case of disrespect for fundamental human rights. Furthermore, the posthumous prosecution of Sergei Magnitsky is a violation of international and national laws and clearly shows the malfunctioning of the Russian criminal justice system. The committee notes that despite the 2011 conclusions of the inquiry conducted by the Russian Presidents Human Rights Council on the illegality of Sergei Magnitskys arrest, the investigations are stalled and the officials involved have been exonerated and even assigned to the posthumous case. The report cites the adoption of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act by the US Senates Foreign Relations Committee on 26 June 2012, seeking to impose visa bans and asset freezes on Russian officials allegedly involved in the detention, abuse and death of Sergei Magnitsky, as well as the fact that several national parliaments of EU Member States among them Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland have already passed resolutions urging their governments to introduce sanctions. It addresses the following recommendations to the Council: · to establish a common EU list of officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky, for the subsequent judicial cover-up and for the ongoing and sustained harassment of his mother and widow; · to impose and implement an EU-wide visa ban on these officials and to freeze any financial assets they or their immediate family may hold inside the European Union; · to call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case, and to bring all those responsible to justice; · to urge the Russian authorities to put an end to the widespread corruption and to reform the judicial system, and bring it into line with international standards, by creating an independent, just and transparent system that cannot, under any circumstances, be misused for political reasons; · to raise, in the course of bilateral meetings with Russian authorities, this issue as well as the issue of intimidation and impunity in cases involving human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers, in a more determined, resolute and result-oriented manner. Whilst acknowledging that visa restrictions and other restrictive measures are not traditional judicial sanctions per se, Members state they constitute a political signal of the EUs concern to a larger target audience and thus remain a necessary and legitimate foreign policy tool. EU sanctions on the Magnitsky case could prompt the Russian authorities to make genuine and fresh efforts to address, in a more concrete and convincing manner, the question of the rule of law in Russia and the current climate of impunity. Lastly, the report encourages the Council to take a coherent and proactive stance on other serious human rights violations in Russia, on the basis of well documented, converging and independent sources and convincing evidence, and to introduce similar restrictive measures against offenders as a last resort measure. New
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Kristiina OJULANDON (ALDE, EE) establishing common visa restrictions for Russian officials involved in the Sergei Magnitsky case. Recalling Russias membership of the Council of Europe and of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which entails full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law, Members state that the arrest, conditions of detention and subsequent death in custody of Sergei Magnitsky represent a well documented and substantial case of disrespect for fundamental human rights. Furthermore, the posthumous prosecution of Sergei Magnitsky is a violation of international and national laws and clearly shows the malfunctioning of the Russian criminal justice system. The committee notes that despite the 2011 conclusions of the inquiry conducted by the Russian Presidents Human Rights Council on the illegality of Sergei Magnitskys arrest, the investigations are stalled and the officials involved have been exonerated and even assigned to the posthumous case. The report cites the adoption of the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act by the US Senates Foreign Relations Committee on 26 June 2012, seeking to impose visa bans and asset freezes on Russian officials allegedly involved in the detention, abuse and death of Sergei Magnitsky, as well as the fact that several national parliaments of EU Member States among them Italy, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland have already passed resolutions urging their governments to introduce sanctions. It addresses the following recommendations to the Council: · to establish a common EU list of officials responsible for the death of Sergei Magnitsky, for the subsequent judicial cover-up and for the ongoing and sustained harassment of his mother and widow; · to impose and implement an EU-wide visa ban on these officials and to freeze any financial assets they or their immediate family may hold inside the European Union; · to call on Russia to conduct a credible and independent investigation encompassing all aspects of this tragic case, and to bring all those responsible to justice; · to urge the Russian authorities to put an end to the widespread corruption and to reform the judicial system, and bring it into line with international standards, by creating an independent, just and transparent system that cannot, under any circumstances, be misused for political reasons; · to raise, in the course of bilateral meetings with Russian authorities, this issue as well as the issue of intimidation and impunity in cases involving human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers, in a more determined, resolute and result-oriented manner. Whilst acknowledging that visa restrictions and other restrictive measures are not traditional judicial sanctions per se, Members state they constitute a political signal of the EUs concern to a larger target audience and thus remain a necessary and legitimate foreign policy tool. EU sanctions on the Magnitsky case could prompt the Russian authorities to make genuine and fresh efforts to address, in a more concrete and convincing manner, the question of the rule of law in Russia and the current climate of impunity. Lastly, the report encourages the Council to take a coherent and proactive stance on other serious human rights violations in Russia, on the basis of well documented, converging and independent sources and convincing evidence, and to introduce similar restrictive measures against offenders as a last resort measure. |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-09-20T00:00:00New
2012-10-22T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-10-22T00:00:00New
2012-10-23T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/9 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1873d0fb8127435bdc182New
4f1ada15b819f207b3000050 |
committees/0/shadows |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 121-p3New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 011 |
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 097New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3 |
activities/0/body |
Old
ECNew
EP |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-10-22T00:00:00New
2012-04-12T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Prev DG PRESNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2012-04-12T00:00:00New
2012-07-04T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
B7-0196/2012New
PE492.835 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-196&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.835 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Committee draft report |
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/8/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
EP 1R PlenaryNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/10 |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-285&language=EN
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2012-09-25T00:00:00New
2012-09-26T00:00:00 |
activities/7 |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Prev Adopt in CteNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Deadline AmendmentsNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/8 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|