Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan ( ALDE) | SARVAMAA Petri ( PPE), AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D), STAES Bart ( Verts/ALE), BRADBOURN Philip ( ECR), ANDREASEN Marta ( EFD), EHRENHAUSER Martin ( NA) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the European Police College for the financial year 2011.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2013/562/EU of the European Parliament on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Police College (CEPOL) for the financial year 2011.
CONTENT: with the present decision, and in accordance with Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Parliament grants discharge to the Executive Director of CEPOL for the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2011.
This decision is in line with the European Parliament's resolution adopted on 17 April 2013 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 17 April 2013).
A parallel decision, 2013/563/EU, adopted on the same day, approves the closure of CEPOL’s accounts for the 2011 financial year.
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Director of the European Police College (CEPOL) in respect of the implementation of the College’s budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure).
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financing, budget and financial management : Parliament recalls that the budget of the College for 2011 was EUR 8.341 million. It stresses that financial management inefficiencies such as the use of payments on incorrect budget lines within chapter or titles took place in 2011. They call on the College to provide the discharge authority with further details on the issue. Implementation rate of appropriations and carryovers : Parliament takes note that for operational expenditure, 93.31% of the appropriations were committed and that 55.98% of payment appropriations were consumed. 22% of appropriations were carried over to 2012. It calls on the College to inform the discharge authority of the actions taken to address this deficiency as the high level of carryovers indicate shortcomings in budget planning and implementation and it is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. Results and performances : Parliament commends the College's efforts to improve its performance without a budget increase, and the results it has achieved. It congratulates it, moreover, on responding comprehensively to Parliament's requirements and to the current budgetary challenges by radically reducing its governing costs.
Parliament made a series of observations as regards the College’s procurement and recruitment procedures and internal audits.
Lastly, Parliament believes that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further. It requests that the Commission come up with a proposal for the relocation of the College to The Hague (NL), where the European Police Office is located, in order to share facilities and services and benefit from synergies, without jeopardising both agencies' core tasks and autonomy. It emphasises that a swift decision on the relocation of the College would diminish the uncertainty that might pose adverse effects on staff and recruitment procedures.
The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (ADLE, NL) on discharge to be granted to the Director of the European Police College (CEPOL) in respect of the implementation of the College’s budget for the financial year 2011.
Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Members approve the closure of CEPOL’s accounts. However, they make a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies :
Financing, budget and financial management : the budget of the College for 2011 was EUR 8.341 million. They stress that financial management inefficiencies such as the use of payments on incorrect budget lines within chapter or titles took place in 2011. They call on the College to provide the discharge authority, as soon as possible, with further details on the issue, including the amounts and budget lines involved and the measures implemented in order to remedy the situation. Implementation rate of appropriations and carryovers : Members take note that for operational expenditure, 93.31% of the appropriations were committed and that 55.98% of payment appropriations were consumed. 22% of appropriations were carried over to 2012. They call on the College to inform the discharge authority of the actions taken to address this deficiency as the high level of carryovers indicate shortcomings in budget planning and implementation and it is at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality.
Lastly, Members made a series of observations as regards the College’s procurement and recruitment procedures, internal audit and performances. They also believe that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further. Members request that the Commission come up with a proposal for the relocation of the College to The Hague (NL) where the European Police Office is located in order to share facilities and services and benefit from synergies, without jeopardising both agencies' core tasks and autonomy. They emphasise that a swift decision on the relocation of the College would diminish the uncertainty that might pose adverse effects on staff and recruitment procedures.
Having examined the revenue and expenditure accounts for the financial year 2011 and the balance sheet at 31 December 2011 of the European Police College, as well as the Court of Auditors' report on the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2011, accompanied by the College's replies to the Court's observations, the Council recommends the European Parliament to give a discharge to the Director of the College in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2011.
The observations in the Court of Auditors' report in relation to the financial year 2011 call for some comments by the Council, which may be summarised as follows:
the Council welcomes the Court's opinion that, in all material respects, the College's annual accounts present fairly its financial position as at 31 December 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of the College's Financial Regulation, and that the underlying transactions for that financial year are legal and regular; nevertheless, the Council urges the College to continue to improve its financial programming and monitoring of the budget implementation in order to improve budget execution and to reduce the number of budgetary transfers and the amounts carried over to the next financial year, in line with the budgetary principle of annuality; the Council encourages the College to pursue its efforts to address the shortcomings detected by the Court in its staff recruitment procedures.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Court of Auditors of its report on the annual accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL) for the financial year 2011, together with the College's replies.
CONTENT: in accordance with the tasks and objectives conferred on it by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court of Auditors, in the context of the discharge procedure, addresses to the European Parliament and the Council a Statement of Assurance on the reliability of the annual accounts, as well as of the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying them of each EU institution, body or agency, on the basis of an external, independent audit.
This audit also covered the annual accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL).
In the Court's opinion, the College's annual accounts presented fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as of 31 December 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation.
The Court also stated that the transactions underlying the annual accounts of the College for the financial year ended 31 December 2011 were, in all material respects, legal and regular.
The report again confirmed that the College's 2011 final budget amounted to EUR 8.3 million and that it employed 26 agents during the financial year.
The report also included comments on the College's budgetary and financial management, together with the Agency's replies. The main comments are as follows:
Court's comments :
the Court states that the high level of carryovers as well as the high level of cancellations indicate shortcomings in budget planning and/or implementation and are at odds with the budgetary principle of annuality. In 2011, the College made 38 budgetary transfers amounting to EUR 1.8 million. This situation is at odds with the principle of specification;
building issues: the College is located in Bramshill, using premises of the UK National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA). NPIA is due to close at the end of 2012 and it is not clear until when the College can continue using its current premises.
CEPOL’s replies :
the College agrees with the comment of the Court. The College would draw attention to the fact that measures have been implemented to ensure that the carried over appropriations are kept to the minimum. The year end carryover procedure has been reviewed and improved. This improved process has resulted in the reduction in the carry over amounts; on buildings, the Home Office informed the College and as well as the Commission that the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) is due to close at the end of 2012. With regard to the future of the Bramshill estate no final decision has been made. Should Bramshill be sold, this is unlikely to occur until at least 2015. In this eventuality, it is assured that the UK Home Office will work closely with the College and the Commission and will update further once the domestic consultation has concluded.
Lastly, the Court of Auditors’ report contains a summary of CEPOL’s activities in 2011 . This is focused on the following:
courses and seminars: 88 activities (courses, seminars and conferences) were organised; external relations: CEPOL has endorsed two new cooperation agreements with Georgia and Montenegro. CEPOL is continuing its fruitful cooperation with strategic partners, partner agencies and EU institutions, including EEAS and has been clearly identified as one of the key providers in training for police officers taking part in EU police missions; development of Training Manuals and (Common) Curricula; research and science; European Police Exchange Programme; the continuation of the electronic network (e-Net and e-Learning).
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL).
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Police College (CEPOL).
In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of CEPOL's tasks : CEPOL, which is located in Bramshill, United Kingdom, was established under Council Decision 2000/820/JHA , as repealed in 2005 and replaced by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . The College's main task is to function as a network and bring together the national police training institutes in the Member States to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police officers; CEPOL's budget for the 2011 financial year : CEPOL’s budget for 2011, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union , gives the following figures:
forecasted income budget: EUR 8 million; entitlements established : EUR 9 million; amounts received : EUR 9 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
forecasted income budget: EUR 8 million; entitlements established : EUR 9 million; amounts received : EUR 9 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
The complete version of the CEPOL's final accounts may be found at the following address:
https://www.cepol.europa.eu/index.php?id=final-accounts
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL).
CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Police College (CEPOL).
In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
description of CEPOL's tasks : CEPOL, which is located in Bramshill, United Kingdom, was established under Council Decision 2000/820/JHA , as repealed in 2005 and replaced by Council Decision 2005/681/JHA . The College's main task is to function as a network and bring together the national police training institutes in the Member States to provide training sessions, based on common standards, for senior police officers; CEPOL's budget for the 2011 financial year : CEPOL’s budget for 2011, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union , gives the following figures:
forecasted income budget: EUR 8 million; entitlements established : EUR 9 million; amounts received : EUR 9 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
forecasted income budget: EUR 8 million; entitlements established : EUR 9 million; amounts received : EUR 9 million; outstanding : EUR 0 million.
The complete version of the CEPOL's final accounts may be found at the following address:
https://www.cepol.europa.eu/index.php?id=final-accounts
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2013/562
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 308 16.11.2013, p. 0180
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0139/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0064/2013
- Committee opinion: PE500.656
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.868
- Document attached to the procedure: 05753/2013
- Committee draft report: PE497.820
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 388 15.12.2012, p. 0023
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N7-0011/2013
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0436
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0436
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0436 EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 388 15.12.2012, p. 0023 N7-0011/2013
- Committee draft report: PE497.820
- Document attached to the procedure: 05753/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.868
- Committee opinion: PE500.656
Amendments | Dossier |
28 |
2012/2199(DEC)
2013/01/23
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes note that CEPOL’s budget amounted EUR 8 341 000 for the financial year 2011 and that the Agency is entirely financed by the European budget; notes further that in 2011, CEPOL committed 96,74% of the appropriations received which represents a slight decrease compared to 2010 (99,56%); observes however a substantial increase from 59,12% to 75,21% in terms of paid commitment between 2010 and 2011; acknowledges CEPOL’s efforts to improve the budgeting and commitment process;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that CEPOL has made significant progress and the number of participants in training courses and exchange programmes increased significantly over the last years, therefore expresses its support for maintaining CEPOL as an independent agency.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Generally
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Notes with concern the weaknesses reported by the Court of Auditors concerning the high level of carryovers, the high level of cancellations and the numerous transfers representing a total of EUR 1 800 000; believes that budget planning and budget implementation procedures should be further strengthened;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Acknowledges CEPOL’s reporting of financial management inefficiencies such as the use of payments on incorrect budget lines within chapter or titles; calls on CEPOL to provide the discharge authority with further details on the issue, including the amounts and budget lines involved and the measures implemented in order to remedy the situation;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes CEPOL’s overall progress in financial management achieved in recent years and encourages
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes CEPOL’s progress in financial management achieved in recent years and encourages CEPOL to continue this way; in this context
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Commends CEPOL’s efforts in streamlining and improving the efficiency of its Governance for instance through the implementation of measures to disband committees and the reduction of the number of Governing Boards meetings per year which should now focus essentially on policy and decision- making at the strategic and long-term level;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Commends CEPOL’s efforts to improve its performance without a budget increase, and the results it has achieved; congratulates it, moreover, on responding comprehensively to Parliament’s requirements and to the current budgetary challenges by radically reducing its governing costs;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the comment made by the Court of Auditors that the UK National Policing Improvement Agency whose premises in Bramshill CEPOL is using is due to close at the end of 2012 and that it is unclear whether CEPOL can continue using its current premises; believes that the Commission together with the Council, the Parliament and CEPOL should take the opportunity to discuss the issue of the relocation of the Agency to the Hague where Europol is based; is of the opinion that this issue should be clarified urgently;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Takes note of the
source: PE-504.053
2013/02/27
CONT
16 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further; reiterates its call on the Commission to prepare a comprehensive impact assessment regarding a potential merger of those two Agencies
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Acknowledges from the College's Final Financial Statements that financial management inefficiencies such as the use of payments on incorrect budget lines within chapter or titles took place in 2011; calls on the College to provide the discharge authority, as soon as possible, with further details on the issue, including the amounts and budget lines involved and the measures implemented in order to remedy the situation;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Takes note from the Court of Auditors' report that in 2011, the College made 38 budgetary transfers amounting to EUR 1,8 million; is of the opinion that budget planning and budget implementation procedures should be further strengthened and calls on the College to inform the discharge authority of the actions taken to address this deficiency as it indicates weaknesses in budget planning and is at odds with the principle of specification;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes with concern that the College is using premises of the UK National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) in Bramshill; notes that NPIA is due to close at the end of 2012 and that
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Notes with concern that the College is using premises of the UK National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) in Bramshill; notes that NPIA
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15 a. Commends the College's efforts in streamlining and improving the efficiency of its Governance for instance through the implementation of measures to disband committees and the reduction of the number of Governing Boards meetings per year which should now focus essentially on policy and decision- making at the strategic and long-term level;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Believes that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further;
source: PE-497.868
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.820New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-497820_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.868New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-497868_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.656&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-500656_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-64&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0064_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-139New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0139_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CONT/7/10540New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0562New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013D0562 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-02-27T00:00:00New
2012-07-25T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE497.868New
COM(2012)0436 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.868New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-01-25T00:00:00New
2012-09-13T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/body |
Old
CoANew
EP |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-09-05T00:00:00New
2013-03-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Court of Auditors: opinion, reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-03-19T00:00:00New
2013-04-17T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/text |
|
activities/9 |
|
committees/0/committee |
Old
LIBENew
CONT |
committees/0/committee_full |
Old
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsNew
Budgetary Control |
committees/0/date |
Old
2012-11-05T00:00:00New
2012-02-29T00:00:00 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
ALDE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187aa0fb8127435bdc224New
4f1ac83bb819f25efd0000d5 |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
PAPANIKOLAOU GeorgiosNew
GERBRANDY Gerben-Jan |
committees/0/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/1/committee |
Old
CONTNew
LIBE |
committees/1/committee_full |
Old
Budgetary ControlNew
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs |
committees/1/date |
Old
2012-02-29T00:00:00New
2012-11-05T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ALDENew
PPE |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185240fb8127435bdbe92New
4f1ada44b819f207b3000060 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
GERBRANDY Gerben-JanNew
PAPANIKOLAOU Georgios |
committees/1/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1/shadows |
|
procedure/final |
|
activities/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
activities/8/docs |
|
procedure/?!oeil-proposed_legal_basis!? |
$procedure.legalBasisListProposed
|
procedure/legal_basis |
|
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/9/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Director of the European Police College (CEPOL) in respect of the implementation of the Colleges budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Rule 5(1) of the European Parliaments Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Parliament made a series of observations as regards the Colleges procurement and recruitment procedures and internal audits. Lastly, Parliament believes that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further. It requests that the Commission come up with a proposal for the relocation of the College to The Hague (NL), where the European Police Office is located, in order to share facilities and services and benefit from synergies, without jeopardising both agencies' core tasks and autonomy. It emphasises that a swift decision on the relocation of the College would diminish the uncertainty that might pose adverse effects on staff and recruitment procedures. New
The European Parliament adopted a decision on discharge to be granted to the Director of the European Police College (CEPOL) in respect of the implementation of the Colleges budget for the financial year 2011. The vote on the decision to grant discharge covers the closure of the accounts (in accordance with Annex VI, Article 5(1) of the European Parliaments Rules of Procedure). Noting that the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurances that the annual accounts of the College for the financial year 2011 are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular, Parliament adopted a resolution containing a number of recommendations that need to be taken into account when the discharge is granted, in addition to the general recommendations that appear in the draft resolution on performance, financial management and control of EU agencies:
Parliament made a series of observations as regards the Colleges procurement and recruitment procedures and internal audits. Lastly, Parliament believes that common elements between the College and the European Police Office should be explored further. It requests that the Commission come up with a proposal for the relocation of the College to The Hague (NL), where the European Police Office is located, in order to share facilities and services and benefit from synergies, without jeopardising both agencies' core tasks and autonomy. It emphasises that a swift decision on the relocation of the College would diminish the uncertainty that might pose adverse effects on staff and recruitment procedures. |
activities/9/docs/0/text |
|
activities/9/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-139
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/9/docs |
|
activities/9/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-64&language=EN
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/6/committees |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/8 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.868
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/1/docs/1/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL). CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Police College (CEPOL). In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
The complete version of the CEPOL's final accounts may be found at the following address: New
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011, as part of the 2011 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Police College (CEPOL). CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2011 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Police College (CEPOL). In 2011, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows:
The complete version of the CEPOL's final accounts may be found at the following address: |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.820
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-05-09T00:00:00New
2012-07-25T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
EP 1R PlenaryNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/1 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=436New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0436/COM_COM(2012)0436_EN.pdf |
activities/2/committees/1/date |
2012-11-05T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Plenary |
activities/7 |
|
committees/1/date |
2012-11-05T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0436:EN
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4de182da0fb8127435bdbb40 |
activities/2/committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
HERCZOG EditNew
AYALA SENDER Inés |
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de185660fb8127435bdbeeeNew
4de182da0fb8127435bdbb40 |
committees/0/shadows/2/name |
Old
HERCZOG EditNew
AYALA SENDER Inés |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/committees/0/date |
2012-02-29T00:00:00
|
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/3 |
|
committees/0/date |
2012-02-29T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|