BETA

Awaiting committee decision



2012/2158(DEC) Special report 10/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of staff development in the European Commission
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT GRÄSSLE Ingeborg (EPP) HERCZOG Edit (S&D), STAES Bart (Verts/ALE), VANHECKE Frank (EFD), ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea (ECR), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), EHRENHAUSER Martin (NI)
Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier: CONT/7/10211
Legal Basis RoP 076

Activites

  • 2012/09/11 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2012/07/27 Non-legislative basic document published
    • N7-0085/2012 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

  • Non-legislative basic document published: N7-0085/2012

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4
group
EFD
name
VANHECKE Frank
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/5
group
NI
name
EHRENHAUSER Martin
committees/0/shadows/4
group
EFD
name
VANHECKE Frank
committees/0/shadows/5
group
NI
name
EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EFD
New
S&D
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4de185660fb8127435bdbeee
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
ANDREASEN Marta
New
HERCZOG Edit
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EFD
New
S&D
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4de185660fb8127435bdbeee
committees/0/shadows/0/name
Old
ANDREASEN Marta
New
HERCZOG Edit
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
procedure/legal_basis
  • Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: the drawing up of a Special Report (No. 10/2012) on the Effectiveness of Staff Development in the European Commission.

CONTENT: the Commission depends upon its 33 000 staff in order to achieve its objectives. To perform effectively, staff members need to acquire and maintain up-to-date skills through training, informal learning and job moves. This is particularly important in the Commission because of the long career and low turnover of its permanent staff.

Conclusions of the Court of Auditors’ audit: in this Special Report (No 10/2012), the European Court of Auditors concludes that the Commission does not have sufficient consolidated information on the existing skills of its staff or the skills which they need. While the Commission does provide a wide range of opportunities for staff to develop, it does not sufficiently track staff participation rates, skills acquisition or the utility of the training back in the workplace.

The Special Report is the result of a performance audit that found that staff development plans at the level of both the organisation and the individual are not sharply focused on organisational objectives.

The Commission has not created a sufficiently strong learning environment to capitalise on the learning offer. Staff attend only 35% of courses on their training maps; 30% of staff attend fewer than two days’ training; there are high levels of absences and dropouts from language courses; and older staff on higher grades participate in less training.

The Commission’s own staff and managers deliver some training, but not enough to demonstrate that the organisation attaches a high value to staff development. The organisation provides limited support to apply new skills in the workplace and the appraisal and promotion system does not give sufficient recognition to those who learn and apply new skills.

The Commission measures the satisfaction of staff with development actions. It also makes some attempts to evaluate the utility of development actions in the workplace. However, it rarely asks managers for their opinion on the effectiveness of training, and it makes little use of objective indicators.

The Commission does not evaluate the impact of development actions on organisational results and so does not have the information necessary to demonstrate the contribution of development actions to achieving organisational objectives.

The Court’s recommendations: the Court has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission which may be summarised as follows:

  • the Commission should ensure it has sufficient consolidated information on existing staff skills and on those needed to meet future challenges and prepare a strategy which convincingly demonstrates how learning and development will contribute to the achievement of organisational goals;
  • it should support this process through improvements to the systems for planning training and job moves;
  • it should develop its systems for monitoring participation in development actions;
  • it should address the issue of underperformance and encourage greater participation in the wide range of development opportunities available while recognising staff who develop their skills and those of others;
  • it should test and certify the acquisition of new skills where practicable, and support their application in the workplace by providing follow up activities;
  • it should evaluate how effectively development actions provide staff with new skills which they are able to apply in the workplace.
New

PURPOSE: the drawing up of a Special Report (No. 10/2012) on the Effectiveness of Staff Development in the European Commission.

CONTENT: the Commission depends upon its 33 000 staff in order to achieve its objectives. To perform effectively, staff members need to acquire and maintain up-to-date skills through training, informal learning and job moves. This is particularly important in the Commission because of the long career and low turnover of its permanent staff.

Conclusions of the Court of Auditors’ audit: in this Special Report (No 10/2012), the European Court of Auditors concludes that the Commission does not have sufficient consolidated information on the existing skills of its staff or the skills which they need. While the Commission does provide a wide range of opportunities for staff to develop, it does not sufficiently track staff participation rates, skills acquisition or the utility of the training back in the workplace.

The Special Report is the result of a performance audit that found that staff development plans at the level of both the organisation and the individual are not sharply focused on organisational objectives.

The Commission has not created a sufficiently strong learning environment to capitalise on the learning offer. Staff attend only 35% of courses on their training maps; 30% of staff attend fewer than two days’ training; there are high levels of absences and dropouts from language courses; and older staff on higher grades participate in less training.

The Commission’s own staff and managers deliver some training, but not enough to demonstrate that the organisation attaches a high value to staff development. The organisation provides limited support to apply new skills in the workplace and the appraisal and promotion system does not give sufficient recognition to those who learn and apply new skills.

The Commission measures the satisfaction of staff with development actions. It also makes some attempts to evaluate the utility of development actions in the workplace. However, it rarely asks managers for their opinion on the effectiveness of training, and it makes little use of objective indicators.

The Commission does not evaluate the impact of development actions on organisational results and so does not have the information necessary to demonstrate the contribution of development actions to achieving organisational objectives.

The Court’s recommendations: the Court has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission which may be summarised as follows:

  • the Commission should ensure it has sufficient consolidated information on existing staff skills and on those needed to meet future challenges and prepare a strategy which convincingly demonstrates how learning and development will contribute to the achievement of organisational goals;
  • it should support this process through improvements to the systems for planning training and job moves;
  • it should develop its systems for monitoring participation in development actions;
  • it should address the issue of underperformance and encourage greater participation in the wide range of development opportunities available while recognising staff who develop their skills and those of others;
  • it should test and certify the acquisition of new skills where practicable, and support their application in the workplace by providing follow up activities;
  • it should evaluate how effectively development actions provide staff with new skills which they are able to apply in the workplace.
procedure/title
Old
Special Report No 10/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of staff development in the European Commission
New
Special report 10/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of staff development in the European Commission
activities/0
body
EP
date
2012-07-27T00:00:00
type
Date
activities/3
body
EP
date
2013-01-25T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/4
body
EP
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
type
Prev Adopt in Cte
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
NI
New
ECR
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de183f10fb8127435bdbcdc
New
4de183f80fb8127435bdbce4
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/1/name
Old
CZARNECKI Ryszard
New
ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
committees/0/shadows/1/group
Old
NI
New
ECR
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de183f10fb8127435bdbcdc
New
4de183f80fb8127435bdbce4
committees/0/shadows/1/name
Old
CZARNECKI Ryszard
New
ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: the drawing up of a Special Report (No. 10/2012) on the Effectiveness of Staff Development in the European Commission.

    CONTENT: the Commission depends upon its 33 000 staff in order to achieve its objectives. To perform effectively, staff members need to acquire and maintain up-to-date skills through training, informal learning and job moves. This is particularly important in the Commission because of the long career and low turnover of its permanent staff.

    Conclusions of the Court of Auditors’ audit: in this Special Report (No 10/2012), the European Court of Auditors concludes that the Commission does not have sufficient consolidated information on the existing skills of its staff or the skills which they need. While the Commission does provide a wide range of opportunities for staff to develop, it does not sufficiently track staff participation rates, skills acquisition or the utility of the training back in the workplace.

    The Special Report is the result of a performance audit that found that staff development plans at the level of both the organisation and the individual are not sharply focused on organisational objectives.

    The Commission has not created a sufficiently strong learning environment to capitalise on the learning offer. Staff attend only 35% of courses on their training maps; 30% of staff attend fewer than two days’ training; there are high levels of absences and dropouts from language courses; and older staff on higher grades participate in less training.

    The Commission’s own staff and managers deliver some training, but not enough to demonstrate that the organisation attaches a high value to staff development. The organisation provides limited support to apply new skills in the workplace and the appraisal and promotion system does not give sufficient recognition to those who learn and apply new skills.

    The Commission measures the satisfaction of staff with development actions. It also makes some attempts to evaluate the utility of development actions in the workplace. However, it rarely asks managers for their opinion on the effectiveness of training, and it makes little use of objective indicators.

    The Commission does not evaluate the impact of development actions on organisational results and so does not have the information necessary to demonstrate the contribution of development actions to achieving organisational objectives.

    The Court’s recommendations: the Court has prepared a series of recommendations to the Commission which may be summarised as follows:

    • the Commission should ensure it has sufficient consolidated information on existing staff skills and on those needed to meet future challenges and prepare a strategy which convincingly demonstrates how learning and development will contribute to the achievement of organisational goals;
    • it should support this process through improvements to the systems for planning training and job moves;
    • it should develop its systems for monitoring participation in development actions;
    • it should address the issue of underperformance and encourage greater participation in the wide range of development opportunities available while recognising staff who develop their skills and those of others;
    • it should test and certify the acquisition of new skills where practicable, and support their application in the workplace by providing follow up activities;
    • it should evaluate how effectively development actions provide staff with new skills which they are able to apply in the workplace.
activities/4
date
2013-02-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3/date
Old
2012-12-03T00:00:00
New
2013-01-25T00:00:00
activities/5/date
Old
2013-01-10T00:00:00
New
2013-02-19T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
NI
committees/0/shadows/3/group
Old
ECR
New
NI
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-07-27T00:00:00 type: Date
  • date: 2012-07-27T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N7-0085/2012 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-08-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP date: 2012-12-03T00:00:00 type: Deadline Amendments
  • body: EP date: 2013-01-10T00:00:00 type: Prev Adopt in Cte
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-08-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: EPP name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/10211
reference
2012/2158(DEC)
title
Special Report No 10/2012 (2011 discharge): Effectiveness of staff development in the European Commission
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject