BETA


2012/2300(INI) Connected TV

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT KAMMEREVERT Petra (icon: S&D S&D) VERHEYEN Sabine (icon: PPE PPE), HIRSCH Nadja (icon: ALDE ALDE), TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2013/07/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/07/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/07/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 525 votes to 62 with 24 abstentions a resolution on connected TV.

It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability . Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising.

In this context, Parliament calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact , particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility.

Parliament calls on the Commission to:

· provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services;

· ‎‎‎‎ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎

· ‎consider whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎

· consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator;

· ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎

· ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection.

· exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements;

· pay due ‎attention to important audience protection ‎issues such as the protection of minors, ‎noting that Electronic Programme ‎Guides may be a possible platform on which to address these issues.

‎Lastly, Parliament calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.

Documents
2013/07/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/06/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report Petra KAMMEREVERT (S&D, DE) on connected TV.

It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability . Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising.

In this context, the committee calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact , particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility.

The report calls on the Commission to:

provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services; ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎ consider whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎ consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator; ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎ ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection, as the processing of personal data is only lawful if, and to the extent that, consent is given by the user. Members feel that analyses of user behaviour and the establishment of user profiles using complete IP addresses (including geo-location) should be allowed only with the witting and unambiguous consent (opt-in) of the user. This must be ensured by legislation; exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements.

‎‎Lastly, the report calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.

Documents
2013/05/28
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/03/21
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/01/31
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/11/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/09/19
   EP - KAMMEREVERT Petra (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CULT

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 3 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 480, -: 115, 0: 12
DE FR IT ES RO PL PT AT HU HR EL SK LV BG BE DK CY IE FI CZ MT SI LU LT NL EE SE GB
Total
83
64
51
44
27
46
17
17
18
11
12
12
6
16
20
10
5
11
9
20
4
6
5
4
22
6
8
52
icon: PPE PPE
224

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Czechia PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Hungary S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Greece EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
42

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
3

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 17 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 528, -: 83, 0: 2
DE FR ES PL IT RO GB CZ HU PT AT HR SK EL BE CY LV BG DK IE FI SI MT LU NL LT SE EE
Total
85
63
46
45
51
27
52
20
18
17
17
12
12
12
20
6
6
16
11
11
9
7
4
5
22
4
8
6
icon: PPE PPE
224

Czechia PPE

2
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Sweden PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
153

Hungary S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Sweden S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: EFD EFD
26
5

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

2
3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
3

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 20 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 473, -: 124, 0: 14
DE FR ES IT RO PT HU PL AT IE HR SK LV BG FI BE EL SI CY CZ MT DK LU LT NL EE SE GB
Total
84
64
47
51
27
18
18
46
17
10
12
12
6
16
9
20
11
7
4
20
4
11
5
4
21
6
8
52
icon: PPE PPE
223

Cyprus PPE

1

Czechia PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Hungary S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Sweden S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: EFD EFD
26

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66
3

Ireland ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 25 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 484, -: 119, 0: 4
DE FR IT ES RO PT HU PL AT SK HR BE CZ EL CY LV DK IE BG FI SI MT LU NL LT SE EE GB
Total
82
64
51
46
27
17
18
45
17
12
12
19
20
12
6
6
11
11
15
9
7
4
4
21
4
8
6
52
icon: PPE PPE
224

Czechia PPE

2
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
150

Hungary S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Sweden S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
3

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 30 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 511, -: 79, 0: 12
DE FR ES IT RO PT BG AT HU PL BE SK IE NL HR DK FI SI SE EE EL CY LV LU LT MT CZ GB
Total
85
62
46
48
27
17
16
17
18
45
19
12
11
22
12
11
9
7
8
6
10
6
6
5
4
4
19
49
icon: PPE PPE
222

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
150

Bulgaria S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Sweden S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Greece ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: EFD EFD
24

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

4
icon: ECR ECR
41

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 32/2 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: -: 311, +: 299, 0: 6
FR DE IT HU PT PL ES EL LU FI LV AT SI RO SK LT BG HR MT EE CY SE IE BE NL DK CZ GB
Total
64
85
51
18
18
46
47
11
5
9
6
17
7
27
12
4
16
12
4
6
6
8
11
20
22
11
20
52
icon: PPE PPE
226

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland PPE

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Spain NI

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

2

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Hungary S&D

3

Greece S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland S&D

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
2

Sweden S&D

2

Ireland S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

3

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 33 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 522, -: 82, 0: 8
FR DE IT ES RO PT BG AT PL BE HU SK IE HR EL NL DK SE FI SI EE LV LU CY CZ MT LT GB
Total
63
86
51
46
27
18
16
17
46
20
17
12
11
12
11
22
11
8
9
7
6
6
5
5
20
4
4
51
icon: PPE PPE
225

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
2

Czechia PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
153

Bulgaria S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3

Greece S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Sweden S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFD EFD
25

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 37 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 479, -: 75, 0: 52
DE FR IT ES PL RO PT HU AT HR SK EL CZ IE BE CY LV FI SI DK BG LU MT LT NL SE EE GB
Total
86
62
51
46
44
26
18
17
17
12
12
12
20
11
20
6
6
8
7
11
14
5
3
4
21
8
6
52
icon: PPE PPE
224

Czechia PPE

2
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Sweden PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
149

Hungary S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Sweden S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Spain Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

Abstain (1)

5
icon: NI NI
20

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65
3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - § 43 #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 503, -: 96, 0: 12
DE FR IT ES RO PL HU BG AT BE PT IE SK HR SE FI SI NL LU EE EL LV LT MT DK CY CZ GB
Total
86
64
50
47
27
47
18
15
17
20
17
11
12
12
7
9
7
22
5
6
9
6
4
4
11
5
20
52
icon: PPE PPE
224

Sweden PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Czechia PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
153

Hungary S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Sweden S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: EFD EFD
25

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

A7-0212/2013 - Petra Kammerevert - Résolution #

2013/07/04 Outcome: +: 525, -: 62, 0: 24
DE FR IT PL ES RO CZ HU PT GB AT HR SK BE FI BG DK CY LV IE SI MT EL LU LT EE NL SE
Total
85
63
51
47
46
27
20
18
18
52
17
12
12
20
9
15
11
6
6
11
7
4
8
5
4
6
22
8
icon: PPE PPE
223

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
154

Hungary S&D

3

Finland S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Sweden S&D

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
43

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFD EFD
25
5

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

For (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
1

Bulgaria PSE

1
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Spain ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

3
AmendmentsDossier
149 2012/2300(INI)
2013/03/21 CULT 149 amendments...
source: PE-504.076

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/4
name
BISKY Lothar
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.075
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-504075_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.076
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-504076_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2013-06-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0212_EN.html title: A7-0212/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-06-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0212_EN.html title: A7-0212/2013
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130704&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2012-07-04-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2013-07-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0329_EN.html title: T7-0329/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-07-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0329_EN.html title: T7-0329/2013
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: KAMMEREVERT Petra date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2012-09-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-212&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0212_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0329_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-11-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
  • date: 2013-05-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-212&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0212/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23062&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0329/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2012-09-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2012-09-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
docs
  • date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.075 title: PE504.075 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.076 title: PE504.076 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2012-11-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-05-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-212&language=EN title: A7-0212/2013 summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report Petra KAMMEREVERT (S&D, DE) on connected TV. It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability . Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising. In this context, the committee calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact , particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility. The report calls on the Commission to: provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services; ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎ consider whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎ consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator; ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎ ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection, as the processing of personal data is only lawful if, and to the extent that, consent is given by the user. Members feel that analyses of user behaviour and the establishment of user profiles using complete IP addresses (including geo-location) should be allowed only with the witting and unambiguous consent (opt-in) of the user. This must be ensured by legislation; exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements. ‎‎Lastly, the report calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23062&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130704&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329 title: T7-0329/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 525 votes to 62 with 24 abstentions a resolution on connected TV. It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability . Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising. In this context, Parliament calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact , particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility. Parliament calls on the Commission to: · provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services; · ‎‎‎‎ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎ · ‎consider whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎ · consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator; · ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎ · ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection. · exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements; · pay due ‎attention to important audience protection ‎issues such as the protection of minors, ‎noting that Electronic Programme ‎Guides may be a possible platform on which to address these issues. ‎Lastly, Parliament calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.
  • date: 2013-07-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/7/11253
New
  • CULT/7/11253
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.02 Television, cable, digital, mobile
New
3.30.02
Television, cable, digital, mobile
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
activities/0/date
Old
2013-07-04T00:00:00
New
2012-11-22T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0329/2013
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/0/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
activities/1/date
Old
2013-01-31T00:00:00
New
2013-05-28T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.075 type: Committee draft report title: PE504.075
activities/1/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.076 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE504.076
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/docs/0/text/0
Old

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report Petra KAMMEREVERT) (S&D, DE) on connected TV. 

It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability. Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising.

In this context, the committee calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact, particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility.

The report calls on the Commission to:

·        provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services;

·        ‎‎‎‎ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎

·        ‎consider  whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎

·        consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator;

·        to ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎

·        ‎‎‎ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection, as the processing of personal data is only lawful if, and to the extent that, consent is given by the user. Members feel that analyses of user behaviour and the establishment of user profiles using complete IP addresses (including geo-location) should be allowed only with the witting and unambiguous consent (opt-in) of the user. This must be ensured by legislation.

·        exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements.

‎‎Lastly, the report calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.

New

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report Petra KAMMEREVERT (S&D, DE) on connected TV. 

It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability. Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising.

In this context, the committee calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact, particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility.

The report calls on the Commission to:

  • provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services;
  • ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎
  • consider  whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎
  • consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator;
  • ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎
  • ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection, as the processing of personal data is only lawful if, and to the extent that, consent is given by the user. Members feel that analyses of user behaviour and the establishment of user profiles using complete IP addresses (including geo-location) should be allowed only with the witting and unambiguous consent (opt-in) of the user. This must be ensured by legislation;
  • exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements.

‎‎Lastly, the report calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.

activities/3
date
2013-05-28T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
activities/3/date
Old
2012-11-22T00:00:00
New
2013-07-04T00:00:00
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23062&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130704&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0329/2013
activities/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de186000fb8127435bdbfc3
New
4f1ac973b819f25efd000138
committees/0/shadows/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de1893f0fb8127435bdc45c
New
4f1adc5eb819f207b3000114
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de185750fb8127435bdbf03
New
4f1ac915b819f25efd00010c
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de188e20fb8127435bdc3e5
New
4f1adc13b819f207b30000fd
committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
Old
4de186f10fb8127435bdc11b
New
4f1ad94bb819f207b300000b
committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
Old
4de1837c0fb8127435bdbc26
New
4f1ac667b819f25efd00003a
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-329 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0329/2013
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/5/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report Petra KAMMEREVERT) (S&D, DE) on connected TV. 

    It notes that the current provisions of Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive 2010/13/EU) do not yet reflect ongoing technological convergence, a situation which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of users and raises fresh questions - regardless of media type - of content access, dissemination method and findability. Members note that the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly those of ensuring diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting children, encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to the visually and hearing impaired, and safeguarding fair competition, as well as quality-and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle. However, the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use made possible by hybrid receiving systems, combining TV and the internet ‎which will allow users to browse indiscriminately ‎between TV channels and the internet, ‎including websites illegally offering ‎audiovisual content. The range of possible uses ‎offered by hybrid devices calls into ‎question core principles of the ‎Audiovisual Media Services Directive, ‎such as the mandatory separation of advertising and programmes, and rules on ‎the insertion of advertising.

    In this context, the committee calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations. Furthermore, the concept of media services defined in Article 1 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be defined in such a way that the need for regulation by Member States is determined more on the basis of the potential socio-political impact of services and specific features of that impact, particularly their relevance to opinion-forming and to diversity of opinion, as well as on the basis of editorial responsibility.

    The report calls on the Commission to:

    ·        provide a breakdown, of which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be established in order to create a level playing field for all content and service providers, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose, from among a wide range of high-quality services;

    ·        ‎‎‎‎ensure that the ban ‎on the violation of human dignity, the ban ‎on incitement to hatred, protection ‎against discrimination and the principle ‎of barrier-free access to apply in the same ‎way to all forms of media content;‎

    ·        ‎consider  whether ‎the principle of the division between ‎advertising and programme content can ‎be maintained across all types of media or ‎whether the aim of providing protection ‎could be better achieved by making ‎advertising and programme content ‎clearly recognisable and clearly ‎distinguishable across all types of media;‎

    ·        consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen co- and self-regulatory approaches can enable the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive to be attained in a lasting fashion, while at the same time maintaining the necessary flexibility for fair competition among media service providers. It is stressed that compliance with the measures must be monitored and the assessment of their effectiveness must be carried out by an independent regulator;

    ·        to ensure that platforms are operated on the basis of open interoperable standards in a way which accords with market conditions and the general interest, entailing fair competition. The committee feels that platform services ‎and portal services should be ‎interoperable, in order to give third parties ‎the opportunity, without discrimination, to ‎produce and market their own applications, ‎irrespective of the medium of transmission;‎

    ·        ‎‎‎ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices that are sold in or imported into the EU is guaranteed in principle and that it is in full compliance with EU rules on privacy and data protection, as the processing of personal data is only lawful if, and to the extent that, consent is given by the user. Members feel that analyses of user behaviour and the establishment of user profiles using complete IP addresses (including geo-location) should be allowed only with the witting and unambiguous consent (opt-in) of the user. This must be ensured by legislation.

    ·        exclude ‎audiovisual media services from ‎liberalisation measures negotiated as part ‎of international trade agreements.

    ‎‎Lastly, the report calls on Member States, in the ‎negotiations on the multiannual financial ‎framework, to reconsider the cut in ‎funding, from the figure of EUR 9.2 ‎billion originally proposed to EUR 1 ‎billion, for DG Connect, CNECT, in order to ‎cover the further development of ‎telecommunications infrastructure.

activities/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-212&language=EN
activities/5/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate scheduled
activities/5/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate scheduled
activities/4
date
2013-06-10T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0212/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4/date
Old
2013-07-01T00:00:00
New
2013-07-04T00:00:00
activities/3/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
activities/3/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4/date
Old
2013-06-10T00:00:00
New
2013-07-01T00:00:00
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.076
activities/3/date
Old
2013-04-22T00:00:00
New
2013-05-28T00:00:00
activities/3/date
Old
2013-04-23T00:00:00
New
2013-04-22T00:00:00
activities/2/date
Old
2013-03-20T00:00:00
New
2013-03-21T00:00:00
activities/4/date
Old
2013-05-20T00:00:00
New
2013-06-10T00:00:00
activities/2
date
2013-03-20T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE504.076
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.075
activities/1/date
Old
2013-01-30T00:00:00
New
2013-01-31T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2013-01-30T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE504.075
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
TRÜPEL Helga
committees/0/shadows/2
group
Verts/ALE
name
TRÜPEL Helga
activities/0
date
2012-11-22T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/7/11253
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities
  • date: 2013-04-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2013-05-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: VERHEYEN Sabine group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2012-09-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure
reference
2012/2300(INI)
title
Connected TV
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.30.02 Television, cable, digital, mobile