BETA

Awaiting committee decision



2012/2328(DEC) Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Opinion AFET
Opinion AGRI
Lead CONT GEIER Jens (S&D) STAES Bart (Verts/ALE), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (GUE/NGL), ANDREASEN Marta (EFD)
Opinion DEVE
Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier: CONT/7/11574
Legal Basis RoP 076

Activites

  • 2013/01/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2012/12/14 Non-legislative basic document
    • N7-0137/2012 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

  • Non-legislative basic document published: N7-0137/2012

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/1/committees/2/shadows
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
committees/2/shadows
  • group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo
  • group: EFD name: ANDREASEN Marta
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to present the European Court of Auditor’s Special Report 19/2012 on the ways to improve the financial management of the EU budget.

    CONTENT: in its special report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ Special Reports relating to 2011, the Court reviews the extent to which the Commission has implemented the recommendations of seven of the Court’s special reports from the 2003-2009 period.

    The Special Reports followed up covered three budgetary areas:

    • agriculture,
    • energy, and
    • external actions.

    The Court assessed the actions taken by the Commission in response to the Court’s recommendations. The follow-up of audit reports is considered by international auditing standards as the final stage in the performance audit cycle of planning, execution and follow-up.

    Approximately two-thirds of the recommendations reviewed related to effectiveness issues (e.g. the setting of strategic objectives, the preparation of project proposals, the design of projects, project performance, and monitoring and evaluation), with the remaining recommendations dealing with economy and efficiency issues (e.g. the occurrence of overpayments and the quality and timeliness of project selection methods).

    The Commission has fully implemented 29% of the recommendations examined, while 49 % have been implemented in most respects, 20% in some respects, and 2% have not been implemented. Non-implementation only occurred in one case.

    The Court found that the Commission has a system in place to manage the implementation of the Court’s recommendations and the requests by the Parliament and Council, but this system needs to be strengthened to enable the Commission to respond in a timely, efficient, and effective manner.

    Court’s conclusions: the Court’s follow-up exercise indicates that, the Court’s audit reports have contributed to improvements in financial management taking place in a number of areas of the EU budget.

procedure/title
Old
Special Report No 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
New
Special report 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
activities
  • date: 2012-12-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N7-0137/2012 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Non-legislative basic document
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-01-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2013-01-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: GEIER Jens
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/7/11574
reference
2012/2328(DEC)
title
Special Report No 19/2012: 2011 report on the follow-up of the European Court of Auditors’ special reports
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 076
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
subject
8.70.03.06 2011 discharge