Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D), STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE), BRADBOURN Philip ( ECR), ANDREASEN Marta ( EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin ( NA) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | HAUG Jutta ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2011.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/576/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2011.
CONTENT: with this Decision and in accordance with Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament gives discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority for the implementation of the Authority’s budget for 2011.
The Decision is consistent with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 17 April 2013 and includes a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (refer to the summary of the opinion of 17 April 2013).
Decision 2013/577/EU, adopted on the same day, approves the closure of the accounts for this Community agency for 2011.
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financing, budget and financial management : Parliament recalls that EFSA’s 2011 budget amounted to EUR 77.31 million, compared to EUR 74.7 million in the previous year which represents an increase of 3.49 %; Implementation rate of appropriations and carryovers : it notes that the payment appropriations execution rate was 82.05%, which represents a minor decrease in comparison to the previous year (83.51%). Members remind the Authority to respect in an improved way the principle of annuality even if they consider 2011 as a special year, due to the movement to the new headquarters and the delayed settlement of payments in this respect. Building's policy : Parliament notes that the Authority purchased a new headquarters building in December 2011 for EUR 36.8 million which will be paid in quarterly instalments over 25 years, resulting in interest payments of EUR 18.5 million. It notes, moreover, that the Court of Auditors questioned whether a more economic alternative could have been sought from the budgetary authority in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and ensuring full respect of the Financial Regulation. The Authority recalls that it submitted the building project to the budgetary authority in 2005 with a deferred purchase price payment agreement over 25 years, and the budgetary authority approved the building project. Parliament also notes that at the Court of Auditors' suggestion, a request was made to the Commission to seek additional payment credits in order to cover the full purchase with only one down-payment. It notes, however, that there was no possibility to increase the appropriations towards the Authority to cover a single down-payment in the current climate of tight expenditure. Conflicts of interest : Parliament notes with concern that according to the findings of the Court of Auditors, the Authority did not adequately manage conflict of interest situations, even if, in the meantime, EFSA had already developed advanced policies for managing conflicts of interest, because these policies have not led to the desired results. EFSA was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest. Members urge EFSA to keep conflicts of interest high on the priority list in order to protect its credibility and to safeguard the public's trust in food safety. They call on it to start a structured dialogue with civil society on matters relating to conflicts of interest and to invite those organisations concerned to openly discuss matters of common interest. They strongly suggest that, in order to prevent its staff from moving directly from their position to work in a similar post in industry or related lobby-agency, or vice versa, an adequate cooling off period should be established and respected for the specific areas of work.
Lastly, Parliament made a series of observations as regards EFSA’s budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ADLE, NL) on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agency’s budget for the financial year 2011.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approve the closure of EFSA’s accounts. However, they make a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financing, budget and financial management : EFSA ’ s 2011 budget amounted to EUR 77.31 million, compared to EUR 74.7 million in the previous year which represents an increase of 3.49 %; Implementation rate of appropriations and carryovers : Members note that the payment appropriations execution rate was 82.05%, which represents a minor decrease in comparison to the previous year (83.51%). They remind the Authority to respect in an improved way the principle of annuality even if they consider 2011 as a special year, due to the movement to the new headquarters and the delayed settlement of payments in this respect; Conflicts of interest: Members note with concern that according to the findings of the Court of Auditors, the Authority did not adequately manage conflict of interest situations, even if, in the meantime, EFSA had already developed advanced policies for managing conflicts of interest, because these policies have not oled to the desired results. EFSA was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest. They urge EFSA to keep conflicts of interest high on the priority list in order to protect its credibility and to safeguard the public's trust in food safety. They call on it to start a structured dialogue with civil society on matters relating to conflicts of interest and to invite those organisations concerned to openly discuss matters of common interest. They strongly suggest that, in order to prevent its staff from moving directly from their position to work in a similar post in industry or related lobby-agency, or vice versa, an adequate cooling off period should be established and respected for the specific areas of work.
Lastly, Members made a series of observations as regards EFSA’s buildings policy, its budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2011 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2011 of the European Food Safety Authority, as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2011, accompanied by the Authority's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Executive Director of the Authority in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011.
The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2011 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows:
the Council welcomes the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the Authority's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the Authority's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for that financial year are legal and regular; nevertheless, the Council stresses the importance of carrying out a thorough expenditure planning and is concerned about the deficiencies highlighted by the Court in the Authority's budgetary and financial management; as for the payment schedule related to the purchase of the Authority's headquarters building, the Council takes note of the Court's observation that the Authority did not put forward for consideration a more economic alternative; lastly, the Council regrets the shortcomings detected by the Court in the transparency of the recruitment procedures, including the irregularities found regarding the conflict of interest declarations of the Selection Board members, and expects this to be fully remedied by the Authority.
PURPOSE: presentation of the EU Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for the financial year 2011, together with the Authority's replies.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks conferred on the Court of Auditors by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Court presents to the European Parliament and to the Council, in the context of the discharge procedure, a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts of each institution, body or agency of the EU, and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them, on the basis of an independent external audit.
This audit concerned, amongst others, the annual accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
In the Court’s opinion, the Authority's Annual Accounts fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation.
The Court also considers that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the Authority for the financial year ended 31 December 2011 are, in all material respects, legal and regular .
The report confirms that the Agency’s 2011 budget amounted to EUR 78.8 million and that the number of staff employed by the Agency at the end of the year was 355.
The report also makes a series of observations on the budgetary and financial management of the Agency, accompanied by the latter’s response. The main observations may be summarised as follows:
Court’s observations :
budgetary management: the Court notes weaknesses in budget planning and implementation and is at odds with the principle of specification; building policy: the Authority purchased a new headquarters building in December 2011 for EUR 36.8 million which will be paid by quarterly instalments over 25 years, resulting in interest payments of EUR 18.5 million. The Court questions whether a more economic alternative could have been sought from the budgetary authorities in accordance with the principle of sound financial management and ensuring full respect of the Financial Regulation; there is room for improving the transparency of recruitment procedure.
Authority’s response :
the Authority states that it will consider adapting its budget structure within the overall budgetary framework to reduce fragmentation and needs for transfers in the future; EFSA states that it acquired its headquarters following modalities cleared by the Budgetary Authority foreseeing payment spread over 25 years. EFSA has asked recently the European Commission to consider requesting additional resources to the Budgetary authority to shorten the purchase calendar. Such anticipated purchase is possible at no costs for EFSA; EFSA recruitment procedures are fully compliant with regulatory requirements and it adapted its relevant processes in January 2012.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of the Authority’s activities in 2011 . This is focused on the following:
scientific outputs and supporting publications: scientific opinions and advice, risk assessment approaches; evaluation of products, substances and claims subject to authorisation; data collection, scientific cooperation and networking; various publications.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EFSA's tasks : EFSA, which is located in Parma, was established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 and its main tasks are to supply the scientific information needed for Union legislation to be drawn up, to collect and analyse data that allow risks to be identified and monitored and to provide independent information on these risks.
EFSA's budget for the 2011 financial year: the Authority’s budget for 2011, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union , gives the following figures:
forecasted income budget: EUR 76 million; entitlements established : EUR 76 million; amounts received: EUR 76 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
forecasted income budget: EUR 76 million; entitlements established : EUR 76 million; amounts received: EUR 76 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
The complete version of EFSA's final accounts may be found at the following address:
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsahow/funding.htm
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of EFSA's tasks : EFSA, which is located in Parma, was established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 and its main tasks are to supply the scientific information needed for Union legislation to be drawn up, to collect and analyse data that allow risks to be identified and monitored and to provide independent information on these risks.
EFSA's budget for the 2011 financial year: the Authority’s budget for 2011, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union , gives the following figures:
forecasted income budget: EUR 76 million; entitlements established : EUR 76 million; amounts received: EUR 76 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
forecasted income budget: EUR 76 million; entitlements established : EUR 76 million; amounts received: EUR 76 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
The complete version of EFSA's final accounts may be found at the following address:
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsahow/funding.htm
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2013/576
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 308 16.11.2013, p. 0228
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0146/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0074/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.875
- Document attached to the procedure: 05753/2013
- Committee draft report: PE497.827
- Committee opinion: PE500.744
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 388 15.12.2012, p. 0092
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N7-0018/2013
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0436
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0436
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0436 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 388 15.12.2012, p. 0092 N7-0018/2013
- Committee draft report: PE497.827
- Committee opinion: PE500.744
- Document attached to the procedure: 05753/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.875
Amendments | Dossier |
51 |
2012/2196(DEC)
2012/12/20
ENVI
13 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Thinks it is noteworthy in this context that
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Believes that the discharge decision for the Authority should be based upon OECD guidelines to ensure high-quality internationally recognised accounting, audit and financial disclosure standards; invites the European institutions to incorporate and commit to introducing OECD guidelines within a common working framework for all European institutions and bodies;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Is of the opinion that the Authority should not be granted discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2011 until the general budget of the European Union is given an unqualified statement of assurance by the Court of Auditors.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. T
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Thinks it is noteworthy in this context that
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Thinks it is noteworthy in this context that
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges the Authority, in particular its Executive Director, to explain, in due time before the plenary vote on its discharge for 2011, which specific measures it has taken or will take to address the problems detected by the Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 15/2012 regarding conflict of interest situations in EFSA; emphasises that discharge to the Authority may only be granted if these explanations are satisfactory;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Draws attention to the Health and Consumer Protection Commissioner’s pledge to pursue an initiative for a common rulebook governing the auditing and management of the Authority and to tackle the various instances of conflicts for interest, whilst examining the scope for cuts to its operating budget;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Reminds the Authority to respect in an improved way the principle of annuality;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is especially aware of the public interest in the decision
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
source: PE-502.122
2013/02/27
CONT
38 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that according to the findings of the Court of Auditors, at the time of completion of the field work (October 2011), the Authority did not adequately manage conflict of interest situations; notes, however, that the Authority ha
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Regrets that according to the findings of
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Is concerned, however, about the fact that the Authority has not submitted a coherent plan to combat conflicts of interest in the management plan 2013, although the Court of Auditors in its special report No 15/2012 on the issue, stated that conflicts of interest in four EU agencies authorising food, medicines, chemicals and aviation security standards might be putting people's safety at risk; notes that the Court of Auditors concluded that none of the four agencies under review manage conflicts of interest adequately; notes, furthermore, that the Court of Auditors' rapporteur stated that situations of conflict of interest can occur in any workplace at any time and, if not addressed, they can affect decisions, cause reputational damage and may affect the safety and health of consumers;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new) 7 b. Welcomes the organisation of a mandatory session on ethics and integrity for all members of the Management Board in October 2012 but calls on the Management Board to enforce effectively its Code of Conduct and adopt provisions preventing and sanctioning revolving door cases in order to avoid similar situations to the one of its former Chairperson in the future;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new) 7 c. Notes that the Authority scheduled an evaluation of its independence policy by the end of 2013 and committed to consider, inter alia, the possibility to publish the outcomes of the breach of trust procedures, including the outcomes of the procedure verifying the integrity of the scientific review and to broaden and reinforce the mandate of its Committee on Conflict of Interests, for instance with a similar mandate to the Committee for Ethical Standards and Prevention of Conflict of Interest of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES); expects the Authority to inform the discharge authority on this matter if possible before October 2013;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new) 7 d. Calls on the Authority to start a structured dialogue with civil society on matters relating to conflicts of interest and to invite those organisations concerned at least twice a year to openly discuss matters of common interest based on a agreed agenda and to inform the discharge authorities on the outcome of these deliberations; has noted that the Authority has intensified this dialogue with stakeholders and civil society, but considers that these dialogues need to be institutionalised and taken into account by the Management Board of the Authority;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes with concern that the Authority was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest and demands that this matter be remedied forthwith;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes with concern that the Authority was criticised for a lack of transparency with respect to the publication of annual declarations of interest and the absence of training on conflicts of interest; welcomes that now all annual declarations of interests of the Authority's experts are published and accessible on the Authority's website;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Urges the Authority to keep conflict of interests high on the priority list in order to protect its credibility and to safeguard the public's trust in food safety, and to indicate, as detailed and precise as possible, how it will implement the main recommendations from the report of the Court of Auditors and the Resolution of the European Parliament; urges the Authority to consider conflict of interests with utmost care, given the start of the revision of the founding regulation, which provides an opportunity to reach the highest governance standards as described by the OECD, and which would influence positively the Authority's governance structure, independence and scientific quality; considers that the revision of the founding regulation is a major opportunity to initiate radical change at the Authority that is responsible for objective scientific advice on food and environmental safety at Union level;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Strongly suggests that in order to prevent the staff of the Authority from moving directly from their position to a post in industry or related lobby-agency, or vice versa, a cooling off period of minimum two years should be respected;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new) 8 c. Is of the opinion that candidates for scientific panels should be screened before their appointment to see if they have direct family related links to lobbyists or industry representatives or if they do any consultancy work for companies which could profit from their work;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – introductory part 9.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Acknowledges the Authority's efforts to improve its prevention and management of conflict of interests; notes however that the independence and competence of its external experts remain questioned by watchdog NGOs or even fellow food safety experts as for instance in the case of the working group on endocrine disruptors experts; underlines that as a consequence the Authority's work is challenged such as during the Joint JRC-NIEHS Workshop on Low Dose Effects of Endocrine Active Chemicals in Berlin in December 2012;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Is of the opinion that watchdog NGOs can provide additional valuable inputs to the Authority in order to assess its expert's independence; encourages therefore the Authority to engage in a constructive dialogue with these NGOs;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9 c. Notes that the Management Board elected its Chair in a publicly-held meeting; recalls however that in the 2010 discharge procedure the Parliament called for an open ballot for electing the Management Board's Chair and expects its request to be implemented;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – indent 2 – since 2011, the Authority has strengthened that framework with the adoption of its revised Policy on independence and scientific decision- making processes
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 urges the Authority to continue to act on the recommendations of the Court of Auditors in order to avoid any conflict of interests among its various governing and operational structures and to report to the discharge authority on the implementation of the abovementioned policies and procedures, as well as on any further developments as regards the management of conflicts of interest;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 urges the Authority to report to the discharge authority on the implementation of the abovementioned policies and procedures, as well as on any further developments as regards the management of conflicts of interest before October 2013;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Urges the Authority to request an annual report from its ethics adviser, to be submitted to the discharge authority and the European Parliament, with a view to the delivery of an opinion by the competent committee or committees;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that the guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Underlines the Authority's commitment to launch in October2012 its first evaluation of a random sample of declarations of interest to verify their coherence with its newly adopted independence policy and implementing rules; notes however that protocols still needed to be completed, which led to the postponement of the evaluation; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the reasons behind this delay and on the calendar foreseen for the organisation of the evaluation;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the Authority's plans to start a pilot project in 2013 to insource
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes with satisfaction that since 2011, the Authority has introduced in its AAR a special section describing the actions taken
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes, from the Court of Auditors' report and the Authority's annual activity report (AAR), that in 2011, 13 budgetary transfers were made; notes that, in particular, EUR 2,46 million was transferred from Title I to the infrastructure and IT budget lines of Title II, aiming to provide the resources for the adaptation of IT systems and financial systems related to the reorganisation and the migration to the accrual-based accounting financial system, and to reinforce the resources available for the move to the final seat and equipment for the final seat; notes, moreover, that transfers were carried out within Titles II and III;
source: PE-497.875
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.827New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-497827_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.744&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-500744_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.875New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-497875_EN.html |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-74&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0074_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-146New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0146_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/7/10531New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0576New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0576 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Non-legislative basic documentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/body |
Old
CoANew
EP |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2012-09-18T00:00:00New
2012-09-13T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Court of Auditors: opinion, reportNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-01-28T00:00:00New
2013-03-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-09-13T00:00:00New
2013-04-17T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/6 |
|
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/text |
|
activities/9 |
|
committees/0/committee |
Old
ENVINew
CONT |
committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyNew
Budgetary Control |
committees/0/date |
Old
2012-09-20T00:00:00New
2012-02-29T00:00:00 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
ALDE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185430fb8127435bdbebdNew
4f1ac83bb819f25efd0000d5 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
HAUG JuttaNew
GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan |
committees/0/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/committee |
Old
CONTNew
ENVI |
committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Budgetary ControlNew
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety |
committees/1/date |
Old
2012-02-29T00:00:00New
2012-09-20T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ALDENew
S&D |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe92New
4f1ac8f6b819f25efd000102 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GERBRANDY Gerben-JanNew
HAUG Jutta |
committees/1/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
procedure/final |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
activities/8/docs |
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/9/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Rule 5(1) of the European Parliaments Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Lastly, Parliament made a series of observations as regards EFSAs budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures. New
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the European Parliaments Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Lastly, Parliament made a series of observations as regards EFSAs budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures. |
activities/9/docs/0/text |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/7/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ADLE, NL) on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2011. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approve the closure of EFSAs accounts. However, they make a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Lastly, Members made a series of observations as regards EFSAs buildings policy, its budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures. New
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ADLE, NL) on discharge to be granted to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) in respect of the implementation of the Agencys budget for the financial year 2011. Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of EFSA for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approve the closure of EFSAs accounts. However, they make a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Lastly, Members made a series of observations as regards EFSAs buildings policy, its budgetary transfers and internal audit procedures. |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-74&language=EN
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/8 |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.875
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/2/docs/1/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
The complete version of EFSA's final accounts may be found at the following address: New
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
The complete version of EFSA's final accounts may be found at the following address: |
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.827
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-05-09T00:00:00New
2012-07-25T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
EP 1R PlenaryNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/1 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/7 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4de182da0fb8127435bdbb40 |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
HERCZOG EditNew
AYALA SENDER Inés |
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4de182da0fb8127435bdbb40 |
committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
HERCZOG EditNew
AYALA SENDER Inés |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|