Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | BRANTNER Franziska Katharina ( Verts/ALE) | NEYNSKY Nadezhda ( PPE), MENÉNDEZ DEL VALLE Emilio ( S&D), SCHAAKE Marietje ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | CASHMAN Michael ( S&D) | Judith SARGENTINI ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3Subjects
- 6.10.02 Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
- 6.10.05 Peace preservation, humanitarian and rescue tasks, crisis management
- 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
- 6.10.09 Human rights situation in the world
- 6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD
Events
The European Parliament adopted a recommendation to the Council on the UN principle of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (‘R2P’).
Background: Parliament recalls that the principle of the responsibility to protect , embedded, for the first time, in the UN 2005 World Summit Outcome, represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world towards anticipating, preventing and responding to genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and upholding fundamental principles of international law, in particular international humanitarian, refugee and human rights law.
The principle of R2P is based on three pillars , namely:
the state bears the primary responsibility to protect its population from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing; the international community must assist states in fulfilling their protection obligations; when a state manifestly fails to protect its population or is in fact a perpetrator of these crimes, the international community has a responsibility to take collective action.
Members consider that more than a decade after the emergence of the concept of R2P, recent events - in Sri Lanka, Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and Syria - have again brought to the fore the importance and the challenges of ensuring timely and decisive responses to the four core crimes covered by the concept , as well as the need to further operationalise the principle in order to implement it effectively and prevent mass atrocities.
The resolution also notes the Brazilian initiative submitted to the UN on 9 September 2011 entitled ‘Responsibility while protecting: elements for the development and promotion of a concept’. This initiative is a welcome contribution to the necessary development of the criteria to be followed when implementing an R2P mandate, including: (i) the proportionality of the scope and duration of any intervention, (ii) a thorough balance of consequences, and (iii) ex ante clarity of the political objectives, and transparency in the intervention's reasoning.
Recommendations: Parliament addresses the following recommendations to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy / Vice-President of the Commission (HR/VP), the EEAS, the Commission, the Member States and the Council:
to reconfirm the EU’s commitment to R2P by adopting an interinstitutional ‘Consensus on R2P’, including a common understanding of the implications of R2P for the EU's external action and the role its actions and instruments can play in situations of concern; to include a chapter in the HR/VP’s annual report to Parliament on the CFSP concerning the EU’s actions on conflict prevention and mitigation in applying the R2P principle and to analyse in this chapter the usefulness of the relevant instruments and administrative structures in implementing R2P; to integrate the R2P principle in the EU’s development assistance and strengthen the Union's preventive diplomacy, mediation, crisis prevention and response capacities; to ensure sufficient policy planning, operational concepts and capability development goals within the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) to enable the Union to fully implement R2P in close international cooperation within the UN and regional organisations; to further develop the EU’s conflict prevention and mitigation capacities and the creation of an autonomous European Institute of Peace intended to provide the EU with advice on and capacities for mediation, two-track diplomacy and exchange of best practices on peace; to strengthen linkages between early warning, policy planning and high-level decision-making in the EEAS and the Council; to include a systematic assessment of the risk factors of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity in regional and country strategy papers, and to include their prevention in dialogues with third countries that are at risk of those crimes and violations; to develop cooperation with and training of the staff of the EU delegations and Member States’ embassies , as well as of civilian and military missions, in the fields of international human rights, humanitarian law and criminal law, and identify an EU Focal Point for R2P in the EEAS in the context of the existing structures and resources; to launch and promote an internal debate within the EU on the reform of the UN Security Council which is the only internationally legitimate body that can sanction R2P interventions without the consent of the target state ; to involve and train representatives of civil society and NGOs , who could play a role in informal or ‘track II’ diplomacy with a view to promoting exchanges of good practice in this field; to insist on respect for the International Criminal Court (ICC) clause in agreements with third countries.
In particular, the recommendation encourages the HR/VP and the Council:
to promote the R2P principle at the UN, and to work towards ensuring its universality; to call on the UN Security Council to take up the Brazilian proposal ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ in order to ensure the most efficient application of the R2P principle that causes the least harm possible to draw lessons, in cooperation with the Member States and our international partners, from the experience of R2P in Libya in 2011 and from the current inability to take action in Syria; to propose to the five permanent members of the UN Security Council the adoption of a voluntary code of conduct which would limit the use of the right of veto in cases of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing or crimes against humanity; to work towards establishing R2P as a new norm of international law ; to work with the UN towards the establishment of a clear link between the implementation of R2P and the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes covered by this concept.
The HR/VP is invited to present to the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs a concrete plan of action within six months of the adoption of the present Recommendation , on the follow-up of the Parliament’s proposals , notably outlining the steps towards achieving a ‘Consensus on R2P’.
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P).
To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail.
It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three – the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya – has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement.
The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference.
Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
fine-tune the R2P concept in cooperation with other state actors who wish to improve the capacities of the international community to prevent atrocities, such as the BRICS proposal initiated by Brazil entitled ‘Responsibility while Protecting’; lay the basis for an interinstitutional consensus on R2P to be adopted jointly by the Council, the EEAS, the Commission and the European Parliament; do everything in its power to further develop preventive diplomacy and mediation, at EU level as well as within the UN, and to develop tools that can also be put to use by the UN; check policy planning and capability development in the context of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) against the goal of creating EU capacities that are compatible with UN needs to provide better protection of human rights and to prevent war and atrocities.
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P).
To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail.
It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three – the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya – has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement.
The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference.
Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
fine-tune the R2P concept in cooperation with other state actors who wish to improve the capacities of the international community to prevent atrocities, such as the BRICS proposal initiated by Brazil entitled ‘Responsibility while Protecting’; lay the basis for an interinstitutional consensus on R2P to be adopted jointly by the Council, the EEAS, the Commission and the European Parliament; do everything in its power to further develop preventive diplomacy and mediation, at EU level as well as within the UN, and to develop tools that can also be put to use by the UN; check policy planning and capability development in the context of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) against the goal of creating EU capacities that are compatible with UN needs to provide better protection of human rights and to prevent war and atrocities.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0180/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0130/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0130/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.043
- Committee opinion: PE502.210
- Committee draft report: PE504.207
- Non-legislative basic document: B7-0191/2012
- Non-legislative basic document published: B7-0191/2012
- Non-legislative basic document: B7-0191/2012
- Committee draft report: PE504.207
- Committee opinion: PE502.210
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE506.043
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0130/2013
Amendments | Dossier |
157 |
2012/2143(INI)
2013/01/30
DEVE
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph - 1 (new) –1. Having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security, to UN Security Council Resolution 1888 (2009) on sexual violence against women and children in situations of armed conflict, to UN Security Council Resolution 1889 (2009) aiming to strengthen the implementation and monitoring of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) and to UN Security Council Resolution 1960 (2010), which created a mechanism for compiling data on, and listing perpetrators of, sexual violence in armed conflict;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates that in situations where R2P is applied it is of the utmost importance to maintain
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that effective regional cooperation in preventing the occurrence of these four crimes and protecting civilians against them is of crucial importance to the implementation of R2P; calls, therefore, for steps to be taken to enhance regional capacity for identifying and implementing effective policies for the prevention of these four crimes;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that R2P is primarily a preventive doctrine and that military intervention should be the last recourse in R2P situations; calls for R2P, whenever possible, to be carried out first and foremost through diplomatic and long-term developmental activities that focus on capacity-building in the fields of human rights, good governance, the rule of law,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that R2P is primarily a preventive doctrine and that military intervention should be the last recourse in R2P situations; calls for R2P, whenever possible, to be carried out first and foremost through diplomatic and long-term developmental activities that focus on capacity-building in the fields of human rights, good governance, the rule of law, conflict prevention and the strengthening of early warning systems; furthermore, recalls that there are many non-military coercive alternatives, such as preventive diplomacy, sanctions, accountability mechanisms and mediation;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that R2P is primarily a preventive doctrine and that military intervention should be the last recourse in R2P situations; calls for R2P, whenever possible, to be carried out first and foremost through diplomatic and long-term developmental activities that focus on capacity-building in the fields of human rights, good governance, the rule of law, conflict prevention through education and the expansion of trade, and the strengthening of early warning systems; furthermore, recalls that there are many non-military coercive alternatives, such as sanctions, accountability mechanisms and mediation; emphasises that the EU must continue to play a leadership role in the field of conflict prevention;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Bearing in mind that human security is the precondition of development, stresses that our commitment to R2P to protect should take place within our commitments to achieving the MDGs and any post-2015 Framework; this includes using all the tools that we have at our disposal that aim at strengthening democratic institutions, poverty reduction and sustainable development;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Recalls that cooperation with regional organisations is an important dimension of R2P work; notes that the forthcoming EU-Africa Summit in 2014 provides a good opportunity to show support to AU leadership and promote African ownership of R2P;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Points out that R2P includes a responsibility to combat impunity and that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has jurisdiction to try individuals for three of the four serious crimes on which the UN member states have chosen to focus the concept of ‘Responsibility to Protect’, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) 4d. stresses that R2P approach must be included to our actions in post-conflict operations whereby we must ensure the responsibility is upheld even in times following conflict and peace-building;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the development of the UN concept of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P), which clarifies and strengthens the existing obligations of states to ensure the protection of civilians against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, where necessary with the assistance of the international community; stresses that this concept, born from the international community’s failures in Rwanda in 1994, is critical for the survival of the community of nations;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the High Representative/Vice President (HR/VP), Member States with a seat on the UN Security Council and all international partners to ensure full consistency of possible further developments of the R2P concept with IHL and to advocate for and monitor the full respect of IHL in future cases where R2P is applied;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the development of the concept of ‘Responsibility to Protect’ (R2P), which clarifies and strengthens the existing obligations of states to ensure the protection of civilians; stresses that this concept, born from the international community’s failures in Rwanda in 1994, is critical for the survival of the community of nations; calls for further development of the concept and asks the EU to work towards its universality, as an essential part of a collective security model based on multilateralism and the primacy of the United Nations;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls upon the European Commission to elaborate and propose policies and programmes both to enhance the Union's role at a regional and global level and promote the necessary means in order to successfully accomplish its humanitarian task in terms of preventive policy;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls, however, that international humanitarian law (IHL) is the prime body of law in times of armed conflict and that its improved implementation should be the focus of the international community; emphasises that, although R2P is not a legal concept, it is grounded in international law and is narrowly focused on the four crimes of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, whether in armed conflicts or in peacetime;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls, however, that international humanitarian law (IHL) is the prime body of law in times of armed conflict and that its improved implementation should be the focus of the international community; emphasises that R2P is not a legal concept and is narrowly focused on the four crimes of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, whether in armed conflicts or in peacetime; stresses the need to integrate a strong gender equality perspective into the R2P framework;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls, however, that international humanitarian law (IHL) is the prime body of law in times of armed conflict and that its improved implementation should be the focus of the international community; emphasises that R2P is not a legal concept and is narrowly focused on the four crimes of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, whether in armed conflicts or in peacetime; calls on the EU to promote the R2P principle at the UN, together with the strengthening of the International Criminal Court.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasizes the need of shifting the manner in which we approach R2P to protect which should involve integrating it within all our schemes that relate to development cooperation, humanitarian aid and crisis management, and building upon programmes that embrace rather than exclude R2P; stresses that clear prioritisation must be made of our objectives under a strict policy of neutrality;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Reiterates that in situations where R2P is applied it is of the utmost importance to maintain the distinction of mandates between military and humanitarian actors, in order to safeguard the perception of the neutrality and impartiality of all humanitarian actors and to avoid putting at risk the effective delivery of aid and medical or any other assistance, access to beneficiaries and the personal safety of field-based humanitarian personnel;
source: PE-504.200
2013/03/04
AFET
137 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Heading 1 on the UN principle of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ ("RtoP" or "R2P")
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to the report 'The Responsibility to Protect' (2001) by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, the report 'A more secure world: our shared responsibility'1 (2004) by the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, and the report 'In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all'2 (2005) by the UN Secretary General, __________________ 1 http://www.un.org/secureworld/report3. pdf. 2 A/59/2005.
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) to strengthen linkages between early warning, policy-planning and high-level decision-making in the EEAS and the Council, and create clear lines of personal accountability for mobilising action in response to warnings about potential crisis situations involving the four specified crimes and violations;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) to include a systematic assessment of the risk factors of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity in regional and country strategy papers, and include their prevention in dialogues with third countries that are at risk of these specified crimes and violations;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) to make greater efforts within the UN Security Council and in cooperation with the USA, Turkey and the Arab League to continue to consider all options in connection with the ‘responsibility to protect’ with a view to helping the Syrian people and bringing about an end to the bloodshed in Syria;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e (e) to train EU and Member States' delegation and embassy staff, as well as civilian and military missions, in international human rights and humanitarian law and
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e (e) to train EU and Member States' delegation and embassy staff in international human rights
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e (e) to train EU and Member States' delegation and embassy staff in international human rights, and humanitarian law and in the capacity of detecting potential situations involving the four specified crimes and violations including by regular exchanges with the local civil society, and further professionalise and strengthen preventive diplomacy and mediation;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point e (e) to better cooperate and train EU and Member States' delegation and embassy staff in international human rights and humanitarian law and further professionalise and strengthen preventive diplomacy and mediation;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f (f) to speedily ratify the amendments to the
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f (f) to ensure speed
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 – having regard to the Paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN 2005
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f (f) to speedily ratify the amendments to the ICC Statutes defining the crime of aggression, since the Court can play a central role in the prevention of mass atrocity crimes, as well as in efforts to ensure accountability, if all UN member states ratify the Rome Statute and when it is implemented in an universal and non- discriminatory manner;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) to launch and promote the EU internal debate on the reform of the United Nations Security Council, which is the only internationally legitimate body that can sanction R2P interventions without the consent of the target state;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) to involve and train representatives of civil society and NGOs, who could play a role in informal, or ‘track II’, diplomacy with a view to promoting exchanges of good practice in this field;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) to strengthen cooperation with regional and sub-regional organisations, including by improving their prevention, capacity-building and response measures in relation to R2P;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) to ensure the respect of the ICC clause in its agreements with third countries and consider reviewing agreement with countries who do not comply with ICC arrest warrants;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point f b (new) (fb) to espouse a dual track approach, which includes promoting the universal acceptance of R2P, while at the same time encouraging states to support and assist the ICC;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point -a (new) (-a) to contribute actively to a differentiated debate on the principle of R2P building on the existing international human rights and humanitarian law enshrined in the Geneva Conventions with a view to strengthening the international community's focus on the R2P's prevention component reducing all those misleading and detrimental interpretations which equate the R2P with military intervention;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a (a) to support the efforts of the UN Secretary-General to f
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a (a) to support the efforts of the UN Secretary-General to fine-tune and enhance the understanding of the implications of the principle of R2P and to cooperate with other UN members who wish to improve the capacities of the international community to prevent and respond to mass atrocity crimes;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a (a) to support the efforts of the UN Secretary-General to fine-tune the principle of R2P and to cooperate with other UN members who wish to improve the civilian capacities of the international community to prevent and respond to mass atrocity crimes;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) to take into account the proposal 'Responsibility while Protecting' and to contribute to the necessary development of criteria to be followed when acting to implement in particular the third pillar of R2P, including the proportionality of the scope and duration of any intervention, a thorough balance of consequences, ex- ante clarity of the political objectives and transparency in the intervention's reasoning; whereas the monitoring and review mechanisms of adopted mandates should be strengthened, including through the UN Secretary-General's Special Advisors on the Prevention of Genocide and on R2P, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and should be conducted 'fairly, prudently and professionally, without political interference or double standards'1; __________________ 1 Art. 51 in: Responsibility to protect: timely and decisive response, Report of the Secretary-General, 25 July 2012 (A/66/874-S/2012/578).
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) to advise the five permanent members of the UN Security Council to adopt a voluntary code of conduct to limit the use of the right of veto to cases other than where there is a major humanitarian crisis;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) to prevent the concept of R2P becoming a dead letter given its predominantly military connotation, and to focus on the development of a broad international consensus and the universal application of the non-coercive tools, and to develop a concrete action plan to that end;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) to engage with the EU's regional partners in order to spell out more clearly the role of regional and sub-regional organizations when applying the R2P;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a a (new) (aa) to work towards establishing R2P as a new norm of international law, within the scope agreed to by UN member states in the 2005 World Summit;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a b (new) (ab) to advise the Security Council that enshrining the R2P, now an emerging standard, as a standard of international law would not limit its decision-making capacity;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a b (new) (ab) to not lose sight of the fact that R2P also comprises the need to rebuild;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a c (new) (ac) to call on the Security Council to adopt the Brazilian initiative on ‘responsibility while protecting’, which lays down a set of fundamental principles, guidelines and procedures with a view to ensuring that the R2P is as effective as possible and causes the least possible harm;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a d (new) (ad) to call on the five permanent members of the Security Council – in close coordination with the Secretary General – to promote the R2P doctrine, particularly ‘responsibility while protecting’, given that the latter initiative provides guarantees which may persuade countries that are currently reticent about or opposed to the R2P doctrine of its usefulness as a key instrument in bringing about fair and decent international relations in which neocolonial ambitions play no part;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point a e (new) (ae) to urge the Security Council, particularly in its dealings with the BRICs (some of which aspire to become permanent members of the Security Council of a reformed UN), to stress the importance of the aforementioned values, guarantees and requirements enshrined in the ‘responsibility while protecting’ initiative;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the regular informal interactive dialogues of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) which are anticipated by reports of the UN Secretary-General,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point b (b) to help strengthen the framework and capacities at UN level for mediation,
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point b (b) to help strengthen the framework and capacities at UN level for mediation, double-track diplomacy
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point b (b) to help strengthen the framework and capacities at UN level for mediation,
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) to work together with the EU's international partners on identifying working methods and measures, including the obligation of public explanations on vetoes, that would make decreasing the suffering of the populations concerned the principal aspect of discussions at the UNSC when deciding on the adoption of a resolution authorising coercive measures under the R2P's third pillar; to countervail forcefully and publicly the blocking of such resolutions due to unrelated arguments based on, for example, domestic or geostrategic considerations, considering in such situations working towards an empowerment of the UNGA to adopt a resolution on behalf of the UNSC; to address the issue of a single EU seat in the Security Council and of a communalized budget for CFSP missions under UN mandate;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point c (c) to integrate women leaders and women's groups much more in all conflict prevention and mitigation, as well as in
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point c (c) to integrate women, including women leaders and women's groups, much more in all conflict mitigation and resolution efforts in accordance with UNSC Resolutions 1325 and 1820;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) to work with the UN towards the establishment of a clear link between the implementation of the R2P and fight against impunity for the most serious crimes covered by this concept;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the HR/VP: (a) to present to the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs a concrete plan of action within three months of the adoption of the present Recommendation, on the follow- up of the Parliament's proposals, notably outlining the steps towards achieving a 'Consensus on R2P';
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 – having regard to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1674 of April 2006
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) – having regard to the 2001 report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS),
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 – having regard to the UNSC Resolution 1973 of 17 March 2011 on
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 – having regard to the UNSC Resolution 197
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) – having regard to the EU priorities for the 65th United Nations General Assembly of 25 May 201011, __________________ 1 10170/10.
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 – having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 8 June 2011 on the 66th session of the UNGA1 and of 13 June 2012 on the 67th session of the UNGA
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 16 February 2012 on the 19th Session of the UN Human Rights Council1, __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0058.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) – having regard to the Charter of the United Nations,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 b (new) – having regard to the 'European Consensus on Development'1 and the 'European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid'2, __________________ 1 OJ C 46, 24.2.2006, p. 1. 2 OJ C 25, 30.1.2008, p. 1.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 b (new) – having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 c (new) – having regard to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 9 December 1948,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 d (new) – having regard to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 e (new) – having regard to the 2001 report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) on "The Responsibility to Protect",
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 14 a (new) – having regard to the Brazilian initiative submitted to the United Nations on 9 September 2011 entitled ‘Responsibility while protecting: elements for the development and promotion of a concept’,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the principle of R2P, embedded in paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish at the same time the obligation of states to protect their
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN 2005 World Summit Outcome
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the principle of R2P is based on three pillars: (I) the
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas an actual case of violence or threats of violence against civilians must be deemed to be a threat to global peace and security;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the principle of R2P shall be further defined by encompassing the components of the responsibility to prevent (R2prevent), the responsibility to react (R2react) and the responsibility to rebuild (R2rebuild)
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas, according to the work on R2P preceding the agreement on the World Summit Outcome Document in 2005, in the report on R2P by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) in 2001, the principle of R2P
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas, in cases where the Security Council has authorised the use of legitimate force, violence, damage and institutional disruption should be kept to a minimum;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) – having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2009 on the European Security Strategy and ESDP,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas, in such cases, legitimate force should only ever be used in a prudent, proportionate and limited manner;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new) Cc. whereas, if the R2P doctrine to be receive widespread support among UN member states, it must be used to guard against, prevent or halt possible genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes or crimes against humanity, but never as a pretext for regime change;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the emergence of the principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world, to which effect it is crucially important that early warning and assessment be conducted fairly, prudently and professionally
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas more than a decade after the emergence of the "Responsibility to Protect"(R2P), and eight years after its endorsement by the international community at the UN world summit of 2005, recent events have brought again to the fore the importance and challenges of timely and decisive responses to the four core crimes covered by this concept, as well as the necessity to further operationalize this principle in order to implement it effectively and prevent mass atrocities;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the development of the principle of R2P - particularly its prevention component - can advance global efforts towards a more peaceful world as many mass atrocity crimes occur during periods of violent conflict and require effective capacities for structural and operational conflict prevention, thus minimising the need for the use of force as the last resort;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas using all tools available under Chapters VI, VII and VIII of the Charter, ranging from non-coercive responses to collective action, is of fundamental importance for the further development and legitimacy of the principle of R2P;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of good governance, inclusiveness, respect for human rights
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) – having regard to its resolution of 11 May 2011 on ‘the EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations’,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of equal social-economic rights, poverty eradication, fair distribution of economic wealth worldwide, fair trade, good governance, inclusiveness, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and democratic values and practices;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of good governance, the rule of law, economic development, poverty reduction, inclusiveness, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and democratic values and practices;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of good governance, human security, rule of law, inclusiveness, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and democratic values and practices;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of good governance, inclusiveness, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and democratic values and
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the most effective form of prevention lies in the promotion of good governance, inclusiveness, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, gender equality, the primacy of law, and democratic values and practices;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas the 2011 military intervention in Libya has shown the need to clarify the role of regional and sub- regional organizations when applying the R2P; whereas these organizations can be both legitimizers and operational agents for the implementation of the R2P but they often lack capacities and resources;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas human rights are of the utmost importance in international relations;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a more consequent implementation of R2P's prevention component (R2prevent), including mediation measures and preventive diplomacy at an early stage, would reduce the potential for conflict
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a more consequent implementation of R2P’s prevention component (R2prevent), including mediation measures and preventive diplomacy at an early stage, would reduce conflicts and help avoid their escalation; whereas informal, or ‘track II’, diplomacy is an important tool in preventive diplomacy which brings the human dimension to bear on conciliation;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas a more consequent implementation of R2P's prevention component (R2prevent), including mediation measures and preventive diplomacy at an early stage, would
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the ICC and R2P are interlinked as both aim to prevent genocide crimes against humanity, war crimes; whereas on the one hand R2P bolsters the ICC's mission to fight impunity by advocating for states to respect their judicial responsibility while, on the other, R2P reinforces the complementarity principle of the ICC, in which the main responsibility to prosecute lies with states;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the EU has always been an active promoter of R2P at the international stage; whereas the EU must strengthen its role as a global political actor to uphold human rights and humanitarian law for reflecting this political support on its own policies;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the International Criminal Court plays a fundamental role not only in crime prevention but also in the reconstruction of countries and in mediation processes;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas EU Member States have also endorsed the R2P principle; whereas only a few of them have incorporated the concept into their national documents;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the UN Guidelines for Effective Mediation identify the dilemma that arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), sanctions regimes and national and international counter-terrorism policies
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas more recent experiences with specific crises such as those in Sri Lanka, Ivory Coast, Libya and Syria have
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas more recent experiences with
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas more recent experiences with specific crises such as those in Sri Lanka, Ivory Coast, Libya and Syria have produced mixed results in terms of the international capacity and a lack of common political will to prevent or stop genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity committed by national and local authorities or non-state actors;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas no consensus in the UNSC has been reached on the application of the concept of R2R after the adoption of UNSC Resolution 1973 and its execution; whereas the risk of a de facto moratorium on R2P is looming;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) – having regard to the EU Programme for the Prevention of Violent Conflicts (Gothenburg Programme) of 2001 and the annual reports on its implementation,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas when R2P is to be used and whereas clear guidelines for the implementation of the third pillar, including how a protection mandate should look like, are crucial elements to be spelled out in order to promote coherent and effective collective action against mass atrocities;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the proposal initiated by Brazil on the ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ is a welcome contribution to the necessary development of criteria to be followed when implementing an R2P mandate, including the proportionality of the scope and duration of any intervention, a thorough balance of consequences, ex-ante clarity of the political objectives and transparency in the intervention's reasoning; whereas the development of such criteria should not, however, come at the expense of effective and rapid decision-making when intervention is required; whereas the monitoring and review mechanisms of adopted mandates should be strengthened, including through the UN Secretary-General's Special Advisors on the Prevention of Genocide and on R2P, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and should be conducted ‘fairly, prudently and
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the proposal initiated by Brazil on the ‘Responsibility while Protecting’ is a welcome contribution to the necessary development of criteria to be followed when implementing an R2P mandate, including legitimacy, the proportionality of the scope and duration of any intervention, a thorough balance of consequences, ex- ante clarity of the political objectives and transparency in the intervention's reasoning; whereas the monitoring and review mechanisms of adopted mandates should be strengthened, including through the UN Secretary-General's Special Advisors on the Prevention of Genocide and on R2P, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and should be conducted ‘fairly, prudently and professionally, without political interference or double standards’7 ;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the definition in international law of crimes which demand an immediate reaction by the international community has made considerable progress since the
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the definition in international law of crimes which demand an immediate reaction by the international community has made considerable progress since the creation of the ICC, although independent assessment mechanisms of when these definitions apply are still, crucially, missing and the Rome Statute has regrettably not been signed and ratified by all states of the international community;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has an important function in awareness-raising on ongoing cases of mass atrocity crimes; whereas the UN Human Rights Council is playing an increasingly important role in implementing the R2P, including by authorising fact-finding missions and commissions of inquiry to gather and assess information relating to the four specified crimes and violations, and by its increasing readiness to refer to R2P in crisis situations such as in Libya and Syria;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas a narrow but deep approach to implementing R2P should restrict its application to the four crimes and violations specified
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas a narrow but deep approach to implementing R2P should restrict its application to the four mass atrocity crimes and violations specified
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas a narrow but deep approach to implementing R2P should restrict its application to the four specified crimes and violations
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas comprehensive assistance has to be offered for post-conflict situations; whereas more efforts are needed in order to ensure accountability for serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and the fight against impunity;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K b (new) Kb. whereas the principle of R2P should not be applied in the context of humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters; whereas humanitarian action should not be used as a substitute for political action, and whereas humanitarian space needs to be respected by all actors involved;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Addresses the following recommendations to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission (HR/VP), the EEAS, the Commission, the Member States and the Council:
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a (a) to
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a (a) to agree to the establishment of an inter-institutional working group
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point a (a) to agree to the establishment of an inter-institutional working group, open to stakeholder participation, charged with preparing the basis for an inter-
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b (b) to cooperate with the European Parliament in the organisation of a series of meetings with concerned interest groups
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point b (b) to cooperate with the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee in the organisation of a series of meetings with concerned interest groups and civil society actors with the goal of integrating the proposals for initiatives and improvements into the ‘Consensus on R2P’ document;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 – having regard to the 2012 Nobel Peace Pri
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c (c) to
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c (c) to in
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c (c) to institutionalise the practice of producing an annual report on the EU's successes and failures in conflict prevention and mitigation in applying the principle of R2P, to be prepared jointly by the EEAS and the Commission in cooperation with the EU Special Representative for Human Rights and to be debated in a special session with the European Parliament; the report can build on the tradition of the annual reports on the Gothenburg programmes, adding an analysis of the usefulness of relevant instruments and administrative structures in implementing R2P, including identifying necessary revisions;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c (c) to institutionalise the practice of producing an annual report on the EU's successes and failures in conflict prevention and mitigation in applying the principle of R2P, to be prepared jointly by the EEAS and the Commission in cooperation with the EU Special Representative for Human Rights; notes that this report should take into account the various positions adopted by the European Parliament on specific issues regarding conflict prevention or human rights protection;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) to integrate the principle of the Responsibility to Protect in the EU's development assistance; to further professionalise and strengthen preventive diplomacy, mediation, crisis prevention and response capacities of the EU, especially information gathering and exchange as well as early warning systems; to improve the coordination between the various Commission, Council and EEAS structures dealing with all the aspects of R2P, and to inform the European Parliament on regular basis of initiatives taken in support of R2P;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) to identify an EU Focal Point for R2P in the EEAS within existing structures and resources, tasked notably with increasing awareness of the implications of R2P and ensuring timely information flows between all concerned actors on situations of concern;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d (d) to adapt policy planning, operational concepts and capability development
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d (d) to
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d (d) to adapt policy planning, operational concepts and capability development goals within the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) for the Union's ability to fully implement the R2P;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) to further develop EU conflict prevention and mitigation capacities, including stand-by capacities of legal experts, police officers and regional analysts and the creation of an autonomous European Institute of Peace intended to provide the EU with advice on and capacities for mediation, two-track diplomacy and exchange of best practices on peace and de-escalation; to strengthen the preventive elements of the EU's external instruments, in particular of the Instrument for Stability;
source: PE-506.043
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/0/date |
Old
2012-03-22T00:00:00New
2012-03-21T00:00:00 |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.207New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-504207_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.210&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-502210_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.043New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-506043_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0191_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0191_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134o-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-191&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2012-0191_EN.html |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-130&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0130_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-180New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0180_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/7/09991New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-03-22T00:00:00New
2012-07-05T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-04T00:00:00New
2013-03-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-07-05T00:00:00New
2013-04-18T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/5 |
|
activities/7 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183830fb8127435bdbc2fNew
4f1ac68fb819f25efd00004a |
committees/0/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187230fb8127435bdc15eNew
4f1ad9f2b819f207b3000045 |
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de186ca0fb8127435bdc0e5New
4f1ad9a5b819f207b300002a |
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de1889d0fb8127435bdc384New
4f1adb1bb819f207b30000a9 |
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de186670fb8127435bdc059New
4f1ad275b819f27595000027 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183c80fb8127435bdbc98New
4f1ac706b819f25efd000061 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 121-p3New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3 |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
6.40.13 Relations with international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRDNew
6.10.02 Common security and defence policy; WEU, NATO |
procedure/subject/4 |
Old
6.10.02 European security and defence policy (ESDP); WEU, NATONew
6.40.13 Relations with/in the context of international organisations: UN, OSCE, OECD, Council of Europe, EBRD |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
6.10.02 Common security and defence policy (CSDP); ESDP, WEU, NATONew
6.10.02 European security and defence policy (ESDP); WEU, NATO |
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-04-15T00:00:00New
2013-04-18T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-03-27T00:00:00New
2013-04-04T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-130&language=EN
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.043
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail. It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement. The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference. Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
New
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail. It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement. The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference. Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
|
activities/1/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail. It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement. The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference. Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
New
Pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Frieda BREPOELS (Greens/EFA, BE) propose, on behalf of the ALDE group, a draft recommendation of the European Parliament on the UN principle of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). To recall, paragraphs 138 and 139 of the UN World Summit Outcome Document establish the obligation of states to protect their citizens against atrocities and the obligation of the international community to react in a measured way, should states fail to protect their citizens against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, as covered by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. This concept is based on three pillars: (i) the protection responsibilities of the state; (ii) international assistance and capacity-building to assist states; (iii) a timely and decisive collective response when pillars one and two fail. It is also recalled that more recent experience with specific crises shows mixed results with international efforts under pillar two. The first example of a global effort under pillar three the UN Security Council-approved military intervention in Libya has saved many lives but has also clearly highlighted questions relating to the R2P concept which need further refinement. The draft recommendation states that the emergence of the UN principle of R2P represents an important step forward towards a more peaceful world by strengthening compliance with universal human rights norms and international humanitarian law. It must be rendered sufficiently legitimate and regulated as to remove the suspicion of some governments that it can serve as an instrument of foreign interference. Accordingly, the following recommendations are addressed to the Council:
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.207
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/committees/1/date |
2012-07-10T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-07-10T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00New
2013-04-15T00:00:00 |
activities/2/committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183660fb8127435bdbc07New
4de183830fb8127435bdbc2f |
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
BREPOELS FriedaNew
BRANTNER Franziska Katharina |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183660fb8127435bdbc07New
4de183830fb8127435bdbc2f |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
BREPOELS FriedaNew
BRANTNER Franziska Katharina |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/3/committees/0/date |
2012-06-18T00:00:00
|
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-06-18T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|