Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria ( PPE) | DAERDEN Frédéric ( S&D), DE BACKER Philippe ( ALDE), LAMBERT Jean ( Verts/ALE), CABRNOCH Milan ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | BASTOS Regina ( PPE) | Norica NICOLAI ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano ( S&D) | Dennis de JONG ( GUE/NGL), Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | MANN Thomas ( PPE) | Thomas HÄNDEL ( GUE/NGL), Syed KAMALL ( ECR), Olle LUDVIGSSON ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 502 votes to 138, with 49 abstentions a resolution on an Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions in response to the Commission Communication on the subject.
Whilst noting that the lowering of pension benefits in many Member States is a consequence of the escalation of the financial crisis, Parliament deplores the severe cuts in the Member States hardest hit by the crisis that have pushed many pensioners into, or at-the-risk of poverty . Emphasising the likelihood of a long-term, low-growth economic scenario, which would require most Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions, Parliament agrees with the Commission that it is necessary to build up funded, complementary occupational pensions, apart from the priority of safeguarding universal, public pensions that at least guarantee a decent standard of living for all in old age.
Parliament recommends a multi-pillar pension approach , consisting of combinations of:
· a universal, pay-as-you-go, public pension;
· a funded, occupational, supplementary pension, resulting from collective agreements at the national, sector or company level or resulting from national legislation, accessible to all workers concerned;
· an individual third-pillar pension based on private savings with equitable incentives geared to low income workers, self-employed people and to people with incomplete contributory years as regards their employment-related pension scheme. Parliament calls on Member States to consider introducing such schemes where they do not yet exist, and asks the Commission to ensure that any regulation in the field of pensions be conducive to this approach.
Since first-pillar, public pension schemes remain the most important source of income for pensioners, Members regret that the White Paper does not properly address the importance of universal, at least poverty-proof, first-pillar public schemes . Member States are asked to work on:
· more inclusive labour market strategies to decrease the economic dependency ratio between inactive persons and people in employment;
· lifelong training schemes and improved working conditions which enable people to have longer careers until the statutory retirement age, and beyond if they so wish.
Raising employment rates and balancing time spent in work and retirement : noting that in the EU, the employment rate among people aged between of 55 and 64 stands at a mere 47.4 % and among women at only 40.2%, Members call for closely linking pension benefits to years worked and premiums paid (‘actuarial fairness’), while duly taking into account periods away from the labour market due to care for dependent persons. They recommend a ban on mandatory retirement when reaching the statutory retirement age , so as to enable people who can and wish to do so to choose to continue to work beyond the statutory retirement age, as extending the period of premiums paid while at the same time shortening the period of benefit eligibility can help workers reduce any pension gaps at a fast pace.
Parliament notes that the assumption behind early retirement schemes, whereby older workers are allowed to retire early so as to make jobs available for the young, has been proven empirically wrong as the Member States displaying the highest youth employment rates, on average, are also the ones displaying the highest employment rates for older workers.
Developing complementary private retirement savings: whilst welcoming the call in the White Paper for developing both funded, complementary occupational pensions accessible for all workers, Parliament considers that the Commission should rather recommend collective, solidarity-based supplementary occupational pension savings , preferably resulting from collective agreements and established at the national, sectoral or company level, as they allow for solidarity within and between generations, whereas individual schemes do not. Parliament stresses the importance of ensuring that any measures proposed at EU level must complement and not contradict national pension reform programmes, noting that pensions remain a Member State competence.
Parliament also stresses the need for citizens to be properly informed about their accrued pension entitlements, so that they are able to make well-informed decisions. Member States are urged to ensure strict disclosure rules regarding the operating costs and risk of, and the return on, investments of pension funds operating within their jurisdiction.
Pensions of mobile workers: noting the lack of mobility between the Member States with only 3 % of working-age EU citizens live in another Member State, Members call for the establishment of efficient tracking services , possibly web-based, that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make well-informed decisions on additional, individual (third-pillar) pension savings. They welcome the Commission’s pilot project, which should be complemented by an impact assessment of the benefits of providing EU citizens with consolidated pension information in an accessible way. Pension tracking services should ideally cover not only occupational pensions, but also third-pillar schemes and individualised information on first-pillar entitlements.
Members stress that any action to promote mobility must be balanced by the cost-effective provision of supplementary pension schemes and must take into account the nature of national pension schemes.
Review of the IORP Directive : Parliament urges the Commission not to jeopardise the investment potential and to respect the different characteristics of pension funds and other pension providers when introducing or changing EU regulation, especially when reviewing this Directive on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision. It goes on to make a series of observations on the Commission’s proposals regarding precautionary measures which must apply the principle of ‘same risk, same rules’ within each national system and respective pillar.
Protection of workers’ occupational pensions in the event of insolvency : Members stress that entitlements under Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC , which requires Member States to ensure that the pension rights of employees are protected in the event of the employer’s insolvency, should be consistently safeguarded. They want the Commission to carry out a comprehensive overview of national guarantee schemes.
Complementary third-pillar pension savings: Parliament regrets that third-pillar systems are most often more cost-intensive, more risky and less transparent than first-pillar systems. It calls on the Commission to assess and optimise incentives for private pension savings , in particular for individuals who otherwise would not build up an adequate pension. It also recommends:
· the legal cost limits at national level for contract conclusion and management, change of provider or change of contract type be investigated and that proposals be made in this regard;
· EU-level voluntary codes of conduct – and possibly also product certification schemes – with regard to quality, information provision to consumers and consumer protection in the third pillar.
Removing tax and contract related cross-border obstacles to pension investments : the Commission and the Member States concerned are asked to reach agreement in the field of cross-border pensions, especially as regards how to avoid double taxation and double non-taxation.
Gender: Members recall the gender challenge regarding pensions, noting that around 22% of women over the age of 75 fall below the EU’s poverty threshold. It considers the growing number of elderly people, especially women, who live below the poverty line alarming.
In this respect, first-pillar, public pension schemes should guarantee at least a decent standard of living for all. Parliament welcomes the call made in the White Paper for Member States to consider the development of care credits as a means of ensuring that periods spent taking care of dependent persons are taken into account when calculating individual pension entitlements.
Members also stress that gender equality in the labour market is crucial to ensure the sustainability of pension systems , and that the equalisation of the pension age for men and women must be accompanied by effective policies to ensure equal pay for equal work, reconciliation of work and care for dependents.
It should be noted that the alternative motion for resolution presented by the EFD group was rejected in plenary.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN (EPP, NL) on an Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions in response to the Commission Communication on the subject.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Article 50 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, has also been consulted for an opinion on the report.
Whilst noting that the lowering of pension benefits in many Member States is a consequence of the escalation of the financial crisis, Members deplore the severe cuts in the Member States hardest hit by the crisis that have pushed many pensioners into, or at-the-risk of poverty . The report recommends a multi-pillar pension approach , consisting of combinations of:
a universal, pay-as-you-go, public pension; a funded, occupational, supplementary pension, resulting from collective agreements at the national, sector or company level or resulting from national legislation, accessible to all workers concerned; an individual third-pillar pension based on private savings with equitable incentives geared to low income workers, self-employed people and to people with incomplete contributory years as regards their employment-related pension scheme;
Since first-pillar, public pension schemes remain the most important source of income for pensioners, Members regret that the White Paper does not properly address the importance of universal, at least poverty-proof, first-pillar public schemes . Member States are asked to work on:
more inclusive labour market strategies to decrease the economic dependency ratio between inactive persons and people in employment; lifelong training schemes and improved working conditions which enable people to have longer careers until the statutory retirement age, and beyond if they so wish.
Raising employment rates and balancing time spent in work and retirement : noting that in the EU, the employment rate among people aged between of 55 and 64 stands at a mere 47.4 % and among women at only 40.2%, Members call for closely linking pension benefits to years worked and premiums paid (‘actuarial fairness’), while duly taking into account periods away from the labour market due to care for dependent persons. They recommend a ban on mandatory retirement when reaching the statutory retirement age , so as to enable people who can and wish to do so to choose to continue to work beyond the statutory retirement age, as extending the period of premiums paid while at the same time shortening the period of benefit eligibility can help workers reduce any pension gaps at a fast pace.
The report notes that the assumption behind early retirement schemes, whereby older workers are allowed to retire early so as to make jobs available for the young, has been proven empirically wrong as the Member States displaying the highest youth employment rates, on average, are also the ones displaying the highest employment rates for older workers.
Developing complementary private retirement savings: whilst welcoming the call in the White Paper for developing both funded, complementary occupational pensions accessible for all workers, Members consider that the Commission should rather recommend collective, solidarity-based supplementary occupational pension savings , preferably resulting from collective agreements and established at the national, sectoral or company level, as they allow for solidarity within and between generations, whereas individual schemes do not.
The committee also stresses the need for citizens to be properly informed about their accrued pension entitlements, so that they are able to make well-informed decisions as regards future additional pension savings. Member States are urged to ensure strict disclosure rules regarding the operating costs and risk of, and the return on, investments of pension funds operating within their jurisdiction.
Pensions of mobile workers: noting the lack of mobility between the Member States with only 3 % of working-age EU citizens live in another Member State, Members call for the establishment of efficient tracking services , possibly web-based, that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make timely and well-informed decisions on additional, individual (third-pillar) pension savings. They welcome the Commission’s pilot project, which should be complemented by an impact assessment of the benefits of providing EU citizens with consolidated pension information in an accessible way. Pension tracking services should ideally cover not only occupational pensions, but also third-pillar schemes and individualised information on first-pillar entitlements.
Review of the IORP Directive : the aim of the review of the Directive 2003/41/EC (the IORP Directive) should be to providing enhanced protection to current and future pensioners. Members make a series of observations on the Commission’s proposals regarding precautionary measures which must apply the principle of ‘same risk, same rules’ within each national system and respective pillar.
Protection of workers’ occupational pensions in the event of insolvency : Members stress that entitlements under Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC , which requires Member States to ensure that the pension rights of employees are protected in the event of the employer’s insolvency, should be consistently safeguarded. They want the Commission to carry out a comprehensive overview of national guarantee schemes.
Complementary third-pillar pension savings: the committee calls on the Commission to assess and optimise incentives for private pension savings , in particular for individuals who otherwise would not build up an adequate pension. It also recommends:
the legal cost limits at national level for contract conclusion and management, change of provider or change of contract type be investigated and that proposals be made in this regard; EU-level voluntary codes of conduct – and possibly also product certification schemes – with regard to quality, information provision to consumers and consumer protection in the third pillar.
Removing tax and contract related cross-border obstacles to pension investments : the Commission and the Member States concerned are asked to reach agreement in the field of cross-border pensions, especially as regards how to avoid double taxation and double non-taxation.
Gender: Members recall the gender challenge regarding pensions, noting that around 22% of women over the age of 75 fall below the EU’s poverty threshold. In this respect, first-pillar, public pension schemes should guarantee at least a decent standard of living for all. Members also stress that gender equality in the labour market is crucial to ensure the sustainability of pension systems , and that the equalisation of the pension age for men and women must be accompanied by effective policies to ensure equal pay for equal work, reconciliation of work and care for dependents.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of a White Paper on an agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions.
CONTEXT: pensions – mostly from public schemes – are the main source of income of older Europeans, who are a significant and growing part of the EU population (120 million or 24%). An ageing population presents a major challenge to pension systems in all Member States. Unless women and men stay longer in employment and save more for their retirement, the adequacy of pensions cannot be guaranteed as the required increase in expenditure would be unsustainable. By 2060, the life expectancy at birth for males is projected to increase by 7.9 years and by 6.5 years for females, when compared to 2010. The number of people of prime working age (20-59) will fall every year over the coming decades. Together, longevity growth and the transition into retirement of baby-boomers will have far-reaching economic and budgetary consequences in the EU, reducing the economic growth potential and exercising pressure on public finances.
Pensions represent a very large and rising share of public expenditure: more than 10% of GDP on average today, possibly rising to 12.5 % in 2060 in the EU as a whole. But with spending on public pensions ranging from 6% of GDP in Ireland to 15% in Italy today, countries are in rather different situations although they face similar demographic challenges.
These prospects are further aggravated by the current financial and economic crisis. Sluggish economic growth, budget deficits and debt burdens, financial instability and low employment have made it harder for all pension systems to deliver on pension promises. Pay-as-you-go pension schemes are affected by falling employment, and hence lower pension contributions. Funded schemes are affected by falling asset values and reduced returns.
In this context, the Commission considers that it is a matter of urgency to draw up and implement strategies adapting pension systems to economic and demographic changes.
CONTENT: the White Paper reflects the common concerns about problems in pension systems outlined above and sets out an agenda for making pensions adequate and sustainable in the long term, by creating the conditions for a high level of labour force participation of women and men throughout their lives and enhancing the opportunities to build up safe complementary retirement savings.
It suggests forward policy orientations and initiatives at the European level through whereby the EU can support national policy makers in their efforts to address reform needs, notably those highlighted in the Annual Growth Surveys 2011 and 2012 which highlighted key orientations for pension reforms which contribute to growth-friendly fiscal consolidation and specified in the 2011 Country-Specific Recommendations .
The EU can harness a range of policy instruments to promote adequate, safe and sustainable pensions, even though the main responsibility for achieving these goals clearly remains with Member States.
The White Paper also reflects the results of the wide-ranging consultation launched by the Green Paper on adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems.
The main points of the agenda, set out in the White Paper, are as follows:
1) Balancing time spent in work and retirement : to reach this objective, it will be necessary to adapt pension systems, raise the pension age and strengthen the incentives to extend active life.
During the European Year 2012 on Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, the Commission will raise awareness of the benefits and possibilities of working longer and stimulate the dissemination of good practices of age management in work places and labour markets. In the framework of Europe 2020, the Commission will step up its support for policy coordination and joint work on enabling and encouraging older workers, women in particular, to stay longer on the labour market .
The Commission will:
encourage reforms linking retirement ages to increases in life expectancy, restricting access to early retirement and closing the pension gap between men and women. call on the social partners to develop ways of adapting work place and labour market practices, including career management notably regarding strenuous jobs, so as to facilitate longer working lives for women and men. building on its proposal for the European Social Fund in the 2014-2020 programming period, encourage Member States to make use of the ESF for supporting active and healthy ageing, including reconciliation of work and family life, and closely monitor whether ESF programmes effectively support the reform needs identified in this area in the Country Specific Recommendations. ask the relevant committees (e.g. the Social Protection Committee, Advisory Committee on equal opportunities between women and men) to identify and recommend best practice in reducing the gender gap in pensions (e.g. promotion of equal pay, minimum pension entitlements, care credits, pension rights splitting at divorce).
2) Developing complementary private retirement savings : there would be added value in stepping up European support for better coverage of women and men and the proliferation of good practices including in the optimal targeting of tax incentives for prefunded pension schemes. These can be promoted by governments (via the optimisation of tax or other incentives) or by encouraging the social partners to develop such schemes. In addition, it needs to be borne in mind that opportunities for complementary retirement savings through occupational and third pillar arrangements are underdeveloped and lacking in cost-effectiveness and safety in many Member States. The Commission will:
as from 2012, cooperate with Member States following a best practices approach t o assess and optimise the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of tax and other incentives for private pension saving, including better targeting of incentives on individuals who would otherwise not build up adequate pensions; in 2012, present a legislative proposal to review the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP) Directive, the aim of the review being to maintain a level playing field with Solvency II and promote more cross-border activity in this field and to help improve overall pension provision in the EU; take initiatives to ensure a more effective protection of workers’ occupational pension rights in the event of insolvency of their employer on the basis of Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC; resume work on a pension portability Directive setting minimum standards for the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights; by 2013, present an initiative aimed at raising the quality of third-pillar retirement products for women and men and improving consumer information and protection standards via voluntary codes and possibly an EU certification scheme for such products, building, where appropriate, on measures to improve information for consumers planned for 2012 on 'packaged retail investment products' (PRIPs); promote the development of pension tracking services.
3) Enhancing the EU’s monitoring tools on pensions and strengthening synergies across policy areas: the Commission will release the 2012 Ageing Report , assessing the economic and budgetary impact of ageing, which will form the basis for a thorough assessment of the sustainability of public finances envisaged for release in the Commission's 2012 Sustainability Report.
In cooperation with the Social Protection Committee it will also prepare in 2012 a Pension Adequacy Report which can help Member States, in the context of the Platform against Poverty, to assess the adequacy of their pensions systems for women and men.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of a White Paper on an agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions.
CONTEXT: pensions – mostly from public schemes – are the main source of income of older Europeans, who are a significant and growing part of the EU population (120 million or 24%). An ageing population presents a major challenge to pension systems in all Member States. Unless women and men stay longer in employment and save more for their retirement, the adequacy of pensions cannot be guaranteed as the required increase in expenditure would be unsustainable. By 2060, the life expectancy at birth for males is projected to increase by 7.9 years and by 6.5 years for females, when compared to 2010. The number of people of prime working age (20-59) will fall every year over the coming decades. Together, longevity growth and the transition into retirement of baby-boomers will have far-reaching economic and budgetary consequences in the EU, reducing the economic growth potential and exercising pressure on public finances.
Pensions represent a very large and rising share of public expenditure: more than 10% of GDP on average today, possibly rising to 12.5 % in 2060 in the EU as a whole. But with spending on public pensions ranging from 6% of GDP in Ireland to 15% in Italy today, countries are in rather different situations although they face similar demographic challenges.
These prospects are further aggravated by the current financial and economic crisis. Sluggish economic growth, budget deficits and debt burdens, financial instability and low employment have made it harder for all pension systems to deliver on pension promises. Pay-as-you-go pension schemes are affected by falling employment, and hence lower pension contributions. Funded schemes are affected by falling asset values and reduced returns.
In this context, the Commission considers that it is a matter of urgency to draw up and implement strategies adapting pension systems to economic and demographic changes.
CONTENT: the White Paper reflects the common concerns about problems in pension systems outlined above and sets out an agenda for making pensions adequate and sustainable in the long term, by creating the conditions for a high level of labour force participation of women and men throughout their lives and enhancing the opportunities to build up safe complementary retirement savings.
It suggests forward policy orientations and initiatives at the European level through whereby the EU can support national policy makers in their efforts to address reform needs, notably those highlighted in the Annual Growth Surveys 2011 and 2012 which highlighted key orientations for pension reforms which contribute to growth-friendly fiscal consolidation and specified in the 2011 Country-Specific Recommendations .
The EU can harness a range of policy instruments to promote adequate, safe and sustainable pensions, even though the main responsibility for achieving these goals clearly remains with Member States.
The White Paper also reflects the results of the wide-ranging consultation launched by the Green Paper on adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems.
The main points of the agenda, set out in the White Paper, are as follows:
1) Balancing time spent in work and retirement : to reach this objective, it will be necessary to adapt pension systems, raise the pension age and strengthen the incentives to extend active life.
During the European Year 2012 on Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, the Commission will raise awareness of the benefits and possibilities of working longer and stimulate the dissemination of good practices of age management in work places and labour markets. In the framework of Europe 2020, the Commission will step up its support for policy coordination and joint work on enabling and encouraging older workers, women in particular, to stay longer on the labour market .
The Commission will:
encourage reforms linking retirement ages to increases in life expectancy, restricting access to early retirement and closing the pension gap between men and women. call on the social partners to develop ways of adapting work place and labour market practices, including career management notably regarding strenuous jobs, so as to facilitate longer working lives for women and men. building on its proposal for the European Social Fund in the 2014-2020 programming period, encourage Member States to make use of the ESF for supporting active and healthy ageing, including reconciliation of work and family life, and closely monitor whether ESF programmes effectively support the reform needs identified in this area in the Country Specific Recommendations. ask the relevant committees (e.g. the Social Protection Committee, Advisory Committee on equal opportunities between women and men) to identify and recommend best practice in reducing the gender gap in pensions (e.g. promotion of equal pay, minimum pension entitlements, care credits, pension rights splitting at divorce).
2) Developing complementary private retirement savings : there would be added value in stepping up European support for better coverage of women and men and the proliferation of good practices including in the optimal targeting of tax incentives for prefunded pension schemes. These can be promoted by governments (via the optimisation of tax or other incentives) or by encouraging the social partners to develop such schemes. In addition, it needs to be borne in mind that opportunities for complementary retirement savings through occupational and third pillar arrangements are underdeveloped and lacking in cost-effectiveness and safety in many Member States. The Commission will:
as from 2012, cooperate with Member States following a best practices approach t o assess and optimise the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of tax and other incentives for private pension saving, including better targeting of incentives on individuals who would otherwise not build up adequate pensions; in 2012, present a legislative proposal to review the Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (IORP) Directive, the aim of the review being to maintain a level playing field with Solvency II and promote more cross-border activity in this field and to help improve overall pension provision in the EU; take initiatives to ensure a more effective protection of workers’ occupational pension rights in the event of insolvency of their employer on the basis of Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC; resume work on a pension portability Directive setting minimum standards for the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights; by 2013, present an initiative aimed at raising the quality of third-pillar retirement products for women and men and improving consumer information and protection standards via voluntary codes and possibly an EU certification scheme for such products, building, where appropriate, on measures to improve information for consumers planned for 2012 on 'packaged retail investment products' (PRIPs); promote the development of pension tracking services.
3) Enhancing the EU’s monitoring tools on pensions and strengthening synergies across policy areas: the Commission will release the 2012 Ageing Report , assessing the economic and budgetary impact of ageing, which will form the basis for a thorough assessment of the sustainability of public finances envisaged for release in the Commission's 2012 Sustainability Report.
In cooperation with the Social Protection Committee it will also prepare in 2012 a Pension Adequacy Report which can help Member States, in the context of the Platform against Poverty, to assess the adequacy of their pensions systems for women and men.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)519
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0204/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0137/2013
- Committee opinion: PE500.553
- Committee opinion: PE502.102
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.214
- Committee draft report: PE500.477
- Committee opinion: PE488.033
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0055
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2012)0055
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2012)0055 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE488.033
- Committee draft report: PE500.477
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE502.214
- Committee opinion: PE502.102
- Committee opinion: PE500.553
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2013)519
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
- Contribution: COM(2012)0055
Activities
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Iosif MATULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Henryk MIGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios PAPANIKOLAOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joanna Katarzyna SKRZYDLEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudiu Ciprian TĂNĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Isabelle THOMAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - Am 1 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 3/2 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 5/3 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 5/4 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/1 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/2 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/3 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/4 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/5 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/6 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 6/7 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 10 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 12/2 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 20/1 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 20/2 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 21 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 22 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 28/1 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - § 28/2 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - Am 33 #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - Considérant S #
A7-0137/2013 - Ria Oomen-Ruijten - Résolution commission EMPL #
Amendments | Dossier |
513 |
2012/2234(INI)
2012/12/18
ECON
135 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission's call in the 2013 Annual Growth Survey to step up pension system reforms in the Member States through better aligning retirement age with life expectancy and enable longer working lives;
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes discussion of the establishment of cross-border pension tracking services for the 2nd pillar to make it easier for workers to move between member states without losing track of their pension rights;
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes the discussion of – and the Commission's intention of starting a pilot project on – the establishment of cross- border pension tracking services for the 2nd pillar;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 21. Notes that, according to the OECD, there
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 21. Notes that, according to the OECD, there is a lack of mobility between the Member States and that only 3% of working-age EU citizens live in another Member State;
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that cross-border mobility is not only a fundamental right of EU citizens, but also a crucial factor in making the internal market and the European economy work as efficiently as possible; stresses that a key aim of EU activities in the field of pensions should be to remove the remaining obstacles to such mobility;
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Emphasises the need to broaden the base by opening schemes to non-standard workers and self-employed, reducing barriers to access such as long vesting periods and age restrictions; stresses the need to remove discriminatory elements from the existing occupational pension schemes points to the fact that some Member States have increased barriers to social security including pensions during the crisis;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Stresses therefore that the development of cross-border pension tracking services
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Stresses therefore that cross-border pension tracking services are
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recognising pension funds are a major investor in the EU economy, and are therefore a key element to achieving growth;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Stresses therefore that cross-border pension tracking services
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that maintaining appropriate provision in the 1st pillar, with its
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 25 25. Stresses that maintaining appropriate provision in the 1st pillar, with its spirit of solidarity, should be the number one priority in the Member States and that the 3rd pillar can play a supplementary role
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 26 26. Regrets that 3rd pillar systems
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 27 27. Notes that in some Member States, 3rd pillar pensions, 2nd and 3rd pillar pensions are available only to people who are employed by thriving or large undertaking or whose income is sufficient for them to pay contributions; calls therefore for
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 29 29. Recalls, with regard to Initiative 9, the need for
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Considers that in certain cases private pension savings could be necessary to build up an adequate pension; encourages the Commission to cooperate with Member States on the basis of a best practices approach and assess and optimise incentives for private pension savings, in particular for individuals who otherwise would not build up an adequate pension;
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 30 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Considers that the potential for a review of the IORP directive should be examined carefully by differentiating between pension funds and life insurance products in some Member States with regards to the application of Solvency II- type capital requirements;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Emphasizes that the key priority of public policy should not be to subsidise 3rd pillar schemes, but to make certain that everyone is adequately protected within a well-functioning and sustainable 1st pillar;
Amendment 121 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 122 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 31 31.
Amendment 123 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 32 32. Recommends that the legal cost limits
Amendment 124 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 32 a (new) 32a. Considers that codes of conduct with regard to quality, information provision to consumers and consumer protection in the 3rd pillar could increase the attractiveness of 3rd pillar pension plans; encourages the Commission to facilitate the exchange of currently existing best practices in Member States;
Amendment 125 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 33 33.
Amendment 126 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 33 33.
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 33 a (new) 33a. Calls on the Commission to look into ways to make better use of EU financial sector legislation when it comes to ensuring that consumers are given accurate and un-biased financial advice on pension and pensions-related products;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 34 34. Calls on the Commission and the Member States concerned to reach agreement on how to avoid double taxation and double non-taxation in the field of cross-border pensions;
Amendment 129 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 35 35. Regards discriminatory taxes as a major barrier to cross-border mobility and calls for their swift withdrawal;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 130 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 35 35. Regards discriminatory taxes as a major barrier to mobility and calls for their swift withdrawal while noting limited EU competence in the area of member state tax policy;
Amendment 131 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 37 37. Calls on the Commission to involve social partners in
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 38 38. Stresses that unsustainable 1st pillar systems pose a major threat to national budgets; therefore welcomes the greater emphasis being placed on Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 systems;
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Stresses the importance of using a uniform methodology to calculate long term sustainability of public finances and the share therein of pension-related obligations;
Amendment 134 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 38 a (new) 38a. Calls on the Member States, inter alia on the basis of the 2012 Pension Adequacy Report, to intensify their work on preventing old-age poverty; underlines that if bold action is not taken on strengthening pensions systems in this regard, the Europe 2020 goal on poverty and social exclusion will probably not be reached;
Amendment 135 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 38 b (new) 38b. Stresses that a key to building more sustainable and adequate pension systems is to focus on eradicating inequalities between women and men; emphasizes that enhanced measures have to be taken in all Member States in this regard, for example when it comes to promoting equal pay, fighting gender-based discrimination, granting pension credits to caring for children and the elderly, reducing the incidence of involuntary part-time work as well as improving work and pension conditions in precarious jobs;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on th
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on those Member States which are
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the recognition that Pillar 2 and Pillar 3 pension schemes are to be encouraged, given the need for individuals to take responsibility for their own finances and futures;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Observes that more than 17% of people in the European Union are currently aged 65 or older, and that according to Eurostat’s forecasts this figure will rise to 30% by 2060;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the commitments made by Member States to ensure adequate and sustainable retirement systems in the country specific recommendations adopted by Council last year in the framework of the European Semester;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having people work more and longer is not the only feasible way to generate the tax revenues and social and pension premiums needed to consolidate Member State budgets and to fund adequate, safe and sustainable pension schemes; Points out that adjustments to general taxation as well as paying proportionally higher contributions for given benefits are equally valid components of a policy response to the economic and demographic challenges faced;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which, coupled with increasing demographic pressure, inevitably means that a given level of income post retirement will require higher contributions during an employees working life. This will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions in order to provide a poverty- proof retirement income under the first pillar; Underscores that adequate provisioning and solvency requirements are essential to ensure that pricing of second and third pillar pensions and savings properly reflect the increasing risk of overreliance on unsustainable assumptions of economic growth rather than adequate contributions;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to clarify the legal basis for any proposals relating to Member State pension systems at the earliest possible moment;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the strengthening of the EU's social dimension and stresses the validity of the principle of subsidiarity in the areas affected by Initiative 1; encourages the Commission to take stock of the progress made in the Member States regarding pension reforms in its country specific recommendations that follow from the 2013 Annual Growth Survey;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that a key pensions-related issue within the Europe 2020 strategy should be to make it feasible for many more employees, in particular in the most strenuous occupations, to work until the standard retirement age by strengthening public policy in the fields of occupational health, workplace environment and vocational retraining;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers that the Commission and Member States should pursue a different strategy with regard to retirement age, which should initially lead to a general rise in employment rates, broaden the financial basis of pension systems and above all bring about greater participation of higher incomes in pay-as-you-go and tax-financed systems in the 1st pillar and gear adjustments in pensions to the development of productivity;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the support; underlines in particular that the planned support could facilitate the exchange of best practices between Member States, for instance to increase labour market participation rates, most notably in the over 55-age group which varies widely between Member States;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the exchange of experiences
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that, when systems for pension statements are fully developed, people should ideally have access to full information about all individual entitlements within all three pillars in one place, such as a coordinated web portal;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that public pension systems are the only ones that rely on inter and intra-generational solidarity;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Considers it to be a fundamental principle that first pillar pensions must be poverty-proof, available to all, whether they have been active or not in the labour market, adopting a lifecycle approach which takes into account the whole career along a life-course, including career interruptions and changes, so as not to punish people with "non-standard" working lives and to recognise the contribution, which is both socially and economically beneficial, of voluntary work and other unpaid care work;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Believes that public pension systems are the ones most capable to ensure the income of pensioners;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Deeply regrets that the White Paper does not address the fundamental concern of strengthening the public pensions systems;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Welcomes the recommendation of the EESC to develop standards on minimum pensions or pension income protection mechanisms in the future legislation in order to provide income above the poverty threshold;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 e (new) 6e. Is of the opinion that the financial transactions tax can represent an innovative answer for funding pensions in the long term;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Underlines that second-pillar pension funds are important long term investors in the real economy; invites the Commission to take stock of the cumulative effects of financial market legislation (e.g. EMIR, MiFID, CRDIV) on second-pillar pension funds and their ability to invest in the real economy and report on this in its forthcoming Green Paper on Long Term Investments;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that 2nd pillar systems must be secure,
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that 2nd pillar systems must be secure and transparent as regards costs and risks to society as a whole and to the individual, for the sake of employees;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that 2nd pillar systems must be secure, for the sake of employees; notes in some Member States, employers' already support their pension schemes through protection schemes, segregation of assets, independent governance of schemes and priority creditor status of pension schemes ahead of shareholders in case of company insolvency; argues that these provisions offer the security that employees need without the costs associated with quantitative capital requirements;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Considers that ensuring that European 2nd pillar systems obey to robust prudential regulation is key to achieve a high level of protection for the members and beneficiaries and to respect the G20 mandate according to which all financial institutions shall be subject to proper regulation and adequate supervision;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that there are considerable differences between the Member States in terms of the composition of the 2nd pillar, making clear that harmonisation should only be explored where there are possible benefits in terms of encouraging free movement of workers.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that there are considerable differences between the Member States in terms of the composition of the 2nd pillar, and notes that in some Member States the work related pensions are mainly included in the first pillar.
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that there are considerable differences between the Member States in terms of the composition of the 2nd pillar
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that the aim of the review of the IORP Directive should be to keep occupational pensions across Europe adequate, sustainable and safe by creating an environment that stimulates further national and internal market progress in this field, by providing enhanced protection to current and future pensioners and by adapting in a flexible way to the considerable cross-border and cross-sector diversity of existing schemes;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Demands that EU legislative initiatives should respect the choices made by Member States with regard to the providers of second pillar pensions;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Rejects regulatory harmonisation of quantitative or qualitative precautionary measures at EU level on the basis that pension systems are deeply embedded in the cultural, social, political and economic circumstances of each Member State;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income is the sole responsibility of the Member States in question and that the Commission should, where appropriate, encourage the Member States to
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that all 2nd pillar pensions providers, whatever their legal form, should be under proportionate and robust regulation that takes into account the characteristics of their business, particularly long term focused;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Insists that 2nd pillar pensions, regardless of their providers, should not be jeopardized by EU regulation that does not take into account their long-term horizon;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that a Commission
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that Commission proposals regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that Commission proposals regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that Commission proposals regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that Commission proposals regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Considers that Commission proposals regarding quantitative and qualitative precautionary measures
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers with regard to qualitative precautionary measures that
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that the provision and regulation of
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers with regard to qualitative precautionary measures that proposals concerning strengthened corporate governance and risk management and those regarding enhanced transparency and information disclosure obligations are useful and should be put forward in the framework of the IORP review;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Considers with regard to qualitative precautionary measures that proposals concerning corporate governance and risk management and those regarding transparency and information disclosure obligations are useful, including disclosure of costs and transparency of investment strategies; notes that, given the considerable differences between Member States, convergence of qualitative precautionary measures at EU level is at this stage more feasible than regulatory harmonisation;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Is
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Is
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Is strongly opposed to Europe-wide harmonised requirements concerning own capital or evaluation; rejects any review of the Pension Funds Directive (the IORP Directive) which aims to achieve this; notes that in order to meet these requirements, employers would have to redirect capital away from other investments such as infrastructure to pension funds, which could have serious implications for EU competitiveness and economic growth;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Is strongly opposed to Europe-wide harmonised requirements concerning own capital or evaluation; therefore fully rejects any review of the Pension Funds Directive (the IORP Directive) which aims to achieve this;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that prior to reviewing the IORP directive with a view of ensuring a high level of protection of employees, it will be important to assess the conclusions of the ongoing Quantitative Impact Study performed by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA);
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Reminds that the Pension Funds Directive applies only to voluntary pension schemes and does not cover any instruments being part of the obligatory public pension scheme.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income is the sole responsibility of the Member States in question and that the Commission should limit its activities to compiling and disseminating information on the pensions situation and the pension reform efforts across the EU and, where appropriate, encourage the Member States to look critically at their systems and engage in exchanges of experience;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the application of the quantitative
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the application of quantitative Solvency II requirements poses a
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the application of quantitative Solvency II requirements poses a great risk to pillar 2 systems, since these may, as a result of increased costs, be forced in future to accept lower company pensions or to stop them altogether; emphasises that this is n
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that the application of quantitative Solvency II requirements poses a great risk to pillar 2 systems, since these may, as a result of increased costs, be forced in future to accept lower company pensions or to stop them altogether; emphasises that this is not in the interests of employees; therefore concludes that there must be no provisions at EU level aiming to apply Solvency II
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses that social partners (i.e. employers and employees) have a shared responsibility for the content of occupational pension arrangements; underlines that contractual agreements between social partners need to be recognized at all times, in particular with regard to the balance between risks and rewards that an occupational pension scheme aims to achieve;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers proposals for the further development of variations to Solvency II, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet Model (HBS), to be useful
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers the further development of variations to Solvency II, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet Model (HBS),
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income is the sole responsibility of the Member States in question and that the Commission should, where appropriate, encourage the Member States to look critically at their systems and engage in exchanges of experience; stresses that the EU should enhance the comparability of pension schemes and promote exchange of good practices, like increasing the accrual rate in the years immediately before the official retirement age or taking into account the life- expectancy coefficient;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers the further development
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers the further development of variations to Solvency II, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet Model (HBS), to be useful only if specific national requirements are complied with and if they are presented as recommendations;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 15. Considers the further development of variations to Solvency II, such as the Holistic Balance Sheet Model (HBS), to be useful only if specific national requirements are complied with and if they are presented as recommendations; cautions against the HBS being used as a means of introducing Solvency 2 style provisions; categorically rejects these as components of EU-level regulations on the basis of the principle of subsidiarity;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Notes a large variety in the design of pension plans, varying from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) or mixed schemes; also notes a shift from DB schemes to DC schemes or the establishment of mandatory funded pillars in some Member States; stresses that this increases the need for more transparency and better information provision to citizens regarding the promised benefits, cost levels and investment strategies;
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Re
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Re
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Rejects the establishment of equal competition between life insurance and 2nd pillar systems,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers that regulation of adequate, sustainable retirement income is the sole responsibility of the Member States in question and that the Commission should, where appropriate, encourage the Member States to look critically at their systems and engage in exchanges of experience and best practice;
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 16. Rejects the establishment of equal competition between life insurance and 2nd pillar systems, as the latter are not financial service providers, have a fundamentally different risk profile, do not seek to make a profit and can therefore not be compared with life insurance providers;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Believes that, in the event of insolvency, entitlements under Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC must be
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Believes it would make sense for the Commission to have an overview of national guarantee schemes and measures
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Underlines that issues regarding pension protection in case of insolvency are closely related to key aspects of the IORP review; stresses that the Commission, in developing these two directives, should ensure that they are made congruent and fully compatible;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the development of a
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Emphasizes that the gender aspect also needs to be specifically addressed in this context, given the problematic fact that women presently have more limited opportunities than men to accumulate adequate occupational retirement savings;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Welcomes the Commission's intention to promote the development of pension tracking services in all Member States; underlines – given the current trend of employees changing jobs more frequently than in the past – that such services will become more and more important for people to get a proper overview of total entitlements and to make rational decisions on pensions-related matters;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 c (new) 19c. Notes that, when fully developed, pension tracking services should ideally cover not only occupational pensions, but also 3rd pillar schemes and individualised information on 1st pillar entitlements;
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes discussion of the establishment of pension tracking services for the 1st and 2nd pillar in Member States, as well as cross-border pension tracking services for the 2nd pillar; encourages the Commission to facilitate the exchange of currently existing best practices in Member States and to promote the development of cross-border pension tracking services
source: PE-502.082
2013/01/21
EMPL
303 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality: ‘Towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems’ (A7- 0025/2011),
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 5 – the importance of avoiding gender inequalities in pensions, resulting in particular from imbalances in the way men and women participate in the reconciliation of work and care;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that public pension schemes are the only ones that rely on the principle of inter- and intra-generational solidarity; therefore takes the view that it is public pension schemes that are best placed to maintain the standard of living of pensioners and prevent poverty among older people, and that while they may be supplemented by other schemes they may on no account be replaced by them; calls on the Member States to ensure first- pillar pensions in order to provide an adequate income for a decent standard of living;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Regrets that the Commission’s White Paper does not address the fundamental need to strengthen public pension schemes and diversify their funding sources, e.g. by means of a general social contribution which would ensure that capital income formed part of their funding;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Recalls that incentives to promote individual pension schemes, such as tax reductions, have a negative impact on public finances and social security systems; calls for greater cost reductions, greater transparency, and better supervision and consumer protection than in private savings schemes;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the crisis has revealed the vulnerability of both funded and pay-as- you-go pension schemes;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the crisis has revealed in some Member States the vulnerability of both funded and pay-as-
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the financial and economic crisis has revealed the vulnerability of
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the crisis
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the crisis has revealed the vulnerability of both funded and pay-as- you-go pension schemes; recommends that Member States consider, where appropriate, introducing or maintaining multi-pillar pension systems, consisting of
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the banking and financial crisis has revealed the vulnerability of
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Observes that the crisis has revealed the
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Α – indent 5 the importance of avoiding gender inequalities in pensions, resulting from imbalances in the way men and women participate in the reconciliation of work and care, by making greater use of ECB funding, firstly for structures to achieve work-life balance and secondly for the launching of vocational training initiatives specifically designed for mothers, thereby improving their position on the employment market and their access to it;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i i. a
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i i. a public, first-pillar
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i i. a public, first
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i i.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point i i. a public
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 6 Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii.
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related,
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a universal funded, employment-related,
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related,
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related,
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related, mandatory collective second-pillar pension, preferably
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related, mandatory collective second-pillar pension,
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point ii ii. a funded, employment-related, mandatory collective second-pillar pension, preferably governed by (sectoral) social partners and with compulsory participation of employers and workers concerned;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 6 - the need to
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii iii.
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii iii. a
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – point iii iii. an
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 calls on the Member States to consider introducing such or comparable schemes where they do not yet exist; calls on the Commission to ensure any existing or future regulation in the field of pensions to be conducive to
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 6 - the need to
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 calls on the Member States to consider introducing such or comparable schemes where they do not yet exist; calls on the Commission to ensure any existing or future regulation in the field of pensions to be conducive to
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 calls on the Member States to consider introducing such or comparable schemes where they do not yet exist and safeguard that pension savings are well-protected and preserved for future use and do not fall prey to the short-term interests of governments having financial difficulties; calls on the Commission to ensure any existing or future regulation in the field of pensions to be conducive to multi-pillar pension schemes both financially and socially sustainable;
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 notes, however, that the first pillar should be the most important and that proportionally greater attention should therefore be devoted to it; calls on the Member States to consider introducing such or comparable schemes where they do not yet exist; calls on the Commission to ensure any existing or future regulation in the field of pensions to be conducive to multi-pillar pension schemes;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new) Calls on the Member States to proceed with the necessary reforms to guarantee the financial sustainability of pension schemes and hence ensure the payment of adequate pensions in accordance with the basic principles of such schemes, which include enabling the elderly to enjoy a dignified and financially independent existence;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the recommendation of the European Economic and Social Committee that minimum pension levels should rise with a view to providing pension incomes above the poverty threshold;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of all pension
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the importance of
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 6 - the need to consider linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy while at the same time enabling workers to lead longer, healthier working lives with a view to extending working careers until the
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Recognises the potential importance of pension
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on Commission, Member States and social partners to ensure that young people are duly represented in the management of pension funds, and to ensure that any regulation of pension funds pays particular attention to the aim of providing adequate pensions to future generations resilient to financial market fluctuations/developments/shocks and demographic change;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Recalls the Lisbon Strategy 2000- 2010, in the context of which the Commission and the Member States, during a decade, exhaustively discussed structural reforms with regard to macro- economic, micro-economic and employment policy, resulting in Treaty based country specific recommendations to Member States, many of which directly or indirectly related to safeguarding adequate and sustainable pensions; deplores the lack of implementation of these recommendations which could, to an important extent, have alleviated the impact of the crisis;
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Welcomes the comprehensive and high-quality publications 2012 Ageing Report and 2012 Adequacy Report that explore the long-term adequacy and sustainability of pension systems in all Member States; deplores the fact that the adequacy and sustainability dimensions of pensions are covered in separate reports of a highly technical nature; urgently requests the Commission and the Council to publish an integrated, concise, non- technical citizen's summary, which allows EU citizens to assess the challenges facing their national pension system in a EU comparison;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge,
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge,
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge, taking into account the need to
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge, taking into account the need to continue to work for longer while at the same time preserving one's health, to adapt working conditions and lifelong learning so as to enable people to work
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 6 - the need in some Member States to consider linking the statutory retirement age to life expectancy while at the same time enabling workers to lead longer, healthier working lives with a view to extending working careers until the statutory retirement age;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that to arrive at a comprehensive solution to the pension challenge, taking into account the need to work longer, to adapt working conditions and promote lifelong learning so as to enable people to work longer, consensus between governments and social partners is paramount;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Is of the opinion that urgent action is needed in most Member States to make their pension systems more inclusive and to include into their schemes persons not in work, thereby broadening the base of both contributors and beneficiaries, including especially self-employed, persons living on non-work income and migrants; stresses the high risk of old age poverty for migrants from third countries and calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve portability provisions for migrants from third countries;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Commission to promote a European framework directive on minimum pensions which could define that every person from a certain age on, independent of the years he or she has worked is entitled to a minimum pension;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the main consequence of raising the statutory retirement age will be that the expenditure formerly insured by pension schemes is shifted to other expenditure items in the social protection system, such as unemployment benefits and healthcare;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: balancing time spent in work and retirement
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: ensuring financial sustainability of pension systems in order to deliver adequate retirement incomes and to allow older people's decent living standards and economic independence; balancing time spent in work and retirement; developing complementary occupational and private pension savings, and enhancing
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 8 Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: balancing time spent in work and retirement; developing complementary occupational and private pension savings, and enhancing the EU's pension monitoring tools; stresses that such measures should always be in compliance with the principle of subsidiary to accommodate the characteristics of occupational pension systems.
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the main thrust of the White Paper that suggests focusing on: balancing
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recommends that the Commission make arrangements for intergenerational participation and codetermination by means of the additional, binding involvement of representatives of the generations without party affiliations at the level of the social partners, or more precisely a European Youth Council and European Council of Older Persons, each comprising representatives of the interests of the young and the old at European level (in the same way as they used to be represented, for example, by the European Youth Forum and the AGE Platform Europe), which should be consulted on all decisions affecting these generations;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Is concerned on the use, in some of the Member States most stricken by the debt crisis, of public Pension Reserve Funds to buy almost exclusively national debt; this practice raises risks for the eventual full disbursement of these funds and distorts debt markets delaying necessary reforms; (For example in Spain, the Pension Reserve Fund with 55 Billion euros was initially built on a balanced approach buying only triple AAA assets. In the last years this practice has been abandoned and now 90% of assets are Spanish public debt.)
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 (new) Considers it important to extend working life in order to ensure adequate pension provision and to fund pensions, but believes that it would be mistaken to regard extending working life purely as a retirement age issue;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 9 - the need to grant all workers equal access to collective pension schemes operating in their firm or sector, and the need for citizens to be better informed about acquired pension entitlements, for example by means of a continually updated pension account combined with a pension tracking system;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having more people
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having people work more and longer is the only feasible way to generate the tax revenues and social and pension premiums needed to consolidate Member State budgets and to fund adequate, safe and sustainable pension schemes; points to the risk of part-time work leading to only partial pension entitlements; calls on the Member States to
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having people work more and longer is the only feasible way to generate the tax revenues and social and pension premiums needed to consolidate Member State budgets and to fund adequate, safe and sustainable pension schemes; points to the
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that implementing structural reforms aimed at having people work more and longer is the only feasible way to generate the tax revenues and social and pension premiums needed to consolidate Member State budgets and to fund adequate, safe and sustainable pension schemes; stresses the central role of equitable treatment of different generations here; points to the risk of part- time work leading to only partial pension entitlements; calls on the Member States to put funds aside to combat the rising public costs of the retiring population;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the Commission's last mention in the 2013 Annual Growth Survey of the need to reform pension systems; observes, however, that in many Member States priority should be assigned to aligning the actual retirement age with the statutory retirement age;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that the EU 2020 has set out to achieve 75% employment rate of persons aged 20-64; calls on the Member States to raise employment levels and increase in particular employment of older women and men; calls on the Member States to offer comprehensive advice and support for jobseekers and rehabilitation measures for long-term reintegration into the labour market;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that a rise in employment rates under the Europe 2020 Strategy can help to safeguard the funding of State pension systems, especially by enabling particularly vulnerable groups to find work and by means of active labour market policies which promote high- quality full employment;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 10 - the importance for Member States to take concrete steps to i
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that it is not the age structure of a society (demographic dependency ratio) that is decisive for the sustainability of pension systems but the ratio of unemployed people and pensioners to the employed (economic dependency ratio - as defined in the White Paper); observes that, despite the accelerated ageing of the population in the decades ahead, the economic dependency ratio can be greatly limited if the currently very small proportion of people of working age who have high-quality employment is improved; stresses that linkage of retirement age to life expectancy fails to take account of the importance of labour market trends and is therefore not an appropriate instrument by means of which to tackle the challenge of ageing; calls on Member States to adopt comprehensive active labour-market policy measures;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Points out that labour market reforms adopted with the aim of reducing unemployment must, on the one hand, ensure the necessary job security and, on the other, take account of the consequences in terms of labour productivity and insurance fund revenues;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Member States to draw up realistic and effective action plans to combat undeclared work and contribution evasion, which are the key factors behind diminishing insurance fund revenues, for example by shifting the tax burden from earned income, stepping up inspections, mobilising available European Structural Fund resources, intensifying exchanges of best practices between Member States and introducing harsher penalties;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Emphasises the acceleration of the pressure posed by demographic developments on national budgets and pension systems in some Member States now that the first cohorts of the ‘baby boom generation’ retire; notes the uneven progress and levels of ambition across Member States in formulating and implementing structural reforms aimed at raising employment
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Emphasises the acceleration of the pressure posed by demographic developments on national budgets and pension systems now that the first cohorts of the ‘baby boom generation’ retire; notes the uneven progress and levels of ambition across Member States in formulating and implementing structural reforms aimed at raising employment
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Emphasises the acceleration of the pressure posed by demographic developments on national budgets and pension systems now that the first cohorts of the
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Emphasises the acceleration of the pressure posed by demographic developments on national budgets and pension systems now that the first cohorts of the ‘baby boom generation’ retire; notes the uneven progress and levels of ambition across Member States in formulating and implementing structural reforms aimed at raising employment, phasing out early retirement schemes and putting both the statutory and effective retirement age on a sustainable footing with increases in life expectancy; welcomes the Commission’s recommendation that the retirement age for women be brought into line with that for men; stresses that Member States that fail to implement gradual reforms now may at a later stage find themselves in a scenario where they have to implement reforms shock-wise and with significant social consequences;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Recommends that, if Member States link the statutory retirement age to rising life expectancy, they have it constantly adjusted by an institutionalised forum of experts comprising demographers, actuaries, etc., and the representatives of the generations; recommends that, for this purpose, very precise definitions be adopted, inter alia, of assessment criteria which are relevant scientifically and from the point of view of social policy (e.g. life expectancy, birth rate, labour market, immigration, health, economic dependency ratio, etc.);
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 9 October 2008 on promoting social inclusion and combating poverty, including child poverty, in the EU1, __________________ 1 OJ C 9E, 15.1.2010, p. 11.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Emphasizes that a general rise in the statutory retirement age and an extension of obligatory contribution periods are not necessary at all; considers that - while maintaining the current overall level of employers’ contributions - a return to parity financing of statutory pension schemes (at least 50 % of contributions to be paid by the employer) would allow most Member States to maintain or return to a statutory retirement age of 60;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Notes that the effective enforcement and implementation of legislation on health and safety at work could also prove beneficial in terms of greater productivity and the sustainability of social security systems. It is of paramount importance to rationalise health services with a view to achieving an optimum ratio between health care costs and quality;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on Member States with first- pillar pay-as-you-go systems to base their statutory pension systems more on solidarity and redistribution by extending the contributory base to the self-employed, civil servants, etc. and at the same time abolishing the ceilings on contributions which exist in some Member States; considers that the contributory base of statutory pension systems could be further broadened by making obligatory contributions from all types of revenue – including, for example, rents and interest payments;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Member States, in cooperation with the social partners, to formulate measures to improve the employment situation for older workers who appear to be at greater risk of long- term unemployment as a means of improving the sustainability of insurance systems and combating poverty and social exclusion, in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy.
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates the call for closely linking pension benefits to years worked and premiums paid (
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates th
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates the call for
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates the call for closely linking pension benefits to years worked and premiums paid (‘actuarial fairness’), to ensure that working more and longer pays off for workers by having a better pension; recommends that the Member States, in consultation with social partners,
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Reiterates the call for closely linking
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on Member States to ensure adequate contributions to the pension system and to prevent and punish contribution evasion, which threatens to undermine the adequacy and sustainability of pension systems and creates discrimination between workers and between undertakings, while exacerbating unfair competition;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Considers that the statutory pension age must take account of the particular circumstances of people who have carried out arduous work or who entered the labour market at a very early age;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Warns that atypical employment and the gaps in social security contributions that come along with it can have a significant negative impact on a person's pension entitlements;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses that the assumption behind early retirement schemes, whereby older workers are allowed to retire early so as to make jobs available for the young, has been proven empirically wrong as the Member States displaying the highest youth employment rates, on average, are also the ones displaying the highest employment rates for older workers; stresses that mentoring schemes can be a valuable tool for the purpose of keeping older employees in work for longer and exploiting their experience to help integrate young people into the employment market;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on Member States to propose measures to facilitate longer, healthy and active working lives, for example age- appropriate working conditions, flexible organisation of work, more preventive health measures, stepping-up of lifelong learning, promoting the skills of older workers, cost-effective strategies to ensure the compatibility of work, private life and family life, and the like;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Regrets the fact that young people are entering late into the labour market and that the final contribution for a full pension is affected by this; considers, therefore, that the time spent in internships needs to be integrated in the final pension calculation;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the worst financial and economic crisis in decades has turned into an acute sovereign debt and social crisis that has already severely affected the pension incomes of millions of EU citizens
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work longer
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners (on the employers’ side) to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work longer, including by making adjustments to the hours worked and the type of work performed by employees reaching the end of their careers; stresses that such adjustments can be coupled with an entitlement to income support provided under social security schemes; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life, while acknowledging the strenuous nature of some occupations, in which people should be able to work for fewer years without losing pension entitlements;
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work longer; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life; calls on the Commission and the Member States to embrace a life-course approach to pensions taking the whole span of a person's working life into account, including career interruptions and changes, as it is flexible enough to adapt to individuals and if it is well-managed it can provide for financial sustainability of public pension systems; stresses the need to improve the integration of older workers into the labour market, to adapt workplaces and to remove discrimination at both ends of the age span in the labour market, both for young and old workers;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to come up with programmes to support active and healthy ageing and to ensure that employees can work longer on a voluntary basis; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Calls on the social partners to adopt a life-cycle approach to human resources management and to adapt workplaces; calls on employers to create adequate working conditions and come up with programmes to ensure that employees can work longer; calls on workers to engage actively in available training opportunities and programmes that enable people to keep themselves fit for the labour market at all stages of their working life;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Considers that the Council and the Commission must come forward with a European Youth Employment Guarantee securing the right of every young person in the EU to be offered a suitable well- paid job in line with their qualifications and skills, an apprenticeship, additional training or combined work and training, within three months of becoming unemployed, thus also improving the scope for young people to build up proper pension entitlements;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Member States, in close consultation with the social partners, to promote longer working-lives by strengthening public policy in the fields of occupational health and safety, workplace environment and vocational retraining; stresses that a core policy target in this regard should be to make it possible for employees, in particular in the most strenuous occupations, to work until the statutory retirement age;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12a. Calls on the Member States to implement socially acceptable incentives for later retirement and, where desirable, development of attractive models for a flexible transition from work to retirement;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) 12b. Stresses that gender equality in the labour market is crucial to ensuring the sustainability of pension systems on the basis of higher employment rates, adequate individual contributions and economic growth;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the worst financial and economic crisis in decades has turned into an acute sovereign debt crisis that has severely affected the pension incomes of millions of EU citizens; whereas this crisis has shown that European economies are all interdependent and that it is no longer possible for any country to guarantee on its own the adequacy, safety and sustainability of its social protection systems;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Member States to act vigorously to realise the ambitions formulated in the EU Pact for Gender Equality (2011-2020) that focus on closing gender gaps and combat gender
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13.
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Proposes a generational check, which should objectively assess the impact of future legislative proposals on all generations – particularly younger and older people – in the legislative procedure. This should make it clear what consequences legislation will have for these generations; generational checks would play a particularly important part in legislative proposals that affect the pensions system;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Council to agree on an EU target for minimum wages (statutory or based on national, regional or sectoral agreements on terms of employment), which should ensure that employees are paid at least 60% of the relevant (national, sectoral, etc.) average wage so that more employees can acquire individual pension entitlements which will keep them above the poverty line;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers that the equalisation of the pension age for men and women must be accompanied by effective policies to ensure equal pay for equal work, a good work-life balance and the recognition of care-related work, which is unpaid;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Draws attention to the gender challenge in the pensions field; stresses the need to ensure greater gender equality at all ages and draws attention to the social impact that a shift from pay-as-you- go to funded systems and from defined benefit to defined contribution schemes would have; emphasises the pressing need to guard against the risk of poverty, in particular among women with little or no entitlement to a personal or a widow’s pension, by introducing a non- contributory income safety net to keep people out of poverty;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Proposes that the younger and older generations, which feel the maximum impact of decisions, should be involved as statutory social partners, with equal rights, in order to ensure their active participation and codetermination in all generational issues; believes that this could guarantee the maximum consensus among all social groups and prevent conflicts in decision-making;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on the Council also to agree on a guarantee of a minimum pension (retirement pension, disability pension, etc.) above the Union’s at-risk-of-poverty threshold of 60% of the national equalised median income in order to prevent poverty in old age;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Welcomes the Commission’s objective of bringing the statutory retirement age for women into line with that for men;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Considers that ways much be found of bringing influence to bear so as to take account of the part of life devoted to caring for and looking after children of all ages and older persons who cannot care for themselves;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. Notes that the sustainability of pension policy goes beyond fiscal considerations; private saving ratios, employment rates and projected demographic developments also play a significant role in ensuring sustainability;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective mandatory occupational pension s
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas this crisis has revealed just how interdependent the Member State economies now are and that no Member State alone can guarantee that its social protection system is adequate, safe and sustainable;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective mandatory occupational pension s
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Welcomes the call in the White Paper for developing funded, complementary occupational pensions and private savings; stresses, however, that the Commission should rather recommend collective mandatory occupational pension savings
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need to put in place a common European supervision and regulatory system for financial markets and institutions in view of creating an environment that will enable every Member State to provide adequate protection of supplementary pensions systems and individual savings; stresses the need to develop EU rules for investment practice and prudent management of DC schemes, including life-styling portfolios, minimum return guarantees, protection of pension outcome when pay-out phase falls during economic and financial downturns and equal treatment through gender neutral life annuities;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need to put in place a common European supervision and regulatory system for financial markets and institutions in view of creating an environment that will enable every Member State to provide adequate protection of supplementary pensions systems and individual savings; stresses the need to develop EU rules for investment practice and prudent management of DC schemes, including life-styling portfolios, minimum return guarantees, protection of pension outcome when pay-out phase falls during economic and financial downturns and equal treatment through gender neutral life annuities;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Observes that in countries with a strong second pillar not all categories of workers have access to funded occupational pensions; believes that funded occupational pensions should be also accessible for workers with a precarious or fixed term contract;
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Notes that many Member States have already embarked on major programmes of pension reform which aim for both sustainability and adequacy; stresses the importance of ensuring that any measures proposed at EU level must compliment and not contradict national pension reform programmes;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Recalls that pensions remain a Member State competence and is concerned that any further European legislation in this area may have adverse impacts on some pensioners or place onerous requirements on certain Member States' schemes;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the low operating costs of
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses the low operating costs of (sector wide) collective not-for-profit occupational pension schemes, as compared to individual pension savings schemes; emphasises the importance of low operating costs as even limited cost reductions can yield substantially higher pensions; stresses, however, that – to date – these schemes only exist in a few Member States;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Emphasises that collective occupational pension schemes should be held with low operating costs;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Member States and
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission to go further in assisting Member States and social partners to inform citizens properly about their accrued pension entitlements, and to raise their awareness and educate them so that they are able to make well-informed decisions as regards future additional pension savings; calls on the Commission to complement its EU-wide work on pension tracking services by conducting an EU impact assessment to understand the economic benefits of Member States and pension providers providing consolidated pension information to citizens in one accessible place; calls on the Member States to formulate and enforce strict disclosure rules regarding the operating costs and risk and return on investments of pension funds operating within their jurisdiction;
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Commission to go further in assisting Member States and social partners to inform citizens properly about their accrued pension entitlements, and to raise their awareness and educate them so that they are able to make well-informed decisions as regards future additional pension savings; calls on the Commission to complement its EU-wide work on pension tracking services by instigating an EU impact assessment to understand the economic benefits to Member States and pension providers of providing consolidated pension information to citizens in one accessible place; calls on the Member States to formulate and enforce strict disclosure rules regarding the operating costs and risk and return on investments of pension funds operating within their jurisdiction;
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Urges the Member States and social
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17.
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Regrets the wide dispersion in characteristics and outcomes across Member States' occupational pension schemes as regards access, solidarity, cost- effectiveness, risk and return; welcomes the Commission's intention, in close consultation with the Member States, social partners,
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Regrets the wide dispersion in characteristics and outcomes across Member States' occupational pension schemes as regards access, solidarity, cost- effectiveness, risk and return; welcomes the Commission's intention, in close consultation with the Member States, social partners, the pension industry and other stakeholders, to develop a code of good practice for occupational pension schemes; calls on the Commission and the Member States to reduce barriers to access such as long vesting periods and age restrictions; stresses the need to remove discriminatory elements from the existing occupational pension schemes; points to the fact that some Member States have increased barriers to social security including pensions during the crisis and this runs directly counter a number of EU2020 targets;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Regrets the wide dispersion in characteristics and outcomes across Member States' occupational pension schemes as regards access, solidarity, cost- effectiveness, risk and return; welcomes the Commission's intention, in close consultation with the Member States, social partners, the pension industry and other stakeholders, to initiate discussions on whether it could be feasible to develop a code of good practice for occupational pension schemes; notes that exchange of best practices or developing guidelines would offer the most appropriate approach to this issue;
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Regrets the wide dispersion in characteristics and outcomes across Member States’ occupational pension schemes as regards access, solidarity, cost- effectiveness, risk and return; welcomes the Commission’s intention, in close consultation with the Member States, social partners, the pension industry, generational representatives of young people and older people, and other stakeholders, to develop a code of good practice for occupational pension schemes;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Welcomes the call made in the White Paper for the development of care credits as a means of ensuring that periods spent taking care of dependent persons are taken into account when calculating individual women’s or men’s pension entitlements; points out that some 30% of women of working age in the EU with responsibility for dependant persons remain unable to work, or are able to work only on a part-time basis, owing to a lack of dependant care facilities; points out that an unequal sharing of family responsibilities between women and men and a lack of accessible and affordable services and facilities are having a direct impact on the size of women’s pensions;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17b. Points out that elderly care credit schemes remain few and far between, despite the fact that such care is provided primarily on an informal basis by family members, in particular women; in nine Member States fewer than 10% of elderly dependants are cared for by specialised institutions, and more than 50% of elderly dependants are cared for on an informal basis in 19 Member States1; __________________ 1 See European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action in the area F: Women and the Economy, 2011.
Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new) 17c. Stresses that care for the elderly is an issue that must be addressed, in particular in view of the increasing need for such care resulting from the ageing of the population;
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 d (new) 17d. Calls for EU rules to be introduced on care credits, as provided for in some Member States1, in order to ensure that women and men can, as a matter of course and at any time in their lives, devote themselves to taking care of dependent persons without being penalised on retirement, in that their pensions will still offer them a decent standard of living; __________________ 1 See European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Review of the Implementation of the Beijing Platform for Action in the area F: Women and the Economy, 2011.
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 e (new) 17e. Draws attention to the social value of providing care for dependent persons; emphasises the fact that EU rules should allow career breaks to be taken into account for pension purposes so as to reduce the shortfall in pension contributions resulting from career breaks being taken to look after dependent persons, and that care credits should continue to accrue if carers work at the same time and should not end when the carers reach the official retirement age;
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 f (new) 17f. Stresses that care credit schemes should encourage, rather than penalise, parallel employment, and that care credits should give rise to pension entitlements in the same way as employment;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 g (new) 17g. Stresses that care credit schemes should make it possible for responsibility for caring for dependent persons to be shared fairly between women and men and that they should not encourage women to take/retain responsibility for providing such care on a full-time basis;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 h (new) 17h. Stresses that all statutory leave arrangements, including maternity, paternity and parental leave, leave for lifelong learning purposes, compassionate leave and leave for palliative care, should give rise to pension entitlements;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the first cohort of the so-called ‘baby boom generation’ has reached pensionable age, causing the demographic challenge to no longer be a future challenge but today’s reality,
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 i (new) 17i. Takes the view that EU rules are needed on care credits (for looking after children, older persons and other dependants) that will be taken into account for pension purposes;
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the Commission’s intention to continue to target EU funding – notably through the European Social Fund (ESF) –
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Supports the Commission’s intention to continue to target EU funding – notably through the European Social Fund (ESF) – to support projects aimed at active and healthy ageing in the workplace, and, through the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity (Progress) and the Programme for Social Change and Innovation (PSCI), to provide financial and practical support to Member States and social partners
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission, since assertions taken as a basis for proposals in some cases are unbalanced, factually incomplete and unrepresentative, to reassess and resubmit the grounds on which the proposals were based;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU
Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU yet emphasises the importance for workers changing jobs within or outside their Member State not to have their mobility hampered by concerns about acquiring and preserving occupational pension entitlements; underlines any action to promote mobility must be balanced with cost-effective provision of supplementary pension schemes by employers and must take into account the nature and purpose of pension schemes; endorses the approach advocated by the Commission to focus on safeguarding the acquisition and preservation of pensions entitlements, aiming at ensuring that dormant pension rights of mobile workers are treated in line with those of active scheme members or
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU yet emphasises the importance for workers changing jobs within or outside their Member State not to have their mobility hampered by concerns about acquiring and preserving occupational pension entitlements; endorses the approach advocated by the Commission to focus on safeguarding the acquisition and preservation of pensions entitlements, a
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU yet emphasises the importance for workers changing jobs within or outside their Member State not to have their mobility hampered by concerns about acquiring and preserving occupational pension entitlements; endorses the approach advocated by the Commission to focus on safeguarding the acquisition and preservation of pensions entitlements, aiming at ensuring that dormant pension rights of mobile workers are treated in line with those of active scheme members or those of retirees; is of the opinion that mobility on the labour market is hampered by long vesting periods and calls on Member States to lower those; rejects harmonisation of minimum conditions for occupational pensions (such as a minimum age, vesting or adjustment of entitlements), as these could result in large cost increases which would jeopardise the survival of second-pillar systems and are therefore not in the interests of employees, either;
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU yet emphasises the importance for workers changing jobs within or outside their Member State not to have their mobility hampered by concerns about acquiring and preserving occupational
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas in many EU countries fertility rates remain low, leading to a drop in the number of people of working age in the future;
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recognises the significant heterogeneity of pension schemes across the EU yet emphasises the importance for workers changing jobs within or outside their Member State not to have their mobility hampered by concerns about acquiring and preserving occupational pension entitlements; endorses the approach advocated by the Commission to focus on safeguarding the acquisition and preservation of pensions entitlements, aiming at ensuring that dormant pension rights of mobile workers are treated in line with those of active scheme members or those of retirees; is of the opinion that mobility on the labour market is hampered by long vesting periods and calls on
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes the important role the Commission can play in removing obstacles to the functioning of the single market, including the mobility of workers; calls on the Commission together with the Member States to consider how best to stimulate savings, while obtaining the benefits of increased portability;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the Commission's proposal to assess possible linkages between Regulation 883/2004/EC on the coordination of social security systems and
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the Commission’s proposal to assess possible linkages between Regulation 883/2004/EC on the coordination of social security systems and ‘certain’ occupational pension schemes
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Notes the Commission's proposal to assess possible linkages between Regulation 883/2004/EC on the coordination of social security systems and
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work ambitiously to set up and maintain tracking services that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make timely and well-informed decisions
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work ambitiously to set up and maintain tracking services that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make timely and well-informed decisions on additional, individual (third-pillar) pension savings; calls for coordination at EU level to ensure adequate compatibility of the national tracking services; welcomes the Commission's pilot project in this field
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work ambitiously to set up and maintain tracking services that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make timely and well-informed decisions on additional, individual (third-pillar) pension savings; calls for coordination at EU level to ensure adequate compatibility of the national tracking services; welcomes the Commission's pilot project in this field and calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment into the economic benefits of the provision of consolidated pension information in one accessible place for EU citizens;;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to work ambitiously to set up and maintain tracking services that enable citizens to track their employment- and non-employment-related pension entitlements and thereby make timely and well-informed decisions on additional, individual (third-pillar) pension savings; calls for coordination at EU level to ensure adequate compatibility of the national tracking services; welcomes the Commission's pilot project in this field; underlines however, that this initiative is no substitute for the portability of pensions rights;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the Council Declaration on the European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations (2012): The Way Forward (SOC 992/SAN 322) of 7 December 2012,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas the demographic indicators used to determine whether pension systems are viable are much less important than is generally claimed: for example, between 1950 and 1990 in West Germany real GDP increased by 473 %, whilst over the same period the number of people in employment rose by only 42 %, meaning that only 9 % of the increase in production over that period could be accounted for by ‘demographic factors’, whilst the increase in the real capital stock, productivity, etc. made up the remaining 91 %; whereas, therefore, the decisive factor determining the ‘sustainability of pensions’ is ‘economic’, not ‘demographic’, in nature;
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22.
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Considers the development that people in general lead longer, healthier and wealthier lives as one of the greatest achievements of modern society; calls for a positive tone in the ageing debate, on the one hand actively coping with the significant but surmountable challenge that ageing poses, on the other hand seizing the opportunities that ageing and the silver economy bring; acknowledges the very active and valuable role that the elderly play in our societies;
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new) 22a. Calls for funding to be provided to cover the EU’s liabilities relating to European institution staff pensions, which stood at EUR 34.835 billion on 31 December 2011;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas being older can be viewed as an opportunity rather than a burden, and whereas the skills older people have to offer, their experience and their contribution to the functioning of society should be recognised and encouraged; whereas older people are an asset to society and it is essential to draw on their knowledge and experience in all areas of life; whereas the market for certain goods and services generated by the phenomenon of an ageing population (the ‘silver economy’) and the related potential for job creation should be promoted;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas even set apart from the economic crisis, long-term demographic and productivity trends point to a low- growth economic scenario
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas, according to the Commission and leading economists, maintaining average annual labour productivity growth of 1.1% to1.4%, as in recent decades, is key to safeguarding the sustainability of pension systems; whereas further productivity reserves could be mobilised by increasing energy and resource efficiency (factor 4 by 2020-2025 and factor 10 by 2050); whereas such overall productivity growth can make it possible for value added to go on increasing despite a diminishing workforce, and can provide a sound basis for a fair redistribution of revenues between economically active and non- active persons (such as pensioners, children, schoolchildren, students, etc.);
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas rising unemployment
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas rising unemployment has hurt pay-as-you-go pension schemes, while
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas rising unemployment has hurt pay-as-you-go pension schemes, while funded systems are hit by disappointing financial markets returns and capital risk;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas falling employment and rising unemployment has hurt pay-as-you-go pension schemes, while funded systems are hit by disappointing financial markets returns;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas in its Green Paper the Commission partially admitted the failings of funded schemes when acknowledging that ‘the return rates and solvency of funded schemes have been affected through falls in interest rates and asset values: private pension funds lost over 20% of their value during 2008’, that ‘many still remain far off the required solvency levels’ and that, moreover, ‘several sponsors of occupational pension funds were hindered in their ability to honour their obligations’;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas a comprehensive, active labour market policy which focuses more closely on integrating non-active and disadvantaged persons is a key factor in funding pay-as-you-go pension systems;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas, moreover, funded pension schemes are increasingly hit by disappointing returns and higher levels of risk on the financial markets;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new) Eb. whereas it has become clear that the concept of a three-pillar pension system, as called for by the EU, the IMF and the World Bank, consisting of a scaled-down first pillar comprising state schemes which guarantee only a basic pension, a second pillar comprising funded occupational pension schemes, and a third pillar based on private pension provision, does not work, a state of affairs which undermines the security and adequacy of pension provision as a whole, and whereas the financial and economic crisis has rendered meaningless the asset growth projections of fund models linked to this concept;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems a
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of the European social model which ensure a
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of the European social model which
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of the European social model which ensure a
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of the European social model which ensure a
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 1 - the s
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of the European social model
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas retirement systems are a key element of
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas pension provision remains a Member State competence;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas the European Council in March 2001 already endorsed the three- pronged Stockholm Strategy aimed at: reducing public debt at a fast pace, raising employment rates and productivity levels and reforming pension, health care and long-term care systems;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas studies show that increasing the number of years people are required to work before they can draw a pension does very little to help governments meet the cost of an ageing population;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas pensioners are a major consumer category and any fluctuation in their spending habits has serious repercussions for the real economy;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. Whereas pension schemes within and across Member States significantly differ, e.g. regarding extent of funding, level of government involvement, governance structure, claim type, cost-efficiency, degree of collectiveness and solidarity, and therefore a common EU typology is not available;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) Fb. whereas a linear increase in the retirement age or minimum contribution periods would be grossly unfair as it would arbitrarily disregard the strenuous nature of certain occupations;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the lowering of pension benefits in many Member States as a consequence of the severe escalation of the financial and economic crisis; deplores th
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 1 -
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the lowering of pension benefits in many Member States as a consequence of the severe escalation of the financial and economic crisis; emphasises that this represents the continuation of a liberal policy of cutting pensions initiated prior to the crisis; deplores the severe cuts in the Member States hardest hit by the crisis that have pushed many pensioners into poverty or put them at risk of poverty;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Regrets the lowering of pension benefits in many Member States as a consequence of the severe escalation of the financial and economic crisis; deplores the severe cuts in the Member States hardest hit by the crisis that have pushed many pensioners into poverty or put them at risk of poverty; calls on Member States to ensure that the most vulnerable are spared and to pay due attention to the interests of future generations when distributing the negative impacts of the crisis on pension benefits;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the priority should be to safeguard the adequacy and funding of statutory pensions, i.e. to increase the social and financial sustainability of pension provision;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the opportunity for the EU to assess the current and future sustainability of pension systems and to identify best practice and policy strategies that can lead to the most cost effective delivery of pensions within Member States;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls the gender challenge regarding pensions; emphasises the need to improve gender equality at all ages and address the social impact of the shift from statutory pay-as-you-go to funded schemes and from defined-benefit to defined-contributions pension plans; underlines the urgency to address the poverty risk in particular among women, with no or inadequate access to individual or spousal pension rights, through the provision of a non-contributory income safety net in order to keep these women out of poverty;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Recalls the gender challenge regarding pensions; emphasises the need to improve gender equality at all ages and address the social impact of the shift from statutory pay-as-you-go to funded schemes and from defined contributions pension plans; underlines the urgency to address the poverty risk in particular among women, with no or inadequate access to individual or spousal pension rights, through the provision of a non- contributory income safety net in order to keep these women out of poverty;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores the weakening of the EU’s social dimension foreshadowed in the Commission White Paper by, for example, the proposal to link the retirement age to increases in life expectancy;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1α. Warns of the inherent danger of one- sided commitment to an internal devaluation policy with regard to insurance fund revenues and sustainability; stresses that the appropriate response to the crisis is the introduction of measures to stimulate growth, coupled with policies designed to rationalise public finances;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 4 - the moral obligation of the Member States to guarantee public (first-pillar) pensions
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises, given the likelihood of a long-
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions; recognizes that this scenario also impacts the financial strength of employers and the active population; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission's White Paper that to the extent that it is possible people will need to build up complementary occupational and
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions through sound management of public finances; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission’s White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and if possible private pension savings;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require many Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission’s White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and if possible private pension savings;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission's White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and i
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises the likelihood of a long- term, low-growth economic scenario, which will require Member States to consolidate their budgets and reform their economies under austere conditions; subscribes, therefore, to the view expressed in the Commission's White Paper that people will need to build up complementary occupational and if possible private pension savings; calls on the Member States to ensure adequate old-age income for all through individual rights to pension, and maintain equal access to mandatory state-regulated pensions whether or not supplementary pensions are developed;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 4 - the moral obligation of the Member
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers the growing number of elderly people, especially women, who live below the poverty line alarming and takes the view that pension systems should guarantee an adequate and decent standard of living for all;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions must remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for many pensioners; calls on Member States to consider implementing reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending; calls on the Member States to ensure
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A – indent 4 - the
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillar pensions if necessary complemented by minimum income provisions to provide a decent
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners and offer the most adequate protection of old-age income, in particular for the most vulnerable groups, such as low-income workers, those with justified gaps in employment careers etc.; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillar pensions
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on those Member States which have considerable ground to make up to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillar pensions - if necessary complemented by minimum income provisions - to provide a
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; calls on Member States to implement reforms to their first-pillar systems aligning contributory years to the changing life expectancy and ratio between pensioners and people in working age, also to prevent public pension costs crowding out other important government spending; calls on the Member States to ensure first-pillar pensions - if necessary complemented by minimum income provisions - to provide a decent minimum income;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the sustainability and improvement of pension systems are obviously conditioned by the first pillar, as the financial crisis has shown; urges that pension systems need to be reformed, upholding universal and supportive public social security systems able to guarantee decent retirement conditions for all, reflecting true inter-generational solidarity;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that a balanced ratio between the number of years worked and the number of years of retirement is contingent not only on the statutory retirement age, but primarily by the number of years a person works before reaching the relevant retirement age;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines that reform efforts in the field of pensions should give high priority to anti-poverty aspects; stresses that if bold action is not taken in this regard, the Europe 2020 goal on poverty and social exclusion will probably not be reached;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Member States to strengthen the public pensions by developing the quality of employment and wages, the quality of social services and the perpetuity of the means to finance social protection systems;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasises that most workers in the EU are not covered by occupational pension schemes and that most groups in society likewise have no access to third- pillar pensions;
source: PE-502.214
2013/01/28
FEMM
75 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A A. whereas the
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C a (new) Ca. whereas women are disproportionately represented in the part- time and flexible job market;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C a (new) Ca. Asks that the involvement of women in running associations for children, the disabled or for people who are dependent, and their commitment to this, may be taken into account in the accreditation of their prior experience, allowing them to avoid career breaks that would reduce the size of their future pension;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C b (new) Cb. whereas women represent a large proportion of workers in undeclared employment, mainly in domestic work and the care of dependent people;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C c (new) Cc. whereas women are over-represented in the lowest-ranked jobs and positions in terms of qualifications, pay and prestige and women therefore face greater job insecurity and are paid less than men;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C d (new) Cd. whereas women encounter greater difficulties in reconciling work and family life, as family responsibilities are not always shared fairly and the care of children and other dependent family members falls mainly upon women;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D D. whereas disparities between men and women in relation to employment, pay, contributions, career breaks, undeclared employment, job insecurity, and part-time working in connection with family responsibilities can have a serious impact on the amount of pension to which women are entitled;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. whereas the negative influence on wages and employment resulting from the economic and financial crisis in Europe will increase the future risk of poverty in old age;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. whereas the study 'Women living alone an update', requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, shows the implicit risks of some of the existing pension arrangements in aggravating gender imbalances, especially for women living alone;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. whereas the OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 116 "Cooking, Caring and Volunteering: Unpaid Work Around the World" (Veerle Miranda) sheds light on the importance of unpaid work which is not yet recognized in the national pension schemes;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. whereas in the EU, the employment rate of people between the age of 55 and 64 years constitutes a mere 47.4% and for women only 40.2%; whereas in some EU- countries only 2% of all job vacancies are filled by people aged 55 or above; whereas such low employment rates cause an intra-generational pension gap, between men and women, as well as an inter- generational gap resulting in substantial disparities in financial resources between the generations;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A A. whereas the ageing of the population threatens to place a strain on public spending on social protection, since pensions account for the largest proportion of such expenditure, pensions being at the same time a human right and a pillar of social solidarity;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. whereas the projected impact of pension reforms is usually based on a male, full time, full career, average earner profile; whereas actuarial gender-based life tables have a negative impact on women's pension calculations and provide a lower replacement rate for women;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D a (new) Da. Asks that, where necessary, Member States re-examine social security systems in order to avoid a significant disparity between women’s and men’s pension levels, and that they consider introducing corrective factors that take account of gaps in contributions caused by short- term working;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D b (new) Db. whereas women work and tend to put money aside, often for the benefit of the children's upbringing or family welfare, and therefore put less aside for their own future pension schemes, especially when relying on private schemes;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph D c (new) Dc. whereas women are often employed in more poorly paid jobs and have less flexibility on the labour market, particularly over the age of 50, making it much more difficult to put money aside for pension schemes;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that there is an urgent need to reform pension systems to take account of economic and demographic trends
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that in several Member States there is a
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the Member States should support research on the impact of different pension indexation formulas on the poverty risk in old age, taking account of the gender dimension; calls on the Member States to take particular account of the evolution in people’s needs when ageing, e.g. long-term care, in order to ensure that elderly people, mainly women, will be able to receive an adequate pension and live with dignity;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that pension policy is a key element of social policy, equally stresses that pensions are a mechanism of direct financial solidarity between generations as well as an investment in the future;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A A. whereas the
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that devising pension systems is the responsibility of Member States and stresses the benefits of a global and coordinated approach at EU level;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the principle of equal treatment between women and men is applied consistently in pension insurance schemes and especially occupational pension schemes are not discriminatory against women so that they do not reinforce existing patterns that already put women at a disadvantage in terms of benefits and contributions;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls on the Commission and the EU Member States to carry out comprehensive impact assessments on all social security reforms, especially pension systems which may have a negative impact on women's employment and pensions rights, such as cuts in daycare and eldercare facilities, pension policies etc;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate the pay differential between women and men which also affects pensions, resulting in a substantial difference between pensions paid to women and the much higher pensions paid to men;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate the pay differential between women and men
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate the pay and income differential between women and men;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate the pay differential
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate the pay differential between women and men; urges the Commission to come forward with the revision of the existing legislation as demanded by Parliament in its resolution adopted 13 March 2012; notes that, despite countless campaigns, targets and measures in recent years, the gender pay gap remains stubbornly wide;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Reiterates the need for Member States to take measures to eliminate, for the same work, the pay differential between women and men and the discrepancies in their achieving positions of responsibility;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that urgent measures need to be taken against the gender pay gap in the private sector, which is particularly serious in most of the Member States;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A a (new) Aa. whereas pension funds are important investors for EU economic growth and substantial contributors towards achieving the Europe 2020 strategic target, of 75% employment of both men and women aged 20-64 years old, and socially inclusive societies;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Member States to promote flexibility in the retirement age, taking into account the gender dimension, increasing the security of pension funds and guaranteeing a minimum pension;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that, when Member States’ pension arrangements do not take into account the particularities of women living alone or gender in general, predominantly women are indirectly discriminated against and exposed to higher poverty risks;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that while flexible working hours and part-time jobs make achieving a work-life balance easier, especially for women, they also imply lower salaries and therefore lower pensions in the future; emphasises that the vast majority of low salaries and almost all very low salaries are paid for part-time work and about 80 % of the working poor are women;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses the need to reduce the pay differential for men and women with the same skills and the same jobs, as this causes women’s income to lag ever more behind that of men and raises the high number of women living in poverty when they retire or are widowed;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Member States to guarantee individual and adequate pension rights for all, including those with justified career breaks (mainly women), so as to ensure a dignified life for all in old age;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the need to
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recognises the need to adjust the retirement age for women and men, to take account of increased life expectancy while improving access to lifelong learning, making it easier for people to reconcile the demands of professional, family and private life and promoting active ageing;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to embrace a life-course approach to pension taking the whole span of a person's working life into account, including career interruption and changes;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the importance of non- discrimination of people aged 55 and over, and calls on the Commission to create equal opportunities for this group in order to enable them to participate in the labour market by implementing effective policies; and subsequently calls on the Member States to implement appropriate standards and quota, so as to speed up and improve the opportunities for older people to contribute to and participate in the labour market;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph A a (new) Aa. whereas in the current European debate, pension schemes are too often considered as a mere burden on public finance instead of essential instrument to combat old-age poverty and allow for redistribution over a lifetime of the individual and across society;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of equalising the pensionable age for women and men, and improving employability for older women and men to stay in the labour market, which will make a significant contribution to boosting the labour force participation of
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of non- discrimination of people aged 55 and over, and calls on the Commission to create equal opportunities for this group in order to enable them to participate in the labour market by implementing effective policies; and subsequently calls on the Member States to implement appropriate standards and policies, so as to speed up and improve the opportunities for older people to contribute to and participate in the labour market;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take into consideration that the raising of the pension age should be voluntary and not obligatory;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that women's long average periods of part-time unemployment, lower wages, fewer average hours of work have profound consequences for women's earnings, social security allowances and not least, in the longer run, their pensions;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that women’s higher life expectancy ought not to be a cause of discrimination in pension calculations;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas pensions are the main source of revenue of older Europeans and are supposed to ensure that older people have a decent standard of living and enable them to be financially independent; whereas, however, around 22% of women over the age of 75 fall below the European Union’s poverty threshold, and women represent the majority of the population over 75;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that first-pillar pensions remain the most important source of income for pensioners; urges Member States to guarantee first-pillar pensions so as to provide a fair income that will enable women to live with dignity without falling below the poverty threshold;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that the first pillar needs to continue to be the main supplier of retirement pensions and that the Commission needs to take measures to make the second and third pillars more accessible and more transparent for women as currently they have fewer opportunities to build up supplementary retirement savings than men;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Urges Member States to comply with and enforce legislation on maternity rights so that women do not suffer disadvantages in terms of pensions because they have been mothers during their working lives;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses the need to encourage Member States to keep citizens better informed so they may take decisions on pension planning in full knowledge of the facts;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that periods in which women or men are obliged to take care of children or other dependent members of their families, as well as housework, should be treated as insured periods for the purpose of establishing, and calculating, entitlement to pension;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that the individualisation of pension rights is necessary from a gender equality perspective, and that the security of many older women currently relying on widow's pensions and other derived rights should be also ensured;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Emphasises that social policies and social services providing childcare and care of the elderly and other dependent people are vital to ensuring that women have the same opportunities as men to obtain paid work, compatible with their family and personal lives, which allows them to earn pension rights sufficient for them to receive a decent pension in their old age;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to encourage Member States to recognise in their welfare systems, and when retirement is reached, time spent, by women more often than not, in caring for and supporting dependents;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to propose new solutions to ensure legally performed informal work is better paid and taken into account when determining pension rights;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph B B. whereas pensions are the main source of revenue of older Europeans and are supposed to ensure that older people have a decent standard of living and enable them to be financially independent; whereas, however, around 22% of women over the age of 75 fall below the European Union's poverty threshold thus running the risk of social exclusion;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the EU Commission project "Beyond GDP - Measuring progress, true wealth and the well-being of Nations" and invites the competent authorities to focus on its impact to national pension scheme's;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Reiterates once again that it is important to combat gender stereotypes which traditionally relegate women’s work to a secondary role, resulting in lower pay for work done by women;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on Member States to provide for good quality and affordable childcare and care of dependents;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the competent EU and national authorities to create a family- friendly tax and social security system that takes into account the substantial additional costs of raising a family, as compared to childless couples, and calls to eliminate the invisible discrimination of mothers who work without pay to raise and educate the children who will support the pensions of people who have not raised children;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 c (new) 7c. Invites the Commission to adopt a lifecycle oriented approach taking into account the whole career as a lifelong course including possible interruptions and changes in a formal career scheme, to reflect the social and economic benefit of unpaid care work and modern work patterns;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C C. whereas women take more frequent career breaks than men for the purpose of
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph C C. whereas women take more frequent career breaks and part-time jobs than men for the purpose of fulfilling family responsibilities, and those periods are either not taken into account at all, or only partially taken into account, when their pension entitlement is calculated, and consequently women's pensions are often lower than men's and women are at greater risk of poverty;
source: PE-504.155
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE488.033&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-488033_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.477New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-PR-500477_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.214New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AM-502214_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.102&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-502102_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.553&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-500553_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0055/COM_COM(2012)0055_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0055/COM_COM(2012)0055_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-137&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0137_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-204New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0204_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/7/10676New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0055:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0055/COM_COM(2012)0055_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0055/COM_COM(2012)0055_EN.pdf |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52012DC0055:EN
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-05-20T00:00:00New
2012-02-16T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs |
|
activities/0/type |
Old
Debate in ParliamentNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-01-21T00:00:00New
2012-10-25T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-11-19T00:00:00New
2013-03-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2012-10-25T00:00:00New
2013-05-20T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-03-21T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/8 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1869c0fb8127435bdc0a4New
4f1ad962b819f207b3000013 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1872b0fb8127435bdc168New
4f1ada1db819f207b3000053 |
committees/1/shadows |
|
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1832c0fb8127435bdbbaeNew
4f1ac637b819f25efd000027 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183fa0fb8127435bdbce6New
4f1ac731b819f25efd000071 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
2.50.05 Insurance, occupational pension fundsNew
2.50.05 Insurance, pension funds |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
4.10.11 Retirement, pensions, pension fundsNew
4.10.11 Retirement, pensions |
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-04-10T00:00:00New
2013-01-21T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs/0/title |
Old
A7-0137/2013New
PE502.214 |
activities/3/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-137&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.214 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Amendments tabled in committee |
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-01-21T00:00:00New
2013-03-14T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs/0/title |
Old
PE502.214New
PE506.363 |
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.214
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-05-22T00:00:00New
2013-04-10T00:00:00 |
activities/6/docs |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
activities/8/docs |
|
activities/8/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Vote scheduled |
activities/6 |
|
activities/7/date |
Old
2013-05-23T00:00:00New
2013-05-21T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote scheduledNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-137&language=EN
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/7 |
|
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-05-20T00:00:00New
2013-05-22T00:00:00 |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-04-15T00:00:00New
2013-05-20T00:00:00 |
activities/5 |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of a White Paper on an agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions. CONTEXT: pensions mostly from public schemes are the main source of income of older Europeans, who are a significant and growing part of the EU population (120 million or 24%). An ageing population presents a major challenge to pension systems in all Member States. Unless women and men stay longer in employment and save more for their retirement, the adequacy of pensions cannot be guaranteed as the required increase in expenditure would be unsustainable. By 2060, the life expectancy at birth for males is projected to increase by 7.9 years and by 6.5 years for females, when compared to 2010. The number of people of prime working age (20-59) will fall every year over the coming decades. Together, longevity growth and the transition into retirement of baby-boomers will have far-reaching economic and budgetary consequences in the EU, reducing the economic growth potential and exercising pressure on public finances. Pensions represent a very large and rising share of public expenditure: more than 10% of GDP on average today, possibly rising to 12.5 % in 2060 in the EU as a whole. But with spending on public pensions ranging from 6% of GDP in Ireland to 15% in Italy today, countries are in rather different situations although they face similar demographic challenges. These prospects are further aggravated by the current financial and economic crisis. Sluggish economic growth, budget deficits and debt burdens, financial instability and low employment have made it harder for all pension systems to deliver on pension promises. Pay-as-you-go pension schemes are affected by falling employment, and hence lower pension contributions. Funded schemes are affected by falling asset values and reduced returns. In this context, the Commission considers that it is a matter of urgency to draw up and implement strategies adapting pension systems to economic and demographic changes. CONTENT: the White Paper reflects the common concerns about problems in pension systems outlined above and sets out an agenda for making pensions adequate and sustainable in the long term, by creating the conditions for a high level of labour force participation of women and men throughout their lives and enhancing the opportunities to build up safe complementary retirement savings. It suggests forward policy orientations and initiatives at the European level through whereby the EU can support national policy makers in their efforts to address reform needs, notably those highlighted in the Annual Growth Surveys 2011and 2012 which highlighted key orientations for pension reforms which contribute to growth-friendly fiscal consolidation and specified in the 2011 Country-Specific Recommendations. The EU can harness a range of policy instruments to promote adequate, safe and sustainable pensions, even though the main responsibility for achieving these goals clearly remains with Member States. The White Paper also reflects the results of the wide-ranging consultation launched by the Green Paper on adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems. The main points of the agenda, set out in the White Paper, are as follows: 1) Balancing time spent in work and retirement: to reach this objective, it will be necessary to adapt pension systems, raise the pension age and strengthen the incentives to extend active life. During the European Year 2012 on Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, the Commission will raise awareness of the benefits and possibilities of working longer and stimulate the dissemination of good practices of age management in work places and labour markets. In the framework of Europe 2020, the Commission will step up its support for policy coordination and joint work on enabling and encouraging older workers, women in particular, to stay longer on the labour market. The Commission will:
2) Developing complementary private retirement savings: there would be added value in stepping up European support for better coverage of women and men and the proliferation of good practices including in the optimal targeting of tax incentives for prefunded pension schemes. These can be promoted by governments (via the optimisation of tax or other incentives) or by encouraging the social partners to develop such schemes. In addition, it needs to be borne in mind that opportunities for complementary retirement savings through occupational and third pillar arrangements are underdeveloped and lacking in cost-effectiveness and safety in many Member States. The Commission will:
3) Enhancing the EUs monitoring tools on pensions and strengthening synergies across policy areas: the Commission will release the 2012 Ageing Report, assessing the economic and budgetary impact of ageing, which will form the basis for a thorough assessment of the sustainability of public finances envisaged for release in the Commission's 2012 Sustainability Report. In cooperation with the Social Protection Committee it will also prepare in 2012 a Pension Adequacy Report which can help Member States, in the context of the Platform against Poverty, to assess the adequacy of their pensions systems for women and men. New
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of a White Paper on an agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions. CONTEXT: pensions mostly from public schemes are the main source of income of older Europeans, who are a significant and growing part of the EU population (120 million or 24%). An ageing population presents a major challenge to pension systems in all Member States. Unless women and men stay longer in employment and save more for their retirement, the adequacy of pensions cannot be guaranteed as the required increase in expenditure would be unsustainable. By 2060, the life expectancy at birth for males is projected to increase by 7.9 years and by 6.5 years for females, when compared to 2010. The number of people of prime working age (20-59) will fall every year over the coming decades. Together, longevity growth and the transition into retirement of baby-boomers will have far-reaching economic and budgetary consequences in the EU, reducing the economic growth potential and exercising pressure on public finances. Pensions represent a very large and rising share of public expenditure: more than 10% of GDP on average today, possibly rising to 12.5 % in 2060 in the EU as a whole. But with spending on public pensions ranging from 6% of GDP in Ireland to 15% in Italy today, countries are in rather different situations although they face similar demographic challenges. These prospects are further aggravated by the current financial and economic crisis. Sluggish economic growth, budget deficits and debt burdens, financial instability and low employment have made it harder for all pension systems to deliver on pension promises. Pay-as-you-go pension schemes are affected by falling employment, and hence lower pension contributions. Funded schemes are affected by falling asset values and reduced returns. In this context, the Commission considers that it is a matter of urgency to draw up and implement strategies adapting pension systems to economic and demographic changes. CONTENT: the White Paper reflects the common concerns about problems in pension systems outlined above and sets out an agenda for making pensions adequate and sustainable in the long term, by creating the conditions for a high level of labour force participation of women and men throughout their lives and enhancing the opportunities to build up safe complementary retirement savings. It suggests forward policy orientations and initiatives at the European level through whereby the EU can support national policy makers in their efforts to address reform needs, notably those highlighted in the Annual Growth Surveys 2011and 2012 which highlighted key orientations for pension reforms which contribute to growth-friendly fiscal consolidation and specified in the 2011 Country-Specific Recommendations. The EU can harness a range of policy instruments to promote adequate, safe and sustainable pensions, even though the main responsibility for achieving these goals clearly remains with Member States. The White Paper also reflects the results of the wide-ranging consultation launched by the Green Paper on adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems. The main points of the agenda, set out in the White Paper, are as follows: 1) Balancing time spent in work and retirement: to reach this objective, it will be necessary to adapt pension systems, raise the pension age and strengthen the incentives to extend active life. During the European Year 2012 on Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations, the Commission will raise awareness of the benefits and possibilities of working longer and stimulate the dissemination of good practices of age management in work places and labour markets. In the framework of Europe 2020, the Commission will step up its support for policy coordination and joint work on enabling and encouraging older workers, women in particular, to stay longer on the labour market. The Commission will:
2) Developing complementary private retirement savings: there would be added value in stepping up European support for better coverage of women and men and the proliferation of good practices including in the optimal targeting of tax incentives for prefunded pension schemes. These can be promoted by governments (via the optimisation of tax or other incentives) or by encouraging the social partners to develop such schemes. In addition, it needs to be borne in mind that opportunities for complementary retirement savings through occupational and third pillar arrangements are underdeveloped and lacking in cost-effectiveness and safety in many Member States. The Commission will:
3) Enhancing the EUs monitoring tools on pensions and strengthening synergies across policy areas: the Commission will release the 2012 Ageing Report, assessing the economic and budgetary impact of ageing, which will form the basis for a thorough assessment of the sustainability of public finances envisaged for release in the Commission's 2012 Sustainability Report. In cooperation with the Social Protection Committee it will also prepare in 2012 a Pension Adequacy Report which can help Member States, in the context of the Platform against Poverty, to assess the adequacy of their pensions systems for women and men. |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2013-03-21T00:00:00New
2012-11-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee draft report |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE502.214
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2013-01-21T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-02-21T00:00:00New
2013-03-21T00:00:00 |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2012-02-16T00:00:00New
2012-11-19T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
DateNew
Committee draft report |
activities/4 |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.477
|
activities/1/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4 |
|
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=55New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0055/COM_COM(2012)0055_EN.pdf |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
EMPL/7/10676
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|