BETA


2012/2175(DEC) 2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea (icon: ECR ECR) DEUTSCH Tamás (icon: PPE PPE), SONIK Bogusław (icon: PPE PPE), KALFIN Ivailo (icon: S&D S&D), SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: EFD EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2013/11/16
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2011.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/550/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2011.

CONTENT: with the present decision, and in accordance with Article 318 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011.

The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 17 April 2013 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 17 April 2013).

2013/04/17
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/04/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 593 votes to 52 with 12 abstentions, a decision granting the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011.

In its resolution accompanying the decision, Parliament notes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observes that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

At the same time, Parliament notes that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. It finds this a positive development but calls for this rate to exceed 90% in 2012.

Members call on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report.

Videosurveillance : Parliament welcomes the Supervisor's inspection report on 13 Brussels-based Union institutions and bodies verifying that the public is informed about video-surveillance in an effective and comprehensive manner by Union institutions and bodies. It suggests the exchange of that information and best practices with the national data protection authorities.

Documents
2013/04/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/04/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control unanimously adopted the report by Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ (ECR, CZ) in which it calls on the European Parliament to grant the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011.

Members welcome the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

Members note that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. They find this a positive development but call for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored and expect engagement to exceed 90% next year.

Lastly, the report calls on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report.

Documents
2013/03/19
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/03/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/02/27
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/02/01
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Details

In view of the observations made in the Court of Auditor's report, the Council calls on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the Union’s institutions in regard to the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2011 .

Overall, the Council’s remarks are positive in regard to the expenditure of the institutions since it notes that, again in 2011, the administrative expenditure of EU institutions and bodies remained free from material error and that their supervisory and control systems continued to comply with the requirements of the Financial Regulation.

Nevertheless, the Council regrets that in some institutions weaknesses were still detected in the payment of social allowances to staff members , in the employment contracts for non-permanent staff and in procurement procedures.

It welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses pointed out by the Court.

The Council notes the Court's recommendations that the institutions concerned should ensure that staff regularly deliver documents on their personal situation, that the relevant provisions are applied when concluding, extending or modifying employment contracts with non-permanent staff, and that the authorising officers further improve guidance and appropriate checks concerning procurement procedures.

Documents
2013/01/24
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/11/05
   EP - PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2012/09/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/09/06
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor).

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year .

In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Regions.

On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

The Court also detects weaknesses when it reviewed a sample of calculations and payments of social allowances as well as a sample of employment contracts concluded with temporary agents.

The Court therefore recommends that the institutions and bodies of the EU take steps to: (i) guarantee that staff deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents confirming their personal situation and implement a system for the timely monitoring of these documents; (ii) ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

The Court also makes a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. However, in the specific case of the audit of the Committee of the Regions, t he Court’s audit did not identify any significant weakness .

Follow-up to the Court of Auditors 2010 Annual Report: as regards the payment of social allowances to staff members, the Court indicated that staff should be requested to deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents proving their personal situation. In this regard, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents.

To this effect, the Supervisor indicates that it has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS’s Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). The Court’s audit showed that these measures were effective.

2012/07/25
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS

Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question .

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year ):

Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows:

available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million; commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%); payments: EUR 6.698 million.

3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years); conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs; impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41); as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.

2012/07/24
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS

Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question .

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year ):

Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows:

available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million; commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%); payments: EUR 6.698 million.

3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years); conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs; impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41); as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.

2012/02/29
   EP - ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Votes

A7-0095/2013 - Andrea Češková - Décision (ensemble du texte) #

2013/04/17 Outcome: +: 593, -: 52, 0: 12
DE FR IT ES RO PL EL PT SE HU NL BG BE SK AT IE GB FI DK LT LV SI CZ LU CY EE MT
Total
86
66
63
48
30
42
21
19
18
22
24
16
19
13
18
10
51
10
13
10
8
8
21
6
6
5
3
icon: PPE PPE
246

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

2
3

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Poland EFD

Against (1)

2

Greece EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2
icon: NI NI
27

Spain NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

For (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

5
icon: ECR ECR
30

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
6 2012/2175(DEC)
2013/01/23 LIBE 1 amendments...
source: PE-504.050
2013/02/26 CONT 5 amendments...
source: PE-506.053

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2012-07-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2012-07-25T00:00:00
New
2012-07-24T00:00:00
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-04-16-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/5
name
SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.972
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-497972_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.053
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-506053_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.653&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-500653_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0095_EN.html title: A7-0095/2013
summary
events/3
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0095_EN.html title: A7-0095/2013
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0132_EN.html title: T7-0132/2013
summary
events/6
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0132_EN.html title: T7-0132/2013
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2012-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/2/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0095_EN.html
events/5
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 title: T7-0132/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22748&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 title: T7-0132/2013
summary
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0132_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-03-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0095/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0132/2013 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-11-16T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550 title: Decision 2013/550 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:308:TOC title: OJ L 308 16.11.2013, p. 0136
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2012-11-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2012-11-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2012-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2012:344:TOC title: OJ C 344 12.11.2012, p. 0001 title: N7-0127/2012 summary: OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor). CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year . In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit. The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Regions. On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %. The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents. The Court also detects weaknesses when it reviewed a sample of calculations and payments of social allowances as well as a sample of employment contracts concluded with temporary agents. The Court therefore recommends that the institutions and bodies of the EU take steps to: (i) guarantee that staff deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents confirming their personal situation and implement a system for the timely monitoring of these documents; (ii) ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance. The Court also makes a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. However, in the specific case of the audit of the Committee of the Regions, t he Court’s audit did not identify any significant weakness . Follow-up to the Court of Auditors 2010 Annual Report: as regards the payment of social allowances to staff members, the Court indicated that staff should be requested to deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents proving their personal situation. In this regard, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents. To this effect, the Supervisor indicates that it has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS’s Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). The Court’s audit showed that these measures were effective. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2013-01-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.972 title: PE497.972 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5752%2F13&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05752/2013 summary: In view of the observations made in the Court of Auditor's report, the Council calls on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the Union’s institutions in regard to the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2011 . Overall, the Council’s remarks are positive in regard to the expenditure of the institutions since it notes that, again in 2011, the administrative expenditure of EU institutions and bodies remained free from material error and that their supervisory and control systems continued to comply with the requirements of the Financial Regulation. Nevertheless, the Council regrets that in some institutions weaknesses were still detected in the payment of social allowances to staff members , in the employment contracts for non-permanent staff and in procurement procedures. It welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses pointed out by the Court. The Council notes the Court's recommendations that the institutions concerned should ensure that staff regularly deliver documents on their personal situation, that the relevant provisions are applied when concluding, extending or modifying employment contracts with non-permanent staff, and that the authorising officers further improve guidance and appropriate checks concerning procurement procedures. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2013-02-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.053 title: PE506.053 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.653&secondRef=02 title: PE500.653 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements. The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it. 1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011 . It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions. The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management. Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues: accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...); consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies); the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments); the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ); the means of recovery following irregularities detected; the modus operandi of the accounting system; the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge. To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year . The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question . The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings. Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements. 2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year ): Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows: available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million; commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%); payments: EUR 6.698 million. 3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities: consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years); conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs; impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41); as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-95&language=EN title: A7-0095/2013 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control unanimously adopted the report by Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ (ECR, CZ) in which it calls on the European Parliament to grant the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011. Members welcome the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor. Members note that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. They find this a positive development but call for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored and expect engagement to exceed 90% next year. Lastly, the report calls on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report.
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 title: T7-0132/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 593 votes to 52 with 12 abstentions, a decision granting the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011. In its resolution accompanying the decision, Parliament notes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observes that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor. At the same time, Parliament notes that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. It finds this a positive development but calls for this rate to exceed 90% in 2012. Members call on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report. Videosurveillance : Parliament welcomes the Supervisor's inspection report on 13 Brussels-based Union institutions and bodies verifying that the public is informed about video-surveillance in an effective and comprehensive manner by Union institutions and bodies. It suggests the exchange of that information and best practices with the national data protection authorities.
  • date: 2013-04-17T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-16T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2011. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/550/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2011. CONTENT: with the present decision, and in accordance with Article 318 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011. The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 17 April 2013 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 17 April 2013). docs: title: Decision 2013/550 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550 title: OJ L 308 16.11.2013, p. 0136 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:308:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/10461
New
  • CONT/7/10461
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.06 2011 discharge
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1/body
Old
CoA
New
EP
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/1/date
Old
2012-09-06T00:00:00
New
2012-09-13T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: N7-0127/2012
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:3440001:SOM:EN:HTML type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: OJ C 344 12.11.2012, p. 0001
activities/1/type
Old
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/body
Old
CSL
New
EP
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: PPE name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/2/date
Old
2013-02-01T00:00:00
New
2013-03-19T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=5752%2F13&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100 type: Document attached to the procedure title: 05752/2013
activities/2/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3
date
2013-01-24T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.972 type: Committee draft report title: PE497.972
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/5
date
2013-02-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.053 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE506.053
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/5/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/5/date
Old
2012-09-13T00:00:00
New
2013-04-17T00:00:00
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0132/2013
activities/5/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/6
date
2013-03-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/6/docs
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550 title: Decision 2013/550
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2013:308:TOC title: OJ L 308 16.11.2013, p. 0136
activities/6/text
  • PURPOSE: to grant discharge to European Data Protection Supervisor for the financial year 2011.

    NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/550/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union’s General Budget, section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, for the financial year 2011.

    CONTENT: with the present decision, and in accordance with Article 318 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament grants discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011.

    The decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 17 April 2013 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 17 April 2013).

activities/9
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0132/2013
body
EP
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de183f80fb8127435bdbce4
New
4f1ac71ab819f25efd000068
committees/4/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/4/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de184620fb8127435bdbd78
New
4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099
committees/4/shadows/1/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/4/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1888b0fb8127435bdc36b
New
4f1adb88b819f207b30000cc
committees/4/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de185fd0fb8127435bdbfc0
New
4f1ac966b819f25efd000133
committees/4/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4dee5a2d0fb8127435be059f
New
4f1adb75b819f207b30000c6
committees/4/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
committees/4/shadows/5/mepref
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
New
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
committees/4/shadows/6/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
committees/4/shadows/7/mepref
Old
4de1847f0fb8127435bdbd9f
New
4f1ac7b8b819f25efd0000a5
committees/15/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/15/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de187aa0fb8127435bdc224
New
4f1ada44b819f207b3000060
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0550
title
Decision 2013/550
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/4/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/10
date
2013-11-16T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/4/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/8/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/8/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
procedure/Modified legal basis
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
procedure/legal_basis
  • $procedure.legalBasisListReal
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!?
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
procedure/Modified legal basis
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!?
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
procedure/legal_basis
  • $procedure.legalBasisListReal
activities/2/committees/10/committee_full
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
New
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
activities/6/committees/10/committee_full
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
New
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committees/10/committee_full
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
New
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
activities/8/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130416&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/9/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 593 votes to 52 with 12 abstentions, a decision granting the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011.

    In its resolution accompanying the decision, Parliament notes the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure were free from material error. It also observes that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

    At the same time, Parliament notes that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. It finds this a positive development but calls for this rate to exceed 90% in 2012.

    Members call on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report.

    Videosurveillance: Parliament welcomes the Supervisor's inspection report on 13 Brussels-based Union institutions and bodies verifying that the public is informed about video-surveillance in an effective and comprehensive manner by Union institutions and bodies. It suggests the exchange of that information and best practices with the national data protection authorities.

activities/9/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-132
activities/8/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/9/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0132/2013
activities/9/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/7/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Budgetary Control unanimously adopted the report by Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ (ECR, CZ) in which it calls on the European Parliament to grant the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011.

    Members welcome the conclusion of the Court of Auditors that the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2011 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error. They observed that no significant weaknesses had been identified in respect to the audited topics related to the human resources and procurement for the Supervisor.

    Members note that, in 2011, the Supervisor had a total of EUR 7 564 137 in commitment appropriations and that the implementation rate of those appropriations was 89.31%. They find this a positive development but call for further efforts to improve the implementation rate and for the changes made to be monitored and expect engagement to exceed 90% next year.

    Lastly, the report calls on the Supervisor to include an exhaustive table of all the human resources at the Supervisor's disposal, broken down by category, grade, sex, participation in professional training and nationality in the next annual activity report.

activities/7/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-95&language=EN
activities/7
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0095/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/6/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo group: ALDE name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2012-02-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2012-11-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/6/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/8
date
2013-04-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.053
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/4/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/4/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/4/type
Old
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
New
Document attached to the procedure
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/4/type
Old
Document attached to the procedure
New
Supplementary non-legislative basic document
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • In view of the observations made in the Court of Auditor's report, the Council calls on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the Union’s institutions in regard to the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2011.

    Overall, the Council’s remarks are positive in regard to the expenditure of the institutions since it notes that, again in 2011, the administrative expenditure of EU institutions and bodies remained free from material error and that their supervisory and control systems continued to comply with the requirements of the Financial Regulation.

    Nevertheless, the Council regrets that in some institutions weaknesses were still detected in the payment of social allowances to staff members, in the employment contracts for non-permanent staff and in procurement procedures.

    It welcomes the measures already taken and encourages the institutions concerned to address the remaining weaknesses pointed out by the Court.

    The Council notes the Court's recommendations that the institutions concerned should ensure that staff regularly deliver documents on their personal situation, that the relevant provisions are applied when concluding, extending or modifying employment contracts with non-permanent staff, and that the authorising officers further improve guidance and appropriate checks concerning procurement procedures. 

activities/5
date
2013-02-27T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE506.053
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS

Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

  • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
  • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
  • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
  • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
  • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
  • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
  • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year):

Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows:

  • available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million;
  • commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%);
  • payments: EUR 6.698 million.

3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

  • consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years);
  • conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs;
  • impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41);
  • as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.
New

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS

Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

  • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
  • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
  • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
  • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
  • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
  • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
  • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year):

Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows:

  • available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million;
  • commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%);
  • payments: EUR 6.698 million.

3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

  • consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years);
  • conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs;
  • impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41);
  • as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.
activities/1/docs/0/text/0
Old

OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor).

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year.

In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Regions.

On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

The Court also detects weaknesses when it reviewed a sample of calculations and payments of social allowances as well as a sample of employment contracts concluded with temporary agents.

The Court therefore recommends that the institutions and bodies of the EU take steps to: (i) guarantee that staff deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents confirming their personal situation and implement a system for the timely monitoring of these documents; (ii) ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

The Court also makes a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. However, in the specific case of the audit of the Committee of the Regions, the Court’s audit did not identify any significant weakness.

Follow-up to the Court of Auditors 2010 Annual Report: as regards the payment of social allowances to staff members, the Court indicated that staff should be requested to deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents proving their personal situation. In this regard, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents.

To this effect, the Supervisor indicates that it has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS’s Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). The Court’s audit showed that these measures were effective.

New

OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor).

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year.

In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Regions.

On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

The Court also detects weaknesses when it reviewed a sample of calculations and payments of social allowances as well as a sample of employment contracts concluded with temporary agents.

The Court therefore recommends that the institutions and bodies of the EU take steps to: (i) guarantee that staff deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents confirming their personal situation and implement a system for the timely monitoring of these documents; (ii) ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

The Court also makes a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. However, in the specific case of the audit of the Committee of the Regions, the Court’s audit did not identify any significant weakness.

Follow-up to the Court of Auditors 2010 Annual Report: as regards the payment of social allowances to staff members, the Court indicated that staff should be requested to deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents proving their personal situation. In this regard, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents.

To this effect, the Supervisor indicates that it has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS’s Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). The Court’s audit showed that these measures were effective.

activities/4
date
2013-02-01T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=5752%2F13&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100 type: Document attached to the procedure title: 05752/2013
body
CSL
type
Document attached to the procedure
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/3/group
Old
EPP
New
ALDE
committees/4/shadows/3/group
Old
EPP
New
ALDE
activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.972
activities/3
date
2013-01-24T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE497.972
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • OBJECTIVE: presentation of the Report of the Court of Auditors on the 2011 budget (section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor).

    CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 35th Annual Report on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2011 financial year.

    In accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it provides under the discharge procedure, for both the European Parliament and Council, a statement of assurance (“DAS”) about the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions of each institution, body or agency of the EU, based on an independent external audit.

    The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the Committee of the Regions.

    On the basis of its audit work, the Court considers that payments for “Administrative and other expenditure” policy are, overall, significantly error-free. The estimated error rate is 0.1 %.

    The Court, however, draws attention to the errors and weaknesses which did not affect the Court’s conclusion. The Court examined a sample of procurement procedures and noted several weaknesses in the application of selection and award criteria, some of which had an impact on the results of the procedure. Other weaknesses relate to the organisation of cross border competition, to the management of automatic award procedures and to the respect of provisions as regards the drafting and filing of tendering documents.

    The Court also detects weaknesses when it reviewed a sample of calculations and payments of social allowances as well as a sample of employment contracts concluded with temporary agents.

    The Court therefore recommends that the institutions and bodies of the EU take steps to: (i) guarantee that staff deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents confirming their personal situation and implement a system for the timely monitoring of these documents; (ii) ensure that authorising officers improve the design, coordination and performance of procurement procedures through appropriate checks and better guidance.

    The Court also makes a number of comments specific to each institution or body of the European Union. These observations do not affect the positive overall appraisal given that they do not significantly affect overall administrative expenditure. However, in the specific case of the audit of the Committee of the Regions, the Court’s audit did not identify any significant weakness.

    Follow-up to the Court of Auditors 2010 Annual Report: as regards the payment of social allowances to staff members, the Court indicated that staff should be requested to deliver, at appropriate intervals, documents proving their personal situation. In this regard, the European Data Protection Supervisor should improve its system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents.

    To this effect, the Supervisor indicates that it has implemented tools for better management of the allowances (formal contacts within the EDPS’s Office and with the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements and yearly information fiche). The Court’s audit showed that these measures were effective.

activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0436
activities/0/type
Old
Date
New
Non-legislative basic document
activities/1
date
2012-07-25T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0436 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
type
Non-legislative basic document
activities/1/body
Old
EP
New
CoA
activities/1/date
Old
2013-05-09T00:00:00
New
2012-09-06T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: N7-0127/2012
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2012:3440001:SOM:EN:HTML type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report title: OJ C 344 12.11.2012, p. 0001
activities/1/type
Old
EP 1R Plenary
New
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
activities/2
date
2012-09-06T00:00:00
docs
body
CoA
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
activities/4
body
EP
date
2013-02-26T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/8
body
EC
date
2013-05-09T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf
activities/2
date
2012-09-06T00:00:00
docs
body
CoA
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
activities/2/committees/15/date
2012-11-05T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/15/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
activities/5
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
EP 1R Plenary
activities/7
body
EC
date
2013-05-09T00:00:00
type
Prev DG PRES
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
committees/15/date
2012-11-05T00:00:00
committees/15/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.

    Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor - EDPS

    Legal reminder: the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the year 2011 have been prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions and bodies under Article 129.2 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Union. They were prepared in accordance with Title VII of this Financial Regulation and with the accounting principles, rules and methods set out in the notes to the financial statements.

    The objective of the financial statements is to provide information about the financial position, performance and cashflow of an entity that is useful to a wide range of users. The objective is to provide information useful for decision making, and to demonstrate the accountability of the entity for the resources entrusted to it.

    1) Purpose: the document helps to bring insight into the EU budget mechanism and the way in which the budget has been managed and spent in 2011. It recalls that the European Union's operational expenditure covers the various headings of the financial framework and takes different forms, depending on how the money is paid out and managed. In accordance with the Financial Regulation, the Commission implements the general budget using the following methods: direct or indirect centralised management (by means of bodies or agencies of public law or other); decentralised management where the Commission delegates certain tasks for the implementation of the budget to third countries; and, thirdly, shared management where budget implementation tasks are delegated to Member States, in areas such as agricultural expenditure and structural actions.

    The document also presents the different financial actors involved in the budget process (accounting officers, internal officers and authorising officers) and recalls their respective roles in the context of the tasks of sound financial management.

    Amongst the other legal elements relating to the implementation of the EU budget presented in this document, the paper focuses on the following issues:

    • accounting principles applicable to the management of EU spending (business continuity, consistency of accounting methods, comparability of information ...);
    • consolidation methods of figures for all major controlled entities (the consolidated financial statements of the EU comprise all significant controlled entities –institutions, organisations and agencies, this being 50 controlled entities, 5 joint ventures and 4 associates. In comparison with 2010, the scope of consolidation has been extended by 7 controlled entities (one institution, 6 agencies);
    • the recognition of financial assets in the EU (tangible and intangible assets, financial assets and other miscellaneous investments);
    • the way in which EU public expenditure is committed and spent, including pre-financing (cash advances intended for the benefit of an EU organ);
    • the means of recovery following irregularities detected;
    • the modus operandi of the accounting system;
    • the audit process followed by the European Parliament's granting of the discharge.

    To recap, the final control is the discharge of the budget for a given financial year. The discharge represents the political aspect of the external control of budget implementation and is the decision by which the European Parliament, acting on a Council recommendation, "releases" the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. When granting the discharge, Parliament may highlight some observations that it considers important, often by recommending that the Commission takes action on the aspects in question.

    The document also details specific expenditure of the institutions, in particular: i) pensions of former Members and officials of institutions; ii) joint sickness insurance scheme and iii) buildings.

    Lastly, the document presents a series of tables and detailed technical indicators on (i) the balance sheet; (ii) the economic outturn account; (iii) cashflow tables; (iv) technical annexes concerning the financial statements.

    2) Implementation of appropriations under Section IX of the budget for the financial year 2011: the document comprises a series of detailed tables, the most important concerning the implementation of the budget. Concerning the EDPS’s expenditure, the table on the financial and budgetary implementation of this institution is presented as follows (information drawn from the Budget and Financial Management Report for the 2011 financial year):

    Budget 2011: the EDPS’s 2011 budget presents itself as follows:

    • available appropriations: EUR 7.564 million;
    • commitments: EUR 6.755 million (rate of implementation: 89.31%);
    • payments: EUR 6.698 million.

    3) Budgetary implementation – conclusions: in more general and political terms, the EDPS’s budgetary implementation for the financial year 2011 was chiefly marked by the following activities:

    • consolidation of administrative cooperation (follow-up of the technical set-up of the EDPS, cooperation with various European Commission and Parliament DGs, extended cooperation agreement for the second time for a period of two years);
    • conclusion of new cooperation agreements with the Commission’s Human Resources and Informatics DGs, as well as with the European Institute of Administration; continuation of other international agreements with the European Parliament and other institutions for the everyday management of the EDPS, with a view to reducing costs;
    • impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty: expanded tasks in relation to the Stockholm programme and a resulting increase in staff (total staff in 2011: 41);
    • as regards budget, its adaptation to the expanded scope of the EDPS’s tasks and the cost of living.
activities/1/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
activities/3
body
EP
date
2013-02-26T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/2/committees/4/date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
activities/2/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
activities/2/committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: EPP name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
  • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
  • group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities/3
date
2013-03-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees/4/date
2012-02-29T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: ČEŠKOVÁ Andrea
committees/4/shadows
  • group: EPP name: DEUTSCH Tamás
  • group: EPP name: SKYLAKAKIS Theodoros
  • group: EPP name: SONIK Bogusław
  • group: S&D name: KALFIN Ivailo
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
  • group: NI name: EHRENHAUSER Martin
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 type: Date
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0436 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women’s Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/10461
reference
2012/2175(DEC)
title
2011 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject
8.70.03.06 2011 discharge