Procedure completed
Next event: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2013/02/21 more...
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/01/31
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2013/04/08
- Debate in Parliament 2013/04/15
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading 2013/04/16
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | AFET | ||
Opinion | AGRI | ||
Opinion | DEVE | SVENSSON Alf (EPP) | |
Opinion | ECON | ||
Opinion | EMPL | ||
Opinion | IMCO | ||
Lead | INTA | SAÏFI Tokia (EPP) | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria (S&D), BEARDER Catherine (ALDE), KELLER Franziska (Verts/ALE), STURDY Robert (ECR), SCHOLZ Helmut (GUE/NGL) |
Opinion | ITRE | ||
Opinion | JURI | ||
Opinion | PECH | ||
Opinion | TRAN |
Legal Basis RoP 048
Activites
-
2013/04/16
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
- T7-0120/2013
-
2013/04/15
Debate in Parliament
-
2013/04/08
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
A7-0053/2013
summary
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on trade and investment-driven growth for developing countries in response to a Commission communication ‘Trade, growth and development – tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need’. The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report. The report supports the Commission‘s aim of enhancing synergies between trade and development policies, recommending that it take account of beneficiary countries’ needs and capacities, encouraging instruments such as regional integration and give priority to measures aimed at: promoting sustainable and inclusive development; creating jobs and reinforcing skills and the development of human capital while reducing social inequalities. Members stress the importance of decent wage levels and decent workplace safety standards, reminding the Commission of its communication ‘Promoting Decent Work for All’; improving resistance to economic shocks, supporting the development of the private sector, in particular small operators, including micro businesses and small and medium-sized enterprises, in order to foster their participation in trade and investment at local, regional, cross-border, bilateral and multilateral level; improving fiscal governance and the fight against corruption, tax fraud and evasion, money laundering and tax havens, including by establishing information exchanges and supervisory mechanisms on corporate payments; improving the trade and investment climate, including the implementation of trade facilitation measures, diversifying trade and investment flows; and, providing the necessary technical assistance to ensure the proper development of these measures. The European Union is invited to: explore possible areas of cooperation for sustainable development, in order to maximise the contribution of business activities to achieving development goals ; respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development when drawing up and implementing its trade, agricultural, environmental and energy policies, and to assess the impact of these policies on the level of development of the developing countries (DCs) and the lesser developed countries (LDCs); in order to increase wealth and living standards among the poorest, to specifically target some of its trade-related assistance for responsible and sustainable development towards building local and regional trade capacities within and among these countries; design its trade agreements so as to foster responsible investor behaviour and compliance with best international practises of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and good corporate governance. The report supports the Commission‘s proposal to differentiate its aid for trade and to focus its efforts on the countries most in need, especially the least developed countries. It recommends, nevertheless, that the Commission take account of a country’s general level of development and its needs, capacities and internal development inequalities, in addition to the standard indicators (gross national product, human capital and vulnerability to economic shocks). Members also emphasise: social entrepreneurship and social innovation in the developing countries are the engines of growth for development; the need to go beyond transfers of funds and microfinance and find innovative forms of financing and partnership and support the introduction of South-South and triangular partnerships; support for the participation of small businesses in trade schemes that secure added value for producers, including those responding to sustainability (e.g. Fair Trade); strengthening the capacity of institutions in developing countries as regards tax collection, combating tax fraud and the introduction of high accounting standards. The Commission is called upon to: offer more assistance, towards increasing governments‘ capacity to incorporate issues linked to sustainable and inclusive economic development into their national trade strategies and programmes; include a democracy and human rights clause in all trade agreements with developing countries; include Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in bilateral trade agreements with binding environmental and labour rules and CSR clauses; promote regional integration in its bilateral and regional trade agreements. Members believe that the EU has developed tools in the field of development assistance through trade and investment, including the GSP and EPAs, that are effective provided their provisions and implementation criteria do not result in discrimination or limitations that may prove disadvantageous to their potential beneficiaries. The report encourages the Commission, nevertheless, to combine all the existing instruments in a genuine overarching strategy that also comprises measures in the fields of technical assistance for trade, capacity-building and trade-related adjustment, also in relation to standardisation. In this context, the Commission and the European External Action Service should develop synergies in order to further enhance the Union‘s commercial diplomacy worldwide.
-
A7-0053/2013
summary
-
2013/02/21
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- 2013/01/31 Amendments tabled in committee
- 2012/11/09 Committee draft report
-
2012/09/13
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2012/04/17
Non-legislative basic document
-
COM(2012)0022
summary
PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust trade and investment policy in favour of those developing countries in greatest need of assistance. BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this. The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs. Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade. CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliament’s resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need. This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2224). Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include: 1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 3) Complementary instruments boosting foreign direct investment (FDI): the Communication notes that while FDI in and from developing countries has surged in the past decade, it has largely evaded the countries most in need due to poor economic prospects and unfavourable investment conditions. Investors need stable, transparent and predictable regulatory environments. The EU can help improve the business environment through AfT and a range of FDI-related instruments, now extended by the Lisbon Treaty: Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) grant investors greater legal certainty regarding market access sectors (e.g. sectors such as telecommunications, transport, banking, energy, environmental services, construction…); Investment protection granted by Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) either as part of on-going FTA negotiations or as stand-alone agreements; EU blending mechanisms can be used to leverage domestic and foreign investment in developing countries: grants would be combined with e.g. loans or risk capital to support the financial viability of strategic investments under the new financial instruments covered by the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014-2020. The use of such financial instruments will be assessed case by case in countries where debt sustainability is fragile. Other instruments that will be considered include guarantees, private equity and public-private partnerships. Cooperation will be sought with the European Investment Bank and Member States' or other development finance agencies. 4) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments in addition to the classic development measures which are: i) greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements; ii) a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development; iii) measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility; iv) measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks; and v) measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries. The following will receive particular attention: measures to enhance transparency of investments and to combat fiscal fraud: several initiatives are in place in this regard (such as the Directive requiring the publication of payments made to governments both by publicly quoted companies on European stock markets and by other large EU companies active in the extractive and forestry sectors); improvement of transparency in the supply chain, including aspects of due diligence; greater support for and use of the recently updated OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises, as well as the OECD’s recommendations on due diligence and responsible supply chain management; specific assistance in regard to sustainable mining, geological knowledge and good governance in natural resources management; mechanisms controlling price volatility of primary resources (such as the Vulnerability FLEX (V-FLEX) mechanism, a short-term instrument to help the most vulnerable ACP countries to cope with the impact of the global food and financial crisis). Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership. The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening. The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members. The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system. As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated. In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment. Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', 'title': 'Trade'}, DE GUCHT Karel
-
COM(2012)0022
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0022
- Committee draft report: PE500.468
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE504.162
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0053/2013
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0120/2013
Amendments | Dossier |
29 |
2012/2225(INI)
2012/12/19
DEVE
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 f (new) 1f. Notes with concern the growing number of investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) cases filed under IIAs, where investors have challenged core public policies, claiming that these policies have negatively affected their business prospects; against this background, considers it essential to reform IIAs to strengthen their development dimension, balancing the rights and obligations of States and investors, ensuring sufficient policy space for sustainable development policies and making investment promotion provisions more concrete and aligned with sustainable development objectives; considers that while a systematic assessment of IIAs remains to be done, multilateral dialogue on ISDS could help to develop a consensus for its reform; insists that any future European investment agreements must not cover international investor-state dispute settlement;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls that mobilizing investment for sustainable development remains a major challenge for developing countries, particularly for LDCs; underlines, in this context, that UNCTAD has developed a comprehensive Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development (IPFSD) that puts a particular emphasis on the relationship between foreign investment and sustainable development;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Recalls that positive development impacts of FDI do not materialize automatically, but require i.a. adequate regulation that covers policy areas beyond investment policies per se, such as trade, taxation, intellectual property, competition, labour market regulation, environmental policies and access to land;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need for the EU, in order to increase wealth and living standards among the poorest, to specifically target some of its trade-related assistance for responsible and sustainable development towards building local and regional trade capacity within and among these countries;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses the need for the EU, in order to increase wealth and living standards among the poorest, to specifically target some of its trade-related assistance towards building local and regional trade capacity within and among these countries; welcomes the objectives of the Development Cooperation Instrument, which highlights the priorities of employment and growth in developing countries;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that, in order for growth to be inclusive and efficient in terms of poverty reduction, it should be pursued in sectors in which poor people are active, should benefit and empower women and should be associated with the creation of jobs as well as
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that social entrepreneurship and social innovation in the developing countries are the engines of growth for development, which can help reduce inequality and promote growth provided that profits are reinvested in the economy;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on EU-based companies with production facilities in developing countries to set an example by abid
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Confirms its support for Policy Coherence for Development; notes that, in the context of trade with developing countries, this presupposes inter alia the safeguarding and expansion of such countries’ abilities to industrialise, diversify their production and move up the value chain, a
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Calls on EU-based companies with production facilities in developing
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that European corporations whose subsidiaries or supply chains are located in developing countries comply with their national and international legal obligations in the areas of human rights, labour standards and environmental rules;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the fact that a broad range of industries and trans-national companies have adopted codes of conduct detailing social and environmental performance standards for their global supply chains; recalls, however, that the proliferation and heterogeneous accounting, auditing and reporting standards of these codes make them difficult to compare; stresses that better implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights will contribute to EU objectives regarding specific human rights issues and core labour standards; hence, calls once more on the EU to strive for a clear international legal framework setting out the responsibilities and obligations of business with regard to human rights;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that EU assistance to governments of third countries in implementing social and environmental regulation is a necessary complement to advancing the CSR of European businesses worldwide;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises the importance of
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. 7. Notes th
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Acknowledges that the European Commission is a partner in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI); calls on the Commission and parties active within the extractive industry to actively encourage more producer countries to join the initiative.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines that future bilateral investment treaties signed by the EU must guarantee a fair balance between investors' protection and the potential for state intervention, especially as regards social and environmental standards;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Confirms its support for Policy Coherence for Development; notes that, in the context of trade with developing countries, this presupposes inter alia the safeguarding and expansion of such countries' abilities to industrialise, diversify their production and move up the value chain, as well as the abolition of any EU agricultural subsidies that could harm their food security;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines that investment policy raises two main challenges for developing countries: at the national level, investment policy needs to be included into development strategy, incorporating sustainable development objectives; at the international level, it is necessary to strengthen the development dimension of international investment agreements (IIAs) and balancing the rights and obligations of States and investors;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises that trade and development should pursue objectives in the field of agriculture, particularly the abolition of any agricultural subsidies that could harm food security, the sustainable management of natural assets and local, regional and national integrated growth strategies;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Regrets that, according to UNCTAD's World Investment Report 2012, some International Investment Agreements (IIA) concluded in 2011 keep to the traditional Treaty model that focuses on investment protection as the sole aim of the Treaty; however, welcomes the fact that some new IIAs include provisions to ensure that the Treaty does not interfere with, but instead contributes to countries' sustainable development strategies that focus on the environmental and social impacts of investment;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Points out that the 2012 revision of the United States Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) turns the best-endeavour commitment not to relax domestic environmental and labour laws into a binding obligation;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Urges the EU and its Member States to strive for the integration of provisions on sustainability in its investment agreements in line with the adoption of and follow-up work on the 2011 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; the UNCTAD/FAO/World Bank/IFAD Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment; the 2011 Revision of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises; the Doha Mandate adopted at UNCTAD's XIII Ministerial Conference in 2012 and the Rio+20 Conference in 2012;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Underlines that UNCTAD's World Investment Report 2012 indicates that IIAs are becoming increasingly controversial and politically sensitive, primarily owing to the spread of IIA- based investor-State arbitrations, which provokes growing discontent (e.g. Australia's trade-policy statement announcing that it would stop including Investor State Dispute Settlement clauses in its future IIAs); takes note of UNCTAD's observation that this reflects deficiencies in the system (e.g. excessively wide definitions of expropriation, insufficient guarantees in relation to the qualifications of arbitrators lack of transparency and high costs of the proceeding, and an unclear relationship between ISDS and State-State proceedings); also draws attention to the broad public concern about the usefulness and legitimacy of the ISDS mechanism;
source: PE-502.087
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/5/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on trade and investment-driven growth for developing countries in response to a Commission communication Trade, growth and development tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need. The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliaments Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report. The report supports the Commissions aim of enhancing synergies between trade and development policies, recommending that it take account of beneficiary countries needs and capacities, encouraging instruments such as regional integration and give priority to measures aimed at:
The European Union is invited to:
The report supports the Commissions proposal to differentiate its aid for trade and to focus its efforts on the countries most in need, especially the least developed countries. It recommends, nevertheless, that the Commission take account of a countrys general level of development and its needs, capacities and internal development inequalities, in addition to the standard indicators (gross national product, human capital and vulnerability to economic shocks). Members also emphasise:
The Commission is called upon to:
Members believe that the EU has developed tools in the field of development assistance through trade and investment, including the GSP and EPAs, that are effective provided their provisions and implementation criteria do not result in discrimination or limitations that may prove disadvantageous to their potential beneficiaries. The report encourages the Commission, nevertheless, to combine all the existing instruments in a genuine overarching strategy that also comprises measures in the fields of technical assistance for trade, capacity-building and trade-related adjustment, also in relation to standardisation. In this context, the Commission and the European External Action Service should develop synergies in order to further enhance the Unions commercial diplomacy worldwide. New
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Tokia SAÏFI (EPP, FR) on trade and investment-driven growth for developing countries in response to a Commission communication Trade, growth and development tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need. The Committee on International Trade, exercising its prerogatives of an associated committee in accordance with Rule 50 of Parliaments Rules of Procedure, was also consulted for an opinion on this report. The report supports the Commissions aim of enhancing synergies between trade and development policies, recommending that it take account of beneficiary countries needs and capacities, encouraging instruments such as regional integration and give priority to measures aimed at:
The European Union is invited to:
The report supports the Commissions proposal to differentiate its aid for trade and to focus its efforts on the countries most in need, especially the least developed countries. It recommends, nevertheless, that the Commission take account of a countrys general level of development and its needs, capacities and internal development inequalities, in addition to the standard indicators (gross national product, human capital and vulnerability to economic shocks). Members also emphasise:
The Commission is called upon to:
Members believe that the EU has developed tools in the field of development assistance through trade and investment, including the GSP and EPAs, that are effective provided their provisions and implementation criteria do not result in discrimination or limitations that may prove disadvantageous to their potential beneficiaries. The report encourages the Commission, nevertheless, to combine all the existing instruments in a genuine overarching strategy that also comprises measures in the fields of technical assistance for trade, capacity-building and trade-related adjustment, also in relation to standardisation. In this context, the Commission and the European External Action Service should develop synergies in order to further enhance the Unions commercial diplomacy worldwide. |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-02-27T00:00:00New
2013-04-08T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-53&language=EN
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.162
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust trade and investment policy in favour of those developing countries in greatest need of assistance. BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this. The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs. Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade. CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliaments resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need. This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2224). Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include: 1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 3) Complementary instruments boosting foreign direct investment (FDI): the Communication notes that while FDI in and from developing countries has surged in the past decade, it has largely evaded the countries most in need due to poor economic prospects and unfavourable investment conditions. Investors need stable, transparent and predictable regulatory environments. The EU can help improve the business environment through AfT and a range of FDI-related instruments, now extended by the Lisbon Treaty: Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) grant investors greater legal certainty regarding market access sectors (e.g. sectors such as telecommunications, transport, banking, energy, environmental services, construction ); Investment protection granted by Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) either as part of on-going FTA negotiations or as stand-alone agreements; EU blending mechanisms can be used to leverage domestic and foreign investment in developing countries: grants would be combined with e.g. loans or risk capital to support the financial viability of strategic investments under the new financial instruments covered by the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014-2020. The use of such financial instruments will be assessed case by case in countries where debt sustainability is fragile. Other instruments that will be considered include guarantees, private equity and public-private partnerships. Cooperation will be sought with the European Investment Bank and Member States' or other development finance agencies. 4) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments in addition to the classic development measures which are: i) greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements; ii) a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development; iii) measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility; iv) measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks; and v) measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries. The following will receive particular attention:
Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership. The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening. The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members. The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system. As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated. In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment. Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development. New
PURPOSE: to establish a new and comprehensive framework to adjust trade and investment policy in favour of those developing countries in greatest need of assistance. BACKGROUND: the world economic landscape has changed dramatically in the past decade, with deep implications for trade, investment and development policies. Historically low tariffs and the reorganisation of international trade along global supply chains increasingly shift the focus of trade policies to regulatory and other behind-the-border issues. Developing countries, such as China, India or Brazil, have gone through radical changes and have managed to reap the benefits of open and increasingly integrated world markets. At the other end of the scale may be found the Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), mainly in Africa, that continue to face many difficulties and are the most off track in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The notion of "developing countries" as a group is losing relevance as a result and trade, investment and development policies now need to be tailored to reflect this. The EU has a particular responsibility as the world's largest trading power, the biggest trading partner of many LDCs. Further to the 2010 Communication on Trade, Growth and World Affairs, this Communication updates the 2002 Communication on Trade and Development to reflect changes in economic realities, to take stock of the way the EU has delivered on its commitments and to outline the direction the EU's trade policies for development should take over the next decade. CONTENT: although it confirms the main principles of the 2002 communication (to this effect, please refer to the European Parliaments resolution on the 2002 Communication, INI/2002/2282), this Communication stresses the need to increasingly differentiate among developing countries to focus on those most in need, as well as to improve the way our instruments deliver. It also emphasises the need for our developing country partners to undertake domestic reforms and for other developed and emerging economies to match our initiatives to open markets to countries most in need. This Communication proposes concrete ways to enhance synergies between trade and development policies (in this context, please also refer to INI/2012/2224). Tasks for the future to strengthen trade and development: building on recent achievements and efforts but also learning from experience where progress has not been as successful as hoped, the EU will step up efforts to help those countries most in need to reap the benefits of increasingly integrated world markets. With this in mind, the Communication envisages a series of measures some of which are already under way. Some examples of these include: 1) More focused preferences: the Commission has proposed a reform of the GSP scheme to make sure corresponding preferences benefit those countries most in need. In addition to this reform that is considered crucial to better target preferences, the Communication envisages a package of measures to promote trade for small operators in developing countries (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 2) Better targeted Aid for Trade (AfT): the objective of this is to encourage developing countries to include trade in their development strategies (please refer to the summary of INI/2012/2224 for details of the measures in question). 3) Complementary instruments boosting foreign direct investment (FDI): the Communication notes that while FDI in and from developing countries has surged in the past decade, it has largely evaded the countries most in need due to poor economic prospects and unfavourable investment conditions. Investors need stable, transparent and predictable regulatory environments. The EU can help improve the business environment through AfT and a range of FDI-related instruments, now extended by the Lisbon Treaty: Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) grant investors greater legal certainty regarding market access sectors (e.g. sectors such as telecommunications, transport, banking, energy, environmental services, construction ); Investment protection granted by Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) either as part of on-going FTA negotiations or as stand-alone agreements; EU blending mechanisms can be used to leverage domestic and foreign investment in developing countries: grants would be combined with e.g. loans or risk capital to support the financial viability of strategic investments under the new financial instruments covered by the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014-2020. The use of such financial instruments will be assessed case by case in countries where debt sustainability is fragile. Other instruments that will be considered include guarantees, private equity and public-private partnerships. Cooperation will be sought with the European Investment Bank and Member States' or other development finance agencies. 4) Complementary instruments: the Communication proposes a series of instruments in addition to the classic development measures which are: i) greater use of comprehensive and modulated bilateral/regional agreements; ii) a values-based trade agenda to promote sustainable development; iii) measures to strengthen corporate social responsibility; iv) measures to help improve resilience to global commodity price shocks; and v) measures to help preparedness for natural catastrophes in particularly vulnerable countries. The following will receive particular attention:
Principles: to properly implement the above-mentioned proposals, the Communication recommends: i) the promotion of good governance, which starts with stable political institutions and practices, an independent judiciary, protection of human rights, transparency of public finances, rules and institutions and a strong stance against fraud and corruption; ii) promotion of transparency and the requirement to provide reports in the context of trade agreements under negotiation; iii) encouragement of ownership. The multilateral programme up to 2020: the Communication stresses that an absolute must be to preserve and strengthen the multilateral trading system. In this connection, it regrets the current impasse in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which offers considerable potential for developing countries. This impasse reveals a fundamental weakness in the WTO setting which has not evolved as quickly as economic realities. There is a growing imbalance between the contribution that large emerging countries make to the multilateral trading system and the benefits they derive from it. This is increasingly felt in poorer countries which see the gap between them and emerging countries widening. The priority for the EU is to pursue negotiations on the DDA to include, for example, mandated topics such as trade facilitation, non-tariff barriers and dispute settlement. An agreement on trade facilitation offers substantial development benefits by ensuring coherent reforms in all WTO members. The issue of differentiation and the role of emerging economies must be addressed. Emerging countries should show more leadership and assume more responsibility for opening their markets to LDCs through preferential schemes but also on a non-discriminatory basis towards the rest of the WTO membership. This does not imply full reciprocity of commitments with developed countries as an outcome of the DDA, but greater proportionality of their contribution with the benefits they derive from the system. As far as LDCs are concerned, the objective is to push for greater coherence in preferential rules of origin, including greater transparency, simplicity and improved market access. In addition to the DDA negotiations and to allow as many countries as possible to benefit from the system, the accession of LDCs to the WTO should be supported and facilitated. In conclusion, the Communication calls on the countries concerned to make choices and assume responsibilities in the interests of consolidating the long-term benefits of trade and investment. Given that South-South trade, for the first time, outweighs North-South trade, the Communication calls on large emerging countries to take more leadership and responsibility in the multilateral trading system in the interest of the system and for the benefit of global development. |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-20T00:00:00New
2013-02-21T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-02-21T00:00:00New
2013-02-20T00:00:00 |
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-01-27T00:00:00New
2012-04-17T00:00:00 |
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2012-09-05T00:00:00New
2012-01-27T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
EP officialisationNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/1 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-01-24T00:00:00New
2013-02-21T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.468
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/1/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/1/commission |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-02-21T00:00:00New
2012-01-27T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
EP 1R CommitteeNew
Non-legislative basic document |
activities/4 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Committee |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-03-27T00:00:00New
2013-04-15T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/committees/6/shadows/4 |
|
committees/6/shadows/4 |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-02-27T00:00:00New
2013-03-27T00:00:00 |
activities/1/commission/0 |
|
activities/4 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
EP 1R Committee |
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2012-09-13T00:00:00New
2013-02-21T00:00:00 |
activities/5/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
committees/6/shadows/1 |
|
committees/6/shadows/2 |
|
committees/6/shadows/3 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
INTA/7/08738
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|