BETA


2012/2328(DEC) Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
AFET
AGRI
CONT GEIER Jens (icon: ) STAES Bart (icon: ), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (icon: ), ANDREASEN Marta (icon: )
DEVE
ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 99

Events

2013/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/01/07
   EP -
2012/12/14
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present the European Court of Auditor’s Special Report 19/2012 on the ways to improve the financial management of the EU budget.

CONTENT: in its special report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ Special Reports relating to 2011, the Court reviews the extent to which the Commission has implemented the recommendations of seven of the Court’s special reports from the 2003-2009 period.

The Special Reports followed up covered three budgetary areas:

agriculture, energy, and external actions.

The Court assessed the actions taken by the Commission in response to the Court’s recommendations. The follow-up of audit reports is considered by international auditing standards as the final stage in the performance audit cycle of planning, execution and follow-up.

Approximately two-thirds of the recommendations reviewed related to effectiveness issues (e.g. the setting of strategic objectives, the preparation of project proposals, the design of projects, project performance, and monitoring and evaluation), with the remaining recommendations dealing with economy and efficiency issues (e.g. the occurrence of overpayments and the quality and timeliness of project selection methods).

The Commission has fully implemented 29% of the recommendations examined , while 49 % have been implemented in most respects, 20% in some respects, and 2% have not been implemented. Non-implementation only occurred in one case.

The Court found that the Commission has a system in place to manage the implementation of the Court’s recommendations and the requests by the Parliament and Council, but this system needs to be strengthened to enable the Commission to respond in a timely, efficient, and effective manner.

Court’s conclusions : the Court’s follow-up exercise indicates that, the Court’s audit reports have contributed to improvements in financial management taking place in a number of areas of the EU budget.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 99
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 93
activities
  • date: 2012-12-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N7-0137/2012 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP shadows: group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-01-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
events
  • date: 2012-12-14T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: title: N7-0137/2012 summary: PURPOSE: to present the European Court of Auditor’s Special Report 19/2012 on the ways to improve the financial management of the EU budget. CONTENT: in its special report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ Special Reports relating to 2011, the Court reviews the extent to which the Commission has implemented the recommendations of seven of the Court’s special reports from the 2003-2009 period. The Special Reports followed up covered three budgetary areas: agriculture, energy, and external actions. The Court assessed the actions taken by the Commission in response to the Court’s recommendations. The follow-up of audit reports is considered by international auditing standards as the final stage in the performance audit cycle of planning, execution and follow-up. Approximately two-thirds of the recommendations reviewed related to effectiveness issues (e.g. the setting of strategic objectives, the preparation of project proposals, the design of projects, project performance, and monitoring and evaluation), with the remaining recommendations dealing with economy and efficiency issues (e.g. the occurrence of overpayments and the quality and timeliness of project selection methods). The Commission has fully implemented 29% of the recommendations examined , while 49 % have been implemented in most respects, 20% in some respects, and 2% have not been implemented. Non-implementation only occurred in one case. The Court found that the Commission has a system in place to manage the implementation of the Court’s recommendations and the requests by the Parliament and Council, but this system needs to be strengthened to enable the Commission to respond in a timely, efficient, and effective manner. Court’s conclusions : the Court’s follow-up exercise indicates that, the Court’s audit reports have contributed to improvements in financial management taking place in a number of areas of the EU budget.
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/7/11574
New
  • CONT/7/11574
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 93
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 093
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.06 2011 discharge
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
procedure/title
Old
Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
New
Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
activities/0/type
Old
Non-legislative basic document
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de185230fb8127435bdbe91
New
4f1ac838b819f25efd0000d4
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
New
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de185230fb8127435bdbe91
New
4f1ac838b819f25efd0000d4
committees/2/shadows/0/mepref
Old
4de188650fb8127435bdc331
New
4f1adb8fb819f207b30000cf
committees/2/shadows/1/mepref
Old
4de1888a0fb8127435bdc36a
New
4f1adb84b819f207b30000cb
committees/2/shadows/2/mepref
Old
4de182e40fb8127435bdbb4b
New
4f1ac5e7b819f25efd00000a
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 093
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/1/committees/2/shadows
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
committees/2/shadows
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to present the European Court of Auditor’s Special Report 19/2012 on the ways to improve the financial management of the EU budget.

    CONTENT: in its special report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ Special Reports relating to 2011, the Court reviews the extent to which the Commission has implemented the recommendations of seven of the Court’s special reports from the 2003-2009 period.

    The Special Reports followed up covered three budgetary areas:

    • agriculture,
    • energy, and
    • external actions.

    The Court assessed the actions taken by the Commission in response to the Court’s recommendations. The follow-up of audit reports is considered by international auditing standards as the final stage in the performance audit cycle of planning, execution and follow-up.

    Approximately two-thirds of the recommendations reviewed related to effectiveness issues (e.g. the setting of strategic objectives, the preparation of project proposals, the design of projects, project performance, and monitoring and evaluation), with the remaining recommendations dealing with economy and efficiency issues (e.g. the occurrence of overpayments and the quality and timeliness of project selection methods).

    The Commission has fully implemented 29% of the recommendations examined, while 49 % have been implemented in most respects, 20% in some respects, and 2% have not been implemented. Non-implementation only occurred in one case.

    The Court found that the Commission has a system in place to manage the implementation of the Court’s recommendations and the requests by the Parliament and Council, but this system needs to be strengthened to enable the Commission to respond in a timely, efficient, and effective manner.

    Court’s conclusions: the Court’s follow-up exercise indicates that, the Court’s audit reports have contributed to improvements in financial management taking place in a number of areas of the EU budget.

procedure/title
Old
Special Report No 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
New
Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
activities
  • date: 2012-12-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N7-0137/2012 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-01-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-01-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/11574
reference
2012/2328(DEC)
title
Special Report No 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject
8.70.03.06 2011 discharge