BETA


2012/2224(INI) Advancing development through trade

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE SVENSSON Alf (icon: PPE PPE) NEUSER Norbert (icon: S&D S&D), GOERENS Charles (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion INTA SAÏFI Tokia (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2013/07/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/04/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/04/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject.

Parliament recalls that Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that the Union's policies which are likely to affect developing countries shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation. Moreover, poverty reduction and the pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals are centrepieces of the EU's development policy and should also guide the EU's trade policy towards developing countries.

In this context, the resolution emphasises the following points :

1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Parliament confirms its position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EU’s trade policy towards developing countries.

Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders , with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women. Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge.

The resolution draws attention to the following points:

fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries; any iniquitous production and trade practices , of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated; the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules . Aid for Trade (AfT) programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses.

Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia, provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy , regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework.

Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistanc e. They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies.

2. Negotiations and trade agreements: Parliament recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid.

The European Union is invited to:

further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date; ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations, with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries; define its policy in full respect of the ‘special and differential treatment’ granted to developing countries.

3. Aid for Trade: Parliament calls for AfT instruments to be focused not only on trade between the EU and developing countries, but also on support for internal, regional and South-South trade , as well as on triangular trade between ACP countries by promoting cross-border value chains, by increasing the efficiency of key services and by reducing transport costs. It also encourages the development of more effective support instruments in relation to production adjustment and diversification .

It calls on the Commission to make progress in developing a package to promote trade for small operators in developing countries so as to support the participation of small business in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability (e.g. Fair Trade).

4. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate .

EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. The resolution calls for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour .

The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight in this regard the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships . They urge all donors - public and private - to coordinate their actions more and to adjust them in line with current funds, particularly given the current situation with regard to budget cuts.

The resolution calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight , which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries.

5. Raw materials and extractive industries: despite the implementation of the Kimberley Process for the certification of conflict diamonds, Parliament observes that trade in natural resources is still fuelling rebels and human rights abuses are still taking place in mining areas. It emphasises therefore the urgent need for a system of due diligence for gems and valuable minerals, such as so-called conflict minerals .

Members take the view that standards for transparency and certification need to be enlarged over time to fully address bribery and corruption in the extractive sector. They call, more broadly, on the EU to support stronger governance mechanisms to address the environmental and human rights dimensions of resource exploitation. They take the view that an international convention for sustainable resource management is essential to lay down fundamental legal principles for sustainable resource management.

6. Food security and biofuels: the resolution urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions . It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.

Documents
2013/04/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/04/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/04/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2013/04/03
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2013/02/19
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/01/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/01/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/11/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/09/17
   EP - SAÏFI Tokia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2012/09/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/09/13
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2012/07/10
   EP - SVENSSON Alf (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2012/04/17
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries.

BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues . Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this .

The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs.

Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade.

CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282 ), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need.

This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225 ).

Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include:

1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries :

improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade; the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods; the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance); the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries; the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered); support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability.

2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by:

improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities; greater support for LDCs to develop trade; greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders); stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance; the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity; equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection; improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors.

3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy:

greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced. a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms; a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth; measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility ; measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks ; measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries.

4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance , which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership .

The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system . In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening.

The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members.

The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system.

As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated .

In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment.

Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.

2012/04/16
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries.

BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues . Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this .

The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs.

Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade.

CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282 ), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need.

This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225 ).

Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include:

1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries :

improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade; the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods; the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance); the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries; the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered); support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability.

2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by:

improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities; greater support for LDCs to develop trade; greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders); stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance; the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity; equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection; improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors.

3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy:

greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced. a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms; a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth; measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility ; measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks ; measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries.

4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance , which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership .

The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system . In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening.

The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members.

The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system.

As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated .

In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment.

Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
166 2012/2224(INI)
2012/12/19 INTA 42 amendments...
source: PE-502.099
2013/01/30 DEVE 124 amendments...
source: PE-504.121

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/3
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/5
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/6
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/7
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/8
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/9
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/10
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
docs/0
date
2012-04-17T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/4
date
2013-04-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: A7-0054/2013
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/0/date
Old
2012-04-17T00:00:00
New
2012-04-16T00:00:00
events/4
date
2013-04-03T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: A7-0054/2013
events/4
date
2013-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: A7-0054/2013
summary
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-04-15-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-PR-500537_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.043&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-498043_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.121
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-504121_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2013-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: A7-0054/2013
summary
events/4
date
2013-04-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: A7-0054/2013
summary
events/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130415&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0119_EN.html title: T7-0119/2013
summary
events/7
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0119_EN.html title: T7-0119/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: SVENSSON Alf date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2012-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SVENSSON Alf group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2012-09-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/3/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-54&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0054_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-119
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0119_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=22 title: COM(2012)0022 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0022:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade Commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: NEUSER Norbert group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SVENSSON Alf body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: NEUSER Norbert group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SVENSSON Alf body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-04-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-54&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0054/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-04-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130415&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22623&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-119 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0119/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2012-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SVENSSON Alf group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2012-09-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SAÏFI Tokia group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2012-07-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Development (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SVENSSON Alf
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2012-09-17T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2012-11-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537 title: PE500.537 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE498.043&secondRef=02 title: PE498.043 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.121 title: PE504.121 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-07-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22623&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)472 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2012-04-17T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0022/COM_COM(2012)0022(COR1)_EN.doc title: COM(2012)0022 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=22 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries. BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues . Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this . The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs. Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade. CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282 ), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need. This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225 ). Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include: 1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries : improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade; the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods; the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance); the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries; the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered); support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability. 2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by: improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities; greater support for LDCs to develop trade; greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders); stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance; the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity; equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection; improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors. 3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy: greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced. a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms; a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth; measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility ; measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks ; measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries. 4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance , which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership . The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system . In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening. The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members. The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system. As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated . In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment. Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-09-13T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2013-02-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-04-04T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-54&language=EN title: A7-0054/2013 summary: The Committee on Development adopted the report by Alf SVENSSON (EPP, SE) on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject. The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , was also consulted for an opinion on this report. 1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Members confirm their position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EU ’ s trade policy towards developing countries. Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders, with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women . Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge. The report draws attention to the following points: fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries; any iniquitous production and trade practices , of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated; the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules . AfT programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses. Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia , provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy , regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework. Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance . They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies. 2. Negotiations and trade agreements: the report recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid. The European Union is invited to: to further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date; ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations , with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries; define its policy in full respect of the ‘ special and differential treatment ’ granted to developing countries. 3. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate . EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. Members call for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour . The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships . The report calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight , which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries. 4. Raw materials and extractive industries: Members highlight that increases in the local processing of raw materials and in the creation of value added are crucial in order to move away from dependence on the export of raw materials. They take the view that developing countries with a high dependency on raw material exports must be allowed to use export taxes and restrictions to further these goals in the public interest . 5. Food security and biofuels: the report urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions. It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.
  • date: 2013-04-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130415&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22623&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-119 title: T7-0119/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject. Parliament recalls that Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union requires that the Union's policies which are likely to affect developing countries shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation. Moreover, poverty reduction and the pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals are centrepieces of the EU's development policy and should also guide the EU's trade policy towards developing countries. In this context, the resolution emphasises the following points : 1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Parliament confirms its position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EU’s trade policy towards developing countries. Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders , with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women. Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge. The resolution draws attention to the following points: fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries; any iniquitous production and trade practices , of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated; the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules . Aid for Trade (AfT) programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses. Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia, provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy , regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework. Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistanc e. They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies. 2. Negotiations and trade agreements: Parliament recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid. The European Union is invited to: further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date; ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations, with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries; define its policy in full respect of the ‘special and differential treatment’ granted to developing countries. 3. Aid for Trade: Parliament calls for AfT instruments to be focused not only on trade between the EU and developing countries, but also on support for internal, regional and South-South trade , as well as on triangular trade between ACP countries by promoting cross-border value chains, by increasing the efficiency of key services and by reducing transport costs. It also encourages the development of more effective support instruments in relation to production adjustment and diversification . It calls on the Commission to make progress in developing a package to promote trade for small operators in developing countries so as to support the participation of small business in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability (e.g. Fair Trade). 4. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate . EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. The resolution calls for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour . The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight in this regard the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships . They urge all donors - public and private - to coordinate their actions more and to adjust them in line with current funds, particularly given the current situation with regard to budget cuts. The resolution calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight , which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries. 5. Raw materials and extractive industries: despite the implementation of the Kimberley Process for the certification of conflict diamonds, Parliament observes that trade in natural resources is still fuelling rebels and human rights abuses are still taking place in mining areas. It emphasises therefore the urgent need for a system of due diligence for gems and valuable minerals, such as so-called conflict minerals . Members take the view that standards for transparency and certification need to be enlarged over time to fully address bribery and corruption in the extractive sector. They call, more broadly, on the EU to support stronger governance mechanisms to address the environmental and human rights dimensions of resource exploitation. They take the view that an international convention for sustainable resource management is essential to lay down fundamental legal principles for sustainable resource management. 6. Food security and biofuels: the resolution urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions . It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.
  • date: 2013-04-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: DE GUCHT Karel
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/7/10590
New
  • DEVE/7/10590
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
  • 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
New
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
6.30
Development cooperation
6.30.02
Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0022:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0022:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: NEUSER Norbert group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SVENSSON Alf
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/1/date
Old
2013-04-16T00:00:00
New
2012-09-13T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0119/2013
activities/1/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2012-11-16T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537 type: Committee draft report title: PE500.537
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: NEUSER Norbert group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SVENSSON Alf
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: SAÏFI Tokia
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/2/date
Old
2013-01-30T00:00:00
New
2013-02-19T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.121 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE504.121
activities/2/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130415&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: SVENSSON Alf
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2012-09-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
activities/5/date
Old
2012-09-13T00:00:00
New
2013-04-16T00:00:00
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22623&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-119 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0119/2013
activities/5/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de188b20fb8127435bdc39f
New
4f1adbb9b819f207b30000de
committees/2/shadows
  • group: S&D name: NEUSER Norbert
  • group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles
committees/6/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1884f0fb8127435bdc30c
New
4f1adaf3b819f207b300009c
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
activities/6/date
Old
2013-04-16T00:00:00
New
2013-04-15T00:00:00
activities/6/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/7/date
Old
2013-04-15T00:00:00
New
2013-04-16T00:00:00
activities/7/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0119/2013
activities/7/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/5/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Development adopted the report by Alf SVENSSON (EPP, SE) on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject.

The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report.

1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Members confirm their position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EUs trade policy towards developing countries.

Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders, with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women.

Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge.

The report draws attention to the following points:

  • fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries;
  • any iniquitous production and trade practices, of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated;
  • the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules.  AfT programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses.

Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia, provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy, regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework.

Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance. They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies.

2. Negotiations and trade agreements: the report recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid.

The European Union is invited to:

  • to further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date;
  • ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations, with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries;
  • define its policy in full respect of the special and differential treatment granted to developing countries.

3. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate.

EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. Members call for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour.

The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships.

The report calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight, which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries.

4. Raw materials and extractive industries: Members highlight that increases in the local processing of raw materials and in the creation of value added are crucial in order to move away from dependence on the export of raw materials. They take the view that developing countries with a high dependency on raw material exports must be allowed to use export taxes and restrictions to further these goals in the public interest.

5. Food security and biofuels: the report urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions. It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.

New

The Committee on Development adopted the report by Alf SVENSSON (EPP, SE) on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject.

The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report.

1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Members confirm their position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EUs trade policy towards developing countries.

Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders, with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women.

Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge.

The report draws attention to the following points:

  • fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries;
  • any iniquitous production and trade practices, of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated;
  • the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules.  AfT programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses.

Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia, provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy, regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework.

Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance. They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies.

2. Negotiations and trade agreements: the report recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid.

The European Union is invited to:

  • to further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date;
  • ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations, with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries;
  • define its policy in full respect of the special and differential treatment granted to developing countries.

3. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate.

EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. Members call for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour.

The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships.

The report calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight, which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries.

4. Raw materials and extractive industries: Members highlight that increases in the local processing of raw materials and in the creation of value added are crucial in order to move away from dependence on the export of raw materials. They take the view that developing countries with a high dependency on raw material exports must be allowed to use export taxes and restrictions to further these goals in the public interest.

5. Food security and biofuels: the report urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions. It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.

activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Development adopted the report by Alf SVENSSON (EPP, SE) on Advancing Development through Trade in response to the Commission’s communication on the subject.

    The Committee on Legal Affairs, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report.

    1) Growth, development and poverty reduction: Members confirm their position that facilitating sustainable development must be the overriding objective of the EUs trade policy towards developing countries.

    Stressing that since it cannot be taken for granted that trade liberalisation leads to growth and poverty reduction, trade and aid for trade policies must consistently be designed on the basis of transparent, inclusive and participatory processes involving all stakeholders, with special attention to the most disadvantaged, especially women.

    Growth should also benefit and empower women and be focused on improving the general business climate for SMEs to flourish, as well as for sustainable microfinance and micro-credit opportunities to emerge.

    The report draws attention to the following points:

    • fair trade between the EU and developing countries must be based on the full respect for, and guarantee of, ILO labour standards and working conditions and must ensure the application of the highest possible social and environmental standards. This includes paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of developing countries;
    • any iniquitous production and trade practices, of over-fishing and of agricultural subsidies that harm development and threaten food security must be eliminated;
    • the successful integration of developing countries into world trade requires more than better market access and strengthened international trade rules.  AfT programming should therefore support developing countries in their domestic efforts to promote local trade, remove supply-side constraints and address structural weaknesses.

    Members also consider that sustainable economic development strategies should, inter alia, provide for participation of the private sector in the real economy, regional cohesion and integration of markets through cross-border cooperation, and the development of open and fair trade, embedded in a rules-based multilateral trade framework.

    Reminding the EU of its aim for its total aid budget to be 0.7 % of GNI by 2015, Members urge the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance. They also call on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies.

    2. Negotiations and trade agreements: the report recommends that the Commission negotiates the inclusion of provisions applicable to human rights in all future bilateral trade and cooperation agreements. It stresses the importance of anchoring corporate social responsibility (CSR) in free trade agreements with developing countries. It urges the Commission to authorise explicit support for the management of climate change as part of all aid-for-trade and other relevant development aid.

    The European Union is invited to:

    • to further lower trade barriers and trade-distorting subsidies in order to help developing countries increase their share of global trade. Members call for the abolition of agricultural export subsidies, committed to in the WTO Doha Development Round, to be implemented at the earliest possible date;
    • ensure that its broad approach to trade negotiations, with the inclusion of issues like investment, government procurement, competition, trade in services and intellectual property rights, is in line with the respective needs and development strategies of partner countries;
    • define its policy in full respect of the special and differential treatment granted to developing countries.

    3. Development and the role of the private sector: Members consider that Foreign Direct Investment is also a strong driver for sustained economic growth, the transfer of know-how, enterprising spirit and technology and job creation, and is therefore vital to development. In this regard, they call for the development agenda to focus on supporting capacity-building in developing countries aimed at creating a transparent, predictable and favourable investment climate.

    EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries are urged to abide strictly by obligations to respect human rights and freedoms, social and environmental standards, equality between women and men, core labour standards, international agreements and payment of appropriate taxes. Members call for the implementation without exception of the right to freedom from forced labour and especially from child labour.

    The Commission and all donors are asked to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships. Members highlight the vital importance of promoting public-private growth initiative partnerships.

    The report calls for stronger EU efforts in relation to tax havens and capital flight, which undermine revenues of both EU and developing countries and work against poverty alleviation and wealth creation in poor countries.

    4. Raw materials and extractive industries: Members highlight that increases in the local processing of raw materials and in the creation of value added are crucial in order to move away from dependence on the export of raw materials. They take the view that developing countries with a high dependency on raw material exports must be allowed to use export taxes and restrictions to further these goals in the public interest.

    5. Food security and biofuels: the report urges the EU and all other donors not to facilitate or contribute to the reassignment of fertile land in food-insecure countries and regions. It stresses the need to remove incentives for farmers in food-insecure countries to use their land for purposes other than food production, such as production of biofuels.

activities/5/date
Old
2013-02-27T00:00:00
New
2013-04-04T00:00:00
activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-54&language=EN
activities/7
date
2013-04-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2013-02-27T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0054/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries.

BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this.

The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs.

Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade.

CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need.

This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225).

Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include:

1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries:

  • improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade;
  • the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods;
  • the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance);
  • the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries;
  • the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered);
  • support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability.

2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by:

  • improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities;
  • greater support for LDCs to develop trade;
  • greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders);
  • stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance;
  • the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity;
  • equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection;
  • improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors.

3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy:

  • greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced.
  • a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms;
  • a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth;
  • measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility;
  • measures to help improve resilience  to global commodity price shocks;
  • measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries.

4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership.

The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening.

The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement.  An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members.

The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system.

As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated.

In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment.

Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.

New

PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries.

BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this.

The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs.

Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade.

CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need.

This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225).

Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include:

1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries:

  • improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade;
  • the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods;
  • the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance);
  • the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries;
  • the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered);
  • support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability.

2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by:

  • improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities;
  • greater support for LDCs to develop trade;
  • greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders);
  • stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance;
  • the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity;
  • equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection;
  • improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors.

3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy:

  • greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced.
  • a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms;
  • a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth;
  • measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility;
  • measures to help improve resilience  to global commodity price shocks;
  • measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries.

4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership.

The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening.

The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement.  An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members.

The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system.

As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated.

In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment.

Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.

activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.121
activities/4/date
Old
2013-03-11T00:00:00
New
2013-04-15T00:00:00
activities/3
date
2013-01-30T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE504.121
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/0/date
Old
2012-01-27T00:00:00
New
2012-04-17T00:00:00
activities/2
body
EP
date
2012-09-06T00:00:00
type
EP officialisation
activities/2/date
Old
2012-01-27T00:00:00
New
2012-11-16T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537 type: Committee draft report title: PE500.537
activities/2/type
Old
Date
New
Committee draft report
activities/4
date
2012-11-16T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537 type: Committee draft report title: PE500.537
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/5
body
EP
date
2013-01-23T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/6
body
EP
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
type
Prev Adopt in Cte
activities/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.537
activities/4
date
2012-11-16T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE500.537
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/4
body
EP
date
2013-01-23T00:00:00
type
Deadline Amendments
activities/5
body
EP
date
2013-02-19T00:00:00
type
Prev Adopt in Cte
activities/6
date
2013-03-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust development policy by trading with those countries having the greatest need of assistance among the developing countries.

    BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

    The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this.

    The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs.

    Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade.

    CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need.

    This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2225).

    Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include:

    1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries:

    • improved publicity on the availability of practical information on trade policies and market information, in particular to encourage South-South trade;
    • the use of intellectual property protection tools by small producers and farmers to help them maximise the economic value of their goods;
    • the promotion of networks of diaspora small traders in the EU (e.g. on trade procedures, standards, access to finance);
    • the facilitation of access to finance for small exporters/traders from developing countries;
    • the extension of the simplified procedure for obtaining proof of origin (trade preferences are relatively less used for small transactions; the 2011 reform of rules of origin for GSP allows for a simplified procedure based on self-certification for all consignments, based on prior registration by the exporter; if this system works well, its extension to other preferential arrangements will be considered);
    • support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability.

    2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies by:

    • improving the complementarity between trade and development policies: when trade policy measures create increased opportunities for our developing partners (e.g. EPAs, the new GSP, etc.), instruments such as sector-wide programmes or budget support could assist with economic reforms needed to be able to take advantage of trade and investment opportunities;
    • greater support for LDCs to develop trade;
    • greater focus on small operators (small farmers and rural smallholders);
    • stepping up economic partnerships, regulatory dialogues and business cooperation to help foster new forms of cooperation in countries graduating from bilateral development assistance;
    • the revision of our approach in supporting regional integration to focus on trade facilitation and connectivity;
    • equipping people for change by increasing their awareness of policies in relation to skills and education, labour rights and social protection;
    • improving aid effectiveness and improving coordination among donors.

    3) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments to underpin this policy:

    • greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements: the FTAs will include commitments on services, investment and trade-related areas. If comprehensive and regional agreements prove to be beyond reach, variable geometry or multiple-speed agreements can be introduced.
    • a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity in response to the Arab Spring going far beyond market access to further deepen integration with countries in the Southern Mediterranean and promote human rights, good governance and democratic reforms;
    • a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development: besides the GSP+ scheme (the flagship EU trade policy instrument supporting sustainable development and good governance), the Commission envisages engaging partner countries in a cooperative process involving civil society as well strengthening compliance with domestic and international labour and environmental standards; private sustainability-bound schemes (e.g. fair, ethical or organic) can be an effective way to foster sustainable and inclusive growth;
    • measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility;
    • measures to help improve resilience  to global commodity price shocks;
    • measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries.

    4) Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership.

    The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening.

    The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement.  An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members.

    The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system.

    As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated.

    In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment.

    Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.

activities/1/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
DE GUCHT Karel
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
DE GUCHT Karel
activities/3/committees/6/date
2012-09-17T00:00:00
activities/3/committees/6/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
committees/6/date
2012-09-17T00:00:00
committees/6/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: SAÏFI Tokia
activities/3
date
2012-09-13T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/7/10590
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities
  • body: EP date: 2012-01-27T00:00:00 type: Date
  • date: 2012-01-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=22 title: COM(2012)0022 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0022:EN body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission:
  • body: EP date: 2012-09-06T00:00:00 type: EP officialisation
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: SVENSSON Alf
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade (Associated committee) committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2012/2224(INI)
    title
    Advancing development through trade
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject